TABLE 2
English
Media
4
3
2
1
Weighted
Mean
Newspaper
0
0
12
38
1.24
TV Shows
8
12
27
3
2.5
Online Media
4
17
14
15
2.8
Mobile Apps
3
17
14
16
2.86
AVERAGE
2.35
Interpre
-tation
Never
Used
Often
Used
Often
Used
Often
Used
Often
Used
TABLE 3
Interpretation
f
%
Outstanding (90-100)
9
18%
Very Satisfactory (85-89)
2
4%
Satisfactory(80-84)
2
4%
2
4%
35
70%
50
100%
Needs Improvement (75-79)
Did Not Meet Expectations (<75)
TOTAL
TABLE 4
English
Media Usage
English Media Usage Pearson
Correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
English
Comprehension
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
English
Comprehension
-.079
.584
50
50
-.079
1
.584
50
50
The table shows that there is a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.079 which is interpreted as very weak correlation. Decision is to accept
null hypothesis.
This implies that there is no significant relationship between
English media usage and English comprehension. Therefore, the two
variables do not affect each other.
ISULOD NI SA IMONG CHAPTER 3 STATISTICAL TREATMENT
Pearson-r Correlation. A positive correlation means as one
variable increases, the other variable also increases while in a negative
correlation, as one variable increases, the other variable decreases.
Below is the scale that determines the interpretation of correlation
coefficients:
Correlation Coefficient
Interpretation
0.0=|r|
No correlation
0.0<|r|<0.2
Very weak correlation
0.2<|r|<0.4
0.6<|r|<0.8
Weak correlation
Moderately strong
correlation
Strong correlation
0.8<|r|<1.0
Very strong correlation
1.0=|r|
Perfect correlation
0.4<|r|<0.6