Organizational Behavior
Topic of the Assignment: “Understanding Power and Politics in the Context
of Workplace”
Prepared for:
Dr. Dewan Niamul Karim
Professor, Department of Management Studies, FBS
Prepared By:
Group-D
SL NO
Name
01
Md. Imtiaze Shamim
02
Mihirul Haque
20232066
03
Rothin Sarkar
20232065
04
Tanzir Ahmed
20232050
Submission Date: 18/05/202
ID
Abstract:
The modern workplace is a dynamic landscape where power plays a significant role
in influencing decisions and shaping careers. This paper explores the concept of
power and its various sources within organizations. It examines the often-overlooked
realm of workplace politics, analyzing its potential benefits and drawbacks.
Furthermore, the paper discusses ethical considerations associated with power and
strategies for navigating organizational politics with integrity. Finally, a case study
serves as a practical application of these concepts, demonstrating how to analyze
power dynamics and navigate complex situations effectively.
Introduction:
People don't always operate in organizations solely based on formal structures and
clearly defined roles. Understanding the interplay of power and politics within the
workplace is crucial for navigating the complexities of professional life. This paper
delves into these intertwined concepts, examining how power dynamics influence
decision-making, career advancement, and overall organizational effectiveness.
Understanding Power:
Power, in the organizational context, refers to the ability of an individual or group
to influence the behavior, decisions, and outcomes within an organization. It
manifests through various sources, each offering a different kind of leverage:




Formal Power: Stems from one's position within the organizational
hierarchy. Managers have formal power to delegate tasks, allocate resources,
and make decisions affecting subordinates.
Expert Power: Derives from specialized knowledge, skills, and expertise
valued by the organization. A data analyst's ability to provide valuable
insights or an engineer's deep technical knowledge are prime examples.
Referent Power: Arises from an individual's charisma, influence, and strong
relationships within the organization. Leaders with loyal teams or individuals
highly respected by colleagues possess referent power.
Coercive Power: The least desirable source of power, it relies on threats or
fear to influence behavior. While effective in the short term, it can damage
relationships and create a negative work environment.
The astute exercise of these various sources of power allows individuals and groups
to influence decisions, advance their agendas, and shape organizational outcomes.
The Art of Workplace Politics:
Workplace politics encompass the informal tactics and maneuvers employed to gain
influence and achieve goals within an organization. It can involve building alliances,
negotiating, and strategically influencing decision-making processes. While often
viewed negatively, workplace politics can be a double-edged sword:
Benefits:



Building Networks: Building relationships across different departments
fosters collaboration and can be a valuable resource for career advancement.
Gaining Visibility: Strategic use of office politics can increase your profile
and make your contributions more visible to decision-makers.
Advancing Ideas: By understanding the political landscape, you can
effectively champion your ideas within the organization.
Drawbacks:



Breeding Negativity: Unethical tactics like gossip or manipulation can
damage team morale and create a toxic work environment.
Creating Distrust: Manipulative tactics can erode trust between colleagues
and hinder collaborative efforts.
Hindering Collaboration: Overly focused political maneuvering can distract
from the core goals of the organization.
Understanding both the positive and negative aspects of workplace politics is crucial
for navigating it effectively.
Navigating the Ethical Landscape:
Power comes with a responsibility to exercise it ethically. Here are some strategies
for navigating organizational politics with integrity:




Transparency: Communicate openly and honestly with colleagues even
when it means disagreeing with superiors.
Focus on the Common Good: Advocate for solutions that benefit the team
and the organization, not just yourself.
Coalition Building: Build alliances based on shared goals and mutual respect,
not manipulation.
Win-Win Solutions: Seek outcomes that benefit everyone involved, fostering
collaboration over competition.
Case Study: Power Dynamics in Action
The Garment Factory Fire - A Power Struggle in Bangladesh's Garment
Industry
Setting: A garment factory in Dhaka, Bangladesh, employing hundreds of workers
to produce clothing for major international brands.
The Players:




Factory Owner: Holds significant formal power as the employer,
controlling job security and wages.
Female Garment Workers: The backbone of the industry, often facing low
wages, unsafe working conditions, and limited bargaining power.
Safety Inspector: A government official with the responsibility to ensure
factory safety standards. May face pressure from bribes or lack of resources.
International Brand Representatives: Representatives of major clothing
brands sourcing garments from the factory. Wield significant economic power
through their purchasing decisions.
The Conflict:
A fire breaks out in the factory due to lack of proper fire safety measures. Several
workers tragically lose their lives, highlighting the longstanding issues of unsafe
working conditions in the Bangladeshi garment industry.
Power Dynamics in Play:



Factory Owner: Primarily concerned with profit margins, they may prioritize
production speed and cost savings over worker safety. They might have a
history of bribing safety inspectors to overlook violations.
Female Garment Workers: Have limited options due to their economic
dependence on the factory. They may lack formal representation or fear
retaliation for speaking up about safety concerns.
Safety Inspector: Under-resourced and possibly susceptible to bribes from
factory owners. Their ability to enforce regulations effectively is
compromised.

International Brand Representatives: Hold significant economic power
through their purchasing contracts. However, they may prioritize competitive
pricing over ethical sourcing practices.
Political Maneuvering:




Female Garment Workers: May resort to protests or strikes to demand safer
working conditions. They may seek support from international labor rights
groups.
Factory Owner: May try to downplay the incident and blame external
factors. They may attempt to silence dissenting voices among the workers
through threats or intimidation.
Safety Inspector: May face pressure from both sides - from the factory owner
to downplay violations and from the public to enforce regulations.
International Brand Representatives: May face public backlash for
sourcing from factories with poor safety records. They might use their
economic leverage to pressure the factory owner to improve working
conditions.
Potential Outcomes:



Business as Usual: Little to no change occurs, with the factory owner
prioritizing profits and the workers continuing to face unsafe conditions.
Increased Regulation: The incident sparks legislative changes and stricter
enforcement of safety standards within the Bangladeshi garment industry.
Shift in Power Dynamics: International brands prioritize ethical sourcing,
leading to improved working conditions and worker empowerment through
unionization.
Takeaways:
The garment factory fire exemplifies the complex power dynamics within
Bangladesh's crucial garment industry. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for
promoting safe working conditions and worker rights. Collaborative efforts
involving strong regulations, ethical sourcing practices, and worker empowerment
are vital for a sustainable and ethical garment industry.
Conclusion:
Understanding power dynamics and workplace politics equips individuals with the
necessary tools to navigate the complexities of organizational life. By wielding
power ethically, building relationships strategically, and utilizing political savvy for
the greater good, individuals can become more influential, impactful members of
their organizations. Furthermore, by recognizing the potential pitfalls of unethical
power dynamics, we can strive to create positive and productive work environments.
The journey of understanding power and politics within the workplace is a lifelong
endeavor, and this paper serves as a foundation for ongoing exploration and
development in this dynamic field.