Sulphur removal in Iron making ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION • Sulphur contains in 1. In Iron ores – Ion Suplhide 2. Flux- Sulphide & Sulphates 3. Coke ash- Iron sulphide, Calcium sulphide and Organic sulphur. ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION • Distribution is as such • in ore : 0.05-0.10 % Final sulphur load • Coke : 0.6-1.5 % Slag Flue dust & top gas Iron Blast Furnace Sulphur Balance Sulphur Input Material Sulphur Output Kg % Kg % Coke (1%S) 600 Kg/THM 6.0 80 Charge materials 1.5 20 Iron (0.03%S) 0.3 4 Flue dust and gas 0.37 5 Slag 6.82 91 A. K. Biswas, Priniciples of blast furnace Ironmaking, Theory and Practice, SBA Publication, 1984. Sulphur Reactions 1. FeS + 10Fe2O3 = 7Fe3O4+ SO2 SO2+2C = ½ S2 (g) + 2CO [Fe] + ½ S2 (g) = [FeS] 2. CaSO4 + [Fe] + 3C = [FeS] + CaO +3CO 3. CaSO4 + 4C = CaS + 4CO CaS + FeO = CaO + [FeO] 4. CaS + SiO (g) = SiS (g) + CaO SiS (g) + 2 [Fe] = [Fe-Si] + [FeS] Sulphur Reactions Coke Sulphur Gasification 0.5 S2 + O2 = SO2 SO2+C = ½ S2 + 2CO SO2+2C = CS + 2CO In reducing Zone SO2+1.5C = 0.5CO2 + COS In presence of Natural Gas SO2 + 3H2 = 2H2O + H2S SO2 + CH4 = CO + H2O + H2S Sulphur Reactions Metal sulphur & Slag sulphur variation along with the furnace height A. K. Biswas, Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking, SBA publication, 1984 Sulphur control in Iron Making process Schrama et al., Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 44 (2017) 333-343 Sulphur Reactions A. K. Biswas, Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking, SBA publication, 1984 Sulphur Reactions The exchange of sulphur between iron droplets and hearth slag depends on 1. Sulphur reaction rate of the slag 2. Reaction surface between slag and metal 3. Contact time 4. Slag composition 5. Slag bulk, slag basicity & sulphur load 6. Metal composition 7. slag and metal viscosity Sulphur Reactions The reaction rate of sulphur transfer from metal to slag depends on 1. Basicity and temperature of slag 2. Slag bulk 3. Contact surface and time. Sulphur Reactions Slag transfer rate increases with increase in basicity and temperature of slag A. K. Biswas, Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking, SBA publication, 1984 Thermodynamic consideration of S removal [S]Fe + (CaO) = (CaS) +(FeO) ππππ .ππ ππ K= ππ .ππππ K= (%π).ππ ππ / %π .ππ .ππππ / ππ . πππ¬π’ππ’ππ² (%π) Sulphur distribution ratio : ππ¬ = ∝ π. [%π] ππ±π²π ππ§ π©π¨πππ§ππ’ππ₯ π¨π π¬π₯ππ Sulphur Reactions The slag metal reaction can be accelerated by 1. 2. 3. 4. Holding the slag longer in the hearth Decreasing the amount of flushing slag, i.e tapping iron and slag together. More frequent tappings. A good and uniform furnace run with high degree of indirect reduction. Sulphur Reactions The contact surface between iron and slag is of considerable importance and rate determining factor. Sulphur transfer increases with increase phase contact surface. Greater the thickness of the slag layer through the Iron droplets pass i.e greater the contact time greater the desulphurization. Some researcher has reported the vice versa effect. Substantial sulphur removal occurs by more frequent tapping of iron. Sulphur Reactions Al2O3 10 10 15 15 SiO2 40 34 33.5 31.8 CaO 45 41 42.5 40.2 MgO 0 10 4 8 (CaO/SiO2) (CaO+MgO)/(SiO2+Al2O3) 1.13 0.90 1.21 1.16 1.27 0.96 1.26 1.03 Optimum slag composition for obtaining optimum desulphurization capacity. A. K. Biswas, Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking, SBA publication, 1984 Sulphur Load, Slag Volume & Slag Basicity The theoretical sulphur content of the iron depends on sulphur distribution ratio, sulphur load & slag bulk. π. π πΊ %πΊ = π + π. πππ πΌπ π S : Sulphur load in Kg/THM q= slag bulk, Kg/THM πΌπ = (%S)/[%S] Sulphur Control 1. Pre-reduction of ore results in higher bosh temperature. 2. High basicity and low-FeO content 3. High fluid bosh slag : slag thinning by MgO and / MnO. 4. Low coke ash. 5. Replacement of coke by hydrocarbon reduces coke ash. 6. Tapping of iron and slag together. External desulphurization 1. Soda ash (Na2CO3) or Caustic soda (NaOH) 2. Lime (CaO), CaC2, Calcium cyanamide (CaNCN) Sodium has higher affinity for sulphur [FeS] + Na2CO3 (or NaOH) = Na2S + FeO + CO2 (H2O) By Lime [FeS] + CaO (s) + C (gr) = CaS (s) + CO (g) + [Fe] 2[FeS] + 2CaO (s) + [Si] = 2CaS (s) + SiO2 (s) + 2[Fe] External desulphurization Lime Its low cost and easy availability make it an attractive reagent. But it has got some critical disadvantages. (1) During the process of desulphurization, lime particles are continuously being covered by two precipitates namely calcium sulphide (CaS) and calcium silicate (CaSiO4). These compounds impede the desulphurizing reaction by surrounding the lime and forming thick barriers at the lime – hot metal interface. (2) In order to reduce this growth, the grain size of the lime is to be restricted to 45 micrometer maximum. The desulphurizing reaction with lime takes place as per equation: 2CaO + 2S =2 CaS + O2. External desulphurization Dr. Dmitri Kopeliovich, Desulfurization of steel, Substech External desulphurization Calcium carbide Calcium carbide was widely used desulphurizing reagent but at present it is less used. Difficult material handling processes and stringent environment requirements with the slag disposal have negatively impacted its use. Calcium carbide also forms layer such as in lime, and inhibits the desulphurizing reaction. The desulphurizing reaction is : CaC2 + S = CaS + 2C. External desulphurization Magnesium • Magnesium possesses high affinity for both oxygen and sulphur. During injection of Mg into the hot metal, therefore it can quickly react with sulphur to form MgS. • Only addition of magnesium is less used because of the violent reaction and the relatively complex equipment requirement. • Magnesium is soluble in hot metal and reacts with sulphur in solution. External desulphurization Magnesium The desulphurizing reaction with magnesium takes place as per equation: Mg + S = MgS. • Mg has low boiling point (1090 °C), magnesium vapourizes as it enters the hot metal. This vapour is under high pressure. • Once in ladle, the magnesium vapour forms bubbles which rise through the hot metal, dissolve and react with sulphur in solution, forming magnesium sulphide (MgS). External desulphurization • The lime injection with the magnesium assists in dissolution by reducing the diameter of the bubbles as well as providing precipitation sites for the MgS. Lime addition to avoid resulphurisation by Mg addition MgS (s) +1/2 O2 (g) = MgO (s) + [S]Fe By adding CaO the formed CaS possesses higher stability than MgS. Schrama et al., Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2017. J. Yang, M. Kuwabara and T. Teshigawara, et al. ISIJ Int., 2005 Issues in External Desulphurization • During the desulphurizing process, the slag formation is proportional to the amount of reagent added to the hot metal. Some hot metal gets trapped in the slag. • The loss of heat during the desulphurizing process is an important factor since it reduces the sensible heat of the hot metal sent to the converters. The three primary sources of heat loss are : (i) radiation from the surface of the hot metal, (ii) addition of cold reagents and (iii) introduction of cold injection lances into the hot metal. The largest temperature loss occurs during injection rather than skimming. A temperature loss of 30 °C is expected during the desulphurization process. Issues in External Desulphurization • No major effect on the refractory lining life of the hot metal ladle as the treatment time is small. • Addition of reagent and slag removing operation generate fumes which are to be collected and dedusted before their release to the environment. • The captured fumes are typically cleaned in a pulse jet type bag house designed for metallurgical operations. External desulphurization Injections Final effect Lime ( 2% weight of HM) +N2 S reduction from 0.1 -0.01 (90% in 3 min) Lime + 2% aluminium powder S reduction from 0.3 -0.004 (99% in 4.5min) Mg Powder Final sulphur 0.001% 80% Lime+20% Soda + compressed Air 0.17-0.05 & 0.043-0.02% Liquid metal+ lime powder (<1.5 mm) + Soda in a refractory lined rotating cylinder S reduction from 0.1 -0.01 (95% in 20-30 min) Calcium carbide + N2 2-2.5 Kg for every 0.01%S drop (50 % Desulphurization) Lime powder + Methane + Mechanical Stirring <0.01 %S (9 Kg lime+ 30 liters of methane) A. K. Biswas, Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking, SBA publication, 1984