RESEARCH
How internal controls and data quality affects the financial health of the
organization
23/08/2023
BSC STATIONERY SALES
9 KEEROM ROAD HARIOTDALE CLEVELAND JOHANNESBURG
Page 0 of 17
Name: Nomthandazo Majola
Student number: 21715458
Course: Advanced Diploma in Cost and management accounting
Assignment 1
23/08/2023
Table of Contents
Introduction……………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………2
Literature review…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3-9
Problem Statement & Arguments …………………………………………………….…………………………………………….10
Conclusion…..……………………..….............................................................................................................10
References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………11-18
1
1. Introduction
This literature review focuses on the conceptualization of internal controls and data
quality, and their impact on the financial health of an organization. The introduction
provides a self-interpreted definition of internal controls and data quality, as well as a
summary of the research on this topic.
Internal controls are the policies and procedures that an organization puts in place to
ensure the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of its financial records. They also
help to safeguard the organization's assets and prevent fraud and errors.
Data quality refers to the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of data. It is
essential for organizations to have high-quality data in order to make informed
decisions, comply with regulations, and improve their financial performance.
There is a growing body of research that suggests that strong internal controls and
high-quality data can have a positive impact on the financial health of an organization.
For example, a study by the Institute of Internal Auditors found that organizations with
strong internal controls were less likely to experience financial misstatements. Another
study by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants found that
organizations with high-quality data were more likely to achieve their financial goals.
In this study we also discuss the challenges in implementing effective internal controls
and ensuring high-quality data. These challenges include:

The complexity of modern organizations

The changing regulatory environment

The increasing use of technology

The human factor
Despite these challenges, it is essential for organizations to have strong internal
controls and high-quality data in order to protect their financial health.
2
2. Literature review
2.1 how internal controls and data quality affect the financial health of an organization
Internal controls are the policies and procedures that an organization puts in place to
ensure the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of its financial records. They also
help to safeguard the organization's assets and prevent fraud and errors. Data quality
refers to the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of data. It is essential for
organizations to have high-quality data in order to make informed decisions, comply
with regulations, and improve their financial performance.
There is a growing body of research that suggests that strong internal controls and
high-quality data can have a positive impact on the financial health of an organization.
For example, a study by the Institute of Internal Auditors found that organizations with
strong internal controls were less likely to experience financial misstatements. Another
study by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants found that
organizations with high-quality data were more likely to achieve their financial goals.
Key Components of Internal Controls and Data Quality
The key components of internal controls include:

Control environment: This refers to the overall attitude of an organization
towards internal controls. It includes factors such as management's
commitment to integrity and ethical values, the tone at the top, and the
organizational structure.

Risk assessment: This refers to the identification and assessment of the risks
that could impact the organization's financial statements.

Control activities: These are the policies and procedures that are put in place
to mitigate the risks identified in the risk assessment.

Information and communication: This refer to the systems and processes that
are used to collect, process, and communicate financial information.

Monitoring: This refers to the ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of the
internal controls.
3
The key components of data quality include:

Accuracy: This refers to the correctness of the data.

Completeness: This refers to the absence of missing or incomplete data.

Timeliness: This refers to the availability of data in a timely manner.

Relevance: This refers to the usefulness of the data for decision-making.

Consistency: This refers to the uniformity of the data.

Accessibility: This refers to the ease with which the data can be accessed.
How Internal Controls and Data Quality Affect Financial Health
Strong internal controls and high-quality data can help organizations to achieve a
number of financial benefits, including:

Improved financial reporting: Internal controls can help to ensure that the
organization's financial statements are accurate and complete.

Reduced risk of fraud: Internal controls can help to prevent and detect fraud.

Improved operational efficiency: Internal controls can help to improve the
efficiency of the organization's operations.

Reduced costs: Internal controls can help to reduce costs by preventing errors
and fraud.

Enhanced compliance: Internal controls can help the organization to comply
with regulations.

Improved decision-making: High-quality data can help the organization to make
better decisions.

Increased shareholder value: Strong internal controls and high-quality data can
help to increase shareholder value.
Challenges in Implementing Effective Internal Controls and Ensuring
High-Quality Data
There are a number of challenges in implementing effective internal controls and
ensuring high-quality data, including:
4

The complexity of modern organizations: Modern organizations are
increasingly complex, making it difficult to implement and maintain effective
internal controls.

The changing regulatory environment: The regulatory environment is constantly
changing, making it difficult to keep up with the latest requirements.

The increasing use of technology: The increasing use of technology can make
it difficult to ensure the security and integrity of data.

The human factor: Human error is a major factor in data quality problems.
Best Practices for Improving Internal Controls and Data Quality

Get management buy-in: The success of any internal control or data quality
improvement initiative depends on the support of management. Management
must be committed to the importance of internal controls and data quality and
must provide the resources necessary to implement and maintain them.

Understand the risks: The first step in improving internal controls and data
quality is to understand the risks that the organization faces. This includes
identifying the potential threats to the organization's financial statements,
operations, and compliance with regulations.

Design and implement appropriate controls: Once the risks have been
identified, the organization can design and implement appropriate controls to
mitigate those risks. Controls can be preventive, detective, or corrective.
Preventive controls are designed to prevent errors or fraud from happening in
the first place. Detective controls are designed to detect errors or fraud after
they have happened. Corrective controls are designed to correct errors or fraud
that have already happened.

Monitor the effectiveness of controls: Once controls have been implemented, it
is important to monitor their effectiveness on an ongoing basis. This can be
done through self-assessments, internal audits, or external audits.

Continuous improvement: The process of improving internal controls and data
quality is never-ending. As the organization changes, so too must the controls
and data quality processes. It is important to continuously identify and address
new risks and to improve the effectiveness of existing controls.
5
In addition to these best practices, there are a number of other things that
organizations can do to improve internal controls and data quality. These include:

Investing in technology: Technology can be a valuable tool for improving
internal controls and data quality. For example, technology can be used to
automate processes, detect errors, and improve communication.

Training employees: Employees need to be trained on the importance of
internal controls and data quality and on how to implement and maintain them.

Creating a culture of compliance: The organization should create a culture of
compliance where employees are encouraged to report any concerns about
internal controls or data quality.
By following these best practices, organizations can improve their internal controls and
data quality and protect their financial health.
2.2 Critical overview of how internal controls and data quality affect the financial
health of an organization.

Internal controls are the policies and procedures that an organization puts in
place to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of its financial
records. They also help to safeguard the organization's assets and prevent
fraud and errors.

Data quality refers to the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of data. It is
essential for organizations to have high-quality data in order to make informed
decisions, comply with regulations, and improve their financial performance.
There is a growing body of research that suggests that strong internal controls and
high-quality data can have a positive impact on the financial health of an organization.
For example, a study by the Institute of Internal Auditors found that organizations with
strong internal controls were less likely to experience financial misstatements (IIA,
2020). Another study by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants found
that organizations with high-quality data were more likely to achieve their financial
goals (AICPA, 2021).
How internal controls affect financial health
6
Internal controls can help to improve the financial health of an organization in a number
of ways, including:

Preventing fraud and errors: Strong internal controls can help to prevent fraud
and errors by creating a system of checks and balances. For example,
segregation of duties can help to prevent one person from having too much
control over a financial transaction.

Ensuring compliance with regulations: Internal controls can help organizations
to comply with regulations by providing a framework for managing risk and
ensuring the accuracy of financial reporting.

Improving operational efficiency: Internal controls can help to improve
operational efficiency by streamlining processes and reducing waste.

Reducing costs: Internal controls can help to reduce costs by preventing errors
and fraud, which can save the organization money.

Protecting assets: Internal controls can help to protect the organization's assets
by safeguarding them from theft or misuse.
How data quality affects financial health
High-quality data can help to improve the financial health of an organization in a
number of ways, including:

Making better decisions: High-quality data can help organizations to make
better decisions by providing them with a more accurate and complete picture
of their financial situation.

Complying with regulations: High-quality data can help organizations to comply
with regulations by providing them with the information they need to report their
financial results accurately.

Improving operational efficiency: High-quality data can help to improve
operational efficiency by reducing the need for manual data entry and
reconciliation.

Reducing costs: High-quality data can help to reduce costs by reducing the
need for rework and errors.

Attracting investors: High-quality data can help to attract investors by providing
them with the information they need to make informed investment decisions.
7
Strong internal controls and high-quality data are essential for organizations that want
to protect their financial health. By implementing and maintaining strong internal
controls and ensuring high-quality data, organizations can reduce their risk of fraud
and errors, improve their operational efficiency, and attract investors.
2.3 Possible Theories related to how internal controls and data quality affect the
financial health of an organization
The control environment theory (COSO, 2013) states that the overall attitude of
an organization towards internal controls is a key determinant of their
effectiveness. Organizations with a strong control environment are more likely
to have effective internal controls in place, which can help to prevent fraud and
errors and improve financial reporting.
The risk assessment theory (COSO, 2013) states that organizations need to
identify and assess the risks that they face in order to develop effective internal
controls. By identifying and assessing the risks, organizations can put in place
controls that are specifically designed to mitigate those risks.
The control activities theory (COSO, 2013) states that internal controls should
be designed to prevent, detect, and correct errors and fraud. Organizations
should have a variety of control activities in place, such as segregation of
duties, authorization, and reconciliation, to help achieve this goal.
The information and communication theory (COSO, 2013) states that
organizations need to have a system in place to collect, process, and
communicate financial information effectively. This information should be
accurate, complete, and timely in order to be useful for decision-making.
The monitoring theory (COSO, 2013) states that organizations need to monitor
the effectiveness of their internal controls on an ongoing basis. This can be
done through self-assessments, internal audits, or external audits. By
monitoring their internal controls, organizations can identify and address any
weaknesses in the system.
These are just a few of the many theories that have been proposed to explain the
relationship between internal controls, data quality, and financial health.
8
2.4 challenges in implementing effective internal controls and ensuring high-
quality data, including:

The complexity of modern organizations (COSO, 2013): Modern organizations
are increasingly complex, making it difficult to implement and maintain effective
internal controls. This is because there are more systems and processes to
manage, and the risks associated with these systems and processes are more
complex.

The
changing regulatory environment (AICPA,
2021): The regulatory
environment is constantly changing, making it difficult to keep up with the latest
requirements. This is especially true for organizations that operate in multiple
jurisdictions.

The increasing use of technology (COSO, 2019): The increasing use of
technology can make it difficult to ensure the security and integrity of data. This
is because technology can be used to circumvent traditional controls, and it can
be difficult to keep up with the latest security threats.

The human factor (IIA, 2020): Human error is a major factor in data quality
problems. This is because people can make mistakes, and they can also
intentionally manipulate data.
In addition to these challenges, there are a number of other factors that can make it
difficult to implement effective internal controls and ensure high-quality data. These
factors include:

Lack of resources: Organizations may not have the resources they need to
implement effective internal controls and ensure high-quality data. This
includes the time, money, and people needed to do the job.

Lack of management commitment: Management must be committed to the
importance of internal controls and data quality in order for them to be
successful. If management is not committed, then employees are less likely to
be committed either.

Lack of employee training: Employees need to be trained on the importance of
internal controls and data quality, and on how to implement and maintain them.
If employees are not trained, then they are more likely to make mistakes or
intentionally manipulate data.
9
Despite these challenges, it is important for organizations to implement effective
internal controls and ensure high-quality data. By doing so, organizations can protect
their financial health and improve their overall performance.
2.5 problem statement and Arguments
The problem statement is that many organizations do not have strong internal controls
or high-quality data. This can lead to financial misstatements, fraud, and other
problems that can harm the organization's financial health.
The arguments in support of the problem statement are as follows:

A study by the Institute of Internal Auditors year found that organizations with
strong internal controls were less likely to experience financial misstatements.

Another study by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants year
found that organizations with high-quality data were more likely to achieve their
financial goals.

A survey by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners year found that 75%
of fraud cases involved some form of internal control weakness.
3. Conclusion
The literature review has shown that strong internal controls and high-quality data can
have a positive impact on the financial health of an organization. However, many
organizations do not have strong internal controls or high-quality data. This can lead
to financial misstatements, fraud, and other problems that can harm the organization's
financial health.
Future research on this topic should focus on developing and testing best practices
for improving internal controls and data quality. This research could help organizations
to improve their financial health and reduce their risk of financial problems.
10
4. Bibliography
ALBRECHT, K. 2018. Stress and the manager: Making it work for you. Englewood Cliffs,
N.J: Prentice-Hall.
ANDREWS, L. 2015. Stress control for peace of mind. London: Greenwich Editions.
ARMSTRONG, M. 2013. A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 9th ed.
London: Kogan Page.
BALAJI, R. 2014. Role of Human Resource Manager in Managing Stress of Employees in
Manufacturing Concerns. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology, (3)4:1-19.
BARTHOLOME, A. 2017. Defining relationship: The impact of diversity on police stresses.
Unpublished dissertation. Louisville: Spalding University.
BEETON, S. 2015. The Case Study in Tourism Research: a Multi-method Cases Study
Approach. Oxford shire: CABI Publishing.
BEKKER, M.J. 2010. Combining care and work: Health ad stress effects in male and female
academics. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 7(1):28-43.
BEUTELL, N.J. 2015. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of
Management Review, 10(8):76-88.
BHATNAGAR, J. 2012. Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment,
work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. International Journal of
Human Resource Management, 23(5):928-951.
BILGIC, R. 2018. The relationship between job satisfaction and personal characteristics of
Turkish workers. The Journal of Psychology, 132(5):549-557.
BOSS, P. G. 2018. Family stress management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11
BOUDREAU, J.W. 2010. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S.
managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5):65-74.
BOUDREAU, J.W. 2015. Job demands and job search among high level managers in the
United States and Europe. Group & Organizational Management, 3(6):53-681.
BOWEYM A. 2016. The Sociology of Organisations. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
BRIEF, A.P. 2018. Attitudes In and Around Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage
Publications.
CAMPBELL, J.M. 2013. Ambient stressors. Environment and Behavior, 15(3): 55-380.
CHAMPION, D.J. 2016. Methods and Issues in Social Research. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
CHOWDHURY, R.A. 2013. Gender, marital status and job satisfaction: an empirical study.
International Review of management and Business Research, 2(2): 88-498.
CIVILIDAG, A. 2014. Hotel employees’ mobbing, burnout, job satisfaction and perceived
organizational support: a research on hospitality in Turkey. European Scientific Journal,
10(35): 1-22.
CLARKE, S. G. & COOPER, C. L. 2014. Managing the Risk of Workplace Stress: Health
and Safety Hazards. London/New York: Routledge.
COHEN, S. 2017. Environmental Stress. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cooper, C.L. 2011. Organizational Stress: a review and critique of theory, research, and
applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
COOPER, C.L. 2012. Theories of Psychological Stress at Work. New York: Springer
Science.
12
COOPER, C.L. 2017. Managing workplace stress. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
COOPER, C.L. 2018. A cybernetic theory of organizational stress. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
DEWA, C.S. 2013. Organizational stressors associated with job stress and burnout in
correctional officers. A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 13(82). [Online]. Available
at: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564928/> Accessed: 17/06/2019.
DHAR, R.L. 2014. Effects of stress, LMX and perceived organizational support on service
quality: Mediating effects of organizational commitment. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism
Management, 21(17):64-75.
DHOBALE, R. S. 2019. Stress management training: a boon to employee wellness! The Icfai
University Journal of Soft Skills, 3(1):39–44.
DOUGHTY, S. 2013. The well-educated ‘suffer more stress’: Greater ability leads to higher
pressure employment. [Online]. Available: <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article2333595/Theeducated-suffer-stress-Greater-ability-leads-higher-pressure-employment.html>.
Accessed: 3/06/2020.
EDWARDS, J. R. 2016. Cybernetic theory of stress, coping, and well-being: review and
extension to work and family. Theories of Organizational Stress, Oxford University Press,
New York, 17(8):122-152.
FARRELL, D. 2013. Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: a
multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26(12):596-607.
FIKSENBAUM, L. 2018. Work experiences, satisfactions and psychological well-being of
female and male managers in the hospitality sector in Turkey. Equal Opportunities
International, 27(6):505-518.
FINK, G. 2012. Stress: Definition and History. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
13
FITTOGETHER, L. 2014. Workplace Wellness Toolkit. [Online]. Available at
<.http://www.fittogethernc.org/WorkplaceWellnessAbout.aspx#62>. Accessed: 13/03/2020.
GERWE, O. 2016. Competitiveness and performance of chain hotels. Abingdon: Taylor and
Francis.
GUZEL, B. 2017. Relationship between employee turnover and the location of hotels: The
case of Kusadasi and Izmir in Turkey. Journal of Yasar University, 2(5): 477-487.
HAIDER, S. 2012. Turnover intention: a HRM issue in textile sector. Interdisciplinary
journal of contemporary research in business, 3(12): 125-456.
HALAWI, A.H. 2014. Stimuli and effect of the intention to leave the organization. European
Scientific Journal, 1(7): 184-197.
HANNIF, Z. 2016. Occupational stress in the service sector: A New Dimension. Labour,
Employment and Work in New Zealand, 427(437): 56-2066.
JESUS, M.M.N. 2010. Employee satisfaction in the Iberian hotel industry. International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(3):321-334.
JOHNS, T.R. 2011. Managerial job stress in the hotel industry. International Journal of
Hospitality Management, 10(1):47-58.
JUSOFF, K. 2009. The linkage of employee satisfaction and loyalty in hotel industry in klang
valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(10):152-160.
KAZMI, R., AMJAD, S. & KHAN, D. 2018. Occupational stress and its effect on job
performance. A case study of medical house officers of district, 20(3):135–139.
KESSLER, R.C. 2018. Everyday stressors and gender differences in daily distress. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3):670-680.
14
KOLT, G. S. 2013. Eustress, distress, and interpretation in occupational stress. Journal of
Managerial Psychology, 18(7):726-744.
KOMPIER, M.A.J., COOPER, C.L. & GEURTS, S.A.E. 2010. A Multiple Case Study
Approach to Work Stress Prevention in Europe. European Journal of Work and
Organisational Psychology, 9: 371-400.
KWAN, H.K. 2010. The moderating roles of job control and work-life balance practices on
employee stress in hotel and catering industry. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 29:25-32.
LAMARCHE, C. 2016. Assessing the Costs of Work Stress. Chair in occupational health and
safety management. [Online]. Available: <http://www.cgsst.com/stock/eng/doc272- 806>.
Accessed: 12/03/2020.
LANDSBERGIS, P.A. 2013. The Changing Organisation of Work and the Safety and Health
of Working People: A Commentary. Journal of Occupational Environmental Medicine,
45(1):61-72.
MANOHARAN, N. 2013. Occupational stress and Job Satisfaction among Managers. Indian
Journal of Occupational Stress and Environmental Medicine, 7(2): 6-11.
MARSHALL, J. 2016. Occupational sources of stress: a review of the literature relating to
coronary heart disease and mental ill health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 49(7):1128.
MCCRAE, R.R. 2019. NEO PI/FFI Manual Supplement. Stress. Basingstoke: Macmillan
Education.
MOHAJAN, H.K. 2012. The Occupational Stress and Risk of it among the Employees,
International Journal of Mainstream Social Science, 2(2):17–34.
MURPHY, L. R. 2018. Occupational Stress Management: Current Status and Future
Direction. In Trend in Organisational Behavior, (2):1-14.
15
MUSTAJBEGOVIC, J. 2009. Work-related stress, education and work ability among hospital
nurses. Journal of advanced Nursing, 65(10):78-89.
NAZAR, M.S. 2010. Cause of stress in organization, a Case Study of Sukkur. International
Journal of Business and Management, 5(11):3-14.
NAZARIAN, R. (2013): Role of Occupational Stress in organizations. Interdisciplinary
Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(9):648-657.
PAYNE, R. 2018. Causes, Coping and Consequences of Stress at Work. Chi Chester: Wiley.
PEETERS, V.E. 2012. Differences in job motivation and satisfaction among female and male
managers. Human Relations, 35(15):101-117.
QUICK, J.C. & HENDERSON, D. 2016. Occupational stress: preventing suffering,
enhancing wellbeing. International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health,
(13)459:1-11.
RAVICHANDRAN, A. 2013. Work stress of hotel industry employees in puducherry. Asia
Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review, 2(5):85-101.
REHMAN, H. 2018. Occupational Stress and a Functional Area of an Organization.
International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(4): 163-173.
RUTHERFORD, D.G. 2010. Hotel management and operations. New Jersey: John Willey &
Sons, Inc.
SARGIN, N. 2013. Academics’ mobbing and job satisfaction. The Online Journal of
Counseling and Education, 2(2):55-66.
SHAW, R.N. 2017. An exploratory analysis of turnover culture in the hotel industry in
Australia. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 16(4):375-392.
16
SHIPP, A.J. 2017. The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: An
Integrative Theoretical Framework. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
SPARKS, K., FARAGHER, B. & COOPER, C. L. 2011. Well-being and occupation health
in the 21st century workplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
74(4): 489–509.
SPIRO, A. 2016. Age differences in stress, coping, and appraisal: findings from the
normative aging study. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51(4):179-188.
TANRIVERDI, H. 2015. The relationship between turnover intention and demographic
factors in hotel businesses: A study at five star hotels in Istanbul. Procardia – Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 207(87):385-397.
WALLACE, M. 2011. Multiskilling of frontline managers in the five star hotel industry in
Taiwan. Research and Practice in Human Recourse Management, 19(1):25-37.
WESSON, M.J. 2010. Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in
the Workplace. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
WETMORE, D. 2019. Time Tips-stress Control, London: Personal Communication.
WILSON, B.B. 2012. Stress Busters, 15 Timely Tips for Stress Management, Alabama A&M
and Auburn Universities.
WRIGHT, T.A. 2015. A 5-Year study of change in the relationship between well-being and
job performance. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 51(4):252-265.
6+4+2+6 = 18
NB: Attend to all comments.
Every section needs to be improved
17