ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” CALCULATION REPORT TECHNOLOGICAL AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT EQUIPMENT "ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN" Nomenclature 1. Inrodiction ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Nomenclature 1. Inrodiction 2. Project data 2.1. Problem description 2.2. Packing parameters 2.3. Inlet data 3. Design procedure 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 3.4. 3.5. 3.6. Tower diameter Pressure drop Diffusion coefficients Mass transfer coefficients Packing Height Operating and equilibrium lines 4.0 Designig of internals 5.0 Determination of nozzles inside diameters 6.0 Mechanical design of absortion column as per ASME S8. Di1/Di2 6.1 Minimum shell thickness 6.2 Torispherical head design 6.3 Shell thicnes at diffrent heights 7.0 Design of support 7.0' Design of support (conventional method) 8.0 Design of flanged joints 9.0 Design an integral radial nozzle centrally located 10.0 Check the design of a radial nozzle in a cylindrical shell Abstract In the present work, a packed bed absorption column is designed to remove certain amounts of acetone contained in a gaseous stream. Four packing types (50-mm metal Hiflow® rings, 50-mm ceramic Pall® rings, 50-mm metal Top Pak® rings rings) are and 25-mm metal VSP® ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Abstract In the present work, a packed bed absorption column is designed to remove certain amounts of acetone contained in a gaseous stream. Four packing types (50-mm metal Hiflow® rings, 50-mm ceramic Pall® rings, 50-mm metal Top Pak® rings rings) are and 25-mm metal VSP® considered in order to select the most appropriate one in terms of column dimensions, pressure drop and mass-transfer results. Several design parameters were determined including column diameter (D), packing height (Z), overall mass-transfer coefficient (Km) and gas pressure drop (delta P/Z), as well as the overall number of gas-phase transfer units (NtOG), overall height of a gas-phase transfer unit (HtOG) and the effective surface area of packing (ah). The most adequate packing to use for this absorption system constitutes the 25-mm metal VSP® rings, since it provided the greatest values of Km , ah , as well as the lowest values of both Z and HtOG , meaning that it will supply the higher mass-transfer conditions with the lowest column dimensions, but it does not comply with the requirement of pressure drop delta P/Z() for this reason the next adequate packing to use for this absorption system is 50-mm ceramic Pall® rings. The influence of both gas mixture (QG) and solvent (mL') feed flowrates on D, Z, Km, P/Z, NtOG and HtOG was also evaluated for the four packing considered. The design methodology was solved using computing software MATHCAD PRIME 3.0. Nomenclature ah A Ch CL CP CSflood CV dP D DG DL e/k fflood Fp Fr G GMy GMx hL H HtOG kG kL Km Kv Effective specific surface area of packing Absorption factor Hydraulic factor Mass-transfer factor Hydraulic factor CS coefficient at flooding conditions Mass-transfer factor Effective particle diameter Tower diameter Gas-phase diffusion coefficient Liquid-phase diffusion coefficient Lennard-Jones parameter Flooding factor Packing factor Froude number Mass velocity Gas molar velocity Liquid molar velocity Liquid holdup Henry’s constant Overall height of a gas-phase transfer unit Gas-phase convective masstransfer coefficient Liquid-phase convective mass-transfer coefficient Overall volumetric masstransfer coefficient Volumetric mass-transfer coefficient m-1 Dimensionless Dimensionless Dimensionless Dimensionless m/s Dimensionless m m m2/s m2/s K % ft-1 Dimensionless kg/m2.s kmol/m2.s kmol/m2.s Dimensionless atm m kmol/m m/s kmol/m3 kmol/m3 Gas molar velocity kmol/m Liquid molar velocity kmol/m Liquid holdup Dimensionless ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Henry’s constant atm Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Overall height of a gas-phase transfer unit kG Gas-phase convective masskmol/m2.s transfer coefficient kL Liquid-phase convective m/s mass-transfer coefficient Km Overall volumetric masskmol/m3.s transfer coefficient Kv Volumetric mass-transfer kmol/m3.s coefficient KW Wall factor Dimensionless m Mass flowrate kg/h M Molecular weight kg/kmol n Factor Dimensionless N Molar flowrate kmol/h NtOG Overall number of gas-phase Dimensionless transfer units ΔPlimit/Z Maximum pressure drop Pa/m permitted ΔP0/Z Dry pressure drop Pa/m ΔP/Z Overall pressure drop Pa/m P Pressure atm Q Volumetric flowrate m3/h R Ideal gas constant m3.atm/kmol.K %R Removal percent % Re Reynolds number Dimensionless Sc Schmidt number Dimensionless T Temperature ºC T* Factor Dimensionless v Velocity m/s vflood Velocity at flooding conditions m/s V Molar volume cm3/mol X Flow parameter Dimensionless x Mole fraction in liquid phase Fraction y Mole fraction in gas phase Fraction y* Mole fraction in gas phase in Fraction equilibrium with the liquid Z Parking height m Greek Symbols Density kg/m3 μ Viscosity Pa.s σ Collision diameter Å σAB Average collision diameter Å ψ0 Dry-packing resistance Dimensionless coefficient Dimensionless ΩD Diffusion collision integral Dimensionless GMy GMx hL H HtOG 1. Inrodiction Gas-liquid operations are used extensively in chemical and petrochemical industries for D Diffusion collision integral ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Dimensionless Dimensionless Design group“ELMAGERARD” 1. Inrodiction Gas-liquid operations are used extensively in chemical and petrochemical industries for transferring mass, heat and momentum between the phases. Among the most important gasliquid systems employed nowadays is absorption, defined as a mass transfer operation at which one or more soluble components contained in a gas phase mixture are dissolved into a liquid solvent whose volatility is low under process conditions. The absorption process could be classified as physical or chemical. The physical absorption occurs when the target solute is dissolved into the solvent, while the chemical absorption takes place when the target solute reacts with the solvent. The removal efficiency of any physical absorption process will depend on the physical-chemical properties (density, viscosity, diffusivity, etc.) and feed flowrates of the gaseous and liquid streams; the type of mass-transfer contact surface (packing or plate); the operating temperature and pressure (commonly, lower temperatures will favor gas absorption by the liquid solvent); gas-liquid ratio; contact time between phases; and the solute concentration at the inlet gas stream. Gas-liquid absorption operations are usually accomplished in equipment named absorbers. Absorbers are used to a great extent in industrial complexes and plants to separate and purify gaseous streams, to recover valuable products and chemicals, as well as for contamination control. The most common absorber types employed in industry are plate columns, packed towers, Venturi cleaning towers and spray chambers. Packed towers are widely used for gasliquid absorption operations and, to a limited extent, for distillations. A typical packed column consists of a vertical, cylindrical shell containing a support plate for the packing material, mist eliminators, as well as a liquid distributing device designed to provide effective irrigation to the packing The liquid is fed at the top of the column and trickles down through the packed bed, exposing a large surface to contact the gaseous stream, which is supplied at the bottom of the tower . The design approach of a packed-bed absorber usually involves the determination of geometrical parameters such as tower diameter (D) and packing height (Z), as well as some other mass-transfer and operational variables such as convective mass-transfer coefficients for gas and liquid streams; dry and overall pressure drops; as well as overall mass-transfer coefficient. A well designed packed-bed tower will provide the required mass-transfer contact between gas and liquid phases, with low pressure drop, small capital and operating costs, and high removal efficiencies. At the present work, a packed bed absorber is designed to remove certain amounts of acetone contained in an air stream. Four different packing types (Pall®, Hiflow®, Top Pak® and VSP®) were evaluated in order to determine which packing configuration provides the lowest column dimensions (tower diameter and packing height) as well as the highest mass-transfer coefficient for this application, without exceeding the maximum allowable pressure drop and also without affecting the requested removal efficiency. The influence of both liquid solvent and gas mixture feed flowrates on 4 important process parameters (tower diameter, packing height, gas pressure drop and overall mass-transfer coefficient) was assessed for the four packing, while the effect of this two flowrates on two design parameters (overall number of gas-phase transfer units; NtOG and overall height of a gas-phase transfer unit, HtOG) was also determined. ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Figure 1: Typical layout of a packed bed absorber 2. Project data A gaseous mixture containing air and acetone, with a molar composition of 99 % air and 1 % of acetone.The ethanol must be removed by means of a countercurrent absorption process ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 2. Project data 2.1. Problem description A gaseous mixture containing air and acetone, with a molar composition of 99 % air and 1 % of acetone.The ethanol must be removed by means of a countercurrent absorption process using water as the solvent. The gas mixture will enter the tower at a rate of 4000 m3/h, at 27 ºC (300 K) and 1.7 atm, while the solvent (water) will be supplied at a flowrate of 14000 kg/h and also at 300 K. The required removal of acetone to a final concentration of 100 mg/m3, while the maximum pressure drop permitted for the gas stream should not exceed 250 Pa/m of packed height. It’s desired to design a suited packed-bed absorber working at 70% of flooding and operating under isothermal conditions. For this application, four packing types will be evaluated (Figure 2): 1. 50-mm metal Hiflow® rings 2. 50-mm ceramic Pall® rings 3. 50-mm metal Top Pak® rings, and 4. 25-mm metal VSP® rings. Table 1. Performance and mass-transfer characteristics of the different packing considered 2.2. Packing parameters 2.2.1. Hydraulic Parameters !! " # " $!% # ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA 2.2. Packing parameters 2.2.1. Hydraulic Parameters * Mass-transfer surface area per unit volume &( ' ) , + -. ' /0 50 mm Metal Hiflow rings 1 + *.* ' /0 50 mm Cheramic Pall rings 2 + 34 ' /0 50 mm Metal Top Pac rings 5 + .64 ' /0 25 mm Metal VSP rings 7&( Packing porosity or void fraction 7, + 68-33 50 mm Metal Hiflow rings 71 + 6839: 50 mm Cheramic Pall rings 72 + 68-9 50 mm Metal Top Pac rings 75 + 68-3 25 mm Metal VSP rings $ & ( Hydraulic factor $, + 6893; 50 mm Metal Hiflow rings $1 + *8::4 50 mm Cheramic Pall rings $2 + 6899* 50 mm Metal Top Pac rings $5 + *8:;- 25 mm Metal VSP rings $ &( Hydraulic factor $ , + 68<.* 50 mm Metal Hiflow rings $ 1 + 68;;. 50 mm Cheramic Pall rings $ 2 + 68;6< 50 mm Metal Top Pac rings $ 5 + 6839. * = &( ' ) 25 mm Metal VSP rings Packing factor 50 mm Metal Hiflow rings (ft) Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA = , + 4. 50 mm Metal Hiflow rings (ft) = 1 + *<. 50 mm Cheramic Pall rings (ft) = 2 + <; 50 mm Metal Top Pac rings (ft) = 5 + *64 25 mm Metal VSP rings (ft) Design group“ELMAGERARD” 2.2.2. Mass trasfer Parameters $" & ( Mass trasfer factor $", + *8*;9 50 mm Metal Hiflow rings $"1 + *8..3 50 mm Cheramic Pall rings $"2 + *8:.; 50 mm Metal Top Pac rings $"5 + *8:3; 25 mm Metal VSP rings $ & ( Mass trasfer factor $, + 68<69 50 mm Metal Hiflow rings $1 + 68<*4 50 mm Cheramic Pall rings $2 + 68:9- 50 mm Metal Top Pac rings $5 + 68<64 25 mm Metal VSP rings Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the packed bed absorber operationg condition Since the absorption system operates at low pressure and temperature (1.7 atm and 300 K, respectively); the solute gas is very diluted in the liquid phase (that is, the liquid phase can be catalogued as a dilute liquid solution), the system operates under isothermal conditions and there is no reaction between the dissolved solute and the solvent, it’s assumed that the system obeys the Henry’s law, the value of the Henry’s constant for an acetone-water system ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Since the absorption system operates at low pressure and temperature (1.7 atm and 300 K, respectively); the solute gas is very diluted in the liquid phase (that is, the liquid phase can be catalogued as a dilute liquid solution), the system operates under isothermal conditions and there is no reaction between the dissolved solute and the solvent, it’s assumed that the system obeys the Henry’s law, the value of the Henry’s constant for an acetone-water system operating at 27 ºC is H = 3.933 atm. Thus, the distribution coefficient for the gas-liquid system (acetone-water system) at 27 ºC and 1.7 atm is H/P = 3.933 /1.7 = 2.314. 2.3. Inlet data The inlet data necessary to carry out the design calculations are showed below: @ >? + <666 )) %ABC + 686* DE + *6 /F ' )) @ GH + *<666 ) ABC + 49869 )) I + *9 )) AJK + .98-; )) Volumetric flowrate Mole fraction of aceton Outlet concentration of acetone in the gass Mass flowrate of water Molecular weight of acetone Molecular weight of water Combined molecular weight of air LM + --8--N Acetone removal percent OPQQR + 36N Flooding factor S & .46 ' )) Maximum pressure drop permitted U + .46 ' )) )) T Liquid density of solvent VG + --386<3 )) @ WG + 686669- ' V?AXY + *8*;. )) @ Liquid viscosity of solvent WABC + 68666:*; ' Vapor viscosity of acetone at 25 ºC WAJK + 686666*- ' @ ABC + 3<8*;; )) " AJK + .<8-.6 )) ZABC + :84;< *6 /0[ Vapor viscosity of air at 25 ºC Gas density at atmospheric preasure Molar volume of acetone Molar volume of air Collision diameter of acetone Collision diameter of air ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA ZAJK + :8;.* *6 /0[ Collision diameter of air ABC + :48.: \ e/k parameter for acetone AJK + -3 \ e/k parameter for air @ ' L + 6866669.* ))) '\ + :8-:: Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ideal gas constant Henry constant for ethanol-water system 25 ºC ] + .3 ^$ System temperature + *83 ` .8:*< _+) System pressure Distribution coefficient 3. Design procedure The equations and correlations used to design the packed-bed absorber were taken from different sources ,considering several aspects such as process operating conditions, mass transfer characteristics, and packing type. ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 3. Design procedure The equations and correlations used to design the packed-bed absorber were taken from different sources ,considering several aspects such as process operating conditions, mass transfer characteristics, and packing type. 3.1. Tower diameter The molecular weight of the gas mixture (MG) was determined applying the equation ? + bc%ABC ' ABCde a bcbc* f %ABCde ' AJKde ` 686.- )) The gas mixture density (ρG) at 27 ºC was determined using the Kay’s method ' bcbc%ABC ' ABCde a bcbc* f %ABCde ' AJKdede ` .86*9 )) Vg + ))))))))))) @ L'] Viscosity of the gas mixture (μG) was calculated using the following correlation. ? /jd b Wg + )))))))))) b %ABC ' ABC d b bc* f %ABCde ' AJK d ` c*8-:; ' *6 e ' h)))) i a h)))))i WAJK c WABC e c e Where μace and μair values are given in Pa.s. The amount of ethanol absorbed is; b >? ' Vg d i ' %ABC ' LM ' ABC ` *;68.44 ) ABCkAlm + h))) c ? e The amount of solvent liquid exiting the column is: F G + GH a ABCkAlm ` bc*8<*; ' *6 de ) The flow parameter (X), the pressure drop parameter under flooding conditions (Yflood) and the CS coefficient at flooding conditions (CSflood) were determined according to the equations. Flow parameter X b Vg d [oj G b d ' h)i n c>?e + ))) >? ' Vg c VG e Vg d [oj G ' hb) n + ))) i ` 6863>? ' Vg c VG e Pressure drop parameter under flooding conditions u bcpOPQQRde & fbc:846. a *86.9 ' qr snt a 68**6-: ' sqr sntt de v pOPQQR + /w@oj[u x 0o[uz y {| }~ x [o00[@ y }{| }~ ` 68.6* S coefficient at flooding conditions ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” CS coefficient at flooding conditions 0 [oj u[ b pOPQQR d $mOPQQR, + h)))) i ' )))) [o0 0 0 ` 68699 hc = , ' WG ei u[ ' u[ 0 b pOPQQR d [oj u[ $mOPQQR1 + h)))) i ' )))) 0 0 ` 6864: hc = 1 ' WG [o0 ei u[ ' u[ 0 [oj u[ b pOPQQR d $mOPQQR2 + h)))) i ' )))) [o0 0 0 ` 686-< hc = 2 ' WG ei u[ ' u[ 0 [oj u[ b pOPQQR d $mOPQQR5 + h)))) i ' )))) 0 0 ` 686;. [o0 hc = 5 ' WG ei u[ ' u[ The gas velocity at flooding conditions (vGflood), the gas velocity (vG), and finally the tower diameter (D), were calculated by using the following correlations: Gas velocity at flooding conditions Gas velocity $mOPQQR, )` *8-4- ) ?OPQQR, + )))) b Vg d [oj h))) i c VG f Vg e $mOPQQR1 )` *8*9; ) ?OPQQR1 + )))) b Vg d [oj h))) i c VG f Vg e $mOPQQR2 )` .869: ) ?OPQQR2 + )))) b Vg d [oj h))) i c VG f Vg e $mOPQQR5 )` *8:3- ) ?OPQQR5 + )))) b Vg d [oj h))) i c VG f Vg e ?, + ?OPQQR, ' OPQQR ` *8:3* ) ?1 + ?OPQQR1 ' OPQQR ` 689: ) ?2 + ?OPQQR2 ' OPQQR ` *8<49 ) ?5 + ?OPQQR5 ' OPQQR ` 68-;4 ) Tower diameter ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Tower diameter DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” u < ' >? b , + ))) ` c*86*; ' *6 @ de U ' ?, u < ' >? b 1 + ))) ` c*8:6; ' *6 @ de U ' ?1 u < ' >? 2 + ))) ` -9486*4 U ' ?2 u < ' >? b 5 + ))) ` c*8.** ' *6 @ de U ' ?5 3.2. Pressure drop Most packed-bed absorbers are designed to safely avoid flooding conditions and also to operate in the preloading region, with a gas-pressure drop limit of 200 – 400 Pa/m of packed depth . In this approach, both the gas dry pressure drop ( 0/Z) and overall pressure drop ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 3.2. Pressure drop Most packed-bed absorbers are designed to safely avoid flooding conditions and also to operate in the preloading region, with a gas-pressure drop limit of 200 – 400 Pa/m of packed depth . In this approach, both the gas dry pressure drop (ΔP0/Z) and overall pressure drop (ΔP/Z) were determined for the absorption process using well-accepted equations. The liquid holdup influence was also taken into account, that is, when the packed bed is irrigated, the liquid holdup causes an increment of the pressure drop. Prior to the determination of both pressure drops, it was necessary to determine several parameters first. Among those parameters are included the effective particle diameter (dP) ; the wall factor (KW); the gasphase Reynolds number (ReG); the dry-packing resistance coefficient (ψ0); liquid mass velocity (GL); the liquid velocity (vL); the liquid-phase Reynolds number (ReL); liquid-phase Froude number (FrL) ; the ratio ah/a; the effective specific surface area of packing (ah); and, finally, the liquid holdup (hL). Effective particle diameter b*f7 d Wall factor , i ` *84 1, + ; ' h))) c , e b * f 71 d 11 + ; ' h)) i ` *683; c 1 e b * f 72 d 12 + ; ' h)) i ` *8; c 2 e b * f 75 d 15 + ; ' h)) i ` 68939 c 5 e * \I, + ))))))) ` 68-4b * d 1, . * a )' h))) ' )) : c * f 7, ei , * \I1 + ))))))) ` 68-34 b * d 11 . * a )' h))i ' )) : c * f 71 e 1 * \I2 + ))))))) ` 68-<b * d 12 . * a )' h))i ' )) : c * f 72 e 2 * \I5 + ))))))) ` 68-9< b * d 15 . * a )' h))i ' )) : c * f 75 e 5 Gas-phase Reynolds number ?, ' Vg ' 1, ' \I, ` 98-:- ' *6 @ L?, + )))))) bc* f 7,de ' Wg ?1 ' Vg ' 11 ' \I1 ` <8*9: ' *6 @ L?1 + )))))) bc* f 71de ' Wg ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ?2 ' Vg ' 12 ' \I2 ` *8*4: ' *6 F L?2 + )))))) bc* f 72de ' Wg ?5 ' Vg ' 15 ' \I5 ` .89-3 ' *6 @ L?5 + )))))) bc* f 75de ' Wg Dry-packing resistance coefficient Liquid mass velocity b ;< *89 d ` 68:;E, + $ , ' h)) a ))) [o[z i c L?, L?, e b ;< *89 d ` 68;.. E1 + $ 1 ' h)) a ))) [o[z i c L?1 L?1 e b ;< *89 d ` 684*9 E2 + $ 2 ' h)) a ))) [o[z i c L?2 L?2 e b ;< *89 d ` 683;* E5 + $ 5 ' h)) a ))) [o[z i c L?5 L?5 e < G G, + ))) ` <8944 )) u u ' U ' , < G G1 + ))) ` .8-:9 )) u u ' U ' 1 < G G2 + ))) ` 48*;. )) u u ' U ' 2 Liquid velocity < G G5 + ))) ` :8<*; )) u u ' U ' 5 G, ` 68664 ) G, + )) VG G1 ` 6866: ) G1 + )) VG G2 ` 68664 ) G2 + )) VG G5 ` 6866: ) G5 + )) VG Liquid-phase Reynolds number ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Liquid-phase Reynolds number G, ' VG ` 4-8.-* LG, + ))) , ' WG G1 ' VG ` .38.9 LG1 + ))) 1 ' WG G2 ' VG ` 338:.LG2 + ))) 2 ' W G G5 ' VG ` *983.4 LG5 + ))) 5 ' WG Liquid-phase Froude number u ' G, , ` .8..< ' *6 /F =G, + ))) u ' G1 1 ` *863* ' *6 /F =G1 + ))) u ' G2 2 ` .864 ' *6 /F =G2 + ))) u G5 ' 5 ` .8<4< ' *6 /F =G5 + ))) Ratio ah/a , & ) + 6894 $, ' LG, [ouj ' =G, [o0 ` 689-* , 1 & ) 1 + 6894 $1 ' LG1 [ouj ' =G1 [o0 ` *86< 2 & ) 2 + 6894 $2 ' LG2 [ouj ' =G2 [o0 ` 68-4 5 & ) 5 + 6894 $5 ' LG5 [ouj ' =G5 [o0 ` *864< Effective specific surface area of packing * , + , ' , ` 9*8-3< ) * 1 + 1 ' 1 ` *.48393 ) * 2 + 2 ' 2 ` 3*8.:9 ) * 5 + 5 ' 5 ` .*;8**: ) Liquid holdup 0 ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Liquid holdup DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 0 u b =G, d @ G, + *. ' h))i ' , @ ` 68*3: c LG, e0 u b =G1 d @ G1 + *. ' h))i ' 1 @ ` 68*-< c LG1 e 0 u b =G2 d @ G2 + *. ' h))i ' 2 @ ` 68*; c LG2 e 0 u b =G5 d @ G5 + *. ' h))i ' 5 @ ` 68.-: c LG5 e The gas dry pressure drop per meter of packing height (ΔP0/Z) was determined according to the following correlation: , ' ?, u ' Vg URKD, + E, ' )))) ` 3.86:* )) @ . \I, ' 7, 1 ' ?1 u ' Vg URKD1 + E1 ' )))) ` ***8;< )) @ . \I1 ' 71 2 ' ?2 u ' Vg URKD2 + E2 ' )))) ` -:8:6< )) @ . \I2 ' 72 5 ' ?5 u ' Vg URKD5 + E5 ' )))) ` *;:8.;. )) @ . \I5 ' 75 The gas overall pressure drop per meter of packing height (ΔP/Z) can be finally calculated: d bb 7 d 0oj , h UCX, + URKD, ' hh)))i u[[ ii ` *.-836. )) cc 7, f G, e e d bb 7 d 0oj 1 h UCX1 + URKD1 ' hh)))i u[[ ii ` *-;8.;. )) cc 71 f G1 e e d bb 7 d 0oj 2 UCX2 + URKD2 ' hhh)))i u[[ ii ` *3-8;6: )) cc 72 f G2 e e d bb 7 d 0oj 5 h UCX5 + URKD5 ' hh)))i u[[ ii ` :6384:* )) cc 75 f G5 e e 3.3. Diffusion coefficients Gas-phase diffusion coefficient: The theory describing diffusion processes in binary gas mixtures at low to moderate pressures has been studied extensively in recent years, and is well developed nowadays. Since the absorption process is a binary gas system taking place at ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 3.3. Diffusion coefficients Gas-phase diffusion coefficient: The theory describing diffusion processes in binary gas mixtures at low to moderate pressures has been studied extensively in recent years, and is well developed nowadays. Since the absorption process is a binary gas system taking place at low-pressure, the gas-phase diffusion coefficient can be estimated using the Wilke and Lee correlation : Gas diffusion coefficient @ b 68-9 d *6 /@ ' ] u :86: f ))) h i u ei hc ? & ))))))))) ' u ' Z u ' /0 b * d * + . h))a ))i ` 686:- )) c ABC AJK e Molecular weight of the gas mixture Colision diameter of the micture ZABC a ZAJK b ` c:84-: ' *6 /0[de Z + )))) . Difusion colision diameter integral of the mixture *86;6:; a ))) 68*-:66 a ))) *86:493 a ))) *83;<3< & ))) [oF@j y 0oju y [o0j0[ ]M @ozF00 y ] ]M + )))) ` 48*:< u ABC ' AJK *86;6:; a ))) 68*-:66 a ))) *86:493 a ))) *83;<3< ` 689: + ))) [oF@j y 0oju y [o0j0[ @ozF00 y ]M u / ? + *689 ' *6 ' )) Liquid-phase diffusion coefficient: Compared with the kinetic theory behind the gases behavior, which is well developed and available today, the theoretical basis of the internal structure of liquids and their transport characteristics are still insufficient to permit a rigorous treatment. Usually, liquid diffusion coefficients are several orders of magnitude smaller than gas diffusivities, and depend mostly on concentration profiles due to changes in viscosity, as well as some changes in the degree of ideality of the solution. To determine the liquid-phase diffusion coefficient in binary systems for solutes transport to aqueous solutions, the Hayduk and Minhas correlation was used: Liquid-phase diffusion coefficient *8.4 ' *6 /z bcCX /[o0 f 68.-.de ] 0oju ' WG ¡ G & )))))))))))) *666 -849 *8*. & )) CX u G + *8*9 ' *6 / ' )) 3.4. Mass transfer coefficients To determine the mass transfer coefficients for both phases, two correlations were used which were obtained from an extensive study, that involved measurement and correlation of masstransfer coefficients for 31 different binary and ternary systems, equipped with 67 different types and sizes of packings, in columns of diameter ranging from 6 cm to 1.4 m. ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 3.4. Mass transfer coefficients To determine the mass transfer coefficients for both phases, two correlations were used which were obtained from an extensive study, that involved measurement and correlation of masstransfer coefficients for 31 different binary and ternary systems, equipped with 67 different types and sizes of packings, in columns of diameter ranging from 6 cm to 1.4 m. Gas-phase convective mass-transfer coefficient (kG): @ u b ? ' d b d b L? d F , ? & 68*:6< ' $, h))) i ' h))))) i ' h)) i ' ? @ u c L ' ] e hc 7, ' bc7, f Gde ei c \I e ScG - Shmit number for gas phase Wg ` 68999 ? + ))) Vg ' ? @ b ? ' d b d b L?, d F , ?, + 68*:6< ' $, ' h))) i ' h)))))) i ' h))i ' ? ` :8<;3 )) u ' c L ' ] e hc u 7, ' bc7, f G,de ei c \I, e @ b ? ' d b d b L?1 d F 1 ' ?1 + 68*:6< ' $1 ' h))) )))))) i h i ' h))i ' ? ` :8:9: )) u ' c L ' ] e hc u b d 71 ' c71 f G1e ei c \I1 e @ b ? ' d b d b L?2 d F 2 ?2 + 68*:6< ' $2 ' h))) i ' h)))))) i ' h))i ' ? ` :8.4: )) u ' c L ' ] e hc u 72 ' bc72 f G2de ei c \I2 e @ b ? ' d b d b L?5 d F 5 ?5 + 68*:6< ' $5 ' h))) i ' h)))))) i ' h))i ' ? ` :84:< )) u ' c L ' ] e hc u 75 ' bc75 f G5de ei c \I5 e Liquid-phase convective mass-transfer coefficient (kL): [oj b G ' , ' G, d b G, + 68343 ' $", ' h))))i ` c<8-4 ' *6 /jde ) c 7, ' G, e [oj b G ' 1 ' G1 d b G1 + 68343 ' $"1 ' h))))i ` c<8994 ' *6 /jde ) c 71 ' G1 e [oj b G ' 2 ' G2 d b G2 + 68343 ' $"2 ' h))))i ` c48<*9 ' *6 /jde ) c 72 ' G2 e [oj b G ' 5 ' G5 d b G5 + 68343 ' $"5 ' h))))i ` c48;.4 ' *6 /jde ) c 75 ' G5 e where: CL – Mass transfer factor a – Mass transfer surface area per unit volume 3.5. Packing Height In those systems handling dilute solutions and when Henry’s law applies, is very usual and convenient to work with overall mass-transfer coefficients in order to calculate the packing height (Z), which can be determined by the following expression: ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN where: – Mass Required: transfer “CONFIDENTIAL” factor Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA a – Mass transfer surface area per unit volume Design group“ELMAGERARD” 3.5. Packing Height In those systems handling dilute solutions and when Henry’s law applies, is very usual and convenient to work with overall mass-transfer coefficients in order to calculate the packing height (Z), which can be determined by the following expression: T & X¢? a £X¢? where: HtOG – Overall height of a gas-phase transfer units NtOG – Overall number of gas-phase transfer units Prior to determine the values of HTU and NTU, it will be necessary to calculate several parameters first, which are the inlet gas molar velocity [GMy(1)]; the outlet gas molar velocity [GMy(2)]; the average molar gas velocity (GMy); the inlet liquid molar velocity [GMx(2)]; the outlet liquid molar velocity [GMx(1)]; the absorption factor at the bottom [A(1)] and top [A(2)] of the column ; the geometric average of the absorption factor (A) ; the ethanol molar composition of outlet gas [yeth(2)] ; the volumetric gas-phase (KvG) and liquid-phase (KvL) mass-transfer coefficients ; the overall volumetric mass-transfer coefficient (Km); the overall height of a gasphase transfer unit (HtOG) ; the overall number of gas-phase transfer units (NtOG); and finally the packing height (Z). Inlet gas molar velocity < §? ¤¥D¦ & ))) U ' ¨u Gas molar flow rate >? ' Vg b ` c.834- ' *6 j de )) §? + ))) ? < §? ¤¥D¦, + ))) ` -<8;69 )) u ' U ' ¨, u < §? ¤¥D¦1 + ))) ` 438.4* )) u ' U ' ¨1 u Inlet gas molar velocity < §? ¤¥D¦2 + ))) ` *66849- )) u ' U ' ¨2 u Molar flow of ethanol absorbed < §? ¤¥D¦5 + ))) ` ;;8439 )) u ' U ' ¨5 u < bc§? f §CXAlmde ¤¥D© & ))))) U ' ¨u >? ' Vg ' % ' LM ` 683;; )) §ABCAlm + ))) ? ABC Outlet gas molar velocity ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Outlet gas molar velocity Average molar gas velocity DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” < bc§? f §ABCAlmde ¤¥D©, + ))))) ` -:8;;. )) u ' U ' ¨, u < bc§? f §ABCAlmde ¤¥D©1 + ))))) ` 4;8;3- )) u ' U ' ¨1 u < bc§? f §ABCAlmde ¤¥D©2 + ))))) ` --849: )) u ' U ' ¨2 u < bc§? f §ABCAlmde ¤¥D©5 + ))))) ` ;48-*: )) u ' U ' ¨5 u ¤¥D¦, a ¤¥D©, ¤¥D, + ))))) ` -<8*:4 )) u ' . ¤¥D¦1 a ¤¥D©1 ¤¥D1 + ))))) ` 4;8-;4 )) u ' . ¤¥D¦2 a ¤¥D©2 ¤¥D2 + ))))) ` *66869; )) u ' . ¤¥D¦5 a ¤¥D©5 ¤¥D5 + ))))) ` ;;8.<; )) u ' . Inlet liquid molar velocity < §G ¤¥ª© & ))) U ' ¨u Inlet liquid molar flow rate G ` .*984.. )) §G + )) I < §G ¤¥ª©, + ))) ` .;-83* )) u ' U ' ¨, u < §G ¤¥ª©1 + ))) ` *;:8.*: )) u ' U ' ¨1 u < §G ¤¥ª©2 + ))) ` .9;83;* )) u ' U ' ¨2 u < §G ¤¥ª©5 + ))) ` *9-896< )) u ' U ' ¨5 u ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” < bc§G f §ABCAlmde ¤¥ª¦, + ))))) ` .;983;< )) u ' U ' ¨, u < bc§G f §ABCAlmde ¤¥ª¦1 + ))))) ` *;.8;<* )) u ' U ' ¨1 u < bc§G f §ABCAlmde ¤¥ª¦2 + ))))) ` .948344 )) u ' U ' ¨2 u < bc§G f §ABCAlmde ¤¥ª¦5 + ))))) ` *9-8*:9 )) u u ' U ' ¨ 5 Absorption factor at the bottom ­®¯¬, _ ` .8:*< «¬, + )))) ` *8..9 ­®D¬, ' _ ­®¯¬1 «¬1 + ))) ` *8..9 ­®D¬1 ' _ ­®¯¬2 «¬2 + ))) ` *8..9 ­®D¬2 ' _ ­®¯¬5 «¬5 + ))) ` *8..9 ­®D¬5 ' _ Absorption factor at the top ­®¯°, «°, + )))) ` *8.<4 ­®D°, ' _ Outlet liquid molar velocity ­®¯°1 «°1 + ))) ` *8.<4 ­®D°1 ' _ ­®¯°2 «°2 + ))) ` *8.<4 ­®D°2 ' _ ­®¯°5 «°5 + ))) ` *8.<4 ­®D°5 ' _ Geometric average of the absorption factor «¬, a «°, «, + )))) ` *8.:; . «¬1 a «°1 «1 + )))) ` *8.:; . «¬2 a «°2 «2 + )))) ` *8.:; . «¬5 a «°5 «5 + )))) ` *8.:; . Ethanol molar composition of outlet gas ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ethanol molar composition of outlet gas %ABCH + %ABC ' s* f LMt ` *6 ' *6 /± Volumetric gas-phase mass-transfer coefficient \5?, + ?, ' , ` .9<8.*4 )) @ ' \5?1 + ?1 ' 1 ` <.4843. )) @ ' \5?2 + ?2 ' 2 ` .:*834; )) @ ' \5?5 + ?5 ' 5 ` 3;:89<4 )) @ ' Volumetric liquid-phase mass-transfer coefficient VG b ` c484:- ' *6 F de )) + )) @ I \5G, + G, ' , ' ` ..<83<< )) @ ' \5G1 + G1 ' 1 ' ` :<68:<. )) @ ' \5G2 + G2 ' 2 ' ` .*:83-. )) @ ' \5G5 + G5 ' 5 ' ` ;3:8:69 )) @ ' Overall volumetric mass-transfer coefficient * \Y, + ))))) ` 3.8:-9 )) @ ' * _ ))a )) \5?, \5G, * \Y1 + ))))) ` *6-8:. )) @ ' * _ ))a )) \5?1 \5G1 * \Y2 + ))))) ` ;;86;; )) @ ' * _ ))a )) \5?2 \5G2 * \Y5 + ))))) ` .*683:9 )) @ ' * _ ))a )) \5?5 \5G5 Overall height of a gas-phase transfer unit ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Overall height of a gas-phase transfer unit ­®D, X²?, + )) ` *8: \Y, ­®D1 X²?1 + )) ` 684.* \Y1 ­®D2 X²?2 + )) ` *84*4 \Y2 ­®D5 X²?5 + )) ` 68:*< \Y5 Product streams and composition ³ + ´? ` bc.834- ' *6 j de )) %³ + 686* )) nE + 6 Molar ratio of acetone in the input gas %³ p³ + )) ` 686* )) * f %³ Molar flowrate of carier gas + ³ ' bc* f p³de ` bc.83:. ' *6 j de )) Concentration of acetone in the output gas AJK b ` c.8<3* ' *6 /jde )) %E + DE ' ))) ABC ' Vg Molar ratio of acetone in the output gas %E b pE + )) ` c.8<3* ' *6 /jde )) * f %E Molar ratio of acetone in the output liquid (equilibrium case) Molar flowrate of liquid p n³Y + )³ ` 6866< )) _ GH ` bc38339 ' *6 j de )) " + )) I Molar ratio of acetone in the output liquid bp f p d ` 6866< )) n³ + nE a ) " c ³ Ee Diferece in molar ratios of acetone in the output gas Sp³ + p³ f _ ' n³ ` 6866. )) SpE + pE a _ ' nE ` bc.8<3* ' *6 /jde )) Diferece in molar ratios of acetone in the input gas Number of gas-phase transfer units ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Number of gas-phase transfer units b Sp³ d p³ f pE ´X²?, + )))) ' qr h)) i ` .:8.6* Sp³ f SpE c SpE e b Sp³ d p³ f pE ´X²?1 + )))) ' qr h)) i ` .:8.6* Sp³ f SpE c SpE e b Sp³ d p³ f pE ´X²?2 + )))) ' qr h)) i ` .:8.6* Sp³ f SpE c SpE e b Sp³ d p³ f pE ´X²?5 + )))) ' qr h)) i ` .:8.6* Sp³ f SpE c SpE e Packing height T + ´X²?, ' X²?, ` :68*;3 T + ´X²?1 ' X²?1 ` *.86T + ´X²?2 ' X²?2 ` :48*<9 T + ´X²?5 ' X²?5 ` 38.-: 3.6. Operating and equilibrium lines The operating line will be elaborated using the following data: Mole fraction of acetone in inlet gas mixture [yace(1)] = 0.01 Mole fraction of acetone in outlet gas mixture [yace(2)] = .8<3* ' *6 /j Mole fraction of acetone in inlet liquid [xace(2)] = 0. Mole fraction of acetone in outlet liquid [xace(1)] = 6866: The operating line points µ ¸ %MM + ¶ 686* /j ¹ · .8<3* ' *6 º ¸ »MM + µ¶ 6866: · 6 ¹º The equilibrium line for the absortion system ' » & .8:*< ' » %M & _ ' » & ) %M s»t + .8:*< ' » The operating and equilibrium line for the absortion system ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” The operating and equilibrium line for the absortion system ¼½¼Æ ¼½¼¼Å ¼½¼¼Ä ¼½¼¼Ã ¼½¼¼Â ¼½¼¼Á ¼½¼¼À ¼½¼¼¿ ¼½¼¼¾ ¼½¼¼Æ ¼¼ .8:*< ' » %MM ÀÇƼÈÉ ÄÇƼÈÉ ¼½¼¼Æ ¼½¼¼¾ ¼½¼¼¾ » »MM ¼½¼¼¾ ¼½¼¼¿ ¼½¼¼¿ ¼½¼¼À ¼½¼¼À ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 4.0 Designig of internals (Designing of internals is proprietary knowledge for me so I will not give you a step by step guide how to design or select internals, instead I will give you a the theoretical fundamentals on how to do i ) Theoretical fundamentalsThe basis of any distributor design is the exact knowledge of the discharge behaviour of liquids from ground holes and lateral rectangular slots or triangular ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 4.0 Designig of internals (Designing of internals is proprietary knowledge for me so I will not give you a step by step guide how to design or select internals, instead I will give you a the theoretical fundamentals on how to do it) Theoretical fundamentalsThe basis of any distributor design is the exact knowledge of the discharge behaviour of liquids from ground holes and lateral rectangular slots or triangular notches. The following refers to circular ground orifices but can be applied analogously to rectangular slots or triangular notches as well. The fundamentals of the discharge behaviour of fluids out of circular openings stretch back to the year 1644, where Torricelli developed Equation 1.Michael Schultes, Werner Grosshans, Steffen Müller and Michael Rink, Raschig GmbH, Germany, present a modern liquid distributor and redistributor design. Ï ËÌÍ Ê ÎÎÎÎÎ Ñ ÒÐÓ Equation 1 describes the theoretical discharge velocity of liquids, wth, from orifices as a function of the gravitational acceleration, g, and the liquid head above the orifice, h. If one multiplies this theoretical velocity, wth, by the cross-sectional area of a hole, Ah, and the number of discharge holes of a liquid distributor, n, then one achieves the theoretical total volume rate, , which can flow out of a liquid distributor (Equation 2). Ï ÔÌÍ Ê ÕÍ Ð Ö Ð ÎÎÎÎÎ Ñ ÒÐÓ Equation 2 applies under ideal conditions, i.e. assuming that the flow through the hole imparts no resistance to the flow of liquid. But in reality, streamlines of different velocities are formed due to the sharp edged holes which cause deflection of the liquid jet flow (Figure 1). For describing the flow behaviour of the liquid jet flow, one has to interpret two effects. First the jet contraction and second the jet velocity. The orientation of the streamlines causes the jet of liquid to contract when it leaves the ground hole. This effect can be described mathematically by a contraction coefficient, CC. Friction losses, caused by shearing forces of the fluid, influence the velocity of the jet of liquid when it issues through the hole and can be described mathematically by a velocity coefficient, CV. The coefficients depend on the liquid head, the hole geometry and the physical properties of the liquid.The product of the contraction coefficient, CC, and the velocity coefficient, CV, results in the discharge coefficient, CD = CC · CV, which describes the difference between the effective volume rate, , and the theoretical value,. Only the discharge coefficient, CD, can be derived from experimental investigations directly. Ï Ô Ê ×Ø Ð ÕÍ Ð Ö Ð ÎÎÎÎÎ Ñ ÒÐÓ The discharge coefficient, CD, is described in the literature according to Table1 as a constant value in function of the hole geometry only. Actual discharge behaviour If one describes the flow through a hole on the basis of an energy balance, equilibrium can be set up according to Equation 4. The inflowing volume, , acts on the hole with the potential energy (?L -?V)gh while the out flowing volume rate leaves the hole as a jet flow with the kinetic energy (?Lw2/2). The energy of the jet leaving the hole is less than that of the ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Actual discharge behaviour If one describes the flow through a hole on the basis of an energy balance, equilibrium can be set up according to Equation 4. The inflowing volume, , acts on the hole with the potential energy (?L -?V)gh while the out flowing volume rate leaves the hole as a jet flow with the kinetic energy (?Lw2/2). The energy of the jet leaving the hole is less than that of the inflowing liquid since the contraction and friction loss of the jet has consumed energy characterised by in Equation 4. ÜÝ Ï ÙÚÜÝ Û ÜÞßà Ð Ò Ð Ó Ð Ô Ê â Ðã ÐÔáä Ñ In Equation 4, ρL describes the liquid density and ρV the gas density; g describes the gravitational acceleration, h describes the liquid head above the hole, and w describes the current velocity of the jet. By including Equation 3 in Equation 4, Equation 5 follows for the coefficient of discharge CD. The second term of the right side of Equation 5 describes the energy consumption E divided by the potential energy for a certain liquid head above the hole h and for a volume flow rate V. The energy consumption E tends to zero for low flow rates. Consequently, the coefficient of discharge CD tends to unity for low flow rates in case the gas density can be neglected compared to the liquid density. Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ ÜÝ Û ÜÞ ä ×Ø Ê âââ Û ââââ ÜÝ ÜÝ Ð Ò Ð Ó Ð Ô Systematic investigations have shown that the discharge coefficient, CD = CC CV is a variable which is dependent on several influencing parameters. An expression for the energy consumption E was evaluated that allows an accurate prediction of the coefficient of discharge CD.Following the influencing parameters on the overall coefficient of discharge, CD, will be discussed in detail (Figure 2). Figure 2 shows measurement points for the discharge coefficient, CD, for water at ambient temperature as a function of the liquid head, h, for various hole diameters, d. It also shows the constant CD = 0.62 recorded in the literature for holes whose dimensions are larger than the depth of the hole.12 It can be clearly seen that the discharge coefficients only approximate the value given in the literature if the liquid head is great and hole diameters large. With decreasing liquid head, the discharge coefficient rises significantly with the result that the discharge behaviour with small liquid head deviate more favourable from discharge behaviour according to Table 1 than with large liquid head. This can be explained by the fact that as the liquid head decreases, the horizontal velocity component decreases and therefore a reduction of the contraction of the jet occurs. Figure 2 also shows that with decreasing hole diameter, the discharge coefficient rises, i.e. the contraction is reduced by the counteraction of the horizontal velocity components. In case of small liquid heads, tensile forces of the jet are also transferred even into the hole cross-section, with the result that the liquid is drawn out of the opening and, if the liquid level is calm, a vortex is formed. This effect is more marked in the case of large hole geometries than in the case of small hole geometries, as can be seen from the steeper curves in Figure 2 at low liquid heads. The relationships described only apply if the influence of the surface tension is negligible. For instance, in case of small holes and liquids with a high surface tension, a drop of liquid is formed beneath the hole, preventing the fluid from flowing out. Further factors that are influencing the coefficient of discharge but not discussed here are physical properties of the fluid (density, viscosity), elevation and orientation of holes, overflow velocity and ratio of hole diameter to deck thickness instance, in case of small holes and liquids with a high surface tension, a drop of liquid is formed beneath the hole, preventing the fluid from flowing out. Further factors that are influencing the coefficient of discharge but not discussed here are physical properties of the ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN fluid (density, viscosity), elevation and orientation of holes, overflow velocity and ratio of hole “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” diameter toRequired: deck thickness The dimensioning of liquid distributors In the dimensioning of liquid distributors, not only the discharge coefficient but also other design determining criteria have to be taken into account. In that manner, first the minimum liquid head, hmin , above a discharge hole of a liquid distributor must be determined. Here the flow velocity of the liquid in the distributor troughs is of decisive importance since flow gradients occur due to wall friction and lead to significant differences in height, particularly in case of low liquid heads. If these minimum liquid heads are not attained, considerable maldistribution of a distributor can occur, as described as follows. The minimal liquid level in a distributor Feeding liquid into a mass transfer column generally takes place via a feed pipe which first leads the liquid into a preliminary distribution trough called a parting box. Afterwards, the liquid reaches the individual distributor troughs lying below and flows in the troughs towards the column wall. Drag, due to wall friction, causes liquid head gradients to form in the distributor troughs, which has to be taken into account, particularly with low liquid levels. This is illustrated in Figure 3. For liquid flow in open trough systems the difference in height, ∆h, taking place along the trough can be calculated using Equation 6. It is a function of the wall friction factor, λ, hydraulic diameter, dh, gravitational acceleration, g, and flow velocity. Figure 3 shows the result of such a calculation for a trough with a width of b = 100 mm for various flow velocities as a function of the liquid head, h. ç ââ ãÏ åÓ Ê æ Ð â èÍ Ñ Ò Õ Ê âââ ÓÐë èÍ Ê é â ê ëáÑ Ó The following recommendations for the minimum liquid level, hmin , in distributor troughs can be derived from the observations of Figure 3. The minimum liquid head should not fall short of a value of 25 - 35 mm and at the same time the flow velocity in the troughs should be limited to a maximum of 0.5 m/s. Furthermore, the liquid head should be equivalent to at least twice the hole diameter in order to avoid vortex formation above the hole (Equation 7). The overall height of a distributor The overall height of a liquid distributor is first defined by the required liquid loading range. To this height, the hydrostatic pressure occurring as the result of the pressure drop of the gas phase as this passes the troughs of the distributor must be added. Furthermore, The following recommendations for the minimum liquid level, hmin , in distributor troughs can be derived from the observations of Figure 3. The minimum liquid head should not fall ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN short of a value of 25 - 35 mm and at the same time the flow velocity in the troughs should be limited toRequired: a maximum of 0.5 m/s. theMITA liquidDesign head group“ELMAGERARD” should be equivalent to at “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Furthermore, DESIGNED: Arberor least twice the hole diameter in order to avoid vortex formation above the hole (Equation 7). The overall height of a distributor The overall height of a liquid distributor is first defined by the required liquid loading range. To this height, the hydrostatic pressure occurring as the result of the pressure drop of the gas phase as this passes the troughs of the distributor must be added. Furthermore, additional height is necessary if a foaming system is present and if a noticeable gas rate is injected into the liquid at the liquid feed point. The latter applies particularly in the case of high pressure systems if the degassing of the liquid is markedly restricted due to the small differences in density between the gas and the liquid. Furthermore, wave formation has to be taken into account in the case of flowing liquids. Liquid loading range By converting Equation 3, Equation 8 can be obtained which defines the necessary extra height, ?h1, of a liquid distributor resulting from a required loading range. ÙÙ Ô ß Ï Ù × Ð Ó ß Ï ß îïð ó Ð íâââ ô îñò ó Û çó Ð Ó åÓì Ê íííââ óà îñò Ô × ÚÚ îñò à Ú ô Ð Óîïð à Reprinted from HydrocarbonEnginEEringJanuary2009 www.hydrocarbonengineering.com When calculating the necessary extra height, Figure 2 must be taken into account showing that the discharge coefficient, CD, provides larger values with the lower liquid head than with the higher liquid head. This yields greater overall heights than if a constant discharge coefficient is assumed. Gas phase pressure drop The pressure drop, which the gas flow undergoes when it passes through the narrowed distributor cross-section, can be calculated by Equation 9. ? is the drag coefficient for the sudden narrowing and expansion of flows, Fv is the gas capacity factor in the column, AC is the cross-sectional area of the column and AD is the free cross-sectional area of the distributor. Õ÷ Ï Ï ö Ð ââ ø åõ Ê â Ñ Õô Ï ù åõ Ê ÙÚÜÝ Û ÜÞßà Ð Ò Ð åÓú Ï This pressure drop causes a rise in hydrostatic pressure to the head of liquid in the distributor, which can be described with the aid of Equation 10. By equating Equation 9 and Equation 10, Equation 11 can be obtained for the description of the second portion, ?h2, for the overall height of a distributor. Ï Õ÷ ç ö Ð ââ Ï åÓú Ê ââââ â ÙÚÜÝ Û ÜÞßà Ð Ò Ñ Õô Ï øù Foaming systemIn the case of a foaming system, the foam will be built up in particular in those areas in which a marked gas injection into the liquid takes place. This applies particularly to the transfer of the liquid from the feed pipe into the parting box, since relatively large quantities of liquid are transferred per transition point. Since the description of the foaming behaviour is very complex, it is advisable to use the foam or system factor, ?, which is described in the literature.13 This empirical factor is known for numerous mass transfer tasks and has to be taken into account by Equation 12, based on empirical equation, for the calculation of the additionally necessary distributor height, ?h3. Foaming systemIn the case of a foaming system, the foam will be built up in particular in those areas in which a marked gas injection into the liquid takes place. This applies particularly to the transfer of the liquid from the feed pipe into the parting box, since ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN relatively large quantities of liquid are transferred per transition point. Since the description of the foamingRequired: behaviour is very complex, it is advisable to useDesign the foam or system factor, ?, “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA group“ELMAGERARD” which is described in the literature.13 This empirical factor is known for numerous mass transfer tasks and has to be taken into account by Equation 12, based on empirical equation, for the calculation of the additionally necessary distributor height, ?h3. Ùçß åÓû Ê ü íâ Ú ý óà One must notice that system factors, listed in the literature, result from long term experience in designing tray columns and includes foaming and degassing effects in parallel. Experience is needed for avoiding overdesigns in taking system factor and degassing into account in parallel. The increase of liquid distributor height can, however, be markedly restricted if design methods are taken into account to reduce foaming. For instance, immersed elongated guide pipes at the feed pipe can be used to feed the liquid into the liquid level of the parting box and thus reduce foaming. Alternatively, guide sheets can be used as impulse dampers above the parting box, or a package of structured or random packings can be used within the parting box or distributor trough in order to support separation of gas and liquid. Degassing As has already been described, the high impulse transfer as liquid passes from the feed pipe into the parting box, causes gas also to be introduced with the jets of liquid into the liquid layer. The gas then occupies a noticeable volume in the amount of liquid, which causes the liquid level in the trough to rise. The additional extra height this requires is determined by the gas portion introduced and by the residence time of the gas in the liquid. The degassing behaviour is essentially defined by the buoyancy of the gas bubbles, i.e. by the difference in density between the gas and the liquid. Particularly in high pressure applications the density differences are small and therefore the degassing efficiency reduced. As is the case with foaming systems, the additional height, ?h4, which must be taken into account on the basis of the degassing behaviour can, until now, only be described on the basis of an empirical equation (Equation 13). Ù Ü ß Ý ó åÓþ Ê ü íâââ Ù Ú ÚÜÝ Û ÜÞßà à The degassing of liquids can, however, be improved by design methods, similar to foaming behaviour. Wave formationIf the liquid is led from the distributor pipe into the parting box and then into the distributor troughs, the impulse transfer causes wave formation which is supported by the flow of the liquid in the troughs. The overall height of a distributor must be dimensioned so that the wave crests do not lead to a flooding of the distributor troughs or gas risers. Since the wave formation depends on the quantity of liquid to be distributed, it is advisable to design the additionally necessary distributor height, ?h5, according to Equation 14 as an empirical function of the liquid load. åÓÿ Ê ü ÙÚêÝßà Taking all the single heights into account, the necessary overall height is defined according to Equation 15. åÓÌ ÌïÝ Ê Óîñò á åÓì á åÓú á åÓû á åÓþ á åÓÿ Conclusion Modern liquid distributor designs are relevant for good mass transfer efficiencies in packed columns. The article describes the flow behaviour of a liquid jet flow that is leaving a distributor via bottom holes. An equation is provided to describe the coefficient of discharge and influencing parameters are discussed. The height of a distributor trough has to take into account the recommended minimum liquid head, specified liquid loading range, gas pressure drop, foaming and degassing effects and wave creations. This subject is described as well. 5.0 Determination of nozzles inside diameters Liquid feed of first distributor nozzle dimension columns. The article describes the flow behaviour of a liquid jet flow that is leaving a distributor via bottom holes. An equation is provided to describe the coefficient of discharge ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN and influencing parameters are discussed. The height of a distributor trough has to take into account theRequired: recommended minimum head, specified range, gas pressure “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. liquid DESIGNED: Arberor MITA liquid Designloading group“ELMAGERARD” drop, foaming and degassing effects and wave creations. This subject is described as well. 5.0 Determination of nozzles inside diameters Liquid feed of first distributor nozzle dimension Øì â ÕòØ âââ Ü Ð Øì Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ é Ð ÕòØ âââ ò Ø ò Ø We accept Ï Sch 40 Liquid feed second distributor nozzle dimension and outlet nozzle Øú â Õò Ì âââ Ü Ð Øú Ï Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ é Ð Õò Ì ò Ì âââ We accept ò Ì Sch 40 Gas feed inlet nozzle dimension Ìç â Ï Õò ââ ééç Ì ò We accept ò é Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎ é Ð Õò ç âââ Sch 20 Gas feed outet nozzle dimension Ìç â Ï ÕòÌ ââ ééç Ì òÌ We accept ò é Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎ é Ð ÕòÌ ç âââ Sch 20 6.0 Mechanical design of absortion column as per ASME S8. Di1/Di2 ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 6.0 Mechanical design of absortion column as per ASME S8. Di1/Di2 Ì ç Diameter of the tower Ò ç Ð ââ Ï Ò ô Ð ââ Ï Ñ × ô Design pressure Working temperature Working pressure × Design temperature Õ Û ç Û Ò ïÝ çé ââ Ï Ò ä Ñ Ð ç " Ð ââ Ï ! Shell material: carbon steel plate Permissible tensile stress Elastic modulus # Joint efficiency ×Õ Corrosion allowance $ çé Overall packing height ì Ñ Top disengaging space ú Ñ Bottom disengaging space û Ñ Middle liquid distribution space $ $ $ Ì % $ ñÌ Ñ $&' á $ì á $ú á $ú Ñ Shell length Skirt length Ò Ñ ââ ) ( ì Ñ $( $(* ú çç $( ì Ñ Ò ì ç + $+ Packing weight First packing section initial distance of applied weight from the top First and second packing height Second packing section initial distance of applied weight from the top Top internals weight Top internals distance of applied weight from the top Middle span internas weight ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN ú é Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Ò Middle span internas weight + ú ç Middle internals distance of applied weight from the top $+ û ç + Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ò Bottom span internas weight û ç Bottom internals distance of applied weight from the top $+ Ò Ë,ñ,&-ÝïØ& ç â Ò ì ç ââ Ï Ò ú ç ââ Ï Ò .&Ì ââ ) Weight of attachment (pipes, ladders & platform) Wind pressure up to 20m Wind pressure beyond 20 m Steel density Ò Ë,Ý çÑ Weight of a plate 6.1 Minimum shell thickness 23 Ù 111 ß Ì 5 4: í ó 6789 /& ââ Ú0 Û çà á ×Õ ééç Ñ We accept: /& Checking maximum pressure allowed before plastic deformation starts to occur ê ç Minimum elastic deformation alued from the curve ; Ù Ù Ñ Ð Ì ßß Ñ !ïÝ Ð ÙÚ/& Û ×Õßà Ð íç á ç Ð ê Ð íç Û ââââ óó %Ì Ò Ú Ú àà &Ý âââââââââââââââ çéçç ââ Ï ç Ð /& The alouble pressure is greater than the design pressure, hence the thickness is satisfactory with respect of plastic deformation 6.2 Torispherical head design Determine, D, assume values for Rc, Rk and tt Ì <= <' Ì ç / ç Ì Crown radius Knuckle radius Torispherical head thickness Compute the head Rc/ D, Rk / D, and Rc/ equations are satisfied. ratios and determine if the following ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Compute the head Rc/ D, Rk / D, and Rc/ tt ratios and determine if the following equations are satisfied. > < < = >ç ââ Ì < Ñ > â= > Ñ /Ì ' ? ââ Ì Calculate the geometric constants @ th, A th, R th. Ù Ð Ì Û <' ß âââââó ç í ÌÍ Ú <= Û <' à Ï ÎÎÎÎÎ <= Ð /Ì AÌÍ âââ ççé @ BCDE <' Since , AÌÍ F @ÌÍ calculate Rth as follows: Ì ÌÍ ââ Ñ < Determine the coefficient C1 and C2 < ' ×ì ç Ð ââ Û Ì ×ú çÑ é Calculate the value of internal pressure expected to produce elastic buckling of the knuckle,Peth ×ì Ð ä Ð /Ì Ï Ò ç çç ââ ââââââ ÌÍ Ï Ù <ÌÍ ß ×ú Ð <ÌÍ Ð íââ Û <'ó Ú Ñ à Calculate the value of internal pressure that will result in a maximum stress in the knuckle equal to the material yield strength Py. Since the allowable stress at design temperature is governed by time-independent properties, C3 is the material yield strength at the design temperature. ×û !ïÝ G ×û Ð /Ì Ò ââ âââââââ Ï Ù <ÌÍ ß ×ú Ð <ÌÍ Ð íââ Û çó Ú Ñ Ð <' à Calculate the value of internal pressure expected to result in a buckling failure of the knuckle, Pck. Calculate variable G. H ÌÍ Ñç ââ ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA H Since HF ç, P ck Design group“ELMAGERARD” G is determenined as: Ù H Û Ñ é H Ï á çÑé Ð H ) ß =' íââââââââââââââó Ð G Ú ç á ççé H Û é H Ï á H ) à Ò çé ââ Ï Calculate the allowable pressure based on a buckling failure of the knuckle, Pak. ï ' =' Ò é é ââ ââ Ï ç Calculate the allowable pressure based on rupture of the crown, Pac. ï = Ñ Ð !ïÝ Ð # ç ââââ <= ç âá â /Ì Ñ Ò ââ Ï Calculate the maximum allowable internal pressure, Pa ÙÚ ï ï Ò ï ßà é é ââ Ï IJK ' L ' Ò ï é é ââ Ï Ò ô ââ Ï ï ô F The alouble pressure is greater than the design pressure, hence the thickness is satisfactory. Weight of the torispherical head Ï ß Ù Ð Ì ËÌ .&Ì Ð íçé Ð ââââ Ð /Ìó é Ú à Ò ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 6.3 Shell thicnes at difrent heights Let X be the distance from the top of up to which we can use 6 mm thick shell 1.Circumferential stress induced in shell plate material at a distance X from the top of shell (due to internal pressure) !MN !MN ô Ð Ì Ò ââ ââââ Ï Ñ ÙÚ/& Û ×Õßà !MN O !ïÝ Ð # will remain same for entire length 2.Various axial stresses induced due to internal in the shell plate material at a distance X from the top of the shell. -Axial stress induced due to internal pressure !PMN ô Ð Ì Ò Ñ ââ ââââ Ï é ÙÚ/& Û ×Õßà -Axial stress induced due to dead load Axial stress induced due to weight of the shell Ï Ù Ïß Ù ß á Ñ / â Ú Ú Ì &à Û Ì à Ð .&Ì Ð S é !PQR Ê ââââââââââââ Ê .&Ì Ð S Ï ß Ù Ï âÚÙÚÌ á Ñ /& Û ×Õßà Û Ì à é !PQR Ò Ê .&Ì Ð S Ê Ð S Ð ââ Ï Axial stress induced due to weight of the packing Ï Ð Ì Ð ( Ð S Ð ââââ é !PQNQ Ê âââââââââââ Ê Ñ Ï ß Ù Ï âÚÙÚÌ á /& Û ×Õßà Û Ì à é Axial stress induced due to weight of the internals Weight of the top internal per surface area é +ì Ò Ëñòì ââââ ç ââ Ï Ï Ð Ì Weight of the middle internal per surface area é +ú Ò Ëñòú ââââ é ââ Ï Ï Ð Ì S Ò Ð ââ Ï ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Weight of the bottom internal per surface area é +û Ò Ëñòú ââââ çç ââ Ï Ï Ð Ì Weight of liquid per meter of packing N ç â ÓT Spread of the moving liquid in the packing U ) V ËÝñî, âââ ç ââ Ü Ð V Weight of liquid per length of the column Ò ËÝñî,W Ê ËÝñî, Ð Ü Ð X Ê ç Ð ç ) Ð X Ð â Axial stress induced due to weight of liquid !YZ-W ËÝñî,W ç Ð X Ò Ê é Ê ââââââ Ê ââââ Ð Ì Ð Ù Ú/& Û ×Õßà çÑ Ï X Ò Ð ââ Ï Axial stress induced due to weight of attachments !WYZ ËÌ á Ë,ñ,&-ÝïØ& Ð X [ Ò Ê âââââââ Ê [ç á çÑÑé X\ \ Ð ââ Ï Ð Ì Ð Ù Ú/& Û ×Õßà Total axial stress due to dead loads ô Ê !YW] á !YWVW á !YZ-W á !WYZ !Y Ð X\\ á [[Ñ X\\ á [[é Ò ÙÚç Ð ç ^ ßà ââ Ï [ [ X\ \ á [[çÑÑé X á ç\\ á [[ç á é á çÑ\\ Ê ç á çéç X ô Ê ç á çéç X !Y Axial stress induced due to wind load at a distance X from the top of the shell !W çé Ð Ì Ð X Ï çé Ð X Ï Ï Ê âââââââ Ê ââââââ Ê ç é Ð X Ï Ð Ì Ð Ù Ú/& Û ×Õßà Ð Ì Ð ÙÚ/& Û ×Õßà ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Maximum tensile stress induced in the shell plate material at a distance X from the top of the shell. Ï Ï Ìîïð Ê !Y_V á !W Û !Yô Ê Ñ Û [[ç á çéç X\\ á çé Ð X Ê Ñ Û çéç X á çé Ð X ! Maximum allowed length for kipping the same shell thickness according to tensile stress. Ìîïð Ê !Y_V á !W Û !Yô Ê !ïÝ Ð # Ò !ïÝ Ð # Ù Úçç Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï !Y_V á !W Û !Yô Û !ïÝ Ð # Ê çé Ð X Ï Û çéç X á Ñ Û çç Ê çé Ð X Ï Û çéç X Û Ê ! Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ï Û é ( Ð çéç á Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ï Ûë á ë ç éç Û é çé Ð [ [Û \ \ X Ê ââââââ Ê ââââââââââââ Ñ( Ñ çé Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ ç éç á çéç Ï Û é çé Ð [[Û \\ X ââââââââââââ Ñ Ñ çé The length x is almost the double off the length of our column hence the same shell thickness can be used through the column according to tensile stress Maximum compressive stress induced in the shell plate at a distance X from the top of the shell. ÷ ! Y Ñ ÙÚ/& Û ×Õßà Ò ç ââââ ä Ð Ñç ââ â ââââ Ï Ï Ù ß çÑ Úç Û à Ì Allowable compressive stress Maximum compressive stress induced in the shell plate material at a distance X from the top of the shell. Ï Ï Ìîïð Ê Û!Y_V á !W á !Yô Ê ÛÑ á [[ç á çéç X\\ á çé Ð X Ê ÛÑ á çéç X á çé Ð X ! Maximum allowed length for kipping the same shell thickness according to compressive stress. Ìîïð Ê !Y_V á !W Û !Yô Ê !÷Y Ð # ! Û!Y_V á !W á !Yô Û !÷Y Ð # Ê çé Ð X Ï á çç X Û Ñ Û Ñé Ê çé Ð X Ï á çéç X Û é Ê Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ï Û é ( Ð Ûçéç á Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ûë á ë çéç Ï Û é çé Ð é X Ê ââââââ Ê âââââââââââ Ñ( Ñ çé Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ï Ûç éç á ç éç Û é çé Ð Ûé X ââââââââââââ çÑé ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ñ çé The length x is less than the length of our column hence we have to use a different thickness in the half bottom of the column, for this reason we are going to use shell thickness of 8mm in the half bottom of it and redo the calculation again only for this section of the column. /& 2.Various axial stresses induced due to internal in the shell plate material at a distance X from the middle of the shell. -Axial stress induced due to internal pressure !Y_V ô Ð Ì Ò ç ââ ââââ Ï é ÙÚ/& Û ×Õßà Weight of the top half of the column Ï %Ì Ù ÙÚÌ á Ñ /&ßà Û Ì Ï ßà Ð ââ ËÌ &ÍÝÝ`aÿ â Ð .&Ì á ËÌ ÙÚÑ ç Ð ç ) ßà Ò Ú é Ñ Ï Ð $(* ÙÚÑ Ð ç ) ßà Ò ËVï`aÿ ( Ð â é Ì +ú ÙÚé Ð ç ) ßà Ò ËÌ &`aÿ ËÌ &ÍÝÝ`aÿ á ËVï`aÿ á +ì á ââ Ñ Total axial stress due to weight of half of the column ËÌ &`aÿ Ò çé ââ ÿ âââââââââââ Ï Ï Ù ÙÚÌ á /& Û ×Õßà Û Ì Ï ßà â Ú é !WZ`a -Axial stress induced due to dead load Axial stress induced due to weight of the shell Ï Ù ÙÚÌ á Ñ /&ßà Û Ì Ï ßà Ð .&Ì Ð X â Ú é !YW] Ê ââââââââââââ Ê .&Ì Ð X Ï ß Ù Ï Ù ß âÚÚÌ á Ñ /& Û ×Õà Û Ì à é !YW] Ò Ê .&Ì Ð X Ê Ð X Ð ââ Ï Axial stress induced due to weight of the packing Ð Ì Ï Ð ( Ð X Ð ââââ Ò é !YWVW Ê âââââââââââ Ê é ç Ñ X Ð ââ Ï Ï ß Ù Ï Ù ß á / Û ×Õ Û â ÚÚ Ì à à Ì ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA á / ×Õà é ÚÚ Ì & Ì Design group“ELMAGERARD” à Axial stress induced due to weight of the internals Weight of the top internal per surface area Ñ +ú Ò Ëñòú ââââ ç ââ Ï Ï Ð Ì Weight of the bottom internal per surface area é +û Ò Ëñòú ââââ çç ââ Ï Ï Ð Ì Weight of liquid per meter of packing V ç â ÓT Speed of the moving liquid in the packing U ) V ËÝñî, âââ ç ââ Ü Ð V Weight of liquid per length of the column Ò ËÝñî,W Ê ËÝñî, Ð Ü Ð X Ê ç Ð ç ) Ð X Ð â Axial stress induced due to weight of liquid !YZ-W ËÝñî,W ç Ð X Ò Ê Ê ââââââ Ê ââââ Ð Ì Ð Ù Ú/& Û ×Õßà Ñ Ï Ò ç X Ð ââ Ï Axial stress induced due to weight of attachments !WYZ ËÌ á Ë,ñ,&-ÝïØ& Ð X [ Ê âââââââ Ê [éÑ á Ð Ì Ð Ù Ú/& Û ×Õßà X\ \ Ò Ð ââ Ï Total axial stress due to dead loads ô Ê !YW] á !YWVW á !YZ-W á !WYZ !Y [ [ Ð X\\ á [[éç Ñ X\\ á [[ ç X\\ á [[ X á éÑ\\ á [[ çé á ç á çç\\ Ê á çÑ ô Ê á çÑ !Y X X ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA ô !Y á Design group“ELMAGERARD” Axial stress induced due to wind load at a distance X from the top of the shell !W çé Ð Ì Ð X Ï çé Ð X Ï Ê âââââââ Ê ââââââ Ê ç Ð X Ï Ï Ù ß Ð Ð / Û ×Õ Ù ß Ð Ì Ð Ú/& Û ×Õà à Ì Ú & Maximum tensile stress induced in the shell plate material at a distance X from the top of the shell. Ìîïð Ê !Y_V á !W Û !Yô Ê ç Û [[ á çÑ ! X\ \ á ç Ð X Ï Ê ç Û çÑ X á ç Ð X Ï Maximum allowed length for kipping the same shell thickness according to tensile stress. Ìîïð Ê !Y_V á !W Û !Yô Ê !ïÝ Ð # ! Ò ïÝ Ð # ÙÚçç Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï Ï ç Ð X Û çÑ á !W Û !Yô Û !ïÝ Ð # Ê Ï X á ç Û çç Ê çé Ð X Û çç X Û ç Ê ! !Y_V Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ï Û é ( Ð çÑ á Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ûë á ë çÑ Ï Û é ç Ð [[Ûç \\ X Ê ââââââ Ê ââââââââââââ Ñ( Ñ ç Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ ç Ñ á çÑ Ï Û é ç Ð [[Ûç \\ X ââââââââââââ éçç Ñ ç The length x is larger than the double off the length of our column hence the same shell thickness can be used through the column according to tensile stress Maximum compressive stress induced in the shell plate at a distance X from the top of the shell. ÷ ! Y Ñ ÙÚ/& Û ×Õßà Ò ç ââââ ä Ð é ç ââ â ââââ Ï Ï çÑ ÙÚç Û ßà Ì Allowable compressive stress Maximum compressive stress induced in the shell plate material at a distance X from the top of the shell. Ìîïð Ê Û!Y_V á !W á !Yô Ê Ûç á [[ á çÑ ! X\ \ á ç Ð X Ï Ê Ûç á çÑ X á ç Ð X Ï Maximum allowed length for keeping the same shell thickness according to compressive stress. Ìîïð Ê !Y_V á !W Û !Yô Ê !÷Y Ð # ! Û!Y_V á !W á !Yô Û !÷Y Ð # Ê Ï Ï ç Ð X á çÑ X Û ç Û éç Ê ç Ð X á çÑ X Û Ê ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. á DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” á Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ï Û é ( Ð ÛçÑ á Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ûë á ë çÑ Ï Û é ç Ð Û X Ê ââââââ Ê ââââââââââââ Ñ( Ñ ç Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ûç Ñ á çÑ Ï Û é ç Ð Û X ââââââââââââ ÑççÑ Ñ ç ç + ÑçÑç Weight of tower Ï Ù ÙÚÌ á Ñ /&ßà Û Ì Ï ßà Ð %Ì Ð .&Ì á Ñ Ð ËÌ ÙÚ ËÌ &ÍÝÝ â Ú é Ñ Ð ç ) ßà Ò 7.0 Design of support Skirt support ñÌ ç &' ñÌ /&' Skirt diameter Skirt thickness Minimum weight of the vessel with attachments Weight of tower ËÌ îñò Ê ËÌ &ÍÝÝ á Ë,ïb'ñòÞ á ËñòÌ á ËïÌb /& Ï %Ì Ù ÙÚÌ á Ñ /&ßà Û Ì Ï ßà Ð ââ ËÌ &ÍÝÝÌ ,`aÿ â Ð .&Ì á ËÌ ÙÚÑ Ð ç ) ßà Ò Ú é Ñ /& Ï %Ì Ù ÙÚÌ á Ñ /&ßà Û Ì Ï ßà Ð ââ ËÌ &ÍÝÝ Ì`aÿ â Ð .&Ì á ËÌ Ú é Ñ ËÌ &ÍÝÝ ËÌ &ÍÝÝÌ ,`aÿ á ËÌ &ÍÝÝ Ì`aÿ Weight of packing ÙÚÑ ç Ð ç ) ßà Ò ÙÚé Ð ç ) ßà Ò Ð Ì Ï Ë,ïb'ñòÞ Ñ Ð $(* Ð ââââ Ð ( ÙÚ é Ð ç ) ßà Ò é Weight of internals Weight of attachments ËñòÌ +ì á +ú á +û Ò ËïÌb Ë,ñ,&-ÝïØ& Ð %Ì ÙÚ Ð ç ) ßà Ò Minimum weight of the vessel with attachments ËÌ îñò ËÌ &ÍÝÝ á Ë,ïb'ñòÞ á ËñòÌ á ËïÌb ÙÚçéé Ð ç ^ ßà Ò ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ËÌ îñò ËÌ &ÍÝÝ á Ë,ïb'ñòÞ á ËñòÌ á ËïÌb Ú à Ò Maximum weight of the vessel Weight of water during testing Ò ÜïÌ ç ââ ) Ð Ì Ï ËÝñc ÜïÌ Ð ââââ Ð %Ì ÙÚÑ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò é ËÌ îïð ËÌ &ÍÝÝ á ËïÌb á ËÝñc ÙÚéÑ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Applied axial force øY ÛËÌ îïð Ð Ò Û é Ð ç d Applied net section bending moment Wind loads acting over the vessel ì ç e ú e øì eì Ð eú Ð ì Ð ÙÚÌ á Ñ /&ßà çç Ò â Ò øú eì Ð eú Ð ú Ð ÙÚÌ á Ñ /&ßà çç â Applied wing bending moment %Ì ÙÚÑ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Ð ì øì Ð %Ì Ð ââ Ñ f Ù $&'ñÌ ß ø Ð $ Ð % á ââ í ó ÙÚéç Ð ç ) ßà Ò Ð ú ú &'ñÌ Ú Ì Ñ à f Pressure loads ^ ì á fú ÙÚçÑ Ð ç ßà Ò Ð f f ñÌ &' Determine applicability of the rules of VIII-2, based on satisfaction of the following requirements. The section of interest is at least 2.5 Rt away from any major structural discontinuity. &'ñÌ ñ Ì ââ Ñ g&' Ñ Ð Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ g&'ñÌ Ð /&'ñÌ ç h Shear force is not applicable. The shell R / t ratio is greater than 3.0: g ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA g&'ñÌ Ê ââ /&'ñÌ Design group“ELMAGERARD” i Calculate the membrane stress for the skirt, with a weld joint efficiency of E =0.85. Note that the maximum bending stress occurs at j Ê è0Ò . j è 0Ò ñÌ !k ñ Ì á Ñ Ð /&'ñÌ &'ñÌ Ò Ò Ð ââ ââ î âââââââ Ï Ï Ù &'ñÌ á Ñ Ð /&'ñÌ ß # Ð lm íâââââ ó &'ñÌ Ú à &' &' !& Ð Ð Ò é Ð ËÌ îïð Ñ Ð f Ð &'ñÌ Ð nop [ [j\ \ß Ò ç Ùâââââââ á á é ââ âââââââ ââââââââ í Ù &'ñÌ Ï&'ñÌ ó îì â ^ ^ Ï Ï Ï Ï # íÐ Ú Ú &'ñÌ Û &'ñÌ ßà Ð ÙÚ &'ñÌ Û &'ñÌ ßà Ð ÙÚ &'ñÌ Û &'ñÌ ßà óà !& Ð Ð Ò é Ð ËÌ îïð Ñ Ð f Ð &'ñÌ Ð nop [ [j\ \ß Ò ç Ùâââââââ á Û ÛÑÑÑ ç ââ âââââââ ââââââââ í Ù &'ñÌ Ï&'ñÌ ó îú â ^ ^ Ï Ï Ï Ï # íÐ Ú Ú &'ñÌ Û &'ñÌ ßà Ð ÙÚ &'ñÌ Û &'ñÌ ßà Ð ÙÚ &'ñÌ Û &'ñÌ ßà óà Ì Ò ç Ð fÌ Ð &'ñÌ Ð nop [[j\\ Ð % Ð ââ Ï Ò q ââââââââââ ââ ^ ^ Ï ÐÙ Ú &'ñÌ Û &'ñÌ ßà f Calculate the principal stresses. ì Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ù Ï ß Ò íÚ!kî á !&îì á ÙÚ!kî Û !&îìßà á é Ð q Ï óà é ââ Ï ú Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ù Ï ß íÚ!kî á !&îì Û ÙÚ!kî Û !&îìßà á é Ð q Ï óà û Ò Ò Ð &'ñÌ Ð ââ Ï ââ Ï ! ! ! Ò ââ Ï Check the allowable stress acceptance criteria. !r ÙÙ! Û ! ß Ï á Ù! Û ! ß Ï á Ù! Û ! ß Ï ß é Ò ç Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ ââ ââ Ï ÎÎ ÚÚ ì úà Ú ú ûà Ú û ìà à Ï Ñ !r s !ïÝ Note that VIII-2 uses an acceptance criteria based on von Mises Stress. VIII-1 typical uses the maximum principal stress in the acceptance criteria. Therefore: Ò ÙÚ ì ú ûßà é ââ Ï tuv ! w ! w ! ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA ÙÚ ì ú ûßà s !ïÝ tuv ! w ! w ! Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ò ïÝ ÙÚçé Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï ! For cylindrical and conical shells, if the axial membrane stress, !& îì is compressive, then VIII-2, Equation (4.3.45) shall be satisfied where Fxa is evaluated using paragraph 4.4.12.2 with æ ç . !& îì x øðï For !&îú that is compressive, a buckling check is required. VIII-2, paragraph 4.4.12.2.b – Axial Compressive Stress Acting Alone. In accordance with VIII-2, paragraph 4.4.12.2.b, the value of øðï is calculated as follows, with æ ç . The design factor FS used in VIII-2, paragraph 4.4.12.2.b is dependent on the predicted buckling stress øñb and the material’s yield strength, !ïÝ as shown in VIII-2, paragraph 4.4.2. An initial calculation is required to determine the value of øðï by setting FS =1.0 , with øñb = øðï . The initial value of øñb is then compared to !ïÝ as shown in paragraph 4.4.2 and the value of FS is determined. This computed value of FS is then used in paragraph 4.4.12.2.b. For æ ç øðï Ê tym ÙÚøðïì w øðïúßà &'ñÌ ñ Ì âââ Ñ g &' Since ø ç x &'ñÌ x âââ /&'ñÌ ç &'ñÌ çé âââ /&'ñÌ Ñ $&'ñÌ fð âââââ ç Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ g &'ñÌ Ð /&'ñÌ , calculate xa1 F as follows with an initial value of FS=1. é !ïÝ Ò ÙÚçç Ð ç ) ßà ââ øðïì ââââââ Ï Ù &'ñÌ ß ø Ð íç á âââ ó /&'ñÌ à Ú øðïú is calculated as follows with an initial value of FS =1. ×ð Ð ä Ð /&'ñÌ øðïú Ê ââââ ø Ð &'ñÌ &'ñÌ Since âââ x çÑé , calculate C x as follows: /&'ñÌ Since fð i ç , calculate c. as follows: é Ð z z ç ×ð âââââ The value of ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA ×ð Therefore: Design group“ELMAGERARD” ñÌ á âââ /&'ñÌ &' ×ð Ð ä Ð /&'ñÌ Ù Ò øðïú ââââ Úé Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï ø Ð &'ñÌ Ò øðï tym ÙÚøðïì w øðïúßà ÙÚçç Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï With a value of øñb Ê øðï , in accordance with VIII-2, paragraph 4.4.2, the value of FS is determined as follows. Ò øñb ççÑ ââ Ï Ð !ïÝ Ò ââ Ï ïÝ s øñb ! Ù øñ b ß ø Ñé Û éç Ð íââ ó Ñéç Ú !ïÝ à Using this computed value of FS =2.401 in paragraph 4.4.12.2.b, øðï is calculated as follows. é Ð !ïÝ Ò øðïì ââââââ é é é ââ Ï Ù &'ñÌ ß ø Ð íç á âââ ó /&'ñÌ à Ú ×ð Ð ä Ð /&'ñÌ Ù Ò øðïú ââââ ÚéÑ Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï ø Ð &'ñÌ øðï tym ÙÚøðïì w øðïúßà Ò éé é ââ Ï Compare the calculated axial compressive membrane stress, compressive membrane stress, øðï per following criteria: !& !& îì to the allowable axial îì x øðï Therefore, local buckling due to axial compressive membrane stress is not a concern. ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 7.0' Design of support (conventional method) Periods of vibration at minimum weight ç îñò ââââââââââââ Ù %Ì ß |}d Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ ËÌ îñò Ð Ò {d Ð ç Ð íââó Ð ââââ /& Ð Ò Ú Ì à îñò x Hence e, Ñ ç Periods of vibration at maximum weight ç îñò ââââââââââââ Ù %Ì ß |}d Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ ËÌ îïð Ð Ò {d Ð ç Ð íââó Ð ââââ /& Ð Ò Ú Ì à îñò x Minimum skirt thickness stress due to wind load Hence e, é ç Coefficient of wind influence for cylindrical surface For minimum weight condition For maximum weight condition Minimum wind moment îñò Ð e, Ð ì Ð Ì Ð %Ì ÙÚÑ Ð ç ) ßà Ò îïð Ð e, Ð ì Ð ÙÚÌ á Ñ Ð ç ßà Ð %Ì ÙÚÑ Ð ç ) ßà Ò f Maximum wind moment f Ù %Ì ß á $&'ñÌó îñò îñò Ð íÚââ Ñ à Ù %Ì ß á $&'ñÌó îïð îïð Ð íÚââ Ñ à ÙÚÑ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Ð ÙÚéç Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Ð Determination of skirt thickness Minimum and maximum stress on the skirt Minimum and maximum wind load stress on the skirt Assuming a small skirt thickness Din=Dout we can write: Minimum wind load stress !W Maximum wind load stress !W é Ð f îñò Ò ÑÑÑ ââ Ê ââ îñò Ê âââââ Ï /&'ñÌ Ð Ì Ð /&'ñÌ é Ð f îïð Ò Ñ ç ââ Ê ââ îïð Ê âââââ Ï /&'ñÌ Ð Ì Ð /&'ñÌ Minimum and maximum dead load stress on the skirt ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Minimum and maximum dead load stress on the skirt Minimum dead load stress ËÌ îñò Ñ Ò Ê ââ ââ ô îñò Ê âââââ Ð Ì Ð /&'ñÌ /&'ñÌ ËÌ îïð ç Ò !ô îïð Ê âââââ Ê âââ ââ Ð Ì Ð /&'ñÌ /&'ñÌ ! Maximum dead load stress Minimum and maximum tensile stress without any eccentric load Maximum tensile stress Ò Ñç ââ îïð Ê !W îñò Û !ô îñò Ê ââ /&'ñÌ !Z] Minimum tensile stress Ò Ñé ââ îñò Ê !W îïð Û !ô îïð Ê ââ /&'ñÌ !Z] Determination of skirt thickness according to minimum and maximum tensile stress Taking into account the joint efficiency of 0.7 we can derive: # ïÝ !Z] Ò ïÝ Ð # ÙÚçç Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï ! Also we can write !Z]îïð Ò Ñé ââ Ê ââ ïÝ Ê âââ /&'ñÌ /&'ñÌ !Z] !Z]îïð Ñé Ê Ñ Ê ââ ñ Ì Ê âââ !Z]ïÝ çç /&' Minimum and maximum stress due to compressive loads Minimum compressive stress Ò ÑÑ ââ ÷ îñò Ê !W îñò á !ô îñò Ê ââ /&'ñÌ ! ] Maximum compressive stress !÷]îïð Ê !W Ò Ñ ââ îïð á !ô îïð Ê ââ /&'ñÌ Determination of skirt thickness according to minimum and maximum compressive stress We can write: çÑ Ð ä Ð /&'ñÌ Ò ÑÑ ââ Ê ââ ÷ Ê âââââ Ì /&'ñÌ Ï Ì Ð ÑÑ Ò /&'ñÌ Ê ââââ ââ çÑ Ð ä Î ! ] From this we can derive ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ì Ð ÑÑ Ò ââç ñ Ìîñò ââââ Ñ Ð ä /&' Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ì Ð Ñ Ò ââââ ââ ñ Ìîïð Ñ Ð ä We accept skirt thickness: /&'ñÌ ç Taking into consideration corrosion and other /&' construction factors Design of skirt bearing plates Maximum compressive stress between bearing plate and foundation ñÌ Ì &' Ñ á Ñ /&'ñÌ ÙÚçÑ Ð ç ) ßà Distance between outer radius of bearing plate and inner radius of bearing plate ÷ ! ]~V Were: ËÌ îïð f îïð Ê ââââ á âââ Õ Ï Ð ÙÚÙÚ&'ñÌ á Ñ ßà Û &'ñÌ Ï ßà Ù Õ âââââââââ Ú Ð ç ) ßà Ï é Ù á Ñ ß ^ Û ^ ß ÚÙ Ú &'ñÌ à &'ñÌ à â ââââââââ Ù ÚÑ Ð ç d ßà ) Ñ &'ñÌ á Ñ From this we can derive: ÷ ! ]~V Ò Ð ââ Ï ÷ ! ]~V x ËÌ îïð f îïð Ò á âââ çééç ââ ââââ Ï Õ Which is concrete compression stress allowed ) ñ Ì á Ñ ÙÚçÑ Ð ç ßà , &' Bearing plate outer diameter Bearing plate thickness ïÝ ç ! We accept: Ò Ð ââ Ï é Allowable compressive stress for bearing plate Ï Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ !÷]~V Ð /, ââââ Ñ !ïÝ /, As bearing thickness plate is less/equal than 20 mm gaskets are no required. Minimum compressive stress in bearing plate ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” As bearing thickness plate is less/equal than 20 Arberor mm gaskets are no required. Minimum compressive stress in bearing plate ÷ ËÌ îñò f îïð Ò á âââ çç ââ îñò ââââ Ï Õ ! ]~V Anchorage factor of overturn # ç ËÌ îñò Ð éÑ Ð , Ñ âââââââ f îñò This means that akore bolts are required # s Calculation of anchor bolts Anchor bolts sum of actual force ÷ ! ]~ ï !÷]~Vîñò Ð Õ ÙÚççé Ð ç d ßà Ò Ò é ââ Ï Hot rolled plain carbon steel allowable stress The sum area of bolts ï ÙÚÑçç Ð ç ^ ßà Ï Õ& ââ !÷]~ Determine bolt diameter Maximum allowable number of bolts is 20, from this we can derive the surface of a bolt Ö Ñ Õ& Ù Õ ââ Úç Ð ç ) ßà Ï Ö Ï ÎÎÎÎÎ é Õ ââ We accept M36 for anchor bolt Thickness of bearing plate inside the bolting chair øç Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ ï Ð ø Ð âââ Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ð fîïð /b Ê ââââ Ê ââââ Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ð !ïÝ Ð !ïÝ We accept: Spacing between stiffeners Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ ï Ð ø Ð Ð ââââ /b ââââââ ÑÑ Ï ÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ð !ïÝ /b ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 8.0 Design of flanged joints General data ô Ò Ð ââ Ï ô × Design pressure Design temperature Õ Û ç Û Shell material: carbon steel plate Ò ïÝ &Ý çé ââ Ï Ò ä Ñ Ð ç " Ð ââ Ï ! Permissible tensile stress Elastic modulus Joint efficiency # Flange data Õ Û ç Û Ñ Ò ïÝ Ýï çé ââ Ï Ò ä Ñ Ð ç " Ð ââ Ï ! Shell material: carbon steel plate Permissible tensile stress Elastic modulus Bolt data Õ Û ç Û Ñ Ò !ïÝ ÝÌ ç ââ Ï Ò ä Ñ Ð ç " Ð ââ Ï Ñ Permissible tensile stress Elastic modulus Diameter of the bolt Number of bolts Õ ç Shell material: carbon steel plate Ï Root Area Of the bolt Gasket data ü(/0/((0/0è Shell material: iron/soft steel Gasket factor Ò Ð ââ Ï Þñ çÑ Seating stress Inside diameter ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Þñ Þ DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Inside diameter ç Outside diameter Design rules for bolted flange connections with ring type gaskets are provided in VIII-1 Mandatory Appendix 2. The rules in this paragraph are the same as those provided in VIII-2. The design procedures in VIII-2, paragraph 4.16 are used in this example problem with substitute references made to VIII-1 Mandatory Appendix 2 paragraphs. Evaluate the girth flange in accordance with VIII-2, paragraph 4.16. VIII-2, paragraph 4.16.6, Design Bolt Loads. The procedure to determine the bolt loads for the operating and gasket seating conditions is shown below. Determine the design pressure and temperature of the flanged joint. ô Ò Ð ââ Ï Design preasure ô Ñ × Design temperature Select a gasket and determine the gasket factors m and y from Table 4.16.1 (VIII-1,Table 2-5.1). Gasket factor Ò Ð ââ Ï Seating stress Determine the width of the gasket, N , basic gasket seating width, bo , the effective gasket seating width, b , and the location of the gasket reaction, G Þ Û Þñ ç âââ Ñ From Table 4.16.3 (VIII-1, Table 2-5.2), Facing Sketch Detail 2, Column II, ã raised nubbin width ã á Ð ë` âââ For ë` s ë ë` Therefore, the location of the gasket reaction is calculated as follows (VIII-1, paragraph 2-3). G mean diameter of the gasket contact face Þ á Þñ ÙÚç Ð ç ) ßà âââ Ñ Determine the design bolt load for the operating condition, (VIII-1, paragraph 2-5). Ë` â Ð Ï Ð ô á Ð Ð ô Ð ë Ð ÙÚééÑ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Ë` DESIGNED: Arberor MITA é ôá ô ë Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ú à Ò Determine the design bolt load for the gasket seating condition (VIII-1, paragraph 2-5). Ù Õî á Õ ß ËÞ Ê íâââ ó Ú Ñ à Þ Were: Õ Õ Ð Ï ß ÙÙ é f ß íí Ë` á øY á ââ ó Ù Ë ßó Þ& óó ó w íâââ Õî Ê tuv ííííââââââ ó ÚÚ !ïÝ ÝÌ à Ú !ïÝ ÝÌ àóà Axial load aplued in flange joint Ï Ù ÙÙ ß øY ËÌ îïð Û íâ Ì á Ñ /&ß Û Ì Ï ßà Ð $û Ð .&Ì á ËÌó ÙÚ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Ú Ú à Úé à Bending moment aplued in flange joint Ù %Ì Û $û ß $û ÙÚçç Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Ð ó Û øì Ð $û Ð ââ ì øì Ð íÚÙÚ%Ì Û $ûßà Ð ââââ Ñ Ñ à f Ù ÙÚ%Ì Û $û Û $&'ñÌßà ß Ù ó Ú Ð ç ) ßà Ò Ð ú øú Ð $&'ñÌ Ð íÚ%Ì Û $û á âââââââ Ñ à f ^ ì á fú ÙÚÑ Ð ç ßà Ò Ð f f Maximum load aplued in flange joint ËÞ& Ð ë Ð Ð ÙÚçé Ð ç d ßà Ò From this we can derive ÙÙ ß é f ß íí Ë` á øY á ââ ó Ù Ë ßó Þ& óó ó w íâââ Õî tuv ííííââââââ ÚÚ !ïÝ ÝÌ óà Ú !ïÝ ÝÌ àóà ÑéÑ Ï Bolt load for the operating condition Ù Õî á Õ ß ËÞ íâââ ó !ïÝ ÝÌ ÙÚ Ð ç d ßà Ò ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. ËÞ í Ú DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Ñ ó !ïÝ ÝÌ Ú à Design group“ELMAGERARD” à Ò Flange Design Procedure. The procedure in this paragraph can be used to design circular integral, loose or reverse flanges, subject to internal or external pressure, and external loadings. The procedure incorporates both a strength check and a rigidity check for flange rotation. Determine the design pressure and temperature of the flanged joint and the external net-section axial force, Fa , and bending moment, Me. ô Ò Ð ââ Ï ô × Design pressure Design temperature øY ÙÚ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò f Axial force ÙÚÑ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Ð Bending moment Determine the design bolt loads for operating condition Ë` , and the gasket seating condition ËÞ , and the corresponding actual bolt load area Õ , (VIII-1, paragraph 2-5). Ë` ÙÚééÑ Ð ç ^ ßà Ò ËÞ ÙÚ Õ Ð ç d ßà Ò Ï Determine an initial flange geometry (see Figure E4.16.1) in addition to the information required to determine the bolt load, the following geometric parameters are required, (VIII-1, paragraph 2-3). çç ×ç á Ñ çÑÑ Flange bore Bolt circle diameter Õ ç Flange outside diameter / Flange thicness Òì Ð [[ç Ò` ç Û ×Õ Û çç \\ Û ×Õ çé Thickness of the hub at the large end Thickness of the hub at the small end ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Ò` Ó × DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Thickness of the hub at the small end Hub length Determine the flange stress factors using the equations in Tables 4.16.4 and 4.16.5 (VIII-1, Table 2-7.1 and Fig. 2-7.1 – Fig. 2-7.6). e Õ çÑç â Ï ç Ù e Ð lo [ [ e\ \ß ââ íé á çç Ð ââââ ó eÛç Ú eÛç à Ï [ç á Ñé Ð lo [[e\\\\ Û ç e Ð[ ââââââââââ ÙÚçéÑ á çéé Ð e Ï ßà Ð [[e Û ç\\ ç Ï [ç á Ñ Ñé Ð lo [[e\\\\ Û ç e Ð[ ê ââââââââââ ç çç Ð ÙÚe Ï Û çßà Ð [[e Û ç\\ VIII-1, Fig. 2-7.2: Ï e áç âââ Ï e Ûç Ó` Ï ÎÎÎÎ Ð Ò` ç Òì XÞ â Ñ Ò` Ó Í â Ó` X Ñ ø* Û ÑçÑ lm ÙÚXÞßà á Ñ Ð ç {) Ð lm ÙÚXÍßà á çÑ ) Ï Ð ÙÚlm ÙÚXÞßàßà á ø** ÛçééÑ Ð lm ÙÚXÞßà Ð lm ÙÚXÍßà Û ççÑ Ð ÙÚlm ÙÚXÞßàßà á çÑ Ð ÙÚlm ÙÚXÍßàßà " Ï ø*** Û lm ÙÚXÞßà Ð ÙÚlm ÙÚXÍßàßà á Ñç Ð ÙÚlm ÙÚXÞßàßà Ð lm ÙÚXÍßà ø ø* á ø** á ø*** çé Ð ÙÚlm ÙÚXÍßàßà ) Í Ñ ç éçç ç ÑÑ Ñééç ççÑ Ô* çéé Û âââ Û ââââ á âââ á ââââ á âââ á âââ ) Ï Ï XÞ XÍ XÞ Ð XÍ XÞ XÍ XÞ ÑÑ ÑÑ Ñç Ô** Ûââââ Û ââââ Û âââ ) Ï Ï XÍ XÞ Ð XÍ XÞ Ð XÍ For x X x Ï ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Þ Þ DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Ô Ô* á Ô** Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ñçç Ù Ñ Û Ð XÞ á éç Ð XÞ Ï á Ñ Ð XÍ á éé Ð XÍ Ï Û éç Ð XÍ ) ß í ó ü tuv ç w ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ íÚ óà ç Û Ð ç {) Ð XÞ á çÑé Ð XÍ á éÑ Ð XÍ Ï á ç Ñ Ð XÍ ) ü ç VIII-1, paragraph 2-3: Ù Ò` ß Ï ê Ð íâó Ð Ó` Ú +Ö à è âââââ çÑ Ô 0 Ö + ø Ñç ââ Ó` â +Ö Ù / ß) Ð 0 á ç â íÚâ ó +Ö +Ö à % âââ âââ ÑÑÑ è â +Ö / Determine the flange forces, (VIII-1, paragraph 2-3). Ð Ï Ð ô Ù ^ $ô ââââÚéçç Ð ç ß à Ò é Ï Ð Ð ô Úéç Ð ç ^ ßà Ò $ ââââÙ é $Z $ $ Û $ô ç Ò Ë` Û $ô ÙÚé Ð ç ) ßà Ò Determine the flange moment for the operating condition using Equation (4.16.14) or Equation (4.16.15), as applicable (VIII-1, paragraph 2-6). In these equations, Óô , ÓZ , Ó , are determined from Table 4.16.6 (VIII-1, Table 2-6). For VIII-2 designs – For integral and loose type flanges, the moment, Moe is calculated using Equation (4.16.16) where I and Ip, in this equation are determined from Table 4.16.7. f Ù ß Ù Óô ß Ê é Ð f Ð íââââ ó Ð íâââó á øY Ð Óô ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” í é Ð á ó í × Û Ñ Ð Ó ó á Ú à Ú ôà , Y Óô From Table 4.16.6 (VIII-1, Table 2-6), × Û Û Òì Óô ââââ Ñ Ñ ×Û Ó ââ Ñ Ñ Ù ×Û ß ÓZ íââ á Óó Ú Ñ à é % Ð Ò` Ï Ð Ó` Ð Ù âââââââÚ Ô Õ [[Õ Û \\ ïÞ Ð ÙÚÒ` á Òìßà ç Ð ç {"ßà ^ ÕY Ó á /& ~ ïÞ ×÷ Õ Û ïÞ ô /& Ùç Ù ~ ßß Ù ç Ù ~ ß ^ ß )ß Ù eY~ ÚÕY Ð ~ à Ð íâ Û Ñç Ð íââ óó Ð íç Û â Ð íââ ó ó Ñç ^ Ú Ú ÕY àà íÚ çÑ Ú ÕY à óà Ùç Ù ô ßß Ù Ù ô ß ^ ß ç )ß Ù í e÷ô Ú×÷ Ð ô à Ð íâ Û ç Ð íââ Ð íââ óó Ð ç Û ââ ó ó Ñç ^ Ú Ú ×÷ àà íÚ çÑ Ú ×÷ à óà V eY~ f Ù ß Ù Óô ß é Ð f Ð íââââ ó á øY Ð Óô ÙÚÑé Ð ç ) ßà Ò Ð ó Ð íâââ é Ð á × Û Ñ Ð Ó Ú V à Ú ôà For internal person ø ç á e÷ô éÑ ^ ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. f` up DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ÙÚÙÚ$ô Ð Óô á $Z Ð ÓZ á $ Ð Ó á f ßà Ð øßà ÙÚç Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Ð Determine the flange moment for gasket seating condition using Equation (4.16.17) or Equation (4.16.18), as applicable (VIII-1, paragraph 2-6). For internal pressure ËÞ Ð [[× Û \\ Ð ø Ù Úéç Ð ç ^ ßà Ò Ð Þ ââââââ Ñ f Where, Fs=1 for non split rings . VIII-1, paragraph 2-6 does not provide a split loose flange factor in the equation for Wgs as is provided for in the VIII-2 procedure. However, VIII-1, paragraph 2-9 provides guidance for split loose flanges. Determine the flange stresses for the operating and gasket seating conditions using the equations in Table 4.16.8 (VIII-1, paragraph 2-7). ü Ð f` Ù Ò âââ ÚÑÑç Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï Ï % Ð Òì Ð ß Ù / Ð 0 á çó f` íÚç Ð â Ò +Ö à âââââââçÑçÑ ââ Ï Ï %Ð/ Ð Z f ` Û Ð ââ Ï / Ð Ò ééçç ââ Ï Gasket Seating Condition ü Ð fÞ Ù Ò âââ Úé Ð ç ) ßà ââ Ï Ï % Ð Òì Ð Ù ß / Ð 0 á çó fÞ íÚç Ð â Ò +Ö à âââââââé Ñ ââ Ï Ï %Ð/ Ð Z fÞ Ò Û Ð ÙÚÑ Ð ç ) ßà ââ ââ Ï Ï / Ð The criteria below shall be evaluated. If the stress criteria are satisfied, go to STEP 10. If the stress criteria are not satisfied, re-proportion the flange dimensions and go to STEP 4. Allowable normal stress – The criteria to evaluate the normal stresses for the operating and gasket seating conditions are shown in Table 4.16.9 (VIII-1, paragraph 2-8), (for integral type flanges with hub welded to the neck, pipe or vessel wall). ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 9.0 Design an integral radial nozzle centrally located in a 2:1 ellipsoidal head based on the vessel and nozzle data below. The parameters used in this design procedure are shown in Figure E4.5.3. Vessel and Nozzle Data: ô Ò Ð ââ Ï ô × Design preasure Design temperature Õ Û ç Û Ñ Ò !ïÝ çé ââ Ï Ò ä Ñ Ð ç " Ð ââ Ï Ellipsoidal head material: carbon steel plate # Joint eficency ×Õ Corrosion allowance Õ Û ç Û Elastic modulus Nozzle material Ò ïÝ ò çé ââ Ï ! Permissible tensile stress Nozzle material permissible tensile stress Í ç Head Inside Diameter Í Height of the Elliptical Head, (2:1) r $r Í /r Ñ Í r Head thickness Nozzle outside diameter ÖrÍ Nozzle thickness Óò Nossle height Ñ Section VIII, Division 1 Solution The required thickness of the 2:1 ellipsoidal head based on circumferential stress is given by UG- 32(d). However, per UG-37(a), when an opening and its reinforcement are in an ellipsoidal head and located entirely within a circle the center which coincides with the center of the head and the diameter of which is equal to 80% of the shell diameter, tr is the thickness required for a seamless sphere of radius K1 D , where K1 is given in Table UG-37. Per Table UG-37, for a 2:1 ellipsoidal head where: - 32(d). However, per UG-37(a), when an opening and its reinforcement are in an ellipsoidal head and located entirely within a circle the center which coincides with the center ACETONE of the head and the diameter of which is ABSORPTION equal to 80% COLUMN of the shell diameter, is the thickness required for a seamless sphere of Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” radius K D , where K is given in Table UG-37. Per Table UG-37, for a 2:1 ellipsoidal head where: rÍ ç âââ Ñ Ð $rÍ ì e The required thickness per UG-32(d) is as follows. Note, the rules of UG-32(d) are only applicable for a specific geometry, i.e. half the minor axis (inside depth of head minus the skirt) equals one–fourth of the inside diameter of the head skirt. Additionally, if the ratio ÖrÍ , ââ % is not satisfied, the rules of Mandatory Appendix 1-4(f) shall also be met. ÖrÍ ÖrÍ Ê âââ Ñ ââ % eì Ð rÍ ÖrÍ âââ eì Ð rÍ ô Ð rÍ ç Í ââââââ Ñ !ïÝ Ð # Û Ñ ô / The required thickness, tr , per the UG-37 definition for nozzle reinforcement calculations. / ô Ð rÍ Ð eì çé ââââââ Ñ !ïÝ Ð # Û Ñ ô The required thickness of the nozzle based on circumferential stress is given by UG-27(c)(1). ô Ð rÍ Ñ ò ââââââ !ïÝ Ð # Û ô / Calculate the Limits of Reinforcement per UG-40. 1) Reinforcing dimensions for an integrally reinforced nozzle per Fig. UG-40(e), UG-40(e-1), UG-40(e-2): See Figure E4.5.3 of this example: Ñ /ð Ñ ð / ð ìÐ % e Í Ñé ð Ñ % r Therfore UG-40 (e-1) ÖÍ ð / / / Reinforcment pad Note: Fig. UG-40 does not provide a sketch for an integral uniform thickness nozzle with full penetration weld inserted through the shell without a reinforcing pad. Therefore, sketch (e-1) was used with. The limits of reinforcement, measured parallel to the vessel wall in the corroded condition: $rÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖrÍ ç Í ââââ Ñ èrÍ Ñ Ð grÍ çé gr Í / tuv ÙÚèrÍ w grÍ á /rÍ á ÖrÍßà çé Ö ÙÚÑ Ð /Í w Ñ Ð ÖÍ á /ßà ç + Calculate the reinforcement strength parameters per UG-37. 1) Strength Reduction Factors: ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Calculate the reinforcement strength parameters per UG-37. 1) Strength Reduction Factors: ïÝ , !ïÝ ! !ïÝ ò üì ââ ç !ïÝ !ïÝ ò ç üú ââ !ïÝ +Ö Ù Ú!ïÝ ò w !ïÝ ,ßà ç üû âââââââ !ïÝ !ïÝ , üþ ââ ç !ïÝ Joint Efficiency Parameter: For a nozzle located in a solid plate: # Correction Factor for variation of internal pressure stresses on different planes with respect to the axis of the vessel: For a nozzle in an ellipsoidal head. ø ç Calculate the Areas of Reinforcement, see Fig. UG–37.1 Area Required, A : Õ èrÍ Ð /Í á Ñ Ð /Í Ð ÖÍ Ð ø Ð ÙÚç Û üìßà çé Area Available in the Shell, A1 . Use larger value: Õìì èrÍ Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßà Û Ñ ÖÍ Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßà ÙÚç Û üìßà ççÑ Õìú Ñ ÙÚ/Í á ÖÍßà Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßà Û Ñ ÖÍ Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßà ÙÚç Û üìßà çç Õì tuv ÙÚÕìì w Õìúßà ççÑ Area Available in the Nozzle Projecting Outward, A2 . Use the smaller value: Õúì ÙÚÖÍ Û /òßà Ð üú Ð /Í Ñç Ñ Õúú ÙÚÖÍ Û /òßà Ð üú Ð ÙÚÖÍ á /ßà ÑÑ Õú +Ö ÙÚÕúì w Õúúßà Ñç Ñ Area Available in the Nozzle Projecting Inward, A3 : Õû tym ÙÚ ñ / Ð ñ Ð ü ú w / / ñ Ð /ñ Ð üú w Ñ Óò Ð /ñ Ð üúßà / Area Available in Welds, A41 , A42 , A43 , use the following minimum specified weld leg dimensions, see Figure E4.5.3 of this example: Òì 0 Òú 0 Òû 0 ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Òì 0 Òú DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Òû 0 0 Õþì 0Òì Ð üú Ñ Õþú 0Òú Ð üú Õþû 0Òû Ð üú Ð Ð Õþ Õþì á Õþú á Õþû Area Available in Element, A5 : Õÿ ÙÚ Û èrÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖÍßà Ð / Ð üþ çÑ Total Available Area, Aavail : ÕïïñÝ Õì á Õú á Õû á Õþ á Õÿ é é Nozzle reinforcement acceptance criterion: ÕïïñÝ Õ Division 2 Solution with VIII-1 Allowable Stresses The procedure, per VIII-2, paragraph 4.5.10, to design a radial nozzle in an ellipsoidal head subject to pressure loading is shown below. Determine the effective radius of the ellipsoidal head as follows. g Ù rÍ ßß Ù Ð rÍ Ù âââ íÑ á íââ óó ÚçÑé Ð ç ßà Ú Ú Ñ Ð Óò àà Calculate the limit of reinforcement along the vessel wall. For integrally reinforced set–in nozzles in ellipsoidal heads, Ù ß rÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖrÍ Ö í ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ g Ð /Í w Ñ ââââó Ñ Ú à % + é Note: This is an analysis of a single nozzle; therefore, the spacing criterion is automatically satisfied. If there were multiple nozzles in the shell, the spacing requirements for nozzles in VIII- 2, paragraph 4.5.13 would need to be checked. Calculate the limit of reinforcement along the nozzle wall projecting outside the vessel surface. See VIII-2, Figures 4.5.9 and 4.5.10. For set–in nozzles in ellipsoidal heads, % Ù Ê +Ö í/Í Ð / á ø, Ð íÚ ß ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ Ù èrÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖÍ ß íââââ ó Ð ÖÍ w Óò á /Íó Ñ Ú à àó ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. X` j uum DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ù ÙÙ èrÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖÍ ß ß Ê +Ö í ííââââ ó á ÖÍó Ð Ñ Ú ÚÚ à à [ [j\ \w rÍ ß ââ ó Ñ à ßß Ù Ñ Óò Ù Ð íââââââ íââ óó Ñ Ù rÍ ß í rÍ í ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ óó ó á óó í í íââ Ú Ú Ú Ñ à àà ÙÙ ÙÙ èrÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖÍ ß ßß rÍ ß Ö íí á ííââââ ó á ÖÍóó Ð nop [[j\\ w ââ ó Ñ Ñ à ÚÚ ÚÚ à àà X` + Since: X` ø, Ê ×ò Ð rÍ é X` Ð rÍ calculate Fp as follows: ÙÙ / á / ß ß Í í ×ò +Ö ííâââ ó w çóó ç ÚÚ ÖÍ à à ø, ×ò ç Ù ß ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ èrÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖÍ Ö í/Í á / á ø, Ð ââââ Ð ÖÍ w Óò á /Íó é Ñ Ñ àó íÚ % + Calculate the limit of reinforcement along the nozzle wall projecting inside the vessel surface, if applicable. ú %V ß Ù ÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎÎ èrÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖÍ Ö íø, Ð ââââ Ð ÖÍ w %Vúó Ñ íÚ óà %_ + Determine the total available area near the nozzle opening (see VIII-2, Figures 4.5.1 and 4.5.2) where frm and Frp are given by VIII-2, Equations (4.5.21) and (4.5.22) respectively. Do not include any area that falls outside of the limits defined by LH , LR , and LI . For set–in nozzles: ÕZ Ê Õì á üò Ð ÙÚÕú á Õûßà á Õþì á Õþú á Õþû á üò Ð Õÿ Õì /Í Ð % éÑ Õú ÖÍ Ð % ÑÑ Õû ÖÍ Ð %_ Õþì Ð 0Òì çÑ ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Õþú Ð 0Òú çÑ Õþû Ð 0Òû çÑ Ë ç Õÿï Ë Ð / Design group“ELMAGERARD” Õÿ ÙÚ% Û ÖÍßà Ð / éÑÑÑ Õÿ +Ö ÙÚÕÿï w Õÿßà éÑÑÑ !ïÝ ò üò ââ ç !ïÝ !ïÝ ò ü, ââ ç !ïÝ ÕZ Õì á üò Ð ÙÚÕú á Õûßà á Õþì á Õþú á Õþû á üò Ð Õÿ çÑÑ Determine the applicable forces. For set–in nozzles, èrÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖÍ ò ââââ Ñ g ü Ê ô Ð g&î Ð % ÖÍ ðò âââââ Ù gò á ÖÍ ß ç Ñ lm íâââ ó Ú gò à g ü ô Ð gðò Ð % Ñç Ò ô Ð gðò Ð Ù Ú% á ÖÍßà ü] Ê ââââââ Ñ Ù ü, Ð Õÿ ß / /Í á íâââ ó ç Ú % à ß Ù âââââ Ù g á ÖÍ ß Úç Ð ç à lm íââââ ó Ú g à ô Ð gð& Ð Ù Ú% á ÖÍßà ÙÚÑ Ð ç ßà Ò ü] ââââââ Ñ ð g & / ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” ô Ð gð& Ð gò ÙÚéÑ Ð ç ßà Ò ü] ââââ Ñ Determine the average local primary membrane stress and the general primary membrane stress at the nozzle intersection. ü á ü ] á ü] Ò çÑçÑ ââ ï Þ ââââ ÕZ ! ñ !b b ô Ð gð& Ò çÑÑ ââ âââ Ñ Ð / Determine the maximum local primary membrane stress at the nozzle intersection. tuv Ò ÙÚÑ Ð !ïÞ Û !bñb w !bñbßà ÙÚçç Ð ç ßà ââ The calculated maximum local primary membrane stress should satisfy VIII-2, Equation 4.5.146. If the nozzle is subjected to internal pressure, then the allowable stress, is given by VIII-2, Equation 4.5.57. If the nozzle is subjected to external pressure,then the allowable stress is given by VIII-2, Equation 4.5.58. Ò ç Ð !ïÝ Ð # ÙÚç Ð ç ßà ââ ç Ð !ïÝ Ð # x Determine the maximum allowable working pressure of the nozzle. ü á ü] á ü] é ÕV ââââ ç Ð !ïÝ Ð # Ò ÛÑ Ñ ââ îïðì ââââââ Ù Ñ Ð ÕV ß Ù gð& ß íââ ó Û íââó Ú ÕZ à Ú Ñ Ð / à Ù /Í ß Ò îïðú Ñ Ð !ïÝ Ð íââ ó é ââ Ú gð& à îïð tuv ÙÚîïðì w îïðúßà The nozzle is acceptable because: îïð ô Ò é ââ ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” 10.0 Check the design of a radial nozzle in a cylindrical shell based on the vessel and nozzle data below.Verify the adequacy of the attachment welds. Calculate the shear stresses from the applied nozzle loads and compare to the acceptance criteria of UG-45. The parameters used in this design procedure are shown in Figure E4.5.5. ô Ò Ð ââ ô × Design pressure Design temperature Õ Û ç Û Ñ Ò !ïÝ çé ââ Ò ä Ñ Ð ç Ð ââ Shell material: carbon steel plate # Joint efficiency ×Õ Corrosion allowance Õ Û ç Û Permissible tensile stress Elastic modulus Nozzle material Ò ïÝ ò çé ââ Nozzle material permissible tensile stress Õ Û ç Û Ñ Reinforcement pad material Ò ïÝ , çé ââ Reinforcement pad material permissible tensile stress ! ! Í ç r Í Shell thickness /r Í Shell Inside Diameter Ñ r ÖrÍ Nozzle outside diameter Nozzle thickness Í r Reinforcement pad diameter õrÍ Reinforcement pad thickness é $ Ò Applied shear load Applied torsional moment ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Ñ ÒÐ DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Applied torsional moment All category A joints are to be fully radiographed (see UW-3). Section VIII, Division 1 Solution Evaluate per UG-37. The required thickness of the shell based on circumferential stress is given by UG-27(c)(1). rÍ ô Ð ââ Ñ / ââââââçéç !ïÝ Ð # Û ô The required thickness of the nozzle based on circumferential stress is given by UG-27(c)(1). rÍ ô Ð ââ Ñ /ò ââââââéçé !ïÝ Ð # Û ô Determine the Minimum Nozzle Thickness per UG-45. 1) For access openings and openings used only for inspection: þÿ Ê ( ÙÚ/ï w /ßà / Where, / Ê ( ÙÚ/û w ( ÙÚ/ì w /úßàßà t , the minimum neck thickness required for internal or external pressure using UG-27 and UG-28 (plus corrosion allowance), as applicable. The effects of external forces and moments from supplemental loads (see UG-22) shall be considered. Shear stresses caused by UG-22 loadings shall not exceed 70% of the allowable tensile stress for the nozzle material. ï / / / ò á ×Õ éçé ì , for vessels under internal pressure, the thickness (plus corrosion allowance) required for pressure for the shell or head at the location where the nozzle neck or other connection attaches to the vessel but in no case less than the minimum thickness specified for the material in UG-16(b). ì ~ ç / / ì ÙÚ á ×Õ w /ì ~ßà ééç / tuv / ú , for vessels under external pressure, the thickness (plus corrosion allowance) obtained by using the external design pressure as an equivalent internal design pressure in the formula for the shell or head at the location where the nozzle neck or other connection attaches to the vessel but in no case less than the minimum thickness specified for the material in UG-16(b). ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN , for vessels under external pressure, the thickness (plus corrosion allowance) obtained “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. as DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” by using theRequired: external design pressure an equivalent internal design pressure in the formula for the shell or head at the location where the nozzle neck or other connection attaches to the vessel but in no case less than the minimum thickness specified for the material in UG-16(b). ú / / û , the thickness given in Table UG-45 plus the thickness added for corrosion allowance. Ìï Ý / é Ìï Ý á ×Õ ççé û / / Therefore, Ö ÙÚ/û w tuv ÙÚ/ì w /úßàßà ééç / + Calculate the maximum membrane shear stress due to the superimposed shear and torsion loads and compare to the allowable shear stress. As specified in the definition of ta in UG-45: Ð ïÝ & ! Ò ââ Membrane shear stress from shear load: Ò Ñ $ Ñé ââ Ý ââââ Ð rÍ Ð ÖrÍ & Membrane shear stress from torsional moment: Ñ ÌÝ ââââââ Ù rÍ ß Ñ Ð íââ ó Ð/ Ú Ñ à rÍ Total membrane stress: Ý Ò Ý á ÌÝ Ñçç ââ & Since Ý x & Ò ââ the nozzle is adequately designed for the applied shear loads. Calculate the required weld sizes per UW-16(d) and Fig. UW-16.1 Sketch (q). See Figure E4.5.5 of this example. 1) Outer nozzle fillet weld, based on throat dimensions: Ö ÙÚ /b + ïÌ Ð Ð Íßà w /r /b b ïÌ /b b /b Outer reinforcing element fillet weld, based on throat dimensions: ¡(/ Ð /rÍ é ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Ð ïÌ ¡(/ b Design group“ELMAGERARD” éÑ ïÌ ¡(/ b i ¡(/ Reinforcing element groove weld: Ð Í /¢ /r Ñ ïÌ /¢ b ïÌ /b b /b Shell groove weld: Ð Í /¢ /r Ñ ïÌ /¢ b ïÌ /b b /b Calculate the Limits of Reinforcement per UG-40. 1) Reinforcing dimensions for a reinforced nozzle per Fig. UG-40 sketch (b-1). See Figure E4.5.5 of this example: 2) The limits of reinforcement, measured parallel to the vessel wall in the corroded condition: Ñ /ð Ñ ð / ð ìÐ % e Í Ñ Ñ ð Ñ % r Therfore UG-40 (e-1) ÖÍ ð / / / Reinforcment pad The limits of reinforcement, measured parallel to the vessel wall in the corroded condition: rÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖrÍ ç Í ââââ Ñ èrÍ Ñ Ð grÍ çÑ gr Í / tuv ÙÚèrÍ w grÍ á /rÍ á ÖrÍßà çÑ Ö ÙÚÑ Ð /Í w Ñ Ð ÖÍ á /ßà Ñ + Calculate the reinforcement strength parameters per UG-37. 1) Strength Reduction Factors: ïÝ , !ïÝ ! !ïÝ ò üì ââ ç !ïÝ ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” !ïÝ ò üú ââ ç !ïÝ +Ö Ù Ú!ïÝ ò w !ïÝ ,ßà ç üû âââââââ !ïÝ !ïÝ , üþ ââ ç !ïÝ Joint Efficiency Parameter: For a nozzle located in a solid plate: # Correction Factor for variation of internal pressure stresses on different planes with respect to the axis of the vessel: For a nozzle in an ellipsoidal head. ø ç Calculate the Areas of Reinforcement, see Fig. UG–37.1 Area Required, A : Õ èrÍ Ð /Í á Ñ Ð /Í Ð ÖÍ Ð ø Ð ÙÚç Û üìßà Ñé Area Available in the Shell, A1 . Use larger value: Õìì èrÍ Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßà Û Ñ ÖÍ Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßà ÙÚç Û üìßà ç Õìú Ñ ÙÚ/Í á ÖÍßà Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßà Û Ñ ÖÍ Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßà ÙÚç Û üìßà ç ç Õì tuv ÙÚÕìì w Õìúßà ç Area Available in the Nozzle Projecting Outward, A2 . Use the smaller value: Õúì ÙÚÖÍ Û /òßà Ð üú Ð /Í Õúú ÙÚÖÍ Û /òßà Ð üú Ð ÙÚÖÍ á /ßà Õú +Ö ÙÚÕúì w Õúúßà é é Area Available in the Nozzle Projecting Inward, A3 : Õû tym ÙÚ ñ / Ð ñ Ð ü ú w / / ñ Ð /ñ Ð üú w Ñ Óò Ð /ñ Ð üúßà / Area Available in Welds, A41 , A42 , A43 , use the following minimum specified weld leg dimensions, see Figure E4.5.3 of this example: Òì 0 Òú 0 Òû 0 Õþì 0Òì Ð üú Õþú 0Òú Ð üú ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Õþû 0Òû Ð üú Design group“ELMAGERARD” Õþ Õþì á Õþú á Õþû ç Area Available in Element, A5 : Õÿ ÙÚ Û èrÍ Û Ñ Ð ÖÍßà Ð / Ð üþ Ñç Total Available Area, Aavail : ÕïïñÝ Õì á Õú á Õû á Õþ á Õÿ éç Nozzle reinforcement acceptance criterion: ÕïïñÝ Õ The load to be carried by the welds is calculated in accordance with UG-41. Per Fig. UG-41.1, sketch (a) Nozzle Attachment Weld Loads and Weld Strength Paths to be Considered; typical nozzle detail with nozzle neck inserted through (set–in) the vessel wall. Weld Load for Strength Path 1-1, W1 1 . Ëìì ÙÚÕú á Õÿ á Õþì á Õþúßà !ïÝ Ð # ÙÚ Ð ç £ ßà Ò Weld Load for Strength Path 2-2, W 2 2 Ëúú ÙÚÕú á Õû á Õþì á Õþû á Ñ Ð /Í Ð ÖÍ Ð üìßà !ïÝ Ð # ÙÚ ç Ð ç ßà Ò Weld Load for Strength Path 3-3, W 3 3 . Ëûû ÙÚÕú á Õû á Õÿ á Õþì á Õþú á Õþû á Ñ Ð /Í Ð ÖÍ Ð üìßà !ïÝ Ð # ÙÚÑç Ð ç £ ßà Ò Total Weld Load, W . Ë ÙÚÕ Û Õì á Ñ Ð ÖÍ Ð üì Ð ÙÚ# Ð /Í Û ø Ð /ßàßà !ïÝ Ð # ÙÚçç Ð ç £ ßà Ò Since W is smaller than W3 3 , W may be used in place of W 3 3 for comparing weld capacity to weld load. Determine the allowable stresses of the attachment welds for weld strength path check. The allowable stress of the welds should be considered equal to the lesser of the two allowable stresses joined. Per UW-15(c) and UG-45(c), the allowable stresses for groove/fillet welds in percentages of stress value for the vessel material, used with UG-41 calculations are as follows: Groove Weld Tension:74% Groove Weld Shear:60% Fillet Weld Shear:49% Nozzle Neck Shear:70% Fillet Weld Shear – Outer Nozzle Fillet and Outer Element Fillet: welds in percentages of stress value for the vessel material, used with UG-41 calculations are as follows: ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. Groove Weld Tension:74% Groove Weld Shear:60% Fillet Weld Shear:49% Nozzle Neck Shear:70% DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Design group“ELMAGERARD” Fillet Weld Shear – Outer Nozzle Fillet and Outer Element Fillet: é Ð ïÝ ò & ! Ò ââ Groove Weld Tension – Nozzle Groove Weld and Element Groove Weld: Ò òÞÌ é Ð !ïÝ ÙÚç Ð ç ßà ââ Groove Weld Shear: Ò é ââ Þ Ð ïÝ ò Ð ïÝ & ! Nozzle Wall Shear: & ! Ò ââ Determine the Strength of Connection Elements 1) Outer Nozzle Fillet Weld Shear: Ë â Ð Ñ £ Í Ð 0Òì Ð ò& ÙÚÑçÑç Ð ç ßà Ò r Outer Element Fillet Weld Shear: ÙÚ Ð ç £ ßà Ò äË â Ð Ð 0Ò Ð Ñ ì ò& Nozzle Groove Weld Tension: Ë â Ð Ñ £ Í Ð 0Òì Ð òÞÌ ÙÚÑ Ð ç ßà Ò r Element Groove Weld Tension: ä Ë â Ð Ñ £ Í Ð 0Òì Ð òÞÌ ÙÚÑ Ð ç ßà Ò r Nozzle Wall Shear: Ë â Ð ÖÍ Ð ÙÚ rÍ Û ÖÍßà Ð ò& ÙÚéç Ð ç £ ßà Ò Ñ Check Weld Strength Paths (/ (/ Óìì äË á Ë ÙÚÑ Ð ç £ ßà Ò Óú ú Ë á ä Ë á Ë ÙÚ Ñ Ð ç £ ßà Ò ACETONE ABSORPTION COLUMN Required: “CONFIDENTIAL” Sh.a. (/ (/ Óúú DESIGNED: Arberor MITA Ë á Óûû äË á Ë á Ë Design group“ELMAGERARD” Ú à Ò Ë ÙÚÑ Ð ç £ ßà Ò (/ Óìì ÙÚÑ Ð ç £ ßà Ò Ëìì ÙÚ Ð ç £ ßà Ò (/ Óìì Ëìì (/ Óúú ÙÚ Ñ Ð ç £ ßà Ò Ëúú ÙÚ ç Ð ç ßà Ò (/ Óúú Ëúú (/ Óûû ÙÚÑ Ð ç £ ßà Ò Ëûû ÙÚÑç Ð ç £ ßà Ò (/ Óûû Ëûû ÙÚ ¤ tym (/ Óìì w (/Óúú w (/Óûûßà ÙÚÑ Ð ç £ ßà Ò Ë ÙÚçç Ð ç £ ßà Ò ¤ Ë