Re-Education Camp for Jordan Peterson! WTF? Comment left on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0zvtpPsMAc This not a legal advice, I am NOT a lawyer Only my present understanding of the system, in CANADA Thankx for giving credit to "Soleil" if you use or share this information. Every gov. in countries with a central bank are debtors indebted to the banksters: In order to "repay" they creditors (which is impossible from the start) the gov MUST ENSLAVED IT'S PEOPLE. To gain control over people, guv created a "person" for each of us. Person = corporation READ IT AGAIN Person = corporation Go see the International covenant on civil and political rights (ICCPR https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-andpolitical-rights ) and read at least up to article 24 --> Article 24 2. Every child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have a name. As opposed to registering EVENTS the information relative to the birth of a child. When you put things in a "REGISTER", you give it to the creator of the register, and recognise their power over the registered thing or child. Article 16 Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. Person = corporation READ IT AGAIN Person = corporation NOTICE how they switch to "person" (sect. 14) and to "everyone" = corporation but NOT a man Problem with that is they decree name on act/certificate of birth is name of a corporation/ person. Civil code of Québec, art. 50 AS OPPOSED TO ART. 54 OF THE civil Code of Lower Canada in force up to Dec. 31st 1994, which states ACT of Birth contains name of child, name of parents, date and place of birth. Which must be voiced to remove their PRESUMPTION YOU HAVE A CORPORATE STATUS BECAUSE of the definition od the owrd “MUNNICIPALITY” IN THE CRIMINAL CODE. They only deal with corporations. Judges are trained every 2-3 years and taught how to bring people with some knowledge in the fold. Just asking your address (seen as a place of business) is enough for them to silently presume you are a corporation. Possible Remedy : create an affidavit denying you have corporate status (that you are not a corporation and never accepted willingly and knowyingly to act for one. As to what you understand --> I am a person/corporation, not a resident (of COUNTRY, STATE/PROVINCE NOR OF A MUNICIPALITY, address is a mailing address, NOT a place of business ZIP code is "near" ex.: NY123456. 2 TRICKs USED BY LAWYERS TO HAVE YOUR AFFIDAVIT REJECTED BY THE JUDGE if it suits him is 1-An affidavit according to your BELIEFS. 2- If affidavit is not sworn under oath and penalty of perjury it has no power, because you have nothing to loose. When sworn under oath and penalty of perjury you become VERY credible, because perjury incurred up to 14 years of prison. I do hope my comment moves you to study your rights and how the legal system enslaves you. PLEASE: DO NOT USE THESE INFOS IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THEIR MEANING THOUROUGHLY This comment does not provide enough for you to be successful in court. *********************************** Name on birth certificate is name of a PERSON. Civil code of Québec, sect 50. It is the same for all countries with a central bank. ASSIGNMENT OF NAME 50. Every person has a name which is assigned to him at birth and is stated in his act of birth. The name includes the surname and given names. Person is legally (in their statutes) defined as a CORPORATION. Yes, read that again ! Compare to s.51. A child is given, as his mother and father choose, one or more given names and a surname composed of not more than two parts taken from those which compose his parents’ surnames. All countries with a central bank are BANKRUPT since around 1933 and the government (who betrayed the people it was created to serve BY removing banks obligation to repay in silver/gold their PROMISSORY NOTES) became a debtor whose first priority became to pay the impossible to repay debt and do the biddings of it's creditors, even to the extent of enslaving the people of the country. By creating the birth certificate (of the corporation so created) and requesting people to present and identify with the corporation whose name appears on the B.C., government and courts could now presume they were dealing with corporation that can NOT suffer AND EXACT PAYMENTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE STATUTES (CORPORATE BY-LAWS). ALL POLICE, SWAT TEAM, and ARMIES are only there to make sure people comply and do not rebel when they start to understand how they have been covertly enslaved. THAT IS WHY THEY AIM TO REMOVE ALL FIREARMS SINCE 1965 (at the request of the United Nations) Take the time to read sect 2 of the criminal code especially, the definition of "Everyone", "Organisation" and "municipality" --> when a judge is asking for your address, it is to ascertain that you have corporate status and when you give them your municipal address, he presumes you are part of the municipality and are a "person" over which he has JURISDICTION. Look at the definition of "person" in the Interpretation act of Canada, sect. 35 (Google it) See how the French version differs from the English while it is similar to the definition in the interpretation actS and in sect 248 of the I.T.A. A judge is a government employee - An employee is a CIVIL SERVANT. Would I take orders from a servant ? If one gives an order, isn't he liable to receive a "BILL" ? A bill is a formal order to pay a sum certain. Bill of exchange act. Criminal code : Only the Queen (now a king) and organisations can be liable (can commit a crime) according to sect. 2 of the criminal code. Criminal code, Charters, Statutes, Bill of rights, Universal Declaration or Human rights, ICCPR, etc ARE THERE TO LIMIT AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. CAVEAT : look at the definition of "municipality" to understand why "they" always presume you have a corporate status (are a corporation). Tricks and traps they use against us : Calling you Mr. or Mrs = person Asking for your address = you are seen as a person living on the municipal territory = person Asking you (even if a clerk of the court is asking) to do something like remove your coat and sit there, = agreeing they have jurisdiction over you... and more. Since there is NO money, only credit which must be borrowed at interests (while the credit to pay for the interests is NEVER created, which makes it impossible to repay the alleged debt. To understand what a claim of right means, find a criminal code pre Feb. 2013 and compare sect 38 with s. 39. What is the limit of my intervention with s. 38 without invocation of rights ? What can I do (limit wise) differently if I have invoked/claim my rights ? If necessary, do it as many time as you need to "see the Light", because of possible cognitive dissonance. BTW, a claim of right must be done at each opportunity when referring to any "official agent of the government, be it federal, provincial or municipal."
