COMPARISON OF MUSCLE ACTIVITY DURING A RING MUSCLE UP AND BAR MUSCLE UP by Cody Walker A thesis presented to the Department of Exercise and Sport Science W and the Graduate School of University of Central Arkansas in partial PR EV IE fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Exercise and Sport Science Conway, AR August, 2017 ProQuest Number: 10616516 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. PR EV IE W ProQuest 10616516 Published by ProQuest LLC (2018 ). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 IE PR EV W IE PR EV W IE W © PR EV 2017 Cody Walker iv Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle activation of selected shoulder and arm muscles during a ring and bar muscle up. Ten active males (27.6 7.9 years) volunteered to participate in this study. Participants performed 5 repetitions of each style of muscle up (ring and bar) in randomized order. Muscle activation of the upper and lower trapezius, serratus anterior, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, triceps brachii, biceps brachii, and forearm flexors was measured using electromyography W (EMG). EMG signals were normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction. A 2 X 2 ANOVA (ring vs bar, pull phase vs push phase) with repeated measures was IE performed for each muscle. Least significant differences (LSD) post hocs were performed when a significant interaction effect occurred. The ring muscle up significantly (p < PR EV 0.005) elicited more muscle activation in the upper trapezius, biceps brachii, and forearm flexors during the pull phase. The ring muscle up also significantly (p < 0.005) elicited more muscle activation in the triceps brachii and biceps brachii during the push phase. Although the ring and bar muscle up are performed in similar patterns, there is different muscle activations. The ring muscle up adds a more unstable environment that increases muscle activation of smaller muscle groups such as the biceps brachii and forearm flexors. From these results, the best training progress would be to learn the bar muscle up after larger muscle groups are trained though pulling exercises and then learn the ring muscle up after the smaller muscle groups are trained. v Table of Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................. v Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................... vii Table of Figures.............................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................... 1 W Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................................... 6 IE Chapter 3 ......................................................................................................................... 13 References ........................................................................................................................ 20 PR EV Chapter 4 ......................................................................................................................... 22 References .........................................................................................................................33 Appendix A ...................................................................................................................... 35 Appendix B ...................................................................................................................... 36 Appendix C .......................................................................................................................46 Appendix D .......................................................................................................................47 Appendix E .......................................................................................................................50 vi List of Tables PR EV IE W Table 1 2X2 (Bar vs Ring, Pull vs Push) ANOVA results for each muscle group .......... 35 vii Table of Figures Figure 1 Bar Muscle............................................................................................................ 2 Figure 2 Ring Muscle Up .................................................................................................... 2 Figure 3 Anterior Electrode Placement..............................................................................15 Figure 4 Posterior Electrode Placement .............................................................................15 Figure 5 Upper Trapezius Manual Muscle Test ............................................................... 16 Figure 6 Lower Trapezius Manual Muscle Test ............................................................... 16 W Figure 7 Biceps Brachii Manual Muscle Test................................................................... 17 Figure 8 Triceps Brachii Manual Muscle Test ................................................................ 17 IE Figure 9 Forearm Flexors Manual Muscle Test ............................................................... 17 Figure 10 Latissimus Dorsi Manual Muscle Test ............................................................ 18 PR EV Figure 11 Serratus Anterior Manual Muscle Test ............................................................ 18 Figure 12 Pectoralis Major Manual Muscle Test ............................................................. 18 Figure 13 Anterior Electrode Placement............................................................................36 Figure 14 Posterior Electrode Placement ...........................................................................37 Figure 15 Upper trapezius activity during the push and pull phases of a muscle up performed on bar and rings ...................................................................................... 38 Figure 16 Lower trapezius activity during the push and pull phases of a muscle up performed on bar and rings ...................................................................................... 39 Figure 17 Serratus anterior activity during the push and pull phases of a muscle up performed on bar and rings ...................................................................................... 40 Figure 18 Triceps brachii activity during the push and pull phases of a muscle up performed on bar and rings ...................................................................................... 41 viii Table of Figures (Continued) Figure 19 Latissimus dorsi activity during the push and pull phases of a muscle up performed on bar and rings ...................................................................................... 42 Figure 20 Pectoralis major activity during the push and pull phases of a muscle up performed on bar and rings ...................................................................................... 43 Figure 21 Biceps brachii activity during the push and pull phases of a muscle up performed on bar and rings ...................................................................................... 44 W Figure 22 Forearm flexors activity during the push and pull phases of a muscle up PR EV IE performed on bar and rings ...................................................................................... 45 ix Chapter 1 Introduction The muscle up is a variation of a common gymnastic movement. It can be performed on either a straight bar (bar muscle up) (Figures 1) or on rings (ring muscle up) (Figures 2). The ring muscle up equivalent in gymnastics is called a front up rise while the bar muscle up’s equivalent is called a glide kip. Much like an Olympic lift, the muscle up is a complex movement that requires both a pulling and a pushing phase. W These movements all take place in the sagittal plane and involve large upper body muscles to perform the movement.1 IE A bar muscle up starts with the athlete hanging below a fixed bar (Figure 1 Right PR EV Frame). Movement is initiated by a kip. The athlete pulls up on the bar rotating the wrist over the bar. Once over the bar, the athlete catches himself/herself in the bottom position of a dip (Figure 1 Middle Frame) and then press to extend the elbows (Figure 1 Left Frame). A ring muscle up starts with the athlete hanging below the rings (Figure 2 Left Frame). It is initiated by performing a leg swing (kip). Once momentum is built up in the kip, the athlete then pulls up, rotating the wrist through the rings. When through the rings, the athlete catches himself/herself in the bottom position of a dip (Figure 2 Middle 1 Frame) and then presses to extend the elbows (Figure 2 Right Frame). The movement is W considered complete once full extension of the elbow is reached. Figure 2 Ring Muscle Up IE Figure 1 Bar Muscle Up The muscle up is a complex, explosive movement. Like an Olympic weightlifting PR EV movement, it requires both strength and coordination to complete a muscle up. It is used for training explosive pulling of the upper shoulder girdle. The muscle up is also useful in training both a pulling and a pushing exercise in one movement. The muscle up trains the latissimus dorsi and biceps brachii primary during the pull phase. During the dip phase, the triceps brachii and pectoralis major are primarily trained. The upper trapezius and the serratus anterior are the primary stabilizers of the scapula throughout the movement. Many bodyweight training programs have adopted the muscle up as a standard movement. There is limited research showing the differences in muscle activation between bar muscle ups and ring muscle ups. It has been speculated that ring muscle ups will create a higher training stimulus because of the instability of the rings; conversely, others claim that a bar muscle up is inherently “harder” because the bar does not move around 2