Forelæsning 1 Hunt, S. (1983). General theories and the fundamental explananda of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 9-17 In addition to the special conferences and books on marketing theory, theorists have devoted signifi- cant attention to the conceptual domain of the mar- keting discipline (Ferber 1970; Hunt 1976b; Kotler 1972; Kotler and Levy 1969; Kotler and Zaltman 1971; Luck 1969, 1974). These debates on the nature of marketing concluded that (1) the primary focus of marketing is the exchange relationship, (2) marketing includes both profit sector and nonprofit sector or- ganizations, and (3) all the problems, issues, theories, and research in marketing can be analyzed using the three categorical dichotomies of profit sector/non- profit sector, micro/macro, and positive/normative Fra GPT: Summary: In the article "General Theories and the Fundamental Explananda of Marketing," authored by S. Hunt and published in the Journal of Marketing in 1983, the author explores the role of general theories in marketing and their ability to explain fundamental marketing phenomena, also referred to as "explananda." The article delves into the importance of developing comprehensive theories in marketing to provide a framework for understanding and explaining various marketing phenomena. Key Points and Findings: 1. The article emphasizes the need for general theories in marketing to provide a systematic and structured approach to understanding the discipline. 2. S. Hunt argues that general theories can help identify and explain the fundamental marketing phenomena or "explananda," which are the core elements of marketing that require theoretical explanations. 3. The author discusses how general theories can aid in the development of marketing knowledge by facilitating the integration of various concepts and perspectives within the field. 4. The article highlights the limitations of existing marketing theories and calls for the development of more robust and encompassing general theories. 5. S. Hunt encourages scholars and researchers to engage in theoretical development and synthesis to advance the field of marketing. Overall, the article by S. Hunt serves as a call to action for the marketing community to focus on developing general theories that can provide a solid foundation for understanding and explaining the fundamental aspects of marketing. It underscores the importance of theoretical work in advancing the field's knowledge and contributing to its academic rigor. The Need for General Theories: Hunt underscores the fragmented nature of marketing knowledge, with numerous concepts and models, but lacking overarching theoretical foundations. General theories can help unify and organize this knowledge, making it more coherent and systematic. Fundamental Explananda: The term "explananda" refers to the essential marketing phenomena that require theoretical explanation, such as consumer behavior, market segmentation, and product adoption. The article identifies these as the core subjects for which general theories should provide insights and understanding. Challenges in Marketing Theories: Hunt acknowledges the challenges faced by marketing scholars, including a lack of universally accepted theories, and a reliance on borrowed theories from other disciplines. Marketing's diverse nature, incorporating elements from economics, psychology, sociology, and more, makes it challenging to develop cohesive theories. Role of General Theories: General theories should provide a foundation for marketing scholars to build upon, allowing them to create more specific and context-specific theories. These theories should guide researchers in explaining, predicting, and understanding marketing phenomena. Integration and Synthesis: The article emphasizes the importance of synthesizing existing knowledge into general theories. Hunt encourages researchers to draw from various disciplines and sources to create comprehensive frameworks for marketing. Call to Action: The article serves as a call to action for the marketing community, urging scholars to engage in theoretical development. It stresses that without robust general theories, marketing risks stagnation and lacks the theoretical depth found in other disciplines. Conclusion: S. Hunt's article underscores the vital role of general theories in advancing the field of marketing. It advocates for a concerted effort among marketing scholars to develop comprehensive theoretical frameworks that can explain fundamental marketing phenomena, ultimately enhancing the discipline's academic rigor and practical applicability. Bagozzi, Richard P. “Marketing as Exchange.” Journal of Marketing, vol. 39, no. 4, 1975, pp. 32– 39. 1. Restricted Exchange: Bagozzi introduces the concept of restricted exchange, where the scope of the exchange is limited to a specific transaction. In this type of exchange, the focus is primarily on the immediate transactional value, with less emphasis on building long-term relationships. 2. Generalized Exchange: Generalized exchange, as proposed by Bagozzi, extends beyond individual transactions and emphasizes the development of ongoing relationships between buyers and sellers. It involves mutual trust, cooperation, and communication between parties, leading to repeated interactions. 3. Complete Exchange: This type of exchange is characterized by a deep and comprehensive relationship between buyers and sellers. It goes beyond product or service exchanges and includes shared goals, values, and mutual benefits. It represents a high degree of integration between parties. 4. Incomplete Exchange: In incomplete exchange, the relationship is more transactional, and the parties may not fully engage in ongoing interactions or develop deep connections. This type of exchange is less focused on building long-term relationships and more on individual transactions. 5. Pure Exchange: Pure exchange refers to a situation where there is a straightforward, one-time transaction with no expectation or intention of future interactions. It is characterized by a lack of ongoing relationship development. 6. Mixed Exchange: Mixed exchange represents a combination of different exchange types within a single marketing relationship. This concept recognizes that exchanges can evolve over time, with parties transitioning between different levels of interaction. 7. Ethical Exchange: Bagozzi discusses the importance of ethical considerations within exchanges. Ethical exchange involves fairness, honesty, and transparency in interactions, contributing to trust and sustainable relationships. Generalized Exchange: Complex Exchange: Summary: Richard P. Bagozzi's article "Marketing as Exchange," published in the Journal of Marketing in 1975, explores the concept of marketing as a process of exchange between buyers and sellers. Bagozzi presents a theoretical framework that emphasizes the interactive and relational nature of marketing transactions. Key Points and Findings: 1. Exchange as the Core: Bagozzi asserts that at the heart of marketing lies the concept of exchange, where individuals or organizations give and receive something of value. This exchange forms the foundation of all marketing activities. 2. Interactive Nature: The author highlights that marketing is not a one-sided process but rather an interactive and dynamic one. It involves negotiation, communication, and cooperation between buyers and sellers. 3. Relationship Marketing: Bagozzi introduces the idea that marketing is not just about individual transactions but also about building long-term relationships. Customer loyalty and repeat business are emphasized as crucial aspects of marketing. 4. Value Creation: The article stresses that marketing should focus on creating value for both buyers and sellers. It is not merely about transferring products or services but enhancing the overall well-being of both parties. 5. Ethical Considerations: Bagozzi touches upon the ethical dimension of marketing, highlighting the importance of fairness and honesty in exchanges. He suggests that unethical practices can undermine the trust necessary for successful marketing relationships. 6. Practical Implications: The article's insights have practical implications for businesses and marketers, as it underscores the need to understand customer needs, communicate effectively, and build trust for sustainable success. 7. Theoretical Contribution: Bagozzi's article contributes to marketing theory by framing marketing as a complex and interactive process, moving beyond a simple transactional view. It encourages scholars to explore the relational aspects of marketing. Conclusion: Richard P. Bagozzi's article "Marketing as Exchange" redefines marketing as a dynamic, interactive, and value-creating process centered around the concept of exchange. It emphasizes the importance of building lasting relationships and ethical conduct in marketing. This conceptual shift has had a lasting impact on the field, influencing discussions around relationship marketing and the broader understanding of marketing as a discipline. Slides L1 THEORY: WHAT IS NOT? - References - Data, observations, and results - Categories and lists of variables. - Diagrams or models , fx A B It is instead: Theories are (testable) explanations of observations. Why does A lead to B? “THERE’S NOTHING AS PRACTICAL...” - FROM OBSERVATION ...TO THEORY ...TO DECISION An observation (empirical relation between 2 or more entities) For FMCGs , First movers often have the highest market shares A theory (testable explanation) - Experience with FMCG production and marketing is accumulative and leads to lower costs and better products Strategic principles (if the market situation is X then do Y) - Aim for market leadership by moving first - If this is not possible, consider buying (recruiting )the necessary experience TPB model search on google for more. EXCHANGES - There are at least two parties Each party has something that might be of value to the other Each party is capable of communication and delivery Each party is free to accept or reject the offer Each party believes it is appropriate to deal with the other party DOMAINS OF MARKETING THEORY 1. 2. 3. 4. The behavior of buyers directed at consummating exchanges The behavior of sellers directed at consummating exchanges The institutional framework directed at consummating and/or faciliating exchanges The consequences on society of the behaviour of buyers, the behaviors of sellers, and the institutional framework Hunt, S. (1983). General theories and the fundamental explananda of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4),