Edward W. Walton Brick & Click Academic Library Symposium November 1, 2013 My Interest ◦ Research began more than 15 years ago ◦ Wondered would e-books supplant printed books 1990s and Early 2000s ◦ E-books existed ◦ Few Adopters (Innovator Stage) Late 2000s (2007) ◦ Kindle sparked growth of e-book use in trade market Expectation ◦ Students will embrace e-books (Unrealized) ◦ E-books will make inroads into academia Conundrum ◦ The e-book is a conundrum. It is loved. It is hated. Sometimes, the lover and the hater is the same person. Book -- Romanticized Technology ◦ The e-book is an innovation that is purported to replace the printed book, a beloved and romanticized technology. ◦ To successfully replace the printed book, the e-book must overcome significant cultural barriers to become a mainstream technology. Diffusion of Innovations Theory (Rodgers, 2003) ◦ Getting an innovation through the adoption process is extremely difficult when the current practice is entrenched within the culture. ◦ To be adopted, an innovation must possess a compelling advantage over the technology that it proposes to supersede or there must be sufficient external motivation to compel adoption over the perceived advantage of the current practice. Broad Questions: 1. Does the e-book provide a compelling advantage that will entice students to embrace the innovation? 2. Are there compelling external motivations influencing students’ decision to adopt the use of e-books? Six Major Areas of Research 1. Impact of E-books on Academic Libraries 2. Desired Features and Technical Issues 3. Impact of E-books on Student Learning 4. Use Rates in Academic Libraries 5. Purpose Students Use E-books 6. Students Preference for Books vs. E-books 1. Impact of E-books on Academic Libraries ◦ Academic Quality ◦ Accessibility ◦ Acquisitions ◦ Competition ◦ Currency ◦ Efficiency ◦ Reserves Desired Features and Technical Issues 2. ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Access to Multiple E-books Appearance Awareness Bookmarking Desirable Features Disparate Systems Navigation Portability Searchability Reading on Screen Technology Issues 3. Impact of E-books on Student Learning ◦ Use as a Textbook ◦ Learning Outcomes 4. Use Rates in Academic Libraries ◦ E-books Used ◦ Patterns of Use 5. Purpose Students Use E-books ◦ Complete Course Assignments ◦ Convenience 6. Reading Preference ◦ Prefer Printed Books ◦ Limited Reading ◦ Use for Research Investigate whether eight factors are related to e-book adoption (use) by undergraduate students at SBU ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Leisure Reading Textbook Use Conducting Research Assigned Reading Read in a Classroom Availability of E-book & Printed Book Impact on Use Using an E-book Because of Forced Adoption Using an E-book Because of Convenience Southwest Baptist University ◦ Liberal Arts Institution w/Professional Degrees 6 Associates, 45 Bachelors, 4 Masters, 1 Specialist, 2 Doctoral ◦ Traditional, Non-traditional and Online Programs Research Focus ◦ Traditional Undergraduate Students (1,405) E-book Collection ◦ 2002 – First Collection (19,768) ◦ Additional Collections & Individual Titles Acquired ◦ Survey Date – 95,415 (33.2% of Titles Available) Instrumentation ◦ Survey -- 15 Questions Convenience Sample ◦ Participants Selected During Chapel Service ◦ Study Conducted in Spring 2012 263 Participants (18.7% of Population) ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Freshman – 87 (33.1%) Sophomore – 78 (29.7%) Junior – 70 (26.6%) Senior – 28 (10.6%) Chi Square Analyses (X 2) ◦ RQ1 & 2: Two-Way X 2 ◦ RQ3 & 4: One-Way X 2 If X 2 Value Exceeds X 2cv (Critical Value) ◦ Correlation Found Between Factors ◦ Run Standardize Residual Test ◦ Residual >= | 2 | -- Identifies Cells w/Correlation Question (RQ1): How often is students’ use of e-books related to (a) reading for leisure; (b) reading a textbook; (c) using to conduct research for a class assignment; (d) reading an assigned reading for a class; or (e) reading an assigned reading in class? Null-Hypothesis (RQ1) There is no difference in the frequency of students’ use of e-books for leisure reading, textbook use, conducting research, assigned reading, and inclass reading. Pearson’s Two-Way Chi Square ◦ df = 16 (Degrees of Freedom) ◦ X 2cv = 7.96 ◦ X 2 = 143.54 (Exceeds X 2cv) ◦ Asymp. Sig. = .00 (<.05) ◦ Correlation Found to Exist Between Purpose and Frequency of Use ◦ Run Standardize Residual Test Frequency Leisure Reading Purpose Textbook Research Course Reading In-Class Reading Never Rarely Occasionally Usually Always Count 135.0 56.0 40.0 22.0 10.0 Expected 165.7 37.1 38.3 16.9 5.0 Residual -2.4 3.1 .3 1.3 2.2 Count 178.0 36.0 35.0 11.0 2.0 Expected 165.1 37.0 38.2 16.8 5.0 Residual 1.0 -.2 -.5 -1.4 -1.3 Count 124.0 37.0 59.0 31.0 11.0 Expected 165.1 37.0 38.2 16.8 5.0 Residual -3.2 .0 3.4 3.5 2.7 Count 159.0 41.0 46.0 15.0 2.0 Expected 165.7 37.1 38.3 16.9 5.0 Residual -.5 .6 1.2 -.5 -1.3 Count 230.0 15.0 11.0 5.0 .0 Expected 164.4 36.8 38.0 16.7 5.0 Residual 5.1 -3.6 -4.4 -2.9 -2.2 Negative Relationship ◦ Never Used Category (-2.4) Positive Relationship ◦ Rarely Used Category (+3.1) ◦ Always Used Category (+2.2) Some students Rarely use and some students Always use e-books for leisure reading Negative Relationship ◦ Never Used Category (-3.2) Positive Relationship ◦ Rarely Used Category (+3.4) ◦ Occasionally Use Category (+3.5) ◦ Always Used Category (+2.7) Some students Rarely, some students Occasionally and some students Always use e-books to conduct research Negative Relationship ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Rarely Used Category (-3.6) Occasionally Used Category (-4.4) Usually Used Category (-2.9) Always Used Category (-2.2) Positive Relationship ◦ Never Used Category (+5.1) Most students Never use e-books to read aloud in class All Categories Unrelated to Students Use of E-books Students use of e-books is Unrelated to textbook use and reading assigned readings outside of class Students Use of E-books Related to ◦ Leisure Reading ◦ Conducting Research Students Non-Use of E-books Related to ◦ Reading Aloud In-Class Students Use of E-books Unrelated to ◦ Textbook Use ◦ Reading Assigned Readings Outside of Class Question (RQ2): How often is students’ use of the printed book and e-book related to which format is accessible? Null-Hypothesis (RQ2): There is no difference in the frequency of students’ use of e-books and printed books when both the printed book and the e-book are available. Pearson’s Two-Way Chi Square ◦ df = 4 ◦ X 2cv = .711 ◦ X 2 = 233.25 ◦ Asymp. Sig. = .00 (<.05) ◦ A relationship exists between the available format and students’ choice to use printed books or ebooks. Frequency Rarely Occasionally Usually Always Count 18.0 20.0 36.0 75.0 122.0 Printed Expected 77.7 38.9 36.9 46.9 60.6 Book Residual -6.8 3.0 -.1 4.1 6.6 Count 136.0 57.0 37.0 18.0 8.0 Expected 76.3 38.1 36.1 46.1 59.4 Residual 6.8 3.1 .1 -4.1 -6.7 Format Never E-book Printed Books Negative Relationship E-books ◦ Usually Used (-4.1) ◦ Always Used (-6.7) ◦ Never Used (-6.8) Positive Relationship ◦ Rarely Used (3.0) ◦ Usually Used (4.1) ◦ Always Used (6.6) Negative Relationship Positive Relationship ◦ Never Used (6.8) ◦ Rarely Used (3.1) When both the printed book and the e-book were available, some students Rarely, some students Usually and some students Always chose to use the Printed Book Students’ prefer to use the printed book If the printed book is available, the e-book is not used Question (RQ3): How often is forced adoption related to students’ choice to use an e-book? Null-Hypothesis (RQ3): There is no difference in the students’ frequency of using e-books when the printed book was not available. Pearson’s One-Way Chi Square ◦ df = 4 ◦ X 2cv = .711 ◦ X 2 = 106.15 ◦ Asymp. Sig. = .00 (<.05) ◦ A relationship exists between forced adoption and the frequency of students’ use of e-books. Frequency E-book Use Never Rarely Occasionally Usually Always Count 15.0 23.0 53.0 61.0 109.0 Expected 52.2 52.2 52.2 52.2 52.2 Residual -37.2 -29.2 -.8 8.8 56.8 E-book Only Available Format ◦ Negative Relationship Never Used Category (-37.2) Rarely Used Category (-29.2) ◦ Positive Relationship Usually Used Category (8.8) Always Used Category (56.8) When the e-book was the only format available, some students Usually and some students Always used the e-book If the e-book format is the only format available, students used the e-book (Forced Adoption) Question (RQ4): How often is convenience related to students’ choice to use e-books? Null Hypotheses (RQ4): There is no difference in the frequency of students’ use of e-books due to convenience. Pearson’s One-Way Chi Square ◦ df = 4 ◦ X 2cv = .711 ◦ X 2 = 62.80 ◦ Asymp. Sig. = .00 (<.05) ◦ A relationship exists between convenience and the frequency of students’ use of e-books. Frequency Convenience Never Rarely Occasionally Usually Always Count 22.0 44.0 46.0 51.0 100.0 Expected 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 Residual -30.6 -8.6 -6.6 -1.6 47.4 E-book Use Due to Convenience ◦ Negative Relationship Never Used Category (-30.6) Rarely Used Category (-8.6) Occasionally Used Category (-6.6) ◦ Positive Relationship Always Used Category (47.4) When use of the e-book was convenient many students Always used the e-book Students use e-books when it is convenient Factors Affecting Students’ Use of E-books ◦ Use Leisure Reading Conducting Research Forced Adoption Convenience ◦ Not Use In-Class Reading Printed Book is Availability ◦ Unrelated to Use E-Textbook Assigned Reading (Outside of Class) Compelling Advantage? ◦ Leisure Reading ◦ Conducting Research ◦ Convenience External Motivation? ◦ Forced Adoption (Only E-book Available) Adoption Inhibitor? ◦ Availability of Printed Book ◦ Increased Difficulty Learning with E-textbooks (Perception) ◦ Not Reading Aloud in Classroom “If you build it, they will come” Prefer Print ◦ Not Opposed to Electronic Forced Adoption ◦ “Do you have this in a book” Convenience ◦ Getting to the Library ◦ Late Night Writing ◦ Find a Resource Recognition: ◦ Digital Library w/Analogy Collections (Rather than) ◦ Analogy Library w/Digital Collections E-book Collection (Today) ◦ 226,000 E-books vs. 192,000 Printed Books ◦ 334,000 E-journals vs. 100 Print Journals E-books following Periodical Pathway ◦ Begin w/Fits and Starts ◦ Surpass all the Hurdles ◦ Majority Adoption Questions Dr. Edward Walton Dean, University Libraries Associate Professor of Library Services Southwest Baptist University 1600 University Ave Bolivar, Mo. 65613 E-mail: ewalton@sbuniv.edu Phone: 417-328-1619