Uploaded by Kirsten Claire Bureros

JP Morgan

advertisement
J.P Morgan may have not directly benefitted from the U.S. Civil War through direct
involvement in weapons, military, or other war-related activities like other people he shares the
same economic class with, but he did benefit from the war indirectly in two following areas: (1)
banking and finance, and (2) post-war reconstruction and industrialization. Using his banking
firm, J.S. Morgan & Co., he was able to profit by funding the United States’ war efforts through
commissions and fees earned by underwriting and selling government bonds. With the profit he
earned during the war, J.P. Morgan was also able to use existing banking and financial
connections to finance multiple industries, especially ones with great potential for profit such as
railroads, steel production, and electricity. Post-war investments generally earn the most
because they often take advantage of the rapid economic growth and recovery as the country
focuses on rebuilding and stabilization. During this time, there was increased demand for goods
and services in all industries, which can lead to higher profits and returns on investments.
Morgan forced consolidation in the US railroad industry as he saw that the scale and
systems of railroad companies during that era hindered overall operational efficiency and cost
savings from all the other industries that utilize transportation. He also had a vested financial
interest in this course of action as consolidating railroads would lead to benefit companies from
all industries, consequently benefitting himself as a banker and financier as they will all
approach him for his financial services. He was able to enforce consolidation through the
following strategies: formation of holding companies, negotiation, financial backing, and
regulatory influence.
Considering that J.P. Morgan’s hold through all of his business reached two-thirds of the
United States’ entire economy, his financial decisions can significantly impact or dictate the
country’s financial situation. He was able to avert two particular crises: (1) the Panic of 1893,
and (2) the Panic of 1907. The first one was caused by bank failures, the stark decline in the
stock market, and the failure of major businesses, all of which led to the country experiencing
depression. The U.S. government sought his help/interference, which he answered by
consolidating a group of bankers to lend a significant amount of gold that replenished the
country’s reserves. The second crisis had similar causes; however, Morgan responded this time
by using his connections to enforce liquidity in the country’s financial system by providing loans
to banks and businesses. It is important to note that the government may have realized that
their repeated requests for help from private entities can be detrimental to the country, leading to
the establishment of the US central bank, the Federal Reserve.
J.P. Morgan became a trailblazer for multiple investment banking practices such as (but
not limited to) syndicated loans (multiple bankers gathering together to provide loans to a single
entity such as the government), mergers and acquisitions, underwriting securities (assuring the
sale of stocks and securities to investors), and lender of last resort (acted as this for the U.S.
government to avert multiple financial crises). His pioneering of these practices played a
significant role in shaping modern finance.
Download