See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346411871 Design And Testing of a FRP Pressure Vessel Conference Paper · November 2020 CITATIONS READS 0 4,043 4 authors, including: Bv Subrahmanyam SIRCRREDDY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING 23 PUBLICATIONS 38 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Bv Subrahmanyam on 27 November 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering SSRG-(IJME) - Special Issue ICCREST April2018 Design And Testing of a FRP Pressure Vessel Annangi Sai Prasad1,Asst. Professor, Mechanical Engineering, PACE Institute of Science & Technology, Ongole , India, Nynala Venkata Ramana2, Asst. Professor, Mechanical Engineering, PACE Institute of Science & Technology Ongole, India, B v Subramanyam3,Asst Professor, Mechanical Engineering, SIR CR REDDY Engineering College, Eluru, India, Abstract—Pressure vessels play a vital Role in Engineering Applications and in Industry. Normally Pressure Vessel is made up of with Metals. But Composite Pressure vessels have their huge demand in now a day because of their excellent Properties and less weight. In this Paper the pressure vessel is designed for the application of Holding Air where it is required for running the Pneumatic Cylinder in a continuous process line. In continuous process line we face so many problems due to power failures, compressor performance and foreign particles in air supply line etc. So, this Pressure vessel is used as emergency equipment when there is a problem is raised. For this manufacturing Glass Fiber & Polyester Resin is used for Getting Good Mechanical Properties and also cheap in cost. This Vessel Was Completely designed with the help of handbook of ASME SECTION-X. The Main Purpose of the Pressure Vessel Is To hold the pressure of 75 psi, Long life time without maintenance, better Corrosion Properties and also good mechanical Properties. Keywords— ASME Section-X, Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastics. Nomenclatures Eta Tensile modulus in axial direction(psi) Eth Tensile modulus in hoop direction(psi) Efa Flexural modulus in axial direction(psi) Efh Flexural modulus in hoop direction(psi) ISSN: 2348 - 8360 x poissions ratio in axial direction y poissions ratio in axial direction P Design Pressure 0 Outside Diameter of Cylindrical Shell rc Radius of Cyllindrical Shell rn Radius of Nozzle Lc Length of the Cylinder tc Thickness of cylindrical shell Edh Design modulus for Head s Shear Strength INTRODUCTION Pressure vessels and Storage Tanks are commonly used Equipment in all Industries. The most common material for manufacturing pressure vessel is commonly steels, aluminum alloys and metals. But in present days the research is going on the replacement of material with better properties as compared to metals. Corrosion is the main drawback for the metals. For increasing life time composites are the best materials as compared to all other materials. As compared to normal metal pressure vessels the composites having better stiffness because of the polymer structure. The time is also very less for manufacturing and the cost is also very cheap. The ASME SECTION-X fiber reinforced plastic pressure vessels are published for the design I. www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 108 SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering SSRG-(IJME) - Special Issue ICCREST April2018 of FRP pressure vessels and boilers. This vessel was made because of less space in the machine area The step by step procedure for the designing of each component ASME section-x has been followed. After successfully completing the design procedure the pressure vessel was manufactured and the further pressure testing was carried out in the laboratory. and further testing’s are carried out in laboratory. The Material properties are listed in below table. S. no Type of resin Viscosit y Gel time Exotherm ic peak temperatu re 1 POLYE STER RESIN 280 20 MIN 130 DEGREE S 1 TENSILE MODULUS IN AXIAL DIRECTION(Eta or E1) 72590.29 psi 2 TENSILE MODULUS IN HOOP DIRECTION(Eth or E2) 72590.2 psi 3 FLEXURAL MODULUS IN AXIAL DIRECTION(Efa) 870226.4 psi 4 TENSILE MODULUS IN HOOP DIRECTION(Efh) 870226.4 psi 5 POISSIONS RATIO IN AXIAL DIRECTION(x) 0.3 6 POISSIONS RATIO IN HOOP DIRECTION(y) 0.3 II. BENEFITS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS Composites are light weight as compared to other materials. Due to its less weight it is having good life time. As compared to other metals or materials composites having high strength. The metals and metal alloys are equally strong in all directions. But in composite structure design criteria the engineers can design the high strength in specified direction. Composites having high strength to weight ratio for example take some metals which is having high strength and also high weight. But in composites we can get the higher strength in less weight also. In design light weight materials plays a vital role. Composite structures having high strength to weight ratio in now a days. Corrosion is the main property to damage the metals. To resist the corrosion extra chemical coatings are required to protect in case of metals. Even if we coat the metal surface with chemicals we cannot get the good results and it will resist the surface only fewer days. But in case of composites such extra coatings are not required due to having better polymeric structure. So these composite vessels are suitable to install in inner and outer side of the environment with maintenance free. Even if any problem is raised due to some conditions it is easy to repair. III. SPECIMENS TESTING FOR DESING Before starting to Design Procedure, first step is to test the material properties like tensile, flexural, poisons ratios in longitudinal direction and axial direction. For manufacturing of test specimen first we should go for which resin is suitable in less cost and specifications of glass fiber material like surface mat and mats. The pieces or manufactured for testing in ASTM D section ISSN: 2348 - 8360 IV. DESIGN OF FRP PRESSURE VESSEL ASME SECTION-X provides the requirements for FRP pressure vessel, According to this the pressure vessels are three types, they are 1. Class I 2. Class II 3. Class III A. Design Pressure: Class I: These vessels are not exceeding 150 Psi manufactured by bag molding, contact molding, centrifugally casting but it is differing for filament winding vessels. Class II: These are definitely follows the limits in RD-1120. www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 109 SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering SSRG-(IJME) - Special Issue ICCREST April2018 Class III: The Pressure shall not exceed 15000 psi manufacture by filament winding. B. Design Temperature: The design Temperature for Class I and Class II vessels 250°F (120°C) for Class I and Class II, and 185°F (85°C) for Class III. In this Present work the Class I type of vessel was designed by Contact Molding Method. GENERAL: Calculations Required Under RD-1150. L = Length of Cylinder = 7.87 in. F = Design factor 5 for internal pressure on cylinders, 10 for external pressure on spheres and heads, and internal pressure on reinforcements. rc = Inside radius of cylindrical shell = 1.77 in. P = Design Pressure = 75 psi. CYLINDRICAL SHELLS UNDER UNIFORM INTERNAL PRESSURE: The thickness of the structural wall of the pressure vessel not less than the (1/4 in)(6mm). 1. Longitudinal Stress tc1= = 𝑃∗ 𝑟 𝐶 3 Zp= 1 𝐸𝑓ℎ 4 𝐸𝑡𝑎 2 𝐸𝑓𝑎 2 75∗ 1.77 (1-xy) ( 𝐿𝑐 2 1/2 ∅0 2 ∗𝑡 𝑐 ) = 51.79 < 100. Then =1-0.001 Z p =0.94821. Substitute the value in the given equation 3 Pa= 1 5 𝐾𝐷0.8531 𝐸𝑓ℎ 4 𝐸𝑡𝑎 4 𝑡 2 3 3 ∅0 )2 2 (1−ϑx ϑy )4 𝐿 ( 𝐹 Pa = 374.07 psi. THICKNESS OF HEADS: THICKNESS OF HEADS UNDER INTERNAL PRESSURE: The thickness of the ellipsoidal head under internal pressure can be calculated by the following formula. Let us assume Edh = 2.8 x 105 psi. th = 𝑃∗𝐷 2(0.001𝐸𝑑 ℎ ) 2(0.001∗725290 .29) = 75∗3.54 2(0.001∗288586 .95) = 0.46 in. 2. Circumferential Stress = Calculate γ 2(0.001𝐸𝑡𝑎 ) = 0.09 in. tc2 = CYLINDRICAL SHELLS UNDER EXTERNAL PRESSURE: The maximum allowable external pressure of the cylindrical shell can be calculated by the given formula. 𝑃∗𝑅𝐶 (0.001𝐸𝑡𝑎 ) 75∗1.77 (0.001∗725290 .29) = 0.46 in. > 0.09 in. THICKNESS OF HEADS UNDER EXTERNAL PRESSURE: The thickness of the ellipsoidal head under external pressure can be computed by the formula Phe = 0.41 𝐸𝑑 ℎ 𝐹 𝑡2 √(1−𝜗𝑥 𝜗𝑦 )(𝐾0 ∅0 )2 Let tc= tc2 =0.46 in. ISSN: 2348 - 8360 www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 110 SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering SSRG-(IJME) - Special Issue ICCREST April2018 = 288586 .95 )0.46 2 10 REINFORCEMENT OF OPENINGS AND NOZZLE ATTACHMENTS: A) Length of secondary overlay on Nozzle: The Secondary bond length can be calculated by using the formula 0.41( √(1−(0.3)(0.3))(2∗8)2 = 24.82 psi The value of K0 can be taken by the following table. Lb = = 𝑃∗𝑟𝑛 𝜏 𝐹 2( 𝑠 ) 75∗0.25 1000 ) 10 2( = 0.093 in < 3in. Let Lb=3 in. The dimensions of Nozzle dimensions was reduced to 3 times, So Lb=1 in. B) Thickness of Secondary overlay on Nozzle: The thickness of the secondary overlay can be calculated by given formula 𝑃∗𝑟𝑛 tb = NOZZLE CALCULATIONS: According to RD-620.1 The minimum Nozzle thickness is 1 inch. When we calculate the outside diameter the Flange thickness was above 50% of the inside diameter of the shell.So the 2 inch nozzle was selected and its dimensions are reduced to 3 times of the original dimension. The Given table shows the actual and reduced value. V Out Bolt al Siz sid circl u e in e e es dia dia Bolt Hol e Dia A ct u al 0.62 5 S ca le 2 0.5 5 1.2 5 3.87 5 0.15 6 ISSN: 2348 - 8360 0.96 5 N o. Of Bo lts 4 4 FT 0.5 0.1 25 N T 0. 25 0. 06 25 𝑆𝑎 = 75∗0.25 0.001∗725290 .29 = 0.025 in < 0.25 in. Let tb = 0.25 in. C) Thickness of reinforcement pad on shell or Head: The thickness of the reinforcement pad on shell or head can be computed by two methods which is the greater of one and two. In first method the thickness can be computed by given formula. tp = = 𝑝∗𝑅𝑐 (0.001𝐸2 ) 75∗1.77 (0.001∗725290 .29) = 0.183 in. www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 111 SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering SSRG-(IJME) - Special Issue ICCREST April2018 In Second method we follow different steps In Step 1 The β value can be computed by the following formula. 𝛽= = ∜3(1−𝜗𝑥 𝜗𝑦 ) 𝑅𝑛 2 √(𝑅𝑐 ∗𝑡) ( D) LENGTH OF REINFORCING PAD: Assume LC = 2r = 2x0.25 in=0.5 = longest chord length of opening. ) ∜3(1− 0.3 0.3 ) 1 2 √1.77∗(0.46) ( = 0.35 > 0.183 Let t p = 0.35 in. LP = ) = 0.6205 = In Step 2 After finding the β value the stress concentration factor Kt can be determined by the chart RD1174.3 from ASME SECTIONX. In Step 3 The maximum stress at opening can be calculated by 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑆2 𝐾𝑡 = (725.29x4.2) = 3046.21 psi In Step 4 The moment M can be calculated by the following formula 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑡 2 𝑀= 6 = 𝑡𝑝 = = 𝑀 6( ) 2 𝑆𝑓 − 𝑡𝑐 107 .42 ) 2 6( (870.2264 ) ISSN: 2348 - 8360 by HEAD TO SHELL JOINT OVERLAY SUBJECTED TO INTERNAL PRESSURE: The thickness of the overlay t0 is 𝑃(𝑟𝑐 +𝑡 𝑐 ) (0.001𝐸2 ) 75(1.77+0.46) (0.001∗725290 .29) = 0.23 in. The length of the secondary overlay is 𝐿0 = − 0.25 1000 ) 10 4( JOINING OF VESSEL PARTS: By joining the vessel parts we should follow two criteria’s: 1) The thickness of the overlay must be stronger when the stresses are produced by the stronger part. 2) The length of the overlay must be produce secondary bond shear strength whoch is equal to longitudinal tensile modulus of the weak part. = In Step 5 Thickness of reinforcement assuming equivalent moment M is M/2. 𝜋∗0.5∗75 = 1 in. 6 = 107.42 in - lb. 4𝑆𝑆 𝐹 = 0.29 in <0.5 𝑡0 = 3046 .2 (0.46)2 𝜋𝐿𝐶 𝑃 = 𝑃∗𝑟𝑐 𝑆 𝐹 2( 𝑠 ) 75∗1.77 1000 ) 10 2( = 0.66 in www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 112 SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering SSRG-(IJME) - Special Issue ICCREST April2018 After completing of the all calculations the Pressure vessel values are calculated and the flange and overlay calculations are completed. The pressure vessel was made by hand-layup method by preparing the moulds for manufacturing shell part and flange part. After completion of manufacturing the parts are joined as per ASME section-x. The drawing of the pressure vessel was shown below and it gives all the dimensions of parts like shell, head and overlay. For the ease of design the flange values are also shown in the drawing This pressure vessel having three flanges two are for inlet and outlet one for pressure gauge. The detailed dimension of nozzle and shell was shown in figure. contact molded method. For this the mould preparation also very easy. We can easily manufacture the mould from clay, cement, wood and sheet metal etc. It requires simple brushes, rollers and plates for removing air traps. The part is manufactured by pouring an activated resin on the mould and with the help of rollers the resin was evenly distributed on the surface of the mold. After Some time the resin was cured and the part was ready. PREPARATION OF MOULD: With the help of mould calculations the mould was made by the materials of wood and Rubber sheets. In this project we prepare three moulds for shell, Ellipsoidal head and flanges. And film was used for the release purpose. MANUFACTURING PROCESS: After completion of making of mold the ellipsoidal head, Shell and Flanges. IN this project we are using GRP mats. The given figures show the head and shell at the time of manufacturing process. ELLIPSOIDAL HEAD MAKING OF PRESSURE VESSEL: HAND LAY-UP METHOD: As compared to all manufacturing process the hand-layup method is very simple, flexible and cost-effective method. It is also called as open mould method or ISSN: 2348 - 8360 CYLINDRICAL SHELL www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 113 SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering SSRG-(IJME) - Special Issue ICCREST April2018 [1] [2] NOZZLE [3] ISSN: 2348 - 8360 View publication stats A.A. Sheik, R.Mistry,”Design of Fiber Reinforced Plastic Pressure Vessel by ASME Section-X”, in International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 11, November 2014. Shyam Lohar and Lavish Patel, “Design of E-Glass Fibre Rain forced Plastic Pressure Vessel Design as per ASME Sec X,”by International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology, Volume 3 , Issue 05 ,October 2016 ISSN (online): 2349-6010. [4] Mr. Mukund Kavekar, Mr. Vinayak H.Khatawate, Mr. Gajendra V. Patil, “weight reduction of pressure vessel using frp composite material”, by International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), Volume 4, Issue 4, July - August (2013), pp. 300-310. [5] Osama M. Al-Habahbeh,and Naser S. AlHuniti, “Composite Pressure Vessels in Petroleum Industry: Status and Outlook “by Fifth International Conference on Composite Science & Technology (ICCST/5) American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, February 2005. JOINING OF VESSEL CONCLUSION: The manufacturing of Pressure Vessel was manufactured according to ASME Section X fiber reinforced plastic Pressure vessel. After successfully completed the pressure vessel was tested according to the ASME. The class 1 pressure vessels are tested with a prototype with the pressure of 1.1 times to the design pressure. The pressure vessel was tested with 82.5 psi pressure and it will be founded that the pressure vessel was with stand the pressure. In Manufacturing So much of Problems are raised like fast gel time, blisters and delamination after rectifying all the problems good pressure vessel was made by rectifying the problems. References ASME SECTION-X FBER REINFORCED PLASTIC PRESSURE VESSELS 2015. [6] Mulla Niyamat , K.Bicha, “Design and stress analysis of pressure vessel by using ansys” by International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, ISSN: 2277-9655 www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 114