Uploaded by ee sisters

9700 s18 qp 51

advertisement
Cambridge International Examinations
Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level
* 3 0 6 0 7 4 1 8 9 8 *
9700/51
BIOLOGY
May/June 2018
Paper 5 Planning, Analysis and Evaluation
1 hour 15 minutes
Candidates answer on the Question Paper.
No Additional Materials are required.
READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST
Write your Centre number, candidate number and name on all the work you hand in.
Write in dark blue or black pen.
You may use an HB pencil for any diagrams or graphs.
Do not use staples, paper clips, glue or correction fluid.
DO NOT WRITE IN ANY BARCODES.
Answer all questions.
Electronic calculators may be used.
You may lose marks if you do not show your working or if you do not use appropriate units.
At the end of the examination, fasten all your work securely together.
The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question.
This document consists of 9 printed pages and 3 blank pages.
DC (SR/JG) 147462/4
© UCLES 2018
[Turn over
2
1
(a) Some students were asked to use leaf discs to investigate photosynthesis in leaves of
different types.
The students decided to compare the rate of photosynthesis in four different types of leaf in a
room kept at a temperature of 20 °C.
The leaves were taken from:
•
•
•
•
ivy, which has a thick waxy cuticle on the upper surface
geranium, which has a thin cuticle on the upper surface
spiderwort, which has purple and green stripes and a thin cuticle
sorghum, which has a thick waxy cuticle on the upper surface.
The students prepared leaf discs of the same diameter from all four types of leaf and placed
them onto damp paper in Petri dishes. Each Petri dish was covered by a lid.
When first placed in a solution, the leaf discs sink. As photosynthesis occurs oxygen is
released and the discs rise to the surface. The time taken for the discs to reach the surface
allows the rate of photosynthesis to be determined.
Fig. 1.1 shows leaf discs rising to the surface after being placed in a solution of sodium
hydrogencarbonate.
leaf disc at surface
beaker
sodium hydrogencarbonate
solution
leaf disc rising
from bottom of beaker
Fig. 1.1
(i)
State the independent variable and the dependent variable in this investigation.
independent variable .........................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
dependent variable ............................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................... [2]
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
3
(ii)
Use the information provided to describe a method by which the students could compare
the rate of photosynthesis in discs cut from the four types of leaf.
Your method should be set out in a logical order and be detailed enough to let another
person follow it.
Details of the preparation of the leaf discs are not required.
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................... [7]
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
[Turn over
4
(b) The students’ results are shown in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1
type of leaf
ivy
geranium
spiderwort
sorghum
mean time for leaf discs to reach
the surface / s
130
75
95
100
(i)
Describe how the students could calculate the rate of photosynthesis from their results.
...........................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................... [1]
(ii)
The students made three conclusions.
conclusion 1
Leaves with a thick cuticle absorb less light and photosynthesise more slowly than leaves
with a thin cuticle.
conclusion 2
Leaves of spiderwort have a slower rate of photosynthesis because they have less
chlorophyll than other plants.
conclusion 3
Sorghum is a C4 plant and so its leaves photosynthesise faster than those of ivy which is
a C3 plant.
Each of these conclusions is supported by the evidence, but may not be valid.
Explain why each conclusion may not be valid, using the information in (a) about the
leaves and the method used to determine the rate of photosynthesis.
conclusion 1 ......................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
conclusion 2 ......................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
conclusion 3 ......................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
[3]
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
5
(c) A colorimeter passes a beam of light through a coloured filter into a solution and measures
the light absorbance of that solution.
A standard solution is used to set the colorimeter scale to zero (0) before taking any
measurements.
Chlorophyll absorbs red light, so the chlorophyll concentration of a leaf extract can be
measured using a colorimeter.
(i)
Outline how the students could use a colorimeter to obtain further evidence to support
the conclusion that leaf discs of spiderwort have a lower chlorophyll content than the leaf
discs from the other types of leaf investigated.
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................... [3]
(ii)
Suggest a standard solution that could be used in the colorimeter to ensure that light
absorbance is due only to the chlorophyll in a leaf extract.
...................................................................................................................................... [1]
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
[Turn over
6
(d) Table 1.2 shows the students’ results from the colorimeter measurements made on
10 samples of each of the four types of leaf.
Table 1.2
type of leaf
ivy
geranium
spiderwort
sorghum
mean absorbance ± s
0.28 ± 0.08
0.32 ± 0.1
0.43 ± 0.18
0.39 ± 0.21
The students decided to use the t‑test to test the hypothesis that:
The difference in the chlorophyll concentration between spiderwort and each of the
other plants is significant.
The formula for the t‑ test is shown in Fig. 1.2.
t=
xr1 - xr2
s 21 s 22
f + p
n1 n2
o = n1 + n2 - 2
o = degrees of freedom
s = standard deviation
n = sample size (number of observations)
x̅ = mean
Fig. 1.2
Comment on the use of the t ‑test by:
stating how many values of t the students should calculate and explaining your answer
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
explaining how the students would find out if the results of their t‑tests were significant.
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
[4]
[Total: 21]
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
7
2
The red squirrel is a tree‑living mammal native to woodlands in the United Kingdom. The population
and distribution of the red squirrel have been decreasing since the introduction of a North American
species of grey squirrel. The grey squirrel occupies an ecological niche that overlaps with that of
the red squirrel, but the grey squirrel is a better competitor.
One cause of the decline in red squirrels is the clearance of woodland for development. New areas
of woodland have been planted, but the species of tree planted have changed over time.
Table 2.1 shows the changes in species composition of woodland in England and Scotland from
1980 to 1990 and the suitability of each species as habitats for red and grey squirrels.
Table 2.1
suitability of tree species
as a habitat for squirrels
tree species
narrow‑leaved
trees
England
Scotland
Sitka spruce
poor for both species
+ 14
+ 61
Scots pine
poor for both species
–5
+8
Norway spruce
good for both species
– 21
– 28
Douglas fir
good for both species
+3
+1
European larch good for red squirrels
– 34
− 39
Japanese larch good for red squirrels
–3
+ 21
+ 36
+ 68
broad‑leaved trees
(a) (i)
percentage change in
species composition
good for grey squirrels
Use the information in Table 2.1 to summarise the effects on habitat for these species of
squirrel as a result of the changes in the tree species composition in woodland.
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................... [3]
(ii)
Suggest why the populations of red squirrels in England and Scotland have decreased.
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................... [2]
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
[Turn over
8
(b) Squirrel parapoxvirus (SPPV) infects both red squirrels and grey squirrels.
Grey squirrels develop immunity to SPPV, but red squirrels are killed by this virus.
One method used to conserve red squirrels on an island involved culling all the grey squirrels.
During the cull, research was carried out to find the percentage of grey squirrels that were
immune to SPPV. When the cull started the island had an estimated population of 40 red
squirrels and 3 000 to 4 000 grey squirrels.
The research involved several steps.
Traps were placed at a density of 1 per 0.01 km2 in broad‑leaved woodland and
2 per 0.01 km2 in narrow‑leaved woodland.
Humane steel traps, all of the same size, were used. Non‑target animals caught were
released, any grey squirrel was killed.
Blood samples were taken from grey squirrels trapped between January and August at
randomly selected habitats.
A standard test for antibodies to SPPV was used to screen the blood samples.
A control sample of grey squirrels from the mainland was tested in 2010.
The percentage testing positive for antibodies to SPPV was calculated for each sample.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Table 2.2 shows the results of this research.
Table 2.2
year
number of grey
squirrels tested
percentage positive for SPPV antibodies
1999
23
52
2002
20
75
2003
99
40
2007
54
13
2010
28
4
2010 (control)
70
67
(i)
State two variables that were controlled during the research.
1 .........................................................................................................................................
2 .........................................................................................................................................
[2]
(ii)
The researchers concluded that culling could help to reduce the spread of SPPV.
State how the evidence in Table 2.2 supports this conclusion.
...........................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................... [1]
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
9
Culling of grey squirrels on the island successfully removed all of them by 2013. Subsequently
the population of red squirrels has increased.
Culling of grey squirrels has also occurred on the mainland in areas occupied by both species.
Within a few months of the end of a cull, the grey squirrel population returns to pre‑cull level
and the red squirrel population is unchanged.
(iii)
Suggest why the cull on the mainland is less effective at removing grey squirrels than the
cull on the island.
...........................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................... [1]
[Total: 9]
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
10
BLANK PAGE
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
11
BLANK PAGE
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
12
BLANK PAGE
Permission to reproduce items where third‑party owned material protected by copyright is included has been sought and cleared where possible. Every
reasonable effort has been made by the publisher (UCLES) to trace copyright holders, but if any items requiring clearance have unwittingly been included, the
publisher will be pleased to make amends at the earliest possible opportunity.
To avoid the issue of disclosure of answer‑related information to candidates, all copyright acknowledgements are reproduced online in the Cambridge International
Examinations Copyright Acknowledgements Booklet. This is produced for each series of examinations and is freely available to download at www.cie.org.uk after
the live examination series.
Cambridge International Examinations is part of the Cambridge Assessment Group. Cambridge Assessment is the brand name of University of Cambridge Local
Examinations Syndicate (UCLES), which is itself a department of the University of Cambridge.
© UCLES 2018
9700/51/M/J/18
Download