Should hate speech on the internet and social media sites be censored? Should there be a legal responsibility for hate speech? conclusion - main thesis statement nattin na nagaagree tau - importance of legal responsibility - think before u click chuchu wise words The censorship of hate speech on different social media platforms should be implemented because with every liberty, there is a limitation and boundary, as hate speech bears negative repercussions to a person. Others may correlate hate speech with free speech, which individuals should not be linking with each other on account of the fact that even with their definition they are unlikely similar. We want the discriminative and abhorrent contents to be not ‘visible’ for everyone as receiving those is really disrespectful, and is not ethical. Additionally everyone has different levels of mental stability and coping mechanisms towards hate. It is not a repression of thought to censor someone's hate speech. We cannot deny the fact that everything has its own limitations and we believe that this should be part of a person limitation in speech, besides your state would not be censored, if implemented, if your statements are descend and would not throw hatred towards anyone, so freedom of speech will still be observed with this kind of tactic. The Legal responsibility towards hate speech may protect the public welfare and development. Providing a law that revolves around the hate speech on social media will delimit the hate sender chance of giving off discriminative utterance. Hate Speech may lead from a situation to a drastic incident that has a possibility of being irreversible, so every social media user should take the responsibility for their respective accounts and duly note that we should always think and comprehend every single post that we will upload as we have no clue on what will go through the reader’s mind, it is not a constructive criticism as it is a form of discrimination.
