Meaning of Abnormality Introduction to Abnormal Psychology Important Terms • Pathology – The science of the causes and effects of diseases – A pathological condition • Psychopathology – Scientific study of mental disorders • Abnormal Psychology – Branch of psychology that focuses on psychological abnormality • Abnormality what is abnormal? Defining Abnormality • Labeling a person or behavior as ‘abnormal’ implies something undesirable and requiring change • Therefore, we must be careful how we use the term • Psychologists need methods for distinguishing ‘normal’ from ‘abnormal’ Defining Abnormality • Our definition of abnormality must be objective: – It must not depend on anyone’s opinion or point of view – It should produce the same results whoever applies it • It must not be under- or over-inclusive – It must not label as ‘abnormal’ or ‘normal’ behaviours or traits that aren’t Defining Abnormality • Four Criteria can be asked for in the examination: – Statistical infrequency – Deviation from social norms – Failure to function adequately – Deviation from ideal mental health Statistical Infrequency • Under this criterion, a person’s trait, thinking or behavior is classified as abnormal if it is rare or statistically unusual. • With this definition it is necessary to be clear about how rare a trait or behavior needs to be before we class it as abnormal. Statistical Infrequency Average IQ in the population is 100pts. frequency The further from 100 you look, the fewer people you find 70 100 IQ Scores 130 Statistical Infrequency frequency A very small subset of the population (<2.2%) have an IQ below 70pts. Such people are statistically rare. We regard them as having abnormally low IQs 70 100 IQ Scores 130 Deviation from Social Norms • Under this criterion, a person’s thinking or behavior is classified as abnormal if it violates the norms the standard of what is expected or acceptable behavior in a particular social group. • Their behavior may: – Be incomprehensible to others – Make others feel threatened or uncomfortable Deviation from Social Norms • With this criterion, it is necessary to consider: – The degree to which a norm is violated, the importance of that norm and the value attached by the social group to different sorts of violation. – E.g. is the violation rude, eccentric, abnormal or criminal? Failure to Function Adequately • Under this criterion, a person is considered abnormal if they are unable to cope with the demands of everyday life. • They may be unable to perform the behaviors necessary for day-to-day living – e.g. self-care, hold down a job, interact meaningfully with others, make themselves understood etc. Failure to Function Adequately • Rosenhan & Seligman suggest the following characteristics: – – – – – – – Suffering Maladaptiveness Vividness & unconventionality Unpredictability & loss of control Irrationality/incomprehensibility Causes observer discomfort Violates moral/social standards Deviation from Ideal Mental health • Under this criterion, rather than defining what is abnormal, we define what is normal/ideal and anything that deviates from this is regarded as abnormal • This requires us to decide on the characteristics we consider necessary to mental health Deviation from Ideal Mental health • Psychologists vary, but usual characteristics include: – Positive view of the self – Capability for growth and development – Autonomy and independence – Accurate perception of reality – Positive friendships and relationships – Environmental mastery – able to meet the varying demands of day-to-day situations Group Discussion • Pick at least two criteria and think of at least one example for each.