Chapter 10: Developing a Global Management Cadre PowerPoint by Hettie A. Richardson Louisiana State University © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-1 Maximising Global Human Resources Use international cadre through career management to develop a top management with global expirience Develop effective global management teams Promote the role of women and minorities Work with the host-country labor relations systems to ease the strategic implementation and higher the productivity © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-2 The Expatriate Transition Process Entry transition (initial confrontation) Adjustment (adaptation) Home country Exit transition (anticipatory socialization) Entry transition (initial confrontation) Adjustment (adaptation) Host country Exit transition (anticipatory socialization) Home country or New Host country © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall Entry transition (initial confrontation) Adjustment (adaptation) Exit transition (anticipatory socialization) 10-3 Preparation, Adaptation, Repatriation Reverse culture shock occurs because Reintegration is difficult Expatriates are often “out of sight, out of mind” Feelings of alienation from “home” Poor management of expatriates means fewer will be willing to take assignments © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-4 Successful Repatriation Programs Mentor programs Career planning and guidance units A system for maintaining contact with expatriates © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-5 The Role of the Expatriate Spouse 60% of expatriate spouses are employed before the assignment, but only 21% are employed during the assignment Spouse adjustment is more likely when: The firm seeks the spouse’s opinion The spouse initiates predeparture training © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-6 Reasons for Poor Expatriate Retention Expatriates are highly marketable Overseas compensation packages are more generous than those at home Expatriates feel unappreciated at home and on assignment © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-7 The Role of Repatriation in Developing a Global Cadre Successful expatriates acquire skills: Managerial skills Tolerance for ambiguity Multiple perspectives Ability to work with and manage others Ability to do business overseas © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-8 Global Management Teams The term Global Management Team describes a collection of managers in or from several countries who must rely on group collaboration if each member is experience optimum success and goal achievement © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-9 Global Management Teams The effects of multicultural teams: Domestic: Mostly internal operations International: Relationships among buyers, sellers and other intermediaries Multinational: Internal, across culturally diverse managers and technical people © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-10 Global Teams in the Global Enterprise © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-11 Challenges for “Virtual” Global Teams Geographic dispersal Cultural differences Language and communication Technology © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-12 Future Needs for Virtual Training How to lead a virtual team meeting How to coach and mentor virtually How to monitor team progress How to use communication technologies How to manage team boundaries © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-13 Criteria for Evaluating Transnational Team Success Do members work together with a common purpose? Has the team developed a common language or procedure? Does the team build on what works, learning to identify the positives? Does the team spell out matters within the limits of the cultural differences involved? Do members recognize the impact of their own cultural programming on individual and group behavior? Does the team have fun? © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-14 Managing Global Business Teams © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-15 The Role of Women in International Management © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-16 The Role of Women in International Management Even US managers are reluctant to give women expatriate assignments Evidence suggests foreigners are viewed first as foreigners © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-17 Working with Local Labor Relations Systems Labor relations and collective bargaining Three dimensions to consider: The participation of labor in firm affairs The role and impact of unions Human resource policies © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-18 Working with Local Labor Relations Systems Labor relations constraints: Wage levels set by unions Limits on the firm’s ability to vary employment levels Limitations on the global integration of operations Example: Europe © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-19 Organized Labor Around the World Union membership is in decline Industrial, craft, conglomerate, and general unions Labor unions must be understood within their given contextual environment © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-20 Management Focus: China Empowers Unions The “iron rice bowl” China is adopting a new law to empower unions and protect workers’ rights Foreign companies operating in China are protesting this move © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-21 Convergence in Labor Systems Forces for convergence: Merger of ICFTU and WCL MNC desire for consistency and coordination Increased monitoring of labor conditions Political and cultural shifts © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-22 Divergence in Labor Systems Most MNCs still adapt practices to national traditions The role of political ideology, overall social structure, and history of industrial practices © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-23 NAFTA and Labor Relations in Mexico Labor issues subject to review under NAFTA: minimum wages, child labor, and safety Workers believe MNCs use blacklists, intimidation and economic pressure to oppose union organization Example: General Electric © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-24 Comparative Management in Focus: Labor Relations in Germany Codetermination law (mitbestimmung) is coming under pressure Union works councils are “co-managers” German unions are increasingly willing to make concessions Linde and IG Mettal © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-25 Comparative Management in Focus: Labor Relations in Germany The influence of Daimler-Chrysler and the US The German model holds that competition should not be based on cost What is the value of codetermination? © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 10-26