UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS SCHOOL OF LAW & GOVERNANCE SEC. 14. FORM OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION .... 27 Business Organization 2 Revised Corporation Code Reviewer SEC. 16. GROUNDS FOR DISAPPROVAL OF AOI OR AMENDMENTS .................................................................. 29 Atty. Eugenio Espedido SEC. 18. REGISTRATION, INCORPORATION AND COMMENCEMENT OF CORPORATION EXISTENCE ..... 30 EH403 SY 2019-2020 CORPO COMMITTEE: Gaviola, Keeshia Earl T. Li, Jinnelyn O. Tagaloguin, Elmar M. Torres, Chezka Bianca P. SEC. 19. DE FACTO CORPORATION .............................. 31 SOURCES Discussion of Atty. Espedido & Atty. Gaviola (2018-2019) | Herbosa | Prior Year Notes: Gaviola, Tanya & Beer Notes | UP Law Notes 2019 | San Beda MemAid 2019 SEC. 15. AMENDMENT OF THE ARTICLES..................... 28 SEC. 17. CORPORATION NAME ...................................... 29 SEC. 20. CORPORATION BY ESTOPPEL ........................ 31 SEC. 21. EFFECT OF NON-USE OF CORPORATE CHARTER AND CONTINUOUS INOPERATION ............... 34 TITLE III. BOARD OF DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS ............................................................................. 34 SEC. 22. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE BOD/BOT ............... 35 SEC. 23. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OR TRUSTEES .... 37 SEC. 24. CORPORATE OFFICERS .................................. 39 Disclaimer: This material is not for sale. The authors do not guarantee the absolute correctness, completeness or accuracy of this reviewer. This is intended to be used as a supplement to your personal readings. Please be vigilant in cross-referring with your own notes. We have arranged Atty. E.’s discussion to align with the codal provisions, and thus this reviewer does not completely follow the flow of his class discussions. Kindly note that the portions of these reviewers marked with double asterisks (**) were not discussed by Atty. E., but for purposes of the mock bar and/or better understanding, the authors thought to include such notes in this material. Tip: To easily reach a specific section or title in this document, simply press CTRL + <click the section you want to go to>. SEC. 25. REPORTORIAL REQUIREMENTS ..................... 41 SEC. 26. DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS, TRUSTEES, OR OFFICERS .............................................. 42 SEC. 27. REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES ........... 42 SEC. 28. VACANCIES in the board.................................... 42 SEC. 29 COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS OR TRUSTEES ........................................................................................... 44 SEC. 30. LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS, TRUSTEES OR OFFICERS ......................................................................... 44 SEC. 31. DEALINGS OF DIRECTORS, TRUSTEES OR OFFICERS ......................................................................... 45 SEC. 32 INTERLOCKING DIRECTORS ............................ 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS SEC. 33. DISLOYALTY OF A DIRECTOR ......................... 47 TITLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS, DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS .................................................................2 SEC. 34. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ................................. 48 TITLE IV. POWERS OF THE CORPORATION ..................... 48 SEC. 1. TITLE OF THE CODE .............................................2 SEC. 35. CORPORATE POWERS AND CAPACITY ......... 48 SEC. 2. CORPORATION DEFINED .....................................4 SEC. 3. CLASSES OF CORPORATIONS .......................... 11 SEC. 36. POWER TO EXTEND OR SHORTEN CORPORATE TERM .......................................................... 50 SEC. 4. CORPORATIONS CREATED BY SPECIAL LAWS OR CHARTERS .................................................................. 14 SEC. 37 POWER TO INCREASE OR DECREASE CAPITAL STOCK ............................................................................... 50 SEC. 5. CORPORATORS AND INCORPORATORS, STOCKHOLDERS AND MEMBERS................................... 14 SEC. 38. POWER TO DENY PRE-EMPTIVE RIGHT ........ 51 SEC. 6. CLASSIFICATION OF SHARES ........................... 15 SEC. 40. POWER TO ACQUIRE OWN SHARES .............. 52 SEC. 7. FOUNDERS’ SHARES .......................................... 16 SEC. 8. REDEEMABLE SHARES ...................................... 16 SEC. 41. POWER TO INVEST CORPORATE FUNDS IN OTHER CORPORATIONS/BUSINESSES ......................... 53 SEC. 9. TREASURY SHARES ........................................... 16 SEC. 42. POWER TO DECLARE DIVIDENDS .................. 54 TITLE II. INCORPORATION AND ORGANIZATION OF PRIVATE CORPORATIONS .................................................. 22 SEC. 43. POWER TO ENTER INTO MANAGEMENT CONTRACT........................................................................ 59 SEC. 10. NUMBER AND QUALIFICATIONS OF INCORPORATORS ............................................................ 22 SEC. 44. ULTRA VIRES ACTS .......................................... 59 TITLE V. BYLAWS ................................................................ 60 SEC. 11. CORPORATE TERM ........................................... 23 SEC. 45. ADOPTION OF BY LAWS ................................... 60 SEC. 12. CAPITAL STOCKS .............................................. 23 SEC. 46. CONTENTS OF BYLAWS ................................... 61 SEC. 13. CONTENTS OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION.............................................................. 23 SEC. 47. AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS ............................... 61 SEC. 39. SALE OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF ASSETS .. 52 TITLE VI. MEETINGS ............................................................ 62 Page 1 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law SEC. 48. KINDS OF MEETINGS ........................................ 62 SEC. 49. REGULAR & SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS OR MEMBERS ..................................... 62 SEC. 50. PLACE & TIME OF MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS OR MEMBERS ..................................... 65 R.A. No. 11232 An Act Providing for the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines TITLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS, DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS SEC. 51. QUORUM IN MEETINGS .................................... 65 SEC. 52. REGULAR & SPECIAL MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES; QUORUM ................................ 65 SEC. 53. WHO SHALL PRESIDE AT MEETINGS ............. 66 SEC. 1. TITLE OF THE CODE Section 1. Title of the Code. This Code shall be known as the “Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines”. SEC. 54. RIGHT TO VOTE OF SECURED CREDITORS & ADMINISTRATORS ............................................................ 66 INTRODUCTION SEC. 55. VOTING IN CASE OF JOINT OWNERSHIP OF STOCK ............................................................................... 66 The Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (RCC) was signed into law by Pres. Rodrigo Duterte on 20 February 2019, and became effective on 23 February 2019, following its publication in 2 newspapers of general circulation. SEC. 56. VOTING RIGHT FOR TREASURY SHARES ...... 67 SEC. 57. MANNER OF VOTING; PROXIES ...................... 67 SEC. 58. VOTING TRUSTS ............................................... 68 TITLE VII. STOCKS AND STOCKHOLDERS ....................... 70 SEC. 59. SUBSCRIPTION CONTRACT ............................. 70 SEC. 60. PRE-INCORPORATION SUBSCRIPTION .......... 70 SEC. 61. CONSIDERATION FOR STOCKS ...................... 71 SEC. 62. CERTIFICATION OF STOCK & TRANSFER OF SHARES ............................................................................. 72 SEC. 63. ISSUANCE OF STOCK CERTIFICATES ............ 73 SEC. 64. LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS FOR WATERED STOCKS ............................................................................. 75 SEC. 65. INTEREST ON UNPAID SUBSCRIPTIONS ........ 77 SEC. 66. PAYMENT OF BALANCE OF SUBSCRIPTION .. 77 SEC. 67. DELINQUENCY SALE ........................................ 78 SEC. 68. WHEN SALE MAY BE QUESTIONED ................ 79 SEC. 69. COURT ACTION TO RECOVER UNPAID SUBSCRIPTION ................................................................. 79 SEC. 70. EFFECT OF DELINQUENCY .............................. 79 SEC. 71. RIGHTS OF UNPAID SHARES, NONDELINQUENT ............................................................................................ 79 SEC. 72. LOST OR DESTROYED CERTIFICATES ........... 80 TITLE VIII. CORPORATE BOOKS AND RECORDS ............ 82 SEC. 73. BOOKS TO BE KEPT; STOCK TRANSFER AGENT ............................................................................................ 82 SEC. 74. RIGHT TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ............... 86 APPENDIX ............................................................................. 87 P.D. 902-A .......................................................................... 87 NATIONALIZED ACTIVITIES (SEC. 8, RA 7042) ............... 87 SEC. 3, R.A. 8179 (AMENDING SEC. 8, RA. 7042) ........... 88 In its repealing clause, the Revised Corporation Code expressly repealed the 1980 Corporation Code, which had no amendments for almost 39 years. Notes: From 149 sections, the RCC now has 188 sections. Being a special law, it is a combination of substantive and procedural law. The most important innovation is the introduction of the OPC, or one-person corporation. This is a very new concept. We have abandoned the old concept of at least 5 incorporators being required to make a corporation. o There is a new concept because many investors refrain from investing much into businesses, because when they invest into sole proprietorships, their liability is unlimited. o However, forming a corporation under the old law required 5 incorporators, and businessmen may not be comfortable with doing business with five other persons. So what they did before was they incorporated a corporation together with family members. Sometimes, they did it with their drivers, gardeners and laundrywomen, etc. The SEC realized that we are just fooling ourselves, that incorporators can sometimes be had in circumvention of the law. That is why they now allow the OPC. However, note that 80-90% of the Code remains the same with the Old Code. TYPES OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS (1) Sole Proprietorships A form of business organization with only one proprietary owner. It is when a person personally or a single individual conducts business under his own name or under a business name. (2) Partnerships By a contract of partnership, two or more persons bind themselves to contribute money, property or industry to a common fund, with the intention of dividing the profits among themselves. Two or more persons may also form a partnership for the exercise of a profession. Page 2 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law (3) Corporation An artificial being created by operation of law, having the right of succession and the powers, attributes and properties expressly authorized by law or incident to its existence. SOLE PROPRIETOR -SHIP Starts upon selling Commence -ment Sole proprietor PART -NERSHIP CORPO -RATION Created by mere agreement of the parties Created by operation of law At least 2 persons New Law: One Person Corporation is allowed No. of Incorporators Old Law: At least 5 incorporators No juridical personality Commence -ment of Juridical Personality Liable up to the extent of personal properties Execution of the contract From the date of issuance of the Certificate of Incorporation by the SEC Liable personally and subsidiarily for partnershi p debts to 3rd persons Stockholder s are liable only to the extent of their investments as represented by the shares subscribed by them Liability Managed by the sole proprietor Management Absence of any agreement, every partner is an agent of the partnership Important: Veil of Corporate Fiction applies only to a Corporation Power to do business is vested in the Board of Directors (BOT) or Board of Trustees Transferrable through asset sale Transferability of Interest Needs consent of all partners (based on delectus personae) No right of succession Right of Succession Does not need prior consent of the stockholders There is right of succession What is the basic distinction between the three? A: The veil of corporation fiction only exists in a corporation, and not in a sole proprietorship or a partnership. Atty. Espedido.: A Corporation, such as a One Person Corporation (OPC) enjoys the veil of corporate fiction and a limited liability whereas a Sole Proprietorship’s liability may not be limited at all. One of the requirements of an OPC to exist is to declare how much capital he intends so that his liability will be based on that capital. He must prove that he has separated that capital from his personal funds. The amount declared as capital for the Corporation has been separated from the personal funds. Unless he can do that, he might be liable as a Sole Proprietor. ADVANTAGES OF A CORPORATION (1) More capitalization (2) Limited liability – veil of corporate fiction applies (3) Right of succession – upon the death of a stockholder, the heir becomes the new stockholder which provides stability for the business to continue (4) Transferability of interest – does not require the consent of other stockholders (5) Easier management – management is centralized in the Board of Directors DISADVANTAGES OF A CORPORATION (1) Higher Income Tax Liability (May be taxed twice) Corporate Income Tax and Income Tax Stockholders to Illustration. When the corporation acquires income, it will be subject to corporate income tax. When it is distributed to the shareholder as cash dividends, it will also be an income of the shareholder and such are taxable income of the shareholder. (2) Less Participation in the Management. Participation of stockholders in a corporation is indirect. Indirect – means the management of the corporation is entrusted to the Board of Directors. The only participation of stockholders in the management is in the election of the Board of Directors. (3) No delectus personae – investing with people you do not know; there is no personal touch; no delectus personae (4) Dissolution – dissolution is granted by the State, unlike in a Partnership which can be dissolved anytime. Dissolution of a Corporation requires consent of the State because it is imbued with public interest. Page 3 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law (5) Greater degree of government control and supervision (6) Difficulty in meeting requirements – high cost of formation and operations TYPES OF CORPORATIONS 1. Public corporations Created to govern a portion of the State. Its purpose is for the general good and welfare (Sec. 3, Act 1456). 2. Private corporations Created for some private purpose, benefit, aim or end. It may either be stock nor non-stock, governmentowned or controlled, or quasi-public. 3. Publicly-listed corporations Private corporations whose stocks are listed in the PSE (Philippine Stock Exchange). SEC. 2. CORPORATION DEFINED Section 2. Corporation Defined. A corporation is an artificial being created by operation of law, having the right of succession, and the powers, attributes, and properties expressly authorized by law or incidental to its existence. This course is actually called Business Organizations II. But what will we be studying in this course? A: We will be studying about private corporations, as distinguished from public corporations. Examples: (1) San Miguel Corporation (2) Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company (3) SM Prime Holdings, Inc. Private corporations are different from public corporations in that the latter are created and governed by special charters. What is a public corporation? A: It is one created by the State either by general or special act for purposes of administration of local government or rendering services in the public interest. PRIVATE CORPORATION VS. PUBLIC CORPORATION PRIVATE CORPORATION Formed for a private purpose, benefit or end. PUBLIC CORPORATION Formed or organized to govern a portion of the State. Examples: 1. Municipalities 2. Provinces 3. Autonomous Regions such as the ARMM and the CAR What about Region 7? A: It is not a public corporation because its purpose is for geographical determination and there is no election of Regional Representatives. Its only purpose is for the clustering of the provinces forming part of that region. How about ARMM and CAR? A: These are autonomous regions that have their own governors and boards. These are public corporations. How do we define private corporations? A: They are corporations that are established for a private purpose or benefit. What do you think about PAGCOR? A: It is an artificial being. Does it have the right of succession? A: It has. The Philippine Airlines before was a private corporation. And it was government-owned. Now, it has been privatized. Meaning, the shares of stock of the government were sold to private persons. PAGCOR is a private corporation. 4. Quasi-public corporations Private corporations performing public functions. (Example: VECO) 5. Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations Private corporations created by the Congress through a special charter and the majority of its shareholdings are owned by the government. A GOCC has a personality of its own, separate and distinct from that of the government. Examples: (1) Development Bank of the Philippines (2) Philippine Ports Authority (3) Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (4) Land Bank of the Philippines (5) Manila International Airport Authority **NOTES: 1. The test to determine whether a GOCC or private corporation: if a corporation is created by its own charter for the exercise of a public function, then GOCC; if by incorporation under the general corporation law, then private corporation (Baluyot vs. Holganza, 2000) What about the Department of Education? A: It is not a public corporation. It is an instrumentality of the government under the Executive Branch. What is a government instrumentality? A: It is not a private or a public corporation, but an instrumentality of the government performing functions of a particular branch of the government. If the employees of a GOCC are illegally dismissed, where do they go? A: It depends on what is written on their special charter. They are not covered under the Revised Corporation Code, and they are also not covered in the Labor Code. Moreover, many of them are covered by the Civil Service Rules even if they are private corporations. Therefore, we have demonstrated the fact that private corporations may be? A: They can be private or government-controlled. Page 4 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law CONSEQUENCES OF BEING A CORPORATION What are the consequences of a corporation existing as an artificial being? A: (1) It has a separate and distinct personality from its members or shareholders, thus incurs separate liability (2) It enjoys rights separate from the stockholders (3) Properties of the corporation are separate from the properties of the stockholders. XPNs: (1) When the crime is punishable by a special law; Atty. Espedido: The special law must specify that it imposes penalties on the officers of the corporation. To be able to punish the officers, the law should specifically provide that in case the corporation becomes liable, the officers shall be directly punishable for the commission of the act or violation, and that they will suffer the penalty of imprisonment. Otherwise, they cannot be held liable. RIGHTS OF A CORPORATION What rights does a corporation have? A: (1) Constitutional rights (2) Civil rights (3) Economic rights (2) When the penalty imposed is a fine; A corporation can be made criminally liable by being made to pay a fine. Fines are not civil obligations, but are penalties. (3) When the corporation violates the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) Note: A corporation does not have political rights. Civil and Economic Rights: (1) Right to sue or be sued (2) Right to own and dispose of properties (3) Right to enter into contracts (4) Right to non-impairment of contracts Constitutional Rights: (1) Right to due process and equal protection of the law Section I, Article III of the Constitution “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the law.” (2) Right against unreasonable searches and seizure (3) Right against non-impairment of contracts (4) Right against self-incrimination Note: An artificial being has a separate set of rights from that of natural persons. Artificial persons enjoy certain rights that persons also enjoy, but not all rights. What rights can a corporation not exercise? A: (1) Political rights – for example, the right to vote and be voted for (2) Right to life – granted only personality in accordance to law (3) Right to liberty – a corporation is not a corporal being (it has no physical existence) which can be detained unlike a natural person. A corporation cannot move, and therefore it is impractical to send the corporation to jail. CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF A CORPORATION GEN: A corporation cannot be held criminally liable under the Revised Penal Code. Rationale: Crimes under the RPC have the element of intent which corporations are not capable of, as it has no mind of its own. As a creature of the law, its intention cannot be determined. It can also not be sent to jail because it has no corporal or physical existence. Penalties in the AMLA include: a. Suspension b. Revocation of license c. Fine PRINCIPLE OF LIBERALITY OF CONTRACTS Rule: Anyone can stipulate any provision in a contract as long as such provision is not contrary to law, morals, public policy, and public order. This right is enjoyed by both natural and juridical persons. Note: A corporation also enjoys the right to liberality of contracts. However, there is an additional condition: a corporation is not only bound by the limitations imposed under the principle of liberality of contracts, but is also bound by the provisions in the Articles of Incorporation. Thus, a corporation’s existence must be within the boundaries of the Revised Corporation Code and its Articles of Incorporation. Atty. Espedido: In other words, you cannot just say that you can enter into any contract under the principle of liberality of contracts but the contract must also be confined within the privilege granted by the State. Important: Although you can enter into any contract, your authority or power to enter into a contract must be confined within the authority granted to you by the State. LIABILITY OF CORPORATIONS IN CASE OF DEBT Consequence of having a separate juridical personality: The debts of the corporation cannot be demanded by the creditors against the stockholders. Stockholders cannot be held personally liable because their liability is limited to the extent of their investments. It is unlike a Partnership where the partners can be held personally liable. Reason: In a corporation, there is a veil of corporate fiction. The main difference between the two is that, while both partnership and corporation are juridical persons, the veil of corporate entity applies only to corporations. Page 5 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Illustration. A corporation incurred debts and its assets are not sufficient to pay its debts. Can the creditors demand payment from its stockholders? A: Generally, no. If the assets are not enough, it will be considered as losses on the part of the creditor. Atty. Espedido: In case the corporation incurs debts and their assets are no longer sufficient, the creditors may organize themselves and discuss the matter with the corporation. To aid the creditors for whatever is due to them, they could agree to pursue rehabilitation. In a rehabilitation, the assets of the corporation will be gathered. It will not be enough so the court will apply a receiver who will determine how the creditors will be paid. The receiver’s job is to settles as much as possible – keep the business of the Corporation going, such as appoint some managers, so that the business will continue, earn income, and such profits will be now distributed to the creditors. However, this may not be a one-time payment. They will now program the payment. In this manner, the creditors will be protected. VEIL OF CORPORATE FICTION A corporation has a separate and distinct personality from its shareholders, officers, and directors. Once said corporate fiction is created, the veil hides the stockholders such that when a corporation incurs liability, the stockholders are shielded from liability. In so far as the law is concerned, we are only dealing with the corporation. Otherwise, without the veil, would you still like to be a stockholder? Atty. Espedido: There is no point. In other words, that veil is the protection of the stockholders. Can the veil of corporate fiction be enjoyed by a partnership? A: No. While a corporation and a partnership are both juridical persons, the veil of corporate fiction only applies to corporations. PIERCING THE VEIL OF CORPORATE FICTION When can there be piercing of the veil of corporate fiction? A: When the corporate veil: (Memory Aid: PDFJ) 1. Defeats public convenience; 2. Is used to perpetuate fraud; 3. Is used to defend a crime; 4. Is used to justify a wrong. Illustration. Corporation A defrauds its creditors by transferring its assets to Corporation B Corporation A has five (5) stockholders. Corporation A incurred debts and has already received a demand letter. Corporation A is now anticipating that the creditor might proceed against their assets. Corporation A now created Corporation B and made it appear that the assets of Corporation A were already sold to Corporation B. When the sheriff came to attach the property of Corporation A, the sheriff was shown a document that the assets are sold to Corporation B. Do you think that the sheriff can go after Corporation B? A: Normally, the sheriff might be hesitant. The sheriff will not want to violate the rights of Corporation B. Atty. Espedido: But lawyers have a way of pursuing Corporation B. They can proceed to Corporation B by proving that the assets were actually owned by Corporation A through establishing that the stockholders of Corporation A are the same stockholders of Corporation B. Show that the assets were only transferred to defraud the creditors. So this is an instance when the corporate veil may be lifted. RELATIONSHIPS OF A CORPORATION When we organize or form a corporation, we will establish various relationships. Relationships are necessary. Relationships formed by a corporation (1) Relationship between Corporation and the Shareholders Which is why it is necessary to execute the Articles of Incorporation. It manages the relationship between the corporation and the shareholders. (2) Relationship among Shareholders themselves The articles and the law provide the regulation and monitors this relationship (3) Relationship between the Corporation and the State A corporation is created by the State. It is the state that granted the privilege; thus, it can also be withdrawn by the state. Therefore, you must be compliant with the provisions of the law. Any violation will cause the suspension or eventual revocation. (4) Relationship between the Corporation and the Public The public here includes the clients. In forming a corporation, your objective is to gather friends and people in order to get funds or ask for investments. Atty. Espedido: In forming a corporation, the main purpose is fundraising. Because when you do not have money or investments, it will be difficult to run a business. The easiest option is to borrow. But if you do not have financial assets, do you think the bank will lend to you? What will the bank require? Financial statements. The FS however will show that you have zero assets. No bank will lend to you. Because if the manager lends to you without collateral, he will lose his job. If you do not pay your debt, you might even be sent to jail because you defrauded the bank. On the other hand, if you form a corporation, even if you do not earn profits, can the investors demand payment from you? Are you obliged to return their money? A: No. By contributing money, they have exposed themselves to risk. In business, you do not guarantee profits. On the other hand, if you borrowed money from the bank and you cannot return it, there will be interest to be paid, compounded interest, and the bank may foreclose your property. Page 6 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A LENDER & AN INVESTOR LENDER No risk presumed INVESTOR Takes the risk because there is no guarantee of success or profits in business. Note: When you invest, you share opportunities. You share risks as well. What is the difference between an investor and a lender? A: The investor takes a risk. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CORPORATION AND STATE A corporation is a creation of the law. In other words, it is a privilege granted by the State. The term extended or granted by the state is subject to the condition that the corporation will comply with the reportorial requirements and behave within the bounds of the law. Otherwise, the State may revoke or cancel the license. It may also suspend and/or charge a fine. PARTNERSHIP VS CORPORATION Manner of Creation PARTNERSHIP Created by mere agreement of the parties CORPORATION Created by law or by operation of law No. of Incorporators At least 2 persons One Person Corporation Old law: at least 5 incorporators Commencement of Juridical Personality Moment of execution of the contract From the date of the issuance of the Certificate of Incorporation by the SEC The primary purpose of the corporation is to maintain, operate, run and manage a funeral parlor. May the corporation maintain, operate and manage a hospital instead? A: It cannot, because their agreement is to engage in a funeral business. Powers May exercise power authorized by the partners Exercise power only expressly granted by law or implied from those granted or incident to its existence What can the stockholder do? A: Even if the Board of Directors (BOD) want to have a hospital, they cannot immediately do so if the Articles of Incorporation is not amended. The stockholders must ratify it, and there should be an amendment of the Articles of Incorporation Management Absence of any agreement, every partner is an agent of the partnership Power to do business is vested in the Board of Directors or Board of Trustees Effect of Mismanagement Partner can sue a co-partner Suit against the member of the BOD or BOT must be in the name of the corporation Rights of Succession No right of succession Has right of succession Extent of Liability to 3rd Persons Liable personally and subsidiarily for partnership debts to 3rd persons Stockholders are liable only to the extent of their investments as represented by the shares subscribed by them Transferability of Interest Needs consent of all partners (based on delectus personarum) Without prior consent of other stockholders Term of Existence Any period of time Perpetual Atty. Espedido: Nobody can guarantee success. But more or less, if there is hard work and perseverance, success follows. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A CORPORATION & THE SHAREHOLDERS The relationship between the corporation and the stockholders is well established in the Articles of Incorporation (AOI). The AOI is considered as the contract or agreement of the Corporation and the Stockholders. Since this is their agreement, the AOI binds their relationship and regulates their relationship. Illustration. A funeral parlor is turned into a hospital The moment the corporation intends to pursue another business, the stockholder may ask for an amendment of the Articles of Incorporation to reflect such changes. Otherwise, the contract will be violated. Note: Amending the Articles of Incorporation is basically amending the contract between the shareholders and the corporation. RELATIONSHIP AMONG SHAREHOLDERS THEMSELVES This is still an agreement among themselves. This can be found in their by-laws. Content of the By-Laws of the Corporation (1) How many boards and officers will be elected (2) Term of office (3) Functions and Powers (4) Manner of election (5) When will the stockholders and/or board meet (6) Definition of various types of shares (7) Etc. Page 7 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Old law: 50 years and extendible for another 50 years cash dividends, it will also be an income of the shareholder and such are taxable income of the shareholder. (2) Less participation in the management of the business Shareholders only have an indirect participation in the management of the corporation o “Indirect” – means that the management of the corporation is entrusted to the Board of Directors. The only participation of the stockholders in the management is the election of the Board of Directors. Firm Name For limited partnership, requires LTD in its name May adopt any name as long as it is not the same or similar to other registered firm name Dissolution May be dissolved anytime by the will of any or all partners Dissolved only with consent of the State Civil Code Governed by a general law which is the Revised Corporation Code or a special charter Governing Laws Why is management in a corporation better? A: 1. There are fewer members, and as a result, it is easier to convene and communicate, while in a partnership, “everyone talks”. 2. Management is vested on persons with expertise. Basic Distinction The veil of corporate fiction only applies to corporations, and is not to sole proprietorships or partnerships. Atty. Espedido: A corporation, such as a One Person Corporation (OPC) enjoys the veil of corporate fiction and a limited liability, whereas a sole proprietorship’s liability may not be limited at all. One of the requirements for an OPC to exist is to declare how much capital he intends so that his liability will be based on that capital. He must prove that he has separated that capital from his personal funds, that the amount declared as capital for the corporation has been separated from the personal funds. Unless he can do that, he will be liable as a sole proprietor. ADVANTAGES OF A CORPORATION (1) More capitalization (2) Limited liability (the veil of corporate fiction applies to corporations) (3) Right of succession (upon the death of a stockholder, the heir becomes the new stockholder which provides stability for the business to continue) (4) Transferability of interest – does not require the consent of the other stockholders (5) Easier management – management is centralized in the Board of Directors (3) No delectus personae A shareholder will be investing in the business with people he doesn’t know; there is no personal touch; there is delectus personae. (4) Dissolution Dissolution is granted by the State, unlike in a partnership which can be dissolved anytime. The dissolution of a corporation requires the consent of the State because it is embued with public interest. (5) Greater degree of government control and supervision (6) Difficulty of organization Organizing a corporation requires a high cost of formation and operations Summary of Differences between a Partnership and Corporation (Note: Only these were highlighted during recitation) Manner of Creation PARTNERSHIP Created by mere agreement of the parties CORPORATION Created by law or by operation of law Commencement of Juridical Personality Moment of execution of the contract From the date of the issuance of the Certificate of Incorporation by the SEC Management Absence of any agreement, every partner is an agent of the partnership Power to do business is vested in the Board of Directors or Board of Trustees Rights of Succession No right succession Has right succession Extent of Liability to 3rd Persons Liable personally and subsidiarily for partnership debts to 3rd persons Stockholders are liable only to the extent of their investments as represented by the shares subscribed by them Transferability of Interest Needs consent of all partners (based on delectus personarum) Without prior consent of other stockholders DISADVANTAGES OF A CORPORATION (1) Higher income tax liability The profits of the corporation is taxed twice: corporate income tax and income tax on the stockholders for the dividends Illustration. When the corporation acquires income, it will be subjected to corporate income tax. When it is distributed to the shareholder as of of Page 8 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Atty. Espedido: The life of the corporation begins in the issuance of the Certificate of Incorporation issued by the SEC. CONTENTS OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION (1) Name of the Corporation (2) Purpose (a) Primary Purpose – main business Example: Operate and establish the best funeral parlor of all time and name it “Libing Things” (b) Secondary purpose – may refer to incidental or related products or activities (3) Nature of the business (4) Term – perpetual term; you could exist for as long as you wish. If you want to stop, just dissolve it along the way (5) Address – Purpose: In order that the SEC will know where to send notices or serve you summons (6) Names of the Stockholders (7) Names of the Incorporators Note: Incorporators may now be juridical persons so long as they present appropriate authority. (Old law: only natural persons) (8) Capital Structure of the Corporation CAPITAL STRUCTURE Three levels of capital structure: (1) Authorized Capital Stock (ACS) – the maximum amount that a corporation intends to invest on a business (2) Subscribed Capital Stock (SCS) – the number of shares a stockholder intends to invest in the corporation which he commits himself to pay – it is the committed investment of the stockholder (3) Paid-Up Capital – stock actually paid for by the stockholders; it is the initial amount that the stockholders are obliged to pay. This is the initial amount that shall be used in starting the corporation. If you are a new corporation, how much should be subscribed? A: The Revised Corporation Code does not require a minimum subscribed capital stock. Reason: To attract the formation of more business organizations. XPN: However, the the 25% subscribed capital stock is compulsory when there is an increase in the capital stock. Thus, it requires that at least 25% must be subscribed, and 25% must be paid-up. A/N: Under the Old Corporation Code, newly formed corporations were required to have 25% of their ACS subscribed, of this subscribed capital stock, 25% must be paid-up (paid-up capital stock). However, this requirement has now been removed under the Revised Corporation Code. Note: You do not have to pay the subscription immediately. The balance or may be due or payable later. When will the balance be due? A: It depends on the Board. The Board may indicate the date when the balance will be due or will simply announce or make a call on the balance. How is it paid? A: The paid-up capital may either be done in cash or property equivalent to the amount you intend to pay. If payment is through property, how will the equivalent of the property be determined? A: (1) The value will be determined through an appraisal. (a) The SEC will send an appraiser OR (b) You will be required to submit an appraisal report of your property done by a duly accredited appraiser, together with the Articles of Incorporation, to the SEC. (2) The SEC personnel will verify WON the paid-up capital has been deposited to the bank in addition to the certified bank deposit, which shall accompany the Articles of Incorporation. (3) The treasurer’s affidavit will indicate that at least 25% of the subscribed capital has been paid, OR under the present code, there will be now a verification. (Does not necessarily by the treasurer but some other officers of the corporation, indicating among others that at least 25% of the subscriptions have been paid and that it was made with cash or properties. APPLICATION WITH THE SEC Atty. Espedido: More or less these are the contents of an Article of Incorporation. You may submit this to the SEC. (1) Verification – The SEC will go over your Article of Incorporation and verify the name. Before you submit your Articles of Incorporation, you have to confirm or verify the name that you intend to use. Otherwise if the SEC discovers that somebody is already using the same name, SEC might deny or return to you your papers and come up with another name. To save time, they require you to give 3 alternative names. SEC is free to choose from those 3 alternative names. (2) Issuance of the Certificate of Incorporation – If all the requisites are in order, the SEC will issue the Certificate of Incorporation. That is the official document that will give the birth of your corporation. Once you receive this, all the stockholders will be convened and we will have the first stockholders meeting. STEPS AFTER THE BIRTH OF THE CORPORATION (1) Organization meeting of the stockholders The main agenda is the election of the Board. (2) Meeting of the Board of Directors, Election of Officers Once the Board of Directors are elected, they could adjourn the stockholders meeting and the directors themselves will now hold its first Board Meeting. Page 9 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law In that meeting, they will elect the officers based on the ballots (President, Chairman, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer). If they may want to, they will select the COO (child of the owner). RIGHT OF SUCCESSION If a stockholder or a member dies, withdraws, is insolvent, or suffers incapacity, the corporation will still continue and not be dissolved. When all the stockholders die, the heirs will become stockholders. The rights, as well as the interests of the deceased stockholders will now be transferred to the heirs at the moment of death because succession starts at the moment of the death of the deceased person. POWERS, ATTRIBUTES, PROPERTIES These rights may be determined in the Articles of Incorporation, the Corporation Code, and the By-Laws. These are the sources of rights and obligations of the stockholders. Illustration 1. Transportation Company + Big building for Garage If you are a transportation company, you are managing, operating, and maintaining a fleet of buses. What do you think your powers could be? A: Demand fare. You have the power to pursue and engage in the business of transportation Your neighbors are complaining because your business is transportation, but you also own a big building. Do you think you can maintain a big building as a garage? A: Yes, it is allowed. Maintaining a big building is incidental to the business. Illustration 2. Cement Factory + Electricity You are operating a cement factory. It requires a big volume of power, so much that the services of VECO may not be enough, prompting you now to maintain your own power plant. You now have your own power plant within the cement factory. You have officers and employees residing within your cement factory. Because you have extra power for your cement factory, you started selling this extra power to your EEs inside the compound. If you are VECO, do you have a reason to complain? A: The best approach would be to ask the EEs who they would want to provide electricity for them. They will definitely side with the cement factory because the rates are subsidized. The corporation may argue that it is not doing business per se but only providing assistance to their EEs – extending facilities to their EEs. Illustration 3. USC + Dance lessons after class After class hours, the entire school will be vacated. The best way to succeed is to maximize the use of assets. Thus, the priests hired dancing instructors and offered dancing lessons to interested matrons and engaged the services of macho dancing instructors. At least they can earn some more for two (2) hours. Can they engage in maintaining and operating a dancing school? A: No, because this is not incidental. Offering academic courses is the principal purpose of USC. Thus, the dancing school is beyond its purpose. Illustration 4. Mining Company + Postal Service There was a mining company in the mountain and to travel from the mining site from the big city was very difficult. So the EEs communicated with their families through mail (no cellphones at this time). The mails were carried by the company facilities and delivered to the city. The EEs requested that their mails could be coursed through the company parcels. The company agreed for it is for the benefit of the EEs provided that the EEs will make payment – a subsidized mailing payment. LBC complained because the mining company is now engaged in delivering parcels and mails. There is now a competition between the company engaged in mining and the company carrying parcels. What do you think? A: SC said that it is still incidental because at that time, transportation was very difficult, no more cellphones or any other mode of communication. Illustration 5. Railroad Company + Buying Tracts of Land A railroad company was buying tracts of land where they could install their railings. Somebody complained that they cannot expropriate since the company’s power is merely to engage in railroad business. They argued that the company cannot compel owners to sell their land to the company because only the government has the power to do so. SC Ruling: The buying of the lands is for the furtherance of the business of the railroad. It is incidental to being a railroad company. Atty. Espedido: These are some of the several illustrations of primary powers and incidental powers. Important: So long as you can justify that the act is incidental to the main purpose, you are allowed to execute such power. Page 10 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law EFFECT OF INCOMPLETE INCORPORATION PAPERS Rule: Failure to acquire or comply with the requirements for an issuance of a Certificate of Incorporation does not justify making it into a partnership. Atty: Espedido: If the papers are not in order, the SEC will not issue a Certificate of Incorporation. The incorporators will have to make the necessary corrections. If the incorporators will not comply, the SEC will have to deny the issuance of a Certificate of Incorporation. The incorporators cannot engage in business as a corporation. They also cannot argue that they are now a partnership because the intention is not to pursue a partnership but to organize a corporation. (I) As to its nationality** 1. Philippine national 2. Foreign corporation (A) AS TO PURPOSE (1) Public Corporation created to govern a portion of a State (2) Private Corporation – created for private ends (a) Publicly listed – private corporations that are publicly listed in the Philippine Stock Exchange which means their shares can be bought and sold on the PSE Examples: San Miguel Corporation, Ayala Land Corporation (b) Quasi-Public Corporations – private corporations performing public functions Example: VECO providing electricity SEC. 3. CLASSES OF CORPORATIONS Section 3. Classes of Corporations. Corporations formed or organized under this Code may be stock or nonstock corporations. Stock corporations are those which have capital stock divided into shares and are authorized to distribute to the holders of such shares, dividends, or allotments of the surplus profits on the basis of the shares held. All other corporations are nonstock corporations. VARIOUS TYPES OF CORPORATIONS (Outline) (A) As to purpose 1. Public Corporation 2. Private Corporation (a) Publicly Listed (b) Quasi-Public (c) Government Owned and Controlled Corporation (GOCC) (B) Under the Revised Corporation Code 1. Stock Corporation 2. Non-Stock Corporation (C) As to number of corporators 1. Corporation Sole 2. One Person Corporation 3. Corporation Aggregate (D) Whether it is Open or Close 1. Open Corporation 2. Close Corporation (E) As to Legal or Corporate Existence 1. De jure corporation 2. De facto corporation (F) Whether it is for a religions purpose or not 1. Ecclesiastical Corporation 2. Lay Corporation (G) As to Formation 1. Domestic Corporation 2. Foreign Corporation (H) As to their relation to another corporation 1. Holding or Parent Corporation 2. Subsidiary Corporation 3. Affiliated Corporation (c) Government Owned and Controlled Corporations (GOCC) – created by Congress through a special charter for which the government is the majority stockholder Examples: PAGCOR, Landbank of the Philippines, SSS, GSIS (B) UNDER THE REVISED CORPORATION CODE (1) Stock Corporation Those which have capital stock divided into shares and are authorized to distribute to the holders of such shares, dividends, or allotments of the surplus profits on the basis of the shares held. It has capital stocks divided into shares and distributed to the holders. A stock corporation is also considered as a corporation for profit. Purpose of dividing shares: Determine the share in the profits. (2) Non-Stock Corporation All other corporations; they do not issue shares and do not distribute profits to its members. However, they still own profits for expenditures and to improve their facilities. They cannot distribute the profits to its members. They have to plough this back to the corporation for the benefit of the members in terms of improvement of facilities. (C) AS TO NUMBER OF CORPORATORS (1) Corporation Sole – one member or corporator; for purely religious purposes (2) One Person Corporation – one member or corporator also but not limited to purely religious purposes (3) Corporation Aggregate – consisting of more than one corporator or member Basis why the State is liberal in the establishment of religious corporations as a corporation sole: Constitutional right to Freedom of Religion and Separation of Powers between the Church and the State. Atty. Espedido: Any attempt of preventing anyone from exercising his religion, from establishing his own church, can be Page 11 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law considered as a violation to his freedom of religion. Thus, the State would just want to know where you are located and the funds that the church has earned. (F) WHETHER IT IS FOR A RELIGIONS PURPOSE OR NOT (1) Ecclesiastical Corporation for religious purposes Notes: Corporation sole – one formed for the purpose of administering and managing, as trustee, the affairs, property and temporalities of any religions denomination, sect, or church, by the chief archbishop, bishop, priest, rabbi, or other presiding elder of such religious denomination, sect or church. (D) AS TO WHETHER IT IS OPEN OR CLOSE (1) Open Corporation open to any person who may wish to become shareholders. Most of these are publicly listed. (2) Close Corporation limited to selected persons or members of a family. This qualification is contained in the Articles of Incorporation (AOI) and the Stock Certificate. The stock certificate indicates that these holders shall not be allowed to dispose the shares UNLESS he offers it to the existing holders first. IOW, it cannot be an absolute prohibition. Otherwise, it will violate the right of an owner which includes the right to own, right to possess, and right to dispose. Relative Prohibition – you are required to offer this to existing stockholders. Only when there are no existing stockholders that would buy that you can sell it to others. Atty. Espedido: Disqualifications on the sale of shares of a close corporation can be found in the articles of incorporation, or in the certificates of stock. For example, in the Stock Certificate, you may place a qualification that “The holder of these shares cannot sell these shares UNLESS the existing holders exercise their right of first refusal xxx” Note: Close corporation – one whose articles of incorporation provide that: 1. All issued stock, exclusive of treasury shares, shall be held by persons not exceeding 20; 2. All issued stock shall be subject to one or more specified restrictions on transfer; and 3. The corporation shall not list in any stock exchange or make any public offering of its stock of any class. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a corporation shall not be deemed a close corporation when at least 2/3 of its voting stock or voting rights is owned or controlled by another corporation which is not a close corporation. (E) AS TO LEGAL OR CORPORATE EXISTENCE (1) De jure corporation corporation existing in fact or in law (2) De facto corporation existing in fact but not in law (2) Lay Corporation purpose other than religion **Other types of religious/charitable corporations: (3) Corporation Sole incorporated by one person a corporation formed for the purpose of administering and managing, as trustee, the affairs, properties and temporalities of any religious denomination, sect or church, by the chief archbishop, bishop, priest, rabbi or other presiding elder of such religious denomination, sect or church. A corporation sole has no nationality but for the purpose of applying nationalization laws, nationality is determined not by the nationality of its presiding elder, but by the nationality of the its members constituting the sect in the Philippines. o Thus, the Roman Catholic Church can acquire lands in the Philippines even if it is headed by the Pope (Roman Catholic Apostolic, et. al. vs. Register of Deeds of Davao City, G.R. No. L-8451) (4) Corporation Aggregate (Religious Society) A religious organization incorporated by more than one person (5) Eleemosynary Corporation One organized for a charitable purpose (G) AS TO FORMATION (1) Domestic Corporation a corporation formed, organized or existing under the laws of the Philippines. (2) Foreign Corporation formed under any laws other than those of the Philippines (H) AS TO THEIR RELATION TO ANOTHER CORPORATION (1) Parent Corporation corporation which holds ownership of various corporations, thereby having control over such corporations. It has the capacity to elect or control other corporations. ** A holding company is a parent corporation which has no other business aside from the holding of the shares of its subsidiaries, which it controls (2) Subsidiary Corporation owned and controlled by the holding or parent corporation. The holding corporation elects the Board of Directors (BOD) for the subsidiary. (3) Affiliated Corporation those related to the parent corporation or subsidiary corporation Page 12 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law **(I) AS TO NATIONALITY **NOTES: What is the difference between an affiliate and a subsidiary? A: The difference lies in the level of ownership of the parent company in a certain corporation. The terms “affiliate” and “associate” corporation are used synonymously to describe a company whose parent only possesses a minority stake in the ownership of the company. On the other hand, a subsidiary is a business whose parent holds a majority stake or is a majority shareholder of 50% or more of all shares. Some subsidiaries are even wholly owned, meaning the parent corporation owns 100% of the subsidiary. PLACE OF INCORPORATION TEST: Where the corporation was created: (1) Domestic Corporation (2) Foreign Corporation CITIZENSHIP OF STOCKHOLDERS (1) Philippine National 100% owned by the Filipino citizens, even if incorporated abroad. Sec. 3, Foreign Investment Act of 1991 (R.A. 7042): Definition: The term "Philippine national" shall mean a citizen of the Philippines or a domestic partnership or association wholly owned by citizens of the Philippines; or a corporation organized under the laws of the Philippines of which at least sixty percent (60%) of the capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote is owned and held by citizens of the Philippines; or a trustee of funds for pension or other employee retirement or separation benefits, where the trustee is a Philippine national and at least sixty (60%) of the fund will accrue to the benefit of the Philippine nationals: Provided, That where a corporation and its non-Filipino stockholders own stocks in a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registered enterprise, at least sixty percent (60%) of the capital stocks outstanding and entitled to vote of both corporations must be owned and held by citizens of the Philippines and at least sixty percent (60%) of the members of the Board of Directors of both corporations must be citizens of the Philippines, in order that the corporations shall be considered a Philippine national. (4) Sister Company fellow subsidiary with respect to another subsidiary; both owned by the parent corporation Although performing other activities, these activities are very much related or part of the other companies (e.g. they are part of the supply chain perhaps). Thus, if the owner of the company creates another corporation related to the other corporation, then it can be considered sister companies. Illustration. A trucking company is engaged in hauling products. The owner noted that the products are brought to various warehouses that are owned by other people. Thus, the owner of the logistics company decided to construct a warehouse. The owner of the trucking company also convinced the producer and the manufacturer that he can assign someone to monitor the products. Thus, a third business was made – Warehouse Management. The owner also created another one as a marketing arm, thus a Sales Force company. Summary: So the Trucking Company here is the parent corporation, and it owns the subsidiaries: (1) Warehouse Company for leasing, a (2) Warehouse Management and a (3) Sales Force Company. These various businesses, in relation to each other, are called sister companies and would constitute a complete chain – they are related to each other. Another example: Aboitiz Company as the owner of Union Bank, VECO, real estate, and many other activities. So these are the subsidiaries of Aboitiz – the more generic term would be affiliates. (2) Foreign-owned corporation Majority of the stockholdings are owned by foreigners, even if incorporated in the Philippines. TESTS TO DETERMINE CITIZENSHIP OF STOCKHOLDERS (Applies when the corporation is not 100% owned by Filipino citizens) A. Control Test At least 60% of the outstanding capital stock which are entitled to vote are owned by Filipino citizens B. Grandfather Rule If the percentage of Filipino ownership is less than 60%, then only the number of shares corresponding to such percentage shall be counted as Philippine nationality. Narra Nickel vs. Redmont The control test is still the prevailing mode of determining whether or not a corporation is a Filipino corporation, within the ambit of Sec. 2, Art. II of the 1987 Constitution. When in the mind of the Court there is doubt, based on the attendant facts and circumstances of the case or in the 60-40 Filipino equity ownership, then it may apply the Grandfather Rule. Page 13 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law What do you mean by “doubt”? A: “Doubt” is any circumstance which renders the beneficial ownership and control of the corporation outside of Filipino ownership. It is not when a corporation’s Filipino ownership falls below 60%. Where does the 60% requirement apply to, the voting shares or the outstanding shares? Atty. Gaviola: The interpretation wherein the SC said that the restriction must apply to each type of share (Gamboa vs. Teves, G.R. 176579) is the correct interpretation. This is because when you say outstanding capital stock entitled to vote, that is very general. You cannot say that preferred stocks are not entitled to vote in the election of directors. Only when they are deemed non-voting expressly can they be deprived of their right to vote, but only in the election of directors. For all the other items enumerated in the RCC, they are required to vote. A/N: This was lifted from the IBL class of Atty. Gaviola. **NOTES NATIONALIZED ACTIVITY This is determined by looking at the Foreign Investment Negative List (FINL), which enumerates activities which are limited to or reserved for Filipinos. It is a list of economic activities whose foreign ownership is limited to a maximum of 40% of the equity capital. Of the enterprise engaged therein. If the activity is listed, then that activity can be performed even by a corporation which is 100% foreign-owned, even if such corporation was incorporated in the Philippines. Sec. 8 of RA 7042 (Foreign Investments Act of 1991) enumerates the activities that are limited to Filipinos. These activities include, but are not limited to: 1. Natural resources exploration, development and use; 2. Public utility corporations; 3. Land ownership; 4. Educational institutions; and 5. Advertising companies. Atty. Gaviola: It is an erroneous belief among foreigners and their attorneys that they need Filipino stockholders in order to incorporate in the Philippines. Get rid of the notion that you need to have citizenship in order to incorporate because to be an incorporator, all that is required is to be a resident. In fact, only a majority need to be residents. Take note that a domestic corporation can be foreign-owned. This happens when a corporation incorporated in the Philippines is composed of foreigners. In the same way, a foreign corporation can be considered a Philippine national when 100% of its capital stock or its stockholders are Filipino citizens. CORPORATE LAYERING This is a type of arrangement whereby a corporation has for its stockholder another corporation. (i.e. Corporation B is the stockholder of Corporation A). This is not a circumvention of the law. It is a valid structure UNLESS it is established that it is used to truly circumvent the law or the Constitution. Basis: The Foreign Investment Act, where it only requires that 60% of the investee corporation and investor corporation’s outstanding capital stock entitled to vote be owned by Filipino citizens, and that at least 60% of their Board of Directors should be composed of Filipino citizens. SEC. 4. CORPORATIONS CREATED BY SPECIAL LAWS OR CHARTERS Section 4. Corporations Created by Special Laws or Charters. – Corporations created by special laws or charters shall be governed primarily by the provisions of the special law or charter creating or applicable to them, supplemented by the provisions of this Code, insofar as they are applicable. SEC. 5. CORPORATORS AND INCORPORATORS, STOCKHOLDERS AND MEMBERS Section 5. Corporators and Incorporators, Stockholders and Members. – Corporators are those who compose a corporation, whether as stockholders or shareholders in a stock corporation or as members in a nonstock corporation. Incorporators are those stockholders or members mentioned in the articles of incorporation as originally forming and composing the corporation and who are signatories thereof. PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE ORGANIZATION OF A CORPORATION Who are the persons involved in the organization of a corporation? A: They are: (1) Incorporators (4) Promoters (2) Corporators (5) Underwriters (3) Board of Directors/ (6) Founders Trustees INCORPORATORS Incorporators are the organizers of the corporation upon its inception. They are mentioned in the AOI as originally forming and composing the corporation, and who are signatories thereof. Under the New Code, juridical persons can now be incorporators. Under the Old Code, only natural persons can be incorporators. CORPORATORS Corporators are those who fund the corporation. These refer to the stockholders, investors, and incorporators themselves. They are people who have interest over the corporation. Stockholders – in a stock corporation Members – in a non-stock corporation BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR TRUSTEES The Board of Directors or Board of Trustees are the group of people who manage the corporation. Page 14 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law PROMOTERS Promoters are persons who, acting alone, or with others, take initiative in founding and organizing the business or enterprise of the issuer and received consideration thereof (Sec. 3.10, RA 8799, The Securities Regulation Code) **NOTES: An underwriter is any party that evaluates and assumes another party’s risk for a fee. The fee is often a commission, premium, spread, or interest. Underwriting services are provided by some large financial institutions, such as banks, or insurance or investment houses, whereby they guarantee payment in case of damage or financial loss and accept the financial risk for liability arising from such guarantee. An underwriting arrangement may be created in a number of situations including insurance, issues of security in a public offering, and bank lending, among others. LIABILITY OF THE PROMOTER FOUNDERS GEN: The promoter binds himself personally and assumes the responsibility of looking to the proposed corporation for reimbursement. The founders are those who came about the idea – they are the think tanks of the corporation. The promoters promote the corporation itself. They convince the people to invest. They tell the people that they are organizing such corporation. However, they are not committed to buy the shares, and are purely salesmen. **NOTES: XPNs: 1. 2. Express or implied agreement to the contrary Novation, not merely adoption or ratification, of the contract LIABILITY OF THE CORPORATION FOR THE PROMOTER’S ACTS GEN: A corporation is not bound by the contract. A corporation, until organized, has no life and no legal existence. It could not have had an agent (the promoter) who could legally bind it. XPNs: A corporation may be bound by the contract if it makes the contract its own by: 1. 2. 3. Adoption or ratification of the entire contract after corporation Acceptance of the benefits under the contract with knowledge of the terms thereof Performance of its obligation under the contract Note: The contract must of course be one which is within the powers of the corporation to enter. UNDERWRITERS Underwriters are mostly banking companies. As distinguished from promoters who have no commitment since they simply promote, underwriters have commitment such that they guarantee the sale of stocks and if these were not sold, they will be the ones who will buy the shares. The underwriters therefore assume liability. Example: The underwriters commit that 60% of the stocks will be bought. If they cannot sell such committed shares, they will guarantee that they will buy such stocks themselves. What are roadshows? A: Roadshows are usually done by big corporations. If you want to promote the formation of a corporation, you may conduct a roadshow. You go around the country or the world and do a roadshow. You tell them about the corporation and the business, and convince them to join – usually accompanied by the underwriters who help convince. As a matter of fact, they are given privilege. They are entitled to an exclusive right to vote and be voted for, but limited for 5 years only from date of inception of the Corporation. What is the purpose of having the exclusive right to vote and be voted for? A: To ensure that the corporation will eventually succeed because they are the ones who envisioned the Corporation. They have the idea of how the business shall proceed. Thus, the laws provide that for a period of 5 years or less – they have the right to vote and be voted upon. NO ONE ELSE have the right to nominate and elect. This is used to guide the infant corporation. The certificate of the founders’ shares defines the privilege that the holders of this share shall have. **Notes on Founders’ Shares Changes in founder’s share expressly provided that the exclusive right to vote and be voted on founders share in the election of directors should not violate the Anti-Dummy Law and the Foreign Investments Act. Anti-Dummy Law Persons not allowed to have an interest in nationalized corporations often just nominate Filipino citizens to be legal stockholders when in reality, it is the prohibited persons who are actually controlling the corporation. This is a violation of the AntiDummy Law, and is a criminal offense. SEC. 6. CLASSIFICATION OF SHARES Section 6. Classification of Shares. – The classification of shares, their corresponding privileges, or restrictions, and their stated par value, if any, must be indicated in the articles of incorporation. Each share shall be equal in all respects to every other share, except as otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation and in the certificate of stock. The shares in stock corporations may divided into classes or series of shares, or both. No share may be deprived of voting rights except those classified and issued as “preferred” or “redeemable” shares, unless otherwise provided in this Code: Provided, That there shall always be a class or series of shares with complete voting rights. Page 15 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Holders of nonvoting shares shall nevertheless be entitled to vote on the following matters: (a) Amendment of the articles of incorporation; (b) Adoption and amendment of bylaws; (c) Sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the corporate property; (d) Incurring, creating, or increasing bonded indebtedness; (e) Increase or decrease of authorized capital stock; (f) Merger or consolidation of the corporation with another corporation or other corporations; (g) Investment of corporate funds in another corporation or business in accordance with this Code; and (h) Dissolution of the corporation. Except as provided in the immediately preceding paragraph, the vote required under this Code to approve a particular corporate act shall be deemed to refer only to stocks with voting rights. The shares or series of shares may or may not have a par value: Provided, That banks, trust, insurance, and preneed companies, public utilities, building and loan associations, and other corporations authorized to obtain or access funds from the public whether publicly listed or not, shall not be permitted to issue no-par value shares of stock. Preferred shares of stock issued by a corporation may be given preference in the distribution of dividends and in the distribution of corporate assets in case of liquidation, or such other preferences: Provided, That preferred shares of stock may be issued only with a stated par value. The board of directors, where authorized in the articles of incorporation, may fix the terms and conditions of preferred shares of stock or any series thereof: Provided, further, That such terms and conditions shall be effective upon filing of a certificate thereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereinafter referred to as the "Commission". Shares of capital stock issued without par value shall be deemed fully paid and nonassessable and the holder of such shares shall not be liable to the corporation or to its creditors in respect thereto: Provided, That no-par value shares must be issued for a consideration of at least Five pesos (₱5.00) per share: Provided, further, That the entire consideration received by the corporation for its no-par value shares shall be treated as capital and shall not be available for distribution as dividends. A corporation may further classify its shares for the purpose of ensuring compliance with constitutional or legal requirements. SEC. 7. FOUNDERS’ SHARES Section 7. Founders’ Shares. – Founders’ shares may be given certain rights and privileges not enjoyed by the owners of other stock. Where the exclusive right to vote and be voted for in the election of directors is granted, it must be for a limited period not to exceed five (5) years from the date of incorporation: Provided, That such exclusive right shall not be allowed if its exercise will violate Commonwealth Act No. 108, otherwise known as the "Anti-Dummy Law"; Republic Act No. 7042, otherwise known as the "Foreign Investments Act of 1991"; and otherwise known as "Foreign Investments Act of 1991"; and other pertinent laws. SEC. 8. REDEEMABLE SHARES Section 8. Redeemable Shares. - Redeemable shares may be issued by the corporation when expressly provided in the articles of incorporation. They are shares which may be purchased by the corporation. They are shares which may be purchased by the corporation from the holders of such shares upon the expiration of a fixed period, regardless of the existence of unrestricted retained earnings in the books of the corporation, and upon such other terms and conditions stated in the articles of incorporation and the certificate of stock representing the shares, subject to rules and regulations issued by the Commission. SEC. 9. TREASURY SHARES Section 9. Treasury Shares. - Treasury shares are shares of stock which have been issued and fully paid for, but subsequently reacquired by the issuing corporation through purchase, redemption, donation, or some other lawful means. Such shares may again be disposed of for a reasonable price fixed by the board of directors. What are “shares”? A: Shares represent the interest or the investment of a stockholder in a corporation. **NOTES: The terms “share” or “stock” may be used interchangeably to refer to shares of stock in a corporation. A share of stock is a unit of division of the capital stock of a corporation. The stock represents: 1. The right interest or right of the stockholder in the management of the corporation through the exercise of his voting rights; 2. The interest or right of the stockholder in the earnings of the corporation in the form of the dividends to be distributed (for a discussion on dividends, see Sec. 42); and 3. The interest or right of the stockholder in the residual assets of the corporation upon its dissolution. A stockholder may own a share even if he is not holding a certificate of stock How do we classify shares? A: Shares are classified as: (1) Common shares (2) Preferred shares (3) Par value shares (4) No-par value shares (5) Founder’s shares (6) Redeemable shares (7) Treasury shares (8) Convertible shares (9) Voting shares (10) Non-voting shares (11) Shares in escrow DOCTRINE OF EQUALITY OF SHARES Each share shall be equal in all respects to every other share, except as otherwise provided in the AOI and stated in the certificate of stock. Page 16 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law **OTHER IMPORTANT PRINCIPLES TO REMEMBER (1) Authorized Capital Stock Refers to the amount of capital stock as specified in the AOI. Additional shares may not be issued unless the AOI is amended by the vote of the stockholders. However, unissued authorized shares may be issued at a later date without amendment of the AOI or approval of the shareholders. (2) Subscribed Capital Stock It is the amount of capital stock subscribed (purchased), whether fully paid or not. It connotes an original subscription contract for the acquisition by a subscriber of unissued shares in a corporation and would, therefore, preclude the acquisition of shares by reason of subsequent transfer from a stockholder or resale of treasury shares. (3) Outstanding Capital Stock It is the portion of the capital stock which is issued and held by persons other than the corporation itself. (4) Paid-up Capital Stock The portion of the subscribed/outstanding capital stock that has been fully paid. (5) Unissued Capital Stock That portion of the capital stock that is not issued or subscribed. It cannot vote, and draws no dividends. (6) Legal Capital It is the amount equal to the aggregate part value and/or issued value of the outstanding capital stock. When par value shares are issued above par, the share premium or excess is not considered as a part of the legal capital. In the case of no-par value shares, the entire consideration received forms part of the legal capital, and shall not be available for distribution as dividends. (7) Shareholder’s Equity (Subscribed Capital) That portion of the capital of the corporation that is composed of all the investments that the subscribers put in (meaning, for stock corporations issuing par value shares at a price above par, the share premium is included). It is also known as the subscribed capital of the corporation. COMMON VS. PREFERRED SHARES COMMON SHARES Entitle the holders to a pro rata share in the profits of the corporation without preference over the other stockholders. They are given voting rights **The most common type of shares, which enjoy no preference, but the owners thereof are entitled to management of the corporation (via the exclusive right to vote), and to equal pro-rata division of profits after preference. It represents a residual ownership interest in the corporation. PREFERRED SHARES Shares having certain rights and privileges not available to holders of common shares. **NOTES: Stocks which are given preference by the issuing corporation in: (1) Distribution of dividends; (2) Distribution of the assets of the corporation in case of liquidation; or (3) Such other preferences as may be stated in the AOI which do not violate the Code. Unless the right to vote is clearly withheld, a preferred stockholder would have such right as it is incident to stock ownership. Limitations: 1. Preferred shares can only be issued with par value 2. Preferred shares must be stated in the AOI and in the COS. 3. The BOD may fix the terms and conditions only when so authorized by the AOI, and such terms and conditions shall be effective upon the filing of a certificate with the SEC. **PREFERENCE AS TO DIVIDENDS Participating vs. Non-participating Those which, after getting their fixed dividend preference, share with the Participating common stocks with the rest of the dividends. Those which, after getting their fixed Nondividend preference, have no more participating right to share in the remaining dividends with the common stocks. Unless otherwise provided, preferred shares are deemed non-participating. Cumulative vs. Non-cumulative Regardless of lack of profits in any given year, and lack of declaration of dividends, the arrears (amount of dividends undeclared or unpaid) have Cumulative to be paid to the preferred stocks in a subsequent year (once profits are made), before any dividends can be paid to the common stocks. Entitlement to receipt of dividends Non-cumulative essentially depends on the declaration of said dividends. Unless otherwise stipulated, preferred stocks are deemed cumulative. KINDS OF PREFERRED SHARES AS TO DIVIDENDS (a) Preferred participating shares (b) Preferred cumulative shares PREFERRED PARTICIPATING SHARES Preferred shareholders already earned premium for their preferred shares and they still participate in the distribution of the common shares. They take both – they have preference and they also participate. Who can issue preferred shares? A: Every corporation can issue preferred shares. CUMULATIVE PREFERRED SHARES Shares which entitle the holder not only to the payment of current dividends but also to dividends in arrears. Page 17 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Illustration. Corporation has cumulative preferred shares. Year 1 – the corporation has not declared dividends Year 2 – the corporation decided to declare dividends In this case, if the stipulated dividend is not paid in Year 1, it shall be added to the dividend which shall be due in Year 2 and the accumulated dividends must be paid to the holder of said preferred share before any dividend may be paid to the holders of common stock. Even if the Corporation has profits, is it obliged to give dividends? A: No. If the Corporation does not declare dividends for a long time, what does the BIR assess? A: The BIR will assess the corporation for Improperly Accumulated Earnings Tax (IAET). PAR VALUE VS. NON-PAR VALUE SHARES PAR VALUE SHARES Par value is the minimum issue price of a share of stock which must be stated in the AOI and in the Certificate of Stock (COS). If the incorporators agreed to the price, that is the price at which the shares will be sold to the public. Who can issue par value shares? A: Any stock corporation is free to issue par value shares as indicated in its AOI. **NOTES: These are shares with a stated value set out in the AOI. This remains the same regardless of the profitability of the corporation (in comparison, the market or fair value of a share of stock fluctuates depending on the company’s profitability). This gives rise to financial stability and is the reason why banks, trust corporations, insurance companies and building and loan associations must always be organized with par value shares. The entire consideration received by the corporation shall be treated as capital, and shall not be available for distribution as dividends. The AOI must state the fact that the corporation issues no-par value shares and the number of such shares No-par shares cannot be issued as preferred stocks Who cannot issue no-par value shares? A: Corporations who have access to public funds, such as: (1) Banks; (2) Trusts; (3) Insurance and pre-need companies; (4) Public utilities; (5) Building and loan associations; and (6) Other corporations authorized to obtain funds from the public (whether publicly-listed or not) **Note: Building and loan associations are organizations with the object of accumulating money from their members. The money is then collected in periodical payments into the treasury thereof, to be invested, from time to time, in loans to the members upon real estate for home purposes. DISTINCTION BETWEEN PAR-VALUE AND NO-PAR VALUE SHARES If the assets of the corporation have all been exhausted and there are still creditors, can the creditors go after the shareholders? Non-Par Value No – the creditors cannot go after such holders. The nonpar value shares are deemed fully paid. Par-Value Yes – the creditors can go after the shareholders. The subscribers are liable to corporate creditors for their unpaid subscriptions Can a corporation lower the par value of shares? A: No. This is because the value of the par value is stated in the AOI, and changing it will mislead the public. NO-PAR VALUE SHARES The practice of selling shares for a price lower than its par value is called watering down of stocks, and these shares are known as “watered stocks”. These are shares without a stated value. WATERED STOCKS You still have to pay for these shares, but its value is not stated in the AOI and in the COS. There is no fixed value stated in the Articles of Incorporation but issued for a consideration not less than five (5) pesos per share. These are stocks sold or issued at a price less than the stocks’ par value. The value of these shares is diluted, in that the public is not apprised of the real value of the corporation. Illustration. **NOTES: A no-par share does not purport to represent any stated proportionate interest in the capital stock measured by value, but only an aliquot part of the whole number of such shares of the issuing corporation (Agbayani) No-par value shares cannot have an issue price of less than P5.00 per share Once issued, they shall be deemed fully paid and nonassessable, and the holders of such shares shall not be liable to the corporation or to its creditors in respect thereto. A corporation has 100Mn authorized capital shares, each with a par value of P1.00. Normally, the public would expect that the corporation has authorized capital in the amount of P100,000,000 (100Mn shares x P1.00 par value). Now let’s say that the corporation initially issued 99.5Mn shares for P1.00, and issued the remaining 500k shares for P0.50 only. How much is now the authorized capital of the corporation? A: Still P100,000,000. Page 18 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law But how much capital actually came in? A: Only P99,750,000. Computation: 99,500,000 shares X P1.00 = 500,000 shares X P0.50 = Total What happens after the five-year limit is over? Founders shall have equal rights with the holders of common shares. + P99,500,000 250,000 P99,750,000 What is the effect? A: The corporation is misleading the public. It is not fair to the public, and does not anymore reflect the actual capital structure of the corporation FOUNDER’S SHARES **These are shares, classified as such in the AOI, which are given certain rights and privileges not enjoyed by the owners of other stocks. Where exclusive right to vote and be voted for in the election of directors is granted, such right must be for a limited period not to exceed 5 years subject to the approval of the SEC. The 5year period shall commence from the date of approval by the SEC. What is the purpose for granting founders the exclusive right to vote and be voted for? A: To ensure that the corporation will eventually succeed because they are the ones who envisioned the Corporation. They have the idea of how the business shall proceed. Thus, the laws provide that for a period of 5 years or less – they have the right to vote and be voted upon. NO ONE ELSE have the right to nominate and elect. This is used to guide the infant corporation. The certificate of the founders’ shares defines the privilege that the holders of this share shall have. What is the rule regarding founders’ rights and privileges? A: They must be clearly expressed in the corporate charter, to provide adequate information to third parties dealing with the corporation. What are some examples of special rights or privileges that may be given to founder’s shares that are not given to common shares? A: These include: 1) Preference in the payment of dividends and/or distribution of assets in case of liquidation 2) Right to convert the shares into other shares 3) Right to cumulative dividends What is the purpose of the founder’s shares? A: It may be given to encourage organizers and promoters to make large investments in the proposed corporation. Exclusive right to vote to be voted for Note: If the exclusive right to vote and be voted for in the election of directors is granted, such right must be limited for a period not exceeding five (5) years. The limit is non-extendible. The limitation is designed to prevent possible abuse of the Board. A lifetime term of the Board absolutely deprives other stockholders/members of the opportunity to participate in the management of the corporation. REDEEMABLE SHARES These are shares which permit the issuing corporation to redeem or purchase its shares. Redeemable shares are redeemable at a fixed date or at the option of either the issuing corporation or the stockholder or both at a certain redemption price. These shares may be issued by the corporation when expressly provided in the articles of incorporation. They are shares which may be purchased by the corporation from the holders of such shares upon the expiration of a fixed period, regardless of the existence of unrestricted retained earnings in the books of the corporation, and upon such other terms and conditions stated in the articles of incorporation and the certificate of stock representing the shares, subject to rules and regulations issued by the Commission. What is the purpose of redeemable shares? A: They are issued for the purpose of attracting capital. **LIMITATIONS: (1) Redeemable shares may be issued only when expressly provided for in the AOI. (2) The terms and conditions affecting said shares must be stated both in the AOI and in the COS. (3) Redeemable shares may be deprived of voting rights in the AOI. (4) The corporation is required to maintain a sinking fund to answer for redemption price if the corporation is required to redeem. (5) The redeemable shares are deemed retired upon redemption unless otherwise provided in the AOI. (6) Unrestricted RE is not necessary before shares can be redeemed, but there must be sufficient assets to pay the creditors and to answer for operations (Republic Planters Banks vs. Agana, G.R. No. 51765, 1997) (7) Redemption cannot be made if such redemption will result in insolvency or inability of the corporation to meet its obligations. Atty. E.; instead of borrowing from banks, the corporation is borrowing money from the public. There are many ways of acquiring funds from the corporation: 1. Borrow from the banks 2. Borrow from the public You have heard that bonds are floated, this is just the corporation issuing bonds to the public, telling the public that if you buy these bonds, we will buy this back from you in 5 years with interest or premium. Or, redeemable shares, this is an option to raise more money with the public. We distinguish redeemable shares from the bank, in that banks are lenders and redeemable shareholders are investors. Page 19 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law What is the difference? A: Redeemable shareholders assume a risk, particularly that the corporation will become insolvent before the expiration of the redemption period. IOW, as far as the lender is concerned, the moment, the loan is due, he may collect. If the corporation has no cash, what will the banks do? A: (1) Demand payment, or (2) Foreclose on the collateral. Can the corporations say: please do not get our capital? A: They cannot. Bank says not our problem, our problem is to collect, if we cannot collect, we get properties. On the other hand, when we talk about redeemable shares? A: If the corporation is insolvent, the shareholder cannot demand redemption. So we can only demand when? A: When we have profits, then we pay. Can it be obliged to pay? A: Yes. That was your promise. To buy back the shares with a premium of course. So here’s the investor, here’s the lender. So that if the investor now demands for the reacquisition of his shares because the due date has arrived, can the corporation say that they will use their profits for another purpose? A: No. So-called treasury shares, because they are now in the custody of the treasurer. So what happens to these shares? A: They become part of the capital. And therefore, while before they were outstanding, are they still so? A: Not anymore. They have been reunited with its parents, it’s now back home, it’s no longer outstanding. However, may it still be entitled to dividends? A: No. Because if they are allowed to be entitled to dividends, it would create a situation where the corporation would be paying itself. However, because these are issued shares, would it have the right to vote? A: No, because otherwise, the current board would just use these to vote for themselves, because the board acts on behalf of the corporation – manage the properties of the corporation, since these are properties, they will use these properties to cast votes in their favor pertaining to these shares. So this will allow incumbent directors to perpetuate themselves in office. Party involved This is what the law calls what? A: Unrestricted retained earnings. Can the corporation even refuse by saying we do not have unrestricted RE? A: No. Atty. Espedido: Restricted or not, if you have surplus, pay. The corporation has to pay, so long as there is surplus, unrestricted or not. When demandable BORROWING FROM A BANK Dealing with lenders/creditors REDEEMABLE SHARE Dealing with investors Compel payment upon maturity date without any conditions. Demand payment on the date of redemption In so far as the creditor is concerned, once it is due and demandable, the creditor will compel the corporation to pay. NOTE: Regardless whether it is restricted or not, as long as there is surplus, it is obliged to pay. The only situation where the corporation can refuse to pay is when the corporation is insolvent, otherwise, the corporation will be touching their capital and will be violating the trust fund doctrine. Exception: Corporation insolvent IOW, clearly, what is the difference between the investor and the lender? A: The investor takes a risk. What is that risk? A: The corporation will not redeem the shares if the corporation becomes insolvent. No assumption of risks; Assumption of Risk However, since he is an investor, does he enjoy anything? A: Rights to dividends during the period while he is still the holder (before the redemption period comes), if dividends are declared. On the other hand, if there are such dividends declared, can the lender also collect on such dividends? A: No, he cannot. So, once reacquired, what happens? A: The redeemable shares become treasury shares. Condition: The investor can compel to redeem only when there are profits. The corporation is obliged to buy back the shares with a premium. Distribution of dividends Lender can collect upon arrival of the due date without any conditions Not entitled to dividends; only paid for the balance + interest is The investor takes the risk because the corporation may or may not have retained earnings During the period while he is still the holder (before the period comes), he is an investor. Thus, when dividends are declared, he is entitled to such. Page 20 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law TREASURY SHARES What are treasury shares? A: These are stocks and were fully paid, but were reacquired by the corporation through: 1) Purchase, 2) Donation, 3) Sale, and 4) Other lawful means. Reason: It is issued to gain more capital and the public is aware that these are just redeemable shares. (6) It can be resold by the corporation (7) It is not considered as outstanding shares because it is back to the corporation – it is in already **NOTES: Nature of Treasury Shares Treasury shares are part of capital. When these shares were bought or reacquired, surplus money will be used and not capital money. Otherwise, we will be violating the Trust Fund Doctrine. Being part of capital, the treasury shares can be sold again. As to how much, it is the Board that will decide. Such shares may be disposed of again for a reasonable price fixed by the BOD. Treasury shares have no voting right as long as such shares remain in the Treasury. Pre-emptive right of stockholders in close corporations shall extend to reissuance of treasury shares unless otherwise provided in the AOI. Special Features of Treasury Shares (1) Once reacquired, it shall form part of its capital as a corporate asset. (2) They can only be reacquired if there are unrestricted retained earnings. (3) It is not entitled to dividends because in effect, the corporation is paying itself, which is absurd. Otherwise, it will involve double sale for the same shares. (4) It is not entitled to the right to vote because the corporation is not a stockholder. If allowed and the BOD exercises such right as representative of the corporation, it can be subject to abuses. If they are were voting shares when issued, now that they are back, who may vote? Answer: NO ONE. Treasury shares have no voting rights. If the law were to give them voting rights, since these treasury shares are owned by the corporation, the BOD necessarily will act on behalf of the corporation. If they were given voting rights, the BOD will definitely vote for them all the time. (5) They can only be reacquired if there are unrestricted retained earnings. Unrestricted retained earnings – assets less liabilities; not allocated for anything; absolutely free; no restrictions or appropriations. GEN: When it comes to treasury shares, the corporation is not always free to buy back the shares. It requires that there should be unrestricted retained earnings, otherwise, the corporation will violate the Trust Fund Doctrine because if they were to buy it back without unrestricted retained earnings, the creditors cannot go after the corporation to satisfy unpaid debts because there is no more capital to speak of. Generally, is the corporation authorized to buy back all of its shares? A: No. Why not? A: It would violate the trust fund doctrine. Such that when you keep expending funds to buy back all the shares, it would disadvantage creditors, because it will reach a point where the capital will used up. THE TRUST FUND DOCTRINE The Trust Fund Doctrine means that the capital stock, properties and other assets of a corporation are regarded as equity in trust for the payment of corporate creditors. Stated simply, the trust fund doctrine states that all funds received by the corporation in payment of the shares of stock shall be held in trust for the corporate creditors and other stockholders of the corporation. Under such doctrine, no fund shall be used to buy back the issued shares of the stock except only in instances specifically allowed by the Code. (Boman Environmental Development Corporation vs. CA, G.R. No. 77860, 1988) By way of exception, however? A: If it is specifically provided for in the AOI, such as redeemable shares. CONVERTIBLE SHARES A type of preferred stock that the holder can exchange for a predetermined number of common shares at a specified time. VOTING VS. NON-VOTING SHARES GEN: No share may be deprived of voting rights. XPNs: 1. Preferred non-voting shares; 2. Redeemable shares; 3. Shares as provided by the Code (treasury shares) There shall always be a class/series of shares which have complete voting rights. XPN: Redeemable Shares – which can be issued regardless of WON there are unrestricted retained earnings Page 21 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law VOTING SHARES Shares that are provided with voting rights on any issue on the corporation. The voter can participate in any meeting and on any issue that may be raised during the meeting. Reason: A shareholder is a part-owner of the corporation. Since the shareholder cannot interfere with the management, he can only exercise his ownership by voting on certain issues. As partowner, he has the right to protect his ownership. Hence, entitles him to vote. NON-VOTING SHARES SHARES IN ESCROW Issued or committed to a particular shareholder, but deposited with a 3rd person or a deposit account pending the fulfilment by that 3rd person for which it was reserved of the conditions expressly provided in the certificate of stocks Share is subject to an agreement; share is deposited with a 3rd person to be kept by the depositary until the performance of a certain condition. TITLE II. INCORPORATION AND ORGANIZATION OF PRIVATE CORPORATIONS Shares that are not provided with voting rights but subject to exceptions. SEC. 10. NUMBER AND QUALIFICATIONS OF INCORPORATORS Exceptions: Holders of non-voting shares shall nevertheless be entitled to vote on the following matters: Section 10. Number and Qualifications of Incorporators. – Any person, partnership, association or corporation, singly or jointly with others but not more than fifteen (15) in number, may organize a corporation for any lawful purpose or purposes: Provided, That natural persons who are licensed to practice a profession, and partnerships or associations organized for the purpose of practicing a profession, shall not be allowed to organize as a corporation unless otherwise provided under special laws. Incorporators who are natural persons must be of legal age. (1) (2) (3) Amendment of the articles of incorporation Adoption and amendment of the bylaws Sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the corporate property Note: In determining whether there is a disposition of all or substantially all of the corporate property, the guide is when such sale already affects the operations of the corporation. When the corporation could no longer carry out its business, then that will be the point when it will have to be open for voting, including nonvoting shares. SC ruled that 80% is considered “substantially all”. (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Incurring, creating, or increasing bonded indebtedness Increase or decrease of authorized capital stock Merger or consolidation of the corporation with another corporation or other corporations Investment of corporate funds in another corporation or business in accordance with this Code; and Dissolution of the corporation Each incorporator of a stock corporation must own or be a subscriber to at least one (1) share of the capital stock. A corporation with a single stockholder is considered a One Person Corporation as described in Title XIII, Chapter III of this Code. Who are incorporators? A: They are the individuals who form the corporation. They are typically nominated directors or members, who will initially manage the corporation. Under the old law, there was a minimum requirement of 5 incorporators, but under the new law, a single person may form a corporation. Reason why a stockholder with non-voting shares is still entitled to vote on these issues: Because the fundamental contract of these parties is the Articles of Incorporation. However, for purposes of practicality and convenience, there remains the limit of not more than 15 incorporators in a stock corporation. However, the number of trustees may be more than 15. In obligations and contracts, we have learned that if we change the terms and conditions of the contract, we can novate the contract. What is necessary in novation is the consent of both parties. If you need to change anything in the AOI, you need consent. All parties must be able to participate WON they agree on the change of the agreement. Who can be incorporators? A: Natural and juridical persons. RIGHT OF APPRAISAL For those who dissent the proposed agreement, they could exercise their right of appraisal. Such right can be exercised by a stockholder who disagrees with the decision of the Board of Directors to amend the Articles of Incorporation. The dissenting stockholder can demand the corporation to buy back his shares at their fair market value. For natural persons: 1) Must be of legal age 2) Must have capacity to contract Note: The law does not prescribe a residency requirement. Unlike the old code, majority of the incorporators need not be residents of the Philippines. What is the requirement for incorporators? A: Whether natural or juridical, they must be subscribers and have financial interest in the corporation. Page 22 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law SEC. 11. CORPORATE TERM SEC. 12. CAPITAL STOCKS Section 11. Corporate Term. – A corporation shall have perpetual existence unless its articles of incorporation provides otherwise. Section 12. Minimum Capital Stock Not Required of Stock Corporations. —Stock corporations shall not be required to have a minimum capital stock, except as otherwise specifically provided by special law. Corporations with certificates of incorporation issued prior to the effectivity of this Code and which continue to exist shall have perpetual existence, unless the corporation, upon a vote of its stockholders representing a majority of its articles of incorporation: Provided, That any change in the corporate right of dissenting stockholders in accordance with the provisions of this Code. A corporate term for a specific period may be extended or shortened by amending the articles of incorporation: Provided, That no extension may be made earlier than three (3) years prior to the original or subsequent expiry date(s) unless there are justifiable reasons for an earlier extension as may be determined by the Commission: Provided, further, That such extension of the corporate term shall take effect only on the day following the original or subsequent expiry date(s). A corporation whose term has expired may apply for revival of its corporate existence, together with all the rights and privileges under its certificate of incorporation and subject to all of its duties, debts and liabilities existing prior to its revival. Upon approval by the Commission, the corporation shall be deemed revived and a certificate of revival of corporate existence shall be issued, giving it perpetual existence, unless its application for revival provides otherwise. No application for revival of certificate of incorporation of banks, banking and quasi-banking institutions, preneed, insurance and trust companies, non-stock savings and loan associations (NSSLAs), pawnshops, corporations engaged in money service business, and other financial intermediaries shall be approved by the Commission unless accompanied by a favorable recommendation of the appropriate government agency. GEN: A corporation shall have a perpetual existence. XPN: When the AOI provides otherwise. When the Corporation was Formed After 3 February 2019 Before 3 February 2019 Effect The corporation shall have a perpetual existence, unless its AOI provides otherwise. The corporation shall be deemed to have a perpetual existence, unless the corporation, upon a vote of its stockholders representing a majority of its outstanding capital stock, notifies the SEC that they intend to retain its original term pursuant to the corporation’s AOI. REVIVAL OF A CORPORATION Rule: A corporation whose term has expired may apply for a revival of its corporate existence to the Commission. Upon the approval by the Commission, the corporation shall be deemed revived and a certificate of revival of corporate existence shall be issued. Authorized Capital Stock Refers to the maximum amount of capital which the corporation will receive when it issues all its shares. Subscribed Capital Stock Refers to the committed amount of capital which the corporation will receive from its existing subscribers Paid-Up Capital Refers to the amount of capital which the corporation already received from its subscribers. This represents the paid portion of the subscribed capital. If you are a new corporation, how much should be subscribed? A: The Revised Corporation Code does not require a minimum subscribed capital stock. Reason: To organizations. attract the formation of more business Exception: However, the 25% subscribed capital stock is compulsory when there is an increase in the capital stock. Thus, it requires that at least 25% must be subscribed, and 25% must be paid-up. SEC. 13. CONTENTS OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION Section 13. Contents of the Articles of Incorporation. - All corporations shall file with the Commission articles of incorporation in any of the official languages, duly signed and acknowledged or authenticated, in such form and manner as may be allowed by the Commission, containing substantially the following matters, except as otherwise prescribed by this Code or by special law: (a) The name of corporation; (b) The specific purpose or purposes for which the corporation is being formed. Where a corporation has more than one stated purpose, the articles of incorporation shall indicate the primary purpose and the secondary purpose or purposes: Provided, That a nonstock corporation may not include a purpose which would change or contradict its nature as such; (c) The place where the principal office of the corporation is to be located, which must be within the Philippines; (d) The term for which the corporation is to exist, if the corporation has not elected perpetual existence; (e) The names, nationalities, and residence addresses of the incorporators; (f) The number of directors, which shall not be more than fifteen (15) or the number of trustees which may be more than fifteen (15); (g) The names, nationalities, and residence addresses of persons who shall act as directors or trustees until the first Page 23 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law regular directors or trustees are duly elected and qualified in accordance with this Code; (h) If it be a stock corporation, the amount of its authorized capital stock, number of shares into which it is divided, the par value of each, names, nationalities, and subscribers, amount subscribed and paid by each on the subscription, and a statement that some or all of the shares are without par value, if applicable; i. j. If it be a nonstock corporation 1. the amount of its capital 2. the names, nationalities, and addresses of the contributors, and 3. amount contributed by each residential Such other matters consistent with law and which the incorporators may deem necessary and convenient. NAME OF THE CORPORATION (See also Sec. 17) (i) If it be a nonstock corporation, the amount of its capital, the names, nationalities, and residence addresses of the contributors, and amount contributed by each; and (j) Such other matters consistent with law and which the incorporators may deem necessary and convenient. An arbitration agreement may be provided in the articles of incorporation pursuant to Section 181 of this Code.1âwphi1 The Articles of incorporation and applications for amendments thereto may be filed with the Commission in the form of an electronic document, in accordance with the Commission's rule and regulations on electronic filing. Essential to the existence of the corporation since it is through it that the corporation can sue and be sued, and perform all legal acts. Importance: For identification purposes; the name is important in order to distinguish it from other organizations. A corporate name shall be disallowed by the SEC if the proposed name is either: 1. Identical or deceptively or confusingly similar to that of any existing corporation or to any other name already protected by law; or 2. Patently deceptive, confusing, or contrary to existing laws CONTENTS OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION a. The name of the corporation; b. The specific purpose or purposes for which the corporation is being formed. Where a corporation has more than one stated purpose, the articles of incorporation shall indicate the primary purpose and the secondary purpose or purposes: Provided, That a nonstock corporation may not include a purpose which would change or contradict its nature as such; c. The place where the principal office of the corporation is to be located, which must be within the Philippines; d. The term for which the corporation is to exist, if the corporation has not elected perpetual existence; e. The names, nationalities, and residential addresses of the incorporators; f. The number of directors, which shall not be more than fifteen (15) or the number of trustees which may be more than fifteen (15); g. The names, nationalities, and residential addresses of persons who shall act as directors or trustees until the first regular directors or trustees are duly elected and qualified in accordance with this Code; h. If it be a stock corporation: 1. the amount of its authorized capital stock 2. number of shares into which it is divided 3. the par value of each, 4. names, nationalities, and residence addresses of the original subscribers 5. amount subscribed and paid by each on the subscription, and 6. a statement that some or all of the shares are without par value, if applicable; What are the limitations on the name of the corporation? A: A corporation cannot use a name: (1) That is already reserved or registered for the use of another corporation; (2) That is protected by law; (3) That is contrary to law, rules and regulations; (4) That is identical or confusingly similar with other corporations’ names. Illustration 1. Haplos-Haplos Corporation vs. Hapyod-Hapyod Corporation If the business of the corporation was to provide most effective and comfortable massage in the city, that’s the principal business, what do you want to call your corporation? Remember, it has to be descriptive of the corporation. A: Haplos-Haplos Corporation. So that, if one corporation is already registered as HaplosHaplos Corporation, do you think the SEC will allow you register as Hapyod-Hapyod Corporation? A: No, because if it confuses the public, then the SEC will now allow it. Illustration 2. Planter’s Peanuts vs. Grower’s Peanuts What about Planter’s Peanuts and Grower’s Peanuts? Atty. Espedido: It violates! Illustration 3. Efficascent Oil One corporation came out with “Efficient Oil Corporation”, do you think somebody will complain? A: Yes! The Efficascent Oil will complain. Especially if you follow the color scheme, samot na! Page 24 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Illustration 4. United Nations Food Corporation United Nations Food Corporation, what do you think? A: No. It would fall under limitation #2. If you are a fan of food, what will go into your mind if you see that name? A: This must be run by the United Nations. So if the SEC will have to examine that, it might be disapproved. This is misleading. The public might believe this is operated, maintained and run by the United Nations. The best chefs in the world, if you were the SEC, what would be a good name? A: International Food Corporation. Atty. Espedido: In practice, SEC will ask you to submit three corporation names to save time. So that, if one name is not allowed or accepted by SEC, then they will just pick from the remaining names submitted. **NOTES: Right to a Corporate Name – A corporation’s right to use its corporate and trade name is a property right, a right in rem, which it may assert or protect against the whole world in the same manner as it may protect its tangible property against trespass or conversion. Statutory Limitations on the Form and Use of Corporate Name: 1) In respect to a corporate name already registered or otherwise protected by law, the proposed name must not be: a. Identical b. Deceptively or confusingly similar; 2) Patently deceptive, confusing or contrary to law; 3) Must contain either: a. “Incorporated” or “Inc.”, or b. “Corporation” or “Corp.”; 4) Must not consist solely of generic, geographical and/or descriptive terms and names; and 5) Must comply with other policies provided by SEC Memorandum No. 14, Series of 2000 Doctrine of Secondary Meaning as Applied to Corporation Names – The doctrine of secondary meaning originated in the field of trademark law. Its application has, however, been extended to corporate names since the right to use a corporate name to the exclusion of others is based upon the same principle which underlies the right to use a particular trademark or tradename (Lyceum of the Philippines vs. CA, G.R. No. 101897, 1993) PURPOSE CLAUSE (1) (2) Primary Franchise – right to exist as a corporation Secondary Franchise – intended for the carrying out of a specific business Atty. Espedido: Once you are issued a certificate of incorporation, this is called primary franchise – this means you have the right to exist as a corporation. If you are dealing or engaged in the jeepney business, you will also be given another franchise by the LTFRB – a secondary franchise – which is intended for the carrying out of a specific business. The fact that you are given a primary franchise is not a guarantee that you can immediately pursue any business that you want, especially if the business that you are trying to pursue would involve public interest or public utilities. Purpose? A: It’s important to state this in the AOI, because it would serve as the guideline within which the corporation can operate. Otherwise? A: It could mislead the public. So that if you perform something not within the purpose? A: It would consist an ultra vires act. Ultra vires acts? A: These acts will be deemed as void acts, and not binding on the corporation. It’s beyond your powers as a corporation. So all these must be indicated in the AOI. Could you change any one of these? A: It’s possible. How? A: Majority of the BOD + 2/3 of the OCS or the members. What happens to the 1/3 shares? A: They may exercise their right of appraisal. (Purchase shares at fair market value). Atty. Espedido: As a creation of law, the corporation have to work within the boundaries of the privilege extended by the State. It will serve as a guide in determining WON the corporation is acting within its authority or powers as indicated in the Articles of Incorporation. If it is beyond the powers prescribed by law – it becomes an ultra vires act which is deemed void, meaning it is not binding. **NOTES: A corporation can only have one (1) primary purpose. However, it can have several secondary purposes. A corporation has only such powers are as expressly granted to it by law and by its AOI, those which may be incidental to such conferred powers, those reasonably necessary to accomplish its purposes, and those which may be incident to its existence. A corporation may not be formed for the purpose of practicing a profession like law, medicine or accountancy. Limitations on the Purpose of a Corporation (1) A non-stock corporation may not include a purpose which would change or contradict its nature as such. (2) The SEC shall reject the AOI or disapprove any amendment when the stated purpose/s of the corporation are patently unconstitutional, illegal, immoral, or contrary to government rules or regulations. Stretching the Purpose Clause It is legal to stretch the meaning of the purpose clause to cover new and unexpected situations. There is no need to amend the Page 25 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law AOI to accommodate new situations. (SEC Opinion No. 08-24, October 22, 2008) allowed since the corporation ceases to exist already, and there is nothing to extend. PRINCIPAL OFFICE INCORPORATORS Importance: For the SEC to be able to locate and identify where the corporation is and to know where to serve summons and notices. (See Sec. 5 for a discussion on incorporators). Address? Why, what’s important about it? A: Because this address is where summons and notices will be sent by the court/s or SEC or other government agencies. DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES (See Sec. 10 for the number & qualifications of incorporators.) So that you would know where to serve. Alright. If you are a stockholder, can you be a director? A: Yes, to be a director, it is a requirement that such is at least a holder of one (1) share. So that if the address is “somewhere in the hinterlands of Mindanao”? A: This would not be in compliance with the requirement because it would be impossible to identify the exact location, because it’s not specific. Requirements for a President and Vice President President – must be a director, thus, a holder of 1 share Vice President – does not require to be a holder of 1 share but once he assumes presidency, he is required to be a holder of at least 1 share **NOTES: **NOTES: Salient Points: 1. Must be located in the Philippines; 2. Must specify the city or province; 3. The street/number is not necessary; 4. Important in determining venue in an action by or against the corporation, or on determining the province where a chattel mortgage of shares should be registered. Qualifications for Directorship/Trusteeship Under Other Sections of the RCC Principal Office Address The AOI must state the place where the principal office of the corporation is to be located, which must be within the Philippines. Purposes of Fixing the Principal Office Address 1. To fix the residence of the corporation in a definite place, instead of allowing it to be ambulatory; 2. For purposes of the stockholders’ or members’ meeting; 3. To determine the place where the books and records of the corporation are ordinarily kept. TERM OF EXISTENCE (See Sec. 11.) **NOTES: The corporate term is necessary in determining at what point in time the corporation will cease to exist or have lost its juridical personality. Sec. 139 of the Code provides that a corporation shall nevertheless be continued as a body corporate for three (3) years after the effective date of dissolution, for the purpose of: 1. Prosecuting and defending suits by or against it; 2. Enabling it to settle and close its affairs; 3. Dispose of and convey its property; and 4. Distribute its assets. Extension of corporate term prior or earlier than 3 years is allowed only if there is justifiable reason. On the day of the expiration of the corporate term, extension is still allowed. However, after the expiration of its term, extension is no longer Board of Trustees of Educational Institutions (Sec. 106) Close Corporations Corporation Sole (Sec. 108) One Man Corporation (Sec. 121) Trustees of educational institutions organized as nonstock corporations shall not be less than 5 nor more than 15, provided that the number of trustees shall be in multiples of 5. All stockholders are considered members of the board of directors, thus allowing 20 members in the board A corporation sole may be formed by the chief archbishop, bishop, priest, minister, rabbi, or other presiding elder of such religious denomination, sect or church The single stockholder shall be the sole director and president of the OPC The RCC provides for the minimum qualifications and disqualifications of the directors/trustees which the corporation may not do away with. However, the by-laws may provide for additional qualifications and disqualifications. (See Sec. 46. Contents of Bylaws) – A private corporation may provide the following in its by-laws: (f) The directors’ or trustees’ qualifications, duties and responsibilities For further discussion: o See Sec. 22 for Qualifications of Directors o See Sec. 26 for Disqualifications of Directors Page 26 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law SEC. 14. FORM OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION Eight: That the number of shares of the authorized capital stockstated has been subscribed as follows: Section 14. Form of Articles of Incorporation. - Unless otherwise prescribed by special law, the articles of incorporation of all domestic corporations shall comply substantially with the following form: Name of Subscriber Nationality No. of Shares Subscribed Amount Subscribed Amount Paid Articles of Incorporation of _____________________ (Name of Corporation) The undersigned incorporators, all of legal age, have voluntarily agreed to form a (stock) (nonstock) corporation under the laws of the Republic of the Philippines and certify the following: First: That the name of said corporation "_________________", Inc. Corporation or OPC"; shall be Second: That the purpose or purposes for which such corporation is incorporated are: (If there is more than one purpose, indicate primary and secondary purposes); Third: That the principal office of the corporation is located in the City/Municipality of _______________, Province of ______________________, Philippines; Fourth: That the corporation shall have perpetual existence or a term of ___________ years from the date of issuance of the certificate of incorporation; Fifth: That the names, nationalities, and residence addresses of the incorporators of the corporation are as follows: Name Nationality Residence Sixth: That the number of directors or trustees of the corporation shall be ___________________; and the names, nationalities, and residence addresses of the first directors or trustees of the corporation are as follows: Name Nationality Residence Seventh: That the authorized capital stock of the corporation is ____________________ PESOS (₱______), divided into ____ shares with the par value of ___________________ PESOS (₱_____________) per share. (In case all the shares are without par value): That the capital stock of the corporation is __________________ shares without par value. (In case some shares have par value and some are without par value): That the capital stock of said corporation consists of ________________________________ shares, of which _______________________ shares have a par value of ___________________________PESOS (₱_______) each, and of which ____________________ shares are without par value. (Modify No. 8 if shares are with no-par value. In case the corporation is nonstock, Nos. 7 and 8 of the above articles may be modified accordingly, and it is sufficient if the articles may be modified accordingly, and it is sufficient if the articles state the amount of capital or money contributed or donated by specified persons, stating the names, nationalities, and residence addresses of the contributors or donors and the respective amount given by each.) Ninth: That _______________________ has been elected by the subscribers as Treasurer of the Corporation to act as such until after the successor is duly elected and qualified in accordance with the bylaws, that as Treasurer, authority has been given to receive in the name and for the benefit of the corporation, all subscriptions, contributions or donations paid or given by the subscribers or members, who certifies the information set forth in the seventh and eighth clauses above, and that the paid-up portion of the subscription in cash and/or property for the benefit and credit of the corporation has been duly received. Tenth: That the incorporators undertake to change the name of the corporation immediately upon receipt of notice from the Commission that another corporation, partnership or person has acquired a prior right to the use of such name, that the name has been declared not distinguishable from a corporation, or that it is contrary to law, public morals, good customs or public policy. Eleventh: (Corporations which will engage in any business or activity reserved for Filipino citizens shall provide the following): "No transfer of stock or interest which shall reduce the ownership of Filipino citizens to less than the required percentage of capital stock as provided by existing laws shall be allowed or permitted to be recorder in the proper books of the corporation, and this restriction shall be indicated in all stock certificates issued by the corporation." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto signed these Articles of Incorporation, this ______ day of _____, 20___ in the City/Municipality of _________________, Province of ________________, Republic of the Philippines. (Names and signatures of the incorporators) ____________________________ (Name and signature of Treasurer) Page 27 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law **CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION The SEC has the ministerial duty to approve an application for registration and issue the Certificate of Incorporation provided all the requirements of law with respect to the AOI are complied with. A corporation commences to have corporate existence and juridical personality and is deemed incorporated only from the moment the SEC issues to the incorporators a Certificate of Incorporation under its official seal. SEC. 15. AMENDMENT OF THE ARTICLES Section 15. Amendment of Articles of Incorporation. Unless otherwise prescribed by this Code or by special law, and for legitimate purposes, any provision or matter stated in the articles of incorporation may be amended by a majority vote of the board of directors or trustees and the vote or written assent of the stockholders representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock, without prejudice to the appraisal right of dissenting stockholders in accordance with the provisions of this Code. The articles of incorporation of a nonstock corporation may be amended by the vote or written assent of majority of the trustees and at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members. The original and amended articles together shall contain all provisions required by law to be set out in the articles of incorporation. Amendments to the articles shall be indicated by underscoring the change or changes made, and a copy thereof duly certified under oath by the corporate secretary and a majority of the directors or trustees, with a statement that the amendments have been duly approved by the required vote of the stockholders or members, shall be submitted to the Commission. The amendments shall take effect upon their approval by the Commission or from the date of filing with the said Commission if not acted upon within six (6) months from the date of filing for a cause not attributable to the corporation. How do we amend the Articles of Incorporation? A: Initiated by the Board itself. What are the requirements for amending the AOI? A: (1) By a majority vote of the Board of Directors or Board of Trustees (2) Vote or the written assent of the stockholders of at least 2/3 representing the outstanding capital stocks What is the option of the 1/3 of the OCS or members that dissented? A: Dissenting stockholders may exercise their APPRAISAL RIGHT. APPRAISAL RIGHT Right of the dissenting stockholder to leave the corporation by determining the value of his shares, and demand the corporation to buy back his shares at their fair market value (FMV) Another instance where the corporation can buy back the shares Note: But unlike redeemable shares, in this case, the dissenting stockholder can be paid only if there are unrestricted retained earnings. What are unrestricted retained earnings? A: The surplus profits of the corporation which are not allocated for anything. IMPROPERLY ACCUMULATED EARNINGS The corporation to avoid double taxation may not declare dividends. Illustration. Travelling to Europe as an incentive instead of declaring dividends Instead of declaring dividends, they will not declare dividends and tell all the stockholders “we will go to Europe as your incentive, and undergo training and observe the latest trends. You can bring your family.” Everybody travelled to Europe. They were given pocket money and per diem. Did they distribute dividends? A: No dividends distributed, yet the stockholder enjoyed the part from the corporation. Will they be taxed? A: If the government is aware that this is being done, the government can charge them for IAET (Improperly Accumulated Earnings Tax). They must declare the dividends, otherwise, they will be penalized by the BIR. What do they do now? A: They can present expansion plans. This is a restriction of their earnings. IOW, they can say that they do not have unrestricted earnings because these are earmarked already for future expansions. Another Exception: Loan condition – borrowing huge amounts of money from the bank. When you loan from the bank, the bank imposes a lot of conditions. Usually, one of the conditions imposed is that the corporation cannot declare dividends without the consent of the bank. The bank wants to be sure that it can collect its credit. WHEN AMENDMENT TAKES EFFECT What happens after the amendment? A: It requires the approval by the SEC to take effect. When will it take effect? A: (1) From date of approval by the SEC (2) From of filing when there is inaction by the SEC within 6 months from filing **NOTES Limitations 1. Requirements imposed by the Code or by special laws 2. Must be for a legitimate purpose 3. Must be approved by the directors/trustees, and the stockholders/members through the vote requirement 4. Appraisal right 5. Both the original and the amended articles together must contain all the provisions required by law to be set out in the articles 6. Will take effect only: Page 28 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law a. b. Upon their approval by the SEC by the issuance of a certificate of amended articles; or From the date of filing with the SEC, if the SEC did not act upon it within 6 months from the date of filing for a cause not attributable to the corporation. Procedure 1. The original and amended articles together shall contain all provisions required by law to be set out in the AOI 2. The articles, as amended, shall be indicated by underscoring the change/s made 3. A copy shall be submitted to the SEC: a. Duly certified under oath by the corporate secretary and a majority of the directors or trustees b. Stating the fact that the amendment/s have been duly approved by the required vote of the stockholders or members 4. Percentage of Filipino ownership of capital stock under existing laws or the Constitution is not complied with. **INDUSTRIES REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORITY BEFORE INCORPORATION (REGULATED CORPORATIONS) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Banks Banking and quasi-banking institutions Pre-need, insurance and trust companies Non-stock savings and loan associations (NSSLAs) Pawnshops Other financial intermediaries Note: These industries cannot incorporate or apply for amendment without the prior authority of the government agencies governing or controlling them. (Ex. Certificate to Incorporate from the BSP before incorporating a bank) The Certificate of Incorporation is to be attached to the Articles of Incorporation. **NOTES SEC. 16. GROUNDS FOR DISAPPROVAL OF AOI OR AMENDMENTS Section 16. Grounds When Articles of Incorporation or Amendment May be Disapproved. The Commission may disapprove the articles of incorporation or any amendment thereto if the same is not compliant with the requirements of this Code: Provided, That the Commission shall give the incorporators, directors, trustees, or officers as reasonable time from receipt of the disapproval within which to modify the objectionable portions of the articles or amendment. The following are ground for such disapproval: (a) The articles of incorporation or any amendment thereto is not substantially in accordance with the form prescribed herein; (b) The purpose or purposes of the corporation are patently unconstitutional, illegal, immoral or contrary to government rules and regulations; Only substantial and not strict compliance is required. The above grounds are not exclusive. Example of another ground is the capital requirement. If there is no valid ground for disapproval, the SEC is dutybound to approve the same, it being the SEC’s ministerial duty given the right to association. **DUE PROCESS IN THE REJECTION OF THE AOI Before rejecting the AOI, the SEC should give the incorporators reasonable time within which to correct or modify the objectionable portions of the articles or amendments. Any decision of the Commission rejecting the AOI or disapproving any amendment thereto is appealable by Petition for Review to the CA in accordance with the pertinent provisions of the Rules of Court. SEC. 17. CORPORATION NAME (c) The certification concerning the amount of capital stock subscribed and/or paid is false; and (d) The required percentage of Filipino ownership of the capital stock under existing laws or the Constitution has not been complied with. No articles of incorporation or amendment to articles of incorporation of banks, banking and quasi-banking institutions, preneed, insurance and trust companies, NSSLAs, pawnshops and other financial intermediaries shall be approved by the Commission unless accompanied by a favorable recommendation of the appropriate government agency to the effect that such articles or amendment is in accordance with law. **GROUNDS TO DISAPPROVE INITIAL APPLICATION FOR INCORPORATION AND AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES 1. 2. 3. Articles or amendment is not substantially in accordance with the form prescribed by law; The purpose/s of the corporation is patently unconstitutional, illegal, immoral, or contrary to government rules and regulations. Certification concerning the amount of capital stock subscribed and/or paid is false. Section 17. Corporation Name. - No corporate name shall be allowed by the Commission if it is not distinguishable from that already reserved or registered for the use if another corporation, or if such name is already protected by law, rules and regulations. A name is not distinguishable even if it contains one or more of the following: (a) The word "corporation", "company", incorporated", "limited", "limited liability", or an abbreviation of one of such words; and (b) Punctuations, articles, conjunctions, contractions, prepositions, abbreviations, different tenses, spacing, or number of the same word or phrase. The Commission upon determination that the corporate name is: (1) not distinguishable from a name already reserved or registered for the use of another corporation; (2) already protected by law; or (3) contrary to law, rules and regulations, may summarily order the corporation to immediately cease and desist from using such name and require the corporation to register a new one. The Commission shall also cause the removal of all visible signages, marks, advertisements, labels prints and other effects bearing such corporate name. Upon the Page 29 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law approval of the new corporate name, the Commission shall issue a certificate of incorporation under the amended name. If the corporation fails to comply with the Commission's order, the Commission may hold the corporation and its responsible directors or officers in contempt and/or hold them administratively, civilly and/or criminally liable under this Code and other applicable laws and/or revoke the registration of the corporation. **REQUIREMENTS FOR A VALID CORPORATE NAME (1) Distinguishable from a name already reserved or registered for the use of another corporation. T/N: A name is not distinguishable even if it contains one or more of the following: (a) The word “corporation”, “company”, “incorporated”, “limited”, “limited liability”, or an abbreviation of one of such words; and (b) Punctations, articles, conjunctions, contractions, prepositions, abbreviations, different tenses, spacing, or number of the same word or phrase. (2) One that is not yet protected by law; (3) Not contrary to law, rules, and regulations. Atty. Gavi: Upon determination by the Commission that the corporate name violates either of the three requirements, it may summarily order the corporation to immediately cease and desist from using such name, and to register a new one. It shall also cause the removal of visible signages, marks, ads, etc. bearing such corporate name. Upon approval of the new corporate name, the Commission shall issue a certificate of incorporation under the amended name. **EFFECT OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SEC ORDER (in the last paragraph) The corporation and its responsible directors or officers may be held: 1. In contempt, and/or 2. Be administratively, civilly and/or criminally liable under the Code and other applicable laws, and/or 3. May result in the revocation of the corporation’s registration Atty. Gaviola: Late December 2017, SEC came out with a new regulation concerning corporate names. Under the Intellectual Property Code, the moment you create a trade name and start using a trade name, it is already protected even if it is not yet registered under the Intellectual Property Code. But under this new regulation, if the corporation is doing business under a trade name different from its corporate name, the trade name should be included in its AOI. In that regard, the protection granted by Sec. 17 of the RCC is extended to that trade name. What is the effect if the trade name is not included in the AOI? A: SEC Rules provide that such trade name can be used by some other corporations subject to the consent of the owner of the trade name. Illustration: Trade Name: Penshoppe Corporate Name: Golden ABC **GROUNDS TO QUESTION CORPORATE NAME (1) Complainant corporation has acquired prior right over the use of such corporate name; and (2) Proposed name is either: a. Identical;’ or b. Deceptively or confusingly similar to that of any existing corporation or to any other name already protected by law; or c. Patently deceptive, confusing or contrary to existing laws. **TEST IN DETERMINING IDENTITY/SIMILARITY If it has the tendency to mislead a person using ordinary care and discrimination. What if the corporation desires to incorporate a subsidiary? Atty. Gaviola: Usually you will have the same name. The SEC allows it, provided that the corporation which had a priority right will send you a letter of consent. In this case, you cannot reserve your name online. You will have to write a letter to the SEC main office in Manila to basically grant permission for the subsidiary to use the name of the parent. So, just because it’s similar, it’s automatically not allowed. So, if the corporation with the prior right consents, then, it will be allowed. But it has to be proven that there is a parent-subsidiary/affiliate. See also discussion of Corporate Name under Sec. 13. SEC. 18. REGISTRATION, INCORPORATION AND COMMENCEMENT OF CORPORATION EXISTENCE Section 18. Registration, Incorporation and Commencement of Corporation Existence. - A person or group of persons desiring to incorporate shall submit the intended corporate name to the Commission for verification. If the Commission finds that the name is distinguishable from a name already reserved or registered for the use of another corporation, not protected by law and is not contrary to law, rules and regulation, the name shall be reserved in favor of the incorporators. The incorporators shall then submit their articles of incorporation and bylaws to the Commission. If the Commission finds that the submitted documents and information are fully compliant with the requirements of this Code, other relevant laws, rules and regulations, the Commission shall issue the certificate of incorporation. A private corporation organized under this Code commences its corporate existence and juridical personality from the date the Commission issues the certificate of incorporation under its official seal thereupon the incorporators, stockholders/members and their successors shall constitute a body corporate under the name stated in the articles of incorporation for the period of time mentioned therein, unless said period is extended or the corporation is sooner dissolved in accordance with law. After the requirements are complied with, the SEC shall now issue the Certificate of Incorporation. Note: The trade name and corporate name need not be the same. Page 30 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law What would the issuance of the Certificate of Incorporation mean? A: It is considered the birth of the corporation and the corporation commences its juridical personality. Importance: The COI is the best evidence of the corporation’s existence. We can now classify ourselves as what kind of corporation? A: It will now become a de jure corporation – which is a corporation in fact and in law. SEC. 19. DE FACTO CORPORATION Section 19. De Facto Corporations. - The due incorporation of any corporation claiming in good faith to be a corporation under this Code, and its right to exercise corporate powers, shall not be required into collaterally in any private suit to which such corporation may be a party. Such inquiry may be made by the Solicitor General in a quo warranto proceeding. What is a de jure corporation? A: it is one created with substantial conformity to the mandatory statutory requirements in the Corporation Code of the Philippines. What is a de facto corporation? A: An association of persons existing under a valid law under which it may be incorporated after having attempted in good faith to incorporate, and assuming corporate powers (Seventh Day Adventist Conference Church of Southern Phils. Vs. Northeastern Mindanao Mission of Seventh Day Adventists, Inc., GR. No. 150416, 1950) What are the requisites to be considered a de facto corporation? A: (1) There is a valid law that deems to establish a corporation; (2) Substantial compliance with the requirements or a colorable attempt to organize a corporation under such law; (3) Good faith on the part of the corporation in exercising corporate powers. Illustration. Group exercised good faith in substantially complying with the requirements – De Facto Corporation A group of five (5), after signing their Articles of Incorporation and having it notarized, told someone else to file it at the SEC and did not bother to follow up. It did not even tell anyone to check on the papers. Nevertheless, it went to say that it is now a corporation since they have executed the articles. They assumed credit with a supplied, and the supplier failed to deliver, despite the transaction. with the requirements to organize a corporation as provided by law. If someone really wants to question the existence of this corporation, it should only be the Solicitor General representing the government, who is supposed to extend the privilege. Only the Solicitor General can question the existence of the corporation through a quo warranto. Rule: The State must bring a direct proceeding to question the validity of its corporate existence through the Solicitor General by filing a quo warranto proceeding. Its existence as a corporation cannot be collaterally attacked either by the State or by private individuals. SEC. 20. CORPORATION BY ESTOPPEL Section 20. Corporation by Estoppel. - All persons who assume to act as a corporation knowing it to be without the authority to do so shall be liable as general partners for all debts, liabilities and damages incurred or arising as a result thereof: Provided, however, That when any such ostensible corporation is sued on any transaction entered by its as a corporation or on any tort committed by it as such, it shall not be allowed to use on any its lack of corporate personality as a defense. Anyone who assumes an obligation to an ostensible corporation as such cannot resist performance thereof on the ground that there was in fact no corporation. What is a corporation by estoppel? A: A group of persons who assume to act as a corporation knowing it to be without authority to do so, who shall be liable as general partners for debts, liabilities and damages incurred or arising as a result thereof. **NOTES: A group of persons which holds itself out as a corporation and enters into a contract with a third person on the strength of such appearance cannot be permitted to deny its existence in an action under said contract. “One who assumes an obligation to an ostensible corporation as such, cannot resist performance thereof on the ground thereof that there was in fact no corporation.” These are corporations who have exercised rights as a corporation and has undertaken obligations as a corporation, even without validly incorporating. In which case, the persons who made up the corporation are estopped from claiming that they are not. But they cannot, because there is no real corporation, they will not be liable as a corporation. They will be liable as partners. They will be solidarily liable in their personal capacity. Lack of corporate personality is not a defense that it can avail. Requirements of a Corporation by Estoppel: They secured everything and applied with all the requirements. They were able to receive the certificate of incorporation. They entered into the same transaction above. The supplier argued that the corporation cannot sue them because the suppliers went to SEC and discovered that the AOI did not contain any information on its capitalization (which is a fatal defect). Can the suppliers file a motion to dismiss? A: No. In this case, the corporation is considered a de facto corporation because of its good faith in substantially complying (1) Representation by a group to the public; (2) Knowing that they do not have the authority to act as a corporation; and (3) Third parties contracting with them are induced to believe that they have the authority to act as a corporation. **NOTE: Estoppel is a defense available only to third persons against the ostensible corporation. When there is no third person involved, Page 31 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law and the conflict arises only among those assuming the form of a corporation, who therefore know that it has not been registered, there is no corporation by estoppel. (Lozano vs. De Los Santos, G.R. No. 125221, 1997) Illustration. Group merely executed the articles and later transacted with a supplier – Corporation by Estoppel A group of five (5), after signing their Articles of Incorporation and having it notarized, told someone else to file it at the SEC and did not bother to follow up. It did not even tell anyone to check on the papers. Nevertheless, it went to say that it is now a corporation since they have executed the articles. They assumed credit with a supplied, and the supplier failed to deliver, despite the transaction. Can they sue the supplier? A: Yes, they can sue the supplier as a CORPORATION BY ESTOPPEL, but not as a corporation de facto. ICAB, there is no substantial attempt at organizing a corporation – merely executing the articles is not an attempt. CORPORATION DE FACTO VS. CORPORATION BY ESTOPPEL Corporation de Facto A corporation that exists in fact, but not in law. Definition 1. There is a valid law that deems to establish a corporation; 2. Requisites 3. Substantial compliance with the requirements or a bona fide attempt to organize a corporation under such law; and Good faith on the part of the corporation in exercising corporate powers. Corporation by Estoppel A group of persons who assume to act as a corporation knowing it to be without authority to do so, who shall be liable as general partners for debts, liabilities and damages incurred or arising as a result thereof. 1. Representation by a group to the public; 2. Knowing that they do not have the authority to act as a corporation; and 3. Third parties contracting with them are induced to believe that they have the authority to act as a corporation. Illustration 1. No papers were submitted to SEC There were 5 individuals who did not submit anything to SEC and entered into a transaction with someone else. Can they be considered as a corporation? A: No. There is no corporation at all. Illustration 2. Five people misrepresented themselves as a corporation and borrowed money from a bank If the five of them went to the bank and told the bank that we they are a corporation – they called themselves the “Omnibus Corporation”. The bank lent them money. However, they failed to pay the bank and sued them as the Omnibus Corporation. The lawyer of the Omnibus Corporation filed a motion to dismiss arguing that it has no juridical personality. Can the bank sue them as a corporation? A: Yes, they are deemed a corporation by estoppel. What happens to the Motion to Dismiss? A: It shall not be granted on the ground that they are considered as a corporation by estoppel Who will pay the amount? A: They will be treated as general partners – they will be solidarily liable. So what is the point of complying with all of these requirement when they will be only treated on as a corporation? A: The law treats them as a corporation by reasons of equity. It is not for purposes of giving them the privilege under the Revised Corporation Code but only for establishing their liability. IOW if they are not treated as corporation, the loan will not be paid. Illustration 3. The Corporation by Estoppel lends money to someone; debtor fails to pay Let’s reverse the situation. Somebody borrowed from the five people because they misrepresented themselves as a corporation. The debtors did not pay. So the Omnibus Corporation are now demanding payment from the debtor. The debtor filed a motion to dismiss arguing that they misrepresented themselves as a corporation. Will the motion to dismiss be entertained? A: No. The debtor likewise cannot free itself from his liability of the unpaid debts by invoking that he transacted with a corporation by estoppel. Atty. Espedido: Bottom line: Once you have enjoyed certain advantages, you cannot now question the existence of that corporation by estoppel. You cannot now say “I will not pay you because you are not a corporation”. This is taken in a sense that a 3rd party cannot take advantage of the fact that the lender is not a corporation. In the same manner that the corporation by estoppel itself cannot pursue any transaction because it does not have any juridical personality. Page 32 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law But if that relationship ripens into a transaction, by rule of equity, that relationship may be recognized and the parties may be afforded a protection of the law. IOW, a corporation by estoppel is established only between the parties. It does not have a juridical personality. The relationship only exists between the parties. We are not saying that they gained juridical personality. Only that the law gives protection. RULE ON EQUITY requires that the rights of the parties must be protected. Illustration 4. No substantial compliance of the requirements There is another group that has signed and executed their AOI and notarized it. After being authorized, they now entered into a transaction. Can they be considered as a corporation? A: We have to qualify. If it is shown that they have substantially complied with the requirements in good faith, they will be considered as a de facto corporation. However, in the facts at hand, it was not mentioned that they substantially complied with the requirements. They did not even file the requirements. There act only ended upon the notarization. ICAB, there was no honest intention. Illustration 5. Substantial compliance of the requirements and good faith of the corporation are both present transaction and only insofar as the parties are concerned. (2) Outside of that, it does not enjoy any privilege of a corporation at all. QUESTIONING THE VALIDITY OF CORPORATE EXISTENCE Rule: Assuming that a de facto corporation actually exists, its existence as a corporation cannot be collaterally attacked either by the State or by private individuals. The State must bring a direct proceeding to question the validity of its corporate existence through the Solicitor General by filing a quo warranto proceeding. Why the State? A: A corporation is a creation by law. It is a privilege granted by the State so that it is only the State that can take it away. It is the state that issues the Certificate of Incorporation. If it does not issue, only the State can say that you do not exist as a corporation. For all intents and purposes, the de facto corporation is considered as existing insofar as the public is concerned, except the State. **NOTES GOOD FAITH The group failed to indicate the capital of the corporation. However, for reasons we do not know, the examiners of the SEC issued them an Articles of Incorporation. The issuance of the COI is essential to the claim of good faith. An association of persons to claiming to exercise the powers of a corporation knowing that no COI had yet been issued to them cannot claim to be exercising such powers in good faith. (Hall vs. Piccio, G.R. No. L-2598, 1950) Believing now that they received the juridical personality, is it now a corporation? A: It could now be considered as a de facto corporation because there was substantial compliance and good faith on the part of the corporation. If after incorporation, the incorporators discovered that they have not complied substantially with the law and still continued transacting business as a corporation, without doing anything to correct the defect, the privilege of a de facto existence can no longer be invoked in good faith. HOWEVER, if they were subsequently notified of the defects of the requirements they have submitted and they still failed to comply with the requirements. They will not be considered as a corporation de facto because it lacks the element of good faith PURPOSES OF THE DE FACTO DOCTRINE 1. 2. BUT PRIOR to that notification from the SEC, believing that it fulfilled the requirements and it proceeded into entering the transactions – they are considered a corporation de facto. What do you think is the justification of the law for treating them as a corporation de facto? A: For stability of business transactions – this is to promote security of business transaction and to eliminate quibbling over irregularities. It is also for the protection of the 3rd persons and consideration of equity. REASONS FOR TREATING A CORPORATION BY ESTOPPEL AS A CORPORATION (1) Principle of Equity (2) Unjust Enrichment – “No one shall unjustly enrich himself at the expense of another.” LIMITATIONS (1) The law only recognizes the transaction and the rights of the parties in relation to that particular 3. 4. To promote the security of business transactions and to eliminate quibbling over irregularities. A third person dealing with a corporation will rarely be prejudiced if the company is recognized as a corporation in spite of minor defects in formation. Seldom would it be just to allow a wrongdoer to quibble over such objections to escape liability or wrongdoing. It would be unjust to allow a claimant against a supposed company to assert the individual liability of innocent passive investors on the ground of flaws in the formal steps of incorporation, when they have attempted in good faith to comply with the statutory requirements and the objecting party is not prejudiced. (Villanueva, Corporate Law) WHEN DE FACTO DOCTRINE DOES NOT APPLY 1. 2. A corporation whose purpose is prohibited by law or is contrary to public policy; A corporation created for the practice of learned profession in the absence of a law expressly permitting the organization of such corporations. (Note: The business organization for the practice of profession shall be by particular partnership.) Page 33 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law INSTANCES WHEN THERE IS A DE FACTO CORPORATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Failure to give the notice required by the statue for the meeting for its organization; Failure to fix and limit the amount of capital stock of the company at the first meeting; Failure to issue stocks; Informalities in the proceedings of corporate meetings; Lack of Certificate of Organization filed or executed; Lack of elected BOD; Irregularities with respect to the number, term, place of residence, and of meeting of the Board of Directors; Some of the persons elected as directors are disqualified; and In general, when there is a defect in the organization of the corporation and not on its creation (Chung Ka Bio vs. IAC, G.R. No. 71837, 1988) CONSEQUENCE OF DE FACTO STATUS For all intents and purposes, a de facto corporation has all the same rights, powers, obligations, and liabilities as a de jure corporation. The only difference is that the due incorporation of a de facto corporation may be directly inquired into by the Solicitor General in a quo warranto proceeding. Conversely, in contrast to a de facto corporation, a de jure corporation can successfully resist a suit brought by the State challenging its existence. SEC. 21. EFFECT OF NON-USE OF CORPORATE CHARTER AND CONTINUOUS INOPERATION Section 21. Effects of Non-Use of Corporate Charter and Continuous Inoperation. - If a corporation does not formally organize and commence its business within five (5) year from the date of its incorporation, its certificate of incorporation shall be deemed revoked as of the day following the end of the five (5)-year period. However, if a corporation has commenced its business but subsequently becomes inoperative for a period of at least five (5) consecutive years, the Commission may, after due notice and hearing, place the corporation under delinquent status. A delinquent corporation shall have a period of two (2) years to resume operations and comply with all requirements that the Commission shall prescribed. Upon the compliance by the corporation, the Commission shall issue an order lifting the delinquent status. Failure to comply with the requirements and resume operations within the period given by the Commission shall cause the revocation of the corporation's certificate of incorporation. The Commission shall give reasonable notice to, and coordinate with the appropriate regulatory agency prior to the suspension or revocation of the certificate of incorporation of companies under their special regulatory jurisdiction. After the Issuance of the Certificate of Incorporation (1) The stockholders will convene to elect the Board of Directors. (2) Once the BOD is elected, they will convene to have set of officers. EFFECT OF FAILURE TO ORGANIZE AND COMMENCE Rule: When the corporation does not formally organize and commence its business within five (5) years FROM the date of its incorporation – the Certificate of Incorporation (COI) will be deemed revoked or cancelled on the day following the end of the five-year period EFFECT OF FAILURE TO OPERATE Rule: If the corporation becomes subsequently inoperative for at least five (5) consecutive years – AFTER due notice and hearing, the Commission will place the Corporation under delinquent status NOTE: There is no automatic revocation. The SEC will place the corporation under a delinquent status and the delinquent corporation shall be given a period of two (2) years to resume the operations and comply with the prescribed requirements of the Commission. Once complied – the delinquent status is lifted and the corporation will have de jure status Failure to comply – cause the revocation of the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation GROUNDS FOR SUSPENSION (a) The articles of incorporation or any amendment thereto is not substantially in accordance with the form prescribed herein; (b) The purpose or purposes of the corporation are patently unconstitutional, illegal, immoral or contrary to government rules and regulations; (c) The certification concerning the amount of capital stock subscribed and/or paid is false; and (D) The required percentage of Filipino ownership of the capital stock under existing laws or the Constitution has not been complied with. (E) TITLE III. BOARD OF DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS The law makes a distinction between ownership and management. The board (management) controls, operates and exercises the powers of the corporation, while the owners periodically elect, or when demanded by the circumstances replace the board. The Corporation Code follows the stakeholder-centered rather than the shareholder-centered model. Under this model, owners are only one of the many corporate stockholders, who have diverse and varied interests. The corporation, through its board, must take into account and rank such interests in its actions. Who are the corporation’s stakeholders? A: They include but are not limited to: (1) Creditors (2) Employees (3) Customers (4) Suppliers (5) Government (6) Community where the corporation operates Whom do we elect? A: President, Secretary, Treasurer, all officers listed in the bylaws of the corporation. Page 34 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Note: Stakeholders are different from shareholders. Shareholders are those individuals or entities who own the corporation by holding the corporation’s share of stocks. On the other hand, stakeholders are those who have an interest in the operations of the corporation, an interest which is not necessarily pecuniary or financial. While a shareholder is always a stakeholder, a stakeholder is not always a shareholder. from among the members of the corporation. Each director and trustee shall hold office until the successor is elected and qualified. A director who ceases to own at least one (1) share of stock or a trustee who ceases to be a member of the corporation shall cease to be such. The board of the following corporations vested with public interest shall have independent directors constituting at least twenty percent (20%) of such board: **DOCTRINE OF CENTRALIZED MANAGEMENT All business of the corporation shall be conducted and all its properties shall be controlled and held by the Board of Directors or Trustees. A corporation can act only through its directors and officers. Acts of management pertain to the board and those of ownership to the stockholders. (PSE vs. Litonjua, G.R. No. 204014, 2016) While stockholders and members are entitled to receive profits, the management and the direction of the corporation are lodged with their representatives and agents – the board of directors/trustees. Acts of management pertain to the board; and those of ownership to the stockholders/members. (Tan vs. Sycip, G.R. No. 153468, 2006) The concentration in the board of the powers of control of corporate business and of appointment of corporate officers and managers is necessary for efficiency in any large organization. Stockholders are too numerous, too scattered, and unfamiliar with the business of a corporation to conduct its business directly. And so the plan of corporate organization is for the stockholders to choose the directors who shall control and supervise the conduct of corporate business. (Filipinas Port vs. Go, G.R. No. 161886, 2007) The power to purchase real property is vested in the Board of Directors or Trustees. While a corporation may appoint agents to negotiate for the purchase of real property needed by the corporation, the final say will have to be with the Board, whose approval will finalize the transaction. A corporation can only exercise its powers and transact its business through its Board of Directors, and through its officers and agents when authorized by a board resolution or by its by-laws. (Sps. Firme vs. Ukal Enterprises and Development Corp., G.R. No. 146608, 2003) WHEN DOCTRINE OF CENTRALIZED MANAGEMENT NOT APPLICABLE 1. 2. 3. In the case of an Executive Committee duly authorized in the by-laws; Where a corporate officer acts within the scope of his authority under the by-laws or board resolution; In case of close corporations, the stockholders may directly manage the business of the corporation instead, if the AOI so provides. (a) Corporations covered by Section 17.2 of Republic Act No. 8799, otherwise known as "The Securities Regulation Code", namely those whose securities are registered with the Commission, corporations listed with an exchange or with assets of at least Fifty million pesos (50,000,000.00) and having two hundred (200) or more holders of shares, each holding at least one hundred (100) shares of a class of its equity shares; (b) Banks and quasi-banks, NSSLAs, pawnshops, corporations engaged in money service business, preneed, trust and insurance companies and other financial intermediaries; and (c) Other corporations engaged in businesses vested with public interest similar to the above, as may be determined by the Commission, after taking into account relevant factors which are germane to the objective and purpose of requiring the election of an independent director, such as the extent of minority ownership, type of financial products or securities issued or offered to investors, public interest involved in the nature of business operations, and other analogous factors. An independent director is a person who apart from shareholdings and fees received from any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonable be received to materially interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities as a director. Independent directors must be elected by the shareholders present or entitled to vote in absentia during the election of directors. Independent directors shall be subject to rules and regulations governing their qualifications, disqualifications, voting requirements, duration of term and term limit, maximum number of board membership and other requirements that the Commission will prescribed to strengthen their independence and align with international best practices. **QUALIFICATIONS FOR A DIRECTOR (1) Must own at least 1 share of stock. By ownership, what is required is legal ownership which is determined through the stocks and transfer book reflecting one’s name as the owner or holder thereof. Beneficial ownership is not necessary. (2) Must not possess any of the disqualifications (See Sec. 26.). SEC. 22. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE BOD/BOT Section 22. The Board of Directors or Trustees of a Corporation; Qualification and Term. - Unless otherwise provided in this Code, the board of directors or trustees shall exercise the corporate powers, conduct all business, and control all properties of the corporation. Note: Majority of the directors must be residents of the Philippines. Majority, not all. There is no citizenship requirement, except for nationalized industries. Even foreigners can be voted as directors. Directors shall be elected for a term of one (1) year from among the holders of stocks registered in the corporation's book while trustees shall be elected for a term not exceeding three (3) years Page 35 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR Who are independent directors? A: They are persons believed to be of independent mind. No relationship at all with the corporation except for some token shareholdings. The wisdom of their decision, whether bad or good, cannot be reversed by the stockholders. Otherwise, it is useless to put them there only to be reversed by the stockholders. However, it does not mean that they can decide on certain business judgments by disregarding all existing limitations. **NOTES: Instances when an Independent Director is required: (1) Corporations vested with public interest such as financial institutions or corporations that have access to public funds, borrow from the public, or corporations that issue or float bonds – they solicit capital from the public (2) Corporations covered under the Securities Regulation Code, namely: (b) Securities registered with the Commission (c) Corporations listed with an exchange (d) Corporations with assets of at least 50M pesos, and having 200 or more holders of shares, each holding at least 100 shares of a class of its equity shares GEN: Directors cannot be held liable for mistakes or errors in the exercise of their business judgment as long as they acted in good faith, with due care and prudence. Contracts entered into by the BOD are binding upon the corporation and courts will not interfere. XPNs: (1) If the contracts are so unconscionable and oppressive as to amount to a wanton destruction of the rights of the minority. (Ingersoll vs. Malabon Sugar, G.R. No. L-27770, 1927) (2) If they violate their duties under Sec. 30 (director willfully and knowingly assents to patently unlawful acts of the corporation, or are guilty of gross negligence or bad faith); and (3) If they violate Sec. 33 (disloyalty of a director who acquires for himself a business opportunity that should have belonged to the corporation, unless his act is ratified by a 2/3 vote of the stockholders). (3) Banks, quasi-banks, NSSLAs, pawnshops, corporations engaged in money service business, preneed, trust and insurance companies, and other financial intermediaries Note: Independent Directors shall make up at least 20% of the board such that when there are 10 members of the BOD, it requires at least two independent directors. CONSEQUENCES OF THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE 1. COMPLIANCE OFFICER Rule: Other than the President, Treasurer, and Secretary, a compliance officer is also appointed in corporations vested with public interest. 2. The resolution, contracts and transactions of the board cannot be overturned or set aside by the stockholders or members, and not even the courts under the principle that the business of the corporation has been left to the hands of the Board. Directors and duly authorized officers cannot be held personally liable for acts or contracts done with the exercise of their business judgment. ELECTION CONTESTS XPNs: - Must follow the prescribed procedure in the by-laws, including the period of instituting the same. The matter should be referred to arbitration, if provided for in the by-laws or the charter. In the absence of such procedure and/or period in the bylaws, the election contest must be filed within 15 days from the date of election. POWERS OF THE BOARD 3-Fold Powers or Authority of the Board (1) Corporate powers (2) Conduct all business (3) Control or administer all properties of the corporation Nature of the Powers of the Board: Generally, the powers of the BOD cannot be delegated. Exception: Ministerial functions PRINCIPLE OF BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE Under this principle, the stockholders cannot review the decisions of the Board. If they do not want the decision of the Board, they cannot go to court and change the decision. a. b. c. When the Code expressly provides otherwise; When the directors or officers acted with fraud, gross negligence or bad faith; When the directors or officers act against the corporation in conflict of interest situations. REMEDIES IN CASE OF MISMANAGEMENT a. b. c. d. e. Removal of directors pursuant to Sec. 27. Derivative suit or complaint filed with the RTC. Receivership. Injunction if the act has not yet been done. Dissolution if abuse amounts to a ground for quo warranto but the SolGen refuses to act. Note: Dean Villanueva opined that a derivative suit may be an exception to such Rule: this occurs when it is apparent that the Board is not in a position to validly exercise its business judgment for the protection of the corporation, e.g.: a. When the Board itself has committed an act causing damage to the corporation, or b. When the Board is placed in a conflict of interests scenario whereby it is unlikely that it would use such business discretion to file such suit for the best interest of the corporation. Atty: Espedido: The BOD can tell the stockholders that they have no authority to question or change their decision. Page 36 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law LIMITATIONS OF THE POWERS OF THE BOARD It is subject to limitations imposed by: (1) Constitution (2) Laws (3) By-laws (4) Articles of Incorporation NATURE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTOR’S POWER Their power is original – it comes from the law or the State. It is the law which defines the Board’s powers. So long as the power is exercised within the law, nobody can question this. However, if the Board’s decision is illegal, the Business Judgment Rule does not mean that they could do anything even if it is illegal. Business judgment rule is confined to the decision of the board purely on business, and within the boundaries of the law, within the boundaries of the AOI. SEC. 23. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OR TRUSTEES Section 23. Election of Directors or Trustees. - Except when the exclusive right is reserved for holders of founders' shares under Section 7 of this Code, each stockholder or member shall have the right to nominate any director or trustee who possesses all of the qualifications and none of the disqualifications and none of the disqualifications set forth in this Code. At all elections of directors or trustees, there must be present, either in person or through a representative authorized to act by written proxy, the owners of majority of the outstanding capital stock, or if there be no capital stock, a majority of the members entitled to vote. When so authorized in the bylaws or by a majority of the board of directors, the stockholders or members may also vote through remote communication or in absentia: Provided, That the right to vote through such modes may be exercised in corporations vested with public interest, notwithstanding the absence of a provision in the bylaws of such corporations. A stockholder or member who participates through remote communication or in absentia, shall be deemed present for purposes of quorum. The election must be by ballot if requested by any voting stockholder or member. In stock corporations, stockholders entitled to vote shall have the right to vote the number of shares of stock standing in their own names in the stock books of the corporation at the time fixed in the bylaws or where the bylaws are silent at the time of the election. The said stockholder may: (a) vote such number of shares for as many persons as there are directors to be elected; (b) cumulate said shares and give one (1) candidate as many votes as the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of shares owned; or (c) distribute them on the same principle among as many candidates as may be seen fit: Provided, That the total number of votes cast shall not exceed the number of shares owned by the stockholders as shown in the books of the corporation multiplied by the whole number of directors to be elected: Provided, however, That no delinquent stock shall be voted. Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation or in the bylaws, members of nonstock corporations may cast as many votes as there are trustees to be elected by may not cast more than one (1) vote for one (1) candidate. Nominees for directors or trustees receiving the highest number of votes shall be declared elected. If no election is held, or the owners of majority of the outstanding capital stock or majority of the members entitled to vote are not present in person, by proxy, or through remote communication or not voting in absentia at the meeting, such meeting may be adjourned and the corporation shall proceed in accordance with Section 25 of this Code. The directors or trustees elected shall perform their duties as prescribed by law, rules of good corporate governance, and bylaws of the corporation. HOW ELECTIONS ARE CONDUCTED Normally, how do we replace officers? A: Through an election. Who calls the meeting? A: (1) It is called by the secretary a. On the order of the President b. By a written demand of the stockholders representing at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock, or a majority of the members entitled to vote (2) Called by any stockholder or member of the corporation signing the demand by directly addressing the stockholders or members – if there is no secretary, or the secretary despite demand, refuses or fails to call the meeting **When are the elections held? A: Elections must be held once every year. The Code does not provide when the first election of directors or trustees shall be held. It authorizes the corporation to provide in the by-laws the time for the holding of the annual election of directors or trustees. Who can elect? A: Majority of the stockholders Rule: At all elections of directors or trustees, there must be present, either in person or through a representative authorized to act by written proxy, the owners of majority of the outstanding capital stock, or if there be no capital stock, a majority of the members entitled to vote. When so authorized in the bylaws or by a majority of the board of directors, the stockholders or members may also vote through remote communication or in absentia. [Section 23, paragraph 2] Shareholders or members must be present either: (a) In person; (b) Through a representative authorized to act by written proxy; (c) Remote communication or (d) In absentia What happens if only a few stockholders appear and there is no quorum? A: A meeting cannot be validly held because as we said a quorum refers to the number of people required to validly hold a meeting. To constitute a valid meeting, the majority of the stockholders must be present. Page 37 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law What happens if the stockholders present for the holding of such election are/is less than the majority? What happens? A: In this case, plurality vote sets in, which means that the nominee receiving the highest number of votes shall be declared elected, even if the majority requirement was not reached. Atty. Espedido: Generally, a meeting cannot be validly held. However, under the circumstances in our illustration, the law provides that “notwithstanding any provision of the articles of incorporation or bylaws to the contrary, the shares of stock or membership represented at such meeting and entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for purposes of conducting an election under this section. [Section 25 paragraph 4] How do we proceed with the elections? A: (1) Presiding officer will call for nominations. Everyone who has at least 1 share of stock is entitled to be nominated. (2) Presiding officer will determine if the nominees have all of the qualifications and none of the disqualifications (3) Other nominees will be tabulated QUORUM Rule: In the meeting of the stockholders, at least majority of the owners of the outstanding capital stock should be present. Otherwise, we do not have a quorum. What is a quorum? A: It is the number of stockholders or members sufficient to conduct a valid meeting. In a meeting of the board of directors, the majority usually constitutes a quorum, but the by-laws can provide for another. Kinds of Quorum (1) Simple majority The traditional kind. 50% + 1 (2) Qualified majority The number stated in the by-laws. It can be more than a simple majority, but it can never be lower than the simple majority Any number higher than 50% + 1 as provided for in the articles of incorporation (e.g. 2/3 or 3/4) Note: Corporations can determine by themselves what would constitute a quorum. There can be instances when the quorum set by the corporation is less than the majority. Do not confuse quorum for majority. **NOTES: 1. In absence of the required majority, there will be failure of election. 2. The law follows plurality voting, wherein the nominee with the highest number of votes shall be elects as a director. 3. The election is generally done through straight voting 4. Cumulative voting is generally not permitted in a nonstock corporation, where each member may not cast more than 1 vote for 1 candidate. PROXY A proxy is a written document which contains the authority given to someone to represent the stockholder and cast his vote during the meeting. IOW, these documents are what we might consider as Management Control Devices which are tools that the management uses to control the decisions. Atty. Espedido: If you are part of management, and you want to secure the issues you want to be approved in a meeting or the persons you want to be elected in the election, you try to gather as many proxies as you can, and cast the vote in behalf of the stockholders. You will cast the vote yourself because you are the duly authorized representative. If you notice you have some PLDT subscriptions, you are a stockholder of PLDT. And from time to time, you will receive notices from the PLDT. If management or the board would want to approve something during the meeting, they would advise you to send proxies as well. **NOTES: Proxies shall be in writing, signed by the stockholder or member and filed before the scheduled meeting with the corporate secretary. Unless otherwise provided by the proxy, it shall be valid only for the meeting for which it was intended. No proxy shall be valid and effective for a period longer than 5 years at any one time. (See Sec. 57.) VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT (See Sec. 58.) A Voting Trust Agreement is a document similar to a proxy but longer in application or existence. It contemplates a situation wherein the group of stockholders agree among themselves that in cases of issues to be presented for approval, they will bot as one (block vote), and cast the vote as one. How many directors do we elect? A: It depends on the by-laws of the corporation. **NOTES Election of Directors (1) Done at any meeting called for the election of BOD and voted for by the stockholders. At all elections, owners of the majority of the outstanding capital stocks must be presented either: a. In person; b. Through a representative authorized to act by written proxy (in absentia), e.g. proxy or trust; c. If allowed by the by-laws or majority of the BOD, through remote communication (e.g. telephone conference or video conference) Note: Such modes of attending the meeting and voting may be utilized by corporations vested with public interest although not provided in their by-laws. (2) The election must be by ballot if requested by any voting stockholder. Hence, voting by viva voces or roll call (raising hands) is valid except when there is a request that it be by ballot. (3) Stockholders shall have the right to vote the number of shares of stock standing in their own names (1 share = 1 vote) as long as the total number of votes cast shall Page 38 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law not exceed the number of shares owned by the stockholders as shown in the books of the corporation multiplied by the whole number of directors to be elected. In this case, A B C D E will win in the elections, but not F. This scenario illustrates the cumulative voting. What is the purpose of cumulative voting? A: The intention of such mode of voting is to protect the interest of the minority shareholder and ensure that the minority has representation in the Board of Directors. Formula: No. of votes = No. of shares x No. of vacant seats Methods of voting: a. Straight voting Vote such number of shares for as many persons as there are directors to be elected. Example. A owns 100 shares. If there are 5 directors to be elected, A is entitled to 500 votes multiplying 100 by 5. He may give to the 5 candidates 100 votes each. b. Cumulative voting (for 1 candidate) Cumulate said shares and give 1 candidate as many votes as the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of shares owned. The privilege of cumulative voting is permitted for the purpose of giving minority stockholders representation in the BOD. Stockholders shall have the right to vote the number of shares of stock standing in their own names. A director elected because of the vote of the minority stockholders who untied in cumulative voting cannot be removed without cause. Illustration. There are 6 nominees for the 5 slots as a director, nominees A B C D E have 20 shares each. However, B C D E agreed to gang up against A, so the four (4) of them agreed to give F one share each so that F will now be qualified to be nominated since he will be holding four shares. How much shares do they have now? A: A 20 shares B 19 shares C 19 shares D 19 shares E 19 shares F 4 shares Do you think they can ease out A? A: No, they cannot ease A out because in this case, A can cumulate all his shares to vote for himself. Thus: Shares A B C D E F 20 19 19 19 19 4 Votes (Shares X No. of Directors) 100 (20 x 5) 95 (19 x 5) 95 (19 x 5) 95 (19 x 5) 95 (19 x 5) 20 (4 x 5) c. Cumulative voting by distribution Distribute them on the same principle as many candidates as may be seen fit. Note: Comparison with non-stock corporations: Members may cast as many votes as there are trustees to be elected, but may not cast more than 1 vote for 1 candidate, unless otherwise provided in the AOI or in the by-laws. They cannot cumulate. Illustration. B, C, D, E and F agreed among themselves that they will be the directors with the exclusion of A. Each will have 50 votes. In order for them to be elected, they should use cumulative voting. They cannot prevent A from being elected, if they don’t want him to be a member of the board. Their plan however will not work because the law says, “protect the minority”. That’s the intention of the law in cumulative voting. (4) No delinquent stock shall be voted. Delinquent stocks – declared by the Board as delinquent because of their subscribers’ failure to pay the balance after the same was due or after the Board called for payment (5) Nominees for directors or trustees receiving the highest number of votes shall be declared elected. (6) If no election is held, or the owners of the majority of the OCS or majority of the members entitled to vote are not present in person, by proxy or through remote communication or not voting in absentia at the meeting, such meeting may be adjourned, and the corporation shall follow the procedures laid out in Sec. 25. SEC. 24. CORPORATE OFFICERS Section 24. Corporate Officers. - Immediately after their election, the directors of a corporation must formally organize an elect: (a) a president, who must be a director; (b) a treasurer, who must be a resident of the Philippines; and (d) such other officers as may be provided in the bylaws. If the corporation is vested with public interest, the board shall also elect compliance officer. The same person may hold two (2) or more positions concurrently, except that no one shall act as president and secretary or as president and treasurer at the same time, unless otherwise allowed in this Code. The officers shall manage the corporation and perform such duties as may be provided in the bylaws and/or as resolved by the board of directors. Page 39 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law REQUIREMENTS TO BECOME PRESIDENT President – must be a director, who is a holder of at least 1 share Vice President – not required to be a holder of at least 1 share, but by the time he succeeds as President, the VP is required to have at least one share by then **BASIC CORPORATE OFFICERS (1) The president (must be a director) (2) The treasurer (must be a resident of the Philippines) (3) The corporate secretary (must be a citizen and resident of the Philippines) (4) In the case of public interest company, the compliance officer (5) Other officers as provided for in the by-laws **RULE ON DUAL POSITIONS GEN: Any director may hold 2 or more positions concurrently. XPN: (1) President & secretary (3) President & treasurer XPN2: (1) Unless otherwise allowed by the RCC (2) In an OPC, the president can be a treasurer Rationale: To ensure faithful performance to their functions. CHAIRMAN Not a statutory corporate officer When his appointment is provided for in the by-laws, he generally sets the meeting and its agenda, and is the default officer to preside the same He may be an independent director, provided he must not hold an executive position and should not be involved in the corporation’s day-to-day operations He may be a non-Philippine national, even in corporations requiring Filipino ownership, provided he limits his role to that of a presiding officer during meetings PRESIDENT The president must be a director Primary officer tasked to implement the decision of the board Regarded as the principal agent of the corporation He shall manage the corporation and perform such duties as may be provided in the by-laws and/or resolved by the board of directors He is primarily authorized to initiate meetings, and in the absence of a Chairman, to preside them He is the main signatory of the stock certificates, and in exceptional cases, the financial statements VICE PRESIDENT The law does not require the board to elect a vice president He/She ensures succession to the presidency It is not provided by law that a vice-president should own at least one share of stock. However, for him to succeed the president, he must own 1 share of stock at the time of ascending into the office of the president. TREASURER The treasurer must be a resident of the Philippines. The law considers his immediate availability being the primary custodian of the corporate funds, which is needed in the running of corporate affairs and implementation of the board decision. Has control over the funds and/or other assets of the corporation Has authority to receive in the name and for the benefit of the corporation, all subscriptions, contributions or donations paid or given by the subscribers or members Certifies the information set forth in 7th and 8th clauses of the AOI, and that the paid-up portion of the subscription for the benefit or credit of the corporation has been received He is one of the main signatories of financial statements CORPORATE SECRETARY Tasked to maintain corporate records, including the stock and transfer book Upon order of the President, he sends notices and takes minutes of meetings Logically, he is the corporate officer with whom a dissenting director must register his objection to a particular corporate resolution, such as the issuance of a watered stock Primary officer tasked to make reports to the SEC Primary officer tasked to attest to corporate resolutions He should thus ensure that none of the information or statements in a report or certification required by the code is: (1) incomplete, (2) inaccurate, (3) false or (4) misleading. Otherwise, he may be liable for willfully certifying a report Together with the President, he is authorized to use stock certificates Restrictions: a. Should be a different person from the compliance officer b. Should not be a member of the BOD COMPLIANCE OFFICER Required only in corporations that are vested with public interest Ensures that the members of the board and corporate officers comply with law, the corporate charter and by-laws Should not be a member of the board OTHER CORPORATE OFFICERS By-laws may sanction the appointment of other corporate officers, who have special roles in running the affairs of the corporation Normally, they assist the president in managing the corporation They are agents of the corporation relative to their authority stipulated in the by-laws What is the significance of distinguishing between a corporate and non-corporate officer? A: Only corporate officers may bind the corporation, provided he acts within the scope of his authority. He may be terminated at will, whereas a non-corporate officer may only be terminated for just or authorized causes. Further, dispute over the separation from office of a corporate officer is considered an intra-corporate dispute, which falls under the jurisdiction of the regular courts. Page 40 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law **TERM OF CORPORATE OFFICERS (1) BOD – 1 year (2) Officers – generally coterminous with the Board, but the by-laws may provide that they have a longer term. Note: Unlike regular employees or subordinate officers who enjoy security of tenure, purely corporate officers and/or executive directors enjoy protection from their respective contracts with the corporation **VACANCIES IN THE POSITION OF THE OFFICERS They are filled a vote of majority of the board of directors, and the elected replacement officer has a term of only the unexpired portion of his predecessor. SEC. 25. REPORTORIAL REQUIREMENTS Section 25. Report of Election of Directors, Trustees and Officers, Non-holding of Election and Cessation from Office. - Within thirty (30) days after the election of the directors, trustees and officers of the corporation, the secretary, or any other officer of the corporation, the secretary, or any other officer of the corporation, shall submit to the Commission, the names, nationalities, shareholdings, and residence addresses of the directors, trustees and officers elected. The non-holding of elections and the reasons therefor shall be reported to the Commission within thirty (30) days from the date of the scheduled election. The report shall specify a new date for the election, which shall not be later than sixty (60) days from the scheduled date. If no new date has been designated, or if the rescheduled election is likewise not held, the Commission may, upon the application of a stockholder, member, director or trustee, and after verification of the unjustifiable non-holding of the election, summarily order that an election be held. The Commission shall have the power to issue such orders as may be appropriate, including other directing the issuance of a notice stating the time and place of the election, designated presiding officer, and the record date or dates for the determination of stockholders or members entitled to vote. Notwithstanding any provision of the articles of incorporation or by laws to the contrary, the shares of stock or membership represented at such meeting and entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for purposes of conducting an election under this section. Should a director, trustee or officer die, resign or in any manner case to hold office, the secretary or the director, trustee or officer of the corporation, shall, within seven (7) days form knowledge thereof, report in writing such fact to the Commission. (A) AFTER ELECTION ▪ After the election of the Members of the Board, the corporate secretary shall submit a report to the SEC for the results of the election within 30 days after the election of directors, trustees, and officers of the corporation. ▪ The report shall specify the new date for the election, which shall not be later than 60 days from the scheduled date. (C) NO QUORUM ON SECOND DATE ▪ The Commission shall have the power to issue a summary order that an election be held. The SEC shall have to power such orders as may be appropriate, including orders directing the issuance of a notice stating the time and place of the election, designated presiding officer, and the record date or dates for the determination of stockholders or members entitled to vote. Reason for SEC calling the election: Atty. Espedido: There are new relationships created. While in the Old Code, the objective of the SEC was more focused on stockholders. In the New Code, it does not only focus on stockholders but to stakeholders as well. The stakeholders include creditors, customers, clients, employees. These are now relationships that the corporation will have to establish. It is no longer focused within the corporation. The law now seems to protect all the stakeholders. They are involved insofar as the existence of the corporation is concerned, and the manner in which the corporation is being managed and operated. If there seems to be a problem, the SEC seems to assume. Who calls the meeting? A: The President orders the Secretary to send notices to the stockholder. However, if one of the agenda is the removal of the president, is the corporation and stakeholders helpless? A: No, not anymore. Under the Old Code, there was what is called HOLDOVER CAPACITY. The old provision says, “until the successor is elected and assumed office.” In the New Code, however, it cannot be done. Now, how could they be elected if there is no election? So now, the law now has a compulsory intervention by the SEC. HOLDOVER CAPACITY Illustration 1. In a situation where there is no President, the Vice President succeeds. However, if the VP cannot succeed, a special election will be called. Illustration 2. President refuses to call a meeting for his removal A meeting is scheduled for the removal of the President. However, the president himself will not call the meeting. In such a case, the usual provision in any organization in case an election of new officers cannot be held is that the old set of officers will continue – there will be a hold-over. The hold-over capacity is the abuse that the law wants to resolve. In order to resolve such scenario, the New Code now provides that the SEC will summarily order an election to be held. (B) IF NO ELECTION ▪ The secretary shall still submit a report and reasons therefor to the SEC within 30 days from the date of the scheduled election. Page 41 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law SEC. 26. DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS, TRUSTEES, OR OFFICERS Section 26. Disqualification of Directors, Trustees or Officers. - A person shall be disqualified from being a director, trustee or officer of any corporation if, within five (5) years prior to the election or appointment as such, the person was: (a) Convicted by final judgment: (1) Of an offense punishable by imprisonment for a period exceeding six (6) years; (2) For violating this Code; and (3) For violating Republic Act No. 8799, otherwise known as "The Securities Regulation Code"; (b) Found administratively liable for any offense involving fraudulent acts; and (c) By a foreign court or equivalent foreign regulatory authority for acts, violations or misconduct similar to those enumerated in paragraphs (a) and (b) above. The foregoing is without prejudice to qualifications or other disqualifications, which the Commission, the primary regulatory agency, or Philippine Competition Commission may impose in its promotion of good corporate governance or as a sanction in its administrative proceedings. GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION If within five (5) years PRIOR to the election or appointment as such, the person was: (3) Convicted by final judgment: a. Of an offense punishable by imprisonment for a period exceeding six (6) years; b. For violating this Code; and c. For violating Republic Act No. 8799, otherwise known as "The Securities Regulation Code"; (4) Found administratively liable for any offense involving fraudulent acts; and (5) By a foreign court or equivalent foreign regulatory authority for acts, violations or misconduct similar to those enumerated in paragraphs (a) and (b) above. Atty. Espedido: The SRC simply controls, manages, and monitors the activities of the stock market. The stock market is a market where only shares of stocks are being sold. If you want to share your shares of stock, all you have to do is register with the stock market. Before you could register, you would have to undergo the process of registering as an IPO. Once you comply with all the requisites, then you could already sell your shares to the public. SEC. 27. REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES Section 27. Removal of Director or Trustees. - Any director or trustee of a corporation may be removed from office by vote of the stockholders holding or representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock, or in a nonstock corporation, by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the member entitled to vote: Provided, That such removal shall take place either at a regular meeting of the corporation or at a special meeting called for the purpose, and in either case, after previous notice to stockholders or members of the corporation of the intention to propose such removal at the meeting. A special meeting of the stockholders or members for the purpose of removing any director or trustee must be called by the secretary on order of the president, or upon written demand of stockholders representing or holding at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock, or a majority of the members entitled to vote. If there is no secretary, or the secretary, despite demand, fails or refuses to call the special meeting or to give notice thereof, the stockholder or member of the corporation signing the demand may call the special meeting or to give notice thereof, the stockholder or member of the corporation signing the demand may call for the meeting by directly addressing the stockholders or members. Notice of the time and place of such meeting, as well as of the intention to propose such removal, must be given by publication or by written notice prescribed in this Code. Removal may be with or without cause: Provided, That removal without cause may not be used to deprive minority stockholders or members of the right representation to which they may be entitled under Section 23 of this Code. The Commission shall, motu propio or upon verified complaint, and after due notice and hearing, order the removal of a director or trustee elected despite the disqualification, or whose disqualification arose or is discovered subsequent to an election. The removal of a disqualified director shall be without prejudice to other sanctions that the Commission may impose on the board of directors or trustees who, with knowledge of the disqualification, failed to remove such director or trustee. SEC. 28. VACANCIES IN THE BOARD Section 28. Vacancies in the Office of Director or Trustee; Emergency Board. - Any vacancy occurring in the board of directors or trustees other that by removal or expiration of term may be filled by the vote of at least a majority of the remaining directors or trustees, if still constituting a quorum; otherwise, said vacancies must be filled by the stockholders or members in a regular or special meeting called for that purpose. When the vacancy is due to term expiration, the election shall be held no later than the day of such expiration at a meeting called for that purpose. When the vacancy arises as a result of removal by the stockholders or members, the election may be held on the same day of the meeting authorizing the removal and this fact must be so stated in the agenda and notice of said meeting. In all other cases, the election must be held no later than forty-five (45) days from the time the vacancy arose. A director or trustee elected to fill vacancy shall be referred to as replacement director or trustee elected to fill a vacancy shall be referred to as replacement director or trustee and shall serve only for the unexpired term of the predecessor in office. However, when the vacancy prevents the remaining directors from constituting a quorum and emergency action is required to prevent grave, substantial, and irreparable loss or damage to the corporation, the vacancy may be temporarily filled from among the officers of the corporation by unanimous vote of the remaining directors or trustees. The action by the designated director or trustee shall be limited to the emergency action necessary, and the term shall cease within a reasonable time form the termination of the emergency or upon election of the replacement director or trustee, whichever comes earlier. The corporation must notify the Commission within three (3) days from the creation of the emergency board, stating therein the reason for its creation. Any directorship or trusteeship to be filled by a reason of an increase in the number of directors or trustees shall be filled only Page 42 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law by an election at a regular or at a special meeting of stockholders or members duly called for the purpose, or in the same meeting authorizing the increase of directors or trustees if so stated in the notice of the meeting. In all elections to fill vacancies under this section, the procedure set forth in Section 23 and 25 of this Code shall apply. Cause of Vacancies: DARI-DREI (1) Death (2) Abandonment (3) Resignation (4) Incapacity (5) Disqualification (6) Removal (7) Expiration of Term (8) Increase in the number of Directors/Trustees RULES IN FILLING UP VACANCIES (A) For Removal Filled up by the stockholders or members in a regular or special meeting called for that purpose When – same day of the meeting authorizing the removal (B) For Expiration of Term Filled up by the stockholders or members in a regular or special meeting called for that purpose When – not later than the day of such expiration at a meeting called for that purpose either through a special or regular meeting (C) For Increase in the Number of Directors or Trustees Filled up by the stockholders or members in a (a) regular or special meeting called for that purpose or in the same meeting (b) When – in the same meeting authorizing the increase of directors or trustees if so stated in the notice of the meeting (D) For other causes (DARID; death, abandonment, resignation, incapacity, disqualification) Filled up by at least the majority of the remaining directors or trustees if still constituting a quorum – existing board will fill the vacancy When – not later than 45 days from the time the vacancy arose ➢ Term expiration Removal stockholders members by or Increase in number directors trustees the of or All other reasons Meeting should be called no later than the day of expiration at a meeting called for that purpose ➢ Meeting may be held on the same day as the meeting authorizing the removal, provided it must be stated in the agenda and notice of the meeting (1) At a regular or at a special meeting of stockholders/members duly called for such purpose, or (2) in the same meeting authorizing the increase of directors or trustees if so stated in the notice of the meeting. ➢ Meeting must be held no later than 45 days from the time the vacancy arose EMERGENCY BOARD Rule: When the vacancy prevents the remaining directors from constituting a quorum and emergency action is required to prevent grave, substantial, and irreparable loss or damage to the corporation, the vacancy may be temporarily filled from among the officers of the corporation by unanimous vote of the remaining directors or trustees. Illustration. If there were 5 members of the board and we have removed 3, how do we fill this up? A: Since there are only 2 members of the board left, the vacancy may be temporarily filled from among the officers of the corporation by unanimous vote of the remaining directors or trustees. The emergency board can now proceed to act on the emergency. The action by the designated director or trustee shall be limited to the emergency action necessary. So if the emergency is to borrow 10M, the Emergency Board has the power and authority to borrow 10M. After such, the term shall cease within a reasonable time from the termination of the emergency or upon election of the replacement director or trustee, whichever comes earlier. We still have a vacancy again. What do we do now? A: We now go to the regular route – calling for a regular stockholder’s meeting. **REMOVAL WHO MAY REMOVE (1) Stock corporation Vote of the stockholders holding or representing at least 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock (2) Non-stock corporation Vote of at least 2/3 of the members entitled to vote HOW REMOVAL IS DONE By the stockholders through a regular or special meeting. If in a special meeting, the special meeting shall be called for the purpose of removing the director. o It must be called by the secretary on order of the president, or upon written demand of the stockholders representing or holding at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock, or a majority of the members entitled to vote. If there is no secretary, or if the secretary, despite demand, fails or refuses to call the special meeting or to give notice thereof, the stockholder or member of the corporation signing the demand may call for the meeting by directly addressing the stockholders or members. Notice of the time and place of such meeting, as well as the information to propose such removal, must be given by publication or by written notice prescribed in this Code by SEC Upon verified complaint, and after due notice and hearing, order the removal of a director or trustee elected despite the disqualification, or whose disqualification arose or is discovered subsequent to an election. Page 43 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Atty. Gaviola: If there is an emergency situation, in order to prevent grave, substantial or irreparable loss or damage to the corporation, the vacancy must be temporarily filled from the officers of the corporation. Temporary only. After the emergency, the Stockholders would have to fill in the vacancy, because the Board does not form a quorum anymore. Note that in emergency situations, the Board, even if they do not constitute a quorum, may temporarily fill-in the vacancy from the officers of the corporation. Rationale: The reason why the law allows the directors to fill-in the vacancies is for convenience because it’s very hard to call a stockholder’s meeting, especially if you have a lot of stockholders. It will be difficult to get quorum, and it’s also the directors who manage the corporation. So, if the BOD cannot act because they’re missing a member, then that is not good for the corporation. So, the law allows the directors to fill in a vacancy. But only in certain instances. However, if the stockholders really insist on holding a meeting to fill a vacancy, then that is their prerogative. Because the power of the Board to fill in a vacancy is merely a delegated power coming from the stockholders. It’s inherent in the stockholders to fill in or elect members of the Board. (Valle Verde Country Club, Inc. vs. Africa, G.R. No. 151969, 4 September 2009) EXPIRATION How should this be filled up? A: Filled up by the majority of the stockholders representing 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock in a regular or special meeting called for that purpose When shall it be filled up? A: Not later than the day of such expiration at a meeting called for that purpose. (3) Voted upon by the stockholders representing the majority of the outstanding capital stocks XPN to XPN: A vote of at least of the majority of the outstanding capital stock or majority of the members entitled to vote grants the directors compensation in a meeting specifically called for that purpose. If they are given compensation, is there a limit? A: Yes. They should not receive more than 10% of the net income before tax of the preceding year. Why are they not paid? A: Being shareholders, they also receive a share in the dividends. Herbosa: Appointment to the board is a consequence of corporate ownership. An owner or member is ordinarily expected to assume the post of director or trustee, and manage the corporation for his ultimate benefit. Thus, the law does not generally authorize the payment of compensation to a shareholder/member as a director or trustee. Illustration. Director A owns 75% of the shares. It is not mentioned in the bylaws that the directors shall receive compensation. Thus, the other directors move that they be given compensation per month. All of the stockholders (including A) agreed that they shall be compensated for 30K per month. Is it valid? A: It is an invalid approval because the director cannot vote on the same meeting. As provided by law, the directors cannot participate in the determination of their own per diems or compensation. Absurdity of the provision (as observed by Atty. Espedido): SEC. 29 COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS OR TRUSTEES Section 29. Compensation of Directors or Trustees. - In the absence of any provision in the bylaws fixing their compensation, the directors or trustees shall not receive any compensation in their capacity as such, except for reasonable per diems: Provided, however, That the stockholders representing at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock or majority of the members may grant directors or trustees with compensation and approve the amount thereof at a regular or special meeting. In no case shall the total yearly compensation of directors exceed ten percent (10%) of the net income before income tax of the corporation during the preceding year. Directors or trustees shall not participate in the determination of their own per diems or compensation. Corporations vested with public interest shall submit to their shareholders and the Commission, an annual report of the total compensation of each of their directors or trustees. GEN: The directors or trustees shall not receive any compensation in their capacity as such. XPN: (1) Reasonable per diems (2) As stipulated in their compensation by-laws fixing their (a) If the remaining directors vote (excluding Director A who owns 75%) – the remaining directors cannot approve because the law requires a vote of at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock (b) If Director A participates – it cannot be approved because the law also prohibits his participation Atty. Espedido: This provision is probably intended for publicly listed corporations where rarely someone owns a share that is 50% or more. That might be the intention there. SEC. 30. LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS, TRUSTEES OR OFFICERS Section 30. Liability of Directors, Trustees or Officers. Directors or trustees who willfully and knowingly vote for or assent to patently unlawful acts of the corporation or who are guilty of gross negligence or bad faith in directing the affairs of the corporation or acquire any personal or pecuniary interest in conflict with their duty as such directors or trustees shall be liable jointly and severally for all damages resulting therefrom suffered by the corporation, its stockholders or members and other persons. A director, trustee or officer shall not attempt to acquire, or any interest adverse to the corporation in respect of any matter which has been reposed in them in confidence, and upon which, equity imposes a disability upon themselves to deal in their own Page 44 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law behalf; otherwise, the said director, trustee or officer shall be liable as a trustee for the corporation and must account for the profits which otherwise would have accrued to the corporation. LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS The directors/trustees are liable to the corporation for the commission of the following: (1) Knowingly and willfully vote or assent to patently unlawful acts (2) Guilty of gross negligence or bad faith (3) Acquire any personal or pecuniary interest in conflict of duty in conducting the affairs of the corporation What is important is that after weighing the pros and cons, the benefit of the corporation outweighs the negative, as a BOD, opt for what is more beneficial to the corporation, in this case the patently unlawful act. In short, the Business Judgment Rule prevails. Business Judgment Rule vs. Gross Negligence SUMMARY: Based on the BJR, the acts of the BOD bind the corporation. As such, it cannot be questioned or reviewed by the stockholders or the courts. Insofar as the BOD exercises their powers under the BJR, the contract is valid but due to gross negligence they can be held liable. NATURE OF LIABILITY As such, directors or trustees shall be liable solidarily for all damages suffered by the corporation, the stockholders, or members and other persons. In the case of acquiring conflict of interest – the director, trustee or officer shall be liable as a trustee for the corporation and must account for the profits which otherwise would have accrued to the corporation. Illustration 1. Corporation’s property was sold for 5Mn while an adjacent property was sold for 15Mn Following the BJR, when the Board enters into transactions with the third parties, the sale is perfectly valid. However, because of their negligence, then the BOD can be held liable for damages the corporation suffered. Personal and Pecuniary Interest SUMMARY: A certain type of trust is expected of a director of a corporation similar to that of the degree of trust among partners in a partnership. A director needs to fully disclose whatever benefits he may have received by virtue of his position as a director in the corporation and he will have to remit such benefits to the corporation. The Board in a meeting decided to sell one of the corporation’s properties for 5M. All of the Board except one approved the sale. While there is no fiduciary trust among stockholders, there lies a certain degree of trust to be had among the board and the corporation. The following day, a property owned by somebody else which is adjacent to the property recently sold by the Corporation was able to sell it for 15M. SEC. 31. DEALINGS OF DIRECTORS, TRUSTEES OR OFFICERS The director who did not approve the earlier sale now questioned the sale approved by the Board. The Board argued that the said sale was fair and reasonable. That director was mad because he was the lone dissenter and now he wants to vindicate himself. What could happen? If you were the one who approved, how would you answer the dissenting stockholder? A: Generally, the stockholders cannot question the decision of the board because of the principle of the Best Judgment Rule. In this case, the Board may invoke the Best Judgment Rule and argue that said sale was fair and reasonable. Provided that there is no defect in the contract of sale, it is perfectly valid. Section 31. Dealings of Directors, Trustees or Officers with the Corporation. - A contract of the corporation with one (1) or more of its directors, trustees, officers or their spouses and relatives within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity or affinity is voidable, at the option of such corporation, unless all the following conditions are present: (a) The presence of such director or trustee in the board meeting in which the contract was approved was not necessary to constitute a quorum for such meeting; (b) The vote of such director or trustee was not necessary for the approval of the contract; (c) The contract is fair and reasonable under the circumstances; HOWEVER, in situations wherein the corporation suffers great loss due to their gross negligence, we can say that although the sale is valid, the BOD may still be held liable provided that they were grossly negligent. In our illustration, what is their liability? A: They are solidarily liable for all damages suffered by the corporation and must account for the 10M difference of the price – they have to pay for whatever losses the Corporation may have realized because of the transaction. Business Judgment Rule vs. Patently Unlawful Acts SUMMARY: Directors who assented to the patently unlawful act cannot be liable if such act is drawn from a justifiable reason such as the business judgment rule. (d) In case of corporations vested with public interest, material contracts are approved by at least a majority of the independent directors voting to approved the material contract; and (e) In case of an officer, the contract has been previously authorized by the board of directors. Where any of the first three (3) conditions set forth in the preceding paragraph is absent, in the case of a contract with a director or trustee, such contract may be ratified by the vote of the stockholders representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock or of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members in a meeting called for the purpose: Provided, That full disclosure of the adverse interest of the directors or trustees Page 45 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law involved is made at such meeting and the contract is fair and reasonable under the circumstances. Summary: In the case of self-dealing directors, it is not considered wrong in itself. However, if any of the conditions under the law is lacking, the contract entered into can be voided at the option of the corporation. GEN: A contract of the Corporation with 1 or more of its directors, trustees, officers, or their spouses and relatives within the 4th civil degree of consanguinity or affinity is VOIDABLE, at the option of the corporation XPN: The contract is held valid provided that the following conditions are present: (1) Presence of the director or trustee in the BOD meeting in which contract is approved was not necessary to constitute a quorum for such meeting; (2) Vote of such director or trustee was not necessary for the approval of the contract (3) The contract is fair and reasonable under the circumstances (4) In case of corporations vested with public interest, material contracts are approved by at least twothirds (2/3) of the entire membership of the board, with at least a majority of the independent directors voting to approve the material contract; and (5) In case of an officer, the contract has been previously authorized by the board of directors. Note: Only conditions 1-3 were mentioned during the recits RATIFICATION BY A VOTE OF 2/3 Although the contract is VOIDABLE, the contract may be ratified by the vote of the stockholders representing at least 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock. Provided, that full disclosure of the director or trustee’s adverse interest is made at such meeting and the contract is fair and reasonable. In the absence of the conditions, what could happen to the contract of lechon. Do you think you can be paid? A: Yes, provided that it is ratified by a vote of 2/3 of stockholders representing the outstanding capital stock (OCS) Illustration 2. Quorum attained even without the presence of the SelfDealing Director Let us assume that all of the 5 Directors are present to approve the contract. Do you think there is a problem? A: There is no problem. Even if the self-dealing director is present, his presence will not be necessary to constitute a quorum. Illustration 3. Quorum cannot be attained without the presence of the Self-Dealing Director Only 3 of the Directors appeared, including the self-dealing director. Do we have a problem? A: Yes. Because without the presence of the self-dealing director, there would be no quorum and the votes to be cast in approving the contract cannot take place. In this case, the vote of the self-dealing director is necessary to approve the contract. The contract may be voided at the option of the corporation. HOWEVER, although it is voidable, it can be ratified by a vote of 2/3 of the stockholders representing the outstanding capital stock. If you were the holder of 75% of the shares, do we have a problem? A: No problem, provided that it is fair and reasonable. Nevertheless if it is not fair and reasonable, how can it be cured? A: It can be cured through ratification by a vote of 2/3 of the stockholders representing the outstanding capital stock. SEC. 32 INTERLOCKING DIRECTORS Illustration 1. Self-Dealing Director owns a business of selling lechon and contracts with the corporation You are Director of a corporation and the corporation planned to hold a big party. At the same time, you have your own business of selling lechon. Can you deal with your corporation? A: Yes. Is there a problem? A: There is no problem for as long as the conditions for a contract with a self-dealing director are complied with, namely: (1) That the presence of the director is not necessary to constitute a quorum for such meeting, (2) The vote of the director is not necessary to approve the contract (3) Contract is fair and reasonable Otherwise, absence of any of the conditions, the contract may be deemed VOIDABLE, at the option of the corporation. Section 32. Contracts Between Corporations with Interlocking Directors. - Except in cases of fraud, and provided the contract is fair and reasonable under the circumstances a contract between two (2) or more corporations having interlocking directors shall not be invalidated on that ground alone: Provided, That if the interest of the interlocking director in one (1) corporation is substantial and the interest in the other corporation or corporations is merely nominal, the contract shall be subject to the provisions of the preceding section insofar as the latter corporation or corporations are concerned. Stockholding exceeding twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding capital stock shall be considered substantial for purposes of interlocking directors. INTERLOCKING DIRECTOR Interlocking director refers to a director of two corporations having a transaction with each other GEN: A contract between two (2) or more corporations having interlocking directors shall not be invalidated on that ground alone. Page 46 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law XPN: (1) Cases of fraud; and (2) Contract is not fair and reasonable Note: In the case of an interlocking director who has a substantial interest in one corporation and a nominal interest in another corporation, the provisions of the Self-Dealing Directors shall apply. The following requisites must be present, namely: (1) Presence of the director is not necessary to constitute a quorum (2) Vote is not necessary to approve the contract (3) Contract is fair and reasonable Illustration 3 The Interlocking Director argues that the remedy is discriminatory on his part The director argues that this is discriminatory on his part and he will be deprived of his right to exercise his right to vote and be voted upon. How do you think would the SC will resolve that? A: SC will rule in favor of the stakeholders because it will be a disaster if we allow this type of directorship to continue. Atty. Espedido: IOW, the interlocking directorship is perfectly valid UNLESS it involves a substantial interest in one corporation and a nominal interest in the other, in which case, the requirements under the Self-Dealing Director should be complied with in order for it to be considered valid. Otherwise, the status of the contract is deemed VOIDABLE. Atty. Espedido: To allow him – there will be a conflict of interest. If we were to tolerate these things, the other corporation will be destroyed. And if the other corporation is destroyed, it will be the bigger corporation that will alone survive. So there is no more competition and so it gets all the market. That will be a disaster! So the Court shall allow the amendment of the By-Laws for the protection and preservation of the other corporation. Competition must be promoted. Note: Stockholdings exceeding twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding capital stock shall be considered substantial for purposes of interlocking directors. SEC. 33. DISLOYALTY OF A DIRECTOR Is there something wrong of being an interlocking director? A: Generally, nothing is wrong. DISADVANTAGE OF HAVING AN INTERLOCKING DIRECTOR Atty. Espedido: However, even if it is valid, the law recognizes the disadvantages of an interlocking directorship – it is prone to DANGER. Illustration 1. Getting the list of the Top 20 Customers In a case where the director owns 90% of a beer company and 10% in another company – there is NOTHING WRONG but the law recognizes some evils. For example, while in the meeting, the Director starts questioning why the sales were going down. He asked the Sales Manager about it and asked for the list of the Top 20 Customers of the Corporation. He took photos of the list and later went to these big customers and convinced them to buy instead in the other corporation. THUS, although it may be said that there is nothing wrong, there is DANGER. This is the evil contemplated by the law. Section 33. Disloyalty of a Director. - Where a director, by virtue of such office, acquires a business opportunity which should belong to the corporation, thereby obtaining profits to the prejudice of such corporation, the director must account for and refund to the latter all such profits, unless the act has been ratified by a vote of the stockholders owning or representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock. This provision shall be applicable, notwithstanding the fact that the director risked one's own funds in the venture. DISLOYAL DIRECTOR GEN: A director, by virtue of such office, ACQUIRES A BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY belonging to the corporation, (that should have benefitted the corporation itself), thereby obtaining profits to the prejudice of the corporation, must ACCOUNT FOR AND REFUND the corporation for ALL PROFITS. XPN: Ratification by the stockholders owning at least 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock . DISTINCTION Illustration 2. Merger of two Corporations – No more competition Currently, the biggest telephone companies right now are PLDT and Globe. If one is a Director in both corporations, he could just propose that the companies should merge and become one. Thus, only one corporation will remain which could result in a monopoly and there will be no more competition in the business. They could either eliminate the competition or come out with a disastrous competition. In that illustration, how do you think will they prevent? A: A remedy is to amend the bylaws and have a stipulation that if there is a director with substantial interest in a company similar to their business, he should be disqualified. IOW, that person who owns the 90% will be disqualified. Grounds Liability Liabilities (1) Willfully and knowingly assent or vote to patently unlawful acts (2) Gross negligence or bad faith in directing the affairs of the corporation; or (3) Acquiring any personal or pecuniary interest in conflict with their duty as a director or trustee Liable as a trustee and must account for the profits which otherwise would have accrued to the corporation Disloyalty By virtue of his office, ACQUISITION OF A BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY belonging to the corporation and OBTAINING PROFITS to the prejudice of the corporation ACCOUNT for and REFUND to the corporation ALL PROFITS Page 47 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Damages Solidarily liable Liable for ALL damages resulting therefrom prerogatives in managing the corporation’s business affairs. ACTUAL DAMAGES suffered (unrealized profit) TITLE IV. POWERS OF THE CORPORATION SEC. 35. CORPORATE POWERS AND CAPACITY SEC. 34. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Section 34. Executive Management, and Other Special Committees. - If the bylaws so provide, the board may create an executive committee composed of at least three (3) directors. Said committee may act, by majority of vote of all its members, on such specific matters within the competence of the board, as may be delegated to it in the bylaws or by majority vote of the board, except with respect to the: (a) approval of any action for which shareholders' approval is also required; (b) filing of vacancies in the board; (c) amendment or repeal of bylaws or the adoption of new bylaws; (d) amendment or term is not amendable or repealable; and (e) distribution of cash dividends to the shareholders. The board of directors may create special committees of temporary or permanent nature and determine the members' term, composition, compensation, powers, and responsibilities. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE A smaller committee given delegated powers by the board. It is composed of not less than three (3) members, who are to be appointed by the board. T/N: The board can delegate, except matters which are discretionary. However, the intention of creating the committee is for purposes of expediency so that the board doesn’t have to meet at all times to ake a decision, because it can be difficult to convent the board sometimes. Matters which cannot be delegated to the Executive Committee (SVB – EC) (1) Approval of any action for which shareholders’ approval is also required; (2) Filling of vacancies within the board; (3) Amendment or repeal of bylaws, or adoption of new bylaws; (4) The amendment or repeal of any resolution of the board which by its express terms is not so amendable or repealable; (5) A distribution of cash dividends to the shareholders. **NOTES Executive Committee Committee which exercises powers within the competence of the Board that requires authority under the by-laws. The Board cannot just create their own executive committee if such committee will be exercising the powers of the Board. Special Committee Can be created by the Board even without the authority under the by-laws. Any other committee exercising a mere recommendatory power whose actions require ratification and confirmation by the board. It cannot approve resolutions on its own. The reason here is that the Board is the corporation’s governing body, clearly upholding the power to exercise the corporation’s Section 35. Corporate Powers and Capacity. - Every corporation incorporated under this Code has the power and capacity: (a) To sue and be sued in its corporate name; (b) To have perpetual existence unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise; (c) To adopt and use a corporate seal; (d) To amend its articles of incorporation in accordance with the provisions of this Code; (e) To adopt bylaws, not contrary to law, morals or public policy, and to amend or repeal the same in accordance with this Code; (f) In case of stock corporations, to issue or sell stocks to subscribers and to sell treasury stocks in accordance with the provisions of this Code; and to admit members to the corporation if it be a nonstock corporation; (g) To purchase, receive, take or grant, hold, convey, sell, lease, pledge, mortgage, and otherwise deal with such real and personal property, including securities and bonds of other corporations, as the transaction of the lawful business of the corporation may reasonably and necessarily require, subject to the limitations prescribed by law and the constitution; (h) To enter into a partnership, joint venture, merger, consolidation, or any other commercial agreement with natural and juridical persons; (i) To make reasonable donations, including those for the public welfare or for hospital, charitable, cultural, scientific, civic, or similar purposes: Provided, That no foreign corporation shall give donations in aid of any political party or candidate or for purpose s of partisan political activity; (j) To establish pension, retirement, and other plans for the benefit of its directors, trustees, officers, and employees; and (k) To exercise such other powers as may be essential or necessary to carry out its purpose or purposes as stated in the articles of incorporation. SPECIFIC POWERS OF A CORPORATION (1) To sue and be sued in its corporate name (2) To have perpetual existence unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise (3) Adopt and use a corporeal seal (4) Amend its Articles of Incorporation (5) Adopt, amend, or repeal bylaws (6) Stock corporations – issue or sell stocks to subscribers and sell treasury stocks a. Nonstock corporation – admit members to the corporation (7) Deal with real and personal property, including securities and bonds of other corporations Page 48 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law (8) Enter into commercial agreeements with natural and juridical persons (9) Make reasonable donations (10) Establish pension, retirement, and other plans for the benefit of its directors, trustees, officers, and employees (11) Other powers essential or necessary to carry out its purpose Illustration. Stockholders winning the lotto and engaging in the buy and sell of second-hand cars There are 5 stockholders of XYZ Corporation. After receiving their dividend, they decided to use their dividend and use it to buy lotto – thereafter, they won. When they won the lotto, they put up a business of their own. They will deal in the buying and selling of second hand cars. In one instance, the second hand car that they sold did not function well. The buyer sued XYZ Corporation. What would happen? Will the case prosper? A: No, XYZ Corporation has a separate personality of its own, so it cannot be sued by the acts of the stockholders doing personal acts. Although they are stockholders, the money they used were not the funds of the corporation. Moreover, the business that the stockholders were engaged in was not the business of the corporation. **NOTES KINDS OF POWERS OF THE CORPORATION (1) Express powers Those expressly stipulated in the AOI and in the by-laws **This refers to the power expressly conferred upon the corporation by law. These powers can be ascertained from the special law creating the corporation, or from the general incorporation law under which it was created, the general laws of the land applicable to the corporation (i.e. the Revised Corporation Code), and its AOI. Atty. Gaviola: Ordinarily, the express powers are provided in the primary purpose clause of the AOI. In the primary purpose clause of the AOI, the powers contained in Sec. 35 are not actually enumerated there. If you think about it, the powers under Sec. 35 are incidental powers – they exist by virtue of the juridical personality of the corporation. To be strict about it, express powers will only exist if they are expressly provided in the primary purpose in the AOI. (2) Implied powers Powers that are necessary to carry out the express powers **Those powers which are reasonably necessary to exercise the express powers and to accomplish/carry out the purposes for which the corporation was formed. Atty. Gaviola: The implied power of the corporation is one which is related or exist by virtue of the express power of the corporation, even if they are not expressly provided. They need not be expressly laid out in the AOI, but exist by virtue of the express powers. Examples: a. Acts in the usual course of business b. Acts to protect debts owing to a corporation c. Embarking on a different business d. Acts in part or wholly to protect or aid employees e. Acts to increase business (3) Incidental/Inherent powers Powers that are necessary to the existence and operation of the corporation; **Powers which a corporation can exercise by the mere fact of it being a corporation; or This refers to powers which are necessary to the corporate existence and are, therefore, impliedly granted. Being powers inherent in the corporation as a legal entity, these powers exist independently of the express powers. Atty. Gaviola: These are the powers which are there by virtue of your being a corporation, so your ability to sue and be sued, to buy and sell properties, everything that is enumerated under Sec. 35 basically. Regardless of the [primary] purpose [of the corporation], incidental powers exist. There was a problem before on the secondary purpose [clause of the AOI] because people just enumerated the secondary purpose[s], and among the secondary [purposes they listed was subparagraph (g), which is] to sell or lease property. A few years back, BIR came up with a rule which they strictly enforced, which is that if a property was classified as an ordinary asset, then VAT and income tax will be imposed on it, but if it was classified as capital asset, then it will be meted with capital gains tax. Ordinarily, you can say that a certain item or property is an ordinary asset of the corporation if it is related to the corporation’s primary purpose. Thus, real estate is considered an ordinary asset if the corporation owning it is engaged in the real estate business. [On the other hand], if the corporation is engaged in retail, then a parcel of land it owns will be considered a capital asset unless it is used for business. The problem with the BIR is that, if they see “to purchase, receive, take or grant real and personal property” [under a corporation’s secondary purposes, then they will consider the corporation to be a real estate company]. Thus, there is a disconnect between the SEC and BIR. Corporations who copied the incidental powers in their secondary purposes clause [will be assessed with VAT plus the 30% income tax as against the 6% capital gains tax whenever it sells land, even though it is actually not a real estate company]. POWER TO SUE AND BE SUED IN ITS CORPORATE NAME As a juridical entity, the corporation can directly pursue all actions to enforce its rights. It does not have to go through its stockholders in order to bring a suit. At the same time, a corporation can directly be held liable for its obligations. The creditor does not have to go through the stockholders. Page 49 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law SEC. 36. POWER TO EXTEND OR SHORTEN CORPORATE TERM Section 36. Power to Extend or Shorten Corporate Term. — A private corporation may extend or shorten its term as stated in the articles of incorporation when approved by a majority vote of the board of directors or trustees, and ratified at a meeting by the stockholders or members representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock or of its members. Written notice of the proposed action and the time and place of the meeting shall be sent to stockholders or members at their respective place of residence as shown in the books of the corporation, and must be deposited to the addressee in the post office with postage prepaid, served personally, or when allowed in the bylaws or done with the consent of the stockholder, sent electronically in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Commission on the use of electronic data messages. In case of extension of corporate term, a dissenting stockholder may exercise the right of appraisal under the conditions provided in this Code. POWER TO EXTEND OR SHORTEN CORPORATE LIFE How do we extend or shorten the corporate life? A: The law now presupposes that their term will be perpetual. However, there is still use of this provision because the corporation has the option to avail of corporate existence or not. It may choose to shorten the term. Rules: 1. If issued prior to the effectivity of the New Code – deemed perpetual UNLESS elects to retain original corporate term 2. If issued under the New Code – perpetual existence UNLESS otherwise specified in the Articles of Incorporation RIGHT TO SUCCESSION Do we still have the right to succession? Is there a need to have right of succession? A: Yes. Because there is a difference between succession and perpetual existence. SEC. 37 POWER TO INCREASE OR DECREASE CAPITAL STOCK Section 37. Power to Increase or Decrease Capital Stock; Incur, Create or Increase Bonded Indebtedness. — No corporation shall increase or decrease its capital stock or incur, create or increase any bonded indebtedness unless approved by a majority vote of the board of directors and by two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock at a stockholders' meeting duly called for the purpose. Written notice of the time and place of the stockholders' meeting and the purpose for said meeting must be sent to the stockholders at their places of residence as shown in the books of the corporation and served on the stockholders personally, or through electronic means recognized in the corporation's bylaws and/or the Commission's rules as a valid mode for service of notices. (b) The amount of the increase or decrease of the capital stock; (c) In case of an increase of the capital stock, the amount of capital stock or number of shares of no-par stock thereof actually subscribed, the names, nationalities and addresses of the persons subscribing, the amount of capital stock or number of no-par stock subscribed by each, and the amount paid by each on the subscription in cash or property, or the amount of capital stock or number of shares of no-par stock allotted to each stockholder if such increase is for the purpose of making effective stock dividend therefor authorized; (d) Any bonded indebtedness to be incurred, created or increased; (e) The amount of stock represented at the meeting; and (f) The vote authorizing the increase or decrease of the capital stock, or the incurring, creating or increasing of any bonded indebtedness. Any increase or decrease in the capital stock or the incurring, creating or increasing of any bonded indebtedness shall require prior approval of the Commission, and where appropriate, of the Philippine Competition Commission. The application with the Commission shall be made within six (6) months from the date of approval of the board of directors and stockholders, which period may be extended for justifiable reasons. Copies of the certificate shall be kept on file in the office of the corporation and led with the Commission and attached to the original articles of incorporation. After approval by the Commission and the issuance by the Commission of its certificate of filing, the capital stock shall be deemed increased or decreased and the incurring, creating or increasing of any bonded indebtedness authorized, as the certificate of filing may declare: Provided, That the Commission shall not accept for filing any certificate of increase of capital stock unless accompanied by a sworn statement of the treasurer of the corporation lawfully holding office at the time of the filing of the certificate, showing that at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the increase in capital stock has been subscribed and that at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount subscribed has been paid in actual cash to the corporation or that property, the valuation of which is equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the subscription, has been transferred to the corporation: Provided, further, That no decrease in capital stock shall be approved by the Commission if its effect shall prejudice the rights of corporate creditors. Nonstock corporations may incur, create or increase bonded indebtedness when approved by a majority of the board of trustees and of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members in a meeting duly called for the purpose. Bonds issued by a corporation shall be registered with the Commission, which shall have the authority to determine the sufficiency of the terms thereof. REQUISITES FOR AN INCREASE OR DECREASE OF CAPITAL STOCK: A certificate must be signed by a majority of the directors of the corporation and countersigned by the chairperson and secretary of the stockholders' meeting, setting forth: 1. 2. (a) That the requirements of this section have been complied with; 3. 4. Done in a stockholder’s meeting duly called for the purpose There must be a written notice of the proposed increase or diminution of the capital stock Majority vote of the board of directors. 2/3 vote of the stockholders representing the outstanding capital stock Page 50 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law 5. 6. 7. 8. A certificate signed by a majority of the directors and countersigned by the chairman and the secretary of the stockholders’ meeting Accompanied by the sworn statement of the treasurer showing that at least 25% of such increased capital stock has been subscribed and that at least 25% of the amount subscribed has been paid Submitted to and approved by the SEC. Approval by the Philippine Competition Commission XPN: Stockholders are denied their pre-emptive right in the following instances: (1) When it is expressly prohibited under the Articles of Incorporation (2) Shares issued in compliance with the laws requiring stock offerings or minimum ownership by the public a. When the corporation decides to go public, the SEC requires the corporation to earmark some shares for the employees (salary deduction, easy instalment payment) b. Under existing laws – earmark existing shares to the public LIMITATION IN THE DECREASE OF CAPITAL STOCK Up to what extent do you think can you increase or decrease capital stock? A: (a) For the increase – no problem, as long as they follow the subscribed capital stock, and the paid-up capital stock (b) For the decrease – to the extent that it will not prejudice creditors What could be the problem if we decrease the capital stock? A: Subscribed capital stock is already part of capital. Thus, if we decrease the capital, we are trying to return some part of the capital – thus in effect, violating the Trust Fund Doctrine. It will prejudice the rights of the corporate creditors. **NOTES INCREASE IN BONDED INDEBTEDNESS Bonded indebtedness is an indebtedness that is evidenced by a bond. It is a debt instrument that is long-term in nature which is issued by a corporation. It is different from a promissory note. A promissory note is more of a short or medium-term, and it is normally issued to a particular person (payee) which is not the case in a bond. Atty. Espedido: At least 20% must be sold to the public (3) Shares to be issued in exchange of properties to retire existing debts Illustration 1. Corporation sells the unsubscribed 20M shares to a stranger Corporation has 100M ACS and 100M shares. There are 5 stockholders. One of them, Mr. A, takes 60% or 60 million. The other four subscribed 5M each. There is a total of 80M subscribed capital stocks with a remaining 20 million unsubscribed. The board then decided to sell the remaining 20 million because somebody else was interested to buy. The board said, “Let’s sell it to Mr. Stranger.” A who subscribed for 60M opposed and argued that he has a pre-emptive right over the 20M. SEC. 38. POWER TO DENY PRE-EMPTIVE RIGHT Section 38. Power to Deny Preemptive Right. - All stockholders of a stock corporation shall enjoy preemptive right to subscribe to all issues or disposition of shares of any class, in proportion to their respective shareholdings, unless such right is denied by the articles of incorporation or an amendment thereto: Provided, That such preemptive right shall not extend to shares issued in compliance with laws requiring stock offerings or minimum stock ownership by the public; or to shares issued in good faith with the approval of the stockholders representing two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock in exchange for property needed for corporate purposes or in payment of previously contracted debt. The board countered that A was already given hischance to subscribe, yet he did not. Thus, they are selling it to others. Is stockholder A entitled to use his preemptive right? A: Yes. The purpose of this right is for the stockholder to maintain its power or influence. Moreover, the language of the law is not limited to issuances, it includes disposition as well. Illustration 2. Corporation decided to increase its authorized capital stock POWER TO DENY PRE-EMTPIVE RIGHT If you were Mr. A who owned 60 million, and the corporation decided to increase its authorized stock for another 100 million because many are interested. GEN: Pre-emptive right is a preferential right granted to the existing stockholders to subscribe to the newly issued stocks before it is being offered to the public. How much will you be able to subscribe for the second 100 million? A: Another 60 million. Reason: In order for the existing stockholders to protect their interest in the corporation and the shares that they hold representing their ownership. It is to allow the stockholders to retain the extent of their power. Can the corporation say, “Somebody is already going to subscribed 80 million shares. You can subscribe 20 million.” Is this allowed? A: No, because this will reduce Mr. A’s influence or dilute his share – instead of 60% influence, he will only have 40% influence. Page 51 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Can the subscriber say, “I will subscribe shares (pay the delinquent shares), but I will pay them when I have my share of the profit.”? A: It depends. We have to distinguish if the cash dividends are already due and demandable or not. such property and assets shall be appropriated for the conduct of its remaining business. If the cash dividends are due and demandable, then compensation is allowed. But if the dividends are not due and demandable, compensation is not allowed. XPN: If the disposition of all or substantially all assets of the corporation, the following requisites must be present: (1) Vote of the majority of the board (2) Authorized by the stockholders representing 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock XPN to the ratification of the stockholders: a. Necessary in the usual and regular course of business of the corporation; or b. Proceeds of the sale or other disposition of property and assets shall be appropriated for the conduct of its remaining business. SEC. 39. SALE OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF ASSETS Section 39. Sale or Other Disposition of Assets. - Subject to the provisions of Republic Act No. 10667, otherwise known as the "Philippine Competition Act", and other related laws a corporation may, by a majority vote of its board of directors or trustees, sell, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, or otherwise dispose of its property and assets, upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration, which may be money, stock, bonds, or other instruments for the payment of money or other property or consideration, as its board of directors or trustees may deem expedient. A sale of all or substantially all of the corporation's properties and assets, including its goodwill, must be authorized by the vote of stockholders representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock, or at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members, meeting duly called for the purpose. In nonstock corporations where there are no members with voting rights, the vote of at least a majority of the trustees in office will be sufficient authorization for the corporation to enter into any transaction authorized by this section. The determination of whether or not the sale involves all or substantially all of the corporation's properties and assets must be computed based on its net asset value, as shown in its latest financial statemments. A sale or other disposition shall be deemed to cover substantially all the corporate property and assets if thereby the corporation would be rendered incapable of continuing the business or accomplishing the purpose of which it was incorporated. Written notice of the proposed action and of the time and place for the meeting shall be addressed to stockholders or members at their places of residence as shown in the books of the corporation and deposited to the addressee in the post office with postage prepaid, served personally, or when allowed by the bylaws or done with the consent of the stockholder, sent electronically: Provided, That any dissenting stockholder may exercise the right of appraisal under the conditions provided in this Code. After such authorization or approval by the stockholders or members, the board of directors or trustees may, nevertheless, in its discretion, abandon such sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, or other disposition of property and assets, subject to the rights of third parties under any contract relating thereto, without further action or approval by the stockholders or members. Nothing in this section is intended to restrict the power of any corporation, without the authorization by the stockholders or members, to sell, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, or otherwise dispose of any of its property and assets if the same is necessary in the usual and regular course of business of the corporation or if the proceeds of the sale or other disposition of GEN: A corporation can dispose its assets by a majority vote of its board of directors or trustees. TEST FOR DETERMINING WON 2/3 VOTES IS REQUIRED: If it will render the corporation incapable of continuing its business – based on jurisprudence, this refers to disposition of at least 80% of its assets. Illustration. Transportation company sells 20 buses out of 100 buses A transportation company operating 100 passenger buses decides to sell only 20 buses. What vote is required? A: It only needs to be approved by a majority vote of the Board of Directors. Selling 20 out of 100 buses cannot be considered substantial to make the company incapable of continuing the business or incapable of performing its stated purpose. If it sells 80 buses out of 100? A: It needs the approval of the stockholders representing 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock as it can already be considered as all or substantially all of the corporate property and assets. Illustrations on the exceptions to ratification: Exception 1 – necessary in the usual course of business of the corporation The corporation is selling subdivision lots. Do you think every time they sell 80% of the subdivision lots available for sale, they have to secure the ratification of the shareholders? A: No, because this is in the usual course of business of the corporation. Exception 2 – if the proceeds of the sale would be plowed back to the business of the corporation There is no need of approval. Whatever proceeds, the corporation can use it back. SEC. 40. POWER TO ACQUIRE OWN SHARES Section 40. Power to Acquire Own Shares. - Provided, That the corporation has unrestricted retained earnings in its books to cover the shares to be purchased or acquired, a stock corporation shall have the power to purchased or acquired, a stock corporation shall have the power to purchase or acquire its own shares for a legitimate corporate purpose or purposes, including the following cases: Page 52 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law (a) To eliminate fractional shares arising out of stock dividends; (b) To collect or compromise an indebtedness to the corporation, arising out of unpaid subscription, in a delinquency sale, and to purchase delinquent shares sold during said sale; and (c) To pay dissenting or withdrawing stockholders entitled to payment for their shares under the provisions of this Code. GEN: A corporation is not allowed to acquire its shares. Reason: Because it is in effect liquidating, to the damage and prejudice of its creditors. If the corporation buy out the shares of the stockholders, we are trying to liquidate which is a violation of the Trust Fund Doctrine. Sooner or later, there will be no more stockholders since the corporation is buying out the shares. If all the stockholders get back all their investment – there will no longer be any investments for the corporation to continue to operate. XPN: (1) Prevent fractional shares arising from stock dividends In distributing stock dividends based on the amount, there will be an instance where 1/2 or 1/4 share is given. Instead of giving fractional shares, the corporation will just buy it back. (2) Satisfy delinquent shares (3) Pay dissenting stockholders – in the exercise of their appraisal right, which means that when the stockholder does not agree with the decision of the board, it may exercise such right and the corporation shall be compelled to buy-back the shares Condition for the exceptions to apply: There must be unrestricted retained earnings. Why would these exceptions not violate the trust fund doctrine? A: Because it can only be exercised when it has unrestricted retained earnings which simply means that such retained earnings are not earmarked for any purpose – SURPLUS OF PROFITS. HOWEVER, if there are no surplus profits or URE – this will already affect the creditors. The Trust Fund Doctrine will be violated. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES If the corporation reacquires the shares and you are one of the remaining stockholders whose shares were not reacquired, will you be happy? A: It depends. Advantageous If the company is expected to earn profits, then they would have bigger dividends because of the fewer stockholders who will be dividing the profits. Disadvantageous If the company expecting losses, then only a few stockholders will be sharing the losses, which is prejudicial on their part. SEC. 41. POWER TO INVEST CORPORATE FUNDS IN OTHER CORPORATIONS/BUSINESSES Section 41. Power to Invest Corporate Funds in Another Corporation or Business or for Any Other Purpose. - Subject to the provisions of this Code, a private corporation may invest its funds in any other corporation, business, or for any purpose other than the primary purpose for which it was organized, when approved by a majority of the board of directors or trustees and ratified by the stockholders representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock, or by at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock, or by at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members in the case of nonstock corporations at a meeting duly called for the purpose. Notice of the proposed investment and the time place of residence as shown in the books of the corporation and deposited to the addressee in the post office with the postage prepaid. Served personally, or sent electronically in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Commission on the use of electronic data message, when allowed by the bylaws or done with the consent of the stockholders: Provided, That any dissenting stockholder shall have appraisal right as provided in this Code: Provided, however, That where the investment by the corporation is reasonably necessary to accomplish its primary purpose as stated in the articles of incorporation, the approval of the stockholders or members shall not be necessary. Requisites: (1) Vote of the majority of the Board of Directors (2) Vote of the stockholders representing 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock Illustration. Airline Corporation buys 60% of a Shipping Company A corporation is engaged in an airline business – operating aircrafts. Since it has a lot of aircrafts, they noticed that their idle funds in the bank are not earning much. The corporation decided to buy 60% of a shipping company. If the corporation buys 60% of the shipping company, what would be required? A: A vote of the majority of the Board of Directors and a vote of the stockholders representing 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock Can the corporation say that there is no need of the ratification since the shipping company is still a transportation company? A: No. It is already a deviation of its principal purpose. What if we have 10 stockholders. How many stockholders will have to approve the decision of the board? A: It depends on the stockholders representing 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock. It may even be just one stockholder because the Code talks about 2/3 of the outstanding shares. It is not on the number of directors but on the number of shares. Atty. Espedido: Our TEST is the PRINCIPAL PURPOSE. A company may invest so long as it is within the bounds of the primary purpose. Otherwise, it requires a vote of the MAJORITY OF THE BOARD AND 2/3 vote of the stockholders representing the OUTSTANDING CAPITAL STOCK. Also, if shares were bought back using other shares, then the shares used as payment could have been used as stock dividends. Page 53 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Note: Other than the primary purpose, THERE IS NO NEED FOR RATIFICATION IF THE NEW BUSINESS WILL BE: (1) Necessary accomplish its primary purpose (2) It falls under the express, implied, inherent, and apparent powers of the corporation (3) There is a logical relationship to the primary business or if it is in furtherance of the business Atty. Espedido: This is the test in determining WON it is express, implied, inherent, or an incidental power. Otherwise, without the ratification of the stockholders, it becomes an ultra vires act which is an unenforceable act. SEC. 42. POWER TO DECLARE DIVIDENDS Section 42. Power to Declare Dividends. - The board of directors of a stock corporation may declare dividends out of the unrestricted retained earnings which shall be payable in cash, property, or in stock to all stockholders on the basis of outstanding stock held by them: Provided, That any cash dividends due on delinquent stock shall be first be applied to the unpaid balance on the subscription plus costs and expenses, while stock holders until their unpaid subscription is fully paid: Provided, further, That no stock dividend shall be issued without the approval of stockholders representing at least two-thirds (2/3)of the outstanding capital stock at a regular or special meeting duly called for the purpose. Stock corporations are prohibited from restraining surplus profits in excess of one hundred percent (100%} of their paid-in capital stock, except: (a) when justified by the definite corporate expansion projects or programs approved by the board of directors; or (b) when the corporation is prohibited under any loan agreement with financial institutions or creditors, whether local or foreign, from declaring dividends without their consent, and such consent has not yet been secured; or (c) when it can be clearly shown that such retention is necessary under special circumstances obtaining in the corporation, such as when there is need for special reserve for probable contingencies. DIVIDENDS What are dividends? A: These are part of the PROFITS distributed as shares to the stockholders. If there are no profits, there are no dividends. GEN: The Board has the sole authority to declared dividends. The declaration of dividends is the sole prerogative of the board. XPN: The Board may be compelled to issue dividends when the retained earnings of the corporation EXCEED 100% of their paid-in capital stock. Note: If they still do not declared dividends, they will be charged with Improperly Accumulated Earnings Tax (IAET) – in which case the corporation is prone to penalties under the NIRC for undue accumulation. XPN to XPN: A corporation may not be compelled to declare dividends even if the profits exceed 100% of the paid-in capital in the following instances: (1) When justified by definite corporate expansion projects or programs approved by the board of directors (2) When the corporation is prohibited under any loan agreement with financial institutions or creditors, whether local or foreign, from declaring dividends without their consent, and such consent has not yet been secured (3) When it can be clearly shown that such retention is necessary under special circumstances obtaining in the corporation, such as when there is need for special reserve for probable contingencies. How are dividends payable? A: It depends. There are several ways that dividends can be paid: whether in cash, property, stock or a combination of any of the three. Can the stockholders demand for the declaration of dividends? A: No. The decision to declare dividends lies with the Board. The Board has the power to manage the corporation. Hence, when the corporation has profits, it is the Board who decides what to do with it. The Board, using its discretion, may not declare dividends but rather use it for business expansion projects. Exception: When there is improper accumulation of profits. This happens when the corporation retains surplus profits in excess of 100% of its paid-in capital stock. In such case, the shareholders may demand for the declaration of dividends. Illustration. You are a shareholder, and in April of a taxable year, you heard that the BOD intends to declare dividends. Per your computation, your tax for the year would be high, not yet including the taxes you will incur upon receiving the dividends. Would you be happy that the BOD will declare dividends? A: No. You would tell the BOD not to declare dividends because of the additional taxes you will incur from it. Can you however compel the corporation to declare dividends if the retained earnings has not reached more than 100% of the paid-in capital? A: No. CORPORATE PRACTICE OF ACCUMULATING EARNINGS When the corporation acquires income, it will be subject to the corporate income tax. Then, when it distributes cash dividends to the shareholders, such dividends will become the income of said shareholders, and thus will be subject to individual income tax. In effect, there is double taxation. This makes the BOD hesitant to declare dividends, and so even though the corporation has cash, it will find ways to make it appear that the “dividends” of the corporation were “expenses” to avoid paying taxes on them. Illustration. The shareholders will attend a seminar abroad to observe the latest trends of the business, and all expenses will be paid by the corporation. The amount to be spent is equal to what should have been the dividends to the shareholders, but instead of declaring said amount as dividends, the amount will now be made to appear as an expense of the company to finance the shareholders’ seminar abroad. It will not be considered as income on the part of the shareholder, and thus will not be subjected to income tax. Page 54 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law IMPROPERLY ACCUMULATED EARNINGS TAX However, the BIR discovered this scheme. They came up with an amendment to the NIRC to impose improperly accumulated earnings tax (IAET) as a penalty for erring corporations. Atty. Espedido: As much as possible, corporations do not declare cash dividends because it is taxable twice: (1) when declared as income by the corporation and (2) when declared income by the stockholders upon distribution. (B) STOCK DIVIDENDS GEN: The corporation will be liable for IAET when its undistributed profits exceed 100% of the paid-up capital. Rule: It shall be withheld from the delinquent stockholders UNTIL their unpaid subscription is fully paid. XPN: When accumulated earnings are allowed, such as when: 1. When justified by definite corporate expansion projects or programs; 2. When the corporation is prohibited under any loan agreement with any financial institution or creditor from declaring cash dividends without securing its/his/her consent; or 3. When it can be clearly shown that such retention is necessary under special circumstances, such as when there is a need for special reserves for possible contingencies (e.g. typhoons). Offsetting in cash dividends does not apply in stock dividends. You cannot issue any stock dividends UNTIL the unpaid stock are fully paid. When will dividends be taxed on the side of the shareholder? A: It depends on the type of dividend that will be received: 1. 2. Cash dividend → the stockholder is liable for tax since it is income already. Stock dividend → it is not yet taxable, even though they already have value. It is not considered income because there is no transfer of cash. Important: Until the shareholder is able to encash stock dividends, the shareholder is not considered to have earned an income. Stock dividends are not subject to income tax because it is not yet cash. This is so because the value of the shares of stock may fluctuate depending on the market value, book value or par value of said share. Because their value fluctuates, they are not taxable because still being unrealized gain, the shareholder would not know their actual value. Recall: 3. Book value → Net assets ÷ no. of outstanding shares Market value → The value that buyers in the market are willing to buy and the value that shareholders are willing to sell. It generally increases if the business of the corporation is doing well, and decreases if the business is doing bad. It may be higher or lower than the par value. Par value → A pre-determined value (1) (2) (3) (4) TYPES OF DIVIDENDS Cash dividends Property dividends Stock dividends Combination of the different kinds of dividends 1. 2. Note: Issuing stock dividends requires a majority vote of the BOD and a ratification of 2/3 vote of the stockholders representing the outstanding capital stock Illustration. If your subscription has not yet been paid and declared due by the Board, can you say “just charge my unpaid subscription to future dividends”? Can a shareholder refuse to pay by saying that? A: No, because there is no assurance whether indeed dividends will be declared in the future, or how soon. If the subscription becomes due, it has to be paid. Otherwise, the subscriber will be declared as a delinquent shareholder. However, if dividends were declared, and the shareholder still has unpaid subscriptions? A: The dividend will first have to be applied to the unpaid subscription. EFFECT OF DELINQUENCY ON THE RIGHT TO DIVIDENDS What are delinquent stocks? A: These are unpaid subscriptions that have become due and demandable, and yet no payment is made. When do unpaid subscriptions become due and demandable? A: 1. Upon the arrival of the specified date or period for payment; or 2. Upon the call of board (considered as a demand to pay). RULES ON DELINQUENT STOCKS When cash dividends are declared, and there is still an unpaid subscription, will the shareholder still receive his or her dividends? If yes, how? A: Cash dividends due on delinquent stock shall first be applied to the unpaid balance of the subscription. If there is an excess amount, then it will go to the shareholder. Atty. Espedido: Apply first the receivable declared cash dividends to the unpaid subscription of the stockholder, then the excess will be given to him. Offsetting will apply. (A) CASH DIVIDENDS Rule: If there are delinquent shares, the cash dividends shall be applied to the unpaid subscription which is due and demandable of the shareholder – OFFSET. Note: Issuing cash dividends requires a vote of majority of the Board of Directors without need of ratification from the stockholders Here, there is a debtor-creditor relationship between the corporation and the stockholder. On one hand, the corporation is a creditor with regards to the unpaid subscription, but a debtor with regards to the declared cash dividends. Page 55 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law On the other hand, the stockholder is a creditor with regards to the declared cash dividends, but a debtor with regards to the unpaid subscription. When stock dividends are declared and there is still an unpaid subscription, would the shareholder still receive dividends? If yes, how? A: Stock dividends will be withheld from the delinquent shareholder until his unpaid subscription is fully paid. Atty. Espedido: We are assuming that the unpaid subscriptions are now delinquent because they are due and demandable for payment. If it is not yet due, no offsetting/withholding will apply. Even if there are unpaid subscriptions, and there are cash dividends declared and to be distributed, if these unpaid subscriptions are not yet due and demandable, no offsetting or withholding will occur. The corporation cannot compel the shareholder to first pay the unpaid subscriptions. There can be offsetting only when both debts are due and demandable. CONVERSION OF EARNINGS INTO CAPITAL THROUGH DECLARATION OF STOCK DIVIDENDS Important: The law permits the corporation to convert its earnings into capital, through the declaration of stock dividends. In this manner, the board may use such earnings for the general or specific corporate purpose. It becomes part of the corporate trust fund and may no longer be used for dividend distribution. This is an effective way to retain earnings without having to explain to SEC/BIR. Illustration. If the original authorized capital stock (ACS) of the corporation is 1Mn, and is fully subscribed, and they increased it by another 1Mn, the SCS should be 250k of the increased ACS, and the paid-up capital should be 62.5k (remember, increase in paid-up capital has a 25%-25% requirement: 25% of the increase must be subscribed, and 25% of such subscription must be paid up). However, there are Unrestrained Retained Earnings of the corporation which the corporation wanted to declare as dividends, just enough to pay the minimum requirement for subscriptions. Therefore, there is enough money from the corporation. The money, if declared as cash dividends, may be used by the shareholders to pay for their new subscriptions. However, once declared as dividends, the corporation cannot be sure whether or not the SH will really invest in the new stocks, since the shareholders cannot be compelled to invest back. KTG (medyo libog, so here is an attempt to clarify the illustration): If a corporation increases its ACS, it is required to fulfill two requirements: 1. 25% must be subscribed; and 2. Of the subscriptions, 25% must be paid up. In this case, the corporation needs to put up 25% x 25% x P1Mn (which is equals to 62.5k). The corporation has such money in the form of its unrestricted retained earnings (URE). However, the corporation wants to declare the URE as dividends. So the corporation now has a problem: should it use the amount of URE as the paid-up capital, or should it declare the same as dividends? INCREASING THE AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK If there are no more stocks, can we still distribute stock dividends? A: Yes. We can increase the authorized capital stock which is done by amending the Articles of Incorporation. This is done through the following processes: 1. A stockholder’s meeting duly called for the purpose 2. A written notice of the proposed increase or diminution of the capital stock 3. Majority vote of the Board of Directors 4. A vote of 2/3 of the stockholders representing the outstanding capital stock 5. A certificate signed by a majority of the directors and countersigned by the chairman and the secretary of the stockholder’s meeting 6. Accompanied by the sworn statement of the treasurer showing that at least 25% of such increased capital stock has been subscribed and that at least 25% of the amount subscribed has been paid 7. Submitted to and approved by the SEC 8. Approval by the Philippine Competition Commission Note: In this case, we are now increasing the capital stock and the it is the corporation who will pay because instead of paying cash, the shareholders will no longer need to pay since the corporation will use the profits that they already have. If the corporation declares it as cash dividends, it gives the existing stockholders enough money to possibly purchase or pay-up the new ACS (remember, existing stockholders have a pre-emptive right to shares). However, the corporation is not assured if the existing shareholders will really buy the new ACS, since they cannot be compelled to invest in the corporation. To make sure that the money will remain with the corporation, what kind of dividends should the corporation declare instead? A: The corporation should declare stock dividends by transferring the URE to capital asset. In effect, the capital stock is increased corresponding increase in the corporate assets. without any De Leon: If the actual capital is increased by accumulated profits and such profits are distributed to the stockholders in the form of stock dividends, the capital stock is increased, for the profits are reinvested in the corporation by transferring the same from surplus account to a capital account. The amount corresponding to the stock dividends declared may be used to cover the required 25% subscription to increase the authorized capital stock and, if sufficient, will obviate the necessity of taking in new subscription. NON-TAXABILITY OF STOCK DIVIDENDS **Tanya Notes Atty. Espedido: If the authorized capital stock of the corporation has all been subscribed, and additional capital is needed, the corporation has the option to increase the authorized capital stock. Stock dividends are NOT TAXABLE because these are not realized income but are considered investments. Page 56 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law STOCK SPLITS REVERSE STOCK SPLIT Stock Split This is an increase in the number of shares, but no increase in the capital value of such shares. Illustration. There are occasions where the par value of the share appears to be expensive, and fractional shares cannot be issued, so to attract investors, what must the corporation do? For example, the value of each share was 10, 000 and somebody was willing to invest only 5, 000. Since the corporation cannot issue only one half, what must they do instead? A: Do a stock split since issuance of fractional shares is neither allowed nor encouraged. In fact, the corporation should eliminate the fractional shares by buying them. So, instead of selling it a share at a value of 10, 000 per share, if only to attract more investors, the corporation may split said share. We now have 2 shares with 5, 000 per share. **Illustration. ABC Corporation currently has 300,000 outstanding shares of stock with a par value of P1. It issues a 2-for-1 stock split as dividends. Decreases the number of shares held by each stockholder. However, it will still retain the same capital value. **Illustration: ABC Corporation currently has 300,000 outstanding shares of stock with a par value of P1. It issues a 1-for-5 stock split as dividends. Before reverse stock split: No. of Shares A 100,000 B 100,000 C 50,000 D 25,000 E 12,500 F 12,500 After reverse stock split: The effect will be as follows: Before stock split: A B C D E F No. of Shares Capital 100,000 100,000 50,000 25,000 12,500 12,500 P200,000 P200,000 P100,000 P50,000 P25,000 P25,000 Value per Share P2.00 P2.00 P2.00 P2.00 P2.00 P2.00 In a 2-for-1 stock split, each stockholder will receive an additional share of stock for each share he/she holds. No. of Shares Capital 200,000 200,000 100,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 P200,000 P200,000 P100,000 P50,000 P25,000 P25,000 Value per Share P1.00 P1.00 P1.00 P1.00 P1.00 P1.00 A/N: (3) A stock split is a corporate action in which a company divides its existing shares into multiple shares to boost the liquidity of the shares. (4) The primary motive is to make shares seem more affordable to small investors even though the underlying value of the company has not changed. (5) The most common split ratios are 2-for-1 or 3-for-1, which means that the stockholder will have two or three shares, respectively, for every share held earlier. (6) Reverse stock splits are the opposite transaction, where a company divides, instead of multiplies, the number of shares that stockholders own, raising the market price accordingly. P200,000 P200,000 P100,000 P50,000 P25,000 P25,000 No. of Shares Capital 20,000 20,000 10,000 5,000 2,500 2,500 P200,000 P200,000 P100,000 P50,000 P25,000 P25,000 Value per Share P2.00 P2.00 P2.00 P2.00 P2.00 P2.00 Value per Share P10.00 P10.00 P10.00 P10.00 P10.00 P10.00 A/N: 1. A reverse stock split reduces the number of shares held by each shareholder but with proportionally more valuable shares. A reverse stock split does not directly impact a company's value. A reverse stock split, however, often signals a company in distress since it raises the value of otherwise low-priced shares. The desire to increase share prices to remain relevant and to avoid being delisted are the most common reasons for corporations to pursue this strategy. 2. After stock split: A B C D E F A B C D E F Capital 3. 4. CONFLICTING VIEWS ON ISSUANCE OF CASH DIVIDENDS WHEN THERE ARE NO PROFITS (UNLAWFUL DECLARATION OF DIVIDENDS) If it was discovered later that there were no profits at all but the Board has already declared and distributed cash dividends and somebody complained, should we now require the stockholders to return? A: There are conflicting views among authorities: (1) If solvent corporation: View 1 – No need to return since creditors are still protected. They will not be prejudiced since the corporation still has capital View 2 – Must still be returned as it violates the Trust Fund Doctrine (2) If insolvent corporation – it needs to be returned Page 57 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Atty. E’s opinion: If the corporation is still solvent, the Trust Fund Doctrine is not violated since capital remains intact. Thus, there is no need to return. **NOTES RETAINED EARNINGS Accumulated profits of a corporation in its previous operations. It includes all income accumulated throughout the years during which the corporation was operating. DECLARING DIVIDENDS FROM THE CAPITAL: PAID-UP CAPITAL GEN: Dividends cannot be distributed out of the capital. It violates the trust fund doctrine. Under such doctrine, the corporation cannot return capital to the stockholders unless all the creditors have been paid first. XPN (exclusive exceptions): 1. If the dividend is a liquidating dividend – dividends that are distributed during the liquidation of a corporation. Here, the trust fund doctrine no longer applies because the corporation is already being liquidated. This means that before the corporation can even distribute the liquidating dividends, it has to pay its creditors. The remainder is what will be distributed as liquidating dividends. 2. When the corporation is a wasting asset corporation. So, if the corporation has been experiencing losses, there will be no retained earnings. Rather, there will be deficits. Retained earnings can only exist if the corporation has been operating at a profit. TYPES OF RETAINED EARNINGS (1) Restricted Retained Earnings In general, retained earnings are restricted if they are not available for dividend declaration (2) Unrestricted Retained Earnings If available for dividend declaration. RESTRICTING RETAINED EARNINGS 1. Appropriated by the Board of Directors for corporate expansion projects or programs. Example: If the Board of Directors say that out of the P50Mn retained earnings, they are going to allocate P15Mn for a future expansion, then that P15Mn will be considered restricted retained earnings. Therefore, out of the P50Mn, P15Mn cannot be declared as dividends. 2. Covered by a restriction for dividend declaration under a loan agreement. Wasting Asset Corporation A type of corporation which has a limited life because its assets are consumed during its operations and cannot be replenished. Example: Mining – If a corporation is created to mine only a certain area, then once the minerals in that area has been fully depleted, the corporation’s purpose ceases to exist. So slowly, as the area’s minerals are consumed, the assets of the corporation are also slowly being depleted. In that sense, the corporation is allowed to return capital to its stockholder because the idea is that the corporation will exist only for a limited period – the period that its assets still exists. Once the assets are depleted, then the corporation can return its capital to its stockholders. RELEVANT DATES IN DIVIDEND DECLARATION Contractual Covenants If, for example, there is a loan agreement, and the creditor expressly provides that the corporation cannot declare dividends out of a certain amount of its retained earnings. That portion that is restricted under the covenant becomes restricted retained earnings. 3. Required to be retained under special circumstances obtaining in the corporation, such as when there is a need for special reserves for probably contingencies. Example: When a corporation acquires treasury shares, it is required to restrict a portion of its retained earnings in the same amount as the treasury shares that they acquired. That portion becomes restricted retained earnings, and cannot be available for dividend declaration. If the corporation has been experiencing losses, such that it has zero or negative retained earnings, then it cannot declare dividends at all. So there has to be unrestricted retained earnings for a corporation to declare dividends. (1) Declaration Date Before the declaration date, the dividends are not a liability of the corporation. In fact, the corporation is not obliged to declare dividends even if it has unrestricted retained earnings. The BOD cannot be compelled to declare dividends. Dividends only become a liability of the corporation once they are declared. The moment of declaration is the time the corporation recognizes such liability. (2) Record Date This refers to the date when the corporation determines who among its stockholders are entitled to receive dividends. The stockholders on record in the stock and transfer book as of the record date are the stockholders who will receive dividends. Before the record date, the stocks are considered sold dividends on. This means that before the record date, stocks are sold with the right to receive dividends on it. In effect, it means that there is actually a premium on the price of those shares because they carry the right to receive dividends. When stocks are sold after the record date, the stocks are commonly referred to as being sold dividends off, because even if they are sold or transferred, the one Page 58 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law who will be receiving dividends on them is the person who was the owner of such as of the record date. Illustration. Declaration Date Record Date March 10 March 30 A is the holder of the share on declaration date. On March 15, A sells the shares to B. Those shares are considered sold dividends on. If B sells the shares to C on March 25, those shares are still considered sold dividends on. On March 30, or the record date, if C is still the owner of those stocks, then C is the one entitled to receive dividends on the shares. If on April 5, C sells the shares to D, then it is still C who is entitled to receive dividends on them. On this date, the shares are considered sold dividends off. (3) Payment Date Date when the dividends are actually paid by the corporation. When a corporation declares dividends, it will normally say when the record and the payment dates are. If the corporation’s resolution for the declaration of dividends is silent as to the record date, then the record date is considered the same as the declaration date. SEC. 43. POWER TO ENTER INTO MANAGEMENT CONTRACT Section 43. Power to Enter into Management Contract. - No corporation shall conclude a management contract with another corporation unless such contract is approved by the board of directors and by the stockholders owning at least the majority of the outstanding capital stock, or by at least a majority of the members in the case of a nonstock corporation, or both the managing and the managed corporation, at a meeting duly called for the purpose: Provided, That (a) where a stockholder or stockholders representing the same interest of both the managing and the managed corporations own or control more than one-third (1/3) of the total outstanding capital stock entitled to vote of the managing corporation; or (b) where a majority if the members of the board of directors of the managing corporation also constitute a majority of the members of the board of directors of the managed corporation, then the management contract must be approved by the stockholders of the managed corporation owning at least two-thirds (2/3) of the total outstanding capital stock entitled to vote, or by at least twothirds (2/3) of the members in the case of a nonstock corporation. These shall apply to any contract whereby a corporation undertakes to manage or operate all or substantially all of the called services contracts, operating agreements or otherwise: Provided, however, That such service contracts or operating agreements which relate to the exploration, development exploitation or utilization of natural resources may entered into such periods as may be provided by the pertinent laws or regulations. MANAGEMENT CONTRACT An agreement under which a corporation delegates the management of its affairs to another corporation for a certain period. Two corporations are involved: (1) the managing corporation and the (2) managed corporation GEN: Management contract is entered into by a MAJORITY vote of the Board of Directors and stockholders of both the managing and managed corporation XPN: Approved by the stockholders of the managed corporation owning at least 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock or of members in two instances: (1) The stockholder representing the same interest of both managing and managed corporation owns or control MORE THAN 1/3 of the outstanding capital stock entitled to vote of the managing corporation; and (2) Majority of the members of the BOD of the managing corporation also constitutes majority of the members of the BOD of the managed corporation . STATUS OF THE BOD OF THE MANAGED CORPORATION What could this mean, what happens to the Board of the managed corporation, do they still function as a board? A: Yes, this is not an abandonment. The BOD of the managed corporation still retains the control of how the corporation should exist. The only thing is that, on the operational side of the managed corporation is now given to the managing corporation. There are companies whose business is just to manage certain portions or operations of other corporations. The board of the managed corporation still functions as to the remaining operations. Examples: ship management corporation, audit managers SEC. 44. ULTRA VIRES ACTS Section 44. Ultra Vires Acts of the Corporations. - No corporation shall possess or exercise corporate powers other than those conferred by this Code or by its articles of incorporation and except as necessary or incidental to the exercise of the powers conferred. What is the effect of an ultra vires act? A: An ultra vires act is an unenforceable act. Since it is not enforceable, the contract is not binding to the corporation. The State looks ultra vires acts with disfavor. It will create more problems than solutions. If we strictly enforce the concept of ultra vires act, the entire business community will be affected. Atty. Espedido: Imagine the inconvenience and discomfort of trying to review AOI of every stockholder for every transaction that we do. Trying to analyze: “Is this inherent, apparent, necessary?” If we do this, we would lose a lot of time before we could enter into business transactions. So, the authorities came out with solutions on how this could be resolved. No management contracts shall be entered into for period longer that five (5) years for any one term. Page 59 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law RESOLVING ULTRA VIRES ACTS Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, bylaws maybe adopted and filed prior to incorporation; in such case, such bylaws shall be approved and signed by all incorporators and submitted to the Commission, together with the articles of incorporation. How do we resolve ultra vires acts? GEN: It is not binding. XPN: INSTANCE i. Contract is completely performed or fulfilled by both parties (parties are estopped) ii. Only one party has been benefited (one of the parties already executed the contract; partial fulfillment) iii. Contract is not yet acted upon SOLUTION Leave them as they are – we do not have to dig up what happened Return what received has been Do not perform or proceed TRUE OR FALSE 1. All illegal acts are ultra vires acts – TRUE 2. All ultra vires acts are illegal acts – FALSE, because they may also be unauthorized acts. In all cases, bylaws shall be effective only upon the issuance by the Commission of a certification that the bylaws are in accordance with this Code. The Commission shall not accept for filing the bylaws or any amendment thereto of any bank, banking institution, building and loan association, trust company, insurance company, public utility, educational institution, or any other corporations governed by special laws, unless accompanied by a certificate of the appropriate government agency to the effect that such by laws or amendments are in accordance with law. What are bylaws? A: They are the internal rules and regulations of a corporation. When should a corporation file its bylaws? A: 1. Within one (1) month after the receipt of the official notice of the issuance of its certificate of incorporation from the SEC, or 2. They may be adopted and filed prior to incorporation, together with the AOI. RATIFICATION OF ULTRA VIRES ACTS Note: You can already submit your by-laws even if you have not yet been given the authority to exist. RULES: (A) Illegal ultra vires acts – cannot be ratified (B) Unauthorized ultra vires act – can be cured through a ratification by a vote of 2/3 of the stockholders representing the outstanding capital stock so long as it DOES NOT AFFECT THIRD PARTIES. **NOTES Ultra Vires Act One not within the express, implied and incidental powers of the corporation, conferred by the RCC or the AOI. What are the requisites for the adoption of by-laws? 1. Vote of the stockholders representing at least a majority of the OCS in case of stock corporations or members in case of non-stock corporations; 2. Approved and signed by all incorporators; and 3. Submitted to the SEC. What is the binding effect of bylaws to the public? GEN: It does not bind the public. XPN: A third person may be bound by the bylaws where has knowledge about it, either actual or constructive. **NOTES Consequence of an Ultra Vires Act Merely voidable, which may be enforced by performance, ratification, or estoppel. (De Leon) TIME AND PROCEDURE FOR THE ADOPTION OF BYLAWS 1) Note: According to Atty. E, an ultra vires act is unenforceable rather than voidable. PRE-INCORPORATION Submitted or filed before the SEC together with the AOI. (This is the one now required in practice; you cannot incorporate without it.) TITLE V. BYLAWS Requirements: 1. Approved and signed by all incorporators; and 2. Submitted to the SEC together with the AOI. SEC. 45. ADOPTION OF BY LAWS Section 45. Adoption of Bylaws. - For the adoption of bylaws by the corporation, the affirmative vote of the stockholders representing at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock, or of at least a majority of the members in case on nonstock corporations, shall be necessary. The bylaws shall be signed by the stockholders or members voting for them and shall be kept in the principal office of the corporation, subject to the inspection of the stockholders or members during office hours. A copy thereof, duly certified by a majority of the directors or trustees and countersigned by the secretary of the corporation, shall be filed with the Commission and attached to the original articles of incorporation. Additional requirements for banks and other special corporations: Accompanied by a certificate of the appropriate government agency to the effect that such bylaws or amendments are in accordance with law. 2) POST-INCORPORATION Basically, everything that you need to do post-incorporation in order to commence the transacting of business. Page 60 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Requirements: 1. Affirmative vote and signature of stockholders representing the majority of the OCS or members in case of nonstock corporation; 2. Duly certified by the majority of the BOD/BOT; and 3. Filed with SEC, to be attached to the original AOI. CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO ADOPT BYLAWS Note: This may not be applicable to the Revised Corporation Code. But this was not discussed by Atty. [Gaviola] after the revision. Non-filing of the bylaws on time will not result in the automatic dissolution of the corporation. Such consequence is not provided under the Corporation Code. However, pursuant to Sec. 6 (i) (5) of P.D. No. 902-A (see Sec. 19), the failure to file the bylaws within one (1) month from the date of incorporation with the SEC shall render the corporation liable to the revocation of its registration, to wit: Section 6. In order to effectively exercise such jurisdiction, the Commission shall possess the following powers: (c) The required quorum in meetings of stockholders or members and the manner of voting therein; (d) The modes by which a stockholder, member, director, or trustee may attend meetings and cast their votes; (e) The form for proxies of stockholders and members and the manner of voting them; (f) The directors’ or trustees’ qualifications, duties and responsibilities, the guidelines for setting the compensation of directors or trustees and officers, and the maximum number of other board representations that an independent director or trustee may have which shall, in no case, be more than the number prescribed by the Commission; (g) The time for holding the annual election of directors or trustees and the mode or manner of giving notice thereof; (h) The manner of election or appointment and the term of office of all officers other than directors or trustees; (i) The penalties for violation of the bylaws; (j) In the case of stock corporations, the manner of issuing stock certificates; and (k) Such other matters as may be necessary for the proper or convenient transaction of its corporate affairs for the promotion of good governance and anti-graft and corruption measures. An arbitration agreement may be provided in the bylaws pursuant to Sec. 181 of this Code. xxx SEC. 47. AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS i) To suspend, or revoke, after proper notice and hearing, the franchise or certificate of registration of corporations, partnerships or associations, upon any of the grounds provided by law, including the following: xxx 5. Failure to file by-laws within the required period; There must, first of all, be a hearing to determine the existence of the ground, and assuming such finding, the penalty is not necessarily dissolution, but may only be revocation. Under the rules and regulations of the Commission, the failure may merely by the imposition of a fine. PERSONS BOUND & NOT BOUND BY THE BYLAWS 1. Persons bound by the bylaws: a. Corporation b. Directors or trustees c. Stockholders 2. Persons not bound by the bylaws: a. Any person who has no actual knowledge of the bylaws of the corporation; b. Employees of the corporation Section 47. Amendment to Bylaws. – A majority of the board of directors or trustees, and the owners of at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock, or at least a majority of the members of a nonstock corporation, at a regular or special meeting duly called for the purpose, may amend or repeal the bylaws or adopt new bylaws. The owners of two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock or two-thirds (2/3) of the members in a nonstock corporation may delegate to the board of directors or trustees the power to amend or repeal the bylaws or adopt new bylaws: Provided, That any power delegated to the board of directors or trustees to amend or repeal the bylaws or adopt new bylaws shall be considered as revoked whenever stockholders owning or representing a majority of the outstanding capital stock or majority of the members shall so vote at a regular or special meeting. Whenever the bylaws are amended or new bylaws are adopted, the corporation shall file with the Commission such amended or new bylaws and, if applicable, the stockholders’ or members’ resolution authorizing the delegation of the power to amend and/or adopt new bylaws, duly certified under oath by the corporate secretary and a majority of the directors or trustees. The amended or new bylaws shall only be effective upon the issuance by the Commission of a certification that the same is in accordance with this Code and other relevant laws. PROCESS OF ADOPTION, AMENDMENT OR REPEALING OF BYLAWS SEC. 46. CONTENTS OF BYLAWS Section 46. Contents of Bylaws. – A private corporation may provide the following in its bylaws: (a) The time, place and manner of calling and conducting regular or special meetings of the directors or trustees; (b) The time and manner of calling and conducting regular or special meetings and mode of notifying the stockholders or members thereof; 1. 2. 3. Required votes are met: a. Approved by a majority of the BOD/BOT; and b. Approved by a majority of the OCS in case of stock corporations, or a majority of the members in the case of nonstock corporations. File with SEC for approval. SEC issues Certificate of Approval. Page 61 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law T/N: Once approved (as evidenced by the certification from SEC), the amended by-laws become the new bylaws of the corporation. A/N: The power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws can be delegated by 2/3 of the OCS or members to the BOD or BOT. However, this delegated power is immediately revoked whenever majority of the OCS or members vote at a special or regular meeting for the adoption, amendment or repealing of bylaws. What must be done if new bylaws are amended or adopted? 1. File with SEC the new bylaws or amended bylaws; 2. If applicable, the stockholders’ resolution authorizing the delegation of the power to amend and/or adopt new bylaws, which must be duly certified under oath by the corporate secretary + majority of the BOD/BOT. TITLE VI. MEETINGS SEC. 48. KINDS OF MEETINGS Section 48. Kinds of Meetings. – Meetings of directors, trustees, stockholders, or members may be regular or special. How many types of meetings do we have? A: There are 4 kinds of meetings, namely: 1. Meetings of Directors 2. Meetings of Trustees 3. Meetings of Stockholders 4. Meetings of Members Which may either be: 1. Regular, or 2. Special Illustration. Gokongwei Case A director and owner of a beer company A, was also a SH of another beer company B. He wanted to become a director of the beer company B so he bought more shares so that he can be elected for the board next year. So Beer Company B amended there by laws stating that “no person holding at least 10% of shares in another competing company shall be allowed to be elected for the board.” Was this amendment discriminatory? Can the director complain? A: No, he cannot complain. The amendment disqualifying a director in a corporation whose business is in competition with or is antagonistic to another corporation from election to the board of directors of the latter corporation is valid. Secondly, it is not discriminatory as the terms of the amended by-laws provides that, “No person shall be allowed to be elected who is also a director of another corporation who is in competition or antagonistic to thereto.” This provision is general in nature it does not single out a particular individual such as the party involved herein. Third, it does not also run counter to the prospective application of the amendment as the party involved has yet to be elected. Atty. Espedido: This is a case involving Gokongwei and San Miguel. The lawyers of Gokongwei said it is discriminatory because no one else in the Philippines owns so much in Asia Brewery and at the same time own stocks in San Miguel; thus, it should be an invalid amendment and should not be approved. But the keyword here is ANTAGONISTIC. In other words, the Supreme Court did not only look at the prospective or retroactive effect but more on its being antagonistic, fierce competition, or direct clash between two corporations involved in the same market. The SC is just trying to prevent a situation whereby one could take advantage over the other. Because imagine if Gokongwei in one meeting of San Miguel says “I understand that the sales of our corporation are going down, maybe there is problem with the formula, it no longer tastes the way it should taste.” Most probably, the brew master might be compelled to present themselves to the board and explain what happened, and be required to present the formula. Once he gets his own copy of the formula, he will give it to the rival company. We have copied the bottle; we will now copy the formula.SC said we do not want that situation. SEC. 49. REGULAR & SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS OR MEMBERS Section 49. Regular and Special Meetings of Stockholders or Members. – Regular meetings of stockholders or members shall be held annually on a date fixed in the bylaws, or if not so fixed, on any date after April 15 of every year as determined by the board of directors or trustees: Provided, That written notice of regular meetings shall be sent to all stockholders or members of record at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the meeting, unless a different period is required in the bylaws, law, or regulation: Provided, further, That written notice of regular meetings may be sent to all stockholders or members of record through electronic mail or such other manner as the Commission shall allow under its guidelines. At each regular meeting of stockholders or members, the board of directors or trustees shall endeavor to present to stockholders or members the following: a) The minutes of the most recent regular meeting which shall include, among others: (1) A description of the voting and vote tabulation procedures used in the previous meeting; (2) A description of the opportunity given to stockholders or members to ask questions and a record of the questions asked and answers given; (3) The matters discussed and resolutions reached; (4) A record of the voting results for each agenda item; (5) A list of the directors or trustees, officers and stockholders or members who attended the meeting; and (6) Such other items that the Commission may require in the interest of good corporate governance and the protection of minority stockholders. b) A members’ list for nonstock corporations and, for stock corporations, material information on the current stockholders, and their voting rights; c) A detailed, descriptive, balanced and comprehensible assessment of the corporation’s performance, which shall include information on any material change in the corporation’s business, strategy, and other affairs; Page 62 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law d) A financial report for the preceding year, which shall include financial statements duly signed and certified in accordance with this Code and the rules the Commission may prescribe, a statement on the adequacy of the corporation’s internal controls or risk management systems, and a statement of all external audit and non-audit fees; e) An explanation of the dividend policy and the fact of payment of dividends or the reasons for nonpayment thereof; f) Director or trustee profiles which shall include, among others, their qualifications and relevant experience, length of service in the corporation, trainings and continuing education attended, and their board representations in other corporations; g) A director or trustee attendance report, indicating the attendance of each director or trustee at each of the meetings of the board and its committees and in regular or special stockholder meetings; h) Appraisals and performance reports for the board and the criteria and procedure for assessment; Unless the bylaws provide for a longer period, the stock and transfer book or membership book shall be closed at least twenty (20) days for regular meetings and seven (7) days for special meetings before the scheduled date of the meeting. In case of postponement of stockholders’ or members’ regular meetings, written notice thereof and the reason therefor shall be sent to all stockholders or members of record at least two (2) weeks prior to the date of the meeting, unless a different period is required under the bylaws, law or regulation. The right to vote of stockholders or members may be exercised in person, through a proxy, or when so authorized in the bylaws, through remote communication or in absentia. The Commission shall issue the rules and regulations governing participation and voting through remote communication or in absentia, taking into account the company’s scale, number of shareholders or members, structure, and other factors consistent with the protection and promotion of shareholders’ or member’s meetings. WHEN MEETINGS ARE CONDUCTED i) A director or trustee compensation report prepared in accordance with this Code and the rules the Commission may prescribe; j) Director disclosures on self-dealings and related party transactions; and/or k) The profiles of directors nominated or seeking election or reelection. A director, trustee, stockholder, or member may propose any other matter for inclusion in the agenda at any regular meeting of stockholders or members. Special meetings of stockholders or members shall be held at any time deemed necessary or as provided in the bylaws: Provided, however, That at least one (1) week written notice shall be sent to all stockholders or members, unless a different period is provided in the bylaws, law or regulation. A stockholder or member may propose the holding of a special meeting and items to be included in the agenda. Notice of any meeting may be waived, expressly or impliedly, by any stockholder or member: Provided, That general waivers of notice in the articles of incorporation or the bylaws shall not be allowed: Provided, further, That attendance at a meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except when the person attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened. Whenever for any cause, there is no person authorized or the person authorized unjustly refuses to call a meeting, the Commission, upon petition of a stockholder or member on a showing of good cause therefor, may issue an order directing the petitioning stockholder or member to call a meeting of the corporation by giving proper notice required by this Code or the bylaws. The petitioning stockholder or member shall preside thereat until at least a majority of the stockholders or members present have chosen from among themselves, a presiding officer. REGULAR MEETING (1) Held annually on a date fixed in the bylaws; or (2) On any date after April 15 of every year, as determined by the BOD/BOT. SPECIAL MEETING At any time deemed necessary by the BOD/BOT or as provided for in the bylaws. Why are regular meetings held only after April 15? A: For purposes of filing income tax return. By that time, the financial statements are already done. All the data, information, figures are already available. NOTICE OF MEETING WHEN GIVEN REGULAR MEETING Sent to all stockholders of record at least 21 days prior to the meeting unless a different period is required in the bylaws, law or regulation. SPECIAL MEETING At least one week prior to the meeting, a written notice shall be sent to all stockholders, unless a different period is provided for in the bylaws, law or regulation. CONTENTS OF A NOTICE OF MEETING In order to be a proper notice of meeting, the following must be contained: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Shall state the time and place of the meeting; The agenda for the meeting; A proxy form which shall be submitted to the corporate secretary within a reasonable time prior to the meeting; When attendance, participation, and voting are allowed by remote communication or in absentia, the requirements and procedures to be followed when a stockholder or member elects either option; and When the meeting is for the election of directors or trustees, the requirements and procedure for nomination and election. The minutes of the most recent regular meeting which shall include, among others: Page 63 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law (a) A description of the voting and vote tabulation procedures used in the previous meeting; (b) A description of the opportunity given to stockholders or members to ask questions and a record of the questions asked and answers given; (c) The matters discussed and resolutions reached; (d) A record of the voting results for each agenda item; (e) A list of the directors or trustees, officers and stockholders or members who attended the meeting; and (f) Such other items that the Commission may require in the interest of good corporate governance and the protection of minority stockholders; Appeals1, the Court ruled that it is the Corporate Secretary who is responsible to serve as custodian of all the records of the corporation, to keep the stock and transfer books, and the only person authorized to make the entries therein. Illustration. An individual purchased shares of stock on March 10 and there is a meeting on March 15. Could he already vote? A: No, he is still not qualified to vote because there is a requirement under the law that for regular meetings, the transfer of book shall be closed for at least 20 days PRIOR to the scheduled meeting. On the other hand, for special meetings, the transfer books shall be closed for at least 7 days PRIOR to the scheduled date of meeting. The notice shall include this information on the closing of the transfer book. Reason for including the minutes of the previous meeting: The minutes of the previous meeting must be attached and must be accompanied by the notices because these will require the approval. POSTPONEMENT OF REGULAR MEETINGS GEN: Written notice and reason thereof shall be sent to ALL stockholders at least 2 weeks prior to the date of meeting. Atty. Espedido: If there is any dissenting stockholder who objects, then it could be discussed again in the new meeting. XPN: A different period is required under the bylaws, law, or regulation. This is important because should there be conflict in the future, they could always refer back to the minutes. These will be in the custody of the secretary. The secretary among others shall take hold of the AOI, bylaws, all resolutions approved, minutes of the meeting approved. UNJUST REFUSAL TO CALL A MEETING HOWEVER, when there is unjust refusal to call a meeting, a stockholder can petition the Commission to order the conduct of a meeting. HOW NOTICE OF MEETINGS ARE SENT • Notice of meetings shall be sent through the means of communication provided in the bylaws. It can be through: (1) Electronic Mail (2) Other means allowed by the Commission • Atty. Espedido: Because of the E-Commerce Act, the electronic records can now be presented in court. The petitioning stockholder shall preside thereat UNTIL at least a majority of the stockholders or members present have chosen from among themselves, a presiding officer. In case where the Commission will order the conduct of the meeting, ANY NUMBER OF THE STOCKHOLDERS PRESENT shall already be considered as a quorum. Such that, when out of the 100 stockholders, 5 only came, it shall be constitute a quorum. CLOSING OF STOCK OR TRANSFER BOOK **NOTES Important: Unless the bylaws provide for a longer period, the stock and transfer book or membership book shall be closed at least twenty (20) days for regular meetings and seven (7) days for special meetings BEFORE the scheduled date of the meeting. REGULAR MEETING Closed at least 20 days before the schedule date of the meeting. SPECIAL MEETING Closed at least 7 days before the schedule date of the meeting. **Stock and transfer book A stock and transfer book (STB) contains the records of all stocks in the names of the stockholders alphabetically arranged; the installment paid and unpaid on all stock for which subscription has been made, and the date of payment of any installment; a statement of every alienation, sale or transfer of stock made, the date thereof, and by and to whom made; and such other entries as the by-laws may prescribe. The STB shall be kept in the principal office of the corporation or in the office of its stock transfer agent and shall be open for inspection by any director or stockholder of the corporation at reasonable hours on business days. In Torres Jr. vs. Court of IMPROPERLY CALLED MEETINGS Improperly called meetings can be considered valid, provided: 3. All the stockholders attend or are duly represented during the meetings; 4. Not one of those stockholders attended just for the purpose of objecting to the calling or holding of such meeting. T/N: Even if the meeting is improperly held or improperly called, all transactions or resolutions approved during the said meeting can still be considered valid provided that ALL the stockholders attend or are duly represented in that meeting. The new amendment added a new caveat: “Provided, that not anyone of those stockholders attended just for the purpose of objecting to the calling or holding of the meeting.” So even if the stockholders are duly represented or are present, but one of them was there just to object the calling or holding of such meeting, then you cannot apply the exception that the meeting is valid even if it’s improperly called or held. Page 64 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law SEC. 50. PLACE & TIME OF MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS OR MEMBERS Illustration Quorum in a non-stock corporation Section 50. Place and Time of Meetings of Stockholders or Members. – Stockholders’ or members’ meetings, whether regular or special, shall be held in the principal office of the corporation as set forth in the articles of incorporation, or, if not practicable, in the city or municipality where the principal office of the corporation is located: Provided, That any city or municipality in Metro Manila, Metro Cebu, Metro Davao, and other Metropolitan areas shall, for purposes of this section, be considered a city or municipality. 10 members in a non-stock corporation in order to hold a meeting. Before the meeting, 3 already died. What will be our quorum? A: The quorum is 4 because the remaining members are only 7. In a non-stock corporation, the dead members cannot be represented. Notice of meetings shall be sent through the means of communication provided in the bylaws, which notice shall state the time, place and purpose of the meetings. SEC. 52. REGULAR & SPECIAL MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES; QUORUM Each notice of meeting shall further be accompanied by the following: (a) The agenda for the meeting; (b) A proxy form which shall be submitted to the corporate secretary within a reasonable time prior to the meeting; (c) When attendance, participation, and voting are allowed by remote communication or in absentia, the requirements and procedures to be followed when a stockholder or member elects either option; and (d) When the meeting is for the election of directors or trustees, the requirements and procedure for nomination and election. All proceedings and any business transacted at a meeting of the stockholders or members, if within the powers or authority of the corporation, shall be valid even if the meeting is improperly held or called: Provided, That all the stockholders or members of the corporation are present or duly represented at the meeting and not one of them expressly states at the beginning of the meeting that the purpose of their attendance is to object to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened. SEC. 51. QUORUM IN MEETINGS Section 51. Quorum in Meetings. – Unless otherwise provided in this Code or in the bylaws, a quorum shall consist of the stockholders representing a majority of the outstanding capital stock or a majority of the members in the case of nonstock corporations. Quorum is the number of shareholders needed in order to validly conduct a meeting. 2 KINDS OF QUORUM (1) Simple quorum – 50% + 1 (2) Qualified Quorum – any number greater than the simple quorum Note: In so far as non-stock corporation is concerned, quorum is based on the majority of the living members. Section 52. Regular and Special Meetings of Directors or Trustees; Quorum. – Unless the articles of incorporation or the bylaws provides for a greater majority, a majority of the directors or trustees as stated in the articles of incorporation shall constitute a quorum to transact corporate business, and every decision reached by at least a majority of the directors or trustees constituting a quorum, except for the election of officers which shall require the vote of a majority of all the members of the board, shall be valid as a corporate act. Regular meetings of the board of directors or trustees of every corporation shall be held monthly, unless the bylaws provide otherwise. Special meetings of the board of directors or trustees may be held at any time upon the call of the president or as provided in the bylaws. Meetings of directors or trustees of corporations may be held anywhere in or outside of the Philippines, unless the bylaws provide otherwise. Notice of regular or special meetings stating the date, time and place of the meeting must be sent to every director or trustee at least two (2) days prior to the scheduled meeting, unless a longer time is provided in the bylaws. A director or trustee may waive this requirement, either expressly or impliedly. Directors or trustees who cannot physically attend or vote at board meetings can participate and vote through remote communication such as videoconferencing, teleconferencing, or other alternative modes of communication that allow them reasonable opportunities to participate. Directors or trustees cannot attend or vote by proxy at board meetings. A director or trustee who has a potential interest in any related party transaction must recuse from voting on the approval of the related party transaction without prejudice to compliance with the requirements of Section 31 of this Code. When Notice of Meeting Regular Meeting Held monthly unless the bylaws provide otherwise. Special Meeting Held anytime upon: (a) The call of the president; or (b) As provided for in the bylaws. GEN: Notice of regular or special meetings stating the date, time and place of the meeting must be sent to every director or trustee at least two (2) days prior to the scheduled meeting XPN: A longer time is provided in the bylaws. Page 65 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law How conducted May be done electronically or other means as allowed by the Commission. T/N: Teleconferencing is now very common and is now the standard way. Reasons why SEC allows teleconferencing: 1. In order to take advantage of the advances of technology; 2. To save time of the busy members of the board. As long as the minutes will reflect the true and accurate information, the BOD or BOT don’t have to conduct a physical meeting. NO REPRESENTATION ALLOWED IN A BOARD MEETING Directors or trustees cannot attend or vote by proxy at board meetings. This is because a director’s presence is personal due to his qualification and expertise. RIGHT TO VOTE OF SECURED CREDITORS GEN: In case a stockholder grants security interest in his or her shares in stock corporations, the stockholder-grantor shall have the right to attend and vote at meetings of stockholders. XPN: UNLESS the secured creditor is expressly given by the stockholder-grantor such right in writing which is recorded in the appropriate corporate books. Atty. Espedido: It is still the pledgor who has the right to participate. Even if the pledgee has the possession of the certificate, there is no ownership that is being transferred, UNLESS the pledgor grants the pledgee the right to vote. In which case, the pledgee may demand from the pledgor the right to vote to be contained in a PROXY. (1) Demand right to vote (2) Demand for a proxy WHEN STOCKHOLDER IS DEAD SEC. 53. WHO SHALL PRESIDE AT MEETINGS Section 53. Who Shall Preside at Meetings. – The chairman or, in his absence, the president shall preside at all meetings of the directors or trustees as well as of the stockholders or members, unless the bylaws provide otherwise. SEC. 54. RIGHT TO VOTE OF SECURED CREDITORS & ADMINISTRATORS Section 54. Right to Vote of Secured Creditors and Administrators. – In case a stockholder grants security interest in his or her shares in stock corporations, the stockholdergrantor shall have the right to attend and vote at meetings of stockholders, unless the secured creditor is expressly given by the stockholder-grantor such right in writing which is recorded in the appropriate corporate books. Executors, administrators, receivers, and other legal representatives duly appointed by the court may attend and vote in behalf of the stockholders or members without need of any written proxy. Certificate of Stock The best evidence of ownership of shares of stocks. IMPORTANT: Shares are personal properties. Being personal properties, the certificate of stock can be offered as security for any liability or loan to guarantee payments of obligations like in pledge and mortgage. Who takes possession of the certificate of stock in a pledge or mortgage? A: PLEDGE MORTGAGE Pledgee takes possession of The mortgagee does not the certificate take possession of the certificate There is a transfer of possession BUT no transfer of ownership Note: Executors, administrators, receivers, and other legal representatives duly appointed by the court may attend and vote in behalf of the stockholders or members WITHOUT NEED OF ANY WRITTEN PROXY. SEC. 55. VOTING IN CASE OF JOINT OWNERSHIP OF STOCK Section 55. Voting in Case of Joint Ownership of Stock. – The consent of all the co-owners shall be necessary in voting shares of stock owned jointly by two (2) or more persons, unless there is a written proxy, signed by all the co-owners, authorizing one (1) or some of them or any other person to vote such share or shares: Provided, That when the shares are owned in an “and/or” capacity by the holders thereof, any one of the joint owners can vote said shares or appoint a proxy therefor. GEN: The consent of all the co-owners shall be necessary in voting shares of stock owned jointly by two (2) or more persons. When the shares are owned in an "and/or" capacity by the holders thereof, any one of the joint owners can vote said shares or appoint a proxy therefor XPN: Unless there is a written proxy, signed by all the coowners, authorizing one (1) or some of them or any other person to vote such share or shares. SUMMARY: (A) If there are 2 of them – BOTH of them should consent to the vote UNLESS one or more of them will authorize the other to represent them and cast their vote in behalf of the other. (B) Owned in an “AND/OR” capacity – EITHER of the co-owners could vote Example: A and/or B – either A or B could vote There is no transfer of possession and ownership Page 66 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Illustration. Two owners with contradicting vote There are 2 owners. Both of them were together taking lunch and there was an issued that required a vote of WON there must be an increase of capital stock. How will we qualify the vote? A: If there are 2 stockholders with contradicting votes – NO VOTE; ZERO VOTE. The best solution: Both should AGREE. SEC. 56. VOTING RIGHT FOR TREASURY SHARES Section 56. Voting Right for Treasury Shares. – Treasury shares shall have no voting right as long as such shares remain in the Treasury. Rule: Treasury shares shall have no voting rights. PROXIES An instrument that refers to the authority given by the stockholder to another to represent the former during meeting Rule: Proxies shall be in writing, signed, and filed by the stockholder in any form authorized in the bylaws. (A/N: See discussion on proxies under Sec. 23.) VALIDITY AND EFFECTIVITY OF A PROXY It shall be valid only for the meeting for which it is intended UNLESS otherwise provided in the proxy form. However, no proxy shall be valid and effective for a period longer than 5 years. Reason: If they were given voting powers, the directors would vote for themselves, thereby perpetuating their position in the board. Illustration. If you have a proxy for the year 2020, you cannot use it for 2021 because it is only intended for that particular meeting unless it is extended but in no case shall it be longer than 5 years. A/N: See Sec. 9. A PROXY CANNOT BE SUBSTITUTED SEC. 57. MANNER OF VOTING; PROXIES Section 57. Manner of Voting; Proxies. – Stockholders and members may vote in person or by proxy in all meetings of stockholders or members. When so authorized in the bylaws or by a majority of the board of directors, the stockholders or members of corporations may also vote through remote communication or in absentia: Provided, That the votes are received before the corporation finishes the tally of votes. A stockholder or member who participates through remote communication or in absentia, shall be deemed present for purposes of quorum. The corporation shall establish the appropriate requirements and procedures for voting through remote communication and in absentia, taking into account the company’s scale, number of shareholders or members, structure and other factors consistent with the basic right of corporate suffrage. Proxies shall be in writing, signed and filed, by the stockholder or member, in any form authorized in the bylaws and received by the corporate secretary within a reasonable time before the scheduled meeting. Unless otherwise provided in the proxy form, it shall be valid only for the meeting for which it is intended. No proxy shall be valid and effective for a period longer than five (5) years at any one time. MANNER OF VOTING Rule: Stockholder or members in all meetings of stockholders or members may vote: (1) In person (2) By proxy (3) Through remote communication or in absentia when authorized: (a) in the bylaws or (b) by a majority vote of the BOD A proxy cannot be substituted by reason of the trust and confidence reposed upon the person given the authority to represent the other. The authority cannot be delegated. Illustration 1. Jin is given a proxy for a particular meeting. It was scheduled on the same day that she has a date and she preferred to go on that date instead. She cannot delegate her authority to attend said meeting to her sister. Her sister cannot attend the meeting because a proxy cannot be substituted or delegated. Illustration 2. On the other hand, Jin is given a proxy all compliant with the requirements. However, at the meeting, she was told that she cannot participate for no reason. Can it be done? A: No, it cannot be done because she has a vested right as an owner. PROXY GIVEN TO TWO OR MORE PERSONS (A) IF TWO PROXY HOLDERS If two persons were given a proxy by the same person, both of them cannot vote at the same time in the meeting. Between two proxy holders, who is entitled to vote? A: RULES: 1. Proxy whose proxy instrument bears the latest date 2. If same date – Proxy holder whose proxy instrument bear the later time 3. If same time – proxy holder who presents it first 4. All things being equal (same date, same time, and present at the same time) – proxy committee decides (B) IF THREE PROXY HOLDERS Where a proxy is given to three persons in one instrument, the three of them must agree upon the vote and in case of conflict, the rule of the majority of the three governs. [See De Leon, Page 512] Atty. Espedido: The most practical approach is to AGREE upon the vote and majority shall prevail. Page 67 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law REVOCATION OF PROXY Illustration. A proxy was declared and recognized as the appropriate proxy holder. However, when he went to the meeting, the stockholder who gave him the proxy was also there. Who is entitled to vote? A: The Stockholder votes. It would constitute a revocation of proxy because the rule says that proxies are generally revocable – expressly or impliedly. Important: The presence of the stockholder in the meeting is an implied revocation. SEC. 58. VOTING TRUSTS Section 58. Voting Trusts. – One or more stockholders of a stock corporation may create a voting trust for the purpose of conferring upon a trustee or trustees the right to vote and other rights pertaining to the shares for a period not exceeding five (5) years at any time: Provided, That in the case of a voting trust specifically required as a condition in a loan agreement, said voting trust may be for a period exceeding five (5) years but shall automatically expire upon full payment of the loan. A voting trust agreement must be in writing and notarized, and shall specify the terms and conditions thereof. A certified copy of such agreement shall be filed with the corporation and with the Commission; otherwise, the agreement is ineffective and unenforceable. The certificate or certificates of stock covered by the voting trust agreement shall be cancelled and new ones shall be issued in the name of the trustee or trustees, stating that they are issued pursuant to said agreement. The books of the corporation shall state that the transfer in the name of the trustee or trustees is made pursuant to the voting trust agreement. MANAGEMENT CONTROL DEVICES Management Control Devices These are devices that are used to attain the particular result that the management wants. They will be able to control the results or predetermine the outcome of their acts. They will guarantee the accomplishment of the objective of the management. Kinds: 1. 2. 3. 4. Management Contract Proxy Voting Trust Agreement Trust Agreement VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT It is an agreement in writing whereby one or more stockholders of a stock corporation transfer his or their shares upon a trustee or trustees for the purpose of conferring to the latter the right to vote and other rights pertaining to the shares for a period not exceeding five years at any time. Management may influence a group of stockholders, telling them that “this is how you should vote”. In order to ensure that they will abide by the agreement on how to vote, they may execute a voting agreement. They could designate any or some to cast their vote in behalf of all the other signatories to that voting agreement. If the management could have this, more or less they can predetermine the outcome of the results/vote. This is a way of PREDICTING the outcome of the results of any issue that may require approval during a stockholders meeting. The trustee or trustees shall execute and deliver to the transferors, voting trust certificates, which shall be transferable in the same manner and with the same effect as certificates of stock. What happens to these voting rights? A: The stockholder transfers his voting rights to another (trustee). The voting trust agreement filed with the corporation shall be subject to examination by any stockholder of the corporation in the same manner as any other corporate book or record: Provided, That both the trustor and the trustee or trustees may exercise the right of inspection of all corporate books and records in accordance with the provisions of this Code. Illustration. Charles was designated as proxy of a certain stockholder. He was already recognized as proxy in the meeting. However, while socializing with the other stockholders, he met someone holding a Voting Trust Agreement bearing the name of the same stockholder who granted him the proxy. In effect, the person holding the VTA and Charles will be voting in behalf of the same stockholder. Any other stockholder may transfer the shares to the same trustee or trustees upon the terms and conditions stated in the voting trust agreement, and thereupon shall be bound by all the provisions of said agreement. No voting trust agreement shall be entered into for purposes of circumventing the laws against anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, anti-competitive mergers and acquisitions, violation of nationality and capital requirements, or for the perpetuation of fraud. Unless expressly renewed, all rights granted in a voting trust agreement shall automatically expire at the end of the agreed period. The voting trust certificates as well as the certificates of stock in the name of the trustee or trustees shall thereby be deemed cancelled and new certificates of stock shall be reissued in the name of the trustors. The voting trustee or trustees may vote by proxy or in any manner authorized under the bylaws unless the agreement provides otherwise. The VTA was executed in February 1, 2017 while the proxy was executed in February 5, 2017. Who is now entitled to vote in the stockholder’s meeting? A: The Voting Trust Agreement prevails. It is the voting trustee who will be entitled to vote because the voting trustee has the legal title and the Voting Trust Agreement is irrevocable despite the subsequent execution of proxy. What if the proxy was executed in February 1, 2017 while the VTA was executed in February 5, 2017. Who is now entitled to vote in the stockholder’s meeting? A: The voting trustee, because the Voting Trust Agreement operates to revoke the proxy. RIGHTS OF A TRUSTEE IN A VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT (1) (2) (3) (4) The right to vote The right to be voted upon The right to be represented Right of inspection of all corporation books and records Page 68 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Important: Basically, all the rights of the stockholders because he has the legal title except the right to dividends because the beneficial ownership is retained by the trustor. In contrast, the proxy holder has limited rights in attending the meeting (e.g. right to vote) because the proxy holder has no legal title of the shares of stock. TERM OF VTA Illustration 1. Stockholder attends the meeting – proxy is revoked You were given the proxy and attended the meeting. However, in the meeting, you saw the stockholder who you are representing. When an issue was about to be resolved, the SH voted. What do you think will happen? A: The stockholder’s vote prevails because the presence of the stockholder revokes the proxy. Voting Trust Agreement is valid for a period not exceeding five (5) years at any one time. Once expired, everything will be returned to the real and lawful stockholder (trustor). Illustration 2. Trustor attends the meeting – trustee’s vote prevails; no revocation of VTA VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT VS. VOTING AGREEMENT On the other hand, a voting trustee attended the meeting and the trustor also appeared. Which vote should prevail? A: The trustee’s vote shall prevail. Voting Trust Agreement An agreement in writing whereby one or more stockholders of a stock corporation transfers their shares to any person/s or to a corporation having authority to act as trustee for the purpose of vesting in such person/s or corporation (as trustee/s) voting or other rights pertaining to the shares for a certain period not exceeding the term fixed by the Code and upon the terms and conditions stated in the agreement. Voting Agreement A written agreement among a group of shareholders, not a joint ownership, wherein they agree among themselves on how they will vote when a certain issue arises. Illustration 3. Trustee delegates authority to a proxy The trustee authorized somebody else to appear in the meeting because he had something else to do. He told his son to represent him (trustee) in the meeting. When the son went there, the stockholder was also there. Whose vote will prevail? Can the trustee transfer this right to someone else? Is this the intention of the law? A: The proxy’s right will prevail. Section 58, last paragraph provides: “The voting trustee or trustees may vote by proxy or in any manner authorized under the bylaws unless the agreement provides otherwise.” Atty Espedido: That is a very dangerous provision. It is basic that delegated power cannot be further delegated. But it is the law. PROXY vs VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT Proxy No legal title to the shares of the stockholder Voting Trust Agreement Acquires legal title to the shares of the stockholder The stockholder precisely executed the trust agreement and even transferred title to the trustee basically because of trust. The proxy of the trustee might not be trusted by the stockholder. It will be very dangerous if we allow the proxy to represent. Revocable at any time unless coupled with interest Irrevocable for a definite and limited period of time A delegated power cannot be delegated. BUT it is the law. It is provided by law. Can only act at the specified SH’s meeting Not limited to any particular meeting **PROHIBITION AGAINST THE USE OF MANAGEMENT DEVICES Votes only in the absence of the owner of stock Can vote and exercise all the rights of the transferring SH even when the SH is present Nationalized Corporations These are corporations which must be either be: (a) Wholly owned by Filipinos (b) 60% is owned by Filipinos, 40% is of foreign ownership Shorter duration Longer duration Need not be notarized nor a copy be filed with the SEC Notarized and filed with SEC No right of inspection of corporate books Has such right Purpose of 60% requirement To make sure that the control shall be in the hands of the Filipino stockholders, so that our natural resources will not be exploited by foreigners. Illustration. Koreans gave bonuses to the Filipino Shareholders, in exchange, they asked that the shareholders execute proxies in their favor. Thus, 60% of the Filipinos executed the proxy in favor of the Koreans. As a result, anything that will be decided in the Stockholders’ meeting will be controlled by the Koreans. Is there a problem with this? A: Yes. This violates the nationalization law. Although they were not forced to sign the proxy, the execution of the proxy is considered invalid on the ground of being against public policy. Page 69 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law TN: Although in the books, there are 60% Filipino stockholders/owners, but they have surrendered the power which accompanies ownership. The intention of the law, to maintain the exclusive control with the Filipinos to certain industries as enshrined in the Constitution, is violated. Important: These management control devices cannot be used to circumvent or violate existing laws against monopoly, restraint of trade, and other similar laws. TITLE VII. STOCKS AND STOCKHOLDERS SEC. 59. SUBSCRIPTION CONTRACT Section 59. Subscription Contract. – Any contract for the acquisition of unissued stock in an existing corporation or a corporation still to be formed shall be deemed a subscription within the meaning of this Title, notwithstanding the fact that the parties refer to it as a purchase or some other contract. Subscription Contract The agreement entered into when subscribing for shares. Important: Like any other contract, it must have the elements of a contract, namely: 1. 2. 3. Consent – consent of the parties (meeting of the minds) Object or subject matter – in the subscription contract, it pertains to the newly-issued stocks Consideration – in the subscription contract, it shall not be less than the par value or issue value of the shares. It can be paid through the following means: a. Cash b. Property c. Labor or services actually rendered d. Amount transferred from URE to capital e. Shares which are reclassified How can you become a stockholder? A: (1) Subscription of an unissued shares of the corporation (2) Direct purchase of existing shares from another stockholder (3) Purchases stock from publicly listed corporations (4) By exercising stock option When would you subscribe? (a) Pre-incorporation subscription – before incorporation (b) Post-incorporation subscription – after subscription STOCK OPTIONS Stock Options It is a privilege given by a corporation to persons not necessarily stockholders, giving them a period within which to decide whether or not to buy shares in a company at a specified price. to stock option because here, person A can already purchase the stock at P10 instead of P15. Atty. Espedido: Do not underestimate when you are given an option. The moment the price will increase, you can sell it to someone interested to buy it even at a higher price. You may make profit out of the option. PRE-EMPTIVE RIGHT It is not a privilege but a right of existing stockholders to subscribe to new unissued shares of the corporation in proportion to their existing shareholdings, so that they can maintain their “hold” or existing % of holdings in the corporation. STOCK OPTION Privilege given by the corporation Can be given to 3rd parties No maximum amount. Depends on the agreement between the corporation and the person given the options. PRE-EMPTIVE RIGHT A right given to stockholders by law Only given to existing stockholders The stockholder has the right to buy newly-issued shares in an amount in proportion to him SEC. 60. PRE-INCORPORATION SUBSCRIPTION Section 60. Pre-incorporation Subscription. – A subscription of shares in a corporation still to be formed shall be irrevocable for a period of at least six (6) months from the date of subscription, unless all of the other subscribers consent to the revocation, or the corporation fails to incorporate within the same period or within a longer period stipulated in the contract of subscription. No pre-incorporation subscription may be revoked after the articles of incorporation is submitted to the Commission. PRE-INCORPORATION SUBSCRIPTION GEN: The individual agrees to subscribe prior to incorporation and said contract is IRREVOCABLE for at least 6 months XPN: Revocable in the following instances: (1) ALL of the other subscribers consent to the revocation; (2) The Corporation fails to incorporate within the same period or (3) Within a longer period stipulated in the contract of subscription. **XPN to XPN: Irrevocable after the AOI have been submitted to the Commission (post-incorporation subscription). What is the purpose of the irrevocability? A: To ensure the creation of the corporation. It gives the organizers the chance to organize. Do stock options have value? A: Yes. They are valuable because they give a person the right to buy shares of stock at a specific price. (A/N: Remember, stock prices fluctuate, so you may have an opportunity to buy shares of stock at a lower price). Atty. Espedido: If revocation is allowed within the 6 months, the organization of the corporation will be highly jeopardized, and nobody might be able to start at all if the subscribers keep on withdrawing. The timetable and the filing of the articles might be unduly affected. Illustration. Stock option gives person A, the right to buy shares of stock of Corp. ABC for a price of P10. Later on, because of the good performance of the corporation, the stocks of the corporation from P10 already increased to P15. There is value **RULE ON POST-INCORPORATION SUBSCRIPTION Under post-incorporation, the law is silent as to the revocability or irrevocability of the subscription, but actually it is irrevocable. Page 70 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law The moment a subscriber subscribes after the incorporation of a company, he becomes a stockholder and cannot anymore revoke his subscription. And since he is already a stockholder, he can now enjoy the rights of a stockholder. The basis for this is Sec. 71 of this Code. Rights of stockholder: 1. He may check the corporate books; 2. He has the right to vote on shares if he has a voting share; 3. He has the right to dividends when the corporation declares said dividends. Atty. Gaviola: There is a rule in Oblicon that generally, a contract is revocable when it is not consummated. We apply the same logic here in the sense that when a subscriber pays for his subscription pre-incorporation, [the shares are issued] with the condition that [the proceeds coming from them] will be used for the formation of the corporation. The failure of such event to happen would allow the subscriber to revoke his subscription as provided in Sec. 60, which states that the corporation has 6 months to comply with said obligation. However, once the corporation files its AOI, then it is as if the corporation has already complied with its obligation, thus making the subscription irrevocable (the contract is already consummated). Meanwhile, for post-incorporation subscription, it is akin to a valid and binding contract that is already perfected (consummated), hence, it is irrevocable. The subscription now becomes part of the capital stock of the corporation. Hence, the corporation cannot allow the subscriptions to be revoked without prejudicing its interests and that of its stockholders. The corporation must now comply with its obligations to its stockholders, like the distribution of dividends and allowing them to exercise their rights as stockholders. Where the consideration is other than actual cash, or consists of intangible property such as patents or copyrights, the valuation thereof shall initially be determined by the stockholders or the board of directors, subject to the approval of the Commission. Shares of stock shall not be issued in exchange for promissory notes or future service. The same considerations provided in this section, insofar as applicable, may be used for the issuance of bonds by the corporation. The issued price of no-par value shares may be fixed in the articles of incorporation or by the board of directors pursuant to authority conferred by the articles of incorporation or the bylaws, or if not so fixed, by the stockholders representing at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock at a meeting duly called for the purpose. How do you pay for subscriptions? A: (1) Actual cash paid to the corporation; (2) Property, tangible or intangible, actually received by the corporation and necessary or convenient for its use and lawful purposes ➢ at a fair valuation equal to the par or issued value of the stock issued; (3) Labor performed for or services actually rendered to the corporation; (4) Previously incurred indebtedness of the corporation; (5) Amounts transferred from unrestricted retained earnings to stated capital; (6) Outstanding shares exchanged for stocks in the event of reclassification or conversion; (7) Shares of stock in another corporation; and/or (8) Other generally accepted form of consideration ACTUAL CASH GEN: Shares of stock shall not be issued in exchanged for promissory notes. SEC. 61. CONSIDERATION FOR STOCKS Section 61. Consideration for Stocks. – Stocks shall not be issued for a consideration less than the par or issued price thereof. Consideration for the issuance of stock may be: XPN: Except if the corporation is the one indebted to the person. If the corporation has debts against the person, then the corporation may allow this by issuing shares of stocks. PROPERTY (TANGIBLE/INTANGIBLE) (a) Actual cash paid to the corporation; (b) Property, tangible or intangible, actually received by the corporation and necessary or convenient for its use and lawful purposes at a fair valuation equal to the par or issued value of the stock issued; (c) Labor performed for or services actually rendered to the corporation; When property is used for the payment of subscription, the property value must be equal to the amount subscribed. This is measured through the fair market value of the property. And to be sure that the property has been evaluated properly, or assigned with the proper valuation, the SEC will examine the property. LABOR OR SERVICES ACTUALLY RENDERED (d) Previously incurred indebtedness of the corporation; (e) Amounts transferred earnings to stated capital; from unrestricted retained (f) Outstanding shares exchanged for stocks in the event of reclassification or conversion; (g) Shares of stock in another corporation; and/or (h) Other generally accepted form of consideration. Rule: Services here do not refer to future services but pertains to ACTUAL services rendered. Illustration. The person planned to join the corporation as a Vice President. Later on, he was eventually appointed as VP. Can he be given shares of stocks by telling the corporation, “I am paying my shares of stock out of my salary for the first month.” Is that allowed? A: No, that is not allowed because services here do not refer to future services. Page 71 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Why are future services not allowed? A: Because of the uncertainty of future services. AMOUNTS TRANSFERRED FROM THE UNRESTRICTED RETAINED EARNINGS TO CAPITAL Illustration. The authorized capital stock (ACS) was increased from 1m to 2m. Five (5) stockholders owned 20% each of the original 1m ACS. They then wanted to subscribe another 20% each of the 1M increase but they don’t have cash. However, there are unrestricted retained earnings. What could be done? A: The 5 stockholders may subscribe, and their subscription will be paid out of the unrestricted retained earnings which should just be transferred to the capital. Hence, instead of issuing cash dividends, the corporation will issue stock dividends to them. Atty. Espedido: A good justification by the corporation in doing this is that such will increase the capital of the corporation considering that the unrestricted retained earnings are ploughed back to the corporation. In the same way, the investments of the stockholders are also increased. WAIVER OF RIGHT TO UNPAID SUBSCRIPTION Illustration. The Corporation wanted to grant bonuses but has no cash. Hence, it instead declared that all unpaid subscriptions are deemed fully paid. Is it valid? A: No, it is not allowed because this will violate the trust fund doctrine since there will be no more capital coming in the corporation. In the books, it is supposed to show that certain stocks are still unpaid and therefore, it must be paid. Atty. Espedido: Waiving the unpaid subscriptions is no different from just returning to the stockholders their investment. If the return of stocks is not allowed, then it should not be allowed to waive the payment of unpaid subscriptions. If you declare all unpaid subscriptions as fully paid, you are making it appear to the public and to creditors that the capital is inside already when in fact, no money came in. You are therefore misleading the public. OPTIONS IN APPLICATION OF PAYMENT In the absence of provisions in the by-laws to the contrary, a corporation may apply payments made by subscribers either: (1) Payment pro rata to each and all the entire number of shares subscribed for; Example. Apply the 50,000 to all the 100 subscribed shares. In effect, there is no single share fully paid Note: If it is a proportional payment or pro rata – the stockholder cannot be issued a Stock Certificate. (2) Full payment for corresponding number of shares – apply payment to as many shares as may be covered by that payment. Example: Apply it to the 50 shares. Therefore the 50 shares are fully paid. Note: The corporation may issue to the stockholder a Stock Certificate on the appropriate number of shares covered. GOODWILL Rule: Goodwill may be used to pay subscription because this is considered property. To determine the value of a good will, it shall be appraised by the SEC. **What is goodwill? A: Goodwill is an intangible asset that is associated with the purchase of one company by another. Specifically, goodwill is the portion of the purchase price that is higher than the sum of the net fair value of all of the assets purchased in the acquisition and the liabilities assumed in the process. The value of a company’s brand name, solid customer base, good customer relations, good employee relations, and proprietary technology represent some reasons why goodwill exists. ISSUED PRICE OF NON-PAR VALUE If unpaid subscriptions are not paid when the date for payment arrives or when the Board makes the call for payment, they become delinquent shares which means that they are due and demandable and can be sold in a delinquent sale. (A) It may be fixed in the: 1. Articles of Incorporation; or 2. By the BOD pursuant to authority conferred by the AOI or the bylaws MANNER OF PAYMENT (B) If not fixed by the abovementioned – fixed by the stockholders representing at least a majority of the OCS at a meeting duly called for the purpose Are you supposed to pay in full? A: The stockholder may either pay in full but this is not required. When is balance payable? A: The balance shall be paid on: (a) The date indicated in the subscription contract; or (b) When the BOD calls for payment. **Atty. Gaviola: The call is only required when there is no date fixed for the payment of the shares. It is the BOD who will make the call by resolutions of the BOD in a meeting where there is a quorum, approved by majority of the directors present in the meeting. Important: Once the stockholder fully pays, he is given a Certificate of Stock. SEC. 62. CERTIFICATION OF STOCK & TRANSFER OF SHARES Section 62. Certificate of Stock and Transfer of Shares. – The capital stock of corporations shall be divided into shares for which certificates signed by the president or vice president, countersigned by the secretary or assistant secretary, and sealed with the seal of the corporation shall be issued in accordance with the bylaws. Shares of stock so issued are personal property and may be transferred by delivery of the certificate or certificates indorsed by the owner, his attorney- infact, or any other person legally authorized to make the transfer. No transfer, however, shall be valid, except as between the Page 72 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law parties, until the transfer is recorded in the books of the corporation showing the names of the parties to the transaction, the date of the transfer, the number of the certificate or certificates, and the number of shares transferred. The Commission may require corporations whose securities are traded in trading markets and which can reasonably demonstrate their capability to do so to issue their securities or shares of stocks in uncertificated or scripless form in accordance with the rules of the Commission. 1 CERTIFICATE OF STOCK CAN BE OFFERED AS COLLATERAL Note: Shares of stock so issued are personal property. Once a certificate of stock is given, the stockholder may offer it as collateral to the bank or he can exercise his right as an owner to dispose or sell it. 2 CERTIFICATE OF STOCK IS TRANSFERRABLE No shares of stock against which the corporation holds any unpaid claim shall be transferable in the books of the corporation. SEC. 63. ISSUANCE OF STOCK CERTIFICATES Section 63. Issuance of Stock Certificates. – No certificate of stock shall be issued to a subscriber until the full amount of the subscription together with interest and expenses (in case of delinquent shares), if any is due, has been paid. **Certificate of Stock (As defined in the case of Anna Teng vs. SEC) A certificate of stock is a written instrument signed by the proper officer of a corporation stating or acknowledging that the person named in the document is the owner of a designated number of shares of its stocks. It is prima facie evidence that the holder is a shareholder of a corporation. A certificate, however, is merely a tangible evidence of ownership of shares of stock. It is not a stock in the corporation, and merely expresses the contract between the corporation and the stockholder. The shares of stock evidenced by said certificates, meanwhile, are regarded as property and the owner of such shares may, as a general rule, dispose of them as he sees fit, unless the corporation has been dissolved, or unless the right to do is properly restricted, or the owner’s privilege of disposing of his shares has been hampered by his own action. What are requirements for a certificate of stock? A: 1. It has to be signed by the president or the VP, countersigned by the corporate secretary or assistant secretary, and sealed with the corporate seal. 2. It has to state the par value of the share. 3. The name of the shareholder must be indicated. 4. The number of shares must be indicated. 5. The stock number must be indicated. SIGNATURES REQUIRED IN A CERTIFICATE OF STOCK (1) Signed by the president or vice-president (2) Countersigned by the secretary or assistant secretary NATURE OF CERTIFICATE OF STOCKS (1) It is a personal property (2) It is transferrable (3) It is NOT a negotiable instrument It is transferred through indorsement + delivery. 3 A CERTIFICATE OF STOCK IS NOT A NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT Distinction between non-negotiability and transferability: NOT NEGOTIABLE It is not negotiable because it does not contain a promise or order to pay a sum certain in money TRANSFERRABLE Stock certificate can be transferred from one person to another so as to constitute the transferee as the lawful owner thereof. Note: Here, it is not negotiable because it does not contain a promise or order to pay a sum certain in money. Although it may contain an order to deliver a certain number of stocks. Atty. Espedido: Negotiability presupposes various or many transfers or subsequent transfers. To constitute the transferee as the lawful holder of the instrument. There are defenses available, and he could avail of these defenses. But when we say transferability, it is more on possession. REQUISITES OF A NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT Section 1. Form of Negotiable Instruments. – An instrument to be negotiable must conform to the following requirements: WUPOD (a) It must be in writing and signed by the maker or drawer (b) Must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money (c) Must be payable on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time (d) Must be payable to order or to bearer (e) Where the instrument is addressed to a drawee, he must be named or other indicated therein with reasonable certainty. MANNER OF TRANSFERRING NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT (1) Payable to order indorsement + delivery (2) Payable to bearer – delivery STOCK CERTIFICATE indorsement + delivery Note: A Certificate of Stock may be transferred through indorsement + delivery. Atty. Espedido: At the back portion of that certificate is an indorsement portion – it simply states that this certificate covering a no. of shares is being transferred to xxx. The date Page 73 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law and place are indicated, and then sign. So, whoever becomes a transferee becomes the shareholder. PROCEDURE (1) (2) (3) (4) Indorsement + Delivery Transferee presents it to the corporation It is shown to the Secretary The Secretary records it in the stock and transfer book of the corporation. On the other page, it will indicate the name of the transferee. (5) Once the transferee is recorded, the name of the new stockholder will now be recorded in the stock and transfer book EFFECT It merely transfers the ownership of the shares to the transferee or assignee, the latter now being the owner of the shares. There is already a valid transfer of ownership. However, it does not make the transferee/assignee a stock holder just yet. So how can the transferee or assignee become the stockholder? A: The registration of the transfer in the stock and transfer book makes one a stockholder, regardless of the issuance or nonissuance of a new certificate of stock. SCRIPLESS TRADING “The Commission may require corporations whose securities are traded in trading markets and which can reasonably demonstrate their capability to do so to issue their securities or shares of stocks in uncertificated or scripless form in accordance with the rules of the Commission.” EFFECT IF NOT RECORDED IN THE STOCK AND TRANSFER BOOK Rule: No transfer, however, shall be valid, except as between the parties, until the transfer is recorded in the books of the corporation Thus, if it is not recorded in the stock and transfer book, the transfer will only be binding upon the parties. Atty. Espedido: You should call the corporate secretary and warn him not to issue it to anyone. If it is not in the books, it will not affect third parties. Thus, the stockholder can sell it again. Summary of effect if not recorded in the stock and transfer book: • Valid and binding as to the parties (corporation and subscriber) • Not binding to 3rd parties PURPOSE OF INDORSEMENT The purpose of indorsement is in order to bind third parties. Because of this indorsement, any third party can go to the secretary and have his name registered in the stock and transfer book. Atty. Espedido: But this usually doesn’t happen since the holder thereof will just call the secretary and warn the secretary as to the fact of the loss of the certificate. REMEDY FOR REFUSAL TO RECORD TRANSFER OF STOCK IN YOUR NAME What if the secretary refuses to record or transfer the stock in your name? A: You have the right to go to court and FILE A MANDAMUS case. You have the right to be recognized – have that right to register the transfer in your name Note: The secretary only has a ministerial duty to comply with the indorsement. What is a “scrip”? A: A scrip is a duly signed certificate of stock. KTG: A scrip is a certificate or receipt that represents something of value, but has no intrinsic value in itself. What’s essential is that the issuer and the recipient must agree on the value that the scrip represents. In other words, it is a substitute or alternative to legal tender that entitles the bearer to receive something in return. Applying this to the provision above, a corporation may be required to issue its shares in the form of scrips. In this case, the scrip will represent each share of stock the shareholder owns. On or before a specific date, the shareholder could combine the scrips he has, and convert the value they represent into actual shares. What happens in scripless trading? A: There is transfer of ownership of shares without actually delivering the stock certificates. Instead, the transfer of ownership is done through book entries. Atty. Gaviola: This kind of trading is usually done when the stocks are listed in the stock exchange. What is the rationale for this provision on scripless trading? A: For convenience in the buying and selling of securities. If we strictly follow the traditional way of transferring shares (which involves delivery of actual certificates), the stock market will not survive because the transactions will take days to months. How is scripless trading done? A: A corporation that intends to trade shares in the stock exchange must: 1. Deliver all their securities or their shares to the Philippine Depository and Trust Corporation (PDTC); 2. The shares in the books of the PDTC will now be assigned or given to the brokers who purchased the shares; **NOTES TWO WAYS TO TRANSFER SHARES 1. 2. Deliver the stock certificate with an intention to transfer ownership duly indorsed; or Execute a Deed of Assignment for the shares. Page 74 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law 3. The corporation’s stock and transfer agent records in the stocks in the Stock and Transfer Book, and issues the certificates of stock of the corporation. T/N: The entity recorded in the Stock and Transfer Book will be the PDTC, the holder of the shares. 4. In turn, the PDTC will make entries in their own records (book entries). Uplifting of Shares If the shares are desired to be kept for a long time without intention to trade them, the shares can be uplifted by: 1. 2. Requesting the PDTC to take out the shares from their custody, and record them in the Stock and Transfer Book under the name of a specific purchaser (who could be the corporation or an actual shareholder). The Stock and Transfer Agent will then issue the certificates of stock to the purchaser. If later on, the purchaser/shareholder decides to sell the shares, the stock certificates he or she has must be returned to the Stock and Transfer Agent, which will take time. Atty. Gaviola: Note, this is the delay and complication that scripless trading avoids. Key Points on Scripless Trading: 1. There is only one owner, the PDTC, who is listed as the stockholder in the books of the corporation. 2. The PDTC will have its own list of brokers who hold the shares for their clients. 3. Brokers will have their own list of clients as well. Who has ownership of the shares of stock in scripless trading then? A: The legal owner is the PDTC, but the beneficial owner/s are the client/s of the brokers. If that is the case, then who can vote on such shares during elections? A: The beneficial owner should ask for a certification from the broker that he is the owner of the specific number of shares that he bought. That certification, which is not a stock certificate, should be brought by the beneficial owner to the election. It is akin to a proxy allowing the holder to vote on shares. SEC. 64. LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS FOR WATERED STOCKS Section 64. Liability of Directors for Watered Stocks. – A director or officer of a corporation who: (a) consents to the issuance of stocks for a consideration less than its par or issued value; (b) consents to the issuance of stocks for a consideration other than cash, valued in excess of its fair value; or (c) having knowledge of the insufficient consideration, does not file a written objection with the corporate secretary, shall be liable to the corporation or its creditors, solidarily with the stockholder concerned for the difference between the value received at the time of issuance of the stock and the par or issued value of the same. STORY OF THE WATERED CHICKEN You go to the market and buy a chicken. When weighed, the chicken’s weight is 1.5 kg and then you bought it. However, when you went home and checked the weight of the chicken, it is already 1.2kg. This is because the chicken was injected with water and then placed inside the freezer so the water becomes ice. When placed in the weighing scale, the chicken now weighs heavier. So when the chicken’s weight was already 1.2kg, all the water was gone. This is why they call it the watered chicken. WATERED STOCKS Stocks which are sold at less than the par value. You pay less for more stocks. If you were able to subscribe to a water stock, the value paid will not reflect the actual value of the shares. How could water stocks exist? 1. When the value of the thing that you used in paying the stocks is lower than the par value of the share– discounted stocks 2. Did not pay anything at all – bonus stocks 3. Consideration is valued in excess of its fair value What is the effect of watered shares? A: Watered stocks are not merely ultra vires, but they are illegal per se, and they cannot be ratified by any vote of the shareholders, or by resolution of the BOD. However, if they are sold to a third party, then it should be honored by the corporation as a valued stock if the third parties acquired it in good faith. ** Why would the law allow a stock certificate which has not been fully paid to be transferred? A: To maintain economic relations among corporations and the public. If we do not allow that, every time a person buys shares of stocks, the buyer will always ask if it was sold with proper consideration and it will lead to the suffering of the economy. That is why certificates are made transferrable even if it is not fully paid. The transferability of the certificates would not mean anything if we have to examine them every time we buy a share of stock because it would cause great inconvenience. T/N: We could no longer trust in the certificate and therefore it loses its credibility. And if no one will trust in them, its transferability is rendered useless. And so here comes now the transferee, he did not know this was a watered stock. He went to the corporation and presented the said stock, duly endorsed. Is the corporation obliged to recognize that he is now the stockholder of the certificate? A: The corporation must honor because there is nothing wrong with the certificate. The mistake or deficiency was in the consideration. So, so long as the certificate is legitimate then the corporation is obliged to honor/acknowledge and effect the transfer. PARTIES LIABLE (1) The directors who consented to the sale of the share at less than par value (2) Shareholder who bought the watered stock Note: Issuance of watered stock is a valid stock. The issuance is valid BUT the purchase is ILLEGAL. Illustration. Such that when the investor subscribed, he can say that you cannot get back his shares. He is correct because the issuance is valid BUT he can be compelled to pay the difference. Atty. Espedido: What is not valid is the consideration. The issuance is valid. Page 75 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Who was at a loss? A: The corporation because the capital indicated and determined through the par value no longer reflect the true capital based on par value. Illustration. 100 shares issued at 1 peso par value = Php 100 capital; 1 share was sold at 50% = Php 99.50 capital If a share for example was sold at a discounted 50%, and 100 shares were all issued at a par value of PHP1/share – the capital should be Php 100. But since one share was sold at 50% discount, then the capital is PHP99.50 when it should have been PHP100 if there was no watered stock. Because of that watered stock, our capital is now less than what it should be. Who are the parties responsible? A: The directors who agreed that the sale will be sold at that discounted price. How do we compel the directors if they do not pay? A: We have to go to court. Who could authorize the filing of the case in a corporation? A: Normally, it is the directors. But because the directors themselves is responsible for the watered stock, they will never authorize the filing of the case. The remedy is to file a derivative suit. DERIVATIVE SUIT What is a derivative suit? A: A derivative suit is filed by a stockholder in behalf of a corporation. Note: The cause of action belongs to the corporation, but the stockholder files the action on behalf of the corporation. Instead of the directors filing the suit, it would now be the stockholders. Is it the same as a representative suit? A: No. A derivative suit is not a representative suit because a representative suit is a class suit – a person files in behalf of a class who have a common interest or are similarly situated. On the other hand, a derivative suit is filed on behalf of a corporation, not on behalf of a person similarly situated to the corporation. It is the corporation that is injured, not the stockholder. This is allowed by law because the person who is required to act (BOD) refuses to act. DERIVATIVE SUIT Filed on behalf of a corporation REPRESENTATIVE SUIT A class suit where a person files in behalf of a class who have common interest or are similarly situated Note: It cannot compel to return the issued stocks because as far as the issuance is concerned, it is VALID. However, it is the deficient consideration that is ILLEGAL. Important: If they are given the option to return, the stocks being transferrable, it could have already been transferred to another person already. If the issuance will not be considered valid, the transferee might be holding something which is not valid even if he has already paid fully. The transferee may even have paid more because at the time the shares were transferred, the value might have already increased. So that, on watered stocks, what is the prayer in the derivative suit? A: The difference between the actual price paid and the par value of the shares against the directors or officers who consented to/did not object against the issuance of watered shares. ** Can a creditor file a derivative suit? A: No, only the stockholders that are stockholders at the time of the suit can file the derivative suit. So we are ready for the derivative suit. Here are stockholder now who’s filing against the directors because the directors refuse the file necessary case, so in the end what would the result of the derivative suit? A: The BOD will liable for the issuance of the watered stock and the non-issuance of the certificate of stock, in that manner the directors shall be solidarily liable. In the prayer of the derivative suit to be filed by the petitioning stockholders prayed that they be awarded with damages and they suffered sleepless nights because watered are issued, why the directors did it to them, do you think they can recover damages from that? A: NO. They can’t recover the damages because the purpose of the derivative it should be in favor of the corporation, and in the instant case it was not for the benefit of the corporation. Such that the cause of action should belong to the corporation. On the other hand, they had not decided to file derivative suit, but a case on their behalf, an individual case, they trying to recover the unpaid portion belongs to the corporation, that should be given to them, then the court should give to them the unpaid balance, do you think they can do that? A: No. The balance there is considered as a legal capital of the corporation, such that it is the corporation has the right to recover the balance, moreover if they are allowed to recover the unpaid balance and be given to them the it would violate the trust fund doctrine, because these are part of the capital of the corporation, and if they allowed to recover the balance then that would tantamount to liquidation because it is part of the capital. And it is the corporation is supposed to recover it. REQUISITES FOR A DERIVATIVE SUIT TO PROSPER 1. Injury to the corporation 2. The person suing must be a stockholder at the time of the injury 3. Suing on behalf of the corporation. OTHER INSTANCES IN WHICH A DERIVATIVE SUIT MAY PROSPER 1. 2. 3. Disloyalty of directors (See Sec. 33) Self-dealing directors (See Sec. 31) Interlocking directors (See Sec. 32) Page 76 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law RR’s answers: 1. Directors assent to acts that are patently illegal 2. Grossly negligent 3. Conflict of interest 4. Disloyalty WATERED STOCKS IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO NEWLY ISSUED SHARES (VIRGIN SHARES) Illustration. Treasury shares with a par value of Php10/share were sold at Php5/share – not a water stock There are treasury shares. The BOD needed cash, and they decided to sell these treasury shares. The par value is at PHP10/share. The board decided to sell it at PHP5/share. Is this a watered stock? A: No, because watered stocks only applies to freshly issued shares. There were watered stocks issued. Fortunately, the corporation was about to be disowned. The existing assets were not enough to pay all the creditors. Would the creditors, in the presence of watered stocks, would it be able to pursue some more other than the existing assets? A: Yes. This is supposed to be part of the asset. Can the transferee be compelled to pay the unpaid portion? A: No. The stocks are not anymore “virgin” stocks when the transferee bought it since it has been previously issued by the Corporation to the subscriber. Watered stock only applies to “virgin” shares. If we allow the transferee to pay, it defeats the transferability. Atty. Espedido: We will have to keep asking if it is a watered stock or not. Thus, insofar as issuance is concerned, it is valid. What is not valid is with regard to the deficient consideration – wherein you paid less for more. **NOTES KINDS OF SUITS 1. Individual Suit – a suit brought by the shareholder in his own name against the corporation when a wrong is directly inflicted against him. 2. Representative Suit – a suit brought by the stockholder in behalf of himself and all the other stockholders similarly situated when a wrong is committed against a group of stockholders. 3. Derivative Suit – a suit brought by a stockholder for wrongful acts committed by directors/trustees of a corporation, when the shareholder finds that he has no redress because the directors/trustees are the ones vested by law to decide whether or not to sue. DERIVATIVE SUITS It is a suit by a shareholder to enforce a corporate cause of action. It is a condition sine qua non that the corporation be impleaded as a party because not only is the corporation an indispensable party, but it is also the present rule that it must be served with process. The judgment must be made binding upon the corporation in order that the corporation may get the benefit of the suit against the same defendants for the same cause of action. REQUISITES FOR DERIVATIVE ACTIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. That the person instituting the action be a stockholder or member at the time the act/s or transaction/s subject of the action occurred and at the time the action was filed; That the stockholder/member exerted all reasonable efforts, and alleges the same with particularity in the complaint, to exhaust all remedies available under the Articles of Incorporation, bylaws, laws or rules governing the corporation to obtain the relief he desires That there is no appraisal right available for the act/s complained of; That the suit is not a nuisance or harassment suit; That the suit is brought in the name of the corporation. Important: In derivative suits, the corporation is an unwilling coplaintiff; the suing stockholder/member is only a nominal party. The number of shares owned by the suing stockholder is not material. The wrong contemplated in a derivative suit is one which injures the corporation directly. But, the personal injury suffered by the stockholder cannot disqualify him from filing said derivative suit. SEC. 65. INTEREST ON UNPAID SUBSCRIPTIONS Section 65. Interest on Unpaid Subscriptions. – Subscribers to stocks shall be liable to the corporation for interest on all unpaid subscriptions from the date of subscription, if so required by and at the rate of interest fixed in the subscription contract. If no rate of interest is fixed in the subscription contract, the prevailing legal rate shall apply. SEC. 66. PAYMENT OF BALANCE OF SUBSCRIPTION Section 66. Payment of Balance of Subscription. – Subject to the provisions of the subscription contract, the board of directors may, at any time, declare due and payable to the corporation unpaid subscriptions and may collect the same or such percentage thereof, in either case, with accrued interest, if any, as it may deem necessary. Payment of unpaid subscription or any percentage thereof, together with any interest accrued shall be made on the date specified in the subscription contract or on the date stated in the call made by the board. Failure to pay on such date shall render the entire balance due and payable and shall make the stockholder liable for interest at the legal rate on such balance, unless a different interest rate is provided in the subscription contract. The interest shall be computed from the date specified, until full payment of the subscription. If no payment is made within thirty (30) days from the said date, all stocks covered by the subscription shall thereupon become delinquent and shall be subject to sale as hereinafter provided, unless the board of directors orders otherwise. **NOTES How does the BOD call for the payment of the balance of the subscription? A: A call is made by a resolution of the BOD in a meeting where there is a quorum, and approved by majority of the directors present in said meeting. Page 77 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law What is the effect of the failure to pay after a call, or upon the lapse of the date specified in the subscription contract? A: The BOD may issue another board resolution declaring said subscriptions delinquent. (3) Publication of Notice of Sale (a) once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks (b) in a newspaper of general circulation in the province or city where the principal office of the corporation is located SEC. 67. DELINQUENCY SALE Section 67. Delinquency Sale. – The board of directors may, by resolution, order the sale of delinquent stock and shall specifically state the amount due on each subscription plus all accrued interest, and the date, time and place of the sale which shall not be less than thirty (30) days nor more than sixty (60) days from the date the stocks become delinquent. Notice of the sale, with a copy of the resolution, shall be sent to every delinquent stockholder either personally, by registered mail, or through other means provided in the bylaws. The same shall be published once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the province or city where the principal office of the corporation is located. Unless the delinquent stockholder pays to the corporation, on or before the date specified for the sale of the delinquent stock, the balance due on the former’s subscription, plus accrued interest, costs of advertisement and expenses of sale, or unless the board of directors otherwise orders, said delinquent stock shall be sold at a public auction to such bidder who shall offer to pay the full amount of the balance on the subscription together with accrued interest, costs of advertisement and expenses of sale, for the smallest number of shares or fraction of a share. The stock so purchased shall be transferred to such purchaser in the books of the corporation and a certificate for such stock shall be issued in the purchaser’s favor. The remaining shares, if any, shall be credited in favor of the delinquent stockholder who shall likewise be entitled to the issuance of a certificate of stock covering such shares. Should there be no bidder at the public auction who offers to pay the full amount of the balance on the subscription together with accrued interest, costs of advertisement, and expenses of sale, for the smallest number of shares or fraction of a share, the corporation may, subject to the provisions of this Code, bid for the same, and the total amount due shall be credited as fully paid in the books of the corporation. Title to all the shares of stock covered by the subscription shall be vested in the corporation as treasury shares and may be disposed of by said corporation in accordance with the provisions of this Code. PROCEDURE FOR DELINQUENCY SALE (1) Resolution by the BOD for the order of sale of delinquent stocks, specifying the following: (a) Amount due on each subscription (b) Accrued interest (c) Date, time, and place of sale which shall not be less than 30 days nor more than 60 days from the date the stocks become delinquent (2) Notice of Sale with a copy of the Resolution shall be sent to every delinquent stockholder either: (a) Personally (b) By registered mail, or (c) Through other means provided in the bylaws (4) Sale at a public auction to the bidder who shall offer to pay the full amount of the balance on the subscription together with accrued interest, costs of advertisements and expenses of sale for the smallest number of shares or fraction of a share. Who is the “highest bidder”? A: He is the bidder who offers to pay the highest amount for the least number of shares. Illustration: Bidder 1 Bidder 2 Their Offer 10k shares for P100k 5k shares for P75k Value per Share P10/share P15/share Who is the highest bidder in this case? A: Bidder 2 is the best bidder. This is because the 2nd bidder bought the least number of shares at the highest price. So if the corporation goes with the best bidder, they can still sell 5k shares to someone else at a good price. The law says best bidder, not highest bidder. DATE OF SALE AT PUBLIC AUCTION The sale must be held not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days FROM the date the stocks become delinquent. EFFECT OF PAYMENT BY THE SUBSCRIBER BEFORE THE PERIOD OF SALE (before 30 days) When the delinquent stockholder pays to the corporation on or before the date specified for the sale of the delinquent stock the balance due on the stockholder’s subscription, the stocks shall be RETAINED by the stockholder. In which case, he may be issued the certificate of stock in his favor. **NOTES Illustration 1 Delinquent Stock Total subscription Total paid subs. Total unpaid subs. - 20,000 shares valued at P1Mn 10,000 shares valued at P500k 10,000 shares valued at P500k In this case, the entire subscription of 20,000 shares is considered delinquent stock. This is because of the Principle of Indivisibility of Subscription. Thus, a delinquent stock shall refer not only to the unpaid subscription, but includes the paid subscription. The winning bidder will be determined by who is willing to pay the for the most for the least/smallest number of stocks. Page 78 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Illustration 2 Delinquent Stock Bidder Bidder A Bidder B Bidder C - Bid 2,000 shares valued at P10k 1,500 shares valued at P10k 1,000 shares valued at P10k SEC. 69. COURT ACTION TO RECOVER UNPAID SUBSCRIPTION Value/Sh P5.00/share P6.67/share P10.00/share In this case, Bidder C should be declared the highest bidder because he is the bidder who is willing to pay the highest amount for the smallest number of shares or fraction of the share. This means that the highest bidder must be the bidder who is willing to pay the highest amount per share. Upon payment of the highest bidder, the stock purchased shall be transferred to such purchaser in the Stock and Transfer Book of the corporation, and certificate/s for such stock shall be issued in the purchaser’s favor. The remaining shares, if any, shall be credited in favor of the delinquent stockholder who shall likewise be entitled to the issuance of a certificate of stock covering such shares. Illustration 3 Excess Shares & No Bidder Section 69. Court Action to Recover Unpaid Subscription. – Nothing in this Code shall prevent the corporation from collecting through court action, the amount due on any unpaid subscription, with accrued interest, costs and expenses. SEC. 70. EFFECT OF DELINQUENCY Section 70. Effect of Delinquency. – No delinquent stock shall be voted for, be entitled to vote, or be represented at any stockholder’s meeting, nor shall the holder thereof be entitled to any of the rights of a stockholder except the right to dividends in accordance with the provisions of this Code, until and unless payment is made by the holder of such delinquent stock for the amount due on the subscription with accrued interest, and the costs and expenses of advertisement, if any. SEC. 71. RIGHTS OF UNPAID SHARES, NONDELINQUENT Section 71. Rights of Unpaid Shares, Nondelinquent. – Holders of subscribed shares not fully paid which are not delinquent shall have all the rights of a stockholder. Excess shares EFFECTS OF DELINQUENCY Based on the illustration above, 1,000 shares out of the 10,000 shares shall be given to Bidder C. The remaining 9,000 shares shall be given to the delinquent shareholder. No bidder If there is no bidder, the corporation is authorized to purchase the shares and the same shall form part of the treasury shares. Effect If the bidder is the corporation, there will be no shares given to the delinquent shareholder. Applying the illustration above, all 10,000 shares will pertain to the shareholder. They will form part of the treasury shares. The corporation may go after the delinquent shareholder in accordance with Sec. 69 of this Code. Note (Atty. Espedido): The Board may decline any bidder. SEC. 68. WHEN SALE MAY BE QUESTIONED Section 68. When Sale May be Questioned. – No action to recover delinquent stock sold can be sustained upon the ground of irregularity or defect in the notice of sale, or in the sale itself of the delinquent stock, unless the party seeking to maintain such action first pays or tenders to the party holding the stock the sum for which the same was sold, with interest from the date of sale at the legal rate. No such action shall be maintained unless a complaint is filed within six (6) months from the date of sale. QUESTIONING OF AUCTION SALE If there is irregularity in the conduct of the sale, the same may be questioned. When can you question the conduct of the auction sale? A: Within 6 months from the date of sale. As to the stockholder, he will no longer enjoy the following rights: (1) Right to vote (2) Right to be voted for; (3) Right of representation at any stockholder's meeting; (4) Not entitled to any of the rights of a stockholder EXCEPT the right to dividends in accordance with the provisions of this Code (5) Stocks will be considered delinquent and shall be subject to delinquency sale UPON DECLARATION OF DELINQUENCY, A STOCKHOLDER CANNOT RETURN SHARES ALREADY BOUGHT Note: After being declared delinquent, the stockholder cannot return the shares already bought. Reason: He cannot return the shares already bought because as between the corporation and the subscriber, there is a debtorcreditor relationship. Thus, the stockholder is obliged to pay the balance. He cannot just simply return the shares he bought. SUBSCRIBER CANNOT USE FUTURE DIVIDENDS AS PAYMENT FOR THE BALANCE Illustration. This coming December, the stockholder is sure that there will be cash dividends. So, the stockholder says: “By the time the cash dividends are issued on December, these dividends will be used to pay the unpaid subscribed shares.” He further says, “I am already sure that the corporation will issue the dividends since the profits have increased beyond 100% of the paid-in capital and it is still March. Thus, by December, I am sure that the corporation is required to declare dividends.” Is that allowed? A: No, it is not allowed. Page 79 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Three Justifications [Summary of Answers] Note: This is based on the answers during the recitation (1) Declaration of dividends when profits exceed the 100% paid-in capital is subject to exceptions (2) Corporation may still incur losses in the future – no assurance that dividends will be declared (3) Corporation NEVER PROMISES that a stockholder will be given dividends and only the Board can determine as to what type of dividend will be issued (not always cash dividends) Elaboration: Since it is still not certain that there will be cash dividends that will be declared since it is subject to exceptions, namely: (1) Expansion projects (2) Loan agreement that contains a condition that the corporation cannot declare dividends UNLESS there is consent by the creditor (3) Emergency purposes Assuming that none of the 3 exceptions are present, the future cash dividends (dividends on December) still cannot be used as payment for the shares because the corporation may still incur losses in the future. There is still no assurance that dividends will be declared. Moreover, assuming that it does not fall under the exceptions and sure that there are no losses to be incurred, it is still not allowed because when you subscribe, you become a debtor to the corporation because you paid partially. However, for the balance, you are a debtor to the corporation because you undertook to pay when it is due and demandable. On the other hand, the Corporation never promises that a stockholder will be given dividends. What was agreed upon is that the subscriber will invest, and in the meantime, he shall wait WON the Board will distribute dividends. Even if the corporation has already reached the 100% of its paidin capital, assuming it is not falling under the exception and sure that no loss shall be incurred, the subscriber is not sure if he will be given cash since the Corporation can either declare cash, stock, or property dividends. Not even the Internal Revenue Code can dictate declaration of cash dividends. Only the Board can determine this. The Internal Revenue Code may only dictate to declare dividends but not as to what kind of dividends to be issued since this is the SOLE prerogative of the Board. **NOTES SEC. 72. LOST OR DESTROYED CERTIFICATES Section 72. Lost or Destroyed Certificates. – The following procedure shall be followed by a corporation in issuing new certificates of stock in lieu of those which have been lost, stolen or destroyed: (a) The registered owner of a certificate of stock in a corporation or such person’s legal representative shall file with the corporation an affidavit in triplicate setting forth, if possible, the circumstances as to how the certificate was lost, stolen or destroyed, the number of shares represented by such certificate, the serial number of the certificate and the name of the corporation which issued the same. The owner of such certificate of stock shall also submit such other information and evidence as may be deemed necessary; and (b) After verifying the affidavit and other information and evidence with the books of the corporation, the corporation shall publish a notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the place where the corporation has its principal office, once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks at the expense of the registered owner of the certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen or destroyed. The notice shall state the name of the corporation, the name of the registered owner, the serial number of the certificate, the number of shares represented by such certificate, and shall state that after the expiration of one (1) year from the date of the last publication, if no contest has been presented to the corporation regarding the certificate of stock, the right to make such contest shall be barred and the corporation shall cancel the lost, destroyed or stolen certificate of stock in its books. In lieu thereof, the corporation shall issue a new certificate of stock, unless the registered owner files a bond or other security as may be required, effective for a period of one (1) year, for such amount and in such form and with such sureties as may be satisfactory to the board of directors, in which case a new certificate may be issued even before the expiration of the one (1) year period provided herein. If a contest has been presented to the corporation or if an action is pending in court regarding the ownership of the certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen or destroyed, the issuance of the new certificate of stock in lieu thereof shall be suspended until the court renders a final decision regarding the ownership of the certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen or destroyed. Except in case of fraud, bad faith, or negligence on the part of the corporation and its officers, no action may be brought against any corporation which shall have issued certificate of stock in lieu of those lost, stolen or destroyed pursuant to the procedure above-described. EFFECTS OF DELINQUENCY The stockholder will remain a stockholder, but the exercise of the any of the stockholder’s rights is suspended except the right to dividends. The distribution of shares in the dividends by a delinquent stockholder will be applied in the following manner: 1. 2. If cash or property dividend – the corporation will offset the payment of the unpaid subscription from the stockholder’s share in the dividend. If stock dividend – the stockholder’s share in the dividends is withheld by the corporation until the subscription is fully paid. LOST CERTIFICATE Being transferrable, is there any danger or risk of loss? A: Yes. Since it is transferrable, the finder might just try to copy the signature and might be able to transfer it to someone. The transferee, once he goes to the Corporate Secretary might recognize that it was a fraudulent signature and may decline – IOW, the buyer is prejudiced. Remedy: File an Affidavit of Loss to the corporation Page 80 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Illustration Stockholder mistakenly used the Certificate of Stock after a “toilet situation” :) The stockholder rushed to the nearest toilet. However, after that, he was looking for a tissue paper but there was none. So he pulled out a white paper from his wallet and used it to clean himself. When he went home, he discovered that he wrongfully used the Certificate of Stock and hurriedly went back to the toilet. However, it was already closed. When he went back the next morning, the trashcan was already empty. The stockholder exerted many efforts to find the janitor, only to discover that the janitor has already resigned. He engaged the services of the NBI to locate the janitor but his address was unknown. He made efforts to retrieve it but became futile. Thus, he executed an Affidavit of loss detailing the circumstances as to how the certificate was lost. It was signed and notarized. **Illustration Taxi So if you happen to find a certificate of stocks in a taxi worth 10 million pesos, what will you do? Can you sell it? A: Yes Sir I can sell it because certificate of stocks is transferrable. So you find a buyer and tell him “you see the par value of this, this worth 10 million pesos and I will sell it to you for only 2 million pesos” will you buy it? Of course it’s way more than profitable, someone will take them. It’s important for the corporation not to just issue new COS because they want to be sure. For all you know you have endorsed it to someone else and that someone will come in the corporation and claim also. So what does the law require? A; The following procedure shall be followed for the issuance by a corporation of new certificates of stock in lieu of those which have been lost, stolen or destroyed: (1) Affidavit. The registered owner of a certificate of stock in a corporation or his legal representative shall file with the corporation an affidavit in triplicate setting forth, if possible, the circumstances as to: a. how the certificate was lost, stolen or destroyed. b. the number of shares represented by such certificate, c. the serial number of the certificate and d. the name of the corporation which issued the same. He shall also submit such other information and evidence which he may deem necessary; (2) Publication by the corporation. Corporation shall publish a notice in a newspaper of general circulation published in the place where the corporation has its principal office, once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks at the expense of the registered owner of the certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen or destroyed. The notice shall state: a. the name of said corporation, b. the name of the registered owner and c. the serial number of said certificate, and the d. number of shares represented by such certificate, T/N: If no contest, general rule is after the expiration of one (1) year from the date of the last publication, the right to make such contest shall be barred and said corporation shall cancel in its books the certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen or destroyed and issue in lieu thereof new certificate of stock. The exception is: Unless the registered owner files a bond or other security in lieu thereof as may be required, effective for a period of one (1) year, for such amount and in such form and with such sureties as may be satisfactory to the board of directors, in which case a new certificate may be issued even before the expiration of the one (1) year period provided herein. If a contest has been presented to said corporation or if an action is pending in court regarding the ownership of said certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen or destroyed, the issuance of the new certificate of stock in lieu thereof shall be suspended until the final decision by the court regarding the ownership of said certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen or destroyed. Summary: General Rule: No action may be brought against any corporation which shall have issued certificate of stock in lieu of those lost, stolen or destroyed pursuant to the procedure above-described. Except In case of fraud, bad faith, or negligence on the part of the corporation and its officers. Alright, if we do not want to wait for 1 year just put up a bond, and that bond will answer to any other party who present himself as the owner who brought the certificate with him and prove that it was not lost and in fact it was legally transferred to him. That’s how important it is because it is transferrable. You should execute an affidavit of loss stating the circumstances of loss “ I Mr J.R.C., and the true and lawful owner stocks certificate number 0-10-0-10, while one evening I was in karaoke I drink too much and I left my stocks certificates beside a lady” you should recite the circumstances leading to the loss. PROCEDURE IN ISSUING NEW CERTIFICATES OF STOCK IN LIEU OF THOSE STOLEN, LOST OR DESTROYED (1) Filing of an Affidavit of Loss to the corporation CONTENTS: 1. Circumstances as to how the certificate was lost, stolen, or destroyed 2. Number of shares represented by such certificate 3. Serial number of the certificate 4. Name of the corporation which issued the same 5. Other information and evidence as may be deemed necessary (2) Submission of a Verified Affidavit and other information and evidence with the books of the corporation (3) Publication of a Notice by the corporation in a newspaper of general circulation in the place where the corporation has its principal office, once a week for 3 Page 81 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law consecutive weeks at the expense of the registered owner of the certificate of stock which has been lost, stolen, or destroyed CONTENTS: 1. Name of the corporation 2. Name of the registered owner 3. Serial number of the certificate 4. Number of shares represented by such certificate 5. State that AFTER the expiration of 1 year from the date of the last publication, if no contest has been presented to the corporation regarding the certificate of stock, the right to make such contest shall be barred and the corporation shall: (a) Cancel the lost, destroyed or stolen COS in its books. (b) In lieu thereof, the corporation shall issue a new certificate of stock T/N: If the transaction is not recorded, then the transaction is binding merely between the parties to the deed, and not against the corporation and third persons. The mere execution of the deed of assignment does not make one a stockholder. Rather, it is the recording in the Stock and Transfer Book that does. ASSIGNMENT OF SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS WHEN A NEW CERTIFICATE OF STOCK IS ISSUED (A) AFTER expiration of 1 year from the date of the last publication – if no contest has been presented to the corporation regarding the certificate of stock (B) BEFORE the 1-year period provided – if the registered owner files a bond or other security as may be required, effective for a period of 1 year, for such amount and in such form and with such sureties as may be satisfactory to the BOD **NOTES ISSUANCE OF NEW STOCK CERTIFICATE GEN: There is a 1-year waiting period before the issuance of a new certificate of stock. This would give the transferee/assignee the chance to object to the declaration of lost or destroyed certificates. 1. Although generally, the law says you cannot transfer shares where there is an unpaid subscription, in practice you can transfer shares by deed of assignment of subscription rights. What happens is that you assign your rights to the subscription. You don’t assign the shares because you are not allowed. 2. The Principle of Indivisibility still exists when you assign your rights to subscription. Meaning, you assign the subscription as a whole. TITLE VIII. CORPORATE BOOKS AND RECORDS SEC. 73. BOOKS TO BE KEPT; STOCK TRANSFER AGENT Section 73. Books to be Kept; Stock Transfer Agent. – Every corporation shall keep and carefully preserve at its principal office all information relating to the corporation including, but not limited to: (a) The articles of incorporation and bylaws of the corporation and all their amendments; (b) The current ownership structure and voting rights of the corporation, including lists of stockholders or members, group structures, intra-group relations, ownership data, and beneficial ownership; (c) The names and addresses of all the members of the board of directors or trustees and the executive officers; If they do not object, the certificate will be issued after 1 year. (d) A record of all business transactions; XPN: If the owner gives a bond or security which will be valid for 1 year. That will now allow the issuance of the new certificate/s of stock even before the lapse of 1 year. Should a legitimate claimant turn out to have been jeopardized by the affidavit of loss, what should the claimant do? A: The claimant will have the rights over the bond posted. DEED OF ASSIGNMENT OF SHARES (TRANSFER W/O STOCK CERTIFICATE) If there is a certificate of stock, transfer will be done by delivery and endorsement, and then you record in the stock and transfer book. If there is no certificate of stock, transfer can be still done by deed of assignment of shares. How is it done? A: It is basically just like a deed of sale. 1. Execute the deed of assignment. 2. Have it recorded in the Stock and Transfer Book. (e) A record of the resolutions of the board of directors or trustees and of the stockholders or members; (f) Copies of the latest reportorial requirements submitted to the Commission; and (g) The minutes of all meetings of stockholders or members, or of the board of directors or trustees. Such minutes shall set forth in detail, among others: the time and place of the meeting held, how it was authorized, the notice given, the agenda therefor, whether the meeting was regular or special, its object if special, those present and absent, and every act done or ordered done at the meeting. Upon the demand of a director, trustee, stockholder or member, the time when any director, trustee, stockholder or member entered or left the meeting must be noted in the minutes; and on a similar demand, the yeas and nays must be taken on any motion or proposition, and a record thereof carefully made. The protest of a director, trustee, stockholder or member on any action or proposed action must be recorded in full upon their demand. Corporate records, regardless of the form in which they are stored, shall be open to inspection by any director, trustee, stockholder or member of the corporation in person or by a Page 82 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law representative at reasonable hours on business days, and a demand in writing may be made by such director, trustee or stockholder at their expense, for copies of such records or excerpts from said records. The inspecting or reproducing party shall remain bound by confidentiality rules under prevailing laws, such as the rules on trade secrets or processes under Republic Act No. 8293, otherwise known as the “Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines”, as amended, Republic Act No. 10173, otherwise known as the “Data Privacy Act of 2012”, Republic Act No. 8799, otherwise known as “The Securities Regulation Code”, and the Rules of Court. fixed by the Commission, which shall be renewable annually: Provided, That a stock corporation is not precluded from performing or making transfers of its own stocks, in which case all the rules and regulations imposed on stock transfer agents, except the payment of a license fee herein provided, shall be applicable: Provided, further, That the Commission may require stock corporations which transfer and/or trade stocks in secondary markets to have an independent transfer agent. A requesting party who is not a stockholder or member of record, or is a competitor, director, officer, controlling stockholder or otherwise represents the interests of a competitor shall have no right to inspect or demand reproduction of corporate records. It is the best evidence used in cases where conflicts need to be resolved in a corporation. It is a proof of the corporation’s transactions. Also, it is considered as a prima facie official evidence of the corporation. Any stockholder who shall abuse the rights granted under this section shall be penalized under Section 158 of this Code, without prejudice to the provisions of Republic Act No. 8293, otherwise known as the “Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines”, as amended, and Republic Act No. 10173, otherwise known as the “Data Privacy Act of 2012”. BOOKS TO BE KEPT What are these books and records? A: Every corporation shall keep and carefully preserve at its principal office all information relating to the corporation including, but not limited to: Any officer or agent of the corporation who shall refuse to allow the inspection and/or reproduction of records in accordance with the provisions of this Code shall be liable to such director, trustee, stockholder or member for damages, and in addition, shall be guilty of an offense which shall be punishable under Section 161 of this Code: Provided, That if such refusal is made pursuant to a resolution or order of the board of directors or trustees, the liability under this section for such action shall be imposed upon the directors or trustees who voted for such refusal: Provided, further, That it shall be a defense to any action under this section that the person demanding to examine and copy excerpts from the corporation’s records and minutes has improperly used any information secured through any prior examination of the records or minutes of such corporation or of any other corporation, or was not acting in good faith or for a legitimate purpose in making the demand to examine or reproduce corporate records, or is a competitor, director, officer, controlling stockholder or otherwise represents the interests of a competitor. (a) The articles of incorporation and bylaws of the corporation and all their amendments; (b) The current ownership structure and voting rights of the corporation, including: i. lists of stockholders or members ii. group structures iii. intra-group relations iv. ownership data, and v. beneficial ownership; (c) The names and addresses of all the members of the board of directors or trustees and the executive officers; (d) A record of all business transactions; (e) A record of the resolutions of the board of directors or trustees and of the stockholders or members; (f) Copies of the latest reportorial requirements submitted to the Commission; and (g) The minutes of all meetings of stockholders or members, or of the board of directors or trustees. If the corporation denies or does not act on a demand for inspection and/or reproduction, the aggrieved party may report such to the Commission. Within five (5) days from receipt of such report, the Commission shall conduct a summary investigation and issue an order directing the inspection or reproduction of the requested records. Contents of the Minutes of the Meeting Such minutes shall set forth in detail, among others: 1. time and place of the meeting held 2. how it was authorized 3. the notice given 4. the agenda therefor, whether the meeting was regular or special, its object if special 5. those present and absent, and every act done or ordered done at the meeting Stock corporations must also keep a stock and transfer book, which shall contain a record of all stocks in the names of the stockholders alphabetically arranged; the installments paid and unpaid on all stocks for which subscription has been made, and the date of payment of any installment; a statement of every alienation, sale or transfer of stock made, the date thereof, by and to whom made; and such other entries as the bylaws may prescribe. The stock and transfer book shall be kept in the principal office of the corporation or in the office of its stock transfer agent and shall be open for inspection by any director or stockholder of the corporation at reasonable hours on business days. A stock transfer agent or one engaged principally in the business of registering transfers of stocks in behalf of a stock corporation shall be allowed to operate in the Philippines upon securing a license from the Commission and the payment of a fee to be REASON FOR THE CORPORATION TO KEEP THE BOOKS AND RECORDS Atty. Espedido: You also have the record of the STOCK CERTIFICATES. SEC will mark it as received. You will also show your stock certificates – there is a book where there is a perforated portion. Once you issue this certificate, secretary removes this perforated portion, but there’s a remaining portion. Summary What are the books to be kept? 1. Articles of Incorporation 2. By-laws 3. Stock and transfer books Page 83 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law 4. 5. 6. 7. Stock certificates Minutes of the stockholders meeting Minutes of the board meeting Records of all business transactions of the corporation (journals, ledgers, financial statements) STOCK TRANSFER AGENT Atty. Espedido: If there are hundreds and thousands of shareholders, you will need a STOCK TRANSFER AGENT to record all the transactions and transfers of the corporation. • Stock transfer agents are duly licenses and are supposed to register with the SEC. • The stock transfer agent does nothing except record all transactions and transfers. Most of these stock transfer agents are banks. Note: A stock transfer agent or one engaged principally in the business of registering transfers of stocks in behalf of a stock corporation shall be allowed to operate in the Philippines upon securing a license from the Commission and the payment of a fee to be fixed by the Commission, which shall be renewable annually. REQUISITES TO BE ALLOWED TO OPERATE AS A STOCK TRANSFER AGENT (1) Secures a license from the Commission (which is renewable annually) (2) Payment of a fee to be fixed by the Commission Atty. Espedido: It is good now because we now have computers. Before, it is done manually. Other than these books, we have the: (1) The minutes of the stockholders’ meeting and (2) The minutes of the board’s meeting CONFIDENTIAL MATTERS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE MINUTES There are reports in the meeting that are confidential that you do not have to include in the minutes. There are confidential matters that you need not have to record – but you must make a reference: meaning, you report it to the account (which is not part of the minutes). RIGHT TO INSPECT BOOKS AND RECORDS What are your rights as a stockholder? A: A stockholder has the right to inspect such books and records at reasonable hours on business days. Can you also just request to have a copy? A: Yes, but the stockholder shoulders the expenses. Important: The right as provided in the Code refers only to the right to inspect but not the right to copy. If you want to have a copy, you have to pay for the copy. Otherwise, can you ask to just bring it to your house? A: No. This cannot be done and is also dangerous because there may be delicate matters contained in the books or records. Take note: The right to inspect does not include the right to take it out even for a few hours. Atty. Espedido: The stockholders have the right to inspect these books and records at are reasonable time during business days. The purpose of which is for them to be informed of the status of the corporation. It is a way to check whether the corporation is operating according to the purpose of the corporation. The purpose why the corporation should keep these corporate books and records is because these are the best evidences that may be used in order to resolve in case there are conflicts. If these books and records are not kept, the conflicting litigants may just present any records and that will result to chaos. One fundamental rule in business is full transparency so that everything must be transparent. It is the right of every stockholder to protect his investment and the only way to do this is to know everything. Can the stockholder authorize his boyfriend to inspect the corporate books? A: Yes. There is no prohibition. There is nothing wrong with it as long as the boyfriend is duly authorized **NOTES CORPORATE BOOKS 1. Records of all business transactions (i.e. accounting books, ledgers, journals) 2. Minutes Book for Stockholders – minutes of meetings of stockholders 3. Minutes Books for Directors or Trustees – minutes of meetings of the BOD or BOT 4. Stock and Transfer Book CORPORATE RECORDS 1. Charter documents: a. AOI b. Bylaws c. Amendments, if any 2. Reports filed with the SEC: a. General Information Sheets (GIS), and b. All other reports required under the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) MINUTES BOOK, CONTENTS: 1. Date and time of meeting 2. Place of holding meeting 3. How the meeting was authorized 4. The fact that notice was given 5. Whether the meeting was regular or special 6. If the meeting was special, the object of the meeting 7. Those present or absent in the meeting 8. Every act done or ordered at the meeting 9. Upon demand of a director, trustee, stockholder or member: a. The time when any director/trustee or stockholder/member entered or left the meeting must be noted in the minutes; b. A carefully-made record of the yeas and nays must be taken on any motion or proposition; c. The protest on any action or proposed action. STOCK AND TRANSFER BOOK, CONTENTS: 1. All stocks in the name of the stockholders, alphabetically arranged; 2. Installments paid and unpaid on all stocks for which subscription has been made, and the date of any installment; 3. Statement of every alienation, sale or transfer of stock made, the date thereof, by and to whom made; and 4. Such other entries as the bylaws may prescribe. Page 84 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law Note: The Stock and Transfer Book shall be kept in the principal office of the corporation, or in the office of its stock and transfer agent. Only the Corporate Secretary is duly authorized to make entries in the Stock and Transfer Book. Entries made by the President or the Chairman are invalid. The Stock and Transfer Book serves as the best evidence of the transactions that are entered or stated therein. However, the entries are only considered as prima facie evidence, and may be subject to proof to the contrary. corporate records, to comply with Sections 45, 73, 92, 128, 177 and other pertinent rules and provisions of this Code on inspection and reproduction of records shall be punished with a fine ranging from Ten thousand pesos (P10,000.00) to Two hundred thousand pesos (P200,000.00), at the discretion of the court, taking into consideration the seriousness of the violation and its implications. When the violation of this provision is injurious or detrimental to the public, the penalty is a fine ranging from Twenty thousand pesos (P20,000.00) to Four hundred thousand pesos (P400,000.00). INSPECTION OF CORPORATE RECORDS The corporate records are open to inspection by any director, trustee, shareholder, or member of the corporation in person or by representative at reasonable hours on business days, and a demand in writing may be made by such director, trustee, shareholder or member at their expense, for copies of such records or excerpts from said records. There are matters that are not covered by the right to inspect however. For instance, a corporation engaged in the manufacturing of goods can keep the formula of its goods secret. Reasonable Hours on Business Days (Throwback to Nego) When is a day considered a business day considering that we have call centers now? Atty. Amago: Follow government service hours. M-F, 8AM5PM. REQUISITES FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT TO INSPECT 1. 2. 3. It must be exercised at reasonable hours on business days. The stockholder must not have improperly used any information he secured through any previous examination. The demand is made in good faith or for a legitimate purpose. The penalties imposed under this section shall be without prejudice to the Commission’s exercise of its contempt powers under Section 157 hereof. REMEDIES OF A STOCKHOLDER REFUSED INSPECTION If the corporation or its officers refuse to allow a stockholder to inspect, is the filing of a case the only option of a stockholder? A: No. An aggrieved party may report such denial or inaction to the Commission. Sec. 73 of the RCC after all provides: “If the corporation denies or does not act on a demand for inspection and/or reproduction, the aggrieved party may report such to the Commission. Within five (5) days from receipt of such report, the Commission shall conduct a summary investigation and issue an order directing the inspection or reproduction of the requested records.” Within 5 days from the receipt of such report, the SEC shall conduct a summary investigation, and issue an order directing the inspection/reproduction of the requested records. VALID DEFENSES FOR REFUSAL 1. 2. WHO CANNOT INSPECT A requesting party who is not a stockholder or member of record, or is a competitor, director, officer, controlling stockholder or otherwise represents the interest of a competitor. LIABILITY FOR REFUSAL TO ALLOW INSPECTION OR PRODUCTION OF RECORDS Who can be liable? A: 1. Any officer or agent of the corporation who shall refuse to allow the inspection or production of records shall be liable; 2. Any director who allows or approves the refusal shall also be guilty of an offense punishable under Sec. 161 of the Revised Corporation Code. SEC. 161. Violation of Duty to Maintain Records, to Allow their Inspection or Reproduction; Penalties. – The unjustified failure or refusal by the corporation, or by those responsible for keeping and maintaining 3. The person demanding to examine and copy excerpts from the corporation’s records and minutes has improperly used any information secured through any prior examination of the records or minutes of such corporation or any other corporation; The person demanding to examine was not acting in good faith or for a legitimate purpose in making the demand; The person demanding is a competitor, or a director, officer, controlling stockholder or representative of the interests of a competitor. JURISPRUDENTIAL PRINCIPLES JUSTIFIED PURPOSE/S FOR INSPECTION (Terelay vs. Yulo citing Ballantine) 1. To ascertain the financial condition of the company or the propriety of dividends; 2. The value of the shares of stock for sale or investment; 3. Whether there has been mismanagement; 4. In anticipation of shareholders’ meetings to obtain a mailing list of shareholders to solicit proxies or influence voting; 5. To obtain information in aid of litigation with the corporation or its officers as to corporate transactions. Page 85 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law UNJUSTIFIED PURPOSES 1. Obtaining information as to business secrets or to aid a competitor; 2. To secure business “prospects” or investment or advertising lists; 3. To find technical defects in corporate transactions in order to bring “strike suits” for purposes of blackmail or transaction. STOCK & TRANSFER BOOK VS. GENERAL INFORMATIONS SHEET The Stock and Transfer Book is still the primary source of determining whether a person is a stockholder or not. However, the General Information Sheet can also serve as a secondary source and other documents can still be shown that a person is a stockholder of a corporation. GENERAL INFORMATION SHEET SEC collects from incorporators, stockholders, directors, trustees, officers, beneficial owners, external auditor, notary public, personal information such as but not limited to full name, signature, nationality, sex, address, accreditation number, roll of attorney number and taxpayer information number. These are contained within the General Information Sheet of a corporation. SEC. 74. RIGHT TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Section 74. Right to Financial Statements. – A corporation shall furnish a stockholder or member, within ten (10) days from receipt of their written request, its most recent financial statement, in the form and substance of the financial reporting required by the Commission. At the regular meeting of stockholders or members, the board of directors or trustees shall present to such stockholders or members a financial report of the operations of the corporation for the preceding year, which shall include financial statements, duly signed and certified in accordance with this Code, and the rules the Commission may prescribe. However, if the total assets or total liabilities of the corporation is less than Six hundred thousand pesos (P600,000.00), or such other amount as may be determined appropriate by the Department of Finance, the financial statements may be certified under oath by the treasurer and the president. Should it be signed by a certified public accountant? A: It depends, but generally, yes. But the law allows the financial statement to be certified under oath by the treasurer and the president if the total assets or total liabilities of the corporation is: (a) Less than 600k; or (b) Any other amount as may be determined appropriate by the DOF When will it be required to be signed by a certified public accountant (CPA)? A: When the total assets or liabilities of the corporation is 600K or more. PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL REPORT The BOD/BOT shall present to such stockholders or members a financial report of the operations of the corporation for the preceding year, which shall include: 1. Financial statements, duly signed and certified in accordance with this Code; 2. Rules the Commission may prescribe. WHEN CERTIFIED UNDER OATH (Treasurer & President instead of CPA) If the total assets or liabilities of the corporation are less than P600,000, or such other amount as determined by the Department of Finance. SUBMISSION TO THE COMMISSION SEC. 177. Reportorial Requirements of Corporations. – Except as otherwise provided in this Code or in the rules issued by the Commission, every corporation, domestic or foreign, doing business in the Philippines shall submit to the Commission: (a) Annual financial statements audited by an independent certified public accountant: Provided, That if the total assets or total liabilities of the corporation are less than Six hundred thousand pesos (P600,000.00), the financial statements shall be certified under oath by the corporation’s treasurer or chief financial officer; and (b) A general information sheet. Corporations vested with public interest must also submit the following: (1) A director or trustee compensation report; and (2) A director or trustee appraisal or performance report and the standards or criteria used to assess each director or trustee. The reportorial requirements shall be submitted annually and within such period as may be prescribed by the Commission. The Commission may place the corporation under delinquent status in case of failure to submit the reportorial requirements three (3) times, consecutively or intermittently, within a period of five (5) years. The Commission shall give reasonable notice to and coordinate with the appropriate regulatory agency prior to placing under delinquent status companies under their special regulatory jurisdiction. Any person required to file a report with the Commission may redact confidential information from such required report: Provided, That such confidential information shall be filed in a supplemental report prominently labelled “confidential”, together with a request for confidential treatment of the report and the specific grounds for the grant thereof. **NOTES LOSS OF STOCK AND TRANSFER BOOK WHEN RECENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FURNISHED Within ten (10) days from the receipt of a written request of a stockholder or member, in the form and substance of the financial reporting required by the SEC. Secondary or extrinsic evidence may be introduced to reconstitute its contents. The new stock and transfer book should be presented to the SEC for registration, accompanied Page 86 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law by a sworn statement executed by any responsible offer setting forth the circumstances attending the loss. STOCK TRANSFER AGENT such activities with the view to promote, conserve or rationalize investment; h) To pass upon, refuse or deny, after consultation with the Board of Investments, Department of Industry, National Economic and Development Authority or any other appropriate government agency, the application for registration of any corporation, partnership or association or any form of organization falling within its jurisdiction, if their establishment, organization or operation will not be consistent with the declared national economic policies. i) To suspend, or revoke, after proper notice and hearing, the franchise or certificate of registration of corporations, partnerships or associations, upon any of the grounds provided by law, including the following: Engaged principally in the business of registering transfers of stock in behalf of a stock corporation shall be allowed to operate in the Philippines upon securing a license from the Commission and payment of a fee to be fixed by the Commission, which should be renewed annually. TRANSFER BY CORPORATION A stock corporation is not precluded from performing or making transfers of its own stocks, in which case all the rules and regulations imposed on stock transfer agents, except the payment of a license fee herein provided, shall be applicable. APPENDIX 1. 2. Fraud in procuring its certificate of registration; Serious misrepresentation as to what the corporation can do or is doing to the great prejudice of or damage to the general public; 3. Refusal to comply or defiance of any lawful order of the Commission restraining commission of acts which would amount to a grave violation of its franchise; 4. Continuous in operation for a period of at least five (5) years; 5. Failure to file by-laws within the required period; 6. Failure to file required reports in appropriate forms as determined by the Commission within the prescribed period; P.D. 902-A PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 902-A March 11, 1976 REORGANIZATION OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WITH ADDITIONAL POWER AND PLACING THE SAID AGENCY UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT Section 6. In order to effectively exercise such jurisdiction, the Commission shall possess the following powers: a) b) To issue preliminary or permanent injunctions, whether prohibitory or mandatory, in all cases in which it has jurisdiction, and in which cases the pertinent provisions of the Rules of Court shall apply; To punish for contempt of the Commission, both direct and indirect, in accordance with the pertinent provisions of, and penalties prescribed by, the Rules of Court; c) To compel the officers of any corporation or association registered by it to call meetings of stockholders or members thereof under its supervision; d) To pass upon the validity of the issuance and use of proxies and voting trust agreements for absent stockholders or members; e) j) To issue subpoena duces tecum and summon witnesses to appear in any proceedings of the Commission and in appropriate cases order search and seizure or cause the search and seizure of all documents, papers, files and records as well as books of accounts of any entity or person under investigation as may be necessary for the proper disposition of the cases before it; f) To impose fines and/or penalties for violation of this Decree or any other laws being implemented by the Commission, the pertinent rules and regulations, its orders, decisions and/or rulings; g) To authorize the establishment and operation of stock exchanges, commodity exchanges and such other similar organization and to supervise and regulate the same; including the authority to determine their number, size and location, in the light of national or regional requirements for To exercise such other powers as implied, necessary or incidental to the carrying out the express powers granted to the Commission or to achieve the objectives and purposes of this Decree. NATIONALIZED ACTIVITIES (SEC. 8, RA 7042) SEC. 8. List of Investment Areas Reserved to Philippine Nationals (Foreign Investment Negative List). – The Foreign Investment Negative List shall have two (2) components lists; A, and B. a) List A shall enumerate the areas of activities reserved to Philippine nationals by mandate of the Constitution and specific laws. b) List B shall contain the areas of activities and enterprises regulated pursuant to law: 1) Which are defense-related activities, requiring prior clearance and authorization from Department of National Defense (DND) to engage in such activity, such as the manufacture, repair, storage and/or distribution of firearms, ammunition, lethal weapons, military ordinance, explosives, pyrotechnics and similar materials; unless such manufacturing or repair activity is specifically authorized, with a substantial export component, to a non-Philippine national by the Secretary of National Defense; or 2) Which have implications on public health and morals, such as the manufacture and distribution of dangerous drugs; all forms of gambling; nightclubs, bars, Page 87 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law beerhouses, dance halls; sauna bathhouses and massage clinics. and steam forms of gambling, nightclubs, bars, beer houses, dance halls, sauna and steam bathhouses and massage clinics. “Small and medium-sized domestic market enterprises, with paid-in equity capital less than the equivalent two hundred thousand US dollars (US$200,000) are reserved to Philippine nationals, Provided that if: (1) they involve advanced technology as determined by the Department of Science and Technology or (2) they employ at least fifty (50) direct employees, then a minimum paid-in capital of one hundred thousand US dollars (US$100,000.00) shall be allowed to non-Philippine nationals. "Small and medium-sized domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital less than the equivalent of Two hundred thousand US dollars (US$200,000.00), are reserved to Philippine nationals: provided, that if (1) they involve advanced technology, or (2) they employ at least fifty (50) direct employees, then a minimum paid-in capital of One hundred thousand US dollars (US$100,000.00) shall be allowed to nonPhilippine nationals. Amendments to List B may be made upon recommendation of the Secretary of National Defense, or the Secretary of Health, or the Secretary of Education, Culture and Sports, endorsed by the NEDA, approved by the President, and promulgated by a Presidential Proclamation. "Amendments to List B may be made upon recommendation of the Secretary of National Defense, or the Secretary of Health, or the Secretary of Education, Culture and Sports, indorsed by the NEDA, or upon recommendation motu propio, of NEDA, approved by the President, and promulgated by a Presidential Proclamation. “Transitory Foreign Investment Negative List” established in Sec. 15 hereof shall be replaced at the end of the transitory period by the first Regular Negative List to be formulated and recommended by NEDA, following the process and criteria provided in Sections 8 of this Act. The first Regular Negative List shall be published not later than sixty (60) days before the end of the transitory period provided in said section, and shall become immediately effective at the end of the transitory period. Subsequent Foreign Investment Negative Lists shall become effective fifteen (15) days after publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines: Provided, however, That each Foreign Investment Negative List shall be prospective in operation and shall in no way affect foreign investment existing on the date of its publication. “Amendments to List B after promulgation and publication of the first Regular Foreign Investment Negative List at the end of the transitory period shall not be made more often than once every two (2) years”. (As amended by R.A. 8179) "The Transitory Foreign Investment Negative List established in Section 15 hereof shall be replaced at the end of the transitory period by the first Regular Negative List to be formulated and recommended by NEDA, following the process and criteria, provided in Sections 8 and 9 of this Act. The first Regular Negative Lists shall be published not later than sixty (60) days before the end of the transitory period provided in said section and shall become immediately effective at the end of the transitory period. Subsequent Foreign Investment Negative Lists shall become effective fifteen (15) days after publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines: provided, however, that each Foreign Investment Negative List shall be prospective in operation and shall in no way affect foreign investment existing on the date of its publication. "Amendments to List B after promulgation and publication of the first Regular Foreign Investment Negative List at the end of the transitory period shall not be made more often than once every two (2) years." SEC. 3, R.A. 8179 (AMENDING SEC. 8, RA. 7042) END OF MIDTERM NOTES Sec. 3. Sec. 8 of the Foreign Investments Act of 1991 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 8. List of Investment Areas Reserved to Philippine Nationals (Foreign Investment Negative List). – The Foreign Investment Negative List shall have two (2) component lists: A and B: "a) List A shall enumerate the areas of activities reserved to Philippine nationals by mandate of the Constitution and specific laws. "b) List B shall contain the areas of activities and enterprises regulated pursuant to law: "1) which are defense-related activities, requiring prior clearance and authorization from Department of National Defense (DND) to engage in such activity, such as the manufacture, repair, storage and/or distribution of firearms, ammunition, lethal weapons, military ordinances, explosives, pyrotechnics and similar materials, unless such manufacturing on repair activity is specifically authorized, with a substantial export component, to a non-Philippine national by the Secretary of National Defense; or "2) which have implications on public health and morals, such as the manufacture and distribution of dangerous drugs, all Page 88 of 88 | EH403 2019-2020 Corporation Law