Federalist #10 (by James Madison) • “Among the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction.” • “By faction I understand that a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” Federalist #10: The Causes of Faction • “The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man; and we see them every where brought into different degrees of activity, according to the circumstances of civil society. A zeal for different opinions concerning religion, concerning Government and many other points, as well of speculation of practice; an attachment to different leaders ambitiously contending for pre-eminence and power . . . .” Political Culture What defines us “Americans?” Not race (e.g., the Japanese or the Germans) Rather: A collection of beliefs and values about the justification and operation of a country’s government. Our political culture is what defines us as “Americans” Americans: A Contradictory People? • Americans are more ethnically and religiously diverse than the citizens of other democracies. • Most multicultural democracies are short-lived. • Long-lasting examples had authoritarian governments: suppression of cultural divisions. • U.S. is diverse, yet has consistency/uniformity in political believes. • How did this happen What does it mean to be an American? Americans Agree on Fundamentals • • • • They value individual liberty They believe in individual responsibility They believe in equality (of opportunity) The believe in the importance of religious faith – But more than anything, it is “individualism” that is the key to American political culture. Alexis de Tocqueville visits America • • • • A French Journalist who toured America in the 1830s. Wrote Democracy in America, published in 1835 The first to write extensively on American Individualism Many of the observations he made in Democracy in America are still quite relevant today • He was much in favor of local government being a strong factor influencing public affairs. • Tocqueville suggests several forms of local government institutions as being able to perform this job. But he identifies one as best able . You should know which form he identifies as the “best able.” Philosophical Unity • The Tension Between Individualism and Equality Most Americans do not regard economic and social inequality as justification for government action Initially, liberty and equality thought to be reinforcing People use their liberty to achieve economic success Industrial Revolution produced concentration of private wealth and masses of low-wage workers • Liberty and equality became detached Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Social Diversity • Colonial American – – – – – Dutch settled New York Swedes along the Delaware River French at northern and western borders Spaniards to the south British most numerous but composed of varied religious groups: Puritans, Anglicans, Catholics, Quakers – Also immigrants from Ireland, Scotland, Wales – Involuntary immigrants: Slaves made up 20% of colonial population A Nation of Immigrants Then (I) • New federal government maintained states’ policy of unrestricted immigration. – Land plentiful and labor scarce • Mid-century – English, Irish, and German immigrants as high as 400,000 a year – Irish immigration became a political issue (Catholicism) • Know-Nothing Party (anti-Catholic) won 43 seats in House (roughly 20% of seats) A Nation of Immigrants Then (II) • Immigration related political issues in the 20th Century – prohibition – funding of parochial schools – bilingual schools – blue laws A Nation of Immigrants Now • Immigration Act of 1965 – largest surge since 1890s – Congress abandoned national-quotas system favoring northern Europeans – Having family in the U.S. now gets a preference – Immigration from Latin American and West Indies increased – Growth in variety of Asian immigrant groups – Non-Hispanic Whites dropped to less than 70 percent of the population by the 2000 census – By 2030 Non-Hispanic Whiles will drop to 60% Immigration as a Contemporary Issue • Four reasons why immigration differs now from that in the past: – 1. immigrants are not entering an unskilled laborhungry economy – 2. there are mismatches between the costs and benefits of immigration • A large majority of new immigrants went to 6 states – CA, NY, TX, FL, NJ, and IL • While immigrants pay taxes, most are federal and not state • Utilize services of states such as education and social services Immigration as a Contemporary Issue – 3. Both the U.S. and the world face environmental problems tied to expanding populations. – 4. Due to the nature of the law giving preference to those with relatives already in the country, 2/3s of all immigrants today are relatives of those already here. • High percentage of dependent persons (often older people) have been admitted in recent years. • Thus, fewer taxpayers and more in need of services. -- 5. Opposition to immigration • Economics • Threat to political culture • Conservative political ideology Immigration from Mexico no longer a population increase factor From 2005 to 2010 1.4 million Mexicans immigrated to the United States (either legally or illegally) From 2005 to 2010, 1.4. Mexican immigrants and their U.S. born children moved back to Mexico from the United States Source: Pew Research Center, April 23, 2012 Illegal Immigration from Mexico to the U.S. is dropping • 2005: 1.1 million Mexicans illegally immigrated to the United States • 2011: 286,000 Mexicans illegally immigrated to the United States Source: Pew Research Center, April 23, 2012 Source: New York Times, September 2, 2015 Change in American Society • Aging of America – Proportion of population over age 65 is growing (14% in 2012; will be 26% in 2030) and proportion of population 18 – 64 is shrinking; proportion over 85 is growing rapidly – Growing proportion of population that is dependent on government services – Debate over Obamacare and how should work – Financing of Social Security and Medicare – Increasingly burdensome tax load on those still in the workforce American Individualism • Central themes of American political thought – Americans emphasize individual responsibility much more than people elsewhere. – Suspicious of governmental power – Skeptical of governmental competence • Belief in individual achievement and responsibility is not closely tied with the actual social and economic circumstances Americans find themselves in -- rich or poor. • Embrace the work ethic whether rich or poor LO 4.3 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Learning Objectives The Tension Between Individualism and Equality • Equality of opportunity – equal chance to advance • Equality of condition – All individuals have a right to a more or less equal part of the material goods that society produces. • While most support the first, few support the latter. • Equality of opportunity should be sufficient. • Of course, not all agree Traditional Explanations of American “classicial” Liberalism • Early American colonists were middle class not impoverished peasants. • Lacked feudal tradition to parallel the social structure of Europe. • Great deal of available land in early America and scarcity of labor. • Ambitious individuals did succeed: reinforcing individualistic values • Why no socialism in America? No need? Newer Explanations for Continued Individualism • Immigrants – Self-selection – What kind of person would emigrate from their country and do well here? • Perhaps those who were individualistic. – Waves of immigrants may rejuvenate those values of individualism. – Diversity itself may influence the staying power of America’s founding ideals and principles. The American Tax Code Income Inequality Based on Data from the Bureau of the Census • 1980 richest 10% total share of total income • 2012 richest 10% of total share of total income 30 percent 48 percent • 1980 richest 1% share of total income • 2012 richest 1% share of total income 08 percent 19 percent Income Inequality in the U.S. One Nation, Under God? • U.S. stands out regarding the widespread importance of religion and religiosity. – Most of the Nation’s Founders were not very religious (many were “Deists”) and wanted to protect state from religion, but today religion seems of more consequence than during the Founding Era – Separation of church and state, but religion is seen in politics through voters and leaders – American politics highly moralistic • How do we explain this in a country with no established church, a reputation for individualism, and a people known for their pragmatism? The Founding Fathers “God” and the Church • It is hard to know exactly what many of the Founder Fathers believed about God as Creator. Darwin’s Origin of the Species was written 50 years later. Even Thomas Jefferson, the Founding Father most skeptical of religion us the term “Creator” in the Declaration of Independence “We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” - Thomas Jefferson However, the Institution of the Church and Clergy were viewed by most of the Founding Fathers as potential threats to democracy • Fear of organized religion merged with the state was one reason many people fled Europe for America. Religious heretics were persecuted, usually by representatives of the state. The Founders were well aware of how the “official state religion” treated those heretics with who they did not agree. • Even the most revered historical figures brutally suppressed heresy. Example: Sir Thomas More, the “Man for All Seasons.” Probably an apt description. He was responsible for the torture and death of many who did not share is Roman Catholic religion, but choose death rather than convert when Henry 8th broke with Rome and established the Church of England as the official state religion with himself as it head. Religion and 1st Amendment • Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion . . . . America is getting less religious. General Social Survey Percent who say “none” when asked “What is your religion?” Why the increase in unaffiliated: Backlash against conservative politics? In their recent book, “American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us,” Robert Putnam of Harvard University and David Campbell of Notre Dame marshal evidence from various surveys that supports this thesis. From the 1970s through the 1990s, they argue, “[r]eligiosity and conservative politics became increasingly aligned, and abortion and gay rights became emblematic of the emergent culture wars.” The result, they write, was that many young Americans came to view religion as “judgmental, homophobic, hypocritical, and too political.” In the 1990s, they argue, “[r]eligiosity and conservative politics became increasingly aligned, and abortion and gay rights became increasing opposed by the religious. Several leading scholars contend that young adults, in particular, have turned away from organized religion because they perceive it as deeply entangled with conservative politics and do not want to have any association with it. University of California, Berkeley, sociologists Michael Hout and Claude S. Fischer first suggested in 2002 that “part of the increase in ‘nones’ can be viewed as a symbolic statement against the Religious Right.” And in their recent book, “American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us,” Robert Putnam of Harvard University and David Campbell of Notre Dame marshal evidence from various surveys that supports this thesis. From the 1970s through the 1990s, they argue, “[r]eligiosity and conservative politics became increasingly aligned, and abortion and gay rights became emblematic of the emergent culture wars.” The result, they write, was that many young Americans came to view religion as “judgmental, homophobic, hypocritical, and too political” and on the wrong side of the emergent culture wars.” A “Personal God” and “god as natural law” • From Albert Einstein • “God does not play dice with the universe” OR “It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.” Scientists and the Public “God” and “god” • A personal God: A God that judges humans and can intervene in a way to violate the laws of nature—i.e. turning water into wine • god as natural law: After the Big Bang the laws of the universe are inviolate, and no being exists that is superior to the laws of the universe. Human life evolved through natural selection. Thomas Jefferson on Religion John Adams on Religion “I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved—the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced.” Hamilton on Religion Thomas Paine • Author of the book: Common Sense • “I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, the Roman church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any Church that I know of.” One Nation, Under God? Diversity of religion promote religious tolerance Competitive environment; no captive audience liberal tradition and religiosity do not conflict at all – Liberal tradition, particularly individualism, allows for religion. In Europe, children were forced into a state religion, which led to resentment. – The church is Europe was often corrupt (e.g. selling indulgences) – Church Bishops and Cardinals were often major political players, were blamed in part when things went wrong. © 2009, Pearson Education Between now and the 2012 political conventions, there will be discussion about the qualifications of presidential candidates. If your party nominated a generally well-qualified person for president who happened to be . . . . . , would you vote for that person? • • • • • • • Black Women Hispanic Mormon Gay/Lesbian Muslim Atheist 96% 95% 92% 78% 68% 58% 54% Vote for an Atheist? Percent “Yes” Age 18-29 70% 30-49 50-64 65% 48% 40% 56% Gender Male 62% Female 47%