Uploaded by raj.tanki

SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE

advertisement
World Cannot form / sustain without water
– Devine Poet Thiruvalluvar more than 2000 years back
Concrete Construction
Concrete Construction
One of the important factors for concrete structure to be
sustainable is
……………..Durability
Concrete Construction
Prof.Basheer
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
6
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
SCC can be defined as..
•
A concrete that is able to flow under its own weight and
completely fill the formwork, even in the presence of dense
reinforcement, without the need of any vibration, whilst
maintaining homogeneity.
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
URCC – NDDB – Odisha – Feb 2015
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
Historical Background:
 The concept of SCC was first time proposed by Prof.Okamura and
Prof.Ozawa in 1986 in Japan
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
The Concept was
 To achieve durability in concrete construction with the reduction in
manual intervention
Experience
 Fast paced construction lead to issues, mainly due to poor
compaction in construction.
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
 The first prototype was built in Japan in 1988
 The World followed the foot steps of Japan in adopting SCC to aid
concrete construction
Ensuring durability of the structure was the main Objective
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
We too need to adopt this “Product-cum-Solution”
AKA
Filling Solution
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
SCC a unique product – ATTRIBUTES
 Fresh condition
- Self-compacting by virtue of its flow and with optimal viscosity
 Early age
– to remain uniform and free from initial defects such as segregation
 Hardened state
– Form Durable structural mass to exceed performance requirements
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
SCC – Requirements in Fresh State
 Flowing Ability
 Passing Ability
 Segregation Resistance
 Viscosity
Self Compacting Concrete (SCC)
SCC – Test Methods
SCC – Test Methods
Slump-Flow Class
Class
Slump – Flow in mm
SF 1
550 to 650
SF 2
660 to 750
SF 3
760 to 850
SCC – Test Methods
Passing Ability class – L box
Class
Passing Ability
PA 1
> 0.8 with 2 bars
PA 1
> 0.8 with 3 bars
SCC – Test Methods
Passing Ability class – J-Ring – ASTM
Class
Passing Ability
ASTM C-1621
Slump Flow difference Not more than 50mm
SCC – Test Methods
Viscosity class
Class
V-Funnel Time
in seconds
Conformity
criteria
VF 1
<8
+/- 3
VF 2
9 to 25
+/- 3
SCC in Critical Structures – A filling Solution
 Structures with congested reinforcement
 Structures have limited access
 Structures have unique shape
 Structures require good amount of resources for assurance
Application & Case Studies
Resource Optimization
SCC – A filling Solution
Pre cast Girders
Southern Railways, Chennai - 2008
SCC – A filling Solution
Pre cast Girders
Southern Railways
Gantry Girders for Fly -overs, Chennai
Details
CVC
SCC
Total Duration of Pour
4
Hours
2.0
Hours
Volume of Pour
40
cum
40
cum
10
cum /
hour
20
cum /
hour
Average Pour Rate
Equipment
requirement
Man Power
requirement
5 Needle
& 7 Surface
15
Needle vibrator &
Surface vibrator
operators,
Masons and helpers
Nil
1
Mason for finishing
Southern Railways, Chennai - 2008
SCC – A filling Solution
Pre cast Girders
27.09.08
M55
81.5
59.01
59.77
59.53
59.44
67.77
68.25
68.48
68.17
15.11.08
M55
80.5
60.66
59.94
60.30
60.30
69.94
68.65
69.54
69.38
10.12.08
M55
81
60.44
58.88
59.64
59.65
68.13
66.89
65.69
66.90
02.01.08
M55
81
60.85
61.02
59.64
60.50
70.62
71.10
73.77
71.83
17.02.09
M55
81.5
59.42
60.40
63.28
61.03
69.95
71.50
72.04
71.17
07.03.09
M55
81
58.57
61.64
59.28
59.83
71.02
70.58
72.13
71.24
Mean
Strength
69.78
Mean
Strength
60.13
Southern Railways, Chennai - 2008
SCC – A filling Solution
R.C.C Structural wall - Mivan
TVH, Chennai
SCC – A filling Solution
R.C.C Structural wall - Mivan
Flat Area 1200 Sft
Details
Volume of concrete 50 cum / flat
Wall 27 cum + Slab 23 cum
CVC
SCC
50.00 cum
Volume of Pour
50.0 cum
11 hours
Total Duration of Pour
Average Pour Rate
4.54 cum/hr
Man Power
3 masons + 3 Vibrator
operator + 9 Others
Equipment
Needle Vibrator 3
4.5 hours
Requires high
level of
supervision
TVH, Chennai
11.00 cum/hr
cum
2 Masons + 4 others
Checking
fresh concrete
properties @
ground is
enough
SCC – A filling Solution
TVH, Chennai
SCC – A filling Solution
UltraTech Concrete, Bengaluru - 2009
SCC – A filling Solution
KGISL, Coimbatore, 2009
Rebar Congestion & Accessibility
SCC – A filling Solution
TN PWD,
Chennai –
2020-21
SCC – A filling Solution
TN PWD,
Chennai –
2020-21
SCC – A filling Solution
URC, Ramanujan IT Park, Chennai
SCC – A filling Solution
SPCL - Fun City Mall, Coimbatore
SCC – A filling Solution
Project
American Hotels
Mysore
Name of Customer
BL Kashyap
Consultant
Synergy
Concrete
M35 – 358 cum
SCC – A filling Solution
Project
Kandaya bhavan, Bangalore
Name of Customer
Devi Prasad construction
Consultant
Narayana Swamy and associates,
Dr Viswanath of Torsteel &
Srinivas and Khan (Architect)
Concrete
M35–190 cum–41m X 1.1m X 4.5m
38 MT of Main Reinforcement Steel
Critical Shape
SCC – A filling Solution
Project
DLF IT Park, Hyderabad
Name of Customer
DLF
Concrete
M50–120 cum +
5 X 2 Y- columns for Atrium
Total height 26 M
SCC for top 17 to 20 M
Self Compacting Concrete
BIAL – URCC, 2020-21
Do it right first time, all the time
M75 Cube results
Stress (Mpa) Average (Mpa)
77.2
76.2
77.9
90.9
102.2
94.6
99.3
95.9
97.6
82.6
79.4
77.7
95.0
90.6
96.0
95.1
106.8
106.8
ROB Pile Cap cast with M75 – BIAL - URC
Age
77.1
7 Days
95.9
21 Days
(100
mm)
97.6
28 Days
(100mm)
79.9
7Days
93.9
14 Days (100mm)
102.9
40 Days (100mm)
Do it right first time, all the time
Precast Segment (SCC) – Curvilinear
BIAL – URCC, 2020-21
Do it right first time, all the time
Precast Segment (SCC) – Curvilinear
SCC with High Early Strength
BIAL – URCC, 2020-21
Self Compacting Concrete
Shape, Access, Placing & Compaction constraints
TN PWD, Chennai – 2020-21
SCC – A filling Solution
Shell Structure
TN PWD, Chennai – 2020-21
Self Compacting Concrete
Shape, Access, Placing & Compaction constraints
TN PWD, Chennai – 2020-21
Execution/Construction Effectiveness
SCC – A filling Solution
G K Shetty, Chennai- 2008
SCC – A filling Solution
Landmark 81, HCMC
SRDC, VIetnam
460m +
SCC – A filling Solution
Wall @ 400m +
SRDC, VIetnam
SCC – A filling Solution
Slab @ 350m +
SRDC, VIetnam
SCC – A filling Solution
M80 Transfer Slab
Estancia IT Park, Zoho, Chennai
Non-Critical Structures??
SCC – A filling Solution
IIT Madras
SCC – A filling Solution
SCC – A filling Solution
GK Shetty, Chennai – Aloft Hotel
SCC – A filling Solution
IIT Madras
Can SCC be every day concrete?
SCC – A filling Solution
Challenges
 Need to be choosy in raw materials
 RMC has to keep other supply aside
 Purchase personnel
 Focused supply and execution
Dedicated and Committed Team – Always overburdened
 Form work
Noteworthy
SCC – A filling Solution
Coarse Aggregates tend to remain in the surface all along
SCC – A filling Solution
Coarse Aggregates tend to remain in the surface all along
SCC – A filling Solution
Coarse Aggregates tend to remain in the surface all along
SCC – Form Work Pressure
Even when SCC falls from height (accidently in this case) it does not segregate
Mix Design Approach for SCC
 Achieving Strength is not an issue
 Achieving the Fresh Concrete Properties will be the objective
(Easier to Say than get done)
Mix Design Approach for SCC
 Higher binder content – OPC + Fly Ash – More than 450kg/cum
 Coarse Aggregate to Fine Aggregate ratio – 50:50
 Fine Aggregates grading (Zone-II) and shape is the key
 PCE based Admixture to impart flow
 Viscosity Modifying Agent (VMA) to control segregation
Mix Design Approach for SCC
VMA Effect
Mix Design Approach for SCC
VMA Effect
Advantages of SCC
 Placing of concrete with ease
 Achieving higher degree of compaction
 Faster construction rate
 Increased life of formworks
 Resource optimization
 Lesser pollution
 Enhancement in Quality of concrete ensuring durability of the
structure
FAQs
Indian Standards?
- Not available
- Euro Guidelines & ASTM
All Grades?
- M40 and Above
Type of Structures?
- All type of Structures including
Piles, Pile Caps, Diaphragm walls,
Columns, Piers, Bridge Decks, etc
Cost Increase?
- Not in overall Cost , in Mix Cost
- Mix cost increase is 2% < 10%
Form Works?
- Leak proof and to withstand
Hydro-Static pressure on vertical sides
Download