THE LEGAL STRUCTURE OF THE WTO SYSTEM The Legal Structure of the WTO System Pertinent questions Describe the treaty structure of the WTO What are the decision-making structures and processes of the WTO? The Legal Structure of the WTO System Pertinent questions – cont’d To what extent are the values of democracy, transparency and accountability accommodated in the institutional structure and processes of the WTO? What would you describe as the strengths and weaknesses of the institutional structures and processes of the WTO? The Legal Structure of the WTO System Pertinent questions (cont’d) What are the requirements and processes for the attainment of WTO membership? How are decisions made in the WTO? How does the concept of ‘negative consensus’ work in the WTO? Introduction • The Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations (MTNs) – which took place between 1986-1994 - brought about the end of the GATT System. The so-called GATT system consisted of: (a) The General Agreement on Tarifs and Trade (GATT) as a multilateral TREATY governing trade in goods; and (b) The GATT (as an international ORGANISATION – which is now the predecessor of the WTO). • Multilateral Rounds of Trade Negotiations UFH-2007 1. 1947: Geneva (23 countries) 2. 1949: Annecy (29 countries) 3. 1951: Torquay (32 countries) 4. 1956: Geneva (33 countries) 5. 1960-61: Dillon (39 countries) 6. 1963-67: Kennedy (74 ==) 7. 1973-79: Tokyo (99 countries) 8. 1986-94 Uruguay (128 ==) 9. 2001-Present: Doha Round Introduction The Uruguay Round of MTNs created ADDITIONAL (regulatory) systems/ frameworks (additional to the already existing GATT framework for trade in goods), namely: Introduction (1) The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS); (2) The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS); and (3) The WTO Charter QUERY: What are the practical implications? TREATY STRUCTURE OF THE WTO WTO Treaty structure comprises of: The WTO Charter – 15 articles; Annex 1 – A, B, C (Multilateral Agreements); Annex 2 (Dispute Settlement Understanding DSU) Annex 3: Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM) Annex 4: Plurilateral Trade Agreements WTO Charter: An international agreement Marrakech Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization Signed in Marrakech on 15 April 1994 Ratified following national procedures Entered into force on 1st January 1995 UFH-2007 (legally binding international instrument engaging the responsibility of States) WTO: Trade Rules and Disciplines WTO WTO Agreement 1A 1B 1C 2 3 4 Multilateral agreements on trade in goods GATS TRIPS Dispute Settlement Understanding Trade Policy Review Mecanism Plurilateral trade agreements UFH-2007 Marrakech Agreement establishing the WTO WTO: Trade Rules and Disciplines Annex 1A Multilateral agreements on trade in Goods GATT 1994 (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) 1A Multilateral trade agreement on trade in goods UFH-2007 Goods Agreements on: Agriculture Antidumping Sanitary and phytosanitary measures Customs valuation Textiles and clothing Rules of origin Technical barriers to trade Import licensing Trade-related investment measures (TRIMS) Preshipment inspection Subsidies and countervailing measures Safeguards LEGAL STATUS • The WTO enjoys LEGAL PERSONALITY under international law. • It is “CAPABLE of POSSESSING rights and duties under international law and having capacity to maintain its rights by bringing international claims.” • ICJ Advisory opinion in Reparation for Injuries suferee in the service of Unitee Nations ICJ Rep. 1949, 174. LEGAL STATUS Article VIII – WTO Charter 1. The WTO shall have legal personality, and shall be accorded by each of its members such legal capacity as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions. 4. The privileges and immunities to be accorded by a member to the WTO, its ofcials, etc shall be similar to the privileges and immunities stipulated in the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialised Agencies, approved by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 21 November 1947. POLICY GOALS OF THE WTO According to the Preamble of the WTO Charter, in entering into the Uruguay Round Agreements: (a) the Parties recognise that trade and economic relations SHOULD be conducted with a view to ENSURING, inter alia, FULL employment and EXPANDING the production of and trade in goods and services while allowing for the optimal use of the world’s resources; and POLICY GOALS OF THE WTO (b) the Parties were desirous of contributing to the objectives spelt out in the Preamble – by entering into RECIPROCAL and MUTUALLY ADVANTAGEOUS ARRANGEMENTS DIRECTED TO - the substantial REDUCTION OF TARIFFS and other BARRIERS TO TRADE and to the ELIMINATION of DISCRIMINATORY treatment in international trade relations. POLICY GOALS OF THE WTO Accordingly, the three primary policy goals of the WTO are: (1) The conduct of trade and economic relations in a manner that ensures full employment and expansion of both production and trade in goods & services. (2) The SUBSTANTIAL reduction of tarifs and other trade barriers. (3) The ELIMINATION of DISCRIMINATORY treatment in international trade. FUNCTIONS OF THE WTO – Art. III of the Charter Article III.1 “The WTO shall facilitate the implementation, administration and operation, and further the objectives, of this Agreement and of the Multilateral Trade Agreements, and shall also provide the framework for the implementation, administration and operation of the Plurilateral Trade Agreements.” FUNCTIONS OF THE WTO – Art. III of the Charter Function #1 To PURSUE the OBJECTIVES and FACILITATE the IMPLEMENTATION, administration and operation of the trade agreements falling within the ambit of the WTO treaty structure. FUNCTIONS OF THE WTO – Art. III of the Charter Article III.2 “The WTO shall provide the forum for negotiations among its members concerning their multilateral trade relations in matters dealt with under the agreements in the annexes to this Agreement. The WTO may also provide a forum for further negotiations among its members concerning their multilateral trade relations and a framework for the implementation of the results of such negotiations, as may be decided by the Ministerial Conference.” FUNCTIONS OF THE WTO – Art. III of the Charter Function #2 Provide a FORUM for NEGOTIATIONS among its member states regarding their ECONOMIC RELATIONS covered by the agreements falling within the organisation’s treaty structure. FUNCTIONS OF THE WTO – Art. III of the Charter Article III.3 “The WTO shall administer the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (hereinafter referred to as the “Dispute Settlement Understanding” or “DSU”) in Annex 2 to this Agreement”. FUNCTIONS OF THE WTO – Art. III of the Charter Function #3 Administer the DISPUTE resolution/ settlement (judicial) processes/system of the WTO with a view to ensuring PEACEFUL and BINDING resolution of trade disputes between the members of the organisation. FUNCTIONS OF THE WTO – Art. III of the Charter Article III.4 “The WTO shall administer the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (hereinafter referred to as the “TPRM”) provided for in Annex 3 to this Agreement. FUNCTIONS OF THE WTO – Art. III of the Charter Function #4 Administer the implementation of the WTO’s trade policy review mechanism - with a view to ensuring the consistent ALIGNMENT of NATIONAL trade LAWS and policies with the requirements of the (WTO’S) multilateral trade agreements. Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Query #1: Representivity – How representative is the WTO? Query #2: Transparency – How transparent is the WTO? Query #3: Efectiveness – How efective is the WTO’s decision-making process? Query #4: Democracy – How democratic is the WTO’s decision-making process? Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation 27 Organisational structure - Art. IV, WTO Charter A total of 70 bodies are involved in the organization’s decision-making processes. 34 of those bodies are STANDING bodies. The others (36) are AD-HOC. QUERY – practical/ operational implications? Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Ministerial Conference (MC) - Art IV: 1, WTO Charter Article IV:1 states as follows: “There shall be a Ministerial Conference composed of representatives of all members, which shall meet at least once every two years. The Ministerial Conference shall carry out the functions of the WTO and take actions necessary to this efect....” Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Article IV:1 further states that: “The Ministerial Conference shall have the authority to take DECISIONS on ALL MATTERS under ANY of the Multilateral Trade Agreements, if so requested by a Member, in accordance with the specifc requirements for decisionmaking in this Agreement and in the relevant Multilateral Trade Agreement.” Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Competence/powers of the MC The MC is empowered to make the fnal decisions on ALL matters. Accordingly, it is the supreme (decision-making) body of the WTO. Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Composition The MC comprises of Trade Ministers (or their representatives) from ALL member countries - QUERY – REPRESENTIVITY? Yes? Frequency of meetings The MC meets every 2 yrs Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation 2) General Council (GC) Art. IV:2, WTO Charter states as follows: “There shall be a General Council composed of representatives of all the Members, which shall meet as appropriate. In the intervals between meetings of the Ministerial Conference, its functions shall be conducted by the General Council. The General Council shall also carry out the functions assigned to it by this Agreement.” Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Competence of the GC The GC is responsible for the ‘DAY TO DAY’ management of the WTO and its many activities. In between sessions of the MC, the GC exercises all the powers of the MC. Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Composition of the GC The GC is composed of ambassador-level diplomats from ALL WTO members and meets every two months (bi-monthly). Practical implication: Every member has to have Geneva-based trade representatives IN ORDER TO BE EFFECTIVE. WHAT ABOUT LDC’s/poor countries? Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Processes of the GC – TRANSPARENCY? The GC meets behind closed doors; Its meetings are only open to representatives of Members; and Distribution of minutes of its meetings is restricted. Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation (3) Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) and Trade Policy Review Body (TPRB) – Art. IV, WTO Charter The GC, DSB and TPRB are in fact one body. The DSB deals with dispute settlement, while the TPRB is a trade policy review organ of the WTO. Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Queries TO REMEMBER/KEEP IN MIND Transparency and democracy – How transparent AND/OR democratic is the WTO? Why should this be an issue, especially for developing countries? Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation 38 4) Specialised Councils (Art IV:5) include: Council for Trade in Goods (CTG); Council for Trade in Services (CTS); and Council for TRIPS. These merely oversee the operation/ implementation of relevant agreements but DO NOT take any decisions. In other words, they have no decision-making powers. Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Specialised Councils – cont’d Membership of the specialised councils SHALL BE OPEN to representatives OF ALL members. The councils shall meet as necessary to carry out their functions. Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation 5) Committees and Working parties (Art. IV:7) They assist the GC and the MC in performing their functions. Membership in the committees SHALL BE OPEN to representatives OF ALL members. The committees include: (a) Committee on Trade and Environment; (b) Committee on Regional Trade Agreements; (c) Trade Negotiations Committee (d) Committee on Trade and Development (e) Committee on Balance-of-Payments Restrictions Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Trade Negotiations Committee (TNC) Established by the MC at its Doha session in November 2001. It supervises the overall conduct of the multilateral trade negotiations (MTNs) under the authority of the GC. It reports on the progress of the MTNs to each regular session of the GC (bimonthly). Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation 42 6) WTO Secretariat: Based in Geneva and headed by a Director-General appointed by the MC (Usually a very contentious appointment); The current DG is Roberto Azevedo of Brazil who took ofce on 1 Sept. 2014. Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation The role (functions) of the DG includes: (a) Provide technical and professional support to the various WTO bodies; (b) Provide technical assistance to developing country members – WHY?; and (c) Monitor and analyse developments in world trade – WHY? Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation The role of DG (continued): (d) Provide information to the public NOTE The DG cannot initiate any proposal for action or reform. Must refrain from providing interpretation of WTO law (a honest broker, facilitator only) Institutional Structure of the World Trade Organisation Special note: WTO is a member-driven organisation; Unlike the IMF and the World Bank, the management has little power. QUERY: What are the implications for democracy and operational fairness in the WTO? Income of the WTO 46 Based on the old GATT system (1947) Assessed contribution: Calculated on the basis of each member’s share of total (global) trade, reported on a three-year average. If the member’s share is less than 0.12% (of total global trade), then the minimum contribution is assessed. Income of the WTO Voluntary contributions Voluntary contributions are often made by industrialised economies to support specifc goals such as the provision of technical training and capacity building for developing country ofcials/ professionals/citizens as well as technological cooperation. This has been in response to the developing countries’ problems in participating fully in the multilateral trading system. IMPLICATION(S) ? Income of the WTO At Doha, members also created the special Doha Development Agenda Trust Fund (DDAGTF) QUERY: Funding for AID FOR TRADE? Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) 49 Current situation in re WTO membership By November 2007 there were 151 members of the WTO representing 92% of the global population and 95% of world Trade. Currently, there are 164 members. Amongst countries that have recently gone through the membership admission process are Afghanistan and Liberia. QUERIES: MEANING/IMPLICATIONS? Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) (1) Original Membership – Article XI Open only to Contracting Parties to the GATT 1947 (as of 01 January 1995). Article XI specifcally states as follows: “The contracting parties to GATT 1947 ... which accept this Agreement and the Multilateral Trade Agreements and for which schedules of concessions and commitments are annexed to GATT 1994 and for which schedules of specifc commitments are annexed to GATS shall become ORIGINAL MEMBERS of the WTO”. Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Requirements for original membership (a) Acceptance of/submission to the WTO Charter (b) Acceptance of the multilateral trade agreements (GATT, GATS, TRIPS, etc). REMEMBER: This requirement excludes the so-called plurilateral agreements. Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Requirements for original membership (cont’d) (c) Submission to a SCHEDULE of tarifs, concessions and commitments ANNEXED to the GATT of 1994; and (d) Submission to a SCHEDULE of specifc commitments ANNEXED to the GATS of 1994. Membership of the WTO (Arts XI & XII) 53 (2) Membership by accession – Art. XII Membership is open to: (a) all states (countries/nations); and (b) separate customs territories having full responsibility for their external commercial relations. Eg Chinese Taipei; Hong Kong; etc Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Membership by accession (cont’d) 5-stage procedure: (1) Applicant state sends a request to the DG of the WTO who establishes a working party (WP) to examine the application Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Membership by accession (cont’d) (2) Submission of a detailed memorandum by the applicant describing its trade regime (tarifs, domestic regulations, etc) Query: What is a trade regime? Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) (3) Negotiation between the applicant state/entity and current members interested in extending their (export) markets into the applicant’s territory; As part of this stage, the applicant negotiates new tarif concessions in respect of trade in goods and specifc commitments on trade in services Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) 57 (4) Report of the WP is forwarded to the GC The GC makes a decision on the application (which must be approved by 2/3 majority of existing members) 5) If the GC decision is favourable, issuance of a Protocol of Accession (by the WTO Secretariat) will follow. Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Note: Accession is asymmetric (unequal): New members cannot demand more than what is contained in the WTO agreements (as they are) However, WTO members can! QUERY: Democratic? Fairness/equity? Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) QUERIES: Why would an applicant be keen on WTO membership? Why the stringent membership requirements? Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Queries - membership requirements I (a) Coverage of the WTO (in terms of geographical extent and trade sectors) has become far reaching; as a result, WTO membership comes with signifcant (market access) benefts. Those benefts could be substantial depending on the size of the applicant state’s production capacity, etc – QUERY: China? Russia? Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) 61 Queries - membership requirements II (b) Accession to the WTO is perceived as a major step towards integration into the global economy. Thus there is a tendency for current members to demand more than what is required by WTO law. Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Queries - membership requirements III For example there may be: (i) a demand for democratisation of governmental institutions; (ii) Privatization of state-owned frms/ entities (Russia); Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Membership requirements (cont’d) (iii) Abolition of subsidies on agricultural products; etc. QUERY: Agree or disagree? Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Accession to the WTO: Russian Experience Accession negotiations took about 12 years. The major stumbling block was the low energy prices in Russia. The EC (EU) considered these (low) prices to be the result of an unfair state subsidy which distorts global competition. Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Accession to the WTO: Russian Experience – cont’d Out of frustration, President Putin declared in June 2007 that the WTO was ‘archaic, undemocratic and infexible’. Membership of the WTO (arts XI & XII) Accession to the WTO: Chinese Experience The accession negotiations lasted for approx 15 years and resulted in a legal text of approx 900 pages. In order to join in 2001, China agreed: (1) To make a series of important MARKET ACCESS commitments and concessions; Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Chinese Experience (continued) (2) To provide a more predictable environment for TRADE and foreign investment in accordance with WTO rules; (3) To eliminate or considerably reduce many of the RESTRICTIONS on foreign companies. Membership of the WTO (Articles XI & XII) Chinese Experience (continued) Additional term (of accession): During a 12-year period, a special TRANSITIONAL safeguard mechanism applies. This mechanism allows other WTO members to restrict imports of Chinese products that cause or threaten to cause market disruption to their domestic producers/industry. Decision-Making in the WTO 69 The decision- making procedure of the WTO is set out in Article IX: 1 of the WTO Charter. It states that: “The WTO shall continue the practice of decision-making by consensus followed under the GATT 1947. Except as otherwise provided, where a decision cannot be arrived at by consensus, the matter at issue shall be decided by voting. Decision-Making in the WTO Article IX: 1 of the WTO Agreement (cont’d) “At meetings of the Ministerial Conference and the General Council, each member of the WTO shall have one vote…Decisions of the Ministerial Conference and General Council shall be taken by a majority of the votes cast, unless otherwise provided in this agreement or in a relevant Multilateral Trade Agreement.” Decision-Making in the WTO 71 Practical implications (1) Decision making by Consensus: Members must frst try and take ANY/EVERY decision by consensus (in re the MC and the GC). Implication: Decision making by consensus efectively gives all members veto power. QUERY: Is this GOOD OR BAD? Decision-Making in the WTO Evaluation of decision making by Consensus Prima facie, decision making by consensus is highly democratic and legitimate in that only matters that are unopposed get approved. QUERY: But is it efective /realistic/ plausible? Decision-Making in the WTO (2) Decision-making by majority voting If consensus fails, the relevant decision should be taken (by majority voting) on the basis of one country one vote. Problem/reality Even in the face of deadlock, it is exceptional for WTO bodies to vote. Decision-Making in the WTO Problem/reality - continued Consensus negotiation procedures give weight to the views of countries that have power in the global trading system. HOW? See discussion of ‘green room meetings’ below Decision-Making in the WTO Problem/reality (cont’d) In 2001, the then DG of the WTO stated that: “the consensus principle which is at the heart of the WTO system – and which is a fundamental democratic guarantee – is not negotiable.” WHY? AGREE OR DISAGREE? Decision-Making in the WTO (3) Special (decision-making) Procedures (a) Decision making by the DSB General rule: Decisions are made by consensus (normal consensus OR reverse/negative consensus) (Article IX of the WTO Charter read together with Article 2.4 of the DSU) Decision-Making in the WTO Decision making by the DSB (cont’d) Certain decisions (of the DSB), such as the appointment of members of the Appellate Body (AB) are taken by normal consensus; Other decisions, such as the appointment of a panel or adoption of dispute settlement reports are taken by reverse/negative consensus. Decision-Making in the WTO Queries in re decision making by the DSB What are the diferences between ‘normal consensus’ and ‘negative/reverse consensus’? What are the practical implications of ‘negative/reverse consensus’ – in terms of its impact on the efectiveness of the DSB as a dispute settlement structure of the WTO? Decision-Making in the WTO (b) Interpretations (Art IX:2) The MC and GC can adopt interpretations of provisions of the WTO Charter and of the Multilateral Trade Agreements. The decision shall be by 3/4 (75%) majority of members Decision-Making in the WTO Accessions (Article XII:2) Decisions taken by MC/GC require 2/3 (66 2/3%) majority of WTO members. QUERY: Why does the WTO Charter provide for such a low threshold for accession-related decisions? Decision-Making in the WTO 81 Waivers (Art. IX:3) A (WTO) member unable to meet any of its obligations may request for a waiver. If not taken by consensus, then a 3/4 majority is required. QUERY: Why provide for a higher threshold/ level of support for decisions on waivers? Decision-Making in the WTO Amendments Decision-making on amendments to any of the WTO Marakech/Uruguay Round Agreements involves a 3-stage procedure set out in Art. X: 1: (a) specialised councils initiate proposal for amendment and submit it to the MC or GC Decision-Making in the WTO Amendments – cont’d b) Within 90 days MC/GC tries to reach consensus. If it fails then voting - 2/3 majority of the members is required c) the proposal is then submitted to members for acceptance in accordance with their national Constitutional requirements Decision-Making in the WTO 84 Amendments – cont’d Amendments are only efective as against members who have accepted it. QUERY Consequence of non-acceptance Members who oppose may be asked to withdraw or be granted a waiver. Decision-Making in the WTO So why all the fuss about democracy and transparency in the WTO? The ‘Green Room’ meetings This is the most controversial of WTO practices aimed at facilitating the achievement of consensus amongst members. Decision-Making in the WTO Methodology of the ‘green room’ meetings An inner circle of countries (8-34) serve as the basic discussion/negotiating group; Results (of those discussions/ negotiations) are then shared with a larger group or with all the other members – usually with a recommendation. Decision-Making in the WTO Justifcation for the ‘green room’ meetings “The Green Room or inner circle model is the organisation’s ee facto way of dealing with the fact that … once the active participation in a group/committee exceeds a certain number (say 25 or 30), discussion, debate and negotiation become increasingly cumbersome, inefcient, and ultimately impossible.” QUERY: MEANING WHAT? Blackhurst & Hartridge, “Improving the capacity of WTO Institutions to fulfll their mandate” in Petersmann, Reforming the Worle Traee System (2005) Decision-Making in the WTO Queries In light of the justifcation for the ‘Green Room’ practice, is there a way to increase the democratic and transparency credentials of the WTO decision making process? Given the sharp diferentials in the extent of interest in global trade and levels of development, is it plausible to expect equality of power and infuence amongst members of the WTO?