1
Communication
Neither during meetings
nor in the WhatsApp
group, this person failed
to communicate.
Additionally, they had no
influence whatsoever on
project outcome
selections.
Attitude
Laid back with no
intention of wanting to
form part of the group
Quality of work
No work has been done
by the group member
2
Bad communication.
Scarcely conveyed their
views or took any
choices. Hardly seldom
took part in decisionmaking
3
Average
Communication.
Adequate
communication, with
some attempt made to
discuss project-related
issues.
Attends meetings, but
Moderate interaction
regularly tries to interact with the group
The work quality of
group member is
insufficient
Work quality provided
by the student is
sufficient towards the
project
4
5
Excellent
communication. Had
outstanding
Good communication.
communication skills,
Made a solid attempt to participated in all
read and understand the conversations and
project materials. Shared meetings, and was
some significant
essential to the project's
judgments
success.
Excellent contribution
Positive toward receiving toward the group
work and interacts
dynamic and striving on
within the group
interaction with others
The group member
understands their
assignment and
submitted good work
The group member has
submitted excellent
work and has an
exceptional
understanding of their
assignment
Higgo Smit
Bernard Haasbroek
Rushane Alexander
Nico Hendrikz
5
3
4
4
3
5
5
4
4
12
4
12
4
13
5
13