Uploaded by Sunamaid Balamaid

Aspect of Bura Phonology

advertisement
ASPECTS OF BURA PHONOLOGY
OLALEKAN OLUWASEUN PAUL
07/15CB078
A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
LINGUISTICS AND NIGERIAN LANGUAGES,
FACULTY OF ARTS, UNIVERSITY OF ILORIN
ILORIN – NIGERIA
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS (B. A. HONS) IN
LINGUISTICS
JUNE, 2011.
CERTIFICATION
This essay has been read and approved as meeting the requirements of
the Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Ilorin, Ilorin,
Nigeria.
MR. S. A. AJE
Project Supervisor
DATE
PROF. A. S. ABDUSSALAM
DATE
EXTERNAL EXAMINER
DATE
Head of Department
DEDICATION
This project is dedicated to Almighty God, Alpha and Omega for His love,
mercy and grace over my life and for seeing me through my programme in the
University of Ilorin.
I also dedicate this project to my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Olalekan Abolanle,
for their financial and moral support and also for their increasing prayers to
ensure that I achieve the best in life.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
God’s reflection of love, care, mercy, goodness, guidance and inspiration
has made this project a reality. I thank God and people that have supported me
in one way or the other to make this dream an everlasting record.
I am particularly in-depted to my supervisor, Mr. S. A. Aje, for his sincere
concern, guidance, patience, understanding and his words of wisdom. You have
deposited what money cannot buy in me. May God keep blessing you sir,
(Amen).
I am also immensely grateful to my dearest mother, lecturer, Mrs.
Abubakre, for her deliberate support over my academic life and specially this
project, despite the huddles of life she never stopped encouraging, guiding and
supporting me by advising and providing necessary materials when needed. May
God reward her efforts. (Amen).
However, for the academic inspiration and support of the Head of
Department (H.O.D), Professor Abdussalam and my wonderful lecturers in the
Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages and that of the Faculty of
Arts. I am grateful.
Gratefull am to my friends and colleagues who played important roles in
the course of this project. May God’s mercy always be with you all (Amen).
Without God, there is no my parents, without my parents, there is no me
and without me there is no this project, and for this project to come true, it has
been the support of my parents Mr. and Mrs. Olalekan Abolanle for their moral,
spiritual, financial, support and guidance. I am indeed very grateful. I am also
grateful to my sisters and brother namely: Atinuke Omosefunmi, Olanike Utulu
and Olalekan Abiodun, for their advice, focus over my activities and challenges of
life, may God guide you in all of your endeavours (Amen).
I wish to thank my informants, Mr. Simon Shelia and Pastor Ishaku Bitrus
Nda for their unmeasurable efforts made over this project, may God fulfill your
aims and objectives (Amen).
Finally, I want to give thanks to the typist of this project, Mr. Sunkanmi for
his full interest he had, to make sure that this project is a must of success in
year 2011, I feel honoured and grateful, may God keep you His mercy (Amen).
LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
C.
-
a consonant
V.
-
a vowel
~
-
nasalization
[]
-
a phonetic transcription
//
-
a phonemic transcription

-
change
+
-
morpheme boundary
#
-
word boundary
-
-
position of change
/
-
environment of change
H
-
high tone
L
-
low tone
M
-
mid tone
[/]
-
high tone
[\]
-
low tone

-
null or empty
C1C2 -
consonant cluster
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
i
Certification
ii
Dedication
iii
Acknowledgements
iv
List of Symbols and Abbreviations
vi
Table of Contents
vii
List of Figures
xi
CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0
Introduction
1
1.1
General Background of the Language
1
1.2
Historical Background of Bura Speakers
2
1.3
Sociolinguistic Profile of Bura People
2
1.4
Genetic Classification
3
1.4.1 Genetic Classification of Bura
4
1.4.2 A Map of Bura
5
1.5
Scope and Organization of Study
6
1.6
Theoretical Framework
6
1.7
Data Collection
7
1.8
Data Analysis
8
1.9
Brief Review of the Chosen Framework
9
1.9.1 Motivation for Generative Phonology
10
1.9.2 Operational Levels of Generative Phonology
11
1.9.3 The Underlying Level
12
1.9.4 The Surface Level
12
1.9.5 Phonological Rules
13
CHAPTER TWO: BASIC PHONOLOGICAL CONCEPTS
2.0 Introduction
14
2.1
Distribution of Consonants
14
2.1.1 Bura Consonant Inventory
22
2.1.2 Distinctive Feature Classification of Bura Consonants
23
2.1.3 Justification of features
24
2.1.4 The Redundancies in Bura Consonant Sounds
27
Bura Vowel Inventory
29
2.2.1 Distribution of Vowels
30
2.2
2.2.1.1 Distribution of Nasals
31
2.2.2 Distinctive Feature Classification of Bura Vowel
33
2.2.3 The Redundancies in Bura Vowel Sounds
34
2.2.4 Tonal Inventory
35
2.2.5 Syllabic Inventory
36
CHAPTER THREE: PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN BURA LANGUAGE
3.0
Introduction
38
3.1
Phonological Processes
38
3.1.1 Syllabic Structure Processes
39
3.1.1.1 Deletion/Elision
39
3.1.1.2 Insertion/Epenthesis
41
3.1.2 Euphonic Processes
43
3.1.2.1 Assimilation
44
3.1.2.1.1 Nasalization
46
CHAPTER FOUR: SYLLABLE AND TONAL PROCESSES
4.0
Introduction
48
4.1
Syllable Process
48
4.1.1 Auto Segmental Analysis
50
4.1.2 Monosyllabic Words
50
4.1.3 Disyllabic Words
52
4.1.4 Trisyllabic Words
59
Tonal Processes
62
4.2.1 Tone Pattern and Distribution
63
4.2
4.2.2 Polarization
66
4.2.3 Tone Stability
67
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.0
Introduction
69
5.1
Summary
69
5.2
Conclusion
71
5.3
Recommendations
72
References
73
LISTS OF FIGURES
1.
Map of Bura
2.
Genetic Classification of Bura
3.
Consonant Chart of Bura
4.
Fully Specified Matrix of Bura Consonant
5.
Partially Specified Matrix of Bura Consonant
6.
Vowel Chart of Bura
7.
Fully Specified Matrix of Bura Vowels
8.
Partially Specified Matrix of Bura Vowels
9.
The Structure of the Syllable
CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0
INTRODUCTION
As an introductory chapter, we shall focus on the historical background of
Bura, sociolinguistic profile of the people and the genetic classification of the
language. Other sub-headings in this chapter include the scope and organization
of study, theoretical framework, data collection, data analysis, and a brief review
of the chosen framework.
1.1
GENETIC BACKGROUND OF THE LANGUAGE
Bura is a language spoken in two adjacent states in the north-eastern part
of Nigeria. Native speakers of Bura are found in the southern part of Borno and
northern Part of Adamawa. In Borno state, native speakers are found, precisely,
in Gwoza and Damboa districts while in Adamawa state, they live around
Madagalik, Gulak, Duhu and Isge.
In terms of population of speakers, the SIL website ethnologue counts
250,000 ‘Bura’ altogether (SIL, 1993).
1.2
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF BURA SPEAKERS
As stated above, native speakers of Bura are found in southern part of
Borno in Borno state and northern part of Adamawa in Adamawa state. In Borno
state, native speakers are found, precisely, in Gwoza and Damba districts while
in Adamawa state, they live around Madagalik, Gulak, Duhu and Isgel.
The people of Duhu in Adamawa state migrated from Sukur mountain.
Sukur mountain is located in Gombi Local Government Area in Adamawa state.
The migration was due to the growth in their population and search for farm
land.
Quite a number of Bura speakers are literate. This is as a result of early
contact with the Church of Brethen (CBM) Missionaries which brought education
and medical care to Bura people.
1.3
SOCIOLINGUISTIC PROFILE OF BURA LANGUAGE
The Bura people have a very rich sociolinguistic profile just like many
African people. These include their system of government with the king as the
head. The king is assisted by leaders of different units like farming and army,
known as ‘Lawans’. Christianity, Islam and African Traditional Religion (ATR) are
the religions practiced by Bura people. A rough estimate of the religious
percentages is as follows: Muslim 78%, Christians 20%, Traditionalists 2%.
Traditionally, Bura people wear the normal Hausa attaire and carry sticks
(especially those on mountain). The women are seen with skirts and wrapper
which they tie on one side above the shoulder. Their hair is always cut short and
covered with a calabash.
The economic system of Bura agriculture. In fact, agriculture is the
dominant occupation of the Bura. Among their festivals are ‘maize harvest’
festival which performed before fresh corn can be eaten and ‘mbal’ festival for
both men and women who are suitable for marriage.
1.4
GENETIC CLASSIFICATION
Bura, Comrie (1987: 706) and Newman (1977) quoted in Meritt (1991:
92), is classified under Bura group of Biu-Mandara branch of Chadic sub-family of
the Afro-Asiatic Phylum. This is shown by the family tree below.
AFRICA
Niger-Kodorfania
Afro-Asiatic Nilo-Saharan
Egyptian
Cushitic
Semitic
West Chadic
Tera
Kotoko
Group Group
Biu Mandara
Omotic
Khoisan
Berber
East Chadic
Bura
Higi
Mandara
Group
Group Group
Chadic
Masa
Matakam
Sukur
Daba
Bata
Group
Group Group Group
Kilba
Chibak
Bura(Pabir)
1.4.1 GENETIC CLASSIFICATION OF BURA
Margi
Puta
1.4.2 A MAP OF BURA
1.5
SCOPE AND ORGANIZATION
This long essay is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the
introductory chapter which will contain the general introduction of the research,
the historical background of the speakers, sociolinguistic profile of Bura people,
genetic classification of the language, collection and analysis of the data and the
theoretical framework employed.
Chapter two deals with basic phonological concepts such as the sound
inventory, tonal inventory, syllable inventory and sound distribution. The chapter
ends with a distinctive feature classification of distinctive sounds of the language.
Finally, chapter five summarizes and concludes the work.
1.6
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This project is theoretically modelled according to ‘generative’ grammar, a
theory propounded by Chomsky in the 1950s. A generative grammar consists of
a set of formal statements which delimit all and only all possible structures that
are part of the language in question. The basic aim of a generative of linguistics
to present in a formal way the tacit knowledge native speakers have of their
language.
1.7
DATA COLLECTION
The data used for this project was collected from native speakers of the
language. The data was collected through the use of the Ibadan word of 400
basic items.
Below are pieces of information about the informants.
1.
NAME:
Simon Shelia
SEX:
Male
AGE:
39
OCCUPATION:
Lecturing
NUMBER OF YEARS SPENT IN BURA: 26 years
OTHER LANGUAGES SPOKEN: English, Hausa, Chibok
2.
NAME:
Ishaku Bitrus Ndah
SEX:
Male
AGE:
37
OCCUPATION:
An Evangelist
NUMBER OF YEARS SPENT IN BURA: Occasionally during holidays
OTHER LANGUAGES SPOKEN: English, Hausa, Fufulde
1.8
DATA ANALYSIS
On collection of the data, the researcher listens to the recorded tape and
writes the words in a chosen orthography and transcribes the words phonetically.
By doing this, the researcher was able to observe the behaviour of
segments in the language. The principle of minimal pair (a principle of identifying
contrastive sounds) was used as a technique for identifying contrastive
segments. Through this, the researcher accounts for the sound inventory and the
syllable inventory of the language. The minimal pair principle was also used in
accounting for the tonal inventory of the language. Words that are homographic
but differ in pitch (tone) are treated as distinct words. Such contrast is analyzed
as the language attesting distinct tonemes, hence, the language being tonal.
Sounds are also examined in terms of their distribution. That is, the
structural positions in which a sound can occur or occurs and the class of sounds
that can pattern together in a given structural position. This triggers an ‘if-then’
condition that warrants the use of distinctive features and the postulation of
phonological rules and rule formalization.
1.9
BRIEF REVIEW OF THE CHOSEN FRAMEWORK
This project is theoretically built on the mode of Generative Grammar
(G.G). The generative approach of language puts greater emphasis on the need
for a linguistic analysis to have explanatory power, that is, to explain adequately
what the native speaker intuitively ‘knows’ about his language (Hawkins, 1984:
22). Generative grammar’s meaning is something like ‘the complete description
of a language’, that is, what the sounds are and how they combine, what the
meaning of the words are, etc. (Davenport and Hannahs, 2005: 4).
Generative Phonology is particularly associated with the works of the
American linguist, Noam Chomsky and his followers. The joint work on
phonology by Chomsky and Halle published in 1968 as ‘sound patterns of
English’ (SPE) marked the emergence of generative phonology as a new theory
and framework of description.
Generative Phonology is an alternative to ‘taxonomic’ or ‘classical’
phonemics, and on the other an ambitious attempt to build a description of
‘English’ phonology on a transformational-generative theory of language (Clark
Yallop and Fltehcer, 2007: 129). Chomsky criticizes the taxonomic phonologists
concerned with segmentation, contrast, distribution and biuniqueness and puts
forward the view that phonological description is not based on analytic
procedures of segmentation and classification but rather a matter of constructing
the set of rules that constitute the phonological component of a grammar (P.
129).
1.9.1 MOTIVATION FOR GENERATIVE PHONOLOGY
Generative Phonology is a theory which built on the insights of taxonomic
phonemes even while remodelling the focus of phonological analysis (Oyebade,
2008: 9). It seeks to resolve many issues that the former theory (Taxonomic
Phonemics) left unaddressed. These include: Linguistic intuition, Foreign Accents,
Speech errors and Language aquisition.
Talking about ‘Linguistic Intuition’, the question that Generative Phonology
attempt to answer is ‘how do we know that native speakers know the sequential
constraints of their own language (Hyman, 1957: 19)’? Chomsky and Halle
(1968: 38) affirm that knowledge of the sequential constraints is responsible for
the fact that speakers of a language have a sense of what sounds like a native
word and what does not. In other words, speakers usually subject the sounds of
foreign languages they intend pronouncing to the phonological pattern of their
own language.
A third motivation for GP is ‘speech errors’. Oyebade (2008: 11) reports
that a large number of utterances heard by man are defective, possibly as a
result of slips of the tongue, stress, stage fright, paralinguistic factors,
psychological, as well as physiological factors.
The final motivation of GP is ‘language acquisition’. The errors children
usually make when they are attempting to discover the phonology of their own
language during the stage of language acquisition is quite revealing.
1.9.2
OPERATIONAL LEVELS OF GENERATIVE PHONOLOGY
There are two operational levels/representations of generative phonology:
the underlying level/representation and the surface level/representation.
Between these two extremes is an intermediary that mediates or the underlying
level to generate surface representations. The mediators are phonological rules
(Oyebade, 2008: 15).
1.9.3 THE UNDERLYING LEVEL
The underlying level/representation is also called the phonemic or
phonological level/representation. The underlying representation represents the
native speaker’s tacit knowledge (Chomsky and Halle 1968: 14) specifically
propose that phonological representation are mentally constructed by the
speaker and the hearer and underlie their actual performance in spelling and
“understanding”. The underlying representation are relatively abstract and do not
manifest surface variants.
1.9.4 THE SURFACE LEVEL
The surface representation, on the other hand, is the physical instatiation
of underlying forms (Davenport and Hannahs, 2005: 122). The surface
representation can be likened to performance – the actual use of language. It is
also called the phonetic level because it deals with the physical manipulation of
the organ speech to produce linguistic forms. It is accompanied with a lot of
nuances that do not characterize the native speaker’s competence, hence, its
predictableness. They are complete with lexical items and reflect the
grammatical rules of the language.
1.9.5 PHONOLOGICAL RULES
Since the underlying/phonemic level differs from the surface level,
phonological rules serve as mediators between these two extremes. Phonological
rules link them together. Phonological rules are facts that are expressed in
formal statements which act on the information stored in the human’s (native
speaker’s) instinct. Phonological rules that act on underlying forms of the
language to yield surface phonetic forms.
CHAPTER TWO
BASIC PHONOLOGICAL CONCEPTS
2.0
INTRODUCTION
This chapter examines key concepts in phonology. To be also considered
in this chapter are the sound, tones, and syllable inventory of the language. A
distinctive feature classification of the distribution sounds of language as well as
knowledge of the distribution of sounds in language is also included in this
chapter.
2.1
DISTRIBUTION OF CONSONANTS
/p/
Voiceless Bilabial Plosive
pífù
‘heart’
sírípí
‘mat’
m‫כ‬sùp
/b/
‘spear’
Voiced Bilabial Plosive
batahu
‘arm’
àjàbà
‘plantain’
àjàbà
‘plantain’
/k/
Voiceless Velar Plosive
kútá
‘belly’
fùkũ
‘chin’
mũsúmakì
‘hunter’
/g/
Voiced Velar Plosive
gàrí
‘mountain’
dĩgìa ‘knife’
dĩgìa ‘knife’
/t/
Voiceless Alveolar Plosive
tílì
‘saliva’
kútá ‘belly’
kútá ‘belly’
/d/
Voiced Alveolar Plosive
dìr
‘town’
dзãdà ‘tongue’
dзãdà ‘tongue’
/l/
Voiced Alveolar Liquid
lìà
‘iron’
álí
‘leaf’
sìl
‘leg’
/r/
Voiced Alveolar Liquid
ráká
‘small’
dárè
‘taste’
dárè
‘taste’
/f/
Voiceless Labio-Dental Fricative
fùkũ ‘chin’
pífù
‘heart’
pífù
‘heart’
/v/
Voiced Labio-Dental Fricative
vìrì
‘day’
ivìrì
‘fear’
ivìrì
/h/
‘fear’
Voiced Glottal Fricative
hir
‘teeth’
ùhà
‘breast’
ùhà
‘breast’
/kw/ Voiceless Labialized Alveolar Plosive
kwárá
‘donkey’
skwár
‘soup’
skwár
‘soup’
/gw/ Voiced Labialized Alveolar Plosive
gwòrò
‘kolanut’
kugwà
‘calabash’
kugwà
‘calabash’
/bw/ Voiced Bilabial Plosive
bwa
‘push’
mbwà ‘groom’
nábuà‘door’
/fw/ Voiced Labio-Dental Affricate
tónfùà
‘leopard’
tónfùà
‘leopard’
tónfùà
‘leopard’
/kp/ Voiceless Labio-Velar Plosive
kpá
‘beat’
kpá
‘beat’
kpá
‘beat’
/gb/ Voiced Labio-Velar Plosive
gègégbó
‘heavy’
bógbá
‘strong’
bógbá
‘strong’
/m/ Voiced Bilabial Nasal
mamì
‘blood’
lmu
‘orange’
s‫כ‬m
‘ear’
/n/
Voiced Alveolar Nasal
ninim
‘sweet’
hóná
‘salt’
hóná
‘salt’
/ŋ/
Voiced Velar Nasal
ŋgilà ‘refuse’
ŋgilà ‘refuse’
ŋgilà ‘refuse’
/‫ת‬/ Voiced Palatal Velar
‫ת‬árá
‘lick’
‫ת‬árá
‘lick’
‫ת‬árá
‘lick’
/m/ Voiced Bilabial Fricative
mfà
‘tree’
mfà
‘tree’
mfà
‘tree’
/j/
Voiced Palatal
jímí
‘water’
d‫כ‬já ‘cassava’
d‫כ‬ja ‘cassava’
/w/ Voiced Labio-Velar
wàdá
‘groundnut’
ùwùlàím
‘charcoal’
ùwùlàím
‘charcoal’
//
Voiceless Palato-Alveolar Fricative
ámbárí
‘wind’
íí
‘hair’
íí
‘hair’
/з/
Voiced Palato-Alevolar Fricative
mãзà ‘red’
mãзà ‘red’
mãзà ‘red’
/t/ Voiceless Palato-Alveolar Affricate
tívì
‘feaces’
tívì
‘feaces’
tívì
‘feaces’
/dз/ Voiced Palato-Alevolar Affricate
dзãdà
‘tongue’
mãdзa
‘oil palm’
mãdзa
‘oil palm’
2.1.1 BURA CONSONANT INVENTORY
Consonants are sounds made by exploiting the articulatory capabilities of
the tongue, teeth and lips in such a way that airflow through the mouth cavity is
radically constricted or even temporarily blocked (Clark, Yallop and Fletcher,
2007: 13). Bura attests the following consonants: pb, td , kg, lr, mnŋm, hfv, sz,
kp gb, kw gw, jw, bw, fw, ʒ, t, dз. The above consonants are represented in a
chart thus:
Labialized
plosive
Fricative
bw
f
Labialized
fricative
Affricate
Nasal
v
d
s z

ʒ
t
dʒ
Kp
gb
m
Lateral
Flap
Approximant
Bura Consonant Chart
n
gw
h
fw
m
Kw
Glottal
kg
Labialize
d velar
Palatal
Palatoalveolar
Aveolar
t
Labiovelar
p b
Velar
Plosive
Labio
dental
Bilabial
PLACE OF ARTICULATION
n
ŋ
j
w
l
r
p
b
t
d
k
g
kw
gw
bw
fw
kp
gb

ʒ
dʒ
+ CONS
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ SON
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+ CONT
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
+ NAS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+ DEREL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+ LAT
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+ VOICE
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+ STRID
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+ COR
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
+ ANT
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+ LAB
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
t
m
n
ŋ
n
m
h
j
w
s
z
l
r
f
v
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
Fully Specified Matrix
2.1.2 DISTINCTIVE FEATURE CLASSIFICATION OF BURA CONSONANT
p
b
t
d
k
g
kw
gw
bw
fw
kp
gb

з
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
dз
t
m
n
ŋ
n
m
h
j
w
s
z
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
l
r
f
v
+
+
+
+ CONS
+ SON
+ CONT
+ NAS
+ DEREL
+ LAT
-
-
-
-
-
+ VOICE
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+ STRID
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+ COR
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ ANT
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+ LAB
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
Partial Specified Matrix
-
-
-
+
-
-
2.1.3 JUSTIFICATION OF FEATURES
According to Oyebade (2008: 29-33), the foregoing features are defined as
follows:
1.
Syllabic [+ Syll]: they are sounds that constitute syllabic peaks (vowels,
syllabic consonants versus glides, non syllabic consonants).
2.
High [+ High]: High sounds are produced by raising the tongue
body
toward the palate (high vowels versus low vowels).
3.
Low [+ Low]: Low sounds are produced by drawing the body of the
tongue down away from the roof of the mouth (Low vowels versus high
vowels).
4.
Back [+ Back]: Back sounds are produced with the tongue body
relatively retracted (back vowels versus front vowels).
5.
Round [+ Round]: Round sounds are produced with protrusion of the
lips (rounded vowels versus front vowel).
6.
Advanced Tongue Root [+ ATR]: They are sounds produced by drawing
the root of the tongue forward [i, e, o, u, vs , ‫כ‬, a].
7.
Tense [+ Tense]: They are produced with a tongue body involving a
greater of constriction than that found in their lax counterpart (tense
versus lax vowels).
According to Oyebade (2008: 29-33), the above distinctive features are
justified as follows:
1.
Consonant [+ Cons]: They are sounds produced with a sustained vocal
tract constriction (obstruents, nasals, liquids versus vowels and glides).
2.
Sonorant [+ Son]: Sonorants are produced with a vocal tract
configuration suffcieitnly open that the air pressure inside and outside
the mouth is approximately equal (vowels, glides, liquids nasals versus
stops, and fricatives).
3.
Continuants [+ Cont]: They are sounds formed with a vocal tract
configuration allowing the aristream to flow through the midsaggital
region of the oral tract (vowels, glides, fricatives versus nasal, oral
stops).
4.
Nasals [+ nas]: nasals are pr oduced by lowering the velum so that the
air passes through the nasal cavity (nasals versus other sounds).
xxxvii
5.
Delayed Release [+ derel]: They are sound produced by totally
constricting the airstream at specific points in the oral tract and
releasing it gradually [affricates versus other sounds).
6.
Lateral [+ lat]: Laterals are produced with the tongue placed in such a
way as to prevent the airstream from flowing outward through the
centre of the mouth (lateral, sonorant versus all others).
7.
Voice [+ Voice]: Voiced sounds are produced with periodic vibration of
the vocal cords; voiceless sounds lack such periodic vibration (voiced
versus voiceless consonants).
8.
Strident [+ Strid]: Strident sounds are produced with a complex
constriction forcing the airstream to strike two surfaces, producing
fricative noise (sibilants, labiodentals versus all others).
9.
Coronal [+ Cor]: Coronals are produced by raising the tongue blade
towards the teeth or the hard palate (dentals, alveolars, palatoalveolars, palatals versus labials, velars).
10.
Anterior [+ ant]: Anterior sounds are produced with a primary
constriction at or in front of the alveolar ridge (labials, dentals,
alveolars, versus palato-alveolars, palatals, velars).
xxxviii
11.
Labial [+ lab]: Labials are formed with constriction at the lips (labial
consonants versus all others).
2.1.4 THE REDUNDANCIES IN BURA CONSONANT SOUNDS
1.
if:
[+ son]


then [-derel]
2.
if:
[+ cont]


Then: [-nas]
3.
If:
[+ strid]


Then: [- lat]
4.
If:
[+ son]


Then: [- strid]
xxxix
5.
If:
[+ nas]


Then: [+ voice]
6.
If:
[+ derel]


Then: [- son]
7.
If:
[+ nas]


Then: [- cont]
8.
If:
[+ cont]


Then: [- derel]
9.
If:
[+ nas]


Then: [- lat]
10.
If:
[+ derel]


Then: [- son]
xl
xli
2.2
Bura Vowel Inventory
Bura Oral Vowels
Front
High
Central
Back
i
Mid-high
u
e
Mid-low
o

ε
Low
a
Bura Nasal Vowels
Front
High
low
Back
ĩ
Mid-high
Mid-low
Central
Ũ
ẽ
õ
‫כ‬
ε
ã
2.2.1 Distribution of Vowels
xlii
/i/
High front Unrounded Vowel
ivìrì
‘fear’
ninim
‘sweet’
ímí
‘bad’
/u/
High Back Rounded Vowel
ùhà
‘breast’
wulia
‘neck’
pífù
‘heart’
/e/
Mid-High Front Unrounded Vowel
èù
‘bone’
délépá
makè
/o/
‘dawn’
‘three’
Mid-High Back Rounded Vowel
ómdá
‘nine’
pósó
‘darkness’
sófó
‘bat’
xliii
//
Mid-Low Front Unrounded Vowel
lmu
‘orange’
jbí
‘rope’
jímírìh
‘rain’
// Mid-Low back Rounded Vowel
mpù
‘white’
djá
‘cassava’
djá
‘cassava’
/a/
Low-Back Unrounded Vowel
álí
‘leaf’
lálè
‘bow’
kusa
‘grass’
2.2.1.1 Distribution of Nasals
/ĩ/
High Front Nasal Unrounded Vowel
sĩbùrù
‘navel’
nsĩsé
‘sit’
jrĩ
‘millet’
xliv
/ũ/
High Back nasal Rounded Vowel
mũsí
‘dwell’
sũnì
‘dream’
sũnì
‘dream’
/ẽ/
Mid-High Front Nasal Unrounded Vowel
ŋgẽlèm
‘crocodile’
ŋgẽlèm
‘crocodile’
kialẽ
‘child’
/õ/
Mid-High Back Nasal Rounded Vowel
õdòkúmádi ‘ninety’
àrúõfùà
‘four hundred’
tehõtà
‘delegate’
//
Mid Low Front Nasal Unrounded Vowel
dʒlì ‘play’
bjì
‘friend’
bjì
‘friend’
// Mid-Low Back Nasal Rounded Vowel
gb ‘thigh’
xlv
gb ‘thigh’
gb ‘thigh’
/ã/
Low Back Nasal Unrounded Vowel
àtó
‘was’
dɔãdà‘tongue’
dɔãdà‘tongue’
2.2.2 Distinctive Feature Classification of Bura Vowel
Fully Specified Matrix
+
+
+
+
+
+
I
Syll
+
High
+
Low
Back
ATR
+
Tense +
e
+
+
+
-

+
+
-
a
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
-
o
+
+
+
+
-
u
+
+
+
+
+

a

o
u
-
+
+
Partial Specified Matrix
I
+
+
+
+
+
Syll
High
Low
Back
ATR
e
xlvi
+ Tense +
-
-
+
2.2.3 The Redundancies in Bura Vowel Sounds
1.
If:
[- syll]


Then: [- low]
2.
If:
[-back]


Then: [- low]
3.
If:
[+ high]


Then: [+ ATR]
4.
If:
[+ round]


Then: [+ back]
5.
If:
[-ATR]


Then: [- round]
6.
If:
[- back]
xlvii
-
-
+


Then: [- round]
2.2.4 TONAL INVENTORY
Bura attests three register tones: high [/], mid (unmarked) and low [\].
The data below attest to thus:
High Tone:
úvúm
‘cotton’
jímí
‘water’
íí
‘hair’
kútá
‘belly’
púl
‘nail’
Mid Tone
hil
‘guinea corn’
kusa
‘grass’
lεmu
‘orange’
wulia
‘neck’
ksuku
‘market’
Low Tone
xlviii
dì
‘ground’
vìrì
‘day’
ùhà
‘breast’
fàkù
‘dry season’
hà
‘song’
2.2.5 SYLLABIC INVENTORY
Bura has three basic syllable structures:
(1)
CVC
(2)
CCV
(3)
CV
xlix
CVC
hil
‘guinea corn’
sm
‘ear’
hir
‘teeth’
sìl
‘leg’
màl
‘oil’
CCV
ndá
‘person’
púá
‘pour’
nbà
‘burn’
CV
sà
‘beat’
sí
‘hand’
jí
‘body’
dì
‘ground’
tà
‘die’
l
CHAPTER THREE
PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN BURA LANGUAGE
3.0
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, we shall examine the phonological processes of Bura. The
following processes, which the language attests shall be discussed: deletion,
insertion, assimilation and nasalization.
3.1
PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES
Phonological processes are results of pronunciation in connected speech.
In connected speech, certain segments have the tendency to run together; extra
segments may be added to ensure smoothness of speech some segments adopt
a less clearly defined phonetic form; and some completely disappear.
Phonological processes are therefore, sound modifications motivated by the need
to maintain euphony in a language or to rectify violations of well-formedness
constrains in the production of an utterance (Oyebade, 2008: 61). Oyebade
classifies phonological processes into two: syllable structure processes and
euphonic processes.
li
3.1.1 SYLLABLE STRUCTURE PROCESSES IN BURA LANGUAGE
According to Oyebade (2008: 62), syllable structure processes are
phonological processes which involve the modification of a derived syllable
structure to conform with a language preferred syllable structure through the
manipulation of distribution of vowels and consonants in a word. Deletion,
coalescence and epenthesis are examples of phonological processes classified
under syllable structure processes. With respect to Bura, however the following
are attested: deletion/elision and insertion/epenthesis.
3.1.1.1 DELETION/ELISION
It is a phonological process common in languages. It involves the loss of a
segment under some language-specifically imposed conditions. Deletion involving
vowels is called elision. Vowels are usually elided when two or more vowels
occur across morpheme boundary in which case the first or the second of the
contiguous vowels may be dropped. Bura attests both consonant deletion and
vowel elision. The data below illustrate this phenomenon.
1.
/kúgùnà/
+
money
2.
/súsúm/
/nbùà/

house
+
/ndásì/
[kúgùnàbùà]
‘house rent’

lii
[súsumdási]
3.
4.
food
swallow
‘swallow food’
/malukum/ +
/kìlfà/ 
[malukumìlfà]
fat
fish
‘big fish’
/dákù/
+
good
house
/nbùà/

[dakùbùà]
‘beautiful house’
Prose Statement:
A consonant get deleted when two consonants followed each other at the
morpheme boundary.
Formal Statement:
C

/+
Vowel Elision:
1.
2.
3.
4.
/tímbá/
+ /àdè/  [tmbádè]
pepper
grind
‘grind pepper’
/ímí/ +
/ivìrì/  [ímívìrì]
bad
fear
/pálá/ +
/ivìrì/  [pálávìrì]
big
fear
‘heavy fear’
/sóltà/
+
/àyàbà/
‘bad fear’
liii

[sóltàyàbà]
fry
5.
banana
/hólhólá/
+
dry
/èshù/
‘friend plantain’

bone
[hólhóláshù]
‘dry bones’
The above data show explicitly that the second of two contiguous vowels
is elided in Bura. This process can be captured using the rule format thus:
V

[+ Syll]
/V +
[Syll]
This rule says that a vowel is deleted if it occurs after a similar vowel
across word boundary.
3.1.1.2 Insertion/Epenthesis
Insertion or epenthesis involves the introduction of an extraneous segment
into an utterance in order to break up unwanted or unallowed sequences.
Although consonant insertion is rare in language, vowel insertion is not an
uncommon occurrence.
Insertion is not limited breaking up clusters; it is also manifested at the
end of words to ensure that a closed syllable does not end a word. It could also
introduce an extraneous vowel at the beginning of a word-prothesis as
exemplifies in Spanish. However, Bura does not attest prothesis, rather it allows
liv
certain consonants to end a word. Examples of vowel insertion to break up
unwanted sequence can be shown by the following:
/CP/
 [kpu]
‘cup’
/ta’ma:tau/  [tamatiru]
‘tomato’
/’teibl/
 [tebu]
‘table’
/’mauta/
 [‘moto]
‘motor’
Epenthesis is a very common phenomenon in the loan-word phonology of
many African languages. The Hausa words borrowed into Bura. For example, are
shown in the following:
Hausa
Bura
makaranta
‘school’
makaranta
lemú
‘orange’ lemú
‘orange’
àyàbà
‘banana’
‘banana’
àyàbà
‘school’
Bura also borrowed from Yoruba language as seen in:
Yoruba
Bura
bàbá
‘father’
bàbá
‘father’
màmá
‘mother’
màmá
‘mother’
àdá
‘cutlass’
àdá
‘cutlass’
lv
Although, Bura permits consonant cluster involving a nasal sound and any
other sound or approximants and (e.g. [nja] ‘mouth,’ [mbál] ‘palm wine’ [mfà]
‘tree’, [ndʒerìl] ‘mortar’, [npa] ‘war’ [ŋgẽlèm] ‘crocodile’, etc.). It is observed that
Bura allows certain consonants ([m, n, p, l, r] to end a word. Where there are no
such sounds at the end of a word, a vowel ends.
However, we also observed that there are sequence of non-nasal
consonant which are attested in Bura language. The following, are the examples
given below:
[sáptá]
[hàlhàlà]
[hólhólá]
‘gather’
‘old’
‘dry’
3.1.2 EUPHONIC PROCESSES
In section 3.1.1.1 above, we examined syllable structure processes as the
first category of phonological processes. In this section, we shall discuss the
second category-euphonic processes. Oyebade (2008) says phonological
processes classified under this category ‘make pronunciation easier or pleasing to
the ear’. Among these processes are assimilation and vowel harmony. Since
lvi
Bura, a Chadic language, does not attest vowel harmony, we shall limit our
discussion to assimilation.
3.1.2.1 ASSIMILATION
Assimilation occurs in an environment where two contiguous sounds with
different modes of production become identical in some or all of the features of
their production. It is the modification of a sound in order to make it more similar
to some other sound in its neighbourhood (Katamba, 1989: 80). Katamba reports
that assimilation is advantageous because it results in smoother, more effortless,
more economical transitions from one sound to another. He went further to say
that assimilation facilitates the task of speaking; and that native speakers
generally usually try to conserve energy by using no more effort than necessary
to produce an utterance.
In terms of directionality, assimilation could be anticipatory/regressive or
preservative/progressive.
(Katamba, 1989: 84 and Oyebade, 2008: 62). It is anticipatory or
regressive if a sound changes to become more like the sound that follows it.
Conversely, it is preservative or progressive if a sound becomes more like the
sound that precedes it. The Bura data below show cases of assimilation.
lvii
DATA A:
/ngèlà/
 [ŋgèlà]
‘abuse’
/nkà/
 [ŋkà]
‘return’
/ngilà/
 [ŋgilà]
‘refuse’
/ngegírítà/  [ŋgegírítà]
‘pull’
The data above describe a case of regressive or anticipatory assimilation in
Bura. as clearly shown in the data, the underlying alveolar nasal /n/, in
anticipation of the velar sounds, changes to a velar nasal [ŋ]. This can formally
expressed thus:
lviii
+ nasal
+ ant
+ cor
+ nas
+ ant
- cor
+obst
- cont
- ant
- cor
The above rule can be interpreted as saying an alveolar nasal changes to a
velar nasal before a following velar sound.
DATA B:
/nbál/

[mbál]
‘palm wine’
/chínbá/

[tímbá]
‘pepper’
Just like data A, data B also show a case of anticipatory assimilation in
Bura. In B, however, the alveolar nasal /n/ changes to a bilabial nasal [m]. This
change can be represented in formal notations as:
+ nasal
+ cor
- cor
- ant
- cor
+nas
+ ant
- cor
+ ant
The above rule says an alveolar nasal becomes a bilabial nasal before a
bilabial sound.
3.1.2.1.1 Nasalization
lix
Nasalization is an assimilatory process attested in Bura. It is a process
whereby an oral segment acquires nasality from a neighbouring segment. Such
neighbouring segment is traditionally a nasal consonant. In terms of
directionality, just like the case of assimilation discussed above, nasalization in
this language is regressive or anticipatory. The following are some examples:
/pínjù/
 [pĩdʒù]
‘mosquito’
/nsìsé/
 [nsĩsé]
‘sit’
/sùnnì/
 [sũnì]
‘dream’
/síndà/
 [sĩdà]
‘know’
/dántà/
 [data]
‘remember’
/antó/
 [ãtó]
‘was’
In this language, a vowel is nasalized if it is followed by a nasal sound.
This can be stated formally as follows:
V

[nas]
+ ant
+ cor
+ nasal
lx
CHAPTER FOUR
SYLLABLE AND TONAL PROCESSES
4.0
Introduction
In chapter two, an inventory of the tones and the syllable structure of Bura
was carried out. This chapter will examine and account for the principles involved
in the arrangement of phonemes to form a syllable and to establish processes
that underlie the modification of tones before they reach their actual phonetic
forms.
According to Goldsmith (1995: 207), the syllable can be viewed as the
structural units providing melodic organization to such strings. This melodic
organization is based, for the most part on the inherent sonority of phonological
segments, that is, the loudness of a sound relative to other sounds produced
with the same input energy. The Goldsmith autosegmental approach to syllable
analysis will be adopted in the study of the syllable structure of Bura.
4.1
Syllable Process
Phonological research has given us a wealth of insight into shared
properties in the phonology of human language. These shared properties and
universal preferences of language have formed a family together in view of the
lxi
relatedness of their functions. Among these shared properties of language is
syllable structure constraints.
Simply put, the syllable is the phonological unit which organizes segmental
melodies in terms of sonority (Goldsmith, 1995: 207). Furthermore, Clark, Yallop
and Fletcher (2007: 67), defined a syllable as a combination of sounds which
consists of a vocalic peak, which may be accompanied by a consonantal onset or
coda.
In other words, syllable has a family of constraints that is born out of the
syllable structure preference of natural language. Some of these constraints are,
onset, peak or nucleus and coda. Onset is the beginning of a syllable, peak is the
central and coda is the end of a syllable. However, the internal structure of
syllable can be diagrammatically represented thus:
Syllable
Onset
Rhyme
Nucleus
Coda
(Centre, peak)
lxii
(Yule 1996: 58)
Therefore, the analysis of syllable process in Bura language will be carried
out or discussed under the prominent theory of phonology called autosegmental
phonology.
4.1.1 Autosegmental Analysis
4.1.2 Monosyllabic Words
They are words with only one syllable. Monosyllabic words, in Bura, have
the following syllabic process: CV, CVC, CCV, VCV and CCVC. Below are some
examples:
CV
kí
‘head’
jù
‘body’
sí
‘hand’
tá
‘cooking’
hà
‘sing’
CVC
s
ɔ
m



C
V
C
‘some’

lxiii
d
ì
r



C
V
C
h
I
r



C
V
C
d
ì
l



C
V
C
‘town’
‘teeth’
‘leg’
It should be noted that in a C1C2V structure, C1 is a Nasal sound
C1C2V
n
j
à



C1
C2
V
‘mouth’
lxiv
m
f
à



C1
C2
V
m
à
l



C
V
C
‘tree’
‘oil’
C1C2VC
m
b
á
l




C1
C2
V
C
‘palmwine’
In Bura, only nasals and liquids are allowed to end a word, otherwise, a
vowel ends.
4.1.3 Disyllabic Words
They are words with two syllables. They have the following syllable
processes: CVCV, CCVCV, CCVCVC and CVCVC. Some examples are given below:
CVCV
lxv

í

í




C
V
C
V

á
t
ú




C
V
C
V
k
ú
m
í




C
V
C
V
ù
h
à
‘breast’



V
C
V
‘hair’
‘stand’
‘jaw’
VCV
lxvi


ù



V
C
V
á
l
í



V
C
V
ú
h
ù



V
C
V
a
d
á



V
C
V
kp
é
f
ù




‘bone’
‘leaf’
‘fire’
‘matchet’
CVCV
‘heart’
lxvii
C
V
C
V
k
ú
t
á




C
V
C
V
‘belly’
C1C2VCV
m
b
a
l
ù





C1
C2
V
C
V
n
m
ù
j
ì





C1
C2
V
C
V
m
m
a
l
à





C1
C2
V
C
V
‘wine’
‘buffalo’
‘male’
lxviii
n
d
á
s
i





C1
C2
V
C
V
‘swallow’
C1C2VCVC
n
d
é
s
a
l






C1
C2
V
C
V
C
n
dʒ
é
r
ì
l






C
C
V
C
V
C
‘wall’
‘man’
‘mortar’
CVCVV
dɔ
ã
b
ú
à





C
V
C
V
V
k
á
l
á
ù





‘sand’
lxix
C
V
C
V
V
s
à
p
ú
à





C
V
C
V
V
‘spin’
CVCVC
kp
í
l
ú
m





C
V
C
V
C
p
ì
n
á
m





C
V
C
V
C
f
ĩ
dɔ
ù
m





C
V
C
V
C
‘yam’
‘maize’
‘ashes’
lxx
g
ì
l
à
m





C
V
C
V
C
m

s
ù
p





C
V
C
V
C
‘water pot’
‘spear’
4.1.4 TRISYLLABIC WORDS
They are words with three syllables. The syllable processes for trisyllabic
words is as follows:
CVCVCV
p
ú
t
i
v
ì






C
V
C
V
C
V
b
á
t
á
h
ú






C
V
C
V
C
V
‘buttocks’
‘arm’
lxxi
k
à
dɔ
í
r
ì






C
V
C
V
C
V
t

é

f

í

r

à

C
V
C
V
C
V
s
í
r
í
p
í






C
V
C
V
C
V
‘vagina’
‘thorn’
‘mat’
CCVCVCV
n
s
e
z
ũ
t
à







C
C
V
C
V
C
V
n
d
e
k
ó
w
á
lxxii
‘throw’
‘split’







C
C
V
C
V
C
V
CVCVCVCV

í

í
k
ú
m
í








C
V
C
V
C
V
C
V
b
ù
r
ù
k
ù
t
ù








C
V
C
V
C
V
C
V
j
í
m
í
r
ì
h









C
V
C
V
C
V
C
V
t
é
r
í
m
à
m
à








lxxiii
‘beard’
‘wine’
‘rain’
‘bee’
C
V
C
V
C
V
C
V
s
à
r
ì
b
ú
l
à








C
V
C
V
C
V
C
V
‘banana’
VCVCV
à
j
à
b
à





V
C
V
C
V
i


w
í





V
C
V
C
V
a
r
ú
p
á





V
C
V
C
V
‘cat’
‘hundred’
lxxiv
‘wring’
4.2
TONAL PROCESSES
Just as segments could be modified or influenced when they collocate or
when morphemes are combined together in order to ease articulation, so also
tone, as a suprasegmental (or prosodic) feature, can be modified. In tonal
language the mechanism that makes this possible is usually referred to as tonal
processes.
Tonal processes, according to Schuh (1978: 21) deal with influence of tone
on each other or the interaction and the relationship between tone and
segments. Also, they refer to influence of or change in pitch that is traceable to
neighbouring tonal or segmental environment or some special morphological
marking.
Before going into tonal process employed in Bura, a quick survey of the
distribution and pattern of tones in the language is appropriate.
4.2.1 TONE PATTERN AND DISTRIBUTION
lxxv
As mentioned earlier, Bura has three contrastive register tones namely,
High, Mid and Low. These tones pattern that:
i.
High-High
[íí]
‘hair’
[kútá]
‘belly’
[kúmí]
‘jaw’
[sũsũ]
‘food’
[jímí]
ii.
‘water’
High-Mid
[mãdʒa]
‘oil palm’
[mábu]
[data]
iii.
‘mud’
‘remember’
High-Low
[kútèr]
‘nose’
[kpéfù]
‘heart’
[tílì]
[kpúsà]
[báʒì]
‘saliva’
‘snow’
‘friend’
lxxvi
iv.
Low-Low
[fùkũ]
‘chin’
[gìlàm]
‘water pot’
[vìrì]
‘night’
[vìjà]
‘rain season’
[fàkù]
‘dry season’
v.
Low-High
[bí]
‘cloth’
[fùgúm]
‘cock’
[bàbá]
[màmá]
‘father’
‘mother’
[gèká]
vi.
‘call’
Low-Mid
[hàze]
‘grind’
[bilem]
‘new’
vii.
Low-High-Low
[sùsúrì]
[ùkásì]
‘kneel’
‘turn around’
lxxvii
[sàpúà]
‘spin’
[dʒbũtà]
‘break’
[ndʒérìl]
‘mortar’
viii.
Mid-Mid
[dɔãdɔar]
‘tongue’
[lmu]
‘orange’
[laku]
‘road’
[kefi]
‘work’
[towa]
ix.
‘weep’
Mid-Low
[mamì]
‘blood’
[ù]
‘bone’
[kugwà]
‘calabash’
[namzà]
‘red’
The above tonal patterns/distribution show that most words containing
one
morpheme
in
this
language
have
the
following
tone
melodies:
H,L,M,H,HM,LM,ML, and LHL in respect of the number of syllables they contain.
lxxviii
4.2.2 POLARIZATION
Polarization occurs when a morpheme is assigned a tone which is opposite
to that of its neighbouring morpheme. When an underlying morpheme posited to
be unmarked or mid tone is assigned, a tone which is opposite to that of a
neighbouring morpheme (from which it gets its tone), polarization can be said to
have taken place (cf. Kenswicz, 1994: 313).
In Bura counting system, the formation of some tense numbers (such as
fifty, thirty and eighty) require a combination of a morpheme denoting a unit
number (five, three and eight), and the morpheme denoting the number ‘ten’
([kúmádi]). The process, however, triggers tone polarization. The following are
some examples of tone polarization in Bura.
/tofu +
kúmádi/
five
ten
/tisu +
kúmádi/
eight
ten
/makiri
+
three
ten
 [tòfùkúmádi]
‘fifty’
 [tìsùkúmádi]
‘eighty’
kúmádi/

[màkìrìkúmádi]
‘thirty’
lxxix
The data given above show that the morphemes for the ‘unit’ numbers in
Bura language counting system which are unmarked at the underlying level,
become the pillar opposite of the morpheme for ‘ten’ at the surface
representation. It can be observed also that the high tone of the morpheme for
‘ten’ that is contiguous with the unmarked-mid tone morphemes of the ‘unit’
numbers (at the unmarked underlying level) trigger the polarization which
manifests at the surface level.
4.2.3 TONE STABILITY
In many languages when an underlying tone-bearing segment (normally a
vowel) is either deleted or becomes nonsyllabic and loses its ability to bear tone,
the tone still survives and surfaced on an adjacent syllable. Bura (cf. Hoffman,
1963; Katamba, 1989: 194 and Oyebade, 2008: 146) has the following
examples:
/ùhù/ +
/ímí/  [ùhúmí]
fire
bad
/súwà/
+
rope
bad
/mpù/
+
‘bad fire’
/ímí/ 
[súwămí]
‘bad rope’
/íká/ 
[mpĭká]
lxxx
white
bird
‘the white bird’
What is observed about the examples given above is that the second of
two contiguous vowels disappears as a result of an elision process but the tone
of such a vowel survives to show up on the surving vowel of such a cluster.
Note, however that the underlying LHL tone pattern is preserved although that
means the LH being squashed on to a single vowel. Similarly, when glide
formation (see the last example) turns an underlying high vowel into a
nonsyllabic glide. Mid tone or unmarked tone does not disappear. It merely gets
shunted on to the next syllabic segment. Once again, the underlying LHL tone
pattern is preserved by having a rising tone on the first available vowel.
lxxxi
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.0
Introduction
This chapter sets out to give a summary of the entire work, conclusion and
some recommendations.
5.1
Summary
Bura is spoken in two adjacent states in the North-eastern part of Nigeria.
Native speakers of the language are found in Adamawa and Borno State,
particularly in Gwoza, Damboa District (Borno State) and Duhu and Gulak
(Adamwa State). Sociolinguistically, the people have their own unique culture
and a monarchical system of government. Christianity, Islam, and African
traditional Religion (ATR) are the religions practiced by the people. Among the
festivals are ‘maize harvest’ festival which performed before fresh corn can be
eaten and ‘mbal’ festival for both men and women who have attained the age of
marriage. The economic system of Bura hinges on agriculture and transportation.
Bura (Pabir) is under Bura group of biu Mandara branch of Chadic sub-family of
the Afro-Asiatic phylum in the genetic tree. The project is theoretically modelled
according to the principles of generative phonology. Meanwhile, the data used
lxxxii
for the project were collected from native speakers of the language. The data
were then analyzed using the principles of data analysis identified by generative
phonologists.
This project deals with the sound inventory of Bura. Bura attests thirty
consonants and seven vowel sounds including seven nasal vowels. Apart from
liquids and nasals, which occur word-initial, medial and final, other consonants
occur word-initial and medial. Similarly, /i/, /u/, /e/, /o/ and /a/ occur wordinitial, medial and final while // occur in word medial and final position. The
language has three register tones High [/], Low [\] and Mid [(unmarked). The
syllable inventory of Bura has three basic structures which are CV, CCV, CVC.
We also examine the phonological processes of the language. The
phonological processes of Bura were examined under two broad headings.
Syllable structure processes and euphonic processes. The former concerns
deletion/elision and insertion/epenthesis where as the latter’s focus is
assimilation and vowel harmony. The elision rule of Bura affects the second of
two contiguous vowels across word boundary. The assimilatory process of Bura
is regressive or anticipatory.
lxxxiii
The syllable and tonal processes were discussed in this project. Bura has
monosyllabic, disyllabic, and trissylabic words structured distinctively. It has
fourteen (14) syllable processes which are: CV, CVC, CCVC, CVCV, CCV, VCV,
CCVCV, CCVCVC, CVCVV, CVCVC, CVCVCV, CCVCVCV,, CVCVCVCV, and VCVCV.
In addition to the syllable processes, Bura has nine tonal configurations or
patterns given as follows:
High-High, High-Mid, High-Low, Low-Low, Low-High, Low-Mid, Low-HighLow, Mid-Mid, Mid-Low. The tonal patterns are reduced to a tonal melody of
H,L,M,HL,HM,LM,ML,LHL, and MM. Tone polarization and stability are properties
of Bura tonal inventory.
5.2
Conclusion
The problem of Nigerian Government and Society is the ignorance of
phonological study of native languages. This has led to negative effect and
languages are less developed because they (speakers of Nigerian languages)
have negative attitude, towards their languages. The Aspects of Bura Phonology
is of immense significance to the development of language change of negative
attitude because this case study embraces the value of language, culture, the
speakers and environment.
lxxxiv
5.3
Recommendations
Despite the work done in various ways, the following recommendations
will be useful. Public and Private Sectors should involve in the development of
minority languages without being biased. The Federal Government should make
the people imbibe their various indigenous languages by enforcing/introducing
various indigenous languages in primary schools, secondary schools. At the
higher institutions, the study of native languages should be of more standard
and professional job opportunities that are incentive should be made available
to zeal up a high interest rate of the people in this field.
Language research institutes should be funded and necessary materials
should be made available in the institute, for the linguists and the Department of
Linguistics and Nigerian Languages all over the federation for both majority and
minority languages. Also, native speakers should be encouraged to get trained in
learning and teaching various indigenous languages. Finally, each native speaker
in the nationhood should imbibe the culture of speaking, writing and learning
through the indigenous in order to encourage increase of size in culture,
population, economy and language. Therefore, native languages must be the
first, and other languages should follow.
lxxxv
REFERENCES
Aitchison, J. (2001). Language Change: Progress or Decay? Third Edition. UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. and M. Halle (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York:
Harper and Row.
Clark, J.C., Yallop and J. Fletcher (2007). An Introductory to Phonetics and
Phonology. Third Edition. UK: Blackwell.
Comorie, B. (ed.) (1989). The World’s Major Languages Revised Edition, London
and New
York: Routledge.
Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
(2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language.
Second Edition.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davenport, M. and S. J. Hannahs (2005). Introducing Phonetics and Phonology.
Second Edition.
London: Hodder Arnold.
Hoffmann, C. (1963). A Grammar of Bura Language. London: OUP.
Hoffmann, C. (1976). ‘The Languages of Nigerian by Language Family’. In
Hansford, G. (et al)
Studies in Nigeria Languages. Accra: Longman.
lxxxvi
Hyman, L. (1975). Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt Rinehart and
Winston.
Katamba, F. (1989). An Introduction to Phonology. New York: Longman.
Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass:
Basil Blackwell.
Oyebade, F. (2008). A Course in Phonology. Second
Edition. Ijebu-Ode:
Shebiotimo Press.
Ruhlen, M. (1991). A Guide to the World’s Languages. Volume 1. London:
Edward Arnold.
Wente-Lukas, R. (1985). Handbook of Ethnic Units in Nigeria. London: OUP.
Schuh, R. G. (1978). ‘Tones Rules’. In Fromkin, V.A. (ed.) Tone: A Linguistics
Survey. New
York: Academic Press.
Vaughan, J.H. (1970). ‘Caste Systems in the Western Sudan in Tunde, A. and L.
Plotnicov (eds.)
Social Stratification in Africa. New York: Free Press.
Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language. Second Edition. UK: Cambridge
University Press.
lxxxvii
lxxxviii
Download