Uploaded by Sasha Pernatov

COMMUNICATIVE ACTIVITIES

advertisement
COMMUNICATIVE ACTIVITIES
Task 1.
Fill in the grid with terms opposite in meaning to the given ones. Work in pairs.
Accuracy activities
Practice activities
Pre-communicative activities
Controlled/guided activities
Closed activities
Non-communicatively oriented
activities
Task 2.
Discuss the diagram below with your colleagues in small groups. Present your
understanding of it to the whole class.
Non-communicatively
oriented activities
Communicative drills
Pre-communicative activities
!
Vivid communicatively
oriented activities
Communicative activities
Task 3.
Use the descriptions of the pre-communicative and communicative activities and
your own experience to complete the chart. Discuss the chart in small groups.
Present your findings to the group-mates.
Pre-communicative activity - is an activity in which the learner is a)to produce
correct language forms in an acceptable way or b)to produce correct language
for specific communicative purpose (e.g. through open or cued dialogues).
Communicative activity – is an activity in which the learner is to use the
language s/he has at her/his command, in order to communicate specific
meanings for specific purposes.
Non
communicative
activity
A
The purpose of the To prepare
Communicative
drill
B
Communicative
activity
C
To enable learners
activity is
learners for later
communication
The focus is
More on language
to communicate
intelligibly
The learners’
purpose is
Criterion of the
assessment
Whether learners
convey meaning in
accordance with a
communicative
task
Task 4.
What characterizes a communicative activity? The chart below will help you to
answer the question.
Gap
Info gap
is created by the activities when
the learners are forced to
exchange info in order to find
a solution.
Opinion gap
is created by the activity
is created by the activity
which requires the learners which lets the learners
to describe and perhaps
share their feelings about
defend their views on
an experience they have
controversial texts or ideas
Examples:
-Guessing games
-Jigsaw tasks
-Problem-solving
activities
Examples:
- Ranking exercises
- Values clarification
- Thinking strategies
in common
Examples:
Discussion games
Task 5.
You will participate in three activities. Refer them to one of the two groups:
1. Info gap
2. Opinion gap.
ACTIVITY 1. Moral dilemma.
You are a group of invigilators at an exit school exam. You see a student cheating
with notes she has illegally brought into the exam room. You have four possible
courses of action:
 ignore the incident
 warn the student that if she cheats again she will be reported to the
authorities
 ask the student to leave the exam, tear up her exam paper and mark her as
absent
 report the student to the authorities, in which case she will have to leave
the school
Reach a consensus on this issue.
ACTIVITY 2. Story reconstruction: The hospital case.
Students are given different parts of a picture story. They have to reconstruct the
whole narrative even though individually they have seen only a small part of it.
This is done because each member of the group has seen a different picture; by
talking about their pictures together the narrative emerges.
Here is a procedure for the technique.
Stage 1. The class is divided into 4 large groups: A,B,C,D.
Stage 2. Each group is given one of the following pictures and told to study it.
Stage 3. After a couple of minutes the teacher takes the pictures back from the
groups.
Stage 4. The teacher makes new groups with one student from each of the original
groups.
Stage 5. The students in the new groups have to try and reconstruct the story by
discussing what
what they saw on each of their pictures.
Stage 6. The teacher then gets the different groups to tell their stories. There will
be more than
one version of the story. The teacher then shows the students all the
pictures.
From: Hammer J. The Practice of ELT. Longman
ACTIVITY 3.Write your answers to Peter’s questions.
Peter: Hello! How are you?
You:______________________________________________________________
______
Peter: I was at the seaside last week. What did you do on your last holiday?
You:______________________________________________________________
______
Peter: That sounds interesting. Did you enjoy it?
You:______________________________________________________________
______
Peter: Next holiday I want to go to the mountains. Are there mountains near you?
You:______________________________________________________________
______
Peter: There are some mountains near my home. They are in Scotland. They have a
lot of snow in the winter. Do you have snow?
You:______________________________________________________________
______
Peter: I must tell you something. My brother got a new car yesterday. It is
fantastic!
What’s new in your life?
You:
__________________________________________________________________
_
Peter: Oh, yes? That’s interesting! Tell me more about it.
You_______________________________________________________________
_____
Peter: Listen, I have to go. I can talk to you later. Bye!
From: Littlejohn A. & Hicks D. (1996) Cambridge English for Schools. CUP.
Task 6.
Look at the list of characteristics below. And decide which of them apply to
communicative activities. Put a tick.












a desire to communicate
materials control
teacher intervention
a communicative purpose
a variety of language
form not content
no communicative desire
no materials control
no teacher intervention
one language item only
content not form
no communicative purpose
Task 7.
You are going to analyze a lesson outline from the course book ‘Hotline’ by T.
Hatchinson
Read about the criteria for evaluating communicative activities in H/O 1
Now draw a table like the one below. Put a tick if you think the activities of the
lesson meet the criteria. Put a cross if you think they do not. In some cases you
may not be sure, so put a question mark.
Criteria
1.
2.
3.
Activities
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
Communicative purpose
2.
Communicative desire
3.
Content not form
4.
Variety of language
5.
No teacher intervention
6.
No materials control
When you have finished filling in the table, rank the seven teaching activities
according to how communicative you think each activity is .
Most communicative
Least communicative
SUMMING UP
H/O 1
Criteria for evaluating how communicative classroom activities are:
1. Communicative purpose: The activity must involve the students in performing a real
communicative purpose rather than just practising language for its own sake. In order for
this to occur there must be some kind of ‘gap’ (information or opinion) which the
students seek to bridge when they are communicating.
2. Communicative desire: the activity must create a desire to communicate in the students.
That is, even though speaking is forced on the students, they must feel a real need to
communicate.
3. Content not form: When the students are doing the activity, they must be concentrating
on What they are saying not How they say it. They must have some ‘message’ that they
want to communicate.
4. Variety of language: The activity must involve the students in using a variety of
language, not just one specific language form. The students should feel free to improvise,
using whatever resources they choose.
5. No teacher intervention: The activity must be designed to be done by the students
working by themselves rather than with the teacher. The activity should not involve the
teacher correcting or evaluating how the students do the activity, although it could
involve some evaluation of the final ‘product’ of the activity when the activity is over.
This assessment should be based on whether the students have achieved their
communicative purpose, not whether the language they used was correct.
6. No materials control: The activity should not be designed to control what language the
students should use. The choice about what language to use should rest with the students.
Home assignment
You are going to read an abridged chapter devoted to different approaches
to language teaching from the book Making It Happen. Interaction in the
Second Language Classroom. by Patricia A. Richard-Amato. Nine sentences have
been removed from this article. choose from the sentences A-J the one which fits
each gap(1-9). There is one extra sentence which you do not need to use.
From Grammatical to Communicative Approaches
1. Until recently many teachers have felt that language teaching is facilitated
by focusing on grammar as content and by exposing the student to input in the
target language that concentrates on one aspect of the grammar system at a time present tense before past, comparative before superlative, first person singular
before first person singular, and so forth. The approaches used have included
grammar-translation,
method. G.
audiolingualism, cognitive approaches,
and the direct
Many variations exist, however that are not noted in this brief
analysis.
2. Grammar-translation was the most popular method of foreign language
teaching in Europe and America in the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth
century. Versions of it still exist today in many countries around the world. Its
goal was to produce students who could read and write in the target language by
teaching them rules and applications. A typical grammar-translation lesson began
with a reading (to be translated into the first language) followed by the rule it
illustrated. New words were presented in a list along with definitions in the first
language. The topics may have involved a trip to the library, a shopping
expedition, a brief historical sketch of an area, or the like.______. Little attempt
was made to communicate orally in the target language.
Directions and
explanations were always given in the first language.
3. Audiolingualism was the new "scientific" oral method that was developed
to replace or enhance grammar-translation. It was introduced as a component of the
"Army-Method" used during World War II. It was recognized as the "audiolingual
method" when it began to gain favor in teaching English as a foreign language in
the 1950s. Through the use of this method, structures of the target language were
carefully ordered and dialogues were repeated in an attempt to develop correct
speaking. Sentences in the substitution, mim-mem (mimic and memorize), and
other drills were often related only syntactically ("I go to the store", "You go to the
store", "He goes to the store"), and they usually had nothing to do with anything
actually
happening.
Rules
were
presented
but
often
not
formally
explained._______. However, in most of the applications, there was very little use
of creative language, and a great deal of attention was paid to correct
pronunciation.
4. Cognitive approaches, most evident since the 1960s, are often referred to
rather vaguely in the literature as "cognitive-code" methodology. Those claiming
to advocate a cognitive approach believed, for the most part, that sub-skills in
listening, speaking, reading, and writing such as sound discrimination,
pronunciation of specific elements, forming capital and small letters and so on
needed to be mastered before the student could participate in real communicative
activities._______. Lessons were usually highly structured through a deductive
process and "the rule of the day" was practiced. Although creative language was at
higher levels during the practice, students generally had to produce correctly right
from the first.
5. The Direct Method was derived from as earlier version called the "Natural
Method", which was developed in the mid-nineteenth century. It was natural in the
sense that it made an effort to "immerse" students in the target language. Teacher
monologues, formal questions and answers, and direct repetitions in the input
were frequent. The method fell short
in being optimal in that the topic for
discussion was often the grammar itself. The students tried inductively to discover
the rules of the language ________. However, most students needed something
more relevant to keep their interests.
6. Although these methods varied from one another, they all generally
adhered to the same principle: grammar is the foundation upon which language
should be taught. Second language teachers who agreed with cognitive approaches
believed that comprehensible input involved teaching sentences that were neither
temporally sequenced nor logically motivated.________.
7. It was N. Chomsky whose basic linguistic model distinguished two
aspects of language competence (the underlying knowledge of the grammatical
system) and performance (the use of that knowledge to communicate). He also
proposed the notion of a "language organ" which he calls the Language
Acquisition Device.______. The findings of psycholinguists proved that human
mind is more than just a blank state but contains highly complex structures which
come into operation through an interactional process. So, patterned drill, with its
endless, often mindless repetition, and memorization of non-realistic dialog might
be replaced by a more natural kind of activity. The target language should be
allowed to grow and develop within the learner during and by means of interaction.
8. In the 1970s most researches of second language teaching agreed with
competence/performance distinction.________. D. Wilkins
was particularly
concerned with helping the student meet specific communication needs through
the input. such input for the student would be organized into a set of notional
categories: semantic-grammatical categories (time, quantity, space, case) and
categories of communicative function (modality, argument, personal emotions,
emotional relations, interpersonal relations0. Syllabi based on a notional approach
often include such topics
as accepting/rejecting invitations, requesting
information, and expressing needs or emotions of various kinds.
9. Still, H. G. Widdowson warns us that although some linguists might boast
of ensuring communicative competence through the use of a notional syllabus,
such an approach does not necessarily mean such competence will be the result.
He emphasizes language "use" (communication) as opposed to "usage"(analysis of
language). Activities based on a notional approach do not always involve real
communication situation than repetitive dialogs or "structures for the day" did.
What kind of activities then would be meaningful and comprehensible? It is
not so much the organizational principles that make the communicative approach
effective. Nor is it the content itself.________. In communicative methodology,
content ceases
to become some external control over learning-teaching
procedures. choosing directions
becomes a part of the curriculum itself, and
involves negotiation between learner and learners, learners and teachers, and
learners and text.
A
He opposed the idea that the mind is simply a tabula rasa.
B
Generally speaking, it was felt that phonemes needed to be learned
Generally speaking, it was felt that phonemes needed to be learned before
words, words before phrases and sentences, simple sentences before more
complicated ones, and so on.
C
In addition, their ideas have been influential in the development of
approaches that involve students in meaningful experiences in the new
language.
D
Lessons were grammatically sequenced and students were expected to
produce errorless translations from the beginning.
E
For example, even grammar may be considered a stimulating topic for
communication by some students and their teachers.
F
Those interested in grammar as a topic of conversation may have found
such lessons stimulating.
G
The most characteristic features of these approaches are presented below.
H
Rather their main reason for existence seemed to be to demonstrate the use
of some grammatical structure or other in an effort to aid the development
of linguistic competence.
I
Listening and speaking skills took precedence over reading and writing
skills.
J
But they felt that competence should not only include grammatical sectors
but psycholinguistic, socio-cultural, and de facto sectors as well.
Download