Uploaded by Kent Marcvonne C. Carugda

Electrometric study of acid-base equilibria

advertisement
I.
INTRODUCTION
One of the most often used methods for analyzing acid-base equilibria is electrometric
pH determination. With a glass electrode and a reference potential or a combination electrode,
the pH of the sample is measured electrometrically. A series of reference solutions with known
pH values are used to calibrate the measurement instrument. Another way of determining the
pH is by using the dissociation constant of an acid (Ka). Note that if Ka is much greater than 1,
the acid is mostly dissociated and so is said to be a strong acid. If Ka is much less than 1, the
acid is dissociated only to a small extent and so is said to be a weak acid. A way to get the Ka
is to get the equilibrium concentrations of HA (weak acid) and the A- (conjugate base) in the
reaction. The amount of HA in the solution is determined by subtracting the amount of HA lost
during ionization from the stoichiometric concentration of HA (the starting HA) in the solution.
Although the amount of HA lost by ionization is substantially lower for acetic acid and most
other weak acids than the initial concentration of HA in solution, the equilibrium concentration
of HA is only marginally below the stoichiometric concentration.
The objectives of this experiment are (1) to determine the dissociation constant of an
acid in buffered and unbuffered solutions (2) to determine whether the measurements made in
both solutions are equally reliable.
I.
METHODOLOGY
A. Chemicals and Apparatus
The chemicals used in the experiment are as follows: 0.20 M acetic acid, 0.20 M sodium
acetate, and pH 4 & 7 buffer solutions for standardizing pH meter. The apparatus used
were: two 10-mL measuring pipets with aspirator bulb (different bulbs for each pipet), six
50-mL volumetric flasks, squirt bottle with distilled water for diluting, 250-mL beaker for
the rinsing of electrode, three 50-mL beaker, and a pH meter (Cyberscan PC 300).
B. Procedure
The pH meter was standardized with buffer solutions supplied. The meter was set to
pH mode before standardizing. A buffer of pH 7 was prepared, the electrode of the pH
meter was carefully submerged in the buffer, allowing it to stabilize and hold. The electrode
was removed from the buffer and was rinsed with distilled water. The electrode was wiped
carefully with tissue to remove excess water. The process was repeated for the buffer of pH
4. Now, the pH meter has been standardized.
Determination of Dissociation Constant of an Acid in Unbuffered Solutions
20-mL of the acetic acid was prepared using the 10-mL measuring pipet and was
transferred to three different 50-mL beakers (Due to the comfortability of the user, a 10mL measuring pipet was utilized instead of a 20-mL one). The pH of each beaker was
measured using the pH meter following the same process used in standardizing the meter.
The average pH was then calculated and the [H+] of the acetic acid was determined, this
was then used to calculate the dissociation constant (Ka).
The following acid sample were prepared using a 10-mL measuring pipet, squirt bottle
with distilled water, and three 50-mL volumetric flask:
Sample A: 20-mL acetic acid, dilute to mark with distilled water
Sample B: 10-mL acetic acid, dilute to mark with distilled water
Sample C: 5-mL acetic acid, dilute to mark with distilled water
Note that the acid used in the samples were the acid in which the pH was measured. The
molarity of each sample was determined. Each of the sample were transferred to three
different 50-mL beakers and the pH was measured again using the pH meter. The Ka was
then calculated for each of the three sample.
Determination of Dissociation Constant of an Acid in Buffered Solutions
The following samples were prepared using two 10-mL measuring pipet, squirt bottle
with distilled water, and three 50-mL volumetric flask:
Sample D: 20-mL acetic acid + 4-mL 0.20 M sodium acetate, dilute to mark with distilled
water
Sample E: 20-mL acetic acid + 20-mL 0.20 M sodium acetate, dilute to mark with distilled
water
Sample F: 4-mL acetic acid + 20-mL 0.20 M sodium acetate, dilute to mark with distilled
water
The new concentrations of the acetic acid and sodium acetate was then calculated for each
sample. The samples are then transferred to three different 50-mL beakers and the pH was
measured using a pH meter. The Ka was then calculated for each of the three sample.
C. Mathematical equations
The [H+] was calculated using the equation [H+] = 10−pH. The molarity was calculated
using the equation C1V1=C2V2. The formula 𝑲𝒂 =
[𝑯+ ][𝑨− ]
[𝑯𝑨]
was used in calculating the
dissociation constant of the weak acid in unbuffered solutions. The Henderson-Hasselbalch
[𝑨− ]
equation 𝒑𝑯 = 𝒑𝑲𝒂 + π₯𝐨𝐠 [𝑯𝑨] was used to relate the pH or the dissociation constant in
buffered solutions. To derive the Ka from the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, the pKa was
calculated, then the equation Ka= 10-pKa was utilized to determine the Ka.
II.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The data in determining the average pH, [H+], and Ka of the acetic acid is summarized
in Table 1 below.
Table 1. Dissociation constant (Ka) of 0.20 M acetic acid
Beaker Volume of acetic (mL)
pH
Average
[H+]
Ka
0.0035
6.12 x 10-5
pH
1
20
2.51
2
20
2.46
3
20
2.40
2.46
The pH recorded in the three beakers are obtained from the pH meter and the average
was calculated. The literature value for Ka of acetic acid is 1.76 x 10-5. Based from this value,
a 0.20 M acetic acid should have a [H+] concentration of 0.00188 and pH of 2.73. This is
evident just by looking at the calculated Ka, there is a huge difference between the literature
value and the calculated value. This error may be due to the purity of the stock solution or an
instrumental error.
Table 1 calculation:
π‘©π’†π’‚π’Œπ’†π’“ 𝟏 𝒑𝑯 + π‘©π’†π’‚π’Œπ’†π’“ 𝟐 𝒑𝑯 + π‘©π’†π’‚π’Œπ’†π’“ πŸ‘ 𝒑𝑯
= π’‚π’—π’†π’“π’‚π’ˆπ’† 𝒑𝑯
πŸ‘
𝟐. πŸ“πŸ + 𝟐. πŸ’πŸ” + 𝟐. πŸ’πŸŽ
= π’‚π’—π’†π’“π’‚π’ˆπ’† 𝒑𝑯
πŸ‘
𝟐. πŸ’πŸ” = π’‚π’—π’†π’“π’‚π’ˆπ’† 𝒑𝑯
𝒑𝑯 = − π₯𝐨𝐠[𝑯+ ]
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟏𝟎−𝒑𝑯
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟏𝟎−𝟐.πŸ’πŸ”
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸ‘πŸ’πŸ”πŸ•πŸ‘πŸ”πŸ–πŸ“πŸŽπŸ“ ≈ 𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸ‘πŸ“
HA + H2O β‡Œ H+ + AI
0.2
0
0
C
0.2-x
+x
+x
E
0.19652
0.0035 0.0035
[𝑯+ ][𝑨− ]
𝑲𝒂 =
[𝑯𝑨]
𝑲𝒂 =
[𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸ‘πŸ“][𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸ‘πŸ“]
[𝟎. πŸπŸ—πŸ”πŸ“πŸ]
𝑲𝒂 = πŸ”. 𝟏𝟐 𝒙 𝟏𝟎−πŸ“
* Note that during calculations using ICE table, the values must not be rounded off, only the
final answers should be rounded off.
The calculated and measured results for the determination of Ka in unbuffered solution is
shown in the table below.
Table 2. Dissociation constant (Ka) of an acid in unbuffered solution
Acid
Volume of acetic acid
pH
Molarity
[H+]
Ka
Sample
(mL)
(M)
A
20
2.63
0.08
0.0023
7.08 x 10-5
B
10
2.79
0.04
0.0016
6.85 x 10-5
C
5
2.99
0.02
0.0010
5.52 x 10-5
Each acid sample had varying amount of acetic acid but they are all diluted to 50-mL of
distilled water. Because of this they also have varying pH, molarity, [H+], and Ka. The
calculated Ka for the three samples is still far from the literature value, with acid sample C the
closer one. For a molarity of 0.02 M in acid sample C, the [H+] should be 0.000593 with a pH
of 3.23, this is attained using the literature value of Ka for acetic acid. The error still could be
from the purity of the stock solution and instrumental error.
Sample calculation for Table 2 (Sample A):
C1V1 = C2V2
𝟎. 𝟐𝟎 𝑴 (πŸπŸŽπ’Žπ‘³) = π‘ͺ𝟐 (πŸ“πŸŽπ’Žπ‘³)
𝟎. 𝟐𝟎 𝑴 (πŸπŸŽπ’Žπ‘³)
= π‘ͺ𝟐
πŸ“πŸŽπ’Žπ‘³
𝟎. πŸŽπŸ– 𝑴 = π‘ͺ𝟐
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟏𝟎−𝒑𝑯
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟏𝟎−𝟐.πŸ”πŸ‘
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸπŸ‘πŸ’πŸ’πŸπŸπŸ–πŸ–πŸπŸ“ ≈ 𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸπŸ‘
HA + H2O β‡Œ H+ + AI
0.8
0
0
C
0.8-x
+x
+x
E
0.0777
𝑲𝒂 =
𝑲𝒂 =
0.0023 0.0023
[𝑯+ ][𝑨− ]
[𝑯𝑨]
[𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸπŸ‘][𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸπŸ‘]
[𝟎. πŸŽπŸ•πŸ•πŸ•]
𝑲𝒂 = πŸ•. πŸŽπŸ– 𝒙 𝟏𝟎−πŸ“
The calculated and measured results for the determination of Ka in buffered solution is
presented in the table below.
Table 3. Dissociation constant (Ka) of an acid in buffered solution
Acid
Volume of
Volume of
Molarity of
Molarity
Sample
acetic acid
sodium
the acetic
of sodium
(mL)
acetate
acid (M)
acetate
(mL)
pH
Ka
(M)
D
20
4
0.08
0.016
3.77
3.44 x 10-5
E
20
20
0.08
0.08
4.49
3.24 x 10-5
F
4
20
0.016
0.08
5.24
2.88 x 10-5
This time a buffer is added, the salt of the acid which is sodium acetate (CH3COONa).
Varying volume is still observed in this section, both for the sodium acetate and acetic acid but
they are all still diluted to 50-mL with distilled water. This will also affect the molarity, pH,
[H+], and Ka of the acid sample. To compare the calculated Ka to the literature value (Ka = 1.76
x 10-5), acid sample F is the closer one.
Sample calculation for Table 3 (Sample D):
Molarity of acetic acid
Molarity of Sodium acetate
C1V1 = C2V2
C1V1 = C2V2
𝟎. 𝟐 𝑴 (πŸπŸŽπ’Žπ‘³) = π‘ͺ𝟐 (πŸ“πŸŽπ’Žπ‘³)
𝟎. 𝟐 𝑴 (πŸ’π’Žπ‘³) = π‘ͺ𝟐 (πŸ“πŸŽπ’Žπ‘³)
𝟎. 𝟐𝟎 𝑴 (πŸπŸŽπ’Žπ‘³)
= π‘ͺ𝟐
πŸ“πŸŽπ’Žπ‘³
𝟎. 𝟐𝟎 𝑴 (πŸ’π’Žπ‘³)
= π‘ͺ𝟐
πŸ“πŸŽπ’Žπ‘³
𝟎. πŸŽπŸ– 𝑴 = π‘ͺ𝟐
𝟎. πŸŽπŸπŸ” 𝑴 = π‘ͺ𝟐
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟏𝟎−𝒑𝑯
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟏𝟎−πŸ‘.πŸ•πŸ•
[𝑯+ ] = 𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸŽπŸπŸ”πŸ—πŸ–πŸπŸ’πŸ‘πŸ”πŸ“πŸ ≈ 𝟎. πŸŽπŸŽπŸŽπŸπŸ•
CH3COOH +
H2O β‡Œ
CH3COO+
I
0.08
0.016
C
0.08-x
0.016+x
E
0.07983
0.016169824
[π‘ͺπ‘―πŸ‘ π‘ͺ𝑢𝑢− ]
𝒑𝑯 = 𝒑𝑲𝒂 + π₯𝐨𝐠
[π‘ͺπ‘―πŸ‘ π‘ͺ𝑢𝑢𝑯]
πŸ‘. πŸ•πŸ• = 𝒑𝑲𝒂 + π₯𝐨𝐠
[𝟎. πŸŽπŸπŸ”πŸπŸ”πŸ—πŸ–πŸπŸ’]
[𝟎. πŸŽπŸ•πŸ—πŸ–πŸ‘]
πŸ‘. πŸ•πŸ• = 𝒑𝑲𝒂 − 𝟎. πŸ”πŸ—πŸ‘πŸ’πŸ”πŸŽπŸ–πŸ‘πŸ”
𝟎. πŸ”πŸ—πŸ‘πŸ’πŸ”πŸŽπŸ–πŸ‘πŸ” + πŸ‘. πŸ•πŸ• = 𝒑𝑲𝒂
πŸ’. πŸ’πŸ”πŸ‘πŸ’πŸ”πŸŽπŸ–πŸ‘πŸ” = 𝒑𝑲𝒂
𝑲𝒂 = 𝟏𝟎−𝒑𝑲𝒂
𝑲𝒂 = 𝟏𝟎−πŸ’.πŸ’πŸ”πŸ‘πŸ’πŸ”πŸŽπŸ–πŸ‘πŸ”
𝑲𝒂 = πŸ‘. πŸ’πŸ’ 𝒙 𝟏𝟎−πŸ“
H+
III.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
To sum it all up, the Ka in unbuffered solution compared to the buffered solution is
much higher, and compare to the literature value for Ka of acetic acid, buffered solutions are
much closer than the unbuffered ones. This result tells us that measurements made in buffered
solutions are much more reliable than unbuffered solutions. This is true due to the common ion
effect. The common ion effect happens when an ion is added to a mixture that already contains
the provided ion and is at equilibrium. When this occurs, the equilibrium changes so that less
of that ion is formed. As CH3COONa dissociates it forms CH3COO- and Na+. For the partial
dissociation of acetic acid, CH3COO- is also formed and this is the common ion, because of
this the reaction will shift to the left therefore decreasing the [H+] and increasing the pH.
It is important to calibrate instruments from time to time, as this will greatly affect the
data obtained. It is also important to ensure the purity of the substance that will be used prior
to the experiment.
IV.
REFERENCES
Kotz, J.C., Treichel Jr, P.M., Townsend, J.R. (2012). Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity.
Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning
Silberberg, M.S. (2009). Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change. Boston, MA:
McGraw Hill.
Zumdahl S. S. & Zumdahl S. A. (2007). Chemistry (5th ed. instructor's annotated). 222
Berkeley
Street, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
E9 chemical equilibria: Ka - chemvision.net. ChemVision. (n.d.). Retrieved February 22,
2023, from http://chemvision.net/102_Lab_7_KaWeakAcid_Sp18.pdf
Download