The Harmonized Matrix Model: A Novel
Framework for B2B Public Relations
Management
Abstract
The field of public relations (PR) has evolved significantly over the years, with increasing complexity and
a focus on B2B relationships. As a result, there is a need for new PR frameworks that can cater to this
evolving landscape. This article introduces the Harmonized Matrix Model (HMM), a novel framework for
B2B public relations management that builds on existing models while addressing the unique needs of
B2B organizations. The HMM considers stakeholder engagement, message optimization, channel
selection, and evaluation as its key components, and integrates them into a cohesive, flexible approach.
By providing a comprehensive and adaptable model, the HMM can effectively guide B2B organizations
in managing their PR strategies and achieving their desired outcomes.
Introduction
Public relations (PR) is an essential component of modern business strategy, encompassing a wide range
of activities aimed at building and maintaining positive relationships between organizations and their
various stakeholders (Grunig, 2009). While PR has traditionally focused on B2C communications, there
has been a growing recognition of the importance of B2B relationships in today's interconnected global
economy (Kitchen & Schultz, 2001). Consequently, there is a need for new PR management frameworks
that can cater to the unique requirements of B2B organizations.
Existing models, such as Grunig's Four Models of Public Relations (Grunig & Hunt, 1984) and the
Excellence Theory (Grunig, 2009), have laid the foundation for PR strategy and management. However,
the ever-changing landscape of B2B communications and the increasing importance of digital channels
call for a more comprehensive and adaptable framework. To this end, this article proposes the
Harmonized Matrix Model (HMM), a novel approach to B2B public relations management.
The Harmonized Matrix Model (HMM)
The HMM is a four-component framework that integrates stakeholder engagement, message
optimization, channel selection, and evaluation, as its core elements. These components are designed to
work together, creating a harmonious approach to B2B PR management.
Stakeholder Engagement
The first component of the HMM is stakeholder engagement, which emphasizes the importance of
identifying and prioritizing key stakeholders in the B2B environment. This approach is consistent with
the stakeholder theory proposed by Freeman (1984), which asserts that an organization's success
depends on its ability to manage relationships with various stakeholders. In the context of B2B PR,
stakeholders may include suppliers, clients, regulators, industry associations, and even competitors
(Kitchen & Schultz, 2001). By engaging these stakeholders effectively, organizations can build trust,
establish credibility, and create mutually beneficial relationships (Grunig, 2009).
Message Optimization
The second component of the HMM focuses on message optimization, which entails crafting tailored
messages that resonate with each stakeholder group. This is in line with the concept of audience
segmentation, a widely recognized PR strategy (Smith, 2011). Message optimization ensures that
organizations communicate their value proposition effectively, demonstrating how their products or
services can meet the needs of various stakeholders (Grunig & Hunt, 1984). In the B2B context, this may
involve emphasizing factors such as cost efficiency, product quality, and long-term partnerships (Kitchen
& Schultz, 2001).
Channel Selection
The HMM also recognizes the importance of channel selection in B2B PR, as organizations must choose
the most appropriate communication channels to reach their target stakeholders. In the digital age, B2B
organizations have access to a wide array of channels, including social media platforms, websites, email
marketing, and content marketing (Kietzmann et al., 2011). The HMM emphasizes the need for a multichannel approach that combines both traditional and digital channels, tailored to the preferences and
habits of each stakeholder group (Paine, 2011). By selecting the right channels, organizations can ensure
that their messages reach the intended audience and achieve the desired impact (Smith, 2011).
Evaluation
The final component of the HMM is evaluation, which involves measuring the effectiveness of PR
activities and making necessary adjustments to improve outcomes. Evaluation is crucial in
demonstrating the return on investment (ROI) of PR efforts, as well as in identifying areas for
improvement (Watson & Noble, 2007). The HMM encourages the use of both quantitative and
qualitative metrics, such as media coverage, online engagement, and stakeholder feedback, to evaluate
the success of B2B PR initiatives (Paine, 2011). By regularly evaluating their PR strategies, organizations
can make data-driven decisions and continuously refine their approach to achieve optimal results
(Grunig, 2009).
Conclusion
The Harmonized Matrix Model (HMM) presents a novel framework for B2B public relations
management, addressing the unique needs of B2B organizations in an increasingly complex and
interconnected world. By integrating stakeholder engagement, message optimization, channel selection,
and evaluation as its core components, the HMM offers a comprehensive and adaptable approach to
managing B2B PR strategies. This model builds on existing PR theories and practices while addressing
the evolving landscape of B2B communications, providing organizations with a flexible and effective tool
for achieving their desired outcomes.
References
1. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
2. Grunig, J. E. (2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. PRism, 6(2), 119.
3. Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and
Winston.
4. Kitchen, P. J., & Schultz, D. E. (2001). Raising the corporate umbrella: Corporate communications
in the 21st century. New York: Palgrave.
5. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get
serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3),
241-251.
6. Paine, K. D. (2011). Measure what matters: Online tools for understanding customers, social
media, engagement, and key relationships. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Smith, R. D. (2011). Strategic planning for public relations. New York: Routledge.
8. Watson, T., & Noble, P. (2007). Evaluating public relations: A best practice guide to public
relations planning, research, and evaluation. London: Kogan Page.