~
~
In
science ,
form hypotheses
we
All datasets will have
to explain
observations
•
accuracy
•
•
•
. .
s
.
measurement
to accepted
is
"
are
close to true
values
"
inaccurate
value
÷
actual
fake
!
%ghf1k9 calibrate
,
calibrate
probability
confidence
equipment should be properly calibrated to ensure readings
how close a
accurate
results
in
by your apparatus
determined
is
accuracy
.
"
•
confident
must be
we
the reliability of results
need to evaluate
•
But
.
variability in results affecting
leads to
degree of variation
some
by testing them
you
are
in known
by weighing
using apparatus
pH solution
Known
" ""
buffer
;
* ensure
"
mass
"
read manuals !
scale is level
ensure
"
I
systematic error
:
consistent repeatable
,
equipment
error
flawed design
,
,
faulty
associated with
human
error
Preventable
.
.
mL
Precision
"
.
.
'
of
consistency
.
.
measurements
close same
precise
are
to
-
20.01=0.5
-
.
20
125 I ± 12.5mL
'
how
I
5
other
imprecise
,
repeats / trials
variance :
/
error
± uncertainty of apparatus
:
add
uncertainties
standard deviation :
101=0.2
within
-
within a group
error :
unknown , unpredictable variations
ex :
5-61=0.1
ex :
10.1 1=0.1
-
can
-
5.61--0.1
mean
0
a
a
powerful statistical measure
repeatable methodology
,
Outliers with TT variability and St .D/ CV
/°bit
I
high precision
within
*
Generally
5 repeats /trials per
high variability
low
precision
:
group variation
errorbarovertap:
overlap :
between group variation
suggests no difference between groups
inconclusive : does
do
ex : conc
mean
not support hypothesis
further tests are required to determine significance
strong controls and many repeats results in It variability within groups
*
uncertainty
4.5 1=0.2
group variation
its own ,
Cannot be
groups can have
=
difference between groups
on
.
reduced
* IV
St. Dev
CV=
be
-
is not
uncertainty
✓ 10.11=0.2
large error bars
may support hypothesis
note : St Dev
✗ 10.251=0.2
between group variation
suggests
as
50
small error bars :
no error bar
,
✗
-
-
coefficient of variation : measure of relative variability
variation
,
* value must have same Sig fig
100
of the spread of most data surrounding the
measure
bar :
Generally
"
prevented but
visually show
*
I
-
precision :
Added /subtracted values :
Mean
"
f
"
± 10
-
,
15
random
Raw data
precise your measurement tools
.
1=0.001
Calculating
more
the less uncertainty in measurements
-
measurements
each
The
"
.
,
and probability
i. e.
low
of effect
STD / CV
NIT exclude them but rather highlight them & discuss their potential cause + significance
experimental group is the MINIMUM
,
otherwise
St .D is
not reliable
more
in
FAQ
.
~
~
The
type of data you collect and your RQ
Relationship
between
2
your statistical
determines
analysis
Is there
hypothesis being tested
continuous variables
difference ?
a
comparing groups
1
I
Regression
1
discrete data
continuous
categorical data
1
1
data
12¥,
{
groups
dependent
t
:
✓
equal variance +
✓
normally distributed
✓
groups
✓
1
:
-
U
rank test
-
-
two
way
|
distribution
\
10=-0.05
compare all groups
compare groups to control
Tukey post hoc
Dunnett post hoc
Whitney
Ñ goodness
of fittest
-
-
test
equal variance Hor
✗
normally distributed
Kruskal
✗
only valid when certain assumptions concerning the data
are
.
does group fall
within an expected
way
-
ANOVA
groups :
Many statistical tests
testa
l
ANOVA
equal variance Hor
✗
normally distributed
Mann
groups
independence
equal variance
normally distributed
✗
Wilcoxon
selected
an
equal probability of being
every sample must
this ensures the sample is more representative of
population
have
:
☒
www.iance-iresiouaisnaue
one
groups :
NOT
sampling
2 or more
IVs
two
l
1
random
association between
unpaired t-test
normally distributed
signed
groups
2- sample
paired t-test
-
IV
one
independent
2- sample
data
|3tgroups-
groups
data normally
distributed
(counts , frequencies )
,
i. e.
no
-
-
10=-0.05
Wallis
test
are
bias
Dunn
post
-
hoc
true
during selection
a
normal distribution : symmetrical distribution of random variables
where
independent groups
:
samples
i. e.
equal variance :
50% of values
I
~
50% of values
I
\
-
distinct without
( St Dei ) within
.
each
of thumb : if no group has
another,
:
tests for normalcy
in
a
sample
Ho : population is normally distributed
:-p
contain different sets of items in each sample
groups are
variance
rule
~
Shapiro Wilk Test
0.05
reject null not normally distributed
,
overlapping items among groups
group is
~
equal
Levene's Test :
tests the
2x the variance of
variance is assumed
to be equal
equality of variance amongst groups
Ho : variances among groups are equal
.
:p
0.05
reject null
,
variance
not equal
among groups
Regression
atbx
y=
i. e.
DV ( y-axis )
of the relation /association between
measure
:
average
r2
.
of y
value
is
function of
a
amount of variance between
-
( x-axis )
IV
and
generates regression line
I
"
y= ab
✗
p=
←
i
'
'
DV
accounts for
'
-
how well a
i. e-
,
linear
'
Allows you to make predictions
affect y ?
✗
Alternative hypothesis ( Ha)
:
,
distribution of
Either A associates with B ( positive association )
null
hypothesis ( Ho )
Chi
squared ( x2 ) goodness of fit test
A does
or
,
:
N
exponential regression
logistic regression
*
cannot
:
e.
r
use
for non linear
'
regressions
-
or
causality
association is likely
e.
not associate
with
any association is
tests if categorical variables fall within
HA sample data do not follow the expected
:
N
species A and species B
statistically significant association between variables i.
no
example
.
This does not determine correlation
.
statistically significant association between variables i.
:
:
:
.
tests if a relationship between categorical variables exist
Ecology example significant association between
Ho : sample
-
.
of the nature of a relationship between continuous variables
squared ( x2) test for independence
\ Genetics
I
variability of y is explained by variability in ✗
other 11% of variance is explained by other factors
understanding
How does
\
.
r
89% of
regression
Allows an
i
r2 = 0.89
ex :
P
.
-
O
Iv
DV
or
the variation in the data
-
•
Chi
fits '
regression line
'
( at bx)
-
-
2 variables
It e-
a
non
-
random
species are dependent
B ( negative association )
likely due to chance
specified distribution
sampled population
is not
representative
of entire population
distribution
expected ( Mendelian ) phenotypic ratios
difference between observed and
sampling error
or
difference
suggests gene linkage
suggests genes
data follow the expected distribution
unlinked
are
Bothx-lestscalculatedthesa.me#
p
-
value : probability of
obtaining the observed effect
\
significance =p
data obtained
X'
2
-
CF
XZ
CF
:
:
fail to reject null hypothesis
we
an
don't accept Ho
calculated ✗ 2
as
we
,
evidence
allows us to
=
probability
extreme) results
where
strength
reject
or
I
12.71
63.66
636.62
2
4.30
9.93
31.60
3
3.18
5.84
12.94
reject null hypothesis
at p= 0.01
12.3 ( DF -_ 2)
haven't proven
affect doesn't exist rather the
of the
*
reject null hypothesis
ex:
*
of obtaining similar ( or more
5% or less likelihood
the
Ho
is
correct
Ho
is
true
degrees of freedom
significance level (a)
(number ofgroups-DO.050.010.CI
expected
expected
XZ
i. e.
Not
data expected
observed
=
0.05
Ho is true
dataset if
in the
not
.
Since
I > 9.93
Assuming
in
1%
no
we
effect
of studies
,
can
we
due
would obtain
to random error
}
observed differences or
critical
values
more
( CF)
f- test :
2- sample
HA
:
there
Ho :
no
is
used to determine
significant difference
a
if there is a significant difference between the
between
2
(s )2 +
=
t
CF
t
,
(5)
ni
Nz
2
=
5-
St dev
( is A larger than B)
tailed : compares differences in only 1 direction
n =
sample size
two tailed : compares differences
-
paired
related /dependent groups
compares
:
\ assumes : ✓random
(is A smaller
either direction
in
-
reject null hypothesis
:
-
mean
fail to reject null hypothesis
:
CF
✗
difference due to treatment and not chance or sampling error
-
one
(x,-~
i. e.
.
or
larger than B)
( before + after )
test same group 2x
sampling ✓ DV continuous + normally distributed
> 20)
for
✓
groups are
dependent
n=
)
unpaired : compares unrelated /independent groups
\ assumes : ✓random
test separate groups ( control us treatment
sampling ✓ DV continuous + normally distributed
> 15 )
( or
✓
A- NOVA ( Analysis of variance) : used to determine if there is a significant difference
why can't
we
HA at least
:
do
multiple t tests
one
group is significantly different
Type
increases
-
Ho : no statistically significant difference between
F
MS between group variance
Ms within group variance
independent
error :
the
PIO 05
.
any groups
all
random
One
way
error
F
F crit
:
fail to reject null hypothesis
F
F crit
:
reject null hypothesis
there
3 or
more
groups
probability that you incorrectly rejected null hypothesis
means
-
equal
is a difference
amongst groups
ANOVA :
\ assumes :
Types of ANOVAs
-
way ANOVA
\ Post hoc tests control
-
Tukey 's Post hoc
:
-
4 groups : A
,
what
for Type 1 errors
✓random
groups differ specifically ( post
,
so
even
the
B C, D
requires
comparisons :
among
B and
are
,
treatment pair
only statistically significant difference
these groups
✓
groups have
equal variance
-
hoc
"
=
A
between
A
-
-
-
B
providing
p
where two
examine
✓
after this
an
value
IV
interaction between
residuals ( value
-
mean
are
considered
IVs
) have equal variance
sampling
if many comparisons are made, the
A
i.
also
\ assumes : ✓ DV continuous
all possible combinations between groups
6
+
compares 3. + groups
can
compares
,
:
,
-
-
considered
IV is
one
normally distributed ✓ groups are
✓random
> 15 )
( or
independent
sampling
✓ DV continuous
post hoc
Post hoc test : used to determine
where
compares 3. + groups
n=
to determine which groups differ
"
error
i. e.
following
a
statistically significant ANOVA )
constant
rate remains
adjusted p value for
each
treatment pair
value
0.89
B
-
p
0.01
C
grouping
*
C
0.21
B
-
D
0.04
D
0.11
C
-
D
0.25
't
}
only
B and C
B and D
are
and
significantly
different from each other
C ( p -0.01 ) and B and D ( p -0.04)
-
-
* the
Dunnett 's Post hoc : compares all treatment groups to
-
ex :
equal variance
from the rest
Two
ex :
of
means
groups have
-
=
-
if
1
between the
✓
groups are
n=
*
groups
Types of t tests
statistically significant
difference between both groups
t
groups
and St. Dev of two
means
I control (A) 3
,
treatment groups ( B. C D)
,
more
comparisons
made, the less
statistical power
only control group
treatmentpairpvalue
A
-
A
-
A
-
B
0.03 't
C
0
D
0.10
.
I 1
only group 13
*
differed from control significantly
because fewer comparisons,
higher statistical power
a) how
,
data within groups
examine
likely
Trials
µ
.
unusually high or low
values
are
identified ?
be
they
can
\
point that differs significantly from others making them unusual in dataset
data
Outlier :
1
outliers
|
outliers
I
2
3
a
8
8
2
b
9
10
8
c
2
4
5
•
} compared to other
bars
•
:
•
in trial ,
values
Terror
•
outlier
'
✓
very low
alters L0BF_
•
•
b) why are they important ?
\ outlier
c) how
\
mean
( Tor b)
error
in
error in
measurement and entry
data
sampling
outliers
any time
measured in incorrect
sample
2
outliers
-
occur ,
occur
can
identify them clearly
significant
:
the
it does not mean the
✗
-
evidence is not
fail to reject
we
null
null
\
an
error :
remeasure
( if possible ) or
as we
know its
an
error :
remeasure
( if possible ) or remove
an
do not
are
\
p
mean
value
your
can
as
removed ,
clearly justify why
?
0.0s
p
an
effect exists
hypothesis is true
an
look important , but
③ what does it
\
mean
if
it means that
.
:
we
\ the
reject
value
p
the
the
\
be
may
is
,
and
but
alternative
or
it's possible :
is
false
effect size
i. e.
too small for
is
size
proof there is
no
you to
effect
detect
too small
is
variability is too high for hypothesis test to detect
didn't work
random
significant
error
10=-0.05
?
strong enough to suggest
an
effect
may exist in the population
hypothesis
stronger the evidence against the Ho
lower the p value , the
✗ it does not mean
population
important caution against drawing conclusions based on differences that
evidence is
null
in the
hypothesis
investigation failed
be
data
doing so skews
remove ,
sample
✗ it does not
remove
analysis without as a comparison
strong enough to suggest
effect may exist
an
know its
outliers
if
*
is non
.
do ?
we
as we
-
what does it mean if p value
the
-
naturally
doing
it means that
statistical power
conditions
consider
\
do
reduces
.
outliers cannot be removed,
*
increases within group variation
-
sample not of target pop
-
unusual
\ natural variation
if
this
.
d) what
-
*
St D
and increases
they caused ?
are
\
alters
the
null
to replicate
need
we
hypothesis is false and
or
the lower the probability of
and
alternative
is
true
i. e.
proof of
statistically significant results several times before
we
an
effect
can
have
a
false positive
confidence
"
s,
✗ it does not relate to the
strength
of the
investigation
or
its
importance ,
i. e.
Ivp value
=
Ronald
Fisher
good investigation
Fur thering
Frost , J
.
2020
.
Hypothesis Testing
Biology for life .com
:
An intuitive guide for
making data driven decisions
statistics html
Statistics solutions .com
-
free
-
resources
directory of statistical analyses
-
-
-
.
Statistics By Jim
Publishing