The Effect of Composition Changes on the Density of Sugar Glass Team 3 Daniel Kian Enriquez Apple Jean Magtuba Test Date: March 16 & 17 2023 April 17, 2023 Dr. Ruben Menchavez A. Abstract Sugar Glass Candy is a simple way in making glasses if you are a beginner, with a minimal material that’s being used you can also find the things in your respective houses. The importance of this study is to understand and analyze if there is a change in density with a different composition in making the sugar glass and hopefully to answer the objective which is to determine how composition affects the density of sugar glasses. We use Two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to fully understand and to give statistical data on the difference of the densities. Based on the result we know that using food colorant has an effect on the densities of the sugar glass candies, there are many complications in making these sugar glass candy, which is human error and the environmental error which slightly affect the result in this experiment but it is still a successful experiment where we ended up having a conclusion that answers the objective of this study. B. Introduction Glasses are created by sufficiently cooling the liquid so that the atoms are prevented from forming the desired crystalline pattern. The same process is used to make candy glasses. A temperature lower than the glass transition temperature is reached with the melt. Corn syrup, water, and sugar, of course, are the main ingredients in sugar glass, which is sometimes referred to as candy glass or breakaway glass. In stunt situations, it is utilized in place of glass to protect the players from damage. Even though it is less harmful than actual glass, accidents could still happen. Sugar glass is a fragile, translucent type of sugar that resembles glass. It can be shaped into a bottle or drinking glass or into a sheet that resembles flat glass. This product's extremely short shelf life is another significant drawback. Sugar glass is less realistic since it warps and melts easily. Due to the students' prior knowledge of and interest in the subject, in previous study, the sugar glass experiment used here not only serves as an excellent paradigm but also functions as an effective way to illustrate how composition affects density. Remarkably, despite the fact that the two technologies evolved independently as empirical arts in ancient times, glassmaking and sugar glass making share the same fundamental principles. In order to create glasses, the liquid must be cooled quickly enough to prevent the atoms from forming the desired crystalline structure. The same process is used to make sugar glasses. A temperature lower than the glass transition temperature is reached with the melt. The experiment is briefly described in the sections that follow, and then it is discussed in relation to how it was applied to different facets of glass formation. The objective of this experiment primarily aims to determine how composition affects the density of sugar glasses. Students can relate to and understand the glass melting experiment by seeing how the results of density differ in the composition of the sugar glass. C. Experimental Procedure Commercial glass and ordinary sugar glasses are very similar, where sugar (sucrose, C12H22O11 with Tm =186ºC) is a good glass former and water (H2O with Tm=0 ºC) is a good modifier, just like SiO2 (Tm=1723 ºC) and Na2O (Tm=1275= ºC), respectively, are in common glass. The interesting observations in the sugar glass experiment can be accessed at much lower temperatures, and it can be carried out using basic, inexpensive supplies. The experiment made use of the following equipment. First, a stove or other heat source. A pan to hold the mixture is the second item. The temperature at which sugar glass was to be created was then precisely determined using a candy thermometer. Then came a silicone spatula or stirring rod, which was much simpler to use than any other material. Silicone molds were suggested as the final tool. Corn syrup (glucose/fructose mixture), water, and table sugar (sucrose) were the components of the experiment's sugar glass. To have an exact amount of the mixture, a weighing scale, measuring cups, and spoons were also required. Two formulated compositions provided by the instructor were used to collect the data. Given the ingredients sucrose, corn syrup, and water, respectively, formulation 1 has a ratio of 53:35:12 by percentage, while formulation 2 has a ratio of 50:38:12. Put the following ingredients, which make up the majority of the experiment's weight in a cooking pot: 0.8 g of tartar, 50 g of corn syrup, 17.14 g of water, and 75.71 g of sucrose, which made up 53% of the mixture's overall weight. The researchers conducted the experiment as follows: bring the mixture to a boil at 148 degrees Celsius while stirring frequently; if you heat it up too quickly, it will caramelize and cease to function. In activity 2, food coloring was added to the formulations in order to compare sugar glasses that were clear and those that were colored. Warning: The syrup is very hot, and if you get any on your skin, it will stick to everything. You'll suffer incredibly bad burns. Please wear gloves and exercise extreme caution. Fill at least five or more of the silicone molds with the mixture before using them to achieve the desired sugar glass density. Pour all the syrup into the mold, letting any extra drip into the cavity. Depending on the thickness you desire or the number of samples/pieces required for the experiment, you can repeat the process or not. After it has cooled, simply remove the sugar glass from the silicone mold. It was prepared to obtain the density once the sugar glass had been released. D. Evaluation The researchers follow the data analysis to get meaningful insights and understand the process as a whole. The following steps are involved in data analysis. First, defining the question which means defining the objective of the study. Second, collecting the data used in the experiment. Third, cleaning the data and getting it ready for analysis. Next, analyzing the data by using analysis of variance two-way replication. Sharing the results will be the next step after analyzing the data. Lastly, embracing failures, mistakes in the data, or human error can’t be avoided earlier in the process [4]. Analysis of variance has a particular example known as one factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). A Two Way ANOVA is an extension of the One Way ANOVA. When you have a single measurement variable (i.e., a quantitative variable) and two nominal variables, do a twoway ANOVA. In other words, a two-way ANOVA is appropriate if your experiment has a quantitative result and you have two classification explanatory variables [5]. Assumptions for two-way ANOVA. The population must be somewhat evenly distributed. Samples must be independent Population variances must be equal Groups must have equal sample sizes ANOVA's null hypothesis (H0) states that there is no variation in group means. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that at least one group departs considerably from the dependent variable's overall mean. Getting the density of the sugar glass Find the object's mass and volume to determine the density of the material. Use the following formula to determine the object's density: density = mass/volume. Use of a balance scale is required to determine mass. The majority of mass scales compare an unknown object's mass to a known mass. Use the water displacement method to determine the volume of objects with irregular shapes. formula 1 E. Results and Discussion E.1 Results Average Density Average Density vs Samples 1.52 1.51 1.50 F1 clear 1.49 F1 w/color 1.48 F2 Clear 1.47 F1 clear F1 F2 Clear F2 w/color w/color Samples F2 w/color Figure 1. The Average Density of the two-formulation clear and with food colorant Table 1: Two-Way Analysis of variance results. ANOVA Source of Variation Sample Columns Interaction Within SS 0.000619992 0.001920781 0.00013716 0.00525125 Total 0.007929183 df 1 1 1 16 MS F P-value F crit 0.00061999 1.88905112 0.188255457 4.493998418 0.00192078 5.8524169 0.027835206 4.493998418 0.00013716 0.417910932 0.527146393 4.493998418 0.0003282 19 E.2 Discussion of Results The experiment's results will be displayed in this section. We can now identify and contrast the densities of the samples by computing the densities of the samples from formulations 1 and 2 of clear sugar glass and sample with food coloring. Formulation 1 had a total weight of 142.86 grams. Sucrose weighs 75.71 grams, corn syrup weighs 50 grams, and water weighs 17.14 grams, for a ratio of 53:35:12. Formulation 2 had a total weight of 131.58 grams. Sucrose weighs 65.79 grams, corn syrup weighs 50 grams, and water weighs 15.79 grams, for a ratio of 53:35:12. Based on the calculated average of the samples, formulation 1 clear and with food colorant has the highest density of all the formulations. With food coloring, Formulation 2 has the lowest density. Each formulation contained 12% water, so the amount of corn syrup used increased as the amount of sucrose decreased. A series of samples were created with various ratios of sucrose and corn syrup in order to determine the ideal composition. It was ultimately determined that the impact of density decreased as the percent of sucrose decreased. The results were calculated by the researchers using a two-way ANOVA factor. The Pvalue in the source of variation column, which is 0.027835206, is lower than the alpha value of 0.05 as a result, and this means that the researchers accepted the alternative, which suggests that at least one group deviates significantly from the dependent variable's overall mean. F. Conclusion We concluded that base on our objective in this experiment we can say that there is an effect on the density due to the composition to make the sugar glass candy, lowering the percentage of the formulation affects the density of the sugar glass. It is shown that the two main ingredients of common candies which is sugar and water serves as the same function as silica and sodium oxide in making common glasses. We also conclude that there is a difference in density between the two composition the with color and without color based on the result on the ANOVA using Two-way analysis of variation, even in using food colorant it still has an effect in the density of the sugar glass candy and it is safe to say that it has a difference between the one with food colorant and the one that doesn’t have a food colorant. G. References [1] Kelly, S. (2006, July 29). Science and Property of Sugar Glass. Lehigh.edu. Retrieved March 19, 2023, from https://www.lehigh.edu/imi/scied/docs_students/Kelly_ReuPresentation.pdf [2] Gerver, E. (2022, August 18). Why Do Some Candies Use Cream of Tartar? Candy Turf. Retrieved March 19, 2023, from https://candyturf.com/why-candies-use-cream-of-tartar [3] Blaettler, K. G. (2020, December 13). How to Calculate Density by Water Displacement. Sciencing. Retrieved March 19, 2023, from https://sciencing.com/calculate-density-waterdisplacement-7373751.html [4] Hillier, W. (2023, January 30). A Step-by-Step Guide to the Data Analysis Process. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/data-analytics/the-data-analysis-processstep-by-step/#step-one-defining-the-q [5] Stephanie Glen. StatisticsHowTo.com: "ANOVA Test: Elementary Definition, Statistics Types, for Examples, the SPSS" From of us! rest https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/hypothesis-testing/anova/ H. Appendices Table 1 Density of the sample from Formulation 1 Sugar glass (clear) Density (g/cm3) Samples Wt. of Sugar Glass (g) Wt. of Sugar Glass submerged in H2O S1 7.94 5.17 1.53 S2 8.74 5.72 1.53 S3 9.11 6.11 1.49 S4 7.52 5.00 1.50 S5 8.33 5.48 1.52 Average 8.33 5.50 1.51 (g) Table 2 Density of the sample from Formulation 2 Sugar glass (clear) Samples Wt. of Sugar Glass (g) Wt. of Sugar Glass submerged in H2O Density (g/cm3) (g) S1 6.74 4.52 1.49 S2 7.17 4.69 1.53 S3 7.12 4.74 1.50 S4 7.57 5.03 1.50 S5 6.29 4.25 1.48 Average 6.98 4.65 1.50 Density (g/cm3) Table 3 Density of the sample from Formulation 1 Sugar glass (with food colorant) Samples Wt. of Sugar Glass (g) Wt. of Sugar Glass submerged in H2O S1 6.81 4.46 1.53 S2 6.17 4.03 1.53 S3 6.29 4.14 1.52 S4 7.59 5.16 1.47 S5 6.47 4.31 1.50 Average 6.67 4.42 1.51 (g) Table 4 Density of the sample from Formulation 2 Sugar glass (with food colorant) Density (g/cm3) Samples Wt. of Sugar Glass (g) Wt. of Sugar Glass submerged in H2O S1 9.59 6.41 1.50 S2 8.37 5.65 1.48 S3 7.05 4.77 1.48 S4 8.00 5.39 1.48 S5 7.13 4.80 1.49 Average 8.03 5.40 1.49 (g) Documentation Weighing of the ingredients Pouring into the Mould Mixing the Ingredients Cooling the Sample Pieces Heating the Mixture Weighing the Sample Pieces Checking the Temperature Weighing to get the Density of the sample