Uploaded by Kevin Larian

Larian Tree Farm - Ethiopia

advertisement
Kevin Larian
Teach a Man to Fish
We share our planet with hundreds of millions of helpless people, unable to pursue their
dreams on account of their never-ending search for a next meal. Mainly born into such
conditions within developing countries, they do not have the means to escape poverty and
hunger. They’ve been calling on us for quite some time now. Starving people need a plan of
action -- an agricultural productivity revolution. Bizunesh, a young girl who weighed under ten
pounds at three years old, “[couldn’t] speak. She [didn’t] want to eat. Health officials [said] she
[was] permanently stunted” (NBC News). See, for 2-3 weeks before dying of starvation, people
must endure the pain of ​permanent​ organ damage as they continue to live and breathe. It’s a
torturous and agonizing way to die. Apart from her suffering, Bizunesh’s loved ones experienced
the degradation and depression which came with their state of helplessness, not having the means
to save their child’s life. There are far too many of these stories –– people imprudently die of
malnourishment, and their families are left mourning. Bizunesh was one of millions affected by
Ethiopia’s 2008 food crisis. Sadly, the number of people starving in Ethiopia continues to
increase. The Ethiopian government invests in dealing with it’s starvation problem, but has taken
little action in ​solving​ this problem. In regards to his fight against world hunger, American actor,
singer and producer Jeff Bridges argues that it wasn’t a matter of “not knowing how to end it, it
was a matter of creating the political will.” I disagree. Sure, the political will to make strategic
investments would have a tremendous impact on ending hunger, but the solution for the starving
is not dependent on this “political will” to action. Those who have attempted and failed to solve
hunger with little to no political support (including various charities which focus on importing
food into developing countries) merely have not addressed the problem in a suitable manner.
Regardless of political drawbacks, to remedy starvation in Ethiopia we do not need to look to
their government or even to existing charities, but we must rather create organizations and
technologies which address the malnourishment problem at its sources -- transportation and
production efficiency of goods.
As in most developing countries, hunger in Ethiopia is an issue with many problematic
factors in farmer education and transportation of goods, which complicate the process of
attaining a solution. The largest and most direct cause of Ethiopian malnourishment is
inefficiency of small-holder farmers. They are responsible for feeding the majority of Ethiopia’s
population. The World Development Report: Agriculture for Development, is a collective of
over 50 authors, editors, and consultants who worked tirelessly to essentially create a handbook
which “provides guidance to governments and the international community on designing and
implementing agriculture-for-development agendas that can make a difference in the lives of
hundreds of millions of rural poor” (WDR08). In their report they explain the many reasons why
small-holder farmers tend to produce food inefficiently and unsustainably. Firstly, weak property
rights often create hectic environments for farmers and can distract them from food production.
Secondly, subsidies indirectly encourage the degradation of natural resources such as soil. Due to
support of soil-nutrient mining, “the estimated annual productivity loss in Ethiopian highlands
from soil degradation is 2-3 percent of agricultural GDP a year” (WDR08). Third, small-holder
Ethiopian farmers do not adapt well to climate change. Most can only farm on small portions of
land, so as they change their crops based off of season, they must farm various crops on the same
plot of land, thus weakening their soil and disabling their ability to quickly adapt to the climate.
Fourth, through value-chains (adding value to a product to compensate for production,
marketing, transportation, and other factors) the food which farmers produce increases in price,
and becomes less affordable for buyers. This is a particularly prevalent issue in Ethiopia, as there
is a larger difficulty in transportation of goods: “farm households are on average 10 kilometers
from the nearest road and 18 kilometers from the nearest public transport” (WDR08). This
drastically increases food cost when small-holders do attempt to export goods. For these reasons,
and due to a general lack of education among Ethiopian small-holders, farming productivity is
inefficient, and small-holders often do not contribute to Ethiopia’s economy whatsoever, only
farming for themselves and their families. Yet even those who farm only for their own family
often have a hard time producing enough food due to the pressures of food crises (like the one in
2008 responsible for Bizunesh’s death), which “tilt public budgets and donor priorities toward
direct provision of food rather than investments in growth and achieving food security through
rising incomes” (WDR08). In other words, in response to food crises the Ethiopian government
draws money out of its agricultural investments and, and invests it in importing food in attempt
to save the lives of its citizens, regardless of the long-term agricultural drawbacks. This is one of
the many reasons people lose motivation in their fight against world hunger and put
responsibility on the political will. Unfortunately, the problematic factors which contribute to
the greater Ethiopian malnourishment issue are yet to receive successful solutions.
Technologies which attempt to provide solutions for Ethiopia often fall short of creating
solutions which are genuinely effective, or are otherwise not prohibited within the country. For
instance, scientists have found a way to replicate the fibers in our meat and produce meat in a lab
with various ingredients. “Not long ago, a lab-grown burger patty was cooked and eaten in view
of the public, touted as a way to help save both planet and people” (Smith, David). Perhaps
further development of this technology will prove effective in saving “the people,” but as of
today reports suggest that a lab-grown meat patty costs nearly eleven dollars to produce, whereas
the common production of a natural meat patty only costs around two dollars. To add, the
Ethiopian government is not so big a fan of food modified by technology, let alone food created
by technology. Ethiopia has had laws in place for some time now, which prohibit plant gene
editing or GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms). Keffyalew Gebremedhin -- an ex-member
of The Ethiopian Foreign Service, ex-leader of the UN division in the international organizations
department of Foreign Ministry, ex-senior diplomat of the Permanent Mission of Ethiopia to the
United Nations in New York, and chief editor of The Ethiopia Observatory -- argues for the use
of GMOs in Ethiopia, explaining that its prohibition is merely a means of maintaining the wealth
of foreign companies. He insists that Ethiopia “should not be forced to eat what it does not like
or appreciate, to keep foreign companies and individuals wealthy and wealthier.” Another factor
which Gebremedhin identifies as a reason GMOs are prohibited in Ethiopia, is their past failures
in other developing countries. He discusses an incident which occured with Kenya’s genetically
modified corn years ago “that forced the government to declare corn emergency in the South Rift
valley region in that country” (Gebremedhin, Keffyalew). Bill Gates is gradually persuading
African countries, including Ethiopia, to be more accepting of GMOs and to realize its potential
by “underlying the need to handle GMOs carefully” (Gebremedhin, Keffyalew). However,
GMOs alone are not enough to put an end to malnourishment, and there are other forces which
not only fail to provide viable solutions for starvation, but are detrimental to that common goal.
When charities import goods into Ethiopia in attempt to directly combat world hunger,
they often encourage the mis-investment of Ethiopian funds, and in this way, they continuously
deal with malnourishment but fail to end it. This is mis-investment of funds is particularly
prevalent in light of the food crises which strike the country. As reported by Humanitarian
Response, the drought that has struck Ethiopia since 2015 has been “the worst drought in 50
years,” leading to Ethiopia’s current struggle with one of their largest food crises. A charity
known as Save the Children had attempted to solve this food crisis in 2016 by urging the
international community to donate food. “​Mitiku Kassa​, General Secretary of the National
Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Committee of the Ethiopian government, said ​Ethiopia​ had
so far spent nearly $150-million on relief efforts,” just by late 2015, “as well as dipping into
strategic grain reserves. Ethiopian government spokesperson ​Getachew Reda​ recently raised the
possibility of the country shelving some of its big ​infrastructure​ ​projects​ to meet the worsening
humanitarian crisis” (Polity: African News Agency). As we see here, the government, along with
supporting charities, invest too much into importing goods to. Though the immediate salvation of
millions of lives is an extremely important and praiseworthy response, it leaves even more
millions vulnerable for the next food crisis! Rather than investing into importing goods through
charities, the Ethiopian government must focus their “$150-million” investments on boosting
agricultural efficiency. This would then benefit the economy in light of each food crisis through
mass production of their own food with the recources they already have available, and it would
leave their country less vulnerable to the next food crisis, saving more lives in the long run. Yet,
as detrimental as it is, the government’s misinvenstment of funds is not a barrier to solving their
hunger predicament, but merely a drawback.
To end starvation, I have conducted years of extensive research on various solutions
which attack world hunger at its sources using the resources available, and have combined their
ideas with some of my own to form a solution. This solution will be tremendously successful
since each of the problematic factors in the general predicament of starvation have been
accounted for. In addressing the factors which play into the inefficiency of food production -weak property rights, the degradation of natural resources (such as soil), climate change, and
farmer education -- I propose the Epicenter Strategy currently being implemented by The Hunger
Project, an organization which has improved the health and living conditions of millions of
suffering people across the developing world. “An epicenter is a dynamic center of community
mobilization and action, as well as an actual facility built by community members. Through the
Epicenter Strategy, 15,000-25,000 people are brought together as a cluster of rural villages,
giving villages more clout with local government than a single village is likely to have while also
increasing a community’s ability to collectively utilize resources.” (The Hunger Project). By
bringing rural farmers together to form one community, we avoid the drawback of weak property
rights. Another strength of such a community, is its ability to collectively utilize resources in a
manner which refrains from resource degradation. To amend The Hunger Project’s solution, we
should utilize the paper tube -- a cheap and durable material -- in construction of epicenter
facilities. This way we can ensure that each epicenter facility will last even longer than they are
depended upon, and will be cost effective. Additionally, these facilities should, first and
foremost, be used to educate the small-holder farmers (which constitute the epicenter) on
methods of successful farming. Aside from the productivity problems addressed by the Epicenter
Strategy, are the dire transportation problems involved in small-holder exporting of food. By
locating the epicenters near roads which lead to larger cities of buyers, they will undoubtedly be
much more effective in exporting food and will receive much more income. To further increase
this income, our epicenters will focus on production of staple foods -- foods which are produced
and eaten routinely in certain countries or areas. This will then increase the value of their export,
and thus increase their returns. In fact, one particular staple food is rising in popularity, and it is
produced almost exclusively in Ethiopia -- teff. Teff is growing in international popularity as a
superfood due to its incomparable health benefits, and has already been endorsed by Victoria
Beckam (of the pop group, Spice Girls, and wife of retired professional soccer player David
Beckam) and Gweneth Palrow (the prestigious Hollywood actress). Through the production and
exporting of such foods, our epicenters will thrive. Through such a solution, we can reach the
majority of the 30 million+ people suffering from malnourishment in Ethiopia today, as the 2008
World Hunger Report estimated that nearly 75% of them live in rural areas. What’s even more
exciting is the potential for such a solution in other developing countries around the world.
The key rationale which ensures the success of my solution -- the amended Epicenter
Strategy -- in developing countries across the world, is this revised way of thinking which it
promotes: rather than feeding those who are starving like most governments and organizations
addressing hunger do, we must ensure their ability to feed themselves. Just like the common
saying goes, “Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed
him for a lifetime.” In that way, it’s a rather obvious solution isn’t it? Shine this light on the
absurdity of organizations which feed the hungry, and on the brilliance of pioneering movements
which help them feed themselves. Sure, governments do tend to serve as obstacles, but we
undermine them for the greater good. We will no longer feed into the ignorance, and assume this
matter is solely political. Politicians have proven their non fulfilment. We will no longer rely on
them to be the change we wish to see in the world; We will be that change. Hundreds of millions
of lives are at stake.
Work Cited
"Despite Ethiopia's Laws Prohibiting Plant Gene Editing, the Gates Push GMO into Nation's
Agriculture." THE ETHIOPIA OBSERVATORY. January 14, 2017. Accessed April 27, 2018.
https://ethiopiaobservatory.com/2017/01/14/despite-ethiopias-laws-prohibiting-plant-gene-edit
ing-gates-foundation-pushes-gmo-into-nations-agriculture/.
"Ethiopia." The Hunger Project. Accessed April 27, 2018.
http://www.thp.org/our-work/where-we-work/africa/ethiopia/.
"Ethiopia Again Revises Upward People in Need of Food Aid." Polity.org.za. Accessed April 27,
2018.
http://www.polity.org.za/article/ethiopia-again-revises-upward-people-in-need-of-food-aid-20
15-12-08.
"Ethiopia's Super Food Export Dilemma." The New York Times. March 17, 2014. Accessed
April 27, 2018.
https://www.nytimes.com/video/multimedia/100000002772388/ethiopias-super-food-export-dile
mma.html.
"Food Aid to Run out in Ethiopia Unless Donors Step In, Says Charity (Reuters)." Food Aid to
Run out in Ethiopia Unless Donors Step In, Says Charity (Reuters) | HumanitarianResponse.
Accessed April 27, 2018.
https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/fr/operations/ethiopia/article/food-aid-run-out-ethiopia
-unless-donors-step-says-charity-reuters.
Nurse, From Earl. "The Ethiopian Superfood That Used to Be Banned." CNN. December 18,
2015. Accessed April 27, 2018.
https://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/africa/ethiopian-superfood-teff/index.html.
"Once Again, Children Are Starving in Ethiopia." NBCNews.com. May 20, 2008. Accessed
April 27, 2018.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24731042/ns/world_news-africa/t/once-again-children-are-starvin
g-ethiopia/#.Wt1_Rja7N9k.
"Why Technology Won't Solve World Hunger." The Borgen Project. February 21, 2017.
Accessed April 27, 2018. https://borgenproject.org/technology-wont-solve-world-hunger/.
Woodhouse, Philip. "Technology, Environment and the Productivity Problem in African
Agriculture: Comment on the World Development Report 2008." Journal of Agrarian Change.
March 20, 2009. Accessed April 27, 2018.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00205.x.
"World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development." Worldbank.org. The World
Bank Group, 2008. Web. April 2018.
<https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2008/Resources/WDR_00_book.pdf>.
Download