Uploaded by Luo Kuankuan

eBook Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 11e Robert Freeman, Craig Shoulders, Dwayne McSwain, Robert Scott

advertisement
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 1
1/20/17 5:38 PM
Get Complete eBook Download Link below
for instant download
https://browsegrades.net/documents/2
86751/ebook-payment-link-for-instantdownload-after-payment
GOVERNMENTAL AND
NONPROFIT ACCOUNTING
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 1
1/17/17 9:44 AM
This page intentionally left blank
A01_THOM6233_05_SE_WALK.indd 9
1/13/17 6:50 PM
GOVERNMENTAL AND
NONPROFIT ACCOUNTING
Theory and Practice
Robert J. Freeman
Texas Tech University
Craig D. Shoulders
University of North Carolina at Pembroke
Dwayne N. McSwain
Sam Houston State University
Robert B. Scott
City of Carrollton, Texas
ELEVENTH EDITION
New York, NY
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 3
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Vice President, Business Publishing: Donna Battista
Director of Portfolio Management: Adrienne D’Ambrosio
Director, Courseware Portfolio Management: Ashley Dodge
Senior Sponsoring Editor: Neeraj Bhalla
Vice President, Product Marketing: Roxanne McCarley
Director of Strategic Marketing: Brad Parkins
Strategic Marketing Manager: Deborah Strickland
Product Marketer: Tricia Murphy
Field Marketing Manager: Natalie Wagner
Field Marketing Assistant: Kristen Compton
Product Marketing Assistant: Jessica Quazza
Vice President, Production and Digital Studio, Arts and
Business: Etain O’Dea
Director of Production, Business: Jeff Holcomb
Managing Producer, Business: Ashley Santora
Operations Specialist: Carol Melville
Creative Director: Blair Brown
Manager, Learning Tools: Brian Surette
Content Developer, Learning Tools: Sarah Peterson
Managing Producer, Digital Studio, Arts and
Business: Diane Lombardo
Digital Studio Producer: Regina Dasilva
Digital Studio Producer: Alana Coles
Digital Content Team Lead: Noel Lotz
Digital Content Project Lead: Martha Lachance
Full-Service Project Management and Composition: Nathaniel
Jones, SPi Global
Interior Design: Laurie Entringer
Cover Design: Laurie Entringer
Cover Art: Konstantin L./Shutterstock
Printer/Binder: RRD Harrisonburg
Cover Printer: RRD Harrisonburg
Copyright © 2018, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Manufactured in the
United States of America. This publication is protected by copyright, and permission should be obtained from the
publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means,
electronic, ­mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise. For information regarding permissions, request forms,
and the ­appropriate contacts within the Pearson Education Global Rights and Permissions department, please visit
www.pearsoned.com/permissions/.
Acknowledgments of third-party content appear on the appropriate page within the text.
PEARSON and ALWAYS LEARNING are exclusive trademarks owned by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates in the
U.S. and/or other countries.
Unless otherwise indicated herein, any third-party trademarks, logos, or icons that may appear in this work are the property
of their respective owners, and any references to third-party trademarks, logos, icons, or other trade dress are for
demonstrative or descriptive purposes only. Such references are not intended to imply any sponsorship, endorsement,
authorization, or promotion of Pearson’s products by the owners of such marks, or any relationship between the owner and
Pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliates, authors, licensees, or distributors.
Portions of various GASB and FASB documents, copyrighted by the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF), 401 Merritt,
PO Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116, are reproduced with permission. Complete copies of those documents are available
from the FAF.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:
Names: Freeman, Robert J., author.
Title: Governmental and nonprofit accounting : theory and practice / Robert
J. Freeman, Texas Tech University, Craig D. Shoulders, University of North
Carolina at Pembroke, Dwayne N. McSwain, Sam Houston State University,
Robert B. Scott, City of Carrollton, Texas.
Description: Eleventh edition. | New York : Pearson Education, [2018]
Identifiers: LCCN 2016046578 | ISBN 9780133799569
Subjects: LCSH: Municipal finance—United States—Accounting. | Local
finance—United States—Accounting. | Finance, Public—United
States—Accounting. | Fund accounting—United States. | Nonprofit
organizations—United States—Accounting.
Classification: LCC HJ9777.A3 L95 2018 | DDC 657/.83500973—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016046578
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ISBN 10: 0-13-379956-5
ISBN 13: 978-0-13-3799569
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 4
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Dedicated to Our Beloved Families and Many Devoted Friends whose love, encouragement,
support, and involvement in our lives make a significant difference in the richness, meaning, and
fulfillment we are blessed to experience and cherish
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 5
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Brief Contents
Preface xiv
CHAPTER 1
Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
Environment and Characteristics
CHAPTER 2
State and Local Government Accounting and Financial Reporting Model
The Foundation
1
31
CHAPTER 3
Budgeting, Budgetary Accounting, and Budgetary Reporting 69
CHAPTER 4
The General Fund and Special Revenue Funds 107
CHAPTER 5
Revenue Accounting — Governmental Funds 171
CHAPTER 6
Expenditure Accounting — Governmental Funds 220
CHAPTER 7
Capital Projects Funds 259
CHAPTER 8
Debt Service Funds 299
CHAPTER 9
General Capital Assets; General Long-Term Liabilities; Permanent Funds
Introduction to Interfund-GCA-GLTL Accounting
340
CHAPTER 10 Enterprise Funds 392
CHAPTER 11 Internal Service Funds 443
CHAPTER 12 Trust and Agency (Fiduciary) Funds
Summary of Interfund-GCA-GLTL Accounting
474
CHAPTER 13 Financial Reporting
The Basic Financial Statements and Required Supplementary Information
510
CHAPTER 14 Financial Reporting
Deriving Government-Wide Financial Statements and Required Reconciliations
551
CHAPTER 15 Financial Reporting
The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and the Financial Reporting Entity
618
CHAPTER 16 Non-SLG Not-for-Profit Organizations 653
CHAPTER 17 Accounting for Colleges and Universities 692
CHAPTER 18 Accounting for Health Care Organizations 731
CHAPTER 19 Federal Government Accounting 762
CHAPTER 20 Auditing Governments and Not-for-Profit Organizations 799
Index 845
vi
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 6
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Contents
Preface xiv
CHAPTER 1
Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting:
Environment and Characteristics 1
Characteristics and Types of G&NP
Organizations 2
G&NP Sector Significance 2
The G&NP Environment 3
Objectives of G&NP Accounting and Financial
Reporting 6
Authoritative Sources of G&NP Accounting
Principles and Reporting Standards 6
The FAF 7
The FASB 7
FASB-GASB Jurisdictions 7
“Government” Defined 7
The GASB 8
GAAP Hierarchies 11
Concepts and Objectives of SLG Accounting and
Financial Reporting 12
Governmental-Type Activities 12
Financial Report Users 17
Financial Report Uses 17
Business-Type Activities 17
Users and Uses of Financial Reports 18
Financial Reporting Objectives 19
Characteristics of SLG Accounting and Financial
Reporting 20
Fund Accounting 20
Budgets and Appropriations 22
Other Distinguishing Characteristics 22
Commercial Accounting Comparison 23
Concluding Comments 23
Appendix 1-1
Questions 27
Exercises 27
Problems 29
Evolution of Accounting
Principles and
Standards — Prior to the
GASB 24
CHAPTER 2
State and Local Government Accounting
and Financial Reporting Model:
The Foundation 31
Overview of the GASB Financial Reporting
Model 32
The Fundamental Features of the SLG Accounting
and Financial Reporting Model 33
GAAP and Legal Compliance 35
Fund Accounting 36
Fund Categories 37
Transaction Analysis 43
Types of Funds 44
Comparative Financial Statement Formats 51
Annual Financial Reporting 55
Concluding Comments 59
Questions 59
Exercises 60
Problems 64
Cases 67
CHAPTER 3
Budgeting, Budgetary Accounting, and
Budgetary Reporting 69
The Government Budgetary Perspective 69
Budgetary Accounting Overview
Budgetary Accounting and Control
71
71
Budgetary Reporting Overview 77
The Budgetary Basis 77
Interim Budgetary Statements 78
Annual Budgetary Comparisons 79
Budgetary Comparison Statement Illustrated—
­Budgetary Basis Differs from GAAP 79
Budgetary Planning, Control, and Evaluation 82
Planning 82
Control 83
Evaluation 83
Basic Budgetary Terminology 83
Capital vs. Current Budgets 84
Tentative vs. Enacted Budgets 84
General vs. Special Budgets 84
Fixed vs. Flexible Budgets 85
Executive vs. Legislative Budgets 85
Budgetary Approaches and Emphases 86
vii
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 7
1/17/17 9:44 AM
viii Contents
Budget Preparation
Overview 87
87
Preliminary Estimates 87
Preparing the Budget 88
Revenue Estimates and Requests 89
Expenditure Estimates and Requests 89
Expenditure Budgeting Approaches 89
Entries During 20X2 141
Classification of Expenditures 143
Combining Special Revenue Fund
Statements 144
Concluding Comments 144
Appendix 4-1
Legislative Consideration and Action 92
Budget Execution 93
Concluding Comments 93
Appendix 4-2
Appendix 3-1
Appendix 4-3
Classification of
Expenditures 93
Questions 98
Exercises 99
Problems 102
Cases 105
CHAPTER 4
The General Fund and Special Revenue
Funds 107
General Fund and Special Revenue Funds: Use
and Measurement Focus 107
Measurement Focus 108
Purposes and Assumptions of This Chapter 109
General Fund Accounting — Illustrative
Example 109
Entries During 20X1 109
Budget Revisions 112
Year-End Adjustments 126
Preclosing Trial Balances 126
Illustrative Example Worksheets 127
20X1 Closing Entries 128
Level of Detail in Subsidiary Ledgers 130
Postclosing Trial Balance 131
Balance Sheets 131
Interim Balance Sheet 131
Year-End Balance Sheet 132
Fund Balance 132
Fund Balance Reporting Classifications 133
Interfund Receivables and Payables 136
Capital Assets and Long-Term
Liabilities 137
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and
Changes in Fund Balances 137
Restatements 138
Extraordinary Items and Special Items 139
Budget Comparison Statement or Schedule of
Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund
Balance — Budget and Actual 140
Budgetary Comparison Statement Illustrated — ­Budgetary
Basis Same as GAAP 141
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 8
General Ledger
Worksheet and
Subsidiary Ledgers 146
Alternative Account
Structure and Entries 150
Budgetary Comparison
Statement Illustrated —
Budgetary Basis Differs
from GAAP 152
Questions 154
Exercises 155
Problems 159
Cases 165
Harvey City Comprehensive Case
167
CHAPTER 5
Revenue Accounting — Governmental
Funds 171
Revenue Definition and Recognition 172
Nonexchange Transactions 174
Governmental Fund and Proprietary Fund
Revenue Recognition Compared 176
Classification of Revenue Accounts 176
General Fund Revenues 177
Other Governmental Funds Revenues 179
Taxes
179
Taxpayer-Assessed Taxes 179
Property Taxes 180
Property Tax Statements/Schedules
Licenses and Permits
188
189
Intergovernmental Revenues 189
Intergovernmental Revenue Classifications 190
Intergovernmental Revenue Accounting 190
Charges for Services
193
Interfund Services vs. Reimbursements
Charges for Services 194
194
Fines and Forfeits 195
Investment Earnings 196
Valuation Approaches and Techniques 197
Disclosure of Inputs to Fair Value Measurements 197
Reporting Investments in the Financial Statements 198
Miscellaneous Revenues 201
Escheats 201
Private Contributions 201
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Contents ix
CHAPTER 7
Capital Projects Funds 259
Selected Nonrevenue Fund Balance
Increases 201
Capital Asset Sales/Losses 201
Internal Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILOTs)
Collateralized Borrowings 202
202
Revenue Reporting: GAAP vs. Budgetary 202
Balance Sheet Reporting Related to Unrecognized
Revenues 205
Changes in Accounting Principles and Error
Corrections 205
New GASB Standards 206
Error Corrections 206
Concluding Comments 207
Questions 207
Exercises 208
Problems 213
Cases 216
Harvey City Comprehensive Case 218
CHAPTER 6
Expenditure Accounting — Governmental
Funds 220
Expenditure Definition and Recognition 221
Capital Outlay Expenditures 222
Debt Service Expenditures 223
Intergovernmental Expenditures 223
Current Operating Expenditures 223
Inventories and Prepayments 223
Expenditure Recognition Summary 224
Expenditure Accounting Controls and
Procedures 225
Personal Services 226
Materials and Supplies 228
Other Services and Charges 230
Adjusting Entries
234
Encumbrances 235
Debt Service 236
Claims and Judgments 237
Compensated Absences 239
Pension/OPEB Plan Expenditures
241
Expenditure Reporting: GAAP vs. Budgetary 242
Changes in Accounting Principles 242
Alternative Principles 244
New GASB Standards 245
Error Corrections
245
Concluding Comments 246
Questions 246
Exercises 246
Problems 249
Cases 255
Harvey City Comprehensive Case
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 9
257
Capital Projects Fund Operations and Accounting
Standards 261
CPF Financial Resources 261
Number of Funds 261
CPF Life Cycle 262
The Budget 263
Interim Financing 264
Project Costs 265
Intergovernmental Revenues 266
Recording Bond Issues 266
Capital Projects Fund — Case Illustration Begun,
20X1 266
Budgetary Entry 267
Transaction/Event Entries 268
General Ledger Worksheet(s) 270
Preclosing Trial Balance 270
Closing Entries 270
Financial Statements 273
Capital Projects Fund — Case Illustration
Concluded, 20X2 274
20X1 Accounts Closed 275
Case Illustration Assumptions and
Entries — 20X2 276
General Ledger Worksheet 278
20X2 Financial Statements 278
Other Capital Projects Fund
Operations, Accounting, and
Reporting Matters 281
Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs) 282
Investments and Arbitrage 283
Remaining Fund Balance 283
Reporting Multiple Projects 284
Combining CPF Statements 284
Concluding Comments 284
Questions 285
Exercises 285
Problems 289
Cases 295
Harvey City Comprehensive Case 297
CHAPTER 8
Debt Service Funds 299
Debt Service Fund Environment,
Financing, and Expenditure
Recognition 300
Long-Term Liabilities 300
Fixed vs. Variable Rates 301
Debt Service Payments 302
Bonds and Fiscal Agents 302
1/17/17 9:44 AM
x Contents
Required DSF Reserves 303
Bond Ratings 303
Bond Insurance 303
Sources of Financing 304
DSF Investments 304
DSF Expenditure Recognition 304
Debt Service Fund for a Serial Bond Issue:
Case Illustration 305
Illustrative Entries 306
Financial Statements 308
Special Assessment Debt Service Funds 308
Illustrative Entries 310
Illustrative Financial Statements 312
Other Conventional Debt Service Fund
Considerations 312
Nonaccrual of Interest 312
Combining Balance Sheet 313
Combining Operating Statement 313
Debt Service Fund for a Term
Bond Issue 314
Debt Service Funds for Deep Discount
Issues 317
Refundings
317
Reasons for Refundings 318
Refundings Defined 318
Defeasance of Debt 319
Debt Service Funds for Refundings 321
Current Refunding 321
Advance Refunding 323
Debt and Nondebt Financing 324
Reporting Refundings 325
Advance Refunding Disclosures 325
Concluding Comments 327
Questions 328
Exercises 329
Problems 332
Cases 336
Harvey City Comprehensive Case 338
CHAPTER 9
General Capital Assets; General Long-Term
Liabilities; Permanent Funds: Introduction
to Interfund-GCA-GLTL Accounting 340
Overview of General Capital Assets and
General Long-Term Liabilities Accounting
Procedures 341
General Capital Assets
342
General Capital Assets Defined
Initial Valuation 343
Classification 344
Capitalization Policy 344
Property Records 346
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 10
342
Capital Assets Inventory 347
Additions, Betterments, and Renewals 347
Depreciation/Accumulated Depreciation 348
Updating GCA Accounts 349
Recording Depreciation 353
Sale, Replacement, or Retirement 353
Intragovernmental Transactions 354
Impairment 356
Insurance Recoveries 358
Damage or Destruction 359
Reporting and Disclosures 359
General Long-Term Liabilities 360
CPF-DSF-GLTL 363
Serial Debt 363
Special Assessment Debt 364
Other Government Liabilities 364
Pensions and OPEB 365
Interest-Related Adjustments 368
Defaulted Bonds 368
In-Substance Defeasance 369
GLTL Records 369
GLTL Reporting and Disclosures 370
Permanent Funds 370
Introduction to Interfund-GCA-GLTL
Accounting 373
Concluding Comments 377
Questions 378
Exercises 378
Problems 384
Cases 388
Harvey City Comprehensive Case 389
CHAPTER 10
Enterprise Funds 392
Common Characteristics and Principles of
Proprietary Funds 392
Accounting Equation 393
Accounting Principles 393
Financial Statements 393
Enterprise Funds Defined 394
Enterprise Fund Accounting Illustrated
Budgeting and Appropriations 396
Interfund Activity 396
Intergovernmental Grants 397
Interest Capitalization 397
396
Establishment of Fund and Acquisition of Plant
Accounting for Routine Operating Transactions
Preclosing Trial Balance and Financial
­Statements — ­Basic Example 402
397
398
Enterprise Fund Accounting — Extended
Illustration 411
Enterprise Fund Reporting — Extended Example ­ 419
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Contents xi
Combining Enterprise Fund Financial
Statements 423
Concluding Comments 429
Questions 429
Exercises 430
Problems 433
Cases 438
Harvey City Comprehensive Case 441
Asset, and General Long-Term Liability
Accounting Illustrations 495
Concluding Comments 500
Questions 501
Exercises 501
Problems 504
Cases 507
Harvey City Comprehensive Case 509
CHAPTER 11
Internal Service Funds 443
CHAPTER 13
Financial Reporting: The Basic F
­ inancial
Statements and Required ­Supplementary
Information 510
Overview of Accounting Principles
Initial Establishment 444
444
Pricing Policies and Methods 446
Pricing Methods 447
Relation to Budget 448
Financial Statements 448
Internal Service Fund
Accounting Illustrated 448
Automotive Equipment Unit 449
Financial Statements–Basic Example 452
Central Stores Fund 452
Self-Insurance Fund 456
Disposition of Increase or Decrease in Net
Position 461
Dissolution of an Internal Service Fund 461
Combining Internal Service Fund Financial
Statements 462
Concluding Comments 462
Questions 466
Exercises 466
Problems 468
Cases 471
Harvey City Comprehensive Case 472
CHAPTER 12
Trust and Agency (Fiduciary) Funds:
Summary of Interfund-GCA-GLTL
Accounting 474
The Accountability Focus
475
Agency Funds 476
Simpler Agency Funds 477
Tax Agency Funds 477
Special Assessment Agency Funds
482
Trust Funds 483
Private-Purpose Trusts 483
Investment Trusts 485
Pension Trusts 486
Combining Trust and Agency Fund Financial
Statements 494
Additional Interfund, General Capital
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 11
Basic Financial Statements Overview 512
Fund Financial Statements 513
Major Fund Reporting 513
Fund-Based Financial Statements
523
Government-Wide Financial Statements 526
Statement of Net Position 527
Statement of Activities 529
Measurement Focus 532
Reporting Expenses 532
Program vs. General Revenues 533
Internal Service Funds 536
Infrastructure Capital Assets 536
Note Disclosures
537
Required Supplementary Information
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Other RSI 539
Special Purpose Governments 541
Concluding Comments 541
Questions 541
Exercises 542
Problems 545
Cases 547
Harvey City Comprehensive Case 550
539
539
CHAPTER 14
Financial Reporting: Deriving GovernmentWide Financial Statements and Required
Reconciliations 551
Deriving Governmental Activities Data 553
Deriving Government-Wide Financial
Statement Data for Governmental
Activities — A Worksheet-Based
Approach 554
The Conversion Worksheets 555
Balance Sheet Conversion Worksheet
­Adjustments 560
Farley County Balance Sheet Conversion 564
Operating Statement Conversion Worksheet
­Adjustments 566
Farley County Operating Statement Conversion
570
1/17/17 9:44 AM
xii Contents
Deriving Business-Type Activities Data 573
Preparing Government-Wide Financial
Statements 575
Statement of Net Position 575
Statement of Activities 575
Reconciliations 579
Concluding Comments 581
Appendix 14-1
Appendix 14-2
A Two-Worksheet
Approach to Deriving
Governmental
Activities Data: An
Adjusting Entry
Presentation 581
A One-Worksheet
Approach to Deriving
Governmental
Activities Data 590
Questions 601
Exercises 602
Problems 605
Cases 612
Harvey City Comprehensive Case
616
CHAPTER 15
Financial Reporting: The Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report and the Financial
Reporting Entity 618
The Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report 619
The Introductory Section 619
The Financial Section 621
The Statistical Section 625
Supplemental and Special
Purpose Reporting 629
Financial Reporting — Complex Entity
Structure 630
Reporting Entity Definition 631
Reporting Entity Disclosures 633
Integrating Component Units into the Reporting
Entity 635
Blending 636
Discrete Presentation 637
Dual Reporting Entity Model 638
Other Issues 639
Separate Issuance of Primary Government
Financial Statements 640
Related Organizations, Joint Ventures, and Jointly
Governed Organizations 640
Concluding Comments 641
Questions 643
Exercises 644
Problems 647
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 12
Cases 650
Harvey City Comprehensive Case
652
CHAPTER 16
Non-SLG Not-for-Profit Organizations 653
Classification of Organizations 654
Voluntary Health and Welfare Organizations
­(VHWOs) 655
Other Not-for-Profit Organizations (ONPOs)
655
Classes of Net Assets 656
Non-GAAP Accounting and Reporting
Requirements 657
Basis of Accounting
657
Financial Statements 657
Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet) 658
Statement of Activities (Operating Statement) 659
Statement of Cash Flows 666
Statement of Functional Expenses 666
Nongovernment VHWO and ONPO Accounting
and Reporting Illustration 666
Transactions and Entries 667
Illustrative Financial Statements 675
Concluding Comments 680
Questions 681
Exercises 681
Problems 685
CHAPTER 17
Accounting for Colleges and
Universities 692
Classification as “Engaged Only in Business-Type
Activities” 693
GAAP Reporting Requirements 694
Statement of Net Position 695
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net
Position 695
Statement of Cash Flows 701
Case Illustration — A Government University 702
Other Resources 707
Annuity and Life Income Gifts 714
Annuity Gifts 714
Life Income Gifts 717
Colleges and Universities Engaged in Both
Governmental and Business-Type
Activities 718
Nongovernment Not-for-Profit University
Reporting 718
Concluding Comments 722
Questions 722
Exercises 722
Problems 724
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Contents xiii
CHAPTER 18
Accounting for Health Care
­Organizations 731
Funds — Government Hospitals
Basic Principles 733
CHAPTER 20
Auditing Governments and Not-for-Profit
Organizations 799
732
747
Statement of Net Position 747
Operating Statement 747
Statement of Cash Flows 749
Nongovernment Not-for-Profit Hospital
Reporting 751
Concluding Comments 755
Questions 755
Exercises 756
Problems 759
CHAPTER 19
Federal Government Accounting 762
The Federal Financial Management
Environment 763
Financial Accounting Responsibilities
Overview 765
763
The Budgetary Process 766
The Budget Cycle 766
769
Accounting Principles and Standards for Federal
Agencies 769
The Federal Model 769
Standard General Ledger 773
Federal Fund Structure 775
Financial Reporting 776
Federal Agency Accounting and Reporting
Illustrated 778
A Case Illustration 778
Maintaining Budgetary Control 779
Maintaining Proprietary Accounts 783
Other Transactions and Entries 783
Closing Entries 787
Reporting 789
Concluding Comments 793
Questions 794
Exercises 794
Problems 796
Exceeding Budget Authority
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 13
799
What Is an Audit? 800
Unique Measurement and Display Features 733
Distinguishing Primary Activities 733
Classes of Revenues 733
Gains 736
Donations 736
Expense Classification 736
Restricted Assets 737
Property, Plant, and Equipment 738
Illustrative Case 738
Summary of Transactions and Events 739
Financial Statements
Overview
Classifications of Audits 800
Sources of Auditing Standards 801
External Auditor Classifications 803
The Financial Statement Audit 804
GAAS and GAGAS 804
Audit Materiality and Early Reporting of
­Deficiencies 806
Additional Reporting Requirements 806
Planning the Financial Statement Audit 807
Determining Materiality in Government 808
Performing the Audit 810
Audit Procedures 810
Reporting 811
Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters 811
Required Communications and the Management
­Letter 812
The Single Audit 812
Purposes and Recent Reforms 814
Applicability 815
Definitions 816
Objectives 816
Overview 816
Auditee Responsibilities 817
Auditor Responsibilities 819
Sources of Guidance for the Single Audit 821
Cognizant Agency Responsibilities 822
Major FFA Programs 822
Findings & Questioned Costs 826
Illegal Acts 826
Subrecipients 826
Auditor Reports — Single Audit 827
Auditee Reporting Responsibilities 828
Concluding Comments 831
Appendix 20-1
Appendix 20-2
Glossary 832
Data Collection
Form for Reporting
on Audits of States,
Local Governments,
and Nonprofit
Organizations 833
Questions 837
Exercises 837
Problems 841
Cases 842
Index 845
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Preface
The 11th edition of Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting continues a 75+ year
tradition as a comprehensive, practice-relevant, up-to-date textbook covering state
and local government, federal government, and not-for-profit organization accounting, financial reporting, and auditing. This new edition is in keeping with our philosophy that what students learn in the accounting classroom should correlate
highly with what they must understand and apply on the CPA examination and as
professional accountants.
Governmental accounting, financial reporting, and auditing have experienced
enormous changes recently, accelerating the trend of past years. In just the 10-month
period from June of 2015 through March of 2016, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued 10 Statements of Governmental Accounting Standards.
Still other GASB standards became effective for the first time during that period, as
did significant changes in Single Audit guidance. These changes have had significant
impacts on government accounting, financial reporting, and auditing. Changes include
a new hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), up-to-date fair
value guidance, and new standards for accounting for and reporting postemployment
benefits—including both pensions and other postemployment benefits. Also, in
August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) adopted Accounting
Standards Update 2016-14, “Not-for-Profit Entities” (Topic 958), making major
changes in not-for-profit organization financial statements. Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting: Theory and Practice, 11th edition, is updated for all of these and
other relevant changes in accounting standards through the beginning of 2017.
EYES-OF-THE-LEARNER–MOTIVATED CHANGES
Changes to this edition will allow students to master content more efficiently. By
continuing to use the feedback from adopters and students, we have examined the
text “through the eyes of the learner.” New features include:
• The order of Chapter 3, “Budgeting, Budgetary Accounting, and Budgetary Reporting,” and
Chapter 4, “General and Special Revenue Funds,” have been reworded so that budgeting is
covered before General Fund accounting and reporting. This change allows budgetary
accounting and reporting to be fully integrated with accounting for actual revenues and
expenditures when initially discussed and illustrated.
• An appendix has been added to Chapter 14, “Financial Reporting: Deriving GovernmentWide Financial Statements and Required Reconciliations.” It provides journal entries consistent with completing the two-worksheet-based conversion of governmental funds data to
government-wide governmental activities data. The appendix was added because many students find that seeing the entries improves their understanding of the conversion. The oneworksheet conversion continues to be provided in a second appendix, as in recent editions.
• Chapter 20, “Auditing Governments and Not-for-Profit Organizations,” has been reorganized and rewritten to facilitate understanding the audit requirements, processes, and
responsibilities under recent revisions of Government Auditing Standards (GAS) and Single
Audit requirements.
STANDARDS-DRIVEN CHANGES
As should be expected, most of the modifications in the content of this 11th edition
are necessary because of the numerous changes in government and nonprofit
xiv
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 14
1/17/17 9:44 AM
 Preface xv
organization accounting standards and in auditing guidance. Changes required by
this new guidance include the following:
• Chapter 1, “Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting: Environment and Characteristics,”
is updated for the new government GAAP hierarchy established by GASB Statement No.
76, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for State and Local
Governments.” Both the authoritative levels of the hierarchy and the guidance for addressing
transactions and events not covered in the authoritative literature are discussed.
• Chapter 5, “Revenue Accounting–Governmental Funds,” is updated for the provisions of
GASB Statement No. 72, “Fair Value Measurement and Application.” This coverage includes
the new definitions of both fair value and investments, the applicability of fair value, fair value
measurement guidance, and the requirement to disclose the levels of inputs (reliability) of
the measurements. In addition, GASB Statement No. 77, “Tax Abatement Disclosures,” is
addressed in this chapter.
• Chapter 6, “Expenditure Accounting–Governmental Funds,” is updated for the provisions of (1)
GASB Statement No. 68, “Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions—An Amendment of
GASB Statement No. 27,” (2) GASB Statement No. 75, “Accounting and Financial Reporting
for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pensions,” and (3) GASB Statement No. 82,
“Pension Issues—An Amendment of GASB Statements No. 67, No. 68, and No. 73.”
• Chapter 9, “General Capital Assets; General Long-Term Liabilities; Permanent Funds:
Introduction to Interfund-GCA-GLTL Accounting,” discusses and illustrates accounting for
net pension liabilities and related deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of
resources. The computation of pension expense for governmental activities is demonstrated
as well. Other postemployment benefits (OPEB) also are incorporated briefly. The chapter
is updated for the GASB Statement No. 72 requirement to use acquisition costs for donated
capital assets and certain other transactions.
• Chapter 10, “Enterprise Funds,” includes the impact of the new pension and OPEB standards on Enterprise Funds.
• Chapter 12, “Trust and Agency (Fiduciary) Funds: Summary of Interfund-GCA-GLTL
Accounting,” is updated for the pertinent provisions of the new pension and OPEB standards—particularly pension plan and OPEB plan reporting. These standards include:
• GASB Statement No. 67, “Financial Reporting for Pension Plans—An Amendment of
GASB Statement No. 25”
• GASB Statement No. 73, “Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions and Related
Assets That Are Not within the Scope of GASB Statement 68, and Amendments to
Certain Provisions of GASB Statements 67 and 68” (This standard supersedes GASB
Statements No. 25 and No. 27.)
• GASB Statement No. 74, “Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other
Than Pension Plans” (This standard supersedes GASB Statement No. 43.)
• GASB Statement No. 82, “Pension Issues—An Amendment of GASB Statements No. 67,
No. 68, and No. 73”
• Chapter 13, “Financial Reporting: The Basic Financial Statements and Required
Supplementary Information,” discusses and illustrates the government-wide statement of
net position, including presentation of pension-related deferred outflows of resources and
deferred inflows of resources as well as net pension liabilities.
• Chapter 14, “Financial Reporting: Deriving Government-Wide Financial Statements and
Required Reconciliations,” expands the coverage of the two-worksheet approach with a new
appendix, including related journal entries, and incorporates new deferred items that must
be included in the conversion.
• Chapter 15, “Financial Reporting: The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and the
Financial Reporting Entity,” incorporates the new blending requirements adopted in
Statement No. 80, “Blending Requirements for Certain Component Units—An Amendment
of GASB Statement No. 14.”
• Chapter 16, “Non-SLG Not-for-Profit Organizations,” has been revised to reflect the changes
in not-for-profit financial statements required by the FASB’s Accounting Standards Update
2016-14, “Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Presentation of Financial Statement of Notfor-Profit Entities.”
• Chapter 17, “Accounting for Colleges and Universities,” has been revised to incorporate
both GASB Statement No. 81, “Irrevocable Split-Interest Agreements,” and FASB
Accounting Standards Update 2016-14.
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 15
1/17/17 9:44 AM
xvi Preface  
• Chapter 18, “Accounting for Health Care Organizations,” has been updated for FASB
Accounting Standards Update 2016-14.
• Chapter 20, “Auditing Governments and Not-for-Profit Organizations,” incorporates recent
changes in auditing guidance and audit reports. In particular, it is updated for the most recent
state and local government audit guide and for the new “Uniform Guidance” that applies to
Single Audits of governments and not-for-profit entities.
CUSTOMIZATION FRIENDLY DESIGN
As in the past, the text design allows professors to tailor their courses to their students’ needs and priorities. Therefore, the breadth of topics is wider than is covered
in the typical government and not-for-profit accounting course. Chapters that tend
to be among the ones omitted are constructed to permit their omission without
harming the flow of a course.
LEARNING FRIENDLY
The 11th edition also continues to incorporate the building block approach to the
learning process consistent with the following philosophy:
• Mastering governmental and not-for-profit accounting concepts, principles, and practices
involves progressing through many different phases of knowledge and understanding.
• Learning efficiency and effectiveness requires this progression to follow a logical
sequence.
• Logical sequencing keeps the next concept to be learned accessible from the base provided
by the concepts learned already. (Students learn more in less time when taken through the
right steps.)
• Efficiently achieving more advanced levels of learning and knowledge requires attaining any
prerequisite knowledge first.
• Having this base of prior knowledge and understanding facilitates learning the new information and ideas.
This approach should guide both the ordering of chapters and the sequencing of
material within a chapter. The learning process should take full advantage of the
business accounting background the learner likely brings into the course.
OTHER POINTS OF DISTINCTION
Other key features of the text, in addition to the learner orientation, flow from our
teaching philosophies and goals, including:
• Integrating the computerized Harvey City Comprehensive Case throughout Chapters 4 to 15
to simulate the experience of accounting and reporting for a small city
• Correlation with professional practice, enhanced by:
• Using a practice-relevant, conversion worksheet approach to develop government-wide
financial statement data
• Integrating practice examples for teaching purposes throughout the state and local government accounting, reporting, and auditing chapters
• Incorporating case problems developed from actual state and local government financial
reports in the end-of-chapter materials
INSTRUCTOR SUPPLEMENTS
Supplements for this new edition of Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting are
available for download by instructors only at www.pearsonhighered.com. Resources
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 16
1/17/17 9:44 AM
 Preface xvii
include an Instructor’s Manual, Solutions Manual, Excel solution templates for the
Harvey City Comprehensive Case and for selected problems, Test Item File, and a
PowerPoint presentation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful for the excellent input provided by numerous adopters and other
individuals that led to improvements in the 11th edition of the text.
A few individuals have provided particularly significant input to help us
enhance the chapters. We offer special thanks to:
Dr. Richard Brooks, West Virginia University
Dr. Catherine A. Finger-Podosky, Saint Mary’s College of California
We appreciate the support and professional commitment of the development,
marketing, production, and editorial staffs at Pearson. We particularly appreciate the
efforts of Ashley Dodge, Director of Courseware Portfolio Management; Jeff Holcomb, Director of Production, Business; Ashley Santora and Alison Kalil, Managing
Producers, Business; Neeraj Bhalla, Senior Sponsoring Editor; and Jona Centino,
Project Manager, who kept us on track and made sure everything was complete.
AUTHORSHIP CHANGES
As anyone familiar with this text will likely have noticed before even opening the
book, we have the bittersweet misfortune of wishing two good friends and colleagues well as they end their time as co-authors of the text.
Greg Allison continues to make monumental contributions to the governmental accounting profession and education in his roles at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The demands on his time continue to be immense. He recently
contributed to the development of an online Masters of Accounting program at the
university in addition to his work with the School of Government, the North Carolina Local Government Commission, and governments throughout the state and
beyond. Greg has made valuable contributions to the text in the more than 10 years
he has served as a co-author.
G. Robert Smith, Jr., better known to us all as Smitty, has retired after a long
and successful career during which he made valuable contributions not only to the
universities and students he served but to the governmental accounting profession
as well. Smitty held leadership roles in the Government and Not-for-Profit Section
of the American Accounting Association, including serving as its president. He also
served on the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council, participated
in multiple roles with the AICPA, and regularly provided continuing professional
education for CPAs and government officials. Smitty accomplished all this even
during the time that he was serving as the accounting department head at Middle
Tennessee State University. One of the contributions to this text that has left its
mark and that we value greatly is Smitty’s introduction of the two-worksheet
approach to converting fund financial statement information into government-wide
financial statement information. This is an effective approach for helping students
(and practitioners) understand the conversion process. We wish Smitty the very
best in his Tennessee mountain retirement.
The other side of authorship changes is we get the benefit of the ideas, experience, and efforts of our new colleagues. Two outstanding professionals have joined
us to carry the load left by the departures of Greg and Smitty.
Dwayne McSwain, currently a member of the accounting faculty at Sam Houston State University, is a well-known and well-respected member of the governmental accounting and auditing specialists within academe. He has had extensive
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 17
1/17/17 9:44 AM
xviii Preface  
experience in both governmental accounting roles and as a public school district
finance director before entering the professorial ranks. Dwayne also co-authored
a significant practitioner guide for several years. This extensive background and his
publishing experience make Dwayne a valuable addition to our authorship team.
Robert Scott, the chief financial officer and assistant city manager of the city
of Carrollton, Texas, is among the most talented and respected CPAs in government today. He has been recognized as the outstanding CPA in government by the
AICPA (2008) and serves on its State and Local Government Expert Panel. Bob
has served the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) in many capacities, including as a member of its Executive Board, and is an outstanding continuing
professional education instructor who has authored or co-authored well-regarded
continuing education courses. Bob, like Dwayne, is a valuable addition to the
author team. Both have made meaningful contributions to this edition.
MOST IMPORTANTLY
Finally, we can never adequately express our love and appreciation to our families.
They stand by us in all that we do, including the revision of this text. Clearly, their
help and support multiply what we are able to accomplish. Most importantly, they
enrich our lives in countless ways and are continuous sources of joy and blessings.
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 18
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Get Complete eBook Download Link below
for instant download
https://browsegrades.net/documents/2
86751/ebook-payment-link-for-instantdownload-after-payment
About the Authors
ROBERT J. FREEMAN
Robert J. Freeman, Ph.D., CPA, is the Distinguished Professor of Accounting Emeritus
at Texas Tech University. He served on the Governmental Accounting Standards Board
from 1990 to 2000 and on its predecessor, the National Council on Governmental
Accounting, from 1974 to 1980. Dr. Freeman has received the Enduring Lifetime
Contributions Award from the American Accounting Association Government and
Nonprofit Section, the Louisiana Tech University Tower Medallion Award, and the
AICPA Elijah Watt Sells Silver Medal Award.
Prior to joining the Texas Tech faculty, Dr. Freeman was on the faculties of the
University of Alabama and Louisiana Tech University, and served as national director
of State and Local Government Activities at Arthur Young & Company. The extensive
governmental accounting, financial reporting, and auditing seminars that he has offered
each summer for the past 35 years have been attended by over 20,000 participants,
including some of today’s leaders whose first introduction to governmental accounting
and financial reporting was in his 3-day Governmental Accounting and Financial
Reporting seminar.
Dr. Freeman has contributed numerous articles to professional journals, including
The Journal of Accountancy, Accounting Horizons, The Government Accountants Journal, Government Finance Review, The International Journal of Governmental Auditing,
and The Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. He has
served on the editorial boards of The Journal of Accountancy, Research in Governmental Accounting, The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, and The Journal of Public
Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. Also, Dr. Freeman and Dr. Shoulders
were co-authors of multiple editions of Practitioners Publishing Company’s three-­
volume practice guide, Preparing Governmental Financial Statements.
CRAIG D. SHOULDERS
Craig D. Shoulders, Ph.D., is a professor of accounting at the University of North
Carolina at Pembroke. He served on the accounting faculty at Virginia Tech for the first
22 years of his career and also taught for 3 years at Western Carolina University.
In addition to being the recipient of the Cornelius E. Tierney/Ernst & Young
Research Award from the Association of Government Accountants, Dr. Shoulders has
been recognized twice by the AICPA as an Outstanding Discussion Leader. He prepares and teaches continuing education courses and seminars on governmental accounting and auditing across the country and is a past president of the Roanoke Area Chapter
of the Virginia Society of CPAs. Dr. Shoulders has conducted research for the GASB
on the financial reporting entity and has served on GASB task forces on other
projects.
Dr. Shoulders coauthors several continuing education courses and for many years
authored the government and not-for-profit sections of the ExamMatrix CPA Review.
His articles have appeared in such journals as Issues in Accounting Education, The
Journal of Accountancy, Government Finance Review, and The Journal of Government
Financial Management. He received his bachelor’s degree from Campbellsville University, his master’s degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and his Ph.D. from
Texas Tech University.
xix
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 19
1/17/17 9:44 AM
xx About the Authors  
DWAYNE N. MCSWAIN
Dwayne McSwain, Ph.D., CPA, is an Associate Professor of accounting at Sam Houston
State University. He previously served on the accounting faculties at Appalachian State
University and Middle Tennessee State University.
Dr. McSwain’s research has been published in Internal Auditing, Journal of
Accounting Literature, Journal of Government Financial Management, and The CPA
Journal, among others. He is a member of the American Accounting Association,
American Institute of CPAs, Association of Government Accountants, Government
Finance Officers Association, and the Texas Society of CPAs. Dr. McSwain has been
teaching governmental and nonprofit accounting since 1999. He has more than 14 years
of governmental accounting experience in practice, working as a staff auditor, payroll
specialist, internal auditor, finance director, and accounting information systems specialist in Texas school districts.
In addition to co-authoring several academic and practitioner articles related to
governmental and nonprofit accounting, Dr. McSwain co-authored annual updates to
Applying Government Accounting Principles for 8 years. He received his associate’s
degree from Gaston College, his bachelor’s degree from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, his master’s degree from Tarleton State University, and his Ph.D. from
the University of Texas at Arlington.
ROBERT B. SCOTT
Robert Scott is the chief financial officer/assistant city manager for the city of Carrollton,
Texas. He earned a master’s degree in Accounting and a bachelor of science degree in
Political Science from Texas Tech University. Today, he combines his extensive knowledge of governmental accounting with practical knowledge of what works in practice.
Mr. Scott began his career in public accounting and has served both as a Practice
Fellow at the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and as a representative to the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Committee. He serves as a
reviewer during revisions of Governmental Accounting, Auditing, and Financial
Reporting (the “Blue Book”), is a past chair of GFOA’s Committee for Accounting,
Auditing and Financial Reporting (CAAFR), and has served on the GFOA’s Executive
Board. Mr. Scott serves on the AICPA State and Local Government Expert Panel, and
in 2008 the AICPA named him the Outstanding CPA in Local Government.
A01_FREE9569_11_SE_FM.indd 20
1/17/17 9:44 AM
Governmental and
Nonprofit Accounting
Environment and Characteristics
CHAPTER
1
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1.1 Describe the key unique characteristics and major
types of government and nonprofit (G&NP)
organizations.
1.2 Describe the objectives of G&NP accounting and
financial reporting.
1.3 Identify the authoritative sources of financial reporting
standards for various types of G&NP organizations and
the level of authority (hierarchy) of various
pronouncements and guides.
1.4 Summarize the key distinguishing characteristics,
concepts, and objectives of G&NP accounting and
financial reporting.
1.5 Explain the key characteristics of state and local
government financial reporting.
A
ccounting and financial reporting for governments and nonprofit (G&NP)
organizations, as well as G&NP auditing, are based on distinctive concepts,
standards, and procedures that accommodate their environments and the
needs of their financial and audit report users. This book focuses on the most important of these concepts, standards, and procedures applicable to (1) state and local
governments, including counties, cities, and school districts, as well as townships,
villages, special districts, and public authorities; (2) the federal government; and
(3) not-for-profit and governmental universities, hospitals, voluntary health and
welfare organizations, and other not-for-profit (or nonprofit) organizations.
Financial management and accountability considerations peculiar to G&NP organizations are emphasized throughout, and auditing G&NP organizations is discussed in the final chapter.
This chapter introduces the characteristics and types of G&NP organizations
and the objectives and nature of G&NP accounting and financial reporting.
Additionally, it discusses and illustrates how to distinguish government and nongovernment organizations; identifies the various authoritative sources of G&NP
accounting principles and reporting standards, including their relative authoritativeness; and introduces the state and local government (SLG) accounting and
1
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 1
1/17/17 9:45 AM
2 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
financial reporting environment, concepts, objectives, and distinctive features. The
latter includes funds, legally enacted budgets and appropriations, and budgetary
control.
CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES OF G&NP
ORGANIZATIONS
Learning
1.1
Objective
Governments and other nonprofit organizations are unique in the following ways:
• They do not attempt to earn a profit, and most are exempt from income taxes. Thus, typical
business accounting, including income tax accounting, usually is not appropriate.
• They are owned collectively by their constituents; because ownership is not evidenced by
equity shares that can be sold or traded, residents who are dissatisfied with their government must await a change in its elected governing body or move elsewhere.
• Those contributing financial resources to the organizations do not necessarily receive a
direct or proportionate share of their services. For example, homeowners pay property
taxes to finance public schools even if they do not have children in school.
• Their major policy decisions, and perhaps some operating decisions, typically are made by
majority vote of an elected or appointed governing body (e.g., a state legislature, a city
council, or a hospital board of directors) whose members serve part time, receive modest
or no compensation, and have diverse backgrounds, philosophies, capabilities, and
interests.
• Decisions usually must be made “in the sunshine”—that is, in meetings open to the public,
including the news media—and most have “open records” laws that make their accounting
and other records open to the public.
A G&NP organization exists because a community or society decides to provide certain goods or services to its group as a whole. Often, these goods or services
are provided regardless of whether costs incurred will be recovered through charges
for the goods or services or whether those paying for the goods or services are those
benefiting from them. Indeed, many G&NP services could not be provided profitably through private enterprise. In addition, the community or society may consider
these services so vital to the public well-being that they should be supervised by its
elected or appointed representatives.
The major types of government and nonprofit organizations may be classified as:
1.
Governmental: federal, state, county, municipal, township, and village, as well as other local
governmental authorities and special districts
2.
Educational: kindergartens, elementary, and secondary schools; vocational and technical
schools; and colleges and universities
3.
Health and welfare: hospitals, nursing homes, child protection agencies, the American Red
Cross, and United Service Organizations (USO)
4.
Religious: Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA), Young Women’s Christian
Association (YWCA), Salvation Army, and other church-related organizations
5.
Charitable: United Way, Community Chest, and similar fund-raising agencies; related
charitable agencies; and other charitable organizations
6.
Foundations: private trusts and corporations organized for educational, religious, or charitable purposes
This general classification scheme has much overlap among the classifications.
Many charitable organizations are operated by churches, for example, and governments are deeply involved in education, health, and welfare activities.
G&NP Sector
Significance
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 2
Governments and other nonprofit organizations have experienced dramatic growth
in recent years and are major economic, political, and social forces in our society.
Indeed, the G&NP sector now accounts for more than one-third of all expenditures
in the U.S. economy. During the Great Recession, government spending temporarily
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Characteristics and Types of G&NP Organizations 3
grew to over 40 percent of the total gross domestic product. The total value of financial and human resources devoted to this sector is gigantic, both absolutely and
relatively.
Sound financial management—including thoughtful budgeting, proper
­accounting, meaningful financial reporting, and timely audits by qualified auditors—is
at least as important in the G&NP sector as in the private business sector. Furthermore, because of the scope and diversity of its activities, proper management of the
financial affairs of a city or town, for example, may be far more complex than that of
a private business with comparable assets or annual expenditures.
As the size and complexity of governments and nonprofit organizations have
increased in recent years, so have the number of career employment opportunities
in this sector for college graduates majoring in accounting and public administration
(and other disciplines). Likewise, the number of governmental and nonprofit organization auditing and consulting engagements with independent public accounting
firms has increased significantly. Accordingly, a significant portion of the Uniform
Certified Public Accountant (CPA) Examination is on G&NP accounting, financial
reporting, and auditing concepts, principles, and procedures.
Government and nonprofit organizations are similar in many ways to profit-­seeking
enterprises. For example:
1.
They are integral parts of the same economic system and use financial, capital, and human
resources to accomplish their purposes.
2.
Both must acquire and convert scarce resources into their respective goods or services.
3.
Both must have viable information systems, including excellent accounting systems to
assure that managers, governing bodies, and others receive relevant and timely information
for planning, directing, controlling, and evaluating the sources, uses, and balances of their
scarce resources.
4.
Cost analysis and other control and evaluation techniques are essential to ensure that
resources are utilized economically, effectively, and efficiently.
5.
In some cases, both produce similar products. For example, both governments and private
enterprises may own and operate transportation systems, sanitation services, and electric
utilities.
The G&NP
Environment
On the other hand, significant differences distinguish profit-seeking organizations
from G&NP organizations. Broad generalizations about such a diversified group as
G&NP organizations are difficult, but the major differences include (1) organizational objectives, (2) sources of financial resources, and (3) methods of evaluating
performance and operating results.
Organizational Objectives
Expectation of income or gain is the principal factor that motivates investors to
provide resources to profit-seeking enterprises. To the contrary:
• The objective of most governmental and nonprofit organizations is to provide as much
service each year as their financial and other resources permit.
• Typically, G&NP organizations operate on a year-to-year basis—that is, each year they
raise as many financial resources as necessary and expend them in serving their
constituencies.
• Government and nonprofit organizations may seek to increase the amount of resources
made available to them each year—and most do—but the purpose is to enable the organizations to provide more or better services, not to increase their wealth.
In sum, whereas private businesses seek to increase their wealth for the benefit of
their owners, G&NP organizations seek to expend their available financial
resources for the benefit of their constituencies. Financial management in the
G&NP environment thus typically focuses on acquiring and using financial
resources—on sources and uses of expendable financial resources, budget status, and
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 3
1/17/17 9:45 AM
4 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
cash flow—rather than on net income. Even G&NP entities whose external financial reports do not require primary emphasis on acquisition and use of financial
resources emphasize this information for internal reporting and management
decision-making purposes.
Sources of Financial Resources
The sources of financial resources differ between business and G&NP organizations, as well as among G&NP organizations. In the absence of a net income objective, no distinction generally is made between invested capital and revenue of G&NP
organizations. A dollar is a financial resource whether acquired through donations,
user charges, sales of assets, loans, or some other manner.
The typical nondebt sources of financing for business enterprises are investments by owners and sales of goods or services to customers. These sources of
financing are usually not the primary sources of G&NP organizations’ financial
resources. Instead, G&NP organizations primarily rely on the following sources:
• Governments have the unique power to force involuntary financial resource contributions
through taxation of property, sales, and income. Indeed, all levels of government rely
heavily on this power. Grants and shared revenues from other governments are also
important state and local government revenue sources, as are charges for services
provided.
• Religious groups and charitable organizations usually rely heavily on donations, although
they may have other revenue sources.
• Some colleges and universities rely heavily on donations and income from trust funds; others depend primarily on state appropriations, federal and state grants, and/or tuition and
fee charges for support.
• Hospitals and other health care organizations generally charge their clientele, although
many do not admit patients solely on the basis of ability to pay. Indeed, many G&NP
hospitals serve numerous charity patients and/or have large amounts of uncollectible
accounts, and some hospitals rely heavily on gifts, federal and state grants, and
bequests.
Other, more subtle differences in sources of G&NP organizations’ financial
resources as compared with profit-seeking businesses include these:
• Many services or goods provided by these organizations, such as police and fire protection,
are monopolistic. Thus, an open market for objectively appraising or evaluating their value
does not exist.
• User charges usually are based on the cost of the services provided rather than on supplyand-demand–related pricing policies.
• Charges levied for goods or services often cover only part of the costs incurred to provide
them; for example, tuition generally covers only a fraction of the cost of operating state
colleges or universities, and token charges (or no charges) may be made to a hospital’s
indigent patients.
• Governments’ revenue-raising capacity is constrained by its geographic boundaries. A wellrun city cannot expand its service and taxing reach to other cities or jurisdictions as a result
of its superior performance. At some point, all the usable property has been utilized by
existing taxpayers and businesses. However, a government typically cannot expand its
boundaries and increase its property tax base and revenue once its existing territory is fully
developed to its capacity except through annexation.
Evaluating Performance and Operating Results
Profit-seeking enterprises usually will modify or withdraw unprofitable goods or
services offered to the consuming public. The direct relationship between the
financial resources each consumer provides and the goods or services a consumer
receives from each enterprise essentially dictates the type and quality of goods
and services each profit-seeking enterprise will provide. Firms with inept or
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 4
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Characteristics and Types of G&NP Organizations 5
unresponsive management will be unprofitable and ultimately will be forced out
of business. Therefore, the profit motive and profit measurement constitute an
automatic allocation and regulating device in the free enterprise segment of our
economy.
This profit test/regulator device is not present in the usual G&NP situation.
Because governments have the power to tax and lack market competition for most
of the services they provide, governments generally continue to operate even if
they are ineffective or inefficient. Because government services are unique or are
provided without charge or at a token charge, consumers have no “dollar vote”
to cast.
Evaluating the performance and operating results of most G&NP organizations is extremely difficult because:
1.
No open market supply-and-demand test occurs to evaluate the value of the services they
provide.
2.
The relationship, if any, between the resource contributors and the recipients of the services
is remote and indirect.
3.
G&NP organizations are not profit oriented in the usual sense and are not expected to
operate profitably; thus, the profit test is neither a valid performance indicator nor an
automatic regulating device.
4.
Governments can force financial resource contributions through taxation.
Accordingly, G&NP organizations must employ measures and controls of operating
results other than net income to ensure that their resources are used appropriately
and to prevent inefficient or ineffective G&NP organizations from operating indefinitely. Governments and nonprofit organizations, particularly governments, are
therefore subject to more stringent legal, regulatory, and other controls than are private businesses.
All facets of a G&NP organization’s operations—especially of state and local
governments—may be affected by legal or quasi-legal requirements (1) imposed
externally, such as by federal or state statute, grant regulations, or judicial decrees,
or (2) imposed internally or by mutual agreement, such as by charter, bylaw, ordinance, trust agreement, donor stipulation, or contract. Furthermore, the need to
ensure compliance with such extensive legal and contractual requirements often
necessitates more stringent operational and administrative controls than in private
enterprise. Aspects of G&NP organizations’ operations that may be regulated or
otherwise controlled include:
1.
Organization structure: form; composition of governing board; number and duties of its
personnel; lines of authority and responsibility; policies concerning which officials or
employees are to be elected, appointed, or hired
2.
Personnel policies and procedures: who will appoint or hire personnel; tenure of personnel;
policies and procedures upon termination; compensation levels; promotion policies; types
and amounts of compensation increments
3.
Sources of financial resources: types and maximum amounts of taxes, licenses, fines, or
fees a government may levy; procedure for setting user charges; tuition rates; debt limits;
purposes for which debt may be incurred; allowable methods for soliciting charitable
contributions
4.
Uses of financial resources: purposes for which resources may be used, including the legal
restriction of certain resources only for specific purposes; purchasing procedures to be followed; budgeting methods, forms, or procedures
5.
Accounting: any or all phases of the accounting system—for example, chart of accounts,
bases of accounting, forms, and procedures
6.
Financial reporting: type and frequency of financial reports; report format and content;
report recipients
7.
Auditing: frequency of audit; who is to perform the audit; scope and type of audit; time and
place for filing the audit report; who is to receive or have access to the audit report
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 5
1/17/17 9:45 AM
6 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
Finally, managers of G&NP organizations may have limited discretion compared
with managers of businesses. The role and emphasis of G&NP financial accounting
and reporting thus are correspondingly altered as compared with the profit-seeking
business environment.
OBJECTIVES OF G&NP ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Learning
1.2
Objective
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting
Concepts No. 4 (SFAC 4), “Objectives of Financial Reporting by Nonbusiness
Organizations,” addresses the objectives of general purpose external financial
reporting by nonbusiness (nonprofit) organizations. SFAC 4 notes that:
• The objectives stem primarily from the needs of external users who generally cannot prescribe the information they want from an organization.
• In addition to information provided by general purpose external financial reporting, managers and . . . governing bodies need a great deal of internal accounting information to carry
out their responsibilities in planning and controlling activities.1
The financial reporting objectives set forth in SFAC 4 state that financial
reporting by nonbusiness organizations should provide information that is useful to
present and potential resource providers and other users in:
• Making rational decisions about the allocation of resources to those organizations.
• Assessing the services that a nonbusiness organization provides and its ability to continue
to provide those services.
• Assessing how managers of a nonbusiness organization have discharged their stewardship
responsibilities and other aspects of their performance.
In addition, nonbusiness organization financial reporting should include explanations
and interpretations to help users understand the financial information provided.2
Note that these broad objectives statements relate to all organizations and
nonbusiness organizations, respectively. The objectives of state and local government accounting and financial reporting are discussed later in this chapter.
AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES OF G&NP ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES AND REPORTING STANDARDS
Learning
1.3
Objective
The G&NP accounting and reporting concepts, principles, and standards evolved
separately from those for business enterprises. Beginning in the 1930s, unique principles and standards evolved separately for each of the several major types of
G&NP organizations.
• The National Council on Governmental Accounting (NCGA) and several similar predecessor committees led the development of accounting concepts, principles, and standards for
state and local governments until the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB)
was created in 1984.
• The American Hospital Association and the Healthcare Financial Management Association
fostered the development of accounting principles and standards for hospitals and other
health care institutions.
• The American Council on Education and the National Association of College and
University Business Officers led the development of those for colleges and universities.
1
Financial Accounting Standards Board, Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 4, “Objectives
of Financial Reporting by Nonbusiness Organizations” (Stamford, CT: FASB, December 1980), p. xii.
Emphasis added.
2
Ibid., pp. xiii–xiv.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 6
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Authoritative Sources of G&NP Accounting Principles and Reporting Standards 7
• Committees of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) set forth
accounting principles and standards for nonprofit organizations in AICPA audit and
accounting guides until the FASB began issuing guidance for nongovernmental, nonprofit
organizations in 1993.
• The Comptroller General of the United States led the federal government accounting
standards effort until the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) was
established in 1990.
In addition, each G&NP field has its own journals, newsletters, and professional
societies.
Both the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) are overseen by the Financial Accounting
Foundation (FAF). The FAF, which is comprised of prominent government
and private-sector leaders, also appoints new members to the FASB and the
GASB.
The FAF
The FASB has seven full-time members and over 60 staff members. Although not
limited by its original charter or rules of procedure to setting business accounting
standards, the FASB devoted its early efforts almost exclusively to business accounting concepts and standards, deferring the decision on what role, if any, it would play
in the G&NP standards area.
In 1979, the FASB (1) agreed to exercise responsibility for all specialized
accounting and reporting principles and practices set forth in AICPA statements of
position, accounting guides, and audit guides except those dealing with state and
local governments (FASB Statement No. 32). Subsequently, the FASB rescinded
FASB Statement No. 32 and issued standards for nongovernmental organizations,
including nongovernmental not-for-profit organization accounting and financial
reporting (discussed in Chapter 16).
The FASB deferred action concerning state and local government standards
during this period because discussions were underway among representatives of
interested organizations, including the NCGA and the AICPA, about the appropriate structure for setting governmental accounting standards. At issue was whether
state and local government accounting standards should continue to be established
by the NCGA or should be set by the FASB or perhaps a new standards-setting
body. These discussions led to formation of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board in 1984.
The FASB
The FAF created the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) in 1984
in a co-equal relationship with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).
The jurisdiction agreement states that:
FASB-GASB
Jurisdictions
• The GASB is responsible for establishing accounting and financial reporting standards for
activities and transactions of state and local governments, including government nonprofit
organizations.
• The FASB is responsible for establishing accounting and financial reporting standards for
all other organizations, including nongovernment nonprofit organizations.
Whether an organization is or is not a “government” is a critical determination
that dictates whether it must follow GASB or FASB standards and guidance.
Most state and local governments—including states, counties, municipalities, townships, and school districts—clearly are “governments” subject to the GASB’s jurisdiction. But it may be difficult to determine whether some not-for-profit and other
organizations are governmental or nongovernmental. Accordingly, the GASB and
FASB jointly developed a definition of government.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 7
“Government”
Defined
1/17/17 9:45 AM
8 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
• This definition, summarized in Illustration 1–1, is published in AICPA audit and accounting
guides to assist practitioners in determining whether organizations are governmental or
nongovernmental and thus are under GASB jurisdiction or FASB jurisdiction.
• Many nonprofit organizations are established by governments and are governments under
this definition.
The practitioner must determine whether a specific organization is “government”
or “nongovernment” using the FASB-GASB definition to apply the generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) hierarchy guidance correctly.
The GASB
The GASB succeeded the NCGA in 1984 (see Appendix 1-1) as the body authorized to establish accounting standards for state and local governments (see
Illustration 1–2). The GASB, FASB, and FAF offices are in the same building in
Norwalk, Connecticut. Again, the GASB is responsible for establishing financial
ILLUSTRATION 1-1
Definition of State and Local Government Entities
Governmental organizations include (1) public corporations1 and bodies corporate and politic, and (2) other organizations if they have one or more of the following characteristics:
• The popular election of officers or appointment (or approval) of a controlling majority
of the members of the organization’s governing body by officials of one or more state
or local governments
• The potential for unilateral dissolution by a government with the net assets reverting
to a government
• The power to enact and enforce a tax levy
• The ability to issue directly (rather than through a state or municipal authority) debt
that pays interest exempt from federal taxation2
1
Black’s Law Dictionary defines a public corporation as “an instrumentality of the state,
founded and owned in the public interest, supported by public funds and governed by those
deriving their authority from the state.”
2
However, organizations possessing only that ability (to issue tax-exempt debt) and none of
the other governmental characteristics may rebut the presumption that they are governmental
if their determination is supported by compelling, relevant evidence.
Source: Adapted from “FASB and GASB Define ‘Government,’ ” Journal of Accountancy, July
1996, pp. 16–17. This definition is cited in pertinent AICPA audit and accounting guides.
1-1
IN PRACTICE
Not-for-Profit (Nonprofit) Organizations May Be Governments
1. Several states have established health care, drug abuse, professional licensing, economic development, and other
agencies as 501(c)(3) not-for-profit (nonprofit) corporations.
2. Cities and counties also have established industrial development, economic development, civic center, convention
center, sports complex, and other activities and facilities as 501(c)(3) corporations.
3. A professional (AAA) baseball team, the Columbus (Ohio) Clippers, is a less commonly encountered type of
­not-for-profit organization.
4. Finally, many public television stations are legally established as not-for-profit or nonprofit corporations by states,
state colleges and universities, or other governments.
Although all of these organizations are established as not-for-profit or nonprofit corporations legally, the GASB requires
a “substance over form” approach to financial reporting. Thus, organizations such as these are “government not-for-profit
or nonprofit organizations” and are under GASB jurisdiction for GAAP reporting.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 8
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Authoritative Sources of G&NP Accounting Principles and Reporting Standards 9
ILLUSTRATION 1-2
Financial Reporting Standards-Setting Structure
Financial
Accounting
Foundation
(FAF)
(Financing
and Oversight)
Financial
Accounting
Standards Advisory
Council
(FASAC)
Advises
Financial
Accounting
Standards
Board
(FASB)
Governmental
Accounting
Standards
Board
(GASB)
Advises
Governmental
Accounting
Standards Advisory
Council
(GASAC)
Source: Based on portions of various GASB documents. Complete copies of documents are available from the GASB.
reporting standards for activities and transactions of state and local governments;
the FASB sets reporting standards for all other organizations, including nongovernmental, nonprofit organizations.
The GASB has seven members. The chairperson serves full time, whereas the
other six members serve part time. The board is assisted by a full-time professional
staff of approximately 20 persons, led by the director of research, and meets in open
session for two to three days about every six weeks, with one-day teleconference
meetings in between. The GASB mission—including its mission statement, an overview of how its mission is accomplished, and its due process—is summarized in
Illustration 1–3.
The GASB’s activities focus on its agenda topics and projects. It may issue
nonauthoritative invitations to comment, discussion memorandums, and preliminary views publications to obtain viewpoints of practitioners and others
before issuing exposure drafts and, finally, an authoritative pronouncement. Its
authoritative pronouncements are issued as Statements, Technical ­Bulletins,
and Implementation Guides. (The GASB no longer issues Interpretations but
some remain effective.) The GASB issues The GASB Report electronic newsletter to inform interested persons of its activities and also issues Concepts
Statements, research studies, and other nonauthoritative publications from
time to time.
GASB Statement No. 1, “Authoritative Status of NCGA Pronouncements and
AICPA Industry Audit Guide,” issued in 1984, provided a transition from the old
standards-setting arrangements to the current one. Statement No. 1 recognized the
then-effective NCGA pronouncements and certain accounting and reporting
­guidance in the then-effective AICPA state and local government audit guide as
authoritative, stating that they are “continued in force until altered, amended, supplemented, revoked, or superseded by a subsequent GASB pronouncement.” 3
These NCGA and AICPA pronouncements—now recognized as GASB
­pronouncements—were integrated into its authoritative Codification of Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards in 1985.4
3
Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Statement No. 1, “Authoritative Status of NCGA Pronouncements
and AICPA Industry Audit Guide” (Norwalk, CT: GASB, July 1984).
4
Governmental Accounting Standards Board and Governmental Accounting Research Foundation of the
Government Finance Officers Association, Codification of Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting
Standards as of November 1, 1984 (Norwalk, CT: GASB, 1985).
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 9
1/17/17 9:45 AM
10 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
ILLUSTRATION 1-3 Facts about GASB
What Is the GASB?
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is
the independent organization that establishes and improves
standards of accounting and financial reporting for U.S. state
and local governments. Established in 1984 by agreement of
the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) and 10 national
associations of state and local government officials, the
GASB is recognized by governments, the accounting industry, and the capital markets as the official source of generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for state and local
governments.
Accounting and financial reporting standards designed
for the government environment are essential because governments are fundamentally different from for-profit businesses. Furthermore, the information needs of the users of
government financial statements are different from the
needs of the users of private company financial statements.
The GASB members and staff understand the unique characteristics of governments and the environment in which
they operate.
The GASB is not a government entity; instead, it is an
operating component of the FAF, which is a private sector
not-for-profit entity. Funding for the GASB comes primarily
from an accounting support fee established under the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act as
well as the sale of certain publications. Its standards are not
federal laws or regulations and the organization does not
have enforcement authority. Compliance with GASB’s standards, however, is enforced through the laws of some individual states and through the audit process, when auditors
render opinions on the fairness of financial statement presentations in conformity with GAAP.
Why Is the GASB’s Work Important?
The GASB, in keeping with its mission, issues standards and
other communications that result in decision-useful information for users of government financial reports, including, for
example, owners of municipal bonds, members of citizen
groups, legislators and legislative staff, and oversight bodies.
Those standards also help government officials demonstrate
to their constituents their accountability and stewardship
over public resources. Additionally, the GASB works to
educate the public, including financial statement preparers,
auditors, and users, about its standards and the information
those standards require governments to present in their
financial reports.
To encourage broad public participation in the standards-setting process, GASB standards are issued only after
completion of extensive and rigorous due process activities,
which are discussed here.
How Does the GASB Set Standards?
Before issuing its standards, the GASB follows the due
process activities described in its published Rules of
Procedure. The GASB’s stringent due process activities are
designed to encourage broad public participation in the
standards-setting process. These activities promote timely,
thorough, and open study of financial accounting and
reporting issues by the preparers, auditors, and users of
financial reports.
For many of the issues it addresses, the GASB
• Appoints an advisory task force of outside experts.
• Studies existing literature on the subject and conducts
or commissions additional research if necessary.
• Publishes a discussion document for public comment,
setting forth the issues or concerns being addressed
and possible solutions.
• Broadly distributes an Exposure Draft of a proposed
standard for public comment.
• Conducts public hearings and forums on its due process documents.
Significant steps in the process are announced publicly. The
GASB’s meetings are open for public observation, and a
public record is maintained. The GASB also is advised by
the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council,
a 30-member group appointed by the FAF trustees that represents a wide range of the GASB’s constituents.
Transcripts of public hearings, letters of comment and
position papers, research reports, and other relevant materials on projects leading to issuance of pronouncements
become part of the board’s public record and are available
for inspection. In addition, letters of comment are available
on the GASB website. To encourage public comment, discussion documents and Exposure Drafts are distributed by
means of the Internet. Single printed copies are available
without charge during the comment period to all who request
them. Final pronouncements are distributed when published
through GASB subscription plans and are posted to the
GASB website. Printed copies of printed pronouncements
may be purchased by placing an order on the GASB website,
www.gasb.org, or by contacting the GASB’s Order
Department at 800-748-0659.
Source: “Facts about GASB” from FACTS ABOUT GASB, 2015-2016. Copyright © 2015 by Financial Accounting Foundation.
Reprinted with permission of the Financial Accounting Foundation, 401 Merritt 7, Norwalk, CT 06856, USA.
The GASB Codification is revised annually to incorporate subsequent GASB
pronouncements (including implementation guides), as are its companion Original
Pronouncements volumes, which contain the complete text of all GASB and
NCGA pronouncements. Implementation guides address practice questions that
arise regarding implementation of GASB standards. As a result of the new hierarchy established in GASB Statement No. 76, the GASB adopted Implementation
Guide 2015-1 in June 2015, establishing a comprehensive implementation guide
that had been subjected to due process. This guide superseded all previous implementation guides. Subsequent modifications made to this guide will be made
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 10
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Authoritative Sources of G&NP Accounting Principles and Reporting Standards 11
through separate implementation guides, including annual updates, in the future.
The GASB will continue to provide a Comprehensive Implementation Guide containing all currently effective implementation guidance. All the GASB and predecessor literature is also available through its Governmental Accounting Research
System (GARS), a readily accessible, online or personal computer disk search and
retrieval system that is revised semiannually. (The GASB maintains an informative
website at http://www.gasb.org.)
Day-to-day accounting and interim reporting by G&NP organizations is often based
on cash receipts, disbursements, and balances or assuring compliance with the organization’s budget. But their annual financial statements must meet the GASB’s
uniform national standards if they are to comply with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) and thus be “presented fairly in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.”
The AICPA established parallel but distinct GAAP hierarchies to assist practitioners in determining (1) which authoritative financial reporting standards or
other guidance should be considered in determining what constitutes GAAP and
(2) their relative status or ranking.
Both the GASB and the FASB recently adopted hierarchies that superseded
the previous AICPA-established hierarchies. The FASB subsequently replaced its
hierarchy with its Accounting Standards Codification. The current content of the
Accounting Standards Codification is authoritative for all nongovernment entities,
and all other literature is nonauthoritative.
For governments, GASB Statement No. 76, The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles for State and Local Governments, established two
levels of authoritative pronouncements for state and local governments. All of the
authoritative literature is incorporated in the Codification of Governmental
Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards.
GAAP Hierarchies
a. Level a pronouncements include GASB Statements of Governmental Accounting
Standards and Interpretations (and authoritative pronouncements of GASB’s predecessor body, the NCGA).
b. Level b pronouncements include GASB Technical Bulletins and implementation guides
(including the Comprehensive Implementation Guide) and if specifically made applicable to state and local governments by the AICPA and cleared by the GASB: AICPA
Industry Audit and Accounting Guides and AICPA Statements of Position.
All other accounting literature is nonauthoritative. However, this nonauthoritative
literature may be relevant guidance if no authoritative guidance is available.
Indeed, GASB Statement No. 76 provides guidance regarding what to consider in
choosing nonauthoritative literature to follow when authoritative guidance is not
available.
To determine the appropriate accounting and reporting treatment for a transaction or other event with no treatment specified in the authoritative literature, a
SLG:
• Should first consider accounting principles specified in Level a or Level b authoritative
literature for similar transactions or other events to apply by analogy
• Then may consider nonauthoritative accounting literature from other sources that does not
conflict with or contradict authoritative GAAP.
Nonauthoritative literature includes, among others, GASB concepts statements,
FASB pronouncements, AICPA literature not included in Level b, predominant
practices in an industry, literature of other professional associations and regulatory agencies, and accounting textbooks, handbooks, and articles. Evaluating the
appropriateness of nonauthoritative literature requires consideration of its consistency with the GASB Concepts Statements, relevance to the specific circumstances, its specificity, and the general recognition of the issuer or author as an
authority.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 11
1/17/17 9:45 AM
12 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
This text focuses initially on state and local governments and the “GASB
Jurisdiction” hierarchy referred to as the “SLG GAAP hierarchy.” The GAAP
hierarchies for nongovernmental, nonprofit organizations and the federal government are discussed in later chapters.
Several points are particularly significant for the SLG GAAP hierarchy:
1.
Its guidance applies only to state and local government organizations; non-SLGs follow the
“FASB” GAAP hierarchy.
2.
GASB Statements of Governmental Accounting Standards (and Interpretations that are
still in force) are the highest-ranking authoritative pronouncements for SLGs, followed by
GASB implementation guides and Technical Bulletins as well as certain AICPA guidance
that has been cleared by the GASB.
3.
FASB guidance that has not been incorporated in GASB pronouncements is not
authoritative.
CONCEPTS AND OBJECTIVES OF SLG ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL REPORTING
Learning
1.4
Objective
The earlier discussions of the G&NP organization environment, concepts and
objectives of G&NP accounting and financial reporting, and characteristics of
G&NP accounting deal with G&NP organizations generally. This section builds on
those discussions and considers similar factors from the state and local government
perspective, as set forth in GASB Concepts Statement No. 1, “Objectives of Financial
Reporting.” The primary purposes of this section are to
• Help the reader understand the principal features of SLGs that have influenced the development of SLG accounting and financial reporting objectives, concepts, principles, and
standards—particularly features that differ from those of business enterprises.
• Provide background necessary for the reader to understand and apply the GASB’s basic
principles, which are discussed in the next chapter.
The environment of SLG accounting and reporting is considered first, followed by a discussion of the users and uses of SLG financial reports. A summary
of the objectives of SLG external financial reporting in GASB Concepts Statement
No. 1 concludes this section.5
One unique aspect of the SLG environment is that governments may be
involved in both governmental-type and business-type activities.
• Governmental-type (or governmental) activities include fire and police protection, the
courts, street and traffic control, health and welfare, executive and legislative offices, and
other “general governmental” activities.
• Business-type activities include public utilities (e.g., electricity, water) and other activities
for which user fees are charged and that are operated similarly to private businesses.
The environments of governmental-type and business-type activities may differ,
even within one government, as may financial statement user information needs.
Thus, the SLG environment, financial statement users, and user information needs
are discussed first for governmental-type activities, and are then compared with
those of business-type activities.
Governmental-Type
Activities
The governmental-type activity environment is unique in several respects. These
aspects include the distinctive SLG:
• Purpose
• Sources of financial resources
5
This section is drawn, with permission, primarily from GASB Concepts Statement No. 1, “Objectives of
Financial Reporting,” which is reproduced in Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Codification of
Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards as of June 30, 2011 (Norwalk, CT: GASB, 2011),
Appendix B. Hereafter cited as GASB Codification.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 12
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Concepts and Objectives of SLG Accounting and Financial Reporting 13
• Financial resource allocation mechanisms
• Accountabilities
• Reporting issues and problems
Purpose
As noted earlier, a government’s primary reason for existence—particularly for its
governmental-type activities—differs from that of business enterprises. Whereas the
key objective of businesses is to earn a profit, the primary goal of governmental-type
(also known as governmental or general government) activities is to provide goods
or services, often without regard to the individual recipient’s ability to pay for them.
Absence of the profit motive in governmental-type activities underlies several
other differences between governments and businesses. As noted earlier, the basic
performance evaluation measure in business—net income—does not apply to
­governmental-type activities. Moreover, most governments do not obtain significant
financial resources for governmental-type activities from service charges to individual recipients in proportion to the services received.
Because proportionate service charges are not a key source of general government financial resources:
1.
Financial resources provided by one person or group may be used to finance services for
another person or group, and
2.
Government goods and services are not automatically allocated to individual users who are
willing and able to pay.
Thus, the market supply-and-demand allocation mechanism does not function as it
does for business.
Sources of Financial Resources
Because significant revenues from sales of services are not available to finance
governmental-type activities, governments must raise financial resources from other
sources. Two primary examples of these revenue sources are taxes and intergovernmental grants and subsidies.
Taxation The power to tax is unique to governments and most governmental-type
SLG services—such as police and fire protection, elementary and secondary education, and streets and highways—are financed primarily by tax revenues. Indeed,
even when SLGs charge fees for general government services, they often must be
subsidized with tax revenues (e.g., many public health clinics).
The power to tax causes taxpayers to be involuntary financial resource providers. Individual taxpayers cannot refuse to pay taxes if they think the government is using the resources improperly, or pay a lesser amount if they do not use
as many of the government’s services as do others. Rather, the amount of taxes a
taxpayer must pay is based on the value of the taxpayer’s real and/or personal
property (property taxes), the amount of income earned (income taxes), retail
purchases (sales taxes), and so forth—not on the amount or value of services
received.
Taxation, then, is a nonexchange transaction or event that eliminates any
direct association between
1.
The amount and quality of the services a constituent receives from the government, and
2.
The amount the constituent pays to the government.
Many governments also have other powers similar to taxation, such as levying
license and permit fees, fines, and other charges. This ability of governments to
exact resources from individuals, businesses, and others by taxation and similar
levies—without an arm’s-length exchange transaction—means that the types, levels,
and quality of services a government provides are not automatically dictated or
regulated by what its constituents are willing to pay for the services. This absence
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 13
1/17/17 9:45 AM
14 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
of the market resource allocation mechanism makes it difficult to measure the success
of a governmental unit solely in financial terms.
Intergovernmental Revenues Grants and subsidies from higher-level governments
are another significant source of SLG revenues. For many state and local governments, intergovernmental revenues approach or exceed the amount of the SLG’s
own tax revenues in many fiscal years. The federal government provides several
hundred billion dollars of revenues to SLGs every year, and states provide additional financial resources to local governments. Most intergovernmental revenues
are not provided as a direct result of services received by the resource provider but
are to help finance certain services for the recipient’s constituency.
Financial Resource Allocation Mechanisms
General government financial resource allocations are derived from processes
clearly different from business enterprises. Indeed, absent a direct relationship
between the financial resources provided by an individual taxpayer and the services provided to that individual taxpayer, it is impossible for resource allocations
to be made in the same manner as for business enterprises. Rather, for the most
part, the nature of the U.S. system of governance, including various restrictions
on financial resource use and the budget process, determines how the allocations
are made.
Restrictions on Resource Use One primary mechanism used for allocating general
government resources to various uses is for restrictions to be placed on financial
resource use by the resource providers or their representatives. One level of restriction requires that certain resources be used for a particular purpose or program.
Such restrictions arise from
• Intergovernmental grantors requiring that the resources provided be used for a particular
purpose.
• Taxes and similar resources being levied for a specific purpose, such as roads, education,
or debt service.
• Debt proceeds being restricted to a specific purpose.
These numerous restrictions are the primary reason for the use of funds and
nonfund accounts—to account for financial resources segregated according to the
purpose(s) for which they may or must be used and any related capital assets and
long-term liabilities, respectively. The GASB recognizes the importance of the governmental fund structure and the fund accounting control mechanism in the SLG
environment, observing that funds and fund accounting controls
• Complement the budgetary process and annual budget in ensuring that a government uses
its financial resources in compliance with both external restrictions and the annual budget.
• Facilitate fulfilling the SLG’s accountability to its constituency, grantors, and others.
The Budget Taxes and other revenues are allocated to various uses by placing
even more detailed budgetary restrictions on their use. Theoretically, taxpayers
could meet and decide as a group how to allocate the resources to various uses.
However, in our representative form of government, citizens have delegated that
power to public officials through the election process. In addition, a system of
checks and balances over the potential abuse of power is provided by the separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of
government.
These more detailed restrictions are thus placed on the use of financial resources
by elected officials through the budget process, which is a key element of the decision-making processes in government. The budget is adopted into law and essentially
becomes a contract between the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the
citizenry. In most jurisdictions, significant changes in this budget contract should be
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 14
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Concepts and Objectives of SLG Accounting and Financial Reporting 15
made only through a process similar to the budget process itself. In the budget
process,
• The executive branch typically prepares a proposed budget and submits appropriation
requests to the legislative branch.
• The legislative branch has the power to approve those requests, thus authorizing the executive branch to make expenditures within the limits of the appropriations and any laws that
may affect programs covered by those appropriations.
• The executive branch is accountable to the legislative branch for operating within those
appropriations and laws, and both branches are accountable to the citizenry.
The annual budgetary process and budget are extremely important in the SLG
governmental-type activities environment. The budget is an expression of public
policy and intent. It is also a financial plan that indicates the proposed expenditures
for the year and the means of financing them. Moreover, an adopted budget has the
force of law. It both
1.
Authorizes amounts to be expended for various specified purposes, and
2.
Limits the amount that may be expended for each of those purposes.
Budgetary limitations generally cannot be exceeded without due process.
Thus, the budget is both a form of control and a basis for evaluating performance in a budgetary context. Accordingly, a government must demonstrate its
budgetary accountability, which entails reporting whether revenues were obtained
and expended as anticipated and whether authorized expenditure limitations
(appropriations) were exceeded.
Establishing the budget—determining the types and amounts of taxes and other
revenues to be exacted from the citizenry and how those resources will be used—is one
of the most important functions that elected representatives perform. Indeed, the citizenry’s perception of a representative’s budgetary performance is a significant factor
in voting decisions. Hence, the budget process is a vital part of the political process.
Accountabilities
The numerous environmental features discussed earlier result in distinct SLG
accountabilities, which are unique both in terms of (1) to whom SLGs and their
officials are accountable and (2) the focuses of their accountability.
To Whom Accountable The need for accountability exists between (1) SLGs and
their constituencies, (2) SLGs and other governments, and (3) the SLG’s own legislative and executive bodies.
1.
State and local governments are accountable to their constituencies for various reasons.
Elected officials are empowered by citizens to act on their behalf and are evaluated by
voters in part on their fiscal and budgetary performance, as well as on the perceived
efficiency and effectiveness with which the SLG is operated. Thus, SLG officials must
demonstrate to citizens that revenues or bond proceeds approved for specific purposes
were in fact used for those purposes.
2.
The SLG’s accountability to other governments arises in part because senior levels of
government often have some oversight authority over lower levels of government; it also
arises when other governments provide grants or other intergovernmental subsidies to
the SLG.
3.
Accountability between each SLG’s legislative and executive bodies focuses on demonstrating that the fund restrictions and budget contract have been complied with and that
resources have been used efficiently and effectively.
Accountability Focuses The financial reports for governmental-type activities
focus on two types of accountability: fiscal accountability and operational
accountability.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 15
1/17/17 9:45 AM
16 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
1.
Fiscal accountability is a government’s responsibility to demonstrate its compliance with
public decisions about the raising and spending of public monies in the short term.6 This
accountability encompasses:
• The use of financial resources from various revenue sources or bond issues in accordance with any restrictions on their use.
• Compliance with fund and budget restrictions.
2.
Operational accountability is a government’s responsibility to demonstrate the extent to
which it has met its operating objectives and whether it can continue to meet its objectives
in the foreseeable future.7 This accountability results in a government providing:
• A measure of the economic costs of providing services (operating costs).
• An assessment of whether a government is raising sufficient revenues each period to
cover the cost of providing services (operating results).
• An assessment of whether services are being provided economically and efficiently.
Reporting Issues and Problems
The characteristics of the SLG general government environment also create issues
and problems that must be dealt with in SLG financial reporting and/or auditing,
including
1.
The need to demonstrate compliance with restrictions on the use of financial resources.
2.
The need for appropriate budgetary reporting.
3.
The impact of restrictions on the use of financial resources (such as from intergovernmental
grants) on revenue recognition.
4.
The difficulty of measuring and reporting the efficiency and effectiveness of SLGs in providing services.
5.
The opportunity to hide or disguise the use or availability of financial resources for various
purposes by (a) improperly reporting transactions between the various SLG funds and (b)
developing an inappropriate fund structure.
6.
The lack of comparability that can result between financial reports of two similarly designated governments that perform different functions (which is common in SLGs).
7.
The existence of taxation and debt limits.
8.
The impact on materiality and reporting judgments caused by (a) overexpenditure of
appropriations being a violation of law and (b) failure to follow compliance requirements
related to intergovernmental revenues, possibly requiring forfeiture of such revenues or
loss of future revenues.
Furthermore, financial reporting for governments must be responsive to the temptations that result because the budget process is a vital part of the political process.
Elected representatives serve for relatively short terms, and officials may be
tempted to employ practices that permit a budget to be technically in balance even
without true budgetary equilibrium.
Accordingly, to appropriately reflect the degree of budgetary equilibrium, the
GASB notes that financial reporting should indicate the extent to which
• Current operations were financed by nonrecurring revenues or by incurring long-term
liabilities.
• Certain essential costs, such as normal maintenance of government capital assets, have
been deferred to future periods.
The GASB provides a more thorough discussion of the reasons for the unique
characteristics of state and local governmental financial reporting in a white paper that
is posted at its website (http://www.gasb.org). The white paper is titled, “Why Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Is—And Should Be—Different.”
6
Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Statement No. 34, “Basic Financial Statements–and
Management’s Discussion and Analysis–for State and Local Governments” (Norwalk, CT: GASB, June
1999), par. 203.
7
Ibid.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 16
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Concepts and Objectives of SLG Accounting and Financial Reporting 17
The GASB has identified the primary groups of users of external financial reports
of SLGs.8 The user groups are:
1.
The citizenry: those to whom the government is primarily accountable, including citizens
(taxpayers, voters, service recipients), the media, advocate groups, and public finance
researchers
2.
Legislative and oversight bodies: those who directly represent the citizens, including members of state legislatures, county commissions, city councils, boards of trustees and school
boards, and executive branch officials with oversight responsibility over other levels of
government
3.
Investors and creditors: those who lend or participate in the lending process, including
individual and institutional investors and creditors, municipal security underwriters, bond
rating agencies, bond insurers, and financial institutions
Financial Report
Users
The needs of intergovernmental grantors and other users are considered by the
GASB to be encompassed within those of these three primary user groups.
Internal executive branch managers usually have ready access to the SLG’s
financial information through internal reports and are not considered primary users
of external financial reports. However, if they are without adequate access, a fourth
primary user group is:
4.
Government administrators: internal executive branch managers who do not have ready
access to the government’s internal information
The GASB notes that financial reporting should provide information useful in making economic and political decisions and in assessing accountability by9
1.
Comparing actual financial results with the legally adopted budget.
2.
Assessing financial condition and results of operations.
3.
Assisting in determining compliance with finance-related laws, rules, and regulations.
4.
Assisting in evaluating efficiency and effectiveness.
In contrast to SLG governmental-type activities, a government’s business-type
activities
Financial Report
Uses
Business-Type
Activities
• Provide the same types of services as private sector businesses.
• Involve exchange relationships—that is, the consumer is charged a fee for services received, and
there is a direct relationship between the services provided and the fee charged the consumer.
• Are often separate, legally constituted, self-sufficient organizations, although some resemble governmental-type activities because they are regularly subsidized by the SLG or are
operated as departments of the SLG.
The GASB contrasts the general government environmental factors discussed
earlier with those for SLG business-type activities.10 The GASB discusses the differences in terms of the relationship between services received and resources provided by the consumer, revenue-producing assets, similarly designated activities
and their potential for comparison, the nature of the political process, and budgets
and fund accounting.
The Relationship between Services Received and Resources Provided by
the Consumer
Business-type activities often involve a direct relationship between the charge and
the service. In that relationship, termed an exchange relationship, a user fee is
charged for a specific service provided, such as a toll for use of a road, a charge for
water, or a fare to ride the bus.
8
GASB Codification, Appendix B, pars. 30–31.
9
Ibid., Appendix B, par. 32.
10
Ibid., Appendix B, pars. 43–50.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 17
1/17/17 9:45 AM
18 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
This exchange relationship in a business-type setting causes users of financial
reports to focus on measuring the costs (or financial resource outflows, or both) of
providing the service, the revenues obtained from the service, and the difference
between the two. The difference is particularly important because it may affect
future user charges.
Measurement of both the cost of services and financial resource outflows is
useful. Whether one is more important than the other depends on various factors,
including the way in which user charges are calculated and whether subsidies are
provided by the general government.
Revenue-Producing Capital Assets
Most capital assets of business-type activities are revenue producing. Therefore,
the incentive for business-type activities to defer needed maintenance may not be
as great as for governmental-type activities.
Similarly Designated Activities and Potential for Comparison
The business-type activities of a government often perform only a single function.
If the function is supplying water, for example, the problems, procedures, and cost
elements of obtaining, treating, and delivering it are similar, regardless of whether
the function is performed by a private-sector business, a public authority, an Enterprise Fund, or an activity financed by the government’s General Fund. As a result,
there is normally a greater potential for comparability among business-type activities that are performing similar functions than among governmental-type activities,
which vary from government to government.
The Nature of the Political Process
Some government business-type activities are designed to be insulated from the
political process. They are not part of the general government budgetary process,
they have a direct relationship between fees and services rendered, and they are
separate, legally constituted agencies. In some instances, however, this insulation
from the political process has less substance than appearances suggest. Indeed,
especially in subsidized activities, rate setting (even by independent boards) is
political in nature. For example, charging mass transit users sufficient fares to pay
all costs of the system may be politically or economically undesirable, so subsidies
are provided from general tax revenues or grants from other jurisdictions. If operating or capital subsidies are provided, the influences of the political process are often
as significant as in governmental-type activities.
Budgets and Fund Accounting
Business-type organizations often perform a single function, so multiple-fund
accounting is not as common as it is in governmental-type activities. The typical
business-type activity is operated as a government department during the year, and
budgets and budgetary controls are internal management processes and tools. Some
lack the force of law, but most business-type activity budgets are legally enacted
and have the force of law.
Users and Uses of
Financial Reports
Several similarities and differences between the users and uses of financial reports
on the SLG’s business-type activities, compared with reports covering its governmental-type activities, are noted in GASB Concepts Statement No. 1:11
• The users and uses of governmental financial reports typically are essentially the same
regardless of whether the activity is business-type or governmental-type. However, the
users and uses of financial reports for business-type activities may differ, depending on
whether the activity reports separately or as part of a broader general government.
11
Ibid., Appendix B, pars. 51–55, adapted.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 18
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Concepts and Objectives of SLG Accounting and Financial Reporting 19
• The uses of financial reports of business-type activities generally differ only in emphasis
from the uses of financial reports of governmental-type activities. Users of separate financial reports of business-type activities are concerned primarily with the financial condition
and results of operations for that activity; they are often not concerned with comparing
actual results with budgeted amounts.
• Investors and creditors are concerned primarily with whether the business-type activity is
generating, and will continue to generate, sufficient cash to meet debt service requirements.
In addition, many investors and creditors are as concerned with compliance with bond
provisions by business-type activities as they are about compliance by governmental-type
activities.
• Citizen groups and consumers may use information on results of operations primarily to
assess the reasonableness of user charges.
• Legislative and oversight officials and executive branch officials review financial reports of
business-type activities from the perspectives of the reasonableness of both the cash flow
and the user charge.
• Legislative and oversight officials also use financial reports to assess the potential need to
subsidize a business-type activity with general governmental revenues or the potential to
subsidize the general government with business-type activity resources.
• Both citizen groups and legislative and oversight officials need information about effectiveness, economy, and efficiency, particularly because that information has an effect on user
charges.
• All user groups may be concerned with the relationship between the financial position and
operating results of the business-type activity and that of the government as a whole—
particularly­if the business-type activity is subsidized by, or subsidizes, the general
government.
Financial reporting objectives set forth what SLG financial statements should
accomplish. GASB Concepts Statement No. 1, “Objectives of Financial Reporting,”
does not establish GAAP standards. Rather, it describes concepts that the GASB
uses as a framework for evaluating present standards and practices and for establishing financial reporting standards in the future.
The GASB notes that its financial reporting objectives are intended to describe
broadly the nature of information needed to meet the needs of users of SLG external financial reports, giving consideration to the SLG environment. Briefly stated,
the GASB concluded that accountability is the “cornerstone”—the paramount
objective—of government financial reporting and that interperiod equity is a significant part of accountability. Moreover, the GASB concluded that governmental
financial reporting should provide information to assist users in (1) assessing
accountability and (2) making economic, social, and political decisions. Accordingly, SLG financial reporting should provide:
1.
Financial Reporting
Objectives
A means of demonstrating the SLG’s accountability that enables users to assess that
accountability. Specifically, the information provided should
a. Permit users to determine whether current-year revenues were sufficient to pay for the
current year’s services and/or whether future-years’ citizens must assume burdens for
services previously provided.
b. Demonstrate the SLG’s budgetary accountability and compliance with other financerelated legal and contractual requirements.
c. Assist users in assessing the SLG’s service efforts, costs, and accomplishments.
2.
Information necessary to evaluate the SLG’s operating results for the period, including
information
a. About the sources and uses of financial resources.
b. On how the SLG financed its activities and met its cash requirements.
c. Necessary to determine whether the SLG’s financial condition improved or deteriorated
during the year.
3.
Information necessary to assess the level of SLG services and its ability to continue to
finance its activities and meet its obligations, including
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 19
1/17/17 9:45 AM
20 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
a. Information about the SLG’s financial position and condition.
b. Information about the SLG’s physical and other nonfinancial resources having useful
lives that extend beyond the current year, including information that can be used to
assess their service potential.
c. Disclosure of (1) legal and contractual restrictions on the use of resources and (2) risks
of potential loss of resources.12
CHARACTERISTICS OF SLG ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Learning
1.5
Objective
Fund Accounting
Some state and local government activities, such as utilities and public transportation, are similar to those of some profit-seeking enterprises. In such cases, the
accounting roughly parallels that of their privately owned counterparts. In most of
their operations, however, governments and nonprofit organizations are not concerned with profit measurement. (Even those SLG entities that account for revenues, expenses, and income may not seek to maximize profits, but only to ensure
continuity and/or improvement of service.) Operations established primarily to
generate profits, such as lotteries, are the exception in government.
Accounting is a service function that must continually evolve to meet the
information demands in a given environment. In the SLG environment, decisions
concerning financial resource acquisition and allocation, managerial direction and
control of financial resource utilization, and custodianship of financial and other
resources have traditionally been framed in terms of social and political objectives
and constraints rather than profitability. Legal and administrative constraints have
served as society’s methods of directing its SLG institutions in achieving those
objectives. Thus, SLG accounting and reporting have a strong emphasis on control
of and accountability for expendable financial resources. The two most important
types of legal and administrative control provisions affecting accounting in this
environment are (1) the use of funds and (2) the distinctive role of the budget.
Using financial resources in accordance with stipulations inherent in their receipt
and reporting on this compliance to others are essential custodianship obligations.
Recall that:
• Many financial resources provided to SLG organizations are restricted; that is, their use is
limited to specified purposes or activities. For example, a county may receive donations for
a building addition; a city may borrow money to construct a sewage treatment plant; a
school district may receive a federal grant for research. Such external restrictions create
significant accountability.
• Governing bodies and management may also constrain certain financial resources to use
for specific purposes. For example, the governing body or management may wish to accumulate resources for equipment replacement or facility enlargement. Because such constraints are internal plans and may be changed by the governing body or management,
some require only internal accountability.
State and local government organizations establish funds to control
restricted and designated resources and to both ensure and demonstrate compliance with legal and administrative requirements. Funds are separate fiscal and
accounting entities and include both cash and noncash resources—segregated
according to the purposes or activities for which they are to be used—as well as
related liabilities.
Two basic categories of fund accounting entities are used by SLGs:
1.
Governmental (expendable) funds: To account for the financial assets, related liabilities,
changes in net assets, and balances that may be expended in its nonbusiness-type activities
(e.g., for fire and police protection)
12
Ibid., Appendix B, pars. 77–79.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 20
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Characteristics of SLG Accounting and Financial Reporting 21
2.
Proprietary (nonexpendable) funds: To account for the revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, and net position of its business-type activities (e.g., utilities, cafeterias, or transportation systems)13
The fund concept involves an accounting segregation—not necessarily the physical
separation—of assets and liabilities; however, fund assets are often physically segregated as well, for example, through separate checking accounts for the cash of
different funds.
Use of the term fund in G&NP situations should be sharply distinguished from
its use in private enterprise.
• A fund of a commercial enterprise, such as a bond sinking fund, is simply a portion of its
assets that has been restricted to specific uses, not a separate and distinct accounting entity.
Revenues and expenses related to such funds are part of enterprise operations; that is, fund
revenue and expense accounts appear side by side in the general ledger with other enterprise revenue and expense accounts.
• A fund in the G&NP accounting sense is a self-contained accounting entity with its own
asset, liability, revenue, expenditure or expense, and fund balance or net position accounts—
and with its own ledger(s). (See Illustration 1–4.)
• A complete set of financial statements may be prepared for each fund of an SLG organization, as well as for the organization as a whole.
ILLUSTRATION 1-4
Single Accounting Entity vs. Multiple Accounting Entities
SINGLE ACCOUNTING ENTITY
(Profit-Seeking Enterprise)
A = L + OE
or
A – L = OE
MULTIPLE ACCOUNTING ENTITIES
(Government Organization)
FUND 1
A – L = FB
(Expendable)
FUND 2
A – L = FB
(Expendable)
FUND 3
A – L = NP
(Nonexpendable)
FUND 4
A – L = FB
(Expendable)
FUND 5
A – L = FB
(Expendable)
FUND 6
A – L = NP
(Nonexpendable)
GENERAL
CAPITAL
(FIXED)
ASSETS
GENERAL
LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES
(DEBT)
Legend:
A
= Assets—only expendable available financial assets in most expendable (governmental) funds;
both current and noncurrent in nonexpendable (proprietary) funds
L
= Liabilities—only current (related) liabilities in most expendable (governmental) funds; both current and
noncurrent in nonexpendable (proprietary) funds
OE = Owners’ Equity (of the enterprise)
FB
= Fund Balance (expendable or governmental funds)
NP = Net Position (nonexpendable or proprietary funds)
= The government as a whole
13
In addition to assets and liabilities, governments report deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources
(discussed in later chapters). Net position is the title the GASB requires to refer to the residual balance of
proprietary funds assets and deferred outflows less liabilities and deferred inflows. Net position also is used
to refer to the corresponding amounts in the government-wide statement of net position.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 21
1/17/17 9:45 AM
22 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
Budgets and
Appropriations
The creation of a governmental (expendable) fund ordinarily does not carry with
it the authority to expend its resources. SLG expenditures may be made only within
the authority of appropriations—which are authorizations to make expenditures
for specified purposes—or similar authorizations by the governing body.
A fixed-dollar budget is commonly prepared for each governmental (expendable) fund. That is, the organization’s chief executive (or perhaps each department
head) asks the governing body for permission to incur a specified (“fixed”) amount
of expenditures (e.g., for salaries, equipment, supplies, etc.) during the budget
period to carry out the department’s mission. This budget is the vehicle normally
used to make and communicate financial resource allocation decisions establishing
the types and quantities of goods and services to be provided during the budget
period.
When approved by the governing body, the budgetary expenditure estimates
become binding appropriations, which both authorize expenditures for specified
purposes and limit the amounts that can be expended for each specified purpose.
Appropriations must indicate the fund from which the expenditure may be made
and specify the purposes, the maximum amount, and the period of time for which
the expenditure authority is granted. A department or activity may be financed
from several funds. In such cases at least one appropriation must be made from
each supporting fund to provide the requisite expenditure authority.
To ensure control and demonstrate budgetary compliance, most governments
establish budgetary accounts within governmental fund ledgers. This technique
permits managers to determine their remaining expenditure authority at any time
during the period.
Fixed-dollar budgeting of governmental and/or proprietary funds often gives
rise to a unique dual basis of accounting and reporting for G&NP organizations.
This is because (1) GAAP prescribe specific standards for the measurement of
revenues, expenditures, expenses, and other amounts reported in financial statements that “present fairly in conformity with GAAP,” but (2) for budgetary purposes, SLG governing boards may estimate revenues and authorize expenditures
on a variety of non-GAAP bases, such as the cash basis.
Where the budgetary basis differs from the GAAP basis:
1.
The accounts are maintained on the budgetary basis during the year to effect budgetary
control through the accounts, so that interim and annual budgetary statements may be
prepared on the budgetary basis.
2.
Adjustments are made at year end to convert the budgetary basis data in the accounts to
the GAAP basis; the GAAP basis annual statements may then be prepared.
3.
The differences between the budgetary basis and the GAAP basis statements are explained
and reconciled in the annual financial report of the governmental organization.
Budgetary accounting and reporting are distinctive characteristics of SLG organizations, and are discussed and illustrated at numerous points throughout this text.
Other
Distinguishing
Characteristics
A key focus of most SLG accounting and reporting is expendable financial
resources, accounted for in governmental fund entities and allocated by the budget
and appropriation process.
The cost measurement focus of proprietary (nonexpendable) fund accounting
and of entity-wide financial reports of G&NP organizations, like that of business
accounting, is expenses—the cost of assets and services consumed during the period.
In contrast, the cost measurement focus of governmental (expendable) fund
accounting is expenditures—the amount of net financial resources expended during
the period for:
• Current operations (e.g., salaries, utilities)
• Capital outlay (acquiring capital assets)
• Long-term debt principal retirement and interest
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 22
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Concluding Comments 23
Expenditures thus decrease net expendable available financial assets.
More specifically, the term expenditures refers to “the cost of goods delivered
or services rendered, whether paid or unpaid, including current operating costs,
provision for retirement of debt not reported as a liability of the fund from which
retired, and capital outlays.”14 Thus, expenditures—the term that is significant in
expendable fund accounting—should not be confused with expenses, as defined for
accounting for profit-seeking enterprises.
Capital assets that are not proprietary or trust fund assets are not appropriable
financial resources. Thus, they are listed and accounted for separately from the
governmental fund accounting entities in a nonfund accounting entity. Similarly,
unmatured long-term liabilities that are not liabilities of a particular proprietary or
fiduciary fund (but of the government as a whole) are listed in a separate nonfund
accounting entity. Accordingly, the cost of acquiring a capital asset is considered an
expenditure (use of expendable net financial resources) in the period in which it
occurs, as is the retirement of a maturing long-term liability, because both reduce
the net financial assets of a governmental fund.
Although commercial-type accounting and financial reporting are employed where
SLG organizations are engaged in commercial-type activities (e.g., electric utilities),
accounting and reporting for other SLG endeavors have evolved largely in view of
these key differences from profit-seeking enterprises:
1.
Objectives: acquiring resources and expending them in a legal and appropriate manner, as
opposed to seeking to increase, or even maintain, capital
2.
Control: substitution of statutory, fund, and budgetary controls in the absence of the supply
and demand and profit regulator/control devices inherent in profit-seeking endeavors
Commercial
Accounting
Comparison
These factors—objectives and control—underlie the major differences
between commercial and SLG accounting. The primary consideration in the SLG
environment is on compliance and accountability, and SLG accounting, reporting,
and auditing have developed principally as tools of compliance control and accountability demonstration.
Concluding Comments
There continue to be several sources of authoritative pronouncements concerning
G&NP accounting and financial reporting and several distinct subsets of GAAP
applicable to the various types of G&NP organizations. This text is based on the
most authoritative pronouncements relevant to each of the organizations discussed.
Sources of authoritative support are cited throughout the text.
Accounting is often referred to as the language of business. It is also the language of government and nonprofit organizations. Whereas most terms and their
meanings are the same in both, each has some of its own terms and occasionally
uses a term with a different connotation than the other. Accordingly, new terms
and the occasional use of a familiar term in an unfamiliar way should be noted carefully in reviewing this and later chapters.
State and local government budgeting, accounting, and financial reporting
concepts, principles, standards, and procedures are discussed and illustrated in the
next several chapters. Federal government accounting and reporting—and that for
public sector and nonprofit hospitals, colleges and universities, and other nonprofit
organizations—are discussed in later chapters, as is auditing in the G&NP organization environment.
14
Based on Committee on Governmental Accounting, Governmental Accounting, Auditing, and Financial
Reporting (Chicago: Municipal Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada, 1968), p. 160.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 23
1/17/17 9:45 AM
24 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
This first chapter is designed to help you begin the transition from business to
nonbusiness accounting and financial reporting. As you study and restudy this chapter, note particularly the different environmental factors, concepts, objectives, and
terms (e.g., expenditures, fund balance, and net position) as well as the abbreviations
and acronyms peculiar to G&NP accounting and financial reporting.
The next several chapters focus on SLG accounting principles, budgeting,
accounting, and financial reporting. You may find it useful to refer to this chapter
as you study these and later chapters.
APPENDIX 1-1
Evolution of Accounting Principles and Standards—Prior to the GASB
Although the origin of the profession of accountancy is sometimes traced to ancient
governments, modern municipal accounting developed in the twentieth century, its
beginning inseparably woven within the municipal reform movement near the turn
of the century. About that time, attention was focused on the scandalous practices
in the financial administration of many cities; the National Municipal League suggested uniform municipal reporting formats, and the U.S. Census Bureau encouraged more uniformity in city accounts and reports.
INITIAL EVOLUTION (1900 – 1933)
A flurry of change in municipal accounting and reporting practices occurred during
the first decade of the twentieth century. In 1901, the firm of Haskins and Sells,
Certified Public Accountants, investigated the affairs of the city of Chicago at the
request of the Merchants’ Club. Subsequently, the firm installed a completely new
system of accounting for that city. The cities of Newton, Massachusetts, and Baltimore, Maryland, published annual reports during 1901 and 1902 along the lines
suggested by the National Municipal League, and the states of New York and Massachusetts passed legislation in the areas of uniform accounting and reporting in
1904 and 1906, respectively. Many other examples of progress took place during
this period as other cities and states followed suit.
During this era Herman A. Metz was elected Comptroller of New York City
on a “business man for the head of the city’s business office” slogan.15 At that time
an estimated one-fourth of New York’s $80 million personal services budget was
being lost through collusion, idleness, or inefficiency, and city departments commonly issued bonds to finance current operating expenditures.
Although Metz was said to have been an outstanding comptroller, his most
important contribution was the formation of the Bureau of Municipal Research.
One of its purposes was “to promote the adoption of scientific methods of accounting [for] and of reporting the details of municipal business.”16
The Handbook of Municipal Accounting, commonly referred to as “The Metz
Fund Handbook,” was called “the most significant contribution of the 1910 decade
[because] it brought together for the first time many of the basic characteristics
and requirements of municipal accounting and outlined methods of appropriate
treatment.”17 Similarly, the bureau’s publications were the “first organized materials that could be called a treatise in Municipal Accounting.”18 Pamphlets, articles,
and a few textbooks appeared as others became more interested in the subject.
15
Slogan from election 1905, New York City Comptroller Herman A. Metz (1867–1934) in office
1906–1909.
16
Bureau of Municipal Research, Making a Municipal Budget: Functional Accounts and Operative Statistics
for the Department of Health of Greater New York (New York: BMR, 1907), 5.
17
Lloyd Morey, “Trends in Governmental Accounting,” Accounting Review, 23 (July 1948), 224.
18
W. K. Newton, “New Developments and Simplified Approaches to Municipal Accounting,” Accounting
Review, 29 (October 1954), 656.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 24
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Appendix 1-1 25
Municipal leagues were formed in various states and, as Newton expressed it, “We
soon began a very serious development of the specialized field of Municipal
Accounting.”19
Interest waned during the 1920s and early 1930s. In a study of Illinois cities
during 1931 and 1932, W. E. Karrenbrock found that few had accounting systems
adequate to segregate transactions of different activities. None had budgetary
accounts coordinated within the regular accounting system.20
Writing in 1933, R. P. Hackett observed:
The first fact that we are confronted with when searching for recent developments, or any
developments, in governmental accounting, particularly that of municipal governments,
is the marked absence of any general improvement. . . . It must be admitted that there is
very little development in the actual practice of governmental and institutional
accounting.21
NATIONAL COMMITTEES ON MUNICIPAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING
(1934 – 1974)
The National Committee on Municipal Accounting was organized in 1934, under
the auspices of the Municipal Finance Officers Association, to bring together representatives of various groups concerned with municipal accounting and to put into
effect sound principles of accounting, budgeting, and reporting. Its membership
included representatives of the American Association of University Instructors in
Accounting; the American Institute of Accountants; the American Municipal Association; the American Society of Certified Public Accountants; the International
City Managers’ Association; the Municipal Finance Officers Association; the
National Association of Cost Accountants; the National Association of State Auditors, Controllers, and Treasurers; the National Municipal League; and the Bureau
of the Census.22 Each group represented also had a subcommittee on municipal
accounting within its own ranks.
At its organizational meeting, the Committee tentatively adopted certain
“principles” of municipal accounting and reporting and began an extensive municipal accounting research program. The Committee’s formation was hailed as “the
first effort on a national scale to establish principles and standards for municipal
accounting and actively promote their use.”23 It was the major event in municipal
accounting until that time. Indeed, the Committee’s principles were officially recognized by the American Institute of Accountants, predecessor of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).24
Numerous publications defining proper or improved municipal accounting and
financial administration practices were issued by the Committee and the Municipal
Finance Officers Association (MFOA) in the 1930s and 1940s. In 1948, Morey
stated,
There is no longer any doubt as to what constitutes good accounting, reporting, and auditing for public bodies. The work of the National Committee on Municipal Accounting in
particular, in establishing standards and models in these subjects, provides an authority to
which officials, accountants, and public may turn with confidence.25
19
Ibid.
20
R. P. Hackett, “Recent Developments in Governmental and Institutional Accounting,” Accounting Review,
8 (June 1933), 122.
21
Ibid., 122, 127.
22
Carl H. Chatters, “Municipal Accounting Progresses,” Certified Public Accountant, 14 (February 1934), 101.
23
Ibid.
24
American Institute of Accountants, Audits of Governmental Bodies and Accounts of Governmental Bodies
(New York: AIA, 1934 and 1935).
25
Morey, “Trends in Governmental Accounting,” 231.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 25
1/17/17 9:45 AM
26 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
In 1951, the Committee, by then known as the National Committee on
Governmental Accounting, issued Municipal Accounting and Auditing.26 This book
combined and revised the major publications of the Committee and became the
basis for the major textbooks in the area, as well as for many state laws and guides
relating to municipal accounting, auditing, and reporting. This “bible of municipal
accounting,” as it came to be called, was succeeded in 1968 by Governmental
Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting (GAAFR 68), often referred to as
the “blue book.”27
In 1974, the AICPA issued an audit guide, Audits of State and Local
Governmental Units (ASLGU), to assist its members in the conduct of governmental audits.28 The ASLGU recognized GAAFR as authoritative and stated that,
except as modified in ASLGU, the principles in GAAFR constituted generally
accepted accounting principles.
The National Committee on Governmental Accounting was not a staff-­
supported, permanent body that met regularly. Rather, a new committee was
formed of appointees of various government agencies, public administration groups,
and accounting organizations whenever deemed necessary (historically about every
10 years) and served in an advisory and review capacity for revisions proposed by
its members and consultants.
NATIONAL COUNCIL ON GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING (1974 – 1984)
The National Council on Governmental Accounting (NCGA) succeeded the
National Committee on Governmental Accounting in 1974. The MFOA—now the
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)—established the NCGA as
an ongoing body to reconcile the differences between GAAFR and ASLGU and
continually evaluate and develop state and local government accounting
principles.
The Council consisted of 21 members who served four-year terms on a parttime, voluntary basis and met for about two days, two to four times each year. The
NCGA maintained close liaison with the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB), the AICPA, and other organizations concerned with state and local government accounting and financial reporting standards.
The NCGA’s major agenda project, called the GAAFR Restatement Project,
was to develop a statement described as “a modest revision to update, clarify,
amplify, and reorder GAAFR.” An important related objective was to incorporate
pertinent aspects of ASLGU and reconcile any significant differences between
GAAFR and ASLGU.
NCGA Statement 1, “Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting
Principles,” commonly known as the GAAFR Restatement Principles, was issued
in 1979. The GAAFR–ASLGU differences had been reconciled during the principles restatement. Accordingly, the AICPA issued a statement of position in 1980
(SOP 80–2),29 amending ASLGU to incorporate NCGA Statement 1 by reference
and provide additional guidance to auditors of state and local government financial
statements.
The NCGA issued seven Statements, eleven Interpretations, and one Concepts
Statement during its 1974–1984 tenure. Its early years coincided with a turbulent
period marked by the fiscal emergency of New York City and by similar financial
problems, including debt defaults, in several other major cities and school districts.
These crises led to demands that the NCGA issue additional accounting standards.
26
Published by the Municipal Finance Officers Association (Chicago, 1951).
27
Published by the Municipal Finance Officers Association (Chicago, 1968), hereafter cited as GAAFR (68).
28
Committee on Governmental Accounting and Auditing, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,
Audits of State and Local Governmental Units (New York: AICPA, 1974).
29
Audit Standards Division, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., Statement of Position
80–2, “Accounting and Financial Reporting by Governmental Units” (New York: AICPA, June 30, 1980).
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 26
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Exercises 27
But the NCGA’s efforts to provide timely guidance were hampered by the fact that
its members served part time, at no pay, and had limited staff support. Thus, leaders
of the accounting profession, including members of the NCGA, sought to devise an
improved approach to setting accounting standards applicable to state and local
governments. Their efforts led to the creation of the Governmental Accounting
Standards Board (GASB) in 1984 to succeed the NCGA, as discussed earlier in this
chapter.
Questions
Q1-1 Discuss (a) the similarities in accounting for profit-seeking and G&NP organizations, and
(b) the unique aspects of accounting for G&NP organizations designed to help ensure compliance
with budgeted spending limits.
Q1-2 (a) Define fund as used in government organizations. (b) Contrast that definition with the
same term as used in a profit-seeking organization. (c) Does the creation of a fund constitute
authority to spend or obligate its resources? Explain.
Q1-3 Distinguish between governmental (expendable) funds and proprietary (nonexpendable)
funds.
Q1-4 Contrast the terms expense and expenditure.
Q1-5 It was noted in this chapter that most of the differences between commercial accounting
and accounting for G&NP organizations result from differences in (a) organizational objectives,
(b) sources of financial resources, and (c) methods of evaluating performance and operating
results. Explain.
Q1-6 Discuss the roles of the GASB and the FASB in standards setting for G&NP
organizations.
Q1-7 The revenues of profit-seeking organizations are based on user charges. Users may be
charged for various services provided by G&NP organizations as well. However, the nature and
purpose of user charges of G&NP organizations and those of profit-seeking organizations often
differ. Explain.
Q1-8 Different sets of accounting and reporting concepts, principles, and standards have evolved
for state and local governments, nonprofit organizations, and business enterprises. Given the
differences between and among them, how can they all be considered “generally accepted
accounting principles”?
Q1-9 (a) What is the purpose of the GASB’s GAAP hierarchy guidelines? (b) How would an
accountant or auditor use the hierarchy if the guidance given in a GASB statement and an AICPA
audit and accounting guide regarding the proper accounting treatment of a state government
transaction or event conflict?
Q1-10 How can one determine whether a specific not-for-profit organization should follow GASB
guidance? FASB guidance?
Exercises
E1-1 (Multiple Choice) Identify the best answer for each of the following:
1. The body with primary accounting standards-setting authority for state and local governments is the
a. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
b. Financial Accounting Standards Board.
c. Government Finance Officers Association.
d. Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
2. The body with primary accounting standards-setting authority for colleges and universities
is the
a. National Association of College and University Business Officers.
b. Financial Accounting Standards Board.
c. Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
d. Governmental Accounting Standards Board for governmental colleges and universities
and the Financial Accounting Standards Board for all other colleges and universities.
3. A governmental (expendable) fund accounting entity
a. is often useful in accounting for general government activities but is optional
(expendable).
b. includes only financial assets and related liabilities and depreciable (expendable) capital
assets. Nondepreciable capital assets are not reported in governmental funds.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 27
1/17/17 9:45 AM
28 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
c. includes financial assets and related liabilities.
d. has its operating activities measured and reported in terms of revenues and expenses,
but the timing of expense recognition differs from that in similar business
organizations.
4. In which of the following situations would the amounts of expense and expenditure for the
period differ?
a. An entity uses and is billed for utilities but has paid only half of the amount billed at year
end.
b. An entity purchases equipment for cash. The purchase occurred on the last day of the
fiscal year.
c. Salaries and wages incurred and paid during the period were $100,000. Additional salaries
and wages accrued at year end were $4,000.
d. The amount of expense and expenditure to be recognized differs in more than one of
these situations.
5. Legally adopted budgets of governmental funds are
a. fixed-dollar budgets, which establish expenditure limits that are not to be exceeded.
b. fixed budgets that cannot be modified during the budget year.
c. flexible budgets in which the expenditure limits are automatically modified to reflect
larger than budgeted levels of various services.
d. always adopted using the same basis of accounting required by GAAP.
6. Which of the following statements is false? A fund
a. is an entity for which financial statements can be prepared.
b. has a self-encompassing, self-balancing accounting equation.
c. is used to account for a subset of an organization’s resources that is to be used for a specific purpose or to achieve a particular objective.
d. is an accounting entity that is used for one year only. Each year a new set of funds must
be established.
7. Which of the following pronouncements provides the most authoritative guidance applicable
to financial reporting for state and local governments?
a. FASB Accounting Standards Codification
b. GASB Technical Bulletins
c. The AICPA government audit guide
d. GASB Statements of Governmental Accounting Standards.
8. One unique characteristic of most government and nonprofit organizations is that
a. a primary source of financing is sales of services and goods to customers.
b. their constituency automatically dictates what the government’s or nonprofit organization’s resources are (to be) used to accomplish.
c. there is no direct relationship between the amount of goods or services that most resource
providers receive and the amount of resources provided by each individual.
d. these entities sometimes have restrictions placed on what their resources may be used
for, whereas such restrictions cannot be placed on business resources.
9. Organizations that are considered to be nonprofit typically include all of the following except:
a. Churches
b. The Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts
c. Semi-professional baseball teams
d. State CPA societies
10. Which of the following statements is true?
a. Governmental and nonprofit organizations never operate with a profit motive.
b. Businesses have scarce resources that must be allocated to different uses; governments
and nonprofits are able to command sufficient resources to avoid the need for such
allocations.
c. Typically, governmental and nonprofit organizations have more restricted resources than
do business entities.
d. Nonprofit organizations never use fund accounting.
E1-2 (Expenditures vs. Expenses) Family Services, a small social service nonprofit agency, began
operations on January 1, 20X1, with $40,000 cash and $150,000 worth of equipment, on which
$60,000 was owed on a note to City Bank. The equipment was expected to have a remaining useful
life of 15 years with no salvage value. During its first year of operations, ending December 31,
20X1, Family Services paid or accrued the following:
1. Salaries and other personnel costs, $100,000.
2. Rent and utilities, $24,000.
3. Debt service: interest, $5,500, and payment on long-term note principal, $10,000.
4. Capital outlay: additional equipment purchased January 3, $30,000, expected to last 6 years
and have a $6,000 salvage value.
5. Other current operating items paid with cash, $4,500.
There were no prepayals or unrecorded accruals at December 31, 20X1, and no additional debt
was incurred during the year.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 28
1/17/17 9:45 AM
Problems 29
Compute for the Family Services agency, for the year ended December 31, 20X1, its total (a)
expenses and (b) expenditures.
Required
Problems
P1-1 (Statement of Revenues and Expenditures—Worksheet) Hatcher Township prepares its
annual General Fund budget on the cash basis and maintains its accounting records on the cash
basis during the year. At the end of Hatcher Township’s 20X9 calendar year, you determine the
following:
Budget (Cash) Basis
General Fund
Accruals
Budget
Actual
1/1/X9
12/31/X9
Taxes.......................................
$600,000
$595,000
$ –
$ 6,000
Licenses..................................
200,000
206,000
–
–
Intergovernmental................
100,000
110,000
9,000
1,000
Revenues:
50,000
45,000
5,000
–
950,000
956,000
14,000
7,000
Salaries...................................
700,000
704,000
17,000
11,000
Utilities...................................
80,000
85,000
–
–
Other......................................
Expenditures:
Supplies..................................
70,000
64,000
–
7,000
Equipment.............................
60,000
58,000
2,000
12,000
Other......................................
30,000
31,000
–
–
940,000
942,000
$19,000
$30,000
$ 10,000
$ 14,000
Excess of Revenues Over
(Under) Expenditures..........
1. Prepare a worksheet to derive a GAAP basis (including accruals) statement of revenues and
expenditures for the Hatcher Township General Fund for the 20X9 fiscal year.
2. Could the readers of the budgetary basis and GAAP basis statements get different
­impressions of the 20X9 operating results of the Hatcher Township General Fund?
Explain.
P1-2 (SLG GAAP Hierarchy) Mark O. Sleuth, a recent accounting graduate, has been assigned
to research several local governmental accounting and financial reporting issues. For each issue,
rank the sources of guidance according to the governmental GAAP hierarchy.
1. Issue 1: The AICPA state and local government (SLG) Audit and Accounting Guide, a
GASB Technical Bulletin, a leading governmental accounting textbook, a GASB
Interpretation, and a section of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
2. Issue 2: A leading governmental accounting textbook, a GASB Implementation Guide, an
article in a leading auditing journal, and a speech by a leading governmental accounting
professor
3. Issue 3: The AICPA SLG Audit and Accounting Guide, a GASB Statement, a journal
article that summarizes current practice on the issue in the United States, notes from a
telephone conversation on the issue with the GASB director of research, and a FASB
Accounting Standards Update
4. Issue 4: An AICPA Statement of Position (cleared by the GASB), an article by the managing
partner of an international public accounting firm, a GASB Technical Bulletin, and the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
5. Issue 5: GASB Implementation Guide 2015-1, the AICPA SLG Audit and Accounting
Guide, four articles from the Journal of Accountancy, and a leading governmental accounting
textbook
6. Issue 6: A predominant practice, Statement of Governmental Accounting Concepts, an
AICPA Statement of Position not included in Level b
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 29
Required
1/17/17 9:45 AM
30 CHAPTER 1 Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting
P1-3 (Internet Research Problem) Locate the homepages for the following organizations and
prepare a brief critique (one to three pages, perhaps with attachments) of the contents of each
site:
1. Governmental Accounting Standards Board
2. Financial Accounting Standards Board
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
4. Government Finance Officers Association
5. Association of Government Accountants
6. National Association of State Auditors, Comptrollers, and Treasurers
7. National Association of College and University Business Officers
8. Association of School Business Officials International
P1-4 (Internet Research Problem) Locate the GASB white paper, “Why Governmental
Accounting and Financial Reporting Is—And Should Be—Different,” on the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board website. Prepare a brief summary and critical analysis of the white
paper.
M01_FREE9569_11_SE_C01.indd 30
1/17/17 9:45 AM
State and Local Government
Accounting and Financial
Reporting Model
CHAPTER
2
The Foundation
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
2.1 Visualize, summarize, and discuss the major overall
aspects of the GASB state and local government
financial reporting model, including the dual
perspective of government-wide and fund financial
statements.
2.2 Explain the fundamental features of the state and local
government accounting and financial reporting model,
including:
• Distinguishing the three broad categories of
funds—governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary—
and the specific types of funds in each fund
category.
• Identifying and explaining the measurement focus
and basis of accounting used for each category of
funds and the financial statements required for
funds of each category.
• Analyzing the effects of transactions on the
proprietary fund and governmental fund categories
and on the General Capital Assets and General
Long-Term Liabilities accounts.
• Identifying typical budgetary accounting and
reporting requirements.
• Explaining the financial reporting requirements for a
government’s basic financial statements and its
comprehensive annual financial report.
S
tate and local government is truly “big business.” The 50 states and 90,000
local governments within the United States employ nearly 20 million p
­ ersons—
more than seven times the federal government civilian e­ mployment—and
spend more than $3.3 trillion annually. Although the federal government accounts
for over half of all government expenditures, state and local governments spend
more for nondefense purposes than does the federal government. Furthermore,
state and local government revenues, expenditures, debt, and employment—both
total and per capita—have been increasing in recent years. Today the state government often is the largest industry within a state, and city hall often houses the
­biggest business in a town.
The types and numbers of local governments are shown in Illustration 2-1.
However, the extent of local government jurisdictional overlap is not obvious from
that listing. It is common for a given geographic area to be served by a municipality,
a school district, a county, and one or more special districts. In fact, many metropolitan areas have 100 or more separate and distinct local government units.
M02_FREE9569_11_SE_C02.indd 31
31
1/17/17 9:46 AM
Get Complete eBook Download Link below
for instant download
https://browsegrades.net/documents/2
86751/ebook-payment-link-for-instantdownload-after-payment
Download