Chapter 9: Managing uncertainty 9.1 MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF UNCERTAINTY there is no guarantee of success but we can view possible successful outcomes Firstly, the assessment of risk is based on limited information Secondly, there is a chance of balance between risk and potential rewards, that may follow if the innovation is successful Can use a business plan in the face of uncertainty In the idea phase involve all stakeholders Incremental inno – low risk Radical inno – high risk 9.2 THE FUNNEL OF UNCERTAINTY Knowledge converts uncertainty to risk It is better to get information as early as possible, especially in a competitive environment as it helps in calculated decision making The challenge in inno is acquiring knowledge early through market research, technological R&D, competitor analysis, trend spotting and other mechanisms We can use innovation to reduce uncertainty but increase resource commitment (e.g. the further we go in a project the more knowledge we have as well as costs increase) – which translates into the innovation funnel roadmap that helps review and make decisions about resource commitment. Essentially, the more we know helps us with the later product We can use the ad hoc basis (doing something for a specific purpose) but having a structured development system with clear decision points and agreed rules on which to base go/no-go decisions is more of an effective approach As the project progresses we move from uncertainty to risk management We need to realise the importance of configuring a system to a particular contingencies of the organisation 9.3 PLANNING UNDER UNCERTAINTY The formal plan is to secure support or funding for a project or venture Planning can help take big and abstract goals into operational needs and support decision making and identify trade-offs planning makes risks and opportunities less vague, exposes unfounded optimism and self-delusion and avoids arguments with responsibilities and rewards. When it comes to entrepreneurs and their business plans, they tend to focus more on their expertise but have insufficient experience in the team and don’t demonstrate passion and commitment to the venture. Business plans for innovation are poorly planned Adoption and diffusion of innovations help with successful business plans The plans fail to identify and analyse any potential competitors. New ventures rely on customers for sales in the early stages this leads to: 1. Loss of negotiating power which may reduce profit margins 2. Don’t develop marketing and sales functions which may limit future growth 3. Vulnerable to changes in the strategy and health of the dominant customer 9.4 FORECASTING INNOVATION Forecasting has a central role in business planning for innovation – it should provide the framework for gathering and sharing data, debating interpretations, and making assumptions, challenges and risks more defined. There is a trade-off between the cost and robustness of a forecast The regression analysis can be used to identify the main factors that drive demand for a given product and can estimate future demand Customer or market surveys: Companies conduct customer surveys – the problem is that customers cannot state their future needs. Information can be based on salesforce, and from existing products and services which is biased as it is based on sales performance instead of long-term development potential. Where products and services are complex, potential users are unaware and not able to articulate their needs – traditional methods of market research are then useless Internal analysis (e.g brainstorming) – a method where a small group of experts interact to identify opportunities or solutions. The suggestions are then recorded so that members can vote on them. It doesn’t produce a forecast, but it provides a useful input. Approaches to problem-solving: 1. Understanding the problem - The process involves analysing the task, determining the need for deliberate problem-structuring efforts, constructing opportunities, exploring data, and framing problems. 2. Generating ideas - The problem-solving process involves generating and focusing phases, where individuals or groups generate various options, such as fluent, flexible, original, or refined, and then examine and select promising options. 3. Planning for action - The goal is to identify and develop effective choices, preparing for successful implementation and social acceptance, despite the potential for unintended benefits. External assessment (e.g Delphi)- method for consensus-building on future technological goals and consumer needs, used for long-term forecasting and identifying factors affecting achievement. It involves selecting experts, structuring questions and including non-tech experts. The process starts with a postal survey, then an analysis and then the resampling with more a focused questionnaire. The Delphi technique is a repetitive process of questionnaires and feedback among experts to forecast probabilities of events. It aims to eliminate biases from face-to-face meetings, but the quality depends on expert expertise and selection. It's popular for national foresight programs. Scenario development – these are the descriptions of alternative possible futures that are based on different assumptions and interpretations of the driving forces of change. Path of development can range from conventional to revolutionary. It incorporates critical events. Can either be normative (preferred vision of the future and outlines different pathways from the goal to the present) or explorative (defines drivers of change and creates scenarios from these without explicit goals or agendas) Must challenge the assumptions of stakeholders The goal is to plan for the outcome with the greatest impact or retain sufficient flexibility to respond to different scenarios. 9.5 ESTIMATING THE DEMAND FOR INNOVATIONS Understanding how and why innovations are adopted helps to develop realistic plans. 9.6 ASSESSING RISK, RECOGNISING UNCERTAINTY Risk can be estimated through either qualitatively (high, medium, low) or by probability estimates. The degree of uncertainty must be known to help select appropriate assessment methods and plan for contingencies. Firms can emphasise project management to mitigate internal risks in the firm – but they can fail to identify or exploit opportunities to acceptable risks and to innovate. Risk as probability – innovation can be uncertain so the forecasts (costs, prices, sales volume etc) that underlie project and program evaluations can be unreliable. Managers and technical managers cannot accurately predict development costs, periods, markets and profits of R&D projects. Assessing opportunities for innovation Value of uncertainty Method one: Method two: supporting decision-making Mapping the selection space The innovation selection space is divided into four spaces Zone 1 – exploit (incremental innovation) Zone 2 – reframing Zone 3 – bounded exploration Zone 4 – coevolve (frontier of innovation) Pg 321-344