Uploaded by Nhi Nguyễn

Stake holder mapping matrix (1)

advertisement
RMIT Classification: Trusted
STAKE HOLDER MAPPING MATRIX
1. Business Process Management (Proposed by John Jeston and Johan Nelis)
➔ Ability to effect the project (low to high) versus their project view (negative to positive).
Stakeholder involvement
should prioritise negative
stakeholders with
substantial project effect.
Stakeholder could
become leaders or
sponsors.
Stakeholder
involvement can aid
project delivery and
promotion.
2. Stakeholder Influence Grid (Proposed by Dragan Milosevic)
➔ The matrix compares the stakeholders' level of commitment to the significance of their support.
should focus on increasing this group's
commitment to the project.
can be engaged to help drive change.
Are perhaps positivity for group
3. Power and Support Stakeholder Analysis (Proposed by Paul Roberts)
RMIT Classification: Trusted
➔ The results help identify who is critical to a project's success.
The project
may lack if the
matrix includes
few persons in
the top half.
are good candidates for a project steering
group
Bottom line
should support
the top line →
great team!!
may be team members but are unlikely to have the authority to manage the project
4. Power and Interest grid (Proposed by Eden and Ackermann)
➔ focuses on those who have influence over the "strategic future" and a stake in a project or
organisation.
RMIT Classification: Trusted
5. Support and Importance stakeholder matrix (Proposed by Paul Nutt)
➔
Stakeholders are positioned on the matrix according to their expected
level of support and importance to the issue.
Scale
5
10
1
Least
Most
Scale
6. Influence and Interest stakeholder matrix (proposed by OGC)
The Managing Successful programme employs nine squares for measuring stakeholders'
interest and influence on a scale of high, medium, and low.
RMIT Classification: Trusted
According to (OGC, 2007), Interest represents a stakeholder's possible interest in the
programme outcomes. Four diagonal bands separate the matrix:
- High-interest, high-impact group
- Key players - require firm buy-in low interest/medium/high influence
- Active consultation with high/moderate interest but minimal influence
- Preserve interest in the low interest / low influence band Maintain
Knowledge.
Download