See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322345351 Design, simulation and implementation of a UPFC (unified power flow controller) for transmission line model Conference Paper · April 2017 DOI: 10.1109/IPACT.2017.8245053 CITATIONS READS 10 1,830 6 authors, including: Dilum Hettiarachchi K T M U Hemapala Curtin University University of Moratuwa 9 PUBLICATIONS 58 CITATIONS 145 PUBLICATIONS 659 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by K T M U Hemapala on 07 February 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. SEE PROFILE International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT2017] Design, Simulation and Implementation of a UPFC (Unified Power Flow Controller) for Transmission Line Model T.P.G.T.A. Priyankara, M.J.L.R. Fernando, I.A.K.Sandeepa, N.M.K.D Bandara, H.W.D.Hettiarachchi, K.T.M.U.Hemapala. Department of Electrical Engineering University of Moratuwa Katubadda, Sri Lanka. Abstract—Generally the power system is frequently faced various disturbances. These disturbances will cause to create harmonics and oscillations in the system which lead to operate protection relays. Further this will cause to create a total system failure. Different techniques and devices are used in order to control these power system oscillations and improve the power quality. One of the techniques is use of FACT (flexible alternating current transmission system) devices. FACT devices improve controllability of power system operation. The unified power flow controller (UPFC) is one of the recently founded FACT device which is constructed using modern power electronics technology to control the active and reactive power of the power system. Developing an UPFC for transmission line model and analyzing impact on power quality on transmission line in abnormal conditions would be presented in this paper. Moreover, MATLAB/Simulink models for subsystems of the UPFC are also developed to create a simulation model of UPFC with transmission line model. and other static equipment that provide control of one or more AC transmission system and increase the capacity of power transfer” As Fig. 1 depicts, FACTS devices can be subdivided in to two categories based on the power electronic devices used in the control. They are Voltage Source Converter (VSC) based FACTS and Thyristor valve base FACTS. UPFC is modern FACTS device which was developed based on VSC control technology. Different FACTS controllers are used to provide corrective actions for different steady-state operating problems in power system. Table 1 shows some applications of the FACTS devices. Keywords—UPFC, FACTS, STATCOM, SSSC I.INTRODUCTION Dynamic nature of the power system causes to frequent disturbances in the system which can drive the system to an unstable state. This continues failures will lower the power system reliability and power quality index of the system. Power quality is a combination of voltage quality and current quality. The UPFC is one of the modern FACTS device that can be used to improve power quality and reliability. UPFC also increases transient and dynamic grid stability of the system by controlling both active and reactive power flow through a transmission line. With the increasing demand, the existing transmission network should be used optimally rather than constructing new transmission lines. UPFC provide better utilization of transmission system assets which already exist and provide environmental benefits. FACTS technology concept was introduced by Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in the late 1980’s. This concept is used in worldwide to improve the system quality, reliability, stability and power flow with the existing power systems [1]. FACTS technology is defined by the IEEE as "a power electronic based system Fig. 1.Classification of FACTS devices TABLE I. FACTS CONTROLLERS FOR STEADY- STATE OPERATING PROBLMES Operating problem Corrective action FACTS controller Voltage limits: Low voltage at heavy load High voltage at low load Supply reactive power Absorb reactive power SVC, STATCOM SVC, STATCOM, TCR Thermal limits: Transmission circuit overload Tripping of parallel circuit Parallel line load sharing Power flow direction reversal Reduce overload TCSC, SSSC,UPFC,PS Limit circuit loading TCSC,SSSC,UPFC,PS Power flows: Adjust series reactance Adjust phase angle TCSC,SSSC,UPFC TCSC, SSSC,PS 1 978-1-5090-5682-8 /17/$31.00 ©2017 IEEE International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT2017] The UPFC is the most versatile device which designed based on the combination of both series and shunt FACTS devices. Shunt FACTS device (Shunt Converter) or STATCOM (Static Synchronous Compensator) is used to control the reactive power flow in the transmission line. Series FACTS device (Series Converter) or SSSC (Static Synchronous Series Compensator) is used to control the series injecting voltage and phase angle which is injected to the transmission line through series transformer. These two converters are combined with a common dc link. This capacitor has small energy storing capacity. So, active power generated by the series converter should be equal to the active power flow through the shunt converter [1]. Fig.2 shows schematic diagram of the UPFC. II.FACTS DEVICES Many research have been done in the field of FACTS. Since UPFC is one of the modern FACTS device, fewresearch have published with reference to UPFC. Lot of them are simulation models and it is hard to find actual harware design of a UPFC. Based on the control strategy used, UPFC has the flexibility to control anyoperation functions.D-Q control strategy is used in this research among different control strategies. Operation of UPFC, main two components of the UPFC, i.e. SSSC (static synchronous series compensator strategy) and STATCOM(static synchronous compensator)and different control strategies would bediscussed here. A. SSSC SSSC is one of the voltage source converter(VSC) based FACTS device which is connected in series with transmission line. SSSC provides advanced series compensation. This has several advantages over a TCSC (Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator). Some of the advantages are listed below [2]. ¾ SSSC doesn’t use bulky passive components such as capacitors and reactors. ¾ Operation capability in both inductive and capacitive mode. ¾ Improved technical characteristics. ¾ Real power exchange is possible between DC side and AC network. i.e. energy source can be connected on the DC side. B. STATCOM STATCOM is also a VSC based FACTS device which is shunt connected with transmission line. Current flowing through converter is controlled to adjust the bus voltage, i.e. reactive power flow of the transmission line. STATCOM has many advantages over a SVC (Static Var Compensator). Some of them are listed below. [2] ¾ ¾ ¾ Quick response. Space requirement is less because STATCOM doesn’t use bulky passive components such as capacitors and reactors. STATCOM can be interfaced with real power sources. UPFC is come with advantages of both SSSC and STATCOM. And has technological edge from controllability and flexibility aspect over the other FACTS devices. C. D-Q axis control strategy Three phase voltage and current is converted in to two axes (D and Q) in this strategy for controlling purposes. Here, measured voltage and current of the transmission line is split into two components which are in phase with D axis and Q axis using abc to dq0 transformation method. These two components provide details about three phase voltage and current. According to these readings, D and Q axis component of the required injecting voltage can be calculated. It should be added to the transmission line to maintain the system stability. Then dq0 to abc transformation gives the required three phase injecting voltage which should be injected to the line through series transformer. Switching signals for the power switching devices should be generated according to that. In series converter, Real power of the transmission line can be controlled using D axis voltage by adjusting D axis current. Reactive power of the transmission line can be controlled using Q axis voltage by adjusting Q axis current component. [3-5] In shunt converter, D-axis shunt current component is related with DC capacitor voltage and Q-axis shunt current component is related with reactive power. D. Phase Shifter Strategy(PS) In this strategy, injecting voltage is maintained in quadrature with UPFC bus voltage which shunt converter is connected. Phase angle of the transmission line sending end voltage can be varied to obtain specific active power flow. [7-9]. E. Operation of the UPFC Fig. 2.Schematic diagram of the UPFC The UPFC consist of mainly three parts. They are converter circuit, inverter circuit and controller circuits. Inverter circuit provide the main function of the UPFC. 2 International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT2017] By using inverter circuit, controllable ac voltage with a magnitude of ܸ௦ ሺͲ ܸ௦ ܸ௦ሺ୫ୟ୶ሻ ሻ and phase angle of ሺͲ ͵Ͳሻcan be injectedto the transmission line through series transformer. Fig.3 and Fig.4 shows the single line diagram and voltage and current phasor diagram of UPFC respectively. The series injecting voltage which has magnitude of ܸ௦ and phase angle of can be controlled by controlling the converter and inverter circuit operation. It implies that ܸଶ and ߜ can be controlled. Active and reactive power flow through transmission line can be calculated using following equation. ݓ݈݂ݎ݁ݓ݁ݒ݅ݐܿܣሺܲሻ ൌ ܸଶ ܸଷ ܵ݅݊ሺߜሻ ܺ ܸଶ ሺܸଶ െ ܸଷ ݏܥሺߜሻሻ ܴ݁ܽܿݓ݈݂ݎ݁ݓ݁ݒ݅ݐሺܲሻ ൌ ܺ According to that, by adjusting magnitude of ܸ௦ and phase angle of , both active and reactive power flows through transmission line can be controlled. The main function of converter is to absorb or supply real power to inverter circuit through dc link. It can also absorb generated adjustable reactive power if it can provide bidirectional operation. By disconnecting from DC link and connecting to the DC source, converter and inverter can operate independently. (i.e. as STATCOM and SSSC) III.SIMULATION MODEL OF UPFC AND TRANSMISSION LINE In order to develop Simulink model of the UPFC, Total system have been sub divided in to several sub systems and develop Simulink models. Sub systems are simulated separately and integrated these subsystems as a one system. A. Transmission line model Transmission line model is designed to test the operation of the UPFC. As Fig.5 UPFC is connected in between transmission line 2 and 3. By using this configuration, active power and reactive power flow through the transmission line 3 can be controlled. In this Simulink model, different loads are connected to switch from the system at different times. UPFC is to be connected between bus 3 and bus 4 as Fig. 6. B. Inverter & Converter circuits Inverter circuit controls the magnitudeሺܸ௦ ሻand phase angle ሺሻof the injecting voltage. By controlling the gate signals of the IGBT, the series injecting voltage can be controlled. Converter circuit control the DC link voltage input to the inverter circuit. Active power flow through converterinverter circuit can be controlled by controlling the gate signals of the IGBTs. Bus 2 Bus 1 Bus 3 Bus 4 Bus 5 Fig. 5. Demonstration model of UPFC Fig.3.Single line diagram of the UPFC Fig.4.Phasor diagram Fig.6.Simulink Model of the Transmission Line Model 3 International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT2017] B. Series controller IV.CONTROLLING OF UPFC In this model, it calculates the required voltage magnitude and the phase angle of the injecting voltage which need to maintain desired condition of the system. D-Q control strategy is used to calculate this injecting voltage. A. Shunt controller In here, Voltage at DC link (Vdc) and bus 3 voltage (V3) are taken as inputs to shunt controller. In that controller, first three phase voltage is converted to d-q axis values. Vdc and V3 are used to calculate reference daxis current (Id) and q- axis current (Iq) values. Then current regulator is used to calculate required voltage and required phase angle. Fig .7 shows the Simulink model. Voltage at bus 3 & 4(V3 & V4) and line current flowing through the bus 4 (I4) are used as inputs in series controller. Here also d-q axis control method is used. By taking reference active and reactive power as inputs (Pref and Qref), it calculates the reference d-axis and q-axis current component (Idref and Iqref) which should be maintained in the system. PI controller is used to get required voltage which should inject in series with line to maintain the stability and quality of the power flow. Fig .8 shows the Simulink model for the series controller with necessary control blocks. Fig 7: Simulink model of the shunt controller Fig.8. Simulink model of series controller 4 International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT2017] V.SIMULATION RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Validity of the simulation is tested using the designed transmission model under several circumstances to ensure the reliability and better performance of the UPFC over other power electronic devices for voltage compensation. As shown in Fig.9, at t=0.2 s large reactive load is parallelly connected to the transmission line before the UPFC and followed by the another load connected at t=0.4s after the UPFC while those are disconnected at t=0.6s and t=0.7s respectively. Transmission line voltage is observed under two scenarios where UPFC connected and SSSC is connected. Same type of analysis has been done using a comparative study of UPFC and shunt device STATCOM which is shown in Fig.10. In both cases, it is clearly seen that voltage suppression is better represented by the UPFC device under the perturbation of the loads connection and disconnection. With the statical data shown in Table 2. this is further proved as the standard deviation of the voltage get reduced and the mean voltage gets enhanced with the replacement of UPFC. Voltage Variation TABLE II. STAT ICAL DATA OF SIMULATION STANDARD DEVIATION(KV) MEAN VOLTAGE(KV) UPFC 0.486 2.85 STATCOM 0.624 2.76 SSSC 0.711 2.66 Reactive Power Reference Fig.11. Comparative analysis of reactive power reference of UPFC and SSSC Fig.11 depicts the variation of reactive power reference signal generation of the control system of UPFC and SSSC. When the reactive power reference of the transmission line is set up to 0.5 at t=0.5 s UPFC controller responds to it quickly where it shows the rising time of 0.1s only. Fig.9. Comparative analysis of UPFC and SSSC Voltage Variation Fig.10. Comparative analysis of UPFC and STATCOM In case of a large reactive load(30 Mvar) connected transmission line, behavior of the system voltage with and without UPFC is studied in Fig.12. At t=0.1 s UPFC is bypassed where it shows serious voltage unitability of the system and then at t-0.3s it is reconnected to the line, where it shows responsive stability of voltage despite of load switching at t=0.6s. Voltage Variation Fig.12. Disconnection and reconnection of UPFC 5 International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT2017] VI.CONCLUSION UPFC is one of the modern technology use in the world to maintain the power quality. The concept is still in developing stage and most of research are still in simulation level. It uses modern power electronic concepts and power system theories to achieve its optimum operation in the system. MATLAB/Simulink was used for simulation purpose in this research. This paper provides a detailed discussion about UPFC and its operation. Addition to that, importance of FACTS devices to increase the power quality and reliability of power transmission is also included here. Furthermore, the paper discussed about control strategies of UPFC, transmission line model design, series and shunt controller designs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Senate Research Council, University of Moratuwa (SRC/LT/2015/04). REFERENCES [1] Shraddha S. Khonde, S. S. Dhamse, Dr. A. G. Thosar, “Power Quality Enhancement of Standard IEEE 14 Bus System using Unified Power Flow Controller” International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT) Volume 3, Issue 5, September 2014. [2] Padiyar, K. R. FACTS Controllers In Power Transmission And Distribution. 1st ed. New Delhi: New Age International, 2007. Print. [3] M. R. Qader, "Design and simulation of a different innovation controller-based UPFC (unified power flow controller) for the enhancement of power quality," Energy, vol. 89, pp. 576–592, Sep. 2015. [4] S. Tara Kalyani and G. Tulasiram Das. “SIMULATION OF D-Q CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A UNIFIED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER”. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. vol. 2, no. 6, december 2007. [5] Mirjana Milosevic. “Decoupling Control of d and q Current Components in Three-Phase Voltage Source Inverter”. [6] Acha, Enrique. FACTS. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley, 2004. Print. [7] MubeenSaminaElyas, Nema RK, AgnihotriGayatri. Power flow control with UPFC in power transmission system. World AcadSciEngTechnol 2008;2:287e91. [8] Padiyar KR. FACTS: controllers in power transmission and distribution. New Age 2007. ISBN No. 9788122425413. [9] Lerch E, Povh D, Witzmann R, Hlebcar R, Mihalic R. Simulation and performance analysis of unified power flow controller. CIGRE August 1994. [10]VaishaliKuralkar, “Active and Reactive Power control using UPFC”, International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science Volume 2, Issue 6, October-November, 2014 [11]S. Muthukrishnan, Dr. A. Nirmal Kumar, “Comparison of Simulation and Experimental Results of UPFC used for Power Quality Improvement”, International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 3, June, 2010. [12]Prof.KishorPorate, N Santhosh Kumar, “Experimental Verification and Matlab Simulation of UPFC for Power Quality Improvement”, IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSRJEEE) e-ISSN: 2278-1676,p-ISSN: 2320-3331, Volume 9, Issue 2 Ver. VII (Mar – Apr. 2014). [13]S. Muthukrishnan,Dr. A.Nirmalkumar, G. Murugananth, “Modeling and Simulation Five Level Inverter based UPFC System” , International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 12– No.11, January 2011. [14] B. Kawkabani, B. Kawkabani, J. Simond, “Modeling and Transient Simulation of Unified Power Flow Controllers (UPFC) in PowerSystem Studies”. [15]K.Suresh, P.Venkatesh, “Modelling and Controlling of Unified Power Flow Controller (Upfc)” ,International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2574-2577 [16] Alok Kumar Mohanty, Amar Kumar Barik, “Power System Stability Improvement Using FACTS Devices”, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER). 6 View publication stats