Uploaded by matee

Effects of ultrasound assisted dough fermentation on the quality of steamed bread

advertisement
Accepted Manuscript
Effects of ultrasound assisted dough fermentation on the quality of steamed bread
Denglin Luo, Ruoyan Wu, Jie Zhang, Kangyi Zhang, Baocheng Xu, Peiyan Li, Yunxia
Yuan, Xuan Li
PII:
S0733-5210(18)30209-1
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcs.2018.07.016
Reference:
YJCRS 2610
To appear in:
Journal of Cereal Science
Received Date: 13 March 2018
Revised Date:
25 May 2018
Accepted Date: 27 July 2018
Please cite this article as: Luo, D., Wu, R., Zhang, J., Zhang, K., Xu, B., Li, P., Yuan, Y., Li, X., Effects
of ultrasound assisted dough fermentation on the quality of steamed bread, Journal of Cereal Science
(2018), doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.07.016.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Effects of Ultrasound Assisted Dough Fermentation on the Quality of Steamed
2
Bread
3
Denglin Luoa, Ruoyan Wua, Jie Zhangb, Kangyi Zhangc, Baocheng Xua, Peiyan Lia, Yunxia Yuana,
4
Xuan Lia
5
RI
PT
1
a. College of Food and Bioengineering, Henan University of Science & Technology, Luoyang
7
471023, Henan Province, China
8
b. School of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001,
9
Henan Province, China
10
c. Center of Agricultural Products Processing, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou,
11
450008 Henan Province, China
M
AN
U
12
SC
6
Corresponding author’s telephone: +86-379-64282342, Email: luodenglin@163.com
13
17
18
19
20
21
EP
16
AC
C
15
TE
D
14
22
23
24
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
25
Abstract
Ultrasound is used to enhance the fermentation of wheat dough to produce steamed bread. The
27
quality of steamed bread stored for different time was analyzed using the texture analyzer.
28
Ultrasound treatment had significant impact on the hardness and specific volume of steamed bread
29
(p<0.05). Compared with the control, the hardness of fresh steamed bread reduced by 22.4% and the
30
specific volume increased by 6.7% at ultrasound power density of 23.08 W/L and ultrasonic time of
31
40 min. During the storage of steamed bread, the hardness with ultrasound was remarkably lower
32
than that of the control, and the difference was even more evident with prolonging storage time. The
33
springiness with ultrasound was lower than that of the control when storage time was no higher than
34
48h. Generally, ultrasound assisted dough fermentation can improve the quality of the steamed bread.
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
26
35
39
40
41
42
43
TE
D
38
EP
37
Key words: ultrasound; steamed bread; fermentation; storage; quality; hardness
AC
C
36
44
45
46
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
47
1. Introduction
Steamed bread has been a stable food in China for nearly 2,000 years. As a kind of daily
49
fermented pasta, there is obviously different from bread in the raw materials and processing. The
50
materials of steamed bread used commonly are plain wheat flour, water and yeast. These materials
51
are mixed to develop a dough, then it ferments at a certain temperature (35-38 °C) and humidity
52
(relative humidity of 81%-85%) for 30-60 min, followed by sheeting, molding, proofing and
53
steaming. The quality of steamed bread is determined by materials characteristic, as well as the
54
recipe and processing conditions. During the processing, the fermentation is an important operation
55
which can affect the quality of products, including the hardness, springiness, specific volume, spread
56
ratio and cohensiveness, as well as other sensor parameters (Sha et al., 2007).
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
48
In recent years, the applications of power ultrasonic (10-1000 W cm-2) in food processing has
58
gained more and more interest as it can produce physical, mechanical and chemical effects to alter
59
food properties. Ultrasound technology has been used to improve the productivity and quality of food
60
through intense pressure, strong shear and temperature gradient depending on the medium of
61
propagation. A lot of research has been conducted about incorporating power ultrasound in food
62
industry, particularly to modify ingredients properties, facilitate food processing and improve product
63
quality (Carrillo-Lopez et al., 2017). Ultrasound has been used to reduce the total fermentation time
64
of yoghurt by 0.5 h after inoculation, and to mix the dough to improve the quality of cakes and bread
65
(Wu et al., 2000; Tan et al., 2011; Pa et al., 2014). The dough mixed by ultrasound had lower density
66
and flow index, higher puffing rate and viscosity, and produced higher quality of sponge cakes (Tan
67
et al., 2011). Compared with the control (without ultrasound), the physical properties of bread with
68
ultrasonic-assisted dough mixing were significantly improved. The volume of the bread increased by
AC
C
EP
TE
D
57
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19%, and the mass and density decreased by 2.1 % and 17%, respectively (Pa et al., 2014). The total
70
time required for dough freezing under ultrasound (288 or 360W) was reduced by more than 11%
71
and the dough springiness was significantly increased, and there was no significant changes in the
72
flavor of the dough (Hu et al., 2013). The foaming capability and the emulsifying stability of wheat
73
gluten sonicated both increased with increasing ultrasonic power (Zhang et al., 2011).
RI
PT
69
In general, most studies focus on the influence of power ultrasound on the physicochemical
75
characteristics of various starches and proteins, or detection ultrasound used for determining the
76
characteristic of dough and products, such as rheology properties, bread volume and density, and
77
textural profiles (Arvanitoyannis et al., 2017). While there are few reports on the quality changes of
78
steamed bread after wheat dough was sonicated during fermentation. Therefore, this paper mainly
79
intends to explore the feasibility of steamed bread produced by ultrasonic-assisted dough
80
fermentation. Changes in textural profiles and storage characteristic of steamed bread were analyzed
81
for hardness, springiness, specific volume, spread ratio, cohesiveness, recovery, chewiness, total
82
moisture content and weighted score.
TE
D
M
AN
U
SC
74
EP
83
2. Materials and Methods
85
2.1 Materials
86
AC
C
84
Wheat flour with 9.64% protein (Lushuiyuan brand, Yugong Agricultural products limited
87
company, China), active dry yeast (Angle brand, Angel Yeast Co., Ltd., China).
88
2.2 Preparation of steamed bread
89
The optimized formula of steamed bread for the control was determined according to the
90
previous experiments, containing 100 g wheat flour, 48 ml distilled water, and 1.2 g dry yeast (1.2%)
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(Liu et al., 2016). The flour was added in a mixer (HM740, Hanshang Corp., Ltd., China). Then, the
92
yeast was dissolved in the 36 °C distilled water and poured into the mixer to mix for 20 min. The
93
mixed dough fermented in a fermentation tank (TQ-15, Topkitch Corp,, Ltd., China) for 40 min at
94
36 °C and 83% of relative humidity. After the first fermentation, the dough was rounded and molded
95
into a round billet. The second fermentation performed for 10 min at the same conditions as above
96
first fermentation. Then the fermented dough was steamed with boiling water for 25 min and cooled
97
for 1 h to room temperature for analysis (Luo et al., 2017). All samples were analyzed in triplicate
98
and the results were reported as the mean of three replicates.
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
91
The formula and mixing process of the dough with ultrasound was the same as the control. The
100
prepared dough was put into a fresh plastic bag. A hollow straw of 15 cm was inserted into the bag
101
and tied tightly to prevent outside water from permeating and to keep open with the outside air. The
102
bag with dough was put into an ultrasonic bath (KQ-500DE, Kun Shan Ultrasonic Instrument Co.,
103
Ltd, Kun Shan, 40 kHz of frequency) with water for sonication. The bag was located at 3 cm below
104
the water level and 7 cm from the bottom (Fig. 1). The water temperature in the bath was maintained
105
at 36-38 ° C. Ultrasonic power density and treatment time was selected from 15.38 W/L to 38.46
106
W/L and from 20 min to 50 min, respectively. The fermentation (except for the first fermentation
107
time) and steaming conditions were the same as the control. All samples were analyzed in triplicate
108
and the results were reported as the mean of three replicates.
109
2.3 Determination of the specific volume and spread ratio of steamed bread
AC
C
EP
TE
D
99
110
The specific volume of steamed bread is the ratio of volume to mass. The volume was measured
111
using the rapeseed replacement method. The spread ratio was obtained by measuring the height and
112
the bottom width of the three different positions on the bread using a vernier caliper, and the average
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
113
value was recorded.
114
2.4 Textural analysis of steamed bread
The texture of steamed bread was measured using a texture analyzer (Instron Universal 5544,
116
Instron Co., USA) equipped with a 25 kg load cell and an aluminum cylindrical probe (P/36D). Three
117
cube blocks of 20 × 20 × 20 mm from the center of the steamed bread were taken as the samples.
118
Measurements were conducted with a test speed of 1 mm/s, and the deformation level was set 60% of
119
the sample height. After the first compression, the probe returned to the height before compression
120
and balanced for 5s, then the second compression started, as described for the first compression.
121
After two compressions were completed, a TPA curve was obtained to calculate parameters.
122
2.5 Determination of moisture content of steamed bread
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
115
Total moisture content of steamed bread was determined using direct drying method. A steamed
124
bread crumb of 2-3 g was dried to constant weight in an oven at 103-105 ° C. The total moisture
125
content (MC) of steamed bread is calculated according to formula (1), where m0 is the raw mass of
126
bread sample, m1 is the mass of sample after baking to constant weight. Analyses were performed in
127
triplicate and the average value was recorded.
129
130
EP
MC % =
× 100%
(1)
AC
C
128
TE
D
123
2.6 Characteristic analysis of steamed bread during storage
The fresh steamed breads were cooled to the room temperature and put into fresh plastic bags
131
for storage in a refrigerator at 4 ° C. The textural properties were measured after the storage of 24, 48,
132
72, 96, 120 and 144 h.
133
2.7 Evaluation of bread quality using comprehensive weighted scoring method (CWS)
134
CWS is a trend forecasting method, which is often used to evaluate the optimal weight
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
coefficient distribution principle. Each factor is given to a certain weight in CWS, and the weighted
136
score is calculated to predict the future value of the factor evaluation according to the relevant
137
indicators of the evaluation index of bread(Fu et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2016). In this study, the most
138
important indexes, including hardness, springiness, specific volume, spread ratio and cohesiveness,
139
were selected as the weight factors in the evaluation of steamed bread. The weights assigned to these
140
five indexes were 40% 20%, 20%, 10% and 10%, respectively. The basic formula of the CWS is
141
given in equations (2) and (3). According to the influence of each factor on the result, the weight of
142
one factor is positive value if they have a positive influence on the quality of steamed bread and
143
otherwise it is negative value. In this experiment, the weight of the hardness is negative, and the
144
others are positive.
145
Y∗ = w y + w y + ⋯ + w y
146
y =
× 100
(2)
(3)
TE
D
!
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
135
Where Y* is the weighted composite score for a group, wj is the weight corresponding to each
148
indicator, yj’ is the scoring value of each indicator, yj is the actual measured value of each indicator in
149
the group, yjmin and yjmax are the minimum and maximum values of the same index among several
150
groups, respectively.
151
2.8 Data processing and analysis
AC
C
152
EP
147
The experiment data was done using the Origin 8.0. The statistical analyses were performed by
153
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significance of differences (p < 0.05) was analyzed using
154
the Duncan’s test (IBM SPASS Statistics V.19).
155
156
3. Results and discussion
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
157
3.1 Effects of ultrasonic time on the quality of steamed bread
The effects of ultrasonic time on the hardness, springiness, specific volume, spread ratio,
159
cohesiveness and weight score of steamed bread were investigated at ultrasonic power density of
160
23.08 W/L (Table 1).
RI
PT
158
Table 1 showed that ultrasonic time had significant impact on the hardness and specific volume
162
of steamed bread (p < 0.05), but induced only slight changes in the springiness, spread ratio and
163
cohesiveness. The hardness decreased over ultrasonic time, and when the time was above 40 min,
164
there was a significant decrease as compared with the control. At ultrasonic time of 50 min, the
165
hardness reduced by 18.2% and 16.2% compared with the control and ultrasonic time of 20 min,
166
respectively. A possible reason is that the dough developed more adequately with prolonging the
167
ultrasonic time during the fermentation (Ojha et al., 2017). Another reason is perhaps that ultrasound
168
cavitation can produce cycles of rarefraction and compression (Liu et al., 2017). In the rarefraction, a
169
large number of bubbles in the dough generates and develops, resulting a uniformly distribution in
170
the dough, which contributes to high quality of steamed breads with homogeneous and porous
171
structure. Additionally, high temperature, high pressure and intense collapse induced by sonication
172
maybe destroy the internal hydrogen bonds between protein molecules, weakening the tertiary and
173
quaternary structures of proteins (Ozuna et al., 2015). The large protein complexes become soluble
174
small aggregates, resulting in a loose network structure of gluten. Therefore, the steamed bread is
175
easier to deform under external forces (Higuera-Barraza et al., 2016). All these elements contribute to
176
the decrease of the hardness.
AC
C
EP
TE
D
M
AN
U
SC
161
177
Studies reported that the storage modulus and loss modulus of gluten decreased under
178
ultrasound treatment, and the contents of α-helix, β-sheet and β-turn also declined, but the content of
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
random coil increased (Hu et al., 2013). This could be explained by the fact that ultrasound cause the
180
structure of wheat gluten to unfold, weakening the interactions between gliadin and glutenin and
181
reducing the disulfide bonds and polar hydrogen bonds between protein molecules. Tan et al. (2011)
182
suggested that the cavitation caused by ultrasound may accelerate the denaturation of proteins in the
183
cake due to the shrinkage of bubbles. Protein denaturation is considered as the destruction of the
184
secondary bonds such as hydrogen bonds, and the tight and curly structure of protein will become
185
loose, leading to a more soft and delicious characteristic of cake. Lomakina et al (2006) observed that
186
after ultrasound treatment, the protein and fat particles dispersed more evenly, and the foaming
187
capacity of liquid egg white was significantly improved. Therefore, this is perhaps another reason
188
that ultrasonic induced a decrease in the hardness of steamed bread by improving the foaming ability
189
of proteins.
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
179
The specific volume of steamed bread increased first and then decreased with increasing
191
ultrasonic time, approaching the maximum at 40 min, which increased by 9.0% and 14.2% as
192
compared with the control and ultrasonic time of 20 min, respectively. The weighted score with
193
ultrasound was higher than that of the control when ultrasonic time above 30 min. It indicated that
194
ultrasound treatment can improve the quality of steamed bread, reduce the fermentation time and
195
enhance productivity. The increase of specific volume is mainly attributed to the following two
196
reasons (Pa et al., 2014). One reason is that ultrasound has a positive effect on increasing the yeast
197
activity at the beginning of the fermentation (Ojha et al., 2017). The other reason is that sonication is
198
helpful to the generation of bubbles in the dough, and the bubbles can provide oxygen for various
199
oxidation reactions and yeast propagation. Previous studies reported that ultrasound with low
200
frequencies (18-30 kHz) and high intensities promoted the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
AC
C
EP
TE
D
190
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(increased by 33.3%), and shortened the fermentation time (reduced by 4 h) (Lanchun et al., 2003). It
202
may be related to the membrane permeability of cell enhanced by ultrasound treatment, promoting
203
the transfer rate of oxygen and nutrient required for microbial cells growth and accelerating the
204
removal of metabolic wastes from cells (Huang et al., 2017). Sulaiman et al. (2011) revealed that
205
ultrasound cycles of 10% and 20% improved the propagation rate of ethanol-producing strains and
206
final product concentration, whereas 40% of the ultrasonic cycle had a negative influence on the
207
propagation rate and product yield, and the logarithmic growth period of the bacteria ended earlier.
208
Therefore, ultrasound with low intensities can promote yeast growth. With the increase of ultrasonic
209
time, the dough fermented more fully, and the specific volume of steamed bread increased and the
210
hardness reduced. However, the specific volume would decrease again when ultrasonic time was
211
higher than 40 min. This is because of excessive fermentation of dough that leads to the collapse of
212
gluten structure to some extent.
213
3.2 Effects of ultrasonic power density on the quality of steamed bread
215
SC
M
AN
U
TE
D
The effects of ultrasound power density on the quality of steamed bread were investigated at
ultrasonic time of 40 min (Table 2).
EP
214
RI
PT
201
Table 2 showed that ultrasonic power density had a remarkable effect on the hardness,
217
springiness and specific volume of steamed bread (p < 0.05), but relatively little influence on the
218
spread ratio and cohesiveness. The hardness of steamed bread decreased first and then increased with
219
increasing ultrasonic power density, which was significantly lower than that of the control. The
220
hardness approached the minimum at ultrasonic power density of 23.08 W/L, reducing by 22.4%
221
compared with the control. At lower power densities, ultrasound may damage the hydrogen bonds
222
between large protein polymers and decompose them into small soluble protein aggregates, which
AC
C
216
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
produced steamed breads with relatively loose and soft structure, so the hardness reduced. However,
224
when ultrasonic power increased to a certain intensity, the denatured proteins increased, and the
225
hydrophobic groups originally existing in the protein molecules were exposed in large numbers,
226
which caused the protein particles more likely to aggregate due to intermolecular collision and
227
formed a more compact network structure of gluten proteins (Yong et al., 2016). Therefore, the
228
hardness of steamed bread increased again. In addition, ultrasound can change the physicochemical
229
properties of wheat starch, including solubility and swelling, molecular size and internal structure,
230
gelatinization and aging properties, thus affecting the quality of flour products (Zheng et al., 2013).
231
Studies have shown that ultrasound can destroy the crystallization zone of starch, leading more
232
hydrophilic groups -OH exposed (Hu et al., 2014). The exposed hydrophilic groups of starch interact
233
with water or protein by non-covalent bonds, which enhances the hydrophilcity of dough. Therefore,
234
the hardness of steamed bread decreased and the shelf life extended. Whereas, when the ultrasonic
235
power intense used is strong, it will break down the long chains of starch molecules into shorter
236
chains, which means that the relative content of amylose increases (Zhu, 2015). It is well known that
237
amylose content is closely related to the short-term aging of steamed bread (< 24 h). The higher the
238
content of amylose is, the faster the short-term aging rate of the bread is. Therefore, the hardness will
239
increase again as the ultrasonic power density increases further.
SC
M
AN
U
TE
D
EP
AC
C
240
RI
PT
223
It was observed a slight decrease in the springiness of steamed bread with ultrasound (p > 0.05)
241
compared with the control. However, there was a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the springiness at
242
the power density of 38.46 W/L when compared with at the power density of 15.38 W/L. The
243
springiness is mainly dependent on the glutenin content in wheat proteins, which is related to the
244
contents of the inter- and intramolecular disulfide bonds in glutenin. O'Sullivan et al. (2016) reported
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
that the size of soy protein did not decrease significantly after sonication. They also used the same
246
ultrasonic parameters to deal with wheat protein and conducted the same conclusion. This may be
247
attributed to low ultrasonic power densities used, which had no energy enough to destroy the
248
disulfide bonds that maintains the denatured polymer structure. When the density is strong enough,
249
the cavitation induced by ultrasound such as high temperature and high pressure, can damage
250
disulfide bonds and molecular structures of gluten, resulting in a decrease in the strength of gluten
251
network. The shear force induced by ultrasound may also destroy the covalent and non-covalent
252
interactions between proteins, leading to protein denaturation and secondary structure changes
253
(Zhang et al., 2015). Zhang et al. (2016) found that the α-helix content of gluten decreased first and
254
then increased with the increase of ultrasonic power, while it is reverse for the content of random coil.
255
Therefore, the springiness declined at high power densities.
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
245
The specific volume of steamed bread increased first and then decreased with increasing
257
ultrasonic power density, approaching the maximum at 23.08 W/L, which increased significantly by
258
6.7% compared with the control (p < 0.05). This may be due to the influence of ultrasound on yeast
259
activity. Ultrasound helps to increase yeast activity and promote the matter transfer at lower power
260
density, facilitating the incorporation of oxygen required for fermentation, the removal of carbon
261
dioxide and the improvement of protein foaming ability. When the ultrasonic power density is high,
262
the intense cavitation damages the cell walls and plasma membranes of yeasts seriously, and even
263
changes the intracellular components such as endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. As a result, it
264
will inhibit the growth of yeasts and even kill some active yeasts (Huang et al., 2017).
265
3.3 Effects of ultrasound treatment on the characteristics of steamed bread during storage
266
AC
C
EP
TE
D
256
Fig. 2 showed that the quality of steamed bread varied over storage time, where steamed breads
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
with ultrasound were prepared at ultrasonic time 40 min and power density 23.08 W/L. The hardness
268
of steamed bread with ultrasound was remarkable lower than that of the control during the storage,
269
and this difference was even more evident with prolonging storage time (Fig. 2a). When the storage
270
time was higher than 24 h, the hardness with ultrasound varied slightly with increasing storage time,
271
even decreased to some extent, which reduced by 7.75% at storage time 144 h compared to at storage
272
time 24 h. However, for the control, the hardness significantly increased with prolonging storage time,
273
it increased by 23.78% at storage time 144 h compared to at storage time 24 h. After steamed breads
274
were stored for 144 h, the hardness with ultrasound reduced by 33.3% compared with the control.
275
When the storage time ranged from 1h to 144 h, the hardness with ultrasound increased by 294%,
276
whereas the control increased by 455%. It implied that ultrasound treatment can reduce the hardness
277
and prolong the shelf life during steamed bread’s storage. The longer the storage time is, the more
278
noticeable the positive effect of ultrasound is.
TE
D
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
267
The hardness is an important parameter affecting the sensory quality of steamed bread and a
280
main index of the aging during the storage and determined by the starch retrogradation, gluten
281
structure and moisture content. It is commonly considered that the retrogradation of gelatinized
282
starch plays an important role in the hardness. The hardness was significantly lower than that of the
283
control after 24 h of storage, which suggested that ultrasound could retard the short-term aging of
284
wheat starch. It is well known that the short-term retrogradation is closely related to the content of
285
amylose (van den Berg et al., 2009). However, low ultrasonic power densities can not affect the
286
structure of amylose and amylopectin significantly, i.e. there were no obvious changes in the contents
287
of amylose and amylopectin. Therefore, the differences in the hardness between ultrasound treatment
288
and the control may be attributed to the changes of gluten structure or water transfer induced by
AC
C
EP
279
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ultrasound. Ultrasound can destroy the non-covalent interactions of protein aggregations, and make
290
starch granules more easily embedded in the relatively loose network structure of gluten. Thus, it
291
retarded the combination of amylose molecules and free water during the storage, which reduced the
292
recrystallization level of starch and suppressing the retrogradation. Hu et al (2014) found that
293
ultrasound reduced the stability, molecular weight and degree of polymerization of starch molecules,
294
resulting in an increase in the aging of sweet potato starch and a decrease in the hardness, springiness
295
and chewiness. Additionally, ultrasound can affect the transfer of water in dough (Jambrak et al.,
296
2007).
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
289
Fig. 2b showed that the springiness of steamed bread decreased with prolonging the storage time.
298
The springiness of steamed bread with ultrasound decreased by 15% after 144 h of storage compared
299
with that after 1 h of storage, whereas it decreased by 13% for the control. This indicated that the
300
decrease of the springiness with ultrasound was more pronounced than that of the control for
301
long-term storage. However, the springiness with ultrasound was higher than that of the control for
302
short-term storage (< 48 h). The springiness of steamed bread is mainly dependent on the gluten
303
network. The difference in the springiness of steamed bread between the ultrasound and the control is
304
probably because ultrasound improves the uniformity and stability of the structure of gluten network.
305
Ultrasound can significantly increase the foaming power of egg albumen (Lomakina and Míková,
306
2006). Tan et al (2011) also revealed that cake batter mixed by ultrasound produced a high quality of
307
cakes with higher springiness, cohesiveness and resilience and lower hardness. However, when the
308
storage time was above 48 hours, the interactions between gluten and water or starch decreased with
309
the storage time due to a loose network structure of gluten induced by ultrasound, and the total
310
moisture content of steamed bread with ultrasound was lower than that of the control (Fig. 2f),
AC
C
EP
TE
D
297
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
311
resulting in a more easier collapse of gluten structure under ultrasonic treatment.
The chewiness of steamed bread is considered as another index which is closely relevant to the
313
flavor of steamed bread. Fig. 2e showed that the chewiness with ultrasound was always lower than
314
that of the control, especially after storage 24 h. This was due to the lower hardness of steamed bread
315
produced by ultrasound. Fig. 2c and Fig. 2d showed that there was no significant difference between
316
the ultrasound and the control in cohesiveness and recovery during the storage.
RI
PT
312
4. Conclusion
M
AN
U
318
SC
317
Ultrasound assisted dough fermentation had considerable impact on the quality of steamed
320
bread. It can improve the quality of steamed bread, especially for the hardness and specific volume.
321
With the increase of ultrasonic time, the hardness decreased, and the specific volume increased first
322
and then decreased. Ultrasonic power density had a remarkable effect on the hardness, springiness
323
and specific volume of steamed bread (p < 0.05), but less pronounced influence on the spread ratio
324
and cohesiveness. Ultrasound treatment can reduce the hardness of steamed bread and prolong its
325
shelf life during the storage. The decline rate in the springiness with ultrasound was lower than that
326
of the control when the storage time was no higher than 48 h, however, it was reverse as the storage
327
time prolonged further.
329
EP
AC
C
328
TE
D
319
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
330
The authors gratefully acknowledge Henan Province University Science and Technology
331
Innovation Talent Support Program (16HASTIT020), Science and Technology Innovation Team of
332
Henan University of Science and Technology (2015XTD007), Foundation for University Youth Key
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
333
Teacher by Henan Province of China (2012GGJS-076).
334
335
References
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
Arvanitoyannis, I.S., Kotsanopoulos, K.V., Savva, A.G., 2017. Use of ultrasounds in the food
RI
PT
336
industry-methods and effects on quality, safety and organoleptic characteristics of foods: A review.
Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 57, 109-128.
Carrillo-Lopez, L.M., Alarcon-Rojo, A.D., Luna-Rodriguez, L., Reyes-Villagrana, R., 2017. Modification
of food systems by ultrasound. J. Food Quality 2017, 1-12.
SC
Fu, J.T., Chang, Y.H., Shiau, S.Y., 2015. Rheological, antioxidative and sensory properties of dough and
Mantou (steamed bread) enriched with lemon fiber. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 61, 56-62.
Higuera-Barraza, O.A., Del Toro-Sanchez, C.L., Ruiz-Cruz, S., Márquez-Ríos, E., 2016. Effects of
M
AN
U
high-energy ultrasound on the functional properties of proteins. Ultrason. Sonochem. 31, 558-562.
Hu, A., Li, L., Zheng, J., Lu, J., Meng, X., Liu, Y., Rizwan ur, R., 2014. Different-frequency ultrasonic
effects on properties and structure of corn starch. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94, 2929-2934.
Hu, H., Wu, J., Li-Chan, E.C.Y., Zhu, L., Zhang, F., Xu, X., Fan, G., Wang, L., Huang, X., Pan, S., 2013.
Effects of ultrasound on structural and physical properties of soy protein isolate (SPI) dispersions.
Food Hydrocolloids 30, 647-655.
Hu, S.-Q., Liu, G., Li, L., Li, Z.-X., Hou, Y., 2013. An improvement in the immersion freezing process for
TE
D
frozen dough via ultrasound irradiation. J. Food Eng. 114, 22-28.
Huang, G., Chen, S., Dai, C., Sun, L., Sun, W., Tang, Y., Xiong, F., He, R., Ma, H., 2017. Effects of
ultrasound on microbial growth and enzyme activity. Ultrason. Sonochem. 37, 144-149.
Jambrak, A.R., Mason, T.J., Paniwnyk, L., Lelas, V., 2007. Accelerated drying of button mushrooms,
brussels sprouts and cauliflower by applying power ultrasound and its rehydration properties. J. Food
EP
Eng. 81, 88-97.
Lanchun, S., Bochu, W., Zhiming, L., Chuanren, D., Chuanyun, D., Sakanishi, A., 2003. The research into
the influence of low-intensity ultrasonic on the growth of S.cerevisiaes. Colloid Surface B. 30, 43-49.
AC
C
Liu, J., Luo, D.L., Chen, R.H., Xu, B.C., Liu, J.X., 2016. Effects of short-chain inulin on quality of
Chinese steamed bread. J. Food Quality 39, 255-263.
Liu, R., Liu, Q., Xiong, S., Fu, Y., Chen, L., 2017. Effects of high intensity unltrasound on structural and
physicochemical properties of myosin from silver carp. Ultrason. Sonochem. 37, 150-157.
Lomakina, K., Míková, K., 2006. A study of the factors affecting the foaming properties of egg white - A
review. Czech J. Food Sci. 24, 110-118.
Luo, D., Liang, X., Xu, B., Li, P., Li, X., Han, S., Liu, J., Zhou, L., 2017. Effect of inulin with different
degree of polymerization on water redistribution of steamed bread. J. Cereal Sci. 76, 289-295.
O'Sullivan, J., Park, M., Beevers, J., 2016. The effect of ultrasound upon the physicochemical and
emulsifying properties of wheat and soy protein isolates. J Cereal Sci. 69, 77-84.
Ojha, K.S., Mason, T.J., O’Donnell, C.P., Kerry, J.P., Tiwari, B.K., 2017. Ultrasound technology for food
fermentation applications. Ultrason. Sonochem. 34, 410-417.
Ozuna, C., Paniagua-Martínez, I., Castaño-Tostado, E., Ozimek, L., Amaya-Llano, S.L., 2015. Innovative
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
applications of high-intensity ultrasound in the development of functional food ingredients:
Production of protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides. Food Res. Int. 77, 685-696.
Pa, N.F.C., Chin, N.L., Yusof, Y.A., Aziz, N.A., 2014. Power ultrasound assisted mixing effects on bread
physical properties. Agr. Agr. Sci. Procedia 2, 60-66.
Sha, K., Qian, P., Wang, L.J., Lu, Z.H., Li, L.T., 2007. Effect of storage time on the physicochemical and
sensory properties of Man-tou (Chinese steamed bread). International Journal of Food Engineering. 3,
1-17.
bioethanol productivity. Biochem. Eng. J. 54, 141-150.
RI
PT
Sulaiman, A.Z., Ajit, A., Yunus, R.M., Chisti, Y., 2011. Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances
Tan, M.C., Chin, N.L., Yusof, Y.A., 2011. Power ultrasound aided batter mixing for sponge cake batter. J
Food Eng. 104, 430-437.
van den Berg, L., Rosenberg, Y., van Boekel, M.A.J.S., Rosenberg, M., van de Velde, F., 2009.
length scales. Food Hydrocolloids 23, 1288-1298.
SC
Microstructural features of composite whey protein/polysaccharide gels characterized at different
Wu, H., Hulbert, G.J., Mount, J.R., 2000. Effects of ultrasound on milk homogenization and fermentation
with yogurt starter. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. 1, 211-218.
M
AN
U
Yong, Y., Wang, Z.J., Shuang, B.I., Sui, X.N., Bao-Kun, Q.I., Yang, L.I., Jiang, L.Z., 2016. Raman
spectroscopy study structural changes in black bean protein isolate upon ultrasonic-treatment.
Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 36, 2318-2324.
Zhang, H., Claver, I.P., Zhu, K.-X., Zhou, H., 2011. The effect of ultrasound on the functional properties
of wheat gluten. Molecules 16, 4231-4240.
Zhang, Y., Ma, H., Wang, B., Qu, W., Li, Y., He, R., Wali, A., 2015. Effects of ultrasound pretreatment
on the enzymolysis and structural characterization of wheat gluten. Food Biophys. 10, 385-395.
TE
D
Zhang, Y., Wang, B., Zhou, C., Atungulu, G.G., Xu, K., Ma, H., Ye, X., Abdualrahman, M.A.Y., 2016.
Surface topography, nano-mechanics and secondary structure of wheat gluten pretreated by alternate
dual-frequency ultrasound and the correlation to enzymolysis. Ultrason. Sonochem. 31, 267-275.
Zheng, J., Li, Q., Hu, A., Yang, L., Lu, J., Zhang, X., Lin, Q., 2013. Dual-frequency ultrasound effect on
structure and properties of sweet potato starch. Starch – Starke 65, 621-627.
EP
Zhu, F., 2015. Impact of ultrasound on structure, physicochemical properties, modifications, and
applications of starch. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 43, 1-17.
Zhu, F., Sakulnak, R., Wang, S., 2016. Effect of black tea on antioxidant, textural, and sensory properties
of Chinese steamed bread. Food Chem. 194, 1217-1223.
AC
C
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table captions:
Table 1 Effect of ultrasonic time on the quality of steamed bread
AC
C
EP
TE
D
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
Table 2 Effect of ultrasonic power density on steamed bread quality
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Time(min)
the control
20
30
40
50
Hardness(N)
6.301±0.07a
6.151±0.32ab
6.122±0.46ab
5.709±0.11b
5.152±0.20c
Springiness
0.942±0.01a
0.940±0.00a
0.946±0.00a
0.943±0.00a
0.939±0.00a
Specific volume(ml/g)
2.88±0.03b
2.75±0.11b
3.06±0.04a
3.14±0.03a
3.07±0.04a
Spread ratio
0.70±0a
0.70±0.04a
0.70±0.01a
Cohesiveness
0.755±0.01a
0.749±0.00a
Weighted score
-6.984
-20.810
RI
PT
Table 1 Effect of ultrasonic time on the quality of steamed bread
0.69±0.01a
0.67±0.01a
0.756±0.00a
0.757±0.00a
0.748±0.00a
21.018
28.704
16.410
AC
C
EP
TE
D
M
AN
U
different letters of the same line (p <0.05).
SC
The control refers steamed bread made at the optimum conditions without ultrasound treatment.
The data shown in the table are average ± SD. There was a significant difference between the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2 Effect of ultrasonic power density on steamed bread quality
Ultrasonic
power density
0 (the control)
15.38
23.08
30.77
38.46
Hardness(N)
6.087±0.14a
5.002±0.30bc
4.725±0.44c
5.519±0.25b
5.431±0.34b
Springiness
0.933±0.00ab
0.950±0.02a
0.934±0.01ab
0.936±0.00ab
0.922±0.01b
2.84±0.03c
2.98±0.04ab
3.03±0.04a
2.95±0.01ab
2.90±0.03b
Spread ratio
0.70±0.01a
0.69±0.00a
0.70±0.00a
0.71±0.00a
0.70±0.00a
Cohesiveness
0.764±0.01a
0.748±0.00a
0.750±0.00a
0.755±0.02a
0.750±0.01a
Weighted score
-17.143
26.602
34.821
12.635
-8.168
volume(ml/g)
SC
Specific
RI
PT
(W/L)
M
AN
U
The data shown in the table are average ± SD. There was a significant difference between the
AC
C
EP
TE
D
different letters of the same line (p <0.05).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure captions:
Fig. 1 The diagram of dough fermentation assisted by power ultrasound
Fig. 2 The hardness(2a), springiness(2b), cohesiveness(2c), recovery(2d), chewiness(2e) and total
moisture content(2f) of the steamed bread prepared by common fermentation method (the control)
AC
C
EP
TE
D
M
AN
U
SC
RI
PT
and ultrasound treatment during the storage of 1 h-144 h.
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
①ultrasonic bath;②water;③dough;④plastic fresh bag;⑤hollow pipe;⑥transducers
AC
C
EP
TE
D
M
AN
U
SC
Fig. 1 The diagram of dough fermentation assisted by power ultrasound
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
36
the control
withultrasound
32
28
32.152
27.360
25.914
25.970
29.313
28.268
23.243
20
24.586
23.939
21.726
21.443
20.794
16
RI
PT
Hardness(N)
24
12
8
5.873
4 5.447
0
24
48
72
96
120
0.96
the control
with ultrasound
0.92
0.90
0.877
Springiness
0.88
0.86
M
AN
U
0.940
0.939
0.94
144
SC
Time(h)
a
0.840
0.855
0.84
0.823
0.820
0.82
0.817
0.797
0.828
0.813
0.80
0.801
0.799
0.78
0
TE
D
0.76
0.784
24
48
72
96
120
144
Time(h)
2b
0.8
EP
0.798
0.790
the control
with ultrasound
0.7
Cohesiveness
AC
C
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.451
0.401
0.364
0.425
0.369
0.340
0.3
0.340
0.321
0.383
0.334
0.320
0.321
96
120
144
0.2
0
24
48
72
Time(h)
2c
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
0.48
0.45
0.447
0.42
0.425
the control
with ultrasound
0.39
0.36
Recovery
0.33
0.30
0.27
0.24
0.18
0.162
0.15
0.154
0.134
0.125
0.125
0.146
0.12
0.133
24
48
0.119
0.109
0.111
0.09
0
72
0.104
96
120
0.105
144
SC
Time(h)
2d
11
the control
with ultrasound
10
9.442
8.591
8.912
9.199
8
7
M
AN
U
9
Chewiness
RI
PT
0.21
7.641
6.986
6
7.463
8.541
7.059
6.163
5.570
4.400
4.044
5
4
5.501
0
TE
D
3
24
48
72
96
120
144
Time(h)
e
40.0
the control
with ultrasound
39.5
39.0
38.5
38.71
AC
C
Total moisture content(%)
EP
39.04
39.02
39.03
39.12
38.81
38.76
38.67
38.95
38.73
38.73
38.42
38.30
38.0
38.12
37.5
37.0
0
24
48
72
96
120
144
Time(h)
2f
Fig. 2 The hardness(2a), springiness(2b), cohesiveness(2c), recovery(2d), chewiness(2e) and total
moisture content(2f) of the steamed bread prepared by common fermentation method (the control)
and ultrasound treatment during the storage of 1 h-144 h.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights:
1. Ultrasound assisted dough fermentation had considerable impact on the quality of
steamed bread.
RI
PT
2. Ultrasound treatment can improve quality of the steamed bread.
3. Compared to the control, the hardness of fresh steamed bread treated by ultrasound
reduced by 22.4%, and the specific volume increased by 6.7%.
SC
4. During the storage of steamed bread, the hardness with ultrasound was remarkably
AC
C
EP
TE
D
M
AN
U
lower than that of the control.
Download