Subscriber access provided by University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries C: Energy Conversion and Storage; Energy and Charge Transport A Novel Li+-Nafion-sulphonated Graphene Oxide Membrane as Single Lithium-ion Conducting Polymer Electrolyte for Lithium Batteries Isabella Nicotera, Cataldo Simari, Marco Agostini, Apostolos Enotiadis, and Sergio Brutti J. Phys. Chem. C, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08826 • Publication Date (Web): 31 Oct 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on November 2, 2019 Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts. is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties. Page 1 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry A Novel Li+-Nafion-Sulphonated Graphene Oxide Membrane as Single LithiumIon Conducting Polymer Electrolyte for Lithium Batteries Isabella Nicotera,a* Cataldo Simari,a Marco Agostini,b Apostolos Enotiadis,c Sergio Brutti d Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy a b Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE41296 Göteborg, Sweden c Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece d Department of Chemistry, University of Rome La Sapienza, P.le A.Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy * corresponding author. Email: isabella.nicotera@unical.it Abstract Single lithium-ion conducting polymer electrolytes are an innovative concept of solid-state polymer electrolytes (SPEs) for lithium-battery technology. In this work, a lithiated Nafion nanocomposite incorporating sulphonated graphene oxide (sGO-Li+), as well as a filler free membrane, have been synthesized and characterized. Ionic conductivities and lithium transference number, evaluated by electrochemical techniques after membrane-swelling in organic aprotic solvents (ethylene carbonatepropylene carbonate mixture), display significant values, with σ ≈ 5ο΄10−4 S cm−1 at 25 °C and π‘πΏπ + close to unity. The absence of solvent leaching on thermal cycles is also noteworthy. The description at molecular level of the lithium transport mechanism has been carefully tackled through a systematic study by 7Li-NMR spectroscopy (Pulsed Field Gradient-PFG and relaxation times), while the mechanical properties of the film electrolytes have been evaluated by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) in a wide temperature range. The electrochemical performances of the graphene-based electrolyte in Li/Li symmetric cells and in secondary cells using LiFePO4 as positive electrode, show good compatibility and functionality with the Li-metal anode by forming a stable interphase, as well as displaying promising performance in galvanostatic cells. 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 2 of 26 1. Introduction Solid-state polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are a valuable technology that are capable of replacing liquid electrolytes in secondary non aqueous Li-ion batteries, thereby enabling the fabrication of flexible, compact, laminated solid-state structures, free from leaks and easily manufactured in variety of geometries.1 They are typically based on various polymers, with polyethylene oxide (PEO) the mostly studied, blended with lithium salts (e.g. lithium triflate, i.e. LiTfO, lithium bis(trifluoromethyl sulphonyl)-imide, etc.) in a variety of ratios.2 These polymer electrolytes are typically dualion conductors, conducting both cations and anions.1–4 The most relevant drawback of such a conduction mechanism within the solid state polymer phase is the occurrence and rise of concentration polarizations under the application of a constant electric field, thus leading to the poor performance of batteries.2,5 More recently, a new concept for polymer electrolytes has been proposed based on a single lithium-ion conducting (SLIC) SPEs, which have anions covalently bonded to the polymer backbone, or immobilized by anion acceptors. 5–7 However, the transport of lithium ions across the SLIC-SPEs membranes is hindered by the formation of strong ionic couples or by the limited concentration of free ions. 5–7 Polymer electrolytes based on ionomers (e.g. Nafion) with easily ionisable groups (e.g. sulfonic groups covalently bonded to the polymer side-chains, −CF2SO3−) are promising thank to the high concentration of weakly coordinating anions (counter-ions).8 Nafion ionomer is a perfluorosulfonated polymer consisting of a tetrafluoroethylene backbone with perfluorovinyl ether sidechains terminating with sulfonic acid groups.9,10 It is widely used in the proton exchange membrane fuel cells11 or electrolyzers12,13 and is well-known for its excellent stability, high cationic conductivity and unity transference number. It is commonly used in the H+-form, but can be easily turned to Li+form, and after swelling in non-aqueous solvents, e.g. mixture of propylene carbonate/ethylene carbonate, it becomes an exploitable ionomer electrolyte for Li-ion batteries.8 Nafion has a robust and stable chemical structure in either oxidative or reductive environments and an high ionic conductivity even at low temperatures.14–16 Going beyond Li-ion, lithiated Nafion-based SLIC-SPE membranes are also particularly interesting for novel battery chemistries such as Li-O2 and Li-S as well as for lithium metal intercalation batteries such as Li-LiFePO4 (Li/LFP). In fact, lithiated Nafionbased membranes can provide a variety of beneficial effects ranging from the limited oxygen crossover, the reduced mobility of the lithium poly-sulfides species, the mitigation of the lithium dendrites growth, and at the same time it can enhance the lithium ion transference number. 14,17 In our laboratory we recently developed and characterized Nafion-nanocomposite membranes for application in proton exchange fuel cells (PEMFCs). 18–22 In particular in previous publications we 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 3 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry demonstrated the preparation of a tailored organo-modified GO nano-layers bearing sulfonated functional groups (sulphonated graphene oxide, sGO) used as additive for the preparation of Nafion nanocomposite membranes for PEMFCs that are able to provide enhanced protons mobility at low temperature and poor humidification.18,23 Graphene oxide is a unique 2D material that shows remarkable structural, morphological and functional properties: e.g. high ionic conductivity through the plane, excellent flexibility and high in-plane electronic conductivity only when it is in the reducedform, r-GO 23–25, otherwise it is a well-known electronic insulator.26,27 The incorporation of its sulphonated derivative, sGO, in the Nafion ionomer, induces improvements of the hybrid electrolyte in terms of thermal stability, mechanical strength and barrier properties (mitigation of the reagent crossover by increased tortuosity and obstruction effect) without hindering proton mobility.18,23 Here our goal is to extend our approach beyond proton conducting membranes to tackle the general problem of the tuning of the alkaline metal ions mobility in single-ion conducting membranes. Thus, here we investigate and discuss the Li+ transport properties of Nafion-based membranes for application in secondary lithium batteries. To this aim, lithiated Nafion and Nafion-nanocomposites membranes based on sGO were synthesized and their ionic conductivity and lithium transference number investigated in common non-aqueous solvents. In addition to electrochemical analyses, i.e. lithium stripping/plating tests and galvanostatic cycling vs. Li/LiFP, a systematic study of the lithiumions transport mechanisms in such systems has been carried out by Pulsed Field Gradient (PFG) NMR spectroscopy. Finally, the mechanical properties of the film electrolytes have been investigated by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) in a wide temperature range. This work is part of a systematic investigation of the impact of the incorporation of fillers in Nafion membranes to alter the ionic transport properties.18,23 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 4 of 26 2. Experimental 2.1 Materials Nafion as 20 wt % dispersion in water and lower aliphatic alcohols was supplied by Aldrich. Synthetic graphite powder, <20 μm, synthetic was purchased from Aldrich. The organic compound used for the synthesis of the organo-graphene oxide is 3-amino-1 propanesulfonic acid (acronym: SULF) was supplied by Aldrich. 2.2. Synthesis of GO and sGO Graphene Oxide (GO) was synthesized from graphite powder using a modified Staudenmaier’s method,28 as reported elsewhere.29 In a typical synthesis process, 10 g of powdered graphite were transferred in a round bottom flask containing a combination of concentrated sulfuric acid (400 mL, 95−97 wt %) and nitric acid (200 mL, 65 wt %). The reaction mixture was then cooled to 0°C by ice bath. Potassium chlorate powder (200 g) was gradually added to the suspension while stirring and cooling. After 18 h the reaction was quenched by pouring the mixture into distilled water, and the oxidation product was washed until the pH reached 6.0, the product was finally dried at room temperature. For the functionalization of GO with sulphonil groups (sGO), 100 mg of GO was dispersed in 100 mL of water, followed by the addition of aqueous solution of the 3-amino-1 propanesulfonic acid. After stirring for 24 h, the product was separated by centrifugation. The successful intercalation of the organic molecules in the interlayer space of the graphene was confirmed by XRD patterns shown in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information. 2.3 Membranes preparation Nafion filler-free membrane was prepared from 20 wt% Nafion solution purchased from Aldrich according to the following processes: (i) 1 g of Nafion solution was heated at about 60 °C to remove all the solvents (water, 2-propanol, etc.); (ii) Nafion resin was redissolved with 10 mL of DMF until become a clear solution and finally casting on a Petri dish at about 60 °C overnight until all the solvent evaporates. Instead, Nafion-sGO membrane was prepared by different procedure, as reported in the previous work 23, by dispersing the filler directly in the alcoholic Nafion solution (as purchased), ultrasonicated for 1 day, and stirred for another day at room temperature until a clear solution was obtained. The resulting dispersion was then casted on a petri dish, placed in the oven at about 40 °C overnight to remove the solvents. In order to reinforce both the membranes, these were sandwiched and pressed 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 5 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry between two Teflon plates and put in oven at 150 °C for about 15 min. The final membranes thickness is about 50 µm. Finally, membranes were activated in acid in order to get them in H+-form 30 by rinsing in: (i) boiling HNO3 solution (1 M) for 1 h, (ii) boiling H2O2 (3 vol %) for 1 h, (iii) boiling deionized H2O for 40 min three times, (iv) boiling H2SO4 (0.5 M) for 1 h min and again (v) boiling deionized H2Ofor 40 min twice to remove excess acid. LiOH (2.0 M aqueous solution) has been used for the lithium-ion exchange reaction in order to convert Nafion membranes in Li+-form. After 24 h under vigorous stirring at room temperature, the resulting lithiated Nafion membranes were then rinsed several times in distilled water to remove the excess of LiOH and thus dried at 120 °C in a convection oven for at least 12 h. With this lithiation procedure, the sGO dispersed in the nanocomposite membrane also undergo the ion-exchange, as depicted in the Scheme 1. Both the Nafion and Nafion-sGO Li-PEMs (polymer electrolyte membranes in lithiated form) were finally soaked in an anhydrous mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and propylene carbonate (PC), with a molar ratio EC:PC of 1:0.4, for at least 3 days before the measurements. These two solvents were completely dried before the using by leaving them on 3 Å molecular sieves for at least one week. The solution uptake of each membrane was determined using a microbalance and recorded as: uptake % = [(mwet - mdry)/mdry] ο΄ 100. Scheme 1. Visual representation of the chemical lithiation of the Nafion membrane and sGO by an ionexchange reaction in 2M LiOH solution. 2.4 Characterization techniques SEM images were recorded by a Cambridge Stereoscan 360 at 12.5 kV. Membranes were first frozen and fractured in liquid nitrogen. This guarantees a sharp fracture without modifications of the 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 6 of 26 morphology. So, samples were sputter-coated with a thin gold film and finally the membrane cross sections were observed at SEM. XRD patterns were recorded with a X’Pert 3710 X-Ray diffrac- tometer (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) using a Cu-Kα source operating at 40 kV and 20 mA 2.4 7Li-PFG-NMR spectroscopy NMR measurements were performed on a Bruker NMR spectrometer AVANCE 300 Wide Bore working at 116.6 MHz on 7Li. The employed probe was a Diff30 Z-diffusion 30 G/cm/A multinuclear with substitutable RF inserts. The pulsed field gradient stimulated-echo (PFG-STE) method 31 was used to measure the lithium self-diffusion coefficients. The sequence consists of three 90° radiofrequency (rf) pulses (π/2 − τ1 − π/2 − τm − π/2) and two gradient pulses that are applied after the first and the third rf pulses, respectively. The echo is found at time τ = 2τ1 + τm. Following the usual notation, the magnetic field pulses have magnitude g, duration δ, and time delay Δ. The FT echo decays were analyzed by means of the relevant Stejskal–Tanner expression: πΌ = πΌ0π -π½π· Here I and I0 represent the intensity/area of a selected resonance peak in the presence and in πΏ absence of gradients, respectively. ο’ is the field gradient parameter, defined as π½ = (πΎππΏ)2(β β 3)]; D is the measured self-diffusion coefficient. In these experiments, the used experimental parameters were: δ = 3 ms, Δ = 30 ms, and the gradient amplitude varied from 400 to 1000 G cm−1. The uncertainties in D values is estimated to about 3% based on the very low standard deviation of the fitting curve and repeatability of the measurements. Longitudinal relaxation times (T1) of 7Li were performed on the same spectrometer by the inversion-recovery sequence (π−τ−π/2). NMR measurements were run by increasing the temperature step by step from 20 to 80 °C with steps of 10 °C, and leaving the sample to equilibrate for about 20 min at each temperature. 2.5 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Ionic conductivities of the membranes were measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in the temperature range between 20 °C and 80 °C by using a PGSTAT30 potentiostat/galvanostat equipped with a FRA module. The EIS tests were performed over the frequency range 1 Hz to 100 KHz. The ohmic resistance was obtained from a high-frequency intercept on the real axis of the Nyquist plot. The Nyquist spectra were fitted by the equivalent circuit consisting of a capacitor in parallel with an ohmic resistance, charge transfer resistance (Rct), representing the 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 7 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry electrodes/sample interface impedance, and in series with an ohmic resistance, representing the electrolyte resistance (Rel). The cell configuration adopted for these measurements is a trough-plane 2-electrodes system, where the electrolyte membrane is sandwiched between two carbon paper electrodes and then between graphite current collectors. The Li-transference number was calculated by using the Bruce-Vincent-Evans method 32 and a Li/Electrolyte/Li symmetrical cell. Three different configurations were investigated: the two membranes swelled for 3 days in a EC:PC mixture (EC, ethylene carbonate; PC, propylene carbonate; Sigma Aldrich, dried for 1 week over 3A molecular sieves) with a molar ratio of 1:0.4, as well as a benchmark liquid electrolyte, i.e. 1 molar solution of lithium trifluoromethane sulphonate (LiTfO, Sigma-Aldrich) in EC:PC=1:0.4. The applied polarization was of 50 mV, while the AC impedance measurements were performed before and after polarization in a frequency range from 100 KHz to 0.1 Hz, using 10 mV amplitude. Lithium deposition stripping tests were performed in a symmetrical Li/electrolyte/Li cell at a current of 0.2 mA cm-2, room temperature of about 20 °C and at 50°C by using a Memmert ventilated oven. All benchmark cells with liquid electrolytes have been assembled using 1.55 mm thick Whatman fiberglass separators. The performance of the Nafion-sGO membrane were also tested in a lithium cell at room temperature by using commercial LiFePO4 (LFP) positive electrode (Customcell, areal capacity 1 mAh cm-2, gravimetric practical capacity 150 mAhg-1, active material mass loading 7.0 mg cm-2) and a lithium disk as negative counterpart (Chemtall Ltd). The galvanostatic cycling tests were run using various current rates, calculated in respect to the LFP theoretical capacity (1C=170 mAg-1), in the voltage range of 3.8-2.5 V using the Nafion-sGO membrane swelled for 3 days in a EC:PC mixture with a molar ratio of 1:0.4. All the above tests were performed in El-Cell EC-Ref electrochemical cell, using a micro-rod of lithium metal as reference electrode. 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 8 of 26 3. Results and Discussion The soaking in EC:PC of both Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+ PEMs leads to a strong swelling of the membranes as shown in the Figure 1. The areal surface increase is about +50 % for the Nafion membrane where the solution uptake is about +100 wt%, whereas slightly smaller values are observed for Naf-sGO nanocomposite (i.e. the black membrane showed in the right panel of Figure 1): +30 wt% and +80 wt%, respectively. Figure 1. Pictures of Naf-Li+ film before and after swelling, and swelled Naf-sGO-Li+ on the right. SEM cross-sectional images of the two PEMs, obtained by cryo-cleavage, are shown in Figure 2. Images were collected on the membranes both before and after swelling in the EC/PC mixture. Filler free Nafion (Fig. 2a) is a very smooth and compact membrane, without any significant changing by absorption of carbonates solvents (Fig. 2b). The presence of graphene platelets dispersed in the polymer matrix produces micrometer-sized cleavage planes (Fig. 2c) which become even more visible on the swelled membrane (Fig. 2d and at higher magnification in Fig. 2e). These images demonstrate the very good dispersion of the graphene sheets without any agglomerates or clustering, as confirmed also by the SEM-BSE (back scattered electrons) image in Fig. 2f. Actually, BSE technique is useful to analyze features based on the principle that heavy elements (high atomic number) backscatter electrons more efficiently than light elements (low atomic number), and thus appear brighter in the image. For this particular membrane, the filler is based on carbon, therefore we cannot have fine contrast, however it is sufficient to put in evidence the homogeneity of the film. 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 9 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry Figure 2. SEM cross-sectional images of Naf-Li+ before (a) and after (b) swelling, and Naf-sGO-Li+ before (c) and after (d, e, f) swelling. The last image (f) was acquired in BSE mode. 3.1 Ion conductivity The plasticizing/swelling operation in aprotic organic solvents is necessary to induce lithium-ions mobility inside the polymer electrolyte that, otherwise, would be almost naught. Generally speaking, 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry Nafion membranes displays remarkable Li+ diffusivity and conductivity only after swelling in the organic carbonate mixtures. We adopted an EC:PC = 1/0.4 molar ratio in analogy with previous literature 32–34 The lithium conduction properties for the two Nafion and Naf-sGO membranes have been investigated by EIS. Figure 3 shows the ionic conductivity measured from 20 to 80 °C for the two swelled membranes. 2x10-3 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 (°C) 10-3 -1 ο³ ο¨S cm ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 10 of 26 Naf-sGO-Li+ Naf-Li+ 10-4 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 1000/T (K-1) Figure 3: Ionic conductivity measured by EIS (ex-situ test) in through-plane cell configuration, from 20 °C up to 80 °C, on filler free Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+ membranes. The graphene composite membrane displays slightly higher values with respect to the filler-free Nafion for the whole temperature range investigated. Additionally, it is worth pointing out that no solvent leaching was detected during and after the measurements, since after cooling at room temperature the conductivity value is identical to the initial one, showing total reproducibility of the data. The absence of leakage is not really trivial in the polymer electrolyte membranes, and this important outcome implies the solvent mixture is strongly electrostatically coordinated inside the polymer's clusters. Furthermore, it is worth highlighting that these conductivity values, even only for Nafion filler free, are quite high if compared to similar studies.17,35,36 This is likely ascribable to the organic solvent, or solvents mixture, used for the membrane swelling. The EC-PC mixture, in the molar ratio 1:0.4, was chosen on the basis that it was particularly performant in several gel electrolytes based on PEO or other polymer matrices.34,37,38 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 11 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry Estimates of the lithium transference number of the lithium ions in the membranes (both Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+) have been obtained by the Bruce-Vincent method. Experimental data are shown in the figure S2 (supplementary information) where the current response as a function of time is shown for symmetric Li:PEM:Li cells after a DC polarization of 30 mV. The figure insets show also the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) responses before and after cells polarization. From the Bruce-Vincent tests, we calculated a lithium transference number (π‘πΏπ + ) of 0.31 ± 0.02 for the liquid benchmark electrolyte in line with the literature 7,39 and lithium transport numbers close to unity for both membranes, i.e. 0.98 ± 0.04 and 0.99 ± 0.05 for the Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+ membranes, respectively. These values are slightly larger compared to those obtained on other singleion conducting polymer electrolytes in the literature 7 and, as expected, much larger to those found for PEO-based polymer electrolytes, i.e. 0.2-0.4,4,40 or PVDF-based polymer membranes,7 where anions are free to move across the polymer matrix following the electric field. Owing to this, the outstanding ion conductivities shown in the Figure 3, are almost completely due to the mobility of lithium ions driven by the electric field thus making these membranes suitable for application in room temperature in lithium cells. As far as we know, compared to literature, both of our Nafion-based membranes show the largest conductivity at room temperature ever reported for single-ion conducting polymer electrolytes. 5,7,36,40 3.2 7Li 7Li NMR study: Diffusivity (PFG-STE) and Relaxometry (T1) NMR spectroscopy was used in this work to deeply investigate on the lithium ion dynamics inside the PEMs through self-diffusion coefficients and spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) measurements as function of the temperature, in the temperature range of 20-80 °C. The collected data sets are shown in the Arrhenius plots of Figure 4, a and b, respectively. Diffusion coefficients represent the long range motions, from 10 nanometers up to micrometers, while T1 is affected by rotational and short range translational motions in the timescale of the reciprocal of the NMR frequency (οΎ 1 nm). It is clear that the lithium diffusion in the Nafion filler-free membrane is higher than in the sGO composite for the whole temperature range. This outcome, which may seem in contrast with the ionic conductivity seen above, can be attributed to: (i) the stronger coordination between lithium ions and 2D-graphene platelets, bringing a large number of –SO3- groups; (ii) higher tortuosity of the ions diffusion path caused by the dispersion of the lamellae in the polymer matrix; and (iii) lower swelling in the EC/PC mixture of this membrane with respect to the recast one (uptake is about 80 wt% against 100 wt%, respectively). 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 12 of 26 Figure 4. (a) Arrhenius plots of the diffusion coefficient (D) and (b) spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) of lithium ions obtained by 7Li NMR spectroscopy. The relaxation times in these two samples differ greatly, in particular by increasing the temperature, meaning that at molecular level there is a different structuring of the lithium, while the shorter T1 values in the Naf-sGO confirm that Li+ is involved in more stringent interactions with the lattice. In other words, lithium ions in Nafion membrane have greater roto-translational degrees of freedom, thus easier movements. Whereas in the sGO-composite the motions are much more impeded due to stronger electrostatic interactions with both polymer’s side chains and the graphite lamellae, which are widely functionalized with anionic groups on their surface (suggested also by the independence of T1 on the temperature); as consequence also the lithium long-range mobility is reduced, in agreement to the diffusion data observed. It is worth specifying also for these NMR measurements that after the cooling the measured diffusion value is identical to the initial one, so we can exclude solvent leaching from the membranes during the measurements and confirm the good thermo-reversibility of these electrolytes. Finally, the diffusion activation energies calculated from the Arrhenius plots are: 7.15 kcal mol-1 for Naf-Li+ and 7.08 kcal mol-1 for Naf-sGO-Li+. These values are almost doubled that of the proton diffusion in Nafion-H+ swelled in water, i.e. about 3.5 kcal mol-1 15, while they are analogous to the activation energies typically observed in PEO-based polymer electrolytes. Therefore, the lithium ions transport mechanism hypothesized in such systems, sketched in the Scheme 2, should be similar to that in PEO-salt gel-type complex: one lithium ion can form four to six coordination bonds simultaneously with sulfonic groups (of Nafion and/or of sGO) and with the carboxylic oxygen of the EC/PC molecules. These electrostatic interactions favor molecular complexes and produce a transitory physical crosslinking, wherein lithium ion can move from one site to another through a conformational transformation assisted by the segmental motion of the polymer chains and the solvent molecules. 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 13 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry Scheme 2. Visual representation of the lithium ions transport mechanism in the Lithiated Nafion and NafionsGO films. Finally, in Table 1 the conductivity of the two PEMs measured by EIS is compared to conductivity values calculated from the DLi self-diffusion coefficients using the Nernst-Einstein equation, which, in this single-ion conduction PEMs, considers only lithium cation as charge carrier: ππππ = πΉ2 π + × π·πΏπ + π π πΏπ ( ) The concentration of lithium ions inside the two samples, and the details of this calculations are reported in the Supporting Information. Generally, this equation was applied to dual-ion conductor systems and allows us to understand the entity of the ionic association.41–43 In fact, ο³NMR values are always higher than ο³EIS due to the presence of mobile ion pairs that contribute to the spin-echo decay in the PFG-SE experiment but do not involve a net charge transport. For these type of systems, no formation of ion pairs or ionic association are possible, but only lithium ions more or less "blocked" in their movement by the electrostatic coordination with the polymer and filler. As we can see from the Table 1, the calculated values are very close to the experimental ones, especially for the Naf-sGO-Li+ membrane for which they are almost superimposable. This outcome strengthens our hypothesis on the ionic transport mechanism exposed above and highlight as in the composite PEM, the presence of sGO favors the formation of an appropriate network which promotes the ion transport. 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry Table 1. Comparison between conductivities (expressed in mS cm-1 ) measured by EIS and calculated by Nerst-Einstein equation. Naf-Li+ T°C Naf-sGO-Li+ ο³EIS ο³NMR ο³EIS ο³NMR 20 0.36 0.39 0.40 0.40 30 0.42 0.47 0.53 0.54 40 0.54 0.60 0.62 0.63 50 0.66 0.74 0.78 0.80 60 0.77 0.87 0.87 0.88 70 0.91 1.01 0.99 1.00 80 0.89 1.07 1.11 1.15 3.3 Dynamic mechanical analysis All PEMs have been investigated by DMA in order to highlight the lithiation effect and the sGO incorporation on the mechanical properties, also in comparison with the protonated Nafion membrane (Naf-H+). Figure 5a shows the elastic modulus (E') in the temperature sweep tests performed from 20 °C to 300 °C on the two membranes, Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+, both before swelling (dry form) and after swelling in the EC/PC solution, in order to investigate also the effect of swelling on the mechanical properties of the polymeric films. Nafion-H+ (a) 108 E' (Pa) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 14 of 26 107 106 swelled films Naf-sGO-Li Naf-Li 105 0 50 dry membranes + Naf-sGO-Li + Naf-Li 100 + + 150 200 250 300 Temperature (°C) 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 15 of 26 1.0 swelled films Naf-sGO-Li Naf-Li Naf-sGO-Li + Naf-Li + 25 (b) dry membranes + ) 0.6 Nafion-H+ 0.4 (c) dry membranes Naf-sGO-Li+ Naf-Li+ 20 + stress (MPa) 0.8 tan ο€ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry 15 swelled films Naf-sGO-Li+ Naf-Li+ 10 5 0.2 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 strain (%) Temperature (°C) Figure 5. Experimental DMA investigation, from 20 °C up to 300 °C, of the membranes both dry and swelled in the EC:PC mixtures: (a) Storage modulus (E’) vs. T and (b) tan ο€ vs. T. and (c) stress-strain curves conducted at 30 °C. As expected, the swelling in the organic carbonates blend has a plasticizing effect on the PEMs: E' is smaller for both Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+ after swelling and therefore, macroscopically, the membranes are “softer” than the dried ones. Additionally, it is observed that the E' trend has a sigmoid pattern with an evident inflection point: this shape denotes a glass transition state, better visible from the tan ο€ trend shown i n Figure 5b. This inflection point occurs at about 220 °C in the swelled membranes, while rising to about 270 °C for the dry ones. Overall the presence of the sGO filler improves the mechanical properties of the membrane, preserving its elasticity. In fact, the Naf-sGO-Li+ membrane has a larger elastic modulus compared to the Naf-Li+ both in the dry and the swelled states. Turning to the effect of lithiation on the mechanical properties of the Nafion membrane, it is important to underline the shift towards much higher temperatures of the typical transitions of this ionomer: the ο‘-relaxation, i.e. the Tg of the ionic clusters, which typically is at about 120 ° C, now is higher than 200°C, and the ο’-relaxation of the hydrophobic chains, which generally is below 20 °C, now moves to being between 80 and 100 °C. 44,45 Our hypothesis is that lithium ions trigger a greater degree of cross-linking within the ionic clusters of the polymer, possibly by modifying the local meso-morphology. Finally, Figure 5c displays the stress-strain behavior of the membranes both swelled and dry, up to the limit of the linearity region for each one. Dry membranes exhibit similar elongation at yield point (strain of about 0.35 %) but with a tensile stress markedly higher for Naf-sGO (21.5 MPa) than Nafion filler-free film (14 MPa). Due to the softening of the membranes upon swelling in the carbonate solvents, the maximum stress decreases in both samples, i.e. the deformability of the films increases, but again the presence of graphene platelets produces higher elongation at break. 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 16 of 26 3.4. Electrochemical lithium stripping/deposition tests The galvanostatic performance of Li/Li symmetric cells with Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+ PEMs have been recorded in order to evaluate the Li-stripping/deposition electrochemical activity in these cell configurations. The Li-stripping/deposition tests have been carried out at room temperature and at 50 °C for both PEMs and compared to the performance in EC:PC=1:0.4 LiTfO 1M benchmark liquid electrolyte, as shown in the Figure 6. It is important to underline that the overvoltage fluctuation observed for all cell at room temperature is due to the small temperature night/day oscillations. The cell polarizations are moderate for both membranes slightly below 200 mV and 100 mV at room temperature and at 50 °C, respectively. Compared to the benchmark liquid electrolyte soaked on a 0.2 mm thick glass-fiber separator, both membranes show polarizations larger in absolute value. However, the Naf-sGO-Li+ membrane shows an activated trend in the cell polarization and after 200 hours of stripping/deposition cycles, it shows the smallest overvoltage and the smallest overall hysteresis both at room temperature and 50 °C. This trend demonstrates the once a stable interphase between the Li-metal anode and the membrane electrolyte is formed, the larger conductivity of the Naf-sGO-Li+ membrane discloses, as expected, smaller overvoltage and better performance. Moreover, the different trends of the overvoltage upon cycling, decreasing for the Naf-sGO-Li+ membrane and increasing for the Naf-Li+ one, call for a more stable and less reactive Naf-sGO-Li+/Li interface. This different trend possibly calls for a different evolution of the solid-electrolyteinterphase (SEI) that forms and evolves upon cycling at the lithium/membrane interface as already discussed in the literature by several authors. 3,46 However, our clear experimental evidence does not provide details about the chemical nature of the long-term performance enhancement provided by the sGO. In order to shed light ex situ analyses by spectroscopy or microscopy are required. Such investigation is however beyond the scope of this manuscript and the current adopted experimental approach. 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 17 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry Figure 6. Stripping/deposition overvoltage responses for the Li/electrolyte/Li symmetric cells, performed at 0.2 mA cm-2 current, at room temperature and at 50 °C: (a) comparison of the three electrolytes at room temperature; (b) EC:PC=1:0.4 LiTfO 1m; (c) Naf-Li+ membrane and (d) Naf-sGO-Li+ membrane. 3.5. Preliminary tests of a solid Li/ Naf-sGO-Li+ /LFP cell configuration The outperforming Naf-sGO-Li+ membrane has been preliminary tested in galvanostatic experiments with LiFePO4 commercial electrodes (nominal capacity 1.0 mAh cm-2) in order to demonstrate its use in a full lithium cell. The cell voltage profiles as well as the experimental specific capacities are shown in the Figure 7. We would like to stress that no liquid electrolyte has been added to these cells and that the LiFePO4-electrode formulation has not been optimized for example by adding some lithiated-Nafion polymer as co-binder in the film preparation. Overall the Li/ Naf-sGO-Li+ /LiFePO4 cell is able to supply stable and reversible performance in galvanostatic cells at room temperature with high coulombic efficiencies of over 98.5% at C/20 and shows promising rate performances. At C/20 more than 67% of the nominal specific capacity of the LiFePO4 electrode is reversibly cycled in a constant plateau at about 3.5 V with a voltage hysteresis between charge and discharge that is less than 100 mV. The Li/ Naf-sGO-Li+ /LiFePO4 cell outperform the benchmark Li/ Naf -Li+ /LiFePO4 in particular at high rates due to the increase of the ohmic drops. 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 18 of 26 In fact as expected both cells suffer a decrease in the specific capacity while the current rates: however the smaller conductivity of the Naf-Li+ membrane (see above) hinders the performance leading to a ≈5% of capacity retention at C/5 compared to C/20, whereas Naf-sGO-Li+ cell keeps approximately 80% of the original capacity. On passing it may be of interest to highlight that both Naf-Li+ and NafsGO-Li+ cells show a so-called activated trend in terms of capacity vs. cycle number at C/20. One may speculate about a possible slow activation of the active material in the electrodes due to a slow wetting from the swelled membrane to the electrode sheet. Figure 7. (a) Cell voltage profiles and (b) specific capacity at different current rate upon cycling for a Li/ NafsGO-Li+/LiFePO4 cell compared to a Li/Naf-Li+/ LiFePO4 one. (30°C; 1C=170 mA g-1 = 1.0 mA cm-2) The obtained preliminary performance at room temperature of the Li/Naf-sGO/LiFePO4 cell are comparable with the existing literature for other single-ion conducting polymer electrolytes 7. One may recall that comparison is not easily straightforward as the electrode mass loading have a direct impact on the real current density for identical current rates. 4. Conclusions In this work we discuss the preparation and use in solid state lithium cells of new SLIC-SPEs based on Nafion and sulphonated GO, where protons are ion-exchanged with Li+ ions. Two new lithium conducting membranes, i.e. Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+, have been prepared and swelled in EC:PC carbonate blend to activate the lithium ion mobility: remarkably high thermo-reversibility of the membranes and no solvent leaching was observed on thermal cycles. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the sGO added membrane is enhanced compared to the Naf-Li+ one, as well as the lithiation of the ionomer produce significant shift of the thermal transitions. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 19 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry The ionic transport mechanism of both membranes has been characterized by impedance spectroscopy to evaluate the thermal trend of the conductivity and the Li+ transport number. Apparently π‘πΏπ + values are close to unity for both membranes and the total ionic conductivities are very high, in particular for the graphene-composite where a value of approximately 1 mS cm-1 is exceeded at 80 °C. The lithium ion transport mechanism has been further analyzed by NMR spectroscopy. Overall the lithium motion in the swelled membrane is similar to that in PEO-salt gel-type ones: molecular complexes of lithium ions with sulfonic groups (Nafion and/or sGO) and carboxylic oxygens (EC/PC) produce a transitory physical crosslinking, wherein ions can move through a conformational transformation assisted by the segmental motion of the polymer chains and by the solvent molecules. Having established the beneficial effect of the sGO addition in the lithiated Nafion membranes on the mechanical, thermal and ion transport properties, these two PEMs have been assembled in solid state lithium cells. Both Naf-Li+ and Naf-sGO-Li+ membranes are capable of galvanostatic stripping/deposition reactions with limited overvoltage. In particular, the formation of a remarkably stable interphase between the Li-metal anode and the Naf-sGO-Li+ electrolyte has been highlighted both at room temperature and at 50 °C. As a final point the outperforming Naf-sGO-Li+ membrane has been successfully used as SLIC-SPE in a Li/LiFePO4 battery to demonstrate its preliminary performance in galvanostatic cycling tests. Supporting Information. XRD characterization of the Graphene and Graphene Oxide materials. Bruce-Vincent test for the evaluation of the lithium transference number of the electrolytes. The method used for the calculation of the density (geometrical method) and lithium concentration in the Nafion-based electrolytes to be used in the Nerst-Einstein Equation. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Prof. Vito di Noto (University of Pavia) for the fruitful discussion, Dr. Mariano Davoli (Univesity of Calabria) for his help in the acquisition of the SEM images. One of us (SB) would like to thank MISE and ENEA for the funding of this research activity through the “Accordo di Collaborazione tra ENEA e Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Università degli Studi della Basilicata-PAR2017”. At the University of Calabria (I.N.) this work was supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7 2007-2013) through the MATERIA Project (PONa3_00370). 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 20 of 26 References (1) Sun, C.; Liu, J.; Gong, Y.; Wilkinson, D. P.; Zhang, J. Recent Advances in All-Solid-State Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Nano Energy. 2017, 33, 363–386. (2) Patil, A.; Patil, V.; Choi, J. W.; Kim, J. S.; Yoon, S. J. Solid Electrolytes for Rechargeable Thin Film Lithium Batteries: A Review. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 29–71. (3) Xu, C.; Sun, B.; Gustafsson, T.; Edström, K.; Brandell, D.; Hahlin, M. Interface Layer Formation in Solid Polymer Electrolyte Lithium Batteries: An XPS Study. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7256. (4) Croce, F.; Sacchetti, S.; Scrosati, B. Advanced, High-Performance Composite Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries. J. Power Sources 2006, 161, 560–564. (5) Ma, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, C.; Zheng, L.; Cheng, P.; Nie, J.; Feng, W.; Hu, Y. S.; Li, H.; Huang, X.; et al. Single Lithium-Ion Conducting Polymer Electrolytes Based on a Super-Delocalized Polyanion. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2521–2525. (6) Zhang, H.; Li, C.; Piszcz, M.; Coya, E.; Rojo, T.; Rodriguez-Martinez, L. M.; Armand, M.; Zhou, Z. Single Lithium-Ion Conducting Solid Polymer Electrolytes: Advances and Perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 797–815. (7) Porcarelli, L.; Shaplov, A. S.; Bella, F.; Nair, J. R.; Mecerreyes, D.; Gerbaldi, C. Single-Ion Conducting Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Metal Polymer Batteries That Operate at Ambient Temperature. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 678–682. (8) Liang, H. Y.; Qiu, X. P.; Zhang, S. C.; Zhu, W. T.; Chen, L. Q. Study of Lithiated Nafion Ionomer for Lithium Batteries. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2004, 34, 1211–1214. (9) Mauritz, K. a; Moore, R. B. State of Understanding of Nafion. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4535–4585. (10) Vasile, N. S.; Monteverde Videla, A. H. A.; Simari, C.; Nicotera, I.; Specchia, S. Influence of Membrane-Type and Flow Field Design on Methanol Crossover on a Single-Cell DMFC: An Experimental and Multi-Physics Modeling Study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 27995-28010. (11) Karimi, M. B.; Mohammadi, F.; Hooshyari, K. Recent Approaches to Improve Nafion Performance for Fuel Cell Applications: A Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 28919-28938. (12) Siracusano, S.; Baglio, V.; Nicotera, I.; Mazzapioda, L.; Aricò, A. S.; Panero, S.; Navarra, M. A. Sulfated Titania as Additive in Nafion Membranes for Water Electrolysis Applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 27851–27858. (13) Siracusano, S.; Baglio, V.; Navarra, M. A.; Panero, S.; Antonucci, V.; Aricò, A. S. Investigation of Composite Nafion/Sulfated Zirconia Membrane for Solid Polymer Electrolyte Electrolyzer Applications. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7, 1532–1542. (14) Jin, Z.; Xie, K.; Hong, X.; Hu, Z.; Liu, X. Application of Lithiated Nafion Ionomer Film as Functional Separator for Lithium Sulfur Cells. J. Power Sources 2012, 218, 163–167. 20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 21 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 (15) The Journal of Physical Chemistry Nicotera, I.; Kosma, V.; Simari, C.; Ranieri, G. A.; Sgambetterra, M.; Panero, S.; Navarra, M. A. An NMR Study on the Molecular Dynamic and Exchange Effects in Composite Nafion/Sulfated Titania Membranes for PEMFCs. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 14651–14660. (16) Cossari, P.; Simari, C.; Cannavale, A.; Gigli, G.; Nicotera, I. Advanced Processing and Characterization of Nafion Electrolyte Films for Solid-State Electrochromic Devices Fabricated at Room Temperature on Single Substrate. Solid State Ionics 2018, 317, 46-52. (17) Lu, Y.; Tikekar, M.; Mohanty, R.; Hendrickson, K.; Ma, L.; Archer, L. A. Stable Cycling of Lithium Metal Batteries Using High Transference Number Electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1–7. (18) Nicotera, I.; Simari, C.; Coppola, L.; Zygouri, P.; Gournis, D.; Brutti, S.; Minuto, F. D.; Aricò, A. S.; Sebastian, D.; Baglio, V. Sulfonated Graphene Oxide Platelets in Nafion Nanocomposite Membrane: Advantages for Application in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 24357– 24368. (19) Boutsika, L. G.; Enotiadis, A.; Nicotera, I.; Simari, C.; Charalambopoulou, G.; Giannelis, E. P.; Steriotis, T. Nafion Nanocomposite Membranes with Enhanced Properties at High Temperature and Low Humidity Environments. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 22406–22414. (20) Nicotera, I.; Angjeli, K.; Coppola, L.; Enotiadis, A.; Pedicini, R.; Carbone, A.; Gournis, D. Composite Polymer Electrolyte Membranes Based on Mg–Al Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH) Platelets for H2/Air-Fed Fuel Cells. Solid State Ionics 2015, 276, 40–46. (21) Simari, C.; Potsi, G.; Policicchio, A.; Perrotta, I.; Nicotera, I. Clay-Carbon Nanotubes Hybrid Materials for Nanocomposite Membranes: Advantages of Branched Structure for Proton Transport under Low Humidity Conditions in PEMFCs. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 2574–2584. (22) Simari, C.; Baglio, V.; Lo Vecchio, C.; Aricò, A. S.; Agostino, R. G.; Coppola, L.; Oliviero Rossi, C.; Nicotera, I. Reduced Methanol Crossover and Enhanced Proton Transport in Nanocomposite Membranes Based on Clay−CNTs Hybrid Materials for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. Ionics (Kiel). 2017, 23, 2113–2123. (23) Enotiadis, A.; Angjeli, K.; Baldino, N.; Nicotera, I.; Gournis, D. Graphene-Based Nafion Nanocomposite Membranes: Enhanced Proton Transport and Water Retention by Novel OrganoFunctionalized Graphene Oxide Nanosheets. Small 2012, 8, 3338–3349. (24) Tokarczyk, M.; Kowalski, G.; Witowski, A. M.; KoziΕski, R.; Librant, K.; Aksienionek, M.; LipiΕska, L.; Ciepielewski, P. Structural and Electronic Properties of Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide Papers Prepared by High Pressure and High Temperature Treatment. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2014, 126, 1190–1194. (25) Gómez-Navarro, C.; Weitz, R. T.; Bittner, A. M.; Scolari, M.; Mews, A.; Burghard, M.; Kern, K. Electronic Transport Properties of Individual Chemically Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets. Nano 21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 22 of 26 Letters 2007, 7, 3499–3503. (26) Karim, M. R.; Hatakeyama, K.; Matsui, T.; Takehira, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Koinuma, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Akutagawa, T.; Nakamura, T.; Noro, S. I.; et al. Graphene Oxide Nanosheet with High Proton Conductivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8097–8100. (27) Jung, I.; Dikin, D. A.; Piner, R. D.; Ruoff, R. S. Tunable Electrical Conductivity of Individual Graphene Oxide Sheets Reduced at Low Temperatures. Nano Letters 2008, 8, 1–5. (28) Staudenmaier, L. Verfahren Zur Darstellung Der Graphitsäure. Berichte der Dtsch. Chem. Gesellschaft 1898, 31, 1481. (29) Simari, C.; Stallworth, P.; Peng, J.; Coppola, L.; Greenbaum, S.; Nicotera, I. Graphene Oxide and Sulfonated-Derivative: Proton Transport Properties and Electrochemical Behavior of Nafion-Based Nanocomposites. Electrochimica Acta 2019, 297, 240–249. (30) Nicotera, I.; Enotiadis, A.; Angjeli, K.; Coppola, L.; Ranieri, G. A.; Gournis, D. Effective Improvement of Water-Retention in Nanocomposite Membranes Using Novel Organo-Modified Clays as Fillers for High Temperature PEMFCs. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 9087–9097. (31) Tanner, J. E. Use of the Stimulated Echo in NMR Diffusion Studies. J. Chem Phys. 1970, 52, 2523– 2526. (32) Bruce, P. G.; Evans, J.; Vincent, C. A. Conductivity and Transference Number Measurements on Polymer Electrolytes. Solid State Ionics 1988, 28–30, 918–922. (33) Nicotera, I.; Oliviero, C.; Coppola, L.; Gianferri, R.; Ranieri, G. A. Mechanical Properties of PANBased Gel Electrolytes: Small-Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Study. Plastic Rubber and Composite 2004, 33, 125–129. (34) Nicotera, I.; Coppola, L.; Oliviero, C.; Russo, A.; Ranieri, G. A. Some Physicochemical Properties of PAN-Based Electrolytes: Solution and Gel Microstructures. Solid State Ionics 2004, 167, 213–220. (35) Jin, Z.; Xie, K.; Hong, X.; Hu, Z.; Liu, X. Application of Lithiated Nafion Ionomer Film as Functional Separator for Lithium Sulfur Cells. J. Power Sources 2012, 218, 163-167. (36) E.A. Sanginov, R.R. Kayumov, L.V. Shmygleva, V.A. Lesnichaya, A.I. Karelin, Y. A. D. Study of the Transport of Alkali Metal Ions in a Nonaqueous Polymer Electrolyte Based on Nafion. Solid State Ionics 2017, 300, 26–31. (37) Nicotera, I.; Coppola, L.; Oliviero, C.; Ranieri, G. a. Rheological Properties and Impedance Spectroscopy of PMMA-PVdF Blend and PMMA Gel Polymer Electrolytes for Advanced Lithium Batteries. Ionics (Kiel). 2005, 11, 87–94. (38) Song, J. Y.; Wang, Y. Y.; Wan, C. C. Review of Gel-Type Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 1999, 77, 183–197. (39) Bommier, C.; Ji, X. Electrolytes, SEI Formation, and Binders: A Review of Nonelectrode Factors for Sodium-Ion Battery Anodes. Small. 2018, 14, 1703576. 22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 23 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry (40) Croce, F.; Appetecchi, G. B.; Persi, L.; Scrosati, B. Nanocomposite Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries. Nature 1998, 394, 456–458. (41) Nicotera, I.; Oliviero, C.; Henderson, W. a; Appetecchi, G. B.; Passerini, S. NMR Investigation of Ionic Liquid-LiX Mixtures: Pyrrolidinium Cations and TFSI- Anions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 22814–22819. (42) Tsurumaki, A.; Agostini, M.; Poiana, R.; Lombardo, L.; Lufrano, E.; Simari, C.; Matic, A.; Nicotera, I.; Panero, S.; Navarra, M. A. Enhanced Safety and Galvanostatic Performance of High Voltage Lithium Batteries by Using Ionic Liquids. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 316, 1-7. (43) Nicotera, I.; Kosma, V.; Simari, C.; Angioni, S.; Mustarelli, P.; Quartarone, E. Ion Dynamics and Mechanical Properties of Sulfonated Polybenzimidazole Membranes for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 9745–9753. (44) Di Noto, V.; Boaretto, N.; Negro, E.; Pace, G. New Inorganic–Organic Proton Conducting Membranes Based on Nafion and Hydrophobic Fluoroalkylated Silica Nanoparticles. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 7734–7742. (45) Osborn, S. J.; Hassan, M. K.; Divoux, G. M.; Rhoades, D. W.; Mauritz, K. A.; Moore, R. B. Glass Transition Temperature of Perfluorosulfonic Acid Ionomers. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 3886–3890. (46) Wu, H.; Cao, Y.; Su, H.; Wang, C. Tough Gel Electrolyte Using Double Polymer Network Design for the Safe, Stable Cycling of Lithium Metal Anode. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1361–1365. 23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 24 of 26 TOC Graphic 24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 25 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 The Journal of Physical Chemistry ACS Paragon Plus Environment The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 254x189mm (150 x 150 DPI) ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 26 of 26