http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
Facilitating Impact of Supply Chain Advancement in Managing Healthcare
Organisational Effectiveness
Sharad Chandra Srivastava1, Anulal Mahto 2 , *Ganesh Prasad Shukla1, Leeladhar Rajput1, Pranav Gupte 1,
Kawal Lal Kurrey1
1
Department of Industrial & Production Engineering, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh,
India.
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Abstract
The goal of the research is to pinpoint the factors that affect how well a healthcare
organisation performs. To be more precise, an intermediary variable has been used to create
a connection between an implicit variable and the dependent variable. The proposed model
considers the effects of three concealed variables on organisational performance: supplier
collaboration, SC efficiency, and quality measurement activities. Exploratory factor analysis
was used to create this model, and structural equation modelling was used to validate it. A
total of 363 respondents from different Indian healthcare facilities provided the information.
Finally, the results indicated that the suggested constructs had a considerable impact on
organisational performance and helped to improve the goodness of fit. The results also
indicate that an organization's performance may be enhanced through ongoing SC
innovation and supplier collaboration, which ultimately enhances organisation performance.
Keywords: Medical services, vendor’s collaboration, SC efficacy, quality assessment
techniques, organisation effectiveness, India.
1. Introduction
The modern healthcare industry is made up of a variety of supply chains because it involves
the purchase of numerous medications. Due to the rising cost of the supply chain (SC)
procedure, the expense of treatment is rising daily. In comparison to other affluent nations,
SC is more expensive in countries like India. As a result, the cost of medical services has
increased, which eventually hinders patients from receiving high-quality care. Supply chain
management (SCM) is crucial in today's competitive market for maximising overall pricing
and effectiveness of service (Schneller and Smeltzer, 2006; White and Mohdzain, 2009).
Currently, healthcare organisations need to run efficiently in order to provide the highest
quality services to their patients (Fawcett and Magnan, 2001; Lin et al., 2005; Teece, 2009).
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 171
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
This includes lowering delivery costs, improving value-added processes, benchmarking the
quality of goods and services, and maintaining positive relationships with suppliers.
In the healthcare industry, many scholars have emphasised the significance of successful
SCM (Fawcett and Magnan, 2001; Chan et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2008; Mustaffa and
Potter, 2009; Shin et al., 2009; White and Mohdzain, 2009). Healthcare materials cover a
wide range of items, such as mobility devices, washing and cleaning supplies, medical
equipment for exercising, home care items, information technology, and other standard
equipment (Gattorna, 1998). The healthcare industry presents a significant obstacle for SCM
in terms of meeting both client expectations for service quality and affordability. The only
way to solve this problem is through innovation and acquiring a competitive edge to boost
service effectiveness (Porter, 1990). According to Porter (1990) and Herzlinger (2006), SC
innovation refers to leveraging cutting-edge technologies to come up with new, better ways
of handling environmental risks while still meeting customer needs. Through the creation of
valuable client experiences, SC innovation contributes to SC efficiency. Innovative, cuttingedge IT solutions provide value creation for clients, improved care quality, and increased
service delivery efficiency (Anderson, 2002; Andre', et al., 2008; Shih, et al., 2009). In this
study, a research methodology is proposed to validate how the adoption of SC innovation can
increase organisational accomplishment through increased SC productivity, improved
supplier cooperation, and efficient quality management (QM) procedures. Hospital
procurement departments provided the data used in the study's data collection. The following
inquiries are addressed in this research study:

Is SC process enhancement impacted by SC innovation?

Is the SC process affecting organisational achievement?
Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) has been used to analyse a study model that was put
forth based on a review of previous studies and the literature. The paper is structured as
follows: The pertinent literature reviews of earlier studies are represented in Section 2, the
conceptual research framework and hypothesis are proposed in Section 3, the research
technique is discussed in Section 4, the findings and discussion are reported in Section 5, the
conclusion is given in Section 6, and the suggestions for further research are suggested in
Section 6.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 172
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
2. Analysis of pertinent literature
2.1 Medical SCM
Healthcare SCM has recently received significant attention due to its major influence on
hospital efficacy with regard to reducing waste, healthcare errors, improving the standard of
service and diligence, and boosting operational effectiveness (Schneller and Smeltzer, 2006;
Kowalski, 2009; Shih, et al., 2009; Lee, et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2016). According to Fawcett
and Magnan (2001), Lee et al. (2011), Yoon et al. (2016), and other researchers, SCM is the
cooperative effort of various supply chain participants to develop, implement, and manage
seamless value-added procedures in order to meet the requirements and expectations of final
users. The flow of data, products, money, and services is represented by the healthcare SCM
(Jacobs and Chase, 2010). In the healthcare system, SC is in charge of giving patients highquality care. It consists of " linking one or multiple businesses of both the downstream and
upstream flow of goods, finances, solutions, as well as data coming from source to the final
user or customers" (Mentzer et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2016).
SCM aims to meet both long-term and short-term goals by facilitating an effective and
productive information flow. The short-term goal is to boost efficiency and reduce delivery
times, while the long-term goal is to enhance shareholder value, competitiveness,
organisational effectiveness, and customer happiness (Chan, et al., 2008). Both internal and
external chains, such as patient care units, hospital retention, and patients, are included in
hospital SCM. Examples of external chains include manufacturers, suppliers, and so forth.
Suppliers deliver goods and services to hospitals, which subsequently store and distribute
them according to patient needs and operational procedures. According to Rivard-Royer et al.
(2002), Shih et al. (2009), and Lee et al. (2011), SCM activities include business procedures
that incorporate a continual effortless flow of goods and services for the delivery of
healthcare as well as SC value chain procedures from vendors that provide goods, amenities,
and data to patients.
Physical goods, financial, and informational flows are the three categories of flows in
healthcare SCM. Physical flow controls the customization of goods and services to meet the
demands of patients and their treatment. For optimal product flow and efficient company
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 173
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
performance, SC design and judgements are necessary (Singh et al., 2006; Kowalski, 2009;
Lee et al., 2011).
2.2 SC inventiveness
According to Drucker (1985), Chapman et al. (2003), Howells and Tether (2004), Miles
(2004), Lee et al. (2011), and other authors, innovation is a crucial element that enables an
organisation to survive in this cutthroat market. It is also a powerful weapon for
entrepreneurs. This innovation adds superior treatment and amenities, as well as an
innovative and productive work environment, and inspires individual and corporate
excellence. It also produces goals, objectives, and future business strategies. Innovation
requires a full grasp of SCM processes, engagement with suppliers, and having the
appropriate resources available when needed to support the entire SCM workflow in the
healthcare industry (Yoon et al., 2016).
Three major innovations that are significant include those that are customer-focused,
technology-based, and integrator (Herzlinger, 2006). Reduced patient wait times, costs, and
additional healthcare expenses are top priorities for the customer-focused innovation. The
second is technologically driven innovation, which seeks to enhance the delivery network
that relies on SC for excellent medical services, novel treatment modalities, shorter product
delivery times, utilisation of cutting-edge IT, and disease prevention. Integrator innovation is
the final one, and it aids in integrating the entire process using SC and IT methodologies. It
will contribute to raising the effectiveness of all three types of healthcare innovation as well
as the SCM as a whole.
According to Byrnes (2004), Herzlinger (2006), Schneller and Smeltzer (2006), Singh et al.
(2006), Lee et al. (2011), and Yoon et al. (2016), SC innovation has been shown to be a
successful component for business performance in the healthcare industry. This SC
innovation is a tool that, through constant interaction with all SCM participants, can help to
strengthen the organisational excellence required for effective SCM (Lin, 2008; Yoon et al.,
2016). As a result, it permits a decrease in lead time and price, uniformity in quality, the
development of new operational strategies, and agility for participating in this quickly
evolving business environment (Stundza, 2009). According to Singh et al. (2006), this
contributes to the process' continual development and the decrease in medical errors.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 174
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
Therefore, SC innovation will aid in ensuring that medical services are delivered to patients
in hospitals in an effective manner in this cutthroat industry.
In Korea, as per Lee et al., 2011, out of the 243 hospitals examined, 100% employed EDI,
66% applied HMIS, 2.9% deployed ERPs, and 1.2% utilised RFID for SCM. According to
Yoon et al. (2016), SC innovation is crucial for enhancing operational procedures to increase
SC efficiency in the healthcare sector.
2.3 Vendor’s collaboration
According to Chan et al. (2008) and Yoon et al. (2016), it's one of the key tactics for any
company's long-term growth. Due to high expenditures, hospital administration and
government entities are looking for methods of lowering medical expenses through efficient
purchasing. The purchase function is included in order and shipping error. As a result,
supplier collaboration in healthcare is stressed (Lambert et al., 1997; Yoon et al., 2016).
For the purpose of choosing the finest supplier, businesses are looking at a variety of supplier
collaboration variables. Product quality, cost, delivery, and service make up the four
variables. However, this particular industry has placed a higher focus on services and product
quality (Lambert et al., 1997). As stated by Lambert et al. in 1997, healthcare organisations
select their suppliers based on their own supplier collaboration standards. Therefore, an
efficient supplier cooperation process might be advantageous for companies to attain their
SCM goals.
2.4 SC efficacy
In order to fulfil the growing demand for personalization, it is necessary to optimise pricing,
meet patient and employee operational effectiveness expectations, and improve overall
company performance (Yoon et al., 2016). Supplier choice is a successful strategy for
lowering costs and raising competency (Fisher, 1997; Cigolini, et al., 2004). By enhancing
products and services for customers and price elements like production costs, transportation,
etc., SC plays a crucial role. Due to negligence in SC, such as an erroneous order-to-delivery
cycle, the intricate nature of logistics procedures may result in an unjustified price increase;
therefore, the flow of data will aid in the creation of a supportive environment between
customers and providers. An effective SC can assist in monitoring waste elimination, which
is a crucial process. When businesses develop and adopt more cutting-edge and effective IT
platforms, they can continuously improve based on customer orders. Although efficiency is
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 175
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
important, it can be difficult to find strategies to enhance SCM and maximise profit for
businesses. Lambert, et al.'s (1997) proposed QM items were modified for this study.
2.5 QM technique
QM is a crucial component that assists the effort to excel by bringing value to the process.
Modern technologies, such as IT, virtualized assets, QM, etc., are crucial elements that boost
business productivity. According to several studies (Flynn and Flynn, 2005; Lin, et al., 2005;
Lee, et al., 2011; Yoon, et al., 2016), QM reduces variability in the method, shipping harm
and delivery period on SC. QM contributes to faster delivery times, more effective
operations, less inventory and trash, and strong connections with vendors and end consumers.
The Lee, et al., (2011) proposed QM items were modified for this investigation.
2.6 Organisation effectiveness
Numerous earlier researches have looked at the connection between SCM measuring items
and organisational success. Shin, et al. (2000) recognised key performance factors in order to
determine the effects of SC perspective on supplier/buyer effectiveness. The performance of
suppliers is evaluated by price, delay time, quality, timeliness of delivery, dependability, and
timely fulfilment, while buyer effectiveness is determined by product dependability,
compliance, attributes, and resilience. The Lee, et al., (2011) study modified the
organisational performance items.
3. Study Framework and Hypotheses
The study conducted by Lee et al., (2011) has been adjusted and adopted in the proposed
framework for research. The model explains the impact of supplier collaboration, SC
effectiveness, and QM practise on SC innovation, all of which have an impact on the
effectiveness of an organisation. According to Kahn (2000), Flint et al. (2005), 2008, Lee et
al. (2011), and Yoon et al. (2016), SC innovation plays an essential part in developing
products that meet the requirements and needs of end consumers while also creating value for
clients as well.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 176
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
Figure 1
3.1 Vendor’s collaboration and SC inventiveness
The company need to collaborate with the highest calibre suppliers for any innovative
strategy. According to Roy et al. (2004), supplier relationships are essential for fostering
innovation in the South Carolina economy. For use in healthcare facilities, pharmaceutical
firms' medical products require authorisation from either the WHO or government bodies. To
ensure the success of their SC, close cooperation with the suppliers will be necessary.
Client input is crucial about the current goods and services when dealing with suppliers since
it allows them to offer goods with added value, which promotes creativity throughout the SC
process (Chan et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2011). Therefore, SC innovation can aid in improving
the company operations if partnerships and cooperation are conducted with vendors and they
are regularly given feedback (Lee et al., 2011). As a result, supplier interaction will be
impacted by SC innovation. The resulting hypothesis is:
H1: Collaboration among suppliers affects SC innovation.
3.2 SC efficacy and SC inventiveness
Businesses must become sleek and efficient if they want to survive in today's competitive
market environment. As a result, in order to stay competitive, businesses are working to
implement efficiency measures across all facets of their processes (Fisher, 1997; Roy et al.,
2004; Flint et al., 2008; White and Mohdzain, 2009; Lee et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2016).
Utilising cutting-edge IT improves SC efficiency, allowing for early dissemination of data
and a reduction in waste (Schneller and Smeltzer, 2006; Lee et al., 2011). By reducing lead
times, developing new operational methods, and maintaining quality, SC innovation
contributes to SC efficiency (Stundza, 2009; Lee, 2011).
H2: SC innovation is affected by SC effectiveness.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 177
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
3.3 QM technique and SC inventiveness
With the goal to enhance the goods' and services' value, which will impact customers'
pleasure, QM practise has been added to SC innovation. In order to satisfy customers and
enhance their company' performance, businesses work collaboratively with their partners to
develop new, more effective procedures. According to Flynn and Flynn (2005), Lin et al.
(2005), Singh et al. (2006), Lin, 2008, Stundza (2009), Lee et al. (2011), and Yoon et al.
(2016), SC innovation supports the quality of goods and services and can have an impact on
QM practise to reduce variation in processes as well as avoid multiple mistakes that can
happen during the process. Consequently, the following is the suggested hypothesis:
H3: Innovation in SC is influenced by QM practise.
3.4 Impact on organisational effectiveness
When a supplier provides top-notch goods or services, they satisfy or even surpass the
demands of their customers. As a result, it is a crucial success factor for enhancing the
company's efficiency and its competitive edge (Flint et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2011; Yoon et al.,
2016). If a company wants to have an effective physical procedure, it can choose its vendors
on the basis of both price and quality, but if it wants to have high-quality products, it should
prioritise speed, adaptability, and quality when choosing its vendors.
To improve the vendor and company's competitive advantages and effectiveness, a long-term
relationship is required between them. According to Chen, Fisher, Pin, Heikkila, Cigolini, et
al., Lee, et al., and Yoon, et al., effective operations improves and sustains a company's
competitiveness and efficacy by optimising waste and the rate of the process flow. The
outcomes of the firms can be improved, according to Thompson, et al.'s (2007) proposal, by
increasing SC effectiveness and efficacy.
As was mentioned, the practise of quality management is crucial for enhancing the quality of
goods and services and enhancing company efficiency. Implementing QM practises will
increase SC effectiveness, which will have a beneficial impact on organisational
performance. Consequently, the following is the suggested hypothesis:
H4: Organisational effectiveness is influenced by SC innovation.
H5: The effectiveness of an organisation is influenced by vendor collaboration, SC efficacy,
and QM practices.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 178
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
4. Methodology
4.1 Collection of information
Information had been gathered from 363 responders in different Indian healthcare facilities.
The population's opinions were gathered using a basic random sample procedure to reduce
bias (Hair, et al., 2010). For the purpose of collecting data, a systematic questionnaire was
created and distributed to the healthcare facilities. Prior to the survey, the questionnaire was
reviewed by academics field-qualified Professors. For evaluating each construct, a five-point
Likert rating system was used in the questionnaire. The scale used for assessing each variable
was created using as many earlier studies as available. Four different variables were used to
measure each concept. A 50-person sampling size was used in an initial preliminary survey to
test the questionnaire. The final information was then collected after modifications were
made in response to the participants' needs, demands, and recommendations as well as those
made by the academics. According to Tan (2002), executives or directors have a better
understanding of the internal workings of their company. Smaller hospitals relied on the
director for responses because their staffs lacked sufficient knowledge of SC procedures.
Only 363 of the 900 responders who received the questionnaires submitted valid copies. The
demographic info of the participants and the hospital are displayed in Table 1. Public
healthcare facilities accounted for 5.3% of responses, foundations for 71.13 percent,
academic medical centres for 6.1%, and private medical facilities for 17.47%. There were
12.04 percent of genuine replies from the third level and 87.96 percent from the second layer.
4.42% healthcare facilities had more than 1000 beds, 50.2% had between 500 and 1000,
30.87% had between 200 and 500, and 14.51% had between 100 and 200. The participants
were appointed to the positions of supervisor (53.36%) and manager (46.64%).
Table 1
Attributes of healthcare
facilities
Category of hospital
Beds available
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
Categories
Frequencies
%
Education
22
6.1
Foundations
258
71.13
The public
Privately
owned
Tertiary level
Secondary
level
>1000
19
5.3
64
17.47
44
12.04
319
87.96
16
4.42
182
50.2
500-1000
PAGE NO: 179
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
Attributes of the
participants
Organisational Role
200-500
112
30.87
100-200
53
14.51
Authorization
Frequencies
%
Supervisor
194
169
53.36
Managers
46.64
Overall participants = 363
4.2 Modelling parameters
The planned survey was created using a Likert scale of five points. SPSS 20.0 and Amos 22.0
were employed to analyse the data gathered. Every item underwent a test of reliability
depending on the Cronbach's alpha rating. The readings for Cronbach's alpha are shown in
Table 2. The dependability indices all went over the cut-off point of 0.70. The smallest and
greatest Cronbach's alpha ratings are 0.72 and 0.878, respectively. Cronbach's alpha metrics
for all the entities under study are >0.7, which at the level of 0.05 indicates strong reliability.
Table 2: Cronbach’s alpha statistics
Elements
Cronbach’s alpha
SC1, SC2 SC3, SC4
0.831
SCE1, SCE2 SCE3, SCE4
0.843
QM1,QM2,QM3,QM4
0.72
SCI1, SCI2, SCI3, SCI4
0.847
OP1,OP2,OP3, OP4
0.878
Validity tests are conducted to measure accuracy. Using principal component analysis (PCA),
the same traits were expressed and considerable skew was found. Confirmatory factor
assessment (CFA) is a method for determining whether the variables accurately reflect the
constructs that were discovered through a literature review. The model adequacy of the
suggested research framework was examined using SEM, or structural equation modelling
(Byrne, 2010).
5. Findings
5.1 Exploratory Factor Analysis
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 180
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
When grouping the factors with comparable qualities, the method of exploratory factor
analysis (EFA) was employed. Each parameter could be put under distinct considerations
during this analysis. For EFA, SPSS 20.0 was used.
Table 3: Evaluation of Bartlett and KMO statistics
The KMO testing for adequacy of sampling.
Bartlett's Measure for
Sphericity
0.869
Chi-Square statistic
2496.126
Df
Sig.
105
.000
The KMO analysis determines how well each factor predicts adequate items. Table 3 shows
the KMO values, that is 0.869 and exceeds the permissible limit of 0.7, as well as the
significance rating, that is 0.000 and is below the limit of 0.05, or the probability value level,
which also stands at a satisfactory level. This indicates that the factors have sufficient
correlation to serve as a solid foundation for the factor analysis in this situation.
Table 4: Overall Variation Defined
Early Eigen values
Parts
Overall
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
5.881
1.846
1.294
1.153
.726
.614
.575
.533
.485
.387
.351
.335
.315
.289
.215
% of
Variation
39.205
12.308
8.624
7.686
4.840
4.096
3.833
3.556
3.234
2.578
2.343
2.236
2.099
1.927
1.434
Totals of Squared loads for
Retrieval
% of
Combined
Overall
Variation
%
5.881
39.205
39.205
1.846
12.308
51.513
1.294
8.624
60.138
1.153
7.686
67.824
Rotation totals of Squared loads
Combined
Overall
%
39.205
2.740
51.513
2.729
60.138
2.668
67.824
2.036
72.664
76.760
80.593
84.149
87.383
89.961
92.304
94.540
96.640
98.566
100.000
Retrieval Procedure: Principal Component Analysis.
% of
Variation
18.270
18.195
17.789
13.571
Combined
%
18.270
36.465
54.253
67.824
Table 4 shows the overall variation that has been explained. PCA, or principal component
assessment, was utilised as the collection technique. The distribution of the variation among
the 15 potential elements is displayed in the Overall Variation Explanation table. Since they
account for the most variability, only eigen values with numbers that exceed 1 are retrieved.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 181
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
the shares of the variation that may be accounted for by components 1 (18.240%), 2
(18.195%), 3 (17.789%), and 4 (13.571%). Each of the four variables together accounts for
67.824% of the variance overall.
Table 5: Rotated Part Matrix
Parts
2
0.807
0.757
0.749
0.797
1
3
4
SC1
SC2
SC3
SC4
SCE1
0.766
SCE2
0.827
SCE3
0.785
SCE4
0.64
QM1
0.824
QM2
0.821
QM3
0.684
SCI1
0.724
SCI4
0.729
SCI2
0.777
SCI3
0.795
Retrieval Procedure: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Technique: Varimax with Kaiser
Normalization.
a. Rotation succeeded in 5 phases.
The overall number of variables is 15, and they were divided into four categories. The matrix
of the switched element is shown in Table 5. Switching the factors makes them simpler to
understand. Switching makes it feasible for various items to be anticipated or described by
several deeper reasons, and each foundational element may clarify a number of things. This is
a simple building constraint. The Varimax rotation was the technique employed. All 15 of the
listed parameters were divided into four categories. The first part includes SC1, SC2, SC3,
and SC4, the subsequent part includes SCE1, SCE2, SCE3, and SCE4, the third portion
includes QM1, QM2, and QM3, and the final part includes SCI1, SCI4, SCI2, and SCI3.
Cross loads forced the removal of QM4 from the assessment.
5.2 Structural Equation Modeling
SEM was employed for testing the hypothesis put forward. Due to its robust visualisations
and intuitive interfaces, AMOS 22.0 was used for this study. The results of the hypothesis test
are shown in this section. Below are the outcomes of the model's important routes. The
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 182
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
resulting model is shown in Figure 2 which includes the three hidden variables, one
dependent variable, and one intermediary variable.
Figure 2: Finalized Framework
Supply chain efficacy (SCE), quality monitoring (QM), and supplier collaboration (SC) are
the three concealed variables. There are indications for each hidden variable. The SC
parameter has four indications (SC1, SC2, SC3 and SC4), the SCE parameter has four
indications (SCE1, SCE2, SCE3 and SCE4), and the QM parameter likewise has four
indications (QM1, QM2, QM3, and QM4). However, QM4 was excluded from the model
since it had cross loads with EFA and did not significantly improve the model's fit.
Organisational effectiveness is a dependent factor and SC innovation (SCI) is the mediator
variable. Both the dependent factor and the intermediary variable (SCI) have four indications
each: SCI1, SCI2, SCI3, and SCI4.
5.3 Quality of fit for the structural framework
The aforementioned model highlights the comments that have substantial effects on the
dependent factor. The results of SEM are displayed in table 6. Actual fit indices are estimated
as CMIN/Df (3.043), where CMIN is the chi-square statistic and Df is the degree of freedom.
The amounts of the goodness of fit indicator (GFI), normed fit indicator (NFI), relation fit
indicator (RFI), and increment fit indicator (IFI), which range from 0.886 to 0.882, 0.861 to
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 183
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
0.861, and 0.918 to 0.918, are in the range of (0-1.0), resulting in the permissible range and is
approved. The approved value for the root mean square error of approximation, also known
as RMSEA, is 0.075, which is fairly close to the cut-off value of 0.08 and falls within it. The
comparison fit index (CFI), which is higher than the cut-off value of 0.90, is 0.917. The
modified goodness of fit score is 0.850, higher than the critical value of 0.80.Table 5 displays
the result in its final form.
In this type of measurement approach, the dependent factor and the three latent factors (SC,
SCE, and QM) are interacted with the help of the intermediary variable, called SC innovation
(SCI). In addition to having an indirect impact on OP, the dependent factor, the three
concealed variables also have a direct impact on SCI, the mediator variable. The model’s fit
is achieved in part by the three concealed variables and one intermediary variable.
Table 6
TP
Framework
A suggested
benchmark
P-level
0.000
CMIN/DF
3.043
RMSEA
0.075
CFI
0.917
NFI
0.882
IFI
0.918
GFI
0.886
AGFI
0.850
<0.05
<3.0
<0.08
0-1.0
0.1.0
0-1.0
0.1.0
>0.80
5.4 Hypotheses evaluation
SC has made major improvements to the SCI. In all, SC, SCE, and QM have an association to
SCI as well as contribute to organizational effectiveness. SC has an important enhancement
to the SCI, SCE provides a substantial assistance to the SCI, QM makes a considerable
impact to the SCI, and SCI has a major impact to the organizational effectiveness. Because
there is a beneficial correlation and an R-square number over the cut-off point of 0.5, the
presumptions made are fulfilled. The model's total level of fit is evident. Similar findings
from earlier studies (Chen, 1997; Li and O' Brien, 1999; Lee, et al., 2011; Yoon, et al., 2016)
were found in this one. Table 7 shows the findings for all of the hypotheses.
Table 7
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
Hypotheses
Outcomes
H1: Vendor Collaboration affects SC inventiveness.
Supports
H2: SC efficacy affects SC inventiveness.
Supports
H3: QM techniques affect SC inventiveness.
Supports
PAGE NO: 184
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
H4: SC inventiveness affects organizational effectiveness.
Supports
H5: Vendor collaboration, SC efficacy and QM technique
affects organisational effectiveness.
Supports
6. Discussion
The current study provides important insights for enhancing organisational effectiveness by
means of concealed variables such as supplier collaboration, SC efficacy, and quality
assessment methods. SC innovation additionally serves an intermediary role among the three
concealed factors and the dependent variable organisational effectiveness. The results make it
quite evident that streamlining operational procedures, including those involving suppliers, is
a prerequisite for creativity on the part of business executives. Practises for measuring quality
are crucial for simplifying a company's overall achievement. In order to strengthen its key
strengths, the health care sector must concentrate on generating novel company tactics and
innovation. The relevance of creative SCM for reducing wasteful spending, speeding
monetary benefits, adopting IT, and optimising SC operations in the healthcare business was
noted in the 2nd Yearly Leaders Conference on Medical Supply Chain Optimisation (2008)
(Lee et al., 2011).
According to the research, SCI is related to SC (0.57), SCE is related to SCI (0.49), QM is
related to SCI (0.33), and because SCI is the mediator factor, it is related to organizational
effectiveness (0.89). The findings additionally indicate that the delivery, together with SC
(Lambert et al., 1997; Kannan and Haq, 2007; Chan et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2011) including
QM (Flynn and Flynn, 2005), is an essential concern for sustaining hospitals' crucial
operations and initiatives. If the organisation and the vendor have a good working
relationship, they may work together to solve various difficulties in the procedures, which
will ultimately lead to improved quality. The QM plays a part in optimising the pricing and
improving the organizational effectiveness in SCM. Each actor (supply and medical) ought to
serve as another participant's collaborator and design tools and procedures that will benefit
both parties with the goal to increase the standard of service provided through SCM in
medical facilities. To offer a lean SC that can deliver optimised medical services at an
optimised cost, the SC operations require to be divided into different groups for organising
the supplies required (Lee et al., 2011).
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 185
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
7. Conclusions
Effective medical care SCM entails the distribution and administration of the supply of
medical equipment and services in order to deliver high-quality and effective health services.
Through SCM, this analysis has pinpointed important aspects that will enhance the
company's overall efficiency. The proposed framework, which greatly contributes to the
organisational effectiveness in a medical firm, demonstrates an association between the three
concealed variables and the mediating factor in the end. To determine all of the above
hypotheses, data from 363 participants in different Indian healthcare organisations was
gathered.
According to this study, the only way to achieve effective SCM deployment is by ongoing SC
innovation and collaboration with vendors, both of which will ultimately affect and improve
organisational effectiveness. The top managers of the company ought to provide a great
workplace atmosphere in order to achieve SC innovation (Byrnes, 2004; Herzlinger, 2006;
Schneller and Smeltzer, 2006; Singh et al., 2006; Shih et al., 2009). This atmosphere ought to
involve offering the proper resources to promote effective operational procedures for a high
standard health services and minimised healthcare errors at a reasonable price or the greatest
level of efficacy.
Understanding the significance of CQI and SC efficacy is necessary in order to include them
into SCM plans for healthcare organisations. When placing orders with vendors, for example,
the medical sector still performs many tasks manually, which leads to numerous data input
problems and wrong data. These issues cause a medical company's overall performance to be
inefficient. Healthcare organisations are required to modernise their methods of operation by
implementing cutting-edge technologies, much as other service sectors and the production
sector have done. They ought to look at the possible advantages of switching from
conventional working practises to novel and sophisticated IT, cloud-based computing, etc.
They will undoubtedly be capable to improve their entire SCM operation and will
undoubtedly raise the degree of organisational effectiveness of their company once they
begin applying the most recent trends, as implemented in some of the sophisticated nations
like the US, UK, etc. in the medical industry.
Data on the issues listed in the survey was gathered from Indian hospitals with over 100 beds
that were comparatively greater. Due of the abundance of local healthcare facilities in our
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 186
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
nation, comparisons between bigger and smaller healthcare facilities are possible. If we were
to think about the degree of collaboration and connections among those both downstream and
upstream medical SCM, data gathered from India may be a restriction. Here, a cross-sectional
inquiry has been conducted.
References
Anderson, J. (2002), “Evaluation in health informatics: social network analysis”, Computers in Biology and
Medicine, Vol. 32, pp. 179-93.
Andre ´, B., Ringdal, G., Loge, J.H., Rannestad, T., Laerum, H. and Kaasa, S. (2008), “Experiences with the
implementation of computerized tools in health care units: a review article”, International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 753-75.
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming.
Second edi.
Byrnes, J. (2004), “Fixing the healthcare supply chain”, Harvard Business School Working Knowledge,
available at: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4036.html (accessed 10 November 2009).
Chan, F., Chan, H., Lau, H. and Ip, R. (2008), “Critical success factors in managing global supply chains”,
International Journal Manufacturing Technology and Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 28-44.
Chapman, R., Soosay, C. and Kandampully, J. (2003), “Innovation in logistic services and the new business
model: a conceptual framework”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.
33 No. 7, pp. 630-50.
Cigolini, R., Cozzi, M. and Perona, M. (2004), “A new framework for supply chain management: conceptual
model and empirical test”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 741.
Drucker, P.F. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.
Fawcett, S. and Magnan, G. (2001), Achieving World-class Supply Chain Alignment: Benefits, Barriers, and
Bridges, Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Arizona State University Research Park, Tempe, AZ.
Fisher, M. (1997), “What is the right supply chain for your product?”, Harvard Business Review, March/April,
pp. 103-16.
Flint, D., Larsson, E. and Gammelgaard, B. (2005), “Logistics innovation: a customer value-oriented social
process”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 113-47.
Flint, D., Larsson, E. and Gammelgaard, B. (2008), “Exploring processes for customer value insights, supply
chain learning and innovation: an international study”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 257-81.
Flynn, B. and Flynn, E. (2005), “Synergies between supply chain management and quality management:
emerging implications”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43 No. 16, pp. 3421-36.
Gattorna, J. (1998), Strategic Supply Chain Alignment: Best Practice in Supply Chain Management, Gower
Publishing, Aldershot.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed., Prentice
Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Heikkila ¨, J. (2012), “From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction”, Journal
of Operations Management, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 747-67.
Herzlinger, R. (2006), Innovating in Health Care-framework, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA,
HBS No. 9-306-042.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 187
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
Howells, J. and Tether, B. (2004), “Innovation in services: issues at stake and trends”, A Report for DG
Enterprise of the European Commission, Under Contract INNO Studies 2001: Lot 3 (ENTR-C/2001), European
Commission, Brussels.
Jacobs, F. and Chase, R., (2010), Operations and Supply Chain Management (13th), McGraw-Hill/Irwin. New
York, NY.
Kahn, K. (2000), Product Planning Essentials, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Kannan, G. and Haq, N. (2007), “Analysis of interactions of criteria and sub-criteria for the selection of supplier
in the built-in-order supply chain environment”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 45 No. 17,
pp. 3831-52.
Kowalski, J. (2009), “Need: a strategic approach to supply chain management”, Healthcare Financial
Management, pp. 90-8.
Kumar, A., Ozdamar, L. and Zhang, N. (2008), “Supply chain redesign in the healthcare industry of Singapore”,
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 95-103.
Lambert, D., Adams, R. and Emmelhainz, M. (1997), “Supplier selection criteria in the healthcare industry: a
comparison of importance and performance”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials, Vol. 33 No. 1,
pp. 16-22.
Lee, S. M., Lee, D., &Schniederjans, M. J. (2011). Supply chain innovation and organizational performance in
the healthcare industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
Li, D. and O’Brien, C. (1999), “Integrated decision modeling of supply chain efficiency”, International Journal
of Production Economics, Vol. 59 Nos 1-3, pp. 147-57.
Lin, C., Chow, W., Madu, C., Kuei, C. and Yu, P. (2005), “A structural equation model of supply chain quality
management and organisational performance”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 96 No. 3,
pp. 355-65.
Miles, I. (2004), “Innovation in services”, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. (Eds), Understanding
Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mustaffa, N. and Potter, A. (2009), “Healthcare supply chain management in Malaysia: a case study”, Supply
Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 234-43.
Porter, M. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillan, London.
Roy, S., Sivakumar, K. and Wilkinson, L.F. (2004), “Innovation generation in supply chain relationships: a
conceptual model and research propositions”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp.
61-79.
Schneller, E. and Smeltzer, L. (2006), Strategic Management of the Health Care Supply Chain, Jossey-Bass, San
Francisco, CA.
Shin, H., Collier, D. and Wilson, D. (2000), “Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance”,
Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 317-33.
Shin, H., Collier, D. and Wilson, D. (2000), “Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance”,
Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 317-33.
Singh, M., Rice, J. and Riquier, D. (2006), Transforming the Global Health Care Supply Chain, MIT Center for
Transportation and Logistics, Cambridge, MA.
Stundza, T. (2009), “Supply chain innovation is important”, purchasing, available at: www.
purchasing.com/article/354518-Supply_chain_innovation_is_important.php (accessed 10 November‘2009).
Teece, D. (2009), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: organizing for innovation and growth”,
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 188
http://poetiquejournal.com/
ISSN NO : 0032-2024
Thompson, R., Eisenstein, D. and Stratman, T. (2007), “Getting supply chain on the CEO’s agenda”, Supply
Chain Management Review, July/August, pp. 26-33.
White, A. and Mohdzain, M. (2009), “An innovative model of supply chain management: a single case study in
the electronic sector”, International Journal of Information Technology and Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 6984.
Yoon, S. N., Lee, D., &Schniederjans, M. (2016). Effects of innovation leadership and supply chain innovation
on supply chain efficiency: Focusing on hospital size. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 412421.
Volume 9 Issue 2, 2022
PAGE NO: 189