"
I halp
I
:D
ffwftlllfn.hn
EE
you STUD
am
good !
boi
good
boil
in
"
""
"
EE asmrr
A UD lT
AND
goop
Bo ,
.gg
HE "
"
A S S U R AN C E
e÷÷0M
:
astronomic
KEYWORDS
independent
>
Independent
examination
avoidance
of
from
expression of opinion on the
financial statements of an entity
a
duly appointed
pursuit of that appointment
by
7
assurance
A three
7
responsible
involving
matter
material
respect
°
.
Required
nature , timing
to
pursue
practitioner to question
subject
info
should
be
7
anything
whether
at
with
a
set
another
For
determining
timing be extent of
required
to
anything
pursue
leads him
to
question
subject
matter
info
should be
changed
some
material
respect
in
.
the
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
assertions
&
INTENDED USERS
person
is)
whom
for
the
practitioner
the
assurance
"""%E}
report
you
B. appropriate
has to be
→
look
in some
changed
person responsible for the information
°
,
whether the
extent of procedures
the
responsible
that
determining the
that leads
could
disagree
and
procedures
rts
for
ES
nature
PRACTITIONER
°
being taken
practitioner
-
party
of action
course
auditor
>
A.
Free
would prevent
auditor
one
of
( ( f IM f N f f
OF
being
constraints that
Opinion
auditor in
a
any
correct
3
interest
by a rested
and
being unduly influenced
of
subject matter
appropriate
identifiable
,
.
in
a
way
capable of consistent
e.in: : ::: :iii. :::::m :::* ::
me
""
÷
"
Ii:::n:Yini; ::*::# et:c.io.no
'
:E:/ig
y
'
:
.am.
..④÷g
C
.
Criteria
Benchmarks used
The
subject
to
matter
open
To
CRITERIA
.
evaluation 1 measurement
.
WITHOUT THE Frame
SUITABLE
TO NOTE :
evaluate I measure
the basis of
practitioner 's own
of
Reference
By a
on
any
conclusion
is
expectations judgement
&
experience
constitute
,
interpretation I
individual
would
not
individual
suitable criteria
MISUNDERSTANDING
characteristics
•
Relevance
criteria
? Relevant criteria contribute
to
•
to the intended users to allow them
conclusions that assist decision
making by
the
to understand
intended users CA )
has
Completeness
?
include
that
•
could
relevant Factors
all
affect the conclusions
Reliability
?
reliable
criteria
consistent
allow
evaluation
reasonably
on
the subject
matter
•
Neutrality
?
criteria have to be
that
bias
•
conclusions
neutral so
free of
are
.
Understandability
?
criteria have
to
result
conclusions that
in
clear
comprehensive
are
,
significantly
interpretations
and
not
different
need to be available
subject
to
been
how the subject matter
evaluated
or
measured
.
KEYWORDS
D. Ennence
BACKSTORY
professional
skepticism
1 'S kept ISI 2101Mt
Practitioner
engagement
p r O F
To
^
an
ATTITUDE
of
with
s
s
an
i
WHETHER
FREE
n
o
a
sufficient
obtain
ABOUT
IS
e
plans & performs
appropriate
IT
misstatement
[ sn.IE?ifoehnkIIaIe3
to
error
human
.
misunderstanding 3 etc
evlbence
CONSIDER :
,
also
recognises
sometimes
beople
.
that
deliberately
dishonest
or
that
aware
subject
be
optimism
mislead
THINGS TO
-
THEREFORE :
Professional
→
all
can
excess
matter (B)
subject
THE
material
FROM
we
CRITICISM
1
is
practitioner
assurance
is
evidence
SKEPTICISM
required to test
1 assumptions
statements
.
→
E.
REPORT
A
PROVIDES
containing
a
'
quantity of enbence must
be
WRITTEN
sufficient & appropriate
( measures
HOW
conclusion
Reasonable
>
PRACTITIONER 'S
In
TO
THE
M
>
l
T
CONCLUSION
POSITIVE
E
D
IS
is
WORDED
IN
F. POSITIVE 7 Negative
)
o
generally
.
AUDITS
POSITIVE assurance
its
Dependent
INDIVIDUAL
THE
UNDER
assurance
( limited )
stat
k
source
and BY ITS NATURE ,
FORM
negative FORM
( reasonable)
Reliability
h
Influenced by
WORDED
assurance
conclusion
:
determine
assurance
ITIS
l
Quality )
The
by its Relevance
in :
L
evidence
ISO FICO) ht
REPORT
ASSURANCE
PRACTITIONER
suriicient
ATTEMPT
TO
PROVIDE
WHICH
on The
circumstances
ITS
OBTAINED
continued
07
HOWEVER ,
where
There
some
.
giving
assurance
budget IS
Practitioner
M O
on
assumptions
} FACTORS
That
cannot Be
VERIFIED
WITH
certainty
would not
d HE led
For EITHER Type
There is
OF The
1-
that a
CORRECT because
depends
IT
+
Is not
.
c. g
Un
circumstances
assurance
POSITIVE
giving
feasible
are
express
an
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
cant
When :
on
LIMITATION
THE scope
FAIRLY
SUBJECT
INFORMATION
MATTER
materially misstated
.
STATED
µ SUFFICIENT APPROPRIATE
,
EVIDENCE ( D)
PRACTITIONER 'S WORK
ASSERTION IS NOT
obtain
/
IS
corporate
governance
"
÷÷÷:÷n÷÷÷÷÷÷:i
"'
"
E
>
: ""
"
ensure
That
are users
efficiently & PRODUCTIVELY
The company 's
M¥1
assets
÷:÷÷÷÷÷:
peen
.
In THE
>
BEST INTERESTS OF
eliminate
Interest
.
OR
MITIGATE
PARTICULARLY
management
ITS
and
SHAREHOLDERS
CONFLICTS OF
THOSE Between
SHAREHOLDERS
.
.
audit
is
important
#
¢
#
principles
of coup governance
.
€
.
✓ ( IP LE g
OF ( OR
POR ATE
GOVERN
AM CE
#
ACCA
:
÷
:
÷
÷÷÷÷÷÷¥
:÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷÷÷
1-
promote Transparent & FAIR
MARKETS
SUPERVISION
A enforcement
t
Recognise
THE
t
ensure Timely
DISCLOSURE
OF
'
Effective
; SUPPORT
for
stakeholders RIGHTS
'
&
Accurate
all
MATERIAL
matters
t
strategic
guidance of
entity , effective
monitoring
ensure
THE
BOARD
management
BY THE
THE BOARD 's
accountability
ENTITY
and THEIR
of
&
TO THE
SHAREHOLDERS
EVERY COMPANY SHOULD
BY
effective
an
IS COLLECTIVELY
Be HEADED
BOARD WHICH
THE LONG TERM
DIVISION B/W Running OF THE BOARD
\
VS
f
°
RUNNING OF THE B12
THE CHAIR
a
.
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
LEADERSHIP OF THE BOARD & SHOULD
\
t
SUCCESS OF THE
-
}
i
FOR
RESPONSIBLE
THERE SHOULD Be a clear
°
I
Be
INDEPENDENT
APPT
ON
.
I
company
I
.
SHOULD
,
"
I
ALL DIRECTORS
o
iii.i'in
,
OF EXEC
DIRECTORS
-
INDEPENDENT
l
.
E
E#s:
:
o
acoans.
s
.
i
:
i
:
i
i
a
i
e
.
n
.
n
't
Rema
'
*
l
-
,
"
nern-tionumrsestruc.ru
.
ok
iii. in:÷:::::n:::n:
( PROFIT RELATED I
T'
Rko
SHOULD
Be
& TRANSPARENT
Developing
a FORMAL
PROCEDURE
Of KK
REMUNERATION
R
PACK
AGES OF INDIVIDUAL
DIRECTORS
ill
DIRECTOR
( NO
il
SHOULD bellmen
HIS OWN
RCMUNE " I
-
RATION )
11
/
d
'
"
'
p
(
l
0
ABLE
l
'
'
I
'
I
I
'
-
11
ill
I
'
it
pl
•
'
ill
"
c
"
II
.
PROCEDURES
AUDIT
" '
u n
i'
niiiiiiiiiiii
siioii:*
s
t
'
y
s
@
,
,
& TRANSPARENT
t
O
Ef
a
FORMAL RIGOROUS
8
s o
s y
PROCEDURE LED BY
A NOMINATION COM
,
cow ypo
OF
f
SHOULD
INTEGRITY
OF THE
-
r
AND
r
-
e
YRS
I
UNDERSTAND
company 's
-
BOARD SHOULD UNDERTAKE
'
r
formal & RIGOROUS
r
POSITION &
of going CONCERN
Basis
VALUATION
FOR
MANAGE
I
RISK
,
INTERNAL
OVERSEE
°
ALL
DIRECTORS SHOULD BE
SUBMITTED FOR
RISKS
Re ELECTION
°
ESTABLISH
ANNUAL
OF PERFORMANCE
CONTROLS & DETERMINE THE NATURE & EXTENT OF THE PRINCIPAL
LONG
A
{ COMMITTEES -1 INDIVIDUAL )
AT
APPROVAL OF FS )
PROCEDURES TO
TO ACHIEVE
SHOULD
CONSIDERED )
I
OF FS
KNOW
OF SERVICE
OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE
THE INDEPENDENCE I BE
-1
/
( ON THE
-
TERM
.
HAVE A COMBI
SKILLS , EXPERIENCE
F LEDGE ( THE length
SHOULD ESTABLISH
TO ENSURE
°
.
r
ASSESSMENT
ESTABLISH
"
"
"
,
PRESENT A FAIR , BALANCED &
PROSPECTS
g
l
y
& Effectiveness of INTERNAL & external
t
.
AUDIT R , gk I §§
NTERNAL
BOARD
O
"
fr
¥
FORMAL & TRANSPARENT POLICIES
KAST 12 MONTHS FROM
•
q'
FOR FIXING
REMUNERATION
THE
..
"
FOR
11
Mt¥
..
=
executive
ON
policy
.
"
e
%
THERE
SHOULD PROVIDE
. .
.
°
MEDS
↳
"
.
A-NCE
executive
WHO ARE
.**y¥
e.gwww.pteshs
r??!*Mltrnh?Nd7qqag
'
"
proportion
-
PERSHIP !
WITH INTEGRITY
" CANT
'
ACT
MUST
Non
Be
DIRECTORS
t
/
501 OF THE BOARD
AT least
⑨
STRATEGIC
AUDIT COMMITTEE
OBJECTIVES
OF
-
.
INDEPENDENT
MEDS
.
ANNUALLY
I
n
O_O
NED # 1
NED # 3
audit
committee
REQUIREMENTS
3
O
MIN
0
CHAIR ¥
°
1 MEMBER
-
MEMBERS
MEMBER
MUST
HAVE
RECENT & RELEVANT
°
FINANCIAL
EXPERIENCE
COMM
MUST
HAVE
competence
IN THE
.
relevant
NOT
Biz
.
°
REQUIRED TO
Have
an INTERNAL
AUDIT
DEPT
c-
MONITOR
AND
REVIEW THE
EFFECTIVENESS
OF
INTERNAL
AUDIT
BUT THE
.
NEED FOR ONE
REVIEWED
ROL @ Smd RESPONSIBILITY
sector
°
MUST Be
ANNUALLY
.
°
MONITOR
THE
FINANCIAL
REPORTING
REVIEW
INTEGRITY
INTERNAL
OF
REVIEW
FS ;
JUDGEMENTS
A
CONTROLS
SIGNIFICANT
.
RISK
MANAGEMENT
systems
°
RECOMMEND TO THE BOARD
REAPPOINTMENT
CONFIRM
THERE
self
-
Are
OF
THE
APPOINTMENT
THE
.
EXTERNAL
AUDITORS
THAT
No
←
°
independence)
ANNUALLY
0
ACT AS
°
Develop
A FORUM
&
OF EXTERNAL
THE
ASSESS
EFFECTIVENESS THE
interest 1 FAMILIARITY
Issues ( ensure
& REMOVAL
ABOUT
INDEPENDENCE
EXTERNAL
TO
IMPLEMENT
LINK
AUDITORS TO supply
objectivity &
AUDITORS
DIRECTORS
POLICY
,
ON
Now
THE
-
&
AUDITORS
engagement
AUDIT
SERVICES
AUDITOR 'S
AUMTORS.net#
REMOVAL ,
IN GENERAL
t¥h%
desianattionn
-
AN AUDITOR
,
in:*:: :*:O: :O :c:*:*:*:c:*
'
.
.
OF ALL
-
TRANSACTIONS
Receive
NOTICE
Nl @ ET INGS
,
ATTEND &
general
about
.
AUDITORS APPOINTMENT
'
=
F-
AUDITORS
AT EVERY
AGM
THE INCUMBENT
HAVE TO Be
REAPPOINTED
l NOT AUTOMATIC , TO PREVENT
AUDITORS
FROM
SIMPLY STAYING
IN OFFICE )
-
fortanagers
mation
:ir"
""
no
AUDITORS
'
"
AUDITORS
RESIGNATION
'
EE
AUDITORS
can
resign
BY GIVING
war emns.in Yes :O : atoms: 'm:
.
"
.
÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷
REMOVAL
:÷
"
AUDITORS
'
REGULATION
FAUDITORS
FRC
'
CTC
are
regulators
BY ACCA , HAC
,
PIE ④ if 8551110 All
ethics
CONFIDENTIALITY
AUDITORS SHOULD
Respect
HAVE
a
SHOULD
.
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITH
TREAT
PIC
DISCLOSE
NOT
legal 1 PROFESSIONAL
UNLESS
INFO
DUTY
TO
DO SO
THEY
'
One-way
AUDITORS
SHOULD
NOT
JUDGEMENTS THEY MUST
UNDUE
DISCREDIT
law and
THE
COMPLY WITH
WHICH
THE PROFESSION
avoid
.
MUST
PROFESSIONAL
AUDITORS
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
,
BEHAVIOUR
SHOULD
ANY ACTIONS
AVOID Bti
.
INFLUENCE
PROFESSIONAL
AUDITORS
PROFESSIONAL 1 B12
:
.
AND
COMPROMISE
competence
& due
keep
up TO DATE
MUST
LEGISLATION & RECENT
Themselves
-
-
j7Qualifiers
care
AUDIT
Developments
INTEGRITY
Have TO BE
HONEST
PROFESSIONAL & B12 RELATIONSHIPS
.
EYE
.
&
STRAIGHTFORWARD
SHOULD NOT
-10
PERFORM THE
WITH
-
AUDITORS
Be
IN
TURN A BLIND
O
-2
µ¥÷w!
•
•
SELF
AT the Tonn: tonnes
"
key
a
auditor
÷÷:÷÷:÷÷÷÷÷:÷:i
:c
.
Af Is !
-
man
audit
FIRM SHOULD
WEIGH up
÷÷÷÷::÷÷:÷÷:: ÷÷÷÷÷÷
THE RISKS
advocacy
promotes
assurance view to
a
TO ITS OBJECTIVITY
,
INTEGRITY
and INDEPENDENCE
point of
-
FIRMS
Have
earlier
UNDER cake
-
( such services include ;
internal audit,
tax
÷i÷÷÷÷÷÷÷:÷÷
:
bookkeeping ,
calculations
,
etc)
subsequent audit
:
.
:÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷÷÷¥¥÷
i
n T
l M
l
DA T
⇐
auditors
litigation
could be
INTIMIDATION blackmail
,
threatened
or
.
NOT
OBJECTIVE
anymore
.
physical
:#
self-interest
enxamptohe
"
÷÷' n'III:#Itn::*:::# remains:*
Lama
:
eine
:#
:
'm
:*: :: :*
compromise.
"
CERTAIN FACTORS
.
47
if auditor owns
shares
in the
auditor
client,
accused of wanting The client 'S PORTFOLIO
TO
GOOD
.
Close business relationships
in The Quality of the
might be QUESTIONED it
audit
There's a close biz
4,
-
Be
COULD
LOOK
:#
"
'
Contingent fees
47 NIT
relationship is present
especially it a member of the audit team gains From
The close biz relationship ( employment)
permitted for audit engagements
.
47
feel that
calculated based
are
on
reported
.
↳
an ex
-
WITH a
should
partner
client FOR
AT
NIT
least
take
2
revenue / profit
.
up
Years
appointment
an
AFTER THE last
engagement
.
High percentage fees
Close family & personal relationships
47 auditor 's
by the auditor earns a high percentage
objectivity and independence may be
one
↳
guarantees
and
acceptable if the lending terms are normal
47
"
special
entice
"
the team to
→
-
Entity ( PIE)
of the firm 's total Fees
15 't
for z consecutive years
.
arrangements )
arrangements can be
opinion
client
on that one
Total fees from a public Interest
should not exceed
↳
( no special
auditor will rely
afford to lose them
& can't
QUESTIONED
loans
client , the
From
pass
a
'
used to
low
clean audit
'
compromise auditor 's
-
balling
ID quoting a
objectivity
very low audit fee to win a client
the nope op
gaining
more
lucrative
non
-
,
in
audit
work
Overdue fees
47 puts the
H H's
auditor at risk
because
there's a
possibility that client will never pay those Feet
? Lp this could lead to
has
not
the
likelihood that
accusations that the auditor
modified the
audit
a worried
the company 's liquidation
opinion to reduce
creditor trigger 's
legal to
have
low audit
fees but it raises
the question as to whether the
is
done
proper
work
.
Recruiting staff on behalf of a client
↳ auditors
might be reluctant to criticise
the performance of the staff recruited by
-
the auditors
b
recruiting services to a non PIE client is
-
not
prohibited
the client's
,
ultimately the decision is
¥4100
TOO : Tackle threats TO PRINCIP
LEFT
iehicminen9e nioIe oat.iIgtnreaI7@actions.mdi
IF There's
an
identified
threat
apply safeguards
.
safeguard ,
dually or in combination taken by
the professional accountant that effectively eliminate
threats to compliance with the fundamental principles
ri
or reduce
,
them to an acceptable
egg samples
level
:
⑤ assigning additional time a qualified
personnel
→
tackles
self review
-
⑤ have an appropriate reviewer to review
the
work
→
performed
tackles
self review
-
D use
①
diff engagement teams with separate
reporting lines for the provision of
non
-
assurance services to an audit
client
→
tackles self review
-
or
advocacy
familiarity
D
O separate teams
when
dealing with
confidential information
-7
,
tackles self
-
interest
i÷
auditor 's report
Independent auditor 's report
Material uncertainty
key audit matters
page 112
-
AO
-
Audit opinion -
④ Independent auditor 's report
States to WHOM The
< shareholders of the
④
-
④
Fateh's:÷ :.in?.:nancias.. men..na..
④
Types of opinions include ;
Include
used to draw
refers
to
independence
complied with
auditor 's
& that
modified
in this
,
been
opinion
explanation would be
the
section
has been
material
related to the going
concern
not
a
attention to a
disclosed
in the
modification of the opinion
it will state that the
If
modification
not
KAM ⑤
there's
,
the emphasis
of matter paragraph may follow
( depending on their
relative importance )
uncertainty
of the company
of the opinion
opinion is
,
.
⑦ key audit matters
matters that were the most
significant during the audit
in
a
'
.
it's
concern
required if there's a
it's not
Disclaimer of opinion
users
properly
that section
.
⑦ Material uncertainty related
to going
matter
modified
.
audit
Adverse opinion
assertion of the
an
other ethical matters have
It an
Qualified opinion
④ Emphasis of matter paragraph
FS
auditor 's
°
o
°
responsibilities
MUST
opinion
°
② Basis for opinion
°
o
-
,
company >
:
-
compliance with ISAs
report is addressed
accordance
with ISA 701
: : :i: :
auditor 's report
Other matter paragraph
-
①
④ other matter paragraph
To communicate
:¥÷
÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷i÷÷÷
no
Auditor's responsibilities
Date , address
-
-
.
page 212
④
Possible circumstances
O
①
That
( e.g
the
is
.
not
o
where
the
that
the auditor 's
for the intended
audit scope
o
report) and conflicts with
to state
report
is
solely
users
auditor unable to withdraw from on
-
modification of the
⑨ Management's
points
.
prepared
management imposed limitation on
.
a
been
engagement even though a
opinion
not
have
for a specific purpose
the audit
IT'S
FS
information
covered in the
Director 's
of FS
reports on 2 Sets
purpose frameworks
⑧ Other information paragraph
other
auditor
include :
prepared under different general
-
TO communicate
.
:
signature
-
not required
that is
a matter
out
FS
pervasive
responsibilities
that its
to prepare the
opinion
is
management's responsibility
in accordance with the IFRS ,
consider
of the company
going
maintain the
system of internal
control
,
concern
→
⑤ Date
④ Auditor 's responsibilities
to
from material
misstatements
whether due to fraud or error
to issue
auditor 's report
includes their
opinion
whether receivables are being
paid , etc )
and
that
after the date
a
level of assurance ,
high
not
a
passive duty
lit any
events
affects the
and fairness of the
will
detect
FS is brought
to
misstatement
attention , he
might have
always
to act )
when it exists
or
auditor has
truth
a material
individually
,
guarantee that an
audit
material → it
.
l this includes
.
reasonable assurance →
duty
investigating
still has an active
,
.
in the
aggregate
,
they could be expected to influence the
economic decisions
basis of these
TRUE and fair -7
of users taken
the
information is factually
and not
fair
on
FS
True :
-
correct
materially misstated
information presented is not misleading I
concealed that would affect the decision
of the
making
stakeholders
Other reporting responsibilities
→
in some
jurisdictions
,
auditor
may have
responsibilities to report on matters
such as the adequacy of accounting books &
additional
records
the auditor
,
free
are
signature
and
before the signing date
obtain reasonable assurance abt
whether the FS as a whole
address
,
his
④
ISA 701
-
'M
communicating key audit matters
o
only
applicable
°
The
auditor
significant
→
to
entities
listed
shall determine
attention
areas of
required
shall take into account the following ;
,
higher
the matters that
assessed risk of material
misstatement 1 significant risks
→
judgements relating to areas
in the FS that involved
significant management
judgment l accounting estimates )
→
effect on the audit of significant events 1 transactions
significant
occurred
that
HOW TO
during the period
:
Determine KA Ms
i÷÷÷÷÷÷
MATTERS
communicated
with TCWG
auditor
;÷÷÷÷:÷
:÷÷÷÷e:
i÷÷÷÷÷÷
.
gums'm
.
÷÷÷÷÷:÷
"
.
a-
÷
.
¥
'
.
→
Determine
which ones
require
.attention
→
MOST
significant
are
KA Ms
•
•
•
se
④ µ # yay
MIMI #④ RR H
e**⇐$
O 51 to 11 Of NEW
⑧
o
'
im
1¥35
-
.
M
.
.
the nature of the
on ,
1
/
to
21
o
5 't
to
101 Off proof#
.
of
.
"
amount
work
is
.
less than
misstatements
the risk that
aggregate
in
identified
misstatements
: ÷÷÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷÷
::c:S
.
of uncorrected
assess
the
i:÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷
o
materiality
statements & obtain
written
representations from mgmt
to state
that the
.
uncorrected
( if Mgmt refuses
.
! !!
:
there
no
auditor must
exceed the
NOTE
TAKE
in
"
thumbs
the rules of
FS materiality )
all
.
the performance
important in
set should be
( reduce
"
.
financing volatility of the benchmark
.
materiality that
audit
IT ¢
entity its ownership
-
.
materiality
performance
of the
structure
@ #§
o
uuaatiitaatiive
N'xnsonwoieidgeiaiewnmiionaiomintinini i saiioi:c
ee
'
-
&
attire
④ want
errors
are
( STATUTORY
misstatements
auditor will issue
amounts in
are
tolerable
a
.
director
disclose
accuracy)
w/ absolute
DUTY TO
remuneration
are
the FS where
Not
/
material
modified
.
( except for ) o
"
"
.
audct.it opinion's
unmodified opinion
modified opinion
unmodified opinion
FS show
*
*
a
and
true
may include;
"
"
fair
view
emphasis of
+
draws attention
t
c'9
"
matters
t
draws attention
-1
generally
( this
to
paragraph
some
to
draw attention
'
other
"
matter
Note
properly disclosed
already
to the
X
in
the FS
FS,
which
describes
nor
should
be
.
.
.
paragraph
matter
to
after
comes
does not
matter
FS
'
the
FS
,
opinion
basis of
the
that
mean
in the
not
are
paragraph
qualified
'
or
wrong
,
criticised )
+ comes
i
"
concern
going
generally
than
12
material
uncertainty
related
+
attention to
disclosure
not less
months
Draw
would
company
( the
continue
can
o
evaluate
Vr
the
o
o
concern
&
the
of
any
additional facts 1 into
since
the
date
become
available
request
written representations
,
of
from
management
actions &
that the
.
Fs)
determine if the company
to
support)
the
company
→
evaluate
the
determine
for
prepared
has
a
forecast :
reliability
underlying data
,
uncertainty
a
flow
have
assessment
regarding their plans for future
feasibility
to
→
whether
.
concern
whether
cash
plan
consider
TCWG
feasibility
o
"
going concern
is adequately disclosed on the
going
evidence
mgmt's plans for future actions
going
to
I find
:
a
material
on
as
responsibility
as
going concern
to
continue
disclosure
auditor 's
t not
evidence
( if applicable)
KAM
after
the
of the
used
it there 's
assumptions
adequate support
modified opinion
*
reasons for
modified opinion
:
+
":÷ifi÷
Nature of
material
pervasive
one
or
o
e.g
are
opinion :
"
materially
misstated
Except for
o
''
obtain
to
a
qualified
opinion :
"
except for
way the figure is presented 1
misstated
are
.
paragraph
it: : ::::: :*:::: :::p:c:::c:::::*
opinion
"
€in{|×p|P)
unable
figure I the
the
disclosures
"
f- s
.
FS
material misstatements in the
more
O
adverse
>
Disclaimer
opinion
misstatements
FS
Ot
,
t unable
a
FS
the
to obtain
"
o
as
,
except for
>
"
significant → renders the
are
whole , useless
do
not
show
true
a
and
fair
view
sufficient evidence
paragraph
is material → auditor
missing information
not been
get
able to
all the
has
information required
to draw conclusions
o
a
disclaimer of opinion
>
missing information is
so
auditors have
it the FS showed
&
no
idea
significant
fair view
> auditors unable
to form
an
opinion
that
a
the
true
Atayal#EEEti
an
:÷: : ÷:
appointment
t
plan the audit
t
understand entity
t
assess
risk
of material misstatement
t
:÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷:÷:÷i÷: ÷
"
reduced substantive procedures
↳
full substantive procedures
overall view of ES
↳
auditor 's
report
#
report
to
management
appointment of auditor
key considerations
0
professionally qualified
O
availability adequate resources
0
Investigate the management
0
communicate
legal and ethical)
( staff, time, expertise)
client and
,
with
(
to act
directors
present the auditors
n.g #anitoryesmtoramoaegYigeiYmnoy.
accept I reject
proceed to ask for
old
auditor
does
client
,
No
I
agree ?
preconditions
-
according to
an
°
audit
The
'
of
Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements
be
only
audit
an
ISA 210
can
reject
accepted
preconditions for
audit
an
the financial
>
of the ES
>
is
These
an
a
present :
acceptable
that
FS
the
(
must
formally
engagement
must
acknowledges
control )
& understands its
&
provide
responsibilities
information necessary
.
understanding
be
it
including internal
common
matters
audit
are
'
if :
,
reporting framework for the preparation
for the audit
there is
continued)
management agrees
for
O
( or
,
be
>
management
7
preconditions
of the terms
documented
declined
or
in
an
impose
not
present
a
engagement
engagement letter
( discontinued )
TCWG
are
of the audit
,
tf :
limitation
on
the
scope of audit
eeenmgggaagggeeemmmeeennn.tt#**eerrrooo
?
Set
out
LOE
f
Bob IAC
to the
auditor & client
between
should :
o
)
define
auditor 's
07
provide
written
07
identify
any
should be sent
to
relationship
contractual
Prior
engagement
D
Typical
responsibilities
evidence
reports
to
of auditor 's
be
acceptance
provide any updates in regards
to
addition
in
produced
changes
of the
appointment
to the
auditor 's report
that
made
-
client ltherls
affect
contents of an LOE ;
)
O
opinion
( express
)
o
objective of an audit
description of
→
prepare
FS ,
→
audit
FS )
auditor
o
)
reference to
07
emphasis that
I can
A
all
applicable
audits
auditors
will
company 's
records
state that
the
certain
(
07
depend
show
&
on
internal
a
true & fair view)
sampling
not
,
guarantee
a
assurance )
report
auditor 's
about
control
reporting framework
unrestricted
full explanation
auditor 's
matters
up
they expect
that
state
set
financial
only give reasonable
addressees of the
07
the FS
define responsibilities
( management
07
whether or not
on
to
any
is a matter
to the
access
queries that they
between
them
report ( members of the
&
have
the
company
)
planning the audit
arranging interim audit & final audit
,
counts,
organising external
internal
audit
attending the inventory
confirmation
of receivables
should
estimate
,
liaison with
department )
fees
( Should
not
be
absolute,
be
an
but
subject to
proviso )
) description of expected relationship
o
( work of internal
auditors)
audit
b/w external
may be reviewed
he
auditor a internal audit
relied
on
by
external
777
LLAAUUDDHTT PPKAANN MMM
IS A 300 Planning
an
Importance of
audit
:
Audit of Financial
Statements
planning ]
ability to carry the audit effectively
o
ability to
°
[ objectives
of
o
up with
come
and a detailed
give appropriate
:
identify
leg
attention
to more
important areas
high volume of cash transactions are debtors particularly significant?)
,
potential problems
changes in accounting system)
.
°
carry out the work expeditiously → efficiently r quickly
°
ensure that the
°
coordinate
( e.g
-
°
approach
adequate planning )
( for example
o
general strategy
right
numbers a right skills
are
in the team
with other parties
with
internal audit
department I
facilitate the direction a supervision
I work done by trainees
→
of staff
that's
→
seniors
why it's important
to review the work
review the work
of the audit team and
-7
managers → partner)
to schedule
,
so
there is
enough time
.
Mom
urdershandingtanhng
•
l
l
l
l
l
l
,
thee
antitype
,
-
-
-
a.
.
"
l
l
-
l
y
Nature of the entity
→
r
Which sector does the biz
operate in
e
?
Regulations
→
what
regulations are to be
met
by
the
company
?
Accounting policies
→
we
need
→
to understand
to allow
the
the
entity 's accounting policies
assurance that
provide reasonable
entity is operating efficiently
us to
Nature of business risks
→
inherent risks
→
( unavoidable , most
businesses have this
financial consequences → affect the FS
Internal controls
→
whether
they exist
to
,
what extent
they
are
expected
to
operate
control environment
→
context
in
which the internal
controls
operate
Financial performance
→
performance assists
pressure
on
of material
the
auditors in
considering
management to act in any way
misstatements
that
whether
increases
they put
the risks
iuat.net#a*
example of an audit timetable
1
January
31
planning visit
December
Year end
-
t
procedures
#
T
interim
T
audit
Final audit
( more direct checking of balances )
Planning
visit
a
client
audit team
would visit
0
agree with
0
enquire on changes that may have taken place after the previous audit
a
when the
.
Interim audit
o
typically
o
auditor to carry out
happens in July
→ ensure
°
might
send
tests
that the
-
for
FY ended
31
December )
of controls
internal
system of
management
a
August
control
letter to report
as
any
they
understand it
weaknesses I
deticiencie
Year end procedures
-
0
carry
out the
→
Value
physical
count
of
inventory
inventory included
of
in the FS
will be based
on
physical quantities
Final audit
o
client should have
o
auditor will
→
be
express
prepared the FS
concentrating
a
conclusions
on
obtaining sufficient appropriate
on the
FS
audit evidence
v I
audience
risks
N
.
L
an
cannot
be reduced to zero as
audit
cannot
i
provide absolute
27
GO.AUyd.lt
risk
o
o
opinion on the FS
IT
IS
°
A
gives an inappropriate
that the
draft
contain
a
audit
procedures are
detect it,
involve suagement
designed to
so
audit needs to be conducted
reasonable time frame
examine
( ROMM )
-
\
fail to
that the FS are
published with the misstatements
present
not to
fraud deliberately concealed
reasonable cost -7
FS
,
at
within
a
impossible to
everything exhaustively
.
material
risk that the auditors
still
usually
a
misstatements
o
0
.
actually
accounting estimates
which
detect
FUNCTION OF 2 RISKS :
risk
FS should include
gather audit evidence
✓
the auditor
To :
inherent limitations
( only reasonable assurances
assurance
DUE
( detection risk)
risk that the
error
in the first place
risk that
occurs
inherent)
the client 's
don't
pick
own
procedures
up
and correct the error
( control )
AAAs
&
O
IF
⇐
Eng
Ggg
O
E
Sg
Q
Isis
.
G q
•
⇐
&&o
I
EEE
E
S
-
t
f
.
.
.⇐÷
.
it
5
s
EEE
s
s
s
Gott
Es
Fo
a
£8
SO
E
of
%
I
Z
SF
.
-
S
°
-
-
OS
E. 5g
E #
88
Sg S
IIe §
S
-
.
§
S
S
•
o
S
Is
§
g- •
s
a
8
s
-
E
I. SS
s Qs
s
@
If
§I§×
⇐ SI
⇐ §
g
•
•
.
I
§
n
@
In
•
O
I
.
O
88.8
S
§§§
I Is
q
I
S
-
S
§
a
I
F- I
IS
E
@
•
--
as
So
I
.
+
S
§
€
I
.
I
Is ?
E Eg
g
g
s
1-
Es
.
IS
§
F
80
=3
.
f
t
=
a
ET
-
35
In
3
Eg
s
S
x
s
← I
f
F
s
.
I
.
±
.
-.
S
↳
-
s
S
s
← I
F
.
,
n
s
§
S
S
t
a
o
§
a
S
EE
s
EE
E
ES
8£
§
S
to E
so
5
I
§§
SAE
.
.
to -
-
+08
I
.
I
.
-
'
Bt
EX
083
of
I
9- I
f
n
-1
& b
S
I
Is
0
is
SEE
SOS
+
↳
-
I.
I.
,
EX
-
SO
I
-
I. 88
=.
g
I
.
%
BEE
-
3€
a
S
8 +
•
BE
.
& If
9-
Ap
n
u
-
-
⇐
E
I
I
o .
-
e
.
s
S
f
-
§
So
I
•
E
-
+
§
-
IS
1-
s
-
5
>
+
§
-
+
S
s
•
.
.
+
g
O
- -
-
=
a
•
a-
-
3
I
s
9 I
-
y
s
g-
I
no
.
@
-
s
80
E
-
a
§ o
s
a
S
o
-
IE
S
n
s
s
-
S
-
8
I
.
I @
.
s
s
-
↳
s
o
IS
QI
In
OSS
-
I
S
O
u
S
-
•
e
s
S
3
s
t
&
-
3
II
o
E
I @
o
S
-
e
1-
E
I
O
s
S
.
I
S
g
-
o
t
-
S
Sy 9Q
s
E
§
-
.
-
S
@
as
a
I. Ss
=D
35505
3
- -
IS
Ss 5€
- GQ
I
1-
S
II
@
I. •
so
↳
-
→
f
g-
08
-
E- En
Is ok
g
g
-
S
d
s
So
-
s
is
5.
S
o
I
.
O
53.89
s
is
s
a #
s
D
-
Ms
x SS
•
n
-
B n
#
S
a
3
I
.
S
* ¥:
88nF
I
.
88×8
u
↳
S
I
-
.
I
.
a
s
-
as
-
O
O
t
if
l
-
±
s
T
-
a
c'
•
§
÷
g
G
&
g
-
T
E
I
O
•
S
-
F
-
-1
E
a
.
S
-
S
I
→
X
g
y
XX
-
ng
b
's =
- o
S
S
83
M
- .
S
I
&
S
1-
•
o
n
§
4
I.
E
o
i
•
O
O
'
o
S
S
-
.
I
38
•
S
a
*
&
a
I
so
to
-
O
I
n
a-
so
g
It §
O
s
S
-
I @
=
-
E
o
3
. .
1-
use
o
1O
↳
.
3
s
<
@
Is
t
§§
a
S I
gs
.
→
SEE
8
-
IS
E
SIO ES
- E
@ § Is ±
0
8
o
-
J
S
on
-
g
C
p
D
as
-
.
'
G -08
f
,
-
-
1-
o
-
t
s
n
s
±
o
sp
EG
g
•
85858
a
O
S
@
=
-
Sg
s
S
§ d
is
no
-
n
-
g- SE
-
g
.
o
8
s
s
Q -
SIG I
I
-
SIS
33
•
×
S @
Eg Is 7-
O
-
D
of S
•
WHERE TO FIND ROMM ?
Assertion level
Any single figure which appears in the FS
! ! nature , timing
extent
and
of audit
l that meet the objectives 's
-
procedures
must be
designed
A , E , c , co pro ,
,
to the
to respond
PAD
assessed risks
financial statement level
risks that relate to the Financial statements as a whole a potentially affect many assertions
(risk
arising from fraud 1 deficient control environment significant doubts about going
concern)
,
Auditor 's response
may include;
assigning more experienced audit staff
07
07
07
designing
audit
exercising
greater supervision
procedures
Ahuuddiit Evidence
EVIDENCE
Analytical procedures
*
used
→
to evaluate
Sufficient
Appropriate
an
-
-
-
'
Ethel
go
calculating
o
last
*
0
evidence
°
Written >
oral
o
originals
>
is better
conclusion
comparing the
procedure
the
when
Financial
statements
.
financial & non financial data
b/w
-
amounts
a
ratios to :
overtime
g.
( ISA 3004315 )
→
planning
,
÷,÷÷÷÷÷,÷÷÷
, ; .ge
.
final review
on
entity 's records
directly 7 passed on by
client
when there's good internal
photocopies
on
any 's Financial statements
quality of audit evidence ( relevance & reliability )
with respect to
reliability ;
evidence obtained
as a
overall
maeyxgm.in/ygaYka!%7ena!Ian:!:Igg:{ inainaei.com
→
>
review
performed
an
→
quantity of audit evidence
°
be
Forming
year results
audit opinion
external evidence
~
Budgets
°
reasonable conclusions
o
* must
plausible relationships
ratios →
,
which
work
& re performance
SUFFICIENT APPROPRIATE
AUDIT EVIDENCE LISA 500)
to base
predictable
l
inspection
|§gggg,
able to draw
audit
less
Observation
Recalculation
to be
over
b
Enquiry & confirmation
GATHERING
are
raising
d
Analytical procedures
The vowels of
that
control
USA 5207
,
.
. ..
.. .. . . . . .
. . . .. . .
. . . . .. . .
.{¥
⇐
a
is
E
=
§
O
o
o
0
S
*
⇐
g
3
.
s
n
⇐
s
S
I
S
,
s
±
.
a
3
a
=
D
X
S
I
t
±
.
I
g
g
-
§
=
.
-
E
ooo
O
o
s
a
e
E
E
S
g
o
0
-
§
S
D
.
e
.
A
8
I
.
↳
a
¥
s
§
S
C
s
.
M
IS
I
%
I
¥
§
I
I
Breakdown
IS A
"
^
(
assertions
of
315 :
management
.
.
balances
and
fall
the
Into
.
disclosures
EF
s
§
E
age
v
)
Completeness THE
→
all
Assertions
transactions
(TIE )
cut off
→ transactions
( Balances )
,
~
,
and
that
events
recognition measurement
the
auditor to
the
consider
presentation of
and
,
by
used
the
different types
classes
of
and
of transactions
misstatements
potential
events
,
account
occur
may
that
"
appropriately
recorded
been
have
amounts
.
following two categories
Accuracy HIE )
→
regarding
assertions
makes
should
been
properly measured
and
described
too
ALOE items
to
applicable
disclosures have
related
a
been
have
recorded I disclosed
have
been
recorded ' disclosed
-
events
and
been
have
recorded
T
Balances )
valuation (
Allocated
→
→
→
,
accuracy
.
and
assets , liabilities
any
resulting valuation
related
disclosures
Classification
and
→
transactions
and
→
transactions
and
→
relevant
Occurrence
→
equity
events
the
adjustments
allocation
measured
the correct
at
in
recorded
are
correct
the
to
are
are
relevant
and
and
events
liabilities
and
entity holds
or
recorded
.
recorded ,
°
actually
( or disaggregated) and
clearly described ,
occurred
and
pertain to the
entity
( Balances )
rights
to
assets
,
and liabilities
are
the
obligations of the entity
o
-
.
•
equity interests exist
controls the
Cut Ott
•
understandable
have
Balances
Occurrence
AWE "em '
accounts
appropriately aggregated
events
TIE
and
described
and
applicable
amounts ,
appropriately
are
"
accounting period
appropriate
( Tre )
Rights n obligations
→
included
Present
disclosures
transactions
assets ,
are
appropriately
are
)
Existence ( Balances
→
or
interests
in
Both
Existence
•
Rights h
obligations
.
Valuation
Allocation
Accuracy
completeness
classist
'
o
-
cation
.
presentation
AAUUDDHTTSSAAMMPPLUMN
involves :
process
sample
0
sample
o
design ( specific population
)
risk)
SIZE ( sufficient enough to reduce sampling
method)
sample selection
( test of controls I test of details)
o
performing audit procedures
I choose
O
o
evaluate
a
sample results ( investigate
"
errors
"
,
conclude
on
the
population )
Ithaca sampling
o
o
regarded as random
use probability theory to evaluate
must be
sample results including
,
sampling
selection
Random
* remove
*
o
o
bias
obtain a representative
( interval 's
Systematic
approximation
to
*
convenient
*
risk OF bias
*
not a
*
# 1
o
to
a
OF
samples
-
-
amount :
monetary
amounts
51001
$1,25015250
$3.105
intervals, :{so
$605 - $1.855
x
* increase the
4
4
random
$4,355
3rd
sample
2nd
sample
sample
chance
of
4th
sample
selecting higher
value
transactions → direct testing to where there's
appear
in
statistical
,
characteristics
each
'
sub
sub
-
populations
'
-
greatest potential of
*
value
any invoice
is
sampling
sequence of samples
testing
evaluated separately
results
of
1St
Stratification
into different
* divide population
*
-
interval
interval
# 20)
with similar
interval selection based on
selection
sample
representative sample
( blocking
sampling
monetary unit
no
selection
Block
monetary unit sampling
example Total receivables : $5,000
invoices
( consciously I unconsciously pick
less work
correct
to
→
be
Which
cannot be used
selection
weighted
:
Haphazard selection
to do )
0
th
-
* uses
pure random
1000
( selecting every
0
o
,
selection
'
value
* used in
sample
120 randomly selected samples
represents a population of
200,000)
*
of
methods
selection
°
measurement
risk
population must be
misstatement
.
which exceeds the interval,
guaranteed to be selected
evaluate
o
sample
results
controls
performs test of
For each
→ binary outcome
k
x
deviation
effective
applied)
( control not
applied )
( control
selected
item
? acceptable ?
→
develop an expectation
performing test of
before
controls
deviations
consider the reasons for
anomalous
→ some might be
.
-
IF
excluding
the
anomalous errors
,
increase sample
> expectation
the deviation rate
deviation rate is
:
→
new
sample size ,
lower than
→ new
sample
higher
rely
expected →
size ,
Ok
deviation rate
than expected →
can
control → perform
on the
substantive procedures
of
details , concerned with monetary amounts
be quantified)
can
Found
( any misstatements
selected items
→ test of
example :
Total
purchases
sample
deviation rate
errors
IF ,
error >
deviation rate
to
between threshold
amount -7
remaining
test
a
→
=
need to decide
larger sample
16 .
ooo
12% OF population )
$
5,
600
,
=
-
:
x
Wahoo may
4 , too
of
which
$1,500
$4, 100
-
-
anomaly
overpricing
x
Imaekeanoo"maY
-
sample
( 800,000
→ portion
-
1,500 )
-
270 , 000
12, 125
potential
→
-
-
$
Actual error
whether to accept or extend the
on
-
$270 , 000
population
'
&
-
$800 , 000
projection :
adjust
IF there's some difference
we need
-
misstatement is
less than
$16,000
=
$13 625 1$12, 125 t
.
conclude that the
Fsu
$1.500 )
is
Not
materially misstated
not
add
.
internal control
Recording
the client's
accounting system
→
provide basis for evaluating
→
3 ways
o
recording the system
of
Narrative
NOTES
explain
47
design of internal controls
the
process of certain things
the
etc )
invoices
are
prepared
relatively quick
to
I
prepare by observing enquiring
(e.g
4,
:
.
how
,
client
cows
Tack of structure or discipline
in
( documents may be mentioned
but
Flowcharts
•
shows
that
diagram
Lp
CONS
= slower to produce &
•
Questionnaires
record the
naps to
up
what happens to these documents ?
tiles calculations
are recorded
as
system as well
accounting
YES
"
preferably
→
answers
(e g
'
.
are
suppliers invoices
cancelled when they're
→ seek out
specific
-
paid )
?
internal
"
→
Internal control
Of
The control environment
with which
o essentially the
regard
o
the
ethics and the culture of
trained
recruited
,
are
now
people
c. g
structure of the
responsibility
→
r
management
°
how
o
estimate
the
→
The
significance
controls
→
risks
risks
of those
invoices be
'
twice ? I
ended
flexible
objectives
a
→
address internal
control
requires greater
skill set
→
-
?
go wrong
"
?
How do i prevent it from happening
system
whether
is
held
.
internal control
is
observed
by management a staff
which
o
the use of journal entries
might
arise
and the likelihood
that are
occurring
?
electronic procedures
manual a
the risks
identified ?
a
records that
initiate , record process
,
and
report transactions
estimates
Information needed for accounting
so
Control activities
policies
Monitoring
o
answers
suppliers
what could
information system
o
→
material
would address
o
°
"
more open
and
organisation
No
→
the internal control
process
assesses
47 what to do about it
↳ what
27
"
organisation
accountability of the STAFF
risk assessment
The
can
.
paid
controls
Components
controls
design of internal
the
evaluate
Internal control evaluation
Questionnaire ( ICE Q)
control
Questionnaire ( ICQ)
( e.g
establish
l
Internal
"
to
difficult to amend
more
preferably
performed
and checks that are
control risks
tip helps
reduce
where checks are performed
l
→
)
,
systems
on now
rules to show
→ has specific
-
the documents , the
Imposes great discipline
47
gathering
evidence
not used in the
the narrative notes
can be
and
see next page
procedures
that
help
ensure that
management
directives are carried out
controls
monitored
by
supervisors → managers → Finance directors → audit committee
control activities
segregation of duties
→
separating the responsibilities for authorising
transactions , recording transactions
and
having custody of assets
→
segregation of duties →
checks a Mgmt supervision
greater need for independent
entities
in smaller
Authorisation
transactions should be
→
comparison
→ constant
GR Ns
leg comparing
.
→
backing up of
→
once
to be
"
a
against
if
.
Pos )
"
system it's liable
gets into computerised
automated From then on
common sense
they occur, to be discovered
frequently
data
transaction
-
approved by appropriate person
comparison allows error
computer controls
stress for
there is usually less
,
applied
to be
,
and there is less
chance
for
later
transaction
to that
Arithmetic controls
→
ensure that simple calculations are correct
Extracting TBS
&
maintaining
it the TB ¥ balance
→
or
control accounts
don't reconcile
control accounts
Accounting reconciliations
reconciliation
→
=
process of ensuring
agree
differences must be
→
that
2
sets of
then
records from
something
is
amiss
different sources
accounted for
that are often
Physical
over certain assets
established
→ physical
safeguards must be
desirable ,
→
such
portable
assets
are
,
Valuable
liable to
Performance Review
go missing
against budget
actual performance
data
→ reviewing
data to operating
→
relating Financial
a
I prior
period
controls
Inherent limitations of internal
benefit
cost vs
may be greater
control system
establishing an internal
needs
supervision ?
→ what
→
cost of
than
the
benefits
Human error
not
on
purpose
collusion
to
employees cooperate
→ 2 or more
system
carry
to
→
in
→
of duties
segregation
up a
I cover
fraud
out
in #
=
circumvent the internal control
mistake
OF staff to collude
=L risk
the
override ( bypass )
interest of
Management
out in the best
carried
situations , may be
→ in dire
'
'
company
if it's
however ,
→
Non routine
-
common
a
→
occurrence
are not
controls
transactions
transactions fall outside
→ relatively
automated)
(may be highly
working
transactions
routine
rare
TESTS
OF
controls
Internal
ya
NOT enough
to be
alone
performed
Enquiry
the effectiveness
management on
→ enquire
→
examples
:
o
ask
0
ask
processes
employees on the hiccups during unusual
it there
any
are
circumstances
look for evidence
in the
,
minutes of
inspection
for evidence
look
→
example : inspect file
of
Observation
→
watch
employees
carry
Re performance
→ re perform employees
it the results
are
'
paid supplier
out
work
the
procedures
invoices
"
for
"
PAID stamps
procedures
as
same
work ? )
meetings
control
internal
of
→
does it still
approval process
leave ,
on
( staff
→
internal controls
of the
according to company
's
policy to see
control
Reporting on internal
the internal control
Auditors find that
→
send
management
÷÷i
letter 1 letter of weakness
pp
weakness 1 deficiency exists
is
control
o
designed
T
such control
o
is
,
not
board of the
to
operating efficiently
(or AC )
company
,
in
way that
a
it's
u n
able to
-
0
o
States the
doubts
raises
competence
about
Auditors
will
weaknesses
"
,
the
( failure
to take
example
problem
can
be
OF those
may exist
→
problems might be
:
consequence
:
supplier invoices net
cancelled
:
double
when
"
recommendation : stamp PAID
once invoices
fixed
not have
duty of the
found
that there is
system
of internal
within
the
ALL control
an
control
adequate
operating
company
www.AH
0g
.
IN
.
Board of directors to
ensure
"t
paid
payment
are paid
normally say that they may
others
of TCWG
.
corrective action )
problem
implications 1 consequences
how
merit the attention
management's
problem
Recommend
timely
: ÷÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷:÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷:: :e.ie#:::r:.:.:::e:ici::e::::au
or
the
correct
misstatements
prevent
importance to
O
States
&
missing
structure of the letter ;
O
also
detect
ya
when :
implemented operated
::*:*:c:::c::*: :":innit
*
inadequate /
is
system
#
a
YOU !
:)
"
Accounting systems
A. Purchases systems
the process
Diagram to illustrate
Document :
Document :
invoice from
Document:
approved PO
qpw
t
t
Ordering
receiving the goods
In general
needed
goods are only
at
competitive prices, at required
suppliers
ordered from authorised
ordered
o
o
o
type
goods received
notes
o
invoices
are
matched
o
invoices
are
entered into
AP
o
payments
properly
made
B. Sales
are
to
Delivery note
t
orders
received
the goods
a
despatch
good internal system
are
accepted From credit worthy
promptly despatched
o
goods
o
goods
,
bank
invoice
receiving
customers
received by customers
are
deliveries
invoices
are
o
payment
is
o
receipts from
promptly & accurately
invoiced
are
entered
o
received
properly into
are
customers
the AR
Ledger
due
when
are
credit control procedures
o
Document :
cheque
accurately recorded
outstanding
targeted at long
receivables
Payroll systems
C.
t
New
In general
,
employees
are
o
employees
are
o
hours
•
overtime
is
•
Net pay
and
o
payments
0
leavers are
o
wages 1 salaries
good internal system
a
hired
only
and deductions
will aim to ensure;
as
paid correctly
are
worked
→
a
employees
accurately
necessary
recorded
authorised
deductions
are
made
promptly
are
correctly
removed
accurately
to the
from
the
calculated
employees
,
the
govt
wages systems
,
others
receipt LTT)
→
raising the
-
all
orders
t
will aim to ensure;
orders
°
and
Document :
invoice to customer
Document:
approved PO
,
CGRN )
condition )
,
ledger
t
o
quantity
,
systems
Document :
In general
making payment
quantity & quality
time ,
( correct
goods received as expected
booked into inventory
o
→
j
receiving the invoice
when
ordered
o
Document :
approved invoice
will aim to ensure;
good internal system
a
,
supplier
timely
leavers
payment
D. Inventory systems
purchases
overlap with
sp
AP
t
receive
In general
a
,
store
with
sales
→
despatch goods
goods
will aim to ensure;
good internal system
misappropriated I stolen
cannot be
goods
o
a
goods
overlap
goods cannot be damaged
identification OF obsolete l slow moving items
o
-
o
with
goods are only despatched
o
•
inventory records
0
the
'
correct
'
cut
-
approval
complete & accurate
is established
are
off
E. Cash systems
sales
overlap with
overlap
t
o
F
hold 1 bank
received is accurately recorded
cash
securely
promptly & intact
o
cash is
held
o
cash is
banked
o
only
•
all
can be made
authorised payments
payments
Non
-
accurately
are
recorded
systems
current assets
.
overlap
cash
with
,
purchases & inventory
overlap
a
Depreciate
purchases
o
as
inventory
o
as
sales
control
( specific
objectives
o
all assets
o
assets
documents
be
to
non
-
approved
and
adequately
maintained
title
safely kept
of
are
&
completely
accurate
+
records
as
an
asset
according to their useful
insured
( FA
accurately recorded
include ;
assets)
recognised
maintain
and
safeguarded
current
are
completely t accurately recorded
authorised and
appropriately depreciated
are
are
be
must
capital expenditures
only
must be
must
assets
disposals
-
o
o
acquisitions
-
-
Dispose
will aim to ensure;
good internal system
as
o
→
a
Acquire
,
with
Ohashi sales
t
In general
payment
will aim to ensure;
good internal system
a
,
all
→
a
receive cash
In general
with
old purchases
lives
listing )
Computer System controls
control activities
Types of
i.
←
controls
Application
o
designed to
integrity of
the
ensure
£
,
→
the
I
important
,
i.
→
,
,
.
generally aim
gets
into
2
a
to
ensure
→
example employee changing
controls
very
completeness
CC ) &
accuracy
CA )
0
met
3
.
data
much
method
are
standing data
over
example
→
sequence checks CC )
a sequence
checking the completeness of
of pre numbered documents before
r
processed
they are input
:
→
we
selling price 1 unit
checks
processing has been done &
to be odd 1 out of
if processing appears
edit
-
the month , will the
include
checks
range
:÷÷:: ÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷:
i
one
-
-
for
-
one
checks
CC )
( AKC )
add up the value of
'
'
run
-
to run
-
control
cnet.me?gf-: i: i:ri:n: n: z: :a:i n.an
on the
from
totals
balance
input
the
ART invoices
s
sing =
and
processing run
one
from the second
totals
pro Ce
-
the 2nd processing
from
results
-
the
-
.
AR
4
.
Output
IF batch
the results
processing
pre determined
are
control total
does not
odd runs
complete & accurate
agree the total
is used,
-
IF
of the
scrutinised regularly by
logs should be
responsible official to look for
controls
→ ensure that
>
level description
logs
run
a
against the system
transaction logs
give a high
processing that was performed
run
-
documents
logs &
run
closing balance on
before they 're input to double
check
end of
-
-
control totals
-
"
checking that every hourly paid
employee has submitted a clock
card
o
O
opening
checks ,
pay be
the
?
run
include :
-
"
o
:
methods
towards
is sick
accountant
example if
CA)
incorrect data
wages
what
want to know
sequence
examining the data For content & format
to identify unfeasible I otherwise
-
basic
,
steps to check it
take deliberate
indication
→
change
used I referred many times
is
:
-
Edit
data , does not
reference
=
but
Processing controls
-
O
their
:
standing
→
methods include :
o
.
data will be processed to conclusion
it incorrect →
general
salary
intervention
human
support many applications
because →
o
:
often there is no
system
computerised
further
transaction
once a
→
unauthorised
up files antivirus programs
preventive 1 detective
will be
controls
development
of
,
applied on
)
(
preventive
1. initiation of input
generally
access of the
records ,
programs , prevention of
back
changes to the systems maintaining
accounting records
the
the
over
its
&
computers
manual 1 automated
o
General IT controls
controls
Include
0
output to
establish completeness
to
be an
agree → investigated
( there might
's
exception report
→
¢
no
'
'
'
data no
File
→
rejected
→ can be
distributed
results
of
trans
-
→ missed
resubmitted
( output
→ ensure that the
file
data
'
control )
processing are properly
,
input
o
Audit
→
→
programs
used
to
can be
quickly
can
zp
used :
Cee, example
re
-
data
so
auditor
→
-
perform
'
1 balances
odd transactions
AR
ledger
.
slow
moving inventory
calculations
easily
could
not
those
predictions
be tested
other
way
'
program
the
chosen
specifically
criteria
investigate
stratified
on the
balances
credit
:
according to the
data
used to investigate the operation of accounting programs that
's
designs dummy data to be processed by the client program
to check that
→
accounting
be set to identify
program might
-
→
'
automatically
be
samples
have
-
Test
.
clients
to
select samples of transactions
-
°
thousands OF records examining each
read
interrogate
and
examine
techniques )
audit
assisted
( computer
CA A- Ts
Traditional
techniques
and
Automated tools
to
works
what the
auditor should predict
present
are
check that the controls
do
should
program
then
a
compare
with
what
the
produces
program actually
Data
analytics
-7
science of
→
commonly
examining
used
o
data
raw
to
draw conclusions
data
analytics tools
compare
purchase
1
→
cost INRV
purposes
in
Inventory age
o
AR IAP
o
analysis
of
revenue
o
analysis
of
Ram
°
3
-
risk assessment
analytical procedures for substantive procedures
:
selling price
a
°
ageing
routines
→
as
well
overdue
as
trend
by
expenses
vs
( invoice
way match
,
PO
,
items
item 1
region
capital expenditures
GRN )
a
RR@cfeeivvaabb
A- ④ ⑧UUA#SS
assertions :
Relevant
Existence
①
a presentation
Rights r obligations classification
,
.
Completeness
Accuracy
,
Allocation
,
.
Valuation
and
email
Fy goof
"
73 4 M G B P 0 9
AR
test
AR ledger to
Analyse
0
listing
the AR
essential
the older the
provide good
-
greater the
payment
-
.
play
→
might be
quality quantity
→ there
ongoing
an
→
,
on
amount
the
change
balance may
I amount
ROMM is
-
→
usually
→
generally
an
indicator of the
a
,
→
notes
receivables
invoices and
Trace
→
proof that the
ledger
has been
procedures)
→
IF
the
=
scrutinise
→
allowed to send
the
credit Notes
issued
during
to
after
year end
-
a
selected
at random ,
that
in some time
have not moved
Disagreements
gain more
along with
credit balances
,
timing and error
may arise due to
assurance)
balances
or
Nll
,
t
cash in
-
transits
-
-
OR
goods in
-
ptorb88EhEbI
reverse the invoices
I
( riskier balances )
has to be reconciled
-
receive the
'
'
balance ,
0
are
account
-7
might have to
receivable is still not received
Cws may be raised
the year
made
the
,
some balances
good Bo
debts
for allowance for doubtful
o
are
only auditor
o
.
-
auditor
o
in AR
received i should not be
.
authorisation I
balance,
book Dr entries
requests
's
usually include management
to
to disclose confidential Information
encouragement
will usually target higher
details )
-
ignore
expected
confirmations
of
tests of detail )
cash
not
smaller balances '
the
to
will
the
notes '
dispatch
obtain evidence
→
examine after date receipts ( analytical end
is received after year
→ IF the receivable
o
,
o
paid invoices to
amount
verify the
goods
invoices
→
in the order file to
from
o
are
low ,
misstatement is
when risk of
customers
bad news
=
suitable
of
large proportion
detail )
1 Tests of
the AR
-
effectiveness of
the
of amount receivable
receipts
(tests of
to
order received
and
exist
completeness
°
period
amounts
if the customer disagrees
requests a reply ONI
-
of
,
measure on
longer collectibility
Test recent orders
copy of
-
disputed
Negative confirmation
receivables / day
Tales
-
handful of receivables
dispatch
•
a
no
M
period
collect ibility of the AR a
the credit control
Trace
0
collection
error
o
procedures
'
the
expected
suspicion of irregularity
°
-
examine
high
high
is
internal controls,
weak
when ;
°
analytical
minutes
° scrutinise the board
should be
which may be going bad ,
→ large receivables
in board discussions
in AR
reflected
days sales
o
misstatement
of
suitable when risk
,
( whether they
not)
agree or
-
be recoverable
may not
suspicions)
:
everyone
requests a reply from
analytical procedures
-
receivable,
valuation of the
positive confirmation
-
a
of
verify the amount to
will
confirmation requests
types of
TWO
o
risk of
customers
disputes
on the
( as to not raise
for time
.
with
evidence
customer in debt
a
→
'
correspondence
o scrutinise
existence
receivable
non
be
debt needs to
allowance for doubtful
increase)
l as days overdue
calculated ( increase
'
-
accuracy
does not
!
directly to the auditor
the
on
and its
analytical procedures
for valuations
debt -7 the
→
-7
o
account
AR control
the
the
on
balances
sum of the
Reconcile the
provides good evidence
o
PROCEDURES
"
"
-
asking customers to respond
owed
to confirm the amount
o
&
OTHER
°
EXTERNAL CONFIRMATION
# involves
to
procedures
some
are
the
balances
"
What
about the
worry
OVERSTATEMENT of
Mel
o
As
a
business
transits
request
customer
( with
client 's
another confirmation or
approval , to protect the
relationship
b/w
client
and
last resort,
phone the
-
auditor may
customer)
AACC
a presentation
Rights r obligations classification
,
.
Completeness
Accuracy
,
reconcile
o
scrutinise
the sum
appear
on
AP
the
Scrutinise the board
→
Ledger
but
over the amount.
-
from PO
→
0
ensure
to
Trace from
events
that
is not
yet
o
and
completeness
cut
cut
accurate
-
indicator of how fast
company pays its suppliers
→
longer period
versa
vice
payments &
cash book
-
end
in
a
'
payable
having trouble paying
company might
liabilities
and
as
miss out
PapYura7n÷
,
when
cash
on
accrued
I day
they're due
discounts
given
early payments
For
perform
'
balances to suppliers statements
reconciliations of individual
verify the completeness be properly accounted For
→
to
→
all
must
reconciling items
-
cash
-
in
-
transit
confirm that
shortly after
-
-
goods
-
in
-
on
payment appears
year
statements
the bank
end
transit
been
goods have
confirm that
the
IF received
before year
-
end,
disputed invoices
should
valid, the invoice
received after year
ensure the
be
amount is
cancelled with
a
-
auditor may use external confirmation
to
request
end
accrued
CN From
1,
→
AP)
off
offouttakes
the
→
→
CCR
suppliers
have to be
the balances
,
→
payment period
=
outcome
claim
legal
identify year
→
-
examine the
:
the
occurred but
have
off
after date payments
included in the AP
→ if not
Review
o re
-
may not
determined
credit entries in
and
to invoices
GRN
credit entries ( Cr AP ) to
→ to ensure
o
to
that
amounts
by suppliers
claimed
example
0 Trace
AP control account
to the
minutes
contingent liabilities
any
For
balances
suppliers
with
correspondence
may be ongoing disputes
→ there
0
of the individual
.
Valuation
and
Allocation
,
ftp.BBYehftaaresomeproggaures-io
o
-
balances
assertions :
Relevant
Existence
Yow ;r¥asa7a:¥mEhfot me
Ppaayyaabblke
uunn#
direct evidence
supplier
AA #rruuaallss
pprreeppaayymmeennttss
*
T
T
AR 's Friend
AP 's friend
Relevant
Existence
a presentation
Rights r obligations classification
,
.
Completeness
qfppfq.qepqfehsfta.9mafsomepr.ro
assertions :
,
Accuracy
,
: amines torso compare
.
Valuation
and
Allocation
'
www.nagmeaaiisng
year figures
to last
prepayments
pareffamymafn.is#/-F
20×0 I
20×0
-
121000
13,000
-
pattern
,
we can expect
o
amounts are
usually similar
the amounts
-
around the
to be accrued 1 prepaid
same time too
is
change
that doesnt
often
likely to be a periodic
→ since there's
,
usually there
a periodic pattern
:
y
y
.
scrutinise payments made shortly before latter year end
-
Accruals
→
it the
look
,
end to see
payments made after year
pertain to period covered
at
-
by the FS
made
payments
( 20 XO )
→
prepayments
see
it
( some
o
perform
→
look
,
at
payments
made
before year end to
correct period
-
services paid for pertain to the
the
partially pertain
could
to 20×0-11 )
analytical procedures
example : analyse the overall
IF an
-
expenses
level
or
-
widely → might
expense varies
difference in payment
a
year on year
date
→
-
ES
are
swor9d4Mh
'
o
drawn
prepayment → ensure that the
the prince
the accruals / matching
goods received not invoiced
→ there
→
payables balances
goods
since the
1
will be recorded
liability
purchase
Dr inventory
Cr
-
must
supplier
A
in
'
,
,
but since the
becomes
Dr
inventory
not invoiced
goods received
letter From
e. g
.
all
statement
inventory the corresponding
-
been
invoice has not
the directors to
received
.
accrual
letter of representation
→
when
be recorded
it
Cr
o
AP
sing
"eoogni
as
expenses
they
accrual
may be timing differences b/w suppliers
balances and
D a
i.ie/
the
and
the auditors
making certain representations
Financial statements
in the
liabilities have been accounted For
based
c. not
're
occur
they
when
on
paid)
need for accrual
up using
"
""
be due to
owvoemfsia enema inventory
HAW @
nnttoryy
assertions :
Relevant
Existence
a presentation
Rights r obligations classification
Completeness
$71
Accuracy
,
,
Valuation
and
Allocation
business that manufactures
Inventory is usually material For
→
directly
→
in
affects
particular
the
0
is
and
cc
quantity of the inventory
of old
-
do during
what auditors should
a STOCK take
to
ascertain this
!!:{Ignites!! em!! :O:
"
.
•
checks
→
listing
to
Floor to
listing
→
some
floor
cut off
•
inventory
sheets
opening
opening
( less )
cogs
110 , 0001
:
COGS
-
closing
:
closing
15,000
20,000
Revenue :
(less)
COGS
:
( less )
( 10,000 )
COGS
-
"
l9'°¥go¥
u , 000
Gross
10,000
Gross
than
NRV
→
what
the
NRV
→
costs
may
include :
i.
will
"
-
IE
o
→
→
in
profit would be
purchase'
adjustments
purchases
incorrect
perform closing inventory
correct
→
to adjust purchases
profit
in 20×0
or sales
Coas → correct
of
the
sales
whether
x
'
overheads )
-
SHELF 01A
I PKT
28
,
sea
page ,
inventory
:
:
Dr
or
at the
purchase
not the
costs are
invoice )
lower I higher
Invoices
-
agreed to costing
.
,
show
consider whether
inventory
client 's
premises
the treatment
inventory
or
AP
Dr
AR
or
inventory
'
accounts
and the
but for every
value the
should Follow
records
quantity
For specialised inventory
recognise purchase
payable'
←
over
down below cost
need to be written
retail
→
goods , consider the
for
)
sale
(
Jm⇐II÷÷÷¥wNesw"aIIFo
,
inventory , not
in
has to
"
received before Year end
circumstances, goods
→ on normal
ab les
purchases & pay
can be found in inventory
:
,
:f"""µ"# /
ftp.YR
returned
in For the Closing inventory
$ , added , $1
put
balance
always
question of ownership
→ goods may be held at
)
-
been
determined by looking
( including
can be
→
o
be
costs unit
value =
management
o
,
cut off ( purchases
have
agreed to suppliers
-
costs
conversion
.
profit
profit
↳
numbered
sheets
inventory sheets
disagreement
purchase price
.
added
etc
Should be
T B any value
20 , 000
:
All
usually
considerable
be
can
%iiMpIe
-
Revenue
,
example renren.iocaum.oas.si# \
Page
should not count lrewrd Inventory
in the warehouse
I
mixed team ( 1 From warehouse,
have a
( can
inventory
o
.
given out
be
department
the value of
-11,000
19.000)
familiar with the steps
instructions have to
recovered
are
:
:
-
is to
The best solution
)
from other
25,000
:
be
staff may not
3rd party inventories
that
see
,
B
251000
:
(less )
and
cogyunat, tewannfswor
o
→ there
A
damaged
-
dispatch notes
Illustration
closing inv
area
important to
°
ORIGINAL
the count
sequentially pre numbered inventory
.
tests
-
All
and
→
a
opareninnuemyngrwe.eay.nineune.niorgm.io#otnismsnouiabepre-
completeness
G Rws
(stock lake)
count area
ascertain existence
,
ascertain
,
a- the year → For
ensure that
and """"
counts
slow-moving
preparation of the
sorted out -7 easily identify
has to be tidy and
o
counts of the inventory
test
take note of the last few
°
"
too much → write
physical inventory
end
year
mostly performed once
is required,
careful advanced planning
i.
management
"
-
,
value should
its
includes
stock take
as it's
any
discussion w/
year
on
Instructions
o
instructions
look at the
issued in advance , identify
shortcomings for
,
decide what
→
→ not as saleable
inventory ( old
auditor may rely
main aspects of
-
properly described
it's
make sure
.
be ( as its condition
this includes consideration
down to NRV)
-
l sells goods
COS)
deducted in calculating
losing inventory is
check :
auditor has to
,
assets)
BS ( current
has to be assessed )
"
cookies
→
✓
°
.
,
.
moving damaged
-
,
cut off
-
or
profit
obsolete
inventory
year end
sewing prices after
may
getting
consider
consignment
on
→ on
.
is added to
basis
,
expert to
an
vice versa
( sales)
snipped before
end
year "
,
norma, circumstances goods
recorded in AR 's"
not still be in inventory , but
should
IE :
o
-
still in
'
recorded , but the goods
sales is
Inventory
overstatement of
fury
→
( even though
the
warehouse , sales
goods
have
is already
not left
recorded)
Inver
the
-
nnoonn-ccuurrrreenntaassss.ee#$
Relevant
Existence
a presentation
Rights r obligations classification
,
.
Completeness
q fj.BY
Ferhat
are
non
-
some
procedures
current assets
assertions :
,
Accuracy
to
o
,
→
many of the non current
assets
are
→
check
for existence
from
books
( non
longer
exist
-
assets
IF the
helps auditor
scrutinise
RAM
examine
test
01 B
Boller 01A
likely
damage
invoices respectively
Form
purchase requisition
a
it
was
( Rem expense = expenses
amounts as
of the
supported by
are
discussed
in the board
cap ex
capitalised )
,
=
meeting
per GL
to the
in the
register
the detail
cost
a
non
-
current assets register
depreciated amounts
accumulated
T
2 . 000
to ensure
→
may be possible through
class of assets
2.000
3,500
→
t
fully depreciated
on
'
reasonableness test
assets → re perform
a
'
total
on
depreciation
for a
sample of detailed calculations
on
individual assets
total (per client) 7,500
?
Total ( per auditor ) 71200
-
300
calculations
accuracy
→
-
Difference
check to
reconcile to the
depreciation
oreperform
( 3 yrs useful life)
oven
due to
impaired
$
depreciation
oven 01A
reconciliation
should
and
register ) to Floor
completeness
FS balances
→
example
the
expenses
disposed
be
receipts & purchase
cash
→
current assets
needs to be
asset
Fifth
high value
of
-
must
→
to
addition is very material
→ to ensure
of reasonableness
it any
to check
is material →
addition
H
°
no
Checking disposals & additions
→ IF
°
(
inspection
perform physical
→
0
.
Valuation
and
Allocation
p
Is
reasonable
this
o
-
disposals
check for
register
to ensure that the
→
( cost and
=
→
when
an
auum
is traded
asset
Fair value of
is
properly adjusted
depre are taken
.
old
-
out of the
register
.
Profit I loss is properly calculated)
in ,
asset should
be counted
as
disposal proceeds
t included in the
cost of new asset
o
inspect documents of title
→
o
o
that the
confirm
→
rights & obligations purposes
for
e.g
.
agree the
all
requirements of IAS 16 PPE
assets
revaluation
in
the same
class
have
amount to a valuation
accounted
have been
been
met
revalued
report
→
other
and
OCI
com pre
shown
income
For
confirm that gain is correctly
in equity
in revaluation surplus in SOCE → stm of changes
separately
based on revalued amount
expense
depreciation
o recalculate
to retained earnings
in
o
.
→
revaluation
amount may be transferred From
with
in accordance
IAS 16
surplus
BB aannlk
a
a presentation
Rights r obligations classification
,
.
Completeness
,
occurs
Accuracy
.
Valuation
and
Allocation
,
auaitoseomiiriormaneiaiiiisiaabcaonumiei: n'iii. :O
/
of:L's's event
assertions :
Relevant
Existence
aanndd Ccaasshh
me client's bank
-
en
→
o
any
show any
→
→
→
will
behalf of
on
and
the
I bank charges
as evidence
normally perform reconciliation
loans
client
the
that
cash
is correct
amount
certificate
bank
to the
the bank statement
agree the balance per
to
( outstanding) deposits a un presented cheques
the uncleared
agree
cleared
are
's bank statement to confirm that they
month
next
items
For reconciling
the bank statement as adjusted
'
confirm that
if the client has
→ to
→ it
→
for overdrafts
interest
IF
a
balance per
client 's books
material
amount of
confirm the existence
the balance is
using
'
the
agrees to the
.
the bank holds
that
assets
→
→
auditors
which the bank has
any security
and
immaterial ,
imprest system
physical cash → some
accuracy
of the
cash
auditor may still perform
( cash t
authorised vouchers
cash
cash count
=
counts
will be carried
out
balance
Imprest
due to
balance )
high risk of theft
→
test
controls
authorisation
on
the
of vouchers
replenishment of float
during the interim
and
aauuddiitt
llhhteerrnnaall
y/
L
.am#rn:an:g mro:nt-ortne/ : im:iaeYim iea.ng:i s
t
Definition
an
appraisal & monitoring activity
"
,
on the
adequacy
effectiveness
of Internal
07 BUI
control
,
other experts
if auditor
•
,
whether it
auditor 's expert
reasons
to
is
evidence
the
an
management
audit
audit
USA 620)
the necessary
expertise 1 a management expert
•
Planning
at
-
-
-
-
°
Other
the
,
nature ,
following matters must be agreed;
work
scope and objectives of
respective responsibilities
Nature
that
external
.
scope and timing
the
expert
observes
auditors ( NOT tested
of communications
confidentiality
in
AA)
of IT
controls A
with external
auditors *
and
has the
supported by organisational
access to
status
TCWG
professional qualifications & experience
adequate resources
IA applies a systematic µ disciplined approach to i
→ has
o
→
→
planning
performing
→
's expert work
have
tests
liaises
direct
IA is competent
→
assertions
( may be IA
auditor 's expert ;
°
( ACCA COVER)
sufficiently reliable For
it management does not
-
to the
IA is objective
→ has
( ISA 500)
sufficient
assists in obtaining
or EA)
needing
evaluate
-
-
o
capabilities t objectivity
of their work
→
→
system
IA , provided that :
the work of
preparing the
in
competence
the
evaluate
-
-
f
money audits
for
control
A
)
Audit Committee CAC
,
appropriateness
-
→
the
←§ using
as
work ;
wants to use the
evaluate
-
reports
to
objectives
management
operation for internal
checks
value
→
,
agents lawyers )
assist management
FS
( estate
's expert
→ management
•
an element
a
m.rs; ;; e.this:S:p .in#r:iti:.ne:.ie:e.onom
→
the
independence
of corporate
risk assessment
.
may rely on
working papers prepared
of
IA includes
helps achievement
aids
→
by the IA
internal audit
Using the work of experts such
o
out for more
external auditors
to review the
achieve
to
,
codes '
audit
need for internal
& directors
a
required
are
Directors
management
to
corporate governance
under
&
of
→
:
£
Hence the main function =
report
look
Functions
:*:: ::
f
examine , evaluate
,
:
documenting its
activities
( including
performing
QC )
Purposes of audit documentation
Audit documentation #
(
✓
Thet
Quality control
Typical contents OF working papers
-
title
date
-
prepared
-
work has been done
properly
senior staff to review the junior staff 's
"
:÷÷÷÷:÷÷:÷
Permanent File
°
;
,
often ;
as
does not
information that
contains
description
-
&
enable
auaiisi.EE?t:::::::;:ai:tm::::::Y.::::::..i:p:::::
types .
change
accounting system
of
:::÷÷:÷÷÷:÷÷÷
.. .
trend)
(to see the
conclusion from the work performed
reviewers signature
show that the audit
o
work
→
÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷:÷÷÷÷÷÷÷
-
o
date of review
0 Current
contains
audit file ,
the FS being
✓
Quality control ( ISA 220 )
policies
quality control
→ the
objective is
control
leadership
the EL is
responsible for
the overall
Ethics
°
appropriate
are
partners
are ;
QC requirements
•
applicable legal
standards &
1 engagement
issued by the firm
reports
o
assurance that;
professional
requirements
regulatory
and
procedures are the responsibility
provide reasonable
to
audit complies with
o
→
control systems ,
States that quality
quality
and
audit firm
of the
performed
work
audited + audit
alert
the El has to remain
,
quality of the audit engagements
and
through observations
enquiries for
evidence of non compliance
-
El has to be
appropriate
El must be
to properly
another
the
-
-
-
additi ons
listed entities
audit
{
-
-
-
and
capabilities
direction ,
supervision
reviews
,
,
before
etc
procedures
should
audits
l independent )
partner
the
are
report
EQ CR
(
Engagement Quality
will be appointed
to
perform
undergo
an
control Review)
objective
significant judgments made by the engagement team
involves ;
Discussion
significant matters with
of
EL
FS and the audit report
of the
Review of selected audit documentation
Review
Evaluation of
the
conclusions
reached
Hr to
& consider
's
consider the team 's evaluation of the firm
consider it
consider
,
y
appropriately operating
out of the )
review
signing
( HOT
farmed
he
that the Qc
evaluation
-
For
engagements
the conclusions are
and deem
audit
quality
provide
evaluation of
o
,
satisfied that team has the appropriate competence
perform the
interest
Public
o
approach
Monitoring
ensure
→
and audit
relationships
Engagement performance
El has to
o
satisfied
with the
Assignment of engagement teams
o
o
continuance of client
and
Acceptance
o
it
appropriate
audit
the co www.M
'
conclusion
documentation
on
significant judgments
independence
differences of
selected
reflects
Kr to the
opinion
the
made
report is appropriate
whether the
engagement
has taken
work
place
performed support
#rraauuddaannddeerrrroorr
I :*:#informers
theft
→ open
<
assets
of records I misappropriation of
deliberately falsifying
in the
management
→
responsibility to prevent and
's
communicated
Fraud must be
→
1
material misstatement
remember :
management
relevant
to know
non
.
that
-
events will
-
existed at the end of the
in
④
not
going
January ( year end is Dec)
to
liquidation
be in a bad financial position
possible liability arising from past
existence of the liability will only be confirmed by
Future events
Different treatments of liability 's
,
have written A
the
condition
December
no
Cr
→
provision for
possible obligation but
-
possible
existence
future
events
use
the
maybe
require
disclose
in
notes to
Meyerwould
i
-
leave it
V
need to pay ?
#
dont think
maybe
likely
provision is
needed
in flow
→
disclosure
needed
is
assets 's
of the economic
virtually certain
-
so
→
nothing is
needed
benefits
it's not
a
is
contingent
✓
show in SFP
pr Assets
Cr
most
→
it
the
arising From past events ,
will only be confirmed by
Different treatments of
→
disclose in
but
y
asset
whose
best estimate
does not
likely to be obligated
,
existed
existed
FS
#
•
FS V
not
adjust
kitties * Uconn#nnggeenntaasssee
-
→
IF inflow is probable
notes to FS v
→
not
-
outflow of resources
→
need to
notes to
off
the Factory
)
the fire
after
,
down in January
-
liability V
Dr expense
after the
year end,
requires the outflow
for the
occur
end is Dec)
-
•
provision
immaterial
as a,
events '
→
are
end
factory burning
in December, A would probably
should
believe uncorrected misstate
arose after the reporting
-
→
that
-
representation from mgmt
written
they
require the FS to be adjusted
date
-
( ccoonnttiinnggeennttll iaabbx
of resources
obtain
adjusting event
c. year
customer A
A
-
example :
example :
"
if the present obligation
o
events
year
conditions
reporting period
→
→
of uncorrected
assess materiality
misstatements
→
does
-
provides evidence of conditions
TY
✓
o
ogidveornse
that
requires the FS to be adjusted
-
they may be
for the stakeholders
f
L
qualified I
communicated to management
/ not
correct the misstatement
involved)
( often , AC will be
merits
-
4- report
,
a
in
adjusting event
of report
occasionally
occur and
should be
°
is implicated
yF0nmg
an
issue
f
'
'
corrected -7
SSUUbbsscc.gg#nn&@vveenn
tr
has an active duty
#
auditor
to
a management refuses
, but the
the misstatement
should be
auditor believes it
correct
detect
TCWG if results
to
:{ niameisniiaiemaen:
o
lading
and
form of teeming
may exists
with B 's receipts)
( theft of A 's receipts , cover it
→
¥
OF cash
a
-
likely to be obligated
disclose
-
in the
leave it
V
'
-
wwrriitteennrreepprreesseenrrtaatiioonns
IS A 580
auditor must obtain
,
acknowledges
o
written representations
all
transactions
representation t
of
→
alone
IF ,
all relevant
provided the auditor with
it has
o
Lor
.
that :
responsibility for the preparation
applicable Financial reporting framework
its
o
letter
I TCWG , IF applicable)
of the FS in
with the
accordance
→
management
from
cannot
management
been
recorded
audit
evidence
have
information
reflected
a
in the FS
provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence for an assertion
:
's intentions are required consider
,
reasons for management 's intention
o
intentions
management's ability to pursue its
intentions
's
past history in carrying out
o
o
management
0
Other
info
may contradict
that
useful
intention
management's
particularlycompleteness
~ ascertain
,
in Lor ;
→
typically found
subject matter specific representations
auditor
fraud has been disclosed to
1 suspicion of
any knowledge
to the
examples of
-
o
all known
o
auditor
→
t
1 actual
litigation
accounted
for
and
all events
o
plans relating
to
has
management's going
management
•
i.
the
auditor
reassess;
's
competence
management
°
reliability of
all
Not reliable
,
an
it more
integrity
representations
Hence, auditor should disclaim
are
inconsistent with
refuses to provide
should
o
are
opinion
,
as
financial reporting requirements
the FS have
concern
arise when 's
potential problems
o written representations
been disclosed
in accordance with
to the date of
occurring subsequent
0
claims
I disclosed
been
assessment
other audit
representations
→
adjusted I disclosed
& its
matter remains
ethical values , etc
audit evidence
on the
feasibility
evidence
FS it the written representations
to
unsolved