Uploaded by Andrei Montalban

156-Project-Beconado

advertisement
CE 156 2nd Semester AY 2016 – 2017
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE:
School Building located in
Quezon City
Submitted by:
Eartha B. Becoñado
2011 – 45392
Submitted to:
Dr. Oscar Victor M. Antonio, Jr.
Date Submitted:
15 May 2017
I.
Design Criteria and Load Calculations
Structure
The structure is a school building that has a total of 8 support reactions where 4 of which are
fixed support and the other 4 are pin supports. There is a roof deck in the middle and designed
to carry live loads as an assembly area. There is an assumed 5 inch thick concrete floor slab. The
building is located in the vicinity of Quezon City on an adobe foundation with wide flanges of
beams and columns and double-angle bars for the truss members.
Figure 1. Structure Configuration
Where,
W1 = 8.71 kN/m2 applied to the 2nd floor of the building
L = 7.13 meters
B = 5.23 meters
L/6 = 1.19 meters
H1 = H2 = 3.0 meters
H3 = 1.0 meter
Figure 2. Geomtery of the Structure in STAAD
Figure 3. Truss Details
Figure 4. Purlins Details
Load Calculations
DEAD LOADS
Minimum Densities for Design Loads for Materials from Table 204-1
Minimum Design Dead Loads from Table 204-2
Dead Loads for Ceiling
Component
Ceiling
Mechanical Duct Allowance
Suspended Steel Channel System
Suspended Metal Lath and Gypsum Plaster
Total
Loads (kPa)
0.20
0.10
0.48
0.78
Dead Loads for Roof and Wall Coverings
Component
Coverings, Roof and Wall
Three-ply ready roofing
Deck, Metal 18 gage
Fiber board, 13mm
Water proofing membranes: Bituminous,
smooth surface
Total
Loads (kPa)
0.05
0.14
0.04
0.07
0.30
Dead Loads for Floors
Component
Floor
Lightweight Concrete Floor Fill (5 in):
0.015kPa per mm
Concrete Fill Finish (30 mm)
0.023kPa per mm
Total
Loads (kPa)
1.905
0.690
2.595
Dead Loads for Concrete
Component
Concrete Masonry Units
Lightweight Masonry Units: 16.5kN/m3
Wythe Thickness: 200 mm
Grout Spacing: Full
Plastered (2 faces) : 0.24 per face
Total
Loads (kPa)
3.59
0.48
4.07
Dead Loads for Roof Trusses
Component
Roof Trusses
2L8x8x5/8
Nominal Weight (kN/m)
0.9548
Dead Loads for Purlins
Component
Purlins
2L8x8x1/2
Nominal Weight (kN/m)
0.7709
Dead Loads for Beams
Component
Beams
W14x48
Nominal Weight (kN/m)
0.7008
Dead Loads for Columns
Component
Columns
W14x48
Nominal Weight (kN/m)
0.7008
LIVE LOADS
Floor Live Loads
Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Live Loads from Table 205-1
Floor Live Load
Classroom uniform live load
Assembly
W1
Loads (kPa)
1.9
4.8
8.71
Roof Live Loads
Minimum Roof Live Loads from Table 205-3
2.62 m
5.23 m
5.23 m
2.62 m
7.13 m
Roof Truss
Tributary Area (m2)
Uniform Load (kPa)
A
B
C
D
18.68
37.29
37.29
18.68
1.00
0.75
0.75
1.00
Distributed Load
(kN/m)
2.62
3.92
3.92
2.62
Symbol
V
Value
250 kph
NSCP 2015
Fig 207A.5-1A
Kd
0.85
Table 207A.6-1
I
1.00
Table 208-1
Kh, Kz
0.65
Section 207A.7
Kzt
1.00
Section 207A.8.2
G
See Reference
Section 207A.9
GCpi
+0.18, -0..18
Table 207A.111
Cp
See Reference
Figure 207B.4-1
WIND LOADS
Location: Quezon City
Parameter
Basic Wind Speed
Wind Directionality
Factor (for MWFRS)
Importance Factor
(Occupancy Category:
I Standard Category)
Velocity Pressure
Exposure Coefficients
(Exposure Category: B,
7m )
Topographic Effects
Gust Effect Factor (for
Rigid Buildings)
Internal Pressure and
Force Coefficients (for
Enclosed Buildings)
External Pressure and
Force Coefficients
Provided parameters may be used to compute for the velocity pressure qz,
π‘žπ‘§ = 0.613 × 0.65 × 1.0 × 0.85 × 69.442 π‘š/𝑠
π‘žπ‘§ = 1633.1
Roof
Angle
5
20
11.9
GCpi
0.18
-0.18
GCpi
0.18
-0.18
1
0.40
0.53
0.46
GCpf- GCpi
0.28
0.64
0.46
1.04
𝑁
π‘˜π‘
π‘œπ‘Ÿ 1.63 2
2
π‘š
π‘š
External Pressure Coefficients, GCpf
Building Surface
2
3
4
1E
2E
-0.69 -0.37 -0.29
0.61 -1.07
-0.69 -0.48 -0.43
0.80 -1.07
-0.69 -0.42 -0.35
0.70 -1.07
3E
-0.53
-0.69
-0.60
4E
-0.43
-0.64
-0.53
-0.87
-0.51
-1.25
-0.89
-0.78
-0.42
-0.71
-0.35
-2.04
-1.45
-1.27
-0.68
-1.16
-0.57
-1.42
-0.83
-0.60 -0.53
0.52
-0.24 -0.17
0.88
P = qz [GCpf- GCpi]
-0.98 -0.86
0.85
-0.39 -0.28
1.43
kN/m2
1.43
-2.04
-1.27
-1.16
-0.82
-0.82
Surface
1/1E
2/2E
3/3E
4/4E
5
6
EARTHQUAKE LOADS
Parameter
Seismic Importance Factor, I
Soil Profile Type: Adobe
Seismic Zone Factor, Z
Seismic Source Type
Near Source Factor, Na
Near Source Factor, Nv
Seismic Coefficient, Ca
Seismic Coefficient, Cv
Structure Period, T
Numerical Coefficient, R
Value
1.50
SA
0.4
A
1.5
2
0.48
0.64
0.327
8.0
NSCP 2015
Table 208-1
Section 208.4.3.1.1.2.4
Table 208-3
Table 208-4
Table 208-5
Table 208-6
Table 208-7
Table 208-8
Equation 208-12
Table 208-11A
Total Dead Load = 2378.53 kN
DESIGN BASE SHEAR
0.11πΆπ‘Ž πΌπ‘Š = 0.11 × 0.48 × 1.50 × 2378.53 π‘˜π‘ = 188.4 π‘˜π‘
0.8 𝑍 𝑁𝑣 𝐼
π‘Š = 285.4 π‘˜π‘
𝑅
𝑉=
𝐢𝑣 𝐼
π‘Š = 872.9 π‘˜π‘
𝑅𝑇
2.5πΆπ‘Ž 𝐼
π‘Š = 535.2 π‘˜π‘
𝑅
Design Base Shear = πŸ“πŸ‘πŸ“. 𝟐 π’Œπ‘΅
Level
1
2
3
II.
V
535.2
Wi
459.96
1303.404
615.16
hi
7
6
3
wh
3219.72
7820.42
1845.48
V-Ft
412.7
412.7
412.7
Ev
103.12
250.48
59.11
Total
515.82
663.18
471.81
STAAD Analysis Results
Node
1
13
13
16
19
13
13
13
22
13
22
1
Fx kN
65.119
-66.574
-66.574
13.241
-0.885
-66.574
-66.574
9.349
7.291
9.349
-53.813
65.119
Fy kN
239.659
718.718
718.718
-25.077
621.069
718.718
718.718
-0.439
-13.511
-0.439
159.214
239.659
Fz kN
2.075
-48.98
-48.98
0.06
39.618
-48.98
-48.98
-6.524
-0.762
-6.524
5.217
2.075
Mx kNm
4.251
15.147
15.147
0
0
15.147
15.147
-11.794
-1.167
-11.794
9.813
4.251
My kNm
-0.007
-0.005
-0.005
0
0
-0.005
-0.005
-0.092
0.015
-0.092
-0.001
-0.007
Mz kNm
-66.4
17.683
17.683
0
0
17.683
17.683
-29.38
-14.566
-29.38
57.391
-66.4
Component
Beams and Columns
Trusses
Purlins
III.
Initial Section
Optimized Section
W14x48
Fail
W24x117
2L8x8x5/8
Fail
2L8x8x5/8
2L8x8x1/2
Pass
L7x4x1/2
Largest Optimized Section was Chosen
Pass
Pass
Pass
AISC Manual Design and STAAD Design Results and Comparison
Manual Calculation Results
The following are the manual calculations for getting the sections for the structure
and the results. Data were taken from the post processing tab in STAAD. Critical
parts/sections were chosen.
BEAMS
Forces
Load
Combination
Beam No.
Max +Fx
2
Max -Fx
2
1.2D +
1.6W + 0.5 Lr +
0.5L
1.2D +
1.6W + 0.5 Lr +
0.5L
kN
Kips
715.108
103.72
-93.532
-13.55
Considering tension:
Where
πœ‘π‘‡π‘› = πœ‘πΉπ‘¦ 𝐴𝑔 ≥ 𝑇𝑒
Substituting the values to equation,
𝑇𝑒 = 103.72 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ 
πœ‘ = 0.9
𝐹𝑦 = 50π‘˜π‘ π‘–
𝐴𝑔 = 2.3 𝑖𝑛2
Using AISC Table 1-15, the section based on the required Ag,
2L3 1/2 x 2 ½ x 1/4 with an π‘¨π’ˆ = 𝟐. πŸ— π’Šπ’πŸ
Considering compression given the data:
𝑃𝑒 = −13.55 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ 
𝐹𝑦 = 50π‘˜π‘ π‘–
𝐸 = 29000π‘˜π‘ π‘–
π‘˜πΏ
= 60
π‘Ÿ
Use equation from AISC,
𝐸
π‘˜πΏ
4.71√
= 113.43 >
𝐹𝑦
π‘Ÿ
Use
𝐹𝑦
πΉπ‘π‘Ÿ = 𝐹𝑦 [0.658𝐹𝑒 ]
πΉπ‘π‘Ÿ
= 21.78
Using Equation,
πœ‘π‘ƒπ‘› = πœ‘πΉπ‘π‘Ÿ 𝐴𝑔 ≥ 𝑃𝑒
𝐴𝑔 = 0.69 𝑖𝑛2
2L2 x 2 x 1/8 with an
π‘¨π’ˆ = 𝟏. πŸπŸ‘ π’Šπ’πŸ
PURLINS
Forces
Purlin No.
Max +Fx
38
Max -Fx
38
Load
Combination
1.2D +
1.6W + 0.5 Lr +
0.5L
1.2D +
1.6W + 0.5 Lr +
0.5L
Considering tension:
Where
πœ‘π‘‡π‘› = πœ‘πΉπ‘¦ 𝐴𝑔 ≥ 𝑇𝑒
Substituting the values to equation,
𝑇𝑒 = 0.24 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ 
πœ‘ = 0.9
𝐹𝑦 = 50π‘˜π‘ π‘–
kN
Kips
1.675
0.24
-1.542
-0.22
𝐴𝑔 = 0.005333 𝑖𝑛2
Using AISC Table 1-15, the section based on the required Ag,
2L2 x 2 x 1/8 with an
π‘¨π’ˆ = 𝟏. πŸπŸ‘ π’Šπ’πŸ
Considering compression given the data:
𝑃𝑒 = −0.22 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ 
𝐹𝑦 = 50π‘˜π‘ π‘–
𝐸 = 29000π‘˜π‘ π‘–
π‘˜πΏ
= 60
π‘Ÿ
Use equation from AISC,
𝐸
π‘˜πΏ
4.71√
= 113.43 >
𝐹𝑦
π‘Ÿ
Use
𝐹𝑦
πΉπ‘π‘Ÿ = 𝐹𝑦 [0.658𝐹𝑒 ]
πΉπ‘π‘Ÿ
= 21.78
Using Equation,
πœ‘π‘ƒπ‘› = πœ‘πΉπ‘π‘Ÿ 𝐴𝑔 ≥ 𝑃𝑒
𝐴𝑔 = 0.0112 𝑖𝑛2
2L2 x 2 x 1/8 with an
π‘¨π’ˆ = 𝟏. πŸπŸ‘ π’Šπ’πŸ
COLUMNS
Forces
Max +Fx
Column No.
Load
Combination
kN-m
Kips-ft
87
1.2D +
1.6W + 0.5 Lr +
0.5L
225.103
166.027
πœ‘π‘€π‘› = πœ‘πΉπ‘¦ 𝑍π‘₯ ≥ 𝑀𝑒
𝑍π‘₯ = 3.69 𝑖𝑛2
Using Table 3-2 of AISC, the section satisfying Z
Use W8x10
With Zx=8.9 but shape exceeds compact limit so use
Use W8x13 with Zx = 1.14
IV.
Connection Design and Detailing
TRUSS CONNECTIONS
Section
Connection
Base Metal
Thickness
Type of Weld
Filler Metal (AISC J-6)
Minimum Size of Weld (Table J2.4)
Factored Load, T
Section
Ag
An
U
Ae
2L2 ½ x2 ½ x3/8 LLBB
Welds
A992
3/8”
Fillet Weld
70 ksi
1/8”
103.72 kips
2L2 ½ x 2 ½ x 3/8 LLBB
3.47 in2
3.47 in2
0.9
3.123 in2
Strength of Base Metal
Yielding
πœ‘π‘‡π‘› = πœ‘πΉπ‘¦ 𝐴𝑔 = 0.9 π‘₯ 50 π‘₯ 3.47 = 156.15 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ 
Rupture
πœ‘π‘‡π‘› = πœ‘πΉπ‘’ 𝐴𝑒 = 0.75 π‘₯ 65 π‘₯ 3.123 = 152.25 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ 
Strength of Weld per Unit Width
πœ‘π‘…π‘›π‘€ = πœ‘π‘‘π‘’ 𝐹𝑀 = 0.75 π‘₯ 0.707 𝑀 π‘₯ 0.66𝐹𝐸π‘₯π‘₯ = 2.78 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ /𝑖𝑛
Solving for Length of Weld
2
∑ 𝑀: 0 = 𝐹2 (2) + 𝐹2 − 152.25 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘  ∗ 0.758
2
= 2.784 𝐿1 (2) + 2.784 (2) − 152.25 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘  ∗ 0.758
π‘³πŸ = πŸπŸ—. πŸ•πŸ‘ π’Šπ’ ≈ 𝟐𝟎 π’Šπ’π’„π’‰π’†π’”
π‘³πŸ‘ = πŸ‘πŸ‘. 𝟎𝟐 π’Šπ’ ≈ πŸ‘πŸ‘ π’Šπ’π’„π’‰π’†π’”
Checking for U,
𝑙=
𝑙1 + 𝑙3
= 26.5 𝑖𝑛
2
π‘ˆ= 1−
π‘₯
= 0.99
𝐿
Using U,
πœ‘π‘‡π‘› = πœ‘πΉπ‘’ 𝐴𝑒 = 0.75 π‘₯ 65 π‘₯ 0.99 π‘₯ 3.47 = 167.7 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ 
Yielding governs.
Solving for the length of weld usingπœ‘π‘‡π‘› = 156.15 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ ,
∑ 𝑀 = 0 = 2.784 𝐿1 (2) + 2.784 (2) − 156.15 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘  ∗ 0.758
π‘³πŸ = 𝟐𝟎. πŸ”πŸ“ π’Šπ’ ≈ 𝟐𝟏 π’Šπ’π’„π’‰π’†π’”
π‘³πŸ‘ = πŸ‘πŸ‘. πŸ–πŸ‘ π’Šπ’ ≈ πŸ‘πŸ’ π’Šπ’π’„π’‰π’†π’”
BEAMS AND COLUMNS CONNECTIONS
Connection
Bolt (J3.2 High strength)
Diameter of bolt
Nominal Tensile Stress, Fnt
Fnv
Minimum bolt pretension (Table J3.1)
U (Clean Mill Scale Class A)
Du
Hsc
Ns
Slip-critical
A490
7/8 in
113 ksi
75 ksi
49 kips
0.35
1.13
1.0
1.0
𝑇𝑒 = 103.72 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘ 
πœ‘π‘…π‘›π‘€ = πœ‘π‘’π·π‘’ β„Žπ‘ π‘ 𝑁𝑠 𝑇𝑏
πœ‘π‘…π‘›π‘€ = (1)(0.35)(1.13)(1)(1)(49) = 19.38
πœ‘π‘‡π‘› ≥ 𝑇𝑒 = 103.72 π‘˜π‘–π‘π‘  = π‘π‘π‘œπ‘™π‘‘π‘  × πœ‘π‘…π‘›π‘€
𝐍𝐛𝐨π₯𝐭𝐬 = πŸ“. πŸ—πŸ“ ≈ πŸ” 𝐛𝐨π₯𝐭𝐬
Detailed Plan of connection for beams and columns
References:
1. American Institute of Steel Construction Manual, 14th Edition
2. Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (2010). National Structural Code of the
Philippines 2010 (6th ed.). Quezon City, Philippines: Association of Structural Engineers of the
Philippines
3. Salmon, C.G., Johnson, J.E. and Malhas, F.A. (2009) Steel Structures Design and
Prentice Hall, 5th edition.
Behavior,
Download