Nigerian Newspapers’ Framing of The Kwara Hijab Crisis: Implications for National Peace Onifade, Oluwafemi Sunday PhD & Tali, Selbol Patience Introduction Religion plays a fundamental role in the affairs of mankind. It is a potent force that could be used to achieve stability and it is also powerful in creating chaos (Okebukola, 2012). Nigeria has experienced numerous religious crises and it is most times between the adherents of the two leading Abrahamic faiths; Christianity and Islam. Introduction The coverage and framing of conflicts and crises by some media organizations arguably aggravate tension and violence. While performing its agenda-setting and correlation functions, the media could consciously or unconsciously promote sectional interests which could harm national peace and progress [Entman, (1994); Nurmalange (2006); and Asemah (2011)]. There seems to be some relationship existing between escalating violence and the media role of correlation of society (Nnanyelugo & Chinedu 2013). Objectives of the Study To explore the portrayal of the Kwara hijab crisis by Daily Trust newspaper. To examine the framing of the Kwara hijab crisis by Guardian newspaper. To evaluate the historical perspectives promoted by the narratives of Daily Trust and Guardian newspapers on the Kwara hijab crisis. To examine the legal perspectives projected by Daily Trust and Guardian newspapers in their narratives on the Kwara hijab crisis. Methodology The research followed the qualitative paradigm. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). Two entries were purposively selected from Daily Trust and Guardian newspapers respectively. While Daily Trust represented Muslim interest in the study, Guardian provided a Christian perspective to the Kwara hijab crisis. Daily Trust How Hijab Controversy Threatens Kwara’s Peace, Education System An Avoidable Crisis In Kwara Schools Guardian Ilorin and the crisis of identity Hijab and status of missionary schools Discussion of Findings The Portrayal of the Kwara Hijab Crisis by Daily Trust Newspaper Daily Trust portrayed the Christian missions who owned the schools as the aggressors. The newspaper also portrayed the schools as properties of the Kwara State government because the government “took over” the schools in the 1970s. It also supports the use of hijab by female students of the Christian mission schools. The Portrayal of the Kwara Hijab Crisis by Daily Trust Newspaper The support for the position of Daily Trust newspaper can be attributed to the fact that the publisher is a Muslim northerner and most of the reporters and members of the Editorial Board are also Muslim northerners. If the case had been the refusal of a Christian female student to wear the hijab in an Islamic mission grant-aided school, it is unlikely that the newspaper would support the religious freedom of the student against the school authority. The newspaper would have sought to preserve the Islamic heritage of the school. Framing of the Kwara Hijab Conflict by Guardian Newspaper In the two entries selected from Guardian newspaper, the authors faulted the claims made by the government of Kwara State and the Muslim stakeholders in the state. Dare Babarinsa faulted the Muslims of Ilorin for promoting their Islamic identity over their Yoruba identity. He opined that this crisis of identity is one of the causes of religious crises in the state and the nation at large. Framing of the Kwara Hijab Conflict by Guardian Newspaper John Cardinal Onaiyekan also rearticulated the history of mission schools in the country and Kwara State in particular with a narrative that favours the Christian community. They frame the issue as jihad which the Muslims are waging against Christianity. Cardinal Onaiyekan referred to the renaming of Christian missionary schools in Kaduna State as an example of the larger plot to Islamize the nation. Historical and Legal Contexts Used in Framing the Crisis The two newspapers adopted opposing narratives in their presentation of the historical facts and contexts of the crisis. Daily Trust supported the claim that the mission schools are public schools because Kwara State Government has paid the salaries of teachers since they were classified as grant-aided schools in 1974. The entries gotten from the newspaper argued that ownership and control of the school is the purview of the government because it pays salaries of staff. Historical and Legal Contexts Used in Framing the Crisis The entries from Guardian on the other hand argued that the State and the nation at large owes its educational development to the Christian missions. They reminded us that the owners were never compensated; arguing that it is standard practice for governments to compensate owners whenever the state takes over their properties. that the military governor of Kwara State Brigadier General David Bamigboye clearly stated in 1972 that the government was only intervening in the schools and not taking over the schools from the missions. Historical and Legal Contexts Used in Framing the Crisis The newspapers also disagreed on the immediate cause of the crisis. While Daily Trust reported that it was caused by the management of a Christian mission school which forced a female Muslim student to remove her hijab, the entries from Guardian reported that the crisis was caused by Muslim fanatics who seek to enforce Islamic traditions in a Christian missionary school. Historical and Legal Contexts Used in Framing the Crisis The entries from Daily Trust projected the legal narrative that that the government of Kwara State and the Muslim stakeholders had defeated the Kwara State chapter of Christian Association of Nigeria. They argued that the court judgments given by the Kwara State High Court and the Court of Appeal expressly permit the enforcement of the hijab policy in all “public” schools in the state irrespective of the founder, history and traditions of the schools. Historical and Legal Contexts Used in Framing the Crisis The entries from Guardian on the other hand maintain that the law had not ran its full cause on the matter since there is a pending appeal at the Supreme Court. They also argue that the judges at the Kwara State High Court were biased in their judgment because most of the judiciary of the state is dominated by Muslims. The entries from Guardian newspaper also claimed that the judgment of the Court of Appeal was declarative and vague. It merely explained the position of Nigerian constitution on religious freedom and right to worship. The judges did not expressly rule on the ownership of the schools or the enforcement of the hijab policy in the grant-aided schools. Conclusion Religion is a fundamental issue which elicits deep emotional outbursts among Nigerians. It has led to loss of countless lives across the country because the average Nigerian is willing and ready to fight and possibly die for his/her faith. The editorial materials selected for analysis reflect the religious orientation of their publishers and they marshalled their points in favour of the religious group of their publisher. Conclusion The battle is unlikely to end soon because there is deep-seethed mutual suspicion among the leaders and followers of Christianity and Islam in Kwara State and the nation at large. The recent case in University of Ibadan International School where some parents insisted that their kids must be allowed to wear the hijab to school against the policy of the school is an indication that we have not seen the last of the hijab conundrum. Recommendations Reporters, columnists, features writers and editors should eschew narratives that highlight religious fault lines in their coverage of controversial issues. They must understand that the power of the pen comes with a lot of responsibilities to the society. As opinion leaders, they must understand that they are responsible for the actions of their readers who cut across religious boundaries. Religious leaders should preach religious tolerance to their followers. Recommendations Intra-religious schism between Sunnis and Shiites in Islam and between the numerous denominations under Christianity shows that unity of religion is not a guarantee to peace. Therefore, they must publicly preach and demonstrate religious tolerance in order to provide a stable polity for national development. Recommendations Readers should endeavour to understand the inner workings of media organizations. They should seek to acquire media literacy skills as this would help them navigate the murky waters of media messages. They must understand that whatever they read in a medium is a product of a complex mix of organizational and personal biases. They should also seek greater religious knowledge as this would help them to identify and embrace areas of agreement between Christianity and Islam. Thank you for listening.