Uploaded by pearlfrancis82

mgt 406 assignment 1

advertisement
Pearl Kurian
G00087359
In Carol J’s article she talks about the downfall of some major players in the corporate world such as;
Sears, GM, Xerox, and IBM. She explains the main reasons behind their undoing. These once-mighty
corporations, leaders in their respective industries of retail, automobiles, and technology, were facing
substantial losses and challenges that led them to be labeled as "dinosaurs" in the business world. What
she focuses on is how even these huge corporations struggle to cope with the shifting market and
technological advances, and underestimating their competition. Leadership transitions proved to be a
stumbling block, and opportunities slipped through their fingers, all while grappling with financial baggage.
However, this article isn't just about the fall the company took; instead it's a roadmap for businesses to
steer clear of the same mistake by embracing change, sparking innovation, keeping your customers front
and center, navigating leadership changes astutely, simplifying decision-making, and managing your
finances.
Main reasons why these corporations failed:
Lack of Flexibility: These companies failed to adapt to changing market dynamics, technological
advancements, and evolving consumer trends. This left them susceptible to new competitors and
disruptive innovations that they failed to foresee. For instance, Sears and GM couldn't foresee the rise of
discount retailers and the demand for fuel-efficient cars.
Failure to Acknowledge Change or Competition: These industry leaders often dismissed or
underestimate emerging competition and shifts in their respective sectors. Their dependance on their past
achievements and reputation resulted in a slow response to evolving markets. An example of this is when
GM underestimated Japanese automakers and IBM failed to capitalize on emerging technologies like
RISC.
Leadership: The higher management of these companies lacked strategic foresight, that caused a loss
of direction and an inability to navigate through transformative periods effectively. For example, IBM
struggled with leadership transitions after the Watsons, and GM faced challenges with leadership
changes in the 1980s.
Missed Opportunities: Sears overlooked the rise of discount retailers trend, GM miscalculated the
potential of Japanese automakers and the demand for fuel-efficient cars, and IBM failed to capitalize on
emerging technologies like RISC, which allowed Microsoft and Intel to take the lead in software and
microprocessors.
What might have been done by the people that managed these companies to stave off their
demise?
To avoid a similar fates, management of these corporations could have pursued strategies like embracing
change, nurturing innovation, staying customer-focused, managing leadership transitions, optimizing
decision-making, guarding against complacency, and efficiently managing costs. The article draws from
history to illustrate these concepts. It discusses the decline of Sears due to its failure to adapt to discount
retailers, GM's struggles with embracing fuel-efficient cars and efficient manufacturing, and IBM's missed
opportunities in the technology sector. The article also highlights how cultural rigidity affected these
companies, stifling innovation and timely responses to changes in the market. The cautionary tales of
Sears, GM, Xerox, and IBM serve as valuable reminders for businesses aiming for enduring success
amid an ever-evolving business landscape. The author emphasizes the importance of learning from their
mistakes and being prepared to adapt swiftly to changing circumstances.
Download