Uploaded by joshua johnson

Conflict Indigenous peoples Borneo case.

advertisement
Indigenous peoples Borneo
Presentation 07/01/2020
Understand what the competing
claim is
Objectives
Insight in two perspectives of
indigenous peoples and the
government in conservation.
Dicide for yourself if you pick one
side or become a mediator
Indigenous
peoples
Borneo
Dayak people
• Live on Borneo (Indonesia, Malysia and Brunei)
• Native people of Borneo
• Subgroups
• Dayak located in the southern and central interior
Current situations
• Over the past half century the rainforests of
Borneo exploited
• Lot of pressure on IPS to feed the global market
“For many indigenous communities
around the world, there are
powerful economic incentives to
sacrifice trees for timber and largescale agricultural crops to feed the
world’s appetite for economic
development.”(UNU,2009)
• The Dayak people have preserved more than
6,000 hectares of old-growth rainforest in their
9,450-hectare customary forest
• The forest is a source of freshwater, food, and
renewable forest products for the community and
functions as a buffer for the nearby Betung
Kerihun National Park. (PAHLEVI,2019)
“First, resource-dependent communities often lack
resilience in the classical sense of being able to
respond proactively and effectively to disturbances.
Community institutions may have little capacity to
make decisions about their own future which is
controlled by larger-scale market and governance.
Rural forest-dependent communities may be caught in
the political struggle.”
(Green,2013)
https://youtu.be/tpbNo5k6NkI?t=306
New capital
city
• The president is planning to move the capital
• Thousands of indigenous people may be uprooted from
their ancestral lands on Borneo island
• The current capital Jakarta is a crowded and polluted city
on the island of Java that is slowly sinking, while Borneo is
known for its forests.
• Indigenous Dayaks who live in
Kalimantan are struggling
• KIARA, an NGO focusing on
fishermen’s livelihood, noted that
the capital’s relocation will affect
the livelihoods of coastal
communities
• Indigenous people in East Kalimantan have not been
consulted, and stand to lose their lands and
livelihoods to make way for the new capital
• "These are people who have lived there for
generations. Resettlement is not a good solution, as
they will be unable to make a living if they are
removed from their traditional lands,"
Government
Indonesia.
Interests and economic factors.
Current effects
• Most of this population increase was caused by
migrants other parts of Indonesia. The government’s
policy of encouraging transmigration has caused the
Dayaks to become increasingly marginalized in their
own land.
• Democratization has by and large not empowered
members of this minority, as they continue to be
under-represented at all levels of government and
politics.
• According to one estimate, more than 2.5 million
indigenous peoples, including Dayaks, were
displaced in Indonesia by logging and other activities
in the 1970s alone.
Conflicting
intrests?
https://youtu.be/sFpofonb0dk?t=65
Government recognised
issues; false promises?
• Jakarta is a polluted, congested and over-crowded city that
is literally sinking into the ocean under the weight of
numerous policy failures.
• Jokowi has pledged to improve conditions for Indonesia’s
70 million indigenous people, although in 2016 his
government had yet to implement the Court’s
recommendations.
Interests
• Palm oil plantations, paper
production and mining sites,
fuelling conflict and
deforestation.
Mining case.
• There are currently 1,190 mining licenses issued in
East Kalimantan and 625 in Kutai Kartanegara,
according to JATAM’s data
• About 13.83 million hectares of permits have been
granted and 5.2 million of them are mining permits,
AMAN claimed.
• Secretary General of KIARA, adding that East
Kalimantan does not yet have zoning regulations on
coastal areas and small islands
Objectives &
Observations
Understand what the competing
claim is
Dicide for yourself if you pick one
side or become a mediator
Insight in two perspectives of
indigenous people and the
government in conservation.
What are similarities between
this case and the case previously
presented
Statements
• It is a good decision to move the capital
• The indigenous peoples need to understand
the need of the country
• The government should give a compensate to
the Indigenous people
• Government policy and Indigenous rights
should be established before the capital
transition
• Divide between Indigenous people, authorities and
mediators
Discussion
• Use examples from the Baiga tribe
Download