The Plank Fitness Test The Plank Test, also known as the Prone Bridge Test, is a simple fitness test of core muscle strength, and can also be used as a fitness exercise for improving core strength. The aim of this test is to hold an elevated plank position for as long as possible. purpose: The plank test measures the control and endurance of the back/core stabilizing muscles. equipment required: flat and clean surface, stopwatch, recording sheets, pen. pre-test: Explain the test procedures to the subject. Perform screening of health risks and obtain informed consent. Prepare forms and record basic information such as age, height, body weight, gender and test conditions. Perform a standard warm-up. See more details of pre-test procedures. procedure: The aim of this test is to hold an elevated position for as long as possible. Start with the upper body supported off the ground by the elbows and forearms, and the legs straight with the weight taken by the toes. The hip is lifted off the floor creating a straight line from head to toe. As soon as the subject is in the correct position, the stopwatch is started. The head should be facing towards the ground and not looking forwards. The test is over when the subject is unable to hold the back straight and the hip is lowered. scoring: The score is the total time completed. The table below is just a rough guide to scores for both males and females created by Topend Sports. See the references below for more detailed norms. In 2020, 62-year-old former US Marine George Hood set the world planking record with a time of eight hours, 15 minutes and 15 seconds. Rating Time Excellent > 6 minutes Very Good 4-6 minutes above average 2-4 minutes Average 1-2 minutes below average 30-60 seconds poor 15-30 seconds very poor < 15 seconds advantages: this test is simple to perform, with minimal costs and can be selfadministered. disadvantages: the determination of when failure occurs is a subjective measurement. references: Strand, S. L., Hjelm, J., Shoepe, T. C., & Fajardo, M. A. (2014). Norms for an isometric muscle endurance test. Journal of human kinetics, 40, 93–102. Bohannon RW, Steffl M, Glenney SS, Green M, Cashwell L, Prajerova K, Bunn J. The prone bridge test: Performance, validity, and reliability among older and younger adults. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Apr;22(2):385-389. Step Test at Home Push-Up | Sit-Up | Squat | Step | Vertical Jump | Sit & Reach This simple test is designed to assess your cardiovascular endurance. Equipment A 12 inch high bench (or a similar sized stair or sturdy box), a watch for timing minutes. Procedure Step on and off the box for three minutes. Step up with one foot and then the other. Step down with one foot followed by the other foot. Try to maintain a steady four beat cycle. It's easy to maintain if you say "up, up, down, down". Go at a steady and consistent pace. This is a basic step test procedure - see also other step tests. Measurement At the end of three minutes, remain standing while you immediately check your heart rate. Take your pulse for one minute (e.g. count the total beats from 3 to 4 minutes after starting the test). Go here for more information about measuring your heart rate. How did you go? The lower your heart rate is after the test, the fitter you are. Compare your heart rate results to the table below. Remember, these scores are based on doing the tests as described, and may not be accurate if the test is modified at all. This home step test is based loosely on the Canadian Home Fitness Test and the results below are also based from data collected from performing this test. Don't worry too much about how you rate - just try and improve your own score. 3-Minute Step Test (Men) - Heart Rate Age 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 65+ Excellent <79 <81 <83 <87 <86 <88 Good 79-89 81-89 83-96 87-97 86-97 88-96 Above Average 90-99 90-99 97-103 98-105 98-103 97-103 Average 100-105 100-107 104-112 106-116 104-112 104-113 Below Average 106-116 108-117 113-119 117-122 113-120 114-120 Poor 117-128 118-128 120-130 123-132 121-129 121-130 Very Poor >128 >128 >130 >132 >129 >130 3-Minute Step Test (Women) - Heart Rate Age 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 65+ Excellent <85 <88 <90 <94 <95 <90 Good 85-98 88-99 90-102 94-104 95-104 90-102 Above Average 99-108 100-111 103-110 105-115 105-112 103-115 Average 109-117 112-119 111-118 116-120 113-118 116-122 Below Average 118-126 120-126 119-128 121-129 119-128 123-128 Poor 127-140 127-138 129-140 130-135 129-139 129-134 Very Poor >140 >138 >140 >135 >139 >134 Modified Sit and Reach Test This is a modified version of the traditional sit and reach test, designed to control for the variable lengths of people's arms and legs, which is a limitation of the standard test. In this test, the zero mark is adjusted for each individual, based on their sitting reach level. purpose: The sit and reach test is an important functional measure of hip region flexibility, including the lower back and hamstring muscles (the back of the legs). Generally, lack of flexibility in this region is associated with an increased risk of injury, and specifically is implicated in lumbar lordosis, forward pelvic tilt and lower back pain. equipment required: modified sit and reach box. You need one designed specifically for the modified test (or alternatively a makeshift ruler and box may be used). pre-test: Explain the test procedures to the subject. Perform screening of health risks and obtain informed consent. Prepare forms and record basic information such as age, height, body weight, gender, test conditions. Perform an appropriate warm-up. procedure: Remove your shoes, and sit on the floor with your back and head against a wall. You legs should be out straight ahead and knees flat against the floor. Have someone place the box flat against your feet. While keeping your back and head against the wall, stretch your arms out towards the box. Adjust the sliding ruler so that the zero mark is at your fingertips. Place your hands side by side, and lean forward slowly as far as possible (your head and shoulders can come away from the wall) keeping the fingertips level with each other and the legs flat. Do not jerk or bounce to reach further. Hold the full reach position for two seconds, and record you score. See also video demonstrations of the Sit and Reach Test. scoring: The score is recorded to the nearest centimeter or half inch as the distance reached. variations: See the general sit and reach procedure page for a list of other test variations. The variations mostly involve differences in the placement of the zero mark. validity: This tests only measures the flexibility of the lower back and hamstrings, and is a valid measure of this. reliability: The reliability will depend on the amount of warm-up allowed, and whether the same procedures are followed each time. Most norms are based on no previous warm-up, though the best results will be achieved after a warm up or if the test is proceeded by a test such as the endurance test. advantages: this modified sit and reach test accounts for variations in arm, leg and trunk length, a limitation of the traditional sit and reach test. disadvantages: This variation of the sit and reach test requires a measurement box specifically made for this test, which is not readily available. The norms for the sit and reach are usually for the traditional method, so it may be hard to find results to compare to. other comments: This test was developed by Acuflex, the makers of a sit and reach apparatus (Acuflex® I Modified Sit and Reach Tester), to overcome perceived limitations of the traditional sit and reach test. Sit and Reach Test Norms The sit and reach test is a common measure of flexibility, and specifically measures the flexibility of the lower back and hamstring muscles. The norm values below are for the standard version of the test in which both knees are held straight. The table below gives you a general guide for expected scores (in cm and inches) for adults, when performed without a warm-up. There are some variation is how the test is measured. In this example, the zero point is at the level of the feet (otherwise you can add 23cm or nine inches, depending on what protocol is used). men cm women inches cm inches super > +27 > +10.5 > +30 > +11.5 excellent +17 to +27 +6.5 to +10.5 +21 to +30 +8.0 to +11.5 good +6 to +16 +2.5 to +6.0 +11 to +20 +4.5 to +7.5 average 0 to +5 0 to +2.0 +1 to +10 +0.5 to +4.0 fair -8 to -1 -3.0 to -0.5 -7 to 0 -2.5 to 0 poor -20 to -9 -7.5 to -3.5 -15 to -8 -6.0 to -3.0 very poor < -20 < -7.5 < -15 < -6.0 Body Mass Index (BMI) BMI stands for Body Mass Index. It is a measure of body composition. The higher the figure the more overweight you are. Like any of these types of measures it is only a guide, and other issues such as body type and shape have a bearing as well. Remember, BMI is just a guide - it does not accurately apply to elderly populations, pregnant women or very muscular athletes such as weight lifters. Calculate your own BMI ! BMI is calculated by taking a person's weight and dividing by their height squared. The standard is to use metric units. For instance, if your height is 1.82 meters, the divisor of the calculation will be (1.82 * 1.82) = 3.3124. If your weight is 70.5 kilograms, then your BMI is 21.3 (70.5 / 3.3124). Using pounds and inches, BMI can be calculated by multiplying by a conversion factor of 703, so BMI = weight (lb) / [height (in)]2 x 703 It is easier if you use these calculators. If you are from the US and want to enter your height in feet and inches, and weight in pounds, use this calculator. For the rest of the world, there is a metric version for entering height in meters and weight in kilograms. Test Details equipment required: scales and stadiometer required for measuring weight and height. procedure: BMI is calculated from body mass (M) and height (H). BMI = M / (H x H), where M = body mass in kilograms and H = height in meters. The higher the score usually indicating higher levels of body fat. scoring: Generally, a BMI between 20 and 25 is considered normal weight for height, and outside these values is either underweight or overweight. The rating scale is the same for males and females. See the table of BMI Norms based on the World Health Organization BMI classification system. You can also use the reverse lookup BMI table for determining your ideal weight based on height. target population: BMI is often used as a general population measure to determine the level of health risk associated with obesity. advantages: only simple calculations are required from standard height and weight measurements. disadvantages: in certain populations BMI can be inaccurate as a measure of body fatness, for example large and muscular though lean athletes may score high BMI levels which incorrectly rates them as obese. other comments: Other simple measures of body composition, such as skinfolds measures, would be preferable if available. BMI Norms BMI stands for Body Mass Index. It is a measure of body composition, using a ratio of height and weight (see procedures and calculators). Once you have worked out you BMI score, use the table below to determine your BMI rating. The rating is the same for males and females. The table shows the World Health Organization BMI classification system. classification underweight BMI (kg/m2) < 18.50 sub-classification BMI (kg/m2) severe thinness < 16.00 moderate thinness 16.00 - 16.99 mild thinness 17.00 - 18.49 normal range 18.5 - 24.99 normal 18.5 - 24.99 overweight ≥ 25.00 pre-obese 25.00 - 29.99 Obese obese class I 30.00 - 34.99 obese class II 35.00 - 39.99 obese class II ≥ 40.00 (≥ 30.00) Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR) The waist to hip ratio is the ratio of waist circumference to the hip circumference, a simple calculation of the measurements of the waist girth divided by the hip girth. This test has been shown to be related to the risk of coronary heart disease. The basis of this measure as a coronary disease risk factor is the assumption is that fat stored around the waist poses a greater risk to health than fat stored elsewhere in the body. purpose: to determine the ratio of waist circumference to the hip circumference, as this has been shown to be related to the risk of coronary heart disease. equipment required: tape measure procedure: A simple calculation of the measurements of the waist girth divided by the hip girth. Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR) = Gw / Gh, where Gw = waist girth, Gh = hip girth. It does not matter which units of measurement you use, as long as it is the same for each measure. scoring: The table below gives general guidelines for acceptable levels for hip to waist ratio. Acceptable values are excellent and good. You can use any units for the measurements (e.g. cm or inches), as it is only the ratio that is important. male female extreme > 1.00 > 0.90 high 0.95 - 1.00 0.85 - 0.90 average 0.90 - 0.95 0.80 - 0.85 good 0.85 - 0.90 0.75 - 0.80 excellent < 0.85 < 0.75 target population: This measure is often used to determine the coronary artery disease risk factor associated with obesity. advantages: the WHR is a simple measure that can be taken at home by anyone to monitor their own body composition levels. Agility T-Test The T-Test is a simple running test of agility, involving forward, lateral, and backward movements, appropriate to a wide range of sports. purpose: the T-Test is a test of agility for athletes, and includes forward, lateral, and backwards running. equipment required: tape measure, marking cones, stopwatch, timing gates (optional) pre-test: Explain the test procedures to the subject. Perform screening of health risks and obtain informed consent. Prepare forms and record basic information such as age, height, body weight, gender, test conditions. Measure and mark out test area. Perform an appropriate warm-up. See more details of pre-test procedures. test setup: Set out four cones as illustrated in the diagram above (5 yards = 4.57 m, 10 yards = 9.14 m). procedure: The subject starts at cone A. On the command of the timer, the subject sprints to cone B and touches the base of the cone with their right hand. They then turn left and shuffle sideways to cone C, and also touches its base, this time with their left hand. Then shuffling sideways to the right to cone D and touching the base with the right hand. They then shuffle back to cone B touching with the left hand, and run backwards to cone A. The stopwatch is stopped as they pass cone A. scoring: The trial will not be counted if the subject crosses one foot in front of the other while shuffling, fails to touch the base of the cones, or fails to face forward throughout the test. Take the best time of three successful trials to the nearest 0.1 seconds. The table below shows some scores for adult team sport athletes. Males (seconds) Females (seconds) Excellent < 9.5 < 10.5 Good 9.5 to 10.5 10.5 to 11.5 Average 10.5 to 11.5 11.5 to 12.5 Poor > 11.5 > 12.5 comments: Ensure that the participants face forwards when shuffling and do not cross the feet over one another. For safety, a spotter should be positioned a few meters behind cone A to catch players in case they fall while running backward through the finish. reliability: the type of surface that is used should be consistent to ensure good test-retest reliability advantages: This is a simple agility test to perform, requiring limited equipment and space. disadvantages: Only one person can perform the test at a time. references: Semenick, D. (1990). The T-test. NSCA Journal, 12(1), 36-37. PAUOLE KAINOA; MADOLE, KENT; GARHAMMER, JOHN; LACOURSE, MICHAEL; ROZENEK, RALPH. (2000). Reliability and Validity of the T-Test as a Measure of Agility, Leg Power, and Leg Speed in College-Aged Men and Women. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 14. 10.1519/00124278-200011000-00012. Stork Balance Stand Test The stork balance test requires the person to stand on one leg, up on the ball of the foot, for as long as possible. The similar Flamingo Balance Test is different as it requires the subject to balance on a board. purpose: To assess whole body balance ability. equipment required: flat, non-slip surface, stopwatch, paper and pencil. pre-test: Explain the test procedures to the subject. Perform screening of health risks and obtain informed consent. Prepare forms and record basic information such as age, height, body weight, gender, test conditions. Perform an appropriate warm-up. See more details of pre-test procedures. procedure: Remove the shoes and place the hands on the hips, then position the non-supporting foot against the inside knee of the supporting leg. The subject is given one minute to practice the balance. The subject raises the heel to balance on the ball of the foot. The stopwatch is started as the heel is raised from the floor. The stopwatch is stopped if any of the follow occur: The hand(s) come off the hips The supporting foot swivels or moves (hops) in any direction The non-supporting foot loses contact with the knee. The heel of the supporting foot touches the floor. Rating Score (seconds) Excellent > 50 Good 40 - 50 Average 25- 39 Fair 10 - 24 Poor < 10 Scoring: The total time in seconds is recorded. The score is the best of three attempts. The table lists general ratings for this test. Variations: the stork balance test is also sometimes conducted with the eyes closed, giving it a higher level of difficulty. See also the similar flamingo balance test. Alpha-Fit Version: in the Alpha-Fit version of this test, the hand do not need to be placed on the hip, and timing stops if the hands go above the horizontal level. There is also a 60 second maximum score. Reference: Johnson BL, Nelson JK. Practical measurements for evaluation in physical education. 4th Edit. Minneapolis: Burgess, 1979. 35m Sprint Norms Sprint or speed tests can be performed over varying distances, depending on the factors being tested and the relevance to the athlete's sport. We do not have many norms of sprint tests on this site, at the moment just this one for 35m sprinting, which surprisingly we don't even have a page about a speed test ober that distance. 35m Sprint Norm Table The table below categorizes the speed in seconds for adult men and women doing a 35 meter sprint test. Time to run 35 meters (in seconds) for men and women rating men women very good < 4.80 < 5.30 good 4.80 - 5.09 5.30 - 5.59 average 5.10 - 5.29 5.60 - 5.89 fair 5.30 - 5.60 5.90 - 6.20 poor > 5.60 > 6.20 * for Australian team sport players Alternate-Hand Wall-Toss Test The Alternate-Hand Wall-Toss Test is a test of hand-eye coordination, where the participant throw a ball against a wall from one hand in an underarm action, and attempt to catch it with the opposite hand. purpose: to measure hand-eye coordination equipment required: tennis ball or baseball, smooth and solid wall, marking tape, stopwatch (optional) pre-test: Explain the test procedures to the subject. Perform screening of health risks and obtain informed consent. Prepare forms and record basic information such as age, height, body weight, gender, test conditions. Perform an appropriate warm-up and practice. See more details of pre-test procedures. procedure: A line is placed on the ground a certain distance from the wall (e.g. 2 meters, 3 feet). The person stands behind the line and facing the wall. The ball is thrown from one hand in an underarm action against the wall, and attempted to be caught with the opposite hand. The ball is then thrown back against the wall and caught with the initial hand. The test can continue for a nominated number of attempts or for a set time period (e.g. 30 seconds). By adding the constraint of a set time period, you also add the factor of working under pressure. scoring: This table lists general ratings (source unknown) for the wall toss test, based on the score of the number of successful catches in a 30 second period. Rating Score (in 30 seconds) Excellent > 35 Good 30 - 35 Average 20- 29 Fair 15 - 19 Poor < 15 variations / modifications: There are numerous variation that can be made to the procedures of this test depending on the desired outcomes: the size, weight and shape of the object, the distance from the wall, the number of attempts or time period can all be varied. The procedure should be recorded with the results and kept consistent for future testing of the same participants. advantages: minimal equipment and costs are involved in conducting this test, and it can be self-administered. disadvantages: the ability to catch the ball can be affected by how hard and straight the ball is thrown to the wall. You may want to draw a target on the wall to help with throwing accuracy. The test results may be skewed if the subject 'flukes' a few catches, so repeating the test a few times may result in more accurate results.