Before school, you articulate and write your names; Parents thought painstakingly about names; Names represent us, and who we are. Human beings attach names that are meaningful for these names are supposed to designate us in the world; We are given also nicknames to identify who we are called for. As students, you are told to write your names on papers, projects, or any output for that matter; Our names signify us; inscribed into one’s grave. Death cannot stop this bond between the person and his/her name even names are A person who was named after a saint most probably will not become an actual saint. The self is thought to be something else than the name. The self is something that a person perennially molds, shapes, and develops. The self is not static thing that one simply born with like a mole on one’s face or The self is just assigned by one’s parents just like the name. Prior to Socrates (Pre-Socratics), Thales, Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus, and Empedocles and other Socrates’ time were preoccupied themselves about archéthat explains the multiplicity of things in the world that is the how the world is made up for, why world is so, and what explains the changes around them. Tired about mythological accounts shared by poet-theologians like Homer and Hesiod who explaining about the nature of change, seeming permanence despite the change, and the unity of the world amidst the diversity. This man is Socrates who was more concerned with the problem of self. The first philosopher engaged in a systematic questioning about the self. The true task of the philosopher is to know oneself. “Unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates affirms, claimed by Plato in his dialogues. He had the trial for allegedly corrupting the minds of the young and old in Athens to the presuppositions about themselves and about the world, particularly about who they are. Most men were really not fully aware of who they were and the virtues that they were supposed to attain to preserve their souls afterlife. Socrates that this is the worst to happen to anyone. To live but die inside. Every man is composed of BODY AND SOUL. Plato, Socrates’ student, added three components to the soul: 1.The rational soul 2.The spirited soul 3.The appetitive soul The rational soul forged by reason and intellect has to govern the affairs of the human person; The spirited soul, which is in charge of emotions, should be kept at bay; The appetitive soul in charge of base desires, like eating, drinking, sleeping, and having sexual intercourse, is controlled as well. Following the ancient view of Plato and infusing it with the new found doctrine of Christianity, Augustine agreed that MAN IS A BIFURCATED NATURE. There is an aspect of man, which dwells in the world, that is imperfect and continuously yearns to be with the divine while the other is capable of reaching immortality. The body is bound to die on earth and the soul anticipate living eternally in the realm of spiritual bliss in communion with God. This is because the body only thrive in the imperfect, physical reality that is the world, whereas the soul can also stay after death in an eternal realm with the all transcendent God. The goal of every human person is to attain this communion and bliss with the Divine by living his life on earth in virtue. he most eminent 13thTcentury scholar and stalwart of medieval philosophy, appended something to this Christian view: Adopting some ideas from Aristotle, Aquinas said that, INDEED, MAN IS COMPOSED OF TWO PARTS: 1.MATTER (Hylein Greek) 2.FORM (Morphein Greek) MATTER refers to the common stuff that makes up everything in the universe. Man’s body is part of this matter. FORM refers to the essence of a substance or thing. It is what makes it what it is. In the case of the human person, the body is something he shares even with the animals. What makes a human person a human person and not a dog or tiger is HIS SOUL, HIS ESSENCE. The Father of Modern Philosophy conceived that the human person as having a body and a mind; In his famous treatise, THE MEDITATIONS OF FIRST PHILOSOPHY, Descartes claims that there is so much that we should doubt. One should only believe that which can pass the test of doubt. If something is clear and lucid as not to be even doubted, then that is the only time when one should actually buy a proposition. In the end, Descartes though that the only thing that one cannot doubt is the existence of the self. For even if one doubts oneself, that only proves there is a doubting self, a thing that thinks and therefore, that cannot be doubted. Thus, his famous COGITO ERGO SUM or I THINK THEREFORE I AM. The self is also a combination of two distinct entities: COGITO or a thing that thinks, which is the mind, and the EXTENZA or the extension of the mind, which is the body. The body is nothing else but a machine that is attached to the mind. Human person has it but it is not what makes man a man. “ But what then, am I? A thinking thing? It has been said. But what is a thinking thing? It is a thing that doubts, understands/conceives, affirms, denies, wills, refuses; that imagines also, and perceives.” Descartes said. The self is not an entity over and beyond the physical body. Empiricism is the school of thought that espouses idea that knowledge can only be possible if it is sensed and experiences. Men can only attain knowledge by experiencing. self is nothing but a bundle of The impressions. (What are impressions?) If one tries to examine his experiences, Hume finds that they can all be categorized into two: IMPRESSIONS and IDEAS. Impressions are the basic object of our experience or sensation. They, therefore, form the core of our thoughts. When one touches an iced cube, the cold sensation is an impression. Impressions, therefore, are vivid because they are products of our direct experience with the world. IDEAS are copies of impressions because they are not as lively and vivid as our impressions. When one imagines the feeling of being in love for the first time, that still is an idea. Self, according to Hume, is simply “A bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement.” Men simply want to believe that there is a unified, coherent self, a soul or mind. In reality, what one thinks as unified self is simply a combination of all experiences with a particular person. Kant recognizes the veracity in Hume’s account that everything starts with perception and sensation of impressions; However, the things that men perceive around them are not just randomly infused into the human person without organizing principle that regulates the relationship of all these impressions. There is necessarily a mind that organizes the impressions that men get from the external world. Time and space, for example, are ideas that one cannot find in the world but is built in our minds. He calls it the APPARATUS OF THE MIND. Without the self, one cannot organize the different impressions that one gets in relation to his own existence. The “self” is an actively engaged intelligence in man that synthesizes all knowledge and experience. The self is not just what gives one his personality. It is also the seat of knowledge acquisition for all human persons. What truly matters is the behaviors that a person manifests in his day-to-day life. Looking for and trying to understand a “self” as it really exists is like a visiting your friend’s university and looking for the “university”. One can roam around the campus, visit the library and the football field, meet the administrators and faculty, and still end up NOT FINDING the university. This is because the campus, the people, the systems, and the territory all form the university. The self is not an entity one can locate and analyze but simply the convenient name that people use to refer to all the behaviors that people make. The mind and body are so intertwined that they cannot be separated from one another. All experience is embodied. One’s body is his opening towards his existence to the world. Because of these bodies, men are in the world. He dismisses the Cartesian Dualism that has spelled so much devastation in the history of man. For him, the Cartesian problem is nothing else but plain misunderstanding. The living body, his thoughts, emotions, and experiences are ALL ONE. In your own words, state what is the meaning of self for each of the following philosophers. After doing so, explain how your concept of self compatible with how they conceived of the self. Socrates, Plato, Augustine, Descartes, Hume, Kant, Ryle, and Merleau-Ponty