Stakeholder Perspective
Introduction
The goal of United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14 is "to prevent and
significantly reduce marine pollution". One effective approach involves using interceptor boats to
gather waste before it affects marine life. This analysis delves into the perspectives and potential
consequences of this technology on groups of people involved in activities such, as local
fishermen and communities living along coasts marine tourism NGOs focused on preserving
nature informal waste recyclers, and aquatic farms. These stakeholders are, from regions not only
across North America but also other areas chosen for their reliance on marine ecosystems, for
their livelihoods, and the overall well-being of the environment and society.
1. Tourism[1]
● The tourism sector sees Trash Interceptor Boats in a good light because they have the
potential to boost water quality and make beaches and coastal areas more appealing, to
visitors.
● Clean Water enhances economic activity by drawing tourists to regions currently plagued
by pollution. This influx of visitors could generate income for hotels and resorts and
provide a boost to local businesses.
● Enhancing water quality can positively impact biodiversity. It can also create ideal
settings for recreational pursuits such as snorkeling and diving.
● The improved cleanliness of our coastlines can help enhance the region's reputation. This
may encourage locals and tourists to feel a sense of pride and dedication, to preserving
the environment.
2. NGO's representing Marine Life[2]
● Environmental nonprofit organizations likely endorse using interceptor boats because it
fits with their mission to safeguard the environment from pollution.
● The economic effect, on non-governmental organizations (NGOs) could be positive as the
general public becomes more aware of marine conservation efforts. This increased
awareness might result in donations and funding opportunities, for these NGOs.
● Technology plays a role, in protecting diversity by lowering the impact on animals, from
plastic and other pollutants.
● NGOs have the opportunity to use the project to spread awareness through programs and
campaigns that aim to encourage communities to take on a sense of environmental
responsibility.
3. Local Fishing Communities[3]
● Local fishing communities might have mixed responses, to the situation at hand. On one
hand, cleaner water could enhance fish populations but on the other hand, there might be
concerns about possible disturbances in fishing zones or alterations, in accessibility
because of interceptor operations.
● The economic effects of enhanced fish populations resulting from decreased pollution
may be advantageous, for fishermen. However, the temporary interruptions caused by the
boats might affect their catches.
● Cleaner water will improve the health of ecosystems. This will boost the fish populations
that these communities depend on.
● Fishing communities often feel a connection, to the sea due to their heritage and
traditions that revolve around it. Interceptor technology could be viewed as disrupting
these standing practices however, its positive impact on the environment may gradually
garner acceptance and support in the future.
4. Informal recyclers[4]
● Informal recyclers might not like interceptor boats because they could limit their ability to
collect materials, from water bodies and affect their source of income.
● Reduced waste, in bodies of water could have an impact by lowering the availability of
recyclable materials. This might lead to a decrease in income, for individuals who depend
on waste collection.
● . While reducing pollution is good, in nature; individuals who recycle informally might
encounter difficulties, in locating materials, and they may resort to unorthodox ways to
collect trash.
● The cultural and social influence of recycling plays a role in several areas as it is deeply
ingrained in the economic and social dynamics of the community members there.
5. Aquatic Farms[5]
● Aquaculture farms would likely favor the use of interceptor boats as it would decrease
pollution levels resulting in cleaner water and healthier fish populations which in turn
could enhance their overall operations.
● The financial implications of having cleaner water could lead to savings on water
treatment expenses. It would also lead to the yielding of healthier crops that would boost
profits.
● Reduced pollution can have an impact, on farmed fish, by lowering mortality rates and
enhancing water quality in aquaculture settings.
● Improved water quality reinforces local food supply and economic stability, which in turn
supports food security and economic growth in farming communities
Sources
1.
Ocean Conservancy, “The Impact of Ocean Pollution on Tourism,” Ocean
Conservancy, 2023. [Online].
2.
Greenpeace, “Protecting Marine Life through Pollution Prevention,” Greenpeace,
2022. [Online].
3.
A. Smith, “The Effects of Marine Pollution on Coastal Fishing Communities,”
Journal of Marine Sciences, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 123-130, 2021.
4.
R. K. Johnson, “Informal Recycling and Economic Stability: A Study of Waste
Pickers,” Waste Management Journal, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 56-63, 2020.
5.
L. Martinez, “Aquaculture and Water Quality: The Role of Pollution Control,”
Aquaculture Reports, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 201-210, 2022.