Uploaded by wbessmer

Lead-agogy: pedagogical approaches to lead contamination

advertisement
1
Lead-agogy: Cleaning up the mess it makes in people’s lives
William D. Bessmer
La Salle University
EDC 503
Dr. Greer
Oct 12th, 2022
2
Research Question:
How do we compensate for the neurobiological effects of
lead poisoning, what is the best early intervention strategy
before 3rd grade?
Thesis Statement
Most treatments for lead toxicity, which can seriously harm a child’s health, focus on
environmental remediation rather than how to treat those afflicted for the intellectual
disabilities, long term educational attainment, and behavioral sequelae of lead
exposure. Of note, lead toxicity imparts the symptoms of ADHD, if not the condition
itself, and thus pedagogies developed for ADHD students should be applicable to the
treatment of the neurological effects of lead poisoning.
3
Annotated Bibliography
1. Ahmad, F., & Liu, P. (2020). (Ascorb)ing Pb Neurotoxicity in the Developing Brain.
Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 9(12), 1311.
https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9121311
Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) supplementation can help ameliorate the long-term effects of
lead toxicity in developing children’s systems by acting as a chelating agent, a molecule
capable of binding lead to itself in order to facilitate its excretion from the body. This is a
meta-analytical study collating the potential reasons Vitamin Can be used to treat lead
exposure, a condition that is a risk factor for ADHD and autism severity in children.
The analysis found that more direct research is needed to definitively demonstrate that
Vitamin C is capable of chelating lead in children, though animal models and adult
results all indicate the likelihood of success. Ascorbic Acid is a potential low cost
solution for chelation in lead exposed children. The implications of the article indicate
that a simple, low cost, neuroprotective intervention warrants further implementation.
2. Barkley, R. (2016). Managing Adhd in school: The best evidence-based methods
for teachers. PESI Publishing & Media.
This book was written by the world renown clinician Russel Barkley, who is a
pre-eminent expert on ADHD. This book collates Barkleys research and modifies it by
providing advice and statistics for how to implement evidenced based pedagogies and
behavioral management techniques in the classroom. Barkley strongly believes in the
effectiveness of medication to treat ADHD. Findings include: despite diagnoses being
more likely in wealthier communities, 10% of a teacher’s students are likely to have
ADHD, though this number is unlikely to truly capture the true number of students with
the condition. Barkley asserts that “no compelling evidence indicates that social factors,
such as parenting or educational environment, have been found to cause ADHD.”
Barkley’s research has also ruled out diet, TV, video game and media consumption as
potential causes of the condition. Barkley doesn’t mention lead toxicity. Barkly makes
suggestions to breaking tasks down for students with ADHD to compensate for the
executive functioning shortfalls. Evidence suggests external organizers should be
provided for scholars to process more efficiently with their lapses in executive
functioning.
3. Billings, S. B., & Schnepel, K. (2017). Life after lead: Effects of early interventions
for children exposed to lead. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2998982
4
This study focuses on the effects of early interventions (and their respective costs) on
children exposed to lead by developing an economic framework and then importing and
analyzing data from Raleigh, NC. The paper used an economic approach and focused
on economic gains that focus on immediate remediation. They found that each $1
invested in children with confirmed elevated blood lead levels yields a return of nearly
$1.40 based on rough (and largely conservative) estimates, based on their sample.
Increases in primary and middle school educational performance among children
eligible for an intervention has been observed to be statistically significant. They found
that even children who test twice over the alert threshold exhibit similar outcomes as
children with lower levels of exposure when remedies are applied before the onset of
school. The study concludes that each dollar spent remediating lead toxicity will yield a
substantial Return on Investment.
4. Evens, A., Hryhorczuk, D., Lanphear, B. P., Rankin, K. M., Lewis, D. A., Forst, L.,
& Rosenberg, D. (2015). The impact of low-level lead toxicity on school
performance among children in the Chicago Public Schools: A population-based
retrospective cohort study. Environmental Health, 14(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-015-0008-9
This study focuses on the impacts of even low levels of lead exposure on the
achievement of children by linking multiple databases about lead exposure and public
school testing. The study attempts adjust for variables like poverty, race, and other
demographic and medical characteristics, though it was opaque on the details as to how
they controlled for it. The study found that at concentrations of lead in the blood below
10 μg/dL, there are still pronounced effects. Concentration of lead above 10 μg/dL are
inversely correlated to reading and math scores. Even below this threshold, failure
rates are significantly different between those who are barely exposed (0-4μg/dL) and
those near the threshold. They estimated that 13% of reading failure and 14.8% of
math failure can be attributed to exposure to blood lead concentrations in Chicago
school children. The impact of this study is in how starkly dangerous lead is to
educational success.
5. Jakubowski, M. (2011). Low-level environmental lead exposure and intellectual
impairment in children — The current concepts of risk assessment. International
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 24(1), 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-011-0009-z
Review paper of the effects of lead on intellectual abilities of children. It finds through
its meta-analysis that there is no safe level of lead consumption. Every 10 μg/l of lead
in the blood leads to an IQ score decrease of 1 point. That 1 point in IQ comes with a
commensurate 4.5% increase in the risk of failure to graduate high school. Each point
of IQ increases worker productivity by 1.76%-2.38%. The developing brain is more
5
vulnerable to the neurotoxicity of lead than the mature brain. In children, an elevated
blood lead (B-Pb) causes concentration-dependent reduction in Intelligence Quotient
(IQ) score and reduced cognitive functions up to at least seven years of age. There is
some evidence that this subsequently leads to a reduced adult brain grey matter
volume, particularly the pre-frontal cortex, the seat of executive control. Elementary
school students have demonstrated a 15% reduction on end of year testing in reading
and mathematics. They postulate that exposure levels measured in 10 μg/l units can
be used for risk analysis and decision making.
6. Love, H. R., & Beneke, M. R. (2021). Pursuing justice-driven inclusive education
research: Disability critical race theory (discrit) in early childhood. Topics in Early
Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 31–44.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121421990833
A qualitative study that ruminates over how the application of DisCrit to inform the
education system. They posit that young children are at risk of exclusion based on their
disability. They focus on early intervention as and are critical of the occupational
frameworks that require significant conformity of the disabled. They disambiguate
ableism and racism and consider how these biases negatively affect children.
Considering the fact that lead poison exposure is a socio-economic and race based
geographically designed issue, it makes sense to look at disability critical race theory
intersection, though I find that the mechanistic effects of environmental racism are
unacknowledged here. The paper suggests that implicit and explicit bias training is
crucial for those working at the intersection of race and disability. They suggest that
adequate supports and variations in seating arrangements are vital elements for
pedagogy of these children, and considering the impulse control issues of lead
poisoning, perhaps fewer demands that students be seated all period is a solution.
7. Lovett, M. W., Frijters, J. C., Wolf, M., Steinbach, K. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Morris,
R. D. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The
impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention
outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 889–914.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000181
This study combined two well known reading intervention programs (PHAST and
RAVE-0) to create a “Triple Focus Intervention” modality that was tested in three cities
for 236 students. A second round of longitudinal analysis was conducted to ascertain
relationships between the timing of intervention. They found that timing of early
intervention for reading problems in the primary grades is vital. Triple-Focus
intervention was associated with benefits for struggling readers across 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
grades, on all reading and reading-related outcomes. Early intervention in 1st and 2nd
6
grade nearly doubled the gains compared to children receiving an intervention in 3rd
grade. It was found that IQ modulated how effective the intervention was, with higher
IQs seeing larger gains for early interventions. The study is hampered by low sample
size and nonconformity between the literature and reading programs offered by the
various schools used in the study. The IQ to effectiveness of early intervention
relationship demonstrates that treating lead toxicity may not be as easy to remediate
8. McDermott, C. L., Seidlitz, J., Nadig, A., Liu, S., Clasen, L. S., Blumenthal, J. D.,
Reardon, P. K., Lalonde, F., Greenstein, D., Patel, R., Chakravarty, M. M., Lerch,
J. P., & Raznahan, A. (2018). Longitudinally mapping childhood socioeconomic
status associations with cortical and subcortical morphology. The Journal of
Neuroscience, 39(8), 1365–1373. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1808-18.2018
1,243 longitudinal MRI brain scans were analyzed to ascertain the morphological
differences in the brain due to the effects of Socio Economic Status (SES), cross
referenced against IQ tests administered to the clients. Up to 20 points of IQ are lost
simply due to the effects of low SES. This change in IQ is manifested by brain
morphological changes. Meta-analyses of functional imaging data indicate that cortical
correlates of SES are centered on brain systems serving sensorimotor functions,
language, memory, and emotional processing. Higher SES is associated with areal
expansion of lateral prefrontal, anterior cingulate, lateral temporal, and superior parietal
cortices. Cortical Surface area seems to be the connection between IQ and SES. The
study used an outdated standard for SES which made it less refined than would be
preferred, and the SES spectrum was not demonstrative of the US population at large.
There was some postcolonial opinionating in the discussion about being surprised at the
effects of SES in a sample that drew heavily from the United States, as if the adversity
of the poor in other nations was of measurable greater magnitude. In regards to lead,
how much of this structural difference of the brain is experiential vs. environmental?
9. Pew Charitable Trust. (2017). 10 policies to prevent and respond to childhood
lead exposure [white paper]. Retrieved October 12, 2022, from
https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2017/08/hip_childhood_lead_poisoning
_report.pdf
This white paper is an academic analysis of the best policies to address childhood lead
exposure. It was found that by keeping blood lead levels of children born in 2018 at
zero would generate $84 billion in benefits. Providing targeted evidence-based
academic and behavioral interventions to the roughly 1.8 million children with a history
of lead exposure could increase their lifetime family incomes and likelihood of
graduating from high school and college. It will decrease their potential for teen
parenthood and criminal conviction. They report that Black children are at highest risk
7
of lead poisoning, followed by Hispanic children. Possible remediation strategies for the
neurocognitive effects of lead toxicity include using PATHS (Promoting Alternative
Thinking Strategies) which fosters emotional and social competencies through the
development and strengthening of skills in emotional literacy, positive peer relations,
and problem solving. This intervention was found to improve cognitive concentration
and reduce aggressive and antisocial behavior for 1st-3rd grade children, as well as
improve academic skills of students, as they were 60-70% more likely to attain
proficiency in reading and math, respectively. This sets up a strong foundation to
compare the Triple focus intervention to PATHS to perhaps grow a hybrid program to
treat lead’s neurotoxic effects on grades. The suggestions on addressing lead are all
conjecture, but well researched.
10. Schatz, N. K., Fabiano, G. A., Raiker, J. S., Hayes, T. B., & Pelham, W. E., Jr. (2021).
Twenty-year trends in elementary teachers’ beliefs about best practices for students with
ADHD. School Psychology, 36(4), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000442
This study focused on the changing opinions of educators in regards to their opinions
and beliefs about ADHD best practices. Teachers responded to a questionnaire about
their interactions with students with ADHD as well as their beliefs about best practices
for these students. This study is qualitative in nature, but does synthesize some trends.
Teachers generally agreed that behavioral classroom management, medications, and
the combination of the two are effective treatments for students with ADHD. The
success of any implementation of any ADHD supports requires teacher buy-in. Does
this environmental cause of the ADHD symptoms therefore build compassion to develop
that buy in? Paired with the implicit bias training and seating arrangement variation
suggested by Love and Benekee, and the focus on early intervention of the other
papers above, a holistic approach to treating the symptoms of lead exposure to children
in early grade levels can potentially be developed.
8
Summary
Lead affects the brain. Even at low doses, IQ points are lost when exposed. The best
and most re-iterated remediation strategies are relegated to cleaning the exposure site
and medically treating the child. There is little as far as instruction as to how to further
clean up the effects of lead exposure, but this bibliography shows a path forward.
1. Lead is an environmental toxin spread by automobiles, water, soil contamination,
and paint chips. Lead is constrained by geography, and that geography is
typically the poorest regions of an aging urban center.
2. Lead affects the IQ and development of children exposed to it.
3. The effect of IQ loss from lead exposure and Socio Economic Level is difficult to
ascertain, but it appears to be mediated by reduced surface area of the brain,
and thus, lead’s ability to lead to diminished brain volume thus affects the IQ, as
volume and surface area are related in 3 dimensional objects.
4. Treatment for exposure to lead includes cleaning or abating the exposure source
and medically treating the child with chelating molecules.
5. Vitamin C supplementation and proper nutrition have been demonstrated to help
lend resilience to those exposed to lead as vitamin C is a chelating biomolecule
that can cross the blood brain barrier, and thus should be present in all lunches
for kids in certain neighborhoods.
6. Lead results in behavioral functioning similar to ADHD and may be a risk factor
for autism spectrum behaviors.
7. Therefore, evidence based pedagogy that is effective for ADHD will be effective
for the treatment of the educational sequelae of exposure.
8. Early interventions for special needs children need not be adapted too much in
order to accommodate those afflicted with lead toxicity.
9. Considering the race and class issues, implicit and explicit bias training is vital.
Download