MGMT20131 Individual Competency Report: Rubric
Criteria
Leadership Competency Analysis: 60%
Overview of two leadership
competencies- conceptual knowledge.
Ability to link and contrast
competencies by Boyatzis, Goleman,
Salovey and Mayer, Pedler et al. etc.
Describe the behavioural
characteristics of the leadership
competency and provide clear
evidence of superior performance.
Demonstrated Research and
Referencing: 30%
Ability to use a minimum of 12 related
references that address competency
models etc in addition to
recommended management texts and
journals, including referencing and
citation using the APA method.
Report Presentation: 10%
Layout, structure and readability of the
written report.
Fail-III
Fail-II
Fail-I
Pass
Credit
Distinction
High Distinction
Poor discussion
with no clear
links to
competency
movement,
authors,
concepts or
terms of any
significance.
Main terms and
concepts not
defined. Poor
overview of
discipline areas
no discussion of
behavioural
characteristics
nor evidence of
superior
performance
Fewer than 6
substantive
references used
in the body of
the text.
Absence of
correct citation
or consistent
errors in
referencing
Very poorly
presented
report.
Poor discussion with
no clear links to
competency
movement- terms
and concepts poorly
defined. Limited
overview of discipline
areas little discussion
of behavioural
characteristics or
evidence of superior
performance
Limited overview of
the two-leadership
area as distinct from
competency. Limited
definitions and
concepts- brief and
limited overview of
discipline areas. No
real comparisons of
competency
literature. Vague
unsupported
descriptions of
behaviour and little if
any evidence of links
to superior
performance.
A satisfactory
overview/ summary
primarily of
conceptual
knowledge related to
the leadership.
Limited linkages to
competency
concepts. No
comparison of
competency
perspectives
(models), limited
reference to
behaviours no
concrete evidence of
superior performance
related to the
competencies
Discussion of
competency and
concise overview of
conceptual
knowledge. Limited
but clear attempts to
outline behavioural
characteristics of
competency with
references to
Goleman, Boyatzis,
Salovey and Mayer,
etc. Some reference
to supporting studies
Concise overview of
competency concept.
Identification of two
competencies from
multiple competency
model perspectives.
Identification of
behavioural
characteristics.
Concise overview of
conceptual
knowledge along with
clear description of
behavioural
characteristics. Some
reference to evidence
of superior
performance through
recent studies
Superior discussion
concise form with
multiple perspectives
and recent
supporting studies
(2014 or later).
Fewer than 8-10
substantive
references used in
the body of the text.
Limited citation or
consistent errors in
referencing
Less than 12
substantive
references used in
the body of the text.
Limited citation or
consistent errors in
referencing
Satisfactory research
as demonstrated by a
minimum of 16
substantive
references -generally
consistent citation
approach minor
errors evident,
Very good research
demonstrated with
20-25 references
cited in the body of
the report. Few if any
citation errors
Superior research
demonstrated with
25+ quality
references including
Journal articles
referred to in the doc
of the report. No
citation errors.
Poorly presented
report - very little
effort spent on
structure, and
general presentation.
Poor report
structure, limited
evidence cohesive
and integrated
structure
Satisfactory report
presentation - clear
and readable layout,
appropriate use of
headings.
Good demonstration
of research as
demonstrated by 1620 substantive
references used in
the body of the
report. Consistent
citation approach
with occasional minor
errors evident,
Clear, attractive and
readable report
layout and structure.
Very good report
presentation, layout
and structure. Good
use of headings and
clear expression and
grammar
Superior report
presentation, layout
and structure. Clear
and concise language.
Superior use of
headings and
subheading to
improve content
flow.