INFORMATION SCIENCE STUDIES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTING, INFORMATICS, AND MATHEMATICS (IM244)
BACHELOR OF INFORMATION SCIENCE (HONS)
LIBRARY MANAGEMENT
(IML606) CHILDREN’S LIBRARIANSHIP
ASSIGNMENT 1 (ARTICLE REVIEW)
PREPARED BY:
NAME:
NURUL IZZATI BINTI ABDUL MAJID
MATRIC NO:
2021864248
PREPARED FOR:
DR. HAZIAH BINTI SA’ARI
CLASS:
N5IM2445A
SUBMISSION DATE:
15 JANUARY 2024
Acknowledgement
In the name of Allah s.w.t, the most gracious, the most merciful. Praise to Allah s.w.t, the lord
of the universe, whom with His willing giving me the opportunity to complete my individual
assignment.
This individual assignment was prepared for my course subject IML606, Children’s
Librarianship, and to my course lecturer, Dr. Haziah Binti Sa’ari. This assignment is based on
the methods given by the lecturer.
Firstly, I would like to express my sincere thanks to my lecturer, Dr. Haziah lecturer of
Information Science Studies, College of Computing, Informatics, and Mathematics who had
guided a lot for my task during classes.
Secondly, I would like to thank to both of my parents, family, and others for their cooperation,
encouragement, constructive suggestion and full of support in the completion of this
assignment from the beginning till the end.
Thirdly, thank you to all my classmates and everyone, that has been contributed by supporting
my work and help me, I finally finish doing this assignment.
Table of Contents
Citation...................................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1
Objectives.................................................................................................................................. 1
Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 2
Results Summary ..................................................................................................................... 3
Critical Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 4
Personal Insight........................................................................................................................ 4
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 5
References ................................................................................................................................. 6
Appendix ................................................................................................................................... 7
Page |1
Citation
Clark, L. (2017). Caregivers’ perceptions of emergent literacy programming in public
libraries in relation to the National Research Councils’ guidelines on quality
environments for children. Library & Information Science Research, 39(2), 107–115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.04.001
Introduction
In this article review assignment, the chosen article title "Caregivers' Perceptions of
Emergent Literacy Programming in Public Libraries in Relation to The National Research
Councils' Guidelines on Quality Environments for Children " (Appendix). This article authored
by Laura K. Clark and was published on 16th April 2017 also available online at Elsevier in
Library and Information Science Research.
The article "Caregivers' Perceptions of Emergent Literacy Programming in Public
Libraries" explores how caregivers perceive and engage with emergent literacy programs in
public libraries, focusing on alignment with the National Research Council's guidelines. Public
libraries have increasingly become crucial for early childhood development, offering programs
that support literacy skills in young learners. This study, conducted in three Florida library
systems, aims to uncover insights to enhance emergent literacy programs and contribute
valuable knowledge to children's librarianship. The focus is on understanding the dynamics
between caregivers, young children, and the literacy initiatives provided by public libraries.
Objectives
The primary objective of the article "Caregivers' Perceptions of Emergent Literacy
Programming in Public Libraries in Relation to The National Research Councils' Guidelines
on Quality Environments for Children " is to investigate and analyse caregivers' perspectives
on emergent literacy programs within the context of public libraries. The research seeks to
address the following central questions:
1. How do caregivers perceive and engage with emergent literacy programming
designed for young children in public libraries?
2. To what extent do these perceptions align with the National Research Council's
guidelines on quality environments for children?
The study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the varied experiences,
preferences, and challenges faced by caregivers participating in emergent literacy programs
Page |2
across different public library settings. By exploring these dynamics, the research endeavours
to contribute valuable insights to the field of children's librarianship, assisting in the ongoing
improvement and tailoring of library programs to better meet the needs of both caregivers and
young learners.
Methodology
Research design is where a survey methodology was employed to quantitatively
describe caregivers' perceptions of emergent literacy programming in public libraries. While
survey methodology allows for quantitative analysis, it may lack the depth of insights provided
by qualitative approaches. The choice of a survey aligns with the aim of providing a
quantitative overview but may not capture nuanced caregiver perspectives comprehensively.
Sampling of the study focused on three medium-sized library systems in Florida,
assuming caregivers' demographics aligned with the community. Caregivers attending
emergent literacy programs in these libraries were invited to participate. The assumption that
caregivers' demographics mirror the communities might oversimplify diversity within the
caregiver population. This could affect the generalizability of findings to a broader
demographic spectrum.
Data collection in which the surveys was administered during a regular week in each
library, following emergent literacy programs. Caregivers were invited to participate
immediately after the program, with paper surveys handed out on-site. The reliance on
caregivers attending programs during the chosen week might introduce selection bias.
Additionally, the absence of daycare during the survey could impact participation, potentially
excluding certain caregivers.
Selection of the Library System, three medium-sized library systems were selected
based on community population and attendance records. Demographic data from the Census
Bureau informed the choice. While the choice of medium-sized libraries is rational, the
generalizability of findings may be constrained. The demographic factors considered might not
fully represent the variety of communities engaged in emergent literacy programs.
Data analysis is where descriptive statistics were used to analyse the self-administered
surveys, with open-ended questions (8 and 15) analysed for themes. Descriptive statistics
provide an overview, but the lack of more advanced statistical methods might limit the depth
Page |3
of analysis. Open-ended questions offer valuable qualitative insights, but their analysis may be
subjective.
A consent form was provided, and the survey explicitly sought permission to collect
and use data for research purposes. Explicit consent is essential, but the absence of
demographic information raises concerns about the potential identifiability of participants,
impacting the robustness of ethical considerations.
The structure of the survey consisted of 17 questions, with specific items excluded from
this study but reported separately. While item exclusion is reasonable, the rationale behind
excluding specific questions is not provided, leaving potential gaps in understanding
caregivers' motivations.
The survey methodology employed in this study offers a quantitative perspective on
caregivers' perceptions of emergent literacy programming in public libraries. However, several
limitations, such as potential selection bias, lack of demographic diversity, and the exclusion
of certain survey items, may impact the study's external validity and depth of insights.
Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches or addressing these limitations
transparently in the study's discussion could enhance the research's overall effectiveness.
Results Summary
The study explored caregivers' views on emergent literacy programs in Florida public
libraries, aligning with the National Research Council's guidelines on children's environments.
Findings showed significant program variations, particularly in content and activities, such as
music, book reading, and props. Caregiver roles were categorized as active or passive, with
varying levels of participation across libraries. Survey data from 77 respondents highlighted
caregiver perceptions of alphabet and reading learning, physical skills, school preparation, and
social interaction. Positive responses were predominant, emphasizing warm program
environments and librarians' positive roles. Caregiver preferences for group sizes varied.
Overall, the study sheds light on diverse program experiences, contributing to a better
understanding of emergent literacy programs in different library settings.
Page |4
Critical Analysis
The article offers insights into emergent literacy programs in public libraries,
specifically focusing on three libraries with diverse programs. This real-world context
increases the applicability of findings. Prioritizing caregivers' perceptions aligns with the
study's aim, utilizing a mixed-methods approach for a nuanced understanding. However,
limitations exist, such as the focus on medium-sized Florida libraries, potentially limiting
generalizability. Assumptions about caregiver demographics lack specificity, affecting sample
representativeness.
Reliability concerns include variations in survey response rates and dependence on
caregiver self-reports, introducing potential biases like social desirability. The study aligns with
National Research Council Guidelines, offering a valid framework. Thorough analysis of openended responses enhances validity, categorizing themes comprehensively. Methodological
considerations suggest a more balanced integration of qualitative and quantitative data,
acknowledging the impact of survey exclusions without clear rationale.
Future research implications involve exploring caregiver demographics for tailored
programs and adopting longitudinal perspectives for dynamic insights over time. Despite
valuable contributions, acknowledging limitations like sample representativeness and data
exclusions is crucial. Addressing these concerns will strengthen the study's overall robustness
in understanding caregivers' experiences in public libraries.
Personal Insight
The article "Caregivers' Perceptions of Emergent Literacy Programming in Public
Libraries" has profoundly influenced my perspective on current and future trends in
librarianship, particularly in the realm of children's services. The study's emphasis on tailoring
programs to diverse caregiver needs aligns seamlessly with the evolving landscape of
personalized and inclusive library experiences. Recognizing the significant variations in
program structures across different libraries underscores the importance of flexibility, a
principle echoed in contemporary discussions within my course content.
The insight into caregiver participation levels, ranging from active involvement to a
more passive role, resonates with the growing recognition of individualized learning journeys
in librarianship courses. Incorporating multimodal approaches, such as live and recorded music,
interactive book readings, and diverse props, aligns perfectly with the emphasis on varied and
engaging learning experiences for children, a topic extensively covered in our coursework.
Page |5
Moreover, the study's encouragement of ongoing conversations with caregivers to
shape program logistics and the promotion of positive librarian-caregiver relationships echoes
the broader trend in librarianship courses, emphasizing community engagement and fostering
supportive relationships.
In essence, this article serves as a practical and insightful bridge between theoretical
course content and the dynamic realities of modern librarianship, influencing my approach to
creating enriching and inclusive library experiences for children and caregivers.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the article "Caregivers' Perceptions of Emergent Literacy Programming in
Public Libraries in Relation to The National Research Councils' Guidelines on Quality
Environments for Children “provides valuable insights into the dynamic landscape of emergent
literacy programs and their impact on caregivers in public library settings. The study's strengths
lie in its real-world diversity, mixed-methods approach, and alignment with the National
Research Council's guidelines on quality environments for children. However, limitations such
as sample representativeness and the exclusion of demographic data should be acknowledged.
The findings contribute significantly to the field of librarianship, offering a nuanced
understanding of caregiver preferences, program variations, and the positive perceptions of
librarians' roles. The study emphasizes the importance of tailoring programs to diverse
caregiver needs, promoting social interaction, and fostering positive librarian-caregiver
relationships. These insights align with broader trends in librarianship, emphasizing inclusivity,
community engagement, and multimodal learning experiences for children. While the study
enriches our understanding of emergent literacy programs, future research could address
identified limitations and explore longitudinal perspectives. This article serves as a valuable
resource for professionals in children's librarianship, encouraging continuous learning, and
prompting thoughtful considerations for designing and implementing effective and inclusive
library programs.
Page |6
References
Clark, L. (2017). Caregivers’ perceptions of emergent literacy programming in public
libraries in relation to the National Research Councils’ guidelines on quality
environments for children. Library & Information Science Research, 39(2), 107–115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.04.001
Taylor and Francis. (2023, February 1). What is a review article? Author Services. Retrieved
January 15, 2024, from https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-yourresearch/writing-your-paper/how-to-write-review-article/
Article review Examples 2024: Free article review writing samples. (n.d.).
AcademicHelp.net. https://academichelp.net/samples/academics/reviews/article/
Review vs. research articles - Concordia University. (n.d.). Concordia University. Retrieved
January 15, 2024, from https://www.concordia.ca/library/guides/exercisescience/review-vs-research.html
McCombes, S. (2023, November 20). What is a research design. Scribbr. Retrieved January
15, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/research-design/
Page |7
Appendix
Page |8
Page |9
P a g e | 10
P a g e | 11
P a g e | 12
P a g e | 13
P a g e | 14
P a g e | 15