ESTROGENERATION
ESTROGENERATION
HOW
ESTROGENICS
FAT, SICK,
ANTHONY
ARE
AND INFERTILE
G. JAY, PH.D.
TALLAHASSEE,
FLORIDA
MAKING
YOU
This
the
book
is intended
advice
professional.
The
any
otherwise,
know
you
author
liability,
that
All
and
Act
electronic
without
unlawful
by
experienced
health
you have
a
health
and
specifically
publisher
or
risk,
as
Anthony
In
of
replace,
a
sharing
the
of
part
would
the
(other
than
book
written
permission
like
for
must
to
use
review
your
support
be
of the
Pyrimidine
Publishing
155
Plaza
Office
Company,
Drive,
Suite
their
respective
publisher
content)
U.S.
uploading,
of
this
book
constitute
intellectual
material
obtained
author’s
Tallahassee,
FL 32301
All registered
trademarks
The
the
purposes),
the
publisher
permissions@pyrimidinepublishing.com
of
Ph.D.
with
the permission
of the publisher
piracy and theft of the author’s
If you
of their
consequence,
scanning,
any
or
application
G. Jay,
accordance
1976,
property.
for
personal
of the use and
of this book.
reserved.
Copyright
not
or suspect
that
should
consult
incurred
© 2017
rights
and
loss,
is
directly or indirectly,
any of the contents
Copyright
supplement,
of a well-trained
professional.
If you
a health
problem,
disclaim
to
by
.
from
prior
contacting
Thank
at
you
rights.
LLC
A
in this
book
responsible
for
are
property
owners.
is not
that
publisher.
Library
of Congress
are
not
Control
owned
Number:
ISBN:
978-1-946546-01-2
(HB)
ISBN:
978-1-946546-05-0
(PB)
ISBN:
978-1-946546-02-9
(EB)
websites
by
2016962910
(or
the
WE
PUT
THE
“FUN”
IN “FUNCTIONAL”
WWW.PYRIMIDINEPUBLISHING.COM
I
dedicate
would
this
not
book
be
where
outstanding
education
essence,
the culture
University
championed
beyond
mere
“ethic”.
And
“work”
so
what
Armaggedon.
At Ave
the end of the world.
to
I
Ave
Maria
University.
am
today
without
I received
and
people
a
“work
and
inspired
if I never
Maria,
I
the
from
Ave.
In
of Ave
Maria
ethic”
that
the
pursuit
learned
I realized
went
this
to
of
spell
wasn’t
Contents
Introduction
Our Sobering
PART 1
INDECENT
Chapter
Situation
EXPOSURES
1.
We
Are
Sterile
Contaminated
by
Estrogenics
Stinklers
Your New
“Tuning
The
Vision
Into”
the
Estrogenic
Chapter
Top
“Nature”
Publication
of Estrogenics
10 List
2. Estrogenic
Laws in Order
Chapter
3. The
The
Definition
Proofs,
Roots
of Our
of Our
Problem
Laws,
and
Estrogenic
Features
Tree
Bias
Errors
Trusting
Chapter
The
Your Soy Mate
4. Estrogenics
by
Mercury
Estrogenic
Drinking
Eating
Air, Land,
and
Sea
Rises
C-Level
Estrogenics
Estrogenics
PART 2
RISING
DISEASE
Chapter
5. Depressing
Estrogenics
in the
Estrogenics
Are
Fat
Causing
Obesity
Stores
Fat
Depressing
News Courtesy
of Estrogenics
Chapter
6. Estrogenic
Sexual Assault
Low
T
“Testrogenics”:
Where
Testosterone
and
Estrogen
Meet
Hormonal
Side-Effects
of Our
Estrogenic
Exposures
Chapter
Super-Cancer-Fragilistic-Extra-Allergy-Doses
It Begins
with
Curdling
Your
Estrogenics
What
Immune
Blood
(Clots)
and
PART 3
TODAY
AND
Chapter
Your
Obesity
TOMORROW
Heck
and
Chapter
System
Cancer
8. “Passing
the
On”
Cancer
and
Cancer
Across
Generations
Your
Family
To Infertility and Beyond
Estrogenics
to Extinction
Sauna
10.
Like
Avoidance
What
Closing
You
Can
Do
It Hot
Plans
Plastic Numbers
Other Avoidance
Boy-Girl
Principles
Numbers
Keys
to a Fish
Tail
Appendix
Actionable
The Top
Summary
on Estrogenics
10 List of Estrogenics
Common
Problems
Directives
for
References
from
Avoiding
Acknowledgements
Obesity
is Epigenetics?
9. Defoliating
Chapter
7.
Estrogenics
Estrogenics
Tree
ESTROGENERATION
INTRODUCTION
Our
Sobering
PAYPAL
“we
Situation
CO-FOUNDER
wanted
flying
PETER
cars
but
THIEL
instead
once
we
said,
got
140
characters”.
I suggest
that we
slogan
and similarly
cancer
but
quite
as
could
refurbish
Peter
Thiel’s
say “ we wanted
a cure
for
instead
catchy
we
as
got. . .
flying
more
cars,
cancer
I know,
”.
Not
a
true
but
story.
Welcome
the Age
to the Age
of Genetics.
of Personalized
I’m glad you
me.
It’s the
dawn
of an
But
welcome,
too,
to the
and
the
of Estrogenics.
Age
exciting
Age
What
clear that our current
or we will no longer
lifespans
of our
medical
and
with
day.
of Politic ized
become
overhaul
Specifically,
Science
are here
Science
a mess!
It
has
system
needs
even
outlast
an
the
predecessors.
our
trust
systems
in
seems
the
to
current
be
political
and
diminishing,
along
with our testosterone,
our muscle-mass,
and
our
fertility. Meanwhile,
rates of obesity,
cancer,
blood
clots,
depression,
beyond
and
population
every
single
back
to these
allergies
increase
health
are
called
the
percentages.
problem
things
on
I
just
rise
Oh,
listed
“estrogenics”
and
relates
and
what
I call “ The 7 Deadly Things ”, as you’ll see.
Within the setting of my life—a little fishing, a
courtship,
our
and
current
sobering
present
a
big
climate
“Chagrin”.
danger
and
wedding—this
of
artificial
book
are
estrogenics
relate
a
with
clear
to
little
reveals
estrogens
Estrogenics
far
most
and
of
our
modern
us and
they
health
are
destroying
At
the
same
prescribed—how
time,
we can
the
very
out
of it. It starts
recognition
least,
how
you
with
of these
do to carefully
get started.
1
epidemics.
avoid
They
the
are
wildlife
the
“Tonic”
reverse
this
and
your
education
artificial
them.
around
is
mess
family
and
estrogens
It’s
destroying
us.
herein
or, at
can
vigilance;
and
important
what
so
stay
the
to
let’s
PART
INDECENT
EXPOSURES
CHAPTER
We
1
Are
Sterile
Contaminated
by
Estrogenics
Stinklers
WHEN
I
ARRIVED
campus
for
the
first
sea of unfamiliar
I had no idea
about
change
time,
some
artificial
information
AVE
University’s
I nervously
bizarre
estrogens.
would
my
Maria
scanned
faces. I was 18 years old.
that, within a few hours,
to learn
to
AT
This
shake
outlook
information
on
the
I
was
pertaining
new
estrogenic
me
to the
core.
It
would
what
goes
into
my
body
and onto my body. In
discover
would one day
fact, what I was about
inspire this very book.
“Don’t
your
on
worry,
I’ll hold
making
reassured
friends,”
my
stuff.
You
trendy
was
a new
up”,
grades,
my. . .
chapter
time
to
fashion
Looking
around,
that
spelled
blue-marker.
there
in my
focus
the
that
place
campus.
fateful
smiled,
was
day
I
I
have
on
name
it
because
life. It was
my
like
time
future,
to
my
a handwritten
name
It
was
scrawled
up,
orientation
week
at Ave
sunshine
state of Florida.
On
campus,
sense.
I noticed
“Dave”.
Above
I walked
From
shorts
me.
“grow
face.
focus
cargo
I advanced
deeper
onto Ave Maria’s
a deer stepping
out onto a meadow.
This
just
to
and
always
was
a
friendly
introduced
onward
and
Maria
University
at Ave,
had
tag
myself.
upward;
in
I felt especially
never
had
once
a
tag
in
visited
weakness
out
the
of
the
for
impetuosity,
and
so
when
faculty
phenomenal,
Well,
that
peculiar
You
at
I had
Ave
called
see,
before
Minnesota
Maria
was
Sometimes
I free-soloed
my
even
home.
trucks
Because
fact,
onto
the
known
lesser
that
the
to
Far,
out,
far
degrees
some
of
college,
rural
is
cold.
cold—that
crazy
ice
physician
sheer
icy
collides
with
people
even
frozen
before
plethora
motorists,
it is also
10
the
my
lakes
in
attempting.
of
ice
motherland
the
land
fishermen
math
of 100,000
per
and
lake,
we’re
patches
is
actually
addicted
addiction?
It’s
drives
what
trucks
usually
onto
Besides
ice in the
a few
of my
past
a central role in this
“soak
in” estrogenics
discuss
the
fat, livers,
to
unfortunate
and
urine
alligators,
college
me
Anyone
again]
to
adventures,
book. They
day
and
estrogenic
well
doing
serious
take
place.
in animals
as
like
Now
you’re
about
to
fishing.
[hand
raising
people
first
fishermen.
in case
talking
fishermen—people
familiar
with this
bears
for
as “The Land of 10,000
Lakes”.
A slightly
known
fact about
Minnesota,
however,
is
that’s
play
and
me.
and
slowly raising].
Think about
that
ice is thick enough
to support
a
your
of
available
were
to Florida
Fahrenheit
In
Minnesota
[hand
for a second—the
Consult
40
Daniel
Celsius.
truck.
culture
University
county of Stevens.
heard,
Minnesota
minus
where
drive
the
“warmth”.
Minnesota;
the grassy
In case
you
haven’t
Anders
that
that had been good enough
for
and
the
promise
of this
rare
thing
juncture
heard
as
the
“breathe
in”
night.
We’ll
burdens
ranging
fish
from
resulting
within
polar
health
problems
from
featured
more
all these
exposures,
consistently
but
and
fish
more
will
be
prominently
than the rest. Fish are second
only to humans
in
this book.
We can learn a lot from the
humble
and
tasty
fish.
artificial
Recent
estrogens,
discovered
in fish.
So,
like
Minnesotan
a
Shortly
for
I met
classmates,
auditorium.
sessions
into
infertility
example,
were
Dave
we
and
were
Lectures
a
few
and
into
orientation
new
a
large
breakout
They
seemed
useful
more
like
legal
broke
the
secretes
bodies,
a substance
that acts like estrogen
as I would discover
later.
mold.
orientation
Perhaps
talk
stepped
up
probably
on
to
talk,
literally. . .
when
the
shouldn’t
these
parts.”
freshies!
Why
in the
began
One
“fig-leaves”
than
speaker
information.
presentations
sparkle
and
rather
went
this
commenced.
passion.
“you
first
other
all herded
Overall,
I felt that
the orientation
were
informative
but
they
lacked
The
from
fish
out
of
ice-cold
water,
migrated
to Florida. To Ave Maria.
after
college
insights
however,
since
a smartly
lectern
drink
the
stated:
water
Strong
words
to
newly
not drink the water!?
The
to say
that
artificial
estrogen
our
dressed
and
tap
mold
in
in
minted
speaker
was
present
water.
Was
this
person
being
over-scrupulous?
Either
way, my
roommates
any
Even
chances.
orientation
palate—a
speech
palate
over-dramatic
and
beyond
I weren’t
that
recommendation,
raised
on
“real”
or
taking
cautionary
my
well
redneck
water
especially
sensitive
confirmed
that
chemicals.
So, at 3
to
the
A.M.
filter
understood
the water
The filter
faucet.
a
why
we
was
night,
we
and
yellow
bought
the
it successfully
that
water.
was
full
all drove
bought
whiffle
already
indeed
ball
a
whiffle
over
I
never
ball bat
to our
removed
otherwise
nasty
our
dorm
Done!
we?
The tap-water
epiphany
set my mind reeling.
artificial
estrogens
found
in places
beyond
water?
And
how
do
Asking
these
very
questions
years
began
enough,
estrogenics
Such
I
to
they
elevate
my
observations
were
awareness.
were
that
memorable
shouldn’t
drink
Ave
the tap
“EE2”
EE2
but
Southernmost
The
high
it was
larger
is at sea
my
the
called.
a classmate
level.
went
Most
And
of
sure
to
find
predicted.
initial spark
informed
of
America
of
birth-control
Nobody
really
after
chugging
odious.
the
something
water
health?
during
orientation
lecture—“you
water”
because
water
in
region
levels
story
to that
Are
the
course
awareness.
additionally
did exactly
or why
it
sure
sounded
suggested
over
all due
Apparently—we
especially
impact
eventually
would
begin
in places I would have never
of orientation
that
but
sink
the
in
of
chrome
bat.
filter saw heavy use.
worked
as a flip attachment
tap
were
very
and
tastes—had
water
Wal-Mart
flavor
room’s
Or
that
Mercifully,
chemical
chemical
the
Naples
water
to
contained
hormones.
explained
EE2
“Man
what
was
bad
boobs?”
talk.
like this:
is contaminated
“Florida
by
salt,
so
the
municipal
continuously
water
recycled.
supply
When
people
out
of their
bodies
in the
hormones
circle
right
back
supply
and
recycling
don’t
really
to
flush
be
hormones
form
of pee,
the
through
the
water
come
out
during
that
process.”
Hormone
concentrate.
Gotcha.
and re-pee”.
It sounded
disgusting
twist on “going
The
needs
experts
recycled
even
water.
Once
my
water
epiphany,
mind
was
had
Fishing
canals
too,
for
the
or
by
that
signs
early-stage
the
reclaimed
reclaimed
that
read:
Reclaimed
signage.
a
it “reclaimed”.
scarred
Only:
similar
trust water
warned
of
reduce,
dream
water
in Florida. The little ponds
I would fish for bass with
Garrity
Release
bad
a name
called
I realized
all around
me
campus
where
Robert
had
They
“Recycle,
like a
green”.
And
around
Father
“Catch
and
Water”.
could
you
was
Many
honestly
without
the signs?
Even
many
reclaimed
water
use
around
lawns
Naples,
Florida.
Oh,
and
the
infamous
lawns!
Florida
Nearly
my
first
Dave—who
turned
immediately
our
dorm
Each
Now
and
every
Florida
They
to be
day
out
lawns
harbored
the
at Ave
Maria
University,
to be my roommate—almost
christened
“the
disappeared,
action,
and
vapors.
Those
sprinklers.
the
sprinklers
surrounding
stinklers”.
evening,
the stinklers
you
could
promptly
after
automatically
smell
the
the
sun
hissed
into
skunk-sulfur
stunk!
fair,
all have
other
countries
“treated”,
and
“recycled”,
states
or
beyond
“reclaimed”
shower,
toilet,
degrees.
This
But
just
‘transformed’
measure
other
are
and
is true
in
EE2
while
the
water
supply,
estrogenic
think.
are
gratitude,
These
persistent
being
higher
little fake
issue
looking
into
For
now,
in
Chapter
estrogenic
though,
successfully
levels,
the
are
drinking
water.
since hormones
Furthermore,
destroy
this
is harder
good
book,
than
sources
news
you
of
out
will
or
or
1
done.
tell you
than
you
that
might
hormones
simply
concomitantly
in our
warned;
killed
high
While
are
chemical
especially
the
removed
very
filter
Some
from
be
does
must
it sounds.
it’s a mess.
can’t
cooking
food.
to this.
parasites
by
not
You
“killed”
little
them.
filters
do
to
Yet,
not
And there are dozens
of other
be doing to avoid estrogenics.
is that
have
artificial
that
also
molecules,
boiling
gratitude,
down
and
They
certainly
are not alive.
remove
estrogenics.
things you should
The
been
generally
estrogenics.
being
contamination
smallest
hormones,
is
while
really “boils”
like bacteria
filtered
estrogenics
of the water.
We
will
related
to this water
4,
you’ve
The water issue
living
organisms
measure
water
finally
do not want to come
out
detail many
actual numbers
supply
it. If
with
are
water
Simply
And
the
I can
varying
toilet
Easy.
you,
however,
levels
at
in
globe.
is present.
to
measurements
the
the
you’re
recycled
too directly.
I am here to testify
Without
water
all around
much
estrogenics
these
faucet
how
directly
is
your
into
drinking
water?
how
high
sink
by
a
the
time
thorough
estrogen
in
you
grasp
your
finish
this
on
the
environment
and
you
will
know
pro.
It will change
how
to
your
remove
life,
your
them
view
like
of
reality,
and,
most
importantly,
your
health.
We’ll
revisit Florida, fishing, and introduce
a special
met
at Ave
Maria
Paradoxically,
armed
a
molecule
this
many
years
in Biochemistry
they
are
are
later,
from
that
the
Myers
you
future.
out
structurally
Serious
recent
Boston
the
from
late
first
the
your
a class
similar
to
trouble.
Family
talk,
one
thing
of
estrogen
tree
I arrived
night
in
sliding
the Fort Myers
airport—hmmmm—rising
warm,
humid,
Florida
air? Stinklers.
at
February.
I smelled
automatic
Maria
our
is
are
estrogenics
airport
guess
Here
estrogenics
trouble.
trouble.
And for
Fort
our
summary:
that
stepped
write
Ph.D.
and
one-sentence
Can
I
I was invited back down to Ave
to speak.
The
topic:
estrogenics,
exposures,
and
also
girl I
University.
as
with
University,
University
a
when
I
doors
of
into
Good
to
the
be
back.
Your
New
Vision
Today,
I realize
EE2
lakes,
birth
control
our seafood
supply.
Other
coloring,
lurking
that
more
too.
soaps,
drinking
But
to
great
toilet-flushed
And
from
plastics,
and
fragrances
the
“stretch”
far beyond
man boobs.
The good news is that you can
estrogenics
than
chemicals
are
in our
oceans,
and our drinking
estrogenics
herbicides,
there
far
degrees.
health
remove
Especially
fishing
water
food
are
problems
or
avoid
from
your
water.
before
spending
money
on
the
“perfect
filter”
or
making
to be
a single
convinced
lifestyle
that
change,
there
you
really
need
Not
only
is a problem.
that, but you also need to be convinced
that the
problem
is immense.
That’s
my job. You
won’t
endure
open
heart
perfectly
healthy,
religious
ed
surgery
as
I
students
So
here’s
“open
the
heart
Exposures
term
explain
in
major
problem
is
major—and
oftentimes
if you
believe
to
Boston.
my
you
are
high-school
Recognition
of
a
necessary
to
motivate
inconvenient—change.
plan.
Basically,
surgery
for
your
diagnosis”,
will begin
with
Part
a simple
a
very
1:
own
Indecent
definition
of the
“estrogenic”.
On
the
the heels of that definition,
we jump right into
all-important
list I have researched
and created
for
your
your
benefit.
This
estrogenic
what
I
list is designed
awareness
believe
and
are
the
to
heighten
it revolves
around
top
10
estrogenic
substances
found
this list the “IRS
in our daily environment.
I dub
10 List” or the “Ill Reproductive
System
to impending
will
List”
due
investigate.
scientists
infertility.
Still in Part
items,
the
These
call
we
1,
will
scientific
conflicts
“male
issues
simply
but
explore
smoking
research.
estrogenic
discussion
the
item
This
and
legal
will
is designed
include
something
It
listing
publication
status
be
of
estrogenic
issues
within
scientific
bias
featured.
spin,
related
single
top
Overall,
your
we
includes
Soy will be
all the pros
every
to sharpen
also
the
hot
includes
commercialized
estrogenic
items.
prominently
featured,
comparing
cons,
issues
feminization”.
after
of interest,
sexuality
vision
to
most
and
10
this
into
the
modern
estrogenic
“insiders”
vantage.
Next,
in
problems
Part
2:
arising
estrogen-like
health
Rising
from
items
problems
research
Disease,
eating
will
be
on
the
discovery
impact
both
humans
of wildlife species.
we
and
very
problems
numbers
specifically,
focus
that
on
basically
these
the
in Part
you
an
health
drinking
These
are
cutting-edge
of
will
see
and
how
the
unbelievable
estrogenic
health
problems
will be
common
elements
2
all estrogenic
health
from
severe
or
unveiled.
scientific
More
scene
problems
substances
“ The
7
share.
Deadly
I
call
Things
because
they
are seven
collective
concerns
unite all the individual estrogenic
substances.
Finally,
in
discuss
how
and
special
view
Of
3:
emotional
going to
fat,
sick,
compelling
After
we
can
focus
be
will
I
Tomorrow,
we
infertility,
passed
be
given
largest,
prefer
on
obesity,
to
future
most
not
to
to
infertility
lasting
since
I
problem.
leave
you
on
an
low at the end of the book. “We’re
all
die and future generations
are
becoming
and
infertile”
is
not
my
idea
of
a
call to action.
discuss
estrogenics,
we
practical
solutions
These
solutions
system
of “Gold”,
Avoidance
and
that
This inheritance
of infertility,
obesity,
is called “transgenerational”
impact
and
this as the
course,
Today
estrogenic-induced
cancer
generations.
and cancer
a
Part
”
Plans.
the
long-armed
reach
of
explore
specific,
simple,
and
to all your estrogenic
problems.
will
be
“Silver”,
Of these
presented
and
as
“Bronze”
3 plans,
the
a
3-tiered
Estrogenic
single
plan
that
best
hopefully
suits
emerge
your
situation
within
the
and your performance
Put another
way, my
is to build
against
an
hundreds
context
goals.
intention
enlightening
estrogenics
of top
and
needs
of your
in writing
and
will
health
this
book
overwhelming
based
on
the
hard
scientists.
I’ve
seen
case
work
how
of
damaging
these chemicals
are and I want you to see
this,
too. The case will grow Bigger,
Faster,
Stronger i ,
and—bam!—this
case
realistic
Ultimately,
guidance.
a decision:
the
final
how
will
extreme
chapter’s
close
do
specific
with
will need
you
want
Gold,
instance,
estrogenic
and
you
may
exposures.
choose
things
overall health
this approach
decide
You
with
and
but
college
might
the
or
to tolerate
go
biggest
convenience.
I empathize
to make
to be
Silver,
Level Estrogenic
Avoidance
Plans?
If you are a “financially-challenged”
for
practical,
you
within
Bronze
student,
some
light
Bronze
Level
payoffs
toward
I don’t
and we
recommend
can still be
athlete
or
friends.
If
you
are
operative,
a
on
zealous
about
and
operatives
meticulous
approach
your
professional
the
other
hand,
you
may
military
want
to be
avoiding
estrogenics.
Many
athletes
are
already
benefiting
from
this
Gold
and
Level
it’s
competition
a
estrogenic
winning
will
avoidance
approach.
overlook
Many
artificial
of
estrogen
avoidance
so Gold Level avoidance
will give you
huge competitive
advantage
if this describes
you.
Similarly,
breast
Gold
if you
cancer,
Level
you
have
need
aggressive.
a
genetic
to strongly
Similar,
too,
predisposition
consider
if you
a
to
being
struggle
with
depression,
estrogenic
obesity,
avoidance
or
may
infertility.
be
accompanied
some new challenges
but your efforts
In the end,
going
“Estrogenic-Free”
part
of your
bright
“Tuning
Into”
the
Ok.
let’s
blast
So
and
cherished
Definition
right
Extreme
by
will pay
off.
will become
legacy.
of Estrogenics
into
defining
“estrogenics”
as I promised.
“Estrogenics”
sounds
like a
between
“estrogen”
and “genetics”
but what
cross
does
it mean?
A
good
definition
I will be
that
using
binds
or
of an
throughout
‘sticks’
and
understand
how
Estrogen
receptor?
look
and
sends
song
the
works
out
For
a signal.
Gonna
tune-in
pick-up
that
tuning-in,
this
from
location.
to
101.9
act
at
and
this:
by
within
the
hear
as a receptor.
the
let’s
Brad
tower
say
the
Paisley
on
Florida
radio
time,
you’ll
proper
Paisley’s
By
“I’m Gonna
Miss
in this example.
Her”
The
one
location
and
picked
essence
Really,
piece.
radio
simple.
the
radio
your
all very
is
a
A current
Perfect.
it’s
That
to
works.
example,
Her”
acts as the receptor.
And
is the estrogen
or hormone
Again:
receptor
like
Miss
broadcast
you
“estrogen
Principle
function
Gator Country,
101.9 FM.
station and a fishing song.
If you
your
system.
I parallel
this
steroid
to a radio broadcasting
system.
broadcasting
is “I’m
in
define
80/20
estrogen
one
“something
receptors
Let’s
estrogenics
steroid
hormone
hormone
system
Radio
at
an
the
this book—is
to estrogen
body”. Simple.
But, wait. Estrogen
receptor”
“estrogenic”—and
song
is
up
at
of
the
sent
out
another
hormone
concept:
and
your
sends
body
them
creates
out
hormones
into
your
hormones—are
locations.
The
picked
up by
key phrase
here
For
real-life
a
fun,
hormone
named
secretes
this
blood.
snazzy
let’s
Your
hormone
place
They—the
receptors
is “other
example,
“leptin”.
in one
in other
locations”.
look
at
body
creates
every
day
a
and
within
your fat cells.
__________________________
We
Interrupt
side-story
this
and
leptin
broadcast
trivia
hormone,
scientifically
to
winner.
this
classified
give
Since
means
as
an
you
fat
a
fat
secrete
cells
“endocrine
is.
Fat
being
most
the
people
from the
Michael
think.
what
you
Schrute:
now?
Michael
Scott:
Dwight
Sorry,
For
will
you’re
Dwight
organ
“organ”
example,
think
here
lot
is a
alike
something
OK,
Umm,
what
am
nacho
No. . .
is
is, with
30%
throughout
have
more
fat
[Dwight].
I
will
I thinking
right
chips.
How
skin
is
the
largest
are
always
body.
Dwight—this
truth
what
scene
and
science.
There
exceptions.
And, by the way, did I just
than Dwight Schrute?
Daaang.
The
to
thinking.
Schrute:
of the
people’s
“organ”.
is contrary
TV show, The Office:
Scott:
We
think
a
Sometimes
say
largest
are
organ”—an
organ
that secretes
hormones.
Therefore,
skin, in certain cases, is not their largest
Fat
quick
cells
the
current
America
cell
volume
and
rate
nerdier
of obesity
rising,
than
get
skin
over
many
people
cell
volume.
Of
course,
we’ll
ourselves
and
just
try
keep
that
to fix the
literally
and
how
create
stored
they
more
for
are
fat
environment
but
also
inside
causing
issues.
Yuck.
arrive
your
Oh,
fat
your
There
rising
rates
estrogenics
we’ll
to
almost
an
entire
about
how
estrogenics
years
cells!
correlation
between
rising
rates
of
quietly
underlying
and
we
will
spend
chapter—Chapter
5—talking
are
factoid
there
body
is
of
in
cells
to
even
obesity
our
a
and
global
soon.
__________________________
So,
let’s
get
back
Understanding
other
When
the
to
leptin
will
hormones.
leptin hormone
cells
throughout
receptor”
snatch
will be
out
help
your
leptin
your
body
by
hormone
you
enters
affected
the
the
understand
all
bloodstream,
all
that
have
leptins.
from
your
Your
organ
receptors.
when
your
blood,
brain
and
coursing
binds
“You are
as the
satiety
(in your
the
no
leptin
other
true
So
“tells”
brain)
hand,
will
and
brain
the
is
leptin
leptin
and
full,” it signals.
communicator
receptors.
and goes
It carries
around,
receptors
eating.
known
On
So
“leptin
cells
blood
those cells.
for instance.
leptin
a
Those
leptins will change
Take
your
brain,
with
leptin.
is
enters
you
an
in
the
to
stop
Leptin, therefore,
of the
feeling
is
of
or fullness.
your
tongue
Therefore,
in blood circulating
no lingual impact.
apparently
leptin
just
around
your
Weird thought
has
comes
tongue.
but
a
story.
in essence,
receptor
=
no
no
radio
hormonal
= no
101.9
actions
at
FM
that
tunes.
No
particular
location
in
your
organs / tissues
body.
This
in your
is
body
a
key
have
is this
because
information
the
spread
all
so
estrogen
throughout
your
no
important?
Well,
are
body.
pretty
They
more
prevalent
than
leptin
and
hormone
receptors.
In fact, estrogen
practically
you
in
tamper
every
“using”
estrogenics
realize
that
not
of
(even
are
your
body’s
not
are
most
receptors
body!
when
levels
on
“injecting”
far
other
are
So,
estrogen
if it is not
much
by
purpose—I
estrogenics),
problems
all throughout
your
body.
will not just change
your
brain,
not
change
muscles,
your
you
this causes
Estrogenics
just
cell
with
they
Conversely,
your body.
darned
receptors
If
receptors,
can
pick
up
the
hormone.
receptors
equal no response
from
Why
concept.
not
just. . .
your
just
well,
fat,
not
change
you
just
your
get
change
reproductive
the
point.
your
organs,
Estrogenics
change
most of your cells because
most of your
cells have estrogen
receptors.
This is similar in wild
mammals
why
artificial
throughout
problems
act
all
estrogen
body.
and
in
fish,
too,
estrogenics—those
this
book—can
and
such
throughout
receptors
by
the
items
cause
way.
we
such
This
is
discuss
diverse
major
problems.
Estrogenics
your
body,
systemically,
on
that
are. . .
all throughout
your
2
Good.
So
same
song,
now
with
we move on
is one
final
hormones
we’re
do
of
receptor
or
speed
estrogenics
“internal”
communication:
These
are
each
First,
think
extremely
about
your
lightning
fast,
communication.
electrical
Electrical
Hormones,
the
Unlike
And
electricity,
this
is
other
hormones
where
same
page,
concept.
artificial
versus
act
estrogenic
effects on your
Well,
our
bodies
have
on
the
the
and
or
But
estrogenic
Top 10
that
is important
estrogen
consideration
quickly
the
to my
detail
like
on
before
List, there
regarding
estrogens:
the
longevity.
how
body?
two
How
sustained
major
nerves
the
are
ways
and
of
hormones.
different.
nerves.
Nerves
signaling;
“hares”.
hand,
travel
Brad
are
carry
the
the
that
speedy
“tortoises”.
slowly.
Paisley
radio
and
receptor
analogy
sound
falls short.
waves
physically
hormones”
“sex
or
electrical
derived
from
are derived
hormone”
Hormones
are
currents.
includes
like
They
cholesterol.
At
from cholesterol.
category
not
are
least
And
“sex
the
estrogen
and
testosterone.
So
these
sex
hormones
are
created,
secreted
your
blood,
and
then
they
slowly
throughout
your body. This happens
into
move
along
physically,
not
electrically.
Put
another
blood”.
way,
Blood
blood
goes.
can
nerves
If
nerves
impact
ever
on
at the
use
arrive,
your
an
electrical
body
of having.
a
long-lasting
see
why
Electricity
impacts,
this would
is
on
be
literally
the
other
your
is
good.
This
impact
like
electricity
and you
bad.
lightning
hand,
have
than
hormones,
you would be convulsing
with
all the time. Envision
a permanent
seizure
can
can
fast.
Hormonal
last beyond
a few
minutes.
hormonal
They
often last hours
or days.
In
impacts,
we are now
discovering,
even
genetic.
on,
be
it doesn’t
Sustained
get
impact
Since
DNA
and
any
more
“long-term”
from
of
anywhere
hormones
dream
sustained
“speed
hormones
don’t
little rascals
sustained
could
travel
transport
Hormones
nerve “wire”.
And once those
a more
hormones
genes
hormones—and
are
fact,
can
passed
than
this.
estrogenics
that activate
the estrogen
hormone
response—will
become
a very key concept
we will revisit in the
final
chapters,
especially
“Epigenetics”—marks
in that
discussion
on
but
our
I don’t
Chapter
DNA—will
want
be
to get
9.
included
ahead
of
myself.
The
Estrogenic
Top
Now
that you
say, “estrogenics
understand
are things
estrogen
receptors
potential
long-term
let’s
move
munching
aware
future
Here
that
on,
what
that
and
sniffing,
there
is
specify
are
are
and
drinking
a
in this book’s
throughout
some
from
the
when
‘stick’
of
that
most
believe
significant
reproductive
tragedy
the
binding,
common
this
handy
every
day.
for
Appendix.
book,
infertility
relating
Be
summary
I will
be
this list the “Ill Reproductive
System
List”,
List”. As mentioned,
this list is so named
I
I
to
estrogenics—artificial
probably
lathering
on,
and
also
I mean
bind or
body”
ramifications
These
you
reference
and
in your
along
estrogenics.
estrogens—that
10 List
to
is
these
calling
or “IRS
because
the
most
artificial
substances.
Finally, the IRS List is exactly 10 items
often refer to it as the “IRS 10 List”.
long,
so
I
As
you
move
forward,
realize
is the “spine” of this book,
words,
everything
revolves
items
on
the
IRS
10
List
that
the
IRS
10
the backbone.
In
around
this list.
are
more
problematic
List
other
Some
to
your
health
And
as
than
you
might
System
List
only
covers
These
There
the
a number
is
before
are
finish
start
the
this
Ill
on
are
bad.
Reproductive
The
IRS 10
List
to be
pervasive.
because
a daily
of other
I
want
looking
for
ones
book,
cut
items
people
are
basis.
substances
that
are
are not included
because
our
is low. The reason
for this, in
because
we
items
the
to them
also estrogenic
but
exposure
frequency
essence,
all the
suspect,
made
exposed
are
but
is not exhaustive.
estrogenics
I find
items
frequently
others
harming
you
to
remove
specks.
your
may
health.
want
to
planks
The
major
After
you
out
and
go
investigate
the “specks”
but it’s not necessary.
In addition, other common
or daily-used
chemicals
may
be
found
out
to
be
estrogenic
future.
Unfortunately,
we
artificial
chemicals
many
and
It’s only a matter
arise in our “daily
For
the
the
newly
list on
less
of time
bread”.
common
emerging
my
website.
finding
provided
new
they
scientific
sources.
are
The
proofs
as
first-rate
examples.
Let’s
move
forward
List estrogenic.
near
studied.
well
an
out
as
in the
begin
in
items
by good
scientific
and
for
updated
assistance
estrogenic
estrogenic
laid
by
estrogenics
I keep
and
emerging
are shown
to be
10
as
appreciate
serve
IRS
barely
new
estrogenics
chapter
of each
are
estrogenics,
the
surrounded
before
3 I also
in
next
source
that
audit
CHAPTER
2
Estrogenic
Proofs,
Laws,
Features
Laws
and
in Order
YOU
WILL
addicted
REMEMBER
fisherman
I
earlier
MENTIONED
and
held
up
my
From
experience,
I can
tell you
that
fisherman—the
addicted
fisherman—seeks
of
accomplishment.
the
fish,
we
conquer.
When
the
The
bigger,
We
discover,
better.
I moved
to Florida
for
college,
hand.
the
true
the opiate
prettier,
we
the
or
rarer
pursue,
and
I
instinctively
knew
I needed
to prioritize
my life and
eliminate
distractions.
Decisions
I made
as a freshman,
I
realized,
would
my
choices
To
this
immeasurably
had
end,
to be
I put
some
ideas.
changes.
Yet,
carefully
pen
to
my
future.
All
calculated.
paper
and
organized
I strategically
outlined
major
life
despite
being well intentioned
during
this process,
I made
a fundamental
Specifically,
in Minnesota
fishing
days
on
impact
of
the
mistake.
before
college,
week
ending
I had
in
been
“Y”.
might be fair to say I had been
fishing for
and
fishing
for girls, too. It was
a tough
During
change
“Who
college
and
go
needs
in my
grades
college
as
“Deny
follow
me,”
a
and
sunny
dancing
student
yourself,
was
I resolved
to
drastically
fishing-free.
girls
sitting
perfect
do.
orientation,
It
fish
life.
who
needs
fish,”
I
thought,
dorm
suite with visions
in my head. I had come
and
take
study
up
auto-looping
your
is
what
cross
in my
head
I
of
to
would
daily,
and
and
the
emphasis
The
was
problem
the college
girls would
aquatic
few
It
short
a
was
that
take
were
around
60%
of
in the
balanced
before
ocean
restorative
and
intense
studying.
my
was
only
restrictions
a
life
is
of
to improve,
healthy.
outdoor
only
even
of balance.
counterbalance
Removing
these
not
quickly
they
of trying
importance
aspects
was
the
Undoubtedly,
of my studies.
process
the
social
meditative
fins,
away.
long
overlooked
life
girls
with
draining.
the quality
essence,
my
yourself”.
population.
Avoiding
involvement
with
be a challenge.
And
for
gill-bearing
minutes
didn’t
had
“deny
vertebrates
became
diminished
In
on
Similarly,
the
pursuits
are
the
key
inconvenient
I
Having
stresses
of
facets
from
but
it
was
IRS
10
counterproductive.
In
a
similar
manner
estrogenics,
elimination
is
around
on
the
a
us
effort
distract
to
regarding
a
daily
avoid
us from
basis
all act
receptor?
Do
on
the
they
so
them?
prioritizing
To answer
these questions,
whether
each item is truly
items
the
key
question
is
too extreme.
These
act
worth
avoidance
simply
healthy
pursuits?
we first need to know
estrogenic.
Do the IRS
same
like
is it really
receptor,
estrogen
estrogen
to these
IRS
10
questions
is “yes” then elimination
of the
estrogenics
emerges
as
a viable
and
extremist
estrogen
position.
receptor
health
option
Artificially
basically
way?
If the
bodies
artificial
sound
twisted
the
in our
in some
scientifically
and
Will
other
whether
total
items
are
all
rather
answer
than
activating
guarantees
that
an
your
health
dysfunctions
This
will follow. . .
chapter,
“Proofs”
scientific
therefore,
begins
by
setting
out
of
each
item’s
estrogenicity.
validation
of estrogenic
behaviors.
chapter
goes
Gaining
mastery
view
.
the
much
This
But
is
this
that
we
further.
over
full
short
estrogenics
panorama
demands
of
problems.
Proving
estrogenic
status
is not enough.
Soy, after all, is
still viewed
by some
as a “health
food”
despite
common
acceptance
Accordingly,
that
“Unique
estrogenic
will
estrogenic
panorama.
it is an
estrogenic
Features”
also
be
included
“Unique
to
in
chapter’s
itself,
solitary
even
a minor
health
though
slice
problems
these
of the
this
Features”
of lurking
health
problems
even
Deadly
Things
we
will connect
various
are
do
And
everybody
various
else
are
health
is doing”.
government
every
estrogenic
We
will be
hold
Let’s
dig into
Estrogenic
vital
health
the
clues
for
just
pie.
include
item, or
will ask:
where
boards
stand?
investigated.
Throughout
this process
of investigation,
you will find shocking
answers
to these
that
in
really
problem
regulatory
item
clues
is eye-opening
Finally,
each
estrogenic
item
will also
information
about the legal status of each
“what
each
beyond
The
7
later.
Glimpsing
“Features”
overall
item.
specific
you
I believe
questions
to
consider.
list.
#1.
PHYTOESTROGENS
The “Plant Estrogenics”
First
on
are
the
plant
the
Ill Reproductive
phytoestrogens.
’roids.
“Phyto-”
System
These
simply
are
means
(IRS)
10
List,
basically
the
“plant”,
so
we’re
talking
substances
about
that
plant
certain
use for their own
Proof of Estrogenic
Unlike
most
I don’t
estrogens
globe,
What
via the
prove
Plant
legal
estrogenic
create
and
the
to
IRS
you
10
List,
that
phyto
Estrogen
is
built
Estrogenics
in all forms
soy
opioid
opioid
on
estrogenic.
though
is this
The
that
can
peptide
receptor
all around
bind
the
“soymorphin”.
that
soy
can
the
opioid
1
activate?
opioid receptor
is the same
sort of receptor
binds other addictive
substances
like morphine,
heroin,
and
these
are
are
even
receptor
to
indeed,
into the name.
Legal Status of The
Phytoestrogens
actually
estrogenics
obligated
are,
plants
or
growth.
Behavior
other
feel
estrogenics,
endorphins.
addictive
properties
interesting
This
are
raises
plants
an
at
this
book
discussing
but
they
done
of
Estrogenics
by
plants
plants
be
actual
sense.
question.
with
numbers
Before
I
reveal
however,
study.
many
the
equivalent
us.
that
some
hard-working
over
100 food plants
for
in a single
How
for?
will
for
levels.
out
thankfully,
work
and,
at different
watching
And,
the
content
study,
within
list? Plants
or “curves”?
comparative
announce
analyzed
be
important
you
and complicated
“huge muscles”
most
not
of The Plant
are
created
in different
should
Looking
will
to note.
Unique Features
Phytoestrogens
therefore,
I
A
give
long
of
us
one
study
I’m
happy
a
has
to
researchers
phytoestrogen
2
the
results
I first
want
from
that
to mention
massive
two
extra
items
this
marijuana
particular
and
study
failed
to
lavender.
While many
people
are
marijuana
or lavender,
not exposed
there
is a
might
them.
is
be,
so
I included
currently
you
legal
will
find
in
estrogenic
there
is
scientific
around
nature
studies
of
total
estrogen”
or
latter searches
marijuana
I specifically
two
them
right?
In
other
through
clear
your
to
concentrating
this
rather
diverse
been
done
on
cannabis
more
but
than
10
estrogen”
either
paper
unique
result
are
and
“cannabis
+
dose
the
(1)
in the
smoke.
into
of
these
estrogenic
the
plants
(2)
and
enough,
directly
bloodstream
levels
you
smell
condensing
Obvious
on
it
with
estrogenics
your
heavily
compared
to—say—what
actually would “stop and
because
aspects
inhaling
lungs
title
“condensate”.
or
“incensing”
in:
present
in via the
words,
way
And
. 3
“smoke”
and
marijuana
that
breathing
with
condensate”
essential-oils
estrogenics
+
all,
states.
or
now
“lavender
studies
after
astonishingly
are
appreciate
phytoestrogens:
Either
smoking
lavender
in
to
you
“marijuana
+ estrogen”.
One of the
yields this title: “Estrogenic
effects of
smoke
at
American
of lavender
There
everyday
chance
Lavender,
beauty products.
of research
has
enough.
100
hints
many
lavender
numbers
of organic
Not a vast amount
the
include:
is
estrogenics
is
a
a
and
problem,
might
find
the lavender”
if
you
out in
nature.
Since
should
lavender
and
cannabis
realize
that
they
are
are
estrogenic,
extremely
likely
you
to
engender
all
through
the
later
estrogenic
in this
problems
book,
The
7
we
Deadly
Keep
that in the back of your mind
frequent
“user” of lavender
or cannabis
And
despite
especially
lavender—only
10
studies—lavender
has
prepubertal
in personal
studies.
For
5
How
are
soap,
of
people
usually.
you
are
with
cannabis
rise
to
gynecomastia
from
care
products. 4
those
means
if you
smoke.
100
given
not
go
Things.
studies
to
already
cases
of
exposure
gynecomastia
limited
compared
will
many
chronic
Multiple
already
familiar,
man-boobs.
“chronically
That’s
exposed”?
what
Through
scientific
researchers
were
looking
at in the above
study.
People
are
also chronically
exposed
via aromatherapy
diffusers.
Ok.
So
let’s
move
promised—the
one
for
with
phytoestrogen
researchers
micrograms
[g]
along
over
big
but
numbers.
you
Getting
I
In
this
study,
each
per
item
of
100
grams
should
lost
study
plants
content.
food,
plant
100
used
units
for
[μg] of phytoestrogen
of the
actual
to that
just
in the
compared
focus
units
the
on
the
would
be
a travesty.
The top two phytoestrogenic
items found
in the
study were flaxseed
at 379,380 μg and soy
beans
at 103,920
produce
μg.
huge
thousands
it is true
have
sometimes
argue
other
estrogenic
of micrograms.
close.
And, yes,
legumes
In
with
that
words,
soy
Nothing
“other
that.
The
explain
researchers
flax
each
Hundreds
else
types
phytoestrogens”,
patronizingly
and
payloads.
of
even
came
of beans
as
some
to
me.
in
or
people
I
won’t
this
study
tested
white
beans,
beans,
kidney
beans,
and baked beans.
Black beans
had
for
example.
What
eat
this
red
chick
on
the
means
of
black
peas
that
beans,
need
to
eat
20,000
reach
phytoestrogen
beans.
Yeeeaaaah.
worse
than
soy,
math.
One other
is
that
8,840
this
is
in case
interesting
they
μg
And
you
thing
found
of
you
soy
too
much
you
peas
cup
almost
want
to run
this
a
case
to
of
soy
4-times
with
same
has
In
to
well,
chick
1
is
protein
phytoestrogen.
way
of
from
need
phytoestrogens
Hmmm.
And
from
flax
5 μg,
end.
and. . .
cups
levels
beans,
had
“high”
is
lima
black
haven’t
quite eaten the amount
of
you get from 1 cup of soy beans.
you
beans,
beans,
and
were
essentially
cups
mung
broad
9 μg
Those
10,000
beans,
this
study
whopping
you
wonder,
phytoestrogen.
In
fact,
basically
anything
with
processed
soy
has
much
estrogenic
load. Often, processed
foods
worse
than
processing
content.
the
condenses
Sound
processing
back
to
have
9μg
Really,
sauce?
That
In
the
of
The
items
the
beans.
phytoestrogen
because
phytoestrogen
cannabis / lavender
example
ringing
a specific
case
condenses
black
plant
or thickens
familiar?
“smoke
condensate”
Let me give you
food
plain
any bells?
revealing
how
phytoestrogens.
As
too
are
I said,
per
100g
Let’s
go
black
beans
of
beans.
nothing
to worry
about.
But black
bean
Well, that has 5,330 μg of phytoestrogen.
2
escalated
fact,
plant-food
quickly,
yes?
only
other
the
item
over
“raw”,
1,000
unprocessed
in
the
big
phytoestrogen
μg.
And
study
I
was
doubt
you
sesame
would
sesame
seeds in one sitting
a good
factoid
to know.
eating
not
some
yet
aware
Surprisingly,
processed
seeds
eat
100
actually
single
who
a
we
Beyond
sesame
licorice
eat
of
product
that
I’m
almost
cleared
hundred
given
the
1,000μg
noteworthy.
people
that
grams
chance.
of
licorice
We
know
are.
those
final
massive
a few
sitting,
few
really
needn’t
Simple.
One
grams
but I suppose
it’s still
Maybe
people
enjoy
of phytoestrogens
so that, too, was
Especially
since I actually know certain
in
8,008
of.
black
might
at
thing:
food
phytoestrogens.
items
worry
and
about
processed
looked
These
coumestan,
isoflavones,
and
but stay with me, it’s not.
you
phytoestrogen.
it is important
study
foods,
at
to
note
specific
specific
lignans.
Great.
that
types
this
of
types
were
Sounds
boring
Interestingly,
soy
isoflavone.
phytoestrogen
Conversely,
is
flax
is
almost
entirely
almost
entirely
lignans. And when I say “almost
entirely”,
I mean
it. Of the 103,920μg
of phytoestrogen
in soy,
for
example,
the
is
103,649μg
379,380μg
lignan
is isoflavone
of phytoestrogen
(99.9%).
low in
studied,
(99.7%).
actual
it isn’t
And,
food
even
And
in flax,
frankly,
379,012μg
coumestan
and
plant
items
worth mentioning
of
is
that
again,
so
were
so I
won’t.
In
the
next
isoflavone
chapter,
research,
research
bias
amounts
flax.
It
that
is enough
But
for
it is important
entertain
an
“less bad”.
What
a
But
is
in
on
soy
discussion
what
about
about
lignans?
estrogenic
lignan.
avoid
consuming
powerfully
high
estrogenic
and
me.
for
you
interesting
to
know
that
that
makes
“secret”
lignans
them
is this “secret”?
Your
In
spin.
loaded with
I personally
of
zoom
including
and
Flax is clearly
First
of all,
we’ll
gut
the
bacteria.
1980’s,
decrease
specifically
free
break-down
Thankfully
scientists
testosterone
investigating
product
for
intestines
have
various
Breaking
units.
down
of
the
we
will later
In
other
found
us,
lignans
but they
were
“enterolactone”,
more
a
of lignan. 6
it seems,
adapted
good
to break
Enterolactone
is
estrogenic
lignan
estrogen-disrupting
observe
words,
that
since
or
bacteria
lignans
in
our
down
into
one
such
diminishes
estrogenic
unit.
some
problems
in this book.
lignans
are
one
of the
few
natural
estrogenics,
adapted
to
bacteria
natural
small
our
deal
bodies
with
them.
have
Our
somewhat
probiotic
have adapted,
more
specifically.
to drink
processed
flax oil but
amount
bodies.
At
suggests.
of flax
least
Our
bacteria,
into all
seeds
this
intestinal
It is not
eating
a
is well-managed
is what
the
by
current
bacteria,
gut
our
evidence
it seems—the
gut
the good
probiotics—break
down
lignans
sorts
of products
with long,
complicated
names.
7
As
aside,
an
Principle”:
this
we’ve
is what
been
I think
exposed
of as
for
the
eons,
“Paleo
so
we’ve
adapted.
Why have we been exposed?
We’ve
because
lignans
are
created
by
protective
When
measure
an
lignans,
insect
for
are
review
reading
more
Finally,
to
papers
from
be
is
decreases
high
if
there
you
in blood
sick
or
nature’s
a
potential
this
cell-killing
a
only
but
are
of studies
are
killing
are
of
performed
this
point
a number
lignans
levels
It’s
as
of
being
factor.
will become
studied
because
are
good
fair,
with
insect
being
at
are
about
a growth
“protective”!
that find a few
lignans.
Mainly,
improvements
These
the
studies
dishes
with
cells
interesting.
(There
this 8
plants
therapy
Those
so than
certainly
actually
anti-cancer
ability.
eats
example,
die.
That
is
home-defense!
Lignans
more
been
exposed
plants
as
a
in
still
but
interested
in
cancer
cells.)
lot
published
of
isolated
positive
benefits
this
has
to
do
with
lipid
profiles
and
apparent
in inflammation.
lignan
benefits,
however,
nearly
always
focus
on
isolated
that
are
metabolites
broken
of lignans—pieces
down
by
bacteria
They generally
do not focus
In addition,
positive
studies
bring
out
an
reintroduce
For
important
later:
example,
spin
I find
in
to
here
and
our
consider
gut.
we
will
bias.
science
journal
titles
“Dietary
lignans:
physiology
and
cardiovascular
disease
risk reduction”
mine
lignans
on the lignan itself. 9
about
flax and
lignan
factor
and
of
throughout
the
like
this:
potential
for
10 [emphasis
entire
book
in
quotations].
Having
the
eating
“potential”
lignans
sounds
further
into the
“The
associations
risk
of
they
are
just
leave
not
the
“Fungus
The
prefix
fungi
yeasts.
are
open
read
are
on
like this:
decreased
promising,
but
”. Interesting.
Let’s
this
for
now
and
Estrogenic”
means
therefore,
kingdom,
fungi.
we
When
are
importantly,
we
discuss
talking
about
includes
molds
Mycoestrogen-secreting
found
but stay
products
mold
sporulation
during
Dark
and
damp
too.
molds
predominantly
as grains,
other
food
mold,
you
3.
such
and
for
from
[zearalenone]
mycoestrogen,
“fungi-estrogen”.
and
disease
jury
“myco-”
The
heart
until
well established
MYCOESTROGEN
The
healthier
exciting. . .
cardiovascular
yet
a
paper.
You find quotes
between
lignans
and
revisit it in Chapter
Estrogenic
#2.
yeasts
for
basements
on
food
and
items
sharp.
Coffee,
chocolate,
are also susceptible
to
processing
are
and
potential
storage.
hotspots
Proof
of Estrogenic
Like
phytoestrogen,
considered
built into
plant
mycoestrogen
estrogenic
the name.
estrogenics,
known
makes
precisely
ZEA
“zearalenone
or
knowing
of “the
most
are
“fungus”
(e.g.
is pervasive
research
has
A number
ZEA
that
your
levels.
for
1,000
ZEA
in relevant
μg/kg
like
baby
so
clear
and
food
items
and
not
(μg)
legally
per
2001.
ZEA
you
or
USA
Unique
Features
ZEA
is
not
on
Fungus
of
Russia
between
kilogram],
at
items
unprocessed
ZEA
the
limits.
of The
(kg)
looking
μg/kg)
for
more
in
per
are
America?
with
allow
range
(350 μg/kg). 13
worldwide
have
countries
indicator
law
12
levels
limits
deadly
kilogram
This
corn for animal feed
In total, 16 countries
Nope—the
legal
is a further
products.
(20
ZEA
informative
established
[micrograms
whether
bad.
Estrogenic
does
on
also
Mycotoxins
that’s
estrogenic
has been in place since
Next, Europe’s
allowable
depending
of
I think,
food
that
above—is
mycotoxins”.
toxins,
micrograms
only
mycoestrogen.
have
strongly
the
mycoestrogen
study
Fungus
example,
than
20-350
sole
mold)
This,
sole
same
of countries
is
Knowing
the
common
of The
ZEA
is
health.
Russia,
the
but plenty
been done.
Status
obviously
can
more
easily
and
up key studies
involving
this is the
one
Legal
is
We
sum
to
(ZEA)
”. 11
ZEA,
life
easier.
search
and
ZEA—according
is
by scientists.
It’s, once
again,
However,
unlike the
various
mycoestrogen
zearalenone,
for
Behavior
Estrogenic
limits. 14
list
of
First,
quotations
about
mycoestrogen”
and
ZEA
“the
as
most
the
“only
common
known
mold
toxin”
come
from a science
paper
titled:
“Developmental
toxicity
and
estrogenic
potency
of
zearalenone
[ZEA]
this
in
zebrafish
paper,
all
[Danio
I
“developmental
rerio]”.
needed
to
toxicity”
see
and
(ZEA)
contaminant
[corn]
Soy!
the
so
is
in cereals
and
Wheat!
So
ZEA
until
you
see
it’s not
estrogenics
to
our
phrase
why
is
mycoestrogen
as
including
just
wheat
for
“growing”
the
the
a
maize
15
maybe
is a
found
worldwide
grains,
pesticides
in America’s
many
health
problems
today?
“The
found
and
soybeans.”
was
I
I wondered:
nobody
talking about ZEA?
Yet the bad news gets worse.
zearalenone
When
the
immune
and
that are
causing
astute
observers
factor.
connection
gluten
And
with
just
ZEA
systems
wait
and
when
we
discuss “ The 7 Deadly Things ”. It’s a bombshell.
But let’s keep the spotlight
on unique
side-effects
of ZEA.
One
thing
ZEA,
I appreciate
is that
about
scientists
are
the
not
and call-out negative
estrogenic
politics here,
in other
words.
filthy
and
they
Scientists
dig right
show
tumor-formations,
16
17
18
brain
problems,
hepatotoxic,
haematotoxic,
means,
who
If
cares.
you
apart.
liver
19
know
and
systems. 20 And,
find
it to
be
immunotoxic
don’t
That’s
investigate
ZEA
causes
male reproductive
things,
researchers
21
tear
ZEA
impairment
of
among
other
genotoxic.
estrogenic,
to
effects. No cautious
Scientists
find
ZEA
in. They
that
mold
afraid
what
a lot of “toxic”!
and
this
all
I especially
to
even
appreciate
refer
to
that
ZEA
researchers
as
aren’t
a “toxin”
22
you
will never
studies are done
find
with
soy,
even
showing
similar health
There
more
is
published
review
even
on
ZEA
papers
But
within
one
pet
highlight
preventative
foods,
and,
that.
than
afraid
—something
if
parallel
problems.
review
foods.
paper
These
“worldwide
scientific
prevalence
and
strategies” 23 24 against
ZEA in pet
of course,
I have
no problem
with
let’s
improve
our
own
food,
shall
we?
Gratias.
One
final
thing,
toxic
effects
to ZEA,
propose
that
therapy!
serious
have
some
that
postmenopausal
Please
a
issue.
been
discovered
researchers
as
ZEA
should
women
Despite
as
recent
be
as
given
hormonal
pass
on
taking
version
that
of
in this paper. . .
the
protection.
Oop,
there
Estrogenic
ATRAZINE
#3.
“Herbicide
When
stopped
replacement
drug
if it is offered
I
version
that
is
of ZEA
recommended
with
US
visiting
a local
goliath-green
din
tractor
Minnesota
farm
tractor,
of the
on
for
patent
it is!
Estrogenic”
was
by
ZEA
to
blinking,
α-ZEA
is
that
last
I know
summer,
I
and
I
had once worked
on this specific farm.
As I took the kids up the ladder
and
the
2012
to
25
specific
The
the
pertaining
you
in some
back
alley
or in some
fluorescently
lit medical office. Of course,
the
all
I asked
engine.
my
kids.
My
about
buddy
love.
inside
atrazine
had
turned
a
over
the
“Farmers
still
friend
use
atrazine,
vociferated,
my
about spraying
near ponds
populations.”
My wife held
and destroying
up the camera
the frog
to take
a picture.
walk
catching
Proof
to crab
a nearby
boom
of Estrogenic
just
sure”
careful
had
are
for
more
She
“they
that’s
sideways
sprayer
in the
to
avoid
face.
Behavior
Because
of all the lawsuits and allegations
of fraud
perpetually
“cropping
up”
with
the
Monsanto®
Corporation
and
(Roundup®),
glyphosate.
and
has snuck
[applause].
under
that
paper
titled
the
atrazine
is
systems”
that
over
results
calls
The
atrazine
estrogenic.
This
that
The
question
basically
is surprising.
highlight
meanwhile,
today,
that
is
begins
with
a
with
in 2008.
yet
the
say
estrogen
This
this
paper
investigate
effects.
many
are
have
in
particular
estrogenic
that
effects”
Let’s
of
other
publications
atrazine
responses
systems”
“estrogenic
paper
of
not
the
26
the
directly
authors
of
a bit.
authors
positive
could
of
this
particular
paper—the
paper
about
estrogenic
atrazine
find—were
located
in
Dr.
Breckenridge’s
work?
into
authors
Until
estrogenic
published
“estrogen-dependent
even
interaction
40
of
glyphosate
heard
Atrazine,
radar.
“Atrazine
explains
described
killer
have
documentaries
glyphosate.
expression
review
weed
people
Television
Monsanto®
Proving
the
most
lab.
Where
might
Dr.
most
that
I
Charles
Breckenridge
Syngenta®!!
According
to all-knowing
Wikipedia,
Syngenta®
is a
“Swiss
agribusiness
and
seeds”.
that
Syngenta®,
biotech
and chemical
Syngenta®
was the
produces
agrochemicals
in
words,
other
company.
And,
world’s
largest
is
a
as of 2014,
crop-chemical
producer.
I’ll
trust
atrazine
the
40
other
publications
that
is estrogenic.
Legal Status of The Herbicide
Estrogenic
Europe,
too, has recognized
that atrazine
is estrogenic
has
for
been
Union
since
2004.
in the
America
you are
may
the
we’ll
not
million
atrazine
European
most
year.
in
in
300
far
million
behind
pounds
numbers
per
for
in
million
pounds
year. 28
in
later
it
have
fact,
the
led
drum-up
outrageous
the
a
Center
lawsuit
atrazine
for
against
in
means
the
1990’s,
number
each
of
has
year
is currently
for
at
And
these
are
America.
They
are
extremely
“super-sized”
numbers,
considering
talking about a chemical
illegal in Europe.
In
is
This
pounds
that
glyphosate,
use
a
herbicide
context,
10
more
Europe,
used
Today,
talk
Estrogenic
illegal
about
each
bloated
to over
glyphosate.
28
the
and
Herbicide
historical
used
glyphosate
only
the
numbers
be
second
some
Americans
80
is why
by
(second
only to glyphosate).
almost certainly exposed.
give
Atrazine,
USA
of The
atrazine
currently
This
water-supply
Features
While
years.
banned
herbicide
27
banned
about
specific
chapter.
Unique
many
completely
It is not
To
find
loads
in
we’re
America
Biological
Diversity
the
for
EPA
to
atrazine
annual
tonnage
damages.
and
The
resulting
EPA’s
environmental
response?
They
committed
to creating
an “Assessment
June of the year 2020. 28 A report!
have
Report”
by
Whew—what
a relief.
I did
the
math
continue
to
and
rise
if use
at the
of atrazine
current
rates,
weed
killer
atrazine
use
will go over 2 billion pounds
the 2020 EPA report
comes
per year by the time
out. This is sarcastic
because
atrazine
won’t
extreme
heights,
have
been
can
and
Here
EPA
use
the
excessive.
should
is my
atrazine
“positive”.
Especially
be
Breckenridge.
will
for
launched
be
in the
billions
be
higher
than
be
At
that
point,
new
against
heavier
Atrazine
the
EPA
for
current
by
but
they
lawsuit,
of
sarcasm],
will really
says
Dr.
lawsuits
the
new
will
by
not
certainly
levels.
pending
dose
Report
“Atrazine,”
that
of herbicides
being used
2020.
The levels might
of pounds
that
published
another
“Assessment
Report”
will be recommended.
it will be due in 2030. I expect of course
even
such
curves”
a chemical
even
record-breaking
levels
American
farmers
in
for
to
“use
illegal.
may
Charles
Next,
arise
atrazine-use
more
probable
prediction:
the
2020
“Assessment
Report”
will be
slightly
It
be
likely
but
Brett
“stick
Hartl,
that
Maybe
[with an
the
it to the
a
EPA
2030
man”.
director
at
the
Center
for Biological
Diversity
leading
the
atrazine
legal charge,
“chemically
castrates
frogs
even
in
tiny
causes
have
doses,
birth
banned
is
an
endocrine
defects
in
this years
disruptor,
people.
ago.” 28
The
and
EPA
likely
should
But—frankly—there
mean,
“food
is
too
much
availability”—at
stake,
Can we really make this stuff
Let’s have a look at a small
research
We’ll
rest
and
focus
later.
see
on
if Brett
Keep
they
may
be
intentions.
Let’s
see.
Low
doses
research
mouse
These
found
types
humans
There
is also
good
rates
and
reveal
for
may
for
numbers
are
not
have
authors
toxicity
in
the
word
of embryonic
death.
called
“chemical
Especially
similar
to
suggests
types
of
atrazine
hernias
human
fetuses. 30 Unfortunately,
no
have been done looking at “historical
or
“rates
‘undeveloped’
will
incorporate
Estrogenic
TRICLOSAN
The
“Soap
We’ll
talk
come
out
of
all estrogenics,
#4.
& APEs
hernias
countries”,
on
one
they
that
specific
of
scientists—and
often
evidence
pure
directions.
is a grave
result.
that mice are more
of
the
Biological
in both
maintain
deaths
frogs.
hernias”
study
of
so this
consider
than
increases
versus
high
science
monies
from
these
a lot of lawsuits—so
work
word
I
something.
cause
developmental
29
The
study
uses
strong
abortions”
when
you
of
atrazine,
atrazine.
Center
and
interests
paper,
embryos.
especially
exposed
studies
exaggerating
of
“cause”—a
the
substantial
they spawn
Money
with
is onto
attributes
in mind
Diversity
receives
EPA lawsuits—and
or,
illegal?
sliver of the
Hartl
unique
money,
this
in
not
just
in
in
direct
rates
‘developed’
but
I
hope
the
future
a
and
atrazine.
[Alkylphenols]
Estrogenics”
about
estrogenic
“transfer”
from
soaps
through
and
your
skin
estrogenic
in
the
coming
fat-gains.
For
now,
prove
these
soap
chemicals
identify unique health risks.
First,
while
you’ve
about
weed
health,
I realize
probably
killers
and
that
APEs
they
the
cause
are
various
adverse
probably
we
are
exposed
American
detergents
or
enabling
being
The
feature
produced
singular
of APEs
en
masse
reason
most
of APEs is they are
There
are no legal
anyone
want
APEs?
APEs,
unhealthy
to
therefore,
a germ-killing
at
soaps
least
Proof
Let’s
have
for
the
capable
never
of
heard
ingredient
so why
their
have
soap
become
labels.
would
contains
one
big,
agent
so
than
I’m
triclosan
is also
often
found
toothpastes.
It is more
a soap
including
must
be
ingredient”
list if it is present,
identify
triclosan
presence
triclosan
are
are
cheaply.
people
that
APEs
secret.
Triclosan,
unfortunately,
many soaps. Even some
many
is they
we
standard
material
absent
from
ramifications
reveal
heard
Mainly,
from
although
very
on
means
soaps.
to APEs
sometimes
even used as starting
chemical
production
of antioxidants.
An
not
which
in
soaps,
things
however,
“surfactants”,
suds
and
effects
Today,
fat
simply
heard
have
delightful
therefore,
let’s
estrogenic
about
alkylphenols
(APEs i ).
live on a planet of the APEs.
Technically,
on
are
their
you
chapter
but
it’s added
it here.
added
in
of
to
to
Fortunately,
the
so you can
and
avoid
“active
at least
buying
soaps.
of Estrogenic
begin
Behavior
with
triclosan.
While
the
triclosan-estrogenic
find
that
link is a fairly
it has
become
new
accepted
by
discovery,
most
I
research
scientists.
For example,
here is one
representative
2015 paper
about fertility problems
that compares
triclosan
to
discuss
have
BPA
shortly)
and
estrogenic
That’s
a
triclosan
long
other
the
casually
about
But
an
APEs.
entire
while
but
are
In
family
own
of
makes
investigations,
instance,
while
have “strongly
finding “weakly
seems
to study
Simply
the
most
substance
considerations—so
we’re
let’s
or
talking
of
research,
family
and
laborious.
are
finding
properties,”
properties.”
use
APE
all fairly similar.
of so many
different
people
different
that
my
For
APEs
33 others
are
34 Everybody
APEs.
“estrogen
is
probably
+
the
most
over
1,000
professional
(on PubMed).
That’s
probably
powerful
that
Many
breeds
variants
nonylphenol”—nonylphenol
APE—yields
publications
clear.
different
words,
searching
popular
scientific
of
and
so
scientific
estrogenic
estrogenic
and
similarity
triclosan.
annoyingly
some
chemical
and
have
tissues.”
31
of molecules.
hundreds
of APEs
both
statements
many
other
will
“they
loud
of
similar
members
exist, 32 they are
Of course,
the
existence
varieties
the
nature
reveal
we
similar
is communicated,
move on to APEs.
Like monkeys,
there
of
that
and
sentence
estrogenic
studies
varieties
notes
item
pharmacokinetic
features
in human
fluids
and
to BPA
does
A—an
properties
structures
and
been
detected
So
(bisphenol
you
we’ll
indicator
can
leave
of
an
get—more
it at that.
estrogenic
than
1,000
Actually,
and
even
looking
specifically
“nonylphenol”
where
at
“estrogenic”
both
terms
are
exclusively
in the title yields over 2 dozen
That’s just for that one single APE.
Legal
Status
Since
APEs
status?
of The
are
Well,
Soap
China.
here’s
And,
Union
has
something
similar
entirely
to
Meanwhile,
in America. . .
Thankfully,
triclosan
recently
undergone
germ-killing
years
If
from
being
At
has
Harken
back,
for
similar
example,
deadly
impacts.
was published
spontaneous
estrogen
European
for
use
and
it. Crickets.
care
Soap
widespread
the
abortion
sulfotransferase
use
in
more
than
40
“generally
it
products.
will
But
show
be
don’t
it to
the
Estrogenics
to atrazine.
use
Remember
abortions
of
is:
mice?
it
has
2015
paper,
for
Nature
Publishing
“Triclosan
accompanied
activity
in
triclosan,
This
by the
title
for
time,
chemical
the
and
of
35
triclosan
will soon
as
safe”
starting
triclosan,
a second,
caused
Despite
Group,
to
declared
that
germ-killing
soap
doses
after
in the USA,
recognized
trash bin.
Features
of The
low
shocked
illegal
in EU, 37
nearest
Unique
how
legal
their list
in 2011.
the
guessed
already
triclosan
your
I was
them—both
you
is
2017. 38
removed
wait.
it
as safe”
generally
September
their
has better news. Triclosan
has
some favorable
legal changes
in
products
of
recognized
be
“not
is
atrazine,
banned
36
While
what
certain
APEs
to
toxic
substances
production.
America.
Estrogenics
estrogenic,
find: China
added
severely
restricted
studies.
by
in
causes
decline
humans
of
and
mice”. 39
Chemical
estrogenic
abortion,
once
Other
health
properties.
triclosan will turn up later.
How
about
the prevalent
look
to
nature
caterpillar-like
actually
for
one
creature
secretes
little
telling
for
Due
Well,
sign.
a
with
are
found
secretion
tastes
You
for
nasty.
Are
decide.
“Estrogenic
octylphenol
40
worm,
The
life
yeast
later.
this
in
(RYA)
the
stuff
paper
found
APEs
utero
41
titled:
on.
#5.
In
vivo
this
scientific
found
genetic
the
scientists
changes
altered
2
weeks
genes
from
weeks
later.
after
one
fish. Let that “sink” in.
transfer
transfer
with
basically
exposure,
for
in
from
the
“tolerable”
can
and
by
due to APEs
simply
to APEs for a single
numerous
above
collectively
and
zebrafish”.
checked
utero
Estrogenic
assay
one-day
failure, pregnancy
But here I catch
charge
2014
genetic changes
the fish embryos
Additionally,
Things
caterpillar
mean
bad?
this
researchers
and
They
in
out
the
the APEs.
Two
exposure
to these
This
course,
actually
of
After
babies
simply
stages
developmental
by exposing
waited
Of
velvet
against
lignans
effects
of nonylphenol
[an APE]
[another
APE]
isomers
in vitro
study,
day.
flax.
might
APEs
Check
recombinant
early
in
defense
little
velvet
defense.
let’s
A
worm
secretes
APEs to protect
themselves
predators
eating
them.
This is similar
to
that
to
problems
APEs?
called
APEs. . .
again.
lead
of
mother
daily
to
day
to
limits.
42
“implantation
loss, or other complications”.
43
myself getting into The 7 Deadly
found
in
estrogenics.
Let’s
BP
&
4-MBC
4-Methylbenzylidene
The
Still
“Sunscreen
on
the
shocked
liquid
I
to
had
Estrogenics”
subject
of
gotten
rid
chemistry.
As
you
here
know,
of
for
BP
all
my
is a tip. Anytime
my
this,
own
frankly.
lavender
4-MBC
terms
you
in
was
hand
America?
and
chemistry
recently
believe
What is up,
Behavior
proofs
the
I
(BP)
I still cannot
soap and now BP.
Proof of Estrogenic
Estrogenic
soap,
benzophenone
soap.
just
&
Camphor]
find
hand
[Benzophenone
are
find
begin
with
daunting,
the
word
so
“phen-”,
as in alkylphenols
(APEs)
or benzophenone
(BP),
you
should
be wary.
The
chemical
is probably
estrogenic.
a prefix,
It doesn’t
or wherever;
It follows,
idea
The
matter
then,
that BP
same
that
scientific
Washington.
Benzyl
Ok,
it would
as
“few
studies
on
of
in
humans.
2013,
the
be
last
real
researchers
45
or
one
up,
Strongly
claim
these
is
And
emails
so
“oxybenzone”
also
estrogenic.
I
don’t
is also
Indeed.
receive
found
in
Science
irate
very
fate”
researchers
acknowledge
that 4-MBC
and they show data to support
this.
just
in
chemistry
and
Nevertheless,
the
as
estrogenic.
occurrence
46
support
that
a
suffix,
wary.
(4-MBC)
was
probably
be
“benz-”,
I made
Washington
Unfortunately,
4-MBC
of
camphor
but
molecule,
estrogenic.
studies
is estrogenic.
44
is
also
true
Benzyl
is a
if it’s in a word,
4-methylbenzylidene
if
if “phen-”
of
same
estrogenic
sunscreens
publications
here,
and
is
show
this
clearly.
tip-off.
And
of
BP
abbreviations
as
but
you
scurry
labels.
Status
Despite
of
steering
I’ll
the
BP.
BP
and
4-MBC
or
personal
of
generally
on
in 2015.
49
In
around
and
recently
the
with
product
house
the
I was
only
checking
“Allergen
to
natural
acts just
news.
When
like
these
receptor,
he
from
sun
the
and
This
on
Estrogenics
estrogenics
chemist—a
just
body
estrogenics.
on
is capable
like
is because
tell the
sunscreen
went
but
sunscreen
receptors,
other
legal
patents
Ph.D.
mine—he
raised
a
fascinating
that 4-MBC
and BP bind
or
substance.
estrogen
the
the
in Europe
4-MBC
organic
of
me
estrogen
is
profitable
of
Society,
Europe.
banned
Sunscreen
discussing
professional
estrogenic
was
own
50
of The
scientist
friend
point. He told
stick
hand,
not
Features
a
IRS
Estrogenics
named
other
America. . .
When
use
other
care
your
Sunscreen
corporations
even
4-MBC
formulations.
Unique
“oxy”.
only
Year”
by the American
Contact
Dermatitis
48 BP remains
legal both in America
and
4-MBC,
quick
Steering
clear
book
of The
being
It’s
will usually
include
fully
spelled
Just something
to keep in mind
ingredient
Legal
type
the
food
lists
names.
“benz-”?
a
includes
for
items
ingredient
chemical
that
is
throughout
10
see
Oxybenzone
clearing
Simple.
Also,
47
to do
This
estrogenics
to
explain,
of fully
any
they
other
pose
estrogenic
is
not
stick
to
ultraviolet
fusing
as
4-MBC
new
the
light
or
BP
to
estrogen
complicated
receptors.
or technical
I
but
know
“stick”
this
with
sounds
me.
The UV light from the sun is essentially
capable
of
“gluing”
the sunscreen
estrogenics
to the estrogen
receptor.
the
If or
estrogen
position.
when
this
receptor
would
Biochemists
receptor”.
Like a light
switch,
or,
be
more
4-MBC
would
or
be
BP
capable
stuck
of
Longer-term
estrogenic
because
the
“switch”
“on” far
fusion.
longer
the
4-MBC
or
be
receptor
than
radio
BP
to keep
Especially
since
artificially
lit
4-MBC
anti-osteoporotic
effects”.
Estrogenic
RED
do
Get
be
turned
via
earlier,
the
“gluing”
receptor
the
is
would
radio.
The
or
the
studies
not
health
effects
while
45
BP
are
test
done
attributes,
comparable
it
is
has
also
in
ultraviolet
to
“strong
associated
51 and the list goes on. Like the
BP will rear its ugly head
later
out
your
#6.
NUMBERS
This
speakers
unique
pituitary
even
book.
animal
and
hypothyroidism”
in the
estrogen
longer-term
in mind.
effects.
additional
with endometriosis
other estrogenics,
to the
intended
dial on
the
active
sun-light
would
ever
until
scientific
“causes
“on”
a
actions.
estrogen
on / off
on
rooms
sunlight fusion
In terms
of
occurs,
in the
causing
from
your
the
would
stay
itself broke.
Sun-thing
nature
analogy
onto
like breaking
radio
radio
stuck
accurately,
damage.
Using
reaction
call this a “constitutively
switch
haing
receptor
chemical
3 & 40
samurai
sword.
The
“Artificial
Not
long
Red
ago,
Food
I
Color
was
shopping.
“dislike”
shopping
is
a
Shopping—the
antithesis
basically
my
On
particular
this
normal.
I was
trip,
feeling
with
bright
brand
across
and
After
I
Saying
that
I
huge
understatement.
of
the
outdoors—is
kryptonite.
and it was about
store so, foolishly,
something
Estrogenics”
faint.
was
I hadn’t
worse
than
eaten
all
3 P.M. I had just arrived
I made a hasty decision
refined
sugar.
of berry
zen
I headed
earned
shopping
for
my
I picked
“fruit”
the
out
juice
check-out
freedom
from
I
day
at the
to buy
the
first
stumbled
counter.
the
checkout
counter,
I whiffled outside
to crack and drink
my
juice. I took one long, committed,
gulp and then
I
realized
the
Like
true
health
pro,
it
the
label.
The
liquescent
a
checked
juice
had
a nasty
chemical
was
aftertaste.
at
this
point
solution
I
was
listed as having
Estrogenic
Red
“Red No. 40” [Red Number
40].
No. 40! I threw it out immediately
and
through
a
went
box
solid
of
OatMega®
win
saying
Once
and
so!
you
dyes
bad
back
to
it
candies,
be
or
bars.
endorsement
the
red
everywhere.
It
just
gelatin
line,
no
looking,
was
checkout
protein
I receive
start
seem
if
the
the
“junk”
desserts
(like
hugging
Those
were
check
“food”
coloring
wouldn’t
foods
a
for
be
like
Jell-O®),
so
soda,
but
I
even find Red No. 40 in foods ranging
from salad
dressings
to salmon
fillets. In fact, at least in one
US
grocery
found
candies
to
store,
40%
of
contain
Red
No.
contained
this
nasty
all
40,
red
food
while
items
78%
dye. 52
were
of
I’ll say
the
it
again:
what
Proof
is up,
America?
of Estrogenic
Behavior
After
researching
concluded
that
“food”
coloring
you
just
this
topic
extensively,
essentially
all the
red
dyes
avoid
distinguishing
are
them
questionable.
all
individual
and
red
sparse.
For
This
in itself
example,
voted
that
was
a
I advise
don’t
dye
I encourage
abstinence
of
and foremost,
good studies
I
have
artificial
that
stress
about
names.
the reds because,
first
are sparse.
Shamefully
is a problem.
93%
of
“additional
committee
scientists
from
studies
are
commissioned
a
committee
needed”.
53
by
FDA
the
This
in
2011 to investigate
artificial red food colorings.
We need further studies because
artificial chemicals
should
until
and
not
be
proven
something
bad.
This
it’s far from
we
assume
happens
“safe”
about
health
anything
good
frequently
today
wise.
Next, mediocre
studies
are frequently
excuse
to justify the use of red dyes.
or
are
outcomes
using
can
poor
be
studies
cited as an
“Satisfactory”
shown
but
for
don’t
just
accept
this.
For instance,
a 1959 rat study
some food colors for estrogenic
“no
estrogenic
No.
3 [Red
me
to use
activity”
Number
my
Ph.D.
access
and
read
designed.
Scientists
various
food
resulting. . .
out
a uterus
from
found
in tests
study—which
credentials
of
of
that
Red
required
in order
to
even
the
actual
text—was
terribly
injected
rats for 3 days
with
dyes.
uterine
was
3]. The
titled “Screening
activity” found
Next,
weights.
each
rat
they
Yes:
and
measured
they
put
the
literally
it on
a
cut
scale.
And
this
Then
was
they
each
food
the
only
concluded
that
no
done
there
in 1997
the
was
also
on
title: “Estrogenic
And
as
this
both
study
although
estrogenic
No.
changes
an
prefer
thorough
study
3. Just
check
properties,
not
activity
and
or
for
“Red
the
same
Number
thing.
of
hundreds
merely
40”
Take
or
of
Once
3 is
DNA-damaging.
piece
work,
of studies
a few.
Speaking
of study
numbers,
this is a
topic
because
food
color
dyes
have
names
out
cells”. 54
Red No.
isolated
to see
in
Expert
DNA-damaging
estrogenic
made!
activity.
breast cancer
it all. Today,
is not
I would
more
Red
and
Red No. 3 in human
again,
the title says
recognized
a
they
weight
uterus
meant
no estrogenic
scientists
are buying this?
Conversely,
on
measurement
“Red
“Allura
confusing
numerous
Number
Red
17”
AC”
or
“6-hydroxy-5-[(2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-sulfophenyl)azo
]-2-naphthalenesulfonate”.
to the exact same dye.
All of those
Tricky.
names
And
I
you
remember
skeptical
or
how
wary
word
encouraged
about
items
“pheno-”?
phenosulfothiazine,
estrogenic,
55 red
for
dyes.
Legal
The
Status
of
that
refer
to
be
contain
the
Phenothiazine—and
that
matter—are
Artificial
Red
artificial,
Food
Color
ingested
both
Estrogenic
Chances
are,
you’ve
almost
certainly
Red
dyes
No. 3 and Red No. 40 recently.
remain
legal and
are
extremely
Let’s
have
First,
Red
Europe.
a peek
In
No.
both
40
at the
is
broader
legal
Europe
in
and
legal
These
red
pervasive.
context.
the
US,
the
UK,
UK,
and
however,
products
containing
with
words
the
Red
“[this
No.
item]
40
must
may
be
have
labeled
an
adverse
effect on activity and attention
in children”. 56 57
No
such
warning
label
is found
on
American
products.
In
addition,
European
Denmark,
Austria,
prior
to
Union,
Red
the
No.
of
dissolved.
the
Except
EU,
No.
40
is now
legal
Red
No.
40
is also
banned
Regarding
complicated.
Europe.
61
in America,
and
Red
No.
No.
rely
held
bans
out,
59
EU.
in Japan.
60
except
one
“Unique
which
Attributes”.
1961,
70’s.
for
Red
exception,
in
lack
action
times. 62
you
I can
heavily
ensuing
in
Sweden,
With
the
2 and No. 4 were banned
in the
3? Why was Red No. 3 skipped?
postponed
What
Well,
under
But
in case
prove.
banned
these
which
in the
the
Red
No. 3, the legal story
is more
First, Red No. 3 is legal in the
US
I’ll mention
26
was
however,
Switzerland,
Red
It wasn’t
40
of
Belgium,
France,
Germany,
Norway,
and
Switzerland.
58
formation
and
formation
No.
1 was
of trying.
on
Probably
By
banning
but
tell you
is that
brown
Red
motive
artificial
mush
1985,
look
FDA
would
be
make
delectable.
of
delay,
hard
processing
to
had
3 a total
motivated
food
dyes
the
No.
a financially
wonder,
on
banned
to
plants
all
Especially
their
to
children,
vulnerable,
or undereducated
individuals.
Unique
Features
of The Artificial Red Food
Color
Estrogenic
Let’s
ban
investigate
Red
No.
why
3 by
26
1985.
attempts
were
Unique
health
made
to
problems
are
prominently
health
“major
discussion.
more
emblematic
of
occur
1985,
toxic
to
be
depression.”
What
again?
the
in this
problems
impacts also
Long before
said
featured
“indicative
That
central
our
appealing.
of
want
But
we
found
Red
brain
caused
even
the
Contemporary
hyperactivity
the
warning
on
without
dopamine
of
more
In
fact,
“Artificial
the
2007
UK
study
colors [multiple
varieties
diet
and
result
benzoate
in
preservative
increased
8/9-year-old
confirmed
sense:
effect
in children”.
sodium
on
to
the
randomized,
trial,
label
“[this
item]
activity
and
concluded
that:
of red dyes]
or
(or
hyperactivity
children
This
study
crossover
the product
attention
a
into
64
this
did a 2007
placebo-controlled,
the UK. 66 Now
make
3
explain
childhood
hyperactivity
was
studies
adverse
uptake
in 1980.
follow-up
an
No.
Researchers
it is today.
So
to
look
a Red
emerged.
researchers
65
We
system
“snacks”
big “thing”
should
have
controls.
that
“fruit”
No. 3 may
childhood
finding.
double-blinded,
performed
in
bodily
preparations”
suggest
that Red
hyperactivity—before
system
nervous
system,
and spinal
cord,
“depress”
“inhibits
synaptosomal
discovery
our
to
carried
3
nervous
were
1977.
studies
No.
toxicities
central
“strawberry”
ban in 1977.
More
“colorful”
may
was
origin
don’t
make
really
of
These
is depression
of central
Depression
of the brain
certainly
estrogenic
but we’ll put a hold on those.
Red No. 3 was found to have
manifestations”.
63
Other
in
both)
in
the
in
the
3-year-old
general
population”.
That’s
a
reverberates
in the
conclusion
that
head.
How
Well,
does the Red No. 3 story end?
the New
York
Times
wrote
a
Red
No.
3
in
1990
awareness.
67
Some
remember
this article
that
is still in place
this
partial
than
10
should
may
I write
late.
studies
implement
impact.
Realize
It came
suggested
a total
vaguely
motivated
a
US in 1990
this. 68
years
spiked
even
its short-lived
ten
after
and
that
more
that
we
complete
ban
No. 3, especially
since Red No. 3 cannot
to be an important
ingredient
for anything
marketing.
And
the
ban
was
still
be
used
in
“partial”?
food
cosmetic
products.
No. 3 in various
buy
as
was
years
clearly
of Red
be said
but
ban
about
temporarily
readers
and
piece
The public outcry—what
else?—finally
“partial
ban”
for Red No. 3 in the
that
hauntingly
as
juice
recent
I
and
Red
bought
drink,
3
just
last
year.
while
when
And,
feeling
I
see
like
ill,
Red
can
not
I
the
in
“fruit”
go
No.
No. 40 on my food labels at home.
those mistakes
into the nearest
trash
Estrogenic
No.
68 This is why I still find Red
syrups
and things I accidentally
as
buyers-remorse
Yes.
3
beyond
or
I slam
can.
Red
dunk
#7.
PARABENS
The
“Fragrance
Up to
feeling
Estrogenics”
this point on the IRS List, you may
be
that
you’ve
done
well
in life.
You’ve
successfully
dodged
thus
plus
far
awareness
to
new
many
you’ve
heights
IRS
items
probably
for
we’ve
raised
improved
seen
your
product
selections.
with
You,
a
along.
Sorry
therefore,
“Soy-Free”
the
as
your
soapy
“Estrogen-Free”
next
two
IRS
they
are
virtually
pervasive
These
are
the
nasty
phthalates
case you
(the
were
From
avoidance
an
best
I
that
some
can,
Unless
rewarding
snack
to burst
but
are
10
List
items
for
Proof
and
Parabens
scientific
69 This
the
phthalates.
are
And,
entire
generally
not
is
do
I
the
realize
inescapable.
Option”
or
sealskin-wearing
pollution
from
start
with
agreed
too
are
powers
parabens.
upon
by
the
“weakly
estrogenic”.
bind the
estrogen
tightly.
This
nevertheless
gives
less
of
effects to BPA. 70
“Benzylparaben”
is
Remember
the
any
what
That’s
exist.
This
means
example,
one
paraben
has
comparable
another
is
yet
an
of
For
“benz-”?
“Phenylparaben”
estrogenic.
APEs,
parabens
are
so a large
number
versions
vary.
“isobutylparaben”
bells?
but
in
effect.
parabens
different
estrogenic
called
Let’s
like the annoying
class
of molecule,
slightly
and
“Benedict
community
to be only
means
that parabens
estrogenic
Of course,
parabens
Behavior
receptor—yes—but
an
avoid.
kids,
exposure
taken
of Estrogenic
so
to
I personally
my
have
committed
to becoming
a
Eskimo,
you
are
getting
body
parabens
are
is silent in phthalate,
[“thalates”]).
“pee”
have
smugly
bubble
impossible
perspective,
revolting
read
“pee-words”:
“p” sound
wondering
especially
you
you
yourself
paraben
Of
another.
I thought.
course
“Phen-”
estrogenic
example.
you
do.
ringing
Legal
Status
Another
of The
thing
point is that
benzylparaben
products,
that
I even
on
the
with
need
legality
Unique
Because
3 other
of all these
71
the
US
to
spectrum
disorder”.
have
fewer
however,
pregnancy.
72
not
health
alter
thyroid
That,
the
brain
brain
study
extent,
alone,
identified
either
cause
physiopathology
73
This
“markers”
in
study
an
in
was
“autistic
model”
and
it certainly
raises
some
eyebrows.
Especially
since
2
additional
similar
results.
fairly
increased
stands
is
problem.
contribute
Another
this
5 parabens?
Furthermore,
a
recent
“paraben
may,
to some
found
at
has banned
both
from
cosmetic
where
do,
during
a considerable
you
parabens.
they
Parabens
levels
testing
surprise
of The Fragrance
Estrogenics
parabens
family members
are
estrogenic,
repercussions.
hormone
not
to tell you
Features
certain
strongly
may
Estrogenics
the European
Union
and
phenylparaben
along
Do
Fragrance
74
recent
anxiety.
that
or
autism
done
by
like
rat
scientific
studies
75
study
in rats
found
parabens
76
Estrogenic
#8.
PHTHALATES
The
“Plastic
There
Atlanta,
couldn’t
blood.
was
Additive
once
Georgia.
a
Estrogenics”
team
They
were
find
Yet
anyone
these
“Phthalate-Free”
group
“Phthalate-Exposed”
research
study.
stumped
at a loss
scientists
because
without
phthalates
in
scientists
needed
of
people
What
of
could
people
for
they
to
their
do?
compare
American
in
they
their
a
with
lab
Well,
the
situation
that
same
year
was
had
grim.
Investigators
revealed
that
US
earlier
infants
exceeded
the EPA’s
maximum
threshold
levels in blood tests. 77 That was 2014.
Furthermore,
in
every
which
phthalates
single
US
further
study,
products.
health
problems
an
natives
idea:
for
natives
they
their
were
Alaskan
oils
to
and
oils
products
story
Georgia
researchers
study.
Remote
Alaskan
and—bingo!—they
They
to
the
compared
the
non-Alaskan
phthalate
an
virtually
health
levels.
existed
78
Your
course,
rise
in plastics.
79
food
as
you
containers?
microwave
the
from
Check.
or
Not
aspect
of
everywhere
The
between
cancer.
frustrating
spelling
of
Americans,
urine
association
a
the
were
heat
of
word:
all
plastics
and perfumes.
In your
new
car?
“yes” for those emissions. 78 Your contact
Yes. 79
the
phthalate
highlights
are
from
Alaskan
besides
phthalates
are
remote
discovered
phthalates
dairy
various
dairy
or
phthalate
levels in urine and breast
good news but great ingenuity.
This
and
in
recruit
easy.
all
scientists
levels,
could
natives
comparing
exposure
whether
tested
“Phthalate-Free”.
The rest was
tested,
phthalate
wonder
related
literally
scientists
phthalate
estrogenics
in those products.
Anyway,
one day, one of the
had
in
in cooking
me
those
phthalate
found
group
the
found
makes
from
been
hazardous
were
This
actually
food
explained
prevalence.
77
In fact, especially
that
had
far
Check
lenses?
Levels,
your
the
of
food
Phthalates,
in
you
perfumes
see,
are
but
chemicals
mainly
During
the process
of
are strategically
added
flexibility,
and
look
better
Since
we
used
all
as
used
“plasticizers”.
making
plastics,
phthalates
to increase
plastic
clarity,
durability.
by
sometimes
Mostly,
they
make
making
it appear
less
cloudy.
associate
cloudy
plastic
with
plastic
inferior
quality plastic—because
in nature
cloudiness
usually
denotes
contamination—we
actually
prefer
this
chemical
contaminant.
purchase
In other
plastics.
“Clear”
phthalates
in
plastics.
cracks”
similar
something
like
liquids
get
glitter.
rid
or food
Often,
into
with
of
not
the
main
Instead,
they
sit
to salt added to food
And,
like
glitter,
phthalates.
upon
plastic
foods
are
plastic
They
you
heated
while
That’s
tells
cooking
oils
and
because
differing
results
The
are
worst
used
Scientists
they
Proof
irony,
in
express
should.
We
of Estrogenic
time
or
can’t
release
into
of a
come
single
into
dairy
or other.
pasteurized
the
foods
a serious
me
that
or
problem.
“health”
products
are
levels
will
phthalate
in such
in
or
contact.
at one
even
scalding hot.
This
further
bias
to
cloudy
Come to think of it, I can’t even think
modern
processed
food
that doesn’t
contact
tend
over
are
ingredients
“molecular
to
we
plastics
irony.
Importantly,
seem
words,
phthalate-containing
and
added
liquids
studies
all
are
of
skewed
influence
or
studies.
though,
I think, is that phthalates
numerous
medical
devices.
80
concern
want
about
this
to call it health
Behavior
issue
“care”. . .
and
Like
in
APEs
a
and
variety
parabens,
of
different
scientific
journals
“[Phthalates]
have
modes
on
have
81
slightly
in
family
come
is
why
like
this:
estrogenic
members
varying
degrees.
act
They
shapes.
This
tends
complicate
scientific research.
For example,
using “recombinant
yeast
screening”
in
family
the
were
different
This
declarations
degrees
of
Phthalate
receptors
chemicals
constructs.
make
different
of action”.
estrogen
phthalate
1990’s,
said
parabens.
to
some
be
Also,
recent
phthalate
“weakly
similar
studies
estrogenic”.
to parabens,
using
better
phthalates.
83
That
2014.
was
can
be
found
last years
phthalates
Even
Similar
to
more
technology
in 2013,
in toxicology
members
82
however,
updated
the status
of phthalates.
considered
significantly
estrogenic.
to
have
Now
they
are
At least
certain
quotes
journal
like this
articles:
“In
one
the
the concern
about the negative
effects of
on reproduction
significantly
increased”.
84
Hmm.
We
will
“estrogenic
discuss
impact”
why
claims
the
research
and
so
drastically
but
flux
that needs to wait until the next chapter.
Legal Status of The Plastic Additive Estrogenics
In
2015,
the
a
number
European
Each
EU
of
Union’s
phthalates
“restricted
member
state
were
was
implementing
and
enforcing
the
Denmark
was saying “WHAT?!”
In
2014,
you
pressure.
comprehensive
see,
Denmark
Denmark
phthalate
just
finally
ban
added
substance”
they
charged
ban.
with
Meanwhile,
caved
scrapped
had
to
list. 85
to
EU
the
in place. 86
Meanwhile,
last
the
day
of
equipment.
convinced
grace
is
year
for
no
went
such
into
2016. . .
effect
except
on
for
the
medical
medical
device
companies
Parliament
to give them
a
medical
despite
phthalates
downplays
devices
phthalate
until July
ban
recognition
in
by
of 2021.
the
the
USA,
of
FDA
that
are rampant. 87 Put frankly,
the
FDA
phthalate
health concerns
that scientists
finding.
America
does
children’s
toys.
types.
“restrict”
Some
However,
are
allowed
plastics. 88
That
up
to
EU
the
0.1%
Bush
had
this
With
this
Things
chapter
are
scientific
with
a
by
journal:
number
including
and
that
quote
the
Dr. Seuss.
Similar
to
phthalates
deficit”
and
the
are
was
put
toy
Here
is
a
no.
the
artificial
91
law
in
Estrogenics
The
line from
noting
7
Deadly
a
preview,
professional
associated
problems,
dysgenesis,
obesity,
90
associated
in children.
place
It is worth
Additive
all
toy
into
children’s
soon.
all. Oh,
“Cat
law
testicular
allergies.”
is not
children’s
complete,
single
not
the
Plastic
in
phthalates
“phthalates
have been
of
serious
health
infertility,
asthma,
“But
this
but
in
identical
nearly
coming
summarized
types
in 2008.
place back in 1999. 89
Unique Features
of The
presence
“restricted”
“restriction”
President
the
phthalate
phthalate
even
phthalate
under
that
ban
Somehow,
the European
course,
are
the
period
There
EU
This
That
Hat”
red
with
is not
by
the
all. . .
late,
“food”
“long-term
attention
deficit
”
to
great,
colorings,
attention
may
be
due
to
phthalate
discovered
in
induction
2016.
92
Or
93
This
neurotoxicity,
perhaps
phthalates
derailing
aspects
(such
as
brain-derived
[BDNF]).
of
it
is
due
to
of brain
development
neurotrophic
factor
finding
also
came
to
light
in
function,
94
2016.
Meanwhile,
phthalates
reflecting
estrogenics.
data
And
remember
more
likely
due
concerns
that
It
Radiation
is
and
Human
Health?”
off
phthalates
things
“Plastic
“the
are
not
medical
Ionizing
keep
juice”.
phthalates
96
as common
Risk
this
Like
than
those
parabens,
then,
A & S]
Estrogenics”
to recognize
“BPS-Free”.
one
using
higher
as perfume.
Yet
that
these
act virtually the same in your
a “BPA-Free”
bottle, it might
(bisphenol
like
now
Unrecognized
Let’s
of
Ingredient
It is imperative
mean
are
between
An
are
estrogen
problems
due
to
delves
into
this
“Interaction
95
the
After
all, pregnant
women
been
found
to have
167%
Estrogenic
#9.
BPA & BPS [Bisphenol
not
with
There
from
Phthalates:
sunscreen
estrogenics
fuse
light?
radiation
concentration
women
The
the
sunscreen
UV
titled:
“unrecognized”.
perfume
have
urine
and
are increasing
phthalate
effects.
A 2016
paper
subject.
for
how
to
thyroid
soy
to permanently
receptor,
x-rays
similar
alter
on
S) or something
“BPA-Free”
plastic
body! So
be made
similar.
does
ingredients
if you buy
from
BPS
Veiled
versions
unhealthy.
Here
of
BPA
is a quote,
Environmental
Science
“BPAF,
BPB,
BPF,
exhibit
antiandrogenic
similar
to
or
are
correspondingly
for instance,
from
the
&
and
Technology
BPS
have
and / or
even
greater
than
that
these
“BPA
simplicity,
“Estrogenic
information
Furthermore,
analogously,
regarding
That
will
called
I have
only
#9”
for
(of
included
10)
I’ll
BPA
simply
simplify
everything
you
need
to
be
is
rest
by
all
act
book.
eliminating
and
BPS”
careful
not
to
so
studies
the
to “BPA
studies.
as
good
at
of
For
BPS
BPS
looking
the
96
are
also
Chemically,
and
this
and
be
throughout
BPA.”
Literally.
BPA
but
you to know.
because
BPA
need to constantly
refer
time I mention
research
Now:
brothers”.
to
activities
of
BPF,
of
course,
versions
of BPA.
be
shown
estrogenic
BPAF,
BPB,
and
camouflage
chemical
could
journal:
been
the
every
confuse
phthalates
with
items
uniquely
are
the
plastic
ingredient
distinct
even
BPA.
though
phthalates
and BPA
disorders
cause many
of the same human
and they are all plastic estrogenics.
Let’s
back
go
differences
better
to
of
than
a
BPA
food
analogy
and
phthalates.
describing
plastics.
It’s simple.
Think
the
about
BPA
would
be
other
“main
ingredient”.
or
some
tortilla
more
other
out
of
want
link up
with
a plastic.
to get
other
If all the
be
all
good.
“unlinked”
BPA
corn
salt
any
will
corn
mush
are
of
tortilla.
or
some
salt
You
can’t
make
more
than
you
BPA
BPA
molecules
BPA
was
be
like the
pure
phthalates.
out of BPA.
technical,
the
creation
a
Phthalates
make
plastic
out of
however,
make plastic
If you
This
making
like
health
highlight
chemical
“seasoning”.
pure
to
These
can,
needs
in order
“linked
can
You
actually
up”
Unfortunately,
there
molecules
in plastics,
a
to
to form
this would
are
so it
always
leaches
out.
Furthermore,
things
BPA
like oil that
a
problem
principle
is
than
actually
circle
back
Proof
of Estrogenic
Like
many
have
that
argued
ongoing
stored
or
“fat-loving”
in BPA
water-based
true of all
are
so
more
solutions.
estrogenics.
of
This
We’ll
to it later.
Behavior
estrogenics
status of BPA has
downs.
In
other
argued
is “lipophilic”
are
BPA
we’ve
the
estrogenic
undergone
numerous
ups
words,
some
scientists
is
weakly
it is strongly
debate.
seen,
estrogenic
estrogenic.
and
There
and
have
some
is
still
In this case,
there
only
about
talking
are
no
family
BPA.
Yet
members.
discrepancies
estrogenic
status still exist. Why?
Well,
scientists
have
difficulties
because
of
estrogenic
Estrogenics
like
everything
during
stick
BPA
such
fat during
my
an
float
on
research
Ph.D.
water
and
I
discovered
that
everything.
How
much
was difficult to say.
This
means
substances
that
off. Scientists
or
can
or
of
fats
I actually
BPA
I studied
form
the
was
fat
fatty
stuck
to
testing?
It
results
about
estrogenics
completely
add
I “added”
the
to
even
to
when
experimental
like fats
They
Whenever
in
stick
used
tribulations
mixture,
studies
properties.
experiments.
work.
are
about
these
“fat-loving”
scientific
experiment
acids,
way
in
to the tools, called “pipettes”,
to dishes or containers.
I learned
to
BPA
We
can
underestimate
be
an
effect or
something
a problem.
This leads to debate
whether
acts strongly
or weakly estrogenic.
A
about
study
the
acid
to laboratory
that
up
to 95%
“Binding
and
materials”,
for
of oleic
acid—a
solubility
of
oleic
example,
revealed
fat
in
found
high
levels in canola oil 97 and in even higher levels
in
avocados
depending
on fruit ripeness 98 —was
lost
by
“dissolving
adsorption
lost!
to
That
[this
glass
fatty
or
will drastically
acid]
metal.”
skew
99
in
Up
a study!
plastic
to
and
95%
was
What
that
means
is you add only 5% of the fat you thought
you added and this loss is generally
not accounted
for
or considered.
Despite
estrogenic,
these
even
important
qualifiers,
at extremely
BPA
low doses.
is
strongly
100
Done.
Legal
Status
Even
of The
though
Plastic
Ingredient
like
phthalates
things
Estrogenics
are
equally
destructive
scientifically
to our health, BPA has recently
become
shunned.
In this regard,
it is similar
to
ZEA
fungus.
from
What
I appreciate
and
attention
negative
attention.
and
culture
this,
is
effects
This
opinion
and
this
scientific
one
massive
has
politics
your
led
impact
own
and
BPA
to
scapegoating
the
substantial
have
number
of
studies
more
were
more
the
fact,
each
to
their
media
public
scientific
as
have
I
write
just
over
names.
This BPA study number
or other BPA analogues.
we
problems
discovered
In
parabens
thing
uncovers
both
health.
publications
has about 10,000.
even include BPS
And
all the
of BPA finding daylight and
is one
example
of how
phthalates
2,000
about
health
learned
is
that
problems.
from
BPA
doesn’t
such
a
more
studies
The
health
always
present,
we
have
as studies have piled up.
just
From
status
Well,
the
2012
even
ban,
Due
over 10,000
BPA
of BPA evolved?
first,
FDA
the
apparently
to
begin
FDA
how
have
learned
to
anti-BPA
BPA
the
banned
FDA’s
states
laws;
laws
BPA
by a child less than 3 years
original federal ban. 101
Will
baby
the
stronger
FDA
ban?
The
FDA
is
BPA
in canned
The
currently
foods,
FDA
exact.
of age”
BPA.
In
bottles
but,
their
of
items,
BPA,
making
Most
of
to be
similar
BPA
is clear
declaring
baby
for
and
“designed
reassessment
No.
enough
executed
in
to be
items
legal
regarding
stepping
states
involve
the
of
from
sluggishness
are
13
has
“reassessments”
though
the FDA never
really
they are reassessing
it anyway.
individual
state
we
studies,
to
the
mean
about
certain
etc.
the
used
levels
as
a
that.
of
perfectly
acceptable.
It’s
102
important
to
realize
these estrogenics
example.
When
many
and
or
Like BPS.
transparency
Or
along
recently
improved
few
years
than
their
to
other
their
limits”
due
or
to
to
the
than
Denmark—countries
in place. 102
Denmark
originally
the
that
original
product.
lack
the
10-fold
of BPA
products.
Specifically,
lift their own
later, however,
is
levels
while
work”.
104
why
EU
has
cut
in the
last
negative
is
is
They
BPA.
research
especially
a
banned
BPA,
places
like
originally
had
worth
would
of
allowance
Denmark
This
as
France
and
a BPA
ban
103
is especially
declared
they
EU’s
highlighting.
stand strong
judgement
to be
Danes
against
regarding
manufactured
Danes
said
and
they
the
used
would
in
not
BPA
ban. 102 More
than 5 years
when political push came to shove,
now
allowing
complaining
This,
the Denmark
again. 86
Unique
of
modify
just
on
increasingly
dismay
slightly
countries,
more
of
is the perfect
for
example,
BPF.
position
some
product
findings.
Environmental
research
strong
factor.
Still, they
haven’t
much
on
and
a
BPAF,
BPB,
here is key.
“allowable
ban
around
producing
worse
Moving
the
turn
continue
unhealthy
a
isn’t sufficient.
BPA
states
ban
BPA,
corporations
BPA
that
you
and
Features
“EU
that
might
“the
have
approved”
BPA
safe
need
levels
already
EU
phthalate
of
The
story
Plastic
noticed,
all
over
Ingredient
Estrogenics
Hyperactivity
in children,
once
again,
is
is
connected
to
BPA
actually
exposure.
makes
general
are
unfortunately,
me
emerging
suspicious
investigated
Frankly,
This
that
I hope
let’s
with
this book
flip
to
other
inspires
such
even
this effect
The
protect
the
brain
is slight
but
real.
irony
here,
artificial
though,
estrogens
that
should
natural
be
studies.
There
is
God-given,
aging and
it
aging. 106
is that
receptor—might
have
the
BPA
does.
BPA
appears
out-competing
from
but,
been
estrogenics.
positive.
evidence
that suggests
estrogen—natural,
estrogen—is
slightly protective
against
may
in
disorders
has not
most
something
pattern
estrogenics
involved
in hyperactivity
the hyperactivity
topic
thoroughly
Now
105
Again,
estrogenics—these
bind
the
estrogen
opposite
effect. At least
to accelerate
aging
by
estrogen.
researching
Another
related
to
thing
we
IRS
10
all
estrogenics.
In
this
shortened
ask?
study
worm
Well,
numbers
for
and
of
worms,
for
example,
lifespan. 107
Why
worms,
one,
they
worms
are
easy
reproduce
to grow
quickly.
BPA
you
in
large
Like
fruit
flies.
And
while
using
BPA
fruit fly lifespan
has
exposure,
estrogenic
tested
parabens
and
fruit
fly
thing
to investigate.
were
to
On the topic
of lifespan,
what
ironic is if sunscreen
estrogenics
would
4-MBC
make
the
this
skin
a
The
good
aging-effects
Seeing
found
pattern?
aging.
108
also
a
accelerate
lifespan.
not been
parabens
paraben
hypothesis.
of
and
tested
were
shorten
Another
really
and
be
BP
BPA
findings
“Protecting”
against
sunshine
while
causing
aging
from
just
too
study,
either.
the
use
much.
but,
Aspects
untapped
This
alas,
of
of
seems
have
been
news
years.
to
come.
Estrogenic
#10.
and
[17α-Ethinylestradiol]
The
“Birth
Over
100
Control
million
women
109
with
these
of Estrogenic
stay
Legal
in the
Status
It has
higher
legal
than America.
short.
Here
lake
Meanwhile,
over
20
generally
studies
Birth
with
of
on
many
globally
levels.
than
Europe
natural
designed
receptor,
estrogen.
Estrogenics
has
maintained
pertaining
to
estrogenics
EE2 is where
Europe
falls
they
high
110
use
20
60%
of people
Control
that
I even
for
bad
about
dropped
the
show
you
levels
of EE2.
balls
a remote
in America,
not only is EE2 legal
states
allow
minors
“consent
contraception”.
pay
Legions
longer
is where
mountain
an
planet—are
currently
on
containing
EE2
drugs
standards
However,
pages,
that
body
clear
In a few
really
EE2 was intentionally
activate
the estrogen
of The
become
here
at future
take
to
Behavior
EE2 is estrogenic.
to mimic estrogen,
and
done
a few
hint
will
thing
worldwide—over
women
on our
contraceptives
involved
Proof
it
is
be
Estrogenic”
(17α-ethinylestradiol).
are
been
Only
they
would
obvious
not
this.
Probably,
EE2
BP
estrogenics
I write
performed
all married
chemical
has
and
as
and
like an
research
aging
field,
4-MBC
Certain
these
this
states
drugs,
so
phrase
have
legal
[sic].
Swiss
but
to
programs
documents
“consent
to
contraception”
rather
contraception
Unique
Despite
than
minors.
most
The
through,
“minors
may
buy
drugs”.
Features
of The
the
fact
that
available,
saying
people
drug
Birth
drug
don’t
sheets
tiresomely
Control
sheets
read
are
technical,
Estrogenic
are
readily
them.
Especially
a lot of work
and
to
sift
pedantic.
But drug sheets
are worth
reading,
especially
for
contraceptives.
The health problems
are substantial.
For
instance,
reactions”
contains
on
pages
headlined,
to
EE2.
I
include
Alesse®
These
[below]
oral
“adverse
18-20
of the
to say
the
drug
least.
the
“adverse
contraception,
reactions”
sheet.
They
which
are
are
listed
not
All other EE2 containing
oral contraception
drugs
have similar “Adverse
Reactions”
lists. 111 Most
are
very
low
acquiring
taking
likelihood
one
oral
or
occurrences
two
but
of these
contraception
is
the
health
much
chance
of
issues
when
more
likely.
Overall, it’s a gamble.
Just don’t gamble
blindly.
least know the list exists and what is on it.
Also,
you
Are
Estrogen
previous
might
compare
Receptors
chapter.
this
list with
Found?”
You
will
similarities.
Did I mention
women
worldwide—over
that
60%
the
list
observe
over
of
At
“Where
in
the
many
100
million
all
married
women
on
contraceptives
our
planet—are
containing
EE2?
currently
109
on
chemical
CHAPTER
The
The
3
Roots
of Our
“Nature”
of Our
Estrogenic
Problem
POST-ORIENTATION
AND
Maria
settled
campus,
making
a
life proved
I had
few
to
Tree
BACK
ON
in nicely.
counterproductive
be fun and
I
THE
Ave
Despite
my
decisions,
found
my
college
classes
engaging.
An
additional
Dave.
blessing
Dave
and
I
common
and
Furthermore,
I
because
he
to nature,
In
we
will
early
my
college
we
became
always
be
redirected
back
my
was
discovered
me
a
story
back
to my
different
funding
of
pretty
Dave
the
US
and
imagine.
better
story
It began
he
college,
roots,
back
I
redirection.
understanding
ended
undertook
me,
the
lab
was
in the lab
would
in
was
second
the
In
lab,
of
scientific
arms
memory,
had
mid-length
variations
of
and
We
introduce
remain
Dave,
me
a
with
his
spasms
of
blonde-brown
facial
friends
let
of
of
hair
of
and
the best
scrunch-faced
Guns
N’
Roses
songs
you
Brilliant.
my
Officer
to none
eidetic
Dave
alternating
same
color,
imitation
of
true
an
character,
spontaneity.
To
of
ultimately
Navy
in
friends.
to
Dave
girl. . . but let’s start with Dave.
was a former
Second
Class Petty
winning
hair,
sort
with
but
lot
to fishing.
semesters
began
a
timeless
grateful
work
in a science
lab. For
another
good
fit and working
kindle
roommate
had
that
falsetto
could
to this day.
give
you
one
example.
in our
2 nd
story
dorm
room,
where
a
perfectly
The
placid
couch
Dave
was
was
located
sprawled
in our
on
the
spacious
couch.
sunroom
and
Dave
Specifically,
was
catching
up on his
homework.
he was reading
Oedipus
Rex, a book
written
the
and
by
Dave
At that
famous
was
same
Greek
totally
time,
tragedian
engrossed.
I happened
to be
room,
sitting at a desk
overlooking
was butchering
math
equations
on
paper
and
finding
it to be
Suddenly
and
feet
a bloodcurdling
with
full capacity
without
Dave
book
The
a fairly
warning,
scream.
jumped
upward
book
exit,
from
and
came
down
“What
“I’m
was
not
that?”
exclaimed
reading
ever
Dave, eyes flashing.
“What!?—You’re
not
“The
eyes
main
out
character
his
the
I searched
he
Was
the
pitched
his
the
high
ceiling.
onto
our
cheap
desk lamp with a crunch
and a clang.
From
the
bowels
of our
dorm
suite,
roommate—Jon—charged
to
employed
in case.
off
same
day.
burst
lungs.
couch,
it bounced
crashing
normal
He
just
the
in the
a window.
I
some
scratch
Dave
of his Navy-seasoned
wildly for the nearest
window
too high?
As
Sophocles,
to the
another
rescue.
Jon.
again!”
reading
declared
a
ruffled
?”
in this
story
just
gouged
his
out!”
“Daaaave!”
During
reading,
with
all his
President.
that
the same
year
I founded
the
newfound
Actually,
year—he
was
that
“Ice
free
Dave
Dave
was
boycotting
Skating
Club”.
Dave,
time,
had
elected
a
became
the
Vice
lot
his
plate
Student
on
Government
President
by
Skating
a popular
Club
vote,
workload
was
for
example—but
light.
In essence,
our Skating Club duties
the Germain
Arena
ice rink
in
number
of
times
each
the
semester
entailed renting
Fort
Myers
a
and
showing
up
to ice skate.
Each
skating
event
was
exclusive
for
Ave
Maria
students
and everyone
had fun. For me, however,
these endeavors
reminded
me what ice looked
like
and
kept
They
for
my
repressed
brought
me.
At
back
Germain
skating
around
about
Team”
to make
i but we
packed
the
in
as
that
Arena,
circles
on
I
adventure
of
we
and
each
had
started
Along
vowed.
working
scientific
with
my
longer
reduced
none
of
to
us
were
All Hockey
Hair
coming back and
dating
Then
year was over in a flash.
Next,
I began
my
second
University.
alive.
balance
outing.
avoided
I
Spirit
missing
were
the “Minnesota
nevertheless
kept
rink
Meanwhile,
Minnesota
some
year
outdoor
my
freshman
at
usual
hours
and
Ave
college
in
the
Maria
affairs,
lab
I
doing
research.
Specifically,
well-respected
Peliska.
In
investigate
(human
I
began
senior
the
and
work
scientist
Peliska
even
lab,
create
immunodeficiency
is a Ph.D. organic
had even worked
major
drug
Peliska
character.
is
a
I
learned
drugs
of
a
James
how
against
to
HIV
chemist
and an HIV
with Pfizer on some
tests. 1 Preeminently,
phenomenal
lab
Dr.
virus).
Dr. Peliska
expert.
He
HIV
in
the
named
teacher
however,
Dr.
and
fun
a
My
involvement
recognize
going
know
one
in
the
of the
Peliska
lab
made
under-appreciated
me
benefits
of
to a relatively small college: you really get to
your professors,
see how they conduct
their
affairs,
and
ascertain
how
the
system
as
a
whole
operates.
In
addition,
at
a smaller
school,
know your classmates.
For me, one such
classmate
positively
I’m
find
energetic
talking
hanging
name
was
girl
about
tiny
taped
to
Allison,
fun
habit
shoulders
was
to
and
curly
hair.
ribbons
you
This
girl’s
Allison.
I further
of
observed,
simpering
two
or
three
fishing—family.
also
from
and, again
working
in
had
and
This
a
like
the
contagiously
shrugging
times
excited—like
when she was
Allison,
I soon
discovered,
mean
get
pretty
gifts.
Allison was also a biology
major
me, she had dedicated
herself
to
lab.
a
irresistibly
like those
in bunches
really
was
with
curls
you
when
her
she
was
off to go fishing.
came
from
a fishy—I
made
Minnesota.
sense
Had
because
all
she
the
stars
aligned?
Either
way,
around
the
roommate
Dave
decided
about
time
After
fishing
and
to introduce
staying
up
just
time I met
we should
do
fish back
it.
I
into
Allison,
my
stop
talking
agreed.
my
I
adventures.
Dolphins
terns
diving
for
minnows.
me,
it was
also
healthy.
For
A.M.
until 2 A.M.
On that fateful beach
trip, I immediately
that I should never have abandoned
these
were
found
life. At 5
were
wave-riding
a
It
was
better
realized
sorts of
and
fun
antidote
little
and
to
the
stresses
decided
of
college
to found
life
than
a University
ice
Fishing
wasn’t
long
before
ways than one.
Let’s
time
of
some
money
might
on
impact
talking
estrogenic
you
and
I
about
influence
and
health.
became
the
products
your
I
Club.
And
Allison?
It
“hooked”
in more
spend
skating.
how
Working
lab of Dr. Peliska
is where
I began
education
into
scientific
funding,
so
this
in
my
let’s
the
early
begin
there.
What
quickly
lab was
Maria
became
our
unique
University,
notably,
especially
the
was
Mr.
Mr.
Monaghan
and owned
to founding
It
didn’t
our
in
in those
Monaghan,
had
also
the
Peliska
circumstances.
Ave
At
early
our
of Ave
Maria’s
founded
of
lab
Maria
founder.
Domino’s
Tigers baseball
University,
so
Ave
days
all
philanthropist
the Detroit
Ave Maria
prodigious
me
received
basically
donations.
main
Thomas
to
financial
the university,
we
money
from private
Most
clear
Pizza
team
prior
he had
a
resumé.
take
donated
long
for
lab money
me
to
was
not
further
the
learn
status
that
quo.
In the USA, most money
that goes into scientific
research
at universities
originates
from corporations
or grants
Again:
Because
sources,
flexibility
were
from
ours
the
money
researching
government.
entered
our
lab
from
private
we
enjoyed
incredible
freedom
and
in our lab work. Even while our
budgets
undoubtedly
basically
US
did not.
whatever
and
tighter,
we
solving.
felt
we
were
most
able
to
passionate
pursue
about
Most
places
do
Most
American
two ways:
government
not
research
things
and
commissions.
And
government
you
influence
money
And
is
no
is the
plastics,
fragrances,
not
or
corporate
a
at
how
from
much
soaps,
and
in the
birth
problem
least
not
products,
cheaper
for
consider
to
“hack”
often
stressor
and
research.
No
estrogenic
it
massive
weedkillers,
This
these
items
were
harmful
but
as
that’s
you’ll
to
use
just
further
perspective,
is
and
room
drugs.
it.
see.
consider
estrogenics
perfumes,
ingredients
that
are
are ultimately
derived
Or
wants
control
if
“bottom-line”
deodorants,
expensive
estrogenics
the
they
for
scientific
elephant
a
a
of
sometimes
tremendous
are relentlessly
harmful,
beyond
one generation.
Now,
that
or
“wants”
and
estrogenics
generates
items
include
soy,
be
one
research.
selling
Lucrative
They
Even
money
corporation
better
professional
because
profits.
healthy
obtain
large
and
see,
money
a
for
within
equals
would
labs
that
sometimes
Money,
this freedom.
either
they investigate
things
wants
and
commissions
investigate
align,
worse.
have
in
rather
than
healthy.
Many
from
petroleum
instance.
how
much
fertility
money
rather
than
is made
selling
promoting
pills
“natural
family planning”
(NFP), which is free.
Or
consider
how
the
addition
of
estrogenics
increases
else
you
find
dressings?
sales
Red
of processed
No.
Examples
40
go
on
foods.
in
and
Why
things
on.
like
would
salad
Basically,
when
settles,
the
dust
“best”
estrogenics.
Remember
plastic?
the
of
corporations
Consumers
the
example
Plus,
we
want
Overall,
estrogenic
margin
category.
unbridled
of
items
emerge
even
clear
things
cheap,
leading
these
selling
“demand”
it.
versus
cloudy
to be
are
Next,
competition
right?
the
same
profit
companies
remain at the corporate
money-based
incentives
“pinnacle”
by championing
and implementing
political
influences
the
are
to
safeguard
peddling.
safeguarded
Kind
of
by
a
other
the
very
vicious
think?
So, as you
influences
In
can
can
circle
imagine,
be
profits
of
But
how
the
estrogenic
might
are
they
health,
and
from
don’t
university
you
government
caution
and
unnatural
remunerative
university
continuously
constantly
swayed
artificial
in the
science
be
direction
adulterated
by
lab
directors
need
to
write
grants
to
stay
afloat.
They
implore
government-commissioned
committees
to
begging
for
job
many
“grant”
money
them
is literally
scientists—I
the way, was another
Ave
Maria
University.
there
was
actual
lab research
the
produce.
monies?
Most
Anyway,
they
estrogenics
regarding
estrogenic
substances—and
of the money
flowage.
for
bad
away
substances—particularly
Easy.
estrogenics
that
corporate
directed
watchfulness
same
words,
far
end
less
kid
benefit
With
money
being
result
money.
In
fact,
a 40-hour
per
week
you
not—which,
by
of private funding
at
the private
funding,
“begging”
and
more
performed.
of
all the
money
begging
at
the
typical
university
beyond
is
problematic.
wasting
millions
of
expertly-trained-scientist-man-hours
every
frustrating
liturgy of paper pushing.
Government
most
grants—the
labs
people
around
to
primary
investigate
the
The
dark
cloud
important
government
over
are
“ethos”,
interests.
That
is
alignment
the
trifecta
of corporate,
is
for
government
by
often
a
forcing
Basically,
funding”
scientist’s
decided
which
corporate
that
of
important.
will have no
hanging
in
source
a way
topics
topics
year
money
America—have
funding
committees
deem
“study this topic or else you
is
Even
heads.
a
current
strangled
of
estrogenic
government,
and
by
influence:
university
interests.
So
that’s
where
of studies
that
Publication
Before we
flag
one
the
are
Bias
move
more
bias
funded.
on,
we
scientific
throughout
this
publication
bias.
originates
book.
within
A funding
bias.
unfortunately
bias
that
This
one
the
is more
and
policies
communicated
Science
papers
are
through
have
lay
are
impartial.
if
It’s
cool
acquiring
various
direct:
this
Alternatively,
too.
influenced
by
publications.
you
you
it’s
if
you
and (2)
results
influence.
people
often believe
“pure”—unbiased
degrees
red
scientific
a powerful
Here’s
the problem:
scientific
journals
to
reemerge
Publications
are
important
because
(1)
publish more papers
you win more grants
people
Done.
need
will also
types
do.
in
Many
science
may
be
students
even
one
that
and
believe
of
those
people
who
about
the
really
doesn’t
scientific
publication
a sort-of black box
most non-scientists.
Let’s
briefly
go
publication
through
it and
The
run
a
and
you
write
and
the
lab.
You
a
results
as I said,
potential
perform
paper
you
will help
about
found.
you
secure
you submit
your paper
online
paper
submission
you
select
other
scientific
as it is
for
the
scientific
will
conferences
and
years—and
reviewing
people
have
journal
It
is
website
who
a
required
submission
experiments
experiments
your
paper,
grant
money.
a journal.
application
termed
you
should
line
forms.
During
process,
“experts”
have
befriended
these
buds
take
your paper. In other
called
those
future
to
is
some
buddies,
“colleagues”—usually
online
be
issues
Publishing
So,
the
paper.
simplify
think
It might
scientific publication
process
Peer-review
goes as follows:
You
science
to you,
to
themselves.
The dominant
“peer-review”.
or
what
process.
or mystery
process.
highlight
know
met
over
on
the
duty
words,
you tell
peer
on
review
most
True
story.
at
the
of
the
your
scientific
It sounds
that
like I’m
last
your
part:
you
top
aware
most
of
industry
literally
this,
medical
It’s
journal
review
I know
dirty
repeat
your
your choices!
heard
this
doctors
a
let me
scientific
should
generally
use
you’ve
never
this.
so
tell the
choices—who
paper—and
they
be surprised
if
because
fabricating
“little”
Don’t
before
aren’t
lab
even
research
secret.
Teleport
yourself
back into your
is competitive.
Everybody
wants
scientific career.
It
more money.
You
realize
grant
that
funded,
you
deems
papers
every
you
study
get
time
a pay
specific
important
on those
another
raise—yes,
topics
that
of
yours
a pay
the
raise—so
government
and you write grants and
same “important”
topics.
One
gloriously
sunny
your
computer.
You
day,
are
you
finalizing
are
some
is
publish
indoors
on
edits
and
you
decide
you
Naturally,
paper
select
are
then,
ready
you
go
to a top science
your
buddies
to
submit
it.
With
your
certainly
wouldn’t
publishing
to random
Next
week,
buddies—usually
given
2
them—and
research
paper.
the
professional
(for
free,
publish
online
and
career
on
to
the
“honor”
or
recommend
they
outright
Oh,
this
criticism.
your
you’ve
them
reviewing
your
on
them
your
paper
of course).
may
(3)
paper
emails
choices
bestows
After reading
your
paper,
your
recommend
that your
paper
is
they
you
your
gives
also
of
line,
or genuine
journal
journal
the
carefully
as
you
the
leave
chance
paper.
submit
and you
the paper
scientific
journal
or 3, from the
The
a
journal
review
want
the
to
may
that
buddies
may
published
or
it needs
recommend
(1)
(2)
modifications
that
it
should
be
rejected.
and—yes—they
see that you
paper
as they
read
and
unbiased
and
immune
Now,
not
“peer
review”
only
And
have
the sheer
published
are
are the author
of
review
it. Sound
to politics?
scientific
procedure
papers
but
subject
scientific
number
of how many
is a huge consideration
to
grants,
this
too.
papers
you
in winning
grants.
Overall,
the
accurately
“peer
compared
essay
essay,
writing.
teacher
name
at
harbored
grudge
review
to
high
could
school
When
you
wrote
a
grading
your
essay
the
top
any
grudge
will
process”
of
undoubtedly
your
against
essay.
you,
influence
If
or
college
high
noted
school
your
the
look
how
be
teacher
out—that
they
think
as
they
are
read
wired
the
as
paper.
humans:
extrapolations.
Now,
I’ve been
that
seeing
is
on
papers
“necessary”.
It
simply
make
my
the
or
grant
is
critical,
to be
In
anything
essence,
while
throughout
want
you
to remain
published
People
already
reading
this
book
skeptical—in
scientific
articles
studies
page
of
applications
is
supposedly,
able
you
to
recognize
scientific
can
see
and
why
a healthy
and
we
and
Ph.D.
cover
because
the reader
“needs
lab history and credentials”.
even
how
associations
during
name
science
deemed
we
taught
the
prospective
This
I
way—of
funded
studies.
often discover
positive benefits that they are
looking
for and these
benefits
are
easily
published
without
much
nod
toward
adverse
effects.
Next,
be
on top
scientist
spin,
wary
of
the
ensuing
of the professional
is publishing
papers
media
scientists
may
are
add
certainly
media
spin
added
scientific
spin.
If
a
that contain
a biased
further
spin.
skeptical,
so
Professional
you
should
be
too.
Dr. Marcia Angell,
England
Journal
away
from
the
for
precisely
and
spin.
I
witnessed
industry
on
decades
at
Medicine.
The
about
New
this
In Dr.
causes
the
of
ex-editor-in-chief
of the New
Medicine,
recently
stepped
England
Journal
reason—the
Angell’s
own
New
staple
of
and
of
Medicine
corruption
words:
firsthand
the
medical
research
the
of
rampant
influence
during
England
the
journal
treatments
of
my
the
two
Journal
of
is
research
for
disease.
Increasingly,
this
companies.
work
I saw
is
sponsored
companies
begin
by
drug
to exercise
a
level of control
over the way research
is done
that was unheard
of when
I first came
to the
journal,
and
to make
This
the
sure
is an
Wizard
exposed
Instead
Ironically,
to load
looked
in some
of being
she
did
place as Yours
Anyway,
don’t
evil—but
A
that
marketing
an
Truly).
hate this
do
be
of
is like the
of
innovation,
training
is not
and
same
hopeless
skeptical.
It
has
messier.
good
Principle
Principle
scientific
for
for
study
something
Evaluating
Estrogenics
Evaluating
is favorable
that
wary!
In essence,
could
journals
publishing
writing
be
generally
decent
everybody—and
when
at
(the
developed
for
screening
science
papers
Principle I recommend
to you is this:
1.
[. . .]
now
being
from
its
Medicine
process—it
cautious
dice
. 2
postgraduate
School
the
good.
ways
engine
machine
her
University
gotten
clearly
[products]
industry
it is a vast
or
their
was
of Oz—still full of bluster but
as
something
far
different
image.
Boston
aim
and
positive
bought
do
I
a
If
a
Estrogenics:
regarding
and
sold,
be
a respectable
job
work.
But
scientific
I mean
that
and
everybody—has
an
agenda
scientific
work.
This is true
the winner’s
of most
selection
things
that are
competitive:
is vulnerable
to
arbitrary,
political,
subjective
and
And,
naturally,
run
by
Ph.D.
mega
influences.
biotech
corporations—usually
scientists—know
this
process
intimately.
show
They
you
a
chapter
company
the
specific
system
instance
in
fact—where
literally
employs
“pro-atrazine
In
game
the
herbicide”
backdrop
publication
of
bias,
soon—in
you
this
papers.
do
Where
you
do
current
funding
should
begin
you
also
bias
once
again,
spin.
You
look
you
for
pick”,
gloss-over,
publications
and
For
more
that,
to
spot
start
by
and
recognize
the
relative
of
conflict-of-interest?
look?
Well,
published
very
Yeaah.
prevalence
of conflict-of-interest,
a close
the funding and publication
biases.
How
I’ll
a
chemical
herbicide
scientists
that
publish
research
our
frequently.
science
for a
articles
strong
that
“cherry
or ignore
major
contradictory
data.
These
manage
to
get
often
we
looking
will
than
we
would
highlight
example
shortly,
where
one
“improve
ignores
bone
density”.
The
study,
meanwhile,
the fact that this same
estrogenic
item
increases
conflict
estrogenic
an
like.
cancer,
and
dragging
allergies,
agenda
close
behind
First,
to
introduce
introduce
Dr. Marion
Nestle
is
more
revealing
item—soy—is
blood
are
often
the
money
conflict
Nestle.
company,
food-related
supports
which
studies.
about
research
that
than
certainly
to
Dr.
and
direct
anyone
Nestlé®
could
tight,
finding
and
ironically
The
Yes:
hitched-up
recommend
you check out her work.
She has no relation,
by the way, to
food
etc.
of
interest
is
In a good way.
passionate
studies
clots,
to
wagon.
agenda-driven
conflict-of-interest
said
I
the
funds
food
be
know.
I
Nestlé®
many
company
viewed
as
“promotional”
or
well
“conflict-of-interest”.
study
funded
promoting
the
Don’t
they
Anyway,
York
within
the
Footnoted
by
the
“healthy
here 3
Nestlé®
nature”
Marion
University
Nestle
a
that
and
has
Health
for
prolific
author.
long
Nestle
is one
ago,
has
a
Ph.D.
15
at
years
been
March
time
actively
Molecular
of
this
writing—Dr.
collecting
professional
study,
she
includes
on
the
bias
or conflict.
Nestle
has
searched,
professional
analyses
In the
short
found
what?
168
Only
are
time
conspicuous
large
number.
corporate-funded
studies.
12 of those
168 studies
“unfavorable”
products—156
In other
Dr.
are
words,
toward
“favorable”.
when
is
2015—not
And,
each
chair
and
and
of
that
include
She
found
a
for
New
was even the
Food Studies,
(1988—2003)
Since
the
in
at
scientific
studies
conflicts-of-interest.
that
such
food
company,
of
whole-grains.
is a professor
Biology. She is legit. Dr. Nestle
of the Department
of Nutrition,
still
of
sell whole-grains?
Dr.
Public
category
highly
she
And
find
the
has
guess
results
company
4
a corporation
funds
a study,
the
“findings”
are
nearly
always
highly
positive
toward their particular
product.
Shocker,
right?
You
see
why
I
am
promoting
or
favoring
should
too?
You
be
multiple
sounds
when
Like
wary
of
published
estrogenics?
should
at least
And
articles
why
demand
you
to see
studies
before
accepting
anything
that
promotional
regarding
estrogenics,
especially
a study
the
of course,
creates
an
entire
field of straw-men.
legal
status
of estrogenics,
are
worse
than
others.
some
countries,
I’ll put
me
two
which
article
quotes
is from
an
side
by
American
side
and
journal
you
and
tell
which
one is from a Chinese
journal.
Here goes the first one, from 2008:
Parabens
[. . .]
response
in
stages
of
[mouse]
offspring.
the
produced
vivo.
offspring.
“Uterotrophic”,
effect
on
They
uterotrophic
damaged
altered
the
late
proportion
of
born
alive, and body
weight
reduced
the number
of sperm
of
in
and
in
the
sperm
motile
activity
5
by
the
positive
also
spermatogenesis,
pups
They
epididymis,
male
a
the
way,
uterus.
animals”.
Also,
simply damage
And
means
“in
damage
to sperm
that
vivo”
there
means
is an
“in
to “spermatogenesis”
formation.
Lots of
live
is
code,
lots of damage.
Next,
I present
Over
the
targeted
threats,
years,
consumers.
for
The
related
there
is
cosmetics
groups
allege
[. . .]
The
that
physiology
are
health-related
chemicals
1,3-butadiene)
scientific
about
they
testing
pose
risks
industry
that
and
and
invalidating
may
little government
oversight,
and
contain
cancer-causing
chemicals
parabens,
that
groups
and
that
toxicants
important
conclusions
safety
have
health
are not
flawed,
specific
human
activist
to safety
involving
found
some
tested
practices
other
this gem:
cosmetics
as
possible
human
claiming that cosmetic
ingredients
adequately
to
to you,
allegations
(e.g.,
fail
phthalates,
to
consider
studies
and recent
regulatory
these
chemicals,
which
have
are
not
differ
simplistic
hazardous.
Animal
in crucial
attempts
ways,
to
and
further
extrapolate
rodent
Ok,
testing
you
win.
American.
American
“A
You
health
knew
the
But
did
you
medical research
Position
Science
to human
Paper
and
American
of
Council
not have
defensive
It
on
guessed
way
it
second
realize
journal
the
Health”?
rambler
this
article
American
came
Science
that.
reads
risks. 6
It
particular
was titled
Council
on
from
the
You
may
directly
and
is
like
was
Health.
written
in
a political
such
a
debate
transcript.
Errors
One
and
final cautionary
then
leave
Pasteur’s
common
One
all
this
publish-or-perish
are
caught,
author,
behind
it is generally
Pascal-Emmanuel
in
“dig”
his
into
for
are
and
greener
increasingly
fast-paced
And
too
soy
even
if
little, too
the
late.
Gobry,
points
article
titled
“ Big
out
fame,
largely
built
that
abortion
writes:
Steven
his
we
system.
an important
example
Science
Is Broken ”.
Gobry
before
[sic].
Scientific
errors
in
our
competitive
scientific
errors
word
Levitt,
career
of Freakonomics
on
to lower
aborted
crime
babies
criminals.
Two
painstaking
analysis
As I said,
that
are
— and
Gobry—never
arguing
economists
went
of
recoding
found
a basic
through
Levitt’s
arithmetic
a lot is at stake. Laws are
based
on
errors
such
most
myself
find
led
rates 20 years later because
the
were
disproportionately
future
work
Unfortunately,
—including
a paper
people
until
out
who
I read
about
read
this
these
often
as
the
statistical
error
. 7
passed
Levitt’s.
Freakonomics
article
errors.
by
P.E.
“Then
there
continues.
is
“In
outright
a
2011
fraud,”
survey
of
P.E.
2,000
research
psychologists,
over
half
admitted
to
reporting
those
experiments
that gave
they
were
P.E.
Gobry
the
after”.
also
repeat
you
journal
check
First
out
Things
confirm,
if you
“Ok,
so
Sketchville
Nature,
are
Cell, and
better
than
nobody
exact
me,
The
is
able
to
of
the
imitation
a
top
pharma
exec told
company
long
safe,
journals
but
ago,
shall
thinking,
a
was
amazing
new
drug
repeat
that
research
was
published
to
if the
journal,
we
experiments
paper
first repeat
‘in house’,
millions
of
dollars
entirely
on
journal.
I estimate,”
a
lunch
biotech
and
nameless.
This
or treatment,
in our
to
create
experiment
he
[drug]
journal
we
own
in a top
first
labs.
science
it. Without
replicating
the
we would otherwise
waste
trying
faulty
not
outright
me “whenever
people
within our
read
something
in a science
an
be
are
or
eating
huge
remain
may
they
work,
I
in
like
right?”
sloppy
from
He
be
frequently
live
science
journals
journals
error,
executive
company.
are
might
big research
psych
not
you
studies
research
to scientific
example,
Even
with
Science
exactly.
immune
fraud.
attempt
like
psychology
but major
not
about
that
even
This
of
studies.
Now,
with
that
intellectual
experiments
or
original
For
recommends
the article
called
“Scientific
Regress”.
8
Things
article
tells
of large
numbers
psychology
No,
selectively
the
result
Wow.
well-respected
and
First
Gobry
went
on,
a
drug
published
“that
over
based
in
a
50%
of
the
time,
findings.”
we
He
cannot
was
repeat
published
referring
to
professionally
published
scientific research
studies!
And
actual
studies
confirm
this. For
study
performed
by
Bayer®
investigated
studies.
A
study
a
group
the
about
the medical and science
“do not match up with
replicate”. . .
So,
more
basically,
Now
you’re
anything
than
science
a
researchers
reproducibility
of
studies.
found
75%
They
of the
saying:
at
scientific
that
time! 8
in bad
“Well,
studies.
can
I
trust
?”
the
Estrogenics
at
and
merely
I’ll add
example,
journal’s
published
studies
their in-house
attempts
to
Great question!
Yes!
The
trick is to use
than
of
is drowning
probably
study
look
one
another
Principle
numerous
isolated
helpful
for
science
Principle
Evaluating
articles
rather
research
soon,
paper.
as well.
If you want to get an overall sense of the positive
and negative
aspects
in each
scientific
area,
you
need
to
pierce
through
science.
Basically,
always
think
while
about
the
agendas
reading
science,
the
possible
and
faulty
you
should
agendas.
Ask
yourself
who might benefit
from the outcome
profit
from
a certain
result.
That
is the
or
best
approach.
Trusting
Now,
Your
let’s
Soy
get
back
Mate
to
splashing
in
estrogenics.
Pour
yourself
a piping
red-velvet
latte into a #7-plastic
mug
First
were
view
on
the
the
of
the
Ill Reproductive
phytoestrogens.
“phyto-”
System
We
category
saw
already
that
pool
hot,
and
soy-milk,
let’s go.
(IRS)
a
of
10
list
panoramic
but
I
want
to include
1,000
another
words,
word
but
And
reveals
money
in
reason,
of the
Other
of
genuine
health
estrogenics
could
to soy
Especially
since
but
is
soy
influences
been
of
discussing:
academic.
we
on
are
3 different
raised
For
home
as a
this
soy
and
like
where
previous
season
farmers
all
and
knew
because
they
vital nitrogen
gluttonously
by
soy
just
fine.
soy.
beans.
was
about
soy
of
30,000
grown
What
that
3
farmers
had
by
to
farms
All
the
corn
all
the
heartland
beans
are
are legumes—they
replenish
supply.
Every
other
year,
devours
the
ways
monoculture
vice-versa.
was
soy.
in
will do
with
clockwork,
the
from
was surrounded
teenager,
I used
Minnesota
massive—one
for example.
other
year
bequeathed
all familiar
were
farms
important
the soil’s
isolate”
corn
acres,
Every
arising
highlighted
both
these
planted
issues
be
“soy
Now, growing
up, my
soy bean
fields. And
corn
we’ve
This
estrogenics,
3-tier
and
about
right?
other
the
work
government,
analogous
that
Actually,
I’ll use soy as THE representative
example
influence
of money
in scientific
work
while
showcasing
work
like
some
scientific
corporate,
soy.
potato / patato,
important.
Soy is estrogenic.
glaringly
about
beans
the
and
vital
the
nitrogen
cycle
begins
anew.
While
soy
is estrogenic,
other
commonly
eat are not estrogenic.
or
So
black
why
exclusively
beans.
do
grow
Yet
US
other
farmers
estrogenic
beans
beans
that
we
Like pinto beans
are
continue
soy
rather
also
legumes.
to
than
almost
other
beans?
For
one,
soy
beans—the
actual
in shape and they practically
once the beans become
dry
grow
nice
and
varieties
are
straight,
often
practical
purposes
In other
corporate,
words,
the
farm
works.
The
US
Furthermore,
like chemical
is
powerful
From
too.
soy beans
farming.
the
sort
to
the
store,
government
rather
“chemical
I add
These
quotation
marks
around
processing
companies
overgrowth
about
processing
soy
chemical
into
enables
talking
to buying
the
with
to
here
be
companies
entire
79-word
is so short
and
abstract
That’s
companies
overly
why
“food”.
fiscally
pulverize
by-products
and
packaged
course,
the
into
soy
promoted
as
“healthy”
options”,
so
“science”
calorie
journals.
from
but
cheaply.
to “prove”
scientific
in
companies.
health
benefits.
here comes the smoke
and mirrors.
As recent as 1999, you can find quotes
professional
crops
the word
become
as
“food”
sizes.
Of
“low
this
farmers
to
other crop
“food”
non-perishable
need
numerous
is employed
that
how
soy
companies”.
processing
mostly
then
thing
is
“food”
beans
sell
these
products
different
shapes
and
products
various
large-scale,
corporate
essentially
encouraging
beans over and above
I’m
soy
of
subsidizes
Really,
the
bean
resistance.
for
here
This
Next,
for
ideal
And
types.
addicted
soy
herbicide
are
shells
plants
lobbies.
numerous
ways,
grow excess
soy
not
round
fall out of their
and hard. The
patent-protected
farming / processing
suckles
beans—are
I am
this
saccharine.
And. . .
like this in
including
paper
because
It states:
the
it
Recent
soy
research
is beneficial
from
article
and
for
makes
asking
daily
can
bad
processed
diets,
so
you
soy
in
important
for
as soy
And,
clear
of
almost
eating
your
the
old
processed
buy
soy
it
actually
be
a
of
so
what
lots
could
message
is given
usually
uniquely
9
course,
(you
would
hormone
consumption.
is the
reacts
about
it’s
of
recommend
everyone
statement
it
including
amount
you
form),
disaster
to
going on?
First,
for
consumption
therapies
subtle.
small
and
aware
of the
potential
of their patients
will be
daily consumption
status.
relatively
be
soy
Additionally,
women”
even
much
undetermined.
This
range
of
research
for
such
for
consuming
how
and
alternative
not
recommended
“undetermined”
a
diet.
therapy,
is beneficial
It’s
health
to be
as many
about
replacement
Since
but
recommendations
woman’s
here.
women
to women’s
for practitioners
benefits
of soy
“Soy
that
what
foods
are
still
looks
at the broad
relating
a
demonstrates
soy,
and
legal
individually
make
this
anything.
in
type
“Exactly
is
to
of
how
much lead paint you should eat is undetermined”.
And speaking
of law and legal ballet, this particular
paper
was
Estrogenic
people
carefully
Effects
reading
titled
May
this
“Considering
Protect
paper
would
not
this title was written conservatively—once
legal
necessity.
Even
in
1999,
truckloads
Interestingly,
this
paper,
of dirt coming
when
one
out
I looked
was
a
on
up
Shirley
Soy:
Its
Women”.
Most
realize
that
again—by
there
were
soy.
the
two
Lindsay.
authors
I
of
found
that
Lindsay
had
pre-publication
(in
1998)
The
sidebar
of
presentation
reads:
vegetarian
main
for
eliminated
90%
menopausal
positive
This
can
be
the
only
permissible,
acknowledged.
honest
because
she
but
ignores
she
a
soy
protein
has
soy
of soy
is taking
risks.
is
10
favoring
and
be
are
viewed
as
are
completely
not
including
an
risks.
She
a favorable
on
the
writing.
symptoms
might
More
her
successfully
research
Menopausal
time
as
symptoms.”
she
lab
Center
near
Lindsay
is definitely
soy
to treat
her
if
the
risks
But
Lindsay
is
declaration
SoyInfo
been
Lindsay
so
her
ok.
Center”.
menopausal
symptoms,
paper
“SoyInfo
has
personal
bias.
after
using
in
this
the
using
[. . .]
of her
aspects
possibly
years,
source
So, now we see
“soy
convinced”
to
Lindsay’s
“Lindsay
two
protein
presented
won’t
get
corporate
risks
sued
stance
soon.
Before
moving
into important
“soy
negatives”—the
rest of the story—there
is one more
footnote
to
Lindsay’s
story.
become
of
the
much
two
Because
bleaker
founders
name
is Akiko
told me that
since
of
soy.
Statement”
hopes
of
so
that
keeps
of course. . .
of
The
I
was
questionable
on
1999,
the
about
soy
I contacted
SoyInfo
SoyInfo
to promote
Center.
giving.
Center
“new
already
neutrality
of the SoyInfo
now it was confirmed.
Speaking
facts
have
one
Her
Aoyagi
Shurtleff.
In essence,
Akiko
they
are very
much
still strongly
promoting
soy, 11
the
skeptical
Center’s
motives,
Unless
soy
“Mission
industrial
uses”
about
intentions
soy
is
truly
is
the
the
but
gift
healthy,
A recent—2015—paper
Clinical
Nutrition
in the
discovered
(the major
estrogenic
99.7%)
are somewhat
bones
of
words,
postmenopausal
estrogen—again,
a
are
an
honest
“effectiveness”
but
was
science
that
place
of
they
are
particular
positive
impact,
improvements,
shouldn’t
finding,
tiny.
even
though
Mathematically
the
“significant”,
are often thrown
off by this
term
basically
just means
“noticeable”
in
this “significant
soy
paper
overall.
Well,
in
other
papers.
despite
from
In
tiny.
Non-scientists
“significant”—it
Yet
by
the
anyone.
is
yes,
12
indication
of
isoflavones
of soy beans
in preserving
acting
clear
Journal
soy
women.
estrogenic—therefore
this
namely,
postmenopausal
It
that
component
effective
isoflavones
surprise
American
regarding
but
bone
tiny”
preservation,
took
a strongly
positive
What’s up with that?
one
of the
advisory
authors
board
Pharmavite—the
Aaannnd,
study has
it gets
a USA
of estrogenic
soy
presumably
plan
from
of
maker
worse.
patent
impact
this
stance
this study
a
of
2015
on
soy
is on
the
company
SoyJoy®
called
energy
bars.
Another
author
on
the
on a unique
formulation
isoflavones.
to
positive
sell
In other
this
words,
particular
they
soy
estrogenic.
SoyJoy®
bars
probably
sold like wild after
this
2015
paper,
too. Headlines
in newspapers
based
on
like
this paper
“Add
published
undoubtedly
Soy
to
Your
in
“Harvard
were
Diet”, 13
Men’s
glowing.
an
Headlines
actual
Health
article
Watch”.
Trusted
advice
for
by
way,
which
the
a
healthier
successfully
permanent
confusion.
Shoot:
you,
personally,
considering
may
hustling
want
to begin
to buy
your
might
to
the
yourself
own
life
sows
even
store
motto,
seeds
be
right
a box
“Joy
is their
of
seriously
now.
You
of SoyJoy®
in 7 days”
Pure
bars
SoyJoy®
Bar
Diet.
bones”—at
After
all,
soy
“preserves
women’s
least for postmenopausal
women—and
I’ve
shown
now
papers
and
Science
journal
as
saw
we
you
2
a Harvard
spin
leads
before.
Where
is
“antioxidants”
very
Health
to influential
This
the
so
harm
they
of
positive
soy’tastic
Publication
happens
article.
media
spin,
the
time.
all
here?
Isoflavones
must
be
good
for
are
you,
right?
Well,
I can
think
toxic
(APEs
14
for
several
one),
so
good
logic.
postmenopausal-bone-preservation,
indeed
be
good.
Here.
I have
2002
paper
Let’s
a
15
Here,
we
you
takes
a
review
toxicity,
carcinogenesis
in
rats
formation”.
bones—now
we’re
And
can
if rats
should
the
talking
cancer
consider.
and
about
and
at
things
like,
isoflavones.
for
[. . .]
developmental
human
soy consumption
by the way,
to
This
look
evidence
estrogen
[. . .]
So,
get
necessarily
broad
disturbing
estrogenic
and
suggesting
a link between
goiter”.
Yikes! Carcinogenesis,
“cancer
isn’t
are
regarding
isoflavones
may
more
It says
produce
briefly
developmental
this
And
that
check.
paper
isoflavones
in soy.
“Soy
is known
to
antioxidants
hell
with
studies
and
means
thinner
cancer
and
goiter?
goiter
from
soy
it
is likely
that
practically
things.
comes
can
The
stomach
a garbage-disposal.
like
rotten
eggs
representative
Rats
They
are
used
toxic
all the
to humans.
absence
much
of
we
On
of a rat
eat
the
is
nastiest
should
in
time
this
to test
for
a
toxicity
but
choice.
If you
found something
the
other
in
rats,
check
2002,
out
hand,
find
very
if there
that
is an
doesn’t
human
above
long
of Clinical
the SoyJoy®
and
other
was
rats.
soy
mean
before
the
just
paper
Can
to
was
favorable
paper
Nutrition).
influence
problems
studies,
“toxicity”
isoflavones-strengthen-your-bones
Journal
sense,
to humans.
confirm.
Good call.
First, note that the
written
in
a great
probably
toxicity
relating
and,
of real-life
are
probably
not
toxicity, fine—you’ve
So,
too.
Here, Templeton
the rat in Charlotte’s
Web
to
mind.
Templeton
collected
disgusting
foods
true
we
2015
(American
you
already
see
and spin? Cancer
formation
were
already
known
but
ignored.
None
of
the
groundbreaking
problems
even
by
with
2002,
soy
however.
were
In
1960,
for example,
problems
with goiter in human
infants
were
already
being
attributed
to soy. 16 I even
found
a
1961
paper
“Soybean-induced
goiter,”
follow
1960
up
to that
soy
having
coming out
By
2015,
probably
to
an
even
effect
earlier:
therefore,
shouldn’t
preserve
our
probably
study.
And
titled,
written
as
research
scientific
suggesting
bones.
Even
that
for
a
about
on
“tumor
growth”
try 1955. 18
the
be
frankly
17
was
community
we
a
eat
soy
limited
“postmenopausal
ways
women”
to strengthen
cohort,
your
there
bones
than
are
better
consuming
substance
that
increases
developmental
cancer
(carcinogenesis),
and
sick
thyroid
(goiter).
basically
looking
at soy
any
big-picture
will find
that
health
consuming
amounts
of soy is associated
with
effects that outweigh
the benefits.
skim
and
one
then
and
more
move
2002
research
along.
paper
developmental
“old”
This
that
defects,
the
I’ve
goiter,
overview
of
“Soy
research
foods
on
and
is
this
the authors
“only”
eating soy products,
of
breast
problems,
this
and
2014.
Things
The
and
hormonal
have
just
19 —an
paper
is
a review
of
risks. ”
In
and
antinutrient
soy
are
focus on 5 health
namely,
“increased
byproducts.”
in agenda-free
2014.
(showing
review
benefits
male
2014
1960’s,
cancer)
a
and
they
problems
products.
gotten
research
fertility
content,
Later,
a 6 th risk:
additional
function
from eating soy
was
better,
cancer,
processing
sneak-in
thyroid
health
hypothyroidism,
harmful
from
supplementation:
perceived
small
harmful
1950’s,
topic.
this paper,
risks from
risk
even
selected
and
commonly
study
multiple
article
Maybe
research
or flukes.
2014
science
paper
titled:
toxicity,
glands
Seriously.
Frankly,
Let’s
a
also
with
Again,
bleaker,
between
not
2002
It’s a mess.
Our food and water
is also a mess.
Let’s
move
on to the final chapter
of Part 1 and
investigate
estrogenic
levels
in our
food
and
water
sources.
CHAPTER
4
Estrogenics
by
Air, Land,
and
The
Mercury
EARLY
Rises
ON,
Allison
IT WAS
and
me.
loves
my
“partners”
too
explain
college
In
But
too
was
at
not
then
the
time,
Allison
to be
my
came
a citrusy
summer
included
and
partner
even
made
in the
future.
twist.
Allison
and
free
work
room,
side-by-side.
board,
bad,”
Florida
I told
Minnesota.
Dave
for
my
just
was
one
skeptical
“And,
also
of Florida
course,
of my
heat,
then
family
anyway,
full-time
so ignorance
it happened.
lab job,
a heat
up
were
grants
a
$2,500
staying
the
so it
was
can’t
be
members
back
learn
some
I’ll
was
her
I
summer
incredible
scientific skills first-hand.”
At that point, I had never experienced
Of
didn’t
Our
and
working
in the I.T. department,
“yes” for me to stay.
in
roommate
meals,
My
in
I
I
that required
campus
over
summer,
an easy
that
were
that
and
stipend.
“Living
we
recalls
independently,
one
memory
to say
both awarded
competitive
lab grants
us to stay in Florida at Ave Maria’s
the
and
the
Allison
for
providence
of me,
Actually,
generous.
Roses
divine
friends,
partner.
fast,
and
than
what I was doing during the pre-fabricated
lab experiments.
Guilty as charged.
fact,
mind
lab
Guns
memories
to her
is being
worked
fish
earliest
to relay
of being
MORE
Then
intervened.
One of Allison’s
she
Sea
a
summer
still bliss.
Nearly
wave
the
first
day
swaggered
in,
exhaling
uncomfortable
to fog
my
glasses.
breaths
of humidity,
Wow.
To adapt,
Dave
and
I became
beach
that summer.
We would
tobacco
while
from
briar-wood
holding
learned
to
enough
pipes
fishing
poles
consistently
regulars
smoke
in our
in
catch
at
the
aromatic
right
our
hands
lefts.
small
ocean
As
we
fish,
we
became
more and more serious about our Fishing
Club. It didn’t take long and we began
dreaming
of catching
Sharks,
a shark,
you
have
I
wading
see,
had
a huge
could
them
deep
into
shark.
never
bump
the
be
ignored.
my
water
leg
on
Not
only
I
was
while
a full moon
night,
but nearly every trip to the beach, something
large
and powerful
would snap our fishing line. It had
to be
we
the
sharks.
would
snook
journey
Despite
skills
reeling
in a smaller
would
were
proved
get
more
than
one
a
struggle.
these
fish
in
My
fish
because
of
were
their
early
for
the
still
breaking
off,
teeth. . .
its
sharking
fishing
truly
us.
and
on
Minnesota
outmatched
razor-sharp
fish
half
Dave and I upgraded
to stronger,
fishing
line, that
wasn’t
“cutting
mystery
occasion,
snook
chomped
non-transferable
because
after
test,
on
to our ice chest. Brutal!
these aggressive
strikes, our
attempts
fish
be
In fact,
monster
And
even
80-pound
it”.
Giant
presumably
presumably
sharks.
With
our
minds
“reeling”
with
new
ideas,
bought
pre-fabricated
foot-long
steel leaders
tied
those
another
crimped
to
new
the
ends
and
connections
of
our
lines.
unexpected
on
the
leaders
This
problem:
would
we
and
led
to
the
break
during
battles
with
giant
crimps
didn’t
break,
fish.
the
12
Plus,
inches
to be too
the
steel.
short. Our lines were
Were
we
hooking
monsters?
We
Then
One
sometimes
even
when
of steel
getting
sharks
the
proved
bit above
or
sea
wondered.
it happened.
day,
after
caught
my
3-foot-long
another
friend
catching
the
small
but
named
a
campus
Trey,
in
left
me
truly
trophy
to
“don’t
levels
eat
of mercury.”
error,
me.
big
It
and
It
was
represented
so
much
about
would
commonly
sharks—they
I
little
and
boat,
ecstatic.
bragging
people
the
more
Trey’s
and
I began
Interestingly,
me:
even
The
shark
was
a
fishing
with
Dave
accomplishment
on
shark.
shark.
I was
shark
still
tremendous
work.
Back
all this trial and
first
bull.
a
hard
my
first
warn
retain
high
“Seriously?”
This advice, I later verified, is true.
In fact, when
you look at the lake-by-lake
“fish
consumption”
(e.g.
Minnesota’s
guidelines
1 ),
around
the
things
look
bleak.
rivers,
or
oceans,
USA
Whether
lakes,
ascertain
updated
that mercury
abounds.
Not all tests
nor are all waters
tested
but plenty
data
exists.
The
good
water
have
news
is
improved.
that
mercury
Awareness
and measures
have
Even
so, however,
been taken.
the number
lakes
is astonishing.
Due
from
this
common
lake
dietary
once
per
you
you
inspect
levels
has
of
recommendation
in
been
are
of
our
raised
“unacceptable”
to mercury,
month”
quickly
“only
is an
in
eat
fish
extremely
government
handbooks.
sizes,
The
slogan
nothing—is
also
numerous
Obviously,
bodies
these
mercury
levels
water
but
Mercury
than
like
herbicides
the
and
your
are
estrogenic
have
other
brain
sprayed,
only
on
based
levels
on
in
the
this for a minute.
in water
fungus,
it kills
serving
stamped
are
risen
of mercury
are often
added
herbicides / fungicides / pesticides.
bacteria,
eat”—no
commonly
consider
levels
not
of water.
guidelines
rather
let’s
“do
because
as
traces
preservatives
Mercury
to
kills
microorganisms,
cells.
Therefore,
mercury
usually
just
wherever
ends
up
water.
Of course,
water, so,
At least,
And,
when
the mercury
too, does the actual
that
here,
about
seems
I’m
estrogenic
likely
ends
up in the
herbicide
chemical.
and
logical.
thinking
especially
and
atrazine.
Remember
specifically
atrazine?
second
most
used
herbicide
in
totally illegal in Europe?
Yeaah.
America
In
levels—and
other
words,
levels
are
might
indicate
high
prevalent
high
mercury
throughout
estrogenic
the
The
that
far,
this
USA—indirectly
levels.
is all common-sense
likely
indicative
Next,
let’s
go
are
steadily
“food-grade”
developing
removing
Meanwhile,
of artificial
This
one
step
further.
diminishing
herbicides.
other
trace
is
likely,
however,
mercury
Chemical
and
of residual
atrazine
and
long
but,
is
presence.
companies
mercury
levels
These
corporations
preservatives
amounts
logic:
estrogen
is
high
if
atrazine
and
other
chemicals
have
shelf-lives.
We’ll look at actual numbers
soon
so
in
getting
better
mercury.
other
from
are
at
Good.
dangerous
chemical
saw
levels
with
continue
the
lawsuits
rising dramatically.
Therefore,
as we
and
fish,
Finding
this
less
set—leads
to
find
leads
an
In
health
the
end,
less
mercury
in our
to
deliberation.
about
a
issue
a
false
our
Can
large
with fast-foods??
Actually,
as a side
bar,
are
finally
being
lab
study.
that
the
officially
2
And
study
found
certain
some
estrogenics
cases—and
other
words,
estrogenics!
Keep
in
eating
mind
cafeterias
but
we’ll
Why
enough
in
by
that
the
should
that
spike
is
a
2016
surprise
you
of Ill Reproductive
the fast
that
by
over
America
discussion
in
50%
in
cases.
In
for
fast-food
blood?
us
and
“fast-food”
so
the
food.
eating
increased
in most
children
as
stick
levels
in
impregnating
around
our
just
research”)
40%
What
estrogenic
blood
many
estrogenics
to
(“for
ridiculous
bass?
the long-term,
this actually
phenotype
or impregnated
save
are
of
won’t
levels
over
qualifies
everyday
news. Over
impregnated
we
estrogenics
in
study
found
fast-food
what
lot
“unwrapped”
fast-foods
for
downplayed.
fast-food
high
are
allowance”
a
it probably
System
(IRS)
List
Specifically,
this
representative
being
Maybe
security.
standards
this wild-caught
tuna?
water
of the fish meat
is
toxicity is becoming
requires
I eat
of
current
we
sometimes
sense
“edible
while
all
as
2;
increased
this
usage,
Chapter
fish even as the true toxicity
likely increasing.
The estrogenic
a larger
in
in
mercury—as
to
rise
with
teens
are
in
school
this
is
big
leads to an
appearance
next
at
Where
chapter.
levels
are
high
the
sources
of all these
specific
numbers
estrogenics?
in the
Estrogenic
C-Level
Let’s begin at the
spraying
80
atrazine
onto
fields,
our
number
only
want
in America,
to (lyrics
for
Many
other
exactly
rationing
And
million
a minute:
their
Yet
America
In
I
Well,
80
of
we
aside
100,000
Brazil
is
and
China
can
course,
And
this
in
take
per
fields
hefty
data
I could
find—and
increasing
atrazine
usage
the
honest
not
other
pollution,
we
top
use
of atrazine.
corn
production.
2 spots.
4
as with all things
is difficult to find.
however,
a
as
also
about
year
global
the
you,
their
is
as we
song).
from these countries.
Brazil is estimated
to
pounds
#3
tell
are
oceanic
unloaded
bad
are
Remember
million.
from
onto
as
we
weed-killing
corn.
thinking
atrazine
all assumes
of
be
farmers
Not
America,
pounds
So, what
about
China?
Well,
Chinese,
data on atrazine
use
What
the
chemical-crop-sprays.
import ship-loads
of food
Take Brazil, for example.
3
are
where
we dream
as big
from
a Brooks
& Dunn
should
a whopping
what
supply?
especially
countries,
why
countries?
water
beginning.
annually
that
And
10
is
that
million
in 2012—the
Chinese
pounds
most
of
recent
the Chinese
have
been
every year since 1980. 5
US
(80
million),
atrazine
number
but
bad.
This
reporting,
of
course.
When
the chem
dust settles, where
are all
millions
of pounds
of atrazine
ending
up?
results
are
washed
And
into
atrazine
in, folks:
our
a tremendous
lakes,
rivers,
is remaining
amount
and
there.
these
The
is being
oceans.
Let’s
start
there.
Atrazine,
10
similar
List,
has
break-down.
This
long
Rapidly
a long
expiring
years.
fact
stable
But,
bacteria.”
man-made
design,
several
years”.
you
248
days
also
encountered
information
say,
“farm
dirt
take
in
soil,
black
of anything
It is likely
longer
oil from
one
“very
contains
to break
meaning
down
that
to investigate.
last
this
is
unusual.
might
done
from
in water
exact
in
dirt?
study.
165
days
Thankfully,
According
soil. 6
That’s
in brown
to
a
that
to
that
this
break-down
2010
soil,
long
and
time
for
let’s say
poured
it
you
into
in dirt!
In fact, based
on this information,
filled a sippy-cup
with atrazine
and
a lake.
in
the half-life of atrazine
at 77 degrees
fairly
hot testing
temperature—was
in red
days
half-life
way.
bleed
not
atrazine
does
have
the
That’s
How
researchers,
Fahrenheit—a
IRS
readily
would
atrazine
is important
315
by
Agreed.
Bacteria
are able
chemicals
like atrazine,
long
not
products
product
says
soil “persistence”
scientists
does
the
industry.
actual
“objection,”
from
be the time frame
for
atrazine
Months?
The answer
appears
to
I found
over
by
dilemma
“food”
The
sheet
and
estrogenic
So, what
might
shelf-life?
Weeks?
be
is
money—a
processed
estrogenics
shelf-life
shelf-life
corporate
the
to most
BP
atrazine
and
Deepwater
that occurred
in the Gulf
million liters of that oil!
of
would
degrade
Horizon
Mexico.
7
literally
than
the
oil
spill
All
600
With
the
immensity
its slow
atrazine
is being
Indeed,
this is the
Brazilian
their own
is 2,000
Brazilians
circulated
by
waterways,
commonly
over
this
The
authors
that
this
find
As
you
and
know
and
oceans.
particular
of
is
this
now,
“maximum
layer
limits”
for
levels
Brazilian
indicative
allowable
by
instance,
easily
top
atrazine
levels,
which
[ng]
per
liter
[L]).
atrazine
present
“health risk”.
And, just to inject another
“maximum
rivers
for
maximum
allowed
ng/L
(nanograms
limit”. 8
these
spraying
case.
4-times
concede
crop
breakdown,
you
might
expect
to
find
in many
lakes.
You
might
also
expect
atrazine
Many
of atrazine
of
are
example,
than
allowable
water
a
of
more
study
clear
reality
and
here,
subjective.
atrazine
is
downright
illegal
limit there,
in
Europe.
Zero
in other
words.
Brazil
is the
allowable
might
say
1,999
ng/L
is not harmful
enforces
a maximum
for your health but
Europe
limit of 1,000 ng/L for any
pesticides
of water.
in any
Meanwhile,
in
maximum
the
It’s
USA,
allowable
water. 9 Care
The allowable
change
type
the
also
limit
health
here
2,000
demonstrated
to cause
let’s
other
the
A
study
80%
of
check
picture
lakes
atrazine
in
drinking
200
ng/L
ng/L—has
of
been
abnormalities”
creatures
are absorbing
it
to mention
the raw
eggs
atrazine
amounts
water
in
a
sources—sources
then move
beyond
IRS List estrogenics.
in
western
contained
and
dirt
later.
that
“reproductive
out
And let’s remember,
means
rain is less
Texan
the
atrazine
Caution:
is grim.
lakes
them
see
200
representative
of
in
is
cess.
home—and
infamous
overall
we’ll
but
in estrogenic
closer
to
to other
ng/L
atrazine
to note
in frogs. 10 Those
poor
through
their skin, not
couple
for
impacts
important
Anyway,
3,000
to guess
what I think about
that?
limits are subjective
but it doesn’t
atrazine—not
sitting
8
high
Texas
likely
rivers.
is
found
of
about
atrazine.
is extremely
dry.
to wash
atrazine
The
clearly
Texas
levels
a
slow
This
into
breakdown
major
factor
11
in
of
that
outcome.
Next, and somewhat
predictably,
America
was discovered
to have
loads
than
Texas.
Iowa,
and
Minnesota,
in 94%
of those
In a study
tested
the Mid-West
of
worse
estrogenic
that
spanned
atrazine
was
water
bodies.
found
12
Illinois,
present
Even
in
a bunch
a
of “preserved”
different
“median
at 200
study,
revealed
the
cases
that
atrazine
waters
were
wetland
Overall,
ponds.
the more
you
“clearer”
waters.
countries
Let’s
flowing
we
move
“dive
Researchers
Sea
“surf”
the
that
import
don’t
Sea
many
that
Poland
recently
oceanic
in
you,
but
researchers
This
also
BPA
that
estrogenics
are
and
in the
means
a
in
A]
zooplankton.
I
I envision
the
compared
further
Baltic
to
the
China,
but
reminded
us
“susceptible
to
accumulating
compounds,”
13
making
the
nod
toward
fat
another
APEs
back
these
Baltic
published
[bisphenol
the US and
contaminated.
problem
much worse.
This
accumulation
is
so keep
drinks.
made
the
“virgin-water”
disrupting
of
and
waters
in the
Their
study,
levels of both BPA
about
zooplankton
storage
research,
in our lakes,
our
course,
our
oceans,
zooplankton
virtually
endocrine
pristine
ubiquitous
Other
investigating
waters
in and
around
these water were found
These
tile
dosing
foods
atrazine.
[alkylphenols]
know
as
is
in
in”.
above
APEs
at least
scientific
heavily
a
water
study
these
atrazine
It is also
beyond
whale-of-a-discovery.
2016, found high
and
have
subsurface
into
also are becoming
concentrated
planet’s
river arteries,
and, of
so let’s
to
present,
because
it becomes
in American
Ok.
found
was
investigated,
drainage
from
were
investigated
concentration
of atrazine
in surface
ng/L” 10 . Wetlands!
The
wetland
even
the
wetlands,
and
of your
chemical
other
estrogenics,
mind.
loads
likely
impact
the
denizen
sea
life, including
etc.,
with
possibly
This
very
impact occurs because
bottom
of the food
discover
the
profound
zooplankton
estrogenic
increase
as
you
accumulating
up
to
the
this is due to the fat storage
“breach”
in the next chapter.
The
moral
globally,
of the
seems
water
problem.
estrogenic
To
Poland
nobody
reinforce
that APE
sediments
this
idea,
cod,
zooplankton
are at the
chain.
When
scientists
is expected
move
sharks,
impacts.
are
load
whales,
estrogenics,
correspondingly
food
chain.
issue
that
we
will
study
is
that
zooplankton
to
have
a different
Again,
escaped
study
the
discovered
and BPA estrogenics
“are ubiquitous
in
from
Northeast
Wetlands
of
Iran,
contaminating
the
aquatic
habitats
in this
area.”
14
Iran!
I
have
further
“food-grade
reef species.
find
studies
like
everything,
our
this
that
with
authors
and
and
says
common
as
one
so-called
Everybody,
be
touched
by
problem.
daily.” 17
Keep
in
parabens
parabens.
are
found
in
well
all
sorts
of
as
scientific
chemicals
explain
to
water
phthalates
fragrances.
“Phthalates”
The
from
from plastics certainly
include
the IRS 10 List, even
more
phthalates
plastics,
contact
seems
estrogenics
BPA from
“BPA-Free”
most
APEs
heartbreaking.
“estrogeneration”
encompass
mind
that
everywhere
new
And while
APEs and
they
found
plastics”
are killing off remote
coral
15 16 As a certified
scuba
diver,
I
That
their
study,
that
is
“are
humans
an
reasoning
are
ominous
by
noting
the
in
start.
that
production
pounds
of
per
phthalates
year,
globally.
100’s
of
measly.
millions
Why
the
high
Well,
these
in
of
This
of
cite
makes
building
moisturizer,
nail polish,
surfactants,
and
and
cleaning
they
argue
chemical
that
are
are
in contact
cited
air-dust,
including
can
exactly
see
and
and
printing
food
as
inks
products,
with
US
I said
No
most
wonder
common
daily.
study included
air-dust.
One
problematic
the
why
all?
the
Actually, this same phthalate
about
phthalate
levels
in
countries
toys,
and
Is
phthalates
are
soap,
applications
such
as
shower
food containers
and
wrappers,
materials.”
we
covering),
shadow,
detergents
children’s
pharmaceuticals
household
floor tiles,
liquid
devices,
packaging,
coatings,
textiles,
curtains,
deodorizer,
medical
presence
products,
(paint,
adhesive,
wall
products
(perfume,
eye
spray),
plastics?
phthalate
“PVC
the
seem
and
materials
personal-care
hair
billion
atrazine
Perfumes
scientists
naughty-list:
300
number
pounds
number?
same
this
reaches
and
for
China.
earlier
a chart
dozen
phthalate
Now
that
you
“phthalates
are like glitter because
you can’t get rid of them”.
Overall,
this
data
tells us
that
phthalates
and
possibly
other
attack.
leach
They
into
fragrances
But
wait.
contact
“The
easily
advance
become
food / drink,
a
airborne,
and
(3)
are
that people use daily.
Phthalate
water
transfer
and
phthalate
estrogenics
(1)
fragrance
exhaust
general
in the
public
and
are
easy
air?
those
three-fold
(2)
present
from
to
swiftly
in
plastic
imagine.
But
allergies,”
says
Seriously?
with
one
study
in the
Immunology,
Annals
“are
Trust
But
the
we’ll
from
If this
isn’t
is. And
those
vinyl
indoor
study,
for
allergies!
especially
on
bad
phthalate
and
crib
mattresses.
for
you
all
“care”
example,
But
your
companies
real
sometimes
is especially
common
Check
facilities
“exceeded
children
Dirt?
play
of
wonder.
the
plastics
age
of
California,
on
in
could
outdoors,
on
southern
your
landscaping.
one
final word
about
air quality.
introduced
to
was
cancer
play
would
some
contains
landscape
grass.
states
This
with
St.
Augustine
have
children
outsource
I
this
or
which
if you
Recently,
out
people
grasses
such
as bermudagrass
or
grass.
Be watchful
for that, if you
Now,
the
simply
Some
atrazine
the
in
2
years
in
where
warm
material. . .
playing
in
phthalate
“chemgrass”
spray
know
provided
that
cushioning
speaking
will be
facilities.
grass?
children
other artificial
phthalates. 20
Ironically,
and
I don’t
showing
“care”
abounds
parents
guidance
child
in child
outdoors.
and
phthalates,
report
benchmarks”
before
the
California 20 . . . the same
prefer
of
flooring
a concern
specific
modern
weather
levels
pharmaceuticals,
ambient
indoor
and
estrogenics,
the last chapter,
in case
Furthermore,
think
of
exposure
significant
and
dust .” 18
scientific
“emissions”
what
of
Allergy,
airborne
is disconcerting.
Plastics
are
In
fact,
there
is even
a
recent,
eye-opening
19
revisit
ability
to become
everywhere.
to
diet,
products,
via air and
me,
Asthma,
exposed
phthalates
via
phthalate-containing
environment
of
a
professional
science
journal
article
“Benzophenone-3
which
(BP-3)
is
begins:
a
widespread
environmental
contaminant
and
an
estrogenic
compound.
Very little is known
with regard
to the
occurrence
in
exposure
Very
indoor
of humans
and
the
inhalation
to BP-3.”
little is known.
But the authors
air samples
were
Albany,
New
BP-3.”
go on: “In this study,
collected from various
York,
20
USA,
indoor
was
[. . .]
first
ever
Hopefully
more
data
Naturally,
studies
to
I’ve
sleuthed
answer
why
air
with
was
for
the
found
highest
survey
preliminary
city
analyzed
up
“BP
the
81 indoor
locations
in
in
all
concentrations
in cars, followed
by barber
shops
> homes
> offices > garages.”
the
2015.
and
heat
that
air samples
were found
public places
This
in 2014
Things
punchline-conclusion
In
air
and,
does
so
only
speculate.
only
added
will come
not
far,
of BP
look
in indoor
soon
but
>
air.
this
promising.
around
there
is
I haven’t
for
supporting
so much
BP
in
found
I expect
that
BP
to sunscreen
but
BP
is
any.
I
probably
is also
can
not
added
to
various
plastics to prevent
sun damage.
I suspect
BP is even a factor in that “new car smell”
along
with
the
cars
parabens
were
found
and
is
why
BP
air
levels in air could simply be
in
hair
products.
Like
the
my
to
phthalates
and
have
highest
the
this
concentration.
Alternatively,
result
of
high
BP
BP-containing
hand
nearest
trash
can
added
to
hair
soap
in
that
Chapter
products
was
2,
to
escorted
BP
is
protect
to
the
frequently
against
sun-damage.
Now,
our
both
Argh.
after
realizing
air-dust,
BP and
in our
that
wouldn’t
phthalates
waterways?
Parabens,
in huge
phthalates
you
loads.
it actually
be
weren’t
being
They
should
and
are
different
because
production
there
we
have
some
According
to
one
performed
Environment”,
by
the
China
parabens
but
production
numbers.
may
produces
year.
even
the
such
a
variety
21
to
good
government
we
news
in
the
manufacturing,
article
humans
products
of
lack
of
a 2015
this
newly
states:
“The
to parabens
is well-known.
accumulation
Nevertheless,
of parabens
for
the
that
get
the
Danish
the
of parabens
but
I consider
transparency
science
is
this
participated:
USA
each
this
paraben
in
article
the
most
their
couldn’t
pounds
overwhelming
of
the
reveal
kidding.
was included
and
parabens
quite
high
since
most
of
America’s
production
is outsourced
overseas.
essence
of
burden.
of
Ministry
produce
The
2 million
not
of paraben
refused
Danish
about
idea
“Danish
and India
they
assessment
That’s
Beyond
reach
it is difficult to
manufacturing
assessment
numbers,
I did. Just
The USA,
however,
Ministry
is
manufactured
parabens.
However,
although
in
shocking
if
concentrated
also
phthalate
proportions.
Unfortunately,
put an exact
number
on paraben
quantities
are
are. 17
know,
Annual
BP
paraben
captured
the
emerging
problem.
The
widespread
present
in
exposure
personal
of
care
Little
is known
in marine
first
time,
about
the
organisms.”
22
these
scientists
uncovered
paraben
organisms
Now,
from
they
accumulation
in
all
investigated.
I normally
don’t
include
lengthy
science
papers
because
they
are
boring.
the
However,
I found
Most
importantly,
it
plastic
estrogenics
we’ve
this
applies
rare
to
been
abstracts
generally
winner
all
below.
four
of
investigating,
the
namely
BPA, APEs, phthalates,
and parabens
and gives
sobering
view of reality from genuine
experts.
a
It
says:
Plastics
are
cheap,
considerable
strong,
benefits
potentially
can
enhance
we
since
have
and
benefits
They
that
of
evidence
that
our
use,
transport
frequent
practices,
masses
plastics
exploded,
current
and
inappropriate
or
of
disposal
of
the environment,
world’s
oceans.
and
in
plastic
some
environment
that
originated
is
into
increasing.
exists
from
large
released
have entered
the
process
continues,
even
now
plastic
serious
Because
behavior,
been
and thereby
Moreover,
this
places
debris
have
to
management
human
items
and
approach
waste
irresponsible
plastic
both
technology
will bestow
to
it has now been
several
materials
has caused,
and is still causing
effects on wildlife, and is not sustainable.
of
offer
humanity.
the
use
production,
the
durable
to
medical
and scientific
humankind.
However,
decades
and
in
Most
the
ocean-based
marine
sources
such as the fishing industry.
Plastics
accumulate
in coastal
areas,
at the ocean
surface
and
on
the
seabed.
known
ever
to
Because
eventually
increasing
70%
sink,
amounts
of
it
of
all
is
plastics
suspected
plastic
items
are
that
are
accumulating
in seabed
biodegrade,
although,
sediments.
under
the
Plastics
do
influence
not
of solar
UV radiations,
plastics do degrade
and
fragment
into
small
particles,
termed
microplastics.
Our
oceans
eventually
plastic
that
particles
serve
and
200,000
ocean’s
plastic
species
have
of the
1960’s.
marine
per
Marine
km 2
exist. The
studied
To
by
these
date,
plastic
mammals
small
it is thought
of
the
impact
since
more
than
are
known
environment
affected
ingestion.
for
estimate,
commonly
has
been
in the
been
in one
microplastics
surface
debris
beginning
as a sink
of
the
267
to
entanglement
are
or
among
those
species
that are most affected
by
entanglement
in plastic debris. By contrast,
marine birds
suffer
the
most
can
also
or
the
from
be
ingestion
absorbed
by
contaminants
additives
that
Recent
studies
microplastics
pathway
may
such
are
contaminants
Contaminants
bioaccumulate
leached
in those
them,
and
higher
at
threat
to
chemical
higher
the
basis
have
serious
and
nonmarine
species
humans,
Polar
genuinely
who
bears?
dire.
derive
easily
plastic
debris,
from
plastic
ingestible
species,
to enter
and
the
concentrations
of
levels.
every
fact,
small
form
food
are
This
food
far-reaching
such
as
Seriously?
by
a
web.
from
plastics
tend
to
organisms
that
absorb
trophic
consume
In
Organisms
to the
environment.
the important
role
of
as plankton
for
plastics.
floating
are leached
emphasize
as they
organisms,
of
web
a
and
can
effects,
even
polar
bears
on
and
marine-grown
Either
once
often
causes
again
food. 23
way,
this
this
abstract
is
doesn’t
even
article.
It
sound
sounds
like
like
a
a
professional
radical
pamphlet.
The problem
is simply
word
mincing.
At
least
for
science
environmentalist
too formidable
for
these
concerned
authors.
Like
these
additive
authors,
effects
when
from
you
all
start
four
to think
of
of
these
the
plastic
components
together,
you really begin to grasp the
tentacles
of the current
estrogenic
water problem.
One
final
estrogenic
actual
to
“purified”
add
before
drinking
we
inspect
water:
EE2
[17α-ethinylestradiol].
Unlike
atrazine,
EE2
restored
wetlands.
Unlike BPA, APEs,
is not
universally
Where
EE2
sources
closer
has
phthalates,
found
is
not
in the
emerging,
yet
been
and
parabens,
open
found
is
coastal
were
The
waters
in the
same
tube
low
open
sea.” 24
to be
Mexico,
layers
pushed
levels
I
in
water
China
risks
Sea,
were
25
But
EE2
how
discovered
in pristine
abnormalities”—levels
within
into
that
first
true
estrogenic
the
wetlands
over
the
was
about
risks
USA.
for example,
sediment
collected
using a hollow
water? That’s a different
Drinking
Estrogenics
When
[EE2]
deep
Sound—revealed
occasionally”.
and
appears
the Gulf of
samples—mud
yet.
to home.
For instance,
one study of the South
concluded
that, “ high [EE2]
estrogenic
in
EE2
oceans. . .
however,
in
In
“core”
metal
Mississippi
only
“detected
our
“drinking”
story.
that
cause
200
estrogenic
“frog
ng/L—I
atrazine
reproductive
immediately
wondered:
water?
what
is
Are
the
we
concerning
dose
Well, according
condition
of
successfully
largest
nationwide
Safe
water
drinking
removing
of atrazine?
to one
thorough
America’s
our
that
investigation
databases—including
Drinking
Water
Act
Data
the
and
Syngenta
Voluntary
—researchers
the USA has
found
that 5% of all raw water
atrazine
levels at 4,800 ng/L and
of our
That
raw
water
means
atrazine
frog’s
at
Monitoring
was
1%
of
at 34,000
our
170-times
private
raw
the
ng/L.
26
water
levels
know
the
Program
in
1%
Wow!
supply
that
has
destroy
a
parts!
But, wait, you might say, that’s just the
What
about
the
“good”
stuff?
The
impacts
of
humans?
people
What
who
about
drink
faucet
directly
raw water.
stuff
that
water?
from
We
their
all
kitchen
taps.
That
same
massive
study
drinking
water
in America
atrazine
clearly
In
and
1%
is at 22,700
still in play
essence,
here.
rather
Not
than
city in that
You
might
you
be
make
sure?
top
top
There
ng/L.
1%?
10%,
1%
the level of
abnormalities.
Probably
does
your
town
website
where
you
much
numbers
in your
drinking
have
can
is
our
atrazine
how
transparency
a simple
look
water?
of
not.
And
non-scientists
on
these
issues,
even
studies are done and paid for by tax
example,
“Wow!”
levels,
though.
isn’t
The
of
for
good.
170-fold
drinking
water has 114-times
that causes
frog reproductive
Is your
reveals
that
5%
is at 2,700
ng/L
up
when
dollars.
and
can
for
the
For
clear
estrogenic
“Recent
estimates
scientific
study
between
exposed
“What
the
USA,”
notes
another
done
in
2013,
“showed
that
2 and
3 million
people
are
annually
to atrazine
present
in drinking
water.” 27
levels?”
researchers
Put
in
you
ask.
“Around
200
ng/L”,
reveal.
another
way,
2-3
million
of us
are
exposed
“frog
reproductive
abnormality
levels”
in
drinking
water!
And
if it sounds
like
I
obsessed
with
that
abnormalities,
one
fittingly
can
season-to-season,
usage
continued
Hence,
drunk
type
of
this
and
from
year-to-year.
levels.
most
worrisome
we
saw
in the
doses
for
drastically
city-to-city,
atrazine
years.
graphic
generally
only
test
shortcoming
because
change
What
is
usage—as
has
reproductive
within
scientists
is a true
levels
Especially
frog
It’s
limitation
is
that
levels. This
estrogenic
about
of am.
to
our
am
situation.
course,
research
average
phrase
I kind
this “sickening”
Of
the
to
the
by
rise
“frog
2-3
about
previous
each
estrogenic
chapter—is
of
the
reproductive
million
past
20
abnormality”
people
in
2013
has
undoubtedly
risen
and
is
annually.
Consider
that most
probably
increasing
of this stuff
virtually
doesn’t
too.
So,
break
here’s
down
my
studies:
atrazine
drinking
drinking
water
water
Sadly,
this
estrogenics.
out.
My
is
based
is not
supply
numbers
also
Once
college
in water,
conclusion
filtered
out
the
of
scientific
your
city’s
effectively.
Raw
water
are far too similar.
true
they
on
get
orientation
of
the
in,
they
lecturer
other
barely
was
IRS
and
10
come
correct.
“Recycle,
reduce,
reality.
The
and
current
re-pee”
municipal
your
own
emphatically
those
that
hands,
not
murky.
“turn
male
to
filtration
not getting the job done.
So what do you do? You
into
appears
need
for
frogs
to
take
are
matters
The
data
at 170-times
into
a
systems
now.
Levels
be
is
above
princesses”—the
level prior to municipal
treatment—is
really not too
much
better
than levels 114-times—the
level
after
muni
treatment.
enough
and
all of this
time
treatments
is ideal,
in Part
bomb
Similar to
and other
The
zero
3 of this
unless
you
book
investigating,
the
because
round
they
BPA,
plastic
out
and
and
it in
herring
cringe
plastic.
as you
deepens
in the sunlight
As one study
consumption
[sunlight]
easy
the
say
100’s
of
to sidestep
have
bottled
even
28
so why
Would
phthalates
or
ticking
levels
when I see people
water. . .
and
then
plastic
begun
water
These
is
only
a
to see.
people
set
plastic
risks
increase
are
“risks”
bottles
from
the
after
UV
that
are
gamble?!
trust
in your
1,000’s
worth
estrogenics,
of microwaving
hot coffee into
you
are
final picture.
or in a hot vehicle.
reminds
us: “Health
exposure.”
STOP.
APEs
“BPA-Free”
when
This
is also
true
plastics and pouring
mug:
it’s a
perfume
First of all, I personally
cringe
properly
filtering their drinking
My
but
address
act.
parabens,
red
effective
We’ll
our discussion
about
lakes and
oceans
“raw” water, let’s move beyond
atrazine.
Phthalates,
storing
aren’t
of course.
of
a
water
other
any
type
of
a plastic-lined
few
studies
are
studies
ok,
that
when
suggest
otherwise?
“The
This
is another
knowledge-base
place
of
you
bottled
will find
water
spin.
leachate,”
says the same author as the UV review paper,
“is
highly contradictory
due to varying
methodologies
and
limited
analyses.”
of
multi-elemental
28
Honestly,
professionally
and / or
that
saying
molecular
is usually
“data
another
on
this
way
topic
is
littered with spin”.
Spin by whom?
People
selling
storage.
I
you
contradictory”
plastics,
not
merely
a
dangers
in
being
food
drink
there
is a lot of
money
in
“analyses
vary”.
Of
of
properly
these
fat-like
the
and
may
because
issue
with
role
for
research
because
course,
the
experimenting
play
plastics
suggest
don’t
“highly
measuring
substances
discrepancies
discovered
be
but
and
does
the
health
disappear
because
of a few
flawed
Anyway,
atrazine
since
you
already
realize
how
much
journeys
from
“raw”
water
into
the
drinking
water,
you
convincing
that
APEs
also
are
studies.
probably
phthalates,
traveling
isolated
estrogenics
BPA
think
in
drinking
since
BPA
predominantly
BPA
be
is
this is especially
Lowering
news.
to
levels
dropping.
Further,
good
appear
BPA,
to
and
filters
of pace,
BPA
offers
While
the
other
leveling-up,
estrogenic
are
comprehensively
our
much
municipal
water
reliable
in
due
need
parabens,
through
into your noodle soup. i
And here, for a nice change
some
don’t
currently
studied,
I
information.
drinking
widespread
water
concern
is
and
public
outcry.
action.
So,
work.
To give
upper
This
good
some
levels
were
10
320
ng/L
sense
of
17 And,
the
China,
can
take
the
good
numbers,
the
up
actual
in drinking
10
at
you
keep
discovered
ng/L
least
might
even
in
one
remember
that
are
humans
here
again,
are
levels
in
just
different
quote
most
from
common
contact
keep
and
particular
a
this
the
water
in Europe,
locations. 28 Not bad.
you might
expect,
are
“Phthalates
chemicals
way
and
in America,
in
You
before:
public
BPA
study’s selected
Phthalates,
as
story.
one
job
of
ng/L
is
with
going
daily.”
up.
What is surprising
is that despite our heavy
usage
of phthalate
chemicals
and the vast recognition
of
health
harms
studies
due
of
to phthalates,
phthalates
surprisingly
sparse.
Or
limited.
Or
limited
untrustworthy. . .
Limitations
what
to
about
example
in
scientific
drinking
the
in
studies
relates
As
a
disclaimer,
who
conducted
the
water,
chemicals.
Anyway,
they
The
the
Study”—my
tested
This
while
this
is a fairly
are
never
let’s
various
the
study
regionally
university
looked
Or
old
studies?
for
measured
are
even
news
Well,
but
for
inspect
New
an
one
Jersey
researchers
chemicals
in
amounts
of
only measured
chemical
“presence”.
researchers
in this
“Jersey-Shore
name,
“raw”
are
ways.
to phthalates,
published
study
done
on
drinking
water sources. 29
scientific
water
studies
other
“untrustworthy”
that
published
water
high
not
theirs—found
samples
percentage.
contained
that
38%
phthalates.
of
But
at
least
there
was
0%
in the
drinking
water,
right?
Of course
not! They
found
29%
water samples
contained
phthalates.
of the
drinking
Not even
10%
less
surprisingly,
after
finding
city
“filtration”.
mirrors
“treatment
my
And,
previous
plants”
are
not
conclusion:
not
this
city
effectively
water
removing
estrogenics.
From
Florida
to New
Jersey. . .
birth control to atrazine
and beyond.
from
But
more
for
disturbing
drinking
This
there
the
water.
same
findings
Agency
The
At least
to those
(EPA).
of
found
samples
to
is
lack
something
of studies
the
Study”
the
38%
phthalates
that
found
compared
Environmental
phthalates
in
even
on
in
in this case.
“Jersey-Shore
EPA
water
3%
me,
than
in
same
by
Protection
only
area.
the
their
3%
of
raw
Compare
that
Jersey-Shore-Study
scientists.
Further,
This is what I mean by “untrustworthy”.
the EPA
claimed
that only 2% of
the
drinking
water
samples
Jersey-Shore
Study
discrepancies
and
Ironically,
the
the
National
Sciences
and
Environmental
finding
found
authors
danced
their
data
write
a
and
29%.
unreliable,
also
the
phthalates.
These
Jersey
29
flaws;
that
are
the
of the
full “Discussion”
serious
Dept.
Government
you
EPA.
section
this?
between
here,
discrepancy
They
in the
of
funds
catching
due the connection
the
funding
source
around
are
Study” was funded
by
Environmental
Health
New
Protection.
The
indeed.
“Jersey-Shore
Institute
for
government
And, predictably
scientists
and
contained
the
these
between
didn’t
even
paper—the
Discussion
components
section
is
of
virtually
paper.
Results
They
section.
Using
common
usually
later
on
(hint:
to APEs
We
already
The
the
sense,
levels.
one
This
about
5
scientific
Discussion
we
also
7 Deadly
Things
into
know
). So,
major
research
the
that
in drinking
water
problems
that we
a
is likely
will see
let’s
move
[alkylphenols].
found
APEs
zooplankton
at disturbing
APEs in drinking
water?
Well,
of
every
meshed
“cocktail”
of estrogenics
to amplify
estrogenic
1
APE
same
study
in
fairly
levels
discovered
study,
in
fact,
remote
but
how
reasonably
also
acts
Polish
about
high
as
a
good
example
of
for
“allowable”
created
the
check it out.
Rather than New
Great
Lakes
measuring
“water
APE
can
now
countries
that
are
than
for
exceeded
you
levels
the
add
let’s
came
from
the
found
of
water
APE
below
United
States.
APE
that
Canadian
to
about
certain
the
you
can
This
are
legally
set
drink
is
noteworthy
for
or
how
what
away
from
from
the
Let’s
source
of drinking
water.
It probably
won’t
surprise
you
phthalate
plastic
faucet,
bottles.
used
to
make
plastic
found
at 1,680ng/L
in bottled
same
bottled
many
the
legal
aside,
the
questions
water
people
consider
that
more
water.
people
enjoy
those
the
European
above
1,000
Union
flexible,
31 This
purchase
ng
from
doesn’t
any
a
DEHP,
by
allow
water
a
was
is
in the grocery
store. Have
I mentioned
the atrazine
“frog-limit”
was 200 ng/L
pesticides
Yum.
much
concern.
drinking
that
of
this same
Great
Lakes
drugs
present
in 34%
samples.
guidelines
Moving
case
that
30
list
estrogenic
drinking
age
should
be. And,
joking
other
drugs
should
be raising
additions
and
In
levels.
those
guidelines.
Canada
stingier
water
no
Prozac
so
America.
surface
because
levels
samples
the
As an interesting
sidebar,
study found pharmaceutical
of
are
they
found
“safe”
authors
acknowledged
samples
So
Certain
criteria”
that
this study
concentrations
other
words,
However,
the
same
limits
estrogenic
Jersey,
region.
quality
arbitrary
the
the
yet
and
any
source?
And
we
other
really
wildlife.
analysis
wildlife”
to
can’t
This
occur
us
appear
at
only
This
Scandal.
the
“in
water
in
the
critical
effects
amphibians
low
one
ng/L
plastic
also
to
that
μg/L
both
Taiwan
2011
fruit
sport
drinks,
jam,
bread,
and
were
adding
Food
this
oil.
and
Scandal
Subway
and
ingredient,
Food
2014,
fruit
food
not
juice,
powder
tea
as
because
your
story
a
food
processing
caught
illegally
phthalate
Wrap
bottle.
mentions
the
into
cheaper
than using
that for a second.
material”
and
of plasticizers
on
used the
paper
multiple
Taiwanese
companies
were
DEHP
Taiwan
the
called
Apparently,
They
“A
biological
study
scandal
beverages,
of
titled
and
inside
water
one but
packaging
adding
crustaceans
frogs
means
1,680
ng/L
easily
makes
cut for environmental
harm
and
bottled
noteworthy
This
was
the
“detrimental”
exposures
range.” 32 This
the “detrimental”
filler.
study
that
in mollusks,
just
and
about
of the biological
impacts
and the scientist
authors
remind
that’s
forget
head
also
it is
around
reminds
McDonalds
me
“yoga
azodicarbonamide.
a
mat
Subway,
McDonalds,
and other
places
were
(are?)
adding
yoga mat materials
to their bread as a filler. They
claim
the
stuff
call
a spade
the
yoga
mat
least in the
Europe. . .
But
let’s
healthy”,
Estrogenic
is added
as a “conditioner”
a spade.
ingredient
US.
go
the
Yet,
“at
is
least”
perfectly
Azodicarbonamide
back
Dasani®
beverage
to
“drink
plastic
transfer
bottled
is
due
let’s
case,
legal—er,
is not
up,
but
in this
legal
at
in
hydration
water
slogan.
to
molecular
is
interactions.
off
It is similar
your
hands.
Once
with water
that drink.
or
In addition,
oils, fats,
in
other
beverages
problem
can
worse.
to
of
recent
plastic
study
caused
coffee
in
alcohol,
and
substances
the
added
estrogenic
substances
this
20%
more
“draw
coffee
“drawing
about
caffeine-free
and
with
caffeine-free
able
to
draw
think what
Put simply,
“shuttle”
caffeine.
out
of
Now:
20%
more
into
coffee.
The
cups
these
plastic-stored
of drinkable
To close this section,
that
people
around
intentionally:
EE2
Remember
how
in
let’s
the
some
drinking
your
EE2
levels
places
drinking
in
on
alone
is
BPA,
just
do!
caffeine
can
of
plastics.
beverages
So
besides
shift
globe
to an
are
estrogenic
consuming
(17α-ethinylestradiol).
the
remote
point
filled
estrogenics”.
of
EE2
like
your
a
water.
daily
life
basis
were
open
restored
wetlands?
Unfortunately,
a different
story. You’ve
certainly
at
were
if caffeine
out
33
hot coffee
filled with
estrogenic
molecules
A
coffee
“migration”
other sugars,
fats, etc. can
certain molecules
including
“sources
minimal
group
coffee.
estrogenic
consider
water
a
out”
caffeine-containing
BPA
into
leaching
molecular
think
that
to
other
experiment
was done by simply pouring
into a BPA mug. A group of cups were
regular
contract
leach
estrogenics,
compared
come
oil
estrogenics
showed
over
washes
liquids,
more estrogenic
chemicals.
For a parallel example
of
out”
soap
plastics
make
The
how
generally
oceans
and
drinking
water
is
drunk
some EE2
and
may
if you
even
don’t
be
filter
Prior
to looking
that,
because
at specific
EE2
numbers,
keep
is a contraceptive
meaning
molecule.
lasting
In
fact,
EE2
estrogenic
on
looked
at
chemicals”—chemicals
this
case
native
5
70
EE2
is
the
10
the
List.
The
little
longest
One
study
researchers
conditions
there
was
and
no
used
found
degradation
that
of EE2.
Zero.
Looking
deeper
into scientific
useful
pattern
emerges
with
water.
This
is something
educated
guess
hormone
levels
you
and
water are
water
concerning
in the
and
cases,
cycling back
continuously
also
use
the
drinking
to make
birth
water
an
control
that
concerns
(2)
where
human
population
to put
breaking
after
health
Things (Part
Environmental
it bluntly,
the
toilet
water
is
through
the water table and EE2
is
re-injected
via urine. Since our bodies
not
through. . .
major
can
is high.
In these
are
you
studies,
I find
a
EE2
and
drinking
yours.
EE2
concentrations
in
drinking
generally
most elevated
where
(1) fresh
is scarce
density
down
problems,
2) .
scientists
“recharging
honestly
acknowledge
concentration
EE2,
contributing
of water
the
It
or
tough
probably
estrogenics.
days
longer.
down
is one
IRS
it is
“endocrine
disrupting
that disrupt hormones
and in
groundwater
within
34
all
that
mind
hormone,
specifically
designed
to stay in the body
is designed
to not
become
broken
metabolized,
in
of
to
course;
name
of water
The
this
of reclaimed
that
it passes
right
predominantly
7
rapid
pollutants
for
Deadly
recycling
water”
potential
7
and
they
condensing
such
as
EE2
is high. 34
So,
let’s
go
back
to
China
again.
The
population
density
certainly
is high in China, so we’ll
launch
EE2
drinking
water
explorations
from
there
and
illustrate
First,
the
it’s
reliability
worth
example.
noting
Chinese
currently
have
fact,
according
to
US
dollars)
since
much
a
extremely
heavy
for
the
sales
EE2
profits.
But
let’s
themselves.
(over
Usage
begin
by
looking
region.
Moving
of China,
you
both
city
and
to
policy
imagine
how
birth
control
mention
all
the
“prefecture-level
city”
to an
State.
at
a
lower
density
away
from
the
crowded
find Yueyang.
Yueyang
is
also
American
billion
is substantial.
Chinese
coastline
a
300
“one-child-only”
Not
In
government
its inception 35 and I can only
they collect on taxes
of the
product
birth
draconian
to 2016
policy.
China’s
yuan
extreme
a
1970
“two-child-only”
BBC,
2 trillion
in fines
is an
maintained
from
about
the
over
density.
China
are
China
policy
and
collected
that
women
control
users.
“one-child-only”
has
of population
a
“prefecture-level
is comparable,
in some
ways,
be
likened to New York [city], New York [state].
And for a size reference,
the area of Yueyang
is
larger
than
fact—continuing
the
population
density
the
state
comparison
of
Yueyang
Yueyang,
A
could
slightly
Yueyang,
city”.
of
Connecticut.
to
Connecticut—the
is 950
people
In
per
square
mile while Connecticut
is 739. Again, similar.
Even
in this region
of China,
EE2 levels are
far
above
the
Framework
levels
are
“European
Directive”
0.035
ng/L.
Union
levels.
36
The
But
EU
the
[EU]
Water
max
allowable
data
here
tells
the
complete
The
lake
story.
upstream
of Yueyang
Lake—has
ng/L. 37
a “mean
EE2
This,
of course,
times
EU
On
the
the
safety
“mean
That’s
0.035
essentially
ng/L!
What
about
Beijing
per
but
side
of Yueyang
a
people
major
per
the
which
square
blows
mile.
sources
outside
like
3,400
In
the
explained
the
municipal
plant
was
Unfortunately,
directly
instead
year
Yueyang’s
950
impartial,
published
in
called
plant
located
in
all
of
Asia.
This
in Beijing.
however,
the
scientists
did
not
measure
EE2
levels
in the study.
used
what
is called
an
EROD
7-ethoxy-resorufin-O-deethylase
treated
the
EROD
a
2005.
test
assay
the charts
study was
water.
because
38
They
EE2
levels
They
assay
assay”)
likely
were
to
used
the
literally
off
using
direct
measurements
when
the
performed
in 2005,
but I don’t
know
sure.
Anyway,
Lake
one
was
journal
(“enzyme
for
people
Chemosphere
study,
the
researchers
how they looked
at water purified
from
largest
water
in the
Beijing?
specifically,
science
“Chemosphere”
of
Beijing?
China,
Netherlands-based
ng/L!
limit
of
away
How’s
safety
city
Well, I was
able to find at least
non-government
study.
The
study
from
city—Honghu
is 17.73
density
3.04
100
worse.
EU
coastline
population
mile,
it gets
concentration”
500-times
a
has
square
EE2
Dongting
concentration”
of
is almost
exactly
level,
downstream
Lake—the
city—East
was
remember
17.73
ng/L
how
and
the
downstream
500-times
the
Honghu
EU
safety
level?
the
Well,
lab’s
diluting
pure
using
95%
water—gave
number
Lots
pure
levels
of women
birth
Next,
drive
water
water
of EE2
and
—in
water
other
into
words,
and
only
5%
treated
above
100 ng/L.
This
problematic
men,
control”
to
beautiful
Lake
fact,
treated
for
Beijing
in other
in that
for
words,
sure.
are
“on
region.
shifting closer to home—actually
about 1-hour
west
of Boston,
Massachusetts,
where
I
happen
for
Beijing
distilled
is hugely
heavy
the
rowing
be
writing
teams,
Lake
this—you
Quinsigamond.
swimmers,
Quinsigamond
can
This
and
appears
thought
Specifically,
it
was
Worcester
maintains
is
a population
hub
fisherman.
In
idyllic
to
However,
this area,
worth
an
the
nearby
density
is
the
a
too
featured
in a scientific
EE2 study.
population
density
is very
high in
scientists
find
lake
be
the
so
investigation.
city
higher
than
and
Beijing
at 4,678 people per square
mile (Beijing = 3,400).
When
researchers
tested the Quinsigamond
water
EE2
levels,
300-times
these
they
the
same
found
EU
safety
scientists
own
water,
on
Anticlimactically,
the
ended
[of EE2
reproduction
organisms
activity”.
in
the
Clearly,
so
you
is
over
unfortunately,
test
the
nearby
how
effectively
removed
from
might
Lake
by
that
of
draw
your
due
Quinsigamond
stating
they found]
fish
lake
this
and,
not
This
that.
the
researchers
“concentration
39
already
seen
are generally
though,
conclusions
ng/L.
level
did
drinking
water. We’ve
estrogenic
compounds
drinking
11.1
and
to
is putting
its
that
may
other
high
it mildly.
the
affect
aquatic
estrogenic
I
suggest
that
it
and
definitely
other
restrictions
The
fish
concern
affects
species
the
based
but we can
reproduction
because
in Quinsigamond
For
final
people
per
performed
again
in
tested
let’s
mile
More
is
the
only
stay
much
River
levels. 40
What
within
to
Acushnet,
density of 559
less
this
Acushnet
EE2
be
again
precisely,
the
European
possibly
head
down
the population
square
Worcester.
the
fish
water.
example,
Let’s
where
of
into that further
later.
health
is especially
a
cannot
estrogenic
one
on
look
and
EE2
Massachusetts.
Massachusetts,
reproduction
that
study
was
Estuary
and
was
this
study’s
conclusion?
“Among
three
estrogenic
compounds
detected,
EE2 has the highest concentration,
up to
4.7
ng/L,
other
at
fish
[where
which
EE2
abundance
the
river
may
in
ends
affect
the
up]
lobster
coastal
due
to
seawater
its
biological activity on fish feminization.”
In summary,
wherever
the water
is
trend
together
is
clear:
population
more
EE2
density.
of a city
levels
And
concern
the
rise
levels
than
with
before
one
moving
final
estrogenics
to foods,
booster-shot
are
high.
a rural
I want
concern
actual
water
with
It
is
but
of
you
regarding
in water.
What
mathematical
the
health
line.
to leave
of awareness
EE2
“model
predictions
were
published
measured
concentrations”
study.
high
tested,
it’s important
to recognize
because
the
your family or extended
family is on the
And,
and
that
means
models
of
testing.
is
EE2
compared
to
in a
recent
scientists
in drinking
compared
water
to
Models,
used
they
to
explained
determine
without using
and cheaper.
What
did
that
taking
“exceed
those
reveal?
that
This
may
found
help
so
The
EPA,
for
prefer
should
to see
too.
Eating
Estrogenics
our
be
actual
why
waterways.
found
with
on
water,
the
model
values
the
are
findings.
Jersey-Shore
models.
the
EE2
from
scientist’s
contamination
From
easier
of
government
measurements
estrogenic
it is
scientists
expected
professional
relying
EE2
conservative
example,
might
Serious
be
very
below
Study,
because
often
of
measurements
would
explain
far
are
levels
These
physical,
model,
despite
assumptions.”
41
paper,
safety
measuring
study
real,
the
water
actual
the
in
This
is why
and
why
I
you
“springs”
from
estrogenics
work
up the food chain, into our seafood,
veggies,
cows,
and, ultimately,
into us. From nature’s
mussels
into
our
dwindling
So
let’s
To
transition
muscles.
talk about
out
food.
of drinking
water,
it seems
to start with “seafood”
both from
from
freshwater.
After
that,
we
“landfood”—especially
Let’s
begin
“filter
feeders”.
siphoning
retaining
scientists
beef
and
nature’s
This
means
out
of
a different
this
sometimes
lifelong
view
and
to
poultry.
mussels.
Mussels
they
plankton
eat
water
into one hole, filtering
the food—and
the toxins—and
wastewater
Because
with
the ocean
will move
fitting
are
by
out
and
shooting
hole.
filter-feeding
mussels
as
behavior,
environmental
“chemical
sensors”.
scientists
find
If
them
in mussel
therefore,
investigating
mussels
are
estrogenics.
Of course,
with
already
and
seen
in open
chemicals
a
the
high
across
the
ocean
meat.
are
present,
Like
plankton,
first-rate
levels
model
for
of estrogenics
board
in
zooplankton,
our
we’ve
waterways
it is a
no-brainer
hypothesis
that high amounts
of estrogenics
are in
mussel meats. Exhibit A: researchers
retrieved
and
tested
mussels.
measured
levels
of
Lawrence
River
above
New
they
found
high
Importantly,
study made
the authors
of the St. Lawrence
it a point to mention
that their
River
mussel
APE
levels
were
other
words,
mussels
They
from
York
the
state.
Not
concentrations
be
and
if you
to
“acute
ate
these
have
an
ignored,
We
you
would
to
gauge
toxicity
especially
thorough
In
health
harder
Long-term
do
in
levels.
immediate
is
frankly,
rarely
toxicity”
mussels,
however,
unpredictable.
frequently
APEs
42
below
toxicity,
is
studies.
surprisingly,
of APEs.
unlikely
emergency.
Long-term
St.
in
is
human
long-term
studies
on humans.
This is why randomized
clinical control
trials of tooth flossing find that flossing is useless,
for
instance.
too
short
often
43
to
Modern
“pick
out”
left to assume
brief
research
slow
time-scale
all the necessary
decisions.
information
But
to the
In
the
let’s
this
APE
go
back
same
values
study,
they
the
time
are
We
are
studies
to make
mussel-bound
scientists
discovered
scales
changes.
vital
give
us
medical
researchers.
did
“could
admit
be
that
sufficient
to introduce
estrogenic
may
additive”.
be
effects
and
In
that
other
their
effects
words,
they
acknowledge
the possibility
of problems
but
can’t
say for sure. Notice
the carefully
qualified
words
like
“could”
tested
and
“may”.
longer-range
infested
meats
problems
at varying
And, since those
“additive”
effects,
say
a mussel
estrogenics
will
in
is
time—even
same
most
has
eating
levels.
to 5 of the
away
APE
included
this phrase
note that, too.
Let’s
feeding.
at small
thoroughly
The
those
amounts,
IRS
10
exposed
toxicants
any
single
List
mussel
in
its
IRS
List
substance
will cause health problems
of
Deadly
Things
variety
so
let’s
take
sex-change
mussel
filter
store
Even
estrogenic
The
7
APE
is exposed
has
from
researchers
you should
while
dutifully
tissues.
Nobody
a
mussel
exposed
only
as
to
small
an
5
example.
When
estrogenics
amounts
of
at
each
a
one
one—that
mussel
now has no hope
of reproduction,
likely, because
the total estrogenic
burden
now
reached
effects
add
point,
“overharvest”
up,
a
tipping
resulting
point.
in major
will
The
minor
changes.
probably
be
At
that
blamed
for
the
ensuing
mussel
population
crash
and
ever
stricter harvest
restrictions
will be put in place.
Anyway,
some
let’s
other
move
into
studies
a
rapid
isolating
succession
additional
of
individual
estrogenics.
First,
high
levels
mussels
from
the
these
mussels
Estuary
designated
in
of phthalates
Bay of Biscay.
were
the
specifically
Bay
a “Biosphere
of
Biscay,
Reserve
were
found
in
44
Disturbingly,
from
the
which
” since
Urdaibai
had
1984.
been
Not
so “reserved”
High
after
levels
of
all, it would
EE2
Venice, Italy. 45
High levels of BPA
Kacza
River
High
levels
many
areas
were
were
in Poland.
of
found
found
in
in mussels
EPA
for
were
the
failing
species.
47
’Merica.
Studies
of
IRS
so
common
found
United
Nowadays,
“if” mussels
the
in mussels
in
States.
to
overall
have
do
on
with
These
include
mussel
of
anatomy
number
but
49
“muscles”?
Growing
favorite
Those
in
Minnesota,
fish
so
we
are
pursued
It’s
was
my
Dad’s
like
stalkers.
tasty.
walleye
them
lights
intensify!
It was
worth
the
a
an
about
those
darker
motivate
How
of
as it got
such
definitely
eater.
edge
Little
“intersex”
have
remember
fishing
long into the
glowing
tube
lights
surrounding
boat.
on
fatty
acids,
reductions
in
even
long
our
all
still
problems.
up
mussels”
Mussels
omen of things to come.
But maybe
you aren’t a mussel
walleye
see
top
like
estrogenics
of health
to
the
estrogenics
effects
reproduction.
focus.
looking
Today,
in
effect
fact—are
shifted
“estrogenics
the
the
sued
mussel
in mussels—in
48
decreases
in
essential
in glucose
metabolism,
and
simple
large
endangered
researchers
listed
mussels.
changes,
changes
protect
so
bad,
actually
they generally
are not
have estrogenic
toxins.
publications
have
to
estrogenics
that
in
in
In fact,
the
atrazine
levels
were
Natural
Resources
Defense
Council
the
mussels
46
atrazine
across
seem.
moths
and
wait
night
the
would
the
because
with
inner
hammer
fishing
the
I
would
bigger
walleye
would
wane—one
bed
trips
because
every
that
and
make
flavor
taint.
the
APEs
agents,
alkylphenols
colored
Basically,
we
smell
taste
or
unnatural.
“secret
Most
people
recently
made
were
not
a
so
“sulfury”
and
netted
guess what
congested
study
they
with
You
most
it.
never
Smell
the
and
leathers,
has
mills. 51
that
smell
a
what
never
cheap
like
clean
but
brown
APE-waste
your
developed
are
washing
cheap
estrogenics—they
Mankind
only
at paper
know
to
coming
inks,
I realized
towels
especially
will then
have
not
detergents,
factoid,
paper
that
were
that
to pulp
Try
towel,
speculated
of APEs
adhesives,
added
smells
like.
Add
vocabulary
arsenal.
too
walleye
textiles,
(APEs).
ones.
same
had
you
was
along
pilgrimages
to action
levels
paints,
also
paper
drag
impression
River
walleye
this
Once
I learned
this
brown
restroom
damp
were
sprung
high
in
are
in
walleye.
Wisconsin
in
pesticides,
APEs
crash
and
upstream
paper mill.
into this, I discovered
used
would
50
especially
from an
Snooping
or
to these
of walleye. Can
walleye
meat
APEs!
wax
walleye
eating
the
would
positive
nighttime
Scientists
researchers
that
a
complaints
the
said
out a bunch
found?
The
we
hours
in Minnesota
in
Reports
estrogenic
few
made
however,
tasty.
night
then
I still enjoy
walleye
The
the
a
clearly
I still
Strangely,
but
for
summer
spots”
do.
as
of those—and
the truck
home.
The
bite
wine-tasting
an
ability
are
needed
to
simply
this
tasting
and
news
for
smelling
your
detection
health
ability.
is that
APEs
But
give
the
good
off a
slight
odor at dangerously
high levels and they taste
at such
levels.
Things
like processed
foods
fragrances
in soaps
but
whole
with
APE
foods
to some
exhibit
will
investigated
in Lake
“gonad
Thun,
odor
unpalatable
with
time
whitefish
nets
they
muscle.
by
mountains.
Yet,
flows
Lake
into
due
this
found
case,
the
organs
Once
were
in
found
called
high
levels
to
of EE2
52
beautiful
looks
can
Thun
in other
were
reproductive
presumably?
map,
you
in it. The
would
lake
is
snowcapped
deceive.
comes
all
Bern
about
30
miles
away.
apparently
transporting
the EE2
day,
scientists
In
fine but the
More
APEs,
This
surrounded
“pristine”
Thun
in
it seems,
Looking
at Lake
Thun
on a
never
expect
to find estrogenics
this
be
by
deformations”.
scientists
investigate.
To
this
rumors.
whitefish
tasted
looked
strange.
in the
walleye
also
ugly
whitefish
again,
to disguise
along,
another
presumably
beautiful
alpine
Lake
Switzerland—was
to
like
able
contamination.
Moving
place—the
The
are
bad
or
words,
A
river
the
This
into
Lake
Swiss
that
way
from
river
Lake
was
Thun.
Thun
feels
the
Bern.
Atrazine
when
fields
lakes
is probably
the
most
unsettling
estrogenic
it comes
to fish. This is because
farms
and
border
the vast
majority
of our
nation’s
and
atrazine
degrade?
rivers.
The
in America
Yah,
our
annual
that
80
takes
seafood
million
a year
is
pounds
or
swimming
more
in
of
to
that.
And
when
it’s
the
meat. 53
in the
water,
atrazine
Let’s move
to alligators.
They
between
seafood
and landfood.
When
I was
in Florida,
to
eating
some
nuggets.
I admit
it
is
it, my
farm-raised
real
fish.
looks
“missed
involved—revealed
were
present
Busted!
Unlike
buddies
on
and
corn
another
tastes
like
the
urine
of
50
wild
actually
did this and
I
the
that
in
boat”
high
and
levels
of
wasn’t
phthalates
Florida-Everglade-gator
pee.
Alligators on estrogenic
dope.
the
fish
and
mussels,
however,
researchers
did not
mention
deformations,”
which
determine
alligators.
with
all
ask.
Anyway,
drug
testing
alligators—yes,
scientists
somehow
a
one time.
like
chicken
that’s
grey
segue
alligator
raised
else—but
stuff
Don’t
college
in
it was
tasty
some,
tastes
and
everything
The
mushy
to doing
even my Mom ate
restaurant
gator
pellets—like
story.
try
up
good
college
thing
because
a
attending
common
did it, and
Of course,
are
ends
anything
would
But
about
be
these
“gonad
difficult
if phthalates
54
to
are
in
the urine on a regular basis, they are going to be
in the meat although
this study did not run
these
important
Now,
tests.
let’s
“gutter”
further
take
move
entirely
and
We haven’t
heard
about phytoestrogens
Well,
first
of
all,
breastmilk,
causing
tiny infants.
55
much
from
soy
this
topic
to dry
land.
about
soy?
soy
phytoestrogens
concern
because
out
lately.
end
they
of
the
What
up
in
expose
Similarly,
were
in
one
recent
phthalates
Canadian
found
in
50%
of women,
but
explicitly shown. 56
These,
and
other
that
if
estrogenic,
the
baby
animal
Milk
milk on
Wisconsin
at
the APEs
from
the
88,000
news
gets
Other
57
in
are
from
processing
contribute
transfer
is
are
strong
exposed
exposed
was
to
an
via breastmilk.
let’s inspect
adults
today
animal
drink
basis.
an
ordinary
and
grocery
found
in
That
to
store
contain
standard
in
APEs
cow
milk,
ng/L.
Goat
milk
higher
at about
is astoundingly
chemicals
high
but
the
the
estrogenic
coming
the
need
from?
plastic
milk
to these
there
is something
milk
to
bottles,
have
a heavy
and,
once
presence
again,
you
that
are
be
said
among
hard
point
steel
humble,
us.
Good
to find.
in the
like
dairy
correct.
diets
for
your
herbicides
in your
leach
although
animal
loads.
and
farmers
and
they
containers,
milk is good. . .
but increasingly
What
about
atrazine?
At this
assume
phthalates,
processed
estrogenic
glass
probably
considered.
Predominantly,
milk
and
high
“Polyface”
be
APEs,
buckets,
small-time,
to
found at “high levels” in all
58 and parabens,
too. 59
“Clearly”,
you
over
worse.
plastic
parabens
of
around
17,000
store
was even
Phthalates
have been
sorts of dairy products
Where
breastmilk
these,
further,
many
Specifically,
were
same
ng/L.
will be
idea
since
tested
levels.
only
like
mother
from
was
high
a
a daily
purchased
not
maternal-baby
studies
indicators
To explore
this
milk.
Especially
the
study,
60
and
book,
atrazine
beef. . .
Heck,
the
USDA
on
even
your
talks
beef
to
about
pouring
extract
some
boiling
of
hot
the
atrazine!
Weird, eh? With atrazine
levels at 739,000
blood extracted
from live, Holstein,
cows,
could
you
not
ZEA,
that
“vegan”
fungus
want
family,
to extract
is
mold
another
overlook
ZEA
is a “beefy”
I have
in most
up
one
auction
cash
in
cool
with
and
toxin
factor
to
from
the
consider
in
overlook
ZEA
grains.
Even
cases.
Yet
experience
with
Minnesota,
I
My family lived
enough
grassland
Then,
ng/L in
62
how
this
because
scientists
mycoestrogen
concern.
personal
Growing
61
some!?
estrogenic
food.
Most
people
simply
the
topic
is cows,
not
water
out
for
day,
borrowed
“bought
and
raised
a
molds.
few
cows.
in the country
and
me to fence, so fence
spring
a
cows
me
I drove
cattle
some
off to a
trailer
cow
owned
I did.
and
cattle
some
babies”.
I’m glad I did because
it turned
out to be
fun.
From the experience
of raising those cows, what
I
can
definitely
not
picky
threw
say
with
eaters.
them
In
their
authority
fact,
hay
in
bales,
is that
cows
the
winter
my
cattle
are
when
I
preferred
old moldy bales over the fresher
ones I brought
them. Strange
creatures.
Maybe
it’s analogous
to a
good,
aged
Such
places—the
where
cheese?
ZEA
moldy
finally
hay
gets
or
to
moldy
grains—are
“shine”.
Really,
while
many
people
forget about
ZEA from the IRS
10
List beyond
foods with grains, ZEA is as common
as cows.
And
Obviously,
contaminating
other
scientific
animal
animals
eating
studies
confirm
feeds.
63
grains.
that
It’s even
ZEA
scientifically
is
documented
well, 64
on
you
in
had
moldy
doubts
hay
the
there
subject.
about
is even
65
And
a “review”
a complete
my
for
anybody
is basically
who
a science
when
cows
eat
ZEA,
this
and
milk
issues
but
let’s
look
at
ZEA
has
been
measured
in
ng/L
after
feeding
cows
about
of ZEA
per day for 21
health
problems
we
will
pages,
this
milk
production
milk
production
in
—rather
may
leads
some
milk
mg
exposure
cows.
69
than
human
to
production
diminishes.
This
makes
wonder
lactation
recipient
as ZEA,
least
study
me
issues
in
2,500
(milligrams)
other
in
a
even
reduces
fact,
reduced
In
health—is
if estrogenics
humans.
a
meat
to
of the major reasons
ZEA is so thoroughly
in cows. Lots of money
“goes
down
the
dairy
that
on
numbers.
up
550
not
paper
days. 68 Among
begin
discussing
ZEA
the
written
reports
Naturally,
at
as
limited
review
summarizes
numerous
experimental
frequently
studied subject. 66 67
couple
bales
experience.
In fact, there
are so
many
papers
published
on
ZEA
relating
to
that
know,
“present”
in case
personal
research
cattle
as
Not
one
studied
tube”
if
also
only
cause
is
the
of the milk impacted
by estrogenics
such
in other words, but the mother
clearly
is,
in the
has
case
not
of
cows.
yet
A
been
thorough
done
human
on
this,
unfortunately.
Like other
beef—your
study.
70
it as
well.
free-range,
estrogenics,
ZEA also ends
burgers
and steaks—according
So
if your
This
is
grass-fed
cow
a
is eating
good
cows,
it, you’re
argument
obviously.
up
for
in
to
the
this
eating
healthy,
That
same
ZEA
study
of
ZEA
in
burgers
also
found
in pork.
Heck,
found
this mold-derived
estrogenic
in tests of buffalo
burger
1ng
of ZEA
is that
per
it’s
grains
gram
nearly
are
has even
been
at levels
around
of meat. 71
impossible
to
The
conclusion
avoid
ZEA
answer.
Animal-
They
just
and
can’t
again.
same
way
from
a
financial
implementing
these
farms
is an
be
Modern
corn-dominant
than
any
and
uphill
use
In
only
compared
a
fraction
to levels
Phthalates,
too,
of
fact,
one
scientific
contained
0.08
(mg/kg)
in
a
concern
as
the
the
scientists
fried
and
European
far
finding
In the
being
investigation,
uncooked
conducting
packaged
Union
in
today’s
is often wrapped
More specifically,
milligrams
frying, and 16.9 mg/kg
that escalated
quickly.
The
was
corn
used
today.
are
meat because
the meat
rather than wax-paper.
to
atrazine
a
on
back
as
1976,
scientists
were
already
“residues
of atrazine
in chicken
tissues”. 72
70’s,
so
polar bears.
a no-brainer
is used
herbicide.
the
battle.
farms
atrazine
other
in
perspective
poultry
diet
of
the
win
monopolized
To finish, let’s mention
chickens
and
Atrazine
in chickens
is, once
again,
hypothesis.
forms
clearly
crop-rotations
once
more
the
moldy!
Feedlot
slaughter
pens
or
other
mass-production
animal
farming
are
wrong
if
after
the
chicken
tolerable
in plastic
according
chicken
of phthalate
meat,
chicken
13.1
kilogram
mg/kg
packaging.
study
meats
per
73
And. . .
concluded
meat
daily
far
after
that
exceeded
intake
level
(1.85mg,
for a 50kg
All
these
of
conclusion:
to harmful
individual).
studies
support
a
that sordid
treatment
animal
and
human
Furthermore,
processing
the
very
simple
of animals
leads
health
impacts.
food
amplifies
the
problems.
Unfortunately,
this
type
of
animal
handling
is not rare.
Even
eggs
from
mistreated
untouched
For
by
ending
74
This
one
up
study
in
study
the
were
being
chunky
proved
eggs
at
became
that
scientists
a
off
was
illegally
animals
When
the
the
to
for
scope
I
that
fattening
effects
profits.
They
being
directly
to make
them
ended
up
levels,
got
in
it
the
tipped
involved,
reminded
us, only
on
being investigated.
The
is really
alluded,
of estrogenics
Using them to make
is clearly
unhealthy
market
unnaturally
high
problem
already
event
estrogenics
enforcement
authors
that are
of the
have
Law
levels.
black
greater
at astonishingly
high
create
estrogenics
authorities.
whistleblowing
limited farms
true
As
the
eggs
the
not
whistleblowing
revealed
used
farm
chicken’s
are
estrogenics
disturbingly
discovered
that
estrogenics
were
used on the chickens,
in this case,
fatter.
food
chickens
because
the researchers
discovered
steroid use in many chickens.
What
and
estrogenics.
example,
are
harm
we
unknown.
will
in the
farm animals
for
everyone
talk
next
about
chapter.
fatter,
though,
involved
and
unethical.
Hearing
throw
these
your
things
hands
up
may
and
even
ask:
cause
is nothing
you
to
in
the
food
aisles
The
these
days
unfortunate
good?
state
dye-injected,
birth-control-tainted
almost
that
Meats
meats
and
And
or
fats
fats
that
are
last
chapter
hopefully
your
faith
in food
and
a
dawn
In
the
the
are
“informed”
health
problem?!
have
of
time?!
will
been
The
eat
whole,
genuinely
organic
preferably
not
unprocessed
and
stored
challenge?
least
what
you
understand
do,
and
can
at least
what
is best,
minimize
Ideal
to include
polar
First,
I know
you
don’t
have
enough
Vitamin
of
estrogenics.
far-reaching
the
“case
so here
A to actually
Polar
we
bear
estrogenic
environmental
from
But
what
a
at
to
You
decide
it’s
study”.
I
it is.
bears—the
livers
kill you,
in case
have
impact
in
foods.
if you
polar
problem
use,
sources,
on,
you ever visit the Arctic Archipelago—but
polar bears can memorably
demonstrate
nature
find,
raised
your
final
bears
eat
and
going
damage
one
to
Foods
Absolutely.
regarding
the
best for you and yours.
Let’s
end Part 1 with
promised
is
miracles.
grown
in plastics,
healthy environment.
Simple? Yes. A major
you
foods,
naturally
of
give
perform
meantime,
we
some
least
Principle you should follow is this:
2. The Ideal Foods
Principle:
Try
and
are
restore
I can’t
eating
Who
humanity—at
ideas—but
mess.
we
humans
The
It’s
herbicide-peppered,
food
is,
indeed,
then
so-called
decent
plastic-wrapped,
and
since the
kidding?
some
our
water
overwhelming.
the
of
tests
we
I
think
global
created
via
the
reveal
are
the
having
and
the
The
urgency
case
to act.
study
parabens,
cosmetic
originating
“fragrances”.
tested
in remote
otters,
pygmy
yes,
began
a total
by
at
from things like
Specific paraben
coastal
sperm
of 10
looking
animals,
whales,
polar
plastics
levels
ranging
various
bears.
estrogenic
from
the
average
groups
nanograms
As
you
This
liver
within
levels
species,
levels
in
graphic
among
with
test
units
of
(ng):
can
see,
clearly
circulating
the
indicates
the
levels
in sea
brain
is
body
due
a
otter
the
not
brains
or
outrageously
estrogenic
only
Is. High.
the
“preserved”
us
area
is
but
paraben
because
“blood-brain
average
Coast,
high.
waste
polluting
—presumably,
so-called
The
scientists
found
an
paraben
in Washington
That.
are
our
around
us.
also
measured
protected
to
levels
that
globe,
polluting everything
These
researchers
brains.
and,
22
paraben
each
sea
dolphin,
Researchers
began by measuring
paraben
each mammal’s
liver. Here is the resulting
of
and
were
of
the
the
barrier”.
of 12,900ng
of
USA,
sea
otter
Finally,
the
scientists
further
tempt
included
to
blubber.
the pun probably
will.
Rough-toothed
dolphin
blubber
paraben
ocean
This
level
of
1,140ng.
an
important
If
data
not,
showed
These
that
might
recognizing
an
are
average
the
open
animals.
brings
up
finally pursue.
and fat?
Let’s
you
some
dig
in. If you
to find
a seat.
found
parabens
17,400ng/g.
What
75
is
are
A recent,
in
the
question
deal
standing,
2015
human
you
study,
fat
that
with
cells
we
will
estrogenics
might
for
want
instance,
to
be
at
PART
RISING
DISEASE
CHAPTER
5
Depressing
Estrogenics
THE
in the
Fat
Stores
DIFFERENCE
AND
“girl
call the
Another
her
BETWEEN
friend”
is that
experience
the
place
It
motorcycle
that
a
begin
the
tale
by
main
character
had
lots
of
space
for
pipes
and
love
space
later years
a beautiful
lots
mine
gave
this
back
extra
sissy
rider.
bar
power,
on
a passenger
rack.
as
was
the
winding
because
I would
max
many
the
scene
and
For
bike.
It
lots
of
dual
back
just
down.
Let’s
“friend
end.
backrest
I would
frequently
the beach
to fish for sharks
especially
as I finished
my final
friends.
me.
sported
the
Ave
850cc
The
but
as
tail
also
another
me,
it was
pop
off
sight.
It all began
trips,
at
matchmaking
to
It also
frames
entered
semester
of
about
became
in my
starred
of
we
That’s
nearly
us.
circle
chrome,
an
at first
is
“laws” of attraction.
a big, loud, and generous
motorcycle
spring
friends
motorcycle.
introducing
sissy bars served
as
doubled
as a luggage
This
in between
between
friend
and
zone” and the
The 850 was
my
zone”
chasm
This story
took
Maria
University.
telling
co-riding
little “friend
uncrossable
“GIRLFRIEND”
little space
“friend zone”.
story Allison enjoys
first
where
an
Obesity
usually
Sometimes
as
capacity
be
Dave
10
people
for
the
joined
in the
exams.
by
come,
would
join—10
Fishing
Club
evenings,
On
these
a mixed
would
to
bag
of
sometimes
supplies
was
the
at
that
time—and
Allison
always
loved
Allison.
coming
because
she
loved
adventure.
She also
Before
a
would
into
typical
meet
a
up
fishing
trip,
in the
main
communal
to
on
campus
leave
Allison.
As
my
interested
parking
van.
From
for
the
leaving
left
summer.
but
town,
I
a 3-piece
strapped
With
he
a
all this
Soon
and
even
hours
on
to be
done.
there,
we
rod
sissy
and
packing
people
staying.
So
remembered
fishing
just
for
With
a
how
and how
also knew
that
bar
could
I
I
be
frame.
before
open
air riding
have
a car.
sharp
leaving,
he
We
tiresome
had
pin.
Florida
and,
at that
roads
time,
Freeeedom!
thereafter,
on one fine
I both
escaped
out
simultaneously.
pile
me his bike keys. He also passed
Obviously,
I felt like a little boy. In
store.
perfect
I didn’t
in mind
gave
deed.
balloon
were
G. Loomis
to his motorcycle’s
generously
along the
and
Most
was
the
parties
lot
much
I enjoyed
going to the beach
appreciated
his 850cc
motorcycle.
He
had
safaris
to the beach and fish.
a friend of mine was
college
buddy
sharking
all
University
were
was
those
fishing
and
appreciated
adored
the ocean at night.
would simply drive
As spring matured,
up
on
both
spring evening,
the
lab
front
been
lab experiments
working
and
Allison
door
long
it felt good
“After you,” I said as I chivalrously
held the door.
“I want that motorcycle
ride you promised
earlier,”
Allison
“That’s
promise.”
announced.
right!”
I remembered.
“I
had
made
that
It
was
nearly
weather
were
“Ok. Sounds
I drove
my
near
sunset
and
both
the
sky
loop
and
pulled
peachy.
good”.
bike around
the
chup,
down.
chup”
I tossed
the
in a few
850
popped
good
“revs”
as
it
mostly
to
She
threw
her
hopped
around
I’m
on
my
not
proud
bristling
the
waist
and
bike
tighter
to
admit
peeling
and
than
a boa
this
her
but
of the bike, I requested
Allison
Allison, unfazed
by such sharp
hold the
demands,
an
asymptotic
and
I was
shaky
on
on
it—and
other
such
and
Allison
hands
more
ride
fishing
became
would
a
bike
bike
regular
eventually
on
find
summer’s
that
particular
her
yet
of
another
Independence. . .
from
Atoms
and molecules,
one
is
relationship
that
bike
another
simple
or
physics
they
way
was
can
but,
like
my
set
seek
be
one
only
further
to
my
attracted
to
another.
bike
for
ironically,
would
fashion
can
the
without
soon
to
repel
and
back
And,
similar
Allison,
Allison
followed.
experience
me.
in a
body
soon
reason
with
another
time
trips
Day.
July
sissy bars.
complied.
clutching
their
Independence
4 th
noise
beach
equal and opposite
reactions.
In fact, our first official “date”
that
the
excuses—so
to the
by
at that
with
lame
graciously
enjoyed
the
cold, dead sissy bars.
More
relationship
the
arms
I responded
off. Over
still had
the
sound
constrictor.
hands
We
idled
to keep
engine
firing in 1 st gear,
but
cool, and Allison walked over.
early
up
Allison.
“Chup,
give
and
trips
This
with
Allison,
this
relationship
complicated,
To
of
principles
discussions
about
most
teachers
by
or
a
partial
be
slightly
more
too.
simplify
atoms,
“+”
can
“-”
holding
signs.
up
This
the electrical
charges
explain
attract-repel
magnets
is good.
understanding.
overlooked
Oils, fats,
and
talking
about
It is, however,
only
What
sometimes
are the properties
of oil versus
and
most
hormones,
usually
water.
Estrogenics,
called
“hydrophobic”,
water”.
In
“afraid”
of water
too.
other
This
which
words,
and
repellent
literally
they
don’t
property
means
estrogenics
is
“fear
are
mix
This fear of water isn’t because
positive
or negative
charge.
In
is
water.
float
on
of
technically
with
it.
estrogenics
have
a
fact, it’s quite
the
opposite.
Oils,
fats,
electrical
and
most
charge
hormones
or
they
Water,
meanwhile,
with those magnetic
Conversely,
rather
are
than
have
Now
let’s
“lipophilic”,
saying
In
an
get
practical
inside
like
we
saw
substances
little
no
charge.
innate
say
that
they
“love
fat”,
You’ll
often
see
way of looking
at this
is
estrogenic
substances
mix.
attraction.
pragmatic.
prefer
your
skin
estrogenics
prefer
are
meaning
“hydrophobic”.
terms,
they
very
sometimes
both words
and each
correct.
Fats, oils, and
They
have
absolutely
has a strong
electrical
charge
positive and negative
ends.
scientists
estrogenics
have
find
this
means
over
water.
to hide out
our
bodies.
with
more
beef,
estrogenics
in
It also means
inside fat cells
Some
find
but
most
permanent
the
lodging
soap
that
when
muscles
estrogenic
in
fat.
We’ll
revisit
this
idea
in
a
minute
but
it’s
significant.
Now,
Well,
remember
a few days
I was
shopping
minutes
found
for
looking
bar
it is usually
estrogenic
red
Europe,
being
slippery
Trojan
fact,
during
a wash
so
of
taking
It all begins
in
illegal
in
Am
I
soap?
so
this
it off, yes?
It’s
a wet
don’t
forget
sheets
hide
In fact,
out
you
mixed
and
as
about
potential
your
give
for
can
“driving”
highway
toward
with
a common
usually
the
day,
skin
use:
and
every
day.
are]
into
a
cosmetic
contact.” 1 I
“vehicle”.
I
right
Man
smell
estrogenics.
“[Phthalates
fragrance
subsequent
term
they
even
skin—in
constant
you a slight
but
all
says:
like
are
in clothing
with
estrogenics
paper
phthalates
the
they
are
vehicle
ingredients
and
this descriptive
imagine
had
drinking
“cleansing”
dryer
is key.
And
clothing—can
scientific
and
is
soaps,
and
that
“dose”
solvent
it
estrogenics.
The estrogenics,
or parabens,
for instance,
cycle.
fragrances
this
that
hazard—it’s
dye
Soap
detergent
of water”
Like
finally
that
people
red
with
“afraid
steady
I
15
horse.
vehicles
for skin
APEs,
phthalates,
Sniff testing
contact
with
to
bad. We wash
soap
is bad.
along
laundry
When
I noticed
is a health
extreme?
possibly be
estrogenic
spent
Soap
with artificial
red
dye?
ruin a good soap like that?
obvious
dye
I probably
ingredients.
remember—but
too
can’t
Well,
soap.
of soap
No. 40 in it!
would anybody
Now,
the
bar
at soap
a “clean”
Red
Why
In
how
much
I “love”
shopping?
ago from the time of writing this,
like
just
my
skin,
of skin:
skin’s
Boobs.
“talent”
ability
to
doesn’t
absorb
just
things.
absorb
scrupulous
job of
like proteins,
and
Of
course,
anything.
It
your
skin
a
fairly
does
keeping
out water,
large
items
most
other
electrically
charged
molecules.
But
fat. . .
your
substances,
skin
too,
is a sucker
like
These readily travel
Keep in mind here
and
“act”
and
hydrophobic.
is
like
hormone
creams
of
and
blast
They
cosmetic
means
other
them
in
for
but
products,
parabens
makes
“are
did
shampoo,
washing
why
swimming
3
not
and
off
only”.
The
medications
skin’s
on
defenses
your
parabens
you
into
deodorant
the
at
pool.
many
are
Next
to
found
be
that public
swimming
Freely’s
paraben
as
“concerning
responsibly
Mr.
This
rubbing
being
jump into
I.P. Freely
off.
2
same
are
levels
might
you
Mr.
shower
skin,
people
pools
Yes:
in
antiperspirants.”
through
taking a shower
before
pool, but chances
are,
nearby
you
present
including
go
it clear
children.”
give
be
dermally
absorbed,”
journal
regarding
another
substance,
crowded
size
is
one
popular
there are dozens
fool our
estrogenics.
And many
on their armpits.
Daily.
This
in
through.
“Parabens,
which
can
affirms another
scientific
estrogenic
“look”
small
use
“topical”
market.
right
are
sometimes
work.
Hydrocortisone
that comes
to mind,
drug
estrogenics.
skin.
molecules
“external
hydrophobic-based
today’s
“Fat-like”
hormone-skin-absorption
doctors
for
fat!
and
They
Indeed,
medical
creams
example
hormones
through
your
that estrogenic
hormones.
why
for
lotion,
particles
him,
his
are
wife,
Mrs.
Ivanna
many
Tinkle
additional
Freely,
has
cosmetics
that
heavy
also
into the pool. Too gross.
Parabens,
it is said in another
widely
care
used
in cosmetics,
products
and
microbial
growth
tortillas
out
I
after
much
contain
I reach
for
you
found
found
inside
“Fetal
exposure
to
possible
authors
personal
to
inhibit
shelf
life.” 4
accidentally
home.
Did
used”.
buying
buy
corn
I usually
I tell you
find
I’m
not
need
to realize
that
parabens
in “products”.
They are
being
us.
to
their
five
parabens
was
endocrine-disrupting
investigated
potential
and
impact
on
fetal
development,”
explains
of a research
journal,
rationalizing
their
study.
5
“This
study”,
report
the
umbilical
parabens
basically
many
on
my
“are
shopping?
Unfortunately,
are not only
due
product
And
off
paper,
not “occasionally
frustration
in
parabens.
and
washing
additives
extend
sometimes
that
science
food
“Widely
used,”
they say,
To
my
dismay,
beyond
cosmetics,
are
pharmaceuticals,
as
and
lipstick
they
the
life blood
contained
specific
97.4% of the
had
another
parabens
on
paraben
umbilical
type. . .
were
present
to note,
of
cord
blood.
is
widespread.”
u-cords
the
went
occurrence
“is the
parabens
first
in
Maternal
exposure
Umbilical
cords
from
mother
to
human
to fetus.
to
are
How
parabens?
Well,
depending
of the
they
looked
five
at,
cords had one type, 94.75%
and
all five of the
tested
in
more
than
40%
of
samples.
The
parabens,
the
phthalates,
the
estrogenics,
are
blasting
through
Possibly
the
skin.
single
biggest
weakness
in our
skin’s
“defensive”
and fats.
ability, in fact, is blocking
out bad
This is why poison ivy is so nasty.
“poison”
from
readily
wash
think
poison
out.
about
this:
ivy
The
is
oil
there
an
oil
prefers
hasn’t
and
the
been
oils
The
doesn’t
skin.
much
And
historical
need for our skin to block bad mercenaries,
like
poison
ivy, because
we
were
never
commonly
exposed.
single
We
But
out
recent
trots
to
learn
the
artificial
we’ve
and
problem:
us—via
a
This
after
managed
a
mistake.
estrogenics.
In
to
And
our
body
doesn’t
an
astringent
rash,
has
artificial
ivy
a single
unhealthy.
negative
smell—that
other
words,
our
matter,
poison
from
very
create
fake
in science
labs that go through
our skin
as most natural fats and oils. Yet these
unnatural
ensuing
avoid
We
history,
hormones
as quickly
are
generally
exposure.
or
this
skin,
never
here’s
exposure
nor our
adapted
the
communicate
taste,
is not
tongue
to
novel,
or
a
cool.
In
for
that
rejecting
these
estrogenics.
raises
another
important
skin
really
have
that
actually. . .
in a sense.
Skin
has
keep
in
some
“fat”.
mind
surrounded
by
that
much
More
every
a “lipid”
question:
fat?
does
Yes,
importantly,
cell
bilayer.
in
it
does
however,
your
That
our
body
means
is
every
cell in your
body
has a “fat coat”
or a “fatty
coating”.
This is how and why estrogenic
molecules
easily
fat.
Both
travel
Every
into
cell
conventional
your
is
cells
designed
fat
and
to
to
your
be
stored
allow
cell’s
in
your
such
entry.
“fat
coats”
allow
estrogenics
to travel
Furthermore,
when
right
estrogenics
bloodstream,
they journey
go into conventional
fat,
the
stuff
you
generally
attraction.
Basically,
estrogenics
once
it! This
and
raises
We’ll
the
discuss
impacts
find
question
can
this
your
of as
even
in the
natural
how
next
to
family
researchers
birds. 6
In
healthy
because
birds
they
other
that
the
hand—the
sensitive”
to
store-away
comes back
A different
APEs
ZEA.
Where
at
chapter
and
how
levels
but,
in fat,
a
it
now,
according
ZEA
actually
study
in
found
researchers
are
note—are
fatty
that
which
to haunt their piggy
study
on estrogenic
bodies.
APEs
in the
of
body”
and
the
allergic
“accumulate
in the
“highly
and
ZEA,
they
for
all.
examples,
rapid-fire.
secreted
by
certain
they
Pigs
modulators
do
hormones
blood
conducted
estrogenic
“accumulate
“potential
deposits,
more
resistant
to ZEA
basically
naturally
very lean. Pigs, on the
same
the
steroid
is stored
study,
are
are
fat
law
the
hormone
members,
the
Why
would
they
they are afraid
of
enter
let’s look at specific fat-storage
ZEA,
the
estrogenic
stuff
fungus
our
fat. It’s
your
sweet
home”.
is like water,
estrogenics
travel
to the land of fat. They
like belly fat or butt
fat;
think
of hydrophobic
they say “home
leave? You blood
in.
so
they
eventually
find
thereby
that
act
as
response.”
body”?
The
7
fat,
naturally.
Recognize,
too, that the brain is basically
the fattiest organ in the body—besides
fat deposits,
of
course—so
My
new
the
sea
plenty
rallying
otter!”
cry
is
for
also
the
stored
brain
in
the
brain.
is
“remember
BP
[benzophenone]
from
“bioaccumulative”
in
this
mean?
“accumulates”
scientific
in
general
In
article—in
a
environmental
there
human
means
BP
this
particular
journal
called
Journal
—expresses
concern
testing
for
a 2015
of
found
20
19
human
to
people.
list
from
every
9
Estrogenics
fat”—it’s
the
act
way
Before
moving
final
story.
important
It gets
estrogenic
words,
that
be
estrogenic,
and
parabens
all 20
here?
people.
I don’t
estrogenic
your
though,
substance
store
on
length
to their
want
time
“love
of
to add
one
fat.
how
In
other
long
does
estrogenics?
is no
answer
perfect
study
this question.
important
for
your
fat,
incessantly
it’s an
of
in
prefer
artificial
gurus”
storage”—and
I do
remain
Unfortunately,
there
yet been
done
to
“health
due
or
They
consideration
to
the
fat-storage
to this question
of how
long
an
estrogenics
body
way
think
of nature.
on,
might
if
this
The
substances
likely to
triclosan,
pattern
fat from
imaginable
and show how they “bioaccumulate”
are “cached”
or “incorporate”
into our fat.
do.
the
in water.
of actual
different
overall
necessary
BP
different
fat samples
the
due
study
were
either
estrogenic
or
including
BPA, some
BPs,
it’s
this
fact,
this
is this:
seeing
does
note
is a
investigators
You
What
to
biopsies
in the
called
BP bioaccumulation.
The scientists
the widespread
use of BP, there
of international
Next,
is also
article. 8
International
problematic
that despite
lack
another
Essentially,
our fat.
review
Environmental
sunscreen,
toxin
talk
about
point—but
storage
that
has
Today’s
is
“toxin
research
rare
and
sparse,
especially
I have
found
with
estrogenics.
plenty
of
“references”
being
guru’s
stored
in fat on these
websites. . .
and
then
back
to
their
own
dubious
source.
So,
scientific
studies.
same
find
websites
let’s
about
popular
health
that they
link
or
dive
to
back
some
other
the
original
into
First, to reiterate:
thorough
investigation
fat storage—or
brain storage,
for that
estrogenics
even
has
on
should
be
“coming
to the
the
occurs.
studied
major
table”
but
And
is
to
But some
have
also
done.
I
radar,
the
“good”
and
referring
been
scientist’s
given
none.
But here’s
also
not
most
drug
drug
in
looking
at
literally
are
fat
I’m
not
clearly
“slim”
storage
well-understood.
studies
It
concerns
storage
recreational
and
been
researched
it’s
yet.
studies
news:
of human
matter!—of
think
just
health
the
toxins
in
has
to
fats
been
specifically
dangerous
drugs.
pharmaceutical
in the context
drugs
of fat
storage.
For
understanding
estrogenics,
interested
in
are
Hydrophobic
they
have
drugs
parallel
similar
chemical
similar
in terms
flushing
might
example,
but
the
the
drugs
we
hydrophobic
estrogenics
properties.
because
They
act
of
their
fat-storing
abilities.
work
for
overdosing
vitamin
not
for
overdosing
heroin,
are
drugs.
Water
C,
for
THC,
or
estrogenics.
You
generally
need
to use
activated
charcoal
and a stomach
pump (“gastric
lavage”
or
“gastric
overdosed
For
decontamination”)
hydrophobic
a specific
example,
to
medically
remove
drugs.
the
appetite
stimulant
and
hallucinogenic
words,
drug
THC
THC
stores
is hydrophobic.
in
fat
hydrophobic
substances.
scientific research
on THC.
The
scientific
study
discoveries
called:
fat-stored
that
time—you
start
your
The
fat
if
and
you
reenter
“is
absorbed
deposits
out
this
the
stop
a
eating
like THC
Lipophilic,
study
to
into
for
fat.
start
lipophilic
Also,
by
will
from
this
study
papers
with
or
abstract.
explaining
drug
that
is
that
rapidly
stored
in the
fat
No surprises
there.
is that
our
some
This
paper.
preferentially
body.”
Good.
remember,
loving”—similar
of
to release
blood.
a well-written
highly
and
of the
excellent
[THC]
will burn
your
of this
the
release
because
it is 1 of only 6
“reintoxication”
in the title
authors
other
food deprivation”
. 10
great title because
it basically
toxins
it is simply
THC
with
other
to
check
begin
fasting—you
hydrophobic
is a catch
the word
Plus,
Let’s
Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol
suggests
cause
similar
“Reintoxication:
blood is enhanced
by
I think this is a truly
In
term
estrogenics
that
on
means
the
“fat
IRS
10
List.
They
go
on:
“THC
is accumulated
in
rodent
gonadal
fat at significantly
higher
concentrations
than
in
lungs
and
other
Wait,
what?
other
organs
fatty
such
Not only is THC stored
in the fat surrounding
ovaries?
(1)
Now,
it’s
bizarre
essence,
THC
sounds
the
liver,
in fat, it prefers
the gonads—the
personally,
and
as
brain,
tissue.”
(2)
I can’t
explain
it apparently
like
a
to reside
testis
or
this
but
happens.
In
“molecular
Darwin”
the
way
natural
this
story
is
unselection
of
unfolding.
fertile
come
in
later
chapters
regarding
estrogenics.
The
same
observed
researchers
in human
liposucked
belly
to research.
month
after
after
drug
use.
after
thing
drug
that
And,
groups.
on
this
that
was
they
cannabis
total
Obviously,
age
THC
like
More
un
fat biopsies—not
fat
sounds
to
selection
has
gonad
been
fat
“generously”
but
donated
In this case, the fat was taken
one
a final exposure
to THC, one
month
in “long-term
days
say
It
77
THC
add,
THC
users”—in
is still
urine
found
samples—77
abstinence.
days
is a
long
this research
study
storage
in fat over
time.
However,
one
did not investigate
was
even
longer
periods
of
time.
Besides
the
storage
of
funding
drugs
is
issues,
testing
difficult
research.
long-term
fat
There
are
increased
numbers
of variables.
For instance,
your
diet or your estrogenic
exposures
could
drastically
change
the
final
crime-investigators
can
actually
test
talk
“increase
results.
about
their
clear—but
crystal
are
how
clear.
stored
long
I can
they
how
until
in
people
fat—that
stay
tell you
certain
concentration
post-mortem”,
11 so waiting
not be the best experiment.
Estrogenics
Furthermore,
in the
that
fat—like
as
we
a person
the
or
pygmy
saw—the
is storing
sperm
whales
of those
die
might
much
it will depend
animal
duration
blood
fat is still
whether
you are gaining
or maintaining
or whether
you are losing your fat.
When
drugs
in
do
is
not
on
your
fat
estrogenics
in
via
estrogenics
blubber,
may
even
simply
So,
this
be
the
raises
fat? How
body,
on
a
duration
new
the
survives
question:
long does
one
average?
Well,
radiation-fingerprints
from
of the
found
is just
over
how
old
nuclear
the
bomb
average
1.5 years.
12
“age”
similar
old
study
might
found
is some
be
older
Estrogenics
fat cells
than
Are
their
Causing
The 7 Deadly
#1. Fat Gains
Things
What
the
I
call
as
tenacious
fat!
that
fat
13
where
the
you
are.
that
your
exposures
Of course,
this all depends
on
your
body
and
how
healthy
And
is
fat cell persist
in your
one
“hot”
study
using
from
1950s,
fat itself.
as
fat is in
Another
10-years.
14
people’s
fat
Many
dog!
Fat
“Estrogenic
Paradox”
has
two
parts:
(1) That
estrogenics
are
stored
(2) Estrogenics
stimulate
We saw #1, so let’s move
As
a
spoiler,
I can
certain
plastic-wrapped
a
of
sort
tell
you
food
“stimulus
in fat and,
also,
fat growth.
on to #2.
that
items,
package”.
when
you
you
Fat
are
buy
getting
stimulus.
Also,
when
you
EE2 / atrazine / phthalate / paraben / BPA
water-stimulus.
you
use
Government
most
Boom.
Actually,
growing,
cancer
may
fat boosting,
we’ll
obesity
In
for
look
into
approved,
too.
fragrance-containing
Stimulus.
but
drink
even be related
characteristic
of
that
later.
in
the
Let’s
When
deodorant?
to this cell
estrogenics,
only
focus
on
now.
America—nay,
entire
developed
world—researchers
in obesity
have
rates
carefully
Control
for
recorded
over
30
years.
about
shortest
10%
of Americans
it was
guessed
summary
achieve
100%
that—it
doesn’t
been
Can
you
is
were
around
it: 30%.
has
this:
1990,
In the
Well,
don’t
and
me
on
the
rise
astronomical
and
will undoubtedly
guess
has
also
what
that
a
significant
saw
before.
standards
way.
risen
Europeans
during
of
simply
regarding
the
that
rising
rates
But
of obesity
in
our
Europe.
estrogenics,
have
much
are
the
Plastic
And
it. They
use
of
not
parallel
countries
emerge
close
behind.
Obesity.
those
estrogenics.
rising
I still find
fact, as budding
obesity
follows
spraying?
the
climb.
Estrogenics
except
in
amount
You
will
But
work
of anything.
2000,
quote
really
I realize
around
year
Europe’s
obesity
rates?
You guessed
almost exactly half of America’s.
15
Now,
been
for
Disease
even
been
in
obese.
obesity!
banned
higher
has
20%.
What
about
2010?
At this rate, by 2080,
we
same
years?
Astronomically?
everyday
environments.
Well,
we
growth
this.
The
as
This
documented
by the Centers
(CDC).
Entire
books
have
written
They
a steady
are
estrogenics
direct
proof
uncanny.
In
into “modernity”,
Farm
chemical
convenience?
Bam.
Obesity.
Processed
sugar,
by
the
way,
is
Estrogenics’
Wingman.
It is usually blamed
and
into countries
as they
“develop”.
usually dumped
An
interesting
article
in
depth
issue,
in
People
The
an
Now
Atlantic
article
Live
reports
titled:
in
in
“Two-Thirds
Developing
on
of
this
Obese
Countries”.
“Developing”
in
which
direction,
we
start
to
wonder.
And, speaking
of
estrogenics
and
insulin-resistance.
Public
is
the USA
used and
BMI
the
Next,
of
an
Science
one
Index)
over
wondering
of
water”.
What
mitochondrial
developed
various
stages
Dr.
work
Attia
on
is an
with
I’m
“ low
drinking
they
inspected
resistance
and
the
come
rats
Serious
from
had
health
Dr.
scientist
known
[“prediabetes”]
potentially
causes
diabetic”
but,
rather,
pre-diabetic
and
therefore
important
distinction.
Of course,
estrogenics
insulin. Estrogenics
spur
For
So
in
of diabetes.
insulin-resistance
in
heavily
with a
mitochondrial
and
insightful
this:
Peter
for
and
obesity—not
way around,
as is conventionally
thought.
words,
people
might not be “getting
fat
then
“getting
rats
provided
here
insulin-resistance
the other
In other
an
sure.
side-note
the
areas
Ah!
energy-producing
disrupted
and
in
this.
did they find? Well,
function
and insulin
observed
concerns,
for
An interesting
30.” 16
on
with
like
between
about
atrazine
were
how
begins
“treated”
functions
his
published
overlap
researchers
concentrations
Attia.
study
(PLOS)
apparent
Mass
only
these
they
such
where
the herbicide,
atrazine,
is
obesity-prevalence
maps of people
(Body
not
One
Library
“There
sugar,
the scientific
research
obesity
seems
to
start
instance,
soy—our
estrogenic—caused
one
weight
getting
might
be
fat”.
It’s
i
don’t
stop
at
hindering
on obesity outright.
research
favorite
people
study
found
allegedly
gains
in
that
“healthy”
rats,
including
increases
17
in fat for
Interestingly,
pregnant
in this
rats
same
and
rat
study,
offspring.
BPA
did
not
cause “soy-big”
weight gains (at least at the doses
they used in this study or with the short durations
of exposure
Yet,
that
does
they
this
weight-gain
employed).
mean
front?
BPA
is
innocent
on
Nope.
A different
study
in
childhood
BPA
was
humans
found
“higher
associated
with excess
adiposity
18
[fat
discovered
stores].”
that
transport
in
brain. 19
that
have
the
research
term
paper
from
or
There
outlawed
earlier
I
strong
even
this
the
way
issue
of
energy
and
insulin
term
in
one
estrogenics:
to
the
that
on the IRS 10
the
estrogenic
intentionally
this
according
that
ZEA
fatten
is good. . .
to
personally
contributes
to
in children.
legal,
we
shouldn’t
be
doing
it!
motto
is not
often.
know
it’s
same
banned
It
was
“if it’s legal, go for it!” is the
number
of scientists.
Morality
too
for
those
practice
has
been
European
Union.
basis
ages
suit,
motto—“if
used
And
if it was
Unfortunately,
of a surprising
our
is no
this
else—the
on
even
new
context
been
cows.
puberty
serious
obesity
a
even
(sugar)
preferred
of both
the
study
21
has
the
researchers,
by—who
But
in
is a
brain’s
early
child
glucose
of studies of other items
similar
findings.
ZEA,
molds,
cattle. 22
This
spawned
is “diabesity”.
A number
List show
us
even
another
disrupts
source
is glucose. 20
Overall, the prevalence
issues
Heck,
BPA
the
considering
the
legal,
a
scientist
go
for
who
it!”—in
teaches
Ph.D.
classes.
once
Word-for-word.
my
I know,
because
he
“teacher”.
What
about
phthalates?
Sure
as water
phthalates
have
also been
connected
to
For
7
instance,
a study
different
of obesity
phthalates
disrupting
and
hormones”
were particularly
Studies
of EE2
estrogenics
thinking
they
are
some
reserves
selling
so
fat”
2009.
The
of Yaz®
imitator
that
sheet
reveals
this
factors
such
and
use
all these
“obesity
But
of
estrogenics.
it
what
and
energy
many
US
years
sales
caution:
in
“The
Remember:
the
composition
patented
Virtually
EE2
and
EE2-containing
and
are
hypertension,
diabetes”.
diabetes”
saying
undoubtedly
we
as
wondering,
the drug labels.
that
this
is not
obesity”.
context
in
were
pills
And
same
checked
Realize
million
is EE2 and one other
called
“drospirenone”.
hormone.
for
$781
risk
you
contraceptive
into
hips
emergency
contraceptive
obesity
in case
bodies
wider
of
and mortality
[when
consuming
significantly
in the presence
of
underlying
hyperlipidemias,
for
but,
at Bayer®
drug
company’s
is telling. Yaz®, by the way,
drug
risk of morbidity
Yaz®]
increases
And,
phthalates
scientifically.
oral
including
other
testing
“endocrine
the
women’s
“baby
running,
24
that
fool
is expected,
a top
other
pregnant,
In fact, one
glance
side-effects
for Yaz®
was
in children
some
found
is
wet,
fat-gains.
associated
with obesity. 23
in promoting
fat are slim
course,
storing
was
hormone
all
oral
one
other
pills include
caution,
“Yaz®
contributes,
discovering
about
long-term
studies
I’ve
causes
in
the
other
are
rarely
performed. . .
especially
obesity,
which
side-effect
scientists
for
a
drug.
and doctors
often
if
you
have
promoting
In
isn’t
you
are
25
The
estrogenics:
“musk”
already
scientists
you
are
on
fat
known
terminology
however,
to promote
fattening.
tonalide
APEs,
that
to
and
all
four
BPA.
of
the
4
“obesogenic”—they
a protein
called
Meanwhile,
growth
but
fat growth
wouldn’t
as
many
“master
testing
“PPARγ”.
the 4 estrogenics
triggered
specific
way they caused
the
caused
be discovered.
Normally,
I
by
cosmetics
were
discovered.
fat
Tonalide
how
in many
compared
phthalates,
fattening—through
promoted
precisely
started
found
substances
was
more
discovered
In other
words,
growth
and the
a
if
fat
growth,
it has
been
Besides
the insulin
problems
scientists
parabens,
estrogenic
growth
even
scientists
toxic
cigarettes,
caused
“dangerous”
of course.
of
“tonalide”—a
These
a
like
In
fact,
conventional
consider
it “your
fault”
wondering
mentioned,
group
and
issue
drugs.
case
One
an
considered
obesity,
estrogenics
promote
recently
unearthed.
already
on
not
tonalide
through
some
other
introduce
“PPARγ
proteins”.
In
today
calling
for
fat
cell
yet
to
technical
scientists
switch
also
PPARγ.
way
such
are
fat
fat
this
case,
PPARγ
development
and
growth,” 26 so I feel compelled
to specifically
name
something
as powerful
or controlling
as a “Master
Switch”
for
fat.
“switch”,
you
should
on
you
have
and
And
when
think
fat
I
use
the
of a light-switch.
growth.
Estrogenics
word
Turn
act
it
this
way:
estrogenics
Depressing
News
The 7 Deadly
#2. Depression
There
is a
and
flip the
PPARγ-fat
Courtesy
strong
uncomfortable
and,
but
that
simply
obesity
they
that
smart
cause
estrogenics
to
increase
depression
done
on
challenge,
not
to be
are
said.
connected
image”
issue
but
chemical—and
connection
and
fat gains,
whether
it’s
have been done
These
studies
a
increase
investigate
Unfortunately,
needs
“body
estrogenics
fat-gains,
depression
a
hormonal—imbalance.
27
Because
of this chemical
saw
the
of studies
depression.
and
of
between
like
something
because
rather
of Estrogenics
connection
First: literally thousands
connecting
obesity
with
not
“on”.
Things
depression
indicate
switch
since
we
it would
estrogenics
be
also
rates.
many
estrogenics
scientifically.
and
direct
studies
depression.
have
It’s
been
quite
a
For
one,
studies
this
usually
Furthermore,
great.
For
mouse
can,
as
take
can
you
to some
depression
dishonesty.
with
their
Then
Again.
And
if you
even
your
aren’t
if
a
think
depressed
of human
are
not
Fat
answers
there
where
you
mouse
is
depression?
studies
are also cramped
by
For obvious
reasons,
people
illness.
honest
research
depression
you
know
form
depression
about
years.
know
Human
rampant
of
models
of
how
can
is depressed?
how
area
many
animal
example,
relevant
but
an
enthusiastically
biopsies
about
are
are
depression
the
candid
easy
to
are
dozens
obtain
not.
of
medical
sub-categories
surprisingly
associated
with
“depression”—a
broad
term—adding
another
layer
of
complication
(e.g.
persistent
seasonal
depressive
affective
[SAD],
psychotic
depression,
Anyway,
it would be poor logic to say
can cause
obesity;
obesity
can cause
“estrogenics
depression;
postpartum
depression,
therefore,
need
better
Let’s
start
you
take
disorder,
disorder
etc.).
estrogenics
can
evidence.
And
with
suicide
depression”.
We
it exists.
numbers.
What
if I
showed
a major
study
that discovered
women
who
oral contraception
have a higher incidence
of
suicide?
That
here
you
the
British
would
have
be
telling,
it. Let’s
Journal
check
of
. This
it to the
medical
journal
man”.
The
has
that
never
BMJ
journals—among
right?
Well
then,
this
study
from
out
Medicine—the
over 45,000
women. 28
First, I need
to admit
BMJ
cause
I
BMJ
really
been
is one
the
admire
afraid
of the
to
—with
the
“stick
top-ranked
upper
5%
internationally—and
research
yet
findings
that
American
medical
seems,
is a more
journals.
For
certain
you
BMJ
would
instance,
BMJ
the
(e.g.
those
the
this
over
half
users.
of
of these
take
of
study
records
The
find
in
an
in
women
with
Good
luck
studies
past
research
data or not!
the
over
researchers
issue
article 29 ).
sorts
suicide
medical
publishes
never
articles
government-funded
American
peer-review
committees. . .
good
Anyway,
still
journal.
Political toe-smashing,
it
prominent
concern
for American
vaccines
getting
the
BMJ
45,000
were
looked
at
women
oral
compared
and
and
contraception
the
users
and
non-users
and went
found
that women
back almost
40 years.
They
that took
oral
contraception
had
higher
incidence
of
“violent
suicides,
compared
to
women
a
significantly
deaths”,
that
including
never
took
oral
contraception.
I realize, of course,
that this, again, is not
direct
“proof”
of cause
and effect.
In fact, this
further
illustrates
so
exactly
why
challenging.
BMJ
could
be
Even
the
this
interpreted
depression
simple
issue
can
be
discovery
in
the
a number
For example,
you
oral contraception
can say
causes
that maybe
depression
types.
did
distinguish
Or
The
you
study
could
contraception
say
users
not
that
have
maybe
higher
because
they came from disadvantaged
more
often—I’m
not sure
they
did,
option.
You
There
might
users—they
are
say
were
lots
that
of other
maybe
from
Great
those
of ways.
one
but
drug
those
suicide
of
all
brands.
oral
rates
households
but it’s
an
theoretical
oral
type
not
options.
contraception
Britain—have
genetics
that
to
are
more
artificial
Other
results.
prone
to depression
hormones
countries
Or you
contraception
from
oral
that
from
were
horse-hormones,
40
poor
back
in
the
day,
Lots
options.
maybes.
points,
nobody
can
number.
That’s
quickly
then
close
say
that
were
with
more
India
The
has
up
and
one
more
from
aged
And
women
these
are
At
is too
least
low
numbers
were
correlation
and
of
making
suicide
international
in
India
have
skyrocketed
and
continue
rising.
But
it’s
actually
widespread
suicide.
This
suicide
specifically
suicide
are
found
rates
fairly
now
those
over
of
according
for
typical.
within
the
the
general
But
15,000
per
the
general
to researchers.
The
suicides,
with
skyrocketing
of
crop
to more
not
is
profession.
population
is
The
of
suicide
year.
This
population
India
rates
“far
[of
are
above
India]”
30
coincide
almost
chemical-spraying.
the
plants
generously
Strangely,
however,
most
speculate
that
recent
the
farming
farmers,
course,
partly
due
to
chemical-resistant
farmers
for
a
studies.
been
rates
taken
older
people
direct
had
used
arguments.
45,000
the reality.
investigate
year,
headlines.
of
corybantic
Suicides
huge.
Let’s
Every
Lots
not
ago
quality—they
the
of
contraception.
years
horse
blood—and
maybe
skewed
the numbers.
valid
exposed
could
potentially
have
opposite
might say that maybe
those
oral
users
hormones
when
exactly
This
recent
introduction
in
India,
which
apply
scientific
suicide
said
is
of
allow
chemicals.
journal
articles
surge
among
farmers
31
is likely
One
due
scientific
to “socioeconomic
study
reductions
in alcohol
Of
course,
these
spit-balling.
actually
that
Who
make
the
“nectar
problem,
depressed
was
of
even
suggests
consumption
authors
are
Reducing
problem
worse.
merriment”
is
30
mandatory
for farmers!
probably
knows?
in any
case.
people
at the
factors”.
booze
could
I at least
creating
I didn’t
Guinness
32
just
a
doubt
suicide
see
a lot
factory
when
of
I
in Ireland.
Meanwhile,
could
not
one
find
exposures
for
again—are
suites,
India.
are
viewed
as
artificial
the
much
are
high-fiving
in
you
decreases
in
“productive
chemicals
natural
in other
Joneses
course,
race”
if
the
scientists—once
suggesting
Using
I
estrogenic
Of
to
rather
than
“technological”,
that
tech
to
solve
methods
words.
certainly
is
“doing
top-floor
it”.
executive
presumably.
Let’s not
are being
kid ourselves
here. Farmers
everywhere
pressured
to continue
increasing
the use
of
chemicals
is
coming
producer
on
our
from
of
sponsored
researchers
2011
in
resistant
indeed,
Amidst
decreasing
farmers
enhancements”.
And,
author
in
the
“chemical
doing
it”.
Many
that
problems
considered
scientific
suggested
can’t
compete
“Joneses
are
things
single
foods.
Some
Syngenta®,
for
atrazine
an
who
“Atrazine
released
reporting
huge
atrazine
use
in
chemicals
is indeed
weed-killer.
a
pressure
a
33
cost-effective
top
Syngenta®
Benefits
Team”
set of five papers
economic
agriculture.
more
of the
example,
benefits
And
than
of
in
from
spraying
paying
for
manual
the
true
labor
to hand-pick
But
what
is
“cost”?
The
long-term
solution,
eliminate
estrogenics
in
the
weeds.
best
technology
in
The
difficulty?
engineering.
Dumping
it seems
conjunction
to me,
is
to
with
utilizing
farming
estrogenics—not
machinery
and
financial
cuts.
The
literally
but
legally—will
require
public and government
support.
subsidized
our
way
into
huge-scale
Yet,
farms
simultaneously
“Omnivore’s
Dilemma”.
the
dug
Let’s
problem
ourselves
face
into
an
it: throwing
will probably
just
more
make
we’ve
and
money
the
at
problem
worse.
Here
is
“Ministry
where
India’s
of Health and
776-page
report.
of
“Food
Safety
It was
sent
out
and
sets
the
2011
government’s
“tolerance
chemicals.
For atrazine,
limit
of
numbers
can’t
be
“nil”.
Most
but
atrazine
Standards
from
Delhi,
giant
for
in August
the
Indian
limits” for herbicides
and
they
include
a tolerance
other
was
chemicals
“nil”.
had
actual
Yeeaaah. . .
that
is: do they really believe
no
be set for atrazine
or is there
safety
simply
corporation
behind
the
Government
“service”?
Ironically,
a
study
scientific
of
Delhi’s
report
own
was
ground
water—where
promulgated—found
sample
was
above
nil limit.
India
standards
influence?
(WHO’s)
Regulations”
good.
My question
level should
a
government
stands.
The
Family Welfare”
drafted
a
allowable
the
World
limits. 34
scenes
atrazine
peddling
levels
in
that government
that nearly
every
Health
That’s
Organization’s
the
result
of
a
In
fact,
the
atrazine
more
in
liberal
Delhi
United
water
States
EPA
The
average
atrazine
among
the 20 samples
level
they
ng/L.
that
the
the
EU
Keep
3,000
in mind
ng/L
Further,
and
the
highest
distance
that
from
are
even
above
allowable
American
found
3,400
EPA
allows
approves
0
ng/L.
level
found
they
17,300
ng/L!
This
Delhi
is presumably
direct
exposures:
spraying
and
limits.
researchers
tested
was
atrazine
one
sample
was
especially
because
was
the
using
in
is
bad,
quite
a
active
heavy
farms
atrazine
quantities.
Scientists
working
in
Mumbai,
say: “Though
herbicide
use
compared
to other countries
intake
is
of pesticide
the
herbicide
[. . .].
[. . .]
farmers?
I
estrogenics—or
which
the
fact,
been
levels
as
people
influence
on
women. 36
natural—not
natural
and
menopausal
List
studied
in
“hormone
most
it
an
artificial
items,
all of
is
one
relation
to
hormone
“estrogen
for
menopausal
however,
used
And
the
“ improved
well-being,
the
replacement
declining
female
brain”
therapy,
female
Indian
the
Among
10
to replace
found
to
chlorinated
probably
IRS
artificial—estrogen.
estrogen
a
age—uncovered
the
This
an
receptor—atrazine
2003,
attempt
by
is
know.
directly
around
therapy”—the
is
my
estrogen
this
in the world. ” 35
the suicides
among
honestly
among
bind
that has not
depression.
In
it
herbicide
causing
don’t
chlorine
Atrazine
and
commonly
used
But is atrazine
had
in India is insignificant
in the world, the total
containing
highest
India,
but
study
the
it does
with
mood
not
act
on
clinically
words,
depressed
researchers
use
in
assisting
have
Something
disrupted
or displaced
Because
natural
estrogen
tested
in
of
this
by
the
positive
nothing
in
studied.
the
37
is telling
into
soy.
finding
research,
I can
tell
be spun
in
positive light,
by
you’re
more
Phthalates
that
direct,
have
women
been
they
lot of
money
experience
will
and
that
be
still
proof.
natural
to soy for
absolutely
anything
probably
clearly
with
a
my
a positive
light,
regarding
soy.
now,
additional,
you
in
toward
natural
is
looked
found
because
And,
for
estrogenics.
postmenopausal
This
poured
brain
have
They
other
an eye
Again:
artificial
estrogen,
a few researchers
use
against
depression.
So,
In
mood-improvement
with
depressed
individuals.
estrogen.
is
women”.
might
spun
in
wanting
Check
out
“associated
a
some
phthalates.
with
adult
depression,”
38 plain and simple. Phthalate
levels in
people’s
pee
have
been
compared
with
people
diagnosed
with
depression.
And
found
phthalates
correlated
elderly
populations
as well. 39
BPA,
too,
Frequently.
First
of
all,
estrogenic
ADHD
has
as
I
Red
and
National
disorder
inattention
No.
3
Institute
marked
with
key
for
linked
and
Chapter
are
ADHD
2,
connected
is defined
Health
ongoing
here
or
by
both
to
the
as “a
brain
pattern
of
development.”
is “brain”,
in
depression.
hyperactivity-impulsivity
functioning
me
in
study
depression
to
BPA
of Mental
by
an
and / or
follow-up
with
mentioned
hyperactivity.
interferes
word
been
a
as
in “it
that
The
alters
your
brain”.
Fast
forward
to
exposed
to high
years.
“Analyses
concluded,
BPA
a
study
BPA, like
indicated,”
“that
prenatal
concentrations
anxiety,
of
of
people
many
of us
the research
in
recent
authors
exposure
were
depression,
thousands
related
and
disorders
all
These
brain.
This
explains
a lot. A lot about
have
certain
lead
paint
BPA
was
ADHD
Researchers
“biomarker”
indicating
How
EE2
about
in
to
me,
for
fading
fast,
I was
growing
up.
uncovered
that BPA
estrogenics
a
so-called
activates,
41
may
function
scientifically.
in contraceptives?
Well,
[containing
EE2]
and
I
was
the mood
in this area
report:
“Oral hormonal
particularly
instance.
approval
encapsulates
The scientists
disturbances
back
while
how
depression,
hyperactivity
trace
even
have
even
for depression
to increase
of
And
when
precisely
levels
tendencies.
government
common
maternal
to higher
aggression
children.” 40
issues in the
to
may
should
in patients
induce
be
with
one
study
of research.
contraception
serious
administered
affective
mood
with
disorders.”
care,
The
title of that study is “ Rapid relapse
in depression
following
initialization
of oral
contraception
with
ethinyl
estradiol
depression
To
wrap
sounds
up
[EE2]
.” 42
weird
but
this
topic
Rapid
also
of
relapse
in
ominous.
estrogenics
and
depression,
I want to extend my reach beyond
the
IRS 10 List. I want to include an estrogenic
that is
called
diethylstilbestrol,
bring
it up
because
DES
has
been
or
(A)
DES,
DES
studied
for
short.
is estrogenic
in
the
I
only
and
(B)
context
of
depression.
At
one
time,
DES
was
commonly
found
in
meat
because
it was used in animal feeds to “improve
feed conversion”—a
euphemism
meaning
it “caused
weight
gains”.
43
always.
The
trusty
prescribed
will see
book.
For
study
effects
an
At
is now
FDA
as a drug.
later.
now,
based
DES
on
The
the
This
relevant
concluded
once
story
people
who
that
of in utero
banned
allowed
phthalates,
convinced
many,
you
many
what
Let’s
will.
move
and
best
estrogenics.
that
study,
antidepressants.
along
to
established
however,
to DES
EE2,
health
the
was
[brain]
to
in adult life.” 44
women,
farmers
in
and
are
of
you
lead
depression,
some
be
The
neurophysiologic
estrogenics
of
out
used
exposure
cases
to
story
close
DES
“the
BPA,
it wasn’t
DES
is a powerful
will actually
increased
risk of depression
this point, if over 45,000
India,
but
the
could
DES
likely
I’m
haven’t
underlying
not
most
problems
sure
immense
with
CHAPTER
6
Estrogenic
Sexual
Low
Assault
T
BACK
IN THE
a
spring
hot
LAND
OF
saw
evaporated
palmetto
into
a
hot
and
palm,
summer
and
my first date with Allison drew near.
Dave
and
I, around
that time, had
mystery
of how
Fishing
Club,
first-time
caught
to catch
we
began
fishers
her
first
day,
away
fish
called
helping
through
the
novice
or
their
first
sharks.
shark
that
spring,
for
other
however,
from
and,
the
catch
along
with
many
students
and staff.
One
sharks
solved
my
sharks.
Ave
“tarpon”.
University
were
re-directed
about
Instantly,
example,
Maria
ambitions
I learned
even
Allison
a
prize-fighting
I knew
I wanted
to
battle and catch one. Bagging
a tarpon
suddenly
seemed
a far greater
accomplishment
than catching
a shark
Like
and
that
testosterone,
chapter,
opiate
became
which
tarpon
are
synonymous
Also
like
with the
testosterone,
interesting
and
we
will
generally
my
new
introduce
in
this
thought
to
be
words
“muscle”
tarpon
are
intricate
than
mark.
it would
or “power”.
much
more
seem
at
first
glance.
Tarpon
fish,
you
should
know,
have
a
strange
mystique
about
them.
Within fishing
communities,
tarpon
are spoken
of in a hushed
reverence
with
a touch
even
of admiration
the
object
fisherman’s
hut
of
and
worship
somewhere.
awe.
in
They
are
some
Undoubtedly,
probably
ramshackle
in
fact,
Dan
Brown
about
is writing
tarpon
a novel
worship
and
actually less about Jesus,
about the tarpon fish.
Like
a
tarpon
are
massive.
But size
Tarpon
metal.
are
This
gives
seek
GPS
grow
the
tarpon
treasure
highest
being
when
to
actually
them
challenge
for
they
release
them,
notice
your
300
the
precious
illusion
gleaming
fish
pounds.
untarnished
that
they
treasure.
They
“X”
their
marked
to believe that
jump the most
on
over
(2)
educated
fisherman
they
which
have
line,
are
one
side
tarpon
the
mystique.
is a
major
they
have
over
out
the years
by
to catch
and
jumbo
and
lengthy
eyes,
(3)
suitable
or
like
are
been
when
tarpon
(1)
they
even
from
to
Hooking
snack
of
stone
crab
unworthy
fish hook. It’s
a granite
adds
reasons:
fishing
have
boats,
which
tarpon,
of
and jump
While
those tales.
only
occurs
is rare.
3
hooked.
tarpon
straight
jaws
keen
tarpon
both
for
to
have
a
for
liberating
trying to set a
tasty
your
hook
tombstone.
witnessing
it is hooked,
size.
to about
are
lifespans
and become
hordes
of sun-burned
Truly:
These
for
hooked,
Hooking
into
their
at a spot
I believe
leaping
get
rock-hard
more
with
in, desperate
leap
to another.
Of
course,
and
maps.
reeled
storied
is
contestant,
up
Furthermore,
I happened
all the fish in the world,
the
Christianity
Olympia
fishermen
seas
moment
Mr.
is just the beginning.
are
the
color
of
pillaging
even
begins
They
how
in its origins,
muscle-bound
veneration
at this very
a tarpon
rattling
its
shaking
gill plates,
its head
and
when
spitting
a
hook
is an
experience
lionhearted
knees.
So, too,
among
us
does
a first
Amidst
all the
shark
rapidly
approaching.
or
went
fishing,
that
dazed
us
Allison
biking
fishing
And,
my
850.
The
was
called,
beaches
brought
the
and
then
long
was
of
into
took
this
night
The
most
in
the
my
and
the
with
infamous
shark
first
The
it
fishing
time,
appraised
we
evening
“Lowdermilk”
the
we
lab
back
It began
favorite
for
was
circled
on
I chose,
our
date
in the
arrived,
show.
science,
and
first
planned.
beach,
firework
the
unscandalous.
To
one
my
together
beach
summers,
our
was
colorful
weak
continually
as
particular
a
the
I worked
finally
beach
Lowdermilk
things
as
but this time and
no fishing gear.
From
and
fun,
mind
commenced
to
even
date.
to this thought.
When
the 4 th of July
with
leaves
we
a
sunset
fireworks
went
talked
about
our
and our friends.
The
event
romantic
but
mostly
motorcycle
ride
home
is
where
stoplights
were
“a turn”.
day,
I
maintain
that
the
largely at fault. In Naples, Florida, the stoplights
go
to sleep
as
early
as
the
snow-bird
denizens.
Starting
around
remember—certainly
appeared
on
the
9
or
by
2 A.M.
10
scene—the
red.
stoplights
actually
In
other
didn’t
remained
words,
blink
fixed
on
Allison
stoplights
roads in Naples would go green
of the night while the crossing
stay
P.M.
when
on
if
I
and
I
major
for the remainder
side-streets
would
the
Naples
yellow
after
red
or green.
nighttime
hours
but
As
you
pulled
after-hours
your
car
side-street
up
to
red-lights,
one
a
of
these
sensor
would
detect your presence
and the light would
promptly
flip to green.
All good.
If you had a motorcycle,
however,
The
the
light
stoplight
ran
out
switch
would
of gas
or
simply
remain
had
become
a
that
4 th
July.
On
my
of
cantankerous
me
was
funny
cops
how
represent
you
on
By
remove
license.”
Meanwhile,
to
never
managed
fact,
I
graduated
Well,
Just
until
your
one
Ave
he
even
Boston.
communicated
teach
girlfriend”.
Or
sure.
Anyway,
streak
reach
and
in
a
need
give
of
that
a
blue
behind
official
for
luck,
I
summer.
dead
the
empty
It
bad
your
In
before
I hooked
a few
reeling
a small
handed.
my science
letter.
me
tarpon
the
closed
University
The
a
to
white,
a tarpon
I never
me
rare
all flashing
caught
within
handed
to
busted.
those
sir, and
my
not entirely empty
before
graduation,
Peliska,
prior
got
needed
they’re
I
air at 2 A.M.
to catch
Maria
therefore,
of
of red,
helmet,
continue
West—but
either
carbon
runner
Ave Maria University. . .
fairly close—even
once
almost
Key
collage
stinkler
never
graduating
and came
tarpon
the
you
I finally
felt
change.
poisonous
red-light
then
who
freedom
in humid
“Please
driver’s
from
date.
until
a lesson
for “endangering
the
it “girl friend”
now?
I wasn’t
it’s
on
And
not
nightcrawler,
habitual
first
red
suffocated
monoxide
fumes.
As a late-night
motorcycle
would
was
of
deal.
I
handed.
mentor,
Dr.
postmarked
stationary
scientific
night
Alas,
skills
inside
in
a
premier
Alzheimer’s
favorable
lead
to Boston
graduated
Allison,
and
she
And
coming
fishing
and
soon
only
would
because
Allison
on
a
She
it
and
I had
her
I
final
remaining
semester
up
at
memory.
literally
in
abroad
ended
seemed
a distant
away
after
finish
than
on
this
whisked
to
fall.
dating,
be
pursued
immediately
rather
embarked
Austria
in the
miles away.
I
being
job
stayed
college.
lab.
up
for a great
Ave Maria.
of
Florida,
had
ended
meanwhile,
year
Our
research
in
5,000
the
Far
moved
time,
distant
on.
Or
we?
Whenever
scientists
thoroughly
research
estrogen
(and artificial estrogen!),
testosterone
seems
to be
irrelevant
but
role.
It
are
deeply
ends
seems
up
on
unlikely
the
that
interconnected,
scene
playing
these
two
hormones
are.
This
association
is what this chapter
is all about.
First, it begins
with brain changes.
Estrogen
and
testosterone
cells.
As
pursuing
both
the
play
mind
tarpon,
important
shifts
for
yet
a vital
they
roles
from
in the
pursuing
example,
brain
brain
sharks
cells
to
physically
rearrange
to some degree.
Moving
from Florida
Boston
also conducts
hormonal
brain changes.
fact,
many
diverse
behaviors,
are
testosterone
brain
estrogen
Scientists
rearrange
plasticity”.
neuroplastic
behaviors,
maybe
connected
cell
to
“neuroplasticity”
And
brain
changes
even
estrogen
rearrangements
and testosterone
interplay.
call
this
capacity
of
or
all
and
relating
to
brain
to
1
the
“neurobehavioral
researchers
occur,
to
In
have
at
learned
least
in
that
part,
because
brain
receptors
and
cells
have
estrogen
both
receptors.
testosterone
In
other
words,
these very different,
almost opposing
be found in the same brain cells. 2
receptors,
can
To
estrogen
and
better
introduce
testosterone
this
strange
relationship,
foundation
and
build
four main types
(1) Eicosanoid
let’s
up.
start
In our
from
bodies,
of hormones:
Hormones
—derived
the
there
are
from
fatty
amino
acid
acids
(2)
Protein
Hormones
—derived
from
chains
(3)
Amine
Hormones
amino acids
(4) Steroid
As
we
saw
all these
or
Hormones
earlier,
and
—derived
the
hormones
gland,
—derived
they
defining
are
created
act
on
from
from
single
cholesterol
feature
here
is that
in one
cell,
organ,
cell,
organ,
a different
or gland.
Like radio signals.
It doesn’t
matter
if
you’re
talking about
eicosanoid
hormones,
protein
hormones,
they
are
Now,
I
amine
hormones,
created
only
“here”
or
and
included
all
delivered
four
you
some
context.
Our
sole
steroid hormones
and you can
Also:
the
3
estrogen
body—namely,
be
confused
E1
EE2,
[estriol]—are
steroid.
steroids,
You
need
don’t
abbreviations
recognize
for
that
which
just
to
E2
“there”.
to
will be
the rest.
created
by
[estradiol,
estrogens,
can
either,
come
the
to
and
E3
(T)
is a
names
or
like testosterone
any
give
your
not
is synthetic],
remember
estrogen
hormones,
categories
focus
ignore
hormones
[estrone],
with
steroid
but
in
just
slightly
different
forms.
testosterone
Keep
and
because
they
your body.
mentioning
300-page
both
I
my
are
built
cannot
good
Ph.D.
cholesterol
of about
that
both
from
go
friend
too,
steroids
cholesterol
forward
without
cholesterol.
dissertation
in
I did
about
my
fats
and
( 3 in case you want to join the
5 people
whom
have
actually
read
dissertation).
Cholesterol
underrated
is
building-block
hormones
and
many—important
and
a
about
good
your
and
body’s
this
highlights
healthy
roles
fats
club
the
misunderstood
for
your body.
We will revisit
cholesterol
in an upcoming
book
mind,
estrogen
are
Ahh—yes—and
in
steroid
one—of
of cholesterol
in
the important
topic
of
Chagrin
& Tonic
Series
but
let’s
get
back
to
steroids.
The
average
person
“steroids”
is
Schwarzenegger
estrogen.
usually
who
hears
the
word
more
likely
to
think
of
Arnold
than
cholesterol
or
especially
Estrogen
think
is
of
a
legitimate
the
big
steroid
“T”;
we
but
we
think
of
testosterone.
Amazingly,
research
into
that human
testosterone
declining
call
this
meaning
“feminine”
essentially,
But
even
for
seen
thousands
of
phenomenon
lower
years
. 4
“craniofacial
testosterone
levels
indicates
steadily
Researchers
feminization”
lead
to
a
facial
skull
bone
shape.
This
a rounder
and less-bony
face.
while
human
for
thousands
diminishing
has
facial skull bones
levels have been
an
especially
testosterone
of
dramatic
years,
dropout
more
means,
has
been
testosterone
in
recent
history.
A
truly
massive
have
been
estrogenics
In the
actually
rising,
in
were
approximately
today.
history,
5 That’s
and strength
Unfortunately,
the
a rapid
testosterone
is
levels
in the
have
a
back
have
average
the
fallout
1940’s
hunch
those
testosterone
on
come
topic
across
completely
was
testosterone
sensitivity
women
find
around
the
testosterone
ignored—but
were
far
I
higher
even
scientists
today
trends
in
women’s
women’s
science
testosterone,
conference
noted
at
the
available
I
were
still
levels
the
did
convened
Princeton
assays
at
was
by
shown
in
to
recent
conference
[to
in women]
are found
and
reliability
at the
testosterone
Even
your
to
testosterone.
“currently
on
of
one
include
it
at
health
back
in
2001.
The
theme
Deficiency
in Women”. 6 Androgens,
way,
While
able
from
too,
are
levels.
the
Princeton
“Androgen
we
women’s
levels,
males
massive
been
that
were
levels
with
levels
probable
then.
Unfortunately,
barely
investigated
levels
time
middle-aged
consequences!
I have
not
1940’s—it
that
the
“coincidentally”.
double
women’s
But,
All about
1940’s,
for instance,
when
scientists
were
able to measure
testosterone
for the first
time
the
drop.
measure
to be lacking
in
lower
ranges”,
have
years.
diminishing
Below
healthy
average.
so: as a
testosterone
woman,
is low?
that
Princeton
why
Isn’t
would
you
testosterone
care
if
a “dude
thing”?
Well,
included
same
this
nice
summary:
conference
on
“[Testosterone]
women
affects
sexual
desire,
strength,
energy,
unless
bone
adipose
and
you
concerned
[fat]
your
mass
mood,
400ng/dL
and
around
testosterone
that
7
and
mood,
are
for
these
density,
adipose
tissue
psychological
currently
women
These
these
are
those
said,
isn’t
bone
and
men
numbers,
means,
desire,
energy,
middle-aged
20ng/dL.
and
distribution,
strength,
well-being,
of course.
Anyway,
middle-aged
mass
well-being.”
Enough
those
women
who
sexual
and
distribution,
muscle
tissue
psychological
are one of
with
muscle
density,
around
days
“total”
who
numbers
are
serum
know
came
what
from
a
massive
multi-ethnic
study of almost 7,000
people.
In other words, these numbers
represent
a reliable
“average”
Now,
for
I
doctor
testosterone
must
legally
in your
own
personally
believe
should
generally
numbers:
that
800ng/dL
40ng/dL
middle-aged
20—aiming
bloodwork
to
bring
scope
are
so
why
the
range?
potentially
to
are
consult
unique
be
a
men
(total
women
(total
target
and,
book.
My
number
well).
I
of
and
In
fact,
probably
triple
professional
natural
which
idealized
but
individuals
testosterone
testosterone)
as
ideally,
testosterone,
your
case,
healthy
middle-aged
be
doubling
these
monitoring
up
still within
this
isn’t
And
you
women
should
for
60ng/dL—using
of this
numbers
advise
would
for
for
levels.
is
methods
outside
testosterone
the
levels
medical chart recommended
ranges,
too
extreme.
My
recommended
just
should
on
you
the
high
aim
on
end.
the
“high”
end
of
Well,
first
high
end
of all, most
of
the
people
scale.
Plus,
abysmally
low compared
believe
it’s
unhealthy.
ancestors
many
who
were
ways
than
researchers
etc.).
Also,
will
around
levels
tell
age
plummet.
levels
30.
steroid
let
levels
diminished
mass
and
mood,
of
Or
Now,
today,
you
(stronger
in
Paleo
bones,
teeth,
testosterone
testosterone
men’s,
elderly
that
I
same
as
natural
you:
so
healthier
women’s
ask
an
and
do
you
there
journal papers
of
testosterone
women’s
are
than
just
usually
do
you
person?
around
want
The
the
whole
“sexual
desire,
bone
density,
muscle
strength,
adipose
tissue
distribution,
Additionally,
psychological
want
are
optimal
the
well-being”
levels?
assortment
of
medical
with titles like this one: “The
imbalance
on
depression
impact
and
health ”. 8
we
can
me
energy,
shebang?
we
our
at the
ancestors
are
the
much
40,
alive
are
physically
earlier
So,
we
to our
These
Actually,
nose-dive
age
feel more
just
provoke
finished
discussing
depression
in
how
estrogenics
Chapter
5—further
proof
that
estrogenics
can
directly
impact
brains—so
let’s mix in testosterone
imbalance
supersize
with
that
high
women
argument.
In
environmental
further
other
words,
estrogenics,
explains
at
least
our
and
along
low
some
T
of
modern
explosion
in depression
rates. 9
One
final
preemptive
prophecy
on
this
medical
are
doctors
“satisfactory”
checked.
You
generally
when
will
will inform
you
have
probably
fall
you
your
within
in
the
topic:
that
you
testosterone
a
certain
range
on
those
the
lab
lab
test
test
and
results.
they
No
hard-earned
medical
license
box. No sense wasting
time
the
principle
Well,
of health
I have
our
news.
current
simply
sense
to
go
Like
every
In
a
the
other
ranges’
to
daily
day.
fun.”
Plus,
ranges
our
vitamin
laughably
recommending
jog
between
“eh. . .
testosterone
numbers
probably
a
bit
block
This
recommendation
in
length
miles,
is
good.
Have
bottom-heavy.
‘recommended
on
on
the
the
at
low
end,
high
end.
would
be
to “walk
every
day”
the
low
end.
is not
health-optimal,
if
we’re
honest.
Of course,
to be fair
hormone
ranges
and
levels
vary
from
week
we
we
26.2
level
high”
you
to
are
low”
250
that
my jogging
analogy,
that
a doctor’s
recommendation
one
much
there
“ severely
based
huge—like
0.2
testosterone
from
Sticking
with
equivalent
to
being
in
are
under-exercised,
Americans.
And
me
words,
a
numbers,
numbers
are
“Somewhere
vary
D
like
That’s
for
risking
optimization.
testosterone-range
numerical
1,000.
with
thinking
outside
the
and money
explaining
on
micronutrient-starved,
indoor-dwelling,
poorly-postured
the
go
to the people
drafting
these
the doctors
using them,
T
throughout
to
the
week.
cholesterol
we
The
are
day
levels
eating,
and
also
depend
what
differ
on
time
how
of
are eating,
how much
we are sleeping,
are acting—a
whole host of things.
So,
Well,
when
should
besides
possible”,
the
definitely
you
have
annoying
check
your
answer
your
T
day
how
measured?
“as
testosterone
soon
as
in
the
morning.
before
Every
time.
having
your
Also,
be
blood
sure
drawn
you
or
at
don’t
eat
least
eat
the exact same
thing you ate last time you
your
T checked.
Stuff like that. In essence,
consistent
Finally,
when
to
problems,
you
have
compound
all
the
even agree
a chart
I
companies.
medical
The
* All
“Free
T”
units
You
are ng/dL
can
see
book,
vary
it or
I had
companies
testosterone
get
and
out
the
lab testing
“range”
corporations
that
widely
not,
don’t
pg/mL
the
“recommended
between
during
upper
are
end
only
the
these
increased
The word
appallingly
of
the
highlights
it simple:
are
to update
we
chart
to keep
units
recently
values.
that
testosterone
particular
people
Believe
the
tests.
on numbers.
For an example,
here
is
compiled
based
on actual
lab
testing
“middle-age”
numbers
follow-up
had
be
and
different
process
“Total
T”
range”
companies.
of writing
this
One
the
numbers.
of
their
upper-range
is finally starting
to
low on
testosterone
testosterone
range
is
much
healthier,
Hopefully,
for
this
males
or females.
thinking
will
gain
“Steroids”
are often seen
as the
sin, despite
their critical importance
but
let’s
moooove
“Testrogenics”:
on
and
Where
momentum.
lowest
form
of
in our
health,
talk about
Testosterone
cows.
and
Estrogen
Meet
The 7 Deadly
#3. Hormonal
Some
Things
Disruption
fascinating
believe
I
just
regarding
dairy
said
cow
testosterone.
of cow
and how that
Unfortunately,
might impact
as fascinating
scientists
measured
not
artificial
and
IRS
matters
Of
you
the
and
is a
true
processing
plants
further
milk to plastics.
despite
improved
almost
normal.
these
dairy
the
In
went
cow
cows
entire
other
throughout
during
shortcomings,
this
was still informative.
to
the
study—“modern
in the dairy
The result is
researchers
collection
as
was,
estrogens
of course,
cows,
major
throughout
The
cow
Men”
from
make
genetically
endurance
and
seen,
the
super-cows
breeding.
Milk
have
course,
not
showed
your T levels.
as the study
This,
“Industrial”
particular
dairy study
Apparently—according
is
study
drink numerous
artificial estrogenics
10 List (Chapters
2 and 4). To
worse,
introduce
“spilled”
“Of
natural
estrogenics.
shortcoming.
eat
the
estrogen
can’t
recently
The
measurements
only
research—I
that—was
continue
pregnancy.
words,
we
industry,
unnatural
to
lactate
” 10
have
This
created
through
selective
milk
production
pregnancy.
on
to
explain
pregnancy
that
introduces
milk
a
variety
of
because
human
(1)
and
mix
of cow
whole
Here’s
milk.
the
and
a
beyond
males
One
of the
summarized
milk.
milk!
In
men
simply
major
this
hour!
was
the
hours,
information
especially
not
days
would
because
every
few
people. . .).
Now—again—this
cows.
from
pregnant
And
(I
was
Well,
cows
not
after
to
drinking
grocery
testosterone
estrogen
study
tested
weeks.
investigate,
actually
be
drink
one
of
estrogen.
entirely
“natural”—it
unnaturally,
lacked
changes
Long-term
to
“natural”
that,
store
researchers
of cow
valuable
people
used
significant
the
the
only
went
estrogens.
study
was
the
hour
or
be
many
hours
from
still
they
“testosterone
standard
milk.
Unfortunately,
measurements
and
boys
after
problem
levels
high
milk.
significant
to high
high
whole
out cow
of this
1
was
the
due
of all the
tested
conclusion,
that
reduction
found
statement:
within
This
study’s
maintained
But
not
purchased
also
urine
in men”.
occurred
store
were
frank
find
drinking
urinating
findings
decreased
the
within
after
milk-fast.
by
One
in
the
long-term
in the
tested
and,
researchers
researchers
estrogens
boys
decrease
arise
exorbitantly
milk,
in grocery
the
they
significantly
has
other
the
estrogen
of cow
underwent
milk
all the
(3)
key:
men
These
it with
then,
levels
and
Problems
of cow
estrogen
and
(2)
farmers
collect this pregnancy
hormone-ridden
surprisingly
levels
problems.
pregnant-cow
high
levels
continue
to
milk
health
milk
those
It
continue
was
came
to
be
milked
was
not
during
in our
testicles
in
ovaries
are
artificial
estrogenic
men
bodies,
and
obvious
estrogen—but
targets, too.
impacted
by
example,
research
article
testicular
tissue:
receptors
and
spermatogenesis.”
“targets”
of
here
is a
about
i
The
estrogen—and
regulate
11
here
impact
on
sperm
is created,
in fact,
is one
by
of males
First,
you
from
recent
receptors
through
in
specific
essentially
in the
how
a
development
are
saying
testes.
testes
and
is
Estrogen
function,
how
and how testes
develop.
of the
ways
males
are
estrogenics
feminization
act
testes
have
an
quote
“Estrogens
can
you
from
women.
estrogen
is a “player”
key
blood
transaction
originates
in
estrogen
what
mainly
from
testicles
are
actually
In other words,
testicles are
researchers
“feminized”
dropping
out.
ovaries
that
much
That,
estrogen
estrogen.
an
the
the
synthetic.
is
male
testosterone
to estrogens?
Let’s find
Testosterone,
What
pregnancy—but
“Made-in-China”
So
why
exposure
For
late
but
we’ll
investigate
shortly.
need
to
realize
is that
circulation
estrogen
at play here.
What
and
does
there
is
a
testosterone
this
mean,
ask?
Well,
cholesterol-derived
steroid
hormones,
steroids—the
remember,
is
definition
that
they
of
derive
from cholesterol—need
to be circulated
through
our
bodies.
How can they circulate?
More
specifically,
how
do
your
body?
Surprisingly,
estrogen
this
and
is
not
testosterone
a
trivial
travel
question.
around
Think
about
are
it for
like
a
second:
cholesterol.
testosterone
They
and
“fear”
water.
“hydro
• phobic”.
And if you add
estrogen
to a glass
of water—or
way—the
hormones
adding
butter
Testosterone
mix
So
do
around
your
properly
with
SHBG
Both
or
or
well.
how
(sex
will
oil
these
is
term
into
water
testosterone
and
into
steroid
is
where
testosterone
98%
is
it
and
stuff
not
free
accessible,
stuff.
travel
mix
that’s
how.
to
Proteins
and,
as
long
interesting.
Of
your
riding
and
therefore,
protein,
in
SHBG,
SHBG
is literally,
all over
it” (the
estrogen. . .
as
they
the
limo
the
total
blood,
the
so
about
limo.
That
“free”.
This is where
the
term
is derived.
Free testosterone
is
bound
Therefore,
won’t
can’t
bind
fine
SHBG,
like
water.
simply
they
protein.
sugars
gets
of
globulin),
just
be
blood?
a SHBG
classes.
to
leaves
2% or so
“free testosterone”
the
if
estrogen
bound
would
“glycoprotein”).
are
snuggling
service of the
Here
or
the
hormones
testosterone
scientific
testosterone
blood,
by
blood
hormone-binding
sugary
“it has
do
and
“water-based”
and
are
glass
important
which is a huge
“sugary”,
as in
go
a
bloodstream
your
They
This
to
estrogen
estrogen
sugars
float.
estrogen
to
SHBG
testosterone
is
in
the
your
most
blood.
useable,
Your muscles
need some testosterone?
“Free T” is
where
it’s at. Your brain?
Free T to the
rescue.
Accordingly,
not
only
testosterone
ranges
testosterone”
numbers
of
do
T
are
you
overall,
especially
want
but
optimal
your
important.
“free
Estrogenics,
importantly,
limo around
your
This
gives
consideration:
rise
to
another
important
how much artificial estrogen
blood
is
Even
consider
“weakly
also
ride
the
and
how
substances
estrogenic”
much
is
that
some
can
scientific
in your
“bound”
have
to
do
scientists
damage
today
Additionally,
a
exposures
in
even
larger
problem
to estrogenics
testosterone.
According
to
medical
contraception
causes
testosterone]
because
. In
other
one
your
example
useable
words,
unexpectedly
both
down!
This further
healthy
more
of higher
men
50%
has
our
Plastic
levels
T
on
of SHBG
” 8
which
just
past
confirmed
could
And
floodgates
in Part
soon,
is
way,
if you
you
are
and
why
the
Estrogeneration.
of
[i.e.
your
sperm
in
be
we’ll
3.
our
blow
likely
T
counts
in
by
years.
This
various
ways
new
open
are
free
dropped
50
number
of studies.
Especially
has been
found
in younger
Generation
levels
androgens
correspondingly
been
our
in
estrogenics,
in
because
oral
another
bound
have
than
most
IRS
10 List— decreases
levels and your
overall
put
light
detail
“Conventional
contraception,
to
your
sheds
observation
by a
semen
decline
Or,
yourself
bringing
alter
research:
a
a
arises
directly
oral
levels!
body,
when they
are
more
considering.
from
the
testosterone
testosterone
exposing
your
aren’t
to
scientists
large impacts
on our health and bodies
are “free” in high percentages.
12 They
free
SHBG
bloodstream.
“free”
SHBG?
can
poor
men,
quality
too. 13
name.
the
Or
fertility
Furthermore,
free
recognizing
testosterone
that
explains
estrogenics
why
lower
moo-juice
lowered
male testosterone,
in case you wondered
earlier.
Finally, there is also good
evidence
that
estrogen
and
testosterone
shortening
each
with
testosterone,
protect
age. 14
The
therefore,
DNA
lowering
elucidates
from
of
how
free
artificial
estrogenics
may
you’ll remember
speed
up the aging
process,
we saw specific
examples
of
as
this
accelerated
in Chapter
2 with
and
also
light
aging
parabens.
you
It
are
will
about
Hormonal
males”.
of Our
time
to
scientists
This
estrogenic
exposures
is a serious
is
the
What
and
our
sex
to
our
heavy
declines
of males”
sidelined
both
and
is the
problems
sexual
on
the
sounds,
here.
testes
issues
and
arising
are
first
and
merely “male” or
emerge
hormone
have
Ominously,
been
a
hot
topic
“feminization
of
testosterone
“feminization
not
exposures
rather than
problematic
women.
To
girls
Exposures
concern.
as
are
means
everyone’s
to
things
ovaries.
that
estrogenic
“hormonal”
The
about
to as
related
Estrogen—remember—acts
on
BPA
other
Estrogenic
talk
refer
issue
As exclusive
women
both
on
to discover.
Side-Effects
Now,
it’s
phenomenon
and
shed
because
levels.
And
they
from
foremost
“female”.
mess
with
estrogenics
nevertheless,
seem
unique
but,
equally
hormonal
illustrate
effects
on both
men
and
this, let’s begin
with
young
puberty.
the
shifting.
onset
On
of puberty
average,
in our
puberty
society
today
has
is
coming-on
far
documented
history
extreme
Puberty
and
major
when
15
and,
older
boys
there
arising
or
girls.
are
from
called
unnaturally
ever
by
men
the
of
“Andro-”
surplus
male
start
early-onset
puberty
is
problems
Like
a
thing
is
female’s
word
in
an
body.
for male.
girls
due
a
is
stressor
essentially
a
It
younger
a
health
girls.
is
instance,
is also
in
more
a girl.
for
which
the Greek
hormones
is
pursuing
in
in
normal
for
concomitant
puberty
hormone
is simply
of
male
before
puberty
“hyperandrogenism”,
excess
this
adjustment,
Early
early
before
far,
stressful
psychological
and younger
for parents.
Next,
than
in girls than boys. 16
that
arrives
years
unusually
a
earlier
This
to
well-documented
side-effect.
Hyperandrogenism
Artificial
estrogen
interactions,
more
than
the
one
hormones
stemming
know
what
can
abilities.
too. 17 18
We could
is:
first
side
point.
must
can
through
early
the
agonist”
know
complicated.
way
To
go
place?
related
“partial
you
be
from
why
a
and
estrogen
receptor
ways,
estrogenics
regulating
other
but
interactions
the direct
unhealthy
up
interact in various
ways with the
Scientists
have terms
for these
like “agonist”
“antagonist”,
these
brings
estrogens
receptor.
with
add
be
our
even
many
sudden
shift
are
variable
interact
in
in
testosterone
complexity,
by
estrogenics,
other
but
that
more
impacted
puberty
is
only
Not
disruptions
can even
and
health
what
issues
I want
in puberty
age
to
in
Well,
here
is
attempting
a
to explain
Estrogenic
consideration
shown
from
medical
and
affected
that
system
by
Environmental
endocrine
disrupters
estrogenlike
products
species
environmental
chemical
with
the
known
as
endocrine
endocrine
pollutants
acting
estrogens
are
of hormones
have
animal
include
that
into
since
studies
some
interfere
and are
disrupters.
form
be
taken
puberty]
epidemiological
humans
adversely
substances
[hormone]
journal,
this phenomenon:
and
that
in the
a
pollutants
must
[for
early-onset
environmental
are
quote
universally
used
in
as
and
present
stockbreeding,
chemicals
employed
in industry
and
agriculture,
and substances
naturally
contained
in plants
and
cereals
. 15
So,
today,
we
are
ladies
all
being
pollution”
from
leads to run-on
published
The
swamped
boys
by
professional
concern
title of that
thelarche
thelarche”
gentleman,
and
estrogenic
over
paper,
by
and environmental
is the premature
science
“estrogenic
the
way,
girls,
“body
our surrounding
environments.
sentences
like the one above
in
expressing
and
This
being
journals,
pollutants”.
is
“Premature
pollutants”.
“Premature
onset of female
breast
development.
It
has
also
parabens
been
for
discovered
example,
act
that
directly
estrogenics,
on
the
like
pituitary
gland. 19
The
pituitary
gland
is considered
a
“master
regulator”
of many
hormones
in children
and
adults.
Undoubtedly
to
high
due
levels
therefore,
of
artificial
at
least
in large
estrogens
in
part,
our
environment,
early
onset
of
puberty
become
extremely
In fact,
medical
early puberty
has become
doctors
are
considering
“normal”
of puberty
Changing
testosterone
the
age
has
range!
vitamin
D).
changing
So,
we
have
have
and
it or
not,
this
undergone
sub
optimal
have
been
set
for
based
on
our
recommendations
culture’s
“average
offices / classrooms
boys
undergone
precedents
“normal”
that
the
have
sub
optimal
“normal”
vitamin D
ranges
(hint:
both
Believe
already
recommendations
so common
changing
for
re-adjustment
(remember:
we
levels of testosterone).
Similarly,
re-adjustments
recently
common.
age-range
girls. 20
has
levels
of
people”;
people
who
sit
indoors
most days. Hurray
in
for
average!
And
before
we
estrogenics,
further
you
might
heck
would
any
promote
modifying
earth
would
age-range
Well,
be
sexual-assaulting
wondering:
why
the
right-minded
lab
or
doctor
the puberty
age-range?
Why on
someone
want
to
adjust
the
puberty
younger?
moving
makes
(“early
incriminate
the
puberty
age-range
a host
of
increasingly
onset
puberty
[disorder]”
thelarche”
or
immediately
“healthy”
“premature
disappear.
younger
common
issues
or
“premature
adrenarche”
Voila,
our
etc.)
society
is
again.
If the age range
was
changed,
for example,
it
would no longer be considered
legally or medically
“abnormal”
or
puberty
at age
should
be
“pathologic”
7—despite
considered
when
the
girls
obvious
abnormal.
fact
Young
entered
that
this
children
are
simply
So,
kids
not
are
clearly
ever. Are
really ?
the
Absolutely.
In
21
prepared
to start
entering
estrogenics
fact,
incriminates
a
BPA,
mycoestrogen
having
children.
puberty
really
single
to
earlier
blame,
scientific
phthalates,
in “precocious
than
I
mean
review
atrazine,
paper
and
ZEA
puberty”—“precocious”
being
another
way
of saying
“early-onset”
puberty.
And there are many studies about
(alkylphenols)
affecting
and
soy
List
estrogenic
way
when
onset
(e.g. 23 ), etc.
is
able
thoroughly
of
In fact,
to
puberty
every
alter
(e.g. 22
single
puberty
investigated
for
APEs
IRS
in
)
10
some
scientifically.
Now let’s move our discussion
a few years
down
the line. Let’s look at college enrollment
and
then
shift
In
focus
1950,
entirely
to males
about
70%
undergraduate
male. 24
was
around
Next, by 1980, undergraduates
were
and women.
By 2006,
undergraduates
equally
were
very
nearly
While
the
trend?
I was
doing
in fact,
present:
enrolled
way,
Ave
male
there
3,691
Maria
were
more
the
that
increasing
slightly
Well,
I realize
But
I also
think
60%
Ph.D.
female.
at Boston
number
than
University
number
University,
more
than
60%
women
women
than
men
were
That
people
Meanwhile,
estimates
first,
and
my
at BU. 25
is more
this
students
60%.
men
40%
1970,
this chapter.
were
Noticing
By
of
to finish
while
US
this
every
the
of women,
entire
study
by
body
the
of
I attended!
Department
gender
gap
year. 25
of
will
What
Education
continue
is going
on?
this is complicated.
to merely
say
“it’s
complicated”
is
a cop-out.
visible
Women
in society,
as we see
from merely
A
have
become
certainly,
but
more
it goes
a notable
imbalance
a few years ago.
contributing
factor
boys
and
men
man,
but
many—have
here,
around
I believe,
us—not
that’s
fine.
But
sports
including
basketball,
more
soccer
are
the
Frankly,
all on
apathy
is
even
not
Sax
titled
Boys
presents
and
Adrift
detailed
environmental
into
portion
contributing
factor
sea
is the
otter
12,900
average
To
study
it
countries.
via
27
grimaced
Estrogenic
I personally
This
many
term
“norm”
on
of
many
years
bodies,
“feminization
including
Dr.
Sax
forget
the
4:
today
everything.
attempted
of my
chemical
found
especially
Dr.
“nucleus
Further,
a
Don’t
were
males
for
Edge.
apathy,
and
raised
my
own
pollution is hard to avoid.
never
26
at in Chapter
estrogenics,
Brains,
and
Girls
male
of paraben
brain.
we
boys’
issues,
estrogens.
looked
frankly,
“feminized”
for
we
and
in
shrinking
male brain.
to overall
artificial
nanograms
sea otter
put
the
of the
or
topic
overall,
I
Dr. Leonard
Sax’s
“motivation”
examinations
accumbens”
argues,
analyses
boy
baseball,
historical
and
many
us can
attest
and
if
you
enrollment
males.
Regarding
this
specific
recommend
that you check out
books
single
in America.
a
opposite
apathetic
football,
decline
that
is that
every
become
and
beyond
today
indifferent
in recent
years. Many
of
to
this
from
personal
experience
disagree,
active
are
in
where
in
the
being
developed
And,
yes,
hand
here.
Furthermore,
estrogenic
avoidance
life.
of
males”,
you
should
I
know,
is not
at all my
everywhere
are
homemade
using
this
term.
phrase,
sounding
alarm. In fact,
scientific studies
the term has become
so let’s dig deeper.
The
disruptions
to
hormonal
have
a
unique
compared
to
from
females.
This
common
factor
goes
discuss
physical
the
estrogenics
anti-motivating
sex-drive
issues
we’ll
talking
here
about
a
Scientists
in
seem
in
males
beyond
the
shortly.
Again,
I’m
neurological
[brain]
change.
In the
scientific
favorite
research,
protein:
(BDNF).
it begins
brain-derived
When
I
with
my
neurotrophic
studied
Alzheimer’s
often
call
You need to
to believe
cells
are
dosed
growths—
when
with
brain
BDNF,
stalks,
these
branches,
factor
disease,
learned
that
researchers
“Miracle-Gro
for the brain”.
it but
all-time
BDNF
see
this
growing
cells
in dishes
sprout
everything
I
new
—like
an
exploding
or fast growing
tree. Exercise
releases
massive
dose of BDNF,
by the way—especially
children—but
that’s
a different
story
for
a
a
in
different
day.
In
a
study
of
rats, BDNF
network-like
behavior”.
Steroid
28
another
in
male
What
was
receptors.
how
the
to “act
affect
BDNF
And
on
male
in a concerted,
[motivational]
“networked”
the
male
young
study
steroid
with?
specifically
receptors
the so-called
“homeostasis”
of
was impacted
by estrogenics.
all connected
In
impacts
was discovered
manner
to
illustrated
therefore
motivation
estrogenic
and
behavioral
This
was
to BDNF!
study
rats”,
about
“ motivation
researchers
found
and
cognition
“ estrogenic
functions
may
young
male
play
behavior
been
previously
connection
to
unrelated
factor.
Let’s
I
into
want
is
prominent
role
development
also
be
research
the
to
not
sensationalizing
literally
and
it could
science
move
First,
males”
more
in
than
has
assumed.”
29 Seeing
the
possible
college
enrollment?
It could
be
but
The
a
dating
suggests
term.
This
of
contributing
the
latter.
scene.
reiterate
my
thousands
a major
that
own,
is
“feminization
of
home-brewed,
a
term
used
hot-off-the-press
by
scientific
articles.
“Fish
are
adequate
sentinels
effects,”
published
judges
one
in 2015, 30
sexually
deformed
Chapter
Why
4 near
are
fish
scientific
reminding
whitefish
Bern,
for
feminization
journal
us
of
we
article,
those
looked
at
Switzerland.
“sentinels”—like
measuring
devices
sensors—for
male
basically
“breathe”
feminization?
In essence,
the
estrogenics
in
environment
observed
Painted
crisis.
as we
turtles
have
a
Recently,
these
turtles
throughout
similar
at
BPA. 31 And,
was
unshelled
least
when
like the
One
alterations,
gonad
and
developmental
were
exposed
above,
this
to
finding
new
examples
of
reality and problem
feminization.
scientific
“urgent
discovered
in 2015.
Here
are
a few
more
hot
scientific studies that affirm the
of male
1.
feminization
been
they
fish study
or
fish
their
Part
male
have
to
have
unusual
hormonal
dysfunctions,
behavior
changes,
problems. . .
in
affair
group
[. . .]
begins
to
by
saying
restrict
that
the
it is
use
an
of
nonylphenol
harm
the
amphibians,
was written
the
fact
while
ethoxylates
[APEs]”
because
they
reproductive
systems
of
fish,
male
and mammals. 32 This, by the
way,
in a Chinese
journal,
commemorating
that
China
America
has
has
“Demasculinization
banned
many
not,
as we
saw
and
feminization
APEs
in Chapter
of male
by
atrazine:
consistent
effects
across
classes,” 33 reads
another
journal
title.
included
humans
and
making
it more
clear
ban
against
The
synonym
human
even
male
why
Europe
in the
atrazine
2.
gonads
vertebrate
This
study
gonad
has
impacts,
an
entire
atrazine.
used
study
for
male
feminization—namely,
“demasculinization”—is
also
seen
in an “Assessment
of
phthalates / phthalate
alternatives
in
title
article
of
an
journals
and,
children
artificial
And
children’s
published
in one
written
in 2015.
again,
exactly,
is male
Simple:
it’s hormones.
Steroid
hormones
time
they
are
These
effects,
unlike
estrogenic
male
It’s
dig
have
of
was
the
The
the
Nature
impact
our
effects
“Phthalates,”
Science
and
by
the
of
impact
behavior
nerve
says
another
of the
Total
occurring?
effects
each
signals.
many
These
elements
potentially
scientists
for
actual
time
reproductive
to
lower
into
our
bloodstreams.
are
long-term
effects
lightning-fast
strongly
called “harm”
deeper
into
and
feminization
thousands
unleased
to review,
development
long-term
the
which
is
especially
dramatic
because
hormone
“doses”
have larger impacts.
how,
rather
toys,” 34
for
a reason.
span
of
impacts
scientific
Environment,
in Part
journal
“have
of
life.
We’ll
these
3.
called
been
shown
to
possess
anti-androgenic
estrogenic
activity
[testosterone-lowering]
remember
adding
To
phthalates
finish,
let’s
this male
Regarding
male
by
the
from
look
testosterone
specifically
understand
at one
final
receptors
study
by
the
what
another
radio
up
Now
I’m
highly
specific
way
are
finding
that
this
location.
or
receptor.
testosterone
are
being
35
is
diminished
one
example
at APEs.
means,
analogy.
This
was
hormone—was
sent from
up
study?
plastic.
This
looking
27
chapter
because
of
feminization.
feminization
occurs.
testosterone,
scientists
estrogenics.
To
moo-juice
display
effects.”
This ties into the beginning
of the
lowering
testosterone
is a form
And
and
recall
where
a
one location
The
signal
the
radio
signal—the
and
picked
is picked
Testosterone
up
receptors
by
pick
“signals”.
Therefore,
lower levels of the testosterone
receptor,
due to estrogenics,
means
that even if you
have
perfect
be
able
This
levels
of testosterone,
to “pick
and apparently
To add insult
and
it up”
doubles-down
possibly
from
on
or use
our
also alters
to injury
the
this
exact
body
the
would
proper
modern
low
even
receptor.
effect
from
problem
estrogenics
block
Here
not
amount.
T
sex drive.
here,
certain
all estrogenics
binding
showing
your
testosterone
is
a
sunscreen
study
4-MBC.
36 That, I must say, is a good way to conclude
the menage
a trois of estrogenic
impacts:
they
decrease
your
testosterone
binding
testosterone,
receptors,
to its necessary
and
receptor
give
rise
block
in your
to
less
testosterone
body.
CHAPTER
7
Super-Cancer-Fragilistic-ExtraAllergy-Doses
It Begins
with
DURING
Your
ALLISON’S
TRAVELING
the
was creating
alone.
new
were
missing
something. . .
I began
for
and
life
good
saving
System
“ENDLESS
world
a
Things
ring
Immune
but
SEMESTER”
studying
for
myself
my
life
in Austria,
in
I
Boston. . .
was
definitely
somebody.
money
Allison.
and
I
also
bought
an
hatched
engagement
a
meticulous
wedding
proposal
plot that was so meticulous
had to be scrapped
at the last minute.
The
plan
from
began
Boston
in Florida
to Fort
for
her
included
some
scheduled
the
days
with
had
calls
most
no
an
after
semester.
Valentine’s
12 th . Allison
buying
Myers
final
phone
flight,
before
me
evening
flight
Allison
was
back
Simple.
The
plan
to college friends and
I
unsuspiciously,
for
two
Day—Thursday,
idea
it
I was
February
coming.
Or
was
I?
My
and
“perfectly
timed”
evening
then it was delayed
some
flight
more.
“It’s
already
I worried,
flight
epic
even
late
go
in the
through?”
proportions
based
From
the
airport,
Christa.
She
was
arranged
I
found
inducing
to keep
out
day,”
on
was
the
state
I called
“in”
on
Allison
later
insomnia
This
was
was
a
delayed
“will
the
problem
of
of my
Allison’s
everything.
nerves.
roommate
Christa
awake.
that
to
Christa’s
watch
what
strategy
for
turned-out
to
be
a
bizarre
“Brideshead
Revisited”.
watching
blankets.
As
with
the
more
the
bottom
and
Allison
Ironically,
Allison
like
the
I
movie
don’t
think
herself
encouraging
but
Allison
Meanwhile,
my
Behind
the
friend
Mike.
me
no
I
He
furry
to
didn’t
want
to “just
keep
the
was
the
brand
and
to Mike,
become
Christa’s
movie
elated
that
the best way.
Allison
pulled
adios
through
in
around
to the
of this
unsung
new
the
arrived
transitioned
hero
seen
persisted
watching”.
finally
story
hero
shiny-red
no
not
and
14-minute
movie
chainsaw
pulling
into
February
even
sissy
to
some
the
13 th .
was
my
because
he
crotch-rocket
bars
on
good
there
the
back
bike.
thanks
already
ever
heroically
see
arose.
could
hopefully
rev
up
some
with Allison. In case you wonder,
backrest
of Mike’s
was
and
problem
She
she’d
flight
scenes,
his
bike
so
memories
So,
started
began
a fresh
Christa
midnight.
The 12 th had
Friday the 13 th .
was
Christa
dish
movie.
called
Christa,
therefore,
had to pretend
like
important
plot twist was
just around
corner.
lent
was
drinks,
popcorn
lamplight,
it
and
popcorn,
of the
more
didn’t
finish.
really
movie.
and
to Christa,
the
moments
suspicious
at
suspicions
on
a
romantic
we
this
2-hour
heard
a
She
had
point—due
insistences—and
her
and
the
ended,
Allison
her
driveway.
watching
a wintery
after
were
long-sleeve
63
confirmed
shirt—it
degrees—and
drove
nighttime
on
Mike’s
stinkler
air.
to
Allison
in
was
we
said
Red
Bull
My
surprise
destination
shark-infested
fishing
Lowdermilk.
A
Ph.D.
and
I proposed
scientist
reel
favorite
fireworking
beach,
said
of
“yes”.
mine
I
attach
suggested
ring
it in. Yet
our
and she
friend
Boston—Chris—had
engagement
was
to a fishing
as
much
as
line and
this
was
my proposal
was more
one-knee
ocean, sharp-toothed
predator
fish
shiny
things
and,
to attract
a fish.
Now,
those
for
for
the
sake
just
this
of you
who
of
the
After
parading
Allison’s
on
Friday,
we
about
the
10,000
Islands
As the
regular
and
a genius
Pat
idea,
the
to
looking
exaggerating
the
centrality
of our
did the
and
Allison
I’m
ring-finger
geared-up
have
I wasn’t
think
shark fishing in the selection
you need to know what we
the
normal.
In
are attracted
once,
story
in
left
of
favorite beach,
next day.
around
campus
for
land
the
O’Donnell’s
shark
of
nets.
leader of the Fishing Club, I had become
a
on biologist
Pat O’Donnell’s
shark-tagging
expeditions,
so
strings
arranged
and
I
had
pulled-some
for
an
monofilament
engagement-day-night
trip.
The trip would go like this: O’Donnell
would
leave
at sunset,
dinghy
boat attached
to his houseboat.
He
would
islands
weave
and
determined
hotspot,
out a
simply
the
every
net
through
sharp
that
we
on
floats
so
the
arrived
houseboat
wait
of
mangrove
When
the smaller
nets.
Next,
bobbing—using
often—or
maze
bars.
had
we would use
series
of long
wait
the
oyster
until
O’Donnell
at
a
boat to string
we would
all
we
either
a flashlight
until
we
shark
heard
to
saw
check
violent
splashing
Upon
noises.
pulling
shark,
we
houseboat
would
up
our
the
we
into
captured
catch
the
we
more.
caught
a bonnethead
shark
several
from
the
shooting
tarpon
stars.
roll
night—they
on
the
were
drove
me
too
surface
in
smart
to
to wonder:
will I
my
first tarpon?
Based
full-time
in
seemed
more
insurmountable
a
goal
but
shifty
One
go
we
a net—which
ever
Those
see
that
ever
catch
Boston,
it
than
and
watching
would
spotlights
swim
a
genus—and,
overall, Allison and I had
times lounging
on the upper
deck
of
houseboat,
the
containing
trip,
notably
hammerhead
the best of
Also,
shark
engagement
sharks—most
the
net
would put it in a pool of water in
and do sciencey
things.
After that,
release
For
a
some
silver
thing
many
old
wounds
never
truly
heal.
monsters!
people
do
not
know
is
that
scientists
find the
shifty and elusive.
immune
system
to be extremely
Immunologists
find research
far
more
than
challenging
experimental
system.
study
them,
disruptions
Specifically,
might
unique
when
expect
to
due
the
to
immune
immunologists
try
to
immune
cells, they agitate them,
dismember
and make them behave
abnormally.
Immune
cells
resist,
they
function.
All 3
told
one
you
attack,
Nobel
me
of
It’s
laureates
react,
like
I’ve
eaten
the same thing. I asked
my
favorite
questions:
newest
frontiers,
about,
in science
different
and
new
sharks.
It’s
how
a mess.
or
areas
today?”
frontiers
we
They
but
they
lunch
with
have
them
individually
“What
are
the
know
listed
all
very
off
a
included
little
couple
the
immune
system
immune
answering
system
is
a
my
future
question.
frontier
because
it is more mystifying
and
than the average
person
realizes.
Furthermore,
immune
will
like
system
talk
and
about
The
#4.
“lymph”
like your
our
target
certainly
cells.
To try
this
Lupus
and
to
Exactly
blood
we
we
to
the
circulating
our
this
clear
and
as
well.
have
that
circulates
system
remains
interact,
collide,
to understand
and
cells.
as important.
have
traced
immune
cells,
our
example:
and
what’s
immune
why
cells
estrogenics
but
conflict
going
estrogenic
those
for example,
on “lymphoid
a mystery
and
It
color
but
your
body
just
how
way
specific
more
adds
in our lymph. Researchers,
estrogenics
interact
directly
estrogens
one
This
immune
scientists
back
cells”. 1
behave
the
ostentatious
blood-red
runs all throughout
blood
Regrettably,
circulating
find that
but
about
stuff
includes
destruction
We
cancer.
to forget
doesn’t
have that
it’s there.
Lymph
just
inseparable.
Dysfunction
it is easy
Lymph
are
cancer. . .
Let’s start with lymph.
As much
as we hear
colorless
the
Things
Immune
bodies,
understood
betrothal,
soon
of
of curing
7 Deadly
less
science
learn
about
immune
system
more we discover
and learn about
involvement
challenge
in
strange
cancer
cancer
discover
and
dysfunction,
the
the
some
The
with
on
system,
estrogenics
immune
with
let’s
artificial
start
with
lupus.
is a strange-sounding,
chronic,
autoimmune
disease
that
immune
occurs
when
systems—eat
our
us.
Yes,
lupus,
own
the
eating
organs
can
be
or
otherwise
natural
and
are
pregnancy
lupus
attacks
“estrogenic
Wait.
That
We
statement
is
you
clear
We’ll
Meanwhile,
associated
make
the
as
But
we
of
both
find
way,
that
as
immune
look
in
with
studies
testosterone-blocking
how
have
it goes.
them—a
philosophy
estrogenic
and
immune
frequently
to
occurs
estrogenics
eat
are
joints”,
or,
are
suppressing
or cancer
cells to
at this yin-yang,
drugs
Immune
discover
“those
cells
further
mud.
that’s
rules,
conversely,
“those
estrogenics
immune
cells to allow infections
grow”.
been
at the same
time?
It
that also contains
sleep
stimulation / suppression
stimulating
have
immunosuppressive
drowsy.
also
bad
and
is
2
science.
Researchers
a
cells
they
especially
and
principle
in
immune
bacteria
process
healthy.
because
is
fundamental
system
ups”
because,
according
to
researchers,
hormones
possess
both
to make
don’t
“flare
normally,
stimulation
and suppression
sounds
like drinking
coffee
meds
your
flares. 2
immunostimulating
properties.”
go
like
lupus
normally
lupus
immune
that
things
invading
“chewing”
involved
to cause
Indeed:
So-called
Remember:
The
characters
include
chewing-up
you—so
the
Estrogenics
shown
joints.
horrific.
would
be
virus—not
may
bodies—our
eat.
cells are
like little Pac-Man
around
devouring
things.
In
own
also
“activate”
shortly.
shown
lupus.
that
In
fact,
testosterone-blockers
Apparently,
kill
immune
mice
that
system
place
but
critical
there
it is. This
interplay
estrogenics
we
downs”
pregnancy
of
(and
in the
“Pregnancy,
begins
a
one
immune
negatively
That’s
to attack
your
due
of
unborn
estrogenics,
been
“ups
system
during
changes.
estrogen
“affects
that
chapter.
who
has
a series of
high
want
too
and
previous
levels,”
the
permit
fetal
cell-mediated
won’t
at
to hormonal
paper,
system
to
modulating
You
smacks
immune
period
research
good.
Artificial
the
beyond)
is
testosterone
Furthermore,
as
any
woman
pregnant
will confirm,
there are
and
3
grey
squeakers.
with lupus in the
also
between
discovered
lupus.
“self-attack”
much
for immune-compromised
I’m not sure how they get mice
first
have
maternal
development,
immunity.”
4
your
immune
other
hand,
system
baby.
on
the
are
not
good. They scam this process,
confusing
immune
cells.
This
helps
explain
the
our
poor
“chemical
abortions”
with
doses
and
we
of
the
noted
estrogenics.
immune
life or death
This
seems
brought
equation,
like
a
substance.
foods
Therefore,
DES
by
contributes
previous
saw
increased
DES may
today
but
it
representing
to
both
estrogenics
our
how
revisit
risk
for
not be so
is
all
be
a
DES
chapter,
DES
high
hormones
can
once-common
also
weight-gains
and
And, to reiterate:
via
a
this
We
occur
in other words.
good
time
to
In
up
which
Disrupting
system
(diethylstilbestrol).
our
earlier,
we
estrogenic
can
cause
depression.
common
in
certainly
estrogenic.
other
estrogenics,
understanding
of
immune
system
dysfunctions.
Researchers
studying
DES
do
not
hesitate
to
label
it “immunotoxic”
systems”.
This
5 —or
“toxic
to
our
immune
is
strong
language
for
nerdy
scientists
professional
and
believe
me.
Other
studies
of DES
add
academic
the
journals,
disturbing
news
that
developing
immune
systems—infant’s
and
children’s
immune
systems—are
at greater
risk than
immune
systems
DES
of
the
exposure.
immune
systems
impacts
from
lasting
allergy
for
In
other
words,
are
likely
to have
years.
immunotoxicity
estrogenic
issues, too. This
rates—allergies
forms—we’ve
recent
adult
6
been
helps
and
following
your
children’s
greater
exposures
negative
and
more
explain the ever-rising
sensitivities
of
all
experiencing
in
America
in
7
Soy,
too,
human
has
been
immune
investigated
Researchers
studied
system.
in
Soy
regarding
children’s
in a 2003
edition
Pediatrics
and
Child
Health
consumption
in
“There
increasing
is an
infancy
regards
has
even
of
that
paper
phytoestrogens”.
would
anyone
was
“Soy,
infant
Once
again,
I have
add
soy
to infant
recent
an
estrogenic
[. . .]
title
and
ask:
why
formula?
ZEA
(zearalenone),
from
fungus
and
moldy grains,
is another
“immunotoxic”
“Zearalenone,
reports
to
The
formula,
to
soy
saying:
that suggest
adverse
effects
with respect
immune
function
and thyroid
disease.” 8
of
been
about
childhood,
number
the
immune
systems.
of the Journal
of
comment
and
to
mycotoxin,
things
like
substance.
is
an
immunotoxic
of
yet
compound”
another
is the
science
when
scientists
that, you can
bluntly
research
written
report.
title
4
And
are crafting
titles of papers
be certain
that “immunotoxicity”
like
is
well-established.
Despite
all
Regarding
this,
ZEA
there
and
is
some
good
immunotoxicity,
one
news.
fascinating
study found that one species
of probiotic
bacteria
neutralized
the estrogenic
ZEA. 9 Fascinatingly,
the
researchers
“Tunisian
found
This
shows,
can
actually
other
less
again,
protect
rats.
and
rats
too,
in
are,
at
considered
fish are
exposed”
Let’s
from
one
Remember
how
estrogenic?
Well,
equal
not
oral
at two
red
after
surprisingly,
of studies
here 10 ).
in
mice
for
of
(a
and
example,
immunity
in
atrazine
exposures.
have
been
found
strangely.
is
in fish 13 —but
they
hmm.
are
11
in
12
contraception,
an exception
because
to EE2 unlike us. . .
look
soy
against
matters!
bacteria
study,
to females,
“immunotoxic”
briefly
bacteria
against
least
suppression
compared
EE2
gut
in a number
can be found
immunotoxic,
significant
Even
gut
protect
quality
fighting
infections
due
to
And
greater
“suppressions”
male
in
impacts.
BPA
Researchers
discuss
healthy
They
higher
called “immunotoxic”
2015 scientific review
Atrazine—also
that
you.
estrogenic
Phthalates
bacterium
protect your immune
system
And the probiotic
species
words,
adverse
probiotic
butter”.
once
and flax, they
mold estrogen.
In
this
artisanal
now
of course,
“constantly
final estrogenics.
food
coloring
reminding
us
that
dye
is
in
the
past
50
years,
increased
by
over
paper 14 say
stealth
mode
immune
that
to
author
dye
500%,
use
And,
just
in
researchers
these dyes
circumvent
system”.
journal
junkie.
synthetic
yes,
foods
has
authoring
this
are “able to act in
and
disrupt
the
a
professional
sounded
like
a
science
video
game
Wow.
To close, a scientific review of APEs
(alkylphenols)
and “immune
system
modulation”
starts with
this
sentence:
“The
increased
in
prevalence
recent
accumulate
in
associated
with
of
allergic
decades.
the
human
the
diseases
[APE’s. . .]
body
adverse
has
tend
and
to
may
effects
of
be
allergic
diseases.
Recently,
new evidence
has supported
the
importance
of alkylphenols
in the in vitro
allergic
response.”
15
Evidence
“Disturbing
the
accumulating
even
our bodies.
This
brings
up
commonly
is not
the
always
APEs
Immune
as
true,
makes
especially
system.
are
interesting
“dose
As
are
System
APEs
an
touted
immune
that
we
is
accumulating
in
allergic
Curdling
The
diseases
are
Your
Blood
7 Deadly
Things
on
the
arising
before
estrogenics
As
you
clearly
the
“mega-money”
phrase
the
context
and
of
are
accumulate
or
still wondering
rise?
(Clots)
#5. Blood Clotting
Let’s
briefly
overview
from
the
The
earlier
seeing
again here,
estrogenics
can
build-up
within our bodies. Are we
why
point.
poison”
within
saw
of
Peace”
side
the
guilty
know
by
corporate
blood
clotting
moving
now,
into
estrogenics
category.
And
issues
cancer.
are
while
in
I
find
myself
tempted,
control—which
here,
to
is specifically
sold
artificial
plastics,
estrogen—the
fragrances,
money
food
colorings,
and
crop
In
Chapter
chemical
3—mainly
of money—I
held
on various
(COI) and
reviewed
a study
for
the
claim
an
authors
for
title of
involved
it is
illustrate
these
influences
workshop
conflicts-of-interest
in Chapter
3, we
phytoestrogen
“risk
the
risk
an
trail
extends
to
products,
artificial
indicated
made
birth
sprays.
disease
“potential
of
awareness-boosting
that
heart
only
because
aspects
of scientific
hidden agendas.
Also
“potential”
fact,
to
think
bold
has
reduction”.
and
reduction”
16
In
controversial
within
the
very
their
paper.
How
can
estrogenics
in blood
clotting
if they
reduce
be
heart
disease?
First,
you
qualified
may
their
remember
assertion
the middle of the
never
see it. They
heart
protection
later
long
after
that
they
with
soy
products
Despite
disease
that
risk
scientific
studies
strokes,
various
7 Deadly
thread
For
readers
should
load
publication,
probably
up
to protect
uphold
increase
are
so
estrogenics
in the
scientists
in
their
their
already
pantries
tickers.
carefully-worded
opinion
about
reduction,
I can tell you that
Estrogenics
and
the
paper,
where
most people
will
qualified
their statement
about
concluded
more
that
the
blood
other
opposite
clots,
heart
embolisms.
heart
most
view.
attacks,
These
issues
common
and
so
collective
among
that blood clotting, therefore,
made The
Things
list. There
is definitely
a
common
here.
instance,
together
with
breast
cancer—an
eye-opening
topic
shortly—blot
clots
side-effect
In
fact,
from
a
are
the
generally
which
estrogen-therapy.
means
can
17
clots
patient
has
wide-ranging
may
would
an
and
show
find
hearts—as
in
up
a
you
thrombophilia.
tendency
blood
clots,
people’s
to
therapy
too.
The
brains—as
arise
around
people’s
attack—or
back
oral
you
elsewhere.
as 1984,
medical
contraception
a
patients
emerged
with
18
clotting
outlandish
thrombocytopenic
that
people
thrombophilia,
bad
when
called
in
estrogen
issues
regarding
oral contraception
EE2 as well. Specifically,
I’m
clots
provoked
with
Even as far
considering
Non-thrombophilia
with
exists
increased
in a heart
“suspect”
common
find
in
discuss
most
issue,
stroke—or
find
Thrombophilia.
doctors
were
prominent
will
the
be
This
form blood clots.
The clots that doctors
are
we
birth control.
medical
condition
“thrombophilia”,
by
which
are
names
purpura”
found
have
been
containing
referring
to
like
“thrombotic
19 —which
in tiny blood
noted
estrogenic
conditions
means
blood
vessels.
And
we’re
just getting
started
with the
strange
names.
Using clinical trial research
from the
oral
contraception
“Physician
drug
drug
Yaz®,
Label”
from
includes
inflammation—“arterial
clots—and
more.
These
Reactions”
reactions
frequently
to
that
not
taking
oral
specifically
you
the
can
Yaz®
find
that
the
contraception
“thrombophlebitis”—vein
thromboembolisms”—artery
are all listed as “Adverse
the
Yaz®
contraception
told.
An
drug
and
users
analogous
are
are
chart
was
shown
near
the
end
of
Chapter
3
for
From that chart, the Yaz®
Adverse
Reactions
also
includes
“pulmonary
embolisms”—where
list
the
Alesse®.
arteries
in
the
lung
clot—and
“myocardial
saying
“heart
infarctions”—a
within
Now
it
include
the
might
specifically.
aware that
problem
seem
nearly
as
of
“cerebral
an
regarding
like
identical
Kariva®,
I’m
Cyclessa®,
“blood
arising
Yaz®
Adverse
blood
picking
for
these
clots
on
Yaz®
regarding
blood
other estrogenics.
even
considering
my
In
21
the
estrogenics
and
connection
between
Ortho-Cyclen®,
and
website.
fact,
weight
EE2
many
but
20
women’s
led to questions
donations
This
yourself
if you’re
really
the
actual
“Physician
on
serious.
has
warnings.
Ortho-Novum®,
drugs
is all very
contraception
clot”
Loestrin®,
others.
You can see for
that
interested.
I posted
Now,
way
And
I am. But you
should
also
be
the other EE2 oral contraception
drugs
Alesse®,
This
medical
blood
brain.
includes
Labels”
a
even
thrombosis”
related
found
by
emergency
condition
inside
the brain.
Oh,
and
“cerebral
Reaction—a
blocked
attacks”—and
hemorrhages”—an
from
bleeding
includes
become
let’s
as
of
issues
move
connection
gains
use
and
on
to
between
well
contraceptives
as
and
the
various
blood clotting issues, you would think hundreds
maybe
thousands
of studies
would
be done
or
on
IRS
or
10
List
thrombosis.
Surprisingly,
estrogenics
This
to
is low-hanging
however,
the
investigate
scientific
fruit
has
clotting
fruit.
not
been
picked.
Nothing
done
big-time
I could
find
has
like
ZEA,
been
or
even
You
atrazine
regarding
blood clotting problems.
will further
find the lack of research
in
this
area
appalling
2007
from
3
estrogenics
even
APEs,
in
on
that
once
was
you
made
different
hear
by
several
vein
What
did
common?
The
thromboses.
the
The
jeopardizing
How many
From
IV
22
saw
was
this
a
also
“Particle
release
from
of acute
venous
thromboses”.
in
infusion
into
undoubtedly,
same
In
their
arm
the
at one
problem
kids
get
“major
concern”
2007.
control estrogenic,
or they
birth
control,
on
top
Just
It’s
etiology
not good
news.
people
have
an
or
other?
compounded
that
are
of
one.
called
equipment:
is
in
phthalates.
time
blood
kids.
have
with
finding from that study was
just one study?
How many
IV put
and
that IV
resulting
clots.
material
the health of all children.
follow up studies were done?
and
those
Australia,
made
Germany
The
But
doctors
found
were
Blood
as
observation
medical
doctors
children
injection
tubing
doctors
an
countries—Belgium,
the USA. These professional
(intravenous)
insertions
into
in deep
this:
is
full
And,
when
of
birth
on various
forms of
the
plastic
tubing
estrogenics.
One
called
final
study
I
want
“phytoestrogens
sinus
thrombosis.”
23
isoflavones
and
brain
“alternative
medicine
you
as
a risk
It
blot
to
be
aware
of
for
cerebral
factor
centers
around
clots that arise
treatments”
using
is
soy
from
soy
isoflavones.
Just
please
say
“no”
if your
alternative
doc
tells
you
to
“No”
go
is
on
soy
the
correct
focus to cancer.
Estrogenics
and
The
cosmos
Yes:
and
too.
In
research,
I
have
especially
in the
treatment
always
find
antibodies
cancer.
Some
of these
is
money,
and
research.
For
US
with
this
lab
year
might
spent
see
salary
universities
and
reasons
Surgeries,
people
various
are
the
with
forms
of
amazing.
energy,
misplaced
within
past
around
cancer
5 years,
5 billion
I surround
about
this
But
is
at
there
everything
our
at
a
the
dollars
phrase
are
committee,
“needs”
found.
sounds
as
we
both
many
us
of getting
actual
only
stake,
around
odds
for
that’s
the
for
billions
seems
cancer.
be
extracted
without
in the
form
of a
disinterested
University,
half-a-mill
payments.
scientists,
increase
are
grant
money
why
money
can’t
“need”—written
all
for
research”.
much
This
of antibodies
telling
against
1-million-dollar
and
somehow
myself
sensationalism
has
beginning.
When
so
of
area
in
because
universities
skim over half of
money
for “overhead”.
So, if I was
a
research
shift
made
approaches.
misplaced
each
“cancer
quotes
grant
awarded
my
also
government
funding
anything.
Let’s
been
antibodies
misplaced
example,
“No”.
advances
about
there
for
is messy.
cancer
But
treatment
response.
of cancer
personalized
fact,
a
Cancer
incredible
cancer
as
to
The
a
justifiable
grant
to
a
discussed
earlier.
So
way
the
Everywhere.
harsh
but
it
is
the
current
system
operates.
today’s
scientists
And
must
go
“justify”
their
work
and
They
need
to emphasize
work
or they
get
Furthermore,
and
sent
the
doing
the
today.
why
I
“ball
field”,
that,
am
tired,
to
findings.
of their
playing-it-safe
experiments
secure
my
career
friend,
personally
playing
lengths
promotes
Hedging
bets
the
mundane
the
And,
great
mistake:
home.
same,
unfortunately,
to
no
“market”
their
the importance
system
else
is
doing.
sensationalizing
make
hard
path
is one
not
out
and
everybody
and
findings
on
then
is,
in
science
of the
reasons
that
academic
wearing
my
team’s
cap,
cleats,
and
tight
pants.
It’s too bad,
because
I do look amazing
in tight pants.
Next,
there
above,
is
a
the
double-dipping.
lot
money”—cancer
of
or
As
I
indicated
government
otherwise—is
too,
“research
actually
detouring
the research
and
ending
up in university
bank
accounts.
Strangely,
much
of
the
government
research
money
in some
form
For
instance,
also
goes
average
is supposedly
over
for
commercial
Marcia
Angell, 25
me
I have
that
but
friends
they
to the
government
cost
to bring
or other.
the
market
inflated
And
back
still:
have
to
$2.5 billion. 24 This
reasons
according
costs
in biotech
literally
a drug
are
who
filled
exorbitant.
have
entire
is
to
informed
semi-trucks
with
paperwork
for a single
FDA
“New
Drug
Application”.
Today
of course,
the drug
companies
crash
computer
truckloads
of paper
Everybody
is trying
servers
but
rather
than
waste
it’s still a dinosaur
to avoid
getting
sued
system.
in
every
direction
But
while
at least
truly
creative
non-profit
research
cancer
research
is a well-oiled
machine,
right?
people walking-for-the-cure?
Well,
as
the
non-profit,
“cancer
current
it irritates
research”
less than
research.
for
rather
To
that
ensure
I am
salary
their
you
that
via
solicitors
of
medical
dozens
literally
of
spending
actual
goes
cancer
to
the
“solicitation
cancer
the
me
research.
state
to
over
million.
of
in
raised
10
They
to
non-profit
indulge
America”
solicitors
$75.4
of
not—ironically—tempted
allow
Fund
million
a
years
some
total
and
ended
of
paid
up
giving
1.0% to actual cancer
research. 26 Oops.
story
with
the
“Breast
Cancer
Relief
Foundation”:
went
are
a
funding
funding
sensationalizing
“Cancer
exactly
Same
end
America
armies
of
are
or
than
cancer
research,
examples.
$86.8
to no
charities
campaigns”
The
President
me
in
All those
5% of their budgets
on
Most
of
their
money
executives
think
is stagnating.
to
“walk
2.2%
actual
for
of the
cancer
cancer
$63.9
research.
awareness”
million
they
Your
could
local
raised
annual
probably
be
named
the annual
“walk to fund more
solicitation
and raise executive
salaries”.
Not good.
At
least
they
have
that.
And
incredible
they
mission
are
statements,
politically
so
correct
there’s
(PC)
to
To go one step deeper,
here is a listing, from
CNN article reference
26 of a few non-profits
this
that
support.
made
over
of that
Recovery
1 million
to cancer
dollars
research:
Foundation”,
and
paid
the
“Children’s
0.7%;
the
less
than
5%
Cancer
“Children’s
Cancer
Fund
0.0%;
the
of
America”,
“Woman
to
4.6%;
“Project
Cure”,
Breast
Cancer
Woman
Foundation”,
0.3%; the “National
Cancer
Coalition”,
1.3%; and, finally, the “Hope
Cancer
Fund”, 0.5%.
Did
you
notice
course,
the
many
non-profits
0.0%?
other
do
this
It’s
cringeworthy.
non-science
same
thing
or
and
can
support
where
people
reputation
you
approval,
which
“the
government
best
Ok.
So,
and
exaggeration.
reliable
field
You
research?
big-picture.
that
You
verify
you
start
for
act
in
of The
Next,
you
have
to
find
thing
the
references
time
that
Furthermore,
really
at
the
studies
different
Estrogenics
Think
of
the
collective
Things.
assess
enough.
the
verification
because
and the estrogenics
the
quality
study. This is where
professional
reliable
references
are imperative.
good
find
using
approaches.
as
waste
what
research
ways.
7 Deadly
form
seen
you
multiple
same
similar
nature
be
looking
different
is
why
possible
by
are perfect
for this type
of
there are so many estrogenics
often
is also
do
you
This
rife with
it. How
do
look
and
smallest
How
the
experiments
This
is a mess,
get
of
government
“subsidiarity”—can
to such problems.
cancer
causes cancer?
Well,
as
always,
than
thing.
is the
is one
preferentially
are local, you
personally.
more
is a good
of government”—aka,
the smartest
solution
the
know
matters
non-cancer
this
many
reasons
you
might
consider
supporting
local work. When
things
Of
I read
of
background
I cannot
online
are
completely
devoid
at
ridiculously
high
of
each
and
stress
articles
all
references.
doses,
nearly
anything
can
matter
cause
in cancer
cancer,
factors
Finally,
are
The
important
the
better
time
important
The
#6.
and
biology
you
and
comprehend
the
disease
the
disease
more
you
can
judge
and as always,
I can
energy
“estrogenics
7 Deadly
to consider.
the
and
the context,
the
implications.
Hopefully,
you
especially
in animals
or humans
or
Is there potential for spin?
understanding
matters.
doses
studies.
Is the research
done
cells growing
in dishes?
These
so
by
highlighting
+ cancer”
the
save
the
most
research.
Things
Cancer
So, like we did for
review
what cancer
estrogenic
impact.
All
of
types
etc.—arise
hormones
is, briefly.
cancers—lung
because
and receptors,
let’s
Then
we’ll look
at
cancer,
DNA
(or
breast
epiDNA
cancer,
but
let’s
not
go there
yet) ends
up
We’re
not talking about
with a critical
mutation.
just any mutation,
we’re
talking
about
“critical”.
cancer,
the
involved
in
mutation
cell
spreading
“proliferations,
And
of
something
tumor
mutations
isn’t
types
in
just
found
“critical”
be
cell
(scientists
propagations,
it generally
12
must
growth,
your
body,
cells—like
your
intestine
many
skin
cells—acquire
on
call
and
genes
cells,
a
rise
DNA
mutation.
average
gave
rise
in genes
spreading.
your
blood
mutations
more
vessel
all the
cell
actions
A
an
to
gene
or
these
metastases”).
one
that
of
give
multiplication,
tumors.
That’s
2-6 mutations
cell growth,
multiplication,
and
In
To
study
of
to
2-6
those
involved
27
in
“exposed”
cells,
time.
or
We
all have
over
it still generally
3 billion
takes
base
a long
pairs
time
to
of DNA,
so
“hit”
of
one
our
important
genes
involved
in
proliferation,
and propagation.
Even
cell
growth,
exposed
cells
take
mutations.
a
fact,
long
time
colon
11,000
to
acquire
cancer
mutations
such
requires—on
in
the
DNA
In
average—over
before
“hit” is made
in a gene
involved
multiplication,
and spreading
that
a
random
in cell growth,
leads to cancer.
28
The
key
11,000
word
here
random
“critical”
is “random”.
mutations
DNA
areas
give
purely
In
rise
by
by
“devil’s
eating
lottery”
and
drinking
where
words,
to mutations
in
chance.
So, the deeper
point I’m making
a numbers
game.
You “increase
cancer
other
is that cancer
your
odds”
estrogenics.
lottery
tickets
is
for
Like
are
a
DNA
mutations.
And after you get
cells, the cancerous
may
remember
beginning
of
between
the
body
studies
the
placed
chapter
system
the messed-up
to survive.
You
emphasis
on
the
and
cancer?
at
the
relationship
Well,
system
detects
a strange
cancer,
chew it up or eat that cell and
been
is why
done
It’s a hotbed
Because
immunity
system
I
of it. This
have
cancer”.
how
immune
your immune
can beneficially
your
those mutations,
cells, still need
on
over
a quarter
“immune
if
it
rid
million
system
+
of research.
of this relationship
between
our
innate
and cancer,
chemicals
that cause immune
damage
might
be
predicted
to
also
cause
cancer.
Let’s
look
at
the
scientific
proof
revealing
that
estrogenics
First,
are
involved.
estrogen
receptor
just like
two
works
binding
an
estrogen
inside your cells. This is step one.
connecting
two puzzle pieces. Then
connected
puzzle
receptor—bind
step
by
directly
It is
these
pieces—estrogen
to
DNA.
plus
Binding
DNA
is
two.
Knowing
this information—as
a scientist—leads
me
to basically
expect
that estrogenics
cause
tumors
when
somebody
Even
beyond
estrogen,
or
estrogen
is
the
tampers
with
immune
system
red
directly
on
estrogenics,
bound
to
act
a
receptor,
site where cancer
originates.
to lead to all sorts of DNA
Sure
enough,
therapy”
multiple
been
started
to rise
cancer
have
and
too
long
estrogen
to
been
known
the
potential
“replacement
benefit
prematurely.
Many
when
on
older
Why
early?
Because
the
the
estrogen-treated
high. 29
The
DNA
the
estrogen
halted
an expensive
study
breast
cancers
in
levels.
flags.
directly
This has
problems.
studies—attempting
women—have
estrogen
forms
stop
rate
of
women
of
to link to
breast
estrogens
receptors.
I mentioned
rising
breast
cancer
rates
in
book’s
Introduction
but I want to add to that.
global
increase
in breast
2010
was
rise
in those
the
As
Phillipines. 30
you might
guess,
oral
want
256%.
The
same
contraception
to
go
contraception.
years.
Rates
you
and
over
I
cancer
Philippines
the
frequently
find
cancer.
positive
hear
between
saw
1980
the
increased
First,
risks
however,
benefits
about
to
biggest
589%
similar
this
The
in
with
I
of
oral
these
oral
contraception
“benefits”
and
they
involve
The
involves
decreasing
your
benefit
ovarian
cancer.
On the one hand,
want
everyone
decreases
to be
aware
for
ovarian
risk
intriguing.
This
companies
is one
of EE2—the
active
let’s check it out.
Unfortunately,
cancer”
few
I
a
this
aspects
control—so
for
ovarian
2013
research
to
find
positive
risk
correlated
for
contraception
birth
In
6,476
use
oral
in
minimal.
of
contraception
of very
risk
contraception
cancer.
“decreased
truly
(meta-analysis)
that
ingredient
this
is
selling
cancer.
study
papers,
oral
approximately
a
0.5% lifetime reduction
in ovarian
cancer
incidence
with no observed
reductions
in mortality . 31 Half a
percent
reduction.
Now
honest.
Especially
with
that’s
no
pretty
tiny—let’s
changes
in
be
the
death
rates.
Yet
people
contraception
will never
in my
“benefit”
get
profession
talk
about
this
like it will guarantee
women
ovarian
EE2
pill poppers.
From
what
I’ve
cancer
heard
if they
from
They
This
is
are
sure
because
scenes—make
sure
this “decreased
risk”.
It’s
minds. And there’s
nothing
true
health
benefits.
birth
control
tiny
the
also
benefit
Of
this benefit.
companies—behind
doctors
regularly
word
truly
is.
the
hear
about
at the front
of
their
illegal about
advertising
course,
hope
this
center
stage
for
prescribe
these
to talk about
the
frequent
women,
“decreased
risk of cancer”
takes
many
medical
doctors,
as they
drugs.
are
companies
doesn’t
Or
how
get
selling
out
how
massive
the
adverse
effects
Meanwhile,
list is.
the
underplayed.
has
been
“adverse
serious
adverse
effects
are
generally
If you doubt this, ask someone
who
prescribed
oral
contraception—what
effects”
you
given
a
the
“Physician
were
full
you
printed
informed
list?
Labels”
are
about?
As
I noted
linked
to
Were
before,
my
website 20 so you can see the side-effect
yourself.
The list is long. Ultimately,
putting
in the
and
shadows
100’s
stems
not
for
of
from
of
corporate
blaming
the
best
ones
contraception
benefits
lay people
pages
by
information
and
docs,
influence.
truly
improvements
minimal—but
in
I’m
here—although
are
telling
people
problems
and
they’re
are
the
about
aware
I would
simplicity
for
list
long-names
unimportant
interest
medical
using
own
list
this
oral
that
like to
and
see
lay-person
accessibility.
Furthermore,
analysis
(“no
regarding
reduction
6,476
I found
papers,
reproving
medical
letter
docs.
the
published
in mortality”)
it comical
written
to
Presumably,
that
the
they
“benefit”
from
the
there
editor
were
was
by
a
some
involved
in
marketing
oral contraception
in some way but who
knows.
This letter to the editor reads:
“we
believe
that
be
further
said
ovarian
studies
that
cancer
oral
still are
mortality]”.
6,476? Seriously
people?
Let’s get into estrogenic
the
numbers.
breast
cervical
cancer
cancer
Oral
32
but
More
risks
liver
what
[before
does
contraceptives
33 , various
36
required
contraception
not
studies
regarding
are
the
can
beyond
cancer
by
risk
for
increase
tumors,
it
reduce
34
35
and
numbers
here?
For
brevity,
let’s
increased
risk
benefits
we saw
legitimate
The
risk
aren’t
Read
the
slightly
users
oral
this
time
discontinuation
the
increased
an
while
other
studies
have
Most
oral
studies
combination
do
been
a similar
not
containing
exact
same
cancer
risk
are offered.
Sleuthing
appears
I
found
too
bad.
they
this,
all
are
looked
am
being
at
the
dose
type
small
use
at a younger
age.
of risk
or
her
the
of
family
other
EE2
nearly
and
One
with
regardless
verbatim.
medical
use
or
relieved
honest.
of
consistent
have
increased”
I
cessation
studies
reported
a
who
first
use
caution—basically
into
no
pattern
drugs
is “slightly
recent
decrease
after
Some
history
And
may
contraceptive
with
contraceptive
contraceptive
to
and
contraceptives
show
Alesse®
duration
studies
have
for
women
oral
than
and
oral
found
cancer.
contraceptives.
with
a woman’s
reproductive
breast cancer
history.
Actually,
pill
appears
not
positive
we find
label:
diagnosed
and by 10 years
risk
disappears.
risk
the
more
current
combination
of steroid.
Some
increase
in risk
combination
are
oral
risk
increased
relationships
they
among
excess
after
report
and
breast
contraceptive
combination
However,
over
but
for
manufacture’s
breast cancer
increased
of
cancer
numbers
huge
(EE2 + levonorgestrel)
The risk of having
be
breast
there.
Unlike
the
tiny
regarding
ovarian
cancer,
increased
numbers
0.5%.
take
no
to
Breast
numbers
say
that
scientific
charts
the
of
it
study
over
100,000
women
increased
risk
and
of
vary
the
depending
background),
other
mind,
IRS
rising
studies.
diet,
And,
taking
vulnerable
like
health,
or
needs
oral
(genetic
be
contraception
to
breast
imbalances.
confuse
cancer
EE2
to
many
Keep
in
of other
can
breast
alongside
widely
how
like these
overall,
more
can
race
and
Unnatural
rates
increases,
said
cancer
3%
oral
but
are
consuming.
exposed
to plenty
meteorically
especially
among
risks
factors
Factors
teenagers
about
numbers
cancer
or
you
are
which is disturbing.
Something
that
also
hormone
huge
other
estrogenics.
emerging
are
or
estrogenics
most people
10
Not
to
cancer
increased
on
up
breast
contraception
users.
than 0.5 in 100.
Importantly,
found
is
EE2
risks
that
are
and
hormone
alterations
in teens is always
Just like teen athletes taking
a different
steroids.
discussion.
One
the
companies
additional
thing
all
drug
say—undoubtedly,
law—is
that
they
“oral
need
contraceptive
in women
with a known
of the breast or personal
(again,
this
sheet).
Risky
was
taken
stuff,
undiagnosed
to
should
not
directly
from
Most
Comparing
stage
that
had
ZEA
people
two
eat
anyone
breast
the
Africa—one
higher
levels
fungus
group
study
of
and
exact
same
eating
Chinese
might
African
potential
cancer.
role
ZEA
with
with
grain
estrogenic
lower
that
people
of esophageal
had
cancer
ZEA
amounts.
observed
ZEA
about
Tunisia,
for
starting
with
Esophageal
Chinese
study
country,
have
Cancer
of
one
higher
people
problem.
heavily-exposed
In a different
used
drug
cancer.
in
ZEA—researchers
found
“considerably
higher”
levels
from
by
grains.
regions
consistently
from
be
Alessa®’s
begins at the level of a single cell.
Let’s move
on to other
estrogenics,
grains.
this
or suspected
carcinoma
history of breast
cancer”
considering
early
state
basically
cancer
groups.
ZEA
was
38
from
researchers
in humans
37
also
A
the
up
in
another
found
developing
a
breast
39
An added issue for grains is that they also contain
atrazine.
Think about it: most times, atrazine
and
ZEA
provide
a
EE2
in there
and
double-estrogenic
we’re
really
ambush.
upping
our
Add
cancer
risks.
Uncharacteristically,
however,
atrazine
reproductive
brain
cancers.
on
appears
problems,
development
the
topic
“innocent”.
feminization,
problems,
but
of
cancer,
It may cause
hernias,
and
probably
not
From
what
with
this
I read,
most
statement
not
on
related
One
the
like
Dr.
reminder,
papers
largest,
and
Charles
so,
List,
scientists
and
been
study
Cancer
health
here
cancer
results
the
published
are
bound
money
conflicts
in
breast
Such
I
read
science
although
found
cell
41
that
proliferation.
atrazine
exposed
to exist.
down
soy
42
a
decreases
43
journal
Then
called
says: “several
recent reports
benefits
of soy isoflavones
these
science.
that
cancer.
with
staff
the
IRS
10
soy?
suggest
them
one
if
positive
reported.”
in humans
regarding
basically
everyone
is
to follow
about
prostate
on
when
Well, like atrazine,
soy appears
to have a
role
in breast
cancer.
A few
scientific
however,
is
atrazine
publishing
of concern
prostate
discrepant
what
and
good.
is that
Researchers
studies
because
Continuing
have
have
promotes
yes,
That’s
this in a professional
is possibly
carcinogenic
results?
Meanwhile,
are difficult
40
though,
they
results
atrazine
of
Recall: Syngenta®
is
crop-chemical
producers,
a spasm
a statement
like
journal:
“Atrazine
Discrepant
Journal
atrazine.
feel
discrepant
agreement
development
Breckenridge
eulogizing
I especially
the
and
to carcinogenesis.”
is a mega moneymaker.
of the world’s
largest
not
in
and
Health:
“[Atrazine’s]
humans
appears
to
be
reproduction
cautionary
are
from
Environmental
Science
potential
impact
on
primarily
studies
a
cancer
lot
a mess.
promotion.
when
money
dualistic
reviews,
breast
again,
cancer
a
2016
Nutrition
and
challenged
the
and
associated
” 44
is
You
involved
find
in
Let’s
take
a break
from
talk sunscreen
and
“consumables”
Personally,
I
soon with
have
a
sunscreen.
Yet
the
BP
or
cancer.
for
We’ll
need
it for
when
parents
are
themselves
just
trash.
(benzophenone)
a minute
revisit
the
to
go
from
long
lathering
outside
sunscreen
studies.
ovarian
cancer,
45
researchers
in
study
also
included
too,
promoted
found
it,
BP
has
an
increase
just
ironically
to try
from
the
large
BP
in
skin
the
Stress
from
critically
the
important
Remember
how
sun
when
cells—accumulate
need
lot
some
many
but
say
a bit of sunshine
some.
we
this
We
is
haven’t
4-MBC
also
up
another
mutations
in
“critical”
This
How
in cell
propagation?
say,
of
For
by
general
brings
and
cells
blasted
prostate
And
the
cells—like,
a
let’s
estrogenic
become
cancerous?
in genes
involved
“stressed
out”,
those
this is a good thing.
instance,
(the
point.
cells
proliferation,
frequently,
in
cancers
sunscreen.
actually
DNA genes
in order
to
mutations
need to occur
growth,
of
cancer.
considered
the
fragrance
or
present
in the same products.
out
shown
cancer
just
number
to prevent
their
been
prostate
cancer), 46
breast
cancer, 47
and
cancer
metastasis
(spreading).
47 48
That’s
up
is featured
of cancer
and
of
trips.
to take
to promote
triclosan
topic
fishing
a number
this
and
Red No. 40 and plastics.
strong
dependency
on
I literally
I cringe
kids
“food”
mutations
simply
die.
of your
and
is good.
skin
and
are
And,
P.S.,
skin
they
The
Well,
your
die.
reason
cells
Not
this
are
too
is
a
good
long,
is
because
they
would
if those
lived
too
to
become
cancerous.
Yes—a
reasonable
amount
is good. Who would have thought?
of
sunshine
is
2015—is
cancer.
also
why
finding
that
49
You’ve
more
cells
likely
This
be
same
the
newest
research—from
“antioxidants”
been
told
actually
the
promote
opposite.
I
know.
However,
scientists
even
as far back
as the
mid
were starting to see that antioxidants
promote
cancer.
Yes.
The
at the
Wait.
1994
time.
beta
and,
found
was
that
actually
“perplexing”
mega-doses
are
their
lung
stressing
cells
developing
mutations
was called
Prevention
the “Vitamin
A,
Study
Group”.
are
and / or
of
increased
by 18% and antioxidant
cancer
in smokers
by
remember,
therefore,
study
carotene
cancer
in smokers
A increased
lung
Smokers,
What?!
antioxidant
Researchers
antioxidant
90’s,
can
out
vitamin
28%. 50
lung
more
dying.
lung
cells
frequently
This
study
Beta Carotene
Cancer
Oops,
no
prevention
here.
Now
think
putting
about
cells
this
that
for
a
ought
second:
if you
are
to
dying
on
be
“life-support”—i.e.
antioxidants—and
live and continue
to accumulate
you
are
more
likely
antioxidant-treated
cancerous
from
occur
is normal
replaced
so don’t
essence,
too
are
all those
extra
mutations
lifespan.
Cell death
to end
cells
get
much
and
then
more
up
with
more
cancer.
likely
additional
those
cells
mutations,
to
mutations.
during
their
cells
constantly
are
all emotional
sunscreen
Your
become
on
probably
The
prolonged
me,
being
here.
In
increases
your
odds
of
getting
“overprotecting”
exposures
much
your
cancers
So
back
that
simply
cells,
during
short
then,
BP
they
to 4-MBC,
are
can
“4-MBC
growing
and
cell
human
and
any
and
all
from
found
in
cancer
51
it
dysfunctions
in
estrogenics
statement
like:
vested
of
in me,
Laws,
I admit
and
grant
privileges
substance
therein .”
is often
privileges
therein”,
The
Estrogenic
3. The
estrogenic,
that match
So,
let’s
estrogenic
the
US?
the
rank
all
the
Not
authority
of
Doctor
rights
The
and
7
Deadly
Things.
That
is
Principle:
Effects
Principle:
If an
it is likely to cause
health
other estrogenic
items.
again
how
to the
you
graduation
ceremony
By simply
being
estrogenic,
a
granted
all the
“rights
and
Effects
Estrogenic
you
to
is
stimulates
other
“By
I’ve
4-MBC
of a college
award.
The
something
that
potentially
that
are
population.
book:
may cause. It reminds
me
ceremony
honorary
degree
goes
cells
bad.
argument
this
therefore
cells”.
when
increasing
throughout
and
estrogenic
in 2005
occurs
In the context of cancer,
that’s
These
scientists
also made the
estrogenic
cause
proliferation
breast
incidentally,
dividing
making
directly
as promised.
accelerates
Cell proliferation,
matters
4-MBC
estrogenic.
BP, the other
sunscreen
10 list is 4-MBC.
Research
estrogen-dependent
been
to make
and
camphor)
because
Besides
the IRS
by
skin
to sunlight.
And
worse,
the
(4-methylbenzylidene
cancer
get
back
to
the
Red
No.
3 was
in
food
but
food.
partially
cosmetic
item
is
problems
Remember
banned
products?
in
Because
of
this
switched
over
bad
from
estrogenic
Red No.
Unfortunately,
even
began
No.
to show
40. 52
studies
Red
the
“acceleration
been
3
stop
studies
drinking
Unlike
has
Red
been
to
on
come
sports
No.
this
Red
done
out
drinks
40,
on
to
to
with
parabens,
Red
not
40
many
in general
cancers.
What
to wait for the
motivate
Red
thankfully,
from
fact,
No.
similarly
researchers
of tumors”
or specifically
with Red No. 40 and
I can tell you is that I’m not going
negative
companies
1980’s,
despite
done
most
No.
40.
during
However,
have
press,
No.
me
thorough
phthalates,
to
40.
research
and
BPA.
These
are
all
definitely
formation.
Over 100 studies
implicated
in
cancer
for parabens,
500
for
phthalates,
for
detailed
bore
and
about
analysis
us
all to
the
major
estrogenics
of
700
+1,000
BPA.
cancer
tears—myself
And
while
studies
included—let’s
a
would
discuss
types
of
cancer
these
3 IRS
play a role in and
then
close
10
with
APEs.
Parabens
have
development
been
of
shown
human
studies verify this. 53 54
dominant
concern
from
important.
studies
Paraben
(2015)
ovary
fits
are
Since
most
the
And,
a
in the
pattern.
finding
in the
even
song
on
near
though
“repeat”,
drive
Many
breast cancer
is the
estrogenics,
this
is
actual
—which
makes
me
wonder
how
tumor types will be found containing
parabens
clearly
cancer.
overall
further
tumors—present
to
breast
Newer
parabens
tumor
in
itself 55
many
other
high levels of
future.
I am
starting
phthalates
to feel
are
like
I
am
implicated
in
breast
cancer,
56
Phthalates
but
are
plain
cell
English,
occur
proliferation”
phthalates
is scary
risk
continues
example,
in
womb
to
are
don’t
plastic.
a
the
these
in
grow
and
cancer
exposures.
exposed
an
breast
exposed
full
“BPA-Free”,
2004
study
of 6,
urine
93%
to
of
yes?
about
samples,
early
this
is that
BPA
had
For
in
the
increased
cancer
of
BPA,
Well,
this
virtually
over
2,500
samples
were
BPA
exposure.
right?
phthalates
were
positive
other words, as those children
are still more likely to develop
that
to
however,
the
offspring
are
forget
age
put
cancers.
fetuses
develop
is
bottles
they
In
to
of
phthalates
to
cells
the
the
during
58
nobody
water
BPA,
after
BPA,
propensity
adulthood.
But
with
studies
or,
in
found
in
54
And
because
cause
long
there.
incriminated
divide out of control. 57
BPA, too, increases
breast
What
stop
tumors
usually
or
esophagus.
properties
“deregulate
doesn’t
also
leiomyomas—muscle
uterus,
intestines,
carcinogenic
it
but
not
All
our
at
least
exactly.
And
identical
children
BPS
around
collected.
for
From
BPA. 59
become
adults,
breast cancer
In
they
from
A final industrial
ingredient
are the APEs
(alkylphenols).
accumulation
of
impacts
the
in our
body
A
APEs
immune
in
preventing
of
studies
“estrogen-like”
activity
This is a serious issue
A serious
of
issue
developing
Breast
cancer
is rising. 61
For men aged
of
for
cancer—from
to
system
cancer.
too.
that
APEs
cancer
Men
cancer
45
powerfully
important
on breast
for women.
men,
breast
bodies
an
find
prevalence
15
our
system,
for
number
we need
to mention
Keep
in mind
the
are
from
exert
cells.
60
at
risk
also
estrogenics.
is not
high
in men
but
years,
the
leading
cause
“industrialized”
countries,
it
anyway—is
also
testicular
major
contributors
“APEs”,
says
above,
“trigger
vitro
and
Now,
cancer.
62
to
the same
testicular
And
this
estrogenics
type
of
are
cancer.
research
study
as
cited
cancer
cell proliferation
in
in vivo. ” 62
in vitro
experiments
literally
that
means
test
cells
outside
the
growing
in
body—like
dishes—and
in vivo
basically,
simply
means
“inside
the
body”.
So,
all forms
of testing
show
APEs
trigger
testicular
cancer.
The
study
even
cell”
I
more
DNA—the
just
that
also
effect:
APEs
alarming
DNA
We see this with
Let’s
shift to the
discuss
referenced
we
pass
on
discovered
altered
to our
other
estrogenics
last section
of
vital issue.
an
“germ
children.
and
cancer.
this book
to
PART
TODAY
AND
TOMORROW
CHAPTER
8
“Passing
On”
Cancer
and
What
the
“WE
ARE
be
Heck
not
the
leave
GOING.
IT’S
God’s
They
bullet
will
ours.”
were
uttered
an
assassin.
of
just
by the
William
as McKinley
Honorable
will
your
legacy
be
and
how
endure?
What actions
in your
when you think of your legacy?
Based
that
on
of
McKinley’s
an
life’s
outdoorsman,
American
an
president.
example,
to
He
manipulation
tamed
and
some
of
therefore,
they
after McKinley.
Recently,
throes
died
words
a
to
officially
Mount
McKinley.
“Denali”.
Ironically,
It
an
actually
anarchist
thing:
executive
historical
who
to
mind
legacy
was
man,
and
idolized
in the
early
gold standard,
arbitrary
gold
rugged
currency
prospectors
Alaskan
have
it
tundra,
peak in America
of legacy.
changed.
for
In
the
PC,
an
name
of
greater
changed
the
must
now
legally
be
called
McKinley
was assassinated
by
operations
institution.
will
famously
As
power-struggle
order
his
the highest
20,000
feet
things
come
day,
the
against
that
named
That’s
long
honorable
was
inflation.
however,
of
executive
protect
life
actions,
by
gold
prospectors
of his
1900’s,
because
he championed
for
His
behind.
What
an
way.
are the final deathbed
words spoken
President
of
the
United
States,
McKinley.
by
is Epigenetics?
ALL
done,
These
25th
Obesity
believed
and
A different
rapid
sort
in this
sort
eradication
of legacy.
of
of
From
Homer,
Anchorage,
through
past
Moose
Mount
McKinley
back down the oil-pipeline
trekked
and
toured
our
14-day
honeymoon
halibut
and
and
on
truckers
even
Overall,
we
had
great
outdoors
have
fact,
liked—we
we joke
Tour
of
the
a musk
nearly
can
in most
find
Ph.D.
iced
our
coffee,
clarion
hiking
In
Boston,
reality:
much
less
we
much
stayed
night. . .
living
healthy
went
rivers
the
from
the
as I would
at
to
some
nicest
iced
to the
And,
as
Best
hotel
you
and I took
a
I began
my
mountains
Charles
much
River,
as
I
the country-city
for me.
live
and
witness
in cities—myself
in
in
Alaska.
sleuthing,
sacrifice
I began
people
we
didn’t rough
it. Today,
in
went on a Best
Western
to sitting.
science
and lab
was a stone-cold
some
interesting
fisherman,
honeymoon
but—as
of remote
and
glaciers,
learned
trip to Alaska,
Allison
turn
back
to Boston.
studies
from
every
for
Deadhorse—and
splendid
because
Western
Following
180-degree
of
farm.
and
and
I
grand
blue
We
to
fished
to
many
arctic
char
oxen
certainly
that we
we
baby
sausage.
of Alaska,
Alaska
There,
town
a
up
to Fairbanks,
on
spoke
trappers,
from
visited
hiked
reindeer
history
and
characters—wolf
back
to Valdez, Allison
way
through
a
in Alaska.
salmon,
feasted
Pass,
general.
and
enjoyed
contrast
a
glaring
included—were
Inner
are more
inflicted
by infertility,
more. . .
.well, insert any of The
to
city
dwellers
more
depressed,
7 Deadly
Things
here.
I believe
urbanite
due,
part,
in
health
to
declines
greater
are
unfoundedly
estrogenic
exposures
compared
to
specifically
America
spraying
most
It’s
people
referring,
of
in
worth
would
noting,
of
this
growing
health
the
to
up
example,
seemed
jaws
what
beyond
our
chemical
exposures
from
to
words
or lack thereof.
The
problems
artificial
we’ve
System
included:
• Hormonal
• Certain
In essence,
For
the
reproductive
concern
And
it would
in
take
inspire
yet
another
fishing success
story.
is that
actions.
our
legacy
goes
Today,
our
future
at
(IRS)
and
like a car
generations
thus
far
arising
aside
from
the
10
fat storage
List
Ill
Unique
of estrogenics
imbalances
• Immune
• Various
own
exposures,
Features,
• Fat
cell growth
• Depression
had
My
looked
Reproductive
life.
My
I
fought
once
learn
impact
developed
had
collapsing
and
estrogen
have
I
the
Minnesota.
compactor.
come
I
in
my
general,
health
to Florida
to
and a tarpon
I’ve
rural
around
move,
town
slowly
of a trash
a final
trip
reawakening. . .
But
the
small
to be
the
that
England
find
in
to
I’m
by industrial
chemical
important
clarification
allergies
for
the
first
time
testosterone
also
declined.
In
desperately
America.
overlook.
for
New
rural
course,
that isn’t decimated
and
the like; an
researchers
time
living
system
blood
dysfunctions
clotting
complications
types of cancer
we have looked
last
of
The
infertility.
because
it
7
This
is
at 6 headliner
Deadly
is
truly
Things,
the
the
most
most
issues.
let’s
talk
ominous
lasting.
Infertility
is
because
The
You
included
in
of its inherent
infertility
and
I.
exposure
begins
These
and
Second-generation
higher.
And,
infertility
infertility,
infertility
means
is being
our children
Epigenetics!
kudos.
science
larger
haven’t
than
even
In
fact,
company.
contacted
for
Per
representative
customer
in other
is academic
words.
it would
sequencing
This
will only
of
product
be
“product”
would
essence,
on
the
my
about
the
have
sequencing
to
me
when
about
having
they
me
scientists.
$18,000.
the
company
that
to have
would
identify
the
I
my
wanted
their
Government
that
in
people
I personally
conversation,
incredible
fields
many
epigenetic
told
will
medicine—much
forecast
and
and
largest
to
means,
grow
field.
But
term, yet.
an
basically
In
generations
epigenetics,
our
Chapter
mechanisms.
what this term
sequenced
me.
“ trans
in
Latin.
The
notion
came
an existing
company
“epi-genome”
I think
of
starting
sounds,
called
personalized
of
future
considered
Just
and
because
prominent
it
are
even higher.
At
research.
This
is
across
one
the
DNA
heard the
legacy.
however,
as
in
research
become
book
see.
I mentioned
“across”
passed
Epigenetic
future
levels,
issue
as
via epigenetic
If you know
undoubtedly
as you’ll
drastic
generational”
“Trans”
levels,
as
this
to our
infertility levels are
to
the
newest
generational
1.
of
first-generation
exposures.
significant
depending
on
infertility
third-generation
least
according
3
connection
in
are
durations
Part
cost
an
funds,
epigenetic
under
epigenetic
main
$100.
status
of
your
most
epi-genes
important
that
are
“epi
best
fingerprint”:
understood
the
in
science
today. Since epigenetic
“marks”
can change,
too, it
is more
than
a one-time
customer
service.
You
could
track
concerns
diet
changes
I’ve
casually
“fingerprint”,
“marks”,
become
more common
they
health
dropped
the
words
and “epi-genes”.
These
will
terms in the future.
What
mean?
Put
simply,
are
made
one,
other
optimally.
Anyway,
do
and
epigenetics
to your
single,
is the
DNA”.
mark.
“study
So,
It is one
an
of marks
“epi-gene”
imprint
on
is
your
music,
lines
of
you
called
notes
have
a staff.
black
You
indicating
to
a
is
dots—notes—written
might
find
just
musician
to
like
DNA.
Since
this might
still be confusing,
here
analogy
I developed
to help explain this.
In
that
an
on
one
string
play
“Mary
had a Little Lamb”
or some
other
song.
Don’t
overthink
this now, just imagine
a few black
dots
on
a staff.
then
another
dot,
then
representing
letter
notes
and
In this analogy,
the simple song
can
easily
pass
this
simple
is your
sheet
DNA.
music
You
to
somebody
can
another
dot.
a simple
“Mary
One
All dots
dot,
song.
else
had
follow
black
the
and—easy!—they
a
Little
notes,
like
Lamb”.
our
code and make proteins.
A more
advanced
musician
one
note
chords,
sound
at
or
a
time,
multiple
pleasing.
Right?
bodies
The
not
They
played
main
just
follow
would
however.
notes
play
They
or
our
to
DNA
just
play
might
play
together
melody
sing
need
of
that
“Mary
had
a
Little
Lamb”
now
additional
“on
still
“notes”
main notes.
That
top of” in Greek.
installed
is
top
Alternatively,
the
is epigenetics.
“Epi” means
It is all about
marks
that
“on
are
the
marks
“histones”—proteins
added
main
can
like
be
wrapped
the
of
that
could
Currently,
be
least
on
best
research.
readily
computers.
at
go
we
epigenetic
can
chemical
you
and
the
the
DNA—but
to
methane
acetylene
gas—and
can
make
these
on.
understand
This
is
sequenced
It might
epi-genome.
Obesity and
items
to
code.
about DNA.
simple
molecule
methylations—similar
to
marks
made
only
are
acetylations—similar
top
of DNA
around
gas—or
list
on
string
we’ll keep it simple and think
These
epigenetic
DNA marks
groups
DNA—but
of
of”
are
there—the
cost
can
already
Cancer
Across
methylations
because
using
a
crippling
sequence
in
methylations
robotics
$18,000
your
and
but
entire
Generations
Ok,
so
notes
DNA.
musical
notes
are like
And we
unique
sequences.
That’s
marks
as
They
harbor
very
your health.
But let’s shift
why
the
main
I
research
melody
are
all
epigenetics”.
to
the
“across”,
so
As
we
of
unique.
in terms
back
within
think
of
that
new
last few
years.
“transgenerational”,
“transgenerational
means
to
information
discussion
is
like
They
powerful
the
term
simply
of
“fingerprints”.
in scientific
The
top
epigenetics.
The marks
on top
of
all have epigenetic
marks
in totally
these
term
on
as
I
said,
are
in
“trans”
literally
just
talking
about
epigenetics
that are passed
across
generations.
In other words,
it’s not merely
your
DNA
that
DNA
get
Now
let’s
change
way.
is
passed
focus
our
Let’s
on
how
our
but
some
inheritable
DNA
the
IRS
history
into
an
famine
with
Scientifically,
was
the
key.
in
a
be
the
10
context.
a
The
originates
unfortunate
to
along
science
is
estrogenics
traits
act
a negative
problematic
passed
The
and
This calamity is known
sometimes
the “Dutch
affected.
on
estrogenics
can
epigenetics
epigenetic
investigations
famine
artificial
generations.
transgenerational
massive
marks
epigenetic
“fingerprint”
investigate
how
on
through
concept,
involved.
Your
bequeathed.
“fingerprint”
First,
along.
of
brand-new
are
definitely
discovery
of
from
scientific
historical
tragedy.
as the “Dutch
Famine”
and
Hunger
Winter”.
It was
a
more
the
than
short
4
million
duration
people
of
this
According
accepted
to
one
date
of
mid-October
Allied armies
science
[the
paper:
Dutch
“a
commonly
Famine]
onset
is
1944; its end was sudden,
when
the
liberated
Holland [from Nazi Germany
occupation]
on
May
7,
1945
.” 1
Less
than
one
year.
This
same
research
paper,
published
recorded
birth weight
declines
from
babies
born
to famine
Birth
weight
were
predictably
surprise
The
declines
in
around
exposed
from
famine
lower—less
food,
exposed
less
No
there.
shocker
were
came
many
discovered
grandmothers
years
in
later.
had
pregnancy”
Dutch
“suffered
from
the
caused
science
to sit-up
1996 paper
even included
insulin-like
since
babies
weight.
In
1996,
it was
discovered
that
birth
declines
had continued
to occur.
Weight
mid
1975,
that
time
mothers.
growth
these
factor
growth
weight
declines
babies
acute
Dutch
whose
starvation
famine!
2
in
This
and
listen.
This
same
the speculation
that the
genes
factors
might
are
be
major
involved,
players
in,
well, growth.
Fast-forward
10
years
later.
Researchers,
sure
enough,
found that babies in the womb
during the
Dutch
Famine
were
methylation
of the
6
later.” 3
decades
“fingerprints”—marks
being altered some
The
1996
prophetic:
least
one
article,
the
with
growth
factor
other
words,
the
on top
60 years
of the
later.
In
impressively,
insulin-like
of
associated
insulin-like
growth
epigenetic
was
factor
marks
“lower
2
epigenetic
DNA—were
starting
(#2)
altered
[. . .]
to
was
by
still
look
at
the
Dutch
Famine.
understood
These
under
Today,
with
less
“inheritable”
many
and
promptly
all just
more
epigenetic
researchers.
changes
lit a
fire
Transgenerational
changes—were
spawned
found
precisely
speculation.
changes—epigenetic
idea
it’s
much
an
incredible
interest.
associations
in
Scientists
humans
between
“ancestral
food
supply
with
longevity
and
cardiovascular
and diabetic mortality.” 4 They
found
that
the
“over-nutrition”
obesity
. 5
and
Yes,
passed
We’ve
disease
on.
seen
how
obesity
on?
Yes.
metabolic
heard
a
A
“fat
that
switch”
research
animals
that
chemicals
various
diabetes
changes
persist
environmental
and
among
that
involved
but
part
life
in
passing
the
Andrology
like this:
synthetic
development
the
and
progressed
activities
outcomes.
are
to
uncover
embodied
in
that
to
in
discovered
environment
compounds
other
be
can
obesity
Some
of
of the
epigenome
and
indeed
into
alter
and
these
and
other
6
generations
Scientists
from
humans
in
can
exposures?
contribute
become
throughout
generations.
Other
and
we
have
biological
metabolism
are
change
experimental
‘estrogenic’,
unexpected
Obesity
in humans
paper
called
toward
generations
their newest findings
exploring
how
a
could
many
correctly.
on
so
in future
estrogenic
summarized
started
by
estrogen
true:
propensity
estrogenics
Through
2016
Journal
We
is
increase
you
turning
inverse
can
with
even
indeed.
study
animal
models
are
the
ones
really
accelerating
discoveries.
Most
these
lab
transgenerational
animals—grown
as
“models”
of
various
human
diseases—reproduce
Transgenerational
epigenetics,
therefore,
has
giving
worth
rise
to
experimental
modern
literally
entire
projects
epigenetic
for
careers’
scientists,
research
rapidly.
been
during
of
our
boom.
And speaking
of animal models, another
interesting
epigenetic
research
study
amazingly
found
that “
male
mice
with
methylation,
diabetes
This
pre-diabetes
and
to the
means
pass
next
males
two
are
and reproductive
lifestyle can alter
have
on
an
abnormal
generations
not
sperm
increased
off the
risk
of
.” 7 8
hook
contributions:
even
future generations!
for
male
Let’s
health
diet and
move on
to cancer.
Like
the
newest
remarkable
that
research
a
be passed
down
fact,
there
are
papers
“[Our]
on
disposition
and
results,”
carcinogenesis
This
about
reports
one
of
such
quite
cancer
can
epigenetics.
cancer
mice,
an
epigenetic
mechanism
for
it’s
is disturbing.
In
100
research
transgenerational
generations
hypothesis
of
expression-based
obesity,
toward
to offspring.
currently
cancer
researching
on
paper
“support
the
and / or
gene
transgenerational
.” 9
They
mention
study
does
epigenetics
not
offer
as
direct
supportive
proof.
Plus
but
this
they
also
include
other
cancer
transference
options.
else
might
cancer
be
passed
along
to
How
future
generations?
Direct
DNA
found
to
damage.
directly
Red
damage
40,
for
example,
DNA
in
was
certain
experiments.
other
10
We
estrogenics,
can
find
too.
ZEA,
similar
for
evidence
instance,
“genotoxic
activity”
meaning
ZEA
causes
array of different types of DNA mutations.
But
while
DNA
inheritable,
“The
epigenetic
liganded
study,
“is
higher-order
changes
In
evidence
estrogen
in
or
that
that
can
lead
particular
” 12
a
11
large
not
be
,”
says
one
key
changes
in
and
epigenetic
lay
terms,
cause
this
epigenetic
to cancer.
study—surprise,
cancer
was
we’ve
seen so
the
more
common
with
the
IRS
In
estrogenics
transmitted
cancer,
as
various
may
causes
is stronger.
receptor
cancer.
is saying
this
may
linked
to
long-range
chromatic
organization
dysregulation
sentence
damage
with
cancers
10
breast
many
surprise—the
cancer.
Breast
times, is one
of
collectively
List estrogenics.
associated
Next,
here
is
studied DES,
Interestingly,
quote
from
another
paper
that
the banned
estrogenic
substance:
our data suggest
that this increased
susceptibility
on
a
for
from
the
generations
tumors
maternal
of male
mechanisms
[from
lineage
and
involved
DES]
female
in
is
to
passed
subsequent
descendants;
these
the
transgenerational
events include genetic and epigenetic
events. 13
Might
DES
be
causing
direct
DNA
damage?
Probably.
But
epigenetics
Finally,
both
BPA
results
in
cancer
and
are
more
phthalates
studies,
clearly
have
involved.
given
revealing
similar
long-range
inherited
changes. 14
BPA
and
phthalates
causing
us to essentially
“give” cancer
to our
or
at
least
increase
cancer
likelihood
in
are
kids,
our
offspring.
Exact
humans,
are
remember
have major
numbers
still
that
minor
impacts.
and
being
doses
doses,
worked
of
especially
in
out.
Just
hormones
can
CHAPTER
9
Defoliating
Your
Family
To
Infertility
IF
WEST
Montana
and
I caught
future
brother-in-law
and
state
knowledge,
of
the
throughout
Wyoming
were
far
from
inadequate
adapted
fresh.
but
phone
The
good
rental
and
radio
news
Plus,
so
The
went
that
Victor
sun
After
narrowly
to pack
any
Vic,
Maria
hiking
at
that
by
Fishing
to this secret
time,
Club
had
but
slow.
found
roads
shone
bright
the
area
would
in the
have
fishing
that
we
hadn’t
cliffs,
I
parked
food.
slithering
some
the car on Victor’s
command.
grizzly bear sign, looked
over
began
was
knew
discovered
remembered
would
dark.
and
soon
an
all
travels,
progress
that
we
so confident
we
you
the
highway,
we
gravelly
mountain
car.
his
local
completing
been
fishing
and
exuded
confidence
success.
In fact, he was
I in him,
in
my
Vic’s
to hard
signals
was
Victor,
Montana
Long
after
we
exited
ourselves
creeping
down
in an
with
easy.
with
us
We had
and
have
fish
Despite
come
began
car ride.
would
then
fish I have
ever
upper
reaches
of
those
Montana.
fish didn’t
The
adventure
ultra-marathon
heaven
outright.
Mountains.
home
we
ALMOST
most “estrogenic-free”
fresh-caught
in the
friend
we
IS
is heaven
Rocky
think
Beyond
VIRGINIA
By far the
eaten
were
the
Tree
We looked at
our shoulders,
mountain
just
taken
Presidency.
lake.
over
He
some
and
was
the
still
Ave
in
college
but
days
of
this
summer
were
making
everything
in.
Soon
after
took
break
a
we
intensified.
jagged,
trip
place
so,
break
began
for
been
with
crags.
our
Despite
all
finding
this
long
distances.
We
trekked
unique.
the
live
front
hardships,
Sharp
rocks,
clattered
down
After
our
fish
closer
than
Both
clean
the
require
to
hours
and
hands
on,
had
bent
called
arctic
icy-cold
heaven.
of
on
grayling.
grayling
water
We
are
and
die if
they
either
they live at
had
chosen
to
hiking,
we
finally
began
suspense
revived
our
spirits,
the sight of a beautiful
lake.
clear
however,
to about
there
was
30
feet
deep.
still quite
a bit
To
of
lake.
“This
will work
What
happened
out
a
then
pole
rocks.
fish
because
“Too
bad”,
I
announced
mountain
air, “this may not
casting
“better
agreed,
but
our fishing
in heaven.
few
dismay,
ice on
became
loose
a
rapidly
slopes
trundled
and
way
cresting
a peak. The
and then, even more,
It was
the
cramming
terrain
was
teeth.
we
lake
this
them
a
and
gets too warm.
This means
to the geographic
poles or
elevations
pursue
we
dislodged
by
our
slipping
feet,
the mountainside
for
unnervingly
These
water
closer
usual,
the
It
to climb
secret
than
mountain
loose-shale
conscripted
first
it
good day in the office”, we both
we had to stop talking
to bite
handles
the
more
hiking,
Woodland
during
fine,”
through
work”.
responded
next
his line and
was
Vic,
comical:
landing
the
thin
“watch”.
Victor
his fishing
started
lure
on
the
smooth
bounced
surface
the
lure
little “plunk”
along.
of
the
across
into
an
After
the
lure
sunk
line.
Next,
he
would
was
a technique
melting
the
ice until
would
lure
up
and
bit.
my rod.
Besides
unexpected
ice, packing
dissipated
because
made
a
fire
As
knew
the
The
no
concern.
we
caught
on
a
the
we
had
Montana
best
fished
earlier
in
places
and
we
food
mess
out
down.
The
rocky
also
let
grayling
It
were
was
of
grayling,
sticks.
was
streams
week.
had
and
It
in other
the
a
concern
shoreline,
on sharpened
aspen
pure and simple.
a contrast,
throughout
of
directly
cooked
the fish
an idyllic scene,
all
Vic
imitating.
cause
his target
hole,
worth
the
a
in the
immediately
to prepare
then
it fell with
water
jig the
hole,
He
open
hungry
and
I scrambled
temporary
ice.
Victor
caught
fish.
It
was
noble
country
but
not
as
idyllic
as
the
mountain
top. In fact, one of the most
successful
trout
streams
“secret”
to
heavily
stocked
words,
fish.
we
This
we
expert
by
were
is ludicrous,
All across
lakes
and
visited
a
fishermen—the
nearby
fish
basically
if you
America,
rivers
harbored
think
fish
via
just
are
shameful
stream
hatcheries.
catching
about
was
other
farm-raised
it.
being
hatcheries.
In
re-stocked
into
Professional
fish
breeders
run full-time operations
raising millions
of
fish in cramped
tanks. They feed these fish corn
pellets,
similar
and
then
fish
to
to most
these
lakes
and
fish
of America’s
breeders
streams.
truck
And
we
standard
the
diet,
corn-fed
wonder
why
our
omega
When
fats
you
actually
quarter
visit
buy
and
imbalanced?
fish
hatcheries,
out
were
originally
of
old-fashioned
vending
designed
quite
fun.
for
I visit
sturgeon
if you
As
ever
we
has
of
have
have
seen
heavily
fish
of
has
the
the
IRS
4, our
10
List
and
it’s
the
to
great
worthwhile,
drinking
water
estrogenics.
It’s
however,
that as bad as
the
“raw”
lake
water
with
estrogenic
been
jeopardized.
in
Yet,
problem,
we treat it. In
issue
by stockbreeding
and
pumping
them
familiar,
yes?
Treating
problems
the
is
estrogenics.
loads
capacity
root
that
all across
is especially
burdened
these
fertility
solving
“treat”
hard-candies
in Chapter
of
for
a
pellets
chance.
worth
remembering,
drinking
water
is,
Because
often
to
Minnesota
my kids. Seeing the
Oregon
the
high-levels
worse—it’s
can
machines
hatcheries
US—from
Oregon
Connecticut—and
I bring
white
you
a handful
of fish-food
pellets
throw
them
to the fish. The
come
actually
are
full
of
our
water,
rather
than
this case,
we
fish at
high
corn.
rather
Sounds
than
solving
causes?
What people
reproduction
most
don’t often realize is that
has declined
to such an
American
lakes
Many
lakes
“boost”.
game-fish
if there
were
and
rivers
would
no
need
be
natural
extent
an
entirely
fish hatchery
fish
that
artificial
without
injections.
To make
matters
worse,
the small-time
fishermen
are scapegoated—Pop
and his daughter
are blamed
for
fish
the
“keeping
too
population
boat
many
declines.
launches
fish”,
in attempts
Government
wearing
clean
to
explain
officials
prowl
khakis
and
looking
fish
for
low-life
above
“criminals”
that
meager
limits.
already
retain
one
You
extra
have
to
enforce
the law but, meanwhile,
estrogenic
atrazine
is being sprayed
just across
the road. It is then
leaching
same
into
the
streams
fish-depleted
The
7 Deadly
glass
show
proof
After
on
we’ll
Things
infertility.
that
Direct
that,
start
infertility,
with
resource.
Let’s
performed
can
in
title
[EE2]
men
exposure
around
rainbow
embryonic
“short-term”
How
much
this
for
to
the
study
a
worth
A
10
short-term
remembering
and
So
using
that
10
renewable
study
rainbow
that
trout.
so
it
this
all:
“
alpha-ethynylestradiol
of
sexually
of
EE2,
a
number
early
dose
study
very
ng/L
researchers
stage
reduction
The
this
maturing
in the
an
50%
used?
ng/L.
being
impacts,
says
reduction
exposures!
EE2
was
was
17
reaching
development.
is
butter,
paper
to
by
women.
that
the
with
levels
eggs
and
important
fertility
a 50%
trout
I want
Montana
on
science
rainbow
trout”. 1
at extremely
low
observed
of
an
a
caused
infertility
rainbows. . .
at me.
this
decreases
male
Even
at
experiments
love
out
of
Short-term
those
putting
be
infertility
popular
look
some
I happen
to
study jumped
The
a
by
Specifically,
infertility
investigate
List
passed
along to our kids.
For
immediate,
first-generation
let’s
into
lakes.
7 Deadly
magnifying
estrogenics.
feed
Things
#7. Infertility
Let’s close The
you
that
low
tested
was
dose.
is a lower
of
from
in
done
It’s
dose
than
Lake
levels,
a
Quinsigamond,
mere
1
[Chapter
4].
Meanwhile,
still
studied
found
in
to
zebrafish.
In the
of
mimics
5 ng/L
American
a
West
levels
different
zebrafish
of
research
“complete
study,
but
exposed
This
lifetime
what
is
reality
also
present
the
drive
EE2
of
Boston
estrogenic
EE2,
lab,
been
have
population
failure”
in
2
The
of
hour
lesser
cause
EE2
lifespan.
a
Massachusetts
we
see
scientists
the
numerous
in our
atrazine
in
lakes.
Texas,
well,
ng/L
entire
accurately
excepting
that
compared
to many
studies
oversimplify.
other
It’s
5
their
more
in lakes. . .
low
these
only
for
exposure
conservatively
lakes.
Plus,
is that
used
fish
not
for
estrogenics
just
EE2.
instance.
are
Think
Or
the
parabens,
the
Further
bad
phthalates,
news
the
is that
BPA. . .
even
hardy fish—were
discovered
a 5 ng/L life-long estrogenic
At this
point,
reside
it’s
full-time
essence,
worth
exposures
“might”.
frog
This
eggs
raw
is
sit
imbalance.
Does
mammals?
In
short,
by
List.
But
let’s
Let’s
dry
and
artificial
not
have
First,
it
infertility.
due
fetal
In
cruel
to
transfer
is
from
jury
out
a closer
discuss
and
and
hormone
science
fertility
the
fish
massively
the
IRS
on
look.
to
this
Where
estrogenic
10
one.
does
infertility
ubiquitous.
begins
One
too.
with
is
two
direct
broad
sexual
categories
organ
of
dysfunction
to estrogenics
and the other
is embryo
dysfunction
or death. Both cause infertility
both
are
both
types
For
are
fish
water
to
estrogens
leave
off and
studies
because
estrogenic
frog
Mammal
the research
specifically
in mammal
species?
Well,
true
hyper-sensitive
yes.
impacted
more
at
such research
might
But the key word
is
in the
fish
that
Frogs,
frequently
especially
are
again
water.
therefore,
humans.
directly
eggs
mentioning
are
relatively
to be made infertile
exposure.
3
in estrogenic
water dwellers
and,
be less relevant
to
goldfish—a
different.
The
bad
of infertility
example,
with
ZEA—the
news
is that
swine
Before
looking
worth
noting
at high
at the
that
find
estrogenics.
mold
estrogenic—has
shown
to cause
total infertility in various
In one
study,
for example,
ZEA
was
female
you
or
but
been
animals.
given
to
doses.
conclusion
high
chemical
of this
doses
study,
are
it
is
often
used
in animal
are
actually
exposed
(2)
because
other words,
become
studies
to these
can
9 months
Anyway,
doses
Next,
exact
high
in
the
higher
female
pigs,
doses
and
studies.
9 years
be
toxin
we
In
to
pinpointed
doses.
ZEA
was
given
at
ranging
from 25,000
ng/L to 100,000
ng/L.
this
laundry-list
of
problems
resulted:
[in
pregnancy,
diminished
size,
some],
smaller
constant
estrus,
pseudo
others],
reduced
malformation,
juvenile
fertility
offspring,
hyper-estrogenism,
and
[in
probably
“Juvenile
hyper-estrogenism”?!
mean?
From
the etymology
we
sometimes
sometimes
using
“infertility
litter
(1)
it speeds
up
research
problems
that might take
manifest
within
because
can
much
probably
infer
estrogen”
in
that
those
fetal
resorption.”
What
does
this medical
of
it means
little
that
term,
“waaaayyy
piggies,
4
too
that’s
for
sure.
And if you look closely
at that list of problems,
you find both types of infertility in the pigs. Sexual
organ
malformations
and
various
direct
fetal
has
been
problems.
This
is
not
discovered,
abortions”
an
for
example,
according
to
assessment”
study.
investigating
puffed
isolated
ZEA
corn
snacks,
5
finding.
ZEA
to
cause
this
human
The
scientists
contaminants
and
wheat
in
a
daily
snacks,
that
basis
and
most
American’s
with
our
wheat
flour.
rice,
were
“rice,
flour”
ZEA as both a “potent
estrogenic”
toxin”. This is all extremely
strong
substance
“chemical
“exposure
and
bread,
refer
to
and
“primary
language
for a
are
consuming
bread,
puffed
on
corn
On
the
subject
abortions
in
of grains,
mice
atrazine,
babies
6
too,
and
so
gave
did
estrogenic
triclosan,
according
to this
fact, the triclosan
study also determined
guilty
You
To
of
causing
read
get
that
chemical
right:
straight
not
to it, estrogenics
considered
already
use
“reproductive
this new
title
and
estrogenics
other
“reproductive
phthalates
same
chemicals
scientists
health
in our
you
are
because
problems,
infertility.
Furthermore,
or
these
has
are
the
via “fragrance”
both
and
direct
the
embryo
of
extend
beyond
the
womb.
in
toxicants
“lower
as
by
categories
effects
babies
to
as
same
plastics,
on
reproductive
shown
classified
major
“toxicant”
even
been
be
Scientists
phthalates
8
The
classification
accurate
and
used
two
and
simply
Yes—the
includes
the
females
Estrogenics
are
well.
dysfunctions
In
is
humans.
should
rubbing
soap
humans.
“BPA-Free”
it
organ
pregnant
as
soaps,
etc.
toxicant”
is
reproductive
Soy
are
in
toxicants”.
regarding
often
toxicants”
that
in
your
“reproductive
mice,
the
to
study. 7
triclosan
abortions
just
rise
semen
in men.
quality,”
9
for instance.
Also, APEs
[alkylphenols]
and
BPs
[benzophenones]
are associated
with overall human
male
infertility.
10
EE2,
too,
even
sperm
has
counts
11
been
but
contraceptives,
right?
drinking
water.
BPA?
Yes,
sperm
motility.”
Shoot—even
BPA
dog
found
men
aren’t
Of course
has
been
to cause
we
decreased
taking
are,
discovered
EE2
it’s
in
the
to
“inhibit
12
sperm
quality
has
declined
due
to
“pet
food
chemicals”.
undoubtedly
partly
to
along with atrazine
red food coloring,
food
To
that
“looks
sum
it
estrogenic
Moldy
blame
content
if your
like”
up,
13
the
are
dog
foods,
and even some artificial
dog is “lucky”
and
has
salmon.
fertility
burdens
in
grains
are
is
clearly
high
or
at
risk
where
where
estrogenic
burdens
are sustained.
My fertility is at risk
and
so is your fertility. So is your children’s
fertility.
Because
some
safe
of the
scientists
rather
species
are
immensity
are
even
than
sorry.
all
extinct.
of this
problem,
suggesting
we
Or
before
Like
various
fish,
decreased
rodents,
fertility
humans
are
due
similar
in
“model-animals”]
should
even
be
concerned
where
direct
performed.
parallels
studies
more
in the
should
start
Some
about
approach.
issues
ethics
are
attempts
have
(2)
embryonic
these
(3)
humans
estrogenic
not
infertility
yet
been
research
and
and
human
I agree
Estrogenic
(1)
reproductive
to
has
field of estrogenics,
admitting
of
frequently,
of
therefore,
research
= bad
with
and
this
we
it openly.
Also,
keep
in mind
particularly
difficult to
questions
terms
14 Based
on the actual
between
animal
studies
cautious
that
exposures,
comparable
[compared
and,
bear
mammals
to estrogenic
systems
and
formation-stages
animal
polar
essence,
and
fact,
being
rare
the
problems
we looked at earlier.
One
scientific
review
says,
in
in
start
that
study.
come
hard
are
human
infertility
is
The time frame
and
to
to
not
mind,
prove
even
for
and,
being
instance.
all
too
made.
Clearly,
it would
estrogenics
be
in order
unethical
to
to find
a dose
total sterility. And many
years
or even generations
see
shortly.
earlier
This
Estrogenics
immune
often
lead
to
damages.
I recommend
Estrogenics
to Extinction
While
the
research
newest
in
transgenerational
decreased
fertility
system
reprogramming.
err
on
or
the
and
is
looked
from
long-range
performed
in humans
cancer
to
artificial
(1) the
timeline
fertility
is
of a perfect
be 100s
of years
fertility studies
are
still
I
studies
near
show
estrogens,
generations
in the
side.
newest
beginning
a
doubt
will
future
study
at
festering
safe
brand-new
concept.
At least in humans.
In fact, for the reasons
I just mentioned,
first-rate
in
damages
take
in, as you
will
long-term
across
results
we
obesity
impacts
with
findings
you
humans
people
that
estrogenic
to sink
reflects
regarding
dose
be
because
in humans
may
and (2) people
signing
on
already
excreting
high levels
for
of
estrogenics.
In
other
current
words,
beyond
estrogenic
We have
eliminated
comparisons.
Another
ask:
how
afford
not
issues
exposures
many
The
a commonplace
duration,
the
end
our
results.
a “pure”
control
group
way to think about this
remote
to recruit?
of
skew
Alaskan
study
natives
we
research
can
discussed
field.
even
and
see
fish
“feminization
This
frogs.
of males”
is
model.
includes
In
we
before
But here’s
the good
news:
animal
models
proven
parallel to human
research
throughout
estrogenic
for
is to
other
rats
and
words,
in the
mice
when
fish you
also
have
the
but
you
see
it in
mice
exposed
this
to
issue
estrogenics
also
see
in exposed
you
you
find certain
tumors
find
those
same
BPA-exposed
people.
And
studies
are
animal
starting
of
transgenerational
of
it involves
was
a
medaka
exposed
to BPA,
of
tumors
in
infertility
infertility.
15
wherein
[Japanese
common
days,
impacts.
so
This
Once
fish.
numbers
rice
of
fish]
fertilized
eggs
exposed
to either BPA or EE2 within 2
test
groups.
BPA
and
EE2
exposures
these
when
a 2015
study
is the
most
well as the most alarming
in
study
fish
extremely
you
to pile up.
the
This
Or
transgenerational
pack,
as
area
then
humans.
in rats
types
Leading
the
straight-forward
again,
and
occurrence
they
were
study
was
found
looking
unique,
were
different
are
an
“in
at
nature”
generational
however,
because
these fertilized eggs were only exposed
for 7 days,
which is an aberrantly
short duration
compared
to
our
“current”
native
lake,
river,
and
ocean
fish
exposures.
In fact,
was
after
the
in this
replaced
7 days
fish
lives.
Next,
the
fish. After
a strong
generations,
Yet
the
diminished
the
BPA
or
EE2
water
with highly-filtered
pure
water
just
of BPA and EE2 “treatment”
and
so
lived
their
experiment,
in
extremely
researchers
pure
simply
water
waited
3 fishy generations,
the
and
alarming
pattern:
the
findings
fish fertility
were
fertility.
even
We’ve
most
and
of
counted
scientists
found
in
subsequent
“tanked”.
more
seen
astonishing
diminished
than
fertility
already.
No.
Even
exposures—just
7
days
without
of
additional
estrogenics
in
that
1 st
generation—the
3 rd generation
fertility was
worse
than
the 2 nd generation.
Fertility
continued
to
plummet!
This
is
an
infertility
merely
occurs
The
alarming
can
be
discovery,
amplified
the
in
finding
future
generations
from a single BPA or EE2 exposure.
This
due to epigenetic
changes
and gives rise to
Estrogenic
Epigenetic
4. The
Estrogenic
changes
can
generations
Principle:
Epigenetic
be
via
Principle:
passed
3 rd
epigenetics
generation
extended
further.
probably
but
The
and
because
the
3 rd
of
to
such
This,
of
course,
animals
become
but
studies
the
difficult
extinct
as
to be
It is worth
adding
medaka
fish
study
events
rise
or
egg
complementary
further
between
to
in germ
the
and
fertility
What
BPA
and
“The
dose
study?
so we
cells
”.
was
such
hopefully
timelines.
research
population
are
mouse
of estrogenic
fish
But
the
at
have
deadline
if all the
done
sperm]
supports
the point
animal species and
about
could
that the scientists
concluded
that
reprogramming
to
the
study
publish
or perish.
to extend
will be
need
the
generation
to
future
inheritance
problem
pressure
shocking
findings.
Publish
future studies will continue
Estrogenic
along
can inflate these health problems.
In this case, the researchers
stopped
the
that
crashes,
know.
from
the
“ epigenetic
[cells
that
give
believed
to
be
This
conclusion
that parallel
ties
humans
in these
exist
types
studies.
EE2
doses
makes
the
in that
poison”,
medaka
right?
Dose
must
such
have
a
been
strong
generations!
Actually,
yes,
BPA
used
7-day
for
that
Extremely
EE2,
however,
BPA.
truly
This
in
the
potency
was
high.
be
not
Epigenetic
doses.
you,
ng/L.
at
all.
EE2
is designed
designed
to
It is powerful
teach
Finally,
EE2
50
gave
ng/L
of
us
have
to
more
stuff.
several
lessons.
estrogenics
if you
if IRS
estrogenics
your
grandchildren
impacted.
That’s
are
likely
to
The
Estrogenic
acted
could
the same
have
also
probably
illustrates
in
would
and
this
have
behaved
substantiates
book:
The
that
match
one
other
exposure
severely
infertility
is
legitimate
And,
as
health crisis.
you might
expect
other
research
study
looking
example,
studies
at
rise
destructive.
that
to
3 rd
is
say
similar
of
states:
health
items”.
to
This
me
have
generations
concluded
estrogenic
giving
an
Estrogenic
Principle.
That Principle,
to reiterate,
item is estrogenic,
it is likely to cause
problems
for
dosed
is to avoid
kids. Even
and
Principle
Effects
“If an
BPA
Principle.
which
earlier
of
100,000
EE2 from birth control
overall. Other estrogenics
added
similarly,
have
across
dose
was
how
should
profoundly
been
extend
The
highly
longer;
study
harm
Secondly,
as BPA
to
50 ng/L.
Fifty. And
outcome
as 100,000
obvious
lesson
plan to have
didn’t
to
exposure
illustrates
body
at lower
fish
The
ever
as
was
at only
identical
This
effect
high
high.
was added
an almost
stay
outrageously
fathead
“population
gen
a
truly
by
now,
findings.
minnows,
dynamics”
A
were
“disrupted”
from
2 nd
generation
fertility
And
BPA
exposures.
was
Specifically,
reduced
51-97%.
16
there are quite a few other similar EE2
and
studies—to
the
point
that
it gets
a
bit
redundant
and
repetitive.
Let’s
close
the
avoid
these
issues
to
in
EE2
book
with
but
what
before
we
can
moving
on,
do
I
to
want
better illustrate
The Estrogenic
Effects
Principle
combination
with
The
Estrogenic
Epigenetic
Principle.
For
List just
briefly.
First,
this,
zebrafish
called
we
move
awash
in
benzo-a-pyrene
“multigenerational
deformities”.
17
estrogenic
Next,
an
common
“Agent
to other
generations.
Finally,
we’ve
previously.
DES
fact,
genital
tracts”
I
human
2016
“transgenerational
rise
estrogenic
chemical
also
interferes
found
release
to
in
stuff.
diethylstilbestrol
appreciate—and
studies
study,
of
exposed
(DES)
hate—about
have
been
doctors
transmission
of children
to
items.
war
which
mentioned
What
is that
in
a
estrogenic
receptor 18 —was
success
and
egg
19 Cruel
10
“developmental
the
effect
is
Orange”—the
with
the
estrogen
reduce
fertilization
IRS
gave
effects”
and
This
indicates
and
the
artificial
(BaP)
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin,
future
outside
done.
In
uncovered
defects
in
in utero
to DES.
male
20
Since
these
are human
children,
this raises
question:
why
were
human
children
exposed
estrogenic
because—and
unsettling
DES
for
pay
part—DES
a
scientific
attention
was
here,
prescribed
study?
this
as
Well,
is
a
the
to
the
human
drug
right
up
to
the
day
we
put
a man
on
the
moon:
Diethylstilbestrol
mimic
that was
1940s
to
hopes
of
DES
(DES)
is a
predominantly
the
1970s
preventing
is known
as
to enhance
loss,
Decades
breast
abortion,
preterm
death.
Additionally,
DES
utero
suffer
second
from
sub / infertility
just
rather
And
it
was
it
as
wasn’t
these
scientists
prescribed
by
and
exposed
patent
women”,
in
trimester
children
drug
pregnant
risk
stillbirth,
cancer
of reproductive
tissues. 21
DES,
you
see,
was
a patented
expired.
in
later,
cancer
delivery,
neonatal
in
women
and
cause
a
variety
of
outcomes
in their daughters
spontaneous
pregnancy
estrogen
from
the
pregnant
miscarriage.
exposed
women
birth-related
adverse
such
by
potent
used
to
and
until
the
“used
by
suggest,
but
licensed
medical
doctors.
It was prescribed
just like birth control
is
prescribed
today—the
only estrogenic
on the
IRS
10
list that
Now,
as
is professionally
you
may
fertility-dysfunction
prescribed.
expect,
list could
go
the
on.
epigenetic
But
I want
to
close this chapter
with a title of a recent
discovery
that sums
it all up succinctly:
phthalate
“ Plastics
derived
epigenetic
endocrine
transgenerational
disease
the
and
disruptors
inheritance
sperm
Estrogeneration.
induce
of obesity,
epimutations.
” 22
reproductive
Welcome
to
CHAPTER
10
What
You
Sauna
Like
YOU
HAVE
Can
It Hot
NOW
estrogenics
we
basis and
estrogenic
The
hormonal
imbalances,
blood
are
DISCOVERED
all being
7 Deadly
exposures:
clotting
finally,
Do
exposed
types
deflowers
10
a
daily
from
these
depression,
system
certain
that
to on
Things arising
fat-gains,
immune
issues,
infertility
THE
dysfunctions,
of
cancer,
future
and,
generations.
You know where they are and what they do.
Now it’s time to discuss
what to do. You need
strategy
for
how
items.
That’s
makes
this the
But
that
before
two
whenever
are
people
and
can
seem
and
cure”.
That’s
Often,
and
It’s
avoiding
health
to dodge
estrogenic
That
also
estrogenics.
good-will
to be
Level
this path
attained.
“quick
these
thing.
chapter.
so
diet
the
hard
truth
Avoidance
guides.
I want
health
easy
but
estrogenics
razzmatazz
the
give up. This
is
customized
Gold,
to better
not
that
Estrogenic
specific
Both
hunters.
pervasive
is tempted
to
so I’ve created
simple
see
be
hopeless.
Secondly,
the
decide
Bronze
with
to clearly
important
destroyers,
average
person
understandable
Plans
avoid
important
presenting
avoidance
strategies,
I find
major
hurdles
present
themselves
estrogenics
Silver,
most
most
motivation
First,
to expertly
the
a
and
it’s
doesn’t
of the
and
how
also
have
so-called
one
that
you
it
not
the
“miracle
deflates
fix” crowd.
estrogenic
avoidance
does
not
lead
to
immediate
might
satisfaction
be
pleasantly
you will lose
however,
I’m
Let’s
be
abrupt
double-over.
health
bodies,
know
this
against
future
If our
be
don’t
shock
Instead,
lukewarm
well
and
problems
are
bodies
were
exposures,
and
better
They
fool
aren’t
your
even
drinking,
and
soaking
take
frogs
natural.
closely
going
to
but
they
body
“shock”
usually
swimming
in
place
this
but
in estrogenics
pot.
they
The
will be
fine.
heat
happen
Suddenly,
are
rises.
slowly.
The
help that a few
everybody
that
it’s
not
fine.
The
boils. . .
essence,
estrogenics
seem
fine.
“Everyone
doing
it,”
we
are
told.
This
is almost
But—and
this is a big but—as
we continue
drink
estrogenic
“health-parodies”,
future
our
it.
frogs
and
to
our
off.
problems
don’t register.
It doesn’t
officials are standing
by reassuring
In
all
estrogenics
creep.
They
are
like
a
pot of water
slowly heating
up.
People
Changes
water
cause
you
health
generations,
would
example;
makes
it’s
estrogenic
estrogen—usually
body.
the
promising
you
see,
are
somewhat
estrogenics—substances
that
your
eating,
that
immediate
you
usually
and
problems.
our
Estrogenics,
Essentially,
like
pain
populations
resemble
not
don’t
or
is that
dramatically
wildlife
I’m
Estrogenics
We
good.
The problem
own
although
10 pounds
in 10 days, for
also not ruling that out.
real.
motivating
changes,
surprised.
bloating
react
or
generations
we
more
creepers,
make
infertile.
true.
to eat
these
ourselves
We
little
and
gain
is
our
a
few
extra
pounds
every
slowly
develop
allergies.
year
Or
cells
slowly
build
up
cancerous.
We
certainly
cancer,
after
increased
(IRS)
all,
exposure
10
always,
World
a
skull
EE2
Carcinogens
issues are
that
So
we
a few
suggestions
health
as
our
and
become
the
odds
for
to
is the
accept
take
my
System
operandi
slow,
deliberate,
word
[WHO]
flag
our
modus
are
for
it.
is even
here
contraception
by
drugs
important
and
The
raising
classifying
as
for
These
you.
simple
are
I have
for you
to
you begin
eliminating
“Group
1
“pre-game”
the
positive
jump-start
estrogenics
your
from
life.
First,
you
can
improve
fatty
acid
ratio.
New
phthalates
likely
due
make
to
your
people
hormonal
across
a new
omega-6
ratios
improved
loss . 2 Athletes,
omega-3
research
stumbled
more
has
to
by
Specifically,
increasing
you
increase
omega-6
discovered
that
physically
weaker—most
imbalances—but
they
finding:
the
than
better
most,
your
your
omega-3
estrogenic
hear
study and say “where
do I sign-up?”
You can easily improve
your omega-3
taking
maybe,
desire.
recommendations
ratio
We
Reproductive
They
crossbones
oral
just
20.
in Humans”.
1 These
festering
health
not the Princess
and the Frog fairy tale
I have
your
Ill
This
just
next
continue
Organization
and
certain
maybe,
we
Things.
don’t
Health
the
mutations
increase
to
estrogenics.
of The 7 Deadly
and vile.
As
as
for
about
to
omega-3
omega-3
fish oil or krill oil pills, eating
more
to
strength
this
omega-6
intake.
intake
by
seafood,
and
eating
more
Improving
this
grass-fed
ratio
animal
also
products.
means
that
you
fastidiously
avoid corn oil, safflower
oil, cottonseed
oil, sunflower
oil,
oil, grape
seed
and
margarine,
specifically.
you
soy
to
I’m
and
already
soybean
know
that
assuming
oil, but
you
“vegetable
might
oil”
also
find
3 4 So
Since
avoid
even
with
trace
omega-3
“vegetable
our
best
will probably
of estrogenics,
numbers
another
time) or it
oils (80%).
oil” too.
efforts
amounts
it valuable
is frequently
way of saying soybean
oil (30% of the
is simply soybean
oil mixed with other
avoid
is good
leave
improving
“health
your
insurance”.
It
preventive
insurance.
Especially
since omega-3
acids have
so many
other
health
benefits.
forget
the
Next,
learn
for
kids,
here,
about
and
“Natural
postponing
Family
(Kippley)
might
even
NFP
also
One
an
Planning:
also
help
app
stored
your
preexisting
BMI
(Body
called
in
are
not
only
remember—but
to break
that
also
get
We
Consider
stored
in
There
is
Cycles”
which
is
to
eliminate
body.
is
estrogenics
Specifically,
all have
cycle
using
Approach
started.
eliminating
cells
the
you
Index)
vicious
called
and is more
a book
like
Complete
low.
fat,
target
even
And
stored
in fat—up
they can also cause
How?
fat
is
(NFP)
“Natural
is
your
fat.
Mass
The
fatty
Don’t
Planning”
Method”
(FAM)
5 A class
or
side-effect-free.
5
final suggestion
already
It
is
fish or krill oil!
Family
pregnancy.
“Fertility
Awareness
than
99%
effective.
Natural
their
us
if
our
estrogenics
to 10
fat. We
years,
need
quickly.
stubborn
heat.
You
estrogenics
need
to
halt
your
rid
estrogenic
yourself
years,
Specifically,
hot
Depending
with
10
on
minutes
But
you’ve
heat
sit in a
sessions.
yes.
of estrogenics
your fat for
for you.
start
exposure,
if you
been
want
to
carrying
in
is a one-step
starter
sauna
least
for
at
plan
a
few
your
health
state,
probably
and
work
your
way
up
slightly
and
slowly.
Do some
research
regarding
your
specific
situation
and
always
consult
your
doctor.
Don’t
pregnant,
start
doing
for
example.
Why
saunas?
Saunas
being
used
by
are
makes
the
The
principle
Any
molecules.
In
huge organ
we
motion
enhance
molecules.
Think
of a
heat
like
heat
likely
speeds
body,
are
even
to
treat
to succeed”.
up
molecules.
especially
estrogenics.
this
simply
on
Your
body
waste / toxin
speeds
that
molecular
or toxic
also
carrying
jumps
some
of
off
the
your
heat
is
removal
it up.
of water. Water molecules
literally jump
heated
pot, turning
to steam
in the
Water
are
even
if
scientist
principle is at play
“skin”,
increases
in
elimination
of waste
undergoing
and
researchers
“most
your
call
the
Toxins
constantly
process
this:
if you
They
6
And
important
technique
is
sessions
great.
medical
mold-toxin
exposures.
weren’t
doing this, an
that
sauna
skin
with
as
it,
you
to
out
air.
sweat,
cool
your
body.
In a
move
when
rapidly
them
similar fashion,
estrogenics
stored
out of those fat cells at a more
they
are
heated.
eliminate
them.
out,
even
breath
This
allows
in fat will
rapid
pace
your
body
You
pee
them
out,
them
out.
Since
estrogenics
to
sweat
lingering
in your
sooner
fat
is better.
are
Rapid
so
excessively
is good.
The
clearance
of estrogenics
explain the supposedly
“strange
saunas
and
scientists.
7
longevity”,
As
chemicals,
you
you
First,
a
as you
sauna,
get
“baked”.
Next,
during
your
food
for
sauna
You
you
your
sessions.
Not
and
using
you
plenty
of
amounts
to
fast.
Don’t
just
freely
before
eat
your
a period
that
into
fat-burn
mode.
change
will shock
physiology.
I
challenging
the
ever
stored
In
case
you
a
better
than
normal
body more from the
Plans
Now
get
and
let’s
introduce
the
improved
saunas.
inside.
Gold,
this
It does.
“autophagy”—cellular
“turnover”
fat
cells
cells]
and
clear
infrared
saunas
are
Infrared
heats
substance.
choice,
specific
worked.
is
your
recommending
called
body
estrogenic
have
and
it really
old fat for
Avoidance
body
be
unless
something
helps
your
[exchange
more
your
wouldn’t
strategy
It increases
eating—and
Usually
get
water
sweat
a
Ideally
long?
detox
before
slightly challenging
for you is best.
Not eating food will put your body
This
How
does
excessive
consider
of time.
Why
so “strange”?
drink
urine
by
unnatural
estrogenic
session.
should
these
water
to
want
a period
that
of
continue
sauna
but plenty.
flow.
Secondly,
up
lots
out
recently
healthier.
find
speed
drink
by heat also
helps
connection
between
discovered
draw
conventional
medicine
Two final tips.
unhealthy,
about
Silver,
estrogenic
and
your
avoidance
Bronze
Level
Estrogenic
To
drill
Avoidance
home
Plans.
the
gravity
of
just once
more,
I want
quote
from
a Taiwanese
particular
calls
a
The
7
excerpt
spade
spade.
Deadly
current
situation
you to read
this
medical
journal.
features
a
our
phthalates
It includes
Things.
Also,
and
most
I
am
exposure
shorter
anogenital
incomplete
intelligence
quotient,
in
many
between
increased
sperm
proportion
of
decreased
sperm
morphology,
pulmonary
infants
DNA
sperm
with
and
children.
have
suggested
exposure
and
decreased
morphology,
decreased
in
sperm
decreased
uterine
cancer,
and
adults.
obesity,
thyroid
Finally,
the
hormone
number
phthalate-related
scientific
publications
Taiwan
has increased
greatly
over
the
years,
the
which
illegal
clouding
may
addition
agent
in
reflect
of
the
health
phthalate
foodstuff
low
alteration,
normal
breast
hyperprolactinemia,
[breast
birth
disorder,
sex hormone
alteration,
function,
endometriosis,
leiomyomas,
age,
penis,
low
damage,
concentration,
it
quote:
between
hormone
hormone
studies
phthalate
of
pubertal
hyperactivity
thyroid
hypospadias
Furthermore,
associations
alteration
sex
puberty,
deficit
all
gestational
premature
thelarche
rhinitis, eczema,
asthma,
attention
or
shorter
descent,
precocious
gynecomastia,
development],
and
shorter
distance,
testicular
alteration,
weight,
and
really
including
because
it is highly motivating.
Here’s
the
Studies
have
suggested
associations
phthalate
block
This
over
from
past
5
effects
plasticizer
the
of
past
from
to
two
decades
Now
. 8
that’s
way. What
First,
find
“Free
do
of
a
grave
list.
can you do?
things
that
say
All Estrogenics”
not
contain
any
or
IRS
between
choose
example,
glass.
Glass
food
are
always
Preferentially
help
use
glass
select
of
I
very
literal
“Estrogenic-Free”
or
that
especially
toothpaste,
for
have
sorts
of items.
and
instance,
endorse
approval
or
stamps
“Estrogenic-Free”
is
package
on
relevant
items,
lotion,
using
product
simpler
labels.
than
“Phthalate-Free”,
warning
labels.
saying
“BPA-Free”,
It encompasses
the
stamps.
etc.
In other words,
simply saying “Estrogenic-Free”
better
than listing each
individual
estrogenic
on
a
containers,
for
of
estrogenics.
care
items
(shampoo,
should
considering
“Estrogenic-Free”
“Paraben-Free”,
obviously
If you
support
produce
personal
etc.),
that
plastic,
storage
free
“Estrogenic-Free”
Companies
a
items.
or
those
consumers,
in
things
10
choice
To
Grave
all those
is
item
nasty
things.
Companies
have
“Estrogenic-Free”
rest
until they
not
yet
assurances
do. You’ll
to
see
labels
them
up
on
before
too
long
if we
is only
the
first
step.
In the
meantime,
team
money
talks.
like The Honest
Company®,
for personal
care
products
about
excepting
example
avoiding
the
lavender.
among
begun
many.
IRS
Check
As
to
add
but I won’t
everywhere
this.
This
Support
book
companies
which lists ingredients
and
is conscientious
Top
them
always,
10
items,
out
I receive
well,
as
one
nothing
for
saying
this and
Additionally,
another
among
avoid
my
good
how
friends
simplicity,
another
label
are
unknowingly
example,
people
either
contain
health—or
is
that
making
are buying
contain
health
than
“BPA-Free”
supplement
glass).
BPA
But
equate
bad
much
work—the
as
are
in
He
plastic
was
also
I appreciate
It’s
a
trusting
good.
most
plastics
introduce
glass
them
and
added
that
just
plastics,
“BPA-Free”
Next,
beyond
this
of
using
health
needs
to
one.
plea
was
be
Scientists
once
have
from
justified
traditional
cannot
is
making
research
journals
petroleum
fuels
derived
(vs
“there
person’s
argument
in place
metals,
more
since the
increased
several
glass,
are
for
liquid
bottles
that
this
common
publishing
in environmental
this to say:
“While
cheap
which
worse
famous
biohacker,
some of his key
environmental
reexamined.
your
are
lowers the amount
of fuel required,
the better environmental
choice.
Yet—as
For
that
for
which
people
response
plastic”.
the
consumers
to something
came
immediate
need
current
is equally
BPA.
must
in the
we
phthalates,
products
His
plastic
plastic
Use
are
huge
mistakes.
“BPA-Free”
items
In a recent
chat
with a
example,
I was asking why
like
Timberlocked
reason
BPS—which
they
your
that
to
at
it.
estrogenics.
“Estrogenic-Free”
no
I like to keep
premier
example.
They
make
kids
toys,
other things, and work hard and smart
to
Besides
for
that’s
materials
hold
any
cost of non-renewable
fossil
fuels
fold during the last 3 decades.”
9
recycle.
More
importantly
avoid
or not.
“Estrogenic-Free”
labeling
and
increasing
education
government,
and
and
awareness,
scientists
need
to
collaborate
estrogenics.
The
to
ensure
goal of this
to improve
current
our
else,
oceanic
organisms
are
already
underway,
transgenerational
To move
things
health,
the
more
government
is
massive
2),
the
on
the
countries,
infants
certain
we
is
status
in
the
our
Americans
eliminating
need
along
behind
artificial
estrogen
all about.
We
shouldn’t
scientific
or legal excuses.
improving
legal
substances
that
regulators
Studies
impact
are
to
are
as
our
thoroughly
with
the
what
heavy
our
way
in
and
preventative
be
We
making
should
a
general
rule,
estrogen
receptor,
estrogenic,
should
be
health”
until
all The
should
of
China
in
in
many
Immediately.
considerations,
things
that
“hazardous
Things
laws.
That’s
many
substances
health
is
complicated
For
health.
not
(Chapter
interests
optimal
start
health,
laws
promoting
a
demands
on
leading
of
become
of our
to start
become
form
crisis
health
with
society’s
to
and children.
Behind
Russia
and
cases
and
far behind
Europe
cases.
die-offs
along
has
focus
of
be
nothing
smallest
this
a
If
needs
the
dragging
especially
saw,
health
with
working
Rapid
enhance
but
This
current
USA
wait.
before,
best
problem.
the
as
mess.
especially
federal-level
support
corporate
interests.
Based
cannot
I said
start
things
are
free
joint effort should
infertility.
along and
As
to
estrogenic
government
active.
corporations,
researched.
remain
spin
skeptical
and
considered
7
Deadly
Even
and
bias
i.e.
then,
cautious.
should
be
assumed,
anticipated,
Furthermore,
and
artificial
chemicals
considered
dangerous
until proven
dangerous.
lead
paint
newly
Of
culture
hatching
course,
certain
unethical
so I know
the
or
substances
they
for
health.
And
transform
the
merely
ban
cannot
that
use
they
are
comparably
substances
that
outcompete
bad
are
ethical
worse
companies
process.
We
must
digital age.
products
demand
transparency.
We
live in
a
Companies
know
what
they put
into
so
ingredient
1-click.
everyone
lists
at
should
least
too.
be
estrogenics,
Access
accessible
simple
should
get
involved.
to
with
and
keeps
companies
honest
companies
to succeed.
scientists
begin
else
should
Regarding
transparency
allows small
cheap
and
Scientists
still
should
flagging
corporate
bias
within
studies
and
for
instance.
And
they
should
be
funding,
rewarded
mincing
for this, not blacklisted.
words
on certain
items
control
and
start
We
watching
should
science
standards
worsening
For
can
safe
the
When
bans
are
imposed,
simply
shift
to
other
Or
we
we
government
estrogenics.
companies
health.
here.
be
Estrogeneration.
for
Next
should
until proven
safe, not
We have transformed
ingredients
in the
exposed.
seeing
not
journal
voluntarily
climate
of
the
be
We need to stop
like soy or birth
bigger
standing
editors
health
idly
with
stepping
down
spin. Those
are
high
crisis
by
and
moral
from
the
the
editors
need.
scientists
saying
that
and
physicians,
promoting
it should
estrogenic
go
without
products
under
the
ruse
of “science”
in
Chapter
3,
it’s
worse
realize. Items like
to mind,
where
headline
minor
massive
negative
needs
to stop.
than
As
most
I illustrated
non-scientists
soy or oral contraception
scientists
and
doctors
favorable
aspects
health
impacts.
underplaying
This
is a
that
leaves
And
bags
why
and
are medical facilities
other plastic items?
still using
Healthcare
care
and
I
that
things
now.
Time
made
a calamitous
while
clear
Blood
they
donation
Mandatory
are
centers
screening
also
haven’t
need
questions
Nor
should
Tiny
to
IV
to
been
step
should
Theresa
plastic
needs
to act.
be
regarding
oral contraception
use.
Tiny Timmy’s
blood transfusion
should
EE2.
calamity
legacy.
understand
but
come
strongly
be
it
in
not
taking
up.
place
contain
EE2
pills.
Period.
Finally,
for
scientific
anonymous
grant
systems.
Seriously
distance
Ok.
scientists
Let’s
Avoidance
shift
researchers,
awards
already.
from
and
Plans.
politics
move
For
want
you
are
of
the
to
an
follow
military
high-performance
Or you want
because
Things
includes
you
runs
deeply
major
Estrogenic
these
Level
Plan
can
because
athlete,
forces,
some
or
or
the
more
in your
health
those
professional
individual.
to adhere
to
one
totally
politicking.
purposes,
Gold
a
special
find
need
10
the
Olympian,
and
into
printing
be found on my website.
GOLD
LEVEL
PLAN
You
we
and
paper
review
Anonymity
will
help
Gold
of
family.
problems
other
Level
The
This
like
7
part
Plan
Deadly
especially
obesity,
infertility,
simply
or
just
depression.
too
Or
also be pregnant
or
protect
their
highly
states
by
maintaining
the
smart
and
motivated
and
Your
•
allergies
are
much.
You may
want
to
average
your
have children.
You
sensitive
hormonal
Gold
Level
more
Plan.
protective
You
are
than
the
person.
Plan is to:
Avoid
ingredients
that
include
“benz-”
or
“phen-”
•
Eliminate
dietary
grains,
including
all
corn
coffee,
and
products
•
Eliminate
dietary
cheap chocolate
• Eliminate
liquid
and
peanuts,
dairy
cheap
products
unless
grass-fed
in glass
•
Eliminate
•
Eliminate
butter
unless
all dietary
especially
oils
•
Eliminate
grass-fed
liquids
fragrances
stored
in
all
in
plastics,
personal
care
detergent
and
products
•
Eliminate
dryer
sheets
fragrances
• Travel
and
without fragrance
sleep
•
Eliminate
processed
•
Eliminate
plastic
•
Eliminate
vinyl
plastic
•
in laundry
with
a
pillow
curtains
flooring / tiling,
industrial
hand-soaps
•
Avoid
cannabis
•
Avoid
candles
except
washed
foods
shower
countertops
Avoid
standard
case
beeswax
wallpaper,
and
bathroom
•
Avoid
plastic
plastics
in
your
environment,
including
toys
• Eliminate
carpets
certified carpets
“Green-Label
Plus”
Avoid
•
Only
eat
wild seafood
•
Only
eat
grass-fed
organic
meats,
preferably
paper
Only eat
grass-fed
organic
animal
fats,
plastic
canned
use
•
wax
•
foods
or
in metal
from
pristine
waters
with
in
no
contacts
•
Only
•
Use
eat
free-range
chicken
charcoal-filtered
water
eggs
for
all drinking
and
cooking
•
•
Use charcoal-filtered
water for showering
Use
all glass
and / or
stainless
steel
coffee
makers
•
•
Use
“Estrogenic-Free”
Use
cleaning
“Estrogenic-Free”
chewable
• Use
kid’s
items
“Estrogenic-Free”
moldy
products
zinc
•
Avoid
•
Eliminate
soy
•
Eliminate
flax
•
•
Eliminate
Eliminate
lavender
products
oral contraception
•
Eliminate
toys,
especially
sunscreen
environments
and
plastic
soy
byproducts
cups,
sippies,
or
plastic-lined
mugs
•
Eliminate
finger paints
• Eliminate
SILVER
LEVEL
You
want
you
are
to
careful
artificial
red
microwaving
food
food
dyes,
including
in plastics
PLAN
follow
and
the
Silver
mindful
Level
about
Plan
your
because
health
but
not
intense
or
destructive
obsessed.
impacts
of
You
The
7
want to avoid these issues
“Extreme
Home and Food
Although
you
still need
to
value
and
are
not
prioritize
determined
to
for
one
at least
You
are
health
•
Plan
level.
health
and
you
the
before
and
expect
from
health will spur
commitments.
high
follow
month
practical
a
your
the
into
deeper
health
the
you
of
corn
are
Plan
cheating.
some
and
you
Level
Your
an
greatly
minor
to see
efforts.
want
You
Silver
any
and
athlete,
You might cheat
on
corn
products
but
strictly
benefits
Your
at
the
Things
professional
your
future
generations.
and
buy
organic
Deadly
but you don’t
Makeover”.
a
function
recognize
tangible
improved
longer
health
is to:
Avoid
ingredients
that
include
“benz-”
or
“phen-”
•
Eliminate
products
dietary
grains,
•
Eliminate
cheap
coffee
•
Eliminate
liquid
dairy
and
•
•
•
and
including
cheap
products
all
corn
chocolate
unless
grass-fed
in glass
Eliminate
Eliminate
butter unless grass-fed
oils stored in plastics
Eliminate
fragrances
in
all
personal
care
detergent
and
products
•
Eliminate
fragrances
dryer sheets
• Use “Fragrance-Free”
extended
in laundry
washed
travels
•
Eliminate
highly
processed
•
Eliminate
vinyl
countertops
foods
pillow
cases
for
•
Avoid
standard
industrial
bathroom
hand-soaps
•
•
Avoid
Avoid
•
Only
eat
wild seafood
•
Only
eat
grass-fed
plastic
organic
animal
fats,
with
no
contacts
• Use
cooking
•
cannabis
foods in metal
charcoal-filtered
Use
all
glass
water
for
and / or
all drinking
stainless
steel
and
coffee
makers
•
•
Use
“Estrogenic-Free”
Use
cleaning
“Estrogenic-Free”
chewable
• Use
kid’s
items
“Estrogenic-Free”
moldy
products
zinc
•
Avoid
•
Eliminate
soy
•
Eliminate
flax
•
•
Eliminate
Eliminate
lavender
products
oral contraception
•
Eliminate
toys,
especially
sunscreen
environments
and
plastic
soy
byproducts
cups,
sippies,
or
plastic-lined
mugs
•
Eliminate
finger paints
• Eliminate
BRONZE
You
you
red
microwaving
LEVEL
decide
because
artificial
food
food
dyes,
including
in plastics
PLAN
to
follow
the
Bronze
Level
Plan
are
honest
and
find
Silver
Level
the
Plan and Gold Level Plan too difficult. You
grains,
dairy, and corn. You correctly
expect
the
Bronze
the
least
yourself,
Level
effort.
you
also
Plan
While
like
has
the
you
to
biggest
certainly
treat
yourself.
payoff
don’t
You
love
that
for
hate
are
also
more
skeptical
the
strong
than
science
research.
improving
expectations
your
health
either way.
Your
is to:
Plan
•
Avoid
most
ingredients
people,
You
despite
all
open
to
are
but
do
not
that
include
have
high
“benz-”
or
“phen-”
•
•
and
•
Diminish
Diminish
dietary grains
liquid dairy products
unless
grass-fed
in glass
Eliminate
•
Eliminate
oils stored
in plastics
fragrances
in
all
personal
care
detergent
and
products
• Eliminate
dryer sheets
•
Eliminate
•
Avoid
•
Only
•
Use
water
•
Use
fragrances
highly
cannabis
eat
in laundry
processed
smoke
organic
corn
products
charcoal-filtered
all
foods
glass
water
and / or
for
stainless
all
drinking
steel
coffee
makers
•
Use
“Estrogenic-Free”
kid’s
chewable
•
•
Use “Estrogenic-Free”
zinc
Avoid moldy environments
sunscreen
•
Eliminate
soy
•
Eliminate
flax
•
Eliminate
lavender
•
•
Eliminate
Eliminate
oral contraception
plastic sippies
•
Eliminate
finger
paints
•
Eliminate
and
soy
items
byproducts
products
artificial
microwaving
red
food
food
dyes,
in plastics
including
Plastic
Numbers
Let’s
briefly
run
the benefit
of
explore
other
more
If
through
the
you and
estrogenic
plastic
numbers
your
health.
Then
avoidance
principles
we’ll
in
detail.
you
must
something,
choose
Plastic
the
manufacture
or
general
I
rule
recyclable
plastic
#1 is polyethylene
phthalate
is
explanation.
in
the
Similarly,
number
Plastic
is polyvinyl
#3
use
plastic
name,
so
#7
Next,
is
to
(PETE)
and
needs
no
or BPS,
so
it
is BPA
is self-explanatory.
chloride
(PVC).
This
contains
phthalates
in nearly
every
even
has other
stand-alone
toxicity
it’s no
for
recommend
#2, 4, or 5.
tere phthalate
plastic
this plastic
plastic
case 11
and
issues, 12
so
good.
plastic
estrogenic.
#6,
13
stand-alone
problems 14
includes
polystyrene
That’s
a good
plates
Styrofoam
Again:
(PS),
start.
these
last
high
#2
is
plastic
and
unshaken
density
resulted
salt-water 15
Furthermore,
which
in only
samples
#6
has
also
hot
foods
and
rather
inspect
plastic
polyethylene
about
leaching
15%
than
#2,
(HDPE).
of unheated
estrogenics
into
so
it’s
less
of
a health
gamble.
plastic #4 is low density
polyethylene
means
to leaching
still “less
not
environmental
avoided.
This
resorts
Plastic
This
actually
cups.
are
but let’s briefly
these are better.
susceptible
Yet
with
recommendations
4, and 5 since
(LDPE),
is
human
toxicity
and
so it should be carefully
Styrofoam
especially
but
for
bad”
than
it is less
estrogenic
dense
materials
1, 3, 6, and
7.
and
than
more
#2,
Finally,
plastic
phthalates
#5
are
applause
for
is
often
plastic
probably
added
#5,
16
but
so
there
Other Avoidance
Principles
General
principles
are
great
further
guide
you
circumstances.
They
framework
for
sources.
Let’s
principles
and
First, improve
2,
we
saw
against
flax
Chapter
good
findings.
improvement
and
estrogenic
help
We
also
bacteria
estrogen.
stay
up
i Gut
bacteria
sources
coffee
of
and
considered
the
mold
book,
especially
cheap
potential
cocoa
butter
to
health
to come.
Avoid
mold.
discussed
of
in
can
is newly
date
on
and
decades
products
us
will continue
including
sources
protect
This
to
discoveries
we’ve
in Chapter
examined,
from
mold
but
for
better
anti-estrogenic
bacteria
opportunities
can
unique
a
But don’t rely heavily on gut bacteria.
mycoestrogen
by preventing
or avoiding
Throughout
they
potential
exciting
it.
your
some
gut
how
new
have
include a bit more detail.
your gut bacteria.
Earlier,
destroy
some
ZEA
emerging
research
provide
you
provide
establish
Again,
withholding
because
can
phytoestrogens.
cutting-edge
I’m
within
recognizing
how
7,
best.
various
grains.
should
mold. 17
ZEA
Cheap
also
18
be
Also
check
under
refrigerator
your
filter
kitchen
draft
and
lines,
bathroom
under
(or
sinks,
even
inside)
old refrigerators,
behind walls where
plumbing
may
have leaked, and any other damp area. Air testing
is extreme
but
useful
Next,
go
through
let’s
personal
care
well)
or
(and
simply
deodorant,
parabens,
and
aggressive
and
If you
don’t
preferably
And,
on
have
time
again,
of the
Next step:
the cheap
fanatic
throw
stuff.
because
soap,
and
and
dryer
Be
side.
to do
your
own
personal
and my
research,
care
products
family on my
I
you
squeeze
and
no
financial
sunscreen
to be
absolutely
can
find.
I
the
protection,
the
sunscreen
a turtle-neck
sweater
brands
contain
so be vigilant.
Buy
of
sunblock
and / or
BP
something
highly
consumer-rated
on.
if you own
a sunscreen
need
95%
4-MBC
that
connections
mean
Probably
estrogenic
zinc
.
items.
away your
I happened
I
strongest
Moving
includes
(alkylphenols).
safe
I have
listed
the
20%
This
confirmations,
you
equals
phthalates,
APEs
the
it
and
“Alkylphenol-Free”
“Estrogenic-Free”
that “fragrance”
err
perfume
unless
detergent
possibly
your
www.ajconsultingcompany.com/whatiuse
once
to any
with
bar
you can find many of the
I personally
use for myself
website:
through)
“Estrogenic-Free”.
shampoo,
Without
assume
go
estrogenic,
“Phthalate-Free”
even—absolutely—laundry
sheets.
should
uncertain.
Anything
considered
says
“Paraben-Free”
are
( really
products.
should
be
specifically
as
if you
is devoid
Diminish
of 4-MBC
or
eliminate
comes
out.
containing
and / or
your
over
BP.
processed
“food”
consumption.
“food”
items
chemical
pronounce.
shaped
names
This
nacho
chemicals
are
with
foods.
directly,
that
are
(or
corn
fast-foods
ingredient
that
buds
meal
even
Find
a local
Also,
wrapped
in
rather
than
into
we
merely
eat
and
trusted
to
obtain
paper
from
meats
and
meat
cuts
a
stewing
butcher
in
plastic.
need
soybean
processed
Next,
again
what
your
your
beef
oil—is
“foods”
dressings.
Simply be
and avoid soy-related
assuming
food
was
been
particularly
and
things
more aware
items.
you
eat
eating.
eating
rampant
like
salad
of ingredient
meat,
In
ask
other
moldy
lists
yourself
words,
ZEA
has
grains
atrazine
herbicide?
Your poultry?
Keep
in mind
that
animals
preferentially
estrogenics
especially
but
you
in
fat,
hunt
can’t
down
charcoal
same
as
good
you
fats.
filter your
we
in
dealing
forget
steaming
food.
to
with
use
our
filtered
water
water
or
store
me,
so
unfortunate
meats
your drinking
at this point.
are
and
It’s
You can charcoal-filter
It’s really a no-brainer
don’t
to
vigilant”.
Soy—especially
in
meats.
farmer
I’m assuming
you eat meat, of course.
If you do not eat meats,
you especially
“soy
with
believing
as we
and
wax
lists and
“sprayed”
cheeses,
try
and
chemists
can
like triangular
are
taste
vegetables,
ideally.
hunter)
massive
chips
our
nuts,
buy
includes
only
professional
also includes
things
a 4-course
carbs.
Buy
fruits,
Whole
those
to fool
eating
This
and
fats.
water. DO IT.
You saw what
supply.
for
boiling
And
or
Estrogenics
order
prefer
to adhere
to
migrate
to noodles
from
or other
sitting in that water
so
“Estrogenic-Free”.
Sink
make
sure
attachment
sufficient,
here,
as
charcoal
to
as
long
remove
estrogenics.
I
they
personally
use
be
sure
liquids
in
high-quality
bottles
day,
If you must,
it immediately
at
a
of
than
is not
plastic
mere
24
that water
is
units
are
or
sufficient.
hours
fluoride
or
other
drinking
steel
plastic
and
bottles.
then
A study
room
found
your
stainless
from
at
like
Berkey”
water
plastic
items
activated
“Royal
by
into
are
the added
unit.
glass
filter water
in glass.
that
molecules
storing
rather
in
include
the
Start
from
“BPA-Free”
dozens
over
aren’t
H 2 O
every
Again:
you
plastics.
water
items
hydrophobic
water filter system
and include
removal
filters. This is a gravity
Next,
the
put
looking
temperature
most
“BPA-Free”
plastics
leached
toxic
levels
of estrogenics
water. 19 That study was even done in the
without
the
sunlight,
20
continuously
estrogenic-releasing
although
the
sloshed
(not
effects
of
plastic
products
stationary).
The
is clear. Make changes
accordingly.
Except
for the rare exception,
I prefer
bottles
protected
though
I
Furthermore,
Pellegrino®,
those bottles
babies,
good.
stainless
by
I
outer
shell
appreciate
save
tall
glass
UV
were
glass
water
of rubber
stainless
bottles
nipples
these
travel
or
nipples
bottles.
straws
or
Pura®
straws
Stainless
to
even
steel.
from
are
or
research
re-fill them,
and
bring
numbers
on various
adventures
and trips.
silicone
Add
an
also
into
dark,
safe
glass
is a
San
of
For
and
or
good
example
and
As
as we
long
mention
frequently
wood
brand
are
silicone.
stainless
I’m
to check
talking
that
silicone
asked about
or
breast
good
about
out.
silicone,
I need
is generally
good.
this. While I prefer
steel,
I
assuming
have
we’re
no
not
to
I
am
natural
issue
with
talking
about
implants. . .
Since
infants
and
kids
are
more
sensitive
to
hormone
imbalances,
be
ultra-vigilant
on
their
behalf.
than
Scrupulously
ever
For
for
instance,
chew-items
watch
and
Also,
beware
plastic
items.
rooms
littered
crib
plastic
intruders
with
in
have
plastic
and
delicate
include
must
material
These
more
plastic
baby
for
that
toys
You
your
might
get
chewed.
inhaling
or
I’m
thinking
plastic
spot
home.
flooring
other
Carefully
floors
plastic
made
toys
of things
breathing
of
play
and
may
entire
sorts
hormonal
a HEPA
be
exposures
for phthalates,
parabens,
childcare
facilities—daily
exposures—that
see.
out
anything
mattresses.
mattresses
avoid
can
plastic
of children
Specifically,
plastic
crib
and
avoid
them.
as
far
are
or
major
research
and APEs,
estrogenic
of
spongy
as
the
eye
terrible
for
the
balance
of your children.
At least
air purifier,
if you or your
child
confined
in
a
plastic
prison
for
some
reason.
As
a
general
rule,
skin,
air,
and
liquid
are the worst
for estrogenic
discharge.
estrogenics
packs
them into your body,
estrogenics
along
about
with
skin
sends
your
them
into
required
transfer
your
oxygen,
in
and
discussions
exposures
Drinking
breathing
bloodstream
we
on
talked
fat.
Estrogenic
level,
transfer
through
Direct
Think
is more
all three
direct,
of these
transfer
principles
of a steak
sitting
surface
is
in
direct
wrapping
but
not
Beverages
sitting
Another
rule
is
is far
room
temperature.
plastic
the
plastic
fine
to have
store
dry
For
short-term
instance,
are
food
items
in
liquids
in
in plastic
at
you
using
boiling
cool.
reasons,
with
plastics
plastics
are
cold
Think
about
coffee
makers
plastic
coffee
filter
a plastic
I personally
glass
blender
make
I
in
it’s
plastics—I
polluting
tubing,
something
hot
sometimes—but
plastic
and even plastic-lined
Find a ceramic
coffee
a
Again:
or microwaving
food or liquid directly
with plastics is powerfully
toxifying.
similar
use
are
inner
stainless.
Also,
but boiling eggs
coffee.
or
steak.
hand,
your
is not
contact
the
or
items
bags
plastic
entire
foods
for
the
other
the
storing
strainer
storage
of
the
heating
For
or
on
Most
people
do. Go
outdoor
survival skills
zipper
heating
contact
interior
than
molecular
foods,
also.
The
exterior
with
exposing
that
worse
colander
noodles?
appreciate
apply
to
in plastic.
in plastic,
plastic
a
modes.
contact
constantly
shifting
and
volume to estrogenics.
on
with
in
our
all
the
holders,
k-cups,
mugs
for the final
dripper,
something
product.
stainless,
like a French
with
coffee
Press.
hot
liquids!
by
boiling
And
water
don’t
to
the
perfect
temperature
then I use a glass
using a stainless-steel
pot and
Chemex®
coffee maker
with a
hemp
actual
For
filter for
foods
principles
the
in contact
apply.
with
brewing
plastic,
process.
several
additional
First,
watch
foods
have
out
for
the
canned
inside
food.
of
A lot of
the
can
canned
coated
with
plastic. This plastic is usually BPA—perfectly
legal in
America,
of course—and
it is generally
even heated
in some
food
sort
last
of pasteurization
forever.
shining
Another
far
bacon
but
in direct
bacon,
for
common
or
with
than
even
and
plastic
with
at
for
oil sitting
compromised
oils
and
major
a better
choice
fats
will
For
is far
absorb
instance,
worse
estrogenic
than
in an
in
storage
room
transfers.
is oil sitting
levels
by
fats,
a
fats, too, that liquids
continue
solids.
Oils are
worse
than
offender
high
is
plastic.
in a
industrial
or bucket,
used for things like
coconut
oil or MCTs
(excellent
found
the
other
non-fats.
with
example,
health
oils
than
contact
Keep in mind
to be worse
is always
is that
estrogenics
to make
apparently
to
glass
fat in contact
steak
Joes
compared
21
principle
more
tub
Trader
star
supermarkets
if possible.
process
deep
and
in plastics.
temperature
plastic
plastic
frying.
healthy
coconut
A
oil)
can
Frankly,
is too
bag
Even
fats
be
for
“hot”.
all
For
water,
short-term
room
temperature
storage
is
probably
fine. Multi-year
studies with all the proper
controls
will
emphasizing
And
health
undoubtedly
than
the
should
but
Your
not
profits
brain
probably
“probably”
issues
never
related
to “eating
originate
from
fats
themselves.
be
allowed
are
currently
is the
be
done
so
I’m
much
fat”
here.
fattiest
too
the estrogenics
Things
like
in the
beating
organ
same
more so
phthalate
room
ethics
in your
as
oils
in this
area.
body
and
it will thank
you
for
Don’t
that
depression
forget
Things.
Finally,
it
is
currently
molecules,
too
eliminating
worth
repeating
BPS,
phthalates,
parabens,
Be
with
red-food
Here
is
journal:
“More
artificial
colorants
drugs,
every
and
day.
unaware
of artificial
Since
most
thinking
Should.
Boy-Girl
Let’s
the
I often
with
I thought.
a
legal
science
amount
FDA
in the
consume
public
behind
foods,
and
is
the
of
use
largely
deceptive
come
out
looking
like
everything
a
but
scientist,
taking
this
hopefully
and
stuff
you
I can
very
a
now
tell
you,
seriously.
So.
You.
Numbers
hit
true
foods
22
foods
on
one
about
tarpon
final
“boys
but
principle,
versus
estrogenic
then
mention
catch
a
hazards,
estrogenics
might
males overall. This may
not
it’s a cultural
hear:
briefly
girls”,
fish.
Despite
all the health
seem to be worse for
be
truth
vigilant
the food
coloring
industry
has
stake here than you might expect.
like
are
something
massive
by
color.”
include
scientists
allowed
processed
brown
mush,
more powerful
are
the
perilous
allure
I can’t
is
just
to avoid
from
shocking
is
are
be
you
what
cosmetics
that we
The
consuming
of the
APEs
and
quote
Deadly
BPA-mimicking
and
That’s
fearless
7
fat.
“BPA-free”
other
to remind
coloring?
another
that
thorough
regarding
plastics.
And do I even need
in
is 1 of The
meaningless.
prevalent.
estrogenics
“Females
exposures,
expectation.
are
probably
except
not
maybe
at
risk
for
the
puberty
issues.”
levels
Or:
of natural
estrogen
It’s a sentiment
course,
it makes
Essentially,
And
idea
natural
estrogen
are
so
they’re
emerges
estrogen
mostly
as
is.
family,
ocean. . .
in
like
the
see”.
this:
Barbie’s
Foxworthy
acceptable
for
estrogen
should
“I
live
the
women
levels.
overpower
all
hormone.
they
the
as
Barbie
the
eye
women
must
have
the
his
estrogen
can
so
he
also
be
such
natural
artificial
Jeff
and
in
Naked
by
woman’s
all the
in
right?
therefore,
since
The
we
comedian
far
is surrounded
must be inhaling estrogen,
Seems
legit. Estrogenics,
of
female
of
as
fine.”
because
a
high
surface,
daughters,
of
daughters
middle
Woodstock—naked
to
probably
Redneck
Foxworthy
describes
his
disproportionate
numbers
extended
adapted
I understand.
On the
sense. But it’s wrong.
this
recognize
“Women
high
estrogen
stuff,
right?
Well,
get out your
quick puff.
estrogen-breathalyzer
and
let’s
have
In boys
men,
low
it is
usually
and
measured
good.
in
As
extremely
picograms
And,
we
as
can
picogram
units
well.
healthy,
the
way
of
predicted,
is so
“pico”
So
so
low.
Usually,
something
like
per milliliter (pg/mL)
is found
in
20
men.
a side
note,
equals
such
it is remarkable
tiny
amounts,
0.000,000,000,001
middle-aged,
20
on
the
woman
pg/mL—the
time
that
since
1
grams.
or not, women
measure
in milliliters of blood, for
Depending
from
I think
measure
estrogen
far
are
even
male
grams.
levels
But, believe
it
picogram
range
as
estrogen
a
of
the
will usually
same
in
the
estrogen,
month,
a
range
all
numbers
as
men—up
highest
to
around
point,
then,
400
these
pg/mL.
female
hormones
your
cells.
have
Plus,
discussed
in
the
the
such
estrogen
(20-400
pg/mL)
numbers
that
thousands.
Women
will be
4,000
pg/mL
phthalates
BPA
pg/mL,
at
at 4,000
1,000
you
15,000
pg/mL
truthfully.
as
on
we
of
the
book.
levels
of
natural
with
our
unnatural
bleed
impacted
of 10
into
the
significantly
by
IRS
estrogenic
other
words,
both
women
impacted.
And if you have
pg/mL,
pg/mL,
really
low
impact
long,
frequently
of any
items, for instance.
In
and men are massively
incredibly
lasts
natural
the
numbers
a massive
beginning
exposures,
drinking
are
impact
Generations,
even.
Now:
contrast
those
at
estrogen
are not actually sky high.
These natural estrogen
numbers
because
Even
have
exposure
EE2
and
a
at 4,000
atrazine
problem!
problem
at
pg/mL,
6,000
Probably
or
beyond,
a
That
brings
Principle
5. The
to
up
one
of Estrogenic
Principle
mixtures
final
principle
of Estrogenic
of
called
estrogenics
Cocktails:
gives
Exposure
rise
to
additive
estrogenic
effects
that
lead
health problems
and “mixture
effects”.
Water
many
find
is
the
studies
ultimate
have
estrogenic
The
Cocktails:
example
been
H 2 O
here,
performed
cocktails.
many
to
worse
because
and
Just
so
many
don’t
forget
that
oils,
fats,
meats,
and
other
things
frequently
comparable
or not far behind.
A
study
neatly
of
mixtures
demonstrates
Cocktails.
with
each
this
toxicity
Toxicity
added
study
of
The
was
different
Principle
discovered
estrogenic
was
8
that
and
of
“estrogenic
are
estrogenics
to
the
so
Estrogenic
be
additive
conclusion
agents
of
are
able
to
when
act
together
combined”.
to
produce
significant
effects
23
So 4,000
ng/L
of atrazine
and 4,000
ng/L
of
EE2 is likely to equal the nasty effects that 8,000
or
even
effects
10,000
ng/L
exemplified
Mixture
are
animals
serious
on
rising
cancer
depression
and
rates.
environment
Chapter
We
looked
4. And
All
at those
4,000
rising
7
Deadly
The
pg/mL,
as
our
our
reside
levels
most
Or
in
4,000
our
pg/mL?
precise
numbers
by
way,
the
in
is
the
as saying
“4,000
ng/L”,
in case
you
go
and
review
Chapter
4. It’s the
difference
between
human
environmental
As
we
high
of
mind.
Or
estrogenics
at such
Absolutely.
too.
in
and,
even
plenty
of
infertility
to
rates.
Allergies,
of
underestimated
comes
obesity
effect”,
Things.
estrogenics
are revealing
Rising
planet
Things.
Do
mixtures
units
massively
issues.
the
“estrogenic
7 Deadly
every
study
on
that fact, studies
incredibly
same
back
total
as The
effects
virtually
despite
of
blood
water
convert
measurement
measurement
Hence,
we
vigilant.
More-so
tree
live
and
Closing Keys
In 1919, the
fishing
in
a
Grey
would
an
than
find
but
these
units
out
in an earlier
chapter,
“if it is legal, it is OK”.
estrogenic
ever.
you
7-foot
in Mexico
tarpon.
often
are
300
look
the
up
Be
your
sap.
Grey
where
Legend
fish some
quagmire.
Don’t
to a Fish Tail
outdoorsman
Zane
expedition
with
and
straight-up.
I additionally
mentioned
live in a culture where,
family
units
described
he
has
days
it
hooked
a
up
that
Zane
of the
year,
it was
his
“duty”
his respect
for
as
the
an
outdoor
tarpon
fish
none.
Grey
describes
experience
infallibly:
The
realization
later
I
would
silver
tigers
feel
[the
own
on
the
fish]
still
second
tarpon
me
that
strike
tarpon
but
remained
his
dawned
author,
of
battle
sooner
one
and
to
or
of
those
a keen,
tingling
thrill
of
primitive
excitement
quivered
man
asserted
himself
over
and
me.
The
I
leaned
forward,
tense
with
suspended
breath
and
Suddenly
energy
and
swelling
the
that
strike
with
a hissing
long
as
and
up
pulled
sound
into
to
air.
glowed,
and
he
from
my
wagged
his
out
which
wand.
head
he
of
toward
the
thought
The
leaving behind a white wake.
he sounded,
while I watched
a series
experience.
He
But
to the
as
king
curve,
Then
began
sheered
stiff
silver
and
eyes.
up
and
fell back
exquisitely
the
blue
astern
troubled
shot
spray,
faded.
sprang
I had
like a willow
tarpon,
who
as many
he plunged
down
with a
crash.
The reel screamed.
The
line
rod,
its
seat;
a great
wolf. When
a
rainbow,
stood
in
I could think of
the water
split
as wide,
He
delicate,
paled,
times
me
that
Then
seemingly
the
tremendous
let out
it like a struggling
a
heavy
splash,
and
so
bewildering
hold on.
a door,
beautiful
Five
came,
it almost
so quick, fierce,
nothing
but to
shook
with
strained
throat.
not
right
long
of magnificent
stood
on
his
sky,
thunderous
sang.
The
a
tree,
came
bent
up
in a long,
did
tactics
tail,
and
the
he
wide
line
with
sulk.
He
new
then
far
in
my
on
his
head;
he
sailed
violently
as
sound;
marring
with
like a bird;
to
make
he
a
shook
convulsive,
so
shuffling
he dove, to come up covered
with mud,
his bright sides; he closed his huge
gills
a slap
and,
in the
shape
such
marvelous
most
remarkable
of a crescent,
another
page
power
and
Tarpon
are
that
he
During
random
trips
in Florida,
along
especially
a
certain
at
the
and
Florida
I were
Key.
At
shorelines
a
at
with
to
least
broken
line.
place
while
enough
on
multiple
tarpon
would
and
called
Robbie’s,
Keys
lucky
tarpon
migration
those seasons,
the
dense
Islamorada
in
for
rose
spirit-breakers.
visiting
Allison
to
witness
the
occasions.
During
stack-up
true
out
seemed
on
culminates
like that;
of all, he
to straighten
actually crack like a whip. 24
This
hand-to-tail
combat
goes
living
himself
they
were
Robbie’s,
nobody
was
on
allowed
to fish but you could buy a bucket
of bait
hand-feed
the tarpon
around
the docks, which
and
we
did.
The
sight
of all those
to finally
from
The
hire
Boston.
trip was
tarpon
Victor.
her
The
I
Invites
brother,
message
when
was
me,
it
sent
Fishing
simple:
one
I visited
planned
were
and
and finally catch a tarpon!
hotel
on
Islamorada
Key
started
inspired
guide
perfect.
migration.
parents,
tarpon
a fishing
during
to
Club
let’s
day,
Florida
the
Allison’s
President
get
serious
We all met at a nice
and
the
anticipation
to build.
The
day
but
calling
of
the
it “day”
guided
tarpon
is overly
trip
generous.
finally
We
arrived
met
the
guide
at 4 A.M.
water
in total
sharp
and
darkness
then
where
buzzed
across
the
guide
piloted
the
the
boat to a “secret”
spot. As soon
a stop, we all could hear tarpon
us in the
As
darkness.
soon
behemoth
as
we
could
fish
after
and
we
each
one
hooking
What
person
took
and
get
another
crabs from our hooks.
fish battle so violently,
rod
as he slowed
to
plopping
around
would
fishing
at
trying
boat-chasing.
was
line
hungrily
a time.
to
catch
Trying.
And.
these
tarpon
guided
tarpon
captures,
As
a
side
adventure
bar,
one
eat
live
yielded
not
one.
we
did
witness
the
one
Therefore,
a
tarpon,
Trying.
would
line or bend
or spit the
hooks.
opportunities
but nobody
landed
a
entire
out,
It was amazing!
Since
we could only handle
turns
happened
a
break
the
We
all
tarpon!
no
had
The
boat
side
lunchtime
for
a
14-foot
hammerhead
shark,
closer to a swimming
beach than you would like to believe. The hammer
came
to
the
perfectly
surface,
through
with
the
water,
tarpon
exactly
in half.
tarpon
reeling
was the one my
in for the past 20
When
we
buzzed
hammerhead’s
twitching
hammer
all
Overall,
it
and
this
sink
bit
this
mother-in-law
minutes.
to
the
crime,
of
a
we
trophy
fin
a
cutting
struggling
unfortunate
had
spot
been
of
saw
teeth
tarpon
into
the
the
blood
tarpon
still
sank. Next, we saw the
around
in full view and
disappear.
total
and
boat
half
as it slowly
wheel back
watched
half-tarpon
the
and
dorsal
Incidentally,
gruesome
everywhere
the
big
we
descending
Woah.
evasion
was
almost
enough
yet
to drive
another
that
routine
and
I
sure,
from
to
from
Boston
stayed
decided
at
to
a
and
to
I
Fort
friend’s
arrange
beach
arranged
Club,
all the necessary
We arrived
at
the
and
seizuring
capture
photos
able
kids
hooked
all
took
fishing
crept
fish.
I gripped
with
a long
turns
in while
my
And
a 6-foot
rod.
Victor
I’d
fought
many
routed—tarpon!
up
to his
the
The
It was
Victor
waist,
before
into
he
I
of close
had
battle
come
calls.
to
Almost
blacktip
and
shark
the
were
heavy
able
out
The
power
had
the
exactly
after
of
never
water,
salty
flashlight
cranked
it finally
expect
to
end.
but
the
to
sunset
strung
raw
strobed
waves.
I cranked
and
fish fought valiantly but
a 40-minute
opponent
times
and
sunset.
at the
jumped
the
I continued
night air got damp and heavy.
Without warning,
I suddenly
felt the
a fish
of
brought
It was
bait
our
also
amazing
left.
and
rod.
a large
to
he
kids
after
family
and
was
handling
The
fishing
line and
us.
then
Allison
captain
nearing
that
shark
and,
with the shark, the
Darkness
years
in the
trip
the
a
Florida,
trip
This
to join
on
Myers,
house
now
equipment.
the beach
Victor
and
into
reel.
over
hopped
sharking
them.
Victor,
was
immediately,
a
with
because
Fishing
prompted
This trip would finally bring closure
dream
I had now held for years.
Allison
Boston
new town of Ave Maria, Florida.
to repay this family’s generosity,
favorite
sea
it
full
adventure,
then
For
a
flight
brand
Partly
crazy.
trip to Florida
year later.
the tarpon
For
me
on
gave
the
all
the
up.
worthy
these
I was
this
surprisingly
long
battle
quiet
but,
and
when
calm
during
I swam
that
most
of
exhausted
tarpon
up under
my arms
in waist-deep
water,
everything
came out. Years of emotion
exploded.
I
started
yelling,
like
a
Super
my
Super
screaming
Bowl
a
champion.
Bowl. . .
way,
victory
this
was
took
those
the
7-foot
This
was
the
worked
so
hard
to
catch.
was
the
always
seemed
was
was
one last,
something
it was
meant
life I loved,
The
all
the
outdoors,
those
to
be
Bowl.
a
of
We
from
Fish
In
cry
long-coveted
pictures
and then released
monster
back into the black waves.
escape
my
battle
fish I had
I realized,
unnatural
wearing
my
wet, adrenaline-laced,
worth fighting for,
to be.
burdens
body
down.
epiphany.
nature
the
that
It
This
way
APPENDIX
Actionable
Summary
on
Estrogenics
THIS
IS
AN
points
from
(1) the
ACTIONABLE
Estrogeneration.
top
10
are exposed
(2) common
artificial
SUMMARY
It includes
estrogenics
health
list
key
3 parts:
and
problems
of
where
you
arising
from
estrogenics
(3) directives
for
diminishing
your
estrogenic
exposures
In
addition,
here
in this book:
(1) Principle
scientific
for
study
something
is a
relisting
Evaluating
could
the
5
Principles
Estrogenics
is favorable
that
of
and
be
:
positive
bought
If
a
regarding
and
sold,
be
wary!
(2) The
Ideal Foods
Principle : Try to find,
use,
and eat whole, unprocessed
foods, from
genuinely
organic
not
and
stored
naturally
in
plastics,
grown
and
sources,
raised
preferably
in
a
healthy
environment.
(3) The
Estrogenic
Effects
Principle : If an item is
estrogenic,
it is likely to cause health problems
that
match
(4) The
changes
other
estrogenic
Estrogenic
can
be
items.
Epigenetic
passed
via epigenetics
and
such
these health problems.
(5) The
to
Principle
mixtures
additive
of
estrogenic
Principle
along
inheritance
of Estrogenic
estrogenics
effects
:
that
Estrogenic
to future
can
Cocktails
gives
lead
generations
rise
:
inflate
Exposure
to
many
to worse
health
problems
and
The
10 List
Top
“mixture
“Estrogenics”
like estrogen
I have
are
exposed
likely
every
day.
of Estrogenics
are
in
research,
effects”.
defined
as
your
body.
found
10
major
to most
All 10
bind
substances
Through
that
10
in Part
the
2 of this
estrogenics.
of these
10
estrogen
mimic
estrogen
in your
body
After that happens,
your health
that
act
extensive
You
estrogenics
receptor
and
in various
ways.
explodes.
You’ll see
Summary.
Here
is the
Top
List:
Estrogenic
#1.
PHYTOESTROGENS
The “Plant Estrogenics”
Phytoestrogens
are plant
estrogen
in your
concerning
on
estrogenics
of
this
are
bad the
So why
Simple.
body.
these
“ok”.
bacteria
just
tend
plant
courtesy
least
mean
don’t
but
tells
plant
to “chew-up”
estrogenics.
of
your
do
so
bacteria
some
This
is
a
probiotics.
well
know
with
how
the
to
may
even
act
might
help
you
phyto’s.
instances,
in positive
ways.
natural
solution
Generally,
estrogenics,
avoid
really
not
the
you?
nature-made
rare
if your
natural
does
like
how
gut
It
probably
act
you
adaptation
break-up
are
list. This
Your
gut
bacteria
artificial
estrogenics
In
They
that
other estrogenics
are for your health.
are phytoestrogens
“less bad”
for
Your
healthy
hormones
soy
plant
For
example,
soy
estrogen
levels
to a sometimes
however,
natural
and
estrogenics
flax.
you
or
No
are too low. It is
real problem.
don’t
artificial.
plants
a
want
high
levels
of
So
you
want
to
come
remotely
close
to
the
flax.
levels
Soy
and
of
times
plant-foods.
Finally:
flax
you
have
are
high,
so
rise
after
all,
Skin
smoke
are
loaded
These
oxygens—or
throughout
our
is
scented
of
products
these
man-boobs.
Estrogenic
probably
perfumes
has
also
oil—which
lungs,
near
designed
to
been
them
blood.
too.
soaps
Avoid
because
shown
the
“catch”
transport
“stream”
of
here,
or
won’t
Our
vessels
problem
are
in is a different
cannabis
and
blood
are
levels
to
use
cause
#2.
“Fungus
[zearalenone]
Estrogenic”
Zearalenone
fungus
and
effects.
a
MYCOESTROGEN
singular
growing
lavender
essential
estrogenics—and
bodies
in the
transfer
other
or
with
and
thousands
estrogenic
them
soy
any
estrogenic
vessels
lavender
[ZEA]—the
estrogenic
concern.
family,
“estrogenic
so mold
toxins”
Anyway,
monoculture
finding
contaminations
fungus
produced
Mold,
by
(this
the
dark
places.
Usually
massive
grain-storage
are
The
eating
to strongly
surface.
ZEA).
that
issues,
but breathing
them
Many
people
inhale
gives
of
than
know
estrogenic.
in
tens
phytoestrogen
lavender—through
The
found
literally
should
terribly
cause
story.
phytoestrogen
more
marijuana
not
of
farms.
that
are
estrogenic—is
by fungus.
the way,
contaminations
is how
trouble
ZEA is a
is in
the
also
scientists
begins
the
describe
damp
and
problems
arise
from
containers,
usually
the
on
Researchers
in
produce
around
fungal / mold
increasingly
common
the
globe
estrogenic
because
mass-storage
of
common.
up
in
animals
So
has
food
and,
store
been
grains
but
also
in
as a result, ZEA ends
Even
corn-fed
fungus
ends
our
farm
up in our
buffalo
meat
estrogenic
ZEA!
Estrogenic”
is the
and
China
increasingly
#3.
second
is glyphosate).
corn
estrogenic
Fungus
to contain
ATRAZINE
The “Herbicide
Atrazine
out!
meats.
found
Estrogenic
is
watch
our
feed
grocery
food-grains
other
and
most
Atrazine
grain
many
common
is heavily
crops
other
herbicide
used
in the
food
export
in
(#1
spraying
Americas
and
countries.
It
is
also a major
contaminant
in drinking
water
at
astonishingly
high levels. Well, except
in countries
like
Europe
where
atrazine
has
been
illegal
since
2004.
Estrogenic
#4.
TRICLOSAN
The “Soap
& APES
Estrogenics”
[Alkylphenols]
Not
surprisingly,
Europe
and
production
of many
Americas,
however,
hidden
in
lubricants.
regulations
Triclosan
triclosan
on
is
a
ceramic
skin.
APEs
a
makes
the
plate
Estrogenics
or
APEs
soaps,
and
has
tighter
America.
too,
but
ingredient”
Doesn’t
washing-off
Nope.
a
but
steel
fat-like
at
list so
estrogenics?
have
use
in the
same
products,
China
“active
soap
the
living
these
estrogenic,
rinsing?
these
banned
People
find
than
nasty
also
APEs.
can
our
cleaning
Hidden.
Even
can avoid it.
What
about
wash-off
has
pot
not
properties
least
you
soap
Maybe
on
(they
on
your
are
“hydrophobic”)
your
skin
so
rather
estrogenics
than
prefer
washing
out
latching
into
onto
the
water.
And, like medical
hormone
creams,
estrogenics
through
your skin and into your body.
Speaking
of
water,
definitely
common
Egregious
water
APEs
and
contaminants
go
Triclosan
of
are
drinking
water.
offenders.
Estrogenic
#5.
BP
&
4-MBC
[Benzophenone
&
4-Methylbenzylidene]
The
“Sunscreen
Here
are
lotions
two
Estrogenics”
more
nearly
always
Even
“organic”
Oxybenzone,
by
Unfortunately,
hand
some
for
have
you
RED
reason,
and
may
is a
even
need
high
“Artificial
has
4-MBC.
contain
type
of
to check
BP.
BP.
your
4-MBC
levels
have
been
4-MBC
in
3 & 40
Red
gotten
companies
Red
often
cereal.
Why
is
not sure. Strange.
Food
Color
Estrogenics”
Both Red No. 40 and Red No.
Red No. 3 remains
legal in the
3
sunblock
#6.
NUMBERS
The
BP
Cheap
BP.
found
in breakfast
breakfast
cereal? I’m
Estrogenic
dippers”.
sunblocks
the
way,
today
soaps
For
“skin
No.
years
hesitate
40
to
instead.
of
use
3 are estrogenic.
USA but Red
No.
bad
press
it. They
The
so
use
negative
food
estrogenic
Red
No.
3
media
action
press
arose
because
the FDA
postponed
on banning
Red No. 3 more than 20 times
(even
after
major
No.
it was
health
3 was
implicated
problems)
never
yet
fully banned
in ADHD
despite
in the
all
and
this,
USA.
other
Red
Also:
Red
No.
pseudonyms.
40
I
Red
usually
artificial red food
simple. Capeesh?
Estrogenic
and
No.
advise
coloring
3
go
by
many
to
avoid
people
in general
and
keep
life
#7.
PARABENS
The
“Fragrance
Estrogenics”
Parabens
are
are
especially
found everywhere
hidden
in the
“fragrances”.
This
detergent,
by
includes
the
way.
your
It’s
paraben
in cosmetics.
They
ingredient
list
as
scented
amazing
aromas
those
cuddly
from
conventional
people
lists
“soak” in parabens
all day long.
alternatives,
since
you
laundry
remain
Does
that
all this
clothing
detergent..and
how
and
90%
work.
“topically-applied”
of
umbilical
so did human
Plus,
My website
asked
(
).
paraben
your body? You bet. Another
example
estrogenic
skin transfer.
In fact, one
over
persistent
in
www.ajconsultingcompany.com/whatiuse
Alternatives
laundry
how
like most
cords
end
up
in
of yet more
study
found
contained
parabens
breastmilk.
estrogenics,
parabens
in our waterways
courtesy
of the
and circulating
ocean
currents.
Northern
Alaska,
for
contain
parabens.
instance,
Dolphin
are
around
Polar
have
been
blubber
ending
up
the globe
bears
in
found
as
to
well,
parabens.
Estrogenic
#8.
PHTHALATES
The
“Plastic
Phthalates
plastic
Additive
are
additive.
an
They
Estrogenics”
extremely
are
not
common
a
“main
estrogenic
ingredient”
in plastic
so
but
they
phthalates
transfer
fit into
out
of
plastic
imagine
tiny specks
of
plastic (e.g. plastic wrap
are
on
Like
the
right
glitter,
you
phthalates.
molecular
fairly
“cracks”
easily.
dust
or
on your
glitter
food)
seem
get
Just
in
and
your
you
track.
cannot
Scientists
find
to
phthalates
rid
of
in wild
the
alligator
pee,
for crying
out loud!
Researchers
also
find
indoor air in California
child care facilities
contains
phthalate
Vinyl
levels
flooring
contain
And,
again
on
been
found
than
women
in
the
crib
benchmarks”.
mattresses
the
“off
the
coffin
of
of “fragrances”,
(along
women
to contain
Estrogenic
The
cancer
baby
topic
phthalates
pregnant
often
used
in
“healthcareless”,
BPA
“exceed
certain
with the parabens).
using perfume
have
167%
higher
juice
[perfume]”.
irony
perfumes
is
phthalate
that
many
medical
wouldn’t
you?
phthalates
devices.
I
& BPS
[Bisphenol
are
call
this
A & S]
Ingredient
Estrogenics”
“additive”
like phthalates,
as “main
ingredients”
certain
BPS
plastics.
is equally
unhealthy,
problems
if alternatives
is used
so
found
of
estrogenics,
wanting
the
the
in place
“banning”
are
banned
substance.
BPA has been
examined
moral
final
#9.
“Plastic
is
levels
The
Rather
than an
BPS
are
used
and
also
phthalates.
often contain
For example,
nail
that
and
bad
in
i.e.
of BPA
BPA
can
or worse
thousands
terrible
the
BPA
and
to
make
story
is
more
problematic
for
more
than
of
you.
we
we
and
lead
to
the
studies
The
study
recognize
them
to be.
Further,
BPA
is still being
found
at high
major
drinking
water
sources
and
deceptively
used
in certain
places.
BPA
is often
metal
canned
the
canned
sprayed
onto
the
food / beverage
food
in
is still being
For
instance,
insides
of
(in
contact
jars
or beverage)
levels
so remain
certain
with
cautious.
Estrogenic
#10.
EE2 [17α-Ethinylestradiol]
The
“Birth
More
Control
than
are
60%
Estrogenic”
of married
currently
on
chemical
Does
most
contain
EE2.
urinated
recycle
out of the
back
into
surprisingly
high
some
of
and
level
sadly,
Indeed,
“caught”
does
by
and
bacteria
Since
similar
get
Yes. Does
water?
we
not
the
all exposed
it
At
to
Absolutely
efficiently
city
tap
plants
but
are
terrible
at
actually,
not
get
water
good
at
removing
just
EE2.
many
estrogenics
on this list, EE2
is
slow to degrade
in the environment.
I’m
years,
now
here,
from
you’ve
not
so it will need
estrogen
properties
is
made
to fats
months.
Estrogenics
glimpsed
Estrogenics
and where
you
discuss
problems,
starting
summary,
that
eventually
control?
treatment
Problems
So
it
Are
birth
All estrogenics,
about
Common
planet
contraceptives
of
yes.
estrogenic
Water
virus
talking
Ok.
levels,
our
yes.
estrogenics.
And
like
extremely
on
human
body?
the
drinking
EE2
simply
or
“captured”
treatments.
killing
women
might
with
to be
from
the
find
fat.
dense.
Top
them.
This
Let’s
is
a
Buckle-up!
cholesterol,
or oils. The
10
technical
it
has
term
is “lipophilic”
mainly
or
floats
“fat-loving”.
on
For
water.
example,
Like
oil.
estrogen
And
artificial
estrogenics,
naturally,
have similar characteristics
natural estrogen.
Estrogenics
are fat-lovers.
Furthermore,
derived
both
from
substances”
now
and
cholesterol.
don’t
your
watery
(called
“sex
Ok,
estrogen
mix
Since
well
with
stay
with
cause
more
testosterone
riding
around
me
an
here:
increase
leads
bodies.
Therefore,
first-world
to
less
In
other
countries
body.
your
“free”
since
high
to
SHBG,
words,
SHBG.
and
have
of
meaning
testosterone
men
already
travel
levels
in SHBG,
testosterone
is useable
for your
Artificial
estrogenics
increase
further
they
“stuck”
blood.
“fatty
the
same
protein
globulin”
[SHBG]).
becomes
your
are
these
water,
bloodstream
on
hormone
binging
testosterone
testosterone
to
less
This
in
our
women
chronically
in
low
testosterone—a
serious
health
concern—estrogenics
compound
this problem
by further
lowering
our
free
testosterone.
the
scientists,
“Feminizing”
is
a
massively
common
side-effect
changes
that
even
Now
include brain structural
changes.
we circle back to fat. Because
estrogenics
are
years,
they
“age”
also
of
although
are
a
stored
human
fat cells
physical
to
estrogenics.
average
causes
according
from
“fat-loving”,
This
males,
have
fat
in fat
cell
been
is
shown
cells.
The
over
1.5
to
“live”
up to 10 years. The life of a fat cell, by the way,
is the length of time that estrogenics
are able
to
hang-out
your
the
body
in
your
as
fat stores!
you
fat,
slowly
burn
fat
being
released
into
stores—
if you
burn
To
make
matters
fattening.
insulin
weight
Estrogenics
“diabesity”.
have
been
are
shown
other
this:
rising,
parallel.
food
while
1990,
the
guessed
paper
occurs
estrogenic
obesity
has
was
around
rising
in
around
10%;
in
20%.
What
are
under
control.
that
Europe
from
rates.
estrogenics
the
This
but
10
appears
is
List,
to be
hard
to
America,
Here’s
are
many
linked
including
directly
rather
than
Speaking
of
growth,
cells
to
direct
caused
scientifically
neurological
estrogenics
grow.
Birth
to
higher
by
prove.
from
estrogenic
exposures
may
the fattening
effects
of estrogenics,
example,
cancer
Top
about
banned
of these artificial estrogenics.
Next, increased
rates of depression
estrogenics
has
been
rates
remembering
our
usage
unlike
the
Depression
related
to
in
estrogenic,
to fatten
Meanwhile,
obesity
calls
because
30%.
Europe’s
suicide
offspring
during
fat-switch
obesity
it was
it:
cause
animals!
artificial
US
2000,
key:
effect
on”
American
In
the year
2010?
science
also
to
protein
called PPARγ.
Mold
even
been
used
intentionally
and
Visualize
one
fattening
“switch
bodies,
a
ZEA,
has
been
what
This
estrogenics
You
estrogenics
resistance,
weight
gains—including
gains
from
estrogenic
exposures
pregnancy—and
cattle
worse,
be
for
changes.
cause
control
certain
EE2,
for
instance,
is clearly
associated
with breast
cancer,
various liver tumors,
and cervical cancer.
Soy? Also
associated
cancer
most
with
is another
estrogenics.
breast
cancer
common
To
make
promotion.
one
found
matters
Prostate
in studies
worse,
of
studies
are
now
beginning
estrogenic
to
cancers
come
can
be
out
showing
that
and
these
“epigenetic”
increased
cancer
risks are likely to be passed
on
to our kids (and grandkids)
from our
estrogenic
exposures.
Obesity
discovered
even
to potentially
generations
wonder
cause
and
as
be
well.
what other
epigenetic
cancer
passed
Not
are
being
to
future
along
good.
It
makes
me
bad environmental
substances
inheritance
(Future
book?
Absolutely!).
Immune
system
estrogenic
for
dysfunctions
issue.
instance,
ZEA
are
another
(fungus / mold
is openly
referred
to
estrogenic),
by
scientists
“immunotoxic”.
Heck, BPA and phthalates
EE2 from birth control
hints at similar
as
do
studies
In
food
dyes,
showing
addition,
and
other
immune
people
variety
of
consuming
inflammation).
Think
dairy
is highly
that
leach
estrogenic.
seem
this:
Milk
The
estrogenic
are
probably
why
plastics
include
cows
often
are
has
estrogen)
(weed-killer).
drinking
in
estrogenics
The
that
All
whole
plus
these
milk
factors
was
found
to lower
testosterone
in men
within
one
Certain
scientists
blame
this effect
on the
levels
of
estrogenics
Wait. . .
cow
are
milk
estrogen
likely
has
in
playing
“high
milk
but
a major
role
levels
of
cow
a
when
eczema
industrial
is stored
(fungus / mold
atrazine
clear
have
standard
phthalates,
APEs,
and
parabens.
eating
grains,
such
as
corn,
mycoestrogen
to
skin
problems
example,
about
estrogenics.
have
derangements.
frequently
immune-related
dairy
(for
as
are too!
problems,
estrogenics
system
major
hour.
high
artificial
too.
estrogen”,
too?
Yes,
absolutely.
farmers
are
milking
mixing that
milk.
Yay,
disrupt
skin
health
very
cells,
leading
problems,
problems
related
(1)
in testosterone
decreases
(5)
fat,
immune
include
that
blood
most
are
all
medically,
advanced
folks,
Now,
We
as well as (7)
I call
these
with estrogenics
these
well
certain
dysfunctions.
clots
The
and
on
the
technologically,
Our
of
chronic
system
we’ve
as
seen
increases
cancers,
also
and
need
major
to
fertility
7
Deadly
Things
you may
recognize
currently
nations.
rates
immune
as
(4)
and
other
estrogenics,
depression,
system
(6)
problems.
associated
rise
and
health
is
on
in
our
chemically
the
decline,
and estrogenics
are at least partly to blame!
I don’t want to gloss past infertility. The fact
that
the
(3)
to
higher
many
to
and
cows
with all the other
way,
estrogenics
to
and
due
researchers,
pregnant
dysfunction.
At this point
in (2)
to
“cow estrogen
milk”
technology.
Either
immune
allergies,
According
estrogenics
most
clearly
are
alarming
shows
causing
problem.
that
single
infertility
The
is
probably
newest
estrogenic
evidence
exposures
in
parents
can
lead
to
future
offspring—including
grandchildren—to
become
infertile.
This
“infertility
inheritance”
is due
top
of our
the
field
DNA.
of
revolutionary
in
fields. Epigenetics
breakthroughs
theoretically
quickly.
to
epigenetics,
In fact,
and
“epigenetics”
or
in my
will
“marks”
own
be
the
on
opinion,
most
the near
future,
within
scientific
is most likely to see the biggest
in
possible
Sequencing
medical
to
science
since
change
epigenetic
epigenetics,
like
it
“marks”
sequencing
is
DNA,
will also
see
cheap,
robotic,
and
for you
around.
innovation
accessible.
for
may
phrase
Avoiding
notice
that
“eliminate
estrogenics,
attainable
goal.
long-term
solution
problems,
ideally
Things.
Realize
this
estrogenics
I
don’t
fat,
act
first
to
for
losing
from
products,
brains,
the
has
of
is
an
a
our
health
chronic
of
for
The
7
Deadly
years,
since
years.
If you
help
squeeze
cells
but
carry
out
remember:
remember?
soy
far
and
more
flax.
Just
estrogenic
stop.
load
consuming,
male or
female.
away
from
the
lavender
your
I’m
fat found
in fish
our brain).
Start
toddlers
in
eliminate
Drastically
too.
in terms
if the
bears
hand,
take
fat
the
is
can
eating
even
the
other
of
may
as a “fat-switch”,
of all, stop
after
polar
use
estrogenics
prevention
your
you should
be
anything.
Move
DHA
time
is also much
more achievable
when
diminish
your
estrogenic
exposures.
than
Soy
and,
many
weight
protein
children’s
the
in fat cells
Soy
Next,
If
to completely
are
too.
on
process
losing weight
you seriously
beauty
in
generally
Diminishing
store
estrogenics
So,
becomes
Will it come
estrogenics”.
diminishing
They
it
Estrogenics
Northern
Alaska are unable
estrogenics
you
probably
excess
as
or your family? I’m not sure. Don’t
wait
Cut-off your estrogenic
exposures
today!
Directives
You
major
brain
a huge
and
fan
especially
of DHA
oil and a major
babies
on DHA
babies
mother
DHA
are
is
oil.
weaned
good
component
in
in the
womb
(breast
supplementing),
Just
(a
your
use
milk
has
spoonfeed
DHA
from
something
Moldy
other
grains
than
can
be
general,
depending
your
health
and
estrogenic
I know
fences
about
or
of
with
unlike
also
grains
it. If you
atrazine
grains
are
usually
be
also
What
about
Extremely
estrogenics
bacon
are
farm
sources.
local,
have
pasture-raised
it packaged
plastics?
Next:
You
buy
No.
40
things
the
your
“fragrances”.
Add
truly
And,
that
waves
that
benefits
an
sadly,
corn
and
foods
more
the
answers.
body
soaps
to say
like
traditional
should
and
I need
the
like
humans
also
store
means
from
can
corn-fed
investigate
know
believe
to
From
you
meats?
Can and should
in wax
paper
rather
already
they
either!
onto
clandestine
to buy
shampoos
the
grains,
unhealthy.
We
This
In general,
(I can’t
be sure
triclosan,
fat.
important
on
“feedlot”
estrogenic.
their
are
consider
in the book.
And
etc.),
farm
animals
in
brutally
a “grain”.
mass-produced
numbers
whales,
is
“amber
loads.
should
actual
(and
in
about
about
avoid
those
seen,
avoiding
grains
number
of people.
considered
to
Europe,
spray
what
I’ve
astonishing
animals?
grains
that may run in your
that fit The 7 Deadly
heavy
list of why
avoiding
not
illnesses
illnesses
Furthermore,
grain”
I do
whether
farmers
by
Avoiding
because
American
flax.
on how serious
you are
how
serious
you
are
consider
the chronic
family. Do you see
Things?
Avoid
avoided
avoidance.
difficult.
the
flax!
free
of
this!).
buy
you
than
Red
Also,
are
free
of BP
and
APEs.
No
You should
not be rubbing
these
skin.
Plus,
Fragrances
estrogenics;
be
are
nasty
more
major
careful
sources
estrogenics
with
of
like
parabens
and
or
family
your
phthalates.
are
On
a similar
regular
note,
sunscreen
again,
like
with
zinc
my
website
www.ajconsultingcompany.com/whatiuse
products
(I am
from them).
Plastics are
you
not
hard
receiving
has
any
to completely
avoid
can.
Since
things
like
vinyl
are
giving
off
detectable
estrogenic
phthalate
your
estrogenic
environment.
your
best
sources
I simply
but
do
and
crib
amounts
of
need
to
you
regarding
potential
in
your
overall
cannot
list everything
home
so use
plastics
and
foods,
This
includes
in plastic.
certainly
coffee
don’t
by
use a Chemex®
so I am a total
snob.
I suggest
even
foods
with
plastic
spoons
silicone.
Next, use
and
you
heat
items.
or
glass
for
foods
don’t
This
plastic
food
stir
storage
and
generally
choices.
I use
drinking
reason
a
word
water
there
about
filtration
seems
to
all the
time
mass
possible
and
sippy
bottles
I
like
get
Use
steel
stainless
water.
be
things
bowls
stainless
and
re-use
glass
San
Pellegrino®
traveling
supply of water.
Finally,
or
turners.
whenever
in glass / ceramic
silicone,
way.
pot. I
coffee
liquids
includes
spatula
Glass / ceramic,
smart
hot
heat
the
I personally
boil water and
also roast my own beans
plastic
what
judgement.
Regarding
anything
benefits
flooring
“exhaust”,
awareness
specific
financial
mattresses
heighten
you
users
Yours
Truly, be sure to use something
and avoid BP and 4-MBC.
Simple.
Once
if
asked
and
for
confusion.
plates.
are
all
cups
for
a
about
some
EE2,
parabens,
phthalates,
atrazine,
estrogenics
are
in most
supply.
in the
every
water
filter
Again,
book.
and
other
drinking
water
we go through
the staggering
Fortunately,
you will remove
details
almost
clearly
estrogenic
filter
as
luck and
“estrogenic
molecule
has
“activated
recommended
I hope
history”
from
and
you
can
today!
BPA,
our
your
water
charcoal”.
Change
it is that
start
if
to
your
the
simple.
Good
erase
your
Acknowledgements
All
my
their
good
editors
indelibly
own
unique
friends
Karen
for
work.
Kelly
also
In
addition,
this
book.
Allison
parents,
Nielson,
thorough
and
and
appreciated.
the
Helen
Tim
Finally,
for
the
and
conceived
Jay
(of
course!),
Juan
Carmona,
Englestad,
Vicinanzo
Genius.
their
Peter
this
book
with
flavors.
Not
surprisingly,
my
and Joe Kelly deserve
special
recognition
Joe
stamped
I
want
incredible
sub
editing
title
for
early-readings
from
my
parents,
Christian
and
Allison’s
Darcie
Syski,
Drake
detailed
the
are
to
title
Caitlin
all
thank
Jay,
Dave
profoundly
Matthew
“Estrogeneration”.
REFERENCES
Introduction
1. Forouzanfar,
A. M., Lozano,
and
in
Naghavi,
187
M. (2011)
countries
systematic
text.
Chapter
K. J., Delossantos,
D., Murray,
C. J.,
Breast
between
analysis.
and
cervical
1980
Lancet
378,
and
cancer
2010:
a
Back
to
1461-1484
1
1. Braekevelt,
and
M. H., Foreman,
R., Lopez,
A.
E., Lau,
Tittlemier,
S.
concentrations
of
A.
B. P., Tague,
B., Popovic,
S.,
(2011)
of
on
beta-estradiol
model matrices
and beef.
915-920 Back to text.
i A documentary
Effect
worth
and
J Agric
Y., Cao,
Z., Giallourakis,
A.,
Xavier,
R.
and
J.
metabolites
Food
watching.
2. Benita,
cooking
Back
in
Chem
59,
to text.
C., Li, C., Gardet,
(2010)
Gene
enrichment
profiles
reveal
T-cell
development,
differentiation,
and
lineage-specific
transcription
factors
including
ZBTB25
as
a
novel
NF-AT
repressor.
Blood
http://xavierlab2.mgh.harvard.edu/EnrichmentProfiler
/index.html
115,
5376-5384
Back
to text.
3. www.ajconsultingcompany.com/estrogenics
to text.
Chapter
2
1. Ohinata,
K.,
Soymorphins,
from
. Back
soy
anxiolytic
2618-2621
2. Thompson,
Cotterchio,
Agui,
S., and
novel
mu
Yoshikawa,
opioid
beta-conglycinin
activities.
Biosci
Back to text.
L.
M.,
U.,
and
M.
peptides
(2007)
derived
beta-subunit,
Biotechnol
Boucher,
Kreiger,
B.
have
Biochem
71,
A.,
Z.,
N.
Liu,
(2006)
Phytoestrogen
content
Canada,
of
including
and
effects
of
4. Diaz,
Danon,
214,
A.,
M.
54, 184-201
and Chung,
270-278
lavender
Pediatr
Endocrinol
Metab
D.
Lipson,
Bloch,
C.
linked
to
Med 356,
V.,
A.
(1987)
Effect
of
lignans
and
circulation
and
on
sex
Steroid
Biochem
7. Lampe,
J.
N.,
dietary
27,
W.,
K.
oils.
K.,
T., and
on
of
Engl
J
C.,
Ollus,
A.
including
enterohepatic
estrogens
and
Back
C.,
and
Bannwart,
globulin
1135-1144
Atkinson,
S.,
N
components,
binding
J
to text.
gynecomastia
tea tree
to text.
E., Fotsis,
and
and
cases.
Back
Korach,
phytoestrogens,
liver metabolism
hormone
of three
103-107
Hockerstedt,
S., Hamalainen,
Appl
Z., Kornic,
S.,
gynecomastia
Prepubertal
and
Back
H.,
Toxicol
report
29,
(2007)
lavender
479-485
6. Adlercreutz,
Bloigu,
exposure:
condensate
to text.
L., Badar,
Prepubertal
chronic
5. Henley,
smoke
Back
and
Back to text.
K. H. (2006)
compounds.
Luque,
(2016)
in
lignans,
marijuana
cannabinoid
Pharmacol
consumed
isoflavones,
coumestan.
Nutr Cancer
3. Lee, S. Y., Oh, S. M.,
Estrogenic
foods
(SHBG).
J
to text.
and
Hullar,
M.
A.
(2006)
Assessing
exposure
to lignans
and
their
metabolites
in humans.
J AOAC
Int 89, 1174-1181
Back
to text.
8. Lamblin,
Fliniaux,
F., Hano,
M.
A.,
and
C.,
Fliniaux,
Laine,
E.
O.,
(2008)
Mesnard,
[Interest
lignans
in prevention
and
Med Sci (Paris) 24, 511-519
treatment
of
Back to text.
9. Adolphe,
S.
J.
L.,
Thorpe,
L. U., and
with
consumption
Whiting,
Alcorn,
of
J.,
the
of
cancers].
Juurlink,
J. (2010)
F.,
B.
H.,
Health
effects
flax
lignan
secoisolariciresinol
929-938
diglucoside.
Back
J.,
Dwyer,
Jacques,
P.,
Dietary
lignans:
cardiovascular
disease
571-603
to text.
Back
11. Bakos,
Urbanyi,
Developmental
of
physiology
and
reduction.
M.
potential
Nutr
toxicity
zearalenone
Toxicol
P.
Mycotoxins—limits
1-19 Back to text.
H.
J.,
Mycotoxin
13-21
M.,
and
and
Back
Rev
and
Ryu,
Public
T 2970-2983
68,
K.,
B.
rerio).
D.
Anc
(2015)
Health
Back
for
estrogenic
(Danio
Sasmal,
D.
H.,
L.
to text.
regulations.
Research:
Sci 80,
and
in zebrafish
136-137,
12. Mazumder,
Food
103,
K., Kovacs,
R., Staszny,
A., Sipos, D.
B., Muller, F., Csenki,
Z., and Kovacs,
potency
13. Lee,
Nutr
J.,
Adlercreutz,
and McCullough,
risk
(2013)
Aquat
J
to text.
10. Peterson,
Scalbert,
A.,
(2010)
Br
(2001)
Sci Life
20,
Advances
in
Perspectives.
J
to text.
14. Nations,
regulations
F. a. A. O. o. t. U. (2003)
Worldwide
for mycotoxins
in food
and
feed
in
2003.
Back
to text.
15. J.
Fink-Gremmels,
and
biochemical
H.
M.
(2007)
mechanisms
exposure
to the mycoestrogen
Feed Science
and Technology
Clinical
effects
associated
zearalenone.
137, 326-341
with
Animal
Back to
text.
16. Coe,
Ross,
J.
M.
E.,
J.
Ishak,
(1992)
of hepatic neoplasia
contaminant.
Proc
1085-1089
Back
17. Kriszt,
R.,
Molnar,
C.,
K.
G.,
Tamoxifen
Ward,
J.
prevents
M.,
and
induction
by zeranol,
an estrogenic
Natl
Acad
Sci
USA
food
89,
to text.
Winkler,
Hrabovszky,
Z.,
E.,
Polyak,
Kallo,
A.,
I.,
Kuti,
D.,
Szoke,
Z.,
Ferenczi,
S.,
Xenoestrogens
Cause
Central
and
Kovacs,
K.
Ethinyl
Estradiol
and
Precocious
Kisspeptin
3996-4007
Back
18. Massart,
Soldani,
G.
(2015)
Zearalenone
Puberty
in Female
Rats
Signaling.
Endocrinology
via
156,
to text.
F.,
Meucci,
(2008)
precocious
mycotoxins.
J.
High
puberty
J Pediatr
V.,
Saggese,
growth
rate
exposed
152, 690-695,
of
to
695
G.,
and
girls
with
estrogenic
e691 Back
to text.
19. Vasatkova,
V.,
A., Krizova,
Zeman,
Effect
L.,
of
Beklova,
naturally
S., Krystofova,
M.,
and
mouldy
Kizek,
Back
20. Zheng,
Q.,
Gu,
J.,
structural
Yuan,
or
fungi
level
in
brain
Lett 30 Suppl
1,
S., Wang,
Y.,
Liu,
G., Wang,
X.
Z.,
Y. J., Liu,
Liu,
Z.
(2016)
Zearalenone
impairs
system
functions
via
and
Environ
(2009)
to text.
W., Pan,
Bian, J. C.
reproductive
R.
wheat
administration
on
metallothioneins
tissues of rats. Neuro
Endocrinol
163-168
O., Adam,
functional
Toxicol
alterations
Pharmacol
42,
of
P.,
and
the
male
inducing
sertoli
146-155
cells.
Back
to
text.
21. Zinedine,
Manes,
J.
A., Soriano,
J. M., Molto, J.
(2007)
Review
on
the
occurrence,
metabolism,
and
intake
mycotoxin.
Food
text.
22. Cortinovis,
Caloni,
F.
of
reproductive
Theriogenology
Chem
C.,
(2013)
Pizzo,
F.,
45,
Spicer,
oestrogenic
1-18 Back
L.
mycotoxins:
in domestic
557-564
regulations
an
Toxicol
Fusarium
function
80,
detoxification,
zearalenone:
Back
C., and
toxicity,
J.,
effects
animals—a
to text.
to
and
on
review.
23. Leung,
M.
(2006)
C.,
Diaz-Llano,
Mycotoxins
in
G.,
pet
and
Smith,
food:
a
worldwide
prevalence
and preventative
Agric Food Chem 54, 9623-9635
Back
24. Boermans,
Mycotoxins
evidence
and
and
119, 95-102
25. Pazaiti,
(2012)
H.
J.,
the
risk
and
pet
Leung,
food
ZEN
maintenance.
assessment.
and
Int
J
review
M.
C.
on
J
(2007)
toxicological
Int J Food
and
K.
strategies.
to text.
industry:
Back to text.
A., Kontos,
M.,
T.
Microbiol
Fentiman,
the
art
of
breast
Clin
Pract
66,
28-36
I.
S.
health
Back
to
text.
26. Eldridge,
J.
Breckenridge,
with
estrogen
C. B. (2008)
Atrazine
interaction
expression
systems.
Rev
Environ
Contam
Toxicol
27. Wilce,
C.,
196,
R. (2012)
Stevens,
147-160
J.
Back
Atrazine:
T.,
and
to text.
A Molecular
Bull in a
China
Shop:
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2012/02/11263/
atrazine-molecular-bull-china-shop
. Back
to text.
28. (2015)
Impact
EPA
Atrazine
Forced
and
to
Study
Glyphosate
of
on US Endangered
Species:
http://sustainablepulse.com/2015/06/28/epa-forcedto-study-impact-of-atrazine-and-glyphosate-on-usendangered-species/
29. Greenlee,
(2004)
A.
. Back
R.,
Low-dose
Ellis,
to text.
T.
M.,
agrochemicals
and
and
Berg,
R.
L.
lawn-care
pesticides
induce
developmental
toxicity
in murine
preimplantation
embryos.
Environ
Health
Perspect
112,
703-709
30. Lubinsky,
related
Back
to text.
M.
(2012)
Hypothesis:
explains
the
thrombosis
Estrogen
pathogenesis
and
epidemiology
158A,
808-811
31. Yuan,
Liu, J.,
(2015)
and
Back
M.,
Hu,
Genet
A
Bai, M.
M. H.,
Triclosan
text.
i APE
May
Z., Huang,
X. F., Zhang,
Zheng,
W. Q., and Jin,
Y.,
F.
usually
I simply
and
to
Back
use
Int
to
if for
you
to
Bisphenol
to Implantation
Res
refers
help
J Med
Exposure
Lead
Biomed
Am
to text.
Preimplantation
Humans.
but
of gastroschisis.
2015,
all alkylphenols
(and
me)
Failure
in
Back
to
184-845
“alkylphenol
A
ethoxylates”
for
remember
simplicity
the
term.
to text.
32. Lu,
Z.,
and
Gan,
occurrence
and
isomers:
a review.
J.
(2014)
Analysis,
biodegradation
Environ
Int 73,
toxicity,
of
nonylphenol
334-345 Back to
text.
33. Soto,
A.
M.,
Justicia,
Sonnenschein,
C.
estrogenic
polystyrene.
Back
(1991)
xenobiotic
Environ
Wray,
J.
W.,
p-Nonyl-phenol:
released
from
Health
Perspect
and
an
“modified”
92, 167-173
to text.
34. Watanabe,
B.,
H.,
H., Suzuki,
Handa,
H.,
A., Goto,
and
M., Lubahn,
Iguchi,
T.
D.
(2004)
Tissue-specific
estrogenic
and non-estrogenic
effects
of a xenoestrogen,
nonylphenol.
J Mol Endocrinol
33,
243-252
35. (2011)
Back
China
to text.
Adds
Nonylphenols
to
Restricted
Substances
List:
https://chemicalwatch.com/6300/china-addsnonylphenols-to-restricted-substances-list
. Back
to
text.
36. Soares,
E.,
and
A.,
Lester,
Guieysse,
J.
N.
B.,
(2008)
Jefferson,
B.,
Nonylphenol
Cartmell,
in
the
environment:
toxicity
a critical
and
review
treatment
on
occurrence,
in wastewaters.
Environ
34, 1033-1049
Back to text.
37. (2016)
Commission
Implementing
2016/110
of
triclosan
as
biocidal
27
an
January
existing
products
for
Decision
2016
active
fate,
not
Int
(EU)
approving
substance
product-type
for
use
in
1.
Official
Journal
of the European
Union Back to text.
38. (2016)
Safety
and
Effectiveness
of
Consumer
Antiseptics;
Topical
Antimicrobial
Over-the-Counter
Back
Human
Products
Federal
Register
for
81
to text.
39. Wang,
X., Chen,
M., Xia, Y.,
spontaneous
estrogen
mice.
X., Feng,
Sci Rep
and
Mayer,
of slime
J Morphol
E.,
Ortiz-Zarragoitia,
nonylphenol
recombinant
early
life
466-467,
in
P.
G.
(2012)
Olivares,
Pina,
B.,
(2014)
stages
of
1-10 Back
Y.
humans
and
to text.
Comparative
A.,
Vallejo,
A.,
O.,
and
Zuloaga,
Estrogenic
and octylphenol
isomers
yeast assay
(RYA)
and
42. Huang,
Yang,
Chen,
M.,
M.
Chen,
glands
in onychophora
(velvet
273, 1079-1088
Back to text.
41. Puy-Azurmendi,
Cajaraville,
Back
F.,
Triclosan
causes
by decline
of
activity
5, 18252
A.,
anatomy
worms).
X., Chang,
and Chen, L. (2015)
abortion
accompanied
sulfotransferase
40. Baer,
zebrafish.
Sci
effects
of
in vitro
by
in vivo
with
Total
Environ
to text.
F.,
Wang,
P.
W.,
Huang,
L.
W.,
W., Yu, C. J., Yang, S. H., Chiu, H. H., and
M.
L.
(2014)
Nonylphenol
in
pregnant
women
transfer
134,
Drug
Use.
and
and
143-148
their
potential
Back
matching
risks
to text.
fetuses:
of infants.
placental
Environ
Res
43. Bechi,
N.,
Cencini,
Ietta,
M.,
F.,
Galassi,
Romagnoli,
G.,
secretion
Health
Perspect
in
118,
S.,
toxicities,
common
and ecological
component
products:
Back
and
a
L.
T.,
Corsi,
I.,
Choi,
placenta.
Back
K.
risks
of
mini-review.
I.,
Jarry,
to text.
(2014)
Occurrences,
of benzophenone-3,
a
organic
sunscreen
Environ
Schmutzler,
Int
H,
C,
70,
143157
Endocrine
Abstracts
11
46. Jimenez-Diaz,
Zafra-Gomez,
Kirschmeyer,
Kohrle,
Back
I.,
A.,
(4MBC)
causes
to
hypothyroidism.
to text.
O.,
salicylate,
homosalate,
phenyl
Estrogenic
UV-filter
M.,
Lavado,
activity
in
80-87
De
Haro,
of
Back
H.,
48. Brunk,
D.
90,
and
reproductive
(2014)
and
tissue
their
in
vitro
B Analyt
Technol
to text.
and
Schlenk,
Back
salicylate,
placental
Deng,
R.,
182-187
Real,
Olea,
N.
UV-filters
octyl
X.,
Rempel,
D.
(2008)
effects
of the
oxybenzone
(2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl-methanone)
Toxicol
M.,
A.,
camphor
human
Assessment
J Chromatogr
Life Sci 936,
47. Coronado,
A.,
salicylate,
camphor
by
LC-MS/MS.
endocrine
activity.
Biomed
F., and
of the
3-(4-methylbenzylidene)
3-benzylidene
J.
Navalon,
M., Saenz,
J. M., Fernandez,
M.
(2013)
Simultaneous
determination
benzyl
(2006)
Molina-Molina,
Ballesteros,
P,
J.
4-methylbenzylidene-camphor
pituitary
effects
comparable
Aquat
Environ
to text.
45. Hamann,
M.
S.,
(2010)
Environmental
are
able
to
affect
human
427-431
44. Kim,
Jantra,
Serchi,
Focardi,
S., and Paulesu,
levels
of
para-nonylphenol
cytokine
R.,
in
fish.
to text.
Benzophenone
named
2014
contact
allergen
Back
of the
year.
skinandallergynews.com
to text.
49. (2015)
Commision
Regulation
(EU)
2015/1298
of 28 July 2015 amending
Annexes
II and VI to
Regulation
(EC)
Parliament
No
and
products.
Back
1223/2009
of
the
of
the
Council
European
on
cosmetic
to text.
50. (1997)
comprising
Photoprotective/cosmetic
compositions
at least one
solid organic
sunscreen
compound
and
salicylate
solvents
therefor
Back
to
text.
51. Kunisue,
T.,
Sundaram,
Chen,
R.,
Z.,
Hediger,
Buck
M.
Louis,
L.,
G.
Sun,
L.,
and
Kannan,
K.
(2012)
Urinary
concentrations
benzophenone-type
UV filters in U.S. women
their
association
Technol
46,
with
46244632
52. Batada,
A.,
Prevalence
of
Store Products
(Phila)
55,
endometriosis.
Back
and
1113-1119
53. Arnold,
L.
(2012)
Artificial
E.,
Environ
M.
Food
Colors
to Children.
Back
of
and
Sci
to text.
Jacobson,
Artificial
Marketed
M.,
F.
(2016)
in
Grocery
Clin Pediatr
to text.
Lofthouse,
N.,
and
food
attention-deficit/hyperactivity
to dye for. Neurotherapeutics
Hurt,
colors
E.
and
symptoms:
conclusions
9, 599-609 Back
to
text.
54. Dees,
Henley,
C.,
D.,
Askari,
and
M.,
Ardies,
Garrett,
C.
M.
S.,
(1997)
and
DNA-damaging
activity
of
human
breast
cancer
cells.
Perspect
105
Suppl
55. el-Yousef,
Letter:
Estrogen
M.
3, 625-632
K.,
effects
and
on
K.,
Estrogenic
Red
No.
Environ
Back
Manier,
Gehrs,
3
in
Health
to text.
D.
phenothiazine
H.
(1974)
derivative
blood
levels.
56. (2008)
JAMA
228,
Modernising
827828
the
Back
rules
to text.
on
food
additives
and
labelling
of
azo
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?
dyes,
language=en&type=IM-PRESS&reference=
20080707IPR33563
Sessions
Back
. Eeropean
Parliament
Plenary
to text.
57. (2016)
Food
labelling
and
https://www.gov.uk/food-labelling-and-packaging/
food-and-drink-warnings
. Back
packaging,
to text.
58. http://www.ukfoodguide.net/e129.htm
. Back
to
text.
59. http://www.foodcolor.com/enumbers
. Back
to
text.
60.
http://www.feingold.org/Research/PDFstudies/List-ofColorants.pdf
61. (2011)
. Back
to text.
Scientific
Opinion
on
the
re-evaluation
of
Erythrosine
(E
127) as a food
https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1854
additive,
.
and
Nutrient
3 and
Thyroid
EFSA
Panel
Sources
on
Added
62. Greger,
Food
Additives
to Food
M. (2015)
Back
Red
to text.
Dye
No.
Cancer:
http://nutritionfacts.org/2015/04/30/coloring-to-dyefor-dangers-of-red-no-3/
63. Yankell,
toxicity
S.
L.,
and
testing
of
. Back
to text.
Loux,
J.
erythrosine
fluorescein
in mice
and
228-231 Back to text.
64. Mailman,
R.
Vogel,
Kilts,
A.,
R. A.,
Mueller,
R.
B.,
rats.
Ferris,
C. D.,
A.,
J.
and
(1977)
and
J
R.
Lipton,
Breese,
Acute
sodium
Periodontol
M.,
M.
Tang,
A.,
G.
48,
F.
L.,
Smith,
D.
R.
(1980)
Erythrosine
(Red
No.
biochemical
actions:
3)
and
what
relation
changes?
Science
207, 535-537
65. Mailman,
R. B., and Lewis,
additives
Child
and
50,
childhood
283-286
66. McCann,
D.,
its
to
ASDC
O.,
and
Barrett,
and
A.,
Stevenson,
hyperactive
8/9-year-old
Food
J Dent
to text.
Cooper,
A.,
D., Dalen,
L., Grimshaw,
K., Kitchin,
Porteous,
L., Prince, E., Sonuga-Barke,
J.
behavioral
Back to text.
M. H. (1983)
hyperactivity.
Back
nonspecific
J.
(2007)
behaviour
children
Food
in
in
Crumpler,
E., Lok,
K.,
E., Warner,
additives
3-year-old
the
and
community:
randomised,
double-blinded,
placebo-controlled
Lancet 370,
67. (1990)
1560-1567
Back
FDA
Limits
to text.
Red
Dye
a
trial.
No.
3:
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/01/30/science/fdalimits-red-dye-no-3.html
68. (2015
. Back
Color
to text.
additive
status
http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ColorAdditives/
ColorAdditiveInventories/ucm106626.htm
Back
A review
R.,
Gandy,
of the
implications
for
Crit Rev Toxicol
70. Kim,
S. M.,
T. T., Kim,
Jeung,
text.
FDA
J
receptor
Physiol
and
Vollmer,
activity
G.
Jung,
E. M.,
S. R., Lee,
An,
Choi,
effects
on
the
progesterone
pathway
Pharmacol
in
63,
and
health.
B. S., Hwang,
S. M.,
Additional
(2005)
of parabens
potential
risks
to human
35, 435-458 Back to text.
E. B. (2012)
estrogen
J.,
endocrine
A
and
paraben
calbindin-D(9K)
and
cells.
.
to text.
69. Golden,
Vo,
list,
K. C.,
of
bisphenol
induction
receptor
via
rat
pituitary
445-455
I.,
and
Back
of
an
GH3
to
71. (2014)
EU
Bans
Five
Triclosan
Parabens,
Restricts
in
Cosmetics:
https://chemicalwatch.com/19141/eu-bans-fiveparabens-restricts-triclosan-in-cosmetics
. Back
to
text.
72. Aker,
A.
M.,
Ferguson,
K.
K.,
Watkins,
Soldin,
D.
O.
J.,
P.,
Johns,
Anzalota
L. V., Alshawabkeh,
A. N., Cordero,
Meeker,
J. D. (2016)
Phenols
and
relation
to
pregnant
reproductive
women.
and
Environ
151,
H.,
and
Del
E.,
Toro,
J. F.,
parabens
thyroid
Res
L.
and
in
hormones
30-37
in
Back
to
A.
H.
text.
73. Hegazy,
H.
G.,
Ali,
(2015)
cytokines
Interplay
and
brain
evidence
of
E.
between
oxidative
parallels
intoxication
and
physiopathology
in autism
and
produces
rat
postnatal
with
Pharmacol
text.
Biochem
75. Kawaguchi,
M.,
Kato,
exposure
M.,
to
isobutyl-paraben
H.,
M.,
G.,
Taya,
and
exposure
in
offspring:
Himi,
K.,
Himi,
Back
H.,
(2010)
K.,
Morita,
Exp
Morita,
social
Anim
Morohoshi,
M.,
(2009)
to
Maternal
impairs
rats.
T.
model.
102-110
T.
female
Irie,
autistic
K., Imai,
and
71,
paraben
111,
Morohoshi,
Cytokine
Combined
acid
Behav
brain
(2013)
symptoms
N.,
76. Kawaguchi,
Imai,
H.
valproic
recognition
in adult
631-635 Back to text.
Watanabe,
A.
paraben
acid
model.
butyl
autism-like
comparison
butyl
valproic
173-180 Back to text.
74. Ali, E. H., and Elgoly,
prenatal
pro-inflammatory
stress
biomarkers:
between
the
Elgoly,
Kondo,
59,
K.,
Y.,
Maternal
isobutyl-paraben
passive
exposure
avoidance
test
alters
anxiety
performance
in
and
adult
male
rats. Neurosci
Res 65, 136-140 Back to text.
77. Serrano,
S. E., Braun,
J., Trasande,
L., Dills, R.,
and
Sathyanarayana,
a review
data.
of the
Environ
78. Liang,
phthalates
and
crib
diet:
epidemiology
to text.
Y. (2014)
alternatives
mattress
and
covers:
Emission
of
from
vinyl
the
influence
Sci
Technol
48,
14228-14237
of
Andre,
L.
and
to text.
M.
L. (2014)
simulants
507-526
A.,
Int
Back
80. Chou,
J
K., and
81. Al-Saleh,
I.,
and
A.,
Henttu,
J.
phthalate
esters
breast
in
Res
Sumpter,
83. Chen,
F.
concentrations
Health
P.
(1997)
in
Back
R. O. (2006)
J
Elkhatib,
Pollut
C.
802-811
Public
devices.
esters
Sci
text.
82. Harris,
Z.
migration
to food
during
microwave
Res
Wright,
medical
to text.
phthalate
human
Environ
Cardeal,
11,
to text.
in food
and
126-135 Back
Environ
C.,
Analysis
of phthalate
in plastic
containers
operations.
Back
and
13, 43 Back
Environ
79. Moreira,
105,
Phthalates
monitoring
Health
temperature.
of
food
Y., and
Xu,
and
phthalate
flooring
Back
S. (2014)
R.
47
(2016)
23,
P.,
The
Toxicol
perfumes.
455-468
Parker,
Back
M.
estrogenic
Environ
2,
Screening
branded
Int
vitro.
Phthalates
Med
G.,
activity
Health
to
and
of
Perspect
to text.
P., and Chien,
of phthalates
M. H. (2014)
Lower
induce
proliferation
in
cancer
cells.
Climacteric
F.,
Evangelisti,
17,
377-384
to text.
84. Maradonna,
M.,
Gioacchini,
G.,
Migliarini,
Assay
B.,
Olivotto,
of vtg,
ERs
I., and
and
PPARs
rapid in vitro screening
Di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate
acid
(PA)
Toxicol
in zebrafish
In Vitro
85. (2015)
27,
of
84-91
O.
as endpoint
the
effect
of
phthalic
hepatocyte
Back
(2013)
for
the harmful
(DEHP)
and
primary
Amending
2011/65/EU
the
Council
Carnevali,
cultures.
to text.
Annex
II
of the European
as
regards
the
to
Directive
Parliament
list
of
and
of
restricted
substances,
http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/3/2015
/EN/3-2015-2067-EN-F1-1.PDF
86. Denmark
yields
. Back
to
EU
to text.
pressure
and
scraps
phthalate
http://cphpost.dk/news/international/denmark-yields-
ban,
to-eu-pressure-and-scraps-phthalate-ban.html
Post
Online
Back
.
CPH
to text.
87. FDA:
http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/ProductsIngredients/
Ingredients/ucm128250.htm
. Back to text.
88. US
Consumer
Product
Safety
Commission:
https://www.cpsc.gov/Business--Manufacturing/
Business-Education/Business-Guidance/PhthalatesInformation
89. Worland,
between
Back
. Back to text.
J. (2015)
The
saunas
and
longevity.
connection
Time
Magazine
to text.
90. Crinnion,
W.
J.
(2010)
easily
avoidable
phthalates
Med Rev 15, 190-196 Back
91. Tasker,
Dealing
of
strange
R.
with
primum
C.,
and
phthalates
non
Toxic
of
and
parabens.
to text.
Sharpe,
in medical
nocere
effects
(first
R.
M.
devices:
do
no
the
Altern
(2016)
a
case
harm)?
Intensive
Care
Med
92. Wojtowicz,
42,
A. K.,
602-604
Back
Szychowski,
to text.
K. A.,
Wnuk,
A.,
and
Kajta,
(DBP)-Induced
M.
(2016)
Dibutyl
Phthalate
Apoptosis
and
Neurotoxicity
are
Mediated
the
via
(AhR)
but
Aryl
not
(ERalpha),
by
Estrogen
Hydrocarbon
Estrogen
Receptor
Receptor
Beta
Peroxisome
Proliferator-Activated
(PPARgamma)
in
Mouse
Neurotox
Res
Back
93. Ponsonby,
Mueller,
Epigenetic
Sly,
effects?
P.
D.,
of
Chiang,
H.
and
B.,
C.,
Guo,
55,
Back
Saffery,
Pan,
92-101
W.
Y.
L.,
Huang,
P. C. (2016)
Does
influence
thyroid
function
Toxicants
C., Vuillermin,
R.
P.,
(2016)
genes
in utero
exposure
to
phthalate
How
can
we
delineate
causal
H.
homeostasis?
or
Gamma
Neurons.
neurodevelopmental
Neurotoxicology
94. Huang,
(ERbeta),
to text.
regulation
in response
to
plastic
chemicals:
Alpha
Receptor
Cortical
A. L., Symeonides,
J.,
Receptor
The
Taiwan
(TEST)
2013.
Back
H.,
to text.
Chang,
Jaakkola,
J.
exposure
to
and
growth
W.,
J.,
and
phthalates
hormone
Environmental
Environ
J.
Survey
Res
153,
for
63-72
to text.
95. Latini,
Rocchiccioli,
G.,
Dipaola,
S., Massaro,
Interaction
between
Phthalates:
Health?
An
D.,
L.,
Bisphenol
Environmental
Ionizing
Unrecognized
Mini Rev
96. Chen,
Feng,
Y.
Toxicity-A
L.,
Andreassi,
M., and Picano,
Med
Kannan,
Wu,
Y.,
Analogues
K.,
and
Back
for
Environ
Zheng,
Z.,
M.
(2016)
Than
Human
Sci
and
Human
to text.
Tan,
H.,
Widelka,
Other
Occurrence,
Review.
Radiation
Risk
Chem
M.
G.,
E. (2016)
BPA:
Exposure,
and
Technol
50,
5438-5453
Back
97. Dupont,
to text.
J.,
White,
P.
J.,
Johnston,
K.
Heggtveit,
H. A., McDonald,
B. E., Grundy,
and Bonanome,
A. (1989)
Food safety and
effects
Back
of
canola
oil.
J
Am
Coll
Nutr
8,
M.,
S. M.,
health
360-375
to text.
98. Dreher,
M.
L.,
and
Davenport,
Hass
avocado
composition
effects.
Crit Rev Food
Sci
A.
J.
(2013)
and
potential
Nutr 53, 738-750
health
Back
to text.
99. Mailman,
D.,
solubility
oleic
possible
of
artifact.
100. Sun,
Luo,
R.,
advances
bisphenol
Back
and
acid
to
Life Sci 47,
F., Kang,
Lu,
C.,
and
A.
Rose,
Binding
laboratory
materials:
1737-1744
L., Xiang,
and
Peng,
progress
Anal
C. (1990)
X., Li, H.,
X. (2016)
in
Bioanal
Back
the
Chem
and
a
to text.
Luo,
X.,
Recent
detection
408,
of
6913-6927
to text.
101. Legislatures,
N. C.
state
restrictions
on
o. S. NCSL
bisphenol
policy
update:
a
(BPA)
in
consumer
products,
http://www.ncsl.org/research/environment-andnatural-resources/policy-update-on-state-restrictionson-bisphenol-a.aspx
102. Harrington,
. Back to text.
R. (2010)
Denmark
maintain
bisphenol
and
France
A
ban,
http://www.foodqualitynews.com/Regulation-andsafety/Denmark-and-France-maintain-bisphenol-Aban . Back
103. EFSA.
to text.
(2015)
bisphenol
No
consumer
health
A
https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/150121
Back
to text.
risk
from
exposure,
.
104. FSN.
says
(2015)
Denmark’s
Europe’s
national
BPA
food
institute
safe levels need
work,
http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2015/02/denmarksnational-food-institute-says-europes-bpa-safe-levelsneed-work/
. Back
105. Ejaredar,
R.,
and
to text.
M.,
Dewey,
Lee,
D.
Y.,
Roberts,
(2016)
D.
Bisphenol
J.,
A
Sauve,
exposure
and
children’s
behavior:
A systematic
review.
Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol
Back to text.
106. Engler-Chiurazzi,
Povroznik,
J.
Estrogens
in the
E.
M.,
as
and
B.,
Brown,
Simpkins,
neuroprotectants:
context
of cognitive
Prog Neurobiol
Back to text.
107. Tan,
L., Wang, S., Wang,
D.
(2015)
aging
Bisphenol
process
elegans.
in
Toxicol
Lett
A
the
235,
C.
J.
W.
and
exposure
injury.
M., and
Liu,
accelerated
nematode
75-83
actions
brain
Y., He,
M.,
(2016)
Estrogenic
aging
J
the
Caenorhabditis
Back
to text.
108. Liu,
T., Li, Y., Zhao, X., Zhang,
M., and
Gu,
W. (2014)
Ethylparaben
affects
lifespan,
fecundity,
and
the
expression
in Drosophila
Back
of
melanogaster.
ERR,
EcR
J Insect
and
Physiol
YPR
71,
1-7
to text.
109. Christin-Maitre,
contraceptive
drugs
Pract
levels
Res
Clin
S.
and
(2013)
History
of
their use worldwide.
Endocrinol
Metab
27,
oral
Best
312 Back
to
text.
110. Institute,
G.
(2016)
Minor’s
access
contraceptive
https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/
minors-access-contraceptive-services
. Back
111.
www.ajconsultingcompany.com/ee2_drug_labels.html
to
services,
to text.
. Back
to text.
Chapter
3
i A low-budget
Back to text.
YouTube
1. Tillekeratne,
Hupe,
and
L.,
annual
series
sensation.
L.
M.,
Sherette,
A.,
Fulmer,
J.
A.,
Hupe,
D.,
Gabbara,
S.,
Peliska,
J.
A.,
inhibition
of
Hudson,
R. A. (2002)
Differential
polymerase
and strand-transfer
activities
reverse
transcriptase.
Bioorg
Med
Chem
525-528
Back
2. Angell,
Do
to text.
M.
Companies
(2005)
: How
about
to text.
N., Koo,
Nasir,
M.
They
H.
T., Tan,
A. R., Thielecke,
and
The
It. Random
Back
3. Ak,
C.,
Tee,
One
C.,
4. Nestle,
about
Deceive
Us
Trade
Hamid
Jan,
S. Y., Appukutty,
F., Hopkins,
E. S. (2015)
10,
Truth
House
the
Diets
Of
Adolescents—Findings
PLoS
of HIV-1
Lett
12,
e0138247
M. Food
Whole
Drug
What
Paperback
J.
M.,
to
Ed.
Mohd
Nurliyana,
M. K.,
Grain
Ning,
Intakes
Children
MyBreakfast
Back
Politics
and
M.,
S., Ong,
Malaysian
from the
the
in
and
Study.
to text.
Blog,
Conflicts-of-Interest:
http://www.foodpolitics.com/tag/conflicts-of-interest/
Back to text.
5. Ge,
J. H.,
and
Chang,
activities
of
parabens].
650-652
Back
to text.
6. Ross,
G.
cosmetic
American
Toxicol
7. Gobry,
(2006)
A
B.
Wei
(2006)
Sheng
perspective
on
.
[Estrogenic
Yan
Jiu
the
safety
35,
of
products:
a
position
paper
of
the
Council
on Science
and Health.
Int
J
25,
269-277
P.-E.
Back
(2016)
to text.
Big
Science
http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-
is
Broken:
broken
. Back
8. Wilson,
to text.
W.
A.
(2016)
Scientific
Regress:
http://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientificregress . Back to text.
9. Lindsay,
S.
Considering
soy:
women.
H.,
J Obstet
Tofu
Claywell,
its estrogenic
Gynecol
Back to text.
10. Shurtleff,
W.,
and
and
Aoyagi,
and
effects
Neonatal
A. (2013)
Products:
Bibliography
L.
G.
(1999)
may
protect
Nurs
28,
History
Extensively
Sourcebook.
21-24
of
Tofu
Annotated
Soyinfo
Center
Back
to text.
11. Soyinfo Center Website
Mission:
http://www.soyinfocenter.com/index.php
text.
12. Pawlowski,
McCabe,
S.,
J. W.,
L.,
and
Martin,
Jackson,
G.
Weaver,
C.
. Back
to
B. R., McCabe,
S.,
Peacock,
M.
(2015)
M.,
G.
P.,
Barnes,
Impact
of
equol-producing
of
supplements
capacity
and soy-isoflavone
profiles
on
bone
calcium
retention
in
postmenopausal
women:
trial. Am
13. (2015)
J Clin Nutr
Add
a
102,
Soy
randomized
695-703
to
Your
crossover
Back
Diet,
to text.
but
Subtract
Other
Healthy
http://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/add-
Don’t
Foods.
soy-to-your-diet-but-dont-subtract-other-healthy-foods
. Back
to text.
14. Isidori,
V.,
and
alkylphenols
and
M.,
Lavorgna,
Parrella,
and trace
endocrine
treatment
1686-1694
Environ
to text.
Palumbo,
M.,
Piccioli,
A.
(2007)
Influence
of
elements
in toxic,
genotoxic,
disruption
plants.
Back
M.,
activity
Toxicol
of
wastewater
Chem
26,
15. Doerge,
D.
Goitrogenic
R.,
and
and
Sheehan,
estrogenic
isoflavones.
Environ
Health
349-353 Back to text.
16. Hydovitz,
an
J. D.
infant
in
Nonspecific
to text.
I. E., and
soybean
Seto,
19. D’Adamo,
T. A. (1955)
hemagglutinin
15, 407-409
C.
R.,
Med
20
and
Chapter
4
1. MN
Dept
Suppl
of
on
Back
tumor
A.
a review
and
risks.
1, 39-51
Health,
growth.
to text.
Sahin,
foods and supplementation:
perceived
health
benefits
Health
J
goiter
18. Liener,
Res
Engl
3,
Am
Cancer
N
Suppl
goiter.
of
diet.
of
soy
17. Ripp,
J. A. (1961)
Soybean-induced
J Dis Child 102, 106-109 Back to text.
Back
soy
of
110
Occurrence
(2002)
262,
effect
a
activity
Perspect
(1960)
M.
Med
351-353
on
D.
Back
(2014)
Soy
of commonly
Altern
Ther
to text.
Statewide
Safe-Eating
Guidelines
for
http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/fish/eating/
kidmom/index.html
2. Zota,
A.
(2016)
Recent
R.,
. Back
Phillips,
to text.
C.
Fast
Fish:
A.,
and
Food
Mitro,
S.
Consumption
D.
and
Bisphenol
A and Phthalates
Exposures
among
the
U.S. Population
in NHANES,
2003-2010.
Environ
Health
Perspect
3. Santos,
Silva,
J.
R.,
Pitelli,
R.
Jaboticabal
and
its
Back
to text.
E. A., Cruz,
Grossi
Botelho,
A.
(2015)
water stream
toxicological
Piaractus
mesopotamicus.
66,
Back
73-82
C., Carraschi,
to text.
R.,
S. P., Marques
Velini,
E.
D.,
and
Atrazine
levels
in
the
(Sao Paulo State,
Brazil)
effects
Arh
on
Hig
the
Rada
pacu
fish
Toksikol
4. Blanco,
F.,
Almeida,
Herbicide
—
Soil
SDB,
Matallo,
Interactions,
MB
Applied
(2013)
to
Maize
Crop
Under
Brazilian
Conditions.
Agricultural
and
Biological
Sciences:
Herbicides—Current
Research
and
Case
5. Jin,
Studies
R.,
disposal
and
on
in Use
Ke,
the
J.
water
in Zhangjiakou
area
Toxicol 68, 893-900
6. Gu,
J.
G.,
Dicamba
soils
D.
Up
Gulf
the
Impact
Y.,
and
Gu,
Atrazine,
atrazine
Yang
How
Oil Spill?
J.
river
Contam
D.
(2003)
Cyanazine
condition
Chemosphere
(2010)
of
of the
methanogenic
of China.
text.
7. Biello,
(2002)
resources
of
under
to text.
in China. Bull Environ
Back to text.
Fan,
Biodegradability
Back
52,
Fast
in
1515-1521
Can
Scientific
and
three
Back
Microbes
to
Clean
American
Back
Cavalcante,
R.
to
text.
8. Sousa,
A.
Milhome,
Estimated
M. A., and
Levels
of
and
Health
Insecticides
Environ
S.,
Risk
Pierce,
L.,
Battaglin,
C. L. (2015)
96,
Back
11. Thurman,
T.
(2000)
Back
D. R. (2003)
Back to text.
Reeves,
W.
Pesticide
Bull
to text.
Health
Muths,
Hladik,
M.
concentrations
in
Total
and
Brazil.
Public
R.,
A.,
tissue
and
wetland
habitats
dominated
by agriculture.
Sci
80-90
Herbicides
of Ceara,
90-95
M.,
R. F. (2016)
Contamination
for
Water
Toxicol
K.
M.,
C.,
Assessment
A. f. T. S.
for Atrazine.
10. Smalling,
Vandever,
W.
do Nascimento,
Environmental
in Surface
Contam
9. ATSDR,
Statement
Duavi,
E.,
L.,
and
in frog
a
landscape
Environ
502,
to text.
E. M.,
Occurrence
Bastian,
of
K. C., and
cotton
Mollhagen,
herbicides
and
insecticides
West
in
Texas.
Sci
to text.
12. Kalkhoff,
lakes
Total
Thurman,
J
M.,
Mudrak-Cegiolka,
S.
A
biomass
Southern
213,
and
14. Mortazavi,
S.,
Bahramifar,
N.,
of
Back
S. D.,
Terrio,
Upper
and
Midwest
August
base-flow
1025-1035
Back
Nehring,
possibility
and
Back
189-200
I.,
(2016)
of
and
of
accumulation
of
depending
on
in zooplankton
Gdansk).
Environ
of
the
Pollut
A.
E.,
to text.
Bakhtiari,
and
A.
R.,
Sari,
Rahbarizade,
F.
(2012)
Phenolic
endocrine
disrupting
chemicals
(EDCs)
Anzali
Wetland,
Iran:
elevated
concentrations
4-nonylphenol,
Pollut
octhylphenol
Bull 64,
15. Hamlin,
(2015)
plastic
1067-1073
Pseudochromis
223-228
and
Back
H. J., Marciano,
Migration
is toxic
Back
16. Kawahata,
to
Changes
alkylphenols,
and
composition,
Baltic (Gulf of
489-501
32,
Plains
Herbicides
in
during
Qual
13. Staniszewska,
bisphenol
248,
products
Environ
concentrations
High
K. E., Porter,
streams
conditions.
text.
the
E. M. (2003)
degradation
agricultural
of
Environ
S. J., Lee,
P. J., and
herbicide
playa
of
to
bisphenol
Mar
to text.
K.,
and
nonylphenol
the
coral
fridmani.
A.
in
of
Downs,
C.
A.
from
food-grade
reef
fish
species
Chemosphere
139,
to text.
H., Ohta,
H., Inoue,
M.,
and
Suzuki,
A. (2004)
Endocrine
disrupter
nonylphenol
and
bisphenol
A contamination
in Okinawa
and Ishigaki
Islands,
river
text.
Japan—within
mouths.
coral
Chemosphere
reefs
55,
and
1519-1527
adjacent
Back
to
17. Net,
and
S.,
Sempere,
Ouddane,
R.,
Delmont,
B. (2015)
A.,
Occurrence,
fate,
and ecotoxicological
state of phthalates
environmental
matrices.
Environ
Sci
4019-4035
Back
18. North,
M.
and
Paluselli,
behavior
in different
Technol
49,
to text.
L.,
Takaro,
Ellis, A. K. (2014)
T.
K.,
Effects
Diamond,
M.
of phthalates
on
development
and expression
of allergic disease
asthma.
Ann
Allergy
Asthma
Immunol
496-502
Back
19. Liang,
flooring
and
and
and
Xu,
crib
Y.,
Occurrence
Albany,
Y.
phthalate
J.,
Technol
and
New
21. (2013)
York,
USA,
Danish
Protection
of
Part
the
1474. Back to text.
22. Xue,
J., Sasaki,
and
of
Parabens
Kannan,
the
dark
Toxicol
Plastics
side
in
220,
(2015)
air
from
implications
Environ
the
for
537,
Environment,
Survey
of
No.
Elangovan,
M.,
Elevated
States
marine
gift.
Rev
to text.
Diamond,
Accumulation
Metabolites
United
1-44 Back
14228-14237
Project
(2015)
of a modern
48,
K.
of
Agency:
their
the
influence
its
in
Coastal
Environ
Sci Technol
49, 12071-12079
23. Hammer,
J., Kraak,
M. H., and
(2012)
vinyl
the
Total
of
of
LOUS-Review,
N.,
K.
and
from
and
Ministry
Parabens,
from
in indoor
Sci
Environmental
G.,
the
and
112,
Emission
Kannan,
of benzophenone-3
inhalation
exposure.
304-308 Back to text.
Mammals
covers:
Sci
Xue,
(2014)
alternatives
mattress
temperature.
Environ
Back to text.
20. Wan,
L.,
to text.
Y.,
phthalates
A.,
Marine
Waters.
Back to text.
Parsons,
J. R.
environment:
Environ
the
Contam
24. Zhang,
L. P.,
L.,
Y.,
Li,
Y.
endocrine
Sea. Mar
and
X.
Zhang,
H.,
Z.
Ya,
L.
G.,
Ma,
Furukawa,
McLachlan,
P.,
Y.,
J.,
and
L.,
Wu,
Levels
Q.,
O’Reilly,
S.
S.
Lewis,
E.,
J.,
1353-1364
Back
26. Mosquin,
(2012)
P.,
Meaux,
(2012)
of
historical
R.
upper
atrazine
M.
M.,
A.,
Guiloski,
de
Endocrine
Maraschi,
A.
Silva
de
herbicide
Assis,
atrazine
quelen).
C.,
J
C.,
waters
Monit
Prodocimo,
Ecotoxicol
data
Environ
C.
V.,
Saf
W.
from
Qual
H.
A.,
B.,
C.
41,
Randi,
Pereira,
Freire,
C.
(2013)
neotropical
Environ
Chen,
concentrations
Doria,
Ribeiro,
H.
in
and
monitoring
I.
Oliveira
W.,
centile
community
water
systems.
834-844 Back to text.
27. Mela,
S.,
to text.
Whitmore,
Estimation
using
of
Lacey,
disrupting
chemicals
in New Orleans
surface
and Mississippi
Sound
sediments.
J Environ
14,
Y.
in South
China
Back to text.
Zhang,
Zhang,
M.
(2014)
disrupting
compounds
Pollut Bull 85, 628-633
25. Wang,
M.,
Wang,
A.,
L.,
and
Effects
of
the
catfish
(Rhamdia
93,
13-21
Back
to
text.
28. Rowell,
(2016)
trace
C.,
Kuiper,
Is container
element
and
water
bottles?
N.,
type
BPA
Food
and
Preud’Homme,
H.
the biggest
predictor
of
leaching
from
drinking
Chem
202,
88-93
Back
to
text.
i Skip
to
the
Estrogenics”
if you
are
next
if you need no
not
interested
numbers.
Back
29. Stiles,
R.,
E.,
Buckley,
and
subsection
titled
“Eating
further
convincing
or
in additional
specific
to text.
Yang,
I.,
B.
Lippincott,
(2008)
R.
L.,
Murphy,
Measurement
of
drinking
water
contaminants
microextraction
initially
quantified
samples
by the USGS.
2976-2981
Back to text.
30. Klecka,
G.,
of emerging
Basin:
analysis
an
in
Environ
Persoon,
Chemicals
by
C.,
and
concern
solid
phase
source
water
Sci
Technol
Currie,
R.
(2010)
Great
Lakes
in the
of environmental
exposures.
Environ
Contam
Toxicol 207, 1-93 Back
31. Otero,
P., Saha,
S. K., Moane,
S.,
Clancy,
G.,
and
Murray,
method
for
rapid
detection
water
J
by
gas
B
997, 229-235
32. Oehlmann,
Jagnytsch,
L.,
Analyt
Lutz,
Santos,
E.
M.,
Tyler,
C.
R.
Paull,
(2009)
J.
H.,
migration
caffeine.
text.
34. Li,
Liu,
Improved
G.
C.,
A
in
bottled
Biomed
U.,
O.,
Kloas,
Sci
W.,
Wollenberger,
Van
critical
Life
Look,
K.
analysis
of
J.,
the
plasticizers
on wildlife.
Philos
B Biol Sci 364,
2047-2062
to text.
33. Kang,
A
K.
J.,
spectrometry.
Technol
I., Kusk,
biological
impacts
of
Trans
R Soc Lond
Back
(2015)
Back to text.
J., Schulte-Oehlmann,
O.,
and
P.
Rev
to text.
Barron,
of phthalates
chromatography-mass
Chromatogr
42,
Food
and
Kondo,
from
cans
Addit
Contam
Z., Xiang,
X. (2015)
F.
19,
X., Li, M.,
Occurrence
pharmaceuticals
and
(2002)
containing
Ma,
and
personal
Bisphenol
coffee
and
886-890
Back
Y., Wang,
J.,
risk
care
assessment
products
to
and
of
and
endocrine
disrupting
chemicals
in reclaimed
water
and
receiving
groundwater
in China.
Ecotoxicol
Environ
Saf
35. Parkinson,
up
119,
J.
China’s
74-80
(2015)
Back
to text.
Five
numbers
one-child
that
sum
policy:
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34666440
Back
to text.
36. Jarosova,
Simek,
Z.,
(2015)
B., Filip, J., Hilscherova,
Giesy,
J. P., Zboril, R.,
Can
waterborne
387-392
zero-valent
iron
estrogens?
J
Back
37. Yang,
(2015)
Lake
and
Yangtze
China.
17644-17652
Back
38. Ma,
T., Wan,
Liu,
J.
(2005)
latipes).
to text.
39. Zuo,
Y.,
of the
Q.,
150,
K.,
Res
a
281-288
Zhou,
Back
S.
and
in lake
Sci
(2013)
microbial
K.,
and
in
water,
Impacts
Deng,
photochemical
of
surface
Process
Y.
River
measurements
271-277
Back
predicted
in
US
to text.
estrogen
waters.
15,
(2006)
degradation
Acushnet
and
and
medaka
of
Estuary.
Chemosphere
63, 1583-1590
Back to text.
41. Kostich,
M., Flick, R., and Martinson,
J.
Comparing
Int
Chinese
degradation
Environ
to text.
17alpha-ethinylestradiol
from
steroids
(EE2)
Zhang,
Wang,
Z.,
responses
59,
and
estrogenic
and
Central
in Japanese
photochemical
a case
study.
1529-1535
Back
J.
of
Honghu
the
Pollut
effluent
Chemosphere
of
the
along
Sci
plant
17alpha-ethinylestradiol
Y.,
Manage
in
Lake
Huang,
Biomarker
Zhang,
Determination
Occurrence
remove
M., and Wang,
distribution
Environ
treatment
(Oryzias
40. Zuo,
J.,
L.
to text.
X.,
toxicity
sewage
and
Environ
Zhang,
and
Dongting
River,
large
nanoparticles
compounds
East
reproductive
K., Tucek,
and Blaha,
to text.
Y., Cao, X.,
Occurrence
endocrine-disrupting
22,
.
(2013)
concentrations
with
Environ
178,
Pollut
42. Sabik,
J.,
H.,
and
F., Blaise,
Jeannot,
alkylphenol
River
and
(Elliptio
Back
Gagne,
R.
(2003)
complanata).
Occurrence
of
St.
by
Lawrence
mussels
51,
349-356
Chemosphere
C. E.,
parameters
review.
of
Slot,
D.
gingival
Int J Dent
Haps,
E.,
6, 265-279
sediments
Guillamon,
bivalve
of
M.,
from
the
45. Pojana,
A.,
Gomiero,
A.
(2007)
Marcomini,
endocrine
disrupting
Kwasniak,
J.,
Sokolowski,
M.,
(2014)
Bisphenol
4-nonylphenol
in
Baltic).
Arch
Falkowska,
Mudrak-Cegiolka,
A.,
Szumilo,
in
Reserve
of
Res
69
N.,
and
E.,
and
synthetic
(EDCs)
sediment
and biota of a coastal
Int 33, 929-936 Back to text.
46. Staniszewska,
parameters
Jonkers,
Natural
C.,
in
Environ
compounds
Kuster,
disruptors
Biosphere’s
Mar
G.,
M.,
M. L., Bayona,
M. P. (2010)
reproduction-related
molluscs
systematic
Dominguez,
endocrine
Urdaibai
(Bay
of Biscay).
Suppl, S63-66 Back to text.
Van
to text.
Ortiz-Zarragoitia,
study
and
a
Back
Serrano,
T., Barbero,
M. C., Alda,
J. M., Barcelo,
D., and Cajaraville,
integrated
S., and
efficacy
of dental
on plaque
and
inflammation:
Hyg
E.,
Martinez,
E.,
A. (2008)
The
to a toothbrush
44. Puy-Azurmendi,
Back
D.
to text.
der Weijden,
G.
floss in addition
An
Marcogliese,
polyethoxylates
in the
their
bioconcentration
43. Berchier,
M.,
C.,
in
lagoon.
water,
Environ
L.,
Grabowski,
P.,
S.,
Reindl,
R.,
and
A.
Zgrundo,
A.
A,
4-tert-octylphenol,
and
the Gulf of Gdansk
(Southern
Environ
Contam
Toxicol
67,
335-347
to text.
47. (2003)
NRDC
Sues
EPA
for
Failing
to
Protect
Endangered
Wildlife from
Herbicide:
https://www.nrdc.org/media/2003/030820
text.
48. Andrew,
A., Van
R.
M.
N.,
Zwieten,
(2008)
Dunstan,
L., Nixon,
Effects
88,
39-47
H.,
B., and
of
17alpha-ethynylestradiol
rock
oyster,
induction
and
R.
. Back
O’Connor,
W.
MacFarlane,
G.
4-nonylphenol
exposure
to
in
and
the
Sydney
Saccostrea
glomerata:
Vitellogenin
gonadal
development.
Aquat
Toxicol
Back
to text.
49. Leonard,
J.
A.,
Cope,
and
Bringolf,
R. B. (2014)
and
reproductive
effects
W.
Barnhart,
Metabolomic,
of
17
alpha-ethinylestradiol
Lampsilis
fasciola. Aquat
G.,
the
M.
C.,
behavioral,
synthetic
estrogen
on
the
unionid
mussel
Toxicol 150, 103-116
Back
to text.
50. Heil,
T.
P.,
Environmental
and
and
industrial
flavor tainting of fish
J Environ
Sci Health
51. Priac,
A.,
Bradu,
C,
Crini,
G.
Lindsay,
Lagarrigue,
polyethoxylates
of options
for
C.
factors
(1990)
relating
to
in the upper Wisconsin
river.
B 25, 527-552 Back to text.
Morin-Crini,
(2014)
R.
N,
C,
Druart,
Torri,
G,
Alkylphenol
C, Gavoille,
S,
Winterton,
P,
and
alkylphenol
in water and wastewater:
their elimination.
Arabian
A review
Journal
of
Chemistry
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.05.011
Back
to text.
52. Liedtke,
and
Suter,
whitefish
Toxicol
A., Schonenberger,
R.,
M. J. (2009)
Internal
(Coregonus
93,
53. Miranda,
158-165
A.
lavaretus)
Back
L.,
Eggen,
R.
exposure
to estrogens.
I.,
of
Aquat
to text.
Roche,
H.,
Randi,
M.
A.,
Menezes,
M.
L.,
Bioaccumulation
and
Ribeiro,
of chlorinated
C.
A.
pesticides
(2008)
and
PCBs
in
the
tropical
freshwater
fish
malabaricus:histopathological,
physiological,
immunological
Back
findings.
Environ
Int
Hoplias
and
34,
939-949
Guillette,
L.
to text.
54. Brock,
J.
W.,
Bell,
J.
M.,
and
Jr.
(2016)
Urinary
Phthalate
Metabolites
American
Alligators
(Alligator
mississippiensis)
Selected
Florida
Toxicol
Back
Wetlands.
Arch
A.
A.,
Halm,
Tatsumura,
Y.,
and
Hebshi,
in breastfed
infants
Am J Clin Nutr 84,
56. Arbuckle,
T.
C.,
Feeley,
E.,
Ayotte,
B.
M.,
S.
Custer,
(2006)
Fisher,
G.,
P.,
M.,
use
in
LeBlanc,
Neisa,
Pregnancy
A.,
(P4)
soy.
S.,
Hauser,
Ramsay,
T.,
R.,
and
life exposure
Personal-care
study.
551-552,
344-356
Back
57. Kilic,
M.,
Lindsay,
R. C. (2005)
of conjugates
of alkylphenols
ruminant
species.
J Dairy
J.,
Isoflavones
A.,
Environ
and
L.
MacPherson,
Tawagi, G. (2016)
Maternal
and early
to
phthalates:
The
Plastics
and
Products
Contam
after
mothers
consume
406-413 Back to text.
Provencher,
M.,
in
from
to text.
55. Franke,
Lang,
Environ
J.,
Sci
Total
to text.
in milk
Sci 88,
Distribution
from
different
7-12 Back
to
text.
58. Fierens,
De
T.,
Henauw,
eight
study.
Van
S.,
Holderbeke,
and
Sioen,
M.,
Willems,
H.,
I. (2013)
Transfer
of
phthalates
through
the
Environ
Int 51, 1-7 Back
59. Liao,
Occurrence
foodstuffs
C.,
Liu,
F.,
of and
from
and
dietary
the
milk chain—a
to text.
Kannan,
exposure
United
States.
K.
case
(2013)
to parabens
Environ
in
Sci
Technol
47,
3918-3925
60. Muldoon,
M.
Back
T.,
to text.
and
Stanker,
L.
H.
(1997)
Molecularly
imprinted
solid
phase
extraction
atrazine
from beef liver extracts.
Anal Chem
803-808
Back
61. Curren,
as
a
of
69,
to text.
M.,
King,
Solvent
J.
to
(2001)
Using
Hot
Water
Analyze Atrazine in
Meat:
http://agresearchmag.ars.usda.gov/2001/oct/meat/
Back to text.
.
62. Peighambarzadeh,
Javanbakht,
Presence
cattle
M.,
of
and
health.
text.
its
feed
F.
samples
S.,
samples
adversity
in
Health
40,
F.,
in Burdur
112-121
Oguz,
Occurrence
A.
of
Province,
M.
(2016)
effects
and
on
the
and
dairy
efficacy
and
V.,
and
Aspergillus
cow
of
in
Environ
Gerulis,
performance
to
mycotoxins
Turkey.
Fusarium
of
human
N.,
185, 4943-4949
Back to text.
J., Bakutis,
B., Baliukoniene,
mycotoxins
(2011)
Back
Monit Assess
64. Jovaisiene,
G.
S.,
biological
the
Mor,
(2013)
Shahtaheri,
in
Public
F.
K.
S.,
Forushani,
consequence
J
63. Kocasari,
Safi,
Rahimi
atrazine
Iran
Oguz,
S.,
and
health,
Anti-Mycotoxin
Additive. Pol J Vet Sci 19, 79-87 Back to text.
65. Becker-Algeri,
T. A., Castagnaro,
D., de Bortoli,
K.,
de
Souza,
C.,
Drunkler,
Badiale-Furlong,
E.
Milk
Products:
and
Dairy
(2016)
D.
A.,
Mycotoxins
A
in
Review.
J
Food
81, R544-552
Back to text.
66. Jay,
A. G., and Hamilton,
J.
enigmatic
transporter
New
effects
membrane
insights
on
fatty
into
uptake
fatty
of
acid
acid
oxidized
A.
(2016)
binding
LDL.
and
Bovine
and
Sci
The
CD36:
their
Prostaglandins
Leukot
Essent
67. Jay,
Fatty
Acids
A. G., and
Back
Hamilton,
to text.
J. A. (2016)
Disorder
Amidst
Membrane
Order:
Standardizing
Generalized
Polarization
and
Membrane
Terms.
J Fluoresc
68. Prelusky,
and
D.
Back
B.,
Lawrence,
to text.
Scott,
G.
A.
effect,
C.,
and
P. M.,
(1990)
of zearalenone
to milk
Sci Health B 25, 87-103
69. Witte,
Trenholm,
Minimal
S.
(2003)
H.
L.,
transmission
of dairy cows.
Back to text.
Hooser,
diagnosis
Laurdan
Fluidity
J
The
Environ
presence,
of zearalenone in dairy
cattle:
https://www.addl.purdue.edu/newsletters/2003/
winter/zearalonenone.shtml
Back to text.
70. Hsieh,
M.,
C. (2013)
by
of
Iran.
origin
Control 1, 25-28
72. Khan,
S. U.,
of
W,
Nutrition
in
and
Disposable
4,
31-38
of zearalenone
produced
Food
and
Meats
Sciences
Occurrence
food
Chou,
of Zeranol
Carbon-Plated
and
Journal
University
She,
Analogs
R. (2014)
animal
J,
Detection
Screen-Plated
71. Mahmoudi,
Purdue
Chang,
Metabolic
Electrodes
Food
Back to text.
in raw
H,
Electrochemical
Zearalenone
Grains
Chen,
.
in
Quality
north-west
and
Hazards
Back to text.
and Foster,
T. S. (1976)
Residues
of
atrazine
(2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine)
and
its
metabolities
Food Chem
73. Tsumura,
K.,
chicken
tissues.
24, 768-771 Back to text.
Y., Ishimitsu,
S., Kaihara,
Nakamura,
Di(2-ethylhexyl)
packed
in
lunches
Y.,
and
phthalate
caused
by
Tonogai,
contamination
PVC
gloves
J
A.,
Y.
Agric
Yoshii,
(2001)
of
used
retail
in
the
preparation
569-579
of
Back
foods.
R.
agents
Handb
Pharmacol,
75. Wang,
K.
L.,
(2015)
phenolic
compounds
78,
1. Api,
Contam
18,
W.
in
(2010)
food
Hormonal
producing
355-367
Asimakopoulos,
Back
A.
Accumulation
to text.
G.,
of
growth
animals.
and
19
Kannan,
environmental
and
xenobiotic
heterocyclic
aromatic
in human
adipose
tissue. Environ
Int
45-50
Back
Chapter
Addit
to text.
74. Stephany,
promoting
Exp
Food
to text.
5
A.
phthalate:
M.
(2001)
Toxicological
a
vehicle
for
ingredients.
text.
Food
2. Crinnion,
W. J. (2010)
avoidable
Chem
phthalates
15, 190-196
Back
and
swimming
pools.
17987-17997
Toxic
and
39,
97-108
effects
parabens.
of
diethyl
cosmetic
Back
of the
Altern
to
easily
Med
Rev
to text.
Gao,
L., Liu, J., and
Cai,
and
human
exposure
their
chlorinated
Environ
Back
Sci
Y.
of
derivatives
Pollut
Res
in
Int
22,
S. D., and Gogal,
potential
impact
R.
of
to text.
4. Karpuzoglu,
E.,
M.,
Jr.
(2013)
low-affinity
fragrance
Toxicol
and
3. Li, W., Shi, Y.,
(2015)
Occurrence
parabens
profile
Holladay,
Parabens:
estrogen
321-335
Back
5. Pycke,
O., and
B. F.,
Halden,
Geer,
L. A., Dalloul, M., Abulafia,
R. U. (2015)
Maternal
and
fetal
population.
6. Guerre,
Environ
P. (2015)
Health
B
on
16,
parabens
Environ
chemicals
Rev
to
Toxicol
binding
health.
exposure
J
receptor
human
Crit
to text.
in a multiethnic
Int 84,
193-200
Fusariotoxins
urban
Back
in Avian
U.S.
to text.
Species:
Toxicokinetics,
Metabolism
Tissues.
(Basel)
Toxins
and
Persistence
7, 2289-2305
Back
in
to text.
7. Suen,
J. L., Hung, C. H., Yu, H. S., and Huang,
S. K. (2012)
Alkylphenols—potential
modulators
of
the
allergic
response.
S43-48
Back
8. Kim,
S.,
toxicities,
common
J
Med
Sci
28,
to text.
and
Choi,
K.
and ecological
component
products:
Back
Kaohsiung
a
(2014)
risks
of
mini-review.
Occurrences,
of benzophenone-3,
a
organic
sunscreen
Environ
Int
70,
143-157
to text.
9. Wang,
(2015)
L., Asimakopoulos,
Accumulation
and xenobiotic
human
adipose
of
A. G., and
19
Kannan,
environmental
heterocyclic
aromatic
tissue. Environ
Int
K.
phenolic
compounds
in
78, 45-50 Back
to text.
10. Gunasekaran,
Hansen,
N.,
G.
Arnold,
J.
Reintoxication:
Long,
L.
H.,
Richardson,
C.,
and
the
Br
by
food
J Pharmacol
11. Drummer,
of drugs
of
Back
O. H.
abuse.
D.
P.,
Li,
I.
of
S.
(THC)
deprivation
158,
Dawson,
McGregor,
release
delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol
enhanced
E.,
or
1330-1337
into
ACTH
Back
B.
K.
L.,
M.,
(2009)
fat-stored
blood
is
exposure.
to text.
(2004)
Postmortem
toxicology
Forensic
Sci Int 142, 101-113
to text.
12. Arner,
P., Bernard,
G.,
J.,
Liebl,
Steier,
S., Salehpour,
P.,
Buchholz,
B.
M.,
Possnert,
A.,
Eriksson,
M., Arner,
E., Hauner,
H., Skurk,
T., Ryden,
M.,
Frayn, K. N., and Spalding,
K. L. (2011)
Dynamics
of
human
adipose
metabolic
disease.
13. Langin,
D.
lipid
Nature
(2011)
In
turnover
478,
and
in
110-113
out:
health
and
Back
to text.
adipose
tissue
lipid
turnover
Metab
in
obesity
14, 569-570
Back
and
dyslipidemia.
Cell
to text.
14. Spalding,
K. L., Arner,
E., Westermark,
P.
Bernard,
S.,
Buchholz,
B.
A.,
Bergmann,
O.,
O.,
Blomqvist,
T.,
Concha,
Arner,
L., Hoffstedt,
H., Hassan,
P. (2008)
humans.
15. Kane,
J., Naslund,
M., Ryden,
Dynamics
E., Britton,
M., Frisen,
of fat
cell turnover
Nature 453, 783-787 Back
J. (2012)
Health
costs:
compares
with
J., and
to text.
how
the
other
in
U.S.
countries,
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/health-costshow-the-us-compares-with-other-countries/
NewsHour
Back
.
PBS
to text.
16. Lim,
S., Ahn, S. Y., Song, I. C., Chung,
M.
Jang, H. C., Park, K. S., Lee, K. U., Pak, Y.
H.,
K.,
and
the
Lee,
H.
herbicide,
and
subject
delivered
that
sometime.
I
Back
J.,
Chronic
causes
resistance.
Attia
17. Cao,
(2009)
atrazine,
insulin
text.
i Dr.
K.
mitochondrial
PLoS
an
exposure
One
to
dysfunction
4, e5186
excellent
recommend
Back
TED
talk
you
check
R.,
Liu,
M.,
and
genistin
food
offspring.
intake
Reprod
M.,
G.,
Karachaliou,
M.,
G.,
Association
alters
in
Toxicol
18. Vafeiadi,
Chalkiadaki,
E.
out
Sluzas,
McCaffrey,
K., Buckley,
B., and
Patisaul,
(2015)
Soy
but not bisphenol
A (BPA)
gain
this
to text.
Echelberger,
phytoestrogen
on
to
Roumeliotaki,
Fthenou,
Sarri,
M.,
of
life
rats
282-294
T.,
E.,
K., Vassilaki,
Kogevinas,
early
developmental
pregnant
58,
H.
or
and
exposure
their
to text.
Myridakis,
Dermitzaki,
Chatzi,
to
B.
the
weight
and
Back
M.,
E.,
A.,
E.,
Stephanou,
L.
(2016)
bisphenol
A
with
obesity
Environ
and
Res
cardiometabolic
146,
379-387
traits
Back
in childhood.
to text.
19. Li, J., Wang,
Y., Fang,
F., Chen,
D., Gao,
Y.,
Liu, J., Gao, R., Wang,
J., and Xiao, H. (2016)
Bisphenol
A
disrupts
neurophysiological
role
axis
of
in
the
Pharmacol
20. Berg,
brain
of
New
Has
mice.
and
Environ
to text.
JL,
Stryer,
York:
a Unique
transport
IR/IRS/AKT/GSK3beta
male
43, 7-12 Back
J., Tymockzko,
Biochemistry.
Organ
glucose
WH
Metabolic
Toxicol
L.
(2005)
Freeman
Each
Profile,
30.32
Back
to text.
21. Bertoli,
S.,
Leone,
Human
Bisphenol
Phenotype”.
Dose
22. Pazaiti,
(2012)
A.,
text.
23. Choi,
and
Int
J
J., Eom,
(2014)
and
Battezzati,
A Exposure
Response
13
Kontos,
ZEN
maintenance.
A.,
M.,
and
of
breast
Clin
Pract
66,
28-36
J., Lee,
chemicals
obesity
samples
biological
cross-sectional
38, 51-57 Back
study.
Environ
to text.
24. Pearle,
Katrandjian,
to
L.,
review
birth
safety
O,
issues
to
Kim,
Y.
some
and
childhood
young
girls:
a
Toxicol
Pharmacol
Cuomo,
C.
surrounding
control
S.
Back
S., and
of
I.
health
between
endocrine-disrupting
FDA
Fentiman,
art
J., Kim,
(2015)
the “Diabesity
to text.
the
Association
in
and
Back
A.
(2011)
leading
pill
Yaz:
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/fda-discuss-safetyissues-surrounding-leading-birth-control/story?id=
15099220
. Back
to text.
25. Pereira-Fernandes,
Vandermeiren,
K.,
A.,
Hectors,
Demaegdt,
T.
L.,
Jorens,
H.,
P.
G.,
Blust,
R., and
screening
system
screening
evaluation
PLoS
One
fat
C. (2013)
for
Evaluation
obesogenic
of
8, e77481
W.
Back
(2002)
cells:
single
a
compounds:
of endocrine
disrupting
compounds
of the PPAR
dependency
of the
26. Cromie,
on
Vanparys,
and
effect.
to text.
Scientists
path
get
found
straight
that
skinny
leads
to
fat
Back
to
production:
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/2002/01.17/01fatcells.html
.
Harvard
University
Gazette
text.
27. Haleem,
and
D. J. (2015)
Depression:
Drug Targets
28. Hannaford,
Elliott,
A.
From
Angus,
Mortality
among
evidence
from
by
P.
V.,
Influenza:
disease.
to
Obesity
Leptin.
Lee,
A.
pill
Curr
BMJ
T. V.,
J.
(2010)
users:
College
Contraception
(2013)
marketing
and
Royal
for
L., Macfarlane,
contraceptive
Practitioners’
Oral
c927 Back to text.
Targets
Serotonin
Back to text.
P. C., Iversen,
M.,
29. Doshi,
Drug
of
Study.
cohort
General
BMJ
340,
marketing
346,
f3037
vaccine
Back
to
text.
30. Merriott,
D. (2016)
Factors
farmer
suicide
crisis in India.
Health
Back
to text.
31. Kennedy,
economy
J.,
of
and
King,
farmers’
10,
32. Aggarwal,
Bull 114,
16 Back
S.
127-134
L.
suicides
cash-crop
farmers
with
explain
state-level
variation
Health
associated
with the
J Epidemiol
Glob
(2014)
in
The
India:
marginal
in suicide
political
indebted
landholdings
rates.
Global
to text.
(2015)
Back
Suicide
to text.
in
India.
Br
Med
33. Ackerman,
(2014)
F.,
Would
Whited,
banning
M.,
atrazine
and
Knight,
P.
benefit
farmers?
Int
J Occup Environ
Health 20, 61-70 Back
34. Aslam,
M., Alam, M, Rais, S. (2013)
of atrazine
and
using
performance
high
ultraviolet
simazine
detector.
liquid
Current
323-329 Back to text.
35. Pathak,
R., Dikshit,
use
International
and
Environment
in ground
AK,.
Journal
(2012)
Atrazine
its
of Research
2, 1-6 Back
G.
(2003)
[Depression,
Brotto,
F.,
L., Kreijkamp-Kaspers,
A
randomized,
effects
quality
of
protein
life
in
Menopause
12, 56-62
38. Shiue,
I.
phthalates
Tinelli,
and
and
Minerva
S., Grobbee,
Schouw,
D.
Y. T.
trial
E.,
(2005)
on
the
containing
isoflavones
on
postmenopausal
women.
Back
(2015)
and
R.,
(HRT)].
placebo-controlled
soy
of
der
Chemistry
menopause
hormonal
replacement
therapy
Ginecol 55, 221-231 Back to text.
van
in
and
to text.
Tinelli,
and
with
8,
T.,
J. W.,
Delhi
Environment
Menis,
Lampe,
of
World
A.,
37. Kok,
water
chormatography
36. Tinelli,
F.
to text.
Detection
to text.
Urinary
heavy
polyaromatic
metals,
hydrocarbons
independent
of health
events
are associated
with
adult
depression:
USA
NHANES,
2011-2012.
Environ
Sci Pollut
Res
Int 22,
17095-17103
Back
to
text.
39. Kim,
K. N., Choi,
Y. H., Lim,
Y. C. (2016)
Urinary
depression
in an elderly
and
Environ
Nutrition
Res
40. Ejaredar,
M.,
61-67
Lee,
Hong,
phthalate
metabolites
and
population:
National Health
Examination
145,
Y. H., and
Back
Survey
2005-2012.
to text.
Y., Roberts,
D. J., Sauve,
R.,
and
Dewey,
children’s
D.
(2016)
behavior:
Bisphenol
A
A
systematic
exposure
review.
Sci Environ
Epidemiol
Back to text.
41. Ribeiro-Varandas,
E., Pereira,
H.
and
Delgado,
transcript
levels
Depressive
and
Back
M.
(2016)
of
in
42. Gahr,
M., Freudenmann,
J., Kolle,
M. A., and
Rapid
relapse
oral
contraception
Moe,
P.
T.
W.,
diethylstilbestrol
feedlot beef
to text.
44. O’Reilly,
Ascherio,
utero
A.
L.
(2003)
B.
M.,
Both
receptors
tissue
gain
J
Anim
75-77
C.
estradiol
Dinius,
(1981)
and
Sci
carcass
53,
in women.
36,
D.
A.,
Effect
of
merit
589-600
M.
of
and
Psychiatry
F.,
R.
B.
(2014)
initialization
Diethylstilbestrol
of
Back
R.,
and
exposure
Am
J
in
Epidemiol
to text.
Breedlove,
S.
estrogen
contribute
Back
cells
153,
F., Forman,
M.,
receptors
to
changes
in the morphology
and sexual arousal
in male
336-346
H.
H.
(2010)
Back
endothelial
Hosp
Cross,
depression
171, 876-882
Chapter
6
Major
ethinyl
E. J., Mirzaei,
and
1. Cooke,
on
steers.
for
following
Tyrrell,
and
genes
R. W., Connemann,
with
S.,
W.,
alters
Schonfeldt-Lecuona,
acetate.
Gen
Back to text.
43. Rumsey,
S., Viegas,
Chemosphere
in depression
chlormadinone
230 e231-232
Expo
A
vascular
cells.
J
Bisphenol
biomarker
Disorder
colon
cancer
to text.
and
and
Jordan,
and
C.
androgen
testosterone-induced
of the medial amygdala
rats. Horm
Behav
43,
to text.
2. Losecaat
Vermeer,
Eisenegger,
C.
(2016)
A.
B.,
Riecansky,
Competition,
I.,
and
testosterone,
and
Res
adult
229,
neurobehavioral
213-238
Back
plasticity.
Prog
to text.
3. www.ajconsultingcompany.com/thesis
text.
. Back
4. Cieri,
RG,
R.,
Hare,
Churchill,
B.
(2014)
tolerance,
and
SE,
Franciscus,
Craniofacial
the
origins
quality
N.
E.
of semen
of behavioral
609-613
Back
Tan,
Evidence
past
50
social
modernity.
N.,
for
and
decreasing
years.
BMJ
305,
G.,
Bancroft,
J.,
Braunstein,
G.,
H., Davis, S., Dennerstein,
L., Goldstein,
A., Leiblum,
S., Lobo,
R., Notelovitz,
Rosen,
R.,
Simpson,
Sarrel,
P.,
E., Shifren,
Princeton.
J,
to text.
6. Bachmann,
Burger,
Guay,
(1992)
during
to
feminization,
Current
Anthropology
55 Back to text.
5. Carlsen,
E., Giwercman,
A., Keiding,
Skakkebaek,
Brain
(2002)
Sherwin,
J., Spark,
Female
B.,
R.,
Simon,
Traish,
androgen
I.,
M.,
J.,
A.,
and
insufficiency:
the Princeton
classification,
consensus
statement
on
definition,
and
assessment.
Fertil
Steril
77,
660-665
to text.
Back
7. Vesper,
C.,
H.
and
W.,
Caudill,
Wang,
Y.,
S.
P.
Vidal,
M.,
(2015)
Botelho,
Serum
J.
Total
Testosterone
Population
Concentrations
in the US
Household
from
the NHANES
2011-2012
Study
Population.
Clin Chem
8. Rohr,
U.
D.
imbalance
Maturitas
9. Hidaka,
on
61, 1495-1504
The
depression
explanations
Disord
10. Maruyama,
140,
K.,
for
205214
Oshima,
Back
impact
and
of
T.,
health.
to text.
as a disease
increasing
Back
to text.
testosterone
women’s
41 Suppl 1, S25-46 Back
B. H. (2012)
Depression
modernity:
Affect
(2002)
prevalence.
of
J
to text.
and
Ohyama,
K.
(2010)
Exposure
intake
Pediatr
adrenal
Back
to text.
L.,
estrogen
through
from
pregnant
produced
33-38 Back to text.
can also secrete
testosterone.
R. L., Alves,
Ferraz,
F. (2016)
(ER-alpha),
milk
Int 52,
glands
11. Bernardino,
Sousa,
M. G., Silva,
M.,
Sa,
R.,
and
J., Barros,
Oliveira,
P.
Expression
of Estrogen
Receptors
Alpha
Beta (ER-beta),
and G Protein-Coupled
Receptor
with
exogenous
of commercial
cows.
i The
A.,
to
30
(GPR30)
Klinefelter
in Testicular
Syndrome.
Horm
Tissue
Metab
of
Men
Res
Back
to text.
12. Yiu,
K.
W.,
Lee,
C.
K.,
Kwok,
Cheung,
N. H. (2014)
Measuring
the binding of xenoestrogens
and
alpha
by
Technol
fluorescence
48,
11591-11599
Back
S. (2003)
steadily
for many
countries:
Is there
decrease?
2 Back
Environ
sperm
count
has
Zool
telomere
for
10,
The
Internet
Journal
S.,
Cheung,
N.
shortening
studying
K.,
78 Back
during
of
Urology
Yip,
B.
W.,
exhibits
estrogen
a
unique
longevity.
Front
to text.
pollutants.
Minerva
16. Krysiak,
R.,
B.
aging:
sex-dependent
15. Chiabotto,
P., Costante,
L,
(2006)
Premature
thelarche
Okopien,
been
years
in
Western
an endocrine
basis
and
Au,
D.
W.
(2013)
Medaka
fish
longevity
gender
gap, a natural
drop
in
model
Sci
to text.
14. Gopalakrishnan,
and
and
to text.
decreasing
industrialized
this
The
C.,
the kinetics
of
estrogen
receptor
polarization.
13. Dindyal,
for
K.
Med
Szkrobka,
(2014)
97,
and
and
277-285
W.,
[Precocious
de Sanctis,
C.
environmental
Back
Kowalska,
puberty
to text.
B.,
in
and
boys].
Przegl
Lek
71, 549-558
17. Ibanez,
L,
Marcos,
premature
and
10,
18. Walsh,
63-76
N.
as
Back
Y.
R.,
Jeung,
E.
B.
octylphenol
Back
onset
and
text.
21. Roy,
E.
M.,
GH3
of puberty
for
Horm
Puberty
K.
C,
(2009)
on
the
rat
affecting
Sci Monit
expression
pituitary
puberty
in
reproductive
Endocrine
23. Fortes,
Sugawara,
E. M., Malerba,
E. K., Sumodjo,
Verreschi,
I.
phytoestrogens
with
and
a
T.
Chakraborty,
T.
disrupting
review.
to text.
A. J., Boyadjieva,
N.
(2005)
Neonatally
affects
Back
onset
in
precocious
of
female
to text.
M. I., Luchini,
L, Ribeiro Neto,
(2007)
possible
and
to
development
26, 161-168
the
Back
humans-a
Back
tert-octylphenol
and
beings
endocrine
puberty
cells.
on
250-261
S., and
15, RA137-145
of
psychological
64,
Estrogen-like
and
effects
adolescent
Behav
in
Today,
in human
J. R., Chakraborty,
administered
report
Early
Choi,
paraben
22. Willoughby,
K. N., Sarkar,
I.,
and
Sarkar,
D.
K.
and
Metab
MedPage
Synergistic
in
tempo
chemicals
rats.
Endocr
Med 29, 294-302 Back to text.
Y., and Styne, D. (2013)
Influences
development.
Med
of
Adults.
to text.
isobutyl
implications
R.
Rev
(2012)
calbindin-D(9)k
and
Clinical
spectrum
of
to metabolic
syndrome
Effects
Jung,
and
A.,
to text.
(2013)
19. Kim,
IntJMol
20. Lee,
Lopez-Bermejo,
hyperandrogenism.
Girls
Persist
Endocrinology
of
R.,
to text.
M.
V.
(2009)
pubarche:
links
ovarian
Disord
Diaz,
Back
[High
intake
thelarche:
correlation].
P.
L.
Arq
D.,
M.,
of
case
Bras
Endocrinol
Metabol
24. Mortenson,
51, 500-503
T.
(2006)
M.
men
Globe
to text.
Back
26. Wallerson,
weakens
in
state
of
Education
(2016)
outnumber
to text.
The
manhood.
Postsecondary
Back to text.
25. Rocheleau,
Back
more
On
than
American
Opportunity
campus,
ever.
women
The
Boston
R.
(2014)
Youth
participation
basketball,
football, baseball,
soccer:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/
SB10001424052702303519404579350892629229918
. The
Wall Street
27. Arbuckle,
T.
Journal
E.,
Back
Fisher,
to text.
M.,
MacPherson,
S.,
Lang, C, Provencher,
G., LeBlanc,
A., Hauser,
Feeley,
M., Ayotte,
P., Neisa, A., Ramsay,
T.,
Tawagi,
to
G. (2016)
phthalates:
Products
The
use
in
Environ
551-552,
28. Meyer,
K.,
receptor
Maternal
functions
and
PLoS
8, e79303
63,
spatial
and
and
376-384
in
Personal-care
study.
the
cognition
Back
Sci
Total
Estrogen
regulation
in young
of
male
rats.
to text.
receptor
cognition
Back
Background
fish
remote
Sci Rep
sites.
genes:
in male
relations
rats.
Horm
to
Behav
to text.
30. Jarque,
S., Quiros,
Catalan,
J., Lackner,
31. Jandegian,
(P4)
exposure
K., and Korz, V. (2013)
Age
dependent
in the regulation
of hippocampal
steroid
hormones
motivation
life
and
Pregnancy
motivation
29. Meyer,
differences
Plastics
early
344-356 Back to text.
and
Korz,
V.
(2013)
alpha
One
and
R.,
and
L, Grimalt,
R., and
feminization
C. M.,
effects
5, 11292
Deem,
J. O., Gallego, E.,
Pina,
B.
(2015)
Back
in
European
to text.
S. L, Bhandari,
R.
K.,
Holliday,
K. W.,
C. M.,
Tillitt,
D.
V.,
Yang,
Developmental
alters
Y.,
sexual
E.,
and
exposure
male
539-542
F. S.,
Gen
in
Selcer,
Velez-Rivera,
K.
A
(2015)
(BPA)
painted
Comp
turtles
Endocrinol
216,
to text.
animals].
Back
33. Hayes,
de
Saal,
C. S.,
Holliday,
D.
to bisphenol
32. Kang,
L. N., Wang,
[Effects
of nonylphenol
of
Rosenfeld,
Vom
picta).
Back
D.,
differentiation
(Chrysemys
77-85
Nicks,
Zhonghua
Nan
Ke
(2003)
system
Xue
9,
V.
R.,
to text.
T.
Solla,
Y., and Han, X. D.
on the reproductive
B.,
S.
Anderson,
R.,
L.
Iguchi,
L,
Beasley,
T.,
Ingraham,
H.,
Kestemont,
P., Kniewald,
J., Kniewald,
Z., Langlois,
V. S., Luque,
E. H., McCoy,
K. A., Munoz-de-Toro,
M.,
Oka,
T.,
Suzawa,
Oliveira,
C.
A.,
M., Tavera-Mendoza,
Victor-Costa,
A.
B.,
Orton,
F.,
Ruby,
L. E., Trudeau,
and
Willingham,
E.
S.,
V. L,
(2011)
Demasculinization
and feminization
of male
gonads
by
atrazine:
consistent
effects
across
vertebrate
classes.
Back
J
Steroid
Biochem
Mol
Biol
127,
64-73
to text.
34. Lioy,
P.
J.,
Hauser,
R.,
Gennings,
M., Mirkes,
A.
(2015)
P. E., Schwetz,
Assessment
alternatives
in children’s
toys
Review
the
including
of
recommendation
report
of
the
C,
Koch,
H.
B. A., and Kortenkamp,
of
phthalates/phthalate
and
Chronic
childcare
articles:
conclusions
Hazard
and
Advisory
Panel of the Consumer
Product
Safety Commission.
J Expo Sci Environ
Epidemiol
25, 343-353 Back to
text.
35. Liu,
and
X.,
Xie,
Nie,
M.
S.,
(2016)
Yu,
Q.,
Wang,
Downregulation
X.,
Huang,
of
D.,
steroid
hormone
signal
receptor
expression
transduction
pathways
and
induced
nonylphenol
isomer
in mouse
Environ
Toxicol Back to text.
36. Jimenez-Diaz,
I.,
Zafra-Gomez,
M.,
A.,
Saenz,
(2013)
benzyl
by
Fernandez,
camphor
LC-MS/MS.
endocrine
Biomed
Chapter
F.,
A. N., Dean,
A.
disease.
S.
Clin
H.
J.
M.,
A.,
and
Real,
Olea,
camphor
their
Back
N.
UV-filters
salicylate,
and
tissue
in
vitro
Technol
to text.
Korach,
W.
K.,
F., and
Tucker,
Boorman,
immunosuppression
is
estrogenic
responses
in
133, 110-116 Back to text.
(2011)
Rev
cells.
B Analyt
T.,
Estrogen
E.
TM4
placental
of
J. H., Greenlee,
(1984)
2. Walker,
80-87
I., Hayes,
regulated
through
thymus.
J Immunol
chiral
of the
octyl
human
J Chromatogr
Life Sci 936,
7
M.
in
cell
a
Navalon,
M.
Assessment
activity.
1. Luster,
G.
O.,
3-(4-methylbenzylidene)
3-benzylidene
by
sertoli
Simultaneous
determination
salicylate,
phenyl
salicylate,
homosalate,
of
Molina-Molina,
Ballesteros,
J. M.,
activation
Estrogen
Allergy
and
Immunol
the
autoimmune
40,
60-65
Back
to text.
3. Walker,
S. E., Besch-Williford,
C. L., and
Keisler,
D. H. (1994)
Accelerated
deaths
from
systemic
lupus
erythematosus
treated
flutamide.
with
J
Lab
text.
4. Hueza,
I. M.,
Latorre,
A.
Zearalenone,
immunotoxic
in
the
NZB
x
NZW
F1
mice
testosterone-blocking
Clin
Med
Raspantini,
401-407
Back
P. C., Raspantini,
O.,
and
an
estrogenic
compound.
124,
drug
Gorniak,
S.
L.
mycotoxin,
Toxins
(Basel)
to
L. E.,
(2014)
is
an
6,
1080-1095
Back
5. Morahan,
Duke,
(1984)
host
to text.
P.
S.,
Bradley,
S., Fromtling,
Immunotoxic
resistance:
J Leukoc
comparison
R.
G.,
R. A., and
effects
of
Biol 35,
6. Luebke,
S.
W.,
Chen,
E.,
F.
on
cyclophosphamide.
Back
D.
A.
Marciano-Cabral,
diethylstilbestrol
with
329-341
Munson,
to text.
H.,
Dietert,
R.,
Yang,
Y., King, M., Luster,
M. I., and
Immunotoxicology,
W. (2006)
The comparative
immunotoxicity
of five
selected
compounds
adult
Rev
exposure.
9, 1-26 Back
7. AAAAI,
following
J
A.
Toxicol
developmental
Environ
Health
.
A.
o.
And
26;162(2):14.
you.
A.,
Asthma,
Allergies
8. Tuohy,
on
P.
&
9. Abbes,
Oueslati,
Immunology.
effects
mice.
of Bisphenol
2010
It’s
Jul
not
nationwide-and
place.
Lindner
Soy
Paediatr
BEJ01
chronic
just
so
is
M. Back
to
infant
formula
and
Child
Health
39,
prevents
Curr
Environ
immunotoxic
exposure
R. (2015)
Phthalates
Function:
Sharafi,
H.,
A.
(2013)
Immunotoxicol
to text.
L., and Miller,
A and
J.,
K.
zearalenone
Immunopharmacol
Immune
Findings.
(2003)
paracasei
341-348 Back
10. Robinson,
and
work
Ben
Salah-Abbes,
and
Noghabi,
during
Balb/c
increasing
the
attack.
Statistics:
to text.
S.,
R.,
Lactobacillus
allergies
J
Back
Fortune.
are
G.
phytoestrogens.
401-405
Figure:
When
the impact
text.
Crit
to text.
Allergy
http://www.aaaai.org/about-aaaai/newsroom/allergystatistics
or
B
a
Health
on
The
Allergy,
Review
Rep
in
35,
Impact
Asthma,
of
2,
Latest
379-387
Back
to text.
11. Rowe,
A. M.,
Brundage,
K. M.,
B. (2008)
Developmental
in rodents.
Basic
Clin
139-145
Back
12. Rooney,
W.
Barnett,
A. A.,
(2003)
immunotoxicity
of atrazine
Pharmacol
Toxicol
102,
Matulka,
R.
A.,
Developmental
and
Luebke,
atrazine
R.
exposure
function
in male,
but
not
rats. Toxicol Sci 76, 366375
to text.
13. Filby,
A. L., Neuparth,
R., Galloway,
impacts
T., Thorpe,
T. S., and
Tyler,
estrogens
in
of
K. L.,
C. R. (2007)
the
14. Vojdani,
A.,
and
reactivity
to food
21
1, 52-62
Suppl
15. Suen,
Huang,
J.
S.
modulators
coloring.
Back
Sci 28,
the
environment,
S43-48
A., Jacques,
P.,
Dietary
lignans:
disease
571-603
to text.
17. Prince,
M.,
Ther
Back
Health
response.
Med
Kaohsiung
risk
C.
J
to text.
J., Adlercreutz,
Glueck,
Immune
H., Yu,
H. S.,
and
Alkylphenols-potential
and
McCullough,
physiology
and
cardiovascular
Back
(2015)
Health
to text.
allergic
J., Dwyer,
C.
Altern
L., Hung,
C.
K.
(2012)
of
16. Peterson,
Vojdani,
Owen,
Health
considering
complex
mixture effects. Environ
Perspect
115, 1704-1710
Back to text.
Med
J.
to text.
suppresses
immune
female Sprague-Dawley
Back
and
reduction.
J.,
Shah,
H., Scalbert,
M. L.
(2010)
potential
for
Nutr
P.,
Rev
68,
Kumar,
A.,
Goldenberg,
M., Rothschild,
M., Motayar,
N., Jetty,
V., Lee, K., and Wang,
P. (2016)
Hospitalization
for
pulmonary
testosterone
to
have
embolism
or
familial
estrogen
and
associated
therapy
acquired
with
antecedent
in patients
found
thrombophilia.
BMC
Hematol
16, 6 Back
18. Kuhnel,
L.,
to text.
and
Heinrichs,
C.
course
study in thrombophilia].
Mag Klin Morphol
Blutforsch
(1984)
[Clinical
Folia Haematol
111, 519-527 Back
Int
to
text.
19. Snir,
G.
M.,
Cohen,
(1985)
Retinal
thrombocytopenic
contraceptive
109-112
S., Ben-Sira,
Back
I., and
manifestations
purpura
treatment.
Buckman,
of
(TTP)
Ann
thrombotic
following
use
Ophthalmol
of
17,
to text.
20.
www.ajconsultingcompany.com/ee2_drug_labels.html
. Back
to text.
21. Covin,
R. B., Rich, N. L., and Aysola,
Upper-extremity
deep
venous
complicating
586-590
whole-blood
Back
donation.
D.,
Hachimi-Idrissi,
Moloney-Harmon,
Braet,
S.,
P.,
F.,
Gyseghem,
E.,
e742-753
and
risk
Cerebrovasc
and
20,
venous
experimental
Back
Azevedo,
factor for
Dis
B.,
(2007)
deep
a clinical
119,
J.,
as a
Van
and
in children:
Pediatrics
23. Guimaraes,
Phytoestrogens
thrombosis.
44,
Van
Bruwaene,
and
Huyghens,
L.
Di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
analysis.
Transfusion
to text.
22. Danschutter,
thrombosis
A. (2004)
thrombosis
to text.
E.
(2005)
cerebral
sinus
137-138
Back
to
text.
24. Mullin,
R.
(2014)
Tufts
study
finds
big
rise
in
cost
of
drug
development:
http://cen.acs.org/articles/92/web/2014/11/TuftsStudy-Finds-Big-Rise.html
25. Angell,
Companies
M.
(2005)
: How
. Back
The
They
to text.
Truth
Deceive
about
Us
and
the
Drug
What
to
Do
about
Back
It. Random
House
Trade
Paperback
Ed.
to text.
26. Taggart,
America’s
K.
H.
a.
K. (2013)
worse
Above
the
law:
charities:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/13/us/worst-charities/
and
http://www.tampabay.com/americas-worst-charities/
Back to text.
27. Kandoth,
C.,
K., Niu,
McLellan,
B., Lu,
C., Xie,
J. F., Wyczalkowski,
C.
A.,
Ley,
Welch,
J.
333-339
Back
S.,
mutations
29. Merz,
W.
cervical
2010:
and
E.
the
G.
S
A
(2004)
risk
Med
Ye,
McMichael,
M. D., Miller,
J.,
Wendl,
M.
B. J., and
C.,
Ding,
L.
of developing
26-28,
analysis.
Moorman,
D.,
and
between
378,
P.
G.,
R. R.,
A.
J.,
Myers,
E.
Back
breast
cancer].
30 Back
Lancet
Coeytaux,
tumor?
replacement
M. (2011)
countries
McBroom,
a
to text.
Foreman,
R., Lopez,
Naghavi,
J.,
make
How
14675-14677
[Hormone
146,
in 187
J. M.,
L. (1999)
to
96,
M.
H.,
M.,
Lozano,
a systematic
M.,
it take
U
C. J., and
cancer
J., Gierisch,
Sanders,
Q.,
Ricciardiello,
does
Fortschr
Back to text.
31. Havrilesky,
Dinan,
M.
R. K., Raphael,
Sci
30. Forouzanfar,
Delossantos,
A.
Murray,
Walter,
C. R., and
Acad
MMW
Zhang,
F.,
to text.
Proc Natl
to text.
therapy
Vandin,
Mutational
landscape
and
significance
major
cancer
types.
Nature
502,
28. Boland,
many
M.,
D.,
M. A., Leiserson,
T. J., Wilson,
L. (2013)
across
12
M.
.
K.
A.
Breast
and
1980
and
1461-1484
Lowery,
Urrutia,
Hasselblad,
R.
J.,
D.,
(2013)
R.
W.
P.,
V.,
Oral
contraceptive
ovarian
pills
as
cancer:
meta-analysis.
text.
primary
a
systematic
Obstet
Gynecol
32. Hatzipetros,
I.,
(2013)
contraceptive
Oral
prevention
for
Gocze,
ovarian
and meta-analysis.
to text.
Breast,
C.
contraceptives:
data
on
on
297
and
Back
122,
review
1114
Hormonal
B.
primary
a systematic
Back
Factors
and
reanalysis
with
to
Farkas,
as
cancer
women
and
139-147
Gynecol
Breast
for
review
pills
collaborative
53
M.,
cancer:
Group
(1996)
122,
P.
Obstet
33. Collaborative
prevention
in
hormonal
of
breast
individual
cancer
and
100 239 women
without
breast
cancer
from
54
epidemiological
studies.
Lancet
347, 1713-1727
Back
to text.
34. Heinemann,
Thiel,
C.,
Modern
tumors:
L.
Schlaud,
oral
the
M.,
Study.
Care
35. Farrell,
Weimann,
and
contraceptive
German
Case-Control
Health
A.,
C.
a.
J
Back
G.
DoMinh,
Vecchia,
C.,
contraceptives,
cancer.
Eur
text.
37. Marasas,
Mirocha,
species
and
J.
the
in
F.,
Boccia,
Prev
van
(1979)
23,
effects
S.
(2014)
and
110-112
Back
S.
of
in
Oral
cervical
J.,
to
and
Fusarium
deoxynivalenol
produced
of
on the
liver.
Back to text.
Rensburg,
Incidence
mycotoxins,
corn
(1998)
Reprod
Adverse
papillomavirus
Cancer
W.
C.
zearalenone,
J
G.,
to text.
(2007)
and
human
T.
Contracept
hormones
and hormone
antagonists
Drug-Induced
Liver Disease,
707-722
36. La
Gerken,
use and
benign
liver
Benign
Liver
Tumor
Eur
3, 194-200
S.
A.,
and
esophageal
cancer
areas
1108-1112
in Transkei.
Back
J Agric
Food
Chem
27,
to text.
38. Hsia,
C. C., Wu, J. L., Lu, X. Q., and Li, Y. S.
(1988)
Natural
occurrence
and clastogenic
effects
of
nivalenol,
deoxynivalenol,
15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol,
from
a high-risk
Detect Prev
39. Belhassen,
Ghali,
and
and
area
Ghorbel,
of esophageal
H.,
Zearalenone
breast
Tunisia.
zearalenone
in
cancer.
corn
Cancer
13, 79-86 Back to text.
H., Jimenez-Diaz,
I., Arrebola,
R.,
(2015)
3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol,
cancer
Olea,
and
its
risk:
a
Chemosphere
128,
N.,
and
P.,
Hedili,
metabolites
in
case-control
1-6 Back
J.
A.
urine
study
in
to text.
40. Jowa,
L., and Howd, R. (2011)
Should
atrazine
and
related
chlorotriazines
be
considered
carcinogenic
for
Environ
Health
Rev
Sci
29,
41. Hu,
Li, N.,
91-144
48,
by
Environ
RM1
activating
2166-2174
on
Back
43. Takagi,
A.,
Possibility
isoflavones
using
Back
J
Ecotoxicol
prostate
cancer
cell
signaling.
Int
J
to text.
Mojzisova,
Soy and
Int
J
G.,
Mirossay,
breast
cancer:
Mol
Sci
16,
to text.
Kano,
M.,
of breast
cancer
and fermented
probiotics.
Carcinog
STAT3
Back
angiogenesis.
11728-11749
assessment?
to text.
42. Varinska,
L., Gal, P.,
L., and Mojzis,
J. (2015)
focus
risk
Y., Du, Y., Huang,
L., Chen,
J.,
Liang,
Z., and Zhao,
L. (2016)
promotes
proliferation
health
C
Back
K., Tian,
Liu, W.,
Atrazine
Oncol
human
Int
J
and
Kaga,
C.
(2015)
prevention:
use of soy
soy beverage
produced
Mol
Sci
16,
10907-10920
to text.
44. Johnson,
K. A., Vemuri,
S., Alsahafi,
S.,
Castillo,
R.,
and
Cheriyath,
Isoflavone
Extracts
V.
(2016)
Glycone-rich
Promote
Estrogen
Receptor
Positive
Breast
Cancer
Cell
68, 622-633 Back to text.
Growth.
Nutr
45. Park,
A.,
H.
R.,
M.
A.,
Jeung,
Hwang,
E.
B.,
Benzophenone-1
ovarian
estrogen
46. Kim,
LNCaP
triclosan
xenograft
Back
S.
K.
H.,
C.
Hwang,
(2015)
Pharmacol
39,
47. In,
growth
growth
K.
Shim,
A.,
and
Back
genes
pathway.
and
benzophenone-1
Choi,
and
Go,
M.,
receptor-dependent
expressing
ovarian
49. Piskounova,
and
of
promoted
by
an
androgen
Toxicol
R. E., Hwang,
cell
via
an
C.
transition
A.,
and
cancer
and
estrogen
receptor
Environ
Health
Hwang,
K.
A.,
(2016)
Effect
of
on
regulation
C. W.,
K.
K.
cycle
J Toxicol
octylphenol
of epithelial-mesenchymal
Hu,
S.
to text.
A 78, 492-505 Back to text.
48. Shin,
S., Go, R. E., Kim,
Back
BG-1
Toxicology
Environ
regulating
alpha-dependent
H.,
B.
via an
pathway
migration
are
via
pathway.
S. H.,
metastasis-related
58-65
of
regulation
signaling
models.
Yi,
(2013)
K.
C.
(2015)
Benzophenone-1
stimulated
MCF-7
breast
by
K.
R.,
C.
mouse
Growth
568576
S. J., Kim,
and
Choi,
nonylphenol
M.,
the
prostate
cancer
cells
and
benzophenone-1
signaling
93,
K.
Cancer
to text.
receptor
Nam,
Choi,
stimulated
and
41-48
Choi,
and
Lee,
cancer
cells by cell cycle
receptor
alpha-mediated
in cellular
305,
K.
Soy
the
via an
estrogen
pathway
in estrogen
receptor
cancer
cells. Food Chem Toxicol
to text.
E.,
Agathocleous,
Z., Huddlestun,
M.,
S. E., Zhao,
Murphy,
M.
Z., Leitch,
A.
M.,
Johnson,
Morrison,
distant
Nature
T.
S.
J.
M.,
DeBerardinis,
(2015)
Oxidative
metastasis
527, 186-191
50. (1994)
The
carotene
on
other
by
human
Back to text.
effect
the
of
in
of
and
inhibits
melanoma
cells.
E
and
beta
cancer
and
lung
male
J.,
stress
vitamin
incidence
cancers
R.
smokers.
The
Alpha-Tocopherol,
Beta Carotene
Cancer
Prevention
Study Group.
N Engl J Med 330, 1029-1035
Back
to text.
51. Klann,
A.,
W.,
Hildebrandt,
and
Levy,
effects
G.,
Lutz,
J.
of
I., Muller,
P.
(2005)
274-281
and
Back
Inst
gene
amphibian
cells.
screen
(Eusolex
6300)
induction
in
Environ
S.,
and
Mosteller,
F.
66, 197-212
Back
P.
Parabens
D.,
can
and
925-938
and
enable
regulatory
Back
54. Crinnion,
Harvey,
hallmarks
W.
and
M.,
97,
A
case
process:
the
Natl
Cancer
P.
and
status.
J
W.
(2014)
characteristics
cells:
new
Appl
a review
exposure
Toxicol
34,
to text.
J.
(2010)
easily
avoidable
phthalates
Med Rev 15, 190-196 Back
55. Sajid,
Res
to text.
of cancer
in human
breast epithelial
of the literature
with reference
to
M.,
(1981)
of statistics
in the regulatory
Red
No. 40 experiments.
J
53. Darbre,
data
Estrogen-like
to text.
52. Lagakos,
study
FD&C
Kloas,
ultraviolet
3-(4-methylbenzylidene)-camphor
on
cell
proliferation
and
mammalian
C.,
Basheer,
Lee,
microwave-assisted
H.
Toxic
of
and
parabens.
to text.
C, Narasimhan,
K.
effects
(2015)
micro-solid-phase
the
Altern
K., Choolani,
Application
of
extraction
for
determination
cancer
of
tissues.
parabens
J
in
Chromatogr
human
B
ovarian
Analyt
Technol
Biomed
Life Sci 1000, 192-198 Back to text.
56. Chen,
F. P., and Chien,
M. H. (2014)
concentrations
of
human
cancer
Back
breast
phthalates
induce
cells.
Lower
proliferation
in
Climacteric
17,
377-384
Pernicova,
Z., Palkova,
J.,
and
Machala,
L.,
M.
Soucek,
(2014)
to text.
57. Hruba,
E.,
K.,
Vondracek,
Phthalates
deregulate
neuroendocrine
LNCaP
prostate
(Praha)
60
cell
proliferation,
but
transdifferentiation,
Suppl
in
cancer
cell
model.
1, 56-61
Back
to text.
not
human
Folia
Biol
58. Paulose,
T., Speroni,
L., Sonnenschein,
C, and
Soto, A. M. (2015)
Estrogens
in the wrong
place
at
the
wrong
mammary
time:
cancer.
Fetal
Reprod
BPA
exposure
Toxicol
54,
and
58-65
Back
to text.
59. Fillon,
M. (2012)
Getting it right: BPA and
the
difficulty proving
environmental
cancer
risks. J Natl
Cancer
Inst
104,
60. Amaro,
Mehilli,
A.
A.,
Pfeffer,
disruptor
U.,
receptor
A.,
Back
Esposito,
Rosano,
C,
and
agent
estrogen-like
Chem
652-655
A.
Noonan,
Angelini,
nonyl
21,
cancer
Back
to text.
62. Ajj,
Flament,
Res
Treat
H.,
S.,
115,
Chesnel,
and
429-430
A.,
Albini,
V.,
A.,
estrogen
Curr
Med
M. (2009)
The
cancer.
Breast
Back
Pinel,
Dumond,
on
cells.
61. Speirs,
V., and
Shaaban,
A.
rising
incidence
of male
breast
Cancer
Mirisola,
M.,
activity
breast
630-640
I.,
D.
G. (2014)
Endocrine
phenol
exerts
an
transcriptional
positive
to text.
to text.
S.,
H.
Plenat,
(2013)
F.,
An
alkylphenol
mix
proliferation
seminoma
through
mechanism.
Chapter
8
1. Stein,
promotes
PLoS
Z.,
One
and
famine,
1944-1945,
Effects
on
M.
and
the
indices
at
to text.
M.
transgenerational
as
a
Gemellol
(Roma)
45, 111-125
birth.
famine
associated
in
process.
gene
Back
Res
Genet
Med
to text.
A. D., Putter,
S., Slagboom,
P. E.,
Persistent
epigenetic
prenatal
Natl
exposure
Acad
Sci
USA
Back
E. (2006)
Epigenetics:
sins
of
their fathers.
Eur J Hum
Genet
131-132
Back
to text.
5. Lane,
M.,
obesity,
impacts.
to text.
Zander-Fox,
O.
to
105,
4. Whitelaw,
fathers,
and
N.
9,
and
17046-17049
McPherson,
I.
expression;
Acta
E. W., Stein,
Proc
Dutch
Pediatr
of
with
humans.
The
Imprinting
H., Blauw,
G. J., Susser,
E.
and
Lumey,
L. H. (2008)
differences
(1975)
model.
B. T., Tobi,
to text.
reproductive
modulation
growth
3. Heijmans,
Back
(1996)
human
cell
ERalpha36-mediated
8, e61758
Susser,
six
70-76 Back
2. Pembrey,
an
derived
D.
(2015)
L, Robker,
R.
Peri-conception
reproductive
health,
and
Trends
Endocrinol
Metab
L,
the
14,
and
parental
transgenerational
26, 84-90 Back
to text.
6. McLachlan,
from
J. A. (2016)
environmental
endocrine-disrupting
Andrology
4, 684-694
7. Wei,
Hou,
Environmental
Y.,
Y.,
Paternally
Yang,
Schatten,
induced
C.
signaling:
estrogens
to
chemicals
and
Back to text.
R.,
H.,
Wei,
Y.
and
Sun,
transgenerational
P.,
beyond.
Zhao,
Q.
Y.
Z.
A.,
(2014)
inheritance
of
susceptibility
to
AcadSciUSA
111,
8. Hughes,
V.
father. Nature
9. Cheng,
diabetes
in
1873-1878
mammals.
Back
Y.,
Hockman,
Anderson,
L.
M.,
and
Epigenetic
and
gene
T.,
Y.
expression
S., Murakami,
Taniguchi,
damage
K.,
administered
to
A.,
Kielbasa,
orally
male
mice.
Toxicol
to text.
R., Cendrowski,
K.,
Cesarz,
B.
(2011)
and
Buszewski,
by
its metabolites
coupled
Bioanal
Chem
Thomas,
J.
A.
(2015)
S.,
in
separation
401,
2069-2078
Sproul,
D.,
and
Estrogen-induced
and
linked
to
breast
cancer.
regional
Genome
N.
R. R., Padilla-Banks,
(2006)
Adverse
environmental
transmitted
Endocrinology
14. Singh,
of
and
nuclear
epigenetic
Biol 16, 145
to text.
13. Newbold,
W.
F.
food
decondensation
reorganization
regulation
in
Back
Y.
and
cancer
W.
to
40,
dyes
endometrial
chromatin
related
Carcinog
Matsusaka,
red
of zearalenone
Bickmore,
(2004)
DNA
Determination
S.,
E.,
Kano,
P.,
12. Rafique,
the
N.,
pregnant
techniques.
Anal
Back to text.
Mo/
Sasaki,
by
Sci 61, 92-99 Back
11. Gadzala-Kopciuch,
H.
changes
M.,
of
(2001)
and
induced
sins
Crawford,
Shiao,
transgenerational
carcinogenesis.
1-11 Back to text.
K.,
Natl
to text.
(2014)
Epigenetics:
The
507, 22-24 Back to text.
R.
10. Tsuda,
Proc
E., and
effects
of
Jefferson,
the
model
estrogen
diethylstilbestrol
are
to
subsequent
generations.
147,
S., and
environmental
S11-17
Back
to text.
Li, S. S. (2012)
chemicals
Epigenetic
bisphenol
effects
A
and
phthalates.
Int
J Mol
Sci
13,
10143-10153
Back
to
text.
Chapter
9
1. Schultz,
I. R., Skillman,
G.,
and
to 17
Nagler,
A., Nicolas,
J. J. (2003)
alpha-ethynylestradiol
sexually
Short-term
decreases
maturing
male
mykiss).
to text.
2. Nash,
Kime,
D.
W.,
Brion,
F.,
and
Tyler,
J.
P.,
P.
Stahlschmidt-Allner,
P.,
Long-term
exposure
concentrations
ethynylestradiol
of
causes
Environ
Environ
Health
E.,
the
der
22,
L.
R.
T.,
G.,
(2004)
environmental
the
reproductive
112,
Ven,
C.
of
trout
Chem
Maack,
to
Perspect
fertility
Toxicol
Van
D.
exposure
rainbow
(Oncorhynchus
1272-1280
Back
Wester,
J. M., Cyr,
pharmaceutical
failure in fish.
1725-1733
Back
to
text.
3. Hatef,
A.,
Alavi,
Golshan,
M.,
Anti-androgen
steroidogenesis
181-187
(1979)
swine
in
Back
4. Chang,
Milla,
S.,
Aquat
Kristan,
J.,
O. (2012)
quality and
Toxicol
122123,
to text.
K.,
Kurtz,
H.
J.,
and
Mirocha,
C.
J.
the mycotoxin
zearalenone
on
Am J Vet Res 40, 1260-1267
to text.
5. Yazdanpanah,
Foroutan,
Nazari,
tehran
Iran
M.,
goldfish.
Effects
of
reproduction.
Back
S.
Fontaine,
P., and Linhart,
vinclozolin
impairs sperm
H.,
S. M., Aboul-Fathi,
A.,
Shafaati,
A.
F., Khoddam,
R.,
A., and
F. (2012)
Exposure
assessment
of
the
population
(iran) to zearalenone
mycotoxin.
J Pharm
6. Greenlee,
(2004)
Zarghi,
Res
A.
R.,
Low-dose
11, 251-256
Ellis,
T.
Back
M.,
agrochemicals
to text.
and
and
Berg,
R.
lawn-care
L.
pesticides
induce
developmental
preimplantation
embryos.
112, 703-709
7. Wang,
X.,
M.,
Xia,
Y.,
spontaneous
estrogen
Environ
Back to text.
Chen, X., Feng,
and
toxicity
Chen,
L.
abortion
X.,
murine
Health
Perspect
Chang,
(2015)
F.,
Chen,
Triclosan
accompanied
sulfotransferase
in
by
activity
in
causes
decline
humans
and
mice. Sci Rep 5, 18252 Back to text.
8. Kay,
V. R., Chambers,
C., and Foster,
(2013)
Reproductive
and
diesters
in females.
phthalate
developmental
200-219
Back
9. Giahi,
L., Mohammadmoradi,
Nutr
10. Chen,
Qiao,
S.,
K.
74,
Tang,
Chen,
118-130
R.,
X.,
Mater
11. Iwase,
Fu,
Xu,
B.,
250-251,
T., Sano,
(1995)
G.
of
43,
A., and
G.,
Qin,
to text.
Xu,
Y.,
115-121
in
2
B.,
Lu,
Zhu,
C.,
P.,
Hang,
Association
of
male
infertility.
Back
to text.
T., and
reproductive
Inazawa,
toxicity
with 4 weeks
J Toxicol Sci
of
daily dosing
20, 265-279
to text.
12. Rahman,
S.
Back
F., Murakami,
Male
ethinylestradiol
associated
prior to mating in rats.
Back
Toxicol
S., Javidan,
Y., and Wang,
X. (2013)
to phenols
and idiopathic
J Hazard
effects
Rev
(2016)
Nutritional
modifications
a systematic
review
covering
Rev
M.,
B., Xia,
exposure
W.
to text.
Sadeghi,
M. R.
male
infertility:
decades.
Crit
of
J.,
M.
Ryu,
S., Kwon,
B.
Y.,
W.
and
Bisphenol-A
affects
male
proteins
in spermatozoa.
S., Lee,
Pang,
J. S.,
M.
fertility via
Sci Rep 5,
G.
Yoon,
(2015)
fertility-related
9169 Back
to
text.
13. Association,
N.
S.
quality
is
blamed
decline
S.
a.
P.
on
(2016)
pet
food
Dog
sperm
chemicals.
New
Scientist
Back
14. Guillette,
L.
to text.
J.,
Jr.,
and
Moore,
Environmental
contaminants,
multioocytic
follicles: a lesson
Reprod
Med
24,
15. Bhandari,
E.
(2015)
Back
to text.
R. K., vom
Saal,
F. S., and
5, 9303
16. Schwindt,
Back
A.,
et
effects
direct
and
Willett,
J.,
K.
L.
developmental
Toxicol 148,
(2014)
from
An
dynamics
transgenerational
Journal
(2014)
of
C.,
effects
Applied
White,
on
and
Ecology
and
effects
survival
Saatcioglu,
Antiestrogenic
on
M.,
Multigenerational
exposure
I.,
early
environmental
deformities
in zebrafish
16-26 Back to text.
18. Kharat,
D.
A
or
latipes.
population
Thornton,
benzo[a]pyrene
Tillitt,
to
bisphenol
medaka,
Oryzias
fish
survival
and fecundity.
51 Back to text.
17. Corrales,
and
Semin
to text.
al.
disrupts
through
(2006)
fertility,
wildlife?
from
Transgenerational
oestrogen
C.
134-141
developmental
exposures
17alpha-ethinylestradiol
in
Sci Rep
B.
of
and
larvae.
F.
Aquat
(1996)
effects
of
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
are
direct transcriptional
estrogen
receptor.
with the liganded
between
aryl
hydrocarbonBiol Chem
19. Baker,
and
271,
T.
interference
Cross-talk
estrogen-mediated
10533-10537
R.,
Back
Peterson,
R.
W. (2014)
Using zebrafish
as
studying
the
transgenerational
Toxicol
Sci 138,
20. Tournaire,
G.,
Le
Bidois,
403-411
M.,
J.,
Back
Epelboin,
Cabau,
E.,
mediated
by
signaling.
J
to text.
and
a model
effects
Heideman,
system
for
of
dioxin.
to text.
S., Devouche,
A.,
Dunbavand,
E.,
Viot,
A.,
and
Levadou,
A.
(2016)
children
of
women
diethylstilbestrol
to text.
(DES).
21. Reed,
to
Adverse
C. E., and
legacy
of heritable
exposed
in
Therapie
Fenton,
diethylstilbestrol
health
in
utero
to
395-404
S. E. (2013)
during
health
71,
effects
sensitive
effects.
Exposure
life
Birth
Back
stages:
a
Defects
Res
C Embryo
Today 99, 134-146 Back to text.
22. Manikkam,
M., Tracey,
R.,
Guerrero-Bosagna,
C.,
and
Skinner,
endocrine
induce
M.
K.
disruptors
epigenetic
obesity,
(2013)
(BPA,
PLoS
1. Society,
A.
C.
carcinogens.
Back
2. Kim,
K. N., Lee,
M. R., Choi,
handgrip
Back
of
sperm
to text.
and
probable
to text.
Y. H., Hwang,
C., and
Hong,
Y.
phthalate
exposure
strength
repeated-measures
Back
Known
human
Oh,
S. Y., Park,
Association
between
and
8, e55387
(2016)
DBP)
inheritance
disease
One
derived
and
transgenerational
reproductive
epimutations.
Chapter
10
Plastics
DEHP
in
an
study.
elderly
Environ
H.,
C.
(2016)
and
lower
population:
Health
a
15,
93
to text.
3. He,
F.,
Chen,
J.
(2013)
Consumption
of
soybean,
soy
foods,
soy
isoflavones
and
breast
cancer
incidence:
women
and
possible
mechanisms
Science
and
Wellness
4. Reeves,
2, 146-161 Back to text.
R. (2012)
Why
soybean
oil
vegetable
oil.
SoyConnection
to text.
Differences
women
the
between
Western
Food
Health
by
in
Chinese
countries
and
Nutrition
United
Soybean
and
Human
is
called
Newsletter:
Board
Back
5. Pearson,
C. (2015)
percent
The
app
effective
that
could
be
form of birth
a
control.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/15/
contraceptive-app-natural-cycles_n_6472642.html
Back
.
to text.
6. Rea,
W. J., Pan,
treatment
of
disease.
text.
between
Y., and
patients
Toxicol
7. Worland,
Back
99
Ind
J.
with
Health
(2015)
saunas
Griffiths,
The
mycotoxin-induced
25,
The
and
B. (2009)
711-714
strange
Back
to
connection
longevity.
Time
Magazine
D. T., and
Lin,
J. L. (2011)
ingestion
prepared
of
to text.
8. Yen,
T. H., Lin-Tan,
Food
safety
beverages
involving
phthalate-plasticizer-containing
Formos
Med
9. Rustagi,
Public
Indian
Assoc
foods
clouding
110,
671-684
N., Pradhan,
agents.
Back
S. K., and
and
with
J
to text.
Singh,
R. (2011)
health
impact
of plastics:
An
J Occup
Environ
Med 15, 100-103
overview.
Back
to
10. http://www.ajconsultingcompany.com/plans.html
.
text.
Back
to text.
11. de
(2005)
Lemos,
M. L., Hamata,
Leaching
of diethylhexyl
polyvinyl
chloride
intravenous
155-157
12. Lewis,
chloride.
13. Ohno,
Kobayashi,
Evaluation
materials
solutions.
Back
L., and
Vu,
T.
phthalate
from
J
into
Oncol
etoposide
Pharm
Pract
11,
to text.
R. (1999)
Occup Med
K.,
T.,
of
Vinyl chloride
and
polyvinyl
14, 719-742 Back to text.
Azuma,
Nagao,
styrene
Y.,
Y.,
Date,
and
K.,
Yamada,
oligomers
Nakano,
T.
eluted
S.,
(2003)
from
polystyrene
for
binding
estrogenicity
assay,
reporter
uterotrophic
assay.
Back to text.
14. Mooney,
biochemistry,
Chem
P. G.,
Microbial
estrogen
gene
Food
A., Ward,
(2006)
in
assay,
Toxicol
and
genetics,
D.
C. Z., Yaniger,
J.,
and
products
health
Bittner,
release
problem
D.
estrogenic
that
can
be
Perspect
119, 989-996 Back
16. Kissin,
Y., et al. (2008)
for
propylene
reactions
styrene:
and
Journal
of
to the
Molecular
17. de
A.,
& Tonic”.
Fatima
Prado,
(2013)
coffee
organic
377-384
18. Copetti,
M.
Taniwaki,
M.
cocoa:
from
Microbiol
19. Lithner,
(2012)
C.,
A:
of
centers.
Chemical
287,
series
called
J. G., Cirillo,
and
Batista,
in Brazil.
L.
M.
R.
with
green
conventional
Braz
J
Microbiol
to text.
13-20
Comparative
catalysts
of active
fungi associated
arabica
L.) in
V., Iamanaka,
D.,
Health
Chemistry
E., Borges,
H. (2014)
farm
to
178,
potential
Environ
educational
L.
cultivation
Back
Klein,
plastic
to text.
Paiva,
Ochratoxigenic
beans
(Coffea
44,
a
Catalysis
Rezende,
G.,
and
chemicals:
formation
Back
V. C.,
Most
to text.
Ziegler-Natta
45-52 Back to text.
i Note: I have a YouTube
“Chagrin
Microbiol
(2011)
solved.
E.
perspectives
Appl
polymerization:
leading
131-141
of
S. I., Jordan,
G.
41,
K.
for
biotechnological
applications.
Biotechnol
72, 1-10 Back to text.
15. Yang,
and
O’Connor,
degradation
molecular
receptor
Back
B. T.,
Fungi and
chocolate.
J. I.,
and
mycotoxins
in
Int
J
Food
to text.
Nordensvan,
acute
Pitt,
I.,
toxicity
and
Dave,
of leachates
G.
from
plastic
products
polyethylene,
and
Res
made
PVC,
of
polypropylene,
acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene,
epoxy
to Daphnia
magna.
Environ
Int 19, 1763-1772
Back to text.
20. Bejgarn,
S.,
MacLeod,
Breitholtz,
M.
weathering
plastics:
with
Back
Nitocra
to text.
21. Jones,
(2015)
M.,
An
of
Consumer
Chemical
Food
C.,
and
from
screening
Chemosphere
A.
Pollut
leachate
exploratory
Hormone-Disrupting
from
Bogdal,
Toxicity
spinipes.
Sci
study
132,
114-119
Alert:
BPA
Toxic
is
Leaching
Can
Liners:
https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/consumeralert-toxic-hormone-disrupting-chemical-bpa-leachingfood-can-liners
. Terrain
Magazine
Back to text.
22. Vojdani,
A.,
and
reactivity
to food
21
1, 52-62
Suppl
23. Silva,
(2002)
Environ
coloring.
Back
C.
Altern
(2015)
Ther
Immune
Health
chemicals
NOECs
combined
produce
Sci Technol
Med
to text.
E., Rajapakse,
N., and Kortenkamp,
Something
from
“nothing”—eight
estrogenic
below
Vojdani,
36,
24. Grey,
Z. (1919)
Tales
Press, Lanham,
Maryland
significant
1751-1756
at
A.
weak
concentrations
mixture
Back
of Fishes. The
Back to text.
effects.
to text.
Derrydale