Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement Program FY 2012 Competition Pre-Application Technical Assistance Workshop Disclaimer This document is a brief summary of the program regulations and application requirements. Do not rely solely on the information in this document. Please refer to the Notice Inviting Applications and the program regulations published in the Federal Register for additional information, as these are the official documents governing the competition. How did we get here? The McNair Program was authorized by Congress in 1987 to commemorate astronaut Ronald E. McNair, who lost his life in the space shuttle Challenger incident in 1985 The McNair Program awards grants to institutions of higher education to provide disadvantaged college students with effective preparation for doctoral study McNair Preapplication Workshop Overview Legislation and Regulations Review 2012 McNair Competition Highlights Competitive Preference Priorities Selection Criteria and PE Submission Logistics TRIO Legislation Highlights Title IV - Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA), as amended by the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA) Eligible Applicants 5 Year Grants Outcome Criteria New and Revised Definitions Low-Income Documentation Required Services and Permissible Services 10 Technical Assistance Workshops Rank-Order Funding Second Review Process for Unsuccessful Applications FY 2012 McNair Competition Highlights 3 Competitive Preference Priorities Required and Permissible Services Maximum funding levels Minimum 25 participants per project Maximum per participant cost of $8,800 Multiple applications to serve different campuses Electronic submission via Grants.gov FY 2012 Competition Award Information $36,118,554 Million Allotment (est.) 127 New Grants (est.) 3,175 Students (est.) New Grants: $220,000 Maximum Award (25 participants minimum) Continuing Grants: Level Funding for current number of participants FY 2012 Competitive Preference Priorities The Department is announcing three competitive preference priorities for this competition. Additional points (up to 6 points for competitive preference priority 1; up to 4 points for competitive preference priority 2; and up to 4 points for competitive preference priority 3) may be awarded to an application, depending on how well the applicant addresses these priorities. Important note: An applicant may receive up to 14 total competitive preference priority points by addressing all three priorities. Competitive Preference Priorities [cont'd.] Competitive Preference Priority 1 – Promoting Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education (up to 6 additional points). Priority : Projects designed to : a) Provide students with increased access to STEM coursework (2 pts) b) Increase the number/proportion of students prepared for advanced study and careers in STEM (2pts) c) Increase the number of students traditionally underrepresented in STEM in criteria a) and b) (2pts) Competitive Preference Priorities [cont'd.] Competitive Preference Priority 2 – Improving Productivity (up to 4 additional points). Priority: Projects designed to increase efficiency in use of resources while improving outcomes Projects are encouraged to propose ways to serve the same or increased number of students, decreasing the cost per participant while improving student outcomes Competitive Preference Priorities [cont'd.] Competitive Preference Priority 3 – Building Evidence of Effectiveness (up to 4 additional points). Projects designed to increase the evidence base around practices, strategies, or policies that may help LI/FG students, particularly in STEM fields Priority : Projects proposing evaluation plans likely to produce evidence for ways to improve outcomes The relevant outcome(s) is to be measured multiple times before and after treatment Where feasible, a comparison group is to be measured multiple times as well McNair Program Regulations 34 CFR Part 647, amended to implement changes made to the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965 by the Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA) of 2008 Final regulations amending 34 CFR Part 647 were published in the Federal Register on October 26, 2010 Who is Eligible to Apply for a Grant? §647.2 Institutions of Higher Education Combinations of Institutions of Higher Education Who is Eligible to Participate in McNair? §647.3 Citizenship Status: a participant must be (A) A U.S. citizen or national of the United States; or A permanent resident of the United States; or In the United States for other than a temporary purpose and must provide evidence from the Immigration and the Naturalization Service of his or her intent to become a permanent resident; or A permanent resident of Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; or A resident of the Freely Associated States-the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the Republic of Palau. Who is Eligible to Participate in McNair? [cont’d.] §647.3 Participants must also be : (B) Enrolled in a degree program at an Institution of Higher Education (IHE) (C) A low-income individual who is a first-generation college student; or A member of a group that is underrepresented in graduate education; or A member of a group that is underrepresented in certain academic disciplines as documented by standard statistical references or other national survey data submitted to and accepted by the Secretary on a case-by-case basis. (D) Not enrolled in doctoral level study at an institution of higher education. McNair Activities and Services (Required) §647.4 All McNair Projects MUST provide: Opportunities for research and other scholarly activities Summer internships Seminars to prepare students for doctoral study Tutoring Academic counseling Assistance in securing admission and financial assistance for enrollment in graduate programs McNair Activities and Services (Permissible) §647.4 McNair projects MAY provide: Education or counseling services designed to improve the financial and economic literacy of students Mentoring programs involving faculty members at institutions of higher education, students, or a combination of faculty members and students Exposure to cultural events and academic programs not usually available to disadvantaged students Other activities designed to meet the purpose of the McNair Program Different Campus Financial and Economic Literacy Graduate Center Groups Underrepresented in Graduate Education Target Population Research or Scholarly Activity A single application unless serving different campuses A single application unless serving a different population (must be designated by the Secretary) Up to 100 points for selection criteria in 647.21 Up to 15 prior experience points based on past service delivery as specified in 647.22 PE only for existing McNair project on campus PE for 3 project years as designated by Secretary New grants made in rank order Tie breaker uses equitable geographic distribution of new projects No new grants to applicants with history of fraudulent activities Activities of an academic or scholarly nature Stipends up to $2,800 for eligible students engaged in research Tuition, room and board, transportation costs for summer research Computer hardware, software, and other equipment (if justified) Payment of tuition, stipends, test preparation and fees, or any financial support to staff and students (unless permitted in §647.30) Construction, renovation, or remodeling Minimum Number of Students Served Determine and Document Student Eligibility Recordkeeping • • • • Student eligibility to participate Student needs assessment Services provided to participant Educational progress made by student during and after participation in the project • Documentation of any services received from another TRIO program or federally funded program serving similar populations Submit other reports and information as requested to demonstrate program effectiveness Designate a project director who has – • authority to conduct the project effectively • appropriate qualifications, experience, skills What Selection Criteria Does the Secretary Use? §647.21 1. Need 16 points 2. Objectives 9 points 3. Plan of Operation 44 points 4. Quality of Personnel 9 points 5. Adequacy of Resources and Budget 15 points 6. Evaluation Plan 7 points Total Points 100 Maximum Points: 16 Provide a clear definition of the target population Clearly describe the academic, financial, and other problems encountered by students in pursuing postbaccalaureate studies Provide data to demonstrate the target population’s underrepresentation in graduate education, doctorate degrees conferred, and careers where a doctorate is a prerequisite Maximum Points: 9 All FOUR standardized objectives must be addressed in your program narrative Each objective must contain the achievement rate proposed for your project as indicated on the McNair Profile Sheet The FOUR standardized objectives MAY NOT be changed or rewritten in any way All 9 points will be awarded based on whether or not your objectives are ambitious AND attainable based on the information provided for Need, Plan of Operation, and Adequacy of Resources and Budget Applicants must provide comparative data to show why the percentage that is proposed for each standardized objective is ambitious AND attainable RESEARCH AND SCHOLARLY ACTIVITIES (2 points) ____% of McNair Program participants served during the project year will have completed appropriate research and scholarly activities during the McNair Program academic year. (*McNair Program Academic Year: The McNair Program academic year is the period that most closely aligns with the first 12-month budget period for which this new award will be made. The 2012-13 McNair Program academic year is roughly August/September 2012 through August 2013.) ENROLLMENT IN GRADUATE PROGRAM (3 points) ____% of McNair Program bachelor’s degree recipients (or equivalent) will be accepted and enrolled in a postbaccalaureate program of study by the fall term of the academic year immediately following the completion of bachelor’s degree (or equivalent). CONTINUED ENROLLMENT IN GRADUATE STUDY (2 points) ____% of first year graduate students will continue to be enrolled in graduate school at the beginning of the fall term of the next academic year. DOCTORAL DEGREE ATTAINMENT (2 points) ____% of prior McNair Program participants served will attain a doctoral degree within ten (10) years of the attainment of the bachelor’s degree. Applicant may provide other objectives; however, other objectives are not requested nor required Additional project objectives will not be considered or affect scoring Maximum Points: 44 Participant selection criteria -Identification, Recruitment, and Selection (4 points) Needs assessment and monitoring of academic growth (4 points) Provision of research and scholarly activities (5 points) Involvement of faculty in research activities (5 points) Services and activities to prepare students for doctoral study including internships, seminars, etc. (5 points) Services to enhance entry into postbaccalaureate education (5 points) Inform institutional community of project’s goals and objectives (3 points) Administration of project and coordination with other programs with disadvantaged students (8 points) Follow-up (5 points) after McNair participation Maximum Points: 9 Qualifications Required of Project Director • Summarize minimum required qualifications and experience • Do not include resumes or job descriptions Qualifications Required of Other Staff • Summarize minimum required qualifications and experience • Do not include resumes or job descriptions • Include information for all staff (professional, administrative, clerical, etc.) Plan for Employment of Qualified Staff • Institution’s affirmative action plan only is not adequate to address this criterion • Include procedures to be used to employ members of groups underrepresented in higher education Maximum Points: 15 Clearly describe the proposed allocation of resources in the budget as they relate to your project objectives Describe how the planned costs and resources are reasonable in relation to the objectives and scope Detail any commitment of institutional resources (commitment of research faculty, tuition and fee waivers, etc) **Remember: Your Institution WILL BE Held Accountable for Resources Committed All NEW projects will receive a maximum of $220,000 for the first year of operation to serve not less than 25 students each year Current grantees will receive a maximum award equal to the applicant’s award amount for FY 2007, the first year of the previous cycle, to continue to serve at least the same number of participants that was approved for the current project, to the extent that at least 25 participants are served and/or the cost per participant does not exceed $8,800 Provide a Budget Summary and Budget Narrative for the first year only: Budget Summary: Provide a specific dollar amount for each appropriate line item in the budget Budget Narrative: Provide a succinct justification for each line item for which a dollar amount is requested **All Costs Must Be Reasonable in Relation to the Objectives Maximum Points: 7 Your Evaluation Plan should: Include both qualitative and quantitative evaluation measures Examine in specific and measurable ways the success of the project in making progress toward achieving its objectives Include formative and summative evaluations Provide for description of project outcomes Your Evaluation Plan should clearly indicate: Types of data to be collected When data will be collected What data collection methods will be used What instruments will be developed and when How the data will be analyzed When reports and outcomes will be available How the information developed will be used to monitor project progress and to provide accountability information Who is responsible for making sure information is available in a timely manner and is influencing the ongoing management of the project Maximum Points: 15 Up to 15 PE points will be awarded under the FY 12 competition to projects operating during project years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 201011. If a project served less than 90% of the funded number to be served in a given assessment year, the project is not eligible to receive any PE points for that particular year. The Department’s policy for awarding PE points for different types of doctoral degrees between 1999-00 and 2002-03 includes granting credit for participants that received an Ed.D. degree. The option “Other Terminal Degree” in the Degree field included both “other doctoral degree” as well as “first professional degree”. Since it is not clear how many students earned an Ed.D. under this option, the Department is allowing a one-time inclusion of “other terminal degree”, option #4 for APR reporting years 1999-00 through 2002-03 in the doctoral degree attainment objective. The calculation of PE points for the three (3) assessment years is based on: A project’s approved number and types of participants to be served A project’s approved objectives The student-level data a project submitted in its annual performance report (APR) The final PE score for most projects is the average of the scores for the three project years assessed (2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11) The Department has not cleaned or changed any of the studentlevel APR data projects submitted and will not accept any changes to the APR data submitted in prior years. Maximum of 15 Points May Be Earned Based On: 1. Number and types of participants the project was funded to serve (3 points) 2. Percent of McNair participants will complete research and scholarly activities that will directly impact their educational progression each McNair Program academic year (4 points) 3. Met/Exceeded Funded Objectives as Demonstrated by Participants’ Academic Progression Attained a baccalaureate degree within three (3) years (2 points) Enrolled in a postbaccalaureate program by the fall term of the academic year immediately following completion of that degree (3 points) Attained a doctoral level within ten (10) years of the attainment of the bachelor’s degree (3 points) Successful applicants under the FY 2012 McNair competition will be assessed under the following five new PE criteria at the end of the next grant award cycle (2012 – 2017) (1) Number of participants (3 points) (2) Research or scholarly activities (3 points) (3) Graduate School Enrollment (3 points) (4) Continued enrollment in Graduate School (3 points) (5) Doctoral Degree Attainment (2 points) Improve confidence in government Development of strategic plan to measure program performance Performance reporting to Congress and public annually McNair participants will: Complete undergraduate programs at rates higher than comparable non-participants Enroll in programs of study at the graduate level at higher rates than comparable non-participants Earn doctorate degrees in various disciplines, including the fields of mathematics and science, at rates higher than comparable non-participants Applicants may not use federal funds to prepare an application This includes costs incurred to attend pre-application workshops Federal funds may not be used to lobby Applicants who knowingly do business with someone who has been debarred from doing business with the Federal government face the possibility of cost disallowances, termination of their grant, suspension and debarment from Federal government procurement and non-procurement transactions Additional documents that Do Not count toward page limit: Application face sheet (SF-424) Table of contents ED abstract form McNair program profile form Federal budget form (ED-524) Assurances, certifications, and survey form Part IIIA -- McNair Profile Sheet All applicants must complete this form Provides basic applicant information Includes McNair standardized objectives Profile Sheet may not be altered or revised All participants must be enrolled in a degree program Participants in research have completed sophomore studies At least 2/3 of Participants must be both low-income AND first-generation college students (Foreign degrees count!) Remaining participants will be from groups underrepresented in graduate education Students will not be served by more than one McNair project at any one time and the project will collaborate with other like programs at the institution so that more students can be served 103-382 Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994 Applies to all Applicants for Federal Funds Six (6) Types of Barriers Identified P.L. • • • • • • Race Gender National Origin Color Disability Age Strategies for Overcoming Identified Barriers • May be Incorporated into Plan of Operation • Must be Succinct and Clearly Identifiable Narrative section is limited to 50 pages A page is 8.5 x 11 inches, on one side only, with 1 inch margins at the top, bottom, and both sides. Page numbers and identifiers may be within the one inch margin. Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, except titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, captions, and all text in charts, tables, figures, and graphs. Text enclosed by borders is not considered a table. Use a 12 point font or larger. Use one of the following fonts: • Times New Roman • Courier • Courier New • Arial 50 page limit – Excluding : • Application Face Sheet (SF-424) • Abstract • Table of Contents • McNair Program Profile Form • Budget Summary Form (ED-524) • Assurances, certifications and survey form All applicants MUST use Grants.gov to submit applications Grants.gov is a portal for all federal grant customers Grants.gov has FIND and APPLY functions that help applicants locate, learn about, and apply for Federal grants online in a simplified, standardized manner Grants.gov accepts only .PDF file types Competitive Preference Priorities Formatting and Submission Applicants are permitted an additional 4 pages of narrative for each competitive preference priority, up to a total of 12 additional pages. Applicants should address the competitive preference priorities separate from the Project Narrative and submit that information in “Other Attachments” in Grants.gov The one-page abstract and the profile sheet must list which competitive preference priorities are being addressed Grants.gov registration is a one-time process that may take five (5) or more days to complete You may begin working on your application while completing the registration process, but you cannot submit an application until all of the Get Started steps are complete For detailed information on the Get Started steps, please go to: http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted Please contact Customer Support for assistance with any technical issues: 1-800-518-4726 You may qualify for an electronic submission waiver if: You do not have Internet access You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to the Grants.gov system If you are submitting a waiver, you must: Mail or fax a written statement to the Department explaining your need for a waiver, due no later than 14 calendar days before the application deadline date If mailing, your letter must be postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline date Submit all Electronic Submission Waivers to: Eileen Bland US Department of Education 1990 K Street, NW, Room 7000 Washington, DC 20006-8510 202-219-7074 (Fax) It is not submitted by the designated closing date by 4:30:00 PM Washington, DC time The application narrative exceeds the 50-page limit or does not use the required formatting You exceed four (4) pages of narrative for each competitive preference priority you address and/or do not submit that information in “Other Attachments” in Grants.gov The application is submitted as a paper submission, without documentation of the submission and approval of a required waiver The application proposes a budget exceeding the maximum funding amount The application proposes a budget to serve fewer than 25 participants Review Application Notices & Instructions Carefully Register Early Submit Early Important: If you start uploading your application before 4:30:00 pm Washington, D.C. time on the application deadline date, and you do not finish uploading until after 4:30:00 pm, your application will be marked late and will not be read. Verify your application has submitted completely Save and keep your own copy Receive Email Confirmation Note: only .PDF file types will be accepted What Happens Next? Prescreening for eligibility A panel of three expert reviewers, who are not federal employees, will review the application The panel will prepare an evaluation of the application and assign points to each selection criterion. The highest score an application may receive is 100, plus up to 14 additional points for the competitive preference priorities Scores from the three reviewers will be averaged together to determine one numeric score for the application Currently funded applicants are eligible to receive up to 15 Prior Experience (PE) points If applicable, PE points are added to the numeric score of the application to get a final score Final scores are ranked in order, highest to lowest, on a funding slate First slate submitted/approved Second review (technical or administrative error, scoring error, funding band) Second slate submitted/approved All successful applicants will receive a 5-year award Keep in mind that information about this competition contained in the Federal Register Notice is the definitive information about the program’s requirements. This includes, but is not limited to, eligibility requirements, selection criteria, competitive preference priorities, application submissions, waiver requests, grounds for exclusion from the competition, page limits and font sizes. If there is any conflict between information provided here today, contained in the application package, or otherwise conveyed to you verbally and in writing, the criteria in the Notice always take precedence. For further information about the McNair Program, please visit our Web site: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/triomcnair/index.html