There are many global issues attract countless eyes, and it need to be solved urgently.
Objectively speaking, international aid organizations can optimize the resources allocation which
should been put on to improving those problems. But whether the famous people supporting is
positive or not, the controversy continues to this day.
Celebrities are very influential in social media, and they can easily enlarge and conduct the
majority of social notice towards those INTERNATIONAL AID ORGANIZATIONS. Also, fans always
love to imitate the behavior that the celebrities done. Thus more resources and efforts will be
invested on those issues. Audrey Hepburn, as a goodwill Ambassador and one of the famous
actress, visited children whom facing death from starving in Somalia in 1992. She hold a skinny
refugee kid, as if to say, ‘ Why can't anyone help them’ . It caused a huge slash at the time and
ggot a lot of attention. In this condition, celebrities do made a difference. If the star power can be
the same influence as Audrey Hepburn in this condition, I think it should be vigorously promoted.
But, not all the famous people in the philanthropy can cause good outcome. Some celebrities
prefer drawing public attention to themselves to paying attention to the issues that
INTERNATIONAL AID ORGANIZATIONS faced, with this purpose to participate in public welfare
activities will inevitably blur the focus of what should be promoted. Moreover, when celebrities
doesn’t gain fully understanding the importance of those INTERNATIONAL AID ORGANIZATIONS,
hey will not be able to achieve the purpose of publicity.
After all, the highly influential nature of celebrities decided whether the famous people
supporting is positive or not depends on behaviors and attitudes their own. If celebrities want to
support international aid organizations, they should focus on themselves, keep a warm heart to
participate in the public welfare.