Uploaded by Dishti

Synthesis Essay Pt II

advertisement
Wadhwani 1
Dishti Wadhwani
Mr. West
APEL Period 3
16 February 2024
Wealth and Empathy Gap
In the United States, 60 to 90% of pregnancies with a prenatal diagnosis of Down
syndrome were terminated in 2022 (United States Congress Joint Economic Committee). Amidst
ongoing debates surrounding disability rights and reproductive technologies, Sarah Zhang,
Harvard graduate and writer at The Atlantic, emerges as a voice on the intersection of
socio-economic privilege and empathy. In her article “The Last Children of Down Syndrome,”
Zhang expresses fear that society could progress to eugenics and designer babies, ultimately
allowing the wealthy to eradicate disability all together, making it a class issue. She argues that
wealthier individuals, who have access to advanced reproductive technologies such as IVF and
prenatal testing, will exhibit decreased empathy towards individuals with disabilities. The pursuit
of wealth leads individuals to prioritize connections solely for personal gain, resulting in societal
divisions and reduced empathy for those directly outside their social sphere.
Wealthy people are less likely to understand and empathize with disabled people because
they don’t actively pursue relationships beyond what directly benefits them. According to a study
by the National Disability Institute, “fewer than one in three working-age adults (33 percent)
with disabilities are employed, compared to 75 percent of adults without a disability” (Goodman
et al.). This highlights the societal barriers that limit economic success for individuals with
disabilities, reflecting the trend that disabled people are more likely to be of lower class.
Discriminatory hiring practices, inaccessible workplaces, and inadequate support systems
Wadhwani 2
contribute to the disproportionately low employment rates observed (Goodman et al.). In short,
those with disabilities are less likely to get a job, let alone get a job that makes them wealthy, and
thus most people with disabilities aren’t likely to be interacting with wealthy people. In
interviews conducted by Thomas C. Corley with 177 American self-made millionaires, these
people made a “conscious effort to only forge relationships with individuals they aspired to be:
other rich and successful people” (Corley). This deliberate networking reflects a mindset geared
towards financial success only. The emphasis on material wealth is especially pronounced in
American society, from media portrayals to cultural norms, reinforcing the notion that financial
success is the ultimate marker of worth, making these selective interactions especially present in
American society. In a relentless quest for money, the focus on financial gain takes priority over
meaningful human connections and empathy toward others. If a relationship doesn’t prove to be
useful in some way, the chances of a wealthy person pursuing it is highly unlikely. Due to the
fact that people with disabilities are unlikely to provide the wealthy some kind of inherent
advantage with economic status, these relationships aren’t developed in such a way that both
sides can understand each other beyond a physical standpoint. Selective approaches to social
interaction fosters an environment where individuals are valued for their economic status and
nothing beyond that. While it is true that wealthy people interact and do benefit from people with
disabilities, such as through public appearances or charity, these interactions are largely surface
level. The wealthy don’t take the time to understand the experiences and lifestyle of disabled,
instead casting them aside as lesser because of their social status. The fact that interacting with
disabled people is an event that needs to be showcased implies that the wealthy person is helping
the disabled simply by acknowledging their existence. This perpetuates a cycle of exclusion and
reinforces the existing divide between the wealthy and who they believe to be lesser than them,
Wadhwani 3
ultimately diminishing empathy towards those outside their immediate social circle.
Understanding that disabled people exist and understanding how they live are two very different
things, but because the wealthy don’t pursue the relationships required to reach this level of
understanding, there is an empathy gap between the two groups.
By prioritizing relationships solely with individuals of similar economic status, people
inadvertently isolate themselves from the diverse aspects of society, leading to a cycle of
ignorance and apathy. This phenomenon underscores a broader truth: when people do not see or
experience something first hand, they are less likely to empathize with it because they don’t
understand the other perspective. This lack of understanding can lead to unfair judgment and
prejudice towards individuals facing circumstances beyond their control. Someone might be
judged for their socioeconomic status, health condition, or cultural background, simply because
others fail to comprehend the challenges they face. Such judgment not only creates stereotypes
and discrimination but also hinders collective efforts toward building a more inclusive and
compassionate society.
Wadhwani 4
Works Cited
Corley, Thomas C. “I Studied 177 Self-Made Millionaires for 5 Years, and Learned That Rich
People Deliberately Surround Themselves with Rich Friends. Here Are the Traits to Look
for to Do the Same.” Business Insider, 21 Feb. 2020,
www.businessinsider.com/rich-people-choose-friends-differently-2018-1. Accessed 14
Feb. 2024.
“Down Syndrome and Social Capital: Assessing the Costs of Selective Abortion - Down
Syndrome and Social Capital: Assessing the Costs of Selective Abortion - United States
Joint Economic Committee.” Joint Economic Committee, 18 March 2022,
https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/republicans/2022/3/down-syndrome-and-so
cial-capital-assessing-the-costs-of-selective-abortion. Accessed 14 February 2024.
Goodman, Nanette, et al. FINANCIAL INEQUALITY: Disability, Race and Poverty in America.
National Disability Institute, Feb. 2019. Accessed 13 February 2024.
Zhang, Sarah. “Prenatal Testing and the Future of Down Syndrome.” The Atlantic, 15 December
2020,
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/12/the-last-children-of-down-syndro
me/616928/. Accessed 15 February 2024.
Download