Uploaded by Khuluma Singini

Annuity Pricing 101 Not As Hard As One Might Think

advertisement
BETA
FORBES
MONEY
RETIREMENT
Annuity Pricing 101: Not As
Hard As One Might Think
Wade Pfau Contributor
Follow
Professor @ The American College; Principal @
McLean Asset Management
May 15, 2020, 07:55pm EDT
Listen to article 7 minutes
This article is more than 2 years old.
How are income annuities priced? It is not as hard as one might
think, as the basic recipe requires just three ingredients:
1. Mortality rates (which vary by age and gender) impact how long
payments will be made. Younger people will have longer projected
payout periods, which means that payout rates must be lower.
2. Interest rates impact the returns the annuity provider can earn
on the underlying annuitized assets. Higher interest rates imply
higher payout rates because the insurance company will be able to
earn more interest on the premiums in their general account
supporting the annuity payments.
3. Overhead costs relate to extra charges an annuity provider
seeks to cover business expenses and to manage risks related to the
accuracy of their future mortality and interest rate predictions.
Click here and subscribe to the Retirement
Researcher weekly newsletter and receive
additional articles, resources, and exclusive
invitations to upcoming webinars!
Pricing for a Life-Only Income Annuity
Exhibit 4.1 provides a simple example to illustrate the basic pricing
dynamics for an actuarially fair income annuity. This is an annuity
without any overhead costs, and it assumes the underlying
projections for mortality and fixed-income returns are correct. I use
the capital market expectations I described in Chapter 3, of which
the relevant aspect is that I assume the bond yield curve is flat at a
nominal 3 percent interest rate. For this example, we consider a
sixty-five-year-old female who is offered $10,000 of spending per
year as long as she lives. Since we are using a nominal bond yield
curve, this spending is fixed. The income annuity is life-only, so
payments stop at death. How much is this protected lifetime
income stream objectively worth?
MORE FROM FORBES ADVISOR
Retirement Basics: What Is An Annuity?
By David Rodeck contributor
What Is a Fixed Annuity?
By David Rodeck contributor
Exhibit 4.1 Calculating the Cost of a $10,000 Income
Stream for a Sixty-Five-Year-Old Female (Life Only)
BETA
BETA
RETIREMENT RESEARCHER
Source: Survival Probabilities are calculated from the Society of
Actuaries 2012 Individual Annuitant Mortality Tables with
improvements through 2019.
Finding how much the annuity is worth requires inputs for
investment returns to be earned on the premium financing these
payments, and the survival probabilities to each subsequent age.
Our example calculation includes some simplifications. With a
typical upward-sloping yield curve, payments coming sooner would
earn less interest, and later payments would grow at a faster rate.
Additionally, many annuity providers will likely seek higher returns
than Treasury bonds offer by including high-quality corporate
bonds with higher yields to compensate for slightly higher default
risk. Annuity providers may also be using more refined mortality
data that is better connected to their customer base.
BETA
GETTY
I also assume the full year of spending arrives at the start of each
year, rather than having income arriving on a more typical monthly
basis. But the simplifications here will capture the concept of
annuity pricing well enough.
The 3 percent bond yield and return acts as a discount rate to
reduce the value needing to be set aside today for the future
$10,000 payments. For instance, the exhibit indicates that at age
seventy-five, the discount factor is 74.4 percent. The interpretation
is if I put $7,441 in the bank today, and it grows at an annual 3
percent compounding interest rate for the next ten years, I can
expect these assets to grow in value to $10,000 by my seventy-fifth
birthday. If I was building a bond ladder, this is the amount I would
need to invest into a ten-year zero-coupon bond to provide that
$10,000 payment.
The process is the same for the $10,000 payment provided at each
age. The later payments are received, the more time they have to
compound and grow, requiring less to be set aside today to fund
those payments.
The next columns are what differentiates an income annuity from a
retirement income bond ladder. For a bond ladder, the total cost is
the sum of the Discounted Value of Income column, which is
$238,082 through age 104. Annuity owners obtain a discount on
the bond ladder pricing because the survival probabilities to each
subsequent age indicate whether these payments will need to be
made. Any one individual is either alive or dead. But for a large
pool of individuals representing the customer base of the annuity
provider, the company can rely on the law of large numbers to
evaluate what percentage of customers will remain alive at each
subsequent age. This is risk pooling.
The data from the Society of Actuaries suggests that a sixty-fiveyear-old female has a 91.4 percent chance of living to seventy-five.
An annuity provider can expect 91.4 percent of their sixty-five-yearold female customers to be alive and receiving income at seventyfive. The company does not know who specifically from among
their customers will be alive and receiving payments, but they can
be pretty confident with their planning that 91.4 percent of their
customers will be alive.
When we multiply this percentage by the discounted value of the
funds needed to provide the $10,000 payment at seventy-five, we
see that the annuity company plans $6,801 for the cost of providing
this payment at age seventy-five. This is the survival-probability
weighted discount factor, and the same process is followed for each
age. For another example, a $10,000 payment at age 100 requires
$3,554 to be set aside today with a 3 percent interest rate for the
purposes of an individual building a bond ladder. Given that there
is a 10.8 percent chance for the sixty-five-year-old female to reach
age 100, the annuity provider further multiplies this amount by the
survival probability so that the expected costs for a $10,000
survival-contingent payment is only $384. A sixty-five-year-old
BETA
female need only pay $384 today for a guarantee to receive
$10,000 at age 100 if she accepts that receiving the payment is
BETA
contingent upon her surviving to that age.
When we add survival-weighted costs by age, we see that the total
expected cost to provide $10,000 of annual spending to a sixty-fiveyear-old female, at least through age 104, is $172,915. If this dollar
amount represents the premium charged, then the payout rate on
the annuity is the $10,000 income it provides divided by this cost.
The payout rate is 5.78 percent. Note that this is also 27 percent
less than the cost of the bond ladder. The bond ladder costs more,
with the benefit that the bond ladder supports some legacy if
retirement lasts less than the full ladder length. But the bond
ladder does not provide any additional longevity protection beyond
the end date of the ladder as assets are fully depleted at that time.
With the income annuity, that longevity protection can be provided
with 27 percent less funds.
This is an excerpt from Wade Pfau’s book, Safety-First Retirement
Planning: An Integrated Approach for a Worry-Free Retirement.
(The Retirement Researcher’s Guide Series), available now on
Amazon AMZN +0.9% .
Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn. Check out my website.
Wade Pfau
Follow
I’m a Professor of Retirement Income, Retirement Income Certified
Professional (RICP®) Program Director, and Co-director of... Read More
Editorial Standards
Reprints & Permissions
Download